Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/01/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
duplicate cat of Category:Armored car operators maps — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katangais (talk • contribs) 2015-01-07T20:19:46 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily JuTa 12:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Not PD in source country (UK). Jee 04:10, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
<moved from Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard [1]>
We received a deletion request claiming this file is not PD in UK. [2]. Jee 05:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- According to the file information page, the painting was created by w:Anne Estelle Rice, who died in 1959. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, and who was British. Painting made in the UK. No reason why a PD-US claim should be applicable at all (especially without information about the publication history). If Rice died 1959, this is under copyright in the UK until the end of 2029. If a pre-1923 publication can be asserted, this could be moved to the English Wikipedia as PD-US-1923-abroad. Lupo 15:36, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Abundently clear that this picture is is still subject to copyright protection in the UK MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete it will upload better one Dishual (talk) 12:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Krd 14:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete as nominator. No evidence of this being own work. Josve05a (talk) 13:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Web site screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
violación del copyright desde http://www.gabrielblanco.cc/nuevaweb/margarita_munoz.html Tarawa1943 (talk) 17:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope. is a better way to display the formula. Stefan4 (talk) 14:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
![{\displaystyle S(t)=K/\left[1+e^{-b(t-t_{0})}\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/d96b222e3660b5ff65c56493c9468b83790774ff)
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_with_his_son_Wyatt,_and_wife_Kathy_2013-11-20_12-56.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-he.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard&oldid=146091237#File:Katherine_Mansfield_1918.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: The mathematical formula has globally been replaced by TeX code McZusatz (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Nose si el archivo contiene Copyright y investigare mas asi saber si puedo resubirlo. KamitoKazehayaER (talk) 19:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploaders request. Fair use (Commons:Fair use or en:Wikipedia:Non-free content) is not allowed here on Commons, even with a fair use rational. Martin H. (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OakvilleMovingServices (talk · contribs)
[edit]Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. INeverCry 21:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
unnecessary, I made a mistake Nixnubix (talk) 22:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
As description says, the photo is "sent to friends by artist herself". This is not a suitable license, uploader's claim of own work is incorrect. Photographer is unknown. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Väga imelik jutt. Nagu aru olen saanud on Wikipedia sedasi vaid "suurte" tsensorite pärusmaa. Miski ei kõlba ja kõik on valesti. Ise midagi korralikku teha ei taheta, aga teisi kritiseeritakse ja kiusatakse. Uhkeldatakse, et mina olin see, kes kellegi Wikipediast blokeeris jne.
Kui näiteks Anton Hansen Tammsaare pildi juures on tekst "Muuseumikogu Fotokogu" siis see nagu kõlbab. Pole kah kirjas, kes pildi on teinud (vt eestpoolt Photographer is unknown). Tõepoolest ei tea, kes fotograaf on, sest see on tehtud u. 35 aastat tagasi ametliku fotograafi poolt ja seejärel on Külli Muna ise saatnud selliseid fotosid omadele sõpradele. Mina olin tema kirjasõber mitu aastat. Kui sellise pildi avaldamine on keelatud, siis mis on lubatud. Palun seletust! Jah, minul on ka Küllist enda tehtud pilt, aga selle kvaliteet nigel. Võin ka tema tütrelt pilti küsida, aga vaevalt, et ka tema autorit teab.
Kui nt. minust tahaks pilti üles panna siis peaks nagu "selfie" võtma, sest muidu pole nagu enda tehtud pilt. Täiest jabur! Kas vanematest kultuuritegelastest peaks siis nagu vaid hauakivide pilte üles panema, nagu seda on tehtud, sest fotograaf on teadmata kuigi pilt leidub perekonnaalbumist. Kui meta-andmed puuduvad, siis ei tähenda see seda, et pilt pole ise fotografeeritud või skaneeritud fotoalbumist. Vahest on parem kui neid andmeid kaasas pole ja osad pilditöötluse programmid kustutavad meta-andmed ära.
Soovitan kustutamise asemel lisada Wikipediasse infot, sest kõik selline on teretulnud. Ka tõeliselt kehvasid jutte tasuks korrigeerda, vigu parandada ja mitte nuriseda, et "see artikkel vajab toimetamist". Toimetage siis kui oskate, kui ei oska, olge vait. Marru ajab kohe teiega õiendamine. Teie nn. administraatorite ebaprofessionaalsest tegevusest võiks juba raamatu avaldada. Pidevalt vaid nurisete ja peidate end mingite varjunimede või osaliste nimede taha.
Vaata kasvõi teksti "Lihula piiskopkond". Ajaloolisest seisukohast on tekst kõlbmatu. Tee tööd ja ära nurise.
Vahur Joala
Deleted, Foto laadimiseks Commonsisse on vaja autori, see tähendab fotograafi luba. Luba ei ole vaja väga vanade fotode jaoks, kui fotograaf on 70 aastat surnud. Tammsaare fotodest on vist osa väga vanad, aga osadel on fotograaf teada ja 70 aastat surnud. Tõepoolest on XX sajandi teise poole inimestest enam-vähem ainus võimalus fotot saada hauakivi pildistada (välja arvatud siis, kui hauakivi on kunstiteos, sel juhul tuleb skulptorilt luba saada). Ja tõesti, kui Vahur Joalast fotot tahta, siis tuleb teha enekas või saada fotograafilt luba. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Uskumatult ajuvaba mõtlemine. Kui käisin lapsepõlves fotograafi juures (50 aastat tagasi), maksin selle foto eest ja kui nüüd tahaks seda fotot Wikisse pannas, siis pean 20 aastat tagasi surnud fotograafi käest selleks küsima loa ja kes mäletab, et kes oli 50 aastat tagasi Pärnus Kalevi tänava fotoateljees just sel päeval fotograafina. Seega soovitaks need Wiki Commons reeglid põhjalikult uuendada tegelikule elule vastavaks. Ja hauakivi pilte on Wikipedias inimeste piltide asemele pandud, sest näopilti panna ei tohi ja pole need mingisugused kunstiteosed (https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Ernst_S%C3%A4rgava#mediaviewer/File:S%C3%A4rgava_haud.jpg).
Ja kui teadsid enne minu kirjutatud juttu Külli Munast midagi, siis miks ise sellest ei kirjutanud? Kindlasti oli tegemist targema inimesega kui mitmed Wiki tegelased. Kui aga keegi näeb vaeva ja paneb asjad kirja ning lisab isegi foto, millel on ajalooline väärtus, siis hakatakse Teie poolt autoreid kuisama ja tsensuuri kasutama.
Kunagi võeti maha kogu ports minu ülespandud fotosid väitega, et nil polnud meta andmeid või olid "liialt pisikesed". Kõik fotod olid minu tehtud ja meelega väikseks tehtud, et mitte kulutada teie väärtuslikku kettamahtu. Pidevalt küsite abirahasid Wiki ülalpidamiseks, aga käitute kasutajatega omavoliliselt.
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vahur Joala
Kas see kõik ei tundu jaburana? Istuge kambaga maha ja arutage omad reeglid läbi. Tundub, et indiviidide omavolile muidu Wikis lõppu vist ei tule.
Vahur Joala
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete Brand, copyrighted logo--Guiggz (talk) 21:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Keep :
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dunkerque - Quatre jours de Dunkerque, étape 1, départ (169) (1er mai 2013).JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Courrières - Quatre jours de Dunkerque, étape 1, 1er mai 2013, arrivée (092).JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Courrières - Quatre jours de Dunkerque, étape 1, 1er mai 2013, arrivée (132).JPG
- and sixty others. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
_(1er_mai_2013).JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: DR opened by a banned user, with spurious rationale. Dereckson (talk) 21:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect date, incorrect source, incorrect author and incorrect license. . HombreDHojalata.talk 00:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect date, incorrect source, incorrect author and incorrect license. . HombreDHojalata.talk 00:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect date, incorrect source, incorrect author and incorrect license. . HombreDHojalata.talk 00:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect date, incorrect source, incorrect author and incorrect license. . HombreDHojalata.talk 00:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect date, incorrect source, incorrect author and incorrect license. . HombreDHojalata.talk 00:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Wider crop of the photo that predates the Commons upload available here: http://www.bkz-online.de/node/460230 Mosmof (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The source at http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10992&page=112 does not state that the photographer died over 70 years ago. In fact the photographer is unknown. The image is likely still under copyright. Diannaa (talk) 01:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment w:David E. Green was born in 1910 and he could easily be more than 35 years old on the picture. The picture was not necessarily even taken 70 years ago. There does not seem to be any indication that this is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Non-free screenshot §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope; personal image 1989 02:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope; personal image 1989 03:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lisette Juares (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
The Haz talk 03:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope; personal image 1989 03:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope The Haz talk 03:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 03:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope; personal image 1989 04:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative works of toys and models - see COM:TOYS, COM:CB and User:Elcobbola/Models... Vikiçizer (talk) 22:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Navsource.org is not a US Navy Website. The photo was contributed to Navsource by Graeme D Fuller and was taken in Fremantle, Australia. It is not clear that he is a US Navy employee or sailor and other photos on the site from the same author are also in Australia, he may be an Australian citizen since it is not clear, recommend deletion. [3] Dual Freq (talk) 04:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The key to this image is the graphical design of this presumably-nonfree billboard or similar advertising poster, but there is no {{FoP-India}} DMacks (talk) 04:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Uploader claims as own-work, but appears to be a photograph of some other publication/printed image. No evidence uploader owns license of the original in order to release this derivative. Uploader does have a history of uploading similar non-free images that then get deleted on these grounds. DMacks (talk) 04:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Uploader claims as own-work, but appears to be a photograph of some other publication/printed image. No evidence uploader owns license of the original in order to release this derivative. Uploader does have a history of uploading similar non-free images that then get deleted on these grounds. DMacks (talk) 04:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation
- File:SirimavoBandaranaike1.jpg
- File:DudleySenanayake1.jpg
- File:NMPERERA1.jpg
- File:MaithripalaSirisena2.jpg
- File:MaithripalaSirisena1.jpg
AntonTalk 04:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful this is own work, SVG does exist as File:Flag of Peru (state).svg. Fry1989 eh? 05:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
PNG with stepped lines, better SVG available (File:Propiconazol.svg) Kopiersperre (talk) 05:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- As the uploader, I have no objection to deletion. Ed (Edgar181) 12:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sayed Mohsin Reza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Sayed Mohsin Reza in Jahangirnagar University.jpg
- File:Sayed Mohsin Reza.jpg
- File:Sayed Mohsin Reza in IUT ICT FEST 2013.JPG
- File:Sayed Mohsin Reza in Bandorban.jpg
- File:Sayed Mohsin Reza in ICEEICT 2014.jpg
Ies (talk) 06:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of project scope.
