Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/03/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2015.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_png_96dpi.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_rowing_blade.gif){kind=link}
![353 File:Dalla mia collezione... La locandina del film "Le ciel est a vous" del 1944.jpg](#File:Dalla_mia_collezione..._La_locandina_del_film_"Le_ciel_est_a_vous"_del_1944.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted image, not "own work", see http://c.duckfm.net/photos/c7/5b/547/529106-0.jpg
Ies (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 09:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission CB2288 (talk) 17:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: There's several related files: File:Cannon and Ball.jpg, File:Shaun Wallace.jpg, File:Tommy Cannon.jpg, and File:Bobby Ball.jpg. All were originally uploaded to en.wiki, and all are shown as being "own work" of en:User:SolomanMcKenzie. The nominator has repeatedly nominated these images for deletion on en.wiki, always claiming there's no evidence of permission, but has never to my knowledge explained why he thinks this is so. See the following related material:
Keep. CB2288 has previously nominated these images when they were hosted on the English Wikipedia for deletion with the above rationale (or none at all). The user has not provided any evidence to the contrary of the uploader's claim—despite a reverse Google image search, larger resolutions of this image do not exist, there is no evidence that this was published elsewhere prior to the original upload date (May 5, 2013), and there is no evidence that this is cropped from any other photo. SolomanMcKenzie's other uploads, both free and non-free, are perfectly fine, so I have no reason to believe that this image and the ones linked above by Diannaa are a different case. — ξxplicit 20:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Media missing permission CB2288 (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Unused image with personality right issues CB2288 (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussion and currently used --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Author request SolomanMcKenzie (talk) 10:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
No evidence of permission CB2288 (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Question: Does Own work need permission? AFG, the original uploader mentioned that is self-made picture, so, is very likely to be the actual photographer. This apply for the other extracted files, too. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)- Keep: There's several related files: File:Cannon and Ball.jpg, File:Shaun Wallace.jpg, File:Tommy Cannon.jpg, and File:Bobby Ball.jpg. All were originally uploaded to en.wiki, and all are shown as being "own work" of en:User:SolomanMcKenzie. The nominator has repeatedly nominated these images for deletion on en.wiki, always claiming there's no evidence of permission, but has never to my knowledge explained why he thinks this is so. See the following related material:
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 00:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Media missing permission CB2288 (talk) 08:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Unused image with personality right issues CB2288 (talk) 19:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussion and currently used --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of permission CB2288 (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Info: See related DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: There's several related files: File:Cannon and Ball.jpg, File:Shaun Wallace.jpg, File:Tommy Cannon.jpg, and File:Bobby Ball.jpg. All were originally uploaded to en.wiki, and all are shown as being "own work" of en:User:SolomanMcKenzie. The nominator has repeatedly nominated these images for deletion on en.wiki, always claiming there's no evidence of permission, but has never to my knowledge explained why he thinks this is so. See the following related material:
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 00:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Media missing permission CB2288 (talk) 08:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Unused image with personality right issues CB2288 (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussion and currently used --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploader request JL45 (talk) 14:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep You are not the uploader. Diannaa (talk) 15:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense request like last time. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Hunan Davos Man Network Technology Co., Ltd.
Files uploaded by Satyug Darshan Trust (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers, logos, book pages, photos of varying resolution, mostly web resolution and mostly without EXIF. Questionable authorship.
- File:Vedio.jpg
- File:Aatmnirikshan.jpg
- File:Logo-Olympiad 2016.png
- File:Governor-Haryan.jpg
- File:Even-Sightedness.JPG
- File:Sahityik-Sangoshti.jpg
- File:Lighting-ceremony.JPG
- File:Jagriti.jpg
- File:Hasan Hasaiya.jpg
- File:Dhyan-Kaksh.jpg
- File:Charitra Nirman.jpg
- File:Patrika-4.jpg
- File:Parivarik.jpg
- File:Granth.jpg
- File:Sangoshti.jpg
- File:Sightedness.JPG
- File:Lamp light.JPG
- File:Karan-Singh.JPG
- File:Equanimity.jpg
- File:Lamp-lighting.JPG
- File:Dhyan Kaksh.jpg
- File:Governer.jpg
- File:Kala-Kendra.png
- File:Sdier-logo.jpg
- File:Kalamsir.jpg
- File:Olympiad 2016.png
- File:Satyug logo.png
Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Mass deleted: most are obvious copyvios. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:XX-Net logo.png
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too small to be educationally useful. Takeaway (talk) 20:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, also too small, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, also too small, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too small to be educationally useful. Takeaway (talk) 20:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. XXN, 00:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution, promotional content. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - Commons not a photo album - low quality selfie Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept, it is used in user pages in 8 wikis. Everybody is allowed to have some private photos. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Please delete. Thanks. Simeon Dahl (talk) 03:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, not used anymore, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Private picture, out of project scope. Cjp24 (talk) 04:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Victormae43. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victormae43 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Victormae43 has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading five personal photos, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Scans of old photos without information about the original source and copyright. They can also be found at http://futsalnob.wix.com/canob#!afa/c1rg3 or http://futsalnob.wix.com/canob#!orgenes/csx9.
- File:Fac8fb 160fdce27171178e3bb6647f0d73c56b.jpg
- File:Fac8fb bc59e0369aed03ceb8bf5788aefe8b01.jpg
- File:Fac8fb 620185f0b9c1b941cf73f852def93a43.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 04:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Newells futsal 1987.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 05:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot. Taivo (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 05:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:PlayStation Vita
[edit]- First of these two logos are dupes of eachother
- We have an svg for this logo; link
- These logos are jpeg's. The worst format for logos.
- The are not in use, and therefore migh be a bit overly promotional to lay around...
- Come on...we don't need jpeg logos when we've got an svg, with proper attributions etc.
Josve05a (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Comment DR is pretty clearly for the two jpeg logos, not all files in the category.... VFC fail? Reventtalk 05:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the first is the uploader's last remaining and the second is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, for collages source and license of every used file is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope KDS4444 (talk) 05:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, without filename I could not understand, what is depicted. Taivo (talk) 16:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too small, too low quality, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Agreed, it got caught up in a bulk Flickr import. --Nemti (talk) 07:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused GIF when we have many png and svg in Category:Tetrahydrocannabinol. This image only includes one of two stereochemical details, so it's neither just the structure nor any one completely specific isomer DMacks (talk) 06:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
It's a redundant image of an image already uploaded to commons. Phoenix flying (talk) 06:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
It's a redundant image of an image already uploaded to commons. Phoenix flying (talk) 06:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Mis-spellings
Deleted, by Jcb. Taivo (talk) 17:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
COM:HOAX. "unicorns are the best pets to own"... text file out of COM:SCOPE as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
l'ho inserito io e voglio cancellarlo Annasiriapia (talk) 18:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Out of scope and promotional. --Lucas (msg) 21:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a bogus own work claim - the image exists on enwiki under the same name as fair use and is sourced to http://www.cityfalcon.com/, with no evidence that the uploader is related to the site. Only question would be whether the MIT license cited on the website page applies to the logo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
_2015.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2015.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a poster of the film en:Okkupert, which is of 2015 and almost certainly copyrighted, and there is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder (seems like a bogus "own work" upload like they are frequent with cross-wiki upload tool uploads). enwiki has a fair use version of the same file under the same name. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
_2015.png){kind=link}
Deleted, I have deleted the poster in the past. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
_2015.png){kind=link}
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 09:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
peronal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
peronal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
no usable size, not used Avron (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I will delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
self created artwork, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal logo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
no education usefull Максим Підліснюк (talk) 10:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Твої Гроші.jpg. Wikipedia is not place of free advertising. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
no usable size/quality Avron (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I will delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 18:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
no usable size/quality Avron (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I will delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 18:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Actually N751UW, typo. I will Upload this in the correct name when this is deleted. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 11:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept, the file is renamed, no need for deletion. Taivo (talk) 19:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Actually N751UW, typo. I will Upload this in the correct name when this is deleted. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 11:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept, the file is renamed, no need to delete. Taivo (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Actually N751UW, typo. I will Upload this in the correct name when this is deleted. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 11:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept, the file is renamed, no need to delete. Taivo (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Actually N751UW, typo. I will Upload this in the correct name when this is deleted. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 11:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept, the file is renamed, no need to delete. Taivo (talk) 19:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vituzzu as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: screenshot of a personal email, no educational purpose File currently in use in a sandbox article. Amitie 10g (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Reginadeinisseni - Using VisualFileChange.
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Big photo with camera data, but in my opinion quality is not adequate. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, No permission. If necessary, upload on local wikis with fair use. Also nominating File:Sigla USEM mini.jpg by the same uploader. XXN, 12:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified road, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, even if identified, the file has still low quality. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pankaj korat (ready) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 13:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, do not promote your business here. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Low quality, unused. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 13:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Huskysiberian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sourced to a website (see watermarks). No evidence of permission from that website.
- File:UNUSUAL NEVER DE LA VALLEE DE MORAVA.JPG
- File:Leonhard Seppala.jpg
- File:Lorna Demidoff.jpg
- File:Istoric husky.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 13:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, all files are watermarked "(C) www.huskysiberian.ro". These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused userphoto. Out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 91×91 pixels, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Uploader might have the rights, but it's not own work.Taken from http://gallusmagnus.nl/index.php/Ekker-van_Lidth_de_Jeude Agora (talk) 14:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- delete - this image is cropped from this picture without mentioning this. This photo belongs to the private archive of C. Feldhaus in Hoorn. The name of the photographer may be known and he was probably still alive after 1946. Gouwenaar (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested speedy deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Songs by Angolan band "Tem Shine". No evidence of permission(s).
Gunnex (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Questionable copyright status, out of scope, probably more Angola spam.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
copied from encarta Triplecaña (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
copied from book Triplecaña (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Polarlys (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
http://i.imgur.com/9nLlu.jpg copyvio Triplecaña (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission CB2288 (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Info: See related DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: There's several related files: File:Cannon and Ball.jpg, File:Shaun Wallace.jpg, File:Tommy Cannon.jpg, and File:Bobby Ball.jpg. All were originally uploaded to en.wiki, and all are shown as being "own work" of en:User:SolomanMcKenzie. The nominator has repeatedly nominated these images for deletion on en.wiki, always claiming there's no evidence of permission, but has never to my knowledge explained why he thinks this is so. See the following related material:
- Why do you say this? In all the years you have been trying to get these photos deleted, you've never said why. Diannaa (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused image with personality right issues CB2288 (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussion and currently used --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, image found in several sites over the web, not elegible for pd-old ☣Banjo tell me 21:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
low res, now own source Triplecaña (talk) 23:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Polarlys: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Dudosa procedencia, sin claro permiso para su uso Yaircohen90 (talk) 05:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Saludos, esa foto es de mi autoría. La tomé durante una manifestación de la oposición venezolana en la calle Élice del municipio Chacao de Caracas. Tengo otras fotos que demuestran que estuve allí ese día. Así que pido se le quite lo de eliminarla. Venlur (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment While lacking useful EXIF information, I cannot find this image used online before the date in the information template. @Yaircohen90: do you have any specific reasoning for doubting ownership? Riley Huntley (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Although the image is all over the web, I agree that none of the ones I see predate this upload. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. Out of scope. Josve05a (talk) 05:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 05:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete very low quality. Taivo (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Atthedmv.png
- File:First date at dmv.png
- File:At dmv.png
- File:Temp 1459135366570.-401799787.jpg
- File:Wikiproject pic 02 - norris tattoo on wills arm.jpg
- File:Wikiproject pic 08 - 95th.jpg
- File:5k..jpg
- File:Signature Room at 95th .jpg
Ies (talk) 05:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Sri lanka.jpg
- File:Highway AKP to PVL.jpg
- File:Villagio4.jpg
- File:Vilagio.jpg
- File:Villagio3.jpg
- File:Selfieroad.jpg
- File:Interview2014.jpg
- File:Teagarden.jpg
- File:Victoriapark.jpg
- File:Thummah.jpg
- File:Villagio2.jpeg
- File:Eid2015.jpg
- File:Villagio.jpg
- File:Shopiing.jpeg
Ies (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Peter Mushimba
[edit]Peter mushimba (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Peter at the roadside.jpg
- File:Peter In 2015.jpg
- File:Peter with his brother Kelvin.jpg
- File:Peter with His Cousin Andrew.jpg
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dax Bamania (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Dax Motivational Speaker.jpg
- File:Dax Business leader.JPG
- File:Dax Legend.jpg
- File:Dipak bamania.jpg
- File:Dipak Bamania.jpg
- File:Dax bamania.jpg
- File:Dax Bamania.jpg
- File:11054286 564277840376346 5263553699538934770 n - Copy.jpg
- File:Dax BAamnia.jpg
- File:10857755 523493291121468 8125370167928695477 n - Copy.jpg
- File:10636158 529239843880146 6894019222458183809 n - Copy.jpg
- File:11072 516262475177883 5866457052588007554 n - Copy.jpg
- File:Dax Public Speaker.jpg
- File:Dax Personality Developer.jpg
- File:Dax bamania details.jpg
- File:ViHAAN EDUCATION SOCIETY.jpg
- File:Personality Development.jpg
Ies (talk) 09:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
out of scope; personal image/selfie theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ladyrumopa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused userphotos.
