Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/07/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 5th, 2015


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wlkrjkwelfkşdslföşlerögmf 81.213.40.218 15:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image seems to be cropped mirror image of File:Chickens in market.jpg. The authorship claim seems to be false. Jarekt (talk) 03:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its my own photo from my market Image boy jr. (talk) 04:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No it isn't. Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Low quality duplicate. Yann (talk) 22:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this page is waste no educated things here only one word and might be the person create this is not yet active in Commons for more info leave me a message Image boy jr. (talk) 07:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Vandalism. Yann (talk) 22:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Strasbourg - Saint-Pierre-le-Jeune protestant - Portail - Corbeau 05.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Entering Tatenhill from Dunstall (geograph 2609467).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nl-souvlaki's.ogg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as the image it was derived from was deleted due to copyright violation 80.1.219.140 18:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as the image it was derived from was deleted due to copyright violation 80.1.219.140 18:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as the image it was derived from was deleted due to copyright violation 80.1.219.140 18:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A sido un error , no es mía la foto Antonio19001 (talk) 19:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Espécimen con un alto grado de modorrismo.jpg]]

 speedy delete - derivative of copyrighted character. Tagging as such (not notifying uploader as they are obviously already aware). Storkk (talk) 20:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise licence (pas compatible avec commons) Asmoth (talk) 17:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 00:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 05:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: taken from here. Not compatible license. Discasto talk 02:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Right. Copyright violation Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:16, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously stolen from the Daily Mail. Binksternet (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by INeverCry; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 05:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EkaPolice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copivo from [1]

Максим Підліснюк (talk) 22:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Anatoliy (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NGUwiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copivo from http://www.volynnews.com/news/authority/nova-patrulna-politsiia-kyyeva-sklala-prysiahu-/

Максим Підліснюк (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Anatoliy (talk) 08:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that jkhjrfre4434.tistory.com is a valid free content source. The blog is a collection of stolen content invalidely licensed under CC-BY. This image is a screenshot from a film en:Master's Sun with copyright presumably by the producers of that movie, not by the tistory blogger. Only a copyright holder can publish somthing under any sort of license. Martin H. (talk) 09:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Other photos uploaded by the same user have the same problem. --ChoHyeri (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Obvious license laundering. Yann (talk) 09:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: This person isn't Alex Rodriguez Yann (talk) 23:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OK with more explanation. Yann (talk) 09:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 19:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from online source, not owned by uploader. Uploader known for other copyright violating uploads. Binksternet (talk) 23:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 19:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the copyright holder so there needs to be some sort of statement of permission. A tweet has been sent to Glenorchy Air to confirm permission. Short of a clear statement this is a COM:PRP DR. MK-3B-NBN (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is the original copyright holder. --Andrewrutherford (talk) 04:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Permission verified per https://twitter.com/commonsaviation/status/617560840951042048 Revent (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonmq45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyright violations. Martin H. (talk) 18:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by mistake Ninniku (talk) 10:58, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usama Al.Jalal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works, out of COM:SCOPE. Last one is an advertisement.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usama Al.Jalal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:18, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, simple work, does not provide any value though. Mippzon (talk) 06:07, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:54, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple user created work that does not provide value. Not used. Mippzon (talk) 06:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:54, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 06:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 06:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above threshold of originality, claim of own work is unlikely. Basvb (talk) 09:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need permission from the original author of the painting. Basvb (talk) 09:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   17:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple reasons: firstly advertisement for the website, secondly not so useful with the big watermark, thirdly we need permission from the website (OTRS), fourthly the carpet depicted might be protectable under copyright. Basvb (talk) 09:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need permission from the copyright holders over the painting. Basvb (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   17:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: low quality unused logo Basvb (talk) 10:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   17:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: low quality unused logo (it is used in personal/project page galleries on fr-wiki) Basvb (talk) 10:16, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   17:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. Storkk (talk) 11:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Really doubtful own work as stated. - Fma12 (talk) 16:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Clear copyvio, looks like profesisonal photograph for a soccer trading card -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mippzon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logotype PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Poorly named and unused potentially copyrighted file. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 21:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG version available. Fry1989 eh? 20:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no locense at all. --JuTa 10:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nakendra Black (talk) 02:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source of the image, www.jnditie.com, states explicitly on the bottom of the page that it is an unofficial, amateur's website about Jinan Metro, thus this logo is not the official logo of Jinan Metro. A similar case can be referenced here. Siyuwj (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope as unused logo Basvb (talk) 12:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: no fop for artistic work Basvb (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not Avaristan 37.190.59.98 06:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The file is in use, if information is wrong please correct it or request renaming Basvb (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Where andi people? Where dido people? Where aechi people? This is map fals 37.190.59.98 06:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason to delete. See source for the meaning of the numbers or the Wikipedia articles where its used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeroen (talk • contribs) 2015-07-05T06:49:06‎ (UTC)