- File:10390413 851213458276734 7840143713321831912 n.jpg
- File:10429844 851281068269973 7264340855420141497 n.jpg
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by المخرج محمد سلامة (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of project scope.
- File:صور المخرج محمد سلامة قناة اليمن.jpg
- File:المخرج محمد سلامة برنامج اليمن اليوم.jpg
- File:المخرج محمد علي سلامة.jpg
- File:صور المخرج محمد سلامة اليمن.jpg
- File:صور المخرج محمد سلامة.jpg
- File:صور المخرج محمد علي سلامة.jpg
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angeldcmoney (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of project scope.
- File:ADMGANSTARS.jpg
- File:ANGELDC.jpg
- File:ANGELDCMONEY.jpg
- File:Kinnnnnng.jpg
- File:D C.jpg
- File:IVORY KING RAPPER.jpg
- File:ANGEL.jpg
- File:Yeaaaa.jpg
- File:0à.jpg
- File:D C MONEY.jpg
- File:ANGEL D C MONEY.jpg
- File:ANGEL D C.jpg
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be replaced by wiki-text and SVG if useful Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Numsamaishop (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional photos, out of project scope.
- File:Contact copy.jpg
- File:Bottom used 160.jpg
- File:Bottom วินเทจ 160.jpg
- File:Preorder web2.jpg
- File:Preorder web.jpg
- File:New comming.gif
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gerald Groehn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not realistically useful for educational purposes, out of project scope.
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farhaddeldooz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of project scope.
- File:Seyed farhad deldust.33.jpg
- File:استاد سیدفرهاددلدوز.JPG
- File:فرهاددلدوز.JPG
- File:Seyed farhad deldooz.jpg
- File:سیدفرهاددلدوز.jpg
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SCK Suryodaya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:SCK Suryodaya child Hood 07.jpg
- File:SCK Suryodaya child Hood 06.jpg
- File:SCK Suryodaya child Hood 05.jpg
- File:SCK Suryodaya child Hood 04.jpg
- File:SCK Suryodaya child Hood 02.jpg
- File:SCK Suryodaya child Hood 03.jpg
- File:SCK Suryodaya child Hood 01.jpg
- File:SCK Suryodaya003.jpg
- File:SCK Suryodaya002.JPG
- File:SCK Suryodaya001.jpg
Ies (talk) 09:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
moved to Category:Zeleni most (Vrankovića ograda) Ma▀▄Ga 09:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 09:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Author - Vladimir Semenov - is alive. None Public Domain. From edition "Russian military uniform of the XIX century" 1986 Gandvik (talk) 09:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 10:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The artist Tony Farah was born in 1961 and there is no freedom of panorama in Lebanon. This image is unfortunately not free. Peripitus (talk) 10:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The artist Tony Farah was born in 1961 and there is no freedom of panorama in Lebanon. This image is unfortunately not free. Peripitus (talk) 10:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TommyTurner64 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality nonsense images uploaded to vandalize at . Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
COPYVIO : © F. Guillot / AFP Photo Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 11:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete: Copyvio.--Gratus (talk) 11:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio. La prochaine fois, utilise plutôt {{Copyvio}} pour qu'il soit supprimé immédiatement. 
Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. Image probably stolen from http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/bbs/view.html?b_bbs_id=10067&pn=1&num=771 (http://img.bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/data/10067/upfile/201409/20140918222827.png) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cap1000 (talk • contribs) 2015-01-07T13:58:31 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Private photograph uploaded when depicted person was politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:27:26 (UTC)
- Keep Person has article about them in pl Wikipedia [4], ergo seems in scope. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 11:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Private photograph uploaded when depicted persons were politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:23:37 (UTC)
- Keep Person has article about them in pl Wikipedia, ergo photo in scope. Wikimedia Commons is not restricted to current events only. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Not used, never linked to any article/page. A private photograph of a person previously politically active. Kotoviski (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per Infrogmation in previous DR... Nothing has changed from that time. Electron ツ ➧☎ 17:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep In scope for pl:Marek Garztecki. Josve05a (talk) 13:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept per above, nothing has changed since previous nomination; same nominator renominating for deletion with no new reason offered months after a previous "Kept" decision. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
A private photograph no longer of general interest, not used on any Wiki. Kotoviski (talk) 11:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing wrong with the image; it's a decent portrayal of him with someone else. And why did you renominate within two weeks of the previous one being closed? Nyttend (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Thirdn nomination. The community is still in interest with the picture, so no valid reason for courtesy deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep:Per above opinion. Electron ツ ➧☎ 07:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No new information or rationale given since last nomination(s). Still in scope per above. (non-admin closure) Josve05a (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Private photograph uploaded when depicted person was politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:28:02 (UTC)
- Keep Person has article about them in pl Wikipedia, ergo photo in scope. Wikimedia is NOT restricted to currently active people only. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
No Freedom of panorama in Belarus. The statue was created in 2002 while all the authors are still alive. It will take at least 70 years since the last of them will die before the image of this statue can be published under a free license. 195.50.31.213 16:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I create this page as the creator and uploader of File:Prob-d'alignement.jpg and as I said by google translation : this image is no longer useful - it was only a draft . Thanks for delete it --tpa2067 (Allô...) 08:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Not approved by government resolution, so license doesn't apply. The source is a German language website that does not contain the file. —Musichistory2009 Talk 06:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 12:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- Delete as nominator per COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 13:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- Delete as nominator per COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 13:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- Delete as nominator per COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 13:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- Delete as nominator per COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 13:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope // Found elsewhere online (copyvio?)
- File:Blog Ristorazione con Ruggi.png
- File:Ruggi Cover facebook 2013.jpg
- File:Infografica new - aboutme.png
- File:Ruggi Cover facebook 2014.png
- File:Utensili cottura.jpg
- File:Utensili conservazione.jpg
- File:Utensili mestolame.jpg
- File:Piccola attrezzatura.jpg
- File:Catering wordle.jpg
- File:Il catering.jpg
- File:Schema Banqueting.jpg
Josve05a (talk) 13:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the profile image is the uploader, also the facebook image on the right is © to Facbook. Josve05a (talk) 13:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted stock photo
Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Copy of a book cover which is probably copyrighted. We hope (talk) 14:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Copy of book cover. See File:Capa completa do Livro MEDIAÇÃO PENAL.jpg We hope (talk) 14:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sopheaktrea (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope.
Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ericdamien (talk · contribs)
[edit]"Pointh Carey" does not appear to be a person of significant note. (His YouTube videos seem to measure in hundreds of views).
Ubcule (talk) 14:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Spam. Ubcule (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
CD Cover (per description) = copyvio Mjrmtg (talk) 14:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rickyelf0075 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent official promo material, probably not the work of the uploader, and no evidence that uploader has permission to release these.
Ubcule (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright issues Richard Avery (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arvid Jay Davarpanah (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos, out of scope
- File:Arvid Jay Davarpanah 2014.jpg
- File:Arvid Jay Davarpanah 2013.jpg
- File:Arvid Jay Davarpanah 2013 + 1.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 15:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope
Mjrmtg (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sinani milaim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Milaim Pelivani kampion në Çikago Çegran.jpg
- File:Milaim Pelivani Çegran.jpg
- File:Qemal Efendija Abduli Çegran.jpg
- File:Xhudistët dhe Trajneri në Çegran.jpg
- File:KF Arsimi Çegran.jpg
- File:Themeluesit e klubit KF Arsimi Çegran.jpg
- File:Balli Kombëtar në Çegran.jpg
- File:SHKA JAHI HASANI Çegran.jpg
- File:Xhamija Qemal Efendija Çegran e devalvuar.jpg
- File:Gjenerata e pare shkollore ne cegran 1932.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sinani milaim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sinani milaim (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Albanian ice cream maker in festival Guča Yugoslavia.jpeg
- File:Albanian Caterer front of the shop from the time of Yugoslavia in Požega Serbia.jpeg
- File:Albanian Caterer front of the shop from the time of Yugoslavia in Požega.jpeg
- File:Destroy old mosque from Čegrane.jpeg
- File:Protesta në Gostivar në vitin 1997.jpeg
- File:Jahi Hasani 1974.jpeg
Derivative work, photos of photos. Who is original photographer and does (s)he allow publishing them under free license? Taivo (talk) 10:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Original photographer(s) should confirm licenses by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Quite some doubts about the original uploader's authorship claim. Image was available online already in 2013[5] and in an even less cropped version than the first one uploaded to Commons.[6] -- Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
An OTRS ticket was indeed received, but it is not obvious at all that teh sender is the copyright owner, possibly a copyvio. Darwin Ahoy! 18:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
All of these are too creative for the very low threshold of originality in Peru. They include shapes, colors, lighting effects, etc. all of which are far more creative than a few words in a sentence, which was deemed copyrightable.
- File:Achancayllo.png
- File:ALIANZA LIMA.png
- File:Alianzalima.png
- File:Amargosdcoop.png
- File:Amargospfc.jpg
- File:Boysh.png
- File:Calitarapoto.png
- File:Club Deportivo Unión comercio.png
- File:Escudo Club Unión Cartavio.jpg
- File:Escudo Real Garcilaso.png
- File:Estudiantes medicina.png
- File:Huracandemoquegua.png
- File:Mcalmiller.png
- File:Sphuracan.png
- File:Ucvallejo.png
- File:Escudo FBC Aurora.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Boigandorra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works: publication covers and YouTube/video screenshots
- File:Els candidats de les primàries del PS a Andorra al 2014.jpg
- File:Ara sí, vot per correu Andorra.jpg
- File:Aiguats 1982 Andorra.jpg
- File:Constitució d'Andorra.JPG
Эlcobbola talk 16:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
IMDb says photo by "Kevin Sullivan". Don't know where the uploader got this hi-res photo (without EXIF) from; photo at IMDb since 2011, and it appears it was a 2011 cover of the "Atlantic Ave" magazine.[7] Should have OTRS from atlanticavemagazine.com or from the photographer himself. Lupo 16:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam. Ubcule (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No clear in-scope use. Apparent image of minor and/or proprietary(?) toolbar. Ubcule (talk) 17:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam. Spam. Ubcule (talk) 17:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Razorsesoftware (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out-of-scope spam. (Also possible- or more likely, probable- copyright violation of base images).