Stefan2 (talk) 12:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused userphoto. Stefan2 (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 12:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
See COM:SCOPE.
Stefan2 (talk) 12:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlberthFriend (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 12:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlberthFriend (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 13:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 19:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Wikipedia is not place for CV-s. I'll delete also file:CV-rahuls.pdf due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Scribereestagere
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Scribereestagere (talk · contribs):
- File:Jeanette Spassova.jpeg (976×1428)
- File:Moon Lake Dismantled.jpg (800×453)
- File:Moon Lake Oil Carrier.jpg (800×461)
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 07:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Diegoev
[edit]Diegoev (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Edge Matrix Technique Sample.jpg
- File:Edge Matrix Technique sample.jpg
- File:EDGES.jpg
- File:HELMENT MEMPO Y KOBUTO COSTADO.png
Unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Gurgin
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Gurgin (talk · contribs):
- File:Darin Zanyar.jpg (300×698)
- File:Demonstration mot en turkisk invasion.jpg (3072×2048)
- File:KOMAK i Ranya.jpg (1600×1067)
- File:Perwer.jpg (440×320)
The files are usually small and they have no camera data. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Msdman
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Msdman (talk · contribs):
Screenshots with unknown copyright status. Website is closed down, so I could not verify the license. Taivo (talk) 07:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Daniel Veramendi
[edit]Daniell Veramendi (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Avenue in Lima, Peru.jpg (696×480)
- File:Old Car in Lima, Peru.jpg (960×720)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Educational value isn't big. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mai Phuong Vy singer
[edit]Here are all contributions of Mai Phương Vy singer (talk · contribs):
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Author and uploader are different. OTRS-permission from Kankan Photo is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web, multiple authors involved, considering also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eve Adams - Toy Safety Announcement 01.jpg (© by "Shan Qiao, © 2013 CNW/Health Canada") + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eve Adams Public Health Announcement in Saskatchewan.jpg + File:Eve Adams RBC Announcement.jpg (© by "Shan Qiao"/© 2014 CNW/Veritas Communications) + File:Event-Eve-Adams-McMaster.jpg (© by "SIMON WILSON ") + File:Eve Adams updates on Avian Flu Crisis.jpg (appears to be a TV screesnhot). All files uploaded in a row on 11.02.2016 for en:Eve Adams, a Canadian executive and former politician, most likely done by an "all-he-can-get"-grabber. Some (if not all) photos are also available under © via official https://www.flickr.com/photos/65105386@N06/, like File:Eve Adams welcomes $9 million investment.jpg --> resized from https://www.flickr.com/photos/65105386@N06/15804317663 (2015, ©)
- File:EveColourwHerSon.jpg
- File:Bernard Lord - Eve Adams.jpg
- File:Eve Adams Breast Cancer Partnership.jpg
- File:Eve Adams Stephen Harper Official.jpg
- File:Eve Adams RBC Announcement.jpg
- File:Eve Adams Announces Funding at Sick Kids Hospital.jpg
- File:Eve Adams updates on Avian Flu Crisis.jpg
- File:Eve Adams - Ebola- Media.jpg
- File:Event-Eve-Adams-McMaster.jpg
- File:Eve Adams welcomes $9 million investment.jpg
- File:Eve Adams Unveils Toronto Argos Postage Stamp.JPG
- File:Eve Adams - ALS Ice Bucket Challenge.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I just wanted to nominate them for deletion. Gunnex reached half of hour earlier. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Pranitsingh07
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Pranitsingh07 (talk · contribs):
- File:Academic Block.jpg (960×635, found at http://gecra.org/events-goldenjubilee.aspx with license "© Copyright and all rights reserved - REC Alumni Association")
- File:Akansha Sharma.jpg (636×960)
- File:Alumni Meet.jpg (960×720)
- File:Alumni Meets.jpg (960×638)
- File:Bangalore Chapter.jpg (720×540)
- File:Bhilai Chapter.jpg (960×720)
- File:Central - Library.jpg (960×720)
- File:Civil-Department.jpg (720×540)
- File:Commencementn.jpg (628×417)
- File:Conference Hall.jpg (960×720)
- File:Delhi Alumni.jpg (960×720)
- File:REC Rewa.jpg (1944×2592, camera Sony Eriksson MT27i)
- File:GEC Rewa.jpg (960×638)
- File:Dubai Chapter.jpg (960×553)
- File:Electrical Department.jpg (960×637)
- File:FALL.jpg (1024×768)
- File:Mechanical - Department.jpg (1944×2592, camera Sony Eriksson MT27i)
- File:GEC Night.jpg (960×637)
- File:GEC Rewa Team.jpg (672×504)
- File:SPORTs.jpg (720×960)
- File:New-s.jpg (960×637)
- File:Newh.jpg (718×527)
- File:Picture- 01s.jpg (1944×1454, camera Sony Eriksson MT27i)
- File:MainGate-.JPG (4608×3456, camera Sony DSC-H100)
- File:GJ Ballon.jpg (960×637)
- File:Golden Jubilees.jpg (667×417)
- File:Hostelpic.jpg (479×296, historical photo)
- File:IIT.jpg (2048×1536, camera Samsung GT-S6102)
- File:IITB.jpg (812×504, watermark "Raido photography 2014")
- File:K Krishnamurthy.jpg (636×960)
- File:Microsoft Lab.jpg (960×720)
- File:Reform.jpg (672×504)
- File:Plantation Caimpaign.jpg (960×720)
- File:WorkshopIITK.jpg (672×504)
Small photos and mostly without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Enockmaregesi
[edit]Here are all contributions of Enockmaregesi (talk · contribs):
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Article project about depicted person was rejected. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankursrmchennai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshot from another website, seemingly copyrighted and not "own work".
Ies (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 08:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of سمپاد2000
[edit]سمپاد2000 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:قله امیری.jpg (448×336, camera Canon IXY 50S)
- File:قله ی امیری آمل.jpg (448×336, camera Canon IXY 50S)
- File:برف در امیری.jpg (2560×1920, camera LG-D325)
- File:دشت سر بیشه.jpg (721×412)
- File:بهشت دشت سر.jpg (690×459)
- File:دشت سر2.jpg (800×600)
- File:دشت سر.jpg (1280×960)
- File:دشت سر 1.jpg (1280×960)
- File:وسطی.jpg (960×1280)
- File:وسطی کلا.jpg (1280×1280)
- File:زیارو.jpg (640×640)
- File:سرای مهدی سلطان.jpg (1024×572)
- File:کیمه در آمل.jpg (720×1280)
The files are usually small and usually without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:ISF International Airport.jpg: "No evidence of CC-0 [or CC-whatever] licence on source website" (which is — btw — not given: only direct links to images). See also User talk:Miladir with multiple related, by uploader unsolved copyright issues.
- File:Iran police Special Unit.jpg
- File:Naghshe Jahan indoor stadium.jpg
- File:ISF Metro Wagons.jpg
- File:ISF Traffic Police.JPG
- File:65th Airborne member.jpg
- File:Flower Garden ISF.jpg
- File:Isfahan Traffic.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Miladir has uploaded copyright violations for many years, but was never blocked. I blocked him/her for a year, because all his/her remaining uploads looked for me also like copyvios. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Newmacau
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Newmacau (talk · contribs):
- File:Macaumay.jpg (3840×5760, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III)
- File:Newmacau.jpg (960×540)
- File:Newmacau199201.jpg (1020×673)
- File:Newmacau199202.png (1018×766, almost totally black)
- File:Newmacau199203.png (813×550)
- File:Newmacau199901.png (1022×754)
- File:Newmacau199902.jpg (1612×1078, camera NIKON D90)
- File:Newmacau199903.png (998×653)
- File:Newmacau200902.jpg (500×333, camera Canon EOS 600D)
- File:Newmacau200903.jpg (1476×1176, camera Apple iPhone 5)
- File:Newmacau200904.jpeg (3264×2448, camera Apple iPhone 4S)
- File:Newmacau200905.jpg (940×705)
- File:NikoLeong.jpg (5605×3737, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III, author NikoLeong)
- File:SouChui2009.jpg (1235×737)
- File:Sulu Sou.jpg (600×327)
- File:SuluSou146.jpg (4055×2703)
- File:Sulu Sou was in Taiwan.jpg (800×533, camera Canon EOS-1D X, author and copyright holder Pochou Chen)
- File:民主新澳門蘇嘉豪.jpg (960×720, derivative work of newspaper)
- File:蘇嘉豪在包圍立法會現場.jpg (896×613)
The files have usually no metadata. If camera data exists, then usually different. Some photos are credited to different photographers. I suspect copyright violation of real photographers. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erick Ariel Ccobos Fiallos (talk · contribs)
[edit]These look like professional studio pictures. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.
- File:Paged.jpg
- File:Carla-sala-rev-mariela.jpg
- File:20150726120000 a-sa-tenemos-planes-de-bodaa.jpg
- File:Carla-sala-se-adentra-entre-las-cronicas-20160131062935-8028c055cd1d38c283947f124f562f7b.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zoegrace44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The watermarks imply that these are professional studio shots. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.
Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oikonomos1953 (talk · contribs)
[edit]One logo, unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Several pictures which look like official team photos, some of them too old to be own work by the uploader, and all of them with a questionable authorship claim. Some other pictures which could have been grabbed from somewhere, and one picture of a non-free cup.
- File:Tsaritsani.jpg
- File:Oiko.jpg
- File:Τσαριτσανη.jpg
- File:Oikonomos 0-0 iraklis.jpg
- File:ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΟΣ.jpg
- File:ΑΟΤ.jpg
- File:Οικονόμος.jpg
- File:Αοτ.jpg
- File:ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΟΣ 1-0 ΕΛΑΣΣΟΝΑ.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all. Usually no EXIF. If camera data exists, then always different. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused userphoto. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Messinis kostas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Λαδοπιτα.jpg
- File:Καλαθία κράσια.jpg
- File:Εξαιρετικά Γλυκά.jpg
- File:Γλύκα Ψυγείου.jpg
- File:Παιδικός Κουμπάρας.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file. Almost created a duplicate nomination. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused (de)motivator. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a picture from Twitter, but I can only find Twitter's thumbnail, not Twitter's file information page or higher resolution copies. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 11:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos, etc. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Correct sources are needed so that the copyright status can be determined. A few of the images are sourced to someone other than the uploader and are missing evidence of permission.
- File:Václav Hrabě.jpg
- File:Вадим Коваль.jpg
- File:Rafał Wojaczek-2.jpg
- File:Gregory Corso.jpg
- File:Frank O'Frank.jpg
- File:Автограф Мірека Боднара.jpg
- File:Mirek Bodnar.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 12:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Cool Wajihullah (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading two small images. One of them is used on sandbox and the other nowhere. All his/her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Seemingly a copyvio and not "own work", also too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation, very questionable attribution Risker (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is clearly textlogo, so it's not a copyright violation. But I support deletion, because in my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Priyavarshani
[edit]
Priyavarshani (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading two personal files, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Concept Haus
[edit]Concept Haus (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No proof, that author and copyright holder Alejandro Catala S is the same person. Please send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 06:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
DW of something, also maybe a copyvio Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It is really derivative work of something. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.breakingbelizenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/johnny_briceno_pup.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Two images of the same man, one is the cover of a book. Both are claimed as own work, but the image appears to be too old to be own work. Also two black and white photos of women, claimed also as own work but with nothing to suggest they are. Nominating for consensus.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Right side of image derivative from https://www.pinterest.com/pin/496521927646131454/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO derivative of http://www.filmitadka.in/images/joomgallery/originals/actors_11/salman_khan_912/salman_khan_20120826_1845975523.jpg with the other head pasted on. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahoon malik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Selfie gallery, out of COM:SCOPE. All of user's other uploads were copyvios.
