Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/01/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 5th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional includes phone number Motopark (talk) 10:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been nominated for speedy deletion, but deleted nonetheless, and blocked the uploader indefinitely for being a single-purpose account. odder (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept, nonsense argument and/or De Minimis Denniss (talk) 11:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1.  Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Keep Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Keep All cyclists , footballers and other athletes logo during competitions such as the Tour de France, the UEFA matches and other competitions. Should we remove all of them ? no, No, of course!
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 12:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The logos are de:Beiwerk.--Sanandros (talk) 09:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 10:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Staunton with Older brother Giz.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Invicta Guiggz (talk) 11:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 13:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

esta duplicado Jciza (talk) 21:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

esta duplicado Jciza (talk) 21:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation anyway, see watermark. Martin H. (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

esta duplicado Jciza (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete}} Jciza (talk) 21:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation anyway. Martin H. (talk) 21:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wewrwrrwrewrwtw 24.184.51.12 03:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalical DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trademark violation. 2620:0:1000:437C:C11E:51A7:85F0:B94B 20:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misopened DR with Speedy as reason. Logo is bellow the Threshold of originality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitie 10g (talk • contribs) 2014-12-23T17:05:57‎ (UTC)


Kept: below COM:TOO. JuTa 21:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trademark violation and unauthorized use of registered trademark logo, Norway Registration No. 278520 and Swiss registration No. 664704 and U.S. Application No. 86303300}} 2620:0:1000:437C:D0AF:8505:C747:51EB 17:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Per previous Dr resolved as kept. Logo very bellow the Threshold of originality. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ItsCebuJobs.PH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotionalm includes web address and phone numbers

Motopark (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Odder; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 08:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Super U Guiggz (talk) 11:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Credit lyonnais, Fiat, France 2 Guiggz (talk) 11:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Saxo Banq Guiggz (talk) 11:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Website www.nordpasdecalais.fr Guiggz (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Omega Guiggz (talk) 11:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Nike Guiggz (talk) 11:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Brand, copyrighted logo Guiggz (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 09:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press picture from the film "The Book Thief", not own work. Ariam (talk) 15:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Krd; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 08:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LeGrandJardin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Tous droits réservés (All rights reserved)

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Bonjour Thibaut120094,
J'ai reçu les 4 photos par mail de l'auteur (Thomas Goisque), pour illustrer la page "Fort de Madama" sur Wikipedia. Il me les a bien envoyées à ma demande en vue de leur publication sur wikipedia. Toutefois il ne les a pas téléchargées lui-même ni envoyé l'autorisation de licence libre à Commons.
J'ai donc envoyé un mail à Thomas Goisque il y a 3 jours pour lui signaler le problème, avec la lettre-type et l'adresse mail pour accorder la licence libre. J'espère qu'il comprendra les règles strictes de wikipedia et acceptera. A défaut, il faudra supprimer ces 4 photos. Merci d'attendre quelques jours encore...
Bien cordialement,
LeGrandJardin — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeGrandJardin (talk • contribs) 14:08, 5 January 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
 Comment En complément de mon post d'hier, je confirme que l'auteur des photos (Thomas Goisque) a envoyé l'e-mail à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org avec la licence libre (double licence GFDL / Cc-by-sa 3.0) mardi 6 janvier à 08:49. Les photos ne devraient donc plus être supprimées.
Cordialement, — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeGrandJardin (talk • contribs) 9:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permission pending, please wait a few days before closing this Deletion Request. Rama (talk) 10:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) Those files have recieved an OTRS authorization ticket (Template:OTRS ticket) that needs complementary informations, please wait before deletion, thanks. Linedwell (talk) 11:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, OTRS permission recieved and mentionned on files pages. Linedwell (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Linedwell: Merci, but I think you forgot to add the licence ? Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Thibaut120094: I was looking for the right templates, but thanks Clin. Linedwell (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Linedwell (talk) 11:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination then. Thank you Linedwell, LeGrandJardin and Thomas Goisque. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then I'll close the DR. Cheers everyone! Rama (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Rama (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is under a CC BY-NC 2.0 license, per the source link.[1] That license is incompatible with Commons. C.Fred (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Kanags (talk) 12:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete no NC Snickerty03 (talk) 05:53, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete CC BY-NC 2.0 license is not valid on Commons.--Obi2canibe (talk) 10:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NC. Masur (talk) 20:14, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it with wrong name by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Fastily JuTa 16:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

마음에 들지 않습니다 Soo9819 (talk) 12:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

마음에 들지 않습니다 Soo9819 (talk) 00:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Fastily. JuTa 16:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

version to old


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 16:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture is to old bye now


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 16:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this foto is to old by now


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 16:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrihgt! Fenerli1978 (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Jaqen. JuTa 16:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused Pibwl (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a holiday album Pibwl (talk) 19:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a holiday album Pibwl (talk) 19:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a holiday album Pibwl (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a holiday album (besides, unknown place) Pibwl (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a holiday album Pibwl (talk) 19:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

friends' photo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 22:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"I was there" photo, unusable Pibwl (talk) 22:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

