Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![55 File:Miley Cyrus singing "When I Look at You" during the Wonder World Tour concert in Portland, Oregon.jpg](#File:Miley_Cyrus_singing_"When_I_Look_at_You"_during_the_Wonder_World_Tour_concert_in_Portland,_Oregon.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
).jpg){kind=link}
_Royal_Purples.jpg){kind=link}
_class_ring_(1976).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
No educative value. Aparently uploaded to vandalise pt:Paulo de Tarso (en:Paul the Apostle). Stegop (talk) 05:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted, retouched picture meant as a joke, likely copyvio Trijnsteltalk 11:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
No educative value. Aparently uploaded to vandalise pt:Paulo de Tarso (en:Paul the Apostle). Stegop (talk) 05:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted, retouched picture meant as a joke, likely copyvio Trijnsteltalk 11:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Depiction of protected sculpture, no FoP, no De Minimis (accordingly deletion of File:BAFTA_Mask_(October_2007).jpg). Yellowcard (talk) 15:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Just saw there's interior FoP in both the UK and US. Withdrawing request. Yellowcard (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
es la antigua Escuela TAI, ahora estamos en Recoletos 22. Escuela TAI (talk) 12:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo with no metadata, so copyright violation is possible. Also the photo does not illustrate Escueala TAI (which is some kind of educational organization), but red car in front of its building, so the photo is also out of scope. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Image from National Geographic [1] here, marked (c) National Geographic, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: image uploaded here and Flickr in 6/2012, first appeared in 11/2012 at NG Denniss (talk) 21:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
image is from flickr with All rights reserved Lady Lotus (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license Lady Lotus (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Has a positive license review, license was valid at time of review, CC license can't be revoked or replaced with a more restrictive version Denniss (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Original was licensed with a CC licence, which has since been changed to ARR. However, a CC licence is irrevocable. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Originally licensed with a CC licence, which has since been changed to ARR. However, a CC licence is irrevocable. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Listed on Flickr as All Rights Reserved, not the license shown on the file's page AussieLegend (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, it's been reviewed, so presumably it used to be freely licensed. Creative Commons licenses are not revokable. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- It was reviewed manually, so it's possible the reviewer made a mistake, which is why I nominated it. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Other pictures from the same photostream have been reviewed by bot. Trycatch (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- And even the very same image (uncropped) was reviewed by bot. Trycatch (talk)
- Keep The images were once listed as under Commons which is good enough. No mistake was made because when I uploaded them, the license was such. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 04:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Uncropped version of this image was auto reviewed by a bot and a Creative Commons license is irrevocable. Bidgee (talk) 07:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: actually read the image desription page with the license info tags Denniss (talk) 21:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Miley Cyrus singing "When I Look at You" during the Wonder World Tour concert in Portland, Oregon.jpg
[edit]
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I've made some changes to the description page for this file. I don't think it's entirely the work of the uploader, but a derivative work of a mural on the Hustler Club in New York City by the graffiti artist Banksy. Someone, possibly the uploader, added Arabic text which wasn't part of the original mural. You can see a photo of the mural, with no text, at http://www.adme.ru/hudozhniki-i-art-proekty/shou-benksi-v-nyu-jorke-579205/579205-1942305 . It's also written about at http://nypost.com/2013/11/01/banksy-building-owners-good-fortune/ . In the United States, freedom of panorama applies to buildings only. While this is a picture of a building, it's framed to show the mural rather than the building in general. Rybec (talk) 03:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. INeverCry 20:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Wrong spelling Kopiersperre (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn Denniss (talk) 14:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Wrong spelling Kopiersperre (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no deletion of an old file redirect Denniss (talk) 14:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 08:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader has stolen this pictures from the internet for illustrating the articles of the new cardinals from the consistory on 22 February 2014. Martin H. (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 08:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader has stolen this pictures from the internet for illustrating the articles of the new cardinals from the consistory on 22 February 2014. Martin H. (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 08:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader has stolen this pictures from the internet for illustrating the articles of the new cardinals from the consistory on 22 February 2014. Martin H. (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 08:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader has stolen this pictures from the internet for illustrating the articles of the new cardinals from the consistory on 22 February 2014. Martin H. (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 08:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Stolen from the web, see http://how2live.tistory.com/434 Martin H. (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: need OTRS Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Likely copyright violations. Non-free images grabbed from the Internet and photos of non-free pre-existing photos.