- File:Web-design.jpg
- File:Web-developmmnnet.png
- File:Web-Design.jpg
- File:Web developmnnet.png
- File:Traffic-&-leads-Development.jpg
- File:Outsourcing.jpg
- File:Open-Source-Development.jpg
- File:MY-SQL-Programming.jpg
- File:MS-Technologies.jpg
- File:Graphic-Designers.jpg
- File:Free-SEO-analysis-report.jpg
- File:Flash design.jpg
- File:Facebook-application-Development.jpg
- File:Razorse Softwrae Logo.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 17:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Redurewebtech (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out-of-scope and probable copyvio of non-free base images.
- File:Hosting.jpg
- File:Redurewebtech Pvt.Ltd.png
- File:Seo campign brochor.jpg
- File:Redure Bulk email & sms.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 17:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of a poster that is likely to be copyrighted itself; no evidence of copyright clearance for that poster. Mike Peel (talk) 17:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Logo of cheapish-looking site with Alexa rank in the 2-millions Ubcule (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam/promo-ish, probably out of scope.
- File:World Records India.jpg
- File:SEO India.png
- File:World Records India.png
- File:World Record Certificate Momentos.JPG
Ubcule (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal images, out of scope.
Yann (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, probably copied from Facebook, please upload the original files or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Kite Flying Club India at Pune Goa Kite Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Goa Kite Festival 2015.jpg
- File:International Kite Festival Organizer India.jpg
- File:Paavan Solanki - Pune Goa Pune Kite Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Royal Kite Club India.jpg
- File:Goa Kite Festival - Royal Kite Flyers Club.jpg
- File:Hanuman Chalisha Chanting World Record.jpg
- File:Shivganga Roller Skating Belgaum World Record.jpg
- File:G Devishree Tirupati World Record.jpg
- File:Miniature Kite Decoration.jpg
- File:Largest Delta Kite India Royal Kite Flyers Club.jpg
- File:Paavan Solanki - International Kite Flyers at Royal Kite Flyers Club India.jpg
- File:Indian Flag Miniature Kite - Royal Kite Flyers Club India.jpg
- File:Ahmedabad International Kite Festival 2014.jpg
- File:Miniature indian fighter kite.jpg
- File:Ahmedabad River Front.jpg
- File:Patang Jatra Kite Festival at Baraamti.jpg
- File:Maximum Patent Submission World Record India.jpg
- File:Largest Hanging Lantern kandeel world record india.JPG
- File:Most People Dressup Mahatma Gandhi World Records India.jpg
- File:Thailand Kite Festival.jpg
- File:Kite Flyers India - Indian Rokaku.jpg
- File:Kite Flyers Club India.jpg
- File:Chess World Record By Women.jpg
Yann (talk) 12:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Uploader is in the photos, not selfies. Permission from the photographers needed.
- File:Akash Solanki - Royal Kite Flyers Club India.JPG
- File:Paavan Solanki - Royal Kite Flyers Club.JPG
- File:G. Devishree Skating World Records Tirupati, India.jpg
- File:First Chopper Bike India Paavan Solanki.JPG
- File:Army Sadbhavna Festival Baramulla.JPG
- File:Sadbhavna Kite Festival for Army by International Kite Flyers India - Paavan Solanki.JPG
- File:Paavan Solanki Professional Kite Flyers Club India.JPG
- File:Paavan Solanki Kite Flyers India.JPG
- File:International Kite Flyers India Paavan Solanki.JPG
- File:Indian Kite Flyer Gujarat India.JPG
- File:India kite flyer paavan solanki.JPG
- File:India Kitist Kite Flying Expert Paavan Solanki.JPG
- File:Bhopal MP Kite Festival Royal Kite Club India.JPG
- File:Akash Stunt Sports Kite Flyer Royal Kite Club.JPG
- File:Jyoti Amge - World's Smallest Women Guinness World Records India.JPG
- File:World's Smallest Girl - Jyoti Amge at Jaipur with Paavan Solanki.JPG
Yann (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EPConnects (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pointless composites of minor general-purpose use, borderline spam.
Ubcule (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, possible copyvio of base works, spam. Ubcule (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam for SEO business. At least one of the files is a derivative of multiple base images whose origin and copyright status is unclear (i.e. near-certain copyvio).
Ubcule (talk) 17:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Scan. Compare also [8] somewhere in this forum, sent with last-modified time stamp of Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:05:35 GMT. Furthermore, compare [9] (at the very bottom).
![[8]](http://www.watsriutumpron.com/webboard/photo/tiger_201307300934054614714602940_.jpg){kind=link}
Unknown photographer; unknown date. File is currently unused. Lupo 17:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Definitely out of scope spam. Also derivative of possibly copyrighted base images (i.e. possible copyvio).
- File:Seo-powerful.png
- File:Portfolio016.jpg
- File:Portfolio017.jpg
- File:Portfolio015.jpg
- File:Portfolio010.jpg
- File:Portfolio014.jpg
- File:Portfolio013.jpg
- File:Portfolio012.jpg
- File:Portfolio011.jpg
- File:Portfolio009.jpg
- File:Portfolio008.jpg
- File:Portfolio007.jpg
- File:Portfolio003.jpg
- File:Portfolio004.jpg
- File:Portfolio006.jpg
- File:Portfolio005.jpg
- File:Portfolio002.jpg
- File:Portfolio001.jpg
- File:Dossier corporativo.jpg
- File:Ibermega.png
Ubcule (talk) 17:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Infometricx (talk · contribs)
[edit]Definitely out of scope spam. Also possible copyvio of non-free(?) base images in at least one case.
Ubcule (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Definite out-of-scope spam for SEO company. Also possible copyvio if base images aren't freely-licensed.
- File:Software Company In Agra.png
- File:SEO Company.png
- File:Web Development Company India.png
- File:Web Design Company.png
- File:Web Design Company Website Design Web Development Company India SEO Company Software Company In Agra.png
Ubcule (talk) 17:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Varunnegi.singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out-of-scope spam.
Ubcule (talk) 17:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam for minor website that doesn't even appear to be up at time of writing(!)
Ubcule (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
SVG available as File:DIN 4844-2 Warnung vor Aetzenden Stoffen D-W004.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Self-promotional images and plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
- File:Anil Steel Works Chiraiyakot Mau.jpg
- File:Anil Steel Works Chiraiyakot Mau e) 9918077251 - 9455937506.jpg
- File:Anil Steel Works Chiraiyakot Mau (Koyala Todane Ki Mashine) 9918077251 - 9455937506.jpg
- File:Anil Steel Works Chiraiyakot Mau (Koyala Todane Ki Mashine) 9918077251 & 9455937506.jpg
- File:Anil Steel Works Chiraiyakot Mau (Koyala Todane Ki Mashine) 9918077251 $ 9455937506.jpg
- File:Anil Steel Works Chiraiyakot Mau (U.P) Cont- 9918077251 - 9455937506.jpg
- File:Anil Steel Works Chiraiyakot Mau (Koyala Todane Ki Mashine) 9918077251 % 9455937506.jpg
- File:Chiraiyakot Ajit.jpg
- File:Ajit Vishwakarmaaaaaa.jpg
- File:Ajit Vishwakarma.jpg
- File:Ajit Vishwakarma In Chiraiyakot Mau 7800078100.jpg
- File:Ajit Vishwakarma In Chiraiyakot Mau Ajit.jpg
- File:AJIT VISHWAKARMA.jpg
- File:Ajit Vishwakarma In Chiraiyakot Mau DjAjit.jpg
- File:Ajit Vishwakarma In Chiraiyakot Mau.jpg
- File:Chiraiyakot Mau - DjAjit Vishwakarma.jpg
- File:Chiraiyakot Mau Ajit Vishwakarma.jpg
_9918077251_-_9455937506.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_9918077251_-_9455937506.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_9918077251_%26_9455937506.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_9918077251_$_9455937506.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cont-_9918077251_-_9455937506.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_9918077251_%25_9455937506.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 18:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious spam and personal images are all out of COM:SCOPE. Tony Webster (talk) 09:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 18:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal badge. Lupo 18:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Is this usefully within scope, and is image that it's based upon at [10] freely-usable? Ubcule (talk) 18:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 18:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot of apparently proprietary SEO software (*), no clear in-scope use. (*) Not free; site lists prices starting from "399 rubles" for one month [11] Ubcule (talk) 18:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded to be used for vandalism on the Russian Wikipedia. DLindsley Need something? 18:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- A photo used to vandalize wikipedia could still be in scope in Commons, and used for other purposes than the originally intended. In this case, however, the subject wears a tee-shirt printed with a copyrighted images (Gremlins) and therefore it should be deleted as a copyright violation. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- You are right. Delete. DLindsley Need something? 15:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- You are right.
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This appears to be a derivative work of cv:Ӳкерчĕк:Bichurin N Ya.jpg, where neither source nor licence seem to be specified. The image also appears at w:File:Famous Chuvash 1.png as "PD-self", unlike Commons which has "cc-by-sa-3.0". Missing evidence that the picture is in the public domain or licensed under a free licence. If the image is licensed under cc-by-sa-3.0, then it is impossible to provide licence-compliant attribution as the author is unidentified. Stefan4 (talk) 18:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe too dark to be educationally useful. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Proton-inspira-super-premium-additional-029.jpg is a copyright infringement.
Original source : http://paultan.org/2014/01/24/proton-inspira-super-premium-launched-rm/proton-inspira-super-premium-additional-029/
Request by ; Aero777 (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The original, cv:Ӳкерчĕк:K ivanov.jpg, has no source nor licence, but seems to be a scan from a book or newspaper. Letters from a different page shine through. No evidence for neither the Commons licence nor the enwiki licence. Stefan4 (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Proton-inspira-super-premium-additional-034.jpg is a copyright infringement.