уже не нужен Maria Bezruk (talk) 22:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 16:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

holiday photo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Russavia. JuTa 16:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it was recently proposed for deletion on en.wiki on the strength of existing here on Commons. I had tried to emphasize that en.wiki is its natural home (it's used on a few userpages there), by marking it {{esoteric file}}, but that didn't stop somebody from nomming it for en.wiki deletion. :-( Please let's keep it on en.wiki and, to that end, remove it from Commons, where it's of no use. Bishonen (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC). Bishonen (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused, is there a reason deleting it from enwp would be problematic? Legoktm (talk) 00:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes: I think it's always likely to be deleted from Commons as useless, and if it then doesn't exist on en.wiki, it'll be gone. I don't feel it's safe on Commons, because of its... uh… nature. Compare this 2011 deletion discussion], especially the comments of Risker and Drilnoth. When it was proposed for en.wiki deletion a week ago because it exists on Commons, I could vividly picture how it would then soon enough be deleted on Commons. Not because of any malice, but because it is extravagantly useless from any perspective other than that of en.wiki userpages. That's my problem. Do you think I worry for nothing, Legoktm? Bishonen (talk) 00:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Yes, but I suppose I have more faith in Commons to do the right thing. In any case I don't really have an opinion as the transferer from enwp. Legoktm (talk) 06:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. No valid reasons for Commons not to host such an iconic original image of a notable Wikimedian, and also to permit en:wp to retain their local copy. I see tremendous and mind boggling educational and commercial possibilities for this image all across Wikimedia strongly requiring that this image is retained as a Commons asset. Alternatively, per COM:SCOPE if the user's alternate account is deleted cross-wiki, I shall reluctantly support letting this image go. Indiaresists (talk) 09:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Indiaresists (talk · contribs) has been blocked as a sockpuppet of HRA1924. Voceditenore (talk) 11:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not sufficient reason to delete this image. Its just as safe on Commons as anywhere else. Snickerty03 (talk) 06:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Snickerty03 (talk · contribs) has been blocked as a sockpuppet of HRA1924. Voceditenore (talk) 11:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal image - deletion requested by creator. INeverCry 00:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses File:Tennis_ball.svg & adds a lot of promotional or self-promotional words. Commons is not a social media site, delete as out of COM:SCOPE and unneeded duplicate of prior image, and hence not own work. User's other uploads were no permissions and speedies. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. Tagged by me as a duplicate of File:Tennis ball.svg. DLindsley Need something? 13:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per above. Eurodyne (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed structure (rendering problems, see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted, there is a different fixed png version J1812 (talk) 01:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned/replaced. Leyo 01:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned/replaced. Leyo 01:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned/replaced. Leyo 01:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned/replaced. Leyo 01:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned/several alternatives available. Leyo 01:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 01:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed; replaced by alternative in Category:Dakin–West reaction. Leyo 01:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed; replaced by alternative in Category:Dakin–West reaction. Leyo 01:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buggy SVG; better alternatives in Category:1,2,3-trichloropropane. Leyo 01:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image shows up on news sites, low quality, no detailed EXIF, questionable own work claim -Tony Webster (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jesmiagui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely and in most cases demonstrably false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing or inconsistent metadata, watermarks, nature of the photos, and the uploader's history of uploading copyright violations.