- File:Graphic design.jpg
- File:Shahoon ali.jpg
- File:M shahoon Malik.jpg
- File:Shahoon malik.jpg
- File:Shahoon.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (user spamblocked on Wikipedia). FDMS 4 15:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Two images of the same woman, both claimed as own work by user with political name. There is no indication of user's own work, no metadata. Both are large and one is in use. We don't need both and I am not confident either image is own work of uploader as I found smaller thumbnails of these, older on the web.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
overprinting right corner shows source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
If this is indeed an official portrait, it's also unlikely to be own work. More information is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of uploader, no metadata, notice image has been reversed (words are backwards). Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of uncited source, not own work. Notice lack of description but image is in use on a page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Artwork by artist who hasn't been dead 70 years from the looks of the acrylic work on this painting. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 18:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hecmary mendoza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 18:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JcMancheno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sounds like commercial music. Missing permission.
- File:Electro Modernos- Amigo ben.wav
- File:Electro Modernos- Se mete en libros.wav
- File:Electro Modernos- Electro modernos.wav
- File:Electro Modernos- Oleo puro.wav
- File:Electro Modernos- Cenizas.wav
- File:Electro Modernos- Instinto.wav
- File:Electro Modernos - Manjar.wav
- File:Electro Modernos- Un lugar.wav
Stefan4 (talk) 20:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JcMancheno (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:PS.
- File:Manchas Solares 6.png
- File:Manchas solares 5.png
- File:Manchas Solares 4.png
- File:Manchas Solares 3.png
- File:Manchas solares 2.png
- File:Manchas Solares 1.png
- File:Estigma Inferior 2.jpg
- File:Estigma 2.jpg
- File:Estigma Inferior.jpg
- File:Estigma.jpg
- File:Manchas Solares 2.jpg
- File:Triangulo de Poder.jpg
- File:Luz Resplandeciente.jpg
- File:Ovni en aterrizaje.jpg
- File:Luz de Ovni.jpg
- File:Cara de extre.jpg
- File:Punto de Poder.jpg
- File:Luces formando cara de Extraterrestre.jpg
- File:Cara Extre.jpg
- File:Ovni Solitario.jpg
- File:Extraterrestre 2.jpg
- File:Sun Power Light.jpg
- File:Ovni Deforme.jpg
- File:Extraterrestre.jpg
- File:Ovni en Boca.jpg
- File:Triángulo Inverso.jpg
- File:Ovni En Descenso.jpg
- File:Mancha Solar.jpg
- File:Rosario.jpg
- File:Extre Tele qui nesis 1.jpg
- File:Extre Tele qui nesis 2.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 20:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: By Denniss. Green Giant (talk) 23:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JcMancheno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused dark low-quality images - no COM:EDUSE
INeverCry 18:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks of non-notable artist
- File:Kai Nakano Rasmussen's Signature.jpg
- File:Big Cookie Gingerwood Raid.jpg
- File:Kai Rasmussen Presentation.jpg
- File:Portrait of Cathy Stepp.jpg
- File:Kevinquinn.jpg
- File:Kai Rasmussen.jpg
- File:Kai rasmussen 2014.jpg
- File:Kai rasmussen working.jpg
- File:Kai-Rasmussen.jpg
INeverCry 18:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jasontyt108 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 18:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This may be the submitter's "own work" in the sense that he captured the shot from his TV, but that doesn't mean that he owns the rights to the image. This shot is obviously from a professional work. Ubiquity (talk) 01:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also file:Back Double .jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Nikhil.T.S. 67
[edit]
Nikhil.T.S.67 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage and sandbox in sa.wiki and uploading two photos about himself, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage and sandbox. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Drx.himanshusharma
[edit]
Drx.himanshusharma (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading 4 photos about himself, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prensa colombiana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images of non-notable musician/s - none in use
- File:Willy Calderon, Percussionist, Desert Shoot 2.jpg
- File:Willy Calderon, Percussionist, Desert Shoot 2015.jpg
- File:Willy Calderon visits la cumbre.JPG
- File:Willy Calderon w Sheila E.JPG
- File:Willy Calderon mtv artist.jpg
- File:Willy Calderon in the studio.JPG
- File:Willy Calderon for Colombia.jpg
- File:Willy calderon Reinvention.JPG
- File:Willy Calderon music headshot.JPG
- File:Willy Calderon Fan photo.JPG
- File:Willy Calderon Gon Bops.jpg
- File:Willy Calderon and Taku Hirano.jpg
- File:Willy Calderon during video shoot.jpeg
- File:Willy Calderon and Miguelito for Gon Bops percussion, August 2014.jpg
- File:Willy Calderon promotional photo "Reinvention", March 2013.jpg
- File:Willy calderon in the studio.jpg
INeverCry 19:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alam100000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope.
Leitoxx 01:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, these photos are out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Alam100000 (talk · contribs)
Copyright violations, it's not a free licensing.
- File:Pashto poetry پښتو شعرونه sad poem.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry پښتو شعرونه.jpg
- File:Pashto sad poetry 1.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry ,,,.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry1.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry,,.jpg
Leitoxx 01:53, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Images are out of COM:SCOPE and without information on sources of underlying photos possible COM:COPYVIOs as well.
- File:Pashto poetry pashto poetry.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry.JPG
- File:Poetry pashto poetry.JPG
- File:Iphone18 2013-12-22 002.JPG
- File:Iphone18 2013-12-22 003.JPG
- File:Pashto poetry ,,, (500x500).jpg
- File:Pashto poetry1 (500x376).jpg
- File:Pashto poetry 1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 09:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE - also, some of the background images/poetry may be copyvios
- File:My pashto poetry shair shairy sandary pukhto pukhtu.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry pakhtu shair shairy sandara (640x481).jpg
- File:Pashto poetry ,,,poetry pashto song.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry sherona.jpg
- File:Pashto poetry shair.JPG
- File:Pashto poetry.JPG
- File:New year نوی کال مو مبارک شه.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 19:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CHARBEL GEORGES ALGHORAYEB (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal cv image and home-made looking book covers, etc - no COM:EDUSE
- File:New cover Page 2.jpg
- File:بيروت عبر التاريخ.jpg
- File:غلاف الكتاب بيروت عبر التاريخ.jpg
- File:لحن الروح.jpg
INeverCry 19:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 19:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shamil03336474172 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 19:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M.SYED ALI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete! Out of scope pdf advertising. Traumrune (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image INeverCry 20:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of unclear notability. Seems to be out of scope. w:Qube electronics was speedily deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Spitacular23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: low-resolution copies of File:Fsc-logo-rgb.jpg.
- File:Farmingdale state college 300.jpg
- File:Farmingdale-state-college 2015-12-21 08-42-28.235.jpg
- File:Fsc-logo.gif
- File:Farming dale logo.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 12:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of unclear notability. Appears to fail COM:SCOPE. See also w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ConvergiaPlanet. Stefan2 (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
No Source defined, No EXIF Meta Data Present and copyrighted logo - IndrajitDas 14:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Private image uploaded to vandalize in en:Lebanon High School (Tennessee), not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IBIZA PAREO (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of unclear notability. wuu:善与志 was speedily deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope. wuu:善与志 was speedily deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused images of non-notable people
INeverCry 19:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 19:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope? Stefan2 (talk) 20:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Errors (see file page); correct alternatives (File:Synthesis of Boc anhydride.png, File:Di-tert-butyl dicarbonate synthesis1.svg) available. Leyo 15:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as tagger for the mistake. Not sure which of the two is a better replacement for the existing use-cases. DMacks (talk) 19:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 12:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality/resolution; replaced by File:Nitration of benzene.svg and File:Nitration benzene.svg. Leyo 19:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sigwald as Copyvio (copyvio).. with no reason given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by NahidSultan: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Porque Foi Um Engano Add Esta Musica. Francisco Xicax (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jianhui67: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Francisco Xicax
Files uploaded by User:Wadii khalili
[edit]
Clear copyvio, links above. --Aziouez (talk) 04:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No copyright information for the drawing in the poster. --ghouston (talk) 05:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No source given for the satellite imagery - unlikely to be the author's own work Hchc2009 (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also almost-copy file:Battle of Hastings Location.jpg. Taivo (talk) 17:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Himanshu.engin
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Himanshu.engin (talk · contribs):
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj Accessing the remote areas.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj Performing a Ritual for Peaceful afterlife of departed souls in 2013 Uttarakhand Devastations.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj and Smt. Amrita Rawat Performing Ritual, for Peaceful afterlife of departed souls in 2013 Uttarakhand Devastations.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj Surveying the Areas affected during 2013 flash floods.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj Voluntarily Trying to reach out the people affected in inaccessible areas, and surveying the damaged caused to them by flash floods.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj Voluntarily Trying to reach out the people in inaccessible areas, and surveying the damaged caused to them by flash floods.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj walking on the edge of the mountain to reach out the affected areas and people of uttarakhand.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj Voluntarily Trying to reach out the people stuck in inaccessible areas, and surveying the damaged caused to them by flash floods.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj Voluntarily Surveying the Affected Remote Areas and People of Uttarakhand During 2013 Flash Floods.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj Voluntarily Surveying the Affected Areas and People of Uttarakhand During 2013 Flash Floods.jpg
- File:Shri Satpal Maharaj & Smt. Amrita Rawat, With Vice President & Other Dignitories of Peru.jpg
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Filenames let me suggest, that this is promo campaign of a politician. Taivo (talk) 07:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Himanshu.engin claims in my talkpage here, that he owns permission from real photographers. That's very good. OTRS-permission from copyright holders is needed. After receiving the permission the files can be kept. If files will be deleted before permission arrives – no problem, after receiving the permission the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- The uploader clearly said is not the author [1], and if he have the permission, it is a fact that we have not. Then this images are currently copyright violations. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per my last comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Already tagged with no-source in 01.2016, reverted by uploader Gunnex (talk) 09:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mezinov Alexey Viktorovich
[edit]Mezinov Alexey Viktorovich (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Адміністрація Ленінського району м.Миколаєва.jpg
- File:Алегорія землі і моря, символ Миколаївщини.JPG
- File:Амфора Бажань.jpg
- File:Антон Макаренко, пам'ятник у Миколаєві.JPG
- File:Антон Чехов, пам'ятник у Миколаєві.JPG
- File:Бахус.jpg
- File:Визволителям Миколаєва, меморіальний комплекс.JPG
- File:Водяні гірки у аквапарку "Аттика".jpg
- File:Володимир Маяковський, пам'ятник у Миколаєві.JPG
- File:Володимир Образцов, вчений у сфері залізничного транспорту.jpg
- File:Готель "Nikotel".jpg
- File:Готель "Пілігрім".jpg
- File:Готель "Турист".JPG
- File:Готель "Ukraine".jpg
- File:Данило Самойлович.JPG
- File:Материнська любов.JPG
- File:Данило Самойлович, лікар-епідеміолог.JPG
- File:Дитяча гірка "Морська змія", аквапарк "Аттика".jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак "Зоря-Машпроект".JPG
- File:Хор янголів.JPG
- File:Материнство.JPG
- File:Микола Римський-Корсаков.JPG
- File:Іван Франко, пам'ятник у Миколаєві.JPG
- File:Хрест на відзнаку 2000-ліття від Різдва Христового.JPG
- File:Мати і дитина.JPG
- File:Ікар біля колишнього кінотеатру "Космос".JPG
- File:Інститут історії МНУ імені Сухомлинського.jpg
- File:Кафе "СРСР".jpg
- File:Максим Горький, пам'ятник у Миколаєві.JPG
- File:Кафе у аквапарку "Аттика".jpg
- File:Князь Григорій Олександрович Потьмокін.JPG
- File:Клуб "Шторм".JPG
- File:Лев Толстой, пам'ятник у Миколаєві.JPG
- File:Михайло Лермонтов, пам'ятник у Миколаєві.JPG
- File:Комендант фортеці Очаків Макар Чижиков.jpg
- File:Лебедине серце.jpg
- File:Святий Миколай.jpg
- File:Миколаївська облдержадміністрація.jpg
- File:Піцерія "Владам".jpg
- File:Пам'ятник борцям за владу Рад.jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак Миколі Леонтовичу.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник "Борцям за владу Рад від вдячних Очаківців".jpg
- File:Пам'ятник видатному лікарю, засновнику військово-польової хірургії Миколі Пирогову.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник видатному лікарю Сергію Боткіну.JPG
- File:Миколаївський муніціпальний колегіум (вулиця Котельна).jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак на місці де знаходився будинок в якому жив і працював Микола Аркас.png
- File:Пам'ятник визволителям Миколаєва (зворотній бік).JPG
- File:Пам'ятник визволителям Миколаєва (лицьова сторона).JPG
- File:"Сухий фонтан", м. Миколаїв.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Макару Чижикову.jpg
- File:Парк імені Петровського, м.Миколаїв.jpg
- File:Тернівська селищна рада, м.Миколаїв.JPG
- File:Торговий центр "Mark Plaza".jpg
- File:Фонтан "Дельфін".jpg
- File:Фонтан"Кохання".jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. If I by error nominated a photo about free object (author is dead more than 70 year), please give author's name and years of birth and death.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. В Викискладе могут быть только эти произведения архитектуры и скульптуры Украины, автор которых умер больше чем 70 лет. Если я ошибочно назначил на удаление свободные файлы, покажите автор и его годы рождения и смерти. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- water park, doesn't contain objects of sculpture and architecture --Butko (talk) 03:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- The slides on right are not simple, but original. They are projected by architect. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Info I started to delete some files but I must go to my job, I will continue to check the files later. Feel free for another administrator to do so. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Some are obviously modern and copyrighted, some may be old enough, but there is no infos to verify the copyright statut. I keep the water slide as it is IMO an utilitarian object, its complex form is not a design, it is like many other water slides, turns are to accentuate the slide and the travel time, not for design. And this model is probably manufactured in series. I keep also File:Кафе у аквапарку "Аттика".jpg as I'm not able to see an architectural artwork. I delete all the other for obvious copyvio (no FoP) and the other as per PCP. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Luke de paul
[edit]- File:Gskyb.gif
- File:Tyne tees.png
- File:Lrg Border TV.gif
- File:Scottish tv.png
- File:Lrg Westcountry TV.gif
- File:Granada logos.jpg
- File:Latestcb=20160107172747.png
- File:Channel television 1983 with dolphin productions watermark-13716.jpg
- File:All-4-logo-LATEST.jpg
- File:Tv clickable 466map.gif
- File:BBC satellite regions.png
- File:ITV MAP UK A4 resize v4-1.jpg
- File:Channel-4-logo 130925041650.jpg
- File:CX3v3s4WAAEl6Rk.jpg
- File:BBC World Service 2002.svg.png
- File:BBC World Service 2.png
Various files uploaded by User:Luke de paul as "own work" under a "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International" license. It seems highly unlikely that these were created by the uploader himself or that he holds the copyright on such images, who have have mistakenly assumed anything he finds on the Internet can be uploaded as his own work. Many of these are TV station/channel logos or former logos and some of them may be above the threshold of originality of the UK to be considered to be {{PD-textlogo}}. Not sure about the maps, but once again it is unlikely these were created by the uploader.
