Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/04/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
kein Artikel verwendet dieses Bild; wurde zum Anlegen eines Fake-Artikels in der de-WP uploadet Regi51 (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Zumal Urheberrechtsvereletzung von http://www.sarahderemer.com/#hybrid-animals. --Martin H. (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
kein Artikel verwendet dieses Bild; wurde zum Anlegen eines Fake-Artikels in der de-WP uploadet Regi51 (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Zumal mit augenscheinlich falscher Behauptung der eigenen Urheberschaft hochgeladen, d.h. URV. --Martin H. (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
{{Copyvio}} H4stings (talk) 12:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by NahidSultan: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not per nomination - but the file is a blatant copyright violation. --Martin H. (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 13:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not per nomination - but the file is a blatant copyright violation. --Martin H. (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Error in file. Konto na chwilę (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: speedy-kept after re-upload of source-file from Flickr. --Túrelio (talk) 20:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Profile picture of a non-notable gamer; article has been speedy deleted at rowiki: ro:CrazyDoctorlWOD; missing scope. // Gikü said done Thursday, 7 April 2016 15:58 (UTC) 15:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Copyright violation:
This file was initially tagged by Hégésippe Cormier as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|This image is copyrighted, no reliable source is given, and there is no proof that the uploader has any right to upload it under a free license. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 16:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC) Amitie 10g (talk) 01:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: 
Speedy delete obvious copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 08:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
replaced by car Gerd Leibrock (talk) 08:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: wrong ns, user intended to create a cat. --Achim (talk) 20:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
this is an old photo Bentojustin (talk) 19:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion JurgenNL (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
its an old picture Bentojustin (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Bentojustin - "its an old picture" is not a good reason for it to be deleted. "Old pictures" can show history. If it looks different now, upload a new picture. Also, do NOT upload new pictures over old ones (as you have done with many of your uploads) as they are all good and usable - one is not better than the other. Admins: File:Puthenthope.jpg was deleted with the same request though (was it a montage?). Some of user's other uploads have multiple good images in the history which should be split out, unless it is a case that authorship is disputed. Thanks. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
this is an old image Bentojustin (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi again and please see my comment above. There is no reason to delete this image. Thanks -- Deadstar (msg) 08:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Software screenshot. The uploader didn't create the software. JoKalliauer (talk) 13:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Software screenshot. The uploader didn't create the software. JoKalliauer (talk) 13:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Software screenshot. The uploader didn't create the software. JoKalliauer (talk) 13:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Software screenshot. The uploader didn't create the software. JoKalliauer (talk) 13:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused photo showing mainly an encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:53, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1036881726369995&set=a.117719381619572.17211.100001445333421&type=1&theater (02.2016). Gunnex (talk) 07:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --★ Poké95 07:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating also (per above)
Gunnex (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. ★ Poké95 08:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Image of a non-notable person; see deletion discussion at ro:Wikipedia:Pagini de șters/Alexandru A. Negrescu // Gikü said done Thursday, 7 April 2016 12:43 (UTC) 12:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of non-notable person, presented in an unencyclopedical manner. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of non-notable person, presented in an unencyclopedical manner. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of non-notable person, presented in an unencyclopedical manner. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal shot of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Fanghong: Out of scope.
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF (Wikipedia Zero uploads). See also previous mass DR via Commons:Deletion requests/File:О. Гречухин на губной гармошке (мал).png.
- File:Нормандия в декабре 2015 года.png
- File:Нормандия в пос. Пролетарский.png --> grabbed from http://vk.com/photo-7940796_375994397?all=1 (2015)
- File:Константин Меркулов, Нормандия.png
- File:Гречухины.png
- File:Юлия (Джул) Гречухина.png
Gunnex (talk) 18:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating also all further uploads:
- File:Юлия Гречухина (Нормандия).jpg --> identical to above File:Юлия (Джул) Гречухина.png
- File:О.Гречухин с губной гармошкой.jpg
- File:Нормандия лого.png
Gunnex (talk) 17:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
This page has no further use. Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 01:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete Taken from the indicated source, but the source does not show a license compatible with Commons. The license added to the image here indicates author's life + 70 years. Given that the person depicted is, himself, only 41...this is impossible. License obviously wrong. Hammersoft (talk) 03:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The depicted sculpture is obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably. Latvia has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Sculpture by living artist Ligita Franckeviča. No FOP in Latvia. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
advertising, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 07:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyvio, as not all these toys appear hand-made by amateurs, per COM:Plushies. Fæ (talk) 15:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmm, as the image focusses on the ensemble (or still life, if you want) and none of the potentially design-copyrighted toys is visible in full, it might be o.k. per de minimis;
Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- The photograph was taken in Germany, so German and US copyright are relevant. The most basic guiding word for COM:DM is that usage must be "trivial". Any object which is the focus of a photograph is not normally interpreted as a trivial representation. Using the German act, we must consider (a) if the toys "may not even have the slightest contextual relationship" with the subject of the photograph and a test given for this is (b) the object's presence is "negligible to such a degree that it could easily be removed without even the slightest impact on the appearance of the actual object to the average viewer". This photograph is easily seen to fail (a) and (b). With regard to none being "visible in full", I see a couple of the toys actually are visible in full, but it is true that any photograph of a 3D toy can normally only reproduce less than half of the design of the toy. This argument, or an argument that partial occlusions may void copyright are not explored in the current policy.
- Should this image be kept, then I believe this would be a new interpretation of De minimis for Commons and it can usefully be added to the examples gallery in the official policy. --Fæ (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- The camera appears to be utalitarian, and Punky + Wendy look like some animals, so maybe not copyrightable, see the toy airplane example below COM:UA, and the blurb about threshold of originality in the next paragraph. That leaves 2 of 5 visible objects, where I'll let you "hug it out". –Be..anyone (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Soft toys are designed works, and are nothing similar to utilitarian objects with a design constrained by their function. There are plenty of examples of commercial merchandize where the toy has an eagerly defended copyright but is a cartoonish animal exactly like those in this photograph. --Fæ (talk) 11:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- I doubt that the accumulation of simple plushies - we are not talking about Star Wars characters, Mickey Mouse or Asterix - must be seen as an art object. I think these plushies are therefore too simple to meet the threshold of originality. Keep --Geolina mente et malleo ✎ 21:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- COM:UA is an aspect in United States law but usually doesn't hold in European countries (except for the British Commonwealth and Ireland where it probably is applicable). Utilitarian objects seem to be subject to copyright protection in Germany (but the camera is de minimis in my opinion). --Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- ACK, but the paragraph with a link to threshold of originality actually tries to explain the German Schöpfungshöhe, and Fæ mentioned German law. IANAL, but from Germany. At least we're not talking about stamps or coins.
–Be..anyone (talk) 13:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- ACK, but the paragraph with a link to threshold of originality actually tries to explain the German Schöpfungshöhe, and Fæ mentioned German law. IANAL, but from Germany. At least we're not talking about stamps or coins.