- File:IGP Kuber Singh Rana.jpg
- File:Ambassador K.J.S. Baral (right) presenting the credentials to late President Suharto of Indonesia.jpg
- File:Major General pip.jpg – no evidence to support the rather unlikely licensing claims.
- File:Nepal Police Insignia.jpg
- File:Igp pip of Nepal.jpg – no evidence to support the rather unlikely licensing claims.
- File:IGP Hem Bahadur Gurung.jpg
- File:King Birendra adorning a medal to Major General Nara Bahadur Burathoki.jpg
- File:Late King Birendra (right) adorning a medal on Major General Nara Bahadur Burathoki. being.jpg
- File:Major General Nara Bahadur Burathoki.jpg
- File:Lama D.B . IGP.jpg – just like PurNep, Dblama claims to be the Nepal Police's official portrait painter
- File:I.G.P. Khadgajeet Baral about to depart for an Interpol visit.jpg
- File:Major Bahadur Singh Baral and his battalion in the Sahara Desert in 1918 A.D.jpg – if the uploader's authorship claims are true, he or she must be well over 100 years old.
- File:From Left, Jeet Jung Thapa, Rudhra Narayan Pradhan, Sarwajeet Singh Baral, Kalu Ram Thapa and Bahadur Singh Baral.jpg
- File:Bahadur Singh Baral.jpg
- File:IGP Ratna Shumsher (right) handing over a shield to the victors at the National Police Training Academy.jpg
- File:IGP Moti Lal Bohora (right) during the inspection of the Birendra Police Hospital.jpg
- File:IGP Ahyut Kharel inspectina police office.jpg
- File:IGP Rom Bahadur Thapa(first from right) and Former Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa(second from right) receive briefing on the inaugural day of Nepal Police Club (Originally Mahendra Police Club).jpg
- File:Former IGP Pahal Singh Lama(left) inspecting the passing out parade at the then Sadar Prahari Talim Kendra.jpg
- File:Former IGP Rom Bahadur Thapa(right) during a courtesy call with the IGP of India.jpg
- File:IGP Hem Bahadur Singh inaugurating a police office in the late 80s.jpg
- File:Former IGP Hem Bahadur Singh adorning a medal to a police officer.jpg
- File:Farewell of IGP Durlav Kumar Thapa(third from left).jpg
- File:High Ranking Police Officials of the Indian delegation inspect the then "Sadar Prahari Talim Kendra".jpg
- File:IGP DB lam(first from left) during the inauguration of the then Birendra Police Hospital.jpg
- File:K.J.S. Baral with late President Suharto after presenting the credentials.jpg
- File:Khadgajeet Baral as the President of Nepal Judo Association.jpg
- File:IGP K.J.S. Baral with the then Nepal Police Hockey Team at the then "((National Police Academy,Sadar Prahari Talim Kendra))".jpg
- File:Major Bahadur Singh Baral in Military Uniform.jpg
- File:Khadgajeet Baral as the chief of Nepal Police.jpg
- File:Khadgajeet Baral(left) and late King Birendra at the Nepalese Embassy at Rangoon, Burma.jpg
- File:IGP Khadgajeet Baral at the then Mahendra Police Club.jpg
- File:Khadgajeet Baral at the Nepalese Embassy in Burma.jpg
_presenting_the_credentials_to_late_President_Suharto_of_Indonesia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_adorning_a_medal_on_Major_General_Nara_Bahadur_Burathoki._being.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_handing_over_a_shield_to_the_victors_at_the_National_Police_Training_Academy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_during_the_inspection_of_the_Birendra_Police_Hospital.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_Former_Prime_Minister_Surya_Bahadur_Thapa(second_from_right)_receive_briefing_on_the_inaugural_day_of_Nepal_Police_Club_(Originally_Mahendra_Police_Club).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_inspecting_the_passing_out_parade_at_the_then_Sadar_Prahari_Talim_Kendra.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_during_a_courtesy_call_with_the_IGP_of_India.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_during_the_inauguration_of_the_then_Birendra_Police_Hospital.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)%22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_late_King_Birendra_at_the_Nepalese_Embassy_at_Rangoon,_Burma.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
As mentioned at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PurNep, I believe that the uploader is using multiple accounts to upload copyright violations. Notably, Dblama and PurNep both claim to be the author of File:K.J.S. Baral with late President Suharto after presenting the credentials..JPG a.k.a. File:K.J.S. Baral with late President Suharto after presenting the credentials.jpg. In both cases, as with many of the uploads from all suspected accounts, a Canon PowerShot SX200 IS was used to reproduce a pre-existing photo. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 20:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snubssulky (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely copyright violations. Non-free photos grabbed from the Internet and photos of non-free pre-existing photos.