Original source : http://paultan.org/2014/01/24/proton-inspira-super-premium-launched-rm/proton-inspira-super-premium-additional-034/
Request by ; Aero777 (talk) 20:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Translation via Google shows this to be purely promotional content for a company, rather than saying anything about SEO itself. [12] Ubcule (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam, and an excuse to fill description with promo fluff. Ubcule (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Spam is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons. I removed the advertising/spam description from the file. DLindsley Need something? 20:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam image and out-of-scope photo of founder of that same company.
Ubcule (talk) 18:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope. Spam image and description. Ubcule (talk) 18:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Although spam description from original uploader has been removed, it's still basically the same image which (I'm assuming) is a piece of clip art whose use online dates back to 2011 (the year before this was uploaded). Given that spammers generally don't give a (cough) about using copyrighted non-free clipart for their spam uploads, precautionary principle means this should be deleted. Ubcule (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anasbin-2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out-of-scope spam.
- File:ODIG Marketing Digital.jpg
- File:Odig Marketing Digital, Santa Maria Rio grande do sul Brazil.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The purpose of this is unclear from the descripton. Ubcule (talk) 18:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Appears to be promoting uploader's own technique; this is the second result returned for "off hat seo" in Google; [13]. Ubcule (talk) 18:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam for some random directory. Ubcule (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work. Possible copyright violation. C messier (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam. Translation: "cvc4you.pl comprehensive web site optimization seo positioning mobil" Ubcule (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Worthless spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam video. Ubcule (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be derivative of generic white cap image used (with text overlaid) at cafepress.com. This *might* in theory have been created by uploader first, but I'm sceptical. Ubcule (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
_with_his_son_Wyatt,_and_wife_Kathy_2013-11-20_12-56.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_with_his_son_Wyatt,_and_wife_Kathy_2013-11-20_12-56.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 19:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
_with_his_son_Wyatt,_and_wife_Kathy_2013-11-20_12-56.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
_with_his_son_Wyatt,_and_wife_Kathy_2013-11-20_12-56.jpg){kind=link}
Apparently pointless (and useless) derivative of File:Panoramic Houston skyline.jpg. Unclear if this was created for good reason or as excuse to "credit" (i.e. link to) the company mentioned. Ubcule (talk) 19:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image; not educationally useful. Lupo 19:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of clipart available at [14] under license not clearly free. Ubcule (talk) 19:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
bad SVG, superseeded, not used. No advantage to keep it. sarang♥사랑 09:24, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I acknowledge that I made a grotesque errors when trying to "edit" the icon and convert it to SVG because at the time, I still was not completely familiar with the interface and how to use Inkscape. I vote to delete this file because it was supplanted by another image with better quality. Fúlviodiz!-fiz! 21:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Looks* like a piece of appropriated stock/clip art. Available in higher resolution here. Uses dating back to at least 2009-2010 (i.e. before 2012 upload) here. Ubcule (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhinav92t (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios and/or spam.
Ubcule (talk) 19:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam logo of limited use. Ubcule (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope uploader's self-promoting spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam; also high chance that based on copyrighted stock/clip art. Ubcule (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope uploader-promoting spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope uploader-self-promoting spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope uploader-self-promoting spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. (Translation: "Vietnamese: is a web design company and seo services and solutions for IT") Ubcule (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Probably a copyright violation, no indication of the license given. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal drawing. Lupo 19:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Missing evidence that the person who created the image was employed by the United States federal government. Since the logo identifies a local government, this seems very unlikely. Stefan4 (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No information but "playhouse" re: where it came from and no proof of dating or publication. We hope (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- The author is listed as "playhouse" on the file template. There's no back uploaded and no proof this was published or when. The eBay link is dead but this appears to be the same seller with copies of the same photo. We don't know enough about the photo to be able to claim it's PD. We hope (talk) 20:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No proof where the photo came from, or that it is without copyright notice. We hope (talk) 20:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- No back was uploaded with this re: proof of lack of copyright notice and proof of publication. There's no studio or photographer name shown on the uncropped portion that we have; the uploader entered "studio" in the file template. EBay link is dead, so there's no way to try to "look back". The film was renewed page 110 on September 19, 1968. We hope (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The design of the logo may be copyrighted. 1989 20:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The design of the logo may be copyrighted. 1989 20:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Looks more like an own photo of a display, making this a DW and probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, image in use on autobiographical user page on enWiki. Not a selfie, very small, low resolution image is likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Commons is not a personal photographic album, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Possibly not user's own work, a much larger version was found at [15] Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
![[15]](http://sverigesradio.se/sida/images/95/3218092_2048_1152.jpg?preset=article){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that this coin is the own work of the user, current licensing incorrect ands valid source to be considered for retention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Possible test edit, out of scope for lack of educational utitliy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Image claimed to be by "sajed" of sajed.ir, but note other deletion discussions, including Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani8.jpg, for additional information about the sajed images. Nominating under COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
unsufficent quality A1AA1A (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal picture, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 22:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
MPTV claims there is a copyright on this photo. We hope (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- The source in the original upload/transfer was listed as mptvimages.com. This is the original black & white copy--the photo has been colorized. The site appears to be similar to Getty and Corbis. We hope (talk) 23:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
False license. This book was written in 2000 and its cover can't be in the public domain. 75.181.160.69 23:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Данная картинка представляет собой обложку книги "Часодеи. Часовое сердце" от издательства "Росмэн". Саму обложку оформила художница Ольга Закис. Я переговаривал и с Ольгой Закис, и с генеральным директором издательства, которым принадлежат авторские права. Оба были не против свободного использования всех обложек (включая "Часодеи"), нарисованных Ольгой Закис. Дмитрий Ткаченко 8 (talk)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
False license. This book was written in 2000 and its cover can't be in the public domain. 75.181.160.69 23:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Данная картинка представляет собой обложку книги "Часодеи. Часовой ключ" от издательства "Росмэн". Саму обложку оформила художница Ольга Закис. Я переговаривал и с Ольгой Закис, и с генеральным директором издательства, которым принадлежат авторские права. Оба были не против свободного использования всех обложек (включая "Часодеи"), нарисованных Ольгой Закис. Дмитрий Ткаченко 8 (talk)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
False license. This book was written in 2000 and its cover can't be in the public domain. 75.181.160.69 23:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Данная картинка представляет собой обложку книги "Часодеи. Часовая башня" от издательства "Росмэн". Саму обложку оформила художница Ольга Закис. Я переговаривал и с Ольгой Закис, и с генеральным директором издательства, которым принадлежат авторские права. Оба были не против свободного использования всех обложек (включая "Часодеи"), нарисованных Ольгой Закис. Дмитрий Ткаченко 8 (talk)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Non-free image taken from a website Timmyshin (talk) 23:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Dubuious claim of own work: lower half is so similar to that at http://www.metrolink.co.uk/ (which is not attributed) that copyright violation has occurred; note also that en:File:ManchesterMetrolinkLogo.svg has the same logo with a fair-use rationale, so license is probably incompatible Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 23:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted character russavia (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Covered by Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Ireland. russavia (talk) 02:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep It's a wax figure, not the original charachter --Duque Santiago (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: FoP-Ireland. Yann (talk) 12:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The image depicts a wax figure. The wax figure is SpongeBob SquarePants, a copyrighted character. That wax figure takes up most of the image, and the Wax Statue is a copyrighted character. Eaaaaugh (talk) 19:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Eaaaaugh: The problem is that, as Yann said keep as per {{FoP-Ireland}}, you need to contest that why this tag isn't suitable in this case, as Ireland is also a Common law+Case law-based country. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
This image does not meet the license as stated. It is from the correct website, but is not at an event or party held by the website and therefore does not qualify for the license as stated. The Haz talk 04:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Please read the license agreement carefully. It does not say that the event or party has to be "held by the website", but all events and parties images that are taken by photographers of the website. To quote, "\exclusively created by their own photographers". Do not cause unnecessary harassment without reading the licensing agreement properly. --Krimuk90 (talk) 04:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)I wasn't causing harrassment, not trying to. The licensing states that it must be a Bollywood Hungama party or event in addition to being taken by one of their photographers. It is why your other uploads are okay and this one isn't. The Haz talk 04:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)No, it means from the Bollywood Hungama website under the heading "parties/events". The website by itself does not host ANY parties or events. I mean, no event till date has been hosted by the website. --Krimuk90 (talk) 04:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Per discussion, deletion retracted. The Haz talk 04:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: License OK, reviewed. Yann (talk) 12:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not required, not a common way of category naming — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psubhashish (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T11:43:05 (UTC)
Kept: Not empty, no reason to delete. For renaming, please discuss on the talk page. Yann (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Broken file for 1.5 years now. New version uploaded by different author, thus also violating c:com:overwrite. Lastly, missing permission for the most recent version... McZusatz (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message; while I was reviewing this beautiful town photos and of its new Municipal Hall, I came across this bugged or broken file; hence, I looked for the latest or renovated Town Hall Image of New Town Hall, which I re-sized and uploaded; all these pictures I am uploading, since February, 2014, thus now, about 121,000̟ are my own by way of gratuitous Donation to me as User editor here, in Commons by Judge Florentino Floro, the photographer who does not happen to know how to upload or edit here and has no time, at age 61; also, the bugged photo was also Donated by the same Judge Florentino Floro to another editor UserːRamon FVelasquez who was on Wiki-break since February, 2014, when I agreed to receive the next Donated 121,000 photos and to have begun uploading; this may be the exception to the Commons rule; however, I have no objection to the deletion since the uploaded version is just a re-sized one or smaller of the original photo [16]; I just want readers or researchers to have a better view of the bugged or broken filed, sincerely, no objection to the deletion, thanks.--Judgefloro (talk) 05:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
![[16]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FvfArayat7648_25.JPG){kind=link}
- Please delete, no objection since I uploaded yesterday's photos of Judge Florentino Floro, the photographer of all my donated by him photos here in Commons, and this Newly renovated park makes the old ones just part of history of this to be made Heritage Park: Category:Mount Arayat National Park and the uploaded also is Arayat, Pampanga New Municipal Hall (1 C, 105 F) thus turning moot and academic the broken file and uploaded version Thanks and sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 01:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Now duplicate. Yann (talk) 12:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