Finally, File:CX3v3s4WAAEl6Rk.jpg seems to be the pretty much the same as File:BBC Three logo.svg. Even if the licensing of both these files is correct, I'm not sure if both a jpg and svg version is needed. --Marchjuly (talk) 01:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
There isn't any source about this coat of arms. The uploader indicated that he only created a "derivative work" of other three files. How and why this "official sign" of a nation can be used without any verification? If this file can't be delete (I see, because anyone can upload a file with valid source and license tag in project's scope), then do we have any solutions for this case? minhhuy (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Just see the files tyhat this file is based... --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - clearly a derrivitive of two attributed PD files. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The copyright status of this work is not clear. The statement is in place since the initial upload, according to the page history, but the author of the work publicly complained that the work was published on wikipedia without her consent (implying that consent is required). The public statement is published in the journal 'monopol', March 2016, Juno Kunstverlag, Berlin, p. 23. 79.239.159.171 07:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - checking web archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100409002209/http://www.sarahillenberger.com/index.html for that year does not reveal a compatible license. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Started with File:LesPins.jpg, but this also applies to File:Tranchee.jpg and File:Broutilles.jpg. Photo of a painting by Jean Rouppert who died in 1979. Multichill (talk) 10:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Can be restored in 2050 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 08:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Appears to have been taken from a poster; no evidence of the original copyright having been released by the anonymous author; will still be under copyright Hchc2009 (talk) 11:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Poster was used in the public for a campaign in the 1980s. -- Ulanwp (talk) 12:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- An image being used on a poster doesn't remove its copyright, though, unless the photographer / author has released it under an appropriate license. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I checked it. File should be deleted -- Ulanwp (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- An image being used on a poster doesn't remove its copyright, though, unless the photographer / author has released it under an appropriate license. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
File is corrupted Squiresy92 (talk) 12:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: SVG is not corrupted. Files bigger than 10 MB are not rendered by MediaWiki. It could be optimised. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - SVG has been modified. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 00:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 22:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
The description suggests that it isn't own work by the uploader. It might be {{PD-FLGov}}, but that needs to be proved with a proper source. There is also no indication that the picture is in scope. Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Depicted person is en:Elizabeth W. Porter, but copyright problem is serious. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - found at http://audubonoffloridanews.org/?p=12368 - uploaded earlier. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 12:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Thatonewikiguy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images taken from http://www.overland.co.jp/ Bellow the COM:TOO in Japan? Amitie 10g (talk) 13:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete In my opinion this is textlogo. But en:Overland does not mention anything from Japan. I suspect, that the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reddogsix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://animushome.com/en Bellow the TOO in Sweden? Amitie 10g (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The same decision should be made for file:Animus Home logo.png. At first I thought, that it is made of 3 trapezium, but they are not exactly trapeziums and there is also shadow. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Both files are unused. "Animus home" is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in sv.wiki and en:Animus does not consist anything from Sweden. So it seems, that the logos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Suspected copyvio uploader. --Martin H. (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. can be found elsewhere on the web, suspected copyright violation. --Martin H. (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Suspected copyvio uploader. --Martin H. (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obviously not a free image. Furthermore, the author is supposedly Google! Pichpich (talk) 21:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 22:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Seems to be unfree, possibly from es:The Worst Witch (serie de televisión) where it is in use. A similar image, probably from the same set, appears here. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 22:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
In metadata is writen author EPA/SRDJAN SUKI. Photo is copyrighted [2]. Ex13 (talk) 23:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 22:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
unusable image Triplecaña (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 22:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
File is corrupted and unusable. Squiresy92 (talk) 06:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Nominated for speedy deletion. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
File is corrupted Squiresy92 (talk) 06:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: SVG is not corrupted, just is too big to be rendered as PNG. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The file is still eligible for speedy deletion as uploader's request on uploading week. But this time the file is displayed for me totally normally, previous version seemed to me corrupted. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- If the uploader requested the deletion due he think that the file is corrupued, but the problem is actually with MediaWiki (specifically with libsvg, bug reported almost 7 monts ago at Phabricator and the reason why I created {{HugeSVG}}), then, the the reason for deletion is invalid (even, the file is now used in 68 pages). --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The large SVG issue has been sorted out. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This building is not more than 50 years old, so the photo can't be more than 50 years old. Unfortunately, the photo needs to be deleted as not having valid licensing. JPA320 (talk) 10:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Freedom of panorama in the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China for buildings. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- If the building is less than 50 years old as JPA320 says, it's true that the copyright tag is invalid. Did the uploader just pick the wrong tag? The other uploads are photos shot with Canon EOS Kiss Digital X, including another panorama, except File:Yizhou Citizen Centre.jpg which is another panorama marked as being PD, edited with Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows as well. --Nemo 18:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- The uploader should just use the right license tag. Since the PRC have FOP, there is no copyvio, and therefore, no valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- There is no copyvio only if the uploader is the same person as the photographer and when the uploader actually adds a free license. Until then, this file is without permission... Nemo 13:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- The uploader should just use the right license tag. Since the PRC have FOP, there is no copyvio, and therefore, no valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, enough is enough, the file has still no meaningful license. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sigwald as Copyvio (copyvio).. and no further reason was given. To be speedied some form of reason must be presented. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: Just use google picture search by link... --Sigwald (talk) 13:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Sigwald: If you want it speedied you get to provide the reason, it's not up to the admins to follow you around with a dustmop. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: You've already spent more time for discussion, than it would be required for finding copyvio source. The photo is presented all over the internet, here for example (2010 year). Obviously it's copyvio, even the file name tells about it. And still you're spending my and yours time instead of fast google search. --Sigwald (talk) 10:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by NahidSultan as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Small size, doesn't look like it is own work Avron (talk) 21:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
No legend for this map to make it useful, no source (maybe copyvio), file name suggests test only. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
SVG available as File:Google Chrome for Android Icon 2016.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Small size, doesn't look like it is own work Avron (talk) 21:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. - Using VisualFileChange.
Earlier copy here, but lower resolution. Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
That link is to a page where someone is using my photo to make Christmas cards. You can clearly see my copyright notice "W.H. Majoros" (that's me) on the photo that she used. Here I have provided the higher resolution original for others to use. I don't see how this is a duplicate. If it is a duplicate, then it should be removed. Can you provide a link to another version on Wikimedia Commons? If one version is higher resolution, I propose deleting the lower-resolution one.
- Since the file was used on that other website before it was uploaded to Commons, you need to provide evidence that you are the copyright holder, either by proving that you are the owner of that website, or that you published the picture somewhere else before it was posted to that website (with evidence that you were the one who published the image at that point). See COM:OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
What?!? Are you kidding? If you look at the photo that the person used, IT CLEARLY HAS MY COPYRIGHT NOTICE ON IT: "(C) W.H. MAJOROS" That person clearly stole the photo from my web site, where the photo has been sitting since 2010 (as opposed to this person's blog dated 2014): http://www.billmajoros.com/photoalbum/categories/new/WinterSpring2010/index.html Please explain how else I could happen to have a version of the photo without all of the text that the thief who is using it added after they stole it from my web site? How could I possibly remove the text while also increasing the resolution without introducing artifacts? I suggest you contact that person and ask them why they are using my photo without attribution, rather than harassing me for giving away my photography free of charge to the world. If you look in the lower left hand corner of the photo she stole from me, you will see "(C)W.H. Majoros". If you google for W.H. Majoros the top hit is to my web site: "Bill Majoros - Third Bird From The Sun." If you click that link and go to the bottom of the page and click on "Contact" it opens up an email to bmajoros@duke.edu. That's my email address. Send me an email I will respond. And then you can STOP HARASSING ME.
She probably stole it from my Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/photos/thirdbirdfromthesun/4792936063/in/photostream/ There you can clearly see that the photo is owned by me, Bill Majoros. It's dated 2010, the same year listed on my personal web page. I have the Canon RAW file. No one else in the world has the RAW file for this image, so there is no way anyone can own the photo except me. But I'm certainly not going to send you the RAW file because you are likely to claim that you own the photo once you have a copy of my RAW file. So how else do you propose I prove that I am the copyright owner????