LX (talk, contribs) 02:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload annotation says it was "adapted" from a screen shot of Google Earth. The underlying graphic would be copyrighted by Google, I'm pretty sure this not allowed. Brianhe (talk) 02:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derivative of CW Snickerty03 (talk) 05:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, doubtful this is the uploader's own work as they state that "[they] took a still of a video", i.e. the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQu0VBDYqr4 (paused at 5m08s), and I don't believe the uploader of that YouTube video is the same person as the uploader of this image here. Mathonius (talk) 03:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a personal resume/CV, which I believe is out of project scope. Michael Barera (talk) 04:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Given the description (just a website address), it looks like this was uploaded primarily for advertisement or self-promotion purposes. Lupo 06:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteAgree with Lupo Snickerty03 (talk) 05:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused text-only screenshot. Lupo 06:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused text-only screenshot. Lupo 06:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see a "fatsuit" here, and that face looks spooky. Delete as vandalism. Lupo 06:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two days after this ugly thumb went INUSE the page was promoted from stub to article. I don't get it. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepSeems a potentially notable person. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. A total of 9060 Google hits for "ankit barot", but evidently about different persons. Which Ankit Barot do you think this shows? Which one did you consider "potentially notable"? (I guess we're all "potentially notable", aren't we?) Lupo 05:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete SPEEDY requested. This is included as child pornography in some countries. Not suitable for Commons. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unsharp to be useful. Lupo 06:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some instagram nonsense (square size...); not exactly useful. Unused. Lupo 06:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot showing some image apparently from some search engine. Lupo 06:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it's quality is bad. Beatrip2001 (talk) 06:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 06:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too dark; unused. Lupo 06:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful, just a line of some colored dots on black. Lupo 06:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: not educationally useful. Lupo 06:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal doodle. Lupo 07:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 07:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete SPEEDY requested. This is obvious and included as child pornography in some countries. Not at all suitable for Commons. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree this should be deleted, where's the "pornography" in this? Lupo 05:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In some countries, which I won't name here, any "unauthorised" photo taken of a child which is uploaded to a "social networking site" is included as child pornography. These countries don't accept that Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Snickerty03 (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's a kid not at all afraid of an old, big, bored dog. On a very bad unused thumbnail in need of a  Delete as out of scope. If you really see what you say ask folks you trust if they also see anything out of line here for a reality check. Nevermind, per Special:Contributions/Snickerty03, I don't get this sock war. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal pet photo; low quality. Lupo 07:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poem by Anton Hribar (1864-1953), copyrighted for 9 more years. Sporti (talk) 07:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very very very low quality, unused personal photo Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this is "selfie". Self promotion of non-notable pseudoscientist. Low resolution. Out of scope. Indiaresists (talk) 08:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Low resolution. Out of scope. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:38, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jakob von Uexküll died 70 years ago, but what's about the design of bookcover? rororo paperbacks exists since 1950! Berthold Werner (talk) 08:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which design? If this is a copy of Jakob von Uexküll's work, there is no copyright for republishing it on a book cover. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality unused personal photo Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader confirmed, that it's not his own work, so an OTRS permission needed. Sealle (talk) 08:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution doodle. No educational value, Out of scope. Another version indicates rights are also vested in third parties like Design Dept IIT Guwahati. Indiaresists (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete both images should be deleted. Copyvio and Out of scope. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyvio, needs a OTRS Snickerty03 (talk) 05:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the permission of the copyright holder has been either sought or received Mikenorton (talk) 09:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Apparently a derivative work of a picture presented on a wall whose copyright holder is unknown to us. whym (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal screenshot. Also text-only. Lupo 09:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical diagram (see file description page); orphaned. Leyo 09:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed image; orphaned/replaced by File:Quinuclidone synthesis norcamphor.svg. Leyo 09:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputed chemical structure; orphaned/alternatives in Category:Lactulose. Leyo 09:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused game(?) screenshot. Lupo 09:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused text-only file. Lupo 09:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture (twitter account of that person ends in "watto", so I'm assuming the uploader is the subject). Lupo 09:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 09:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless. Very blurry, lots of upscaling artifacts. Lupo 09:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, the source publication[5] is CC-BY-NC, which we don't accept. (All right, probably that table in isolation is not copyrightable material anyway...) Second, this table is useless without context. Third, the file is unused. Lupo 10:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derivative of 2D, so not OK. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 10:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep in scope. Has educational value broadly construed. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing stereochemistry, varying background, replaced by File:Nardosinone.svg. Leyo 10:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This should definitely be deleted. It no longer serves a function, as Leyo explains. Brandonazz (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrick Zoller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks

BrightRaven (talk) 10:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New Coke design. Too large for COM:DM read with COM:PACKAGING. Also wrong licence under Indian Copyright law, if image created in India. Indiaresists (talk) 10:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I'm in agreement with nominator Snickerty03 (talk) 05:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Seems to be a simple design. Does COM:TOO apply in this case? --Puramyun31 (talk) 10:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete "(but not to more recent Coke designs)." see COM:PACKAGING. It is clearly unusable in India where the image was taken / photographer resides, so can't be used in Commons. "Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc." is about a commercial dispute over a work commissioned by the copyright owner of the 3D work, and the "infringement" alleged was with the consent of Skyy Sprirts Inc. Material facts are different. 122.162.128.119 17:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Lupo. INeverCry 01:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparecen personas sin identificar que pueden molestarse reboledo (talk) 10:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparecen personas identificables sin autorización reboledo (talk) 10:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: nondescript photo through car window with misleading and misspelled title. Lupo 10:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, unused text document of questionable notability Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small size. Not useful. We heve better versions: File:Francois Rabelais - Portrait.jpg BrightRaven (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grupo Tradeco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status:


Gunnex (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not the user's own work, no EXIF data, can be found on many websites Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gkselmaral (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of project scope.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the user's own work per EXIF data. EXIF data shows the author is Kwon Hyon Jin. Can be found on many websites as well, so most likely copyrighted. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no real description, no educational value, the only one upload of the user Avron (talk) 11:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1932 German photo. No evidence that this is actually freely licensed as claimed or that the uploader had any rights to it. No author is named, but that does not mean he is actually unknown in a legal sense. The photographer of a 1932 photo could well have lived beyond 1944, and the photo would still be protected by copyright then. Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pranav21391 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copies available here, credited to AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool.

Yann (talk) 12:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All these are copyvios Snickerty03 (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Belgium. Ras67 (talk) 12:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo already posted Nov 3, 2014 (a week before the upload here) at [6]. Lupo 12:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is watermarked (sky right, on the tower, and below the tree left). No EXIF. Given this uploader's history, I suspect copyvio. Lupo 13:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Probably below TOO in the USA. BrightRaven (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Red symbol looks pretty original/complex. INeverCry 01:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original appears to be [7] by Alex Avqustinov, used at [8]; compare [9] (posted 2009). Although smaller in size, the clouds are the same. Lupo 13:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stolichanin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user removed a "no permission" tag from this file, claiming that the website given as source has a notice that indicates that all the images on that website are licensed under a free license, which appears to be false. In any case, the image in question is credited to EPA/BGNES (http://www.epa.eu / http://www.bgnes.com), which have all rights reserved copyright notices. Other images uploaded by this user have similar copyright problems.

