Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/01/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_1423.JPG){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_1433.JPG){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_3062.JPG){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_3062-1.jpg){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_3817.jpg){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_3818.jpg){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_4330.JPG){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_4337.JPG){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_4753.JPG){kind=link}
_활동_사진_DSC_4754.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_(crop).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![225 File:Opuscolo scandalistico del Partito Comunista Britannico sul "Cliveden set".JPG](#File:Opuscolo_scandalistico_del_Partito_Comunista_Britannico_sul_"Cliveden_set".JPG){kind=link}
Small size pictures without EXIF data + maps, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 340.jpg
- File:آثار رومانية ،ولاية سطيف 4.jpg
- File:آثار رومانية ،ولاية سطيف.jpg
- File:زهرة اللوتس (من معالم ولاية سطيف).jpg
- File:صورة لمقر ولاية سطيف.jpg
- File:خارطة ولاية سطيف 1.PNG
- File:مسجد عبد الحميد بن باديس سطيف.jpg
- File:شبكة طرقات ولاية سطيف.jpg
- File:القلعة الرومانية بمدينة سطيف.jpg
- File:مئذنة مسجد العتيق سطيف.jpg
- File:برج التجارة ،أحد معالم مدينة سطيف.jpg
- File:حديقة التسلية سطيف.jpg
- File:مسجد بن باديس ، أحد معالم مدينة سطيف.jpg
- File:المسرح القديم سطيف.jpg
- File:زهرة اللوتس، أحد معالم المدينة.jpg
- File:المسجد الجامع العتيق (سطيف).jpg
- File:شوارع مدينة سطيف 9.jpg
- File:شوارع مدينة سطيف 8.jpg
- File:شوارع مدينة سطيف 6.jpg
- File:شوارع مدينة سطيف 5.jpg
- File:شوارع مدينة سطيف 4.jpg
- File:شوارع مدينة سطيف 3.jpg
- File:شوارع مدينة سطيف 2.jpg
- File:شوارع مدينة سطيف 1.jpg
- File:عين السبت - سطيف 9.jpg
- File:عين السبت - سطيف 8.jpg
- File:عين السبت - سطيف 7.jpg
- File:عين السبت - سطيف 6.jpg
- File:عين السبت - سطيف 5.jpg
- File:عين السبت - سطيف 4.jpg
- File:عين السبت - سطيف 1.jpg
- File:قنزت - سطيف 8.jpg
- File:قنزت - سطيف 6.jpg
- File:قنزت - سطيف 5.jpg
- File:قنزت - سطيف 4.jpg
- File:قنزت - سطيف 3.jpg
- File:قنزت - سطيف 2.jpg
- File:قنزت - سطيف 1.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 15.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 14.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 13.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 12.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 10.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 7.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 6.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 5.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 4.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف 3.jpg
- File:الواد البارد سطيف 1.jpg
- File:الواد البارد - سطيف.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 25.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 24.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 23.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 22.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 21.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 20.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 19.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 18.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 17.jpg
- File:صورة من مدية سطيف 16.jpg
- File:صورة من مدية سطيف 15.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 14.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 13.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 11.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 10.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 9.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 8.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 7.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 3.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف 2.jpg
- File:صورة من مدينة سطيف ,الجزائر.jpg
- File:خارطة ولاية سطيف -حسب التقسيم الإدراي.png
- File:خارطة مطار سطيف الدولي 8 ماي 1945 - عين أرنات.JPG
- File:مطار 8 ماي 1945 م الدولي - سطيف - الجزائر.jpg
- File:مطار سطيف - الجزائر.jpg
- File:مطار عين أرنات سطيف.jpg
- File:Setif Ain Arnat Airport.jpg
- File:مطار سطيف 8 ماي 1945 عين أرنات.jpg
- File:ALG19 خارطة ولاية سطيف.jpg
- File:مطار سطيف . الجزائر.JPG
- File:مطار سطيف 8 ماي 1945.JPG
- File:مطار سطيف 8 ماي 1945 الدولي.JPG
- File:Setief-International-Airport.jpg
- File:مطار سطيف الدولي 8 ماي 1945.jpg
- File:مطار سطيف.jpg
- File:مطار سطيف الدولي.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 12:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete. I'd trust this uploader about as far as I could throw him. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mohamed19dz. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as per LX. Yann (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
False source, authorship and licensing claims by serial copyright violator and sockpuppeteer. If we are to keep any of these, we need truthful file descriptions with valid licenses or PD rationales.
- File:سطيف القديمة 10.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 9.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 8.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 7.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 6.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 5.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 4.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 3.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 2.jpg
- File:سطيف القديمة 1.jpg
- File:Setif International Airport -19 ALG.jpg
- File:QSFمطار سطيف الدولي.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marko breda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of scope.
Yann (talk) 15:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:MARKO BREDA a.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marko breda; File:MARKO BREDA 7.jpg is a sideways duplicate of this file, and User:Lakonew, User:Marko breda and User:Markobredabr are obvious sockpuppets. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
immagine coperta da copyright Bart ryker (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DominicVera10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Shawn-fonteno 1420279545.jpeg
- File:YoungMaylay-w downtown-LA-shot.jpg
- File:Ryan-newman-2015.jpg
- File:Hutch-7.jpg
- File:Calum-worthy.jpg
- File:RainiRodriguez.jpg
- File:JonahBoboBand.jpg
- File:AdamZolotin.jpg
- File:Tomko2012.jpg
- File:DominicVeraTeflon.jpg
Didym (talk) 01:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Add
- File:NedLuke2013.jpg
- File:Ottawa-vanessa-morgan-mtv-finding-carter.jpg
Comment: this image has the GTAV logo on it. As far as I can remember images with logo have been deleted before, because the Logo couldn't be {{PD-Textlogo}}. --Wiki13 talk 09:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Given the previous block, warnings, history of copyvio images, and current indef of DominicVera10 (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log) for latest rash of copyvio images, we must presume that anything uploaded is a copyright violation per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Unlicensed pics
[edit]
None of these images provide credible claims of being own work, only seem to have "love" and "<3" for descriptions. I seriously doubt they're properly licensed. SNUGGUMS (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Quick web search shows these files and all others by the same uploader are copied from various online sources. Ed (Edgar181) 21:38, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio - Uploader states it is from the film Tornament Arjayay (talk) 09:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Clearly not fair use. Ari (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
If a design work is awarded bby the type directors club one should assume, that it is above the threshold of originality. Martin K. (talk) 15:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Krd 11:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Uncertain copyright, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete minecraft's graphics derivative work. --Vituzzu (talk) 14:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 15:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TomWenk as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Jan Löffler and I are still updating his Wikipedia-Article. We would like to delete this old picture cause of the aging Krd 17:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- This is no valid reason for deleting. It is the nature of things that people tend to getting older. Following this abstruse logic we would have to delete all photos of people after 2-3 years. --Stepro (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sehr lustige Löschbegründung. 1. April ist aber noch ein bischen hin. Löschen wir doch gleich Einsteins Bild, der sieht heute auch nicht mehr so aus. --ST ○ 20:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Raymond 21:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 22:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
No exif info, likely a copyvio of a promotional shot Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of a non-free image [1]. De728631 (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
No exif info, likely a copyvio of a promotional shot Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotional images used widely across the internet, e.g. here. De728631 (talk) 16:54, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
http://140.130.34.14/ Stang 13:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
no permission, see exif data Krd 17:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
-- Tom (Krd), 09:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Ich verstehe dein Anliegen und habe die Beschreibungen auf Wiki-Commons bezüglich der Namensgebung/Lizensgebung gelesen. Dieses Bild habe ich von Jan Löffler mit seiner Kamera gemacht. In der Kamera waren jedoch seine exif-Daten hinterlegt. Kann ich irrtümlich hinterlegtes, natürlich auch mit der Erlaubnis von ihm, noch richtig stellen?
