Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Not properly uploaded in commons - trademark - rookie's mistake (the rookie being me) Fishbed1942 (talk) 04:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: New unused image, uploader requested deletion, speedy close. Revent (talk) 05:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
images from url (google link) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 09:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
copied from url visit link Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 09:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. Present in too many copyrighted websites. Check out Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: A file is not a copyvio because it is present in too many copyrighted websites. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
No probs that it is a NASA image. B dash (talk) 01:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This photo has been taken by Scott Kelly, astronaut on the International Space Station. I've fixed source and author in the file description. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio content. check out Present in too many copyrighted websites. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: obvious pd Steinsplitter (talk) 14:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: obviouis pd Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Present in copyrighted website. check out Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: obvious pd Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Images depicted may possess other license terms not listed within the file description. Diego Grez return fire 15:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep: Seroiusly? Come on! --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment Could the nominator clarify his concern ? Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 15:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Racconish Images featured in that Wikipedia's main page may have other licensing terms, not listed within the file description. Attribution may be required, and the uploader is not satisfying that. --Diego Grez return fire 16:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Do you mean File:Lawrence Sullivan Ross.jpg, which is {{PD-US-1923}}, or File:Nusa dua beach.jpg, which is {{CC-BY-SA-3.0}} ? Or something else ? How do you think this should be fixed ? — Racconish ☎ 17:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Racconish Images featured in that Wikipedia's main page may have other licensing terms, not listed within the file description. Attribution may be required, and the uploader is not satisfying that. --Diego Grez return fire 16:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Both files... but I still finding third file. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- I think we should credit their authors (even if they are PD). Since one of them is CC-BY-SA, the attribution requirement is not satisfied yet, and is a copyvio. I am worried by proper copyright statements, rather than anything else. --Diego Grez return fire 17:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- First, I'm not the original uploader of this screenshot (see the logs); the currect version was cropped to remove the non-free elements (namely, the Windows taskbar, the rest is bellow the TOO in the US).
- Second, I taken my precious time to find the source of every picture depicted in the Russian Wikipedia, but I missed the third file, due I have more important thinks to do... and now, Diego Grez nominated the file in not good faith very likely... --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Found the source of the three picture depicted (even whille finding them in the Russian Wikipedia is quite hard). Now this DR should be speedy closed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- You have failed to credit the authors. --Diego Grez return fire 17:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- That you failed sounds too rude. Instead of fixing these issues by yourself, you're still attacking me... --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- You've got a problem with the word "failed"? --Diego Grez return fire 22:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- I added appropriate attribution to the author section, similar to the way Commons handles collages, however I'm not sure this image can be freely licensed without cropping out the copyrighted browser chrome. —RP88 (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. And about the MS Edge interface, some admins already agree that is bellow the TOO in the US. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Alan (talk) 23:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I made a mistake when uploading and don't want this image included Dmz75dmz75 (talk) 04:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
(copyvio) Present in too many copyrighted websites. Please see here Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 17:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
(copyvio) Source: http://www.vozdascomunidades.com.br/complexo-do-alemao/morro-da-baiana/escolha-de-samba-da-imperatriz-leopoldinense/ Fabiano msg 21:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) vio, not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Not free picture for a living person. Dr-Taher (talk) 06:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) vio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded this file, not mine. Sorry Jahuwuhire (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: speedydel, per nom. Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
No explanation given for why this is screenshot is assumed to be free. January (talk) 19:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Appearance, png format and metadata suggest these are screenshots.
January (talk) 19:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- New run with the same files
Appearance, png format and metadata suggest these are screenshots.
- re-uploaded by the same user --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ 20:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- I recorded these files, so what is the problem with them? Urgup-tur (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- You can't upload screenshots of copyrighted videos or TV broadcasts, this is a copyright violation. January (talk) 14:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Alan (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. Check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a failed image upload with 0 X 0 pixels Leoboudv (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Not free picture for a living person. Dr-Taher (talk) 06:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
possible copyviol: based on a gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 10:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Google Maps. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
uploader request - inappropriate license Blue Rasberry (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Revent (talk) 21:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as watermarked "fb.com/nararohith", Roland zh (talk) 01:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Watermark, permission needed. Yann (talk) 12:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
again, no offense, but as per File:Nara Rohith.jpg as imho maybe protected content used, please see watermarks, Roland zh (talk) 01:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Poster, no permission. Yann (talk) 12:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded many times on commons with different names. File:AC Milan.svg, File:Acm.png (copyvio content) Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 16:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- For more, Please! see here Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 16:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus Revent (talk) 16:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
{{speedy-delete | this logo shouldn't be on wiki common because isn't non-free work}}
copyvio content. Present in google plus+ & other websites. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete Hi Vchukkrit, The article you have mentioned above had been deleted & what about present in other copyrighted website too. Overwrite of the logo. Visit here.
OK, bad luck my article have to rewrite :( due to copyright content from school website. --Vchukkrit (talk) 17:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
found on too many websites. google searched url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) Pixar Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio [1] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) Pixar Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aviatrix8704 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these images seem to have been uploaded and re-licensed on Flickr without permission. They come from a number of different sources unrelated to the Flickr account.