Jespinos (talk) 15:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Източниците са посочени под снимките и там изображенията са упоменати под този лиценз. Файловете за Крисия Тодорова, Нели Петкова и Ралица Василева са под свободен лиценз и са използвани на много места под същия лиценз, като се упоменава източникът. Разпространението на тези снимки е свободно във всички страни - членки на ЕС и в други страни със сходно законодателство. Ограничението се отнася само за текстовото съдържание, не за снимките. Справка - виж източниците.--Stolichanin (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahrooz m20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from postcards and drawings. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user's only other upload is a copyvio. I doubt very much that this user drew this map from scratch as claimed. If the base map used here is PD, then it is just polite to give credit to the source, but if it is licensed, then the source must be credited. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. That claim is definitely doubtful. DLindsley Need something? 01:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image (with under-age person!) without any educational relevance (Commons used as personal hosting) L736E (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Protected by password. Likely to be out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Castlemate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either personal artwork (out of scope) or derivative of unknown source (permission missing). P 1 9 9   16:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a derivative work, no FOP in France. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mattbuck Sorry, I had not noticed the signing of this work of art-- Pierre André (talk) 17:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andre Salmon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear name ; generic file name : Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
What's wrong with this file? --Zarateman (talk) 21:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't create the advertisement, someone else did. You need to obtain permission from that person. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Battle of Vitoria. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The most likely the photograph has been taken after 1969-01-01. Apalsola tc 18:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC) –– (moved) Apalsola tc 18:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My claim is based on two facts:
  • The picture is taken at the current Helsinki Airport Terminal 2 which was opened in 1969.[10]. So, the picture cannot be taken in 1966 or 1967.
  • A jetbridge can be seen in the picture. However, I found two photographs[11][12] taken ca. 1969, and no jetbridges can be seen in them.
So, this photograph is newer, taken probably in the 1970s or the early 1980s and thus not in Public Domain yet. –– Apalsola tc 18:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It's a shame to lose this, but you are indeed correct. russavia (talk) 19:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, it is a shame. – There are not too many old pictures of Finnish airports here. Any chance to get an OTRS permission of this one? ––Apalsola tc 19:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Apalsola I will try but it might have to come in some weeks. This might interest you. I am currently writing a proposal to them so stay tuned! :) russavia (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear description ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 3 photos with unclear descriptions. Civa (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown group or team (what sport ?) ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 18:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown team (what town ? what country ?) ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown group (what job ? what country ?) ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 2 photos. Civa (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 19:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo (of himself) is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 19:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 19:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the author of photos. Do not have permission to publish. Wisky (talk) 19:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the author of photos. Do not have permission to publish. Wisky (talk) 19:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This could be used to illustrate tourism, reading and perhaps most importantly, Lonely Planet. russavia (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In scope of Category:3850 (number) russavia (talk) 19:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

holiday photo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In scope of Category:4715 (number) russavia (talk) 19:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

holiday photo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In scope of Category:3375 (number) and Category:Time 09:54 russavia (talk) 19:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect data, incorrect source, incorrect author and incorrect license . HombreDHojalata.talk 20:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a house drowned in a river, but a real artistic creation. No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. Civa (talk) 20:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As it is a replica, this is a delete. russavia (talk) 20:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The smurfs are protected till 2063. FoP-Spain is not applicable, because it's not permanently located there. Ras67 (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a simple door or wall, but an original creation. No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The author Lawrence Caroll is still alive. Civa (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Alrofficial (talk) 20:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo with wrong licence, probably copyrighted. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The author Michel Rigel is still alive. Civa (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The author Michel Rigel is still alive. Civa (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. This photo was uploaded several times by User:Karllilienberg and speedy deleted in all the cases. Magically, a user with the same name as the author of the photo uploaded it once more. Jespinos (talk) 21:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je reçois une mise en garde pour chaque article que j'ai numérisé et que je mets sur https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symfolium_Universit%C3%A9_de_foulosophie Les articles en question sont du domaine public puisqu'ils ont été publiés et qu'ils nous concernent. Pour ce qui est du reste je ne comprends pas bien ce qui ne va pas dans cette page qui fait état d'un organisme à but non lucratif OBNL reconnu depuis 16 ans maintenant.

Merci de nous orienter. --Symfolium (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data : CC-BY-NC 2.0 Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.camillethomas.com/pdf/2Dossier%20Camille%20Thomas%20FR.pdf Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a bottled water, doesn't look like an amateur photo, unused, sole contribution Pibwl (talk) 22:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

name says it all Pibwl (talk) 22:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use and minor pixel/quality duplicate of Wappen Landau Pfalz.png Fränsmer (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted? Pibwl (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyvio. Eurodyne (talk) 01:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 22:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to delete, copyright checked and respected.