UPDATE: The woman has removed my photo from her web site, after I informed her she was infringing on my copyright. Now hopefully you will stop harassing me when I try to share my photography on wikimedia commons. Photographers who give away their photos for free on wikimedia are providing a valuable service to the public -- the vast majority of skilled photographers do not give away their work for free. You, by harassing generous photographers like myself, are working against the greater good. Your efforts to harass photographers like myself are working to stifle the sharing of works on wikimedia commons. Your ability to accurately research the history of a file is clearly lacking. That you could entertain the notion that this elderly blogger who posted a low resolution, grainy image of my photo, WITH MY COPYRIGHT CLEARLY VISIBLE IN THE LOWER LEFT CORNER, was evidence that I, with my higher resolution, unmodified version, had somehow stolen the photo from her and miraculously removed her text and increased the resolution without introducing artifacts, strongly suggests that you need to find something else to do with your time and let people who want to contribute to wikimedia commons do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmajoros (talk • contribs)
- Keep: The copyright holder is, obviously, Willimam "Bill" Majoros (the uploader) (proof is the Exif metadata, the watermark, and his Flickr account that I found). Stefan2, is not the first time that I told you to research before nominating and claiming that uploaders are just assuming bad faith when mentioned you need to provide evidence that you are the copyright holder, and, in special, see the user history (431 files uploaded since 2011). --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- The rule is that users who publish files outside Commons before publishing them here should provide evidence of ownership. The Flickr page reveals that the picture is freely licensed, so the problem seems to be solved. I'm not sure why you think that demanding evidence means assuming bad faith. It's much better to sort out potential problems immediately than postponing them for a decade or two when the user might no longer be around. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: ticket:2016031210008765 proves that the uploader is the copyright holder. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hamzan2015 - Using VisualFileChange.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KLM_Boeing_747.png is nearly identical PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a SVG. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified person. The file information page additionally mentions a website, so the picture might be a copyright violation from there. Stefan2 (talk) 15:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Selfie of a random kid Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In use in a sandbox article (and the guy is not a kid). --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per description: file of official batch -> likely copyvio. --Basvb (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope? Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Looks like some kind of hoax edit, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Although human glans penis can be in scope, the image is low quality and unused, can be replaced by alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:53, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, unclear copyright status. FDMS 4 17:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content (no FOP for temporary displayings). FDMS 4 17:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
No educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork or derivative, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused and unusable marked-up photo, likely derivative, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal doodle, unusable, superseded by many better ones at Category:AC waves. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grecoly167 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book pages/screenshots without permission. Probably out of scope.
- File:Leyes de la naturaleza 5.jpg
- File:Leyes de la naturaleza 2.jpg
- File:Leyes de la naturaleza 3.jpg
- File:Leyes de la naturaleza 4.jpg
- File:Abu kamil matematico antiguo.png
- File:Edad media.jpg
- File:Matemáticos en la edad media.jpg
- File:Microfono 3.jpg
- File:Microgono 2.jpg
- File:Microfono 1.jpg
- File:Funciones 1.JPG
- File:Funciones.JPG
- File:Formulas de integración 2.jpg
- File:Formulas de integración 1.jpg
- File:Formulas de integración.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración 9.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración 2.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración 8.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración 7.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración 6.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración 5.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración 4.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración 3.jpg
- File:Metodos de integración.png
- File:Metodos de integración 1.jpg
- File:Valor medio y promedio de una función 4.jpg
- File:Valor medio y promedio de una función 5.jpg
- File:Valor medio y promedio de una función 1.jpg
- File:Valor medio y promedio de una función 2.jpg
- File:Valor medio y promedio de una función 3.jpg
- File:Métodos para solidos 1.jpg
- File:Métodos para solidos.jpg
- File:Métodos para solidos 2.jpg
- File:Métodos para solidos 3.jpg
- File:Concepto de continuidad 3.jpg
- File:Concepto de continuidad 4.jpg
- File:Concepto de continuidad 1.jpg
- File:Concepto de continuidad 2.jpg
- File:Ejemplo de limites con funcion trigonométrica.jpg
- File:Limites de funciones trigonométricas.jpg
- File:Limites de funciones.JPG
- File:Grafica estadistica.JPG
Art-top (talk) 14:12, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grecoly167 1
[edit]Text-only documents, out of scope. Some incidental derivative images. Comparing the uploader's user name with the names shown on File:ERROR 3.jpg, it is likely that he is not the author of these text files, so likely copyvio as well.
- File:ERROR -3-U2.jpg
- File:ERROR 3.jpg
- File:Actividad de errror.jpg
- File:Actividad U2.jpg
- File:Actividad u2.jpg
- File:Actividad 3.jpg
- File:Actividad error.jpg
- File:Actividad influencia.jpg
- File:Actividad infleuncia de error.jpg
- File:Actividad 3 U2.jpg
- File:Act 2.jpg
- File:Act 3.jpg
- File:Act 3 1.jpg
- File:Curvas de nivel 5.jpg
- File:Curvas de nivel 4.jpg
- File:Curvas de nivel 3.jpg
- File:Curvas de nivel 1.jpg
- File:Curvas de nivel 2.jpg
- File:Sucesiones.jpg
- File:Función de densidad de probabilidad 3.jpg
- File:Función de densidad de probabilidad 4.jpg
- File:Función de densidad de probabilidad 2.jpg
- File:Función de densidad de probabilidad 1.jpg
- File:Función de densidad de probabilidad.jpg
- File:Formulas de integracion2.jpg
- File:Formulas de integracion1.jpg
- File:Formulas de integracion.jpg
- File:Actividad 5.3.png
- File:Actividad 5.1.png
- File:Actividad 5.2.png
- File:Actividad5.png
- File:ACT 3-1.jpg
- File:ACT 3.jpg
- File:Actividad 3 U1 WIKI 3.jpg
- File:Actividad 3 U1 WIKI.jpg
- File:Actividad 3 U1 WIKI 1.jpg
- File:Actividad 3 U1 WIKI 2.jpg
- File:Actividad 2-U1 probabilidad.jpg
- File:Actividad 2-U1-2 probabilidad.jpg
- File:Actividad 2-U1-1 probabilidad.jpg
- File:Sigma algebra 1.jpg
- File:Sigma algebra 2.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
This is picture of Joseph Haydn. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Joseph_Haydn.jpg ListMyCDs (talk) 18:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Looks like a scan of a printed publication. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Looks like a scan of a printed publication. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
See COM:DW. Stefan2 (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Looks a bit like a magazine scan. Possibly not own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 19:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 19:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krk rajkumarr andaman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
INeverCry 19:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krk rajkumarr andaman (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images, no educational purpose served, unused in user pages
—SpacemanSpiff 03:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JordiKeruac (talk · contribs)
[edit]The watermarks contradict the uploader's authorship claims.
Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: unused personal photos are out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 12:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: unused personal photos are out of scope. Additional possible copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 12:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be a non-free character from w:The Flash (2014 TV series). Stefan2 (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Storkk (talk) 12:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ies as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Artwork by a living artist, indoods and therefore not covered by FoP. Jcb (talk) 14:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer and artist should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ies as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Artwork by a living artist, indoods and therefore not covered by FoP. Jcb (talk) 14:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer and artist should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ies as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Artwork by a living artist, indoods and therefore not covered by FoP. Jcb (talk) 14:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer and artist should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Benoît Prieur as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: screenshot I guess; not a personal picture...(not sure). No actual link was provided. Speedy is not for "I guess" but for images with proven difficulties. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I clicked on "Report copyright violation" cause I found this action relevant. Sorry if not... --Benoît Prieur (d) 15:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No proof of copyvio. Google Image Search didn't returned results prior to uploading to Wikipedia (other results are just Wikipedia mirrors). --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like a screengrab. Basvb (talk) 21:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Three identical images (other than file name). There is no reason to keep all three.
- File:Sede da manutenção da Caesb - SIA 06.jpg
- File:Sede da manutenção da Caesb - SIA 04.jpg
- File:Sede da manutenção da Caesb - SIA 03.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, nearly identical... kept best exposed and least tilted version (...SIA 04.jpg). --Storkk (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
These images were randomly searched on Flickr. Possible copyright violation.
- File:Travis Fimmel 10.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 11.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 2.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 3.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 4.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 5.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 6.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 7.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 8.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel 9.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel-Vikings.jpg
- File:Travis Fimmel.jpg
1989 19:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Flickr uploader doesn't appear to be the copyright holder (flickrphoto:8247814245, flickrphoto:14892024960).
FDMS 4 15:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Regarding deletion request:
- The images on Flickr (tank and taekwondoe) are licensed under CC by 2.0.
- Photographer Tom Ebrite verified by email 30-Mar-2016 his desire that his 1967-68 Vietnam photos be used on Wikimedia under the Creative Commons 3.0 license.
- There are over 500 other images uploaded to Wikimedia from 2013 to 2016 which are from the same two sources under the same licensing terms: tommy japan images and manhhai images (links to wikimedia search showing the images from these two sources)
- The photographs were taken as a work of a U.S. military or Department of Defense employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the images are in the public domain. VeeWin (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- @VeeWin:
- The license on Flickr is irrelevant if the Flickr uploader isn't the copyright holder, i.e. created the works him-/herself or obtained the copyrights from the creators.
- If #4 is true, he can't (and doesn't have to) release them. If it isn't, please have him contact OTRS.
- I count 5.
- Please present evidence for your claim, there wasn't only military personell in Vietnam at that time.
- FDMS 4 15:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- @FDMS4:
- There are 5 images from "manhhai", 342 from "tommy james" (corrected search link) on Wikimedia. My fault for saying 500; I just saw the 500 on the "view" panel of the search results; the correct total is 347. Looking through several of them, they include the caption: "It was reviewed on 4 July 2014 by the FlickreviewR robot and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0."
- An example of one of these pictures which is used in several places on wikipedia is this image.
- There are lots of photographers in that collection of 300+ images on Wikimedia. I don't know all of them, but some definitely were taking their pictures as part of their job as soldiers of the U.S. government in Vietnam. Regarding Tom Ebrite specifically, the photographer of the tank picture I uploaded (and quite a few of the other pictures in the tommy japan collection), he took the images while serving in central Vietnam in 1967-68 in the 19th Engineer Battalion (Combat)(Army). He (and other photographers) are listed in the U.S. government records from the time; more recently, you can find him on internet searches as an organizer of the commemorative events for the soldiers of that battalion. Moreover, he's said he wants the pictures to be public domain and used here under CC 3.0 and wishes us luck. I suggested to him that he could make his own account and upload the pictures himself, but doing that or emailing might be a little too much effort for him at this stage, so hopefully that's not necessary.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by VeeWin (talk • contribs)
- @VeeWin:
- The bot just checks whether the license (and actual file) on Commons matches the one behind the Flickr link. I could upload literally any picture to Flickr (the most obvious copyvios might get caught by an algorithm), mark it with a free license, transfer it to Commons and the bot would add that review tag to it.
- There might be some acceptable files in manhai's Flickr stream, but if the files were uploaded with an intact source field, you would've received a warning message from the review bot because manhai is on the questionable Flickr users list and you should therefore exercise extra caution when transferring images uploaded by him/her to Flickr.
- I did some research and found that Tom Ebrite was indeed in military duty in Vietnam at that time. As you wrote, only works created as part of a soldier's official duties are in the public domain for that reason. Looking at other photos he took ([1], [2]), it doesn't appear to me that that was the case (since I'm by no means a military expert I might be wrong here). Unless you have something that actually proves that, again, please have Mr. Ebrite contact OTRS – we'd love to have his entire collection under a free license and the release process really doesn't hurt.
- As for the Walter Hart picture (and the future), please note that the burden of proof lies with you. Thanks, FDMS 4 20:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- @FDMS4:
Ok. OTRS email sent for the issue here. As for the other 347 photos in the collection, though, they're still on wikimedia and not flagged. Are they grandfathered in? Anyway, good luck. Thanks. VeeWin (talk) 05:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, VeeWin, we have received your message and I have therefore excluded the picture from this deletion request. Please note that this doesn't mean that we can ultimately keep it, just that its fate will be decided at another venue (you will receive a follow-up via eMail). FDMS 4 17:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission from Walter Hart. Second photo undergoing OTRS review, so kept for now. --Storkk (talk) 12:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Images are credited belonging to the G.H. Rothe estate. Rothe died in 2007, which makes this not public domain. There is no proof that this account belongs to the estate, it is likely Flickr Washing.
