User talk:Vinhtantran
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 07:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Về việc thêm Việt Nam vào trang user cá nhân
[edit]Hiện nay mình đã tạo trang Users in Vietnam để tạo trang user cho từng cá nhân có quốc kỳ Việt Nam. Vì mình thấy là trong trang Users in Asia đã có tất cả các nước, ngoại trừ Việt Nam. Bạn có thể thêm Việt Nam vào phần Babel trên trang user của bạn. Chúc bạn ngày mới thật vui: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Users_in_Vietnam dokientrung (talk) 29 December 2011
Image Tagging Image:BD-propagande colour vi.png
[edit]
This is an automated message from a bot. You recently uploaded Image:BD-propagande colour vi.png. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. If you believed you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. Thank you. HermesBot 04:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Meissner_effect.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Papa November 16:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token de1d0b39c26410f2fbd9d56e882c7785
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
otrs
[edit]- Done: [1] -- Drini 16:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Please link images
[edit]
Hello Vinhtantran!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Quoc-huy.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Quoc-huy.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 02:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- This is an official coat of arm of Socialist Republic of Vietnam, which appears in every official documents such as act, law, or constitution. You can read Article 15. If you feel that this image is copyright violation, you should think about Image:Coat of arms of Vietnam.svg would be, too. Vinhtantran (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Ho Chi Minh 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Karuman (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Please provide a spectific source of this photo.--Karuman (talk) 09:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token be1e9b5b9a39fc0a855cae8ed8544f11
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 6a51526d1a9265f3cf7183d5bd123c73
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File source is not properly indicated: File:Puyi-Manchukuo.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Puyi-Manchukuo.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
shizhao (talk) 03:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Tolstoy a k001.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tolstoy a k001.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Tolstoy a k001.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Alex Spade (talk) 11:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Ho chi minh portrait
[edit]My uploaded photoes obviously can answer two question: When was it taken? and Who originally took those photos?. In contrast, you uploaded photo can answer only one question When was it taken?. Anyway, thank for your retaliatied nomination; I haven't imagined that you will do that.
I'm sorry if my requests are bothering you but I can't be careless in this case. The copyright law of Vietnam is too complicated. What I did will gain many good for Vietnamese contributors and Wikimedia lawyers.--Karuman2 (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token bddb2f85789e86d1035ee5c267f10847
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Before you put "no source" tag, look at the picture and read what is easy to see. Under the map you can catch sight of small notice: Stottish Geographical Magazine, 1886. I think it would be much easier for you just to rewrite this notice instead of wasting time with tagging and starting unnecessary procedures.
Regards from Poland Julo (talk) 19:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I removed the template {{PermissionOTRS}} on this picture. User:Rédacteur Tibet isn't the author and the permission is not clear for the moment. See #2008111910023664 (in french) for details.
Cheers.--Bapti ✉ 22:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Vietnamese translations needed
[edit]Hi! I contact you as you speak English and Vietnamese.
Jastrow and I are working on autotranslating {{Meta information museum}}, the meta-template we use for many museums, like {{Information Louvre}}. Could you please help us find Vietnamese translations for every tag name:
* artist/maker * description * dimensions * credit line * accession number * location * source/photographer * references * other versions
"Credit line" is mainly about the mode of acquisition: what collection does it come from? Did it join the collections by gift, purchase, on loan, etc.?
Thanks for any help. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 16:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- All seems perfect. Now the museum templates should appear in Vietnamese for Vietnamese-speaking people. Thanks a lot! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 09:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 04:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Gia Long.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Phục hồi
[edit]"họ" dùng bot và di chuyển cỡ trăm hình Category:An Dinh Residence, tôi không thể phục hồi bằng tay :D Lưu Ly (talk) 13:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Rãnh rỗi thì giúp tui cái, thank. Lưu Ly (talk) 06:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Vulcanbarnstar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Powers (talk) 16:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Lưu Thị Diễm Hương
[edit]Trang web Miss Vietnam World để rõ dòng chữ Copyright, vậy đâu có được phép chuyển lên Commons. 113.22.159.243 10:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC).