Deleted: Unused personal image - out of COM:SCOPE. INeverCry 01:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some blog logo, promo, unused. Same for File:Sunny Live Projects.jpg, File:Sunny saini (www.techz.tk).jpg Pibwl (talk) 22:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo - user's only activity was to create an user page on en-wiki, without this photo, though Pibwl (talk) 22:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted to PNG, the original source is http://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/schistosomiasis/ anyway. Leyo 22:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad photo, there are many others at Category:Church of St. Bernard of Siena in Kraków Pibwl (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality photo - unusable Pibwl (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image, vastly superior file available as File:Flag of Cameroon.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad technical quality, unusable (and unknown place) Pibwl (talk) 23:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of a person, unused, unknown notability, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some scan?, unknown notability, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some unused logo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some unused diagram, one of user's three uploads (same for File:서울시 하수냄새 발생원인 및 저감 방안.jpg, File:연도별 하수냄새 민원 발생건수.jpg). Auto translator says: "Sewage odor ideas conspirators poster" Pibwl (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: not relevant person Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rociokm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam or blatant advertising in my opinion.

Jespinos (talk) 23:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. Eurodyne (talk) 01:04, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material collection of unknown author pictures, can be written to some wikipdia if needed Motopark (talk) 23:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text only, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad technical quality photo of a popular place Pibwl (talk) 23:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a duplicate of File:Figure of Durga at Halebid in Karnataka in 1856.jpg Co9man (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong image creation date. This event was held between 5 April 2011 till 8 April 2011. Such images were widely circulated on social media. Hence authorship and capacity to licence this Indian work to Commons is dubious. EXIF shows Photoshop used on 11 April 2011. Uploader was previously blocked for serial copyvio of images of Poonam Jhawar, SPA. So this image Poonam is also a suspected copyvio.Indiaresists (talk) 08:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep a Hot CHICK. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Both files are copyrighted in the USA under URAA. You will also have to show proof of publication, because a lower res version of this file was uploaded to Facebook on 18 April 2011 on user a/c "PoonamJhawerOfficial" and probably elsewhere also. To be in public domain means need to be in PD in USA as well as in most significant country connected to image. An anonymous PD dedication on Commons from a SPA previously blocked for uploading serial copy violations of Poonam Jhawer ? 122.162.174.47 18:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note The nominator Indiaresists (talk · contribs) has been blocked as a sockpuppet, as has Snickerty03 (talk · contribs). 122.162.174.47, please provide the URL for where this image was previously published. Note also that this IP is in the same range as three other IPs blocked for abusing multiple accounts: [14], [15], [16]. Voceditenore (talk) 18:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per Lupo. Yann (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, unused, no useful description, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Registered Logo too large for COM:DM, No Freedom of Panorama available here. Out of scope. Indiaresists (talk) 10:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as not DM or FoP. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Logo is PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is not original creator of this image. 117.204.194.168 10:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falta de parcialidade Arcanji (talk) 11:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Album cover, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Legoktm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo (already previously deleted), has been uploaded to enwp as fair use. Could be below TOO in the USA. BrightRaven (talk) 11:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rodrigolopes as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://rafamendez.es/imagenes/ Steinsplitter (talk) 19:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket #2012080310003418 -- Steinsplitter (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the OTRS ticket, this is still a purely promotional image, unused and unusable, out of scope. . P 1 9 9   16:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This doesn't seem to be an actual coat of arms. The Romanian communes' coats of arms have a certain format: no ribbon and a mural crown. This doesn't have any, so it begs the question whether or not it was approved by Government Resolution. If not, then it doesn't qualify as "official symbol of a public authority", so the license template doesn't apply. —Andrei S. Talk 17:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 16:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Primarily, it shows a woman standing by several video games. She is certainly identifiable in the photo. It is not clear if the person uploading the photo is the person who published the photo at flickr; if not it is quite possible the subject has not consented to the use of the photo for anything other than the personal usage of the photographer. Looking at the commons guidelines such consent would ideally have been obtained and indicated before uploading. Benthatsme (talk) 20:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Available on Flick, and in use. Yann (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Bonjour, je reçois une mise en garde pour chaque article que j'ai numérisé et que je mets sur https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symfolium_Universit%C3%A9_de_foulosophie Les articles en question sont du domaine public puisqu'ils ont été publiés et qu'ils nous concernent. Pour ce qui est du reste je ne comprends pas bien ce qui ne va pas dans cette page qui fait état d'un organisme à but non lucratif OBNL reconnu depuis 16 ans maintenant.[reply]

Merci de nous orienter. Symfolium--Symfolium (talk) 22:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [ [User:Shev123|Shev123]] (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour, je reçois une mise en garde pour chaque article que j'ai numérisé et que je mets sur https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symfolium_Universit%C3%A9_de_foulosophie Les articles en question sont du domaine public puisqu'ils ont été publiés et qu'ils nous concernent. Pour ce qui est du reste je ne comprends pas bien ce qui ne va pas dans cette page qui fait état d'un organisme à but non lucratif OBNL reconnu depuis 16 ans maintenant.

Merci de nous orienter. Symfolium--Symfolium (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work (rather own scan), same for


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lesser-quality copy of File:Ludovikof.jpg Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 01:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Redirected to larger and older file. Green Giant (talk) 16:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  Delete as nominator per COM:DW. The flickr user can only license the video (visual) recoding, not the music heard on the video, which is a derivative work. Josve05a (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've sent an e-mail off the the performing band, the Great Bear Trio, requesting that they license the music under a free license. I'll reply back here if I get a response. If the video is deleted, and I receive a subsequent response from them with permission, should I just have the request sent to OTRS? I JethroBT (talk) 09:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. No email at OTRS as of today, but if you receive a reply, jus ask them to send it to OTRS, Green Giant (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David Adam Kess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

DW of artworks by living painter Daniel Reinoso. There is FOP in Ecuador, but the paintings were on display in the park for sale. They are not permanently displayed so FOP is not applicable. So permission of the artist is needed.

BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep all the picsǃ

VIVA WIKI
Yours sincerely, David Adam Kess (talk) 11:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
i totally contest deteting these pics, i am using them in my user pages on seven languages in wikipedia and wiimedia
I think it is unfair that you are deleting every single one of these photos, i totally contest and think that maybe a few can be kept
but i think that detail of art from quito is very important
i am also using these on many user pages of mine from many languages, so the files are being used
Yours sincerely, David Adam Kess (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As explained on your talk page, the permission of the artist should be sent through COM:OTRS. It is not mandatory for the artist to create and account. BrightRaven (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protest thal all 100 percent to be wiped out

[edit]

File usage The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed): User:David Adam Kess Global file usage The following other wikis use this file:

Usage on es.wikipedia.org Usuario:David Adam Kess Usage on fi.wikipedia.org Käyttäjä:David Adam Kess Usage on fr.wikipedia.org Utilisateur:David Adam Kess Usage on lt.wikipedia.org Naudotojo aptarimas:David Adam Kess Naudotojas:David Adam Kess Usage on zh.wikipedia.org User:David Adam Kess File:(Artist Daniel Reinoso) at Parque El Ejido.JPG (Art at Parque El Ejido)

this above picture was accepted to gogle maps and google earth and should be kept in wikipedia

VIVA WIKI
Yours sincerely, David Adam Kess (talk) 8:33 pm 12th of January 2015 (UTC)

This one is in Google maps and google earth

[edit]

http://www.panoramio.com/photo/115455173

VIVA WIKI
Yours sincerely, David Adam Kess (talk) 8:43 pm 12th of January 2015 (UTC)

Google Maps, not an issue

[edit]

Google Maps is a desktop and mobile web mapping service application and technology provided by Google, offering satellite imagery, street maps, and Street View perspectives, as well as functions such as a route planner for traveling by foot, car, bicycle (beta test), or with public transportation. Also supported are maps embedded on third-party websites via the Google Maps API,[1] and a locator for urban businesses and other organizations in numerous countries around the world. Google Maps satellite images are not updated in real time; however, Google adds data to their Primary Database on a regular basis. Google Earth support states that most of the images are no more than 3 years old.[2] Protest thal all 100 percent to be wiped out[edit] File:(Artist Daniel Reinoso) at Parque El Ejido.JPG (Art at Parque El Ejido) this above picture was accepted to gogle maps and google earth and should be kept in wikipedia VIVA WIKI

the pics are in use, so why delete ǃ

[edit]

just an idea to keep the great photographs of the paintings ǃ

  1. What is the Google Maps API?.
  2. Frequently Asked Questions - Earth Help. Support.google.com. Retrieved on 2013-11-24.

Deleted: Per nom. No email found at OTRS as of today. If something does turn up, the files can easily be restored. Green Giant (talk) 16:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David Adam Kess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious derivative work

Discasto talk 12:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious derivative work:

Discasto talk 08:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious derivative work. Maybe some of them may be deemed as simple enough for being eligible, but generally speaking, they seem to be a photograph of a copyrighted artwork

Discasto talk 09:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's the same file with a different name (File:Tarallo dolce e calzoncelli.JPG), which is more appropriate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Generale Lee (talk • contribs) 2015-01-05T11:46:07‎ (UTC)