OLd photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sankarjoshua (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T12:43:09 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 12:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
no copyright information Wolfch (talk) 06:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Not used, no description, no source, nothing. Yann (talk) 12:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Private photograph uploaded when depicted persons were politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:28:27 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 12:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Private photograph uploaded when depicted persons were politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:24:57 (UTC)
Deleted: Private image, not used. Yann (talk) 12:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Private photograph uploaded when depicted person was politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:28:58 (UTC)
Kept: Article on Polish WP. In scope. Yann (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Not used, never linked to any article/page. A private photograph of a person previously politically active. Kotoviski (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Private photograph uploaded when depicted person was politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:29:31 (UTC)
Kept: Article on Polish WP. Taken in a public place. In scope. Yann (talk) 12:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Not used, never linked to any page. Private photograph of a person previously politically active. Kotoviski (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo no longer in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Looks to me like a google map, but maybe I'm wrong? Or maybe that's okay? I don't know the rules on this. Themightyquill (talk) 13:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Google Map. Yann (talk) 12:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
One of the two men responsible for the source work, Erik Rudberg, was born in 1891. We cannot assume that he died before 1945. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Project Runeberg lists it as being being out of copyright and claims the copyright is based upon the creation of the work, not the authors. The authors of periodical aren't the copyright owners of the picture, they are just editors of the periodical in general. I believe the copyright information I provided upon upload is correct in that it's out of copyright in it's source country for a variety of reasons including the ones I selected when uploading. Suppafly (talk) 20:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as per Suppafly. Yann (talk) 12:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
-he.png){kind=link}
-he.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is a VERY MUCH Inaccurate map! אדם אדום (talk) 14:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
-he.png){kind=link}
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 12:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
-he.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is a VERY MUCH Inaccurate map! אדם אדום (talk) 14:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 12:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Appears not to be own work by file name. Tineye found the photo in 2 places on the internet. We hope (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Bigger copies on the Net: [17] Yann (talk) 12:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
![[17]](http://www.songdalen.kommune.no/Global/Arrangementer/marcus%20og%20martinus.png){kind=link}
A graffiti of copyrighted character, Spongebob Squarepants. Originally tagged as copyvio, then uploader removed it. 1989 15:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Siehe Commons:Freedom of panorama#Germany. Die Aufnahme wurde auf einem öffentlichen Platz gemacht und das Bild ist dauerhaft dort zu finden (ist immer noch dort falls es jmd. interessiert). DIese Information habe ich auch, wie im SLA-Template vorgesehen, auf der disk. des bildes hinterlassen. Aber 1989 ist wohl nicht so, ehm, lesefreudig wie auch auf meiner disk. zu sehen ist. ...Sicherlich talk 17:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: FoP Germany apply. Yann (talk) 15:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Youtube video. Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Youtube screenscap. Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted character, Spongebob Squarepants is in foreground. 1989 15:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Character is de minimis. Yann (talk) 15:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted character, Spongebob Squarepants is being shown. I don't find that de minimis. Also, the file is named after the copyrighted character. 1989 16:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep (I am the photographer and uploader). Photo is part of series showing the destructive aftermath of the Hurricane Katrina levee failure flood on the Lower 9th Ward section of New Orleans. Shows a pile of debris, including peoples shoes and childrens' toys. Reproduction of copyrighted character image is not the purpose of the image. (I found the children's toys gave extra poignancy to the scene; unfortunately now a days most children's toys seem to be copyrighted corporate characters.) If the visible doll is a problem, it can be blurred or pixilated. If the name is a problem, file can be renamed (eg Feb06Low9thDebrisPileShoesAndToys or whatever; I gave file names on the fly by something visible in the photo, otherwise simple letters or numbers for photos). -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep A simple presence of a possibly copyrighted toy does not make this image a derivative work. Purpose of the image is to show the pile of debris of which this toy is a part of and the toy is not a major part of this image. That's why I denied the obviously wrong speedy deletion tag. --Denniss (talk) 22:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- KeepThis is a historic photo and we should make every effort to retain it. The doll's face can be blurred and the file name changed; there's nothing here that can't be fixed in an effort to keep the photo. Deleting this is like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. We hope (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The waterlogged stuffie is imho de minimus compared with the pile of soggy trainers, the Rubbermaid tub, the buckets and bins, the bike tire, some kind of nasty drink container and the remainder of the flotsam of the storm here recorded. I totally agree with Denniss and We Hope ! keep Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Character is de minimis. Yann (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
NSYSU mainent00.jpg NSYSU (talk) 17:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Catch some body's face, but he now allow it. There is no freedom in Taiwan. 3jyuku (talk) 01:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Support Poor quality, strangeweird version history.PK1913 (talk) 08:35, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: The subject seems to be a building rather than a sculpture, and therefore FoP in the RoC appliess here. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Strange DR but per above. Natuur12 (talk) 14:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
involve some body but they were not allow it, and the image not in use NSYSU (talk) 17:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
involve some body's face but they were not allow it, and the image not in use NSYSU (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use NSYSU (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
involve some body's face but they were not allow it NSYSU (talk) 06:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- I agree PK1913 (talk) 06:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept, the request is incorrect, because no face is well seen. The file is used and has encyclopedical value. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
involve some body's face but they were not allow it NSYSU (talk) 17:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Public place. Yann (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/023.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- keep see FJU files above Smallbones (talk) 17:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Since you're the author, that's not surprising. Or relevant.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep That's not evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Ｕse private unlicensed photos WebmasterRome (talk) 06:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep nothing new being raised here. The original uploader released it under PD, and there's no evidence that uploader wasn't able to make such a release. There's no FOP issue. Not redundant. Not a typical "private photo". It isn't a great image but it's not deletable. 69.174.144.79 16:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep Still no valid reason for deletion, {{FoP-Taiwan}}, etc. per above. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/020.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- keep see FJU files above Smallbones (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Since you're the author, that's not surprising. Or relevant.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep That's not evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted character Spongebob Squarepants in foreground. 1989 17:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Clearly de minimis in this situation. Nice urban street photography example. russavia (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Character is de minimis. Yann (talk) 16:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
involve some body's face but they were not allow it, and the image not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
involve some body's face but they were not allow it, and the image not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
involve some body's face but they were not allow it, and the image not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope
INeverCry 17:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Easily-reproduced, extremely generic graphic presumably uploaded to promote uploader's business with little benefit to community in general. Ubcule (talk) 17:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
While I understand your reasoning. I made this image so that other people that are starting a business can use this image on their site. I have not even mentioned my business name and am therefore not using this to promote. While you say this is easily reproducible, there are people who don't have the time and/or the knowledge to do so and I made this image for them.OliverWins (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- To be fair, you *did* link to your website, "<link>".
- This was your one and only contribution to Wikimedia Commons (until you responded to this deletion request). That isn't a crime, of course, it *does* follow the common pattern of "upload one or two worthless promo images and put promo blurb in the 'description' field" spam.
- Your upload- in fairness- wasn't that bad, but if I'm being sceptical, it came across as if it *might* have been a token effort and attempt to legitimise linking a mention of "SEO" and "SEO Company CA" with your business.
- Maybe I should have assumed good faith more than I did, but I still don't feel that a simple graphic saying "SEO" is useful. If people "don't have the knowledge" to create something as straightforward as this, they're probably going to need outside help in creating a website, and if they "don't have the time", I'm not sure they'd have the time to search Commons, especially as they're going to have to find other matching images in a similar style.
I see how that could set off some red flags. It was my first and yes my only contribution to Wikimedia Commons. But I am planning to add more. i.e. I'm researching content to edit the Upcycled Wikipedia page because I like recycling items as a hobby and saw some info I could contribute. Either way I appreciate you trying to make Wiki a better place. OliverWins (talk) 01:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Not used. Sinophone (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Potentially-useful picture of the campus of a university in Taiwan. Verbcatcher Verbcatcher (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep As per Verbcatcher. Not used is not a good deletion reason.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 01:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Not used. Sinophone (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Potentially-useful picture of the campus of a university in Taiwan. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep As per Verbcatcher. Not used is not a good deletion reason.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 01:23, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Armyrocknroll (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Antara Tugas dan Cinta 2014-05-15 14-48.jpeg
- File:Terteng 2014-05-15 14-47.jpeg
- File:TNI Ganteng 2014-05-15 14-44.jpg
INeverCry 17:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Little general-purpose usage, probable spam, possible copyvio of base images. (Translation of description:The SEO is able to use IT polytechnics and policiencias together as diktyologia to bring the famous and fabulous relevance coefficient prescribed by Google, which coefficient - rightly or wrongly? - The universal search as a determinant of top5 integrates Google.) Ubcule (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/030.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- keep see FJU files above Smallbones (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am author, I want to delete it.PK1913 (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep deletion already declined on this set of photos; site no evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Due to worng posture. Forgot the password of the author Sattriyadance critic. Pls delete this file from wikipedia commons. 223.176.25.97 17:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Do you have a valid email address? If so, can you use it to reset your password and get back in to your account? DLindsley Need something? 18:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Pls delete this photo from Wikipedia commons. Forgot the password of user id. As the posture is wrong it is hampering the artiste reputation. Request you to delete the file Sattriya critc (talk) 18:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: still no reson to delete. DR reopened withouth any new arguments. Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Pls delete the file from Wikipedia commons. Repated request given . Deletion required as the posture is wrong and it is hampering the artist reputation. Request by artist. 182.66.18.150 18:03, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Three DRs, two from an unidentified IP address. If you really are the uploader, please try to recover the access to your account first. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Avinash Shandilya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 17:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