In der Tat handelte es beim Fotografieren um meine eigene Kamera. Lediglich den Auslöser habe ich nicht selbst gedrückt, sondern Herr Wenk. Wie kann man das Problem mit der Diskrepanz zwischen exif-Datei und Autorenangabe korregieren? Selbstverständlich stelle ich auch von meiner Seite die Rechte am Bild unter die Creative-Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland. Namensnennung des Autors Tom Wenk am Bild. Beste Grüße Jan Löffler -- Jan (Krd) 22:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Bitte senden Sie für das Bild eine Freigabe per E-Mail, wie in Commons:OTRS/de beschrieben ist. --Krd 08:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Vielen herzlichen Dank, wird erledigt! Schönes Wochenende :) Jan (Krd) 10:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: for now, per ongoing ticket:2016011010007086 - file will be deleted after 30 days if OTRS is not completed Jcb (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivate work of map with copyright from mapa.buenosaires.gob.ar 186.135.131.219 19:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This map was made by me. As it is stated, the mapa.buenosaires.gob.ar I used to make this "Mapa Gardeliano", is licenced by the government of Buenos Aires City with a Creative Commons Atribución 2.5 Argentina licence. See Propiedad Intelectual:
Las marcas, avisos, nombres comerciales, frases de propaganda, dibujos, diseños, logotipos, textos, etc. que aparecen en el Sitio Web son propiedad del GCBA, excepto cuando se aclare. El GCBA licencia todos sus contenidos bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 2.5 Argentina, cuyo texto legal puede encontrarse en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/legalcode.
Keep: And also, these maps are based on OpenStreetMap, as you can see at the bottom of the page. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep: This deletion request is part of a campaign of harassment. See 186.135.128.72 contributions.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Nonsense DR Natuur12 (talk) 00:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
For the quality: bad author from flickr. Please use flickrreview and correct the tag. 186.135.128.72 22:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Done--Roblespepe (talk) 02:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep: This deletion request is part of a campaign of harassment. See 186.135.128.72 contributions.
- What campaign? Screencapture of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SKFo-kjWmM video with copyright. I am sorry. --186.135.141.23 03:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Christian Ferrer Natuur12 (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Bad authoe from flickr: no has EXIF. Please, use flickrreview. 186.135.128.72 22:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep: This deletion request is part of a campaign of harassment. See 186.135.128.72 contributions.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- I am sorry Rosy and Betito, thats a copyright violation from red bull page: http://image2.redbull.com/rbcom/010/2015-09-28/1331750494715_25/0010/1/320/213/25/carlos-sainz-dakar-rally.jpg, and billion of pages: http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-news/motoring-issues/, example
Deleted: Sorry but this is a blatant copyright violation. Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I see no educational in this, out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
The picture could be deleted (no problem) if it does not fit the project's requirements Vadim A. Volochaev, ResearcherID: N-3239-2014 (Chemistry Department, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia) (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
likely from http://www.ogol.com.br/foto.php?id=109859 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.84.46.227 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: It has expired the time of adding essential source information Yann (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Self nomination, low quality file, now replaced by File:2009 Holden Captiva (CG MY10) LX wagon (2015-05-29) 01.jpg. OSX (talk • contributions) 00:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
_LX_wagon_(2015-05-29)_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted / Uploader reqested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_1423.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_1423.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_1433.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_1433.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_3062.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_3062.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_3062-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_3062-1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_3817.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_3817.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_3818.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_3818.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_4330.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_4330.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_4337.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_4337.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_4753.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_4753.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_4754.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%ED%99%9C%EB%8F%99_%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84_DSC_4754.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
creators will 최광모 (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader reqeusted and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted /Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted /Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
looks to me pretty much out of scope. JuTa 08:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted /Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Sturm (talk) 08:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted /Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted /Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image of a non-notable person. Also not used as image for an userpage. Therefor out of project scope. Wiki13 talk 09:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted /Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ranabiswas.mechju (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Rana 108.jpg
- File:Rana 107.jpg
- File:Rana 106.jpg
- File:Rana 104.jpg
- File:Rana 105.jpg
- File:Rana A.JPG
Gunnex (talk) 10:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
personal rights vio. Nolispanmo 11:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted /Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
unused userpage image. JuTa 13:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, pers. rights, del. on DE Nolispanmo 14:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danny Mcman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of them are loq quality images of a non-notable person. Some are also plainly photoshopped trying to be funny. They have no educational value, are not licensed right and not even one of them is used as userpage image. Therefor out of project scope.
- File:Sixigter.jpg
- File:Actuer.jpg
- File:Dinapen.jpg
- File:Agradable.jpg
- File:Reporteroctv.jpg
- File:Poprock.jpg
- File:My friend.jpg
- File:Forever.jpg
- File:Ricurty.jpg
- File:Care789.jpg
- File:Next to me.jpg
- File:Then.jpg
- File:Let it go.jpg
- File:Let her go.jpg
- File:Picturte21.jpg
Wiki13 talk 14:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ishuidewari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality images about non-notable people. Out of project scope
- File:Ishu at Almora Hills.jpg
- File:Ishu going for Awards.jpg
- File:Ishu at C.P., New Delhi.JPG
- File:Ishu at palika Market.JPG
- File:Ramleela.jpg
- File:Ishu and Mom.jpg
- File:Edited PhotoGrid 1450774303504.jpg
- File:PhotoGrid 1451210859982.jpg
Wiki13 talk 14:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:38, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation 46.218.9.198 13:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 18:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Being featured for a branded search on Google. This property has been rebranded and is not the proper photo for Stuytown. 108.21.60.172 17:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. What Google does is not our problem. And this is clearly titled as Peter Cooper Village, not Stuyvesant Town. Anyway, nothing of the sort is a reason to delete a photo from Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - As the photographer, I know where I was located when I took it, and which of the two projects I was photographing. This is Peter Cooper Village
as it was called at the time(I am not aware of any rebranding, but concede it could be possible) as anyone familiar with the area can tell. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell from looking around a bit, the "rebranding" of StuyTown and PCV does not involve changing the names of the projects, just an attempt to up-class them. I don't see where that has anything to do with my photo, or any other photo of the projects, for that matter. I honestly don;t understand the point of the nominator, but suggest they withdraw their nomination. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, edits connected with this deletion request are the only edits made on Commons by this IP. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. - If the filename were mistaken or misleading, that would not be grounds for deletion. Jim.henderson (talk) 12:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
The property has been renovated and rebranded since this photo has been taken. It does not profile the apartments to their current updared status. 100.33.236.18 23:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - This is a frivolous request, considering that the previous deletion request has not yet been closed, and that the "rebranding" and renovating does not involve any physical alteration of the exteriors of the buildings -- and even if it did, the photo would still accurately reflect the look of the buildings at the time it was taken. Note that neither of these two IPs have made any edits to Commons except for these two deletion requests. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Акваджипер (talk · contribs)
[edit]False own work - reproductions of paintings/graphics of artist V. Savosin who died October 2, 2014, thus the uploader cannot be an author and not proven to be his heir. The only file that can actually be real own work is the photo of the artist file:ВИ.jpg (thus currently not listed fro deletion) - however even this one has at least false date of creation in description (has to be before the death of the person in 2014)
Tatewaki (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
No proof of permission, if the uploader is the creator then they need to send proof of permission to OTRS Mlpearc (open channel) 05:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Derivate work of deleted image (rosenkrantz) 186.135.131.219 05:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
No license on the source page. --ghouston (talk) 05:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: yes there is a license : © Copyright 2014 Antenna Free TV Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damian Vo (talk • contribs) 2016-01-08T05:46:18 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Modern work, no FOP for 3D artwork in the USA. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Modern work, no FOP for 3D artwork in the USA. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Why
[edit]
Not sure why this was flagged for deletion. It is a photo I took of a Jaguar statue in front of the stadium.