- COM:UA is an aspect in United States law but usually doesn't hold in European countries (except for the British Commonwealth and Ireland where it probably is applicable). Utilitarian objects seem to be subject to copyright protection in Germany (but the camera is de minimis in my opinion). --Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- The camera appears to be utalitarian, and Punky + Wendy look like some animals, so maybe not copyrightable, see the toy airplane example below COM:UA, and the blurb about threshold of originality in the next paragraph. That leaves 2 of 5 visible objects, where I'll let you "hug it out". –Be..anyone (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_copia.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.1.jpg){kind=link}
![130 File:"Si esto es un delito, me declaro preso".jpg](#File:"Si_esto_es_un_delito,_me_declaro_preso".jpg){kind=link}
![140 File:Vanessa con letras del abecedario y "ss".jpg](#File:Vanessa_con_letras_del_abecedario_y_"ss".jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_copia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_copia.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_copia.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%87%D1%83%D1%85%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![01:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/04/07#c-Tobias_"ToMar"_Maier-2016-04-07T01:00:00.000Z-File:Young_woman_in_clothes_typical_for_autum_or_winter.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per Geolina. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep see also Meta:Requests for deletion#Wikimedia Cuteness Association --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 00:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. As pointed out, this is not Disney/Star Wars merchandise and these plushies are arguably too simple to meet originality criteria.
- Also 1971markus points out above, there is some background here. Also, see also where this chain of events appears to begin.
And I can't help but feel that this nomination is not only erroneous, but is particularly bad, because it's basically copyright-trolling; Something the whole open movement pretty much exists in opposition to.- We believe that the freedom to use of our creative works and the ability to access and use others' work is something worth fighting for, or at least writing strongly worded letters and signing petitions for.
- Strong, but realistic and up-to-date copyright law is important. And respecting existing copyright law is good practice for our movement's credibility.
- But going out of your way looking for a technicality to prohibit a set of images that even any possible copyright-holders couldn't enforce and wouldn't care about anyway, and enforcement of this "policy" possibly affecting many more users in the future and retrospectively, not to mention that the images are from some prolific, long-term community members whose contributions online and offline are extensive, and this clearly being some kind of retaliation to some edits on Meta...
- ...it's like, defecating in the community swimming pool to protest against something another swimmer did, actually in another pool. Now everyone has to swim in the dirty pool, including you.
It's vexatious, it's not a good use of anyone's time and it's against the overall goals of the movement.Battleofalma (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)- @Battleofalma, while I want very much like to keep this image (see my above vote), please remove your ad-hominem-attack against the nominator. This is totally inappropriate. --Túrelio (talk) 12:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Túrelio, fair enough, is strikethrough ok? This isn't ad hominem though, it is vital context across Wikis. It's not "You have done this because you are this", it's "You have done this and also, this, this and this." but I know this isn't necessarily the forum to point this out. But to reiterate, I don't think the case for copyright infringement is strong, the main reason being originality criteria. Battleofalma (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Battleofalma, while I want very much like to keep this image (see my above vote), please remove your ad-hominem-attack against the nominator. This is totally inappropriate. --Túrelio (talk) 12:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- "Copyright holders wouldn't care about anyway" is specifically not a justification for keeping files at Commons.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- I refuse your attempt to make this into an ad hominim battlefield. COM:DM, COM:UA and the section COM:TOYS apply to all Commons images, we do not turn a blind eye just because the uploader is a Wikimedia insider rather than a new contributor. If as a community we do not believe these official policies, then we should change them. --Fæ (talk) 11:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- The section COM:UA contains a lot of information about United States copyright law, but there's not much information about other countries, except for a quick statement that other countries may have different rules. Per COM:L, files have to be free in both the source country and the United States, and since COM:UA doesn't contain a lot of discussion about other countries, the section is, in its current state, only useful for determining the copyright status of utilitarian objects within the United States. There are plenty of court rulings from various European countries where utilitarian objects have been declared copyrighted, so there are clearly countries which take a different approach than the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Fæ: Your way of acting on Meta was rude, hostile and for experienced editors unworthy. You did put false claims there without doing any effort to give evidence, nor you did effort to look the subject up at all (but instead false assumptions), and yes, you made some users angry with your disturbing behaviour. I would classify exactly that behaviour in general as one of the reasons why less editors are active on Wikipedia. So if you point to other user(s) that they react "ad hominim", please be aware that you started the issue by behaving terrible and that people also react on that behaviour what you used there. Of course Meta is not Commons, but do not play happy miss sunshine as you are the direct cause of it. People do not turn a blind eye just because the uploader considers himself a Wikimedia insider, nobody has a wild card. Romaine (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- The section COM:UA contains a lot of information about United States copyright law, but there's not much information about other countries, except for a quick statement that other countries may have different rules. Per COM:L, files have to be free in both the source country and the United States, and since COM:UA doesn't contain a lot of discussion about other countries, the section is, in its current state, only useful for determining the copyright status of utilitarian objects within the United States. There are plenty of court rulings from various European countries where utilitarian objects have been declared copyrighted, so there are clearly countries which take a different approach than the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- I refuse your attempt to make this into an ad hominim battlefield. COM:DM, COM:UA and the section COM:TOYS apply to all Commons images, we do not turn a blind eye just because the uploader is a Wikimedia insider rather than a new contributor. If as a community we do not believe these official policies, then we should change them. --Fæ (talk) 11:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- The DR was raised in good faith, your allegations are in bad faith, and seem to have no relevance to whether the image should be hosted on Commons. I note your use of gender as offensive, don't do that, it's not welcome. --Fæ (talk) 01:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I don't have a opinion on de minimis here. However, there are teddy bears registered with the Copyright Office, like one of the ones that Wal-Mart has every Christmas. The threshold for copyrightability of original works is pretty low.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The French Supreme Court ruled that photos of fairly simple chairs infringed the copyright of the chairs.[1] There's no indication that Germany treats works of applied arts any different to France, and the toys are quite complex. Additionally, toys are copyrighted in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Template:RPA --Yann (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
After a series of counter-views by experienced Commons contributors at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Interpreting_COM:TOYS for photographs taken by established Wikimedians, I am raising this request.
The photograph fails to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
There has been no evidence presented that the soft toys which are the central focus of this photograph are public domain.
For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and prior related deletion requests DR1 Wendy the Weasel and Percy Plush and DR2 Wikimania 2014.
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Fæ (talk) 10:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - First "a series of counter-views by experienced Commons contributors" seems to me not true, as only 3 people besides you react there. How to frame a deletion request in such way that other users are impressed, sorry, I don't buy this kind of framing. Further, to quote "When uploading a picture of a toy" it is not "a toy", but a group of toys that are in a fun way displayed by the people on site. Third, only a very small portion of the photo is actually showing the stuffed animals itself. Only less than 20% of the photo is showing the stuffed animals. Fourth: on the other images the stuffed animals are fully focussed and very large on the photo, comparison to those deletion requests seems to me another attempt of framing it, as that is not the case here. Romaine (talk) 20:11, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- If you are putting a de minimis case, that does not seem appropriate as the focus of the photograph is the toys, in fact there is no other possible reason for this photograph to be taken. This is demonstrably true due to the title and description of the photograph (which is relevant to the de minimis policy) being about the toys, and if the area with the toys in it were blanked out, more like half the photo would have to be blanked, and what is left is a table and two out of focus chairs.