- File:Rtn. Khadgajeet Baral being awarded by the then Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal on Police Day in 2009 A.D.jpg – obviously a photo of a pre-existing photo in some printed publication. If the uploader really were the author and copyright holder, they'd probably know if it's been published before.
- File:The then Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal (left) awarding Rtn. Khadgajeet Baral with the Life Time Achievement Award on Nepal Police Day.jpg – photo of a photo on a website. Non-free photo by Rajkumar Parajuli/The Himalayan Times. The quoted "permission" statement ("We are committed to safeguard the privacy of our users...") in no way supports the uploader's licensing claims.
- File:I.G.P. K.J.S. Baral inspecting the Guard of Honour at Nepalgunj.png – unlikely authorship claims. Obviously a photo of a pre-existing photo (note how the tree cuts off at the top left-hand corner).
- File:I.G.P. Khadgajeet Baral (second from left) in Bhairawa on an inspection tour.jpg – unlikely authorship claims. Probably a photo of a pre-existing photo.
- File:Ambassador Khadgajeet Baral at Hanoi, Vietnam while presenting the credentials.jpg – unlikely authorship claims. Obviously a photo of a pre-existing photo (the Canon PowerShot SX200 IS did not exist in 1981). The uploader doesn't know when the photo was taken even though he or she supposedly created it and even though it's clearly marked in the photo itself.
- File:K.J.S. Baral briefing the Burmese Press at the Nepalese Embassy.jpg – unlikely authorship claims. Probably a photo of a pre-existing photo.
- File:Dil B. Lama.jpg – unlikely authorship claims. Low-quality copy of a professional studio photo of a public figure.
- File:Motilal Bohora during his trial at the Special Court in early 2012 A.D.jpg – Internet image with unsubstantiated and unlikely licensing claims. Less tightly cropped version found at haribhaktasigdel.com
- File:Moti Lal Bohora during after his trial at the Supreme Court in April, 2012.jpg – non-free Internet image with made-up licensing claims
- File:IGP MOTILAL.jpg – unlikely authorship claims. Probably a photo of a pre-existing photo.
_awarding_Rtn._Khadgajeet_Baral_with_the_Life_Time_Achievement_Award_on_Nepal_Police_Day.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Bhairawa_on_an_inspection_tour.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
As mentioned at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PurNep, I believe that the uploader is using multiple accounts to upload copyright violations. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 20:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)
[edit]Plain text decorated with a small number of not self-created images. Out of project scope, Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Contenido educativo excluido. The project to participate in writing articles is Wikipedia.