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Clearly above threshold of originality for PD-textlogo. Tgr (talk) 04:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Heraldic work that has other appropriate licensing. Fry1989 eh? 19:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
This is a renomination; I believe the admin closing the original debate made an erroneous decision. The image quite plainly goes beyond the threshold of originality, and the only argument in favor of keeping it ("Heraldic work that has other appropriate licensing") is demonstrably false: there is no license whatsoever attached to the file. I trust that the second time around the correct decision (deletion) will be reached. Malatinszky (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Fry1989: @Tgr: care to comment? The file was kept because the deletion rational was to thin. Natuur12 (talk) 00:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Natuur12 has pointed out an inaccuracy in my justification of the deletion request: there is, in fact a license attached to the file: a GFDL license based on the claim that the image is Madboy74-s own work. This license is so obviously flawed that I didn't even think it was necessary to address it, but for the sake of completeness, here it goes:
- I seriously doubt that the logo is Madboy74's own work. Let me hasten to clarify: I don't doubt that Madboy74 created the SVG copy of the logo himself, but I am certain that he did not create the original logo image. This is the logo of KDNP, an established Hungarian party (a member of the current governing coalition in Budapest). The party itself has been in existence since 1945 (with obvious interruptions due to Communist rule), and has used this logo at least since 1990.(See their logo on two election posters from 1990 on this page.) Making an SVG copy of that image makes it no more Madboy74's "own work" than making a photocopy of the Mona Lisa would make the artwork my own. (That's not just common sense, that's the law, specifically paragraph 1, section 3 of the Hungarian Copyright Act of 1999).
- There are two conflicting copyright claims attached to the image. One states that the image is in the public domain because it's not sufficiently original, the second says that the copyright belongs to Madboy74, who is placing it under a GFDL license. Well, which is it? If its public domain then what gives Madboy74 the right to place it under GFDL? If it's his intellectual property then how can it be PD?
My contention is that it's neither: the work, in fact, is sufficiently original that it merits copyright protection, and the copyright belongs not to Madboy74 but probably to KDNP itself. The GFD License is not valid because it is not Madboy74's to give; his only claim to the intellectual property is that he created a copy of it. --Malatinszky (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- I still disagree with the nomination. Fry1989 eh? 04:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure what comment is expected. The image is a logo whose hosting on Commons is justified with "image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text" which is rather obviously not true. About half of the images uploaded by Madboy74 have an invalid random license template (which is a shame because he does a beautiful job). --Tgr (talk) 08:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: No licence. PD-Textlogo does not apply as the logo does not merely consist "of simple geometric shapes or text." --RJFF (talk) 14:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not PD-textlogo PierreSelim (talk) 06:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
COM:FOP#India doesn't include 2D art. This is a photograph of a cutout, which is to be considered 2D and not 3D. Same applies with File:Photo from 6th Thekkady Flower show in Kumily - April 2012 2813.JPG. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- This 2D art was there for a specific event and is not permanent. This might have been moved from there. I am not so sure about the licensing complexities. if this supposed to be not there in commons, you may please go ahead and delete it. Rameshng (talk) 04:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: In all case, FoP in India apply only for work permanently in public place, This is not a permanent display here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio: middle picture is from Getty Images. Nagle (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- See Huffington Post article using picture.[2]
- Getty Images page: [3] --Nagle (talk) 07:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Image name indicates it was saved from tumblr - no evidence of permission Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This file is not the uploader's own work but the non-free television screenshot.--Y.haruo (talk) 08:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Image name indicates it was saved from tumblr - no evidence of permission Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This file is not the uploader's own work but the non-free television screenshot.--Y.haruo (talk) 08:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
not useful Henxter (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused and merely promotional for ClearCaps.com. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:ClearCaps.com Unbraceyourself banner 2.png
- File:ClearCaps.com logo.png
- File:ClearCaps.com Unbraceyourself banner 5.png
- File:ClearCaps.com Unbraceyourself banner 3.png
- File:ClearCaps.com Unbraceyourself banner 4.png
- File:ClearCaps.com Unbraceyourself banner 6.png
- File:ClearCaps.com Unbraceyourself banner 8.png
- File:ClearCaps.com Unbraceyourself banner 7.png
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, seems to be a video screenshot. Gunnex (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soplisbichi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://media.farsnews.com/media/Uploaded/Files/Images/1393/11/07/13931107000012_PhotoL.jpg.
- File:@sopelgram.jpg
- File:GdiiGermany.jpg
- File:EftetaheGDII.JPG
- File:پژوهشکده ی لیزر و پلاسما دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.jpg
- File:Parlemansopeli.jpg
- File:Parlemansopel.jpg
- File:Pistsopeli.jpg
- File:Sopelpist2.jpg
- File:Sopelpist1.jpg
- File:Saravi.jpg
- File:Pitniani2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably not free and leeched from the web. PierreSelim (talk) 06:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
out of scope -private picture Narayan (talk) 21:34, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A non-notable wedding using Commons as an album. Not valid within the scope Richard Avery (talk) 16:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small, no EXIF, already in the internet since April 2013 http://www.eldetallista.cl/portal/econom_a/tir_a_comuna_m_s_austral_de_la_provincia_de_arauco_muestra_poder_del_comercio_establecido_d C messier (talk) 12:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- also file:MaitePerroni.jpg
On 18th of November, Commons:Deletion requests/File:MaitePerroni2015.jpg was closed as deleted. On the same day a new Flickr account was created and only 2 files so far were uploaded, they were on the same day uploaded into Commons. I suspect Flickrwashing. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Uploader and author are different, and I suspect copyright violation. OTRS-permission from Darwin is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Depicted person was born in 1928, so the photo is older than 50 years. The uploader was warned for copyright violations and this is his/her last remaining contribution, so own work is in doubt and I suspect copyright violation. (But depicted person is notable.) Taivo (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed.
JuTa 12:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 12:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed.# JuTa 12:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unclear source/author of used picture A.Savin 12:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Looks like someone played around with MS paint. Imho, this is neither "funny" nor "art" nor compatible with COM:SCOPE. El Grafo (talk) 12:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Probably stolen from http://vk.com/club52999195?z=photo-52999195_392107776%2Fwall-52999195_1045 and removed "Kirill Oreshkin" copyright watermark, no evidence that the uploader is the author A.Savin 12:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Claimed as public domain in India, with an unclear rationale. The painting is not an "anonymous work" (it's clearly signed in the bottom right corner) and there is no suggestion that the artist is deceased. McGeddon (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Unclear Indian public domain claim - artwork is not anonymous (it is signed), no evidence that the original artist is now dead. McGeddon (talk) 13:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- ok . I agree with you.--Baddu676 (talk) 13:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lysnovakor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed.
JuTa 13:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
looks to me pretty much like out of scope. JuTa 13:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Misleadingly photoshopped image - this cellphone from 1999 presumably did not have a high resolution video feed (cf. File:Video Call.jpg, a phone from 2007 with a much lower quality picture) with no visible interface. McGeddon (talk) 14:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I believe the large Sol Le Witt wall drawing makes this image non-free. The copyright for it should still be held by the artist's estate as it has not been 70 years since he died. This is in a museum settign though, so I am not sure of the rules are different here. Found5dollar (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- All that actually needs to happen is for a black rectangle to be drawn over the artwork, right? If that's the case, can somebody please just do that instead of deleting the entire image? It takes time and effort to physically travel to places and create these images. Struthious Bandersnatch 12:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: An image with the two artworks blanked would be out of scope -- not useful for any educational purpose. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eisenbahn%s (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- File:Logo Hochschule Mannheim.png should be in de.wikipedia and not in wikimedia commons. Sorry for my mistake. This file can be deleted immediately.
- File:RCD Symbol K.png the originally is in de.wikipedia and was copied to wikimedia commons by other user.