- File:2-0006 Landscape 3.jpg
- File:2-0007 Anatomy Landscape 5.jpg
- File:2-0008 Anatomy Landscape 6.jpg
- File:2-0010 Anatomy Landscape - Busenbaum I.jpg
- File:2-0011 Anatomy Landscape 8.jpg
- File:2-0012 Anatomy Landscape 10.jpg
- File:2-0013 Anatomy Landscape 11 - Probedruck.jpg
- File:2-0015 Anatomy Landscape 12.jpg
- File:2-0017 Anatomy Landscape.jpg
- File:2-0018 Anatomy Landscape - 2 figures.jpg
- File:2-0019 Anatomy Landscape - hanging eyeballs - augen.jpg
- File:2-0021 Anatomy Landscape - VI - bb 4.jpg
- File:2-0022 Anatomy Landscape - female torsos with skulls - bb 9.jpg
- File:2-0024 Anatomy Landscape - BB 16.jpg
- File:2-0039 Anatomy Landscape - eyes.jpg
- File:2-0040 fingers and penis.jpg
- File:2A-000 Anatomy Landscape -Einzeldruck.jpg
- File:2A-002 Anatomy Landscape - embrace - bb 11.jpg
- File:2A-003 Anatomy Landscape - I - bb 12.jpg
- File:2A-005 Anatomy Landscape - IV - bb 13.jpg
- File:2A-006 Anatomy Landscape - Penises - bb 6.jpg
- File:2A-007 Anatomy Landscape - 2 female forms - bb 20.jpg
- File:2A-008 Anatomy Landscape - 2 figures - bb 22.jpg
- File:2A-010 Anatomy Landscape - 2 figures dark skin - bb21.jpg
- File:2A-013 Anatomy Landscape - skeleton - bb 23.jpg
- File:2A-014 Anatomy Landscape - furry shape - lips.jpg
- File:2A-020 Anatomy Landscape - bb 13.jpg
- File:5-0055 Geriatric Erotic - Fellatio.jpg
- File:5B-008 Anatomy Landscape - penises with helmets - bb 12.jpg
- File:Geriatrica 1.jpg
- File:Geriatrica 2.jpg
- File:Geriatrica 3.jpg
- File:Geriatrica 4.jpg
- File:Geriatrica 5.jpg
- File:Geriatrica 6.jpg
- File:Geriatrica 7.jpg
- File:Geriatrica 8.jpg
- File:Girl with Trumpet Flowers.jpg
- File:Graffiti Doors by GH Rothe.jpg
- File:Midwinter Spring.jpg
- File:Reclining Madrone.jpg
- File:Window (mezzotint).jpg
- File:Worlds Fastest (mezzotint).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 22:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I see your concern. However, here are several important points. The GH Rothe Estate is directed and managed by her son, Peter Rothe, with whom I've had several interactions over the last year. The Estate is in the process of reviewing their website: www.peter-rothe.squarespace.com
I am writing the article of GH Rothe for Wikipedia, after having talked to Peter several times and after seeing the most recent exhibition of a not very well-known, yet hugely important portion of her work exhibited at the Walter and McBean galleries in San Francisco: http://www.artinamericamagazine.com/reviews/gh-rothe/
I uploaded the images, with Peter's permission, onto Wikimedia, in order to be able to use them for the article that is currently being reviewed by Wikipedia. Please let me know if there are any more concerns with this, or how would I be able to prove that I indeed have Peter Rothe's permission (the owner of the images). --Juanppacheco (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Juanppacheco: the best way to prove this unequivocally is through the OTRS system. That way we can make sure everything is in order. Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Source does not link to images and site has a clear copyright tag on each page.
Ww2censor (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Also, Delete per Commons:Nudity, especially COM:PORN. Elisfkc (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
It's not clear what the copyright status of these images is but they are likely still in copyright and while they are on Flickr under a free licence in this source album that states they are from an art collection of works by w:Bassel Khartabil there is no evidence the artist actually released them under a free license despite him having been in jail before his death. In this image File:Bassel Khartabil (Safadi).jpg he is wearing a Creative Commons t-shirt and there are Creative Commons and Wikimedia Foundation references of support for him in his enwiki article w:Bassel Khartabil. I think we need some better verification than the photographer's free license such as an heirs verification.
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Deformity-Bassel-6-17-15.jpg
- File:Resurrection-Bassel-7-10-15.jpg
- File:Uncertain-Dream-Bassel-6-15-15.jpg
- File:Uneasiness-Bassel-7-11-15.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 16:11, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep They are freely licensed, as he licensed all of his work. Confirmed per their recipient, who is the photographer. We can ask his widow for confirmation. --SJ+ 15:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed, getting confirmation would really be the best as there is no actual evidence the images are freely licensed. But make sure that she realises that under a free license anyone can use the images for any purposes, even making money by selling them. Ww2censor (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence that the Flickr license covers the art. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: as pr [3]. Yann (talk) 09:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Belhistorik111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A gallery of head shots of men, some illustrated, some photographed, all claimed as user's own work. This claim is unlikely due to the vast range of time depicted in these images. It is possible some of them could be kept with research as to the actual source of the image, but as claimed own work they are obviously not.
- File:Яков Яковлев.jpeg
- File:Анатолий Соколов.jpeg
- File:Слюнков.jpeg
- File:Малофеев.jpeg
- File:Мазуров.jpeg
- File:Киселёв.jpeg
- File:Богуцкий.jpeg
- File:Генкин.jpg
- File:Констонтин вениоминович.jpg
- File:Святополк мстиславич.jpg
- File:Транята.jpg
- File:Конунг.gif
- File:Бериг.jpg
- File:Изяслав.jpg
- File:Германарих.jpg
- File:Гусаров.jpeg
- File:Волков - копия.jpg
- File:Асаткин владимирсккий.jpg
- File:Владимир полоцкий.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination... creation/published dates and photographers' identities need to be established. --Storkk (talk) 12:28, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
https://models.com/models/stefan-pollmann NeverDoING (talk) 15:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Political poster, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer and poster designer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this obviously professional headshot which has been in use, in smaller versions for a while. https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_400_400/p/3/000/08b/35e/2fac3ac.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Overprinted logo in upper left corner shows true source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
It's a Nikon stock image, specifically the third image in the slideshow here: http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product-archive/dslr-cameras/d100.html Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Snapshot of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Snapshot of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality snapshot of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Snapshot of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal map of fictional history/country, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal and fictional flag, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal and fictional flag, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal and fictional flag (no such party), no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal and fictional insignia, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
This seems to be a picture created by a government or organisation or something. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. No idea what it is - possibly out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear permission status. --Basvb (talk) 00:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Charlie Qi
[edit]Charlie Qi (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Laiwuyishuguan.jpg (2000×1482, camera Xiaomi HM NOTE)
- File:Laiwuyejing.jpg (960×720)
- File:Laiwudong.jpg (4160×3120, camera LA2-T)
- File:Laiwushiyanzhongxue.jpg (1440×810, camera Huawei G621-TL00)
- File:Chenyizhongxue.jpg (5312×2988)
- File:莱芜市实验中学南校区.jpg (1440×810, camera Huawei G621-TL00)
- File:Lwemsbeixiaoqu.jpg (1680×1260, Pyongyang camera PYC1)
- File:Laiwucity.JPG (4000×3000, camera Fujifilm FinePix AX205)
- File:1990年的莱芜汽车站.jpg (800×549)
- File:Longkou City.jpg (1280×960, Pyongyang Camera v1)
- File:Laiwujiuyang.jpg (2000×1482, camera Xiaomi HM NOTE)
- File:1985laiwu.png (742×468)
- File:Yantainanshanxueyuan donghaixiaoqu.jpg (4160×3120, camera Letv X800)
- File:Yantainanshanxueyuan.jpg (3120×4160, camera Letv X800)
- File:烟台南山学院体育馆.jpg (4160×3120, camera Letv X800)
- File:Laiwu Experimental Junior High School.jpg (1680×1260)
- File:莱芜市实验中学南校区1.jpg (1440×810, camera Huawei G621-TL00)
- File:莱芜市的社会校车.jpg (800×600)
- File:莱芜第一中学.jpg (1280×949)
- File:A junior high school student in Laiwu Shandong.jpg (1280×949)
- File:山东省莱芜市城中村.jpg (1280×949)
- File:山东省莱芜市城中村巷道.jpg (1052×780)
- File:莱芜市实验中学的学生.jpg (1280×949)
- File:Laiwu city Fengcheng Xi Da Jie road.jpg (2000×1482, camera Xiaomi HM NOTE)
- File:山东省莱芜市居民家中.jpg (1482×2000, camera Xiaomi HM NOTE)
- File:莱芜市实验中学南校区操场.jpg (1280×949)
- File:莱芜市区街景.jpg (1280×949)
- File:莱芜市图书馆内.jpg (1280×949)
- File:Snow in Laiwu,Shandong,China.jpg (2000×1482, camera Xiaomi HM NOTE)
- File:莱芜战役指挥所旧址.jpg (853×536, Pyongyang Camera)
- File:莱芜市实验中学北校区一楼的教室.jpeg (853×640)
- File:莱芜日报社.png (668×454)
- File:烟台南山学院学生证.jpg (3120×4160, camera Letv X800)
- File:Laiwu Chenlou Tang Gua.JPG (4000×3000, camera Fujifilm FinePix AX205)
- File:莱芜市人民政府办公大楼.png (666×456)
- File:Rural Credit Cooperative Of Shandong.jpg (1680×1146)
The photos have mostly no metadata. If camera exists, then usually different (6 producers). I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- 这些照片均为本人拍摄。部分照片通过手机拍摄，元数据会不全。还有照片经过压缩处理，丢失了元数据。--Charlie Qi (talk) 09:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- 您好。如果这些照片是您拍摄的，我们需要您根据COM:OTRS/zh-hans发送一个电邮到 permissions-commons@wikimedia.org。 您也能到这个页面查询。谢谢。Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- 这些照片均为本人拍摄。部分照片通过手机拍摄，元数据会不全。还有照片经过压缩处理，丢失了元数据。--Charlie Qi (talk) 09:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of Половко Сергей Николаевич
[edit]Половко Сергей Николаевич (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Базовский В. (Новгородская область).jpg
- File:Бойцев А. (Новгородская область).jpg
- File:Дрокин.jpg
- File:Мещеряков В. (Новгородская область).jpg
- File:Прокофьев В. (Новгородская область).jpg
- File:Рябков Г. (Новгородская область).jpg
- File:Соколов Т. (Новгородская область).jpg
- File:Трофимов Ю. (Оренбургская область).jpg
- File:Фабричный С. (Новгородская область).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Historical photos, not own work. Some can be free, if published before 1917 or if photographer is dead more than 70 years, but publication data and correct author is needed.