- File:Flt. Lt. Joanne 'Jo' Mein selfie in her Pilatus PC-9 cockpit while manoeuvring up side down flight.jpg
- File:RAAF First female Roulette pilot Flt. Lt. Joanne 'Jo' Mein gives the thumbs from the cockpit of her Pilatus PC-9.jpg
- File:USAF Female F-16 Pilot Major Heather Penney in full flight gear (STpennyd15).jpg
- File:The first seven female pilot officers of the Colombian Air Forcea pose in front of T-34 aircraft (Hernandez1).jpg
- File:Final shot of Lt Johanna Herrera preparing to fly in the cockpit of T-37 before her death (Imagen 664).jpg
- File:Lt. Johana Herrera, the first woman fighter pilot in South America, killed in air accident 2006 101Columbia2.jpg
- File:RIP Colombian Fighter Pilots Lts. Herman Ramirez and Johanna Ximena Herrera Cortes Imagecategory31977.jpg
- File:First Malaysian Female Mig-29 Fighter Pilot Capt. Patricia Yapp Syau Yin checks her aircraft before take off (thecremedelacreme01).jpg
- File:Russian Female Mig-29 Pilot Maj. Svetlana Protasova (Светлана Протасова МиГ-29 женщина-пилот).jpg
- File:012uNXVwiNus Norway's First Female Fighter Pilot Lt. Mette Grøtteland (2nd from L-R ) sitting on an F-16 aircraft.jpg
- File:Mette Grøtteland Norges første kvinnelige jagerflyger (Norway's First Female F-16 Pilot).jpg
- File:USAF F-15 pilot Capt. Ashley Rolfe the only female fighter pilot participating in Exercise Commando Sling.webm
Ariadacapo (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Except the webm one, it's from a different site and the page have a PD notice. Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aviatrix8704 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence of licence on the Swedish Armed Forces website
- File:SAAF Maj Catherine Labuschagne, World's first female JAS 39 Gripen fighter pilot, attracted international media interest exercise Lion Effort 2012.jpg
- File:Female JAS39 Gripen Fighter Pilots Majors Catherine Labuschagne (South African) and Anna Dellham (Swedish) share their experiences in exercise Lion Effort 2012.jpg
- File:Female JAS39 Gripen Fighter Pilots, Catherine Labuschagne (SAAF) and Anna Dellham (Flygvapnet).jpg
Mundoola (talk) 19:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Not own work Hangsna (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept, really not own work, but 1886 is enough far past to keep the file. Copyright is very probably expired. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:EL MAESTRO HECHIZOS Y CONJUROS.jpg
- File:EL MAESTRO HECHIZOS E CONJUROS.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI HECHIZOS E CONJUROS.jpg
- File:HECHIZOS E CONJUROS.jpg
- File:MARIO SOLIS SEGURA PADRE DE HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ HECHIZOS Y CONJUROS.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ EL PROFESOR.jpg
- File:HORACIOLUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ "HECHIZOSECONJUROS.jpg
- File:HORACIO HECHICERO Y MAGO.JPG
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS HECHICERO Y BRUJO.jpg
Ies (talk) 07:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted (nuked) Alan (talk) 01:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Offtopic and almost-certain derivative copyvios in all cases. User's only (non-)contribution to Wikimedia projects was a spam userpage at es.wikipedia. Wikipedia/Commons is not your personal userspace. (Gogle Spanish translation: ios copia derivado Offtopic y casi-determinados en todos los casos. la única contribución de usuario (no) a los proyectos de Wikimedia era una página de usuario en el correo no deseado es.wikipedia. Wikipedia / Commons no es su espacio de usuario personal.).
- File:Horacio.jpg
- File:CONSULTA MAGIA GRATIS.jpg
- File:NOVENA A LA SANTA MUERTE.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ MAGIA ANTIGUA.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ Suerte.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ Foto-monge - copia.jpg
- File:EL MAESTRO HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ MAGIA NEGRA.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ MAGIA EN IMAGENES.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ TALISMAN.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ MAGIA 5.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ MAGIA 2.png
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ MAGIA.png
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNADEZ MAGIA 3.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ 4.jpg
- File:HORACIO LUCIANI SOLIS FERNANDEZ MAGIA.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 21:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
copyvio from http://rakbankdirect.ae/wps/portal/deals/rvc-sme Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: cv Alan (talk) 01:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from http://www.sportsboules.org.sg/index.html Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: c v Alan (talk) 01:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from http://poalot.com/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: cv Alan (talk) 01:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio (visit this url) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by HiW Alan (talk) 01:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted en:Ankit joshi JohnCD (talk) 16:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CheiroVerde (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use --Krd 01:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project! Sakhalinio (talk) 07:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 01:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio or out of commons scope. http://www.tru-rollputters.com/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 01:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content http://www.uiass.ma/Uiass/home/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 01:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copied from google plus+ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 01:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 01:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (visit web link) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (web link) present in too many websites. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. uploaded from google plus+ & present in other websites too. for more, please visit Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (web link) for more, Please visit Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (visit url.) for more, please visit Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (web link) For more, please visit [2] [3] [4] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (web link) For more, Please visit [5] [6] [7] [8] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (web link) Present in too many copyrighted websites. [9] [10] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. check out Present in other copyrighted websites too. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. check out. Above reasons too. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:26, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. check out [11] [12] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. check out [13] [14] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. Check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. Check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 01:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 01:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE, logo of non-notable company Stang 02:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 02:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly a copyrighted image, not "own work", see watermark. Note also the nonsense category. This is not a serious contribution.
Ies (talk) 04:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be Copyright violation. This photgraph can be found several times in the internet. look here --ProfessorX (talk) 13:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 02:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hangiemelisa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 04:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 02:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 02:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PANKAJ RAMNATH TIWARI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 02:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Na fotografii není Josef Gruber, ale Rudolf Gruber. Při načítání došlo k záměně. Martin wolf (talk) 07:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Auf der Quelldatei, die unten verlinkt ist, steht "50. Wahlkreis: Rudolf Gruber, Nied.-Oest. (Christsoz.)". Wie kommst du drauf dass es ein Josef sein sollte? LG --AleXXw 09:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be resolved Ymblanter (talk) 02:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:EDUSE Dindon~enwiki (talk) 08:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elyza jane s. corpus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private /nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 08:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from http://www.sunkface.com/svnk-face-arabic Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation, and possibly out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 02:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Naina kane.ogg
- File:Kitne Dinon Ke Baad Hai Aayi Ayee Milan Ki Raat 19.ogg
- File:Mera dil.ogg
- File:Goori tera gau.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nominating too (an all eventual further uploads):
- Gunnex (talk) 08:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Info: All files tagged (including 1 new one) with Mass deletion of files added by User:C4cat77: All files — considering also User talk:C4cat77 — grabbed from Internet.. Gunnex (talk) 09:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copvyios. Yann (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Promotional - Out of scope
Scoopfinder(d) 10:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
out of scope, unknown subject, user's only contribution Pibwl (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
No need for file, superior versions are available. Maschen (talk) 00:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by uploader, image is unused. AFBorchert (talk) 12:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Uploader is not the author, author = Peter Madsen. No indication of free license. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
See also: Commons:Village_pump#Concerns_about_File:Freya_launch.jpg, likely wrong sub. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