- --Eisenbahn%s (talk) 18:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
no license Mehlauge (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Photographer is not uploader . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Likely comes from team photo, no indication that uploader owns copyright Ytoyoda (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Studentstv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like .https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-_gBTLYloFjA/Vf0V7sHddbI/AAAAAAAAAKw/-CvImm6An6g/w506-h750/11160587_10203751393338728_6008223342278008497_n.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paramedic2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Difficult to seen any educative or illustrative value in this image that might qualify it for inclusion in the commons Richard Avery (talk) 15:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not "own work" Same image (with highest resolution) can be found here: http://federation-k9.ru/punkty-menyu-i-saita/o-federacii/predsedatel-k-9.html Cap1000 (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikiphotosdpt1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed
JuTa 16:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Description says "photo by Ray Yap" but the uploader, Sergej, is the subject of the photo and claims "own work". Unclear whether the actual copyright holder has agreed to the license. BethNaught (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sergej krivoruchko.jpeg BethNaught (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahdiroohi110 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these small (and variably) sized, low quality images with varying whitebalance, no camera metadata and file names in three formats are own work of uploader. Most likely internet culls and COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:N00002907-r-b-008.jpg
- File:Small 0DSC01444.JPG
- File:N00003366-b.jpg
- File:شهید شجیعی در جبهه.jpg
- File:شهید شجیعی.jpg
- File:زکزاکی و فرزندان شهیدش.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
No FOP in France. Thesupermat (talk) 16:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahultapariavj (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs and HOAX material. Per https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rahul-taparia/419923134876500, Rahul Taparia's page, where one of these three images is in the profile picture at the top. None of these look to be own work of uploader. The "Rahul Quiz" mentioned is also found http://www.androidmusic.net/download/y-Z7w_XgLL0pU/rahul-taparia-rahul-quiz.html and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7w_XgLL0pU . They seem to be some form of fan art, derivative of the music with words and self-promotional links embedded. I don't see any indication of user's own work here, I see three Facebook sized images, of which one is in active use at the top of Mr. Taparia's Facebook page.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Obviously from same photo shoot as https://www.flickr.com/photos/138900684@N04/23841667731/in/dateposted-public/, a copy of which was previously uploaded and subsequently deleted. No confidence in own work of this uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed und likely out of scope. JuTa 17:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mishellvelastegui (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work in this pile of drawings, memes, and copies from the internet.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed JuTa 17:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Very low resolution, many better analogs, no educational value. Stas (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
quality not sufficient for encyclopedic use Louperivois Ψ @ 21:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, last remaining file, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. 186.135.128.72 22:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- The image illustrates an article at the Spanish Wikipedia El anillo del Capitán Beto.--Roblespepe (talk) 02:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: This deletion request is part of a campaign of harassment.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- A draw by the uploader. Dont has use in Wikipedia. I am sorry. --186.135.141.23 03:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal art has no place on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Is this a hoax? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Nope. --H2WatAll (talk) 19:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be blank. V low quality file Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 16:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in France and I'm afraid the mosaics still has copyright A.Savin 22:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The paintings has copyright. 186.135.128.72 23:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Not FoP in Argentina for 3 D scultures 186.135.128.72 23:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The location is Chile, not Argentina. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The location is Chile, not Argentina. --Roblespepe (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The location is Chile, not Argentina.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 21:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The photograph is covered by an OTRS e-mail and the sculpture by Chilean FOP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This is not a picture created by NASA, this is an image hosted on a NASA website, which does not mean it is a public domain image. The fact that not all images on the NASA website are free has already been noted by others and the template already has this warning. Sir Anon (talk) 23:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This is not a picture created by NASA, this is an image hosted on a NASA website, which does not mean it is a public domain image. The fact that not all images on the NASA website are free has already been noted by others and the template already has this warning. Sir Anon (talk) 23:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This is not a picture created by NASA, this is an image hosted on a NASA website, which does not mean it is a public domain image. The fact that not all images on the NASA website are free has already been noted by others and the template already has this warning. Sir Anon (talk) 23:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This is not a picture created by NASA, this is an image hosted on a NASA website, which does not mean it is a public domain image. The fact that not all images on the NASA website are free has already been noted by others and the template already has this warning. Sir Anon (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This is not a picture created by NASA, this is an image hosted on a NASA website, which does not mean it is a public domain image. The fact that not all images on the NASA website are free has already been noted by others and the template already has this warning. Sir Anon (talk) 23:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This is not a picture created by NASA, this is an image hosted on a NASA website, which does not mean it is a public domain image. The fact that not all images on the NASA website are free has already been noted by others and the template already has this warning. Sir Anon (talk) 23:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation GoEThe (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
1939 photos are not own work. Anonymous Polish photos from 1939 are not protected by copyright, but is the photo anonymous? Taivo (talk) 11:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, recent bank note. Are the banknotes of Peru freely licensed, like the USA ones? C messier (talk) 12:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: see Commons:Currency#Peru . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Peru#Currency Regasterios (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Don't know what happened between the previous close and this one but it clearly says that Peru's currency cannot be uploaded here. --Majora (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright notice is visible at lower left: "Copyright 1953 Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corporation". A copy of the poster seen here can be enlarged to show the detail. — WFinch (talk) 05:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mgomezinostroza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
_(crop).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(crop).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damian Vo (talk • contribs) 2016-01-08T05:51:31 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
_(crop).jpg){kind=link}
File:Ahmed Benabdenbi decoré du wisâm al-Kafâ’a al-fikriyya (médaille du Mérite intellectuel).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely own work of uploader: main subject has deceased in 1972. Likely taken in the 1960's. Not in public domain, either (Morocc: 70 years after death of the real author, here unidentified) Henxter (talk) 10:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely own work of uploader: subject has deceased in 1972. Likely taken in the 1950's or 1960's. Not in public domain, either (Morocco: 70 years after death of the real author, here unidentified) Henxter (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Buildings in Piraeus
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Greece. All of these infringe on the various architect's copyright and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the architects.
- File:Attica 06-13 Piraeus 03 Megaron Navtikou.jpg
- File:Bilding in Piraeus.JPG
- File:Clock building in Piraeus port.jpg
- File:Frenel Light.JPG
- File:Hospital Panagia Odigitria.jpg
- File:Piraeus 02.JPG
- File:Piraeus 03.JPG
- File:Piraeus 04.JPG
- File:Piraeus 23.JPG
- File:Piraeus 27.JPG
- File:Piraeus 29.JPG
- File:Piraeus 30.JPG
- File:Piraeus 34.JPG
- File:Piraeus 36.JPG
- File:Piraeus 38.JPG
- File:Piraeus 39.JPG
- File:Piraeus 40.JPG
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- File:Attica 06-13 Piraeus 03 Megaron Navtikou.jpg => Keep, built in 1861. --A.Savin 12:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- File:Frenel Light.JPG Keep, It's just the lighting mechanism from a lighthouse, not a sculpture or building - Badseed talk 01:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Yup, apart from the above exceptions the others should go (including my File:Clock building in Piraeus port.jpg). We could perhaps keep File:Piraeus 02.JPG, File:Piraeus 23.JPG, File:Piraeus 27.JPG, the building is just a concrete box with a wooden panel, but then again I wonder if it's within scope - Badseed talk 01:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: kept the images mentioned in the discussion; deleted the others Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Drawings by Roman Zakharii
[edit]First, we have no proof that the uploader is actually the artist. That can easily be fixed with OTRS, so it is not a major reason for this DR.
Second, this is personal art, by a non-notable artist. Our policy is that such work is out of scope.
Third, the description at Category:Drawings by Roman Zakharii, which offers to sell the originals of these drawings and to create custom art for pay is a violation of commons policy which prohibits using Commons to advertise the sale of goods or services..