불필요한 사진입니다 주은유 (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No source or permission. Yann (talk) 16:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Missing evidence that the photographer is anonymous. Stefan4 (talk) 18:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, The e-mail I received from Father Larry Kondra C.Ss.R.(Fr. Delaere was actually a Redemptorist. Their current Provincial, Fr. Larry Kondra, CSsR, is at St. Joseph’s Parish at 250 Jefferson, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R2V 0M6) reads: "The photo of Father Delaere was taken circa 1920. I have no idea who took the photo." To confirm this, you may contact Father Larry by mail at the above address, or e-mail at: Kondra2008@live.com Nicola Mitchell (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- This looks like a scan from a book or something. Is the photographer's name given in the book? --Stefan4 (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is taken from Redemptorists From the Beginning on the Yorkton Redemptorists website, and no credit for the photographer is given there. Nicola Mitchell (talk) 20:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but it looks as if the website has taken the image from a book. You need to check if the photographer is credited in that book. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello Stefan, I've e-mailed Paul Laverdure who wrote the article: Achille Delaere and the Origins of the Ukrainian Catholic Church in Western Canada asking him if he might know the name of the photographer. We might have to wait for a few days to hear from him. If anyone has any further information it will be him. I'll get back to you as soon as I hear from him. Nicola Mitchell (talk) 22:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello Stefan, Paul got back to me quicker than I thought. Here is his e-mail:
The photo is undated and I found no attribution in the archives when I worked there. As I remember, a large, professionally-done photograph hung in the monastery of Yorkton, but it had been cropped to fit an oval frame and the photographer's name may be missing. It may be available, but I do not have it and I cannot get to Yorkton. I would suggest that you date it c. 1925 (I have a 1920 photo of him which shows a slightly younger man) and publish it as "courtesy of the Ukrainian Catholic Mission of the Most Holy Redeemer" or whatever legal name the Yorkton Redemptorists have at this time. I am copying Father Provincial Kondra this message, so that he may correct whatever he wishes. The photograph is probably out of copyright, given that the photographer is unknown and so is his date of death. Best of luck,
Paul Laverdure, M.A., Ph.D. Director of Library and Archive Services/Directeur de la bibliothèque et des archives University of Sudbury/Université de Sudbury 935 Ramsey Lake Road Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6 Canada Tel: (705) 673-5661 (x 208) Fax: (705) 673-4912 plaverdure@usudbury.ca www.usudbury.ca
Nicola Mitchell (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello Stefan, As you can see from Paul Laverdure's e-mail, the photo is not a scan from a book, but a photo hanging on the wall of the Redemptorist monastery in Yorkton, Saskatchewan, Canada. He says: "The photo is undated and I found no attribution in the archives when I worked there." He worked in the actual place where this photograph is located. If he had come across a photographer's credit on this photo or in the archives of the monastery, he would have recorded it as an Archivist by profession who pays attention to such detail. Though he speculates a little in his reply, he concludes with: "The photograph is probably out of copyright, given that the photographer is unknown and so is his date of death." Also, he suggests correcting the date of the photo to circa: 1925. I think that Paul Laverdure's credibility and word as a Director of Library and Archive Services at a major University should be respected and taken as the final word on this matter and the photo freed for use. Thank you. Nicola Mitchell (talk) 21:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Is it a Canadian or a European picture? It has a European copyright tag so I assumed that the origin was European, but the address above is in Canada. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is Canadian if it was taken in 1925. Father Delaere immigrated to Canada in 1899 and spent the next 40 years till he died on the Canadian prairie. The picture is being used by different language Wikipedia. European editors helped me put the photo into Commons, since I needed technical help as I'm not very good at technical things, so I'm not sure what they did to get it to work, if that's what you refer to. I would like the photo available worldwide. Currently, there are Wikipedia: English, French, Polish, Ukrainian, language versions of the article, and a German language version to be soon created. Any help you can give me with making the photo available worldwide for Wikipedia will be much appreciated. Nicola Mitchell (talk) 12:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The "anonymous or just unknown" (to us) discussions related to {{Anonymous-EU}} templates are so hard since usually neither side know any facts in support of their case. However in case of this image a {{PD-Canada}} might be a better fit, since the photograph was taken in Canada before January 1, 1949. Nicola Mitchell, if the image stays, you should see if you can get a larger version of it and without the flash, if possible. --Jarekt (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
If its kept, I'll try to get a fresh digital photo of it, a larger version without the flash. Nicola Mitchell (talk) 14:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Old enough. Yann (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Drummer Lee Rigby.jpg Sebari (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Converted speedy deletion request to a regular one. This file has been discussed multiple times before. Sebari (talk) 21:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC) The copyvio tag description was "web pgae says © H Szymanski. All Rights Reserved. Oficial confimation by MOD at OTRS 2016072910014915". See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Drummer Lee Rigby.jpg. --Sebari (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Procedural close - I'm closing this and merging it to the main DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramveer singh chauhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images.
Ubcule (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry. Yann (talk) 16:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope spam. Ubcule (talk) 18:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry. Yann (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out-of-scope and/or limited reuse value. Ubcule (talk) 18:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry. Yann (talk) 16:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam. "100% Mexican company dedicated to: Electronic Billing CFDI, high-impact Web Development, Websites, Portals, Ecommerce, Hosting, Design and Web Application Development, Digital Printing & Advertising Media." Ubcule (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry. Yann (talk) 16:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Theturfchick (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 19:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aleliz9408 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
INeverCry 19:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
copyright infringement: shown as a copyrighted on the front of the initial upload SchroCat (talk) 20:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Though the uploader licensed this as copyright not renewed, there was a claim-"A copyright search showed no renewals of anything related to the film or Kubrick between 1984 and 1990."
- As per the information on another Spartacus-related photo also at DR, there have been quite a few renewals for the title, especially for home video licensing--here are 3 relating to the film from copyright.gov: We hope (talk) 20:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Type of Work: Recorded Document
- Document Number: V2318P123
- Date of Recordation: 1987-11-24
- Entire Copyright Document: V2318P123-124
- Date of Execution: as of 25Jun87; 3Nov87
- Registration Number Not Verified: LP24917 (1963)
- Title: Spartacus; motion picture / LP24917 (1963)
- Notes: Assignment.
- Party 1: the Bryna Company.
- Party 2: Universal City Studios, Inc.
- Type of Work: Recorded Document
- Document Number: V2870P165
- Date of Recordation: 1993-02-17
- Entire Copyright Document: V2870P165-166
- Date of Execution: 9Mar92; 16Mar92
- Title: Spartacus; motion picture / Restored version.
- Notes: Mortgage of rights under copyright.
- Party 1: Voyager Company.
- Party 2: MCA Home Video, Inc.
- Type of Work: Motion Picture
- Registration Number / Date: RE0000400902 / 1988-11-21
- Renewal registration for: LP0000024917 / 1960-10-06
- Title: Spartacus; motion picture. By Universal Pictures Company, Inc.
- Copyright Claimant: Universal City Studios, Inc. (PWH)
- Variant title: Spartacus
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted characters of The Simpsons Family; in foreground, Flintstones characters 1989 20:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Commons:Freedom of Panorama#Ireland. Yann (talk) 17:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Micahbhakti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No proof that this license is allowed by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 17:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted characters from The Flintstones 1989 20:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Snow keep. Freedom of panorama in Ireland allows for derivative photos taken in public interior rooms. There is no reason to assume that this excludes museums. De728631 (talk) 16:40, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Commons:Freedom of Panorama#Ireland. Yann (talk) 17:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above, and pobable copyvios. Yann (talk) 17:15, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - plain text in a jpg INeverCry 20:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 17:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Cover, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Cover, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Painting, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Pellicer2.jpg
- File:Pellicer4.jpg
- File:Pellicer.jpg
- File:Pellcer3.jpg
- File:Pellidakarseries.jpg
- File:Images grau.jpg
- File:Motocross Motos Grau.jpg
- File:Suprmotard.jpg
- File:MOTOS GRAU.jpg
- File:Motocross Grau.jpg
- File:Supermotard.jpg
INeverCry 20:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexismoralespinto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Vista desde el Hotel Westin Lima.jpg
- File:Plaza de los Heroes Navales Lima.jpg
- File:Lima San Isidro Centro Financiero.jpg
INeverCry 20:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Watermark or copies on the web. Yann (talk) 17:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The background of the text may be copyrighted; related to this, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Green-Lantern-The-Animated-Series.jpg 1989 20:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 17:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The design of the text may be copyrighted. 1989 20:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 20:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks
- File:Self-portrait by Rudy Méliczek.jpg
- File:Mobile Film Festival 2008 with Jan Kounen.jpg
- File:Ouvrage Hédoniste création double.jpg
INeverCry 20:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sleider Galindo Niño (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
La imagen no es la oficialBananga (talk) 00:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Private photograph uploaded when depicted persons were politically active, no longer of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotoviski (talk • contribs) 2015-01-10T19:23:57 (UTC)
- There seems to still be an article at https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek_Garztecki ... ? Same with the other 4 images of this person. --GRuban (talk) 04:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, looks OK. Yarl ✉ 15:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Better photo available: Grabmal Familie August Schmitt-Rau Nordfriedhof Wiesbaden.JPG Haffitt (talk) 12:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because it depicts readable infomation wholly related to personal identity and as such has no place on Wiki Loves Monuments lightbulb 12:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of this photo used at [18], published 2013-07-10. The problem here is that this is credited to "picture-alliance/dpa". While it is possible that Michael Teuchert is the photographer; I rather think that Michael Teuchert just photographed the drawing. Compare for instance File:Johann Traugott Lohse.jpg, where Teuschert is also given as photographer, while the drawing is clearly based on an old painting, or File:Eckart Friedrichson.jpg, where agian Teuchert is given as photographer, but the drawing is clearly based on (possibly more than one) photos from the 1950s.[19] or also File:Alfred Gunzenhauser.jpg: Teuchert given as photographer in EXIF, but drawing based on a photo by Heinz Hammer.
I think this would need OTRS confirmation from either the TV station where this image was published (www.br.de) or from picture-alliance/dpa directly that the photographer of the base image was indeed Michael Teuchert. Absent such confirmation, delete as derivative work. Lupo 13:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused self-created work. Plus misleading claim "Flag of the State of Russia". -- Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oh nonsense :), the Commons are packed with myriad fictional flags of all sorts. This is a fictional flag for the HoI universe.. imo that's an overly-rigorous application of policy manifestly not in-line with general practice: have a look at all this stuff, for just one example. Or look at this collection here. Or this entire category created for fictional flags of equal value [20], I could go on. Literally just go down the list of files in the Special or fictional flags cat.
- This particular image is only a slight modification of File:Flag of Russian Fascist Party.svg, which I intended to point out in the description (the image was only just uploaded).
- P.s. I want to make it clear for the record that I in no way espouse nor wish to promote the ideology expressed in the image, nor any ideologies espoused by the 1931-43 'Russian Fascist Party' (quite the opposite, in fact). Nor am I myself Russian, for that matter.. JimDyne (talk) 16:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This is a real flag, it was used by the Russian Fascist Party. However, as we have a file with the proper name, I see no reason to keep this one. Fry1989 eh? 18:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- This file has the symbol a bit larger, off-center, with the colours changed slightly. JimDyne (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Fry1989 - we already have a properly named version. INeverCry 20:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnalfredmendoza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality images. "Own work" claim is doubtful.