- To be kept according to policy which is fairly applied to all images, there must be evidence that the toys are in the public domain. If you refer to the random sample of similar photographs of stuffed toys listed in the copyright noticeboard discussion, only 1 out of 12 has not been deleted, and that is because there is some evidence that the Steiff toy is in the public domain. Interpreting policy differently apparently just because the photograph is of special interest to Wikimedians, and was taken at a Wikimedia event, would be a poor precedent.
- Perhaps you would like to help by ascertaining the copyright of the toys, normally there is a tag on the toy with the manufacturer's name, and there may be a statement about copyright that would be worth capturing. --Fæ (talk) 21:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Romaine: That is, quite simply, not how de minimis works. The inclusion of the toys is neither incidental nor inadvertent... they are clearly the focus of the image, and can not be removed without making the image useless for the obviously intended purpose. Delete, unless evidence can be provided that the toys are PD or in the public domain, as a derivative work of several objects that are almost certainly copyrighted. Reventtalk 11:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- I think it was my mistake to upload some one of this Pictures in this categorie, i will upload in the future no more images... thank you and good bye --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 00:44, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The best test of de minimis is asking whether the offending object could be removed without materially affecting the image. Obviously, if you removed all the toys from this, you would have an empty, boring table. The fact that half a dozen copyrights are infringed, rather than just one, does not somehow make it all right. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality; orphaned/replaced by e.g. File:L-Photo-Leucine.svg. Leyo 08:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality; orphaned/replaced by File:L-Photo-Methionine.svg. Leyo 08:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Replaced by a corrected version by the same user: File:Procés d'utilització dels aminoàcids foto-reactius.jpg. Leyo 08:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Replaced by a corrected version by the same user: File:Procés d'utilització dels aminoàcids foto-reactius.jpg. Leyo 08:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
some unknown group, see description, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 15:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
they are my family, i post thems on my user page at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Javier_Jos%C3%A9_Moreno_Tovar18
Deleted: x-wiki userpage spam. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Disputed (see file page) and orphaned. Leyo 16:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. For the record, the concern is "the labels ABCD are wrong and very misleading. The Correct labels would be A-B-A-B from the ground up.". Ed (Edgar181) 17:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 7 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 7 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
.1.jpg){kind=link}
.1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Aufnahmestandort von Privatgrund 79.248.125.32 08:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
.1.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep We do not delete deletion requests. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion – ostensibly this was intended as a delete vote on the DR but this user already participated. czar 14:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
.1.jpg){kind=link}
falsely started > imho copyright violation, pardon, Roland zh (talk) 18:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as copyvio on 20:31, 7 April 2016 by Túrelio. czar 14:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
unused pdf, and imho personality right issues, Roland zh (talk) 17:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
unused PDF imho having potentially copyright issues, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: file was deleted before. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
unused pdf, imho doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible COM:COPYVIO: small size, missing EXIF, seems to be published before 2014 [2]. Uploader has bad history. KurodaSho (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'profiling' - see description - file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Promotional file used on promotional userpage TJH2018 talk 18:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; seems to be just a picture of the uploader or their friends or whoever. The description is definitely inaccurate. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, a photo of some non-notable high school football players IagoQnsi (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzan2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion for non-notable or non-existing websites
- File:مسابقة للفوز بمدونتي بلوجر بهم خاصية الإشتراك بأدسنس مفعلة.jpg
- File:Logo-i7tiraf-7asoub-2015.png
- File:Logo-i7tiraf-7asoub.png
- File:Logo-mo7arif-arabya.png
- File:Logo-Fahraas-info.png
- File:Logo-mo7tarif-internet.png
- File:Logo-th1111.png
- File:Logo-kolana-ibda3.png
BrightRaven (talk) 09:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
The size, the lack of EXIF and the quality make me wonder if these are really own work. Moreover, they are probably out of scope too.
- File:12074580 hgjghjghjghjgh.jpg
- File:Kjkljlkhjlhhjkhkjhjk.jpg
- File:12421788 210680772ghgkfhklm.jpg
- File:M9awda.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 09:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzan2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload).
- File:Hfgghfgdxhdfhf.jpg
- File:Dfghgjhgjghjhjgh.jpg
- File:Ghhgjhghjghfj.jpg
- File:Gjhgjhgjhgjgh.jpg
- File:M9awd-3lik.jpg
- File:زوهري.jpg
- File:ChamselMaarifKobra4.pdf
Gunnex (talk) 19:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I think we should speed'em in the future. --Vituzzu (talk) 21:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating (per above) also:
Gunnex (talk) 22:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; un-original banner ad for non-notable site. Not being used anywhere. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
I wonder whether this is "own work". I think it is a "photoshopped" version of this photo. Moreover other photos of this user have the same "problem". Wouter (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: In speedy del process at ruwiki. (Wikipedia Zero upload). If IN scope, needs permission via http://vk.com/alataufans. Gunnex (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
I wonder whether this is "own work". I think this is a "photoshopped" version with this photo as start. Wouter (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Vanity. No educational purpose Fixertool (talk) 23:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.pinterest.com/umafilming/omega-crosby. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free content. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, the image was nominated for deletion, but I think the image should be kept. It is the official guide book, and there is no copyright issue as it has the blessing of the official London Games Festival. Any concern of keeping the image? Billfromhk (talk) 08:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- If the legitimate copyright holder(s) have agreed to publish the depicted content under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license, granting anyone the right to use, modify and redistribute the content for any purpose, including commercial purposes, then evidence of that needs to be submitted to our permission archive. And if you did not personally create the content shown, including the illustrations in the background, then you should not be claiming to be the author and copyright holder of that content. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Copyright content. Certainly not the work of the uploader as claimed, and there is no evidence that the uploader has permission to upload it to Commons. --DAJF (talk) 08:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, here is the evidence showing that I have obtained permission to reproduce the image here on this page. Please restore the image to the wikipedia page. https://twitter.com/billhung/status/716551200183820288 Billfromhk (talk) 08:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khanpur Dist Chakwal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata/metadata indicating the files were grabbed from Facebook, the uploader's history, and watermarks indicating these files were grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/chakwal1947/photos_stream.
- File:شہریار ہوٹل.jpg
- File:Kpss School Sehgalabad.jpg
- File:Talagang Road....jpg
- File:Kallar Kahar,Dist Chakwal.jpg
- File:Lt.Gen Mushtaq Baig Shaeehd Hospital,Lehr Sultan Pur....jpg
- File:Chakwal near chungi.jpg
- File:Thoa Bahadur Bipass.jpg
- File:Talagang road.jpg
- File:Dullah chakwal.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khanpur Dist Chakwal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Khanpur Dist Chakwal (serial copyright violator: Facebook/Panoramio/Flickr/etc. grabber & file cropper + watermark remover). Uploaded since 02.2016 for related entries of en:Chakwal District in Pakistan. See also above (@LX: ).