- File:Archangel Michael 0.jpg
- File:Archangel Michael 1.jpg
- File:Archangel.jpg
- File:Artwork 1.JPG
- File:Cormorant 1.jpg
- File:Cormorant 2.png
- File:Cossack.jpg
- File:Jesus 1.JPG
- File:Jesus Christ Saviour.JPG
- File:Mary - spring of the New covenant.jpg
- File:Penguin - Pingvin.jpg
- File:Puffin - Lundi.jpg
- File:Puffin bird.jpg
- File:Rabbi Elezar Rokeach of Brody and Amsterdam.png
- File:Rabbi Elezar Rokeach.JPG
- File:Rabbi Nachman of Uman.jpg
- File:Sea scorpion or bull head.jpg
- File:Seal drawing.jpg
- File:Some woman.jpg
- File:Ukrainian.jpg
- File:Woman portrait.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, I aldo deleted the category. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: No educational purpose: Not used. Hystrix (talk) 15:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work, photo of poster. Photo is own work, poster isn't. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Logo probably under copyright 46.218.9.198 08:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Logo is below the threshold of originality, therefore is applicable for {{PD-textlogo}}. Also in use in frwiki. So the logo is in the public domain. --★ Poké95 10:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The "o" reminds the planet earth with the oceans, thus this is a concept, a design, thus it is enough original and artistic to be an artwork IMO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: As above. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sobradinho (Bahia) regarding official symbols
[edit]Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Sobradinho (Bahia) emancipated in 1989 (see also http://www.sobradinho.ba.gov.br/?sessao=informacao&cod_informacao=2), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government (mostly some years after official federal constitution, see also this extreme case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols in 2014: 81 years after emancipation...).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 09:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, low resolution, vector version available, does not match specification (ГОСТ 10807-78 and ГОСТ Р 52290-2004) Nikolaev_ec06ffa5 (talk) 12:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, low resolution, vector version available, does not match specification (ГОСТ 10807-78 and ГОСТ Р 52290-2004) Nikolaev_ec06ffa5 (talk) 12:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
You can not use PD-old-70 for files of anonymous photographer published in 1932 Jarekt (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Should not use {{PD-textlogo}}: low TOO in China. Wcam (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. The underlying map is likely a copyright violation. JuTa 15:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
three different versions of this picture, is there any importance in the stamp or writing? Rettinghaus (talk) 15:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
copyvio from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Howitzer_shelling_of_Sirte.jpg. Rafy (talk) 12:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image has been updated and copyright violation picture has been removed.--NovusLux (talk) 03:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Proper author attribution is missing, the self-part from the license tag has to be removed as plunging several images together does not create new copyright. --Denniss (talk) 04:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- That has been rectified. -Kudzu1 (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- STRONG KEEP OK this is sorted... Let's remove the tag Mike Young (talk) 15:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The image in question has been taken out of the picture. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Looks legit now. First image from history have to be removed though.--Rafy (talk) 20:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:45, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Delete Information page on this image indicates the top left photo as coming from File:Libya Brega rebel fighters 10 March 2011 - VOA Ittner.jpg. Subsequently, that photo has been deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Libya Brega rebel fighters 10 March 2011 - VOA Ittner.jpg, which determined the image is a copyright violation of an Associated Press photo. Therefore this montage, while mostly free, is not entirely free and needs to be deleted. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: According to the aforementioned arguments (copyright infringement), I cast a vote to delete the file. --GeoTrinity (talk) 21:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
bad quality, no exif, unlikely own work Krd 17:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- +1 Seems to be a screenshot from a video. --Slökmann (talk) 02:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: According to the aforementioned arguments (low quality), I cast a vote to delete the file. --GeoTrinity (talk) 21:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that any of these are own work of uploader... highly variable sizes, and content, only 2 have camera meta data, no similarity of style, color, or white balance, probable COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Павел Прокудин.jpg
- File:Туранская у Президента ПМР.jpg
- File:Генерал-губернаторский дворец в г. Омске.jpg
- File:Знак выпускника ОмКК.jpg
- File:И. Трусова.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Inconsistent or missing EXIF data (7 DSLR), user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Slunskayana.jpg
- File:Lubiaghin.jpg
- File:Зварыч.jpg
- File:Молоканова И.jpg
- File:ПрокудинПН.jpg
- File:IgnatievВВ.jpg
- File:Kirsta.jpg
- File:Sokirka.jpg
- File:Zibin.jpg
- File:Zvarich.jpg
- File:Molokanova.jpg
- File:ГОМЕНЮК.jpg
- File:Романюк.jpg
- File:Гужев П..jpg
- File:Слинченко А.jpg
- File:Парнас премьер.jpg
- File:Туранская делом подтверждает.jpg
Yann (talk) 00:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
File is derivated from this image that appeared long before the user uploaded the file. And can be found in many websites that have copyrights restrictions (here an example). Fringio—α†Ω 19:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Any celebrity portraits should be given high scrutiny, and any found on the web are most likely not under free copyright. Animalparty (talk) 04:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Agree! Delete: According to the aforementioned arguments (duplicate), I cast a vote to delete the file. --GeoTrinity (talk) 21:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.google.de/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiu9xSltWavrBkSQwaA6Ngv3sN9mn52fLyWHzYuUFFUPYwJxHI8hZgIvTsDw8yJtWm0fIv4LbkpHb72bUvsp7nm1lBnNpvZQCrzkT3zdrjOS3_1OznII2YLnmpLWk_1aaaNUE-rt-hQb7EyzOtJSQcdAFmkqBVTm4ibDhqJCojKr1EkkIuC4Dk-RL26wtGKt1Q4ecDefy6bW9PxF7qjOGLW7N52ticp-WJoQDt2SST1PAFrwlKvCm41hxP5eEfhsJ5p1xRIb_1mw_1CG7w14RO7fUddXic340PVSGiai5Ico0BH8_1YoXfAj_1tpqQNmm2Rsf0faWpqT2zNwID2mOVPypgK5Q1cGlI7vuk-kOfR1ThnGftwzqH2dpezsVi2v82E1Id2VSWATKJXKJvV40_1ztTzM8JouEDUx4Znuv2-uREedAV4ttQG-yY8U7WQNzDyKsHl_1WDIH5WNHiFJf450j9gbHcSyABHKpB71eU40FNKY8PoNMuZ-HVMHFSt3cbeipkioD1wXDEsyWeED88CDq6-Iu72t5pE_1wys08esTGvvxwqd_1Cpf8aSvClDPWaPkAcVcASKggPzWMiEO1yh6weVQQx21beEs9Tb2BT7kI329RCkt378EBJTbFz_1p3k-vDSVz3nuwuekBymeloAE3trEOMKK0w0XVDpx3grzXoMDKv0RwuETA6p9EJa_14zsyrfKQG71LdEBodPnikEUGq808GFb2AvEiX2jEY2G2xRd1OZw0Bv8eWVCOhsXFX4nZwFrbcql_1iBD06Uy33aLGarxwpgRV7hylMKCcqgPvogf_1YSFjLzCuVox_1M2fJDZ4rbRd9aZLBGiChWdo6KEx0hWOr3q6Nu046ZrQx9LF6mzkg1qfZj9wNO9wo5gYl0RK_18TIphBw8DHi5zluuBXDAAcrACBLXf-FUnNnEuucCcSKEc-6976g6hu8wH4_1JyoSNIZ5ZI4ZCEfK5Yc5QgKjr-7Baa8fwtf1N6ndYVIG7jJG8szgCpLLHFIJYTH0KWl2Kh4oqGrMmn0zYqhwLjP5y1YnQMWICD5JlIglsKEIecTahmnDfa46ZuJd9HCD8lHwpurzhB5vyZNmnTfZuJ4POaD6p_1L-fzyfU_1YHymIq7vsM7dD9Jp083fHdV9YNJyQwPMmfliomyz5t7HUe4xXp8yZGlbKGHCxpZ9v0zt57APeBpmJXkZ5rSvjk2hJEqAg-Ph67HMO7nNqQGm5ojwBOkKQv9qIF3RcZsCHo1tRz2WGGw2eQeIf9Eg6DFPQsmAn4IGqZ8cDUoZYRvM1q_15b7MoihUz2Nt8cr1mRNljU0VdhmU7YaUM_1pHOfx9EkT11MHJFaTfM8yhYyrmbgPizyhWl6QQ5HPiCm3d5cCqhaoo0wOTlRAv1gWGddntp2VHyuBZN0d2CSQ5qopJZ1tW4vKcL4bqCyinIcqxXJH9NrRcBaJlMCnyW6aENNpV2C4PvmuP3ajrzrvUcSrfnAiDbn3TbnpwG_1ziZ4wZf98y5TaRa9eJQW2-iV1eXzZjsbZYcRxFKkWmlrSY1rD7hLW592H0EM5ECaOrymySxpISZHZVk61GqjuaM9K0W8MxI&hl=de 92.75.78.136 22:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't really know. The same photo, but larger section: [4]. In this case commons can't be the source. The same photo, but smaller size. [5]. Same photo used as basic: [6], [7], but maybe commons is the source in this cases?