NB: This photo is DEFINITELY NOT of UC1 FREYA - 223.205.244.178 19:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete unless evidence of permission can be provided. As noted at the VP, there is a higher-resolution version, probably the original, named “crane_one.JPG”, at PSUB Picture Exchange.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Info The PSUB Picture Exchange web site suggests the high-resolution photograph was contributed by "Peter Madsen" with an email address of "_peter 'at' submarines.dk_". Has anyone reached out to him asking if the image can be released under a "free" license? Another possible email address can be found on the RML Space Lab web site. Who knows, if we ask nicely he or his company may freely license a lot more of their imagery. Davidwr (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment My "vote" would be to allow 1-2 weeks to establish contact and as soon as contact is established, add {{OTRS pending}} to the image and start the OTRS process. If the image is published elsewhere under a free license, remove the "OTRS pending" template and add a link to the other publication and its license. If the photographer chooses to go through OTRS, let the OTRS team members handle the rest. If the artist says "no" delete the image. If communication stalls or cannot be established, delete the image for now in the hopes that eventually permission will be granted. If the image is deleted, transwiki it to the English Wikipedia, as I believe it qualifies as a fair-use image in the article en:UC1 Freya. Davidwr (talk) 20:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- PLEASE take note, as has been pointed out many times already, this photo is DEFINITELY NOT of UC1 FREYA! - 223.205.244.178 19:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- I would like to assume that the uploader didn't deliberately or mistakenly mis-label the image without proof. Can you provide some clear evidence that the Freya was a different vessel? Davidwr (talk) 00:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- My only evidence is in the source both you and I have linked here, where the image in question is listed under the heading From: "Peter Madsen" _peter 'at' submarines.dk_ / Kraka launched may 2005. The image metadata says April 2005, while (according to enWP) the Freya was launched in 2002 (and the UC3 Nautilus in 2009). BTW this image is lower-resolution than the one at PSUB, so it may have been taken from some other website where it was mislabelled (or ambiguously displayed between two captions in a set of ‘stacked’ photos).—Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Clear evidence has already been provided. Read the second line of this page, "See also: Commons:Village_pump#Concerns_about_File:Freya_launch.jpg, likely wrong sub." -- follow the VP link in that line -- the first paragraph in the VP discussion (from which this deletion request originates) has a plus.google.com link to clear evidence that this photo is definitely not of UC1 and definitely not of UC3. Or search for last voyage freya. 223.205.244.178 07:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- My only evidence is in the source both you and I have linked here, where the image in question is listed under the heading From: "Peter Madsen" _peter 'at' submarines.dk_ / Kraka launched may 2005. The image metadata says April 2005, while (according to enWP) the Freya was launched in 2002 (and the UC3 Nautilus in 2009). BTW this image is lower-resolution than the one at PSUB, so it may have been taken from some other website where it was mislabelled (or ambiguously displayed between two captions in a set of ‘stacked’ photos).—Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- I would like to assume that the uploader didn't deliberately or mistakenly mis-label the image without proof. Can you provide some clear evidence that the Freya was a different vessel? Davidwr (talk) 00:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- PLEASE take note, as has been pointed out many times already, this photo is DEFINITELY NOT of UC1 FREYA! - 223.205.244.178 19:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no proof that this image is free as it was claimed by the uploader. We need the permission of the copyright holder to be processed through OTRS to keep it. AFBorchert (talk) 12:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Image produced in mid-2006 (after COM:GOF) but listed under a 2008 date. No evidence of photographer permission (copyright holder). Original uploader (@Holon67) hasn't edited in five years and has no listed email address contact. – czar 04:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed, this file is not covered by COM:GOF. The permission needs to be processed by the support team. We cannot keep this photograph without such a confirmation. AFBorchert (talk) 12:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Near full Moon between tower of Staufenberg and nearby roof near Giessen 2015-10-23 (2).JPG
[edit]Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are right, it is of a low quality, and I have written that on the description page, but there is no better photo of that old gate-tower at the moment. My old camera had been done these night-longtime exposures better, but I have not enough money to change that, and a possible solution is, to combine some of these low-quality-photos to get an impression of objects: I have added File:Moon between tower of Staufenberg and nearby roof near Giessen 2015-10-23.JPG (detail of roof) and File:Moon and inner of tower of Staufenberg near Giessen 2015-10-23.jpg (detail of ceiling). Now I add it to Category:Images of low quality, okay? From far away there is indeed a photo: File:Burg Staufenberg-von Odenhausen aus.JPG (the tower in the right, but not at night and no details! A description is not given there ...). We should keep it. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 06:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, there is literally nothing in the image which is truly recognisable, not even the full moon. — Huntster (t @ c) 07:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: There is hardly anything recognizable on this image. This image is not even usable as bad quality image of an otherwise unphotographed object of interest. It is thereby out of scope. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
By looking at the watermark, the images comes from http://bielskobiala.geminipark.pl/en/ where the content is copyrighted. I don't find the image on the site, but in any cases the watermarks also are copyrighted "Any use of the logo of Gemini Park Bielsko-Biała is subject to prior written acceptance. " http://bielskobiala.geminipark.pl/en/for-media
- File:Galeria Gemini Park Bielsko-Biała 04.jpg
- File:Galeria Gemini Park Bielsko-Biała 03.jpg
- File:Galeria Gemini Park Bielsko-Biała 01.jpg
- File:Galeria Gemini Park Bielsko-Biała 02.jpg
--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: These are promotional photographs that were used during the construction of this business park. To keep them we need a permission in writing processed by our support team. AFBorchert (talk) 12:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- The three last are out of scope unused personal images.
- The logo is likely copyrighted 3
- All the others are unlikely to be own works as no ones have EXIF, some are very small, and some can be found with google search image ex: 1 or 2
- File:Kripl.jpg
- File:Galatvova.jpg
- File:Gambitd.jpg
- File:Baranovd.jpg
- File:Micchiba.jpg
- File:Jubileee.jpg
- File:Grehi otcov.jpg
- File:Goodtim.jpg
- File:Steepr.jpg
- File:Steep171.jpg
--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect and misleadin version of File:Suomen lentomerkki konekivääriampujalle ja radiosähköttäjälle 1942-1945.svg. (See e.g. [15]) Msaynevirta (talk) 09:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Correct file exists. --Kwasura (talk) 10:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 10:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep Kuukauden esine :colour is silver, not white. --FAF Flags (talk) 15:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This is the original badge. See for yourself how different it is from the file that you are advocating. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This, this or this is the right badge? Honourably, --FAF Flags (talk) 20:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- This file has still different crown compared to all of those pins. Also, the inner lines of the wings seem to end too soon and are too thick. --Msaynevirta (talk) 22:10, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment FAF Flags is a suspected sockpuppet of WPK~commonswiki, and has been blocked indefinitely. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 07:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Books. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Franklin Anderson Tavárez Ureña (talk · contribs)
[edit]some un-notable person, picture collectiopns without source pictures, text in the picture
- File:Anderson Távarez Etapas.jpg
- File:Anderson Távarez Foto 2013.jpg
- File:Anderson Távarez En liceo.jpg
- File:Frase De Anderson Távarez.jpg
- File:Anderson Távarez El Liceo María Pascual.jpg
Motopark (talk) 18:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Previously published, no evidence of permission https://www.facebook.com/GalerieCachee?ref=stream&hc_location=stream --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: This was uploaded by a promotional account but there is no proof of notability. The logo is due to the drawing of the bird eligible for copyright. The artist was not identified, nor was a permission provided. AFBorchert (talk) 13:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
As the link provided show copyrighted content https://www.facebook.com/GalleonNewsOnline if there is really a permission, it should be an OTRS one --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The uploader claimed: Full permission has been granted by The Galleon and by Ilana Weisman. However, this permission was not yet passed to our support team. AFBorchert (talk) 13:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Google images (visit url) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hello,
- Why has this file been nominated for deletion? I found this image on google images and the user rights were "free to use, share or modify even commercially" and the website where the image originated had the appropriate licensing terms. I look forward to your response. Thank you very much Em.jacobs (talk) 02:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Em.jacobs: For your kind information, this image is presented in too many copyrighted website and i've attached the url too. In short, it is copyvio content and out of Com:Scope. Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete this image. Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- The original photo appears to be https://pixabay.com/en/girl-eyes-makeup-sexy-glamor-237871/ by jura-photography on Pixabay.com, where it is marked as released into the public domain using {{cc-zero}}. The modifications probably do not rise above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection.