Старые фотографии, не своя работа. Некоторые из них могут быть свободными, если публикованы пре-1917 или если автор умер больше чем 70 лет назад, но для этого данные публикации и автора нужны. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of Saimaan kameraseura ry (wikidata:Q11891929), designed by V. F. Tiihonen in 1957. {{PD-Finland50}} does not apply here since this is not a photograph. Apalsola t • c 13:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC) –– (link fix) Apalsola t • c 18:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Because of the rules of the logo competition, Saimaan Kameraseura ry owns and uses the logo and it's copyrights. It don't have anything against the publication here, and with the text in the border, it's public domain. No need to delete it, but maybe should change some better lincence for this. Tvkosone (talk) 19:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I see only one solution: please send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- If Saimaan Kameraseura ry owns the copyright, please send OTRS permission as suggested above, so the file does not need to be deleted. ––Apalsola t • c 07:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand what to do. As User:Apalsola speak Finnish, maybe can explain me what to do (in Finnish), please? Should the chief or board of SKS ry give some permission or what? Tvkosone (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Suomi: Logon osalta ongelma siis on, että se on todennäköisesti tekijänoikeuksien alainen. (En ole asiantuntija, mutta ainakaan minun näkemykseni mukaan se ei ole niin yksinkertainen, etteikö se ylittäisi teoskynnystä.) Lähtökohtaisesti tekijänoikeuden omistaa tekijä (V. F. Tiihonen), tai jos hän on kuollut, hänen oikeudenomistajansa. Jos oikeudet kuitenkin on luovutettu Saimaan Kameraseura ry:lle, tämä tulisi ilmoittaa OTRS-järjestelmän kautta ja samalla antaa lupa kuvan julkaisemiseen jollakin vapaalla lisenssillä. OTRS:ää koskevat ohjeet ovat saatavissa myös suomeksi. Ja koska kyseessä on yhdistys, ilmoitus pitää tulla yhdistyksen edustajalta. ––Apalsola t • c 11:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- OK, kiitos! Tämä tilanne on siinä mielessä absurdi, ettei kukaan edes tietäisi V.F.Tiihosen olevan logon alkuperäinen piirtäjä, jos minä en olisi sitä tietoa onnistunut aikanaan kaivamaan historian syövereistä. :) (Suomen) tekijänoikeuden mukaan ongelmaa ei ole, koska logo on nimenomaan seuran omistama - sehän nimenomaan järjesti kilpailun logon saamiseksi ja Tiihonen sen kisan sitten voitti. Seura myös käyttää sitä jatkuvasti ja joka paikassa. Ja seuran etu on se, että logo on myös Wikipediassa siitä kertovan artikkelin yhteydessä. Mutta tutustun tuohon OTRS:ään ja pyydän lausunnon myös nykyiseltä puheenjohtajalta. Tvkosone (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand what to do. As User:Apalsola speak Finnish, maybe can explain me what to do (in Finnish), please? Should the chief or board of SKS ry give some permission or what? Tvkosone (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Se, että seura on järjestänyt kilpailun, ei automaattisesti tarkoita, että logon tekijänoikeudet olisivat siirtyneet seuralle. Yhtä hyvin olisi mahdollista, että seuralla olisi vain oikeus käyttää logoa itse ei-kaupallisessa käytössä mutta ei oikeutta esimerkiksi edelleenlisenssointiin. Kannattaa huomata, että Commonsiin ladattavien tiedostojen tulee olla lisensoituja vapaalla lisenssillä niin, että kenellä tahansa pitää olla mm. oikeus uudelleenjulkaisuun, muokkaamiseen, muokattujen teosten julkaisuun, kaupalliseen käyttöön jne. (ks. tarkemmat tiedot tuosta linkistä). Pelkkä "lupa julkaista Wikipediassa" ei esimerkiksi riitä. ––Apalsola t • c 19:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nykyään tässä asiassa toki ollaan valveutuneempia, mutta muistettava on myös se että ko. kilpailu järjestettiin 1950-luvulla. :) Siihen aikaan laki oli ihan toisenlainen, käytännöstä ja talkoohengestä puhumattakaan. Mutta kyselenpä jos pj voisi kuitata asian olevan kunnossa, koska kaikkien olemassa olevien dokumenttien perusteella asia on juuri näin. Tvkosone (talk) 19:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
_png_96dpi.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_png_96dpi.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by FRDian as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not a free logo Bellow the TOO in the PRC? Amitie 10g (talk) 13:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
_png_96dpi.png){kind=link}
- Delete In my opinion complex logo. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
_png_96dpi.png){kind=link}
photo incorrect Le Grenoblois 38 (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yunuskhuja Tuygunkhujaev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, drawings and book cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Abdullayev habib.jpg
- File:Behbudiy.jpg
- File:Munavvar qori.jpg
- File:Hygiene book.jpg
- File:Saidamin.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Photos taken from various web sites. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Lessons at andijan news.uzreport.uz.jpg
- File:View to the building.jpg
- File:Andijan11.jpg
- File:LogoTARCI.jpg
- File:Meeting at TARCI.jpg
- File:TARCI main building.jpg
- File:Conference at TARCI.jpg
- File:French delegation.jpg
- File:International affairs.jpg
- File:Meeting of students.JPG
- File:Open doors.jpg
- File:Examination procedure.jpg
- File:Students of MSUT.jpg
- File:Meeting with President.jpg
- File:MGU3.jpg
- File:MGU1.jpg
- File:TIK1.jpg
- File:TIK canteen1.jpg
- File:TIK canteen2.jpg
- File:TIK canteen.jpg
- File:Room mexanika faculty.jpg
- File:Meeting with the Presidend of Israilian Univer.jpg
- File:Meeting with Latvian Univ.jpg
- File:Meeting with Wisconsin-Madison.jpg
- File:State2.jpg
- File:State1.jpg
- File:Tdtu1.jpg
- File:State3.jpg
- File:State4.png
- File:Tohir Malik INHA.jpg
- File:Tohir Malik at INHA.jpg
- File:Tohir Malik at INHA1.jpg
- File:Tohir Malik.jpg
- File:Building of Institute.jpg
- File:Ce78d de6a.jpg
- File:Interhouse.jpg
- File:Yunusabad lyceum.jpg
- File:Suv xojalgni avt.bino.jpg
- File:Water industry management.jpg
- File:Irrigation institute.jpg
- File:Irrigatsya.png
- File:Libraryyyy.jpg
- File:Audit bino.png
- File:Budget building.JPG
- File:Credit economy faculty conference.png
- File:Finance-economy class.png
- File:Insurance building.jpg
- File:Moliyaviy menejment hayoti.png
- File:Dorm 3.1.png
- File:Dorm 3.png
- File:Dormitory 2.png
- File:Dormitory 1.png
- File:Campus ASMI.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small historical photo, more information about it would be needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Programme of concert is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
new run, like the last run 2003:4D:2C35:7032:18FC:CC43:B022:961D 11:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per prior nomination: unlikely to be own work. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Art by living artist http://www.panoramio.com/user/780447?with_photo_id=10363997 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Vietnam Football League (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-trivial logos. Unlikely "Vietnam Football League" owns the copyright on individual club logos.
- File:Logo Long An FC.png
- File:Logo XSKT Can Tho.png
- File:Logo Ha Noi T&T FC.png
- File:Logo TP Ho Chi Minh.jpg
- File:Logo 2016 V.League 2.png
- File:Logo Toyota V.League 2016.png
BethNaught (talk) 16:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
I doubt in the authorship. 3 out of 5 pictures from this user have been deleted right from the spot as copyvios. Small, no camera-exif, professional quality, same truck (per number plate) and the same location as in this promotion video of the manufacturing company. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Simular situation as at File:Полноприводный самосвал 6х6 МАЗ-МАН.jpg. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
I really doubt this professional photo is the work of the uploader. Avron (talk) 17:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
obraz je silně poškozen Ivas1950 (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
According to en:User_talk:Shark96z/Archive_1#Your_use_of_my_photos (I came there via Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Blatantly_stolen_photo), this is not the original uploader's own work. While the original author of this file says "I am very open to people using photos with proper attribution", there's no actual permission to use this specific image under this specific license. El Grafo (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
File uploaded by sockpuppet. Fry1989 eh? 17:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- What issues are there with the file itself? It is in use. Basvb (talk) 20:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- The file was uploaded to circumvent NPOV rules on Wikipedia. The uploader who is also a sockpuppeteer is now blocked indefinitely on Commons and their Wikipedia accounts. Fry1989 eh? 21:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- I don't see how that warrants deletion of the file. The file is in use in three wikis. If the fact that the Western Sahara is colored (different from the map on enwiki) is the issue, then I see your point that this file might be deemed to portray a POV, but doesn't the other map (File:Morocco USA Locator.svg) then also portray a POV, being the opposite POV? In the end it is up to the local wiki-versions to decide which version they use. Currently this map is in use, making it in scope on Commons. If the file being on the three wiki-articles is caused by, now blocked for, POV-pushing, maybe a simple revert on those projects is the way to go. Otherwise local discussions on those wiki-versions is what will have to determine whether this version or the other version of the map is used. If on all wikis it is deemed that this file is not useful (because it portrays incorrect information) than it can be deleted on Commons. Basvb (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- PS: I would agree with renaming this file as the current situation where the .svg and .png with the same name have a different content is potentially confusing. Renaming the file to something like: File:Morocco with Western Sahara - USA locator.png Basvb (talk) 00:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- It warrants deletion because it's purpose was to circumvent regulation on Wikipedia. With that user and their sockpuppets now blocked, this file no longer has a proper purpose. It doesn't belong here! Fry1989 eh? 00:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Now it is no longer in use, delete it. Fry1989 eh? 00:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- It is no longer in use because you just removed it (I suggest onwiki discussion rather than reverting). Looking into the history (arwiki, fawiki and ruwiki) there seems to be an ongoing edit conflict between you and another user. This file seems to be part of a cross-wiki conflict and as such I think deleting it here, and in that way deciding in an cross-wiki edit conflict, is not what deletions requests are for. I currently fail to see any valid reason for deletion of the file and as such I support keeping the file. Basvb (talk) 00:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- And that was completely in my rights. I have no stake in the territorial issue, but we should not reward vandals and socks by keeping their material long after they are no longer permitted be be productive here. If there is a genuine need for a similar map, another user will create one, if one doesn't already exist. Fry1989 eh? 02:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- It is no longer in use because you just removed it (I suggest onwiki discussion rather than reverting). Looking into the history (arwiki, fawiki and ruwiki) there seems to be an ongoing edit conflict between you and another user. This file seems to be part of a cross-wiki conflict and as such I think deleting it here, and in that way deciding in an cross-wiki edit conflict, is not what deletions requests are for. I currently fail to see any valid reason for deletion of the file and as such I support keeping the file. Basvb (talk) 00:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Now it is no longer in use, delete it. Fry1989 eh? 00:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- It warrants deletion because it's purpose was to circumvent regulation on Wikipedia. With that user and their sockpuppets now blocked, this file no longer has a proper purpose. It doesn't belong here! Fry1989 eh? 00:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- The file was uploaded to circumvent NPOV rules on Wikipedia. The uploader who is also a sockpuppeteer is now blocked indefinitely on Commons and their Wikipedia accounts. Fry1989 eh? 21:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
side tracked Category:Bilateral maps of Morocco
[edit]
- (what I wrote before an edit conflict):Looking into some more maps of the bilateral relations of Morocco, I see that they use different colorings for Morocco, and as such that this issue is much more widespread than this single image (pair). File:Cyprus Morocco Locator.png (only Morocco), File:France Morocco Locator.jpg (Western Sahara disputed), File:European Union Morocco Locator (orthographic projection).svg (Western Sahara included). It's a very interesting category so I did a little tally of Category:Bilateral_maps_of_Morocco and found that 18 maps show only Morocco, 17 maps show Morocco with a disputed Western Sahara (using more than 10 different methods) and 5 show Morocco including the Western Sahara. Thus this POV discussion seems to have the potential to be quite big. I've no preference/stance on which of the three ways of showing it is the best. I do however feel that we should leave it up to the projects to decide on this matter, if different projects want to show Morocco in a different way than it is not up to us here at Commons to decide that they can't show it in the way they want. Basvb (talk) 00:51, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
chybná reprodukce oltáře Ivas1950 (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
chybová reprodukce Ivas1950 (talk) 18:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Anonym - Oltare ze Zatone - Steti sv. Jana Krtitele a Salome pred kralem Herodesem- prave kridlo.jpg
[edit]
chybová reprodukce Ivas1950 (talk) 18:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation of [4], not the uploader's own work as stated. NatureBoyMD (talk) 18:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation from Stephen L. Brusatte, Alexander Averianov, Hans-Dieter Sues, Amy Muir and Ian B. Butler (2016). "New tyrannosaur from the mid-Cretaceous of Uzbekistan clarifies evolution of giant body sizes and advanced senses in tyrant dinosaurs". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America in press. MWAK (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps of Vichy Government
[edit]There is no evidence that Vichy stamps are treated any different from French stamps. Most of the designers and engravers are all listed at Commons:Stamps/Public domain#France as not being dead over 70 years. An outside source for French stamp designers is at: http://www.phil-ouest.com/Liste_artistes.php. The oldest death ranges from Ouvre whose stamps fall into the public domain in 2022 through to Gandon's stamps which are copyright until 2061. I previously asked Spiessens about the situation at User talk:Spiessens#Vichy stamps and despite his reply back in August 2015 that contact was being made with La Poste, no information has been forthcoming.
Several other stamps by this uploader have been deleted per this log. File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1943-24.png might actually be ok as the designer died in 1943.