![[4]](http://www.bilgibilgiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/ALTAY-milli-ana-muharebe-tanki-ozellikleri-1.jpg){kind=link}
Take also a look at File:Tulpar-ifv-TRDefence.jpg from the same user--Avron (talk) 20:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. In addition, Careesma is unknown to en.wiki and unused logos of non-notable companies are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Image apparently not PD. {{PD-USGov}} tag is incorrect because the source web site explicitly credits the photo to the Puerto Rico State Historic Preservation Office, not a federal agency. No other information is presented to assess other license possibilities. — Ipoellet (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: State historic preservation office is a federal agency "(...)created by the United States federal government in 1966...", see [8] categorized in [9] . Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 15:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 15:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HijoDeBarrioObrero (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence of user's own work on these images of football/soccer players. Two of the three are on same background as this film showing they're likely screen caps from similar film clips. None have any camera metadata, all small sizes and single subject.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Ellin. I saw your message and I just want to tell that all the photos are from my owm work and I just want to help the Wiki to keep growing, don't want to infringe any copyright. Please don't eliminate them, I had a hard time uploading to the network. Greetings. Hope you can help me with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HijoDeBarrioObrero (talk • contribs)
- None of these images have metadata, they're on the same background as this film, another upload from same series was found and speedied. Please explain how television images are your own work? Also please explain why your photos uploaded here are so small? I have had to protect the images since the uploader removed the deletion nomination tags, and then wiped this entire deletion nomination which was restored by another. Please do not wipe out tags or discussions until closed. User has seven previously deleted images from these same series, see File:Cardozo.png, File:Roque.png, File:Óscar Romero.jpg, File:Fidencio Oviedo.jpg, File:Sasá.jpg, File:Santiago Salcedo.png and File:Fredy Bareiro.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
What do you mean with "television images"? They have been taken with the camera of Samsung Galaxy, and what do you mean they’re small? In some cases I had to crop images because other people were in it, and they’re good, for example, this here does not have that metadata thing or whatever. And also is smaller than my images. And look at this video, you see how people are interviewing the player with cell phones? Well, sometimes we take pictures of them once the interview is over or before it stars. So why are you still nominating my pictures for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HijoDeBarrioObrero (talk • contribs)
- Adding File:Jonathan Valiente.jpg, another image with the telltale flatness/artifact of a photograph of a 2D screen. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
It WAS CROPPED FROM IT’S ORGINAL SIDE. In what language do you want me to explain you? In spanish? Because I’ve already explained over and over again and you still bother with this. And just for the record, that picture of Valiente was cropped because other people WERE IN IT, because I can’t upload a picture of a player if someone else is in, right? Please stop, you have no more arguments to try to delete my images.
Deleted: per nomination: I found this copyvio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD0yo9PEEEo (Rodrigo Rojas) and deleted the others as precaution. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HijoDeBarrioObrero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Poorly sourced, low-ish quality, likely that they're photographs of TV broadcast
- File:VaienteJonathan.jpg
- File:CarlosSebastianFerreira.JPG
- File:Enrique Borja.jpg
- File:Derlis Meza Colli.jpg
- File:OscarRomero.JPG
- File:FidencioOviedo.jpg
- File:Jorge Ortega.jpg
- File:Érwin Ávalos.jpg
- File:Santiago Salcedo.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see also the uploader's talk page. --Didym (talk) 02:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1984532!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_1200/article-hero10-1023.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Basically per nomination; nicely spotted. --odder (talk) 22:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xtp1/t51.2885-19/12357597_1710128859216288_1165666726_a.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This might actually be own work of the uploader as the link provided looks like an Instagram profile picture, however this personal photograph is not used on the uploader's user page here or anywhere else and is therefore out of scope. --odder (talk) 22:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Very low quality, no educational value. Stas (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: We should probably search for pictures like that at some point, too. --odder (talk) 22:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Non free image 186.135.131.219 19:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. No information on source or permission has been provided, therefore deleting. If a free release for the file is obtained, please forward it to to our OTRS system at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and nominate the file for undeletion at COM:UDEL citing the relevant ticket number. --odder (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
File present in copyrighted website before user upload (here). Fringio—α†Ω 19:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination; quite unlikely to be own work, particularly given the evidence provided. --odder (talk) 22:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Judging by the description, "If I had been standing when I found this photograph I think I would have fallen down. I never expected to find a photograph of Alf Shead...", this is yet another photo that Leonard Bentley did not in fact take, and thus has no right to release under a free licence. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Flickr uploader isn't the actual copyright holder, therefore deleting as a copyright violation. Nicely spotted, too. --odder (talk) 22:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not own work, its a movie (Sapphire (1959) sreenshot Cap1000 (talk) 22:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC) youtu.be/QAb20GIo9Yw?t=35
Deleted: Screenshot from a copyrighted 1959 movie. --odder (talk) 22:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Not Froghall Brickworks Dudley Miles (talk) 09:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
no valid license HB-Musikus 2 (talk) 12:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 양념파닭 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 자작 아님. bellow the COM:TOO, but prommotional and article where is used tagged for speedy. Amitie 10g (talk) 14:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: hardly own work: https://www.google.de/search?q=komik+arka+plan&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSiAEahQELEKjU2AQaAggLDAsQsIynCBpeClwIAxIkhglHLNESBocJgwmCCYUJRv4zpCOlI5U1_1CuGLa8p_1zO3J_1E9GjD4HWw92UDHgYtdk-2Kl8rGCZSZ0mg2jYj_1OYc8s02DK64DPI_1l7nBceFSkMMAJCVsgAwwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBIFKOJEM&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwikydby7JnKAhWGgQ8KHVpzBVMQ2A4IGygB&biw=1280&bih=961 Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Way below TOO. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Already have File:Circlemesh_square_tangent.svg, a svg version. Stang 14:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Don't delete. They are not identical. The SVG version has boundary effects that might not be desired. Tomruen (talk) 15:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Tomruen. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Не знаю почему, но шрифты отображаются нормально везде кроме Вики. В таком виде файл не имеет смысла Leokand (talk) 15:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
PNG format suggests screen capture, source is unclear and user has uploaded copyrighted images previously and claimed as their own. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from the web. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from mural. Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Info: Source Country is Spain (University of the Basque Country). --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: FoP-Spain. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC) The DIMENSIONS on the Wikipedia drawing ARE WRONG. All I am trying to do is correct them.