- The image is in use on wikiversity:Motivation and emotion/Book/2015/Antisocial Personality Disorder and emotion, so it would appear to be within scope according to Commons:Project scope#File in use in another Wikimedia project.
- Em.jacobs, please understand that when uploading content to Commons, you must provide verifiable source information so that others can confirm the information that you have provided in the file description. "Google Images" doesn't cut it. I fixed one of your other uploads. Please follow that example with your other uploads. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Em.jacobs: For your kind information, this image is presented in too many copyrighted website and i've attached the url too. In short, it is copyvio content and out of Com:Scope. Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per the rationale given by LX, i.e. the original photograph appears to be in the public domain (I've added a source link to the description), and the blanking of the face and adding of a question mark appears to be below the threshold of originality. AFBorchert (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
image from website Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The two uploads by this account where used for an attack or prank on the depicted person, see this diff, which in turned caused the account to be blocked at ko:wp. We cannot have any trust in such an account. AFBorchert (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
|
File:さくら一平.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kept: No deletion rationale was provided. The uploader claimed that this photograph is their own work. The presence of EXIF data and a recent date make that very plausible. I just notice that the deletion request was posted by the uploader. However, we do not delete here anything without a good reason. If a courtesy deletion is asked for, then please ask for it explicitly. Given that the DR notice was posted into the DR, this could very well be an editing accident. AFBorchert (talk) 13:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: In this case, we need to consider whether this logo is below or beyond the threshold of originality according to US law. The two lines of typeface in the lower sections of the logo are not eligible for copyright. Hence, we have to focus on the blue ribbon in the upper section which is formed to an arc where one end narrows to a cusp pointing to the other end, creating a free space in the form of an ellipse in its centre. The ribbon is represented by small rectangular blocks of varying sizes and two longer opposite stretches which gives it a dynamic touch. Even if the the individual elements appear to be very simple, the composition appears to reach some minimal amount of originality. it is clear beyond that of File:CarCreditCity.png which was judged to be very narrowly below the threshold. In that case the office argued that the individual shapes were close enough to the shape of a “C”. In this case, however, the two longer stretches of the logo are not close to any letter but far more creative, giving it a somewhat dynamic or even twirling impression. To quote from the decision regarding the CCC logo which quotes from Satava v. Lowry: “Our case law suggests, and we hold today, that a combination of unprotectible elements is eligible for copyright protection only if those elements are numerous enough and their selection and arrangement original enough that their combination constitutes an original work of authorship.” Given this criterion, I consider this logo to be beyond the threshold of originality. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio from [16] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- It's not a copyvio, I made it. plus, I don't think a design based on simple shapes can be copyrighted. --Pozeetronic (talk) 13:43, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- The file is ineligible for copyright, it consists of information considered common property, and therefore is in the public domain. --Pozeetronic (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This is below the threshold of originality as it combines the flag of the United States with the swastika, a well-known symbol. Nothing of this is original. AFBorchert (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio image from [17] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep Purported original is actually copied from Wikipedia; per page source the image there is loaded from //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c3/Kitchener-Waterloo.png/220px-Kitchener-Waterloo.png and is not identical, just part of the same series.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 19:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete this image. This image is from Copyrighted website. Visit here The website is copyrighted by (© 2015 Freelyshout). The above reason is not appropriate. Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- This looks like a standard map. It is unlikely that the website has any copyright in it. Ruslik (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
I believe this is fine as it stands. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=176877962#Possibly_trick_deletion_requests. - Jmabel ! talk 14:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: It is not helpful to claim copyright violations on base of Wikipedia mirrors. These maps appear to be work by the uploader and no sufficient ground has been provided why we should doubt that. AFBorchert (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio this edition copyrightef by "Batalata" Jayantanth (talk) 09:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This is not a copyright violation, nor does Batalata hold the copyright under the assumption that this is simply a reprint and not a new edition with added content. According to the description, the book was written by Satyanath Bora (1860-1925) and published in India. As India has pma60 this is in the public domain in its source country since 1996. As, according to the description, the book was published in 1915 it is also in the public domain in the United States. I've fixed the license tag accordingly. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copied from url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep Purported original is actually copied from Wikipedia; per page source the image there is loaded from //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c3/Kitchener-Waterloo.png/220px-Kitchener-Waterloo.png and is not identical, just part of the same series.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 19:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete this image. Overwrite of the file present in copyrighted website. Visit here. Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- This looks like a standard map. It is unlikely that the website has any copyright in it. Ruslik (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
I believe this is fine as it stands. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=176877962#Possibly_trick_deletion_requests. - Jmabel ! talk 14:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: As in the previous case it is not helpful to claim copyright violations by linking to Wikipedia mirrors. AFBorchert (talk) 15:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
again, no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as imho looks alike a montage, Roland zh (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Found on Flickr as a non-commercial image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/fejorca/5437443865 Ytoyoda (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Looks clear to me. Michael Barera (talk) 04:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
because of watermark Peter bankers (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination : duplicate of File:151024 HALTE DEURNE Japanse duizendknoop Fallopia Japonica DSC0980-001.JPG without the watermark --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
I really doubt this is own work: same image with higher resolution: [18] Avron (talk) 21:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Probably not own work, bottom image found at http://www.airlinesoccerleague.com/Larry-Gomes-Stadium.html. 4ing (talk) 21:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
personal photos, unused - same for File:Янис.jpg, File:(Янис).jpg, File:Криевиньш Янис.jpg, File:Выстовку поситил общественый деитель ,Янис Криевиньш.jpg, File:Криевиньш.jpg (user's only activity was to create user page on ru.wiki with two other photos) Pibwl (talk) 22:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photos, out of scope, but also not selfies and not credited to photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping, deleted by 30 October 2015 Hedwig in Washington Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping, deleted 30 October 2015 Hedwig in Washington Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://41.media.tumblr.com/0efbb7b7b17d2da81a91d4ba2130c3ee/tumblr_n3mjjo5mAs1ry16bpo1_1280.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Image is unused and not within the project scope unless used in one of the sister projects. Also, it does not seem free content. Please see [19]. Codename Lisa (talk) 16:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & promotional (see watermarked link to commercial website) Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content from website https://namu.wiki/w/%EB%B0%95%ED%98%84%EB%8F%99 and website is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA which is not allowed in commons. For more, see Com:L Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 16:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content from Google play store which is out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 16:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Not notable (the article was deleted from ru.wiki: https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%94%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0,_%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%A2%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0&action=edit&redlink=1 ). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
mere advertising -- image appears merely to be a vehicle for putting spammy text into commons, and indirectly, into Wikipedia The Anome (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Yet more Indian astrologer advertising spam The Anome (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Yet more Indian astrology advertising spam The Anome (talk) 17:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