Kept: In use Basvb (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

She is not Lezgian 37.190.59.98 06:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Maybe she’s not, maybe you can even prove it. It would be a reason to rename the file, and to stop using it to illustrate Lezgians in other projects. Either way, this deletion request is useless. -- Tuválkin 05:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Basvb (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shen is not Lezgian. 109.252.73.48 08:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 12:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет АИ. Не флаг лакцев. 37.190.59.98 06:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use Basvb (talk) 12:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет авторитетных источников. Это придуманный флаг. 185.79.101.123 10:31, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: File is widely used, from ar:الأعلام الثقافية وأعلام العرقيات to zh:俄罗斯-波斯战争 (1722-1723年). Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not try to override their editorial judgement. If the file is good enough for 21 Wikipedias, it's good enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 23:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет авторитетных источников Vendettaaa (talk) 00:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion (Google Translate: "No authoritative sources"). Use {{Factual accuracy}} instead. --P 1 9 9   19:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет авторитетных источников. 37.190.59.98 06:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use Basvb (talk) 12:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is photoshop! 37.190.59.98 06:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I see no problem Basvb (talk) 12:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not sources 37.190.59.98 06:58, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I see no problem Basvb (talk) 12:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not sources 37.190.59.98 06:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I see no problem Basvb (talk) 12:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not sources 37.190.59.98 07:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion Basvb (talk) 12:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not sources 37.190.59.98 07:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I see no problem Basvb (talk) 12:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, unused, out of scope Rsteen (talk) 07:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Could be in scope with more specific categorization/description Basvb (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.afisha.ru/people/307987/ Drakosh (talk) 07:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non-free image; the packaging (particularly the image of the baby) is still copyrighted.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contain non-free images such as: http://www.amam-magazine.com/inosanto_legends.html, http://www.your-krav-maga-expert.com/bruce-lee-attack-gusto.html InstantNull (talk) 09:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, sharp for noticing. Basvb (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages uploaded by Oliszydlowski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User grabs images from the web (e.g. dioblina.pl), combines them into a collage and uploads them here as "own work".

El Grafo (talk) 12:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Listed some sources now. As File:Gliwic.jpg shows, images have also been taken from commons without attribution. Hence, it might turn out that we can actually keep some of them, given that someone figures out all the sources … --El Grafo (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 08:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oliszydlowski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots from Magnat, a 1987 polish film

— Racconish 📥 10:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata - unlikely to be {{Own work}}. Storkk (talk) 11:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, letterboxed - unlikely to be {{Own work}}. Storkk (talk) 11:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is based on a screenshot from GoogleEarth, which is not free to use Mikenorton (talk) 11:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sensitive information (telephone, email address) of persons Takeaway (talk) 12:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 12:59, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Josve05a (talk) 12:18, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:59, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osvaldo O Faz Acontecer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Josve05a (talk) 12:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Basvb (talk) 13:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osvaldo O Faz Acontecer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. For File:Olha Nós.jpg: unlikely own work, most likely grabbed from social media (see also User talk:Osvaldo O Faz Acontecer: serial copyright violator).

Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photocopy of a newspaper article.  Dr Greg  talk  12:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs OTRS-permission from newspaper Basvb (talk) 13:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo that cannot be considered free - not in use and has not place in the Commons Ldorfman (talk) 12:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, apparently commercial/promotional document. Copyright unlikely to be owned by uploader. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 13:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of photo of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: source needed for derivative Basvb (talk) 13:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork. No FoP in the Netherlands. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete, but for a different reason from what user:TwoWings indicates; there is freedom of panorama in the Netherlands (see e.g. Commons:Freedom of panorama#Netherlands), but that is only for art permanently located in a public space, quod non.... L.tak (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@L.tak: yes, wnat I meant is that FoP rules in the Netherlands don't apply to that work. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:39, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It was briefly located at a public location. How fixed does it need to be to be considered fixed? "Permanent" statues can be moved. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:05, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleted: No evidence that it is permanently in a public space Basvb (talk) 13:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stained glass window seems to be signed and dated 2010. Storkk (talk) 13:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of paintings by Segala75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are photos of paintings signed by multiple different people (J. Ruiz, M. Stenek and a "CC"), with no indication that they have been dead for 70 years.

Storkk (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: we need permission from the painters Basvb (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. {{PD-text}} ? Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not in use and no license Basvb (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by António Paulo Matthews (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album and file storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cuongtonghung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 13:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure it's allowed to upload an alternative version of an anonymous caricature. Even if it's anonymous, can we consider it free to use or in the public domain ? TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is it the real reason for the deletion request, knowing the context & the reactions in this so controversed domain ? If not, claim clarely the ethic problem. If yes, someone must find the first anonymous caricature and author. Finding the caricature is surely possible but very difficult because Flux.md don't conserve all the paper archives, and Moldova is far. Finding the anonymous author is absolutely impossible because only me know who he was, and meet him... when I watch a mirror.  ;-D But I can show all my old creations under the eyes of any Wiki administrator if necessary... talk to [9] about it... --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey, don't be paranoiac ! And try to check yourself who you're talking to ! If you had looked at my profiles (especially on French WP) you may easily find the answer : I'm fully aware of the problem of "concurrence des mémoires", and I actually struggle every day against my own students who are in that kind of sick logic (especially about the Muslims-Palestinian/Jews-Israel topic). And I actually think this caricature is a good way to think about that because the message is clear (I kept a copy of it to show it to my students).
    No, the real problem is just a question of right. And if you know the author, that may help us to have his authorization. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, if I'm alive, it's because I'm paranoiac (I growed next the low Danube, far of the rivers Thames or Seine, a lot of years ago, in the "worker's paradise" when the General Secretary of the unique Party was more as a God). But I stop joking now... my english isn't so good, for make sense word-games in this language. Alors je passe en français : oui, je suis bel et bien l'auteur de ce dessin, le seul, le vrai, l'unique, dessin réalisé d'abord pour Flux il y a environ dix ans, anonymement (je ne tenais pas à me faire injurier, voire menacer). C'était pour illustrer une brève sur la "concurrence mémorielle" en Moldavie entre les survivants des "martyrs" du fascisme (juifs, partisans, slaves, roms, homos...) et ceux du stalinisme (roumanophones, russes "blancs", membres de sectes néoprotestantes, dissidents...). Ensuite j'ai utilisé ce dessin pour mes cours à l'UTL de Toulon, dans un cadre plus général, c'était de l'histoire sociale. Quand je l'ai téléchargé sur Commons il y a huit ans, sous le pseudo que j'utilisais encore à l'époque, j'ai préféré me référer à Flux, toujours pour ne pas me faire pourrir, mais ta demande de délétion (beau barbarisme, non ?) m'oblige à faire mon coming out. Tant pis pour ma parano ! je vais modifier la page. Cordialement, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 15:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC) (un survivant parmi d'autres)[reply]
  •  Keep I had some discussions in French with the uploader Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (on my French WP profile talk page), and I tend to trust his story. In fact, the "anonymous" author is the uploader himself. He first preferred to be anonymous because his caricature provoked some hatred from nationalists when he created it. Thus there's no problem of rights. We just have to make it clear in the description. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Basvb (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kristine zels (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reivax28 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Seems to be test versions of File:Composition du Conseil Départemental de 2015 à 2021.pdf.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 1 version is enough Basvb (talk) 13:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milton Shyne O Imorrivel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:13, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robin kumer Ghosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tokollom6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, name also looks like a download name Basvb (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guillermo Donostillo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page from a personal journal with a non-useful description. Out of COM:SCOPE. CT Cooper · talk 14:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 13:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aldavas12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aldavas12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious case I think. The first file File:CitiBanck.jpg is stolen from https://www.flickr.com/photos/moi_rivas/3420625094. The second file File:Panorama de San Salvador.jpg can be found in larger size at http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=44411976&postcount=270, the file is hosted on photobucket as 31040727663e40f1836co.jpg, that filename identifies it as a flickr file from https://www.flickr.com/photos/calero/3104072766/. The third file File:Centro Comercial la Gran Via.jpg has a watermark. All stolen. --Martin H. (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Commons is not the place for Missing Person notes and the file is not in use. Please delete. Ldorfman (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:23, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professionally created and low resolution image of what appears to be a celebrity. Very unlikely to be the work of the uploader. CT Cooper · talk 14:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also adding the following images to this nomination for the same reason:

CT Cooper · talk 14:54, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 15:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image ripped from the internet. Of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 15:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image ripped from the internet. Of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 15:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 15:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 15:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The lighthouse was designed by Maurice Durand who died in 1978. Unfortunately, there is no COM:FOP in France, so architecture created by Durand is still copyrighted. Also nominated: File:W2139-SablesDO Chaume Armandeche 1525 IA85000529i.JPG. De728631 (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated

De728631 (talk) 16:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

De728631 (talk) 17:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Industrial / utility buildings, no copyright. Yann (talk) 22:41, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable, out of scopoe -- Christian Ferrer 16:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 16:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The info was added, I believe this file is a perfect example where the statement about collecting from local pictures from commons is unneeded, I believe that this information is incorrect (on which page is this rule stated?). The uploader of the collage is also the creator of all the images and as such own copyright over all elements, simply releasing those (maybe stating that uploader is creator of all of the images) is enough to apply the attribution criterium at collages. Basvb (talk) 13:41, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wale7.jpg Mippzon (talk) 17:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use Basvb (talk) 13:49, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User created work, unused, no added value for Commons. Mippzon (talk) 17:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image displaying a yellow blow. Not used. Mippzon (talk) 17:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self created work. Black background with some text. Does not provide any value to Commons Mippzon (talk) 17:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Homemade logo, not used, simple forms, does not add any value to commons. Mippzon (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality work, some text of some kind, not used, does not add value to Commons Mippzon (talk) 18:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion of some kind Mippzon (talk) 18:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stand up promotion Mippzon (talk) 18:04, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ies (talk • contribs) 2015-07-02T12:30:54‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Achim (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file (from me) is nolonger needed or in use. The Wikiversity course does not exist anymore. Res 2015 (talk) 19:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request Basvb (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material (a logo of a company). A logo, with appropriate fair use rationale, has been uploaded to en.wikipedia Djkeddie (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. Uploader added {{PD-textlogo}}{{Trademarked}} later. But I fear that is above COM:TOO. JuTa 20:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO Basvb (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is wrong – see e.g. http://theskylive.com/planetarium?obj=voyager1#ra%7C17.19359786241244%7Cdec%7C13.199348620437261%7Cfov%7C50 DmitTrix (talk) 05:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: image has been updated. P 1 9 9   14:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logos uploaded as own work

[edit]

I nominated logos with the following properties: 1. They are not in use on any project; 2. They have an own work tag. The argumentation for this deletion request lies in the first two points. Most of these files are created by a company or organisation, and copied from their website by the uploader. As such the "own work" claim is false and thus the attribution, permission etcetera should be fixed. However as the files are not currently used the files could well be out of scope, and if they would be in scope and somebody wants to use them on a page on the organization getting the logo again and reuploading it with proper attribution is not much work. There could also be files which are actually own work and are not from a company (personal art), for this files I argue that as they are not used and as such out of scope. Thus the argument is that all of these files are either out of scope, or an infringement on authorship because of incorrect attribution and as such should be deleted. With logos there is always the issue of threshold of originality. The argument above in my opinion also applies to images below the threshold of originality, some of the images might be above it as well but that's not the issue here.