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work, unknown author and source. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Begründung unnecessary, it already exits with other name Birne1993 (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: empty category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Overexposed and quite identical to File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 145946 (15759162681).jpg. And there is yet a third one. Tangopaso (talk) 21:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Overexposed and quite identical to File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 145946 (15759162681).jpg. And there is yet a third one. Tangopaso (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
image published here: http://www.doxologia.ro/imagine/manastirea-sfantul-gherasim-de-la-iordan-galerie-foto in 2014 year, and only in 2015 placed in wiki as "own work" Cap1000 (talk) 20:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos of some kind. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:العلامة الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري.PNG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 3.JPG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 2.JPG
- File:شيخ محمد خلفي.jpg
- File:العلامة المختار بن الشيخ.jpg
- File:الشيخ عبد الرحمان بن الطيب حمادوش 2.jpg
- File:الشيخ عبد الرحمان بن الطيب حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ محمد الصديق بن الطيب حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ القريشي مدني.jpg
- File:الإمام الشهيد عبد الحميد حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ محمد صالح حمر العين.jpg
- File:رسالة الشيخ محمد العربي التباني الى شيوخ زاوية قجال.JPG
- File:الشيخ محمد العربي التباني.jpg
- File:وثيقة تحدد أراضي وقفية لعائلة حمادوش.JPG
- File:صورة قديمة لزاوية قجال.jpg
- File:مسجد قجال الجديد.jpg
- File:مسجد زاوية قجال القديم.jpg
- File:زاوية بن حمادوش قجال.png
- File:وثيقة تحدد أراضي حمادوش ڤجال.jpg
- File:زاوية بن حمادوش ڤجال.jpg
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود (رضي الله عنه)2.jpg
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود (رضي الله عنه)1.jpg
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images with no EXIF data, not own work, some are derivatives with no informations about permissions
- File:مقام سيدي مسعود الحسني.jpg
- File:Guidjel.19DZ.png
- File:Guidjel.19ALG.png
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود الحسني.jpg
- File:العلامة الشيخ محمد العربي التباني ،رضي الله عنه.jpg
- File:Daïra de Guidjel 19 DZ.PNG
- File:Daïra de Guidjel.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لزاوية قجال -202.jpg
- File:ضريح الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري بنطيوس , طولقة , بسكرة , الجزائر.jpg
- File:الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي.PNG
- File:حمام أولاد يلس , مزلوق , عين آرنات , سطيف , الجزائر.PNG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 4.JPG
- File:36.092230°N 5.487371°E بلدية ڤجال - احداثيات.PNG
- File:DZ - 19 - Guidjel - Guidjel - بلدية ڤجال - دائرة ڤجال - ولاية سطيف - الجزائر.jpg
- File:Dz - 19 - Guidjel - دائرة ڤجال - ولاية سطيف.jpg
- File:Dz - 19 - Guidjelدائرة ڤجال.png
- File:ضريح الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري.PNG
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably also not own work
- File:الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي (19).jpg
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien3.PNG
- File:كتيبة الشهداء (الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي) سطيف.PNG
- File:الملعب الإفريقي سطيف 19.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 23.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 22.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 2.jpg
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien.jpg
- File:الوثيقة 4 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 3 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 2 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 1 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:Httpswww.google.commapssearch-D8-B2-D8-A7-D9-88-D9-8A-D8-A9+-D8-A8-D9-86+-D8-AD-D9-85-D8-A7-D8-AF-D9-88-D8-B4-E2-80-AD@36.0922225,5.4859385,17zdata=!3m1!4b1.jpg
- File:شعار قجال.jpg
- File:قجال.jpg
- File:مسجد زاوية قجال القديم.jpg
- File:سطيف.png
- File:ڤجال ,سطيف ,الجزائر.png
- File:ڤجال 3.PNG
- File:ڤجال 2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D8%B3%D8%B7%D9%8A%D9%81.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 22:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]False authorship claims by serial copyright violator and sockpuppeteer. Non-free sports logos and low-resolution photos grabbed from the Internet.
- File:الشعار الحالي لإتحاد سطيف.jpg
- File:صورة لفريق اتحاد سطيف في نهائي ، كأس الجزائر 2005.jpg – http://usms-setif-1933.blogspot.com/2013/05/usmsetif.html
- File:الملعب الإفريقي سطيف.jpg
- File:تشكيلة الوفاق السطايفي2.jpg – http://sport.echoroukonline.com/articles/22947.html
- File:الشعار الرسمي الحالي لنادي وفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:الشعار السابق لوفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:الشعار الأسبق لوفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:USMS.gif
- File:S,A,Setif.PNG
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Per Nomination: Files deleted, account blocked. --Rosenzweig τ 23:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
unused version of File:Fluegelrad.svg Louperivois Ψ @ 21:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
quality not sufficient for encyclopedic use Louperivois Ψ @ 21:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 10:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
quality not sufficient for encyclopedic use Louperivois Ψ @ 21:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 10:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Address Downtown Dubai
[edit]Building was built in 2008. No Freedom of Panorama in UAE. I believe these images to all be copyright violations.
- File:Address Downtown Dubai and burj dubai.jpg
- File:BDLH21.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 10 December 2007 Pict 1.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 10 December 2007 Pict 2.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 11 November 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 15 October 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 23 December 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 12 April 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 14 February 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 16 August 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 2 February 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 2 March 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 22 September 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 4 July 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 4 May 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 8 June 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel 02.12.2007.jpg
- File:Dubai Mall Hotel Under Construction on 29 November 2007.jpg
- File:Infossible address downtown dubai featured image.jpg (File:CXk3osuWkAEFxup.jpg-large.jpg is nearly a duplicate of this photo. probably copied from same website?)
- File:Infossible address downtown dubai.jpg
- File:Infossible address downtown dubai2.jpg
- File:Infossible address downtown dubai3.jpg
- File:Infossible address downtown dubai4.jpg
- File:The Address Downtown Burj Dubai Under Construction on 25 January 2008.jpg
- File:The Address Downtown Dubai after the fire.jpg
- File:The Address Downtown Dubai.jpg
- File:TheAddressDowntownDubaMarch2012.jpg
- File:TheAddressDowntownZoneDubaMarch2012.jpg
- File:View from my hotel room at night.jpg
- File:View from our room.jpg
Themightyquill (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- As for Address Downtown Dubai and burj dubai.jpg - I had already cropped the image to eliminate the relevant architectural elements. What remains is of no architectural originality. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 22:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep These two files have already passed in the past deletion requests because fall under the "De Minimis"! Do not waste time on these, we see others.