low quality image. badly cropped. many details invisible. Better version available at File:Hans Memling - The Man of Sorrows in the arms of the Virgin - Google Art Project.jpg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Go ahead. Same picture, better quality, you can do express delete. Changing the articles afected, obviously. Thanks to told me. --amador (talk) 18:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F8. —Codename Lisa (talk) 21:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Question: Is the depicted picture the same reproduction? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitie 10g (talk • contribs)
- The subject is the same. —Codename Lisa (talk) 11:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
low quality image. badly cropped. many details invisible. Better version available at File:Hans Memling - The Man of Sorrows in the arms of the Virgin - Google Art Project.jpg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Promotional Edslov (talk) 17:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Duplicated of the file File:Orvieto subterranea 2009 09.JPG Paperoastro (talk) 18:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded twice. Duplicate file. Ali Mujtaba (talk) 18:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded twice. Duplicate file. Ali Mujtaba (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Not own work Hangsna (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Not own work Hangsna (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Not own work/no permit. Hangsna (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Not own work Hangsna (talk) 19:26, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
This image is copyrightable. Uploader failed to ask permission of copyright owner. George Ho (talk) 20:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 21:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: screenshot from television with CRT lines, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 21:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: screenshot from television with CRT lines. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Files from Control Arms Flickr stream
[edit]- File:Costa Rica's Vice President Alfio Piva Mesén, June 2013.jpg
- File:Loisyoung.jpg
- File:Marie-Louise Potter, June 2013.jpg
According to these files' descriptions and EXIF data (I uploaded two of them, so I'm sorry that I didn't pay attention to that), they belong to Keith Bedford of Insider Images and not to Control Arms organization itself (the opposite example which description openly says, that photographer relates to Control Arms Coalition). So this is probably some kind of Flickr washing. --INS Pirat (talk) 21:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio copyrighted by "Bani mandir publication" Jayantanth (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Frye1989 Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation image (visit link) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from copyrighted website, not simple. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
last time this was not own work as now claimed - see here (admin link only) JuTa 09:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Rapid delete. Fantastic and misinforming file. --Kwasura (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: reverted to last version. JuTa 18:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Suomen Ilmavoimien tunnus.svg. The previous versions of this file are also incorrect and misleading (they aren't definitely the Air Force emblem). Msaynevirta (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Correct file exists. --Kwasura (talk) 10:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 02:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as previous and per Kwasura and Motopark.
copied from url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- One quick question: are you sure it wasn't they who copied me, if you check the dates? Jidanni (talk) 10:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
In fact bit by bit examination shows they are indeed the same file. All that is left is Their file has HTTP HEAD
Last-Modified: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:40:56 GMT
which is many years after my version. My only conclusion is you have discovered it is they who copied me, not me who copied them. Jidanni (talk) 10:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep PD-shape. Mars/Venus symbol is not copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per Frye1989 & Jidanni! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content (above similar image) little change url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep PD-shape. Mars/Venus symbol is not copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per Frye1989 Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (overwrite file too) [20] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep PD-shape. Mars/Venus symbol is not copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per Frye1989 Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Simple logos of non-notable companies are out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation IgorMagic (talk) 12:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: "minions" per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from copyrighted website. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found on copyrighted website without provenance for halftoned image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Strange depiction of a pre-Columbian rock carving. Modern hat, sunglasses, shoes and camera. Not an illustration of muisca culture and probably protected by modern copyright Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. (http://www.spring2.com/our-partners/) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 19:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
{{Vd}} @Fry1989: i think you haven't read the licensing terms as per uploader and also it is copyvio content, found elsewhere in the web and unlikely said to be own work. Regards, Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 18:10, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- You nominated the image, you do not get to "vote twice". Furthermore, this is very obviously PD-textlogo. You have made quite a number of bad nominations recently, I suggest you take a break and study licensing a bit more. Fry1989 eh? 18:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Text logo, not copyvio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Logo of a company, used in a deleted article en:Henri Miller Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
File:24EFEED500000578-2921477-Dream team Lady Gaga has sparked rumours she is set to collabora-a-66 1421924242070.jpg
[edit]Copyvio mik@ni 12:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. check out [21] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- This image is from tudjman.hr page. At the bottom of it in "Terms of use" (Uvjeti korištenja) it states that content on the page is released under Creative Commons 3.0 licence. United Union (talk) 20:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The bottom of the linked source page read "©2015 Tudjman.hr · Uvjeti korištenja Kontakt · Impressum · Facebook · Knjiga posjetitelja"... I'm sorry but I do not see any Commons Compatible License there. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Present in too many copyrighted websites. Check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Simple logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdelmalek1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:ألقاب الوداد.jpg
- File:At. Madrid 1965, ganador Mohamed V.jpg
- File:Coupe mohamed 5 wydad 1979.jpg
- File:Coupe mohamed 5.jpg
- File:Image Agadir 1960.jpg
- File:Agadir 1960.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdelmalek1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:صورة كاس محمد الخامس.jpg
- File:Coupe-mohamed-5.jpg
- File:Adidas Wydad.AC.png
- File:جمهور الوداد الرياضي.jpg
- File:Tidkar Zilzal agadir 1960.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content. https://www.digisigner.com/customers.html Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Simple logo, the leaf in the corner was two curved lines. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Document from a compagny, possible copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copied from http://disneyxd.disney.nl/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 16:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Disney is an American company, the signature is PD-old and the rest is textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 18:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per Fry1989 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio from imegroup official website whose license is not suitable under commons. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 17:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 18:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per Fry1989. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio http://peoplesdemocraticparty.com.ng/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
found in website (looks copyvio) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Designed logo http://www.apeksbank.com.ua/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
out of commons scope or copyvio from url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio "Portions not contributed by visitors are Copyright 2015 Tangient LLC", this logo is not contributed by visitors --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
what own work?? copyvio url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted content visit here Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: not simple text, copyvio --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content url Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio http://www.cedarvalleycollege.edu/default.aspx --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
uploaded from from facebook & also present in other websites. [22] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 05:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
found in copyrighted website. http://www.untrm.edu.pe/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo. JuTa 06:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
image from facebook and found in websites also. In short, copyvio content. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Permission has been given by Karl Beattie, the creator of the image by uploading it to Facebook. You're welcome to verify it by contacting karl@karlbeattie.com or contacting his twitter @realkarlbeattie.