- File:Cadet College Choa Saiden Shah Dist Chakwal.jpg
- File:Cadet College Choa Saiden Shah Chakwal.jpg
- File:Fazaia Inter College Kallar Kahar.jpg
- File:Kallar Kahar Science College.jpg
- File:DareArqam Allied Park Campus Chakwal.jpg --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/768996106445602/photos/pb.768996106445602.-2207520000.1460208426./786747861337093/?type=3&theater (2014)
- File:DareArqam Talagang Road Campus Chakwal.jpg
- File:Punjab College Chakwal.jpg
- File:UETChakwal.jpg
- File:UET Taxila Sub Campus Chakwal.jpg
- File:Horizon College Chakwal ( HCC ).jpg
- File:Cadet College Chakwal For Boys.jpg
- File:Cadet College Chakwal For Girls.jpg
- File:Rohani Darssgah, Jhelum Road.jpg
- File:New Larid Ada.jpg
- File:ضلع کونسل پلازہ.jpg
- File:Diamond Plaza , Talagang Road..jpg
- File:Hospital road.jpg
- File:چکوالیے آسٹریلیا میں.jpg
- File:Rain in Chakwal... Myers College Chakwal..jpg
- File:کلر کہار کینٹ.jpg
- File:Yasir plaza.jpg
- File:Bhaun Road.jpg
- File:Mega Family Festival Chakwal.jpg
- File:Jehlum road.jpg
- File:Mureed Air Base....jpg
- File:Balkasar interchange.jpg
- File:District Complex.....jpg
- File:Tehsil chok city.jpg
- File:Beautiful View of Chakwal 1.jpg
- File:Chakwal city 1..jpg
- File:Executive Town Near Sutwal....jpg
- File:LINE PARK.jpg
- File:CTM پنڈی روڈ..jpg
- File:Choa Chok chakwal city.jpg
- File:Talagang Road. chakwal city.jpg
- File:Beautiful View of Chakwal city.jpg
- File:Beautiful View of Chakwal.jpg
- File:Shahriyar Hotel...jpg
- File:Choa Chok Chakwal.jpg
- File:Near rescue 1122 chakwal.jpg
- File:Tehsil chok chakwal.jpg
- File:Public Park..jpg
- File:Talagang Road...chakwal.jpg
- File:Diamond Plaza, Talagang Road Near Rescue 15 ( Yaadgar Shuhda Chok).jpg
- File:Tehsil chok.jpg
- File:Stylo...chakwal.jpg
- File:Dubai Islamic Bank, Talagang Road.jpg
- File:Shaeen Chemist.jpg
- File:Nisar hotel.jpg
- File:Chakwal city.jpg
- File:Near murid chakwal.jpg
- File:Near murid.jpg
- File:Pindi road.jpg
- File:Bab-e-Chakwal, 14 August.jpg
- File:Suzuki, Chakwal Motors.....jpg
- File:Chakwal Motors, Talagang Road.jpg
- File:Freedom day pakistan.jpg
- File:Baldia Plaza...jpg
- File:Yadgar Shahuda,,,.jpg
- File:14th august on tehsil chok chakwal.jpg
- File:Talagang road view.jpg
- File:Cricket Stadium, Near 3 Marla Scheme.jpg
- File:14th august in chakwal.jpg
- File:Shinwari Hotel....jpg
- File:Ali Masjid, Jhelum Road..jpg
- File:SUZUKI, Chakwal Motors.....jpg
- File:Balkasar Interchange...jpg
- File:Bhaun Road, Near Kahoot Plaza....jpg
- File:حسیب شاپنگ سینٹر، تلہ گنگ روڈ.jpg
- File:Pakeeza hotel, Bhaun Road...jpg
- File:Chapar bazar chakwal.jpg
- File:Public park.jpg
- File:Bhon chok chakwal.jpg
- File:Khanpur main bazar.jpg
- File:Khanpur bazar.jpg
- File:Mili shows chakwal.jpg
- File:Petrol pump khanpur.jpg
- File:Double Road Project Construction on mandra road.jpg
- File:لاس ویگاس ہوٹل، پنڈی روڈ.jpg
- File:Near 15 chok chakwal.jpg
- File:Khanpur,chakwal.jpg
- File:Near dab.jpg
- File:Near balkasar .jpg
- File:Thoa bahadur bipass.jpg
- File:Mureed.jpg
- File:Chapar bazar.jpg
- File:Chapar Chok.jpg
- File:Sabzi Mandi Chakwal .jpg
- File:Near Chungi On Jehlum Road.jpg
- File:Near Chungi.jpg
- File:Dhudial Chok.jpg
- File:Milad Chok Khanpur,On Sohawa Road.jpg
- File:Salt range chakwal.jpg
- File:Mud House Chakwal Choa Road.jpg
- File:Katas Raaj Beautifull.jpg
- File:Mayers chakwal.jpg
- File:Mayers college chakwal.jpg
- File:Nelah dullah.jpg
- File:District Govt chakwal.jpg
- File:Kpss school sehgalabad.jpg
- File:Balkasar Interchange new.jpg
- File:Balkasar Interchange Mape.jpg
- File:Balkasar Interchange Chakwal.jpg
- File:Khandoa Lake Chakwal.jpg
- File:Chakwal Tourism.jpg
- File:Motorway in chakwal.jpg
- File:Balkasar Interchange Motorway Chakwal.png
- File:Govt high school khanpur chakwal.jpg
- File:Chashma Mianwali.jpg
- File:Punjab College Chakwal & Talagang.jpg
- File:Wah Engineering College.jpg
- File:Chakwal Mape block wise.png
- File:Umarfarooq12image.png
- File:Umarfarooq12.jpg
- File:Chakwal tourism.jpg
- File:Dhok taliyan dam 1.jpg
- File:Khanpur main stop.jpg
- File:Neelah Dullah Interchange Location chakwal.jpg
- File:Neelah Dullah Interchange Location.png
- File:Neelah Dullah chakwal.jpg
- File:Neelah Dullah Interchange chakwal.jpg
- File:Neelah Chakwal.jpg
- File:Tamseel Town Khanpur.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 13:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
This file contains professional paintings and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nofil Jawed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:Shaheen Air's Future Plans.png
- File:Shaheen Air advertisement for Kuala Lampur .png
- File:Shaheen Air advertisement towards new destination, Bangkok..png
Basvb (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
advertisement on reddit makes me doubt the own work claim. Basvb (talk) 14:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded it from Wikipedia and I realize it does not appear to have a proper license. I found the original here http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=278577&nseq=3 and there is no indication of a public license. I suspect the Wikipedia uploader was using fair use, since the version is a thumbnail, but of course that doesn't work for Commons. Since I am the uploader a speedy delete is appropriate unless anyone knows why not. agr (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saidaitzaid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shubham Singh45 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Clearly out of scope; Commons is no place for inspirational quote memes. -IagoQnsi (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating (per above) also (all: Wikipedia Zero uploads)
Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Probadly via Wikipedia Zero. Gunnex (talk) 15:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (max: 200x133) resolutions, missing EXIF. Wikipedia Zero uploads.