Basvb (talk) 10:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused logos are generally considered com:adverts. --McZusatz (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per nom - Fma12 (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   14:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be useful Takeaway (talk) 13:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other than that, I doubt there is a dish called "mercimekli köfte". Please see "mercimek köftesi" in Ca:WP. --E4024 (talk) 08:42, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   14:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work was uploaded by me in 2008. I'm not sure to have the rights to publish them here and so I'm asking for deletion. Res 2015 (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - {{PD-ineligible}} and even if not, {{PD-old-auto|deathyear=1934}}. Storkk (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   14:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded this image without permission. So I please for deletion. Thx. Res 2015 (talk) 19:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and rename under FRC#3 - photograph was taken in 1875. Storkk (talk) 20:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   14:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded this image without permission. So please delete this file. Thx. Res 2015 (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - {{PD-ineligible}} and even if not, {{PD-100}}, year of death was 1890. Storkk (talk) 20:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   14:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded this image without permission. So please delete this file. Thx. Res 2015 (talk) 19:27, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 1777 publication, copyrights long expired. P 1 9 9   14:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This clip art is not related in any way to Luigi's Mansion video game Hernanmassetti (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: No reason for deletion. This file is used in many pages, not only for Luigi's mansion. As Commons does not accepts Fair use, this generic haunted house graphic is suitable as a free replacement for non-free haunted house artworks or such (as your non-free files uploaded, now deleted). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per User:Amitie 10g. P 1 9 9   14:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan from a print, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   14:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused text file: out of scope Basvb (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject is in UAE, no FoP in UAE and thus this at best is fair use Penwhale (talk) 23:19, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete + tagged with:copyvio via grabbed from internet. Last remaining file, see User talk:Omio Asad (serial copyright violator). Gunnex (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Yann as copyvio. Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely, needs permission. Basvb (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely, needs permission. Basvb (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist doppelt. Manfred&Barbara Aulbach (talk) 11:31, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file is in use, what is the name of the duplicate file? Basvb (talk) 12:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of File:Tatlisu-Nord-Cypern-Moschee - ehemalige griechisch-orthodoxe Kirche (2003).jpg. P 1 9 9   16:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently photoshopped to add the subject's head to a Chelsea shirt Mattythewhite (talk) 11:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file is in use, the photoshop is not that clear. Is the file a (likely) copyvio? Because that would be the only reason I could see to delete this file. Basvb (talk) 12:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The file was uploaded before the subject signed for Chelsea (whose shirt he is wearing), so it's some been tampered with in some way. But it is likely to be a copyvio in any case. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy  Delete Grabbed & derivated from (example) http://www.uefa.com/uefaeuropaleague/season=2012/clubs/player=250012196/index.html (© 1998-2014 UEFA. All rights reserved) = http://img.uefa.com/imgml/TP/players/14/2012/324x324/250012196.jpg (last modified: 2011, identical exif = copyrighted work by "© phil greig 2010"). Gunnex (talk) 17:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per User:Gunnex. P 1 9 9   16:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am extremely baffled by how such a childish and non-encyclopedic file can stay on for so long. It has absolutely no use except to humiliate others. I doubt that any of the Wikipedias will have a use for it. This picture has absolutely no evidence that it is even based on reality. Corsicanwarrah (talk) 14:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

quite strong words for just a drawing. Somebody with more knowledge on the subject of drawing distinct species could help out here by looking whether this is at least a little bit realistic or just a random fantasy animal drawing. Basvb (talk) 13:15, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: completely unscientific. P 1 9 9   16:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is excessively childish. I am baffled that this picture gets used in articles, and that it has stayed for such a long time. It has no use at all in illustrating articles. What's Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia - websites specially designed for children or something? Corsicanwarrah (talk) 14:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As much as I agree with the nomination, it is in use, so someone saw some value in this image. P 1 9 9   16:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. I doubt that is uploader's own work and PD-old also doubtful. /St1995 20:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work. Unclear copyright status. P 1 9 9   16:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, various personalities, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 23:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the artist.

Yann (talk) 23:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NB: All uploads by this user are suspicious. More investigation needed. Yann (talk) 23:31, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

:-) I found the source [10] for the part of this image (File:Hacı Həsənov.jpg). --Ray Garraty (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Montage/photoshopped. Ties and suits are available here, and elsewhere.