copied content from https://uk.pinterest.com/lifebike/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 16:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Permissions given to me directly from logo owner and creator at Revelo Electric. A fwd proving these permissions was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Caris129 (talk) 18:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: can be undeleted when OTRS is confimed. JuTa 06:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 19:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
falsche Beschriftung, kann so nicht verwendet werden. Ich dachte dass der Titel eingelesen wird, leider wurde nur der Dateiname eingelesen.... dronepicr (talk) 19:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion Krd 10:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Please delete these files as either uploaders request, or out of scope, or similar reason.
- File:Image from page 1003 of "Atlanta City Directory" (1913) (14598689517).jpg
- File:Image from page 1003 of "Atlanta City Directory" (1913) (14762209596).jpg
- File:Image from page 1004 of "Atlanta City Directory" (1913) (14805053643).jpg
- File:Image from page 162 of "Boone County Recorder" (1922) (14598498010).jpg
- File:Image from page 162 of "Boone County Recorder" (1922) (14805053023).jpg
Josve05a (talk) 09:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael Jackson BAD 25.jpg.
Several people listed as the Sony BMG Sweden contacts on the MyNewsDesk pages have been sent a number of emails requesting confirmation of the copyright status of the Sony images on MyNewsDesk but they have failed to respond one way or the other. [...] Without an OTRS confirmation this must go.
Uploaders request.
- File:AronChupa.jpg
- File:D'Angelo - Black Messiah Album Cover.jpg
- File:D'Angelo - pressbild.jpg
- File:Kygo (366336).jpg
Josve05a (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Uploaders request. Part of mass-upload.
Josve05a (talk) 10:19, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Josve05a (talk) 10:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request, out of project scope. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 11:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Part of mass-upload. Uploaders request.
- File:...och polisongerna stod som spön i backen...eller nåt sånt (2304286933).jpg (Cool hair – Taivo)
- File:A good day for clouds and shadows... (14727759480).jpg (nothing special – Taivo)
- File:A good day for clouds and shadows... (14914068562).jpg (nothing special – Taivo)
- File:A little lichen (7479009802).jpg (unidentified – Taivo)
- File:Alpine and Mediterranean (14581951981).jpg (unidentified, bad composition – Taivo)
- File:Alpine bed (8866861590).jpg (unidentified, bad composition – Taivo)
- File:Andreas Björsten (2457590915).jpg (notable subject, added into article in sv.wiki – Taivo)
- File:Andreas Bruzelius (2456737844).jpg (unknown to sv.wiki and en.wiki – Taivo)
- File:Andreas Bruzelius (2458415498).jpg
- File:Andreas Bruzelius (2458416836).jpg
Josve05a (talk) 18:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: All except the last 4 appear to be possibly useful images. And if any of the subject of the last four have articles they too might be useful. Personality rights would apple to all the people images. Ww2censor (talk) 09:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- The persons in the images do not have any articles. The other images' educational scope has not been made evident. Josve05a (talk) 13:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep all: Frankly, I don’t know what’s going on, but this reeks of COM:POINTYness. If indeed some of these are out of scope, lets have them treated individually or bundled in sensible group DRs, not like this. And please be all reminded, admins included, that there is not such thing as an “uploader’s request” — a courtesy deletion can be asked by the author or by the subject; an uploader at most can ask for the deletion of images uploaded by mistake, but this bunch doesn’t qualify as such. (I voted/commented the same way in the other such DRs which were still open.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- These images were all "by mistake" since they were not the intended images to be uploaded by me when doing these mass-uploads (over thousand images in one go) and therefore I nominate them to be deleted. But well-well...(and I do not see how it is pointy...mind explaining that one?) Josve05a (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- I’m glad there’s no drama going on surrounding these DRs — simply the way they were announced did reek, as said, of COM:POINTYness: Oblique wording in nominations for deletion of long lists of unrelated files uploaded by a well known contributer… In the light of recent debacles, alarms went off. I’d suggest avoiding the polemic notion of an uploader’s request and frame it instead as «Uploaded by mistake». And then the DR discussion can calmly decide how much of it was a happy mistake. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry if I caused some bells to go of, that was not my intention. Josve05a (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- I’m glad there’s no drama going on surrounding these DRs — simply the way they were announced did reek, as said, of COM:POINTYness: Oblique wording in nominations for deletion of long lists of unrelated files uploaded by a well known contributer… In the light of recent debacles, alarms went off. I’d suggest avoiding the polemic notion of an uploader’s request and frame it instead as «Uploaded by mistake». And then the DR discussion can calmly decide how much of it was a happy mistake. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- These images were all "by mistake" since they were not the intended images to be uploaded by me when doing these mass-uploads (over thousand images in one go) and therefore I nominate them to be deleted. But well-well...(and I do not see how it is pointy...mind explaining that one?) Josve05a (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment (multi-post) I do not really care about this outcome of this DR. I'm just requesting deletion, since they were not the intended part of my uploads. If they are useful/in scope, then great! Josve05a (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Part of mass-upload. Uploaders request.
- File:4 kms before La Gloria, Nuevo Leon (5729220015).jpg
- File:4 kms before La Gloria, Nuevo Leon (5729752566).jpg
- File:56 km South of Estacion Vanegas (5692520129).jpg (Bad quality – Taivo)
- File:56 km South of Estacion Vanegas (5692542189).jpg
- File:56 km South of Estacion Vanegas (5692546015).jpg
- File:Anini (7453882254).jpg
Josve05a (talk) 13:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Frankly, none of these looks out of scope to me:.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
- Comment Autenticity of the location of these first two photos is up for discussion at Category talk:Geography of Nuevo León#La Gloria, Nuevo Leon. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Part of mass-upload. Uploaders request.