Gunnex (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating also (per above) further uploads:
Gunnex (talk) 07:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). Related frwiki entry (different titles) +5x speedy deleted in the last days. Gunnex (talk) 15:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private child image uploaded to vandalize in es:Gonorrea. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Private image uploaded to vandalize in en:Sedgwick Club. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; clearly serves no useful purpose. -IagoQnsi (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
It is a copy righted image, copied from facebook AdilSwatai (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private nonsense image, note the nonsense category. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Note
Ies (talk) 16:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Christian Marquez Jimenez is unknown. The picture itself is not very usefull. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yadav Satya Pal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload).
Gunnex (talk) 17:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, used for a deleted article about his/her own pet Triplecaña (talk) 17:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
No value to the project; non-notable person Sjö (talk) 17:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maira Gómez Cedeño (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused charts and maps; possible COM:COPYVIOs, unlikely to be own works.
- File:DOING BUSSINES.jpg
- File:Indicador de ingresos.jpg
- File:Grafica círculo.jpg
- File:Datos michoacan.jpg
- File:Panorama poblacional.jpg
- File:MaPA2.jpg
- File:Mapa general.jpg
KurodaSho (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible COM:COPYVIO: looks like TV screenshot because he uses a pin microphone. Small size and missing EXIF metadata. KurodaSho (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Also affected: File:Columnista de opinión Juan Manuel Ramírez Montero.png. --KurodaSho (talk) 17:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned photo of non-notable person, see en:Steven Lord and edits to en:Lord (surname). Martin H. (talk) 17:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
I wonder to what extend this is "own work". The lady has been "photoshopped" into this photo. There are no metadata and it is the only contribution of the user. Is the photo of the lady (Demi Harman) own work and/or is the main part of the photo "own work"? Wouter (talk) 07:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. It is unclear, what is depicted, no categories, no meaningful description. Probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 09:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. If IN scope, needs permission via http://www.terabyteshop.com.br/ Gunnex (talk) 09:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Strategy Consulting (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 09:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 09:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Tagged with copyvio: grabbed from (example) Instagram via https://pixpix.co/ricardoribeiromusic/BC2xN1pSS4r/ = https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s640x640/sh0.08/e35/12822434_812513058875439_743320162_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTIwNDM2NjQwNTYwMTQwNjUwNw%3D%3D.2.l (last modified: 12.03.2016). Gunnex (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: "09:29, 7 April 2016 NahidSultan (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Ricardo Ribeiro Fado.jpg". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
The uploader, Maestro76~dewiki, tells us today at Commons:UnDR, that he is the subject of this photo, Timor Oliver Chadik. That makes the claim of "own work" silly. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted packaging. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Quality is bad. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
video game screenshot Sismarinho (talk) 11:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
PD-textlogo does not apply: more than just "simple geometric shapes or text" RJFF (talk) 11:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photograph of the uploader, used only for his article en:Rahul gangani which is a speedy deletion candidate. IagoQnsi (talk) 11:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely, that uploader is the author of all images used in this collage. Also no source provided for tha images used and no evidence that they are PD under CC-BY-SA 4.0 compatible l.cense. Ankry (talk) 11:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Just as an example the photo of William Shimell (third row from the top, fifth column from the left) can be found here as published on 2014-07-06 and no evidence of free licence nor author information on the page containing the image. We cannot host works based on fair use. Ankry (talk) 11:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adele84Adele (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images circulate widely on the internet. Probable copyright violations.
- File:Catacombe di san Gennaro, vestibolo superiore.jpg
- File:Catacombe di san Gaudioso.jpg
- File:Catacombe di san Gennaro, livello superiore.jpg
- File:Catacombe di san Gennaro, vestibolo inferiore.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
{{PD-ineligible}} is not a correct license. This file is copyrighted onless one can shouw that there is proof that it is in public domain. Jarekt (talk) 13:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Wdwd (talk) 13:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
![13:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/04/07#c-Wdwd-2016-04-07T13:48:00.000Z-File:"Si_esto_es_un_delito,_me_declaro_preso".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
![18:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/04/07#c-Ellin_Beltz-2016-04-15T18:32:00.000Z-File:"Si_esto_es_un_delito,_me_declaro_preso".jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Wdwd (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file Wdwd (talk) 13:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Used only for trolling, see User:DannyLongSCH and User:Naeemrana2k. Unused personal image, out of scope. Laber□T 14:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- look who created the user page of said user. --Laber□T 17:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I just noticed that the user page User:Naeemrana2k was not created by the user himself, so this user page should be deleted per insulting behavior of its creator. However, this would leave File:Naeem Ahmed Zafar.jpg no longer as a user page image, so that it might be deleted per out of scope. Delete --Achim (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I just noticed that the user page User:Naeemrana2k was not created by the user himself, so this user page should be deleted per insulting behavior of its creator. However, this would leave File:Naeem Ahmed Zafar.jpg no longer as a user page image, so that it might be deleted per out of scope.
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antimpareta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
New upload, duplicates existing SVG: File:Lormetazepam 200.svg. We do not keep raster files when an SVG file already exists. This file is not in use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ARBENTIA PARTNER (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:DATOS ARBENTIA.jpg
- File:ARBENTIA Gold Partner Microsoft.png
- File:ARBENTIA PARTNER.svg
- File:ARBENTIA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Uploader has a history of uploading images that circulate on the internet. This same image in a lower resolution can be found @ http://www.italia.it/en/travel-ideas/art-and-history/the-catacombs-of-naples.html#prettyPhoto[idee_vacanze]/5/. Unclear if the uploader owns the rights to this image. Takeaway (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: commons is not a personal web host.
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY).pdf
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) PHOTO-1.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) PHOTO-2.jpg
_PHOTO-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_PHOTO-2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~ Nahid Talk 06:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 9.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 8.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 7.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 6.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 5.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 4.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 1.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 2.jpg
- File:MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN (HRIDOY) 3.jpg
_9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_7.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: "18:27, 12 April 2016 Fanghong (talk | contribs | block) deleted page". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
no es confiable Flaca9428 (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
![03:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/04/07#c-Flaca9428-2016-04-07T03:44:00.000Z-File:Vanessa_con_letras_del_abecedario_y_"ss".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Commons is not a private photo album. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
![08:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/04/07#c-MichaelMaggs-2016-04-17T08:05:00.000Z-File:Vanessa_con_letras_del_abecedario_y_"ss".jpg){kind=link}
es falso esto Flaca9428 (talk) 03:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons is not a private photo album. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
The depicted sculpture is obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably. Latvia has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
The depicted sculpture is obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably. Latvia has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
The depicted sculpture is obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably. Latvia has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
The depicted sculpture is likely recent and might thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably. Latvia has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, as EXIF data is missing. Wikipedia Zero upload. ★ Poké95 07:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons is not a private photo album. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
The file is not own work. I am not totally sure, that it is in public domain due to age. Creation year and correct author must be given. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marieke Eerdmans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably not own work because "photoshoots".