Yann (talk) 09:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own works. P 1 9 9   16:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More suspicious uploads: official portraits, maps, old photos, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Skith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering [[User talk:Skith]/logs. See also below. Ignoring two files with short time between taken and upload date.

Gunnex (talk) 22:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No such signs on line U3 (wrong construction era + other inaccuracies).

   FDMS  4    01:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per FDMS 4 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:38, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не указаны андо-цезские народы и арчинцы. Карта не верная! 37.190.59.98 06:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Перепись не верная? См. источник, они числятся и всегда числились в составе аварцев --Tovel (talk) 14:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Seems correct to me. Please provide a link why this chart is wrong. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need permission from the author of the photograph. Basvb (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission since 2015-07-05 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like flickr-washing. Low resolution (see original size in metadata), no author's (Thomas Sabo) permission.

Sealle (talk) 12:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Someone with a Flickr account should ask for clarification, may be an accidental release or they have full permission. --Denniss (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Probably flickr-wash. Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a concrete Help:Inkscape page with nearly exact same goal involving. I suggest to merge relevant(?) text in an additional section there. (hint on H:SVG to here is left) ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No graphix wizz interested? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hedwig in Washington Can you write it in German please? I don't understand it. I would merge both this days ans made an redirect. GreetingsUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  13:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Perhelion: Tschuldigung. :) Behalten, weil sich offenbar keiner freiwillig gemeldet hat Deine Idee umzusetzen. Und ja, redirect ist immer 'ne gute Idee. Danke fuer Deine Muehen!! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the uploader, who seems never categorize this uploads, can provide a more precise description, I would be happy to categorize it myself if necessary. However, this low quality image is IMO out of scope without a more precise description. -- Christian Ferrer 16:07, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Christian Ferrer Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no author, no licensing information. Info: Shown person died 1939. Might be eligible for PD-old (anon). Wdwd (talk) 16:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Belize has PD-old after 50 years, seems like the file was updated and a date (1924) for publication was added. Basvb (talk) 13:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: J. in office: May 4, 1924 - July 16, 1938. Died 1939. So PD-Belize ok. BUT! No source Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no author, no licensing information. Info: Shown person died 1923. May be eligible for PD-old (anon). Wdwd (talk) 16:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Died in 1923. Woods, Charles M. Sr., et al. Years of Grace: The History of Roman Catholic Evangelization in Belize: 1524-2014.” (Belize: Roman Catholic Diocese of Belize City-Belmopan, 2015), page 358.Jzsj (talk) 08:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Same here: no source Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jenos96 as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: text|reason=This file is ONLY published under a license that does not allow unrestricted commercial use. Under Commons licensing policy, files must be published under at least one license which permits unrestricted commercial use. The file will be deleted without notice unless it is relicensed or multi-licensed in accordance with the Commons licensing policy. Finnish picture taken and/or published in 1944. {{PD-Finland50}} may apply here. Licensing is irrelevant because Creative Commons did not existed prior to the XXI century, and simple changes to a picture like colorization over a BW one does not give new copyright. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:16, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Correct. But no source to original photograph given. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  Delete Issued in 1948, so no PD. Photo and text still under copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coentor (talk • contribs) 2015-07-04T16:01:02‎ (UTC)
  •  Comment There is an error. Not 1948 , photo and text is 1941.
Still no PD.--Coentor (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not PD yet Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though this book is taken from archive.org,and even there "This book cannot be viewed because it is under review by the Million Books Project" is given. And DLI's copyright policy is not clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.247.188.21 (talk • contribs) 2015-07-04T10:07:43‎ (UTC)

@117.247.188.21, I am not sure whether it is worth responding to an anonymous IP address as the above IP user seems to have flagged several deletion requests without enough understanding of copyrights. Requesting the administrators to clarify the same. The Archive people are not sure about the copyright status. This book is also available in Digital Library of India, see: [11]. According to the DLI site; all the books are copyright free. Hence I request the administrators to remove the deletion request.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
there is the user name Ju in the last deletion request of TeluguVariJanapadaKalarupalu. here is with IP address used for unsigned.. --విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 10:52, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Author died 2011, not PD Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]