- File:Legionfrancaiscontrelebolchevisme1942.jpg
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1941-49.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1941-54.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1941-55.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1942-17.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1942-21.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1942-22.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1942-26.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1942-27.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1942-28.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1942-33.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1943-16.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1943-24.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1943-6.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1943-8.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1943-9.png
- File:WIKITIMBRES.FR POSTE-1944-3.png
Ww2censor (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Disagree. It's wrong logique I thing. For example, here is famous painter en:Czesław Słania, who created a lot of postage stamps for ~21 or 22 different countries of Europe and abroad. And copyrights of that stamps are different - depending of postal authority terms. For Sweden - using is prohibited till 2075. For Faroe Islands - is free! But both stamps created by the same human. So, for the Vichy govt there is legal template - defunct govt. Nickpo (talk) 00:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Le régime de Vichy n'a pas d'existence légale en droit français (déclaration du Général de Gaulle en août 1944) et donc ne peut prétendre à un Copyright quelconque. Le seul copyright qui pourrait s'appliquer concernerait l'auteur du timbre mais en aucun cas l'administration postale qui était soumise à un régime réputé n'avoir jamais existé. Malosse (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunately your argument is flawed because the Vichy government was never the copyright holder. That belongs to the engraver and designer, so the fact the stamps were made for a now defunct government does not matter to the copyright. Regarding Slania, it depends on the country who issued the stamps, for instance in Ireland the 1974 Slania rugby stamps are copyright for 50 years because they are government works but for countries that are copyright to the engraver, such as Sweden, they will be copyright for 70 years pma, i.e., 2076. Ww2censor (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Source needed for this one: the Vichy government was never the copyright holder. Please, show it. Nickpo (talk) 22:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunately your argument is flawed because the Vichy government was never the copyright holder. That belongs to the engraver and designer, so the fact the stamps were made for a now defunct government does not matter to the copyright. Regarding Slania, it depends on the country who issued the stamps, for instance in Ireland the 1974 Slania rugby stamps are copyright for 50 years because they are government works but for countries that are copyright to the engraver, such as Sweden, they will be copyright for 70 years pma, i.e., 2076. Ww2censor (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Actually all French constitutional laws remained in place except for those that were abrogated as being incompatible with the Vichy government (see article II [5]). We all know that Vichy made several anti-semetic laws and when the regime ceased those same French laws continued that had been in place before Vichy until they were superseded by new ones. There is no evidence that the copyright laws were ever changed during the Vichy period, so the regular French copyright law applied. Anyway, as I already stated, the Vichy government was never the copyright holder which remained with the designer and engravers. The ordonnance of 1944 Concerning the Reestablishment of the Legally Constituted Republics tates that: Article 1: The form of the Government of France is and remains the Republic. By law it has not ceased to exist. and Article 2: The following are therefore null and void: all legislative or regulatory acts as well as all actions of any description whatsoever taken to execute them, promulgated in Metropolitan France after 16 June 1940 and until the restoration of the Provisional Government of the French Republic. This nullification is hereby expressly declared and must be noted. That confirms that clearly French law prevailed. If the government did not cease to exist then its laws did not cease to exist either. Ww2censor (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- But Wikipedia is international project, not French. So, we must see primary the complex of international law, not French. Vichy regime was recognized as legitimate French government by the main world powers and a lot of ordinary countries (USA, USSR, Canada, Australia, Switzerland and other neutral states, of course Axis states, etc.) with full diplomatic relations. Pétain was constitutionally appointed the Premier by President Lebrun on 16 June 1940. it was not an unconstitutional putsch. For example, the Baltic states claim they are recovered regimes from pre-Soviet era now. OK, but we are not obliged to obey this. Nickpo (talk) 08:20, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Actually all French constitutional laws remained in place except for those that were abrogated as being incompatible with the Vichy government (see article II [5]). We all know that Vichy made several anti-semetic laws and when the regime ceased those same French laws continued that had been in place before Vichy until they were superseded by new ones. There is no evidence that the copyright laws were ever changed during the Vichy period, so the regular French copyright law applied. Anyway, as I already stated, the Vichy government was never the copyright holder which remained with the designer and engravers. The ordonnance of 1944 Concerning the Reestablishment of the Legally Constituted Republics tates that: Article 1: The form of the Government of France is and remains the Republic. By law it has not ceased to exist. and Article 2: The following are therefore null and void: all legislative or regulatory acts as well as all actions of any description whatsoever taken to execute them, promulgated in Metropolitan France after 16 June 1940 and until the restoration of the Provisional Government of the French Republic. This nullification is hereby expressly declared and must be noted. That confirms that clearly French law prevailed. If the government did not cease to exist then its laws did not cease to exist either. Ww2censor (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea what point you are trying to make but here on the commons images must be freely licence both in the country of origin and in the US and these are not. Ww2censor (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- I give up. Nickpo (talk) 16:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea what point you are trying to make but here on the commons images must be freely licence both in the country of origin and in the US and these are not. Ww2censor (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except one of which designer died in 1943. --Jcb (talk) 23:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Village Pump#Blatantly stolen photo Sebari (talk) 18:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The en-wiki uploader has uploaded many images from off the internet by many different authors before and claimed them as "own work" -- I'm guessing most of their uploads are bad. If there is a specific accusation about a photo, I would tend to believe that. Many of the images were uploaded so long ago however that the original source is hard to prove -- but apparently here, per the Village Pump discussion, it was a private Facebook gallery (since removed). Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
possible copyvio - the US military may have used this image to identify a wanted ISIS terrorist, but I doubt an actual member of the US military went and took a photo of the guy - If they knew where he was to photograph him, they probably would've killed him instead INeverCry 18:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
The information template only says who the original uploader is but not who the author is. Additionally, the original upload log contains a URL, suggesting that the picture comes from a website. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
This image also appears on a Google image server, although I can only find a thumbnail. Questionable authorship claim, and presumably out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 19:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
No FOP for sculptures in Argentina: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Argentina FunkMonk (talk) 21:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 23:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Argentina. FunkMonk (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
The source webpage restricts the reuse of this photograph to "research and personal study" only Hchc2009 (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Have a look here: http://mp.natlib.govt.nz/detail/?id=58123&l=en
- Usage: You can search, browse, print and download items from this website for research and personal study. You are welcome to reproduce the above image(s) on your blog or another website, but please maintain the integrity of the image (i.e. don't crop, recolour or overprint it), reproduce the image's caption information and link back to here (http://mp.natlib.govt.nz/detail/?id=58123). If you would like to use the above image(s) in a different way (e.g. in a print publication), or use the transcription or translation, permission must be obtained. More information about copyright and usage can be found on the Copyright and Usage page of the NLNZ web site. -- Ulanwp (talk) 22:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly - it is definitely not released under the license given on the file, which runs "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other use is permitted." The museum has restricted the purposes, derivative works are limited and commercial use is not permitted. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ok I'm not an expert in law and it might be that my English is not good enough to understand the second sentence which I have shown above. I understod to have the right. If you are sure, than delete it. -- Ulanwp (talk) 09:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly - it is definitely not released under the license given on the file, which runs "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other use is permitted." The museum has restricted the purposes, derivative works are limited and commercial use is not permitted. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
The source website restricts the reuse of this photograph to "research and personal study" only Hchc2009 (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Have a look here: http://mp.natlib.govt.nz/detail/?id=58123&l=en
- Usage: You can search, browse, print and download items from this website for research and personal study. You are welcome to reproduce the above image(s) on your blog or another website, but please maintain the integrity of the image (i.e. don't crop, recolour or overprint it), reproduce the image's caption information and link back to here (http://mp.natlib.govt.nz/detail/?id=58123). If you would like to use the above image(s) in a different way (e.g. in a print publication), or use the transcription or translation, permission must be obtained. More information about copyright and usage can be found on the Copyright and Usage page of the NLNZ web site. -- Ulanwp (talk) 22:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly - it is definitely not released under the license given on the file, which runs "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other use is permitted." The museum has restricted the purposes, derivative works are limited and commercial use is not permitted. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
No se ha usado en la página correspondiente Lfrojo (talk) 23:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: user request within 7 days of upload. Green Giant (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - no source and no author information so no way to tell if done by an official White House photographer. Similar images are for sale on Getty Images by photographer Diana Walker and she has been Time magazine White House photographer for over twenty years so shows that commercial photographers were there not just White House staff. If you look at User talk:Akhiljaxxn you will see the uploader has already had a few Michael Jackson related images deleted. 77.99.249.77 00:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of Eton Excelsior RC Rowing Blade.svg and therefore extending the list, wrongly, also poor quality. Adam37 (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Poorer quality duplicate of File:George Watson's College Rowing Blade.svg Not used. Adam37 (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of Pangbourne College Oar.svg Adam37 (talk) 20:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
_rowing_blade.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_rowing_blade.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of St Edward's School Boat Club Rowing Blade.png. Confirmed unused. Adam37 (talk) 20:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
_rowing_blade.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
_rowing_blade.gif){kind=link}
copyrighted, author http://rogallery.com/Colin_Jean/colin-biography.html Threecharlie (talk) 20:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Radley College Boat Club Rowing Blade.png which is correct direction Adam37 (talk) 20:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Ukraine - 2011 monument to Shevchenko in Melitopol Ukraine INeverCry 21:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Я фотографировал, зачем удалять? --DENAMAX (talk) 15:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- @DENAMAX: В Украине (и ряд других стран) новые памятники и фассады оригинальных зданий практически нельзя фотографировать и загружать здесь изображения (если не исторический монумент или что-то в этом роде). --XXN, 23:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Что делать теперь? --DENAMAX (talk) 09:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Also appears on Twitter, but I can only find a thumbnail crop. Is there some way to find the file information page on Twitter from an image? Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Stefan2: Ask and ye shall receive. Google Image Search has nothing for the full image though.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Passport of unknown copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Not-PD-US-URAA}}: Still copyrighted in the U.S. through 2037 because of COM:URAA; ineligible for Commons until 2038 because Commons uses U.S. law. Closeapple (talk) 21:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Move to de.wikipedia.org (with {{Bild-PD-alt}} tag) and possibly Wikilivres (with {{Not-PD-US-URAA|Germany}}) and suppress on Commons until 2038-01-01. Philipp Ernst died in 1942. Copyright in Germany is 70 years p.m.a. 1942+70=2012, so the file is OK on German Wikipedia. But this work was still copyrighted in Germany on 1996-01-01, the date that the URAA took effect. So this work became "protected" by U.S. law in 1996, and the U.S. rule is 95 years p.m.a. 1942+95=2037, so this work will be copyrighted in the U.S. until the end of 2037, unless there is evidence that it was published in the United States within 30 days of being first-published somewhere else. (If it was simultaneously published in the U.S., then it could have expired for not having a copyright registration or a copyright notice.) --Closeapple (talk) 22:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: non-USA work. --Jcb (talk) 01:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Эта работа не может быть собственной работой User:Tttttttdjhgh, так как маленькое изображение значка увеличивала и корректировала я для своего сайта, использована картинка с сайта http://chernobylpeople.ucoz.ua/publ/chernobyl/o_gorode/o_gorode/15-1-0-10 Natis (talk) 22:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
copyvio http://library.unc.edu/davis/banners/ Triplecaña (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I'm not completely sure about this one, but it might be a flickrwash. I can't see the source Flickr page, although it obviously was CC licensed there at least at one time. However there is another, larger version under a different Flickr author at https://www.flickr.com/photos/msabeln/2104270521 and that has a clear copyright claim in the EXIF, and seems to predate upload here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
El archivo es copiado de Internet, anexo la página de donde fue sacado. https://www.facebook.com/LuciaChaviraA/photos/a.216964825005005.58984.216963435005144/1164711963563615/?type=3&theater EddieBurciaga (talk) 22:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The title of the file indicate that this image describe the climate of Congo, but their is nothing for it. The licence speak about the camera and not the origninal author of the map. No interest for commons. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Tagged {{subst:dw-nsd}} because there is no source for the tins. Jcb removed the tag, but without providing a source for the tins, and they are still missing a source, so their copyright status can't be determined. Stefan2 (talk) 17:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep'No source' seems a very strange nomination here. Feel free to fill in 'some supermarket' if you like? The question would rather be: is there a copyright problem now some copyrighted tins are depicted. The text on the tins won't be the problem here. So the question is: does COM:DM apply to the depictured pictures of e.g. the beans, which cover a part of the tins. I think so. Jcb (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Where would you find a use of the picture where the packaging is de minimis? The entire purpose of the image is to show product packaging, and the product packaging can only be de minimis when you use the image for a purpose other than displaying product packaging, and I find it very hard to identify a situation where you would use the picture for a purpose other than showing product packaging. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- The tins are utilitarian objects. See here for our official guidelines about such objects. Jcb (talk) 20:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Utilitarian objects are copyrighted in some countries, and the source country is unknown. See for example [6] where photos of chairs violated copyright. However, the important things are not the cans themselves but the product packaging - see COM:PACKAGING. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- The tins are utilitarian objects. See here for our official guidelines about such objects. Jcb (talk) 20:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Where would you find a use of the picture where the packaging is de minimis? The entire purpose of the image is to show product packaging, and the product packaging can only be de minimis when you use the image for a purpose other than displaying product packaging, and I find it very hard to identify a situation where you would use the picture for a purpose other than showing product packaging. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Besides that it's a small, poor-quality image that isn't used anywhere. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, it seems to be out of scope as well. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, ALSO: file was small, blurry and unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