- File:FB sept 15 campagne II.jpg
- File:FB sept 15 campagne.jpg
- File:CHALROSE GOINGOUT SET01 08 FN PAG LR.jpg
- File:CHALROSE CASUAL SET03 07 FN PAG LR.jpg
- File:CHALROSE CASUAL SET02 08 FN PAG LR.jpg
- File:CHALROSE CASUAL SET01 05 FN PAG1 LR.jpg
- File:CHALROSE BUSINESS SET02 03 FN PAG LR.jpg
- File:CHALROSE BUSINESS SET01 05 FN PAG LR.jpg
Sismarinho (talk) 11:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Techno245). MER-C 11:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not useful for any educational purpose. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotional text. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, cropped from somewhere else (see little remnant top right corner), uploader has history of copyvios. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
his file looks professional (book page) and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely that both text and photo are own work as claimed. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
This was copied from a website and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: No free licence at source. Needs permsiision sent to OTRS if we are to keep this. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that this image is own work of uploader, small size, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
No confidence this image is own work of uploader, odd size, no metadata, obviously "on field" shooting position. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Same and similar reason with Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Diyar Muhammed. "20th century" is not enough.
- File:Piramerd - Kurdish Poet and Writer.jpg
- File:Hamdi - Kurdish Poet.jpg
- File:Kurdish leader Abdulrahman Qasimlo young.jpg
- File:Kurdish leader Andulrahman Qasimlo in Europe.jpg
- File:Mustafa Barzani and with his son Masoud Barzani in USA in Ohio.jpg
- File:Mustafa Barzani with his son Masoud Barzani in USA, Newyork.jpg
- File:Kurdish Author and Poet Abdulrahman Zabihi.jpg
Takabeg (talk) 03:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:Ibrahem Hanano 1.jpg
- File:Yousef alazma 1.jpg
- File:Abed Alrahman Alshahbanda.jpg
- File:Hassan Alkarrat.jpg
- File:Ibrahem Hanano.jpg
- File:Saleh Ali.jpg
- File:Sultan Alatrash 2.jpg
- File:Sultan Alatrash.jpg
- File:Yousef Alazma.jpg
- File:Mohammed Bik Alayyash.jpg
- File:Abed Alrahman Alshabandar.jpg
- File:Saleh Alali.jpg
- File:Sultan Alatrash 22.jpg
- File:Sultan Alatrash 11.jpg
- File:Yousef Alazma 1.jpg
- File:Sultan Basha Alatrash.jpg
- File:Sultan Bash Alatrash5.jpg
- File:Sultan Bash Alatrash6.jpg
- File:Sultan Bash Alatrash7.jpg
- File:Sultan Bash Alatrash8.jpg
- File:Sultan Bash Alatrash9.jpg
- File:Hassan Alkarat.jpg
Possible copyvio. There is no proof of {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} If the uploader were the copyright holder, please apply to OTRS. Takabeg (talk) 03:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Depicted mural is obviously recent and might still be copyrighted. Regrettably, ROC has no freedom-of-panorama exception for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Diannaa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from http://www.sarahtse.com/; click on "Exhibition view"
Converted by me to DR, as uploader may well be the depicted artist. Anyway, a permission sould be requested. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Agree; user needs to get an OTRS tag in place on the image. Diannaa (talk) 00:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Argentinian photos need 25+20 years, but this is a logo. Argentinian logos need generally 70 years from author's death. 70 years even from creation have not passed yet. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational purpose, upload from long-term abuser Vituzzu (talk) 14:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oilpressmachine (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Diagrams should be in SVG.
- File:Soybean oil production line.pdf
- File:Sunflower oil production line.pdf
- File:Rice bran oil production line.pdf
- File:Rapeseed oil production line.pdf
- File:Peanut oil production line.pdf
- File:Cottonseedoil production line.pdf
- File:Corn oil production line.pdf
- File:Camellia oil production line.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David Alves 2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:GT 5 – PROPOSTAS E PRÁTICAS PARA O ENSINO DE GEOGRAFIA.pdf
- File:GT 4 - REFLEXÕES E PRÁTICAS PARA O ENSINO DE GEOGRAFIA FINAL.pdf
- File:GT 3 - CARTOGRAFIA E GEOTECNOLOGIAS NO ENSINO DE GEOGRAFIA.pdf
- File:GT 2 – AÇÕES E EXPERIÊNCIAS DO PIBID.pdf
- File:GT 1 – EXPERIÊNCIAS EM ESTÁGIO SUPERVISIONADO.pdf
- File:APRESENTAÇÃO.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. The used images are also not properly sourced, own work is unlikely. Basvb (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyvio, per COM:Plushies. Fæ (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep It is incredibly likely that this would follow under a purview of originality, as there is no way to tell color and this is an incredibly generic-looking stuffed animal (i.e. not Mickey Mouse). Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- I think you mean threshold of originality, which normally applies to far more simple objects than the design of a stuffed toy with a detailed and characterful face. In terms of "generic-looking", the same thing can be said about Simpsons cartoons or Lego figures, they are still subject to intellectual property claims. --Fæ (talk) 16:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg. Multichill (talk) 16:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Toys are copyrighted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
File:神戸の夕焼け1982、Img747.jpg
[edit]
Very similar to be scans of old photographs. No permission from original authors. /St1995 20:01, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- File:神戸の夕焼け1982、Img747.jpg
- File:神戸の夕焼け1982、Img747－２.jpg
- File:高尾山ー富士山.JPG - also blurry
- File:Sunset Kolkata.jpg - also bad quality
- File:Trees sky and landscape.JPG
- File:Makkovik sunset.png
- File:Toyako sunset by daita.jpg - also bad quality
- File:LadyMusgraveIsland-Sunset.png
- File:Sunset on the island.JPG
- File:Sunrise over the North Pacific.jpg
- File:Atardecer campechano.jpg
- File:Atardecer en Zacatecas.JPG
- File:Mexico Baja Sunset.jpg
- File:München bei Sonnenuntergang Altstadt Richtung Norden c. 1997-1999.jpg
- File:HMS Tiger Bay sunset, 1982.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 14736 Naama Beach Sunset Sharm El - Sheikh.JPG
- File:Polen Masurische Seen 1982.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
All images seem to have been culled from the internet but uploaded as "own work". Probable copyright violations.