- File:VIRGEN DEL VOLCAN. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:TOACASO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:TILIPULO DE MAENZA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:SHAIRUCU. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:RUMIÑAHUI. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:ORIGEN DE LA MAMA NEGRA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:ONCE DE NOVIEMBRE DE 1.820. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:NAGSICHE. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:MUERTE DE VICENTE LEON EN CUSCO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGUEÑOS FUNDARON QUEVEDO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-VIRGEN DEL SALTO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-PROCESIONES. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-PILETA CON HISTORIA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-PARROQUIA ONCE DE NOVIEMBRE. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-MONASTERIO DE FRANCISCANOS.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-MERCEDARIOS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-INQUISICION. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-IGLESIA DE SANTO DOMINGO-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-FRANCISCANOS-DATOS INEDITOS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-FIESTA DE MERCEDES. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-FATALIDADES. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-EJIDOS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-CASA DE MIRAFLORES. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA. CORREOS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA. PAÑOS Y BAYETA PARA TROPAS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA. PRIMER DOCTRINERO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:EL DORADO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:DESCUBRIMIENTO DEL RIO AMAZONAS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:COTOPAXI DE COLORADO 1.875. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:ALAQUEZ-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-ANGUSTIOSA PROCESION. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-ARTESANOS DE LEON-1.908. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-DESIGUALDAD DE SANGRE-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-FIESTA REAL-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-GREMIOS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-LA CIENEGA-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-RAPTO SIN GULAR-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-TERREMOTO DE 1.757-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-UN MEDICO FAMOSO-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-VIERNES SANTO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-UNA VOCACION. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:PUJILI-ARTE Y CULTURA-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:PUJILI-NIÑO DE ISINCHE-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:PUJILI-ABANDERADO DE LAS ALMAS-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-ALUVIONES-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:QUILOTOA-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:CURIQUINGUES-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-CAMINO REAL.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA 1.919.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA. ABOGADOS..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA. FUNDACION.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA 1.599. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-OPULENCIA.JPG
- File:ILLINIZAS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA. LA FABRICA DE POLVORA...1. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:COTOPAXI-PASE DEL NIÑO..jpg
- File:UTC.-PANEL SOBRE LATACUNGA..jpg
- File:PANGUA-PARROQUIA RAMON CAMPAÑA...2.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ BAUTISTA..jpg
- File:PANGUA-PARROQUIA RAMON CAMPAÑA...1.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ BAUTISTA..jpg
- File:UNIVERSIDAD DE COTOPAXI-1.992.jpg
- File:PUJILI. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LLANGANATES...3. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LLANGANATES....2. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LLANGANATES...1. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:COTOPAXI- LA CHILINTOSA. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:QUITO-SISMO DE 1.587. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:TILIPULO (EL MONASTERIO)-AUTOR EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA.jpg
- File:CAMINO REAL...2. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:CAMINO REAL....1. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:CHILINTOSA. PIEDRA GIGANTE EN EL VALLE DE PEDREGAL-MULALO-CANTON LATACUNGA. FOTO SEBASTIAN LANAS PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:AGUSTINOS EN LATACUNGA...2. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:AGUSTINOS EN LATACUNGA...1. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:SALCEDO-ORIGENES...2. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:SALCEDO-ORIGENES...1. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-LOS HERREROS. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:TERREMOTO 1.996.jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-FIESTA DE INOCENTES. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-IGLESIA MATRIZ...AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA...INDEPENDENCIA, TOROS Y AGUARDIENTE. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:SAQUISILI-GALLARDO CHICO MELIDA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:RAMON CAMPAÑA-DEFUNCION.jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-SIMON RODRIGUEZ...2.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-SIMON RODRIGUEZ...1.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-LOAS...4.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-LOAS...3.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-LOAS...2. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-LOAS...1.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MULALO...9.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ BAUTISTA-LATACUNGA-ECUADOR..jpg