DLindsley Need something? 16:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
False authorship (photo of Strizhov is unlikely to be made by him) and no proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
False authorship (photo of Strizhov is unlikely to be made by him) and no proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
False authorship (photo of Strizhov is unlikely to be made by him) and no proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
False authorship (photo of Strizhov is unlikely to be made by him) and no proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
False authorship (photo of Strizhov is unlikely to be made by him) and no proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner. Tatewaki (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
No proof of permission to use such license by copyright owner (author's given name is Svetlana, uploaded by Alexandra) Tatewaki (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The design of the logo may be copyrighted. 1989 20:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
bad quality, better files File:Jan Brueghel I & Peter Paul Rubens - Hearing (Museo del Prado).jpg Oursana (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: In use. INeverCry 20:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:H9aqtKun-p4.jpg
- File:DsZidx6UV4g.jpg
- File:D-jwRTnFyvo.jpg
- File:3QFMHqydFsk.jpg
- File:PMgQA8WTCq8.jpg
INeverCry 19:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:1509178 694667533906778 918877065 n.jpg
- File:Politehnikaudg.jpg
- File:Editschooludg.jpg
- File:Creativecenterudg.jpg
- File:10299996 755596957813835 2639630526892045556 n.jpg
- File:1385377 652890624751136 1978698297 n.jpg
- File:Kosarkaugd.jpg
- File:Berzaideja.jpg
- File:Studenti-na-UDG.jpg
- File:Udgzgrada.jpg
INeverCry 20:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:56, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope; personal image 1989 02:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC) keep; not a personal image; official portrait of a published author --DidierMoise (talk) 15:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, unused, no categories, per nom. –Be..anyone (talk) 02:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom rubin16 (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Restored: User request. Yann (talk) 16:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Not actually in the public domain as the uploader indicates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGoofyGolfer (talk • contribs) 2015-01-11T00:54:05 (UTC)
- Can I ask why? I'm not the original uploader (I could care less about this) but I'm just wondering. If this gets deleted, then so should the SVG version. Just saying "it isn't in the PD as the uploader indicates" is not a real good reason... in my opinion. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 05:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, maybe redundant, maybe not, X-linked with SVG, the license is no issue. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- To claim that this logo and its SVG sister are in the public domain is completely false. Legally it is protected under a registered trademark made to the United States Patent and Trademark Office and owned is by NBCUniversal (Disclaimer: I am not affiliated in any way with NBC or NBCUniversal) therefore permission would been needed from NBCUniversal for its uses. You cannot just post something and claim that it is public domain because you want to usurp any of the rights of the trademark owner. Here's a good example, let's say that you have a dog name Butch, well I come by your house and pick up Butch and take him with me, you stop me and say that you own butch but I claim that he (Butch) is public property and that I can use him for whatever I want but you claim that you paid for him, you give him his food and shelter and that he legally belongs to you, it's same thing with a registered trademark, proper channels for use have to be followed. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 19:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- There is a {{Trademark}} info on both files, and PD for 20 lines SVG describes the originality adequatly from my POV. –Be..anyone (talk) 23:41, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Image is in the public domain, nominator confusing copyright with trademark law. Fry1989 eh? 19:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: It is a trademark, but in public domain. rubin16 (talk) 11:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Large High Performance Outdoor Shake Table at --wikipedia-en-University of California, San Diego-UCSD--.jpeg
[edit]
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Is Diego Grez's request for deletion due to "he works as a professor" legitimate? ShustovVal (talk) 07:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Found elsewhere - http://www.dailytechinfo.org/news/3532-mashiny-monstry-pyatietazhnoe-zdanie-vozvedennoe-na-odnom-iz-samyh-bolshih-v-mire-imitatore-zemletryaseniy.html rubin16 (talk) 11:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 04:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment, INUSE, but an ugly DIY "makeagif.com" watermark (unintended spam.) –Be..anyone (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Be..anyone: Neither "he works as a professor" nor "makeagif.com" watermark (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ShustovVal) can compromise my work. Sorry! ShustovVal (talk) 10:34, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of being free - watermarks, the original Youtube video isn't free rubin16 (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will you prove your accusation, please?ShustovVal (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, cf. 2007. The general idea here is that stuff published earlier elsewhere needs an OTRS-permission by the copyright holder, because anybody could grab the picture and create an account with a matching name (ShustovVal vs. shustov). If that's already handled for one of your pictures it should cover everything, but I don't know the details (you would know, it's supposed to be a simple "out of band" plausiblity check, e-mail or whatever is convenient for you.) –Be..anyone (talk) 03:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Be..anyone: Neither "he works as a professor" nor the image pasted in one of my web pages (not "elsewhere", see the Page Info, please) can compromise my download to Commons. ShustovVal (talk) 10:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio rubin16 (talk) 11:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Diego Grez return fire 15:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I have added an original upload log. I don't know whether "Shustov" at Wikipedia is the same user as "ShustovVal" on Commons. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's easy to verify: just click on Shustov and you will see.ShustovVal (talk) 03:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Images published elsewhere should be confirmed via COM:OTRS rubin16 (talk) 11:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, he works as a professor and has uploaded in the past several copyvios. Someone should review Shustov's uploads... Diego Grez return fire 15:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion? Will you spell them out clearly, please?ShustovVal (talk) 04:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, INUSE, source given, and if the 2004 address still works OTRS will be simple. Or add CC-BY-SA on the source in your home directory. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Is Diego Grez's request for deletion due to "he works as a professor" legitimate? ShustovVal (talk) 07:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- I haven't the faintest idea what he is talking about, and haven't checked any upload logs, but if you are or were the person in control of
~shustov"professor" could be correct and this deletion request utter dubious. I also didn't look at talk pages, now done: some files you uploaded were deleted. Just in case, "delete" doesn't do what it says, the files are only hidden, and can be undeleted in an UNDEL procedure when the license issues are solved. –Be..anyone (talk) 08:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- I haven't the faintest idea what he is talking about, and haven't checked any upload logs, but if you are or were the person in control of
- Is Diego Grez's request for deletion due to "he works as a professor" legitimate? ShustovVal (talk) 07:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- For the record: That "he works as a professor" thing was not meant to be the reason for deletion, it just emphasizes the fact that he should know all that stuff of plagiarism and stuff. It's only about that. --Diego Grez return fire 15:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Images published elsewhere should be confirmed via COM:OTRS rubin16 (talk) 11:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/PK1913. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: rubin16 (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
involve some body's face but they were not allow it, and the image not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, socks. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: rubin16 (talk) 11:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, socks. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: rubin16 (talk) 11:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mirko Simón García (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be the uploader's "own work". One of the images is a screenshot of a map. However, screenshots are not permitted under COM:FU.
- File:Disney Channel Logo 2014.jpg
- File:Telenoche (Córdoba) Logo.jpg
- File:Temblor en Córdoba.jpg
- File:Canal 2 Cosquín.jpg
_Logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
DLindsley Need something? 19:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The companies that own the rights of the logos are The Walt Disney Company (Disney Channel Logo 2014.jpg), Telecor S.A./Artear (Telenoche (Córdoba) Logo.jpg) and Cablevisión Argentina (Canal 2 Cosquín.jpg). The map (Temblor en Córdoba.jpg) appears here --Mega-buses (talk) 19:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Other logo with copyright: File:Disney Channel Logotipo 2014.jpg --Mega-buses (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- That gives us more consensus to delete these images. DLindsley Need something? 20:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Other logo with copyright: File:Fono Bus.png A same logo (but with different resolution) also appears in the official website of the bus company. --Mega-buses (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Now the user is Mirko García Velez (talk · contribs) --Mega-buses (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Other logo with copyright: File:Fono Bus.png A same logo (but with different resolution) also appears in the official website of the bus company. --Mega-buses (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- That gives us more consensus to delete these images. DLindsley Need something? 20:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom rubin16 (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted character(s) russavia (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copyvio of SpongeBob Squarepants. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted character(s) russavia (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copyvio of SpongeBob Squarepants. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Drawing is a derivative work of this photo used at [21]. Google's cache also shows a larger version of this: [22].
![[22]](http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hunderttausend.de%2Fimg%2F103373e9-392a-416c-9ab6-0b14c3931d2c%2C1.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpeoplecheck.de%2Fs%2Fmetty%2Bkrings&h=390&w=550&tbnid=aNRSQqzUKUK-AM%3A&zoom=1&docid=HvkN1p5OwKlMyM&ei=k3qyVPjkI6HgyQOirYHgDQ&tbm=isch&ved=0CCIQMygFMAU&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=6541&page=1&start=0&ndsp=48){kind=link}
Does the OTRS ticket confirm that Michael Teuchert was the photographer of that base image? If not, delete as derivative work. Lupo 13:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Ticket contains no mention of original author. Green Giant (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of this copyrighted photo. Does the OTRS ticket also contain a release from the photographer, Heinz Hammer? If not, delete. Lupo 13:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Guten Tag,
hier die Freigabe des Fotografen Herrn Hammer. Ich bitte die Wikipedianer um den gewünschten Eintrag von Herrn Hammer als Urheber der Fotografie, nach der das Bild entstanden ist. Eine Kopie dieser mail wurde ebenfalls an die Permissionsabteilung weitergeleitet.
Am 13.01.2015 um 18:27 schrieb Heinz Hammer <heinz.hammer@gmx.net>:
Werte Frau Martin, die Angaben sind aber bei Wiikipedia noch nicht eingefügt! MfG Heinz Hammer
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: Heinz Hammer <heinz.hammer@gmx.net> Datum: 12. Januar 2015 15:18:49 MEZ An: Benita Martin <benitamartin11@yahoo.de> Betreff: Re: Alfred Gunzenhauser
Hallo, mit der Angabe: Gezeichnet nach einem Foto von Heinz Hammer. MfG Heinz Hammer
Am 12.01.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Benita Martin:
Sehr geehrter Herr Hammer,
ich male ehrenamtlich für die Wikipedia Porträts.
Nun habe ich oben genannte Person gezeichnet, die Wikipedia möchte Ihre Zusage, zwecks Verwendung Ihres Fotos als Vorlage.