- File:Canon Powershot SX410 - Camera.jpg
- File:Nikon Coolpix P530 - Camera.jpg
- File:Canon PowerShot A800 - Camera.jpg
- File:Canon PowerShot SX40 HS - Camera.jpg
- File:Leaf (AI) - 2016.svg
- File:Nikon Coolpix L840 (B) - 2016.jpg
- File:Nikon Coolpix L840 (C) - 2016.jpg
- File:Nikon Coolpix L840 (A) - 2016.jpg
_-_2016.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2016.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Takeaway (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The painter, bg:Никола Михайлов (Nikola Mihaylov) died in 1960, so no public domain here. Лорд Бъмбъри (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I wonder whether this is "own work". I think it is a photoshoppped" version with this photo as start. Note that that photo shows shadows and that of the user not. Moreover the user has uploaded more photoshopped images. Also never metadata. Wouter (talk) 20:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Add: Year and author unknown - with some additional info it could be eligible for PD-Old-*? Otherwise delete per COM:PCP.-- Wdwd (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Created by another user, also see contributions of said user. Laber□T 17:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete --Achim (talk) 18:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
This image is derivative of the two paintings on either side. Since, except for the paintings, it is a very ordinary classroom, and they are the first thing that catches the viewer's eye, they cannot be dissmissed as de minimis. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
As author of the work (photographic image of the classroom) I object to the deletion request for the following reasons: - The canvases were publicly exposed on the outside of the building of UniDufour (central administration building of the University of Geneva) for about one year, starting June 2009, on the occasion of the 450th anniversary of the founding of the University: as such they lost copyright as determined by swiss law, and everybody can take a picture of them - the canvases (all of them, including the ones in the classroom) were all depicted in a catalogue "Faces à faces" which to my knowledge had no prior copyright transfer, exactly because the canvases were in the public domain - the canvases are property of the University of Geneva, which is a public University and the building including the classroom is accessible to the public. - The canvases are in the classroom just for decorative purposes, the classroom is not designed to be an exhibition place for the canvases.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Morningbastet (talk • contribs) 11:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Morningbastet: Freedom of Panorama is an exception to copyright law, and does not mean that items lose their copyrights, but rather that certain derivative works are not considered copyright infringements in certain cases. Freedom of Panorama in Switzerland requires the items to be permanently situated outdoors; that they are indoors now indicates they were not permanently situated outdoors. Note that specifically Posters in public are not considered “permanently situated” by the literature. (citation to the literature is in the document previously linked). Delete Storkk (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for this info. I wonder what happens 1. for statues for examples that were placed outdoors for centuries and then one day they are transferred inside because they get ruined by pollution?and 2) whether an image of the canvas taken when it was exhibited outside would eb considered free of rights under the Freedom of panorama ? regarding the canvases I took a picture of, i will inquire with the Legal dept. and Communication Office of the university of geneva, since this may be in their public domain (open archives).Morningbastet (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, Morningbastet I hope will obtain the needed copyright as the artist himself, Roger Pfund wrote to her today (I received a copy of the mail) saying that the current copyright may well be in the hands of Mrs Brigitte Mantilleri of of the Equal Opportunity office of the Unkversity of Geneva. We will ask the communicate department of UNIGe and hopefully come back quickly with the necessary authorizations. --Nattes à chat (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Morningbastet, to answer your questions:
- Statues that were outside for centuries would be PD, so it is not an issue. If you imagine a sculpture from, say, 1920, whose sculptor died in 1950, that was outside from 1920 until 2010, then I think that images taken of it outdoors in an FOP country would be OK, because it was clear that the intention was that the sculpture be permanently installed outdoors.
- These paintings, however, may be a different case -- unless the original intention was that they would be displayed permanently outdoors, photos of them in either place would not be OK for Commons.
- In almost all cases, the copyright remains with the artist when a work is sold. Please note that if the University claims that it owns the copyright for these works, the OTRS volunteer will need to see a copy of the written transfer of copyright from the artist to the University. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Morningbastet, to answer your questions:
- Hello, Morningbastet I hope will obtain the needed copyright as the artist himself, Roger Pfund wrote to her today (I received a copy of the mail) saying that the current copyright may well be in the hands of Mrs Brigitte Mantilleri of of the Equal Opportunity office of the Unkversity of Geneva. We will ask the communicate department of UNIGe and hopefully come back quickly with the necessary authorizations. --Nattes à chat (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative of unfree work. Unfortunately, cropping would seem to render the photo educationally useless. --Storkk (talk) 12:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I have another comment/question regarding the suppression of the images of the canvases. These canvases are actually reproductions by a graphic artist of previously existing photographs. Notably , the canvas of Grete Kellenberger was massed using as a template the photograph of Grete Kellenberger-gujer that is currently on the Wikipedia. fr page. Now, does the artist actually own the copyright of this work? Does it not belong rather to the author of the photograph (that was copied, basically, and rendered in colour), who is the daughter of Grete Kellenberger, Elisabeth DiCapua? I am basically arguing that the canvases are themselves DERIVATIVES of photos (which they are) and as such the copyright belongs to the original author of the photo, not the author of the canvas. Morningbastet (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: files are malicious. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
I originally deleted this as a copyvio. User:Sreejithk2000 has requested undeletion and a DR for review. I believe that this a copyvio because the scribble below the letters is a shape apart from the lettering, and it has a lot of etches and curves that likely push it above the threshold of originality in the United States (see COM:TOO#United States). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- I originally uploaded this logo to Commons before I understood COM:TOO. Magog deleted a number of my uploads and helped me understand. I then uploaded the images to the English wikipedia under their fair use rules. This file apparently went through a discontinued process there that determined that it is {{PD-textlogo}}. I was not notified about this discussion. I tend to agree with Magog about the level of originality of this file and would not contest its re-deletion here as long as it is still hosted under fair use there. BigrTex (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Here is a link to the archived discussion: en:Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 69#Not sure if these are non-free or PD BigrTex (talk) 00:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate ballot measure maps of Oregon
[edit]- File:Oregon 2006 Measures 46 and 48.svg
- File:Oregon 2008 Measures 51 and 52.svg
- File:Oregon 2008 Measure 51.svg
- File:Oregon 2010 Measure 70.svg
- File:Oregon 2010 Measure 71.svg
- File:Oregon 2010 Measure 76.svg
- File:Oregon 2008 Measure 65.svg
- File:Oregon 2010 Measure 75.svg
- File:Oregon 2014 Measure 90.svg
Two sets of duplicate files that have been superseded by File:Oregon Ballot Measures No.svg and File:Oregon Ballot Measures Yes.svg. These files can be used in all circumstances when every county voted no, or when every county voted yes. --MB298 (talk) 03:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: After deleting, please redirect in order to preserve links. MB298 (talk) 03:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - usage replaced. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. This image is very small and doesn't have camera data. 03:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
copy/pasted from http://www.bu.edu/asian/taiwan-forum-3/ or http://www.bu.edu/asian/files/2016/04/Lung-Yingtai1.jpg Jim1138 (talk) 06:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
this is an old photo Bentojustin (talk) 19:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion JurgenNL (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
this is an old image Bentojustin (talk) 21:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality Bentojustin (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Osvaldo Mercado (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:Biografía de Gilberto Lora 3.png
- File:Biografía de Gilberto Lora.png