- File:MULALO...8.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MULALO...7.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MULALO...6.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MULALO...5.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MULALO...4.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MULALO...3.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MULALO...2.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MULALO...1.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-PROF. DORILA ZURITA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA. PROF. ELVIRA ORTEGA FREIRE. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LA INMACULADA AMBANDERADAS 2.009 -2..jpg
- File:COTOPAXI. CONSEJO PROVINCIAL...ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-HALLULLAS...2.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-HALLULLAS...1.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MELCHOR TUITISE.jpg
- File:INOCENTES 1.991.jpg
- File:TORO RUIZ.-DEDICATORIA A EPO....jpg
- File:LATACUNGA. LA FABRICA DE POLVORA...2. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
-AUTOR_EDUARDO_PAREDEZ_ORTEGA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Martin H. (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- More
- File:NOCHE VIEJA.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:ESCUELA SIMON BOLIVAR DE LATACUNGA..JPG
- File:ILLINIZAS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:COTOPAXI-RADIODIFUSION. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA 1.860. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:ESCUELA SIMON BOLIVAR DE LATACUNGA 2. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:VOLCAN COTOPAXI. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:YALO (SIGCHOS). ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:UNIVERSIDAD TECNICA DE COTOPAXI.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:PROVINCIALIZACION DE COTOPAXI.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:PUJILI-RADIO EL SOL...1.969..JPG
- File:NORMAL DE PUJILI.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-VILLA 1.811..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-RADIO X (1.952). ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:PANGUA.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-INAUGURACION PLANTA ELECTRICA..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-CASA DE LOS PORTALES. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-PRIMERA PLANTA DE LUZ.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-HOSPITAL SAN VICENTE 1.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-LAGO FLORES.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-BETHLEMITAS-COLEGIO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA-ASILO DE ANCIANOS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LA MANA-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LATACUNGA SIGLO XX (2).ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LATACUNGA SIGLO XX.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LA MANA 3...ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:LA MANA-ASENTAMIENTO ANTIGUO.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:LA MANA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:INAUGURACION DE LA LUZ EN LATACUNGA.-1.909.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:EL CONDOR. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:COTOPAXI-SINDICATO DE CHOFERES.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:COTOPAXI-DECRETO.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:COTOPAXI.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:EL FONOGRAFO EN LATACUNGA.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:COTOPAXI-PRIMERO DE ABRIL. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:CASA DE GOBIERNO. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:BOLIVAR. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:BOLIVAR EN LATACUNGA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.JPG
- File:AEREOPUERTO DE LTGA. VIEJO HANGAR. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:AEREOPUERTO DE LATACUNGA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:BOMBEROS DE LATACUNGA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:BETHLEMITAS-LATACUNGA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
- File:AERODROMO DE LATACUNGA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..JPG
._ARCHIVO_PAREDEZ.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._ARCHIVO_PAREDEZ..JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.ARCHIVO_PAREDEZ..JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin H. (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: All out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scans of various publications, most probably not own work.
- File:FAUSTO EDUARDO PAREDES ORTEGA.pdf
- File:CANTON RUMIÑAHUI.pdf
- File:EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..pdf
- File:QUITO. LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA-WEB..pdf
- File:LATACUNGA SIGLO XX. LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA.pdf
- File:PROVINCIA DE COTOPAXI. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..pdf
- File:INDEPENDENCIA DE LATACUNGA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.pdf
- File:MITAS. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..pdf
- File:RADIODIFUSION EN COTOPAXI.-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..pdf
- File:VICTORIA VASCONEZ CUVI. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ-LATACUNGA..pdf
- File:BOLIVAR EN LATACUNGA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..pdf