Deleted: and merged. Green Giant (talk) 16:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS, wrong user made CoA of File:Wappen Altdoebern.png, also with wrong license, had also never historical validity. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 11:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Burdack apparently created this, and later uploaded a correct official File:Wappen_Altdoebern.png somewhere, somehow ending up here. No obvious reasons to keep this 8 years old contribution,  Delete. –Be..anyone (talk) 13:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OOS, superseded Avi (talk) 06:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As you read in the link at the description (Leonardo da Vinci: a natureza da invenção), the object was made in 1952 and is used in expositions, so the object is highly possible under a copyright, so this image is a copyvio. - -- RTA 11:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment It was suggested at Featured Pictures that "This is supposed to be an utilitarian vehicle, not a work of art. And if it is a faithful reproduction of the original, there is no copyright anyway." But it looks like this is a model designed with cut-out to display the interior workings (thus could not have served as a tank). Is it to scale or made from the intended materials? My guess is da Vinci drew a tank rather than created one, so is not a "faithful reproduction" but an interpretation by the contemporary artist/craftsperson of those sketches. -- Colin (talk) 12:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment On the other hand, Da Vinci schemes in his time was the equivalent of the current project books "Blue Books Design Guides", the exhibition presents the reproduction as faithful to the original schemes(obviously within the constraints of a scheme) in this way would not be a work of art but a small-scale prototype using the techniques and materials of the time of the original scheme. I believe this would be the most appropriate to describe the object in question. Otherwise all other pictures of prototypes in this category(and many others) should be considered works of art and removed (Of course this is just an ironic way to draw attention to the absurdity of the question, I hope no one takes it seriously). And please gentleman's "absurdity of the question" is not an attack is only my point of view on this interpretation. -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 15:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • User:Lauro Sirgado, copyright law is absurd: it does not stand up to reason. Some of the images in the category may well have the same flaw but others may be on permanent exhibition in a public place, and (depending on the country) could then be permissible. -- Colin (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Colin Sorry I did not understand the relevance of your counter-argument. From my point of view this is a small-scale prototype not an art object . That's just what I'm arguing for. But I'm here just to participate and learn, I will not argue more, better appreciate the good work of photographers and abandon this issue(isn't my place).  ; ) -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 23:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment More info about exactly this reproduction, here --The Photographer (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For me is a  Delete, I can't see how this is not a copyvio, is a object of expositions, made with this purpose, and is not permanent in a open public space. -- RTA 21:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Faithful reproduction from plans by Leonardo Da Vinci. Is this really above the threshold of originality in Brazil? --Sebari (talk) 22:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is not Brazilian "sculptures", they are Italians ones... but, lets change the example, take a Beethoven songs, than made a version of the songs, our version is under copyright, :/, and makes sense, that's why exists SA in CC licenses, to people not create copyrighted versions of your free work... so do not matter if the origin is free, if the license do not have a SA or similar, you can create copyrighted versions. And that's the case... furthermore, Da Vinci never made one single 3D prototype he just draw that, some parts are truly creations of the artist, and you can compare with others made by the same sketches and you can see a lot of differences check... -- RTA 01:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright cannot be worked-out and analogies always fail. The rules for 3D sculptures are totally different to the rules for sheet music and performances. -- Colin (talk) 08:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I'm fairly convinced this has (sadly) to be a copyvio. It is not a utilitarian item (a real tank) but instead a reduced-sized model with cut-out for showing the insides. Creating this from da Vinci's sketches is a work of art and subject to copyright. If this work was on permanent display in some countries, then it would be permitted due to the rules governing 3D art on permanent display in a public space. But I believe this is a temporary exhibition. -- Colin (talk) 08:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This is a permanent exhibition, however, not in one place because it is in constant movement around the world. Always free and in public spaces. However, I have some doubts about the process of reproduction. As Colin says, this was not done to actually operate. The intent of the engineer / craftsman was, display internally operation at a small scale, without putting a real interest in the appropriate measures and materials for operation. This case was not very obvious to me, and still remains, however, in these cases it is better to delete the image. It's a shame, because I took 437 photos of different objects in this exhibition that never can be uploaded. I thank the nominator and Colin clarify the situation.--The Photographer (talk) 10:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Most likely a copyvio per discussion. Avi (talk) 06:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owner of Flickr account deleted photo from Flickr and would like it removed from the Commons. Jakubcfc (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think that the nominator's Commons user account needs verification. --Puramyun31 (talk) 02:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete "(Photo by Jesse Grant/WireImage)". Needs OTRS permission. Snickerty03 (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Snickerty03: See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Canadian_Film_Centre_photos_by_WireImage --Puramyun31 (talk) 06:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suspect DR. User account was created just for it. Permission seems fine. No reason to delete. --Sebari (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The photo was imported to the commons under an acceptable license. The claim here is not that this image is harming the subject and that a substitute would be preferred, but that because the original flickr account was deleted that should ipso facto make this image unacceptable. That is not accurate to the best of my understanding. If the subject of the image would like this image removed from the commons due to fear of embarrassment or harm, she should either contact OTRS with reason for said concern, or, better yet, provide the commons with an acceptable substitute. Until such time, the image remains legal and in scope as it is used to illustrate the subject's article on one of the Wikimedia projects. Avi (talk) 07:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aggravated copy of File:Boxing pictogram.svg Brateevsky {talk} 20:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. Green Giant (talk) 23:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality: blurry, low resolution, better file e.g. File:Iglesia de Santa Anastasia (Verona).JPG Oursana (talk) 11:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 14:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality: blurry, low resolution, better file e.g. File:Iglesia de Santa Anastasia (Verona).JPG, no more in use Oursana (talk) 23:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep While the quality is pretty bad, the perspective (seemingly taken with a fairly long lens from a narrow street in front of the church) is unique among the photos in the category. --Sebari (talk) 22:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Quality is not that bad when we consider it is a photo from over a decade ago. We have room for both photos. Green Giant (talk) 23:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Probably below TOO in the USA. BrightRaven (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nominator rubin16 (talk) 11:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a hobby stillife-photograph without further sense or historical or artificial or biographical importance Alfred Löhr (talk) 16:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete rather out of SCOPE imho. --BaseSat (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 02:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The author Armand Langlois is still alive. Civa (talk) 20:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

====Ces photos ont été prises par moi-même et représentent des œuvres que j’ai moi-même créées, mon nom est Armand Langlois et je suis artiste plasticien et donc l’auteur des œuvres et des photos. Elles sont libres de droits dans les conditions requises. Il n’y a donc pas de problème de droits d’auteur. Le château de Breteuil est par ailleurs d’accord pour que ces photos soient sur cette page. Il n’y a pas lieu de les supprimer de wikimedia communs. merci.