- File:Biografía de Gilberto Lora 2.png
- File:Biografía de Gilberto Lora 1.png
Basvb (talk) 14:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguel w cardona (talk · contribs)
[edit]One screengrab, one photo of a photo and for all:
Images of small size with no exif data which makes me suspect that this image was copied from elsewhere. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:DIRECTOR DE A TODO FUTBOL.jpg
- File:DIRECTOR EDITOR DE TODO DEPORTES RADIO 920 AM EN WOODBRIDGE VA,.jpg
- File:BIOGRAFIA DE MIGUEL W. CARDONA.jpg
- File:COORDINADOR DE DEPORTES EN CANAL 63 TELENISA SAN PEDRO SULA HONDURAS.jpg
- File:Miguel Wilmer Cardona Sanchez.JPG
Basvb (talk) 14:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
this is an old photo Bentojustin (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion JurgenNL (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
this is an old image Bentojustin (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Low quality 2409:4073:2085:61B9:32FC:546D:AE68:8F43 13:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
this is an old image Bentojustin (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Low quality Bentojustin (talk) 13:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://s3.india.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ggdfg.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Soy el titular de la fotografía y deseo retirarla Rafael Pérez de Vega (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Zgłaszam ten plik do usunięcia z powodu błędnego numeru obozowego błogosławionego,prawidłowy numer obozowy to 24544 te zdjęcia zaraz prześlę.Taktoperz77 Taktoperz77 18:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self nom of Flickr file uploaded. Replaced by File:1980 Peugeot 504 (4642532741).jpg. OSX (talk • contributions) 22:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Self nomination of low quality Flickr file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1980 Peugeot 504 (4642532741).jpg (and other files within Category:Peugeot 504 sedan). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. OSX (talk • contributions) 00:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self nom of Flickr file uploaded. Replaced by File:1980 Peugeot 504 (4642543737).jpg. OSX (talk • contributions) 22:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Some arrows are not in the right place Santanyiner (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Format jpg, there exits a svg format file Santanyiner (talk) 21:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Superior SVG available as File:Flag of Europe.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo @ https://www.foodora.com/ Takeaway (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern sculpture.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Taken from http://www.herofestival.fr/ which give no licence. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bolt221954 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photo and doicuments. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Houston dynamo release form.pdf
- File:Houstan Dynamo Media Release.pdf
- File:IanDetroitSoccer.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
No deso que este en google Rafael Pérez de Vega (talk) 15:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The painter, bg:Никола Михайлов (Nikola Mihaylov) died in 1960, so no public domain here. Лорд Бъмбъри (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Counterfeit map Meysam (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Selbst hochgeladen. Jetzt durch PNG ersetzt. Deshalb überflüssig geworden. Geo-Science-International (talk) 22:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Selbst hochgeladen. Jetzt durch PNG ersetzt. Deshalb überflüssig geworden. Geo-Science-International (talk) 22:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:40, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
See COM:VPC#File:JaysRetired12Banner.png. Yann (talk) 11:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: File:AlomarRetired.jpg is esentially the same file and also uploaded as "own work", but by a different uploader. Is there any real difference between these two files? -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the shape of the numbers in the middle is slightly different, same copyvio in the top and the bottom. --Jcb (talk) 20:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
PD-textlogo does not apply: more than just "simple geometric shapes or text" RJFF (talk) 11:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Keep PD-textlogoの範囲内で、シンプルなYGロゴだと思います。このくらいの構造のロゴは他にもたくさんあります。--Goo16 (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Low quality, new file with .png-format has been uploaded (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:UitslagReferendumOekraine.PNG). Reave (talk) 12:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Fehler im Titel - neue Datei wird erstellt NorHae (talk) 14:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: the redirect. --Jcb (talk) 20:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Text file used on user page of single edit user, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:40, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Team logo, everything about this is dubious. BethNaught (talk) 21:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Collage of copyrighted images/without attribution/found in Internet. 190.62.165.11 22:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I changed and images for each commons (free of copyright), please cancel the request for deletion Miguu (talk) 01:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Miguu The old revision will still need to be deleted then. In the meantime, I would advise you to track down all the files that were used and all the authors and attribute them in the authors section. Ideally listing the files themselves in the "source". You cannot release derivatives of creative commons licenses into the public domain, so you must also upgrade the license tag to creative commons. Jolly Janner (talk) 07:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Miguu, please update the attribution info for the constituent images (Commons:Collages) czar 14:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Have to delete if we don't have attribution on the constituent images czar 02:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No attribution of individual pictures. --Taichi (talk) 20:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
PNG形式の物をアップロード Ishuty (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - superseded by File:Imperial Japanese Navy Amatsukaze1945.png. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
_Olsson-2016-04-07T14:21:00.000Z-File:Stenkyrka_kyrka_(3,5).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no version with better quality mentioned. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
_Olsson-2016-04-07T14:22:00.000Z-File:Stenkyrka_kyrka_(4.5).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no version with better quality mentioned. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
_Olsson-2016-04-07T14:22:00.000Z-File:Stenkyrka_kyrka_(5.5).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no version with better quality mentioned. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
_Olsson-2016-04-07T14:23:00.000Z-File:Othems_kyrka.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no version with better quality mentioned. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
(Uploader request) Useless because of aspect ratio and bad image quality: the panorama is light in the left and gets dark towards right. I hoped it could be fixed and asked for help at german Wikipedia's graphic lab. I was told images with such an aspect ratio can not be used properly in Wikimedia projects and should not be uploaded. There is another image showing most of the village Volkmarshausen with better aspect ratio and without this light-and-dark-problem, so please delete this bad one. Dehio (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Dehio: I think it can be fixed for the most part (some buildings on the left might remain blown out), at least made to look much better. Would you mind if I tried? I think the aspect ratio is not a real problem. Storkk (talk) 12:41, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. You don't have to try it, I managed to fix the problem by stitching the original photos using another software (I had no hope this would work before, because it's an old software and mostly didn't work with more than 4 photos, but here it did after a few hours). If the old panorama photo should be kept here, I think I'll overwrite it. If it will be deleted (as is probably the wish of User Gestumblindi and my faint hope still), nothing else will happen. --Dehio (talk) 07:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: feel free to overwrite with a better version. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not "Own work". Watermarked. Apparently a work from 1967 (and cannot be copyrighted at 2002 unless the works has been effectively made and published at 2002). Could apply {{PD-US-No notice}}? Amitie 10g (talk) 21:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- The uploader says "from 1967", but they also claim to own the picture, and they lied about that. Is her hand-painted patio from July 1967 and the photo taken in 2002? You can't just randomly claim PD with no valid source. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Of course it could be taken in 1967 and first published in 2002... Anyway Delete until Mary Randlett confirms license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 08:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