- Chính xác là như vậy. Tôi đã gửi email xin cấp giấy phép CC-BY-SA cho riêng tấm hình đó và đã được Ban tổ chức gửi thư trả lời đồng ý sau khi đã được giải thích về cái được và mất của họ khi đóng góp cho Wikipedia. Bức thư đó đã được chuyển tiếp đến Wikimedia OTRS để lưu trữ, được thể hiện bằng bản mẫu ở trang hình. Bạn có thể liên hệ với User:Apple, người đọc được tiếng Việt và cũng có quyền truy cập vào OTRS để được xác nhận sự cho phép. Tân (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Arms of Viet Nam
[edit]Hello. I have been trying to find official sources for the Arms of Viet Nam. So far, I have only been able to find the Arms depicted officially on the websites of the Vietnamese Embassy to the United States, and the Vietnamese Government web portal. That is how I know that the colours are uniform. I am still trying to find other official sources with larger illustrations of the Arms though. Fry1989 (talk) 01:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- As for the colors of the flag, the document that I have "TCVN 2242:1977 Quốc kỳ Cộng hòa xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam. Cờ may bằng vải National flag of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Flag made of textile materials" does not have anything about the colors I can find. Vinhtantran, I put the document on the Commons at [[::File:TCVN 2242 1977.pdf]] so if you want to look at it, you can. The TCVN does not have a document about the emblem (I gave it a shot since Kazakhstan's standards office has a standard about the emblem), but I will also take a look and see what I can get. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know any documents about the emblem or the colours. The TCVN 2242:1977 mentions only "fresh red colour" (I translated word-by-word, 'cause I don't know "đỏ tươi" in English). I think this situation happens with many flags and emblems in the world, where you don't know exactly what RGB colours they are. So the best thing I can do is compare with the daily use flags and emblems. What I want to discuss about the current Vietnamese emblem is: 1) the colour of the yellow, 2) the 3D shape of star. What I'm disappointed with Fry1989 is that he didn't care to discuss in the talk page, the only thing he knows is revert and claim that his version is more accurate, even though it doesn't resemble the source he pointed out. See the latest photo of our emblem to see what is wrong with the current version. Tân (talk) 08:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- The yellow color is also an issue with the national flag. I do not know what the TCVN says about it. As for the red, "đỏ tươi" in English is "scarlet." So imagine the Soviet flag colors used for the national flag and the emblem. The reason why I bring up the flag is that the same colors used on the national flag image will be used on the image of the national emblem. As for the star, if you ask me, I would like to draw it flat (non-3d). I remember drawing 3D stars for the PR China emblem and people hated that. However, I do not have specifications for the emblem and I will probably ask my embassy for a big drawing. Have you tried asking a comercial website like http://mynghevietnam.com/ to ask for a diagram of the emblem. Ministry of the Interior? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, for Vietnam, the colours of emblem and flag are not the same, you can see the parade photo here to compare. In the above discussion, I showed a link to Vietnamese bank notes, to show that when drawing the emblem, they always try to depict 3-D. I hope you consider the characteristics of each country. Tân (talk) 09:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Alright fellas, sorry it took me a while to get back. My changes are the following: According to the two sources I have from the Vietnamese government, the national emblem only uses two colours, 1 red and 1 yellow. That is the change I have made, so that the ribbons and the star and the wheat are all the same yellow, which they weren't before. I may have chosen the wrong yellow, and you guys can change it to whichever you prefer, I just wanted the same yellow used throughout. As for the star, I felt that the 3-D effect was wrong, which is why I made it flat, but if you guys prefer, you can bring it back to 3-D. Fry1989 (talk) 21:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- The yellow color is also an issue with the national flag. I do not know what the TCVN says about it. As for the red, "đỏ tươi" in English is "scarlet." So imagine the Soviet flag colors used for the national flag and the emblem. The reason why I bring up the flag is that the same colors used on the national flag image will be used on the image of the national emblem. As for the star, if you ask me, I would like to draw it flat (non-3d). I remember drawing 3D stars for the PR China emblem and people hated that. However, I do not have specifications for the emblem and I will probably ask my embassy for a big drawing. Have you tried asking a comercial website like http://mynghevietnam.com/ to ask for a diagram of the emblem. Ministry of the Interior? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know any documents about the emblem or the colours. The TCVN 2242:1977 mentions only "fresh red colour" (I translated word-by-word, 'cause I don't know "đỏ tươi" in English). I think this situation happens with many flags and emblems in the world, where you don't know exactly what RGB colours they are. So the best thing I can do is compare with the daily use flags and emblems. What I want to discuss about the current Vietnamese emblem is: 1) the colour of the yellow, 2) the 3D shape of star. What I'm disappointed with Fry1989 is that he didn't care to discuss in the talk page, the only thing he knows is revert and claim that his version is more accurate, even though it doesn't resemble the source he pointed out. See the latest photo of our emblem to see what is wrong with the current version. Tân (talk) 08:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Bạn có thể nói rõ hình bạn truyền lên "thẩm mỹ" hơn là như thế nào không? 117.5.34.98 15:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- Tôi đã tải nó lên từ lâu, từ khi quốc huy Việt Nam ở dạng SVG trên Commons trông như quốc huy Trung Quốc. Hiện giờ nó đã được sửa tốt hơn tại File:Coat of arms of Vietnam.svg nên tôi thấy không có lý do gì để giữ nó lại nữa. Tân (talk) 00:05, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Samsung_Tower_Palace_3_-_Tower_G.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.62.200.57 13:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Mok-dong_Hyperion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.62.200.57 13:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Insignia/vi has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
79.180.118.242 08:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Polypropylene.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 09:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Ho Chi Minh 1946 cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Samsung Tower Palace 3 - Tower G.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Quoc-huy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Antemister (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
I do not really believe that this file is above teh treshold of originality. PD-shape should be enough. As I meet a vietnamese here, can you check the flags User:Namkhanh02 and his sock puppets User:Giangnam007 and User:Duykien, This guy did upload several flags without providing a source. Without knowing the vietnamese language, it is sometimes impossible to verify its existence or accuracy.--Antemister (talk) 18:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Nightingale (talk) 02:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Djami.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Djami.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Djami.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Hoisin sauce squeeze bottle LeeKumKee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kelly (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Bing logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
81.158.207.126 22:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Jade Emperor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cold Season (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Youtubeheadquarterssanbruno.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
152.200.11.124 22:50, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
User:Magnus Manske/Commonshelper interface/Help vi has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