- File:Ancient hemlock (7196206116).jpg
- File:Another neat thing about lichens (7472654616).jpg
- File:Another road-side attraction (8696267386).jpg (Very beautiful – Taivo)
Josve05a (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep all: Frankly, I don’t know what’s going on, but this reeks of COM:POINTYness. If indeed some of these are out of scope, lets have them treated individually or bundled in sensible group DRs, not like this. And please be all reminded, admins included, that there is not such thing as an “uploader’s request” — a courtesy deletion can be asked by the author or by the subject, an uploader at most can ask for the deletion of images uploaded by mistake, but this bunch doesn’t qualify as such. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- I fail to see the pointy-part. Jove and I work on some of his uploads together and I flagged those as possible out of scopies and Josve double checked and started the DR. I fail to see the possible educational use of a bad quality image of some random Tsuga for example. And no, it won't be possible to ID unless you are an expert on Tsuga perhaps since you need to take closer look at the needles to make an ID. Natuur12 (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Replied above. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- I fail to see the pointy-part. Jove and I work on some of his uploads together and I flagged those as possible out of scopies and Josve double checked and started the DR. I fail to see the possible educational use of a bad quality image of some random Tsuga for example. And no, it won't be possible to ID unless you are an expert on Tsuga perhaps since you need to take closer look at the needles to make an ID. Natuur12 (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
- Some categories added to these. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- File:Ancient hemlock (7196206116).jpg may be useless for reusers focusing on the Tsuga genus, but right now it is our only “portrait” image about Alberni Inlet, and the only showing some canopy coverage; it is also 20% of the whole. (I also added other categories.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment (multi-post) I do not really care about this outcome of this DR. I'm just requesting deletion, since they were not the intended part of my uploads. If they are useful/in scope, then great! Josve05a (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept, but some deleted with different reasons. Also, I edited the requests to be more understandable and deleted some repeats. Now I try to categorize uncategorized photos. Taivo (talk) 16:52, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Recently (today) batch uploaded by me, out of scope.
- File:P1010009 (4544459245).jpg
- File:P1010010 (4545092232).jpg
- File:P1010011 (4544459835).jpg
- File:P1010012 (4544460047).jpg
- File:P1010014 (4544460471).jpg
- File:P1010015 (4544460371).jpg
- File:P1010016 (4545093386).jpg
- File:P1010017 (4545093462).jpg
- File:P1010018 (4545093560).jpg
- File:P1010019 (4544460933).jpg
- File:P1010020 (4544461035).jpg
- File:P1010022 (4545093976).jpg
- File:P1010024 (4544461291).jpg
- File:P1010027 (4544461497).jpg
- File:P1010028 (4545094718).jpg
- File:P1010029 (4544461355).jpg
- File:P1010030 (4545094424).jpg
- File:P1010031 (4545094510).jpg
- File:P1010035 (4544462011).jpg
- File:P1010036 (4545094918).jpg
Josve05a (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted per above, all 'random' personal images of anonymous people. Revent (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW. No evidence of being PD or freely licensed. (I uploaded these images by mistake, as part of a mass-upload)
- File:A boy with Kalashnikov (10404759643).jpg
- File:Amateur Gardening July 2015 (20138255285) (2).jpg
- File:Amateur Gardening July 2015 (20138255285).jpg
- File:My great grandmother (26689354925).jpg
- File:My second great grandmother (26596416242).jpg
- File:Soda Shaq (17748228733).jpg
Josve05a (talk) 21:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: derivatives of unlicensed photos czar 23:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Uploaded by mistake, as part of mass-upload.
- File:Attack? (2397397826).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (14797192939).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (14960878616).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (14960879296).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (15083085639).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (15113557764).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (15269442272).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (15269443712).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (15269824595).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (15269825655).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (15415703362).jpg
- File:Collecting... Atlantic forest, northern littoral of Bahia, Brazil (15416051085).jpg
- File:North El Tecolote, Nuevo Leon (5709655025).jpg
Josve05a (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sitting_on_an_F-16_aircraft.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_Anna_Dellham_(Swedish)_share_their_experiences_in_exercise_Lion_Effort_2012.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_Anna_Dellham_(Flygvapnet).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14598689517).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14762209596).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14805053643).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14598498010).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14805053023).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep, obviously. They are all interesting photos; the fact that they were uploaded by mistake doesn’t make them automaticly off-scope. I suggest that the nominator quickly {{Withdraw}} this request and work at adding categories to these fine pictures. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- How is e.g. this selfie in scope? I see no educational value in any of these images. It is tru that we could create a categoy called "blurry images of unidentified objects" as well, but those photos wold not be in scope either, since there would be no educational value of them. Just because a category exists, it doesn't mean that there is a cope for them. I' rather categorize te rest of this photographers amazing images of species insstead. Josve05a (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think self-portraits of notable botanists are in scope; you think human faces are automatically off scope. Well, don’t waste time discussing with me, User:Josve05a, for there are millions of “selfies” in Commons urgently needing your deletionist zeal. When the last human face is removed from Commons, you can then «categorize te rest of this photographers amazing images of species». -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep this one, for it is now in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep other then File:North El Tecolote, Nuevo Leon (5709655025).jpg which is unlikely to be useful, the inclusion of a human figure provides scale for the rest of the photo's content. These would be less interesting without the person included and most are unlikely selfies. Ww2censor (talk) 05:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I did not realize that the people in the pictures could be notable, and just assumed it was 'another selfie' included in a Flickr users feed. I was not aware that the photographer was notable. (I myself might take photos, some of myself as well, and upload to my Flickr. That doesn't make those photos in-scope, but since the person(s) in these are talked about in articles, they are.) hope you all understand my reasoning. Josve05a (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn, potential use for images. czar 16:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete a 2010 statue in France where there is no Freedom of Panorama exception. Ww2censor (talk) 22:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete because there is no freedom of panorama exception for sculptures in the United States. -- Asclepias (talk) 04:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- FYI, this sculpture is not in the US but in France, however the same reasoning applies. Ww2censor (talk) 11:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
poor quality SVG that is not used nor is it color correct. EricSerge (talk) 23:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content (visit link) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content. (Visit web link) Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
François Bazin is dead in 1956. Copyright violation. 86.217.10.181 13:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Armel Beaufils is dead in 1952. No FoP in France. 86.217.67.11 13:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Armel Beaufils is dead in 1952. No FoP in France. 86.217.67.11 13:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE , school logo Stang 17:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is used on some Wikipedia pages.--Hang9417 (talk) 15:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use Krd 16:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Smaller duplicate of File:Piran Tartini-Platz Panoramabild.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 20:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
copyright content or out of commons scope. [23] Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator's stated rationale. MBisanz talk 01:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
possible copyviol: seems to be a screenshot from mapsdumaroc.com Ciaurlec (talk) 10:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator's stated rationale. MBisanz talk 01:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
copied from http://www.e-olive-project.eu/partners/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator's stated rationale. MBisanz talk 01:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