- File:HISTORIA DE SALCEDO.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..pdf
- File:BAÑOS (ECUADOR). LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..pdf
- File:LATACUNGA EN LA HISTORIA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.pdf
- File:TILIPULO JOYA NACIONAL. LIC. EDUARDO PAREDES ORTEGA..pdf
- File:LATACUNGA 1.912.JPG
- File:GACETA MUNICIPAL. NOV. 1.980. DIRECTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-LOAS...5.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:MAMA NEGRA NOVEMBRINA.-EDIT. GRAFICOS UNIDOS.-AÑO 2.004.-AUT.jpg
- File:MAMA NEGRA - EDIT. COTOPAXI 1.987 - AUTOR EDUARDO PAREDEZ OR.jpg
- File:TRADICIONES DE COTOPAXI-TOMO 2 - SEGUNDA EDICION 1.988-EDIT..jpg
- File:TRADICIONES DE COTOPAXI-TOMO 2-EDIT. ANDRADE 1.980-AUTOR EDU.jpg
- File:HISTORIA DE COTOPAXI.-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.-AÑO 2.009.-LATACUNGA-.jpg
- File:DANZANTES.-OBRA PUBLICADA EN 1.993 EN LA REVISTA COTOPAXI EN.jpg
- File:CRONICAS DE COTOPAXI.-TOMO III.-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.-LATACUNGA 2.jpg
- File:CRONICAS DE COTOPAXI .- TOMO II.-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.-2.006.-LAT.jpg
- File:CRONICAS DE COTOPAXI.-TOMO I.-AÑO 2.006.-ARCHIVO PAREDEZ.-LA.jpg
- File:COTOPAXI-DOCUMENTOS DE ORO - TOMO I -EDIT. COTOPAXI 1.982.-A.jpg
- File:COTOPAXI - DOCUMNETOS DE ORO - TOMO II AÑO 2.010.-AUTOR EDUA.jpg
- File:CRONICAS DE COTOPAXI-TOMO I. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-GENESIS COLONIAL. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA.jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-EJIDOS. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-CONSEJO DE JEFES PATRIOTAS. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA EN 1.573. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..jpg
- File:LATACUNGA-MONSERRAT. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:COTOPAXI...LOS ILLINIZAS. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..jpg
- File:CENTRO HISTORICO DE LATACUNGA 1.jpg
- File:008.jpg
- File:AGUA DEL INCA AFICHE DE 1.912.jpg
- File:ESCUELA PEDRO FERMIN CEVALLOS.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment They are not scans, but original works. That can be checked to see that they are not photographs but generated files directly to PDF format. You can check this by opening any of them. For original works upload, permission in OTRS is required? I need to read them all, but seem to be valid sources for Wikipedia articles. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- But (important!) all say: "Edición limitada sin fines de lucro. Prohibida la reproducción." In English: "Limited Edition nonprofit. Do not reproduce." This contradicts the license CC-BY-SA. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- If these are his own works, then they are out of scope. Yann (talk) 04:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- But (important!) all say: "Edición limitada sin fines de lucro. Prohibida la reproducción." In English: "Limited Edition nonprofit. Do not reproduce." This contradicts the license CC-BY-SA. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- My analysis
- Keep Biography of Fausto Eduardo Paredes Ortega, journalist, broadcaster and governor of the w:Cotopaxi Province, Ecuador. Is not an autobiography and maintains a neutral point of view. Useful source of information for future article w:Fausto Eduardo Paredes Ortega.
- Keep Article about w:Rumiñahui Canton, source very useful.
- Delete Curriculum Vitae
- Delete Brief history of the city of w:Quito, totally useless and a little promo of the author.
- Keep History of w:Latacunga. 41 pages extract a more complete work of 540, very useful.
- Keep History of w:Cotopaxi Province, brief but useful source.
- Keep Lacatunga city during the war of independence of Ecuador.
- Keep Book "Mitas" (2010), 2nd edition. Source about w:Mita (Inca) with images in public domain.
- Keep History of the broadcasting in Cotopaxi Province, useful.
- Keep Biography of w:Victoria Vasconez Cuvi (1891-1939), Ecuadorian writer.
- Keep More history and images in public domain.
- Keep History of w:Salcedo Canton, very useful.
- Keep Source about w:Tungurahua volcano, useful.
- Keep More history and images in public domain.
- Keep More history and images in public domain.
--Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 17:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Articles are maybe in scope of Wikipedia but out of scope of Wikimedia Commons. So File:FAUSTO EDUARDO PAREDES ORTEGA.pdf and other articles are not accepted here. For the rest: In absence of any source information or authorhip information and in absence of any evidence that a file is public domain we cant keep those. So Delete. If a file is PD we can also take it from the primary source, we not need it wrapped up in some trashy pdf. --Martin H. (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- They are not articles, but publications that at the time were printed and the author now published under a CC license. Each correctly mentions the author, date of publication, and in some cases publishing and edition number. What I said is that these works are valid for use in Wikipedia and in some cases, very good quality sources. Also you can extract from them many images in the public domain, which can be displayed using just the page number of the file, instead of having to upload one by one. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:FAUSTO EDUARDO PAREDES ORTEGA.pdf is not a CV, is a brief biography (not autobiography). But you can not compare to that file with others, as they are very different. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- If there is useful text, it should be copied to Wikipedia. Individual pictures created by the uploader should be uploaded to Commons in JPEG format. As these are not peer-reviewed publications, they can