24.184.51.12 03:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Zhukov reads capitulation act.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kelly (talk) 13:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Removal of uploader credit
[edit]Hello, you are being contacted as a user who has previously [or currently] included "* Uploaded by Example" in your file uploads. A bot task has been approved to remove this specific phrase from files because it can be misleading when attempting to attribute the file creator. As an alternative, RileyBot is willing to tag your uploads with a user category instead. Please respond stating if you opt-in and if you have any specific requests (addition of user category, etc); if there is no response within two weeks, consent will be implied. Please note, this message has been left by an automated bot, however, a user will be tracking your response. RileyBot (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Sa-5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
85.140.7.253 05:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
File:A6N2-N Rufe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Keelingpalms.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Keelingsunset.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 11:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 03:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 16:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for having uploaded it. Please talk at Commons:Village pump#The United Nations Treaty Series should have uniform naming of files as I like your naming style over File:UNTS 1.pdf (maybe too short to be meaningful) and File:United Nations Treaties and international agreements registered - Volume 221 (13 November 1955 - 30 November 1955).pdf (too long to be easily reused).--Jusjih (talk) 04:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Phung Xuan Nha photo by Bui Tuan Jan2015 (1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
File:NewlyIndustrializedCountries.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mottezen (talk) 06:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
File:La Fontaine NVV - page1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tranminh360 (talk) 06:58, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Tho ngu ngon La Fontaine Nguyen Van Vinh.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tranminh360 (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1003 1004.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1005 1006 nam 2013.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1007 1008 nam 2013.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1009 1010 nam 2013.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1011 1012 nam 2013.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1029 1030 nam 2021.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1031 1032 nam 2021.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1057 1058 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1059 1060 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1061 1062 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1133 1134 nam 2018.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1135 1136 nam 2018.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1137 1138 nam 2018.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1139 1140 nam 2018.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1163 1164 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1165 1166 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1167 1168 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1169 1170 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1171 1172 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1173 1174 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1175 1176 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1177 1178 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1179 1180 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1179 1180 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1181 1182 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1183 1184 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1185 1186 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1187 1188 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1239 1240 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1241 1242 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1247 1248 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1249 1250 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1257 1258 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1257 1258 nam 2016.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1261 1262 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1263 1264 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 1277 1278 nam 2016.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 235 236 nam 2022.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 285 286 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 287 288 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 333 334 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 335 336 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 337 338 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 339 340 nam 2016.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 341 342 nam 2016.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 343 344 nam 2016.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 345 346 nam 2016.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 403 404 nam 2013.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 405 406 nam 2013.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 407 408 nam 2013.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 419 420 nam 2011.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 473 474 nam 2012.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 511 512 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 513 514 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 515 516 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 517 518 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 519 520 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 521 522 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 523 524 nam 2017.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 559 560 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 561 562 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 563 564 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 565 566 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 567 568 nam 2021.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 569 570 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 569 570 nam 2022.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 571 572 nam 2022.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 575 576 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 575 576 nam 2022.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 577 578 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 577 578 nam 2022.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 677 678 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 679 680 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 681 682 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 683 684 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 685 686 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 687 688 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 709 710 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 711 712 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 713 714 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 715 716 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 717 718 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 719 720 nam 2020.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 729 730 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 733 734 nam 2014.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 773 774 nam 2018.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 775 776 nam 2018.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 777 778 nam 2018.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 861 862 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 863 864 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 865 866 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 867 868 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 869 870 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 871 872 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 873 874 nam 2015.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 993 994 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 995 996 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 997 998 nam 2019.pdf
- File:Cong bao Chinh phu 999 1000 nam 2019.pdf
Yours sincerely, Tranminh360 (talk) 04:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)