copied from http://www.e-olive-project.eu/partners/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 10:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator's stated rationale. MBisanz talk 01:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://gradehub.com/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 17:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator's stated rationale. MBisanz talk 01:25, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 02:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Isn't the same. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 00:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Krd 11:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Re-nominating. This is very clearly the same image as File:Sol de Mayo Bandera Argentina.png and File:Sol de Mayo-Bandera de Argentina.svg, except this file is distorted. It doesn't belong here. Fry1989 eh? 18:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete it. Don't attack me more. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 18:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: (poor quality) duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Crop of a pic that was already deleted because of copyvio (picture of an election campaign poster) (:Julien:) (talk) 09:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
-2015-10-24T09:17:00.000Z-File:Slobodan_Milosevic_Election_Poster_Crop.jpg){kind=link}
- There are other Election posters with the same licence here, and no one is thinking about deleting them. Check out the German Election posters on Commons. --WikiNameBaks (talk) 12:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- You have not shown that the copyright owner has licensed this under a acceptable license. I'm not convinced by your en:Two wrongs make a right argument. Thuresson (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Fully copyright violations. Check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- I would like to make 2 points: 1st, everything on OpenClipart.org is in the PUBLIC DOMAIN. 2nd, If you check out who uploaded it to OpenClipart, i.e. the author, you'll see that we both share 3 initials... if you get my meaning. GDJ2015 (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- "All Clipart are Released into the Public Domain.", openclipart.org. Thuresson (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
possibly copyvio - small photo without metadata /St1995 09:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from web link. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Designed logo, no permission --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from web link. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Designed logo, no permission --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio content Check out Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- A map of the United States highlighting states that conform to a specified condition can not be copyrighted. It is purely informative, and no creative thought goes into it. BD2412 T 15:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: this map has been in the public domain since its origination in 2007 with this update showing the current status of the SIAC; there are more than 100 of these maps in use and absolutely none of them are a copyright violation. If this file was flagged because it was thought a newbie uploaded it, that assumption is most definitely wrong also. Msjraz64 (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- The map is based on a 2006 version of File:BlankMap-USA-states.PNG which has been licensed as GNU. Thuresson (talk) 23:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per above. Updated summary to accurately identify and attribute source. License updated to GPL (GPL source + PD modifications = GPL derivative). —RP88 (talk) 11:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:L, Commons only accepts media that is freely licensed or public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. The uploader of this image has failed to indicate why it is public domain in the United States. Since this work was created in 1928, it can't use the {{PD-1923}} tag. Even if we assume the author died immediately after creating it or that the author is anonymous, it was still protected by copyright in the UK in 1996, so it can't use the {{PD-1996}} tag. It appears it will not be in the public domain in U.S. until 2024. —RP88 (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Basically per the extensive and detailed nomination statement by RP88. odder (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
copyvio content http://www.9bis.net/kitty/ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 09:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Айдар Сарсембаев (talk · contribs)
[edit]possibly copyvios - small photos without metadata
/St1995 10:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Contributed by a problematic user. It is likely that these photos come from a group at Russian Facebook, VK. Thuresson (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started to verify claimed "own work" as watermarked/copyrighted "Enchantingkerala.org", pls see also File talk:Mannarassala amma.jpg 8:13, 24 October 2015 related to {DeletionHeader}, Roland zh (talk) 18:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Watermarked with name of photographer Samson P Samuel, a photographer based in India. Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-free logos and their derivatives, no evidences of free licensing.
- File:ABSENTH LOGO.jpg
- File:ARMA ostem logo.jpg
- File:Kasta new.jpg
- File:Kedbl band.jpg
- File:Kukryniksy logo.svg
- File:Louna (Logo).png
- File:Rainwill logo.jpg
- File:Wandersword logo.jpg
- File:Логотип АЗЪ.png
- File:Логотип группы АЗЪ.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 17:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-free, claim of public domain is implausible Stifle (talk) 13:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
clearly not Bollywood Hungama owned; author credited in the caption ~ Nahid Talk 10:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
clearly not Bollywood Hungama owned; author credited in the caption ~ Nahid Talk 10:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
clearly not Bollywood Hungama owned; author credited in the caption ~ Nahid Talk 10:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
clearly not Bollywood Hungama owned; author credited in the caption ~ Nahid Talk 10:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
clearly not Bollywood Hungama owned; author credited in the caption ~ Nahid Talk 10:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's Bollywood Hungama owned image as there is no watermark on it; In the past we've had similar discussion but did not turn out good so far as they do use other people's photographs. As far as my understanding on this, only water-marked images are owned by Bollywood Hungama. ~ Nahid Talk 10:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's Bollywood Hungama owned image as there is no watermark on it; In the past we've had similar discussion but did not turn out good so far as they do use other people's photographs. As far as my understanding on this, only water-marked images are owned by Bollywood Hungama. ~ Nahid Talk 10:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no cropped version available on other copyrighted web site http://www.kemmannu.com/index.php?action=highlights&type=876 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's Bollywood Hungama owned image as there is no watermark on it; In the past we've had similar discussion but did not turn out good so far as they do use other people's photographs. As far as my understanding on this, only water-marked images are owned by Bollywood Hungama. ~ Nahid Talk 10:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's Bollywood Hungama owned image as there is no watermark on it; In the past we've had similar discussion but did not turn out good so far as they do use other people's photographs. As far as my understanding on this, only water-marked images are owned by Bollywood Hungama. ~ Nahid Talk 10:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No cropped version available on other web sites http://www.hamaraphotos.com/photo_-253291.html --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's Bollywood Hungama owned image as there is no watermark on it; In the past we've had similar discussion but did not turn out good so far as they do use other people's photographs. As far as my understanding on this, only water-marked images are owned by Bollywood Hungama. ~ Nahid Talk 10:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's Bollywood Hungama owned image as there is no watermark on it; In the past we've had similar discussion but did not turn out good so far as they do use other people's photographs. As far as my understanding on this, only water-marked images are owned by Bollywood Hungama. ~ Nahid Talk 10:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's Bollywood Hungama owned image as there is no watermark on it; In the past we've had similar discussion but did not turn out good so far as they do use other people's photographs. As far as my understanding on this, only water-marked images are owned by Bollywood Hungama. ~ Nahid Talk 10:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's Bollywood Hungama owned image as there is no watermark on it; In the past we've had similar discussion but did not turn out good so far as they do use other people's photographs. As far as my understanding on this, only water-marked images are owned by Bollywood Hungama. ~ Nahid Talk 10:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, see also per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pyarelal1.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahil Azam and Shama Sikander.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