Darf ich mein Bild veröffentlichen? Hier der link. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Gunzenhauser
Vielen Dank Und liebe Grüße aus Chemnitz --89.246.215.25 04:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC) Benita Martin
www.benitamartin.de www.ada-dimensionsmalerei.de
Deleted: Per nom. No mention of the original author. Green Giant (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/004.jpg PK1913 (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep No evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:10, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Quality is ok. No reason to delete. --Sebari (talk) 02:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Also: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/PK1913 --Sebari (talk) 02:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, more than one MB is generally not (yet) poor quality here. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept, Sockpuppeting. Green Giant (talk) 23:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/012.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- no claim of copyright on that page. Metadata is included on our upload page and there is no reason to disbelieve the uploader's claim of authorship. Smallbones (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Since you're the author, that's not surprising. Or relevant.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep That's not evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/PK1913. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept, Sockpuppeting. Green Giant (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/004_2.JPG PK1913 (talk) 14:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- keep see FJU files above Smallbones (talk) 17:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am author, I want to delete it.PK1913 (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep deletion already declined on this set of photos; site no evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:10, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, socks. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept, Sockpuppeting. Green Giant (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/025.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- keep see FJU files above Smallbones (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Since you're the author, that's not surprising. Or relevant.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep That's not evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, socks. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept, Sockpuppeting. Green Giant (talk) 23:05, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/026.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- No claim of copyright on that page - this appears to be the personal website of a dorm student - the uploader here. 2 major points from the dorm website (google translation from the Chinese)
"3. Do not involve commercial web space content, obscene, pornographic or breach of the good customs and related matters, or to place copyrighted software or illegal files for downloading, and offenders the right to stop the system, when the evidence of serious information, and submit the school by school rules processing.
4. Personal web site for the ~ your Student ID."
So nothing is wrong here. Smallbones (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Not evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
involve some body's face but they were not allow it, and the image not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, socks. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:06, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept, Sockpuppeting. Green Giant (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/011.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- no claim of copyright on that page. Metadata is included on our upload page and there is no reason to disbelieve the uploader's claim of authorship. Smallbones (talk) 16:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Since you're the author, that's not surprising. Or relevant.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have a greater size, the origin version.PK1913 (talk) 17:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep That's not evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, socks. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept, Sockpuppeting. Green Giant (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright http://dorm.nsysu.edu.tw/~m976070005/wiki/043.JPG PK1913 (talk) 13:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- keep see FJU files above Smallbones (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am author, I want to delete it.220.134.119.245 17:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep deletion already declined on this set of photos; site no evidence of anything.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
not in use Daigaku (talk) 17:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, because Poor quality, not used, out of scope.PK1913 (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, socks. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:10, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept, Sockpuppeting. Green Giant (talk) 23:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small sized aerial image - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 17:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:PRP. Green Giant (talk) 23:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Is it an artistic monument? It is a town sign, the deer belongs to the coat of arms of Podgorny, the letters say "Podgorny". --Figugegl (talk) 14:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:22, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
{{PD-textlogo}} would not apply here, because it is too complex. The company that owns the rights of the logo is The Walt Disney Company.
The request also includes:
- File:Disney Channel Logo.jpg (Same logo)
Mega-buses (talk) 18:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Logo is copyrighted. 1989 01:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Comparing to COM:TOO#United States I don't think it is that clear. --Leyo 01:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-textlogo}} applies. Having some color or some minor aesthetic gradation effects on the logo does not change the copyrightablity of a text logo. "Copyrightability depends upon the presence of creative expression in a work, and not upon aesthetic merit, commercial appeal, or symbolic value. ... mere coloration cannot support a copyright even though it may enhance the aesthetic appeal or commercial value of a work." -- from s:Page:Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices, II (1984).pdf/131. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 22:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- @朝彦: File:Disney Channel Logo.jpg was deleted per copyright violation. And was the same logo. A similar logo without the "HD" appears here (official website of DC Germany). en:File:Disney Channel 2014 logo.png (only used on the english wikipedia) is a derivative of the DC Germany logo. You say (I think): the logo of Disney Channel US can be also used in Commons, if I'm not mistaken. --Mega-buses (talk) 19:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe that en:File:Disney Channel 2014 logo.png can be on Commons also. I can't see File:Disney Channel Logo.jpg now, but like this one, most likely it wasn't so obvious of a violation. Needless to say, I'm open to more detailed information by experts. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 19:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- @朝彦: File:Disney Channel Logo.jpg was deleted per copyright violation. And was the same logo. A similar logo without the "HD" appears here (official website of DC Germany). en:File:Disney Channel 2014 logo.png (only used on the english wikipedia) is a derivative of the DC Germany logo. You say (I think): the logo of Disney Channel US can be also used in Commons, if I'm not mistaken. --Mega-buses (talk) 19:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per User:朝彦 /St1995 13:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Kept: I would say PD-text Natuur12 (talk) 13:22, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Obviously, this not consists of simple geometric shapes . HombreDHojalata.talk 09:01, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment It seems unnecessary to reopen a deletion request. It was decided to keep the file six months ago. --Mega-buses (talk) 21:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: text-only. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney-channel-new2015.png, is too complex for PD-textlogo. ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Did you considered the two previous DR resolved as kept (the last one closed one week ago)? --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Notice that Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney-channel-new2015.png belongs to the logo with the swirl, that is abobe the TOO, unlike this file, that is text-only and is bellow the TOO in the US (broad concensus determined that several times). --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Text-only (albeit simulated hand-written text) and in no way above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete If one of the files can not be, the other also not. The only difference between one and the other were the circles that were above the "I" (That one anyone can add inclusive with the Windows Paint or a Design Program). Comment The two logos were first used in Germany (in January 2014); then the logos were incorporated into the other Disney Channel networks in the world. --Mega-buses (talk) 18:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per P199. --Leyo 20:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Textlogo until a court decides otherwise. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:30, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional flags with swastikas are banned in Germany and possibly other countries. 84.61.143.9 16:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Not possibly - definitely. In many other countries. Not in the US, though. I don't see your point? JimDyne (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please add a notice to some categories, such as Category:Swastikas, that certain symbols cannot be used in German video games, even if they can be used in movies. --84.61.143.9 19:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- There's a template for that, and I will certainly introduce it. JimDyne (talk) 19:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please add a notice to some categories, such as Category:Swastikas, that certain symbols cannot be used in German video games, even if they can be used in movies. --84.61.143.9 19:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Swastikas are not banned in Germany, only in certain contexts. Also German law does not apply in this case. --Sebari (talk) 02:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The nominating reason is absolutely invalid. However I do not see the value of this image. Fry1989 eh? 16:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Links to ban no.--Daverdis (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: since the nom reason is clearly invalid. I'm not opposed to a second DR specificly about the educational value of the image though. Natuur12 (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Appears to be a fictional flag for the unrecognised w:Confederate States of America and is therefore not of educational use. Also, Commons is not a repository for non-notable graphics. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Unused. Is there any background to this flag, or is it just an invention of the uploader? --Sebari (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- I suspect it is an invention of the uploader. Alan Liefting (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal art work, not used. Yann (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Vidsich
[edit]No evidence of permissions from authors.
File:Boycott of Russian cinema.jpgFile:Boycott Russian bank.jpgFile:Discrimination of Ukrainian language.jpgFile:Russian films are cilling.jpgFile:Stopmvs.jpgFile:Матрьошка Львів.jpg
Anatoliy (talk) 00:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
DW of posters. Copyright status of posters is unknown.
Anatoliy (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- The whole argument here [23].--Trydence (talk) 22:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep at least for files sourced to http://vidsich.info . Their website states: Копілефт — кожен робить те, що він готовий робити, не вимагаючи нічого для себе. Все, що робить активіст у Відсічі, перестає бути його власним і стає надбанням Відсічі, суспільства та людської цивілізації. Ніхто не має права вимагати почестей або привілеїв за те, що він робить., meaning that content created by Vidsich volunteers during their work for Vidsich is released by Vidsich into public domain — NickK (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- But there are licences CC-BY-SA. It is not Public domain.--Anatoliy (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- If you need to fix a license, you do not have to make a DR for that. However, AFAICS from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Demonstrations and protests by Vidsich in Ukraine, they have also provided an OTRS permission under CC-BY-SA, thus can we close this based on that OTRS ticket? — NickK (talk) 13:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- I
cannotmust not change the licenses of not mine photos, because I do not know what license should be correct. Author should decide what license he want to use. And sending permission is not enough to keep photos. Permission should be accepted or declined first. P.S. Do you really believe that anti-Russian activists store their photos щn Russian social network?--Anatoliy (talk) 13:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)- Add one more argumentation there [24]. Щодо "Do you really believe that anti-Russian activists store their photos щn Russian social network?" я вам вже давав пояснення в приваті з порівнянням з УПА та трофейною зброєю. Але ваша віра не має значення, бо доказів приналежності сторінок у соцмережах "Відсічі", зокрема на Вконтакте, надано різними шляхами вже достатньо.--Trydence (talk) 19:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- I
- If you need to fix a license, you do not have to make a DR for that. However, AFAICS from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Demonstrations and protests by Vidsich in Ukraine, they have also provided an OTRS permission under CC-BY-SA, thus can we close this based on that OTRS ticket? — NickK (talk) 13:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- But there are licences CC-BY-SA. It is not Public domain.--Anatoliy (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Images which fall upon {{Відсіч}} are kept. Rest problem images:
- File:Boycott rusia logo.jpg, File:PTN KhYLO.jpg, File:Матрешка Одесса.jpg - unknown author of original matryoshka image (невідомий автор самого зображення матрьошки)
File:Russian films are cilling.jpg— source page is not available- Fixed--Trydence (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
:File:Матрьошка Львів.jpg— no permission, {{OTRS received|2015012310000864}}.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)- Підтвердили. Перевірте пошту.--Trydence (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- File:Boycott rusia logo.jpg - the original matryoshka image seems to be from a poster of Museum of Communism Poster in Prague? //Vätte (talk) 22:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that is true. I am precising details now. But it requires some time.--Trydence (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: those whose permission is not confirmed (yet). Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Hey, I asked to wait the issue is in the process of solving...--Trydence (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- I guess we can leave this one open a little longer. Natuur12 (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for restoring. Could you please wait one or two more weeks? Assumed copyright holder had been contacted and negotiation is underway, we are waiting for response. The situation is complicated with the need of translation. --Pash (talk) 08:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Kept: those with OTRS release, deleted those without. JuTa 21:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)