- Thank you --Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
I have deleted the obvious cases, remaining images might be considered DM. --Krd 06:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Some of these obvious cases can't be that obvious as they have survived previous deletion requests e.g. File talk:The Address Downtown Burj Dubai Under Construction on 25 January 2008.jpg and File talk:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 2 February 2007.jpg. Images that have survived deletion requests should be subject to another deletion request before deletion is carried out, and in any case, the complexities of freedom of panorama mean it is not an appropriate area for liberal use of speedy deletion. For instance, there is established precedent that buildings under construction often don't meet the threshold of originality to be considered copyrighted, thereby making FoP irrelevant. These images should be undeleted and subject to a full deletion request. CT Cooper · talk 12:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Plus IMHO in order to fall in the NoFop a work must be clearly recognizable. A night view of a building which architectural elements are pratically invisible doesn't violate any copyright. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 19:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- That might be right (I'm no legal expert), but a photograph of a building in which the building is not recognizable might put it out of scope anyway, no? - Themightyquill (talk) 15:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Possibly, that would depend on the images in question. Regardless, this just brings us back to my original point that the images need to be scrutinised properly and that it is not appropriate to speedy delete images soley on FoP grounds, particularly when they have survived a previous deletion request. If this issue remains unaddressed when this DR is closed, I will take it to Commons:Undeletion requests. CT Cooper · talk 19:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- That might be right (I'm no legal expert), but a photograph of a building in which the building is not recognizable might put it out of scope anyway, no? - Themightyquill (talk) 15:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Plus IMHO in order to fall in the NoFop a work must be clearly recognizable. A night view of a building which architectural elements are pratically invisible doesn't violate any copyright. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 19:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete the ones that start with "File:Infossible" probably copied from infossible.com and probably not not own work judging by that users other uploads. --Dual Freq (talk) 01:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- File:CXk3osuWkAEFxup.jpg-large.jpg is probably not legitimately licensed either. --Dual Freq (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- For the record, the following images have been subject to a previous deletion request and were speedy deleted within 24 hours of this DR opening:
- File:BDLH21.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:BDLH21.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 10 December 2007 Pict 1.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 10 December 2007 Pict 1.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 10 December 2007 Pict 2.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 10 December 2007 Pict 2.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 11 November 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 11 November 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 15 October 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 15 October 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 23 December 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments on 23 December 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 12 April 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 12 April 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 14 February 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 14 February 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 16 August 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 16 August 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 2 February 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 2 February 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 2 March 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 2 March 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 22 September 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 22 September 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 4 July 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 4 July 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 4 May 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 4 May 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 8 June 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel & Serviced Apartments Under Construction on 8 June 2007.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel 02.12.2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Dubai Lake Hotel 02.12.2007.jpg
- File:Dubai Mall Hotel Under Construction on 29 November 2007.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dubai Mall Hotel Under Construction on 29 November 2007.jpg
- File:The Address Downtown Burj Dubai Under Construction on 25 January 2008.jpg – Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Address Downtown Burj Dubai Under Construction on 25 January 2008.jpg
- The following images have not been subject to a previous DR but were also speedy deleted within 24 hours of this DR opening:
- In addition, the following images have not been speedy deleted but have been subject to a previous DR:
- Any image not listed above were neither speedy deleted nor subject to a previous DR. CT Cooper · talk 20:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete on:
- all "Infossible" uploads due to reasonable non-architectural related copyright concerns per Dual Freq (talk · contribs), given the lack of metadata, poor quality, search engine evidence, and user's other uploads.
- File:Address Downtown Dubai and burj dubai.jpg – The buildings are too prominent in my opinion to qualify as de minimis. The cropping, though well intentioned, hasn't made things better as the low rise building is a recent construction which will also be subject to copyright, even if it uses an "older" style.
- File:View from our room.jpg and File:View from my hotel room at night.jpg – I can see why opinion was split in a previous deletion request. In any case, both of these images are very similar, with all subjects being well lit/exposed in the nighttime image, meaning that they should either both be kept or both deleted. I would argue that all the skyscrapers in the background, including the Burj Khalifa, qualify as de minimis. However, the low-rise building in the foreground is clearly a prominent part of the image and it would not be practical to crop it out and be left with a useful image, which pushes me to vote delete. A real shame, as these are both good quality images.
- Keep on:
- File:The Address Downtown Dubai.jpg – This one is also a close call as the camera does appear to have been slightly panned-up to include The Address, with the image title and description not helping matters, however, the vehicles and roads are clearly the main subject of the actual image, making everything else de minimis. It wouldn't be very difficult to crop-out The Address anyway.
- All speedy deleted images, so they can be properly reviewed before deletion, as per my earlier comments. I accept that some of the previous DR results may have been frivolous, consensus on FoP issues may have changed etc., but the community should be given a chance to verify that for themselves. CT Cooper · talk 21:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm fine with undeleting those that were speedily deleted, and discussing them individually. For File:The Address Downtown Dubai.jpg, let's just crop out the building then? - Themightyquill (talk) 10:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: except three images remaining which show no recognizable architectural elements. --Krd 10:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Modern sculpture. No FoP for sculptures in Russia Stolbovsky (talk) 21:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
this file is a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Piccole_favare_pantelleria.webm
the .ogv has no audio, while the .webm does Cortesi (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
probably in the public domain, but obviously not own work Didym (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Expired copyright is enough reason to keep the file. Just correct the licensing and ignore any claiming. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: author unknown, likely PD but cannot be kept without further information. --Krd 18:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Pensavo che il periodo di copyright fosse scaduto Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Krd 17:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
data says that copyright is held by Northwestern Memorial Medicine Theroadislong (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
the file links to letter with permission from authorities but the permission isn't complete: it allows "usage", but nothing is said about "modification", "distribution" and "commercial purpose". I had some personal discussions with people from local government responsible for such decision and they confirmed that modification isn't allowed - you can use but not change, so, such files couldn't be kept
- File:Shafagat Takhautdinov.jpg
- File:Ildar Khalikov.jpg
- File:Razil Valeev.jpg
- File:Rafik Mukhametshin.jpg
- File:Tatarstan stateman authorisation-Russian.png
- File:Farid Mukhametshin.jpg
rubin16 (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Добрый день, rubin16!
- File:Razil Valeev.jpg - файл без изменений
- File:Tatarstan stateman authorisation-Russian.png - это письмо, отправленное в мой адрес,где указывается возможность использования файлов с сайта Госсовета.
- File:Farid Mukhametshin.jpg - изначально была не измененная версия, изменения не мои. Изменения могу убрать.
- File:Shafagat Takhautdinov.jpg - если нельзя изменять файл, то можно будет залить как есть
- File:Rafik Mukhametshin.jpg - файл залит без изменений
- Почему у Вас такая политика удалять все связанное с Татарстаном?--MalTsilna (talk) 20:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Нет у меня такой политики, просто я сам оттуда и слежу за статьями о Татарстане: вот заметил правку в статье о Халикове и посмотрел остальное. Текущее разрешение не подходит rubin16 (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Разрешение не подходит ко всем файлам? И что можно с этим сделать? --MalTsilna (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Пытаться уговорить их дать разрешение наподобие File:Bashkortostan authorisation-Russian.jpg и File:Kremlin authorisation-Russian.pdf: я честно пытался и не один год, но у меня не вышло rubin16 (talk) 07:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Спасибо! Жаль, что наши не хотят выдавать такое разрешение. Пока попрошу не удалять файлы, попробую что нибудь придумать MalTsilna (talk) 12:39, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Вот уже двое у них просят. Надо, чтобы попросили ещё хотя бы сорок человек. Тогда пресс-служба задумается. Вообще, это можно понять: пресс-служба живёт в условиях, когда у неё вообще никто никаких позволений не спрашивает. Она не обучена позволять. Она боится. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Спасибо! Жаль, что наши не хотят выдавать такое разрешение. Пока попрошу не удалять файлы, попробую что нибудь придумать MalTsilna (talk) 12:39, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Пытаться уговорить их дать разрешение наподобие File:Bashkortostan authorisation-Russian.jpg и File:Kremlin authorisation-Russian.pdf: я честно пытался и не один год, но у меня не вышло rubin16 (talk) 07:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Разрешение не подходит ко всем файлам? И что можно с этим сделать? --MalTsilna (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Нет у меня такой политики, просто я сам оттуда и слежу за статьями о Татарстане: вот заметил правку в статье о Халикове и посмотрел остальное. Текущее разрешение не подходит rubin16 (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Comment: please take a look at File talk:National Anthem of the Republic of Tatarstan with words.ogg. —andrybak (talk) 19:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Not free image. Please see sourse, direct copyright: Всі права захищені www.ngu.gov.ua © 2016 Cap1000 (talk) 20:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Файл нужен, это лицо Национальной гвардии - Командующий. Чего тут всё удаляют? Зачем вообще тогда нужна Википедия? --Дима-101 (talk) 22:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Та я понимаю, что нужен. Но на сайте же стоит копирайт ©, они не разрешают использовать фотку свободно. Единственный выход это писать им и просить разрешение на использование. Если они дадут разрешение, отправляйте его в ОТРС и только потом загружайте файл. Ещё можно сделать так, как я в Вашей статье сделал.
А удаляют потому, что википедия зарегистрирована в США. А там очень серьёзно относятся к авторскому праву увы... Википедия нужна для свободного контента (это контент, который может использовать кто угодно, где угодно и абсолютно бесплатно). Cap1000 (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-free image, no permission. --Sealle (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