These photos were taken by myself and represent the works that I created myself, my name is Armand Langlois and I'm a visual artist and therefore the author of the works and photos. They are free of rights under the required conditions. There is no copyright problem. The Château de Breteuil is also agreed that the photos are on this page. There is no need to eliminate the common wikimedia. thank you. --2A01:E34:ED2C:AC0:B0B6:9235:77E3:1AF 10:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 02:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The author Armand Langlois is still alive. Civa (talk) 20:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

==Ces photos ont été prises par moi-même et représentent des œuvres que j’ai moi-même créées, mon nom est Armand Langlois et je suis artiste plasticien et donc l’auteur des œuvres et des photos. Elles sont libres de droits dans les conditions requises. Il n’y a donc pas de problème de droits d’auteur. Le château de Breteuil est par ailleurs d’accord pour que ces photos soient sur cette page. Il n’y a pas lieu de les supprimer de wikimedia communs. merci.

These photos were taken by myself and represent the works that I created myself, my name is Armand Langlois and I'm a visual artist and therefore the author of the works and photos. They are free of rights under the required conditions. There is no copyright problem. The Château de Breteuil is also agreed that the photos are on this page. There is no need to eliminate the common wikimedia. thank you. --2A01:E34:ED2C:AC0:B0B6:9235:77E3:1AF 10:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 02:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

--2A01:E34:ED2C:AC0:B0B6:9235:77E3:1AF 10:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The author Armand Langlois is still alive. Civa (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

====Ces photos ont été prises par moi-même et représentent des œuvres que j’ai moi-même créées, mon nom est Armand Langlois et je suis artiste plasticien et donc l’auteur des œuvres et des photos. Elles sont libres de droits dans les conditions requises. Il n’y a donc pas de problème de droits d’auteur. Le château de Breteuil est par ailleurs d’accord pour que ces photos soient sur cette page. Il n’y a pas lieu de les supprimer de wikimedia communs. merci.

These photos were taken by myself and represent the works that I created myself, my name is Armand Langlois and I'm a visual artist and therefore the author of the works and photos. They are free of rights under the required conditions. There is no copyright problem. The Château de Breteuil is also agreed that the photos are on this page. There is no need to eliminate the common wikimedia. thank you. --2A01:E34:ED2C:AC0:B0B6:9235:77E3:1AF 10:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 02:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no pages that link to this file. Low resolution and low quality of image. Chwdp pl (talk) 03:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that is really valid reasons. // Liftarn (talk)

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotografia przedstawia kościół M.B.Bolesnej z innej miejscowosci o nazwie Jarocin, z województwa Podkarpackiego, choć artykuł dotyczy miejscowości Jarocin w województwie Wielkopolskim. W Jarocinie (Wlkp.) nie znajduje się żaden kościół pod tym wezwaniem. 77.89.110.126 15:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - there was only error in usage (other city of this name). Pibwl (talk) 14:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The 1801 Union Jack did not exist at the time of the US Revolution. Fry1989 eh? 16:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment, recently discussed on Commons_talk:Overwriting_existing_files#Fixing_an_invalid_SVG and before on the upload help page. Whatever is wrong (presumably this, because it's new here) could be kept as warning for others that it is wrong, and a short info why it is wrong. –Be..anyone (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really see any point in keeping the file. This version of the Grand Union Flag simply never existed. Fry1989 eh? 16:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And that wasn't obvious for the uploader and me, so this upload was "educational" for two contributors. If you're confident that the "undeducated masses" are now exhausted the image can go.:tongue:Be..anyone (talk) 23:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to maintain the image as an educational piece, I won't stop you. :tongue: Fry1989 eh? 04:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: It seems like that Fry is okay with keeping the file. Plus there is no clear consensus to delete this file on a scope basis anyways. Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been replaced with a higher quality version with a more appropriate name: Flag_of_Amestris_(Fullmetal_Alchemist).svg (see preview). The wikis that link to this file have been updated. The replacement file has Fullmetal Alchemist added in parenthesis to suggest that this is a fictional country; the naming of this current file is used for real life uses of a flag connected to the name Amestris.

File:Flag_of_Amestris_(Fullmetal_Alchemist).svg

VorteXLP (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In use. In addition to that, the new file uses a different licence. If somebody is developing an educational project, that is GFDL based, they'll be unable to use the new version, since it's not multilicenced as widely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.175.181.53 (talk • contribs)
 Info The last page that used it has been updated, and I've updated the license of my work. — VorteXLP (talk) 18:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. I've nominated the invalid dupe File:Flag of Amestris (Fullmetal Alchemist).svg for speedy deletion, stating as reason: invalid dupe of File:Flag of Amestris.svg abused in a DR for the 2009 flag.Be..anyone (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC) Update: reverted speedy escalated to COM:ANV#VorteXLP. Be..anyone (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How is it an invalid dupe? It's clearly a different and higher quality version of the same flag --VorteXLP (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep and delete the duplicated, and re-edit the articles to link to this image back. Just upload the new version here instead of uploading with a different name. Also, the subject in the flag is just a pseudo-heraldic representation of the Amestris (pseudo because is a fictional subject of a fictional flag/coat of arms), and this file seems worse than the original Amestris (and also the dupe one). --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The wiki pages referring to the fictional country in question are named "Amestris (Fullmetal Alchemist)", therefore the flag should have the same naming convention. As of now it has the naming convention of flags of existing real life countries. --VorteXLP (talk) 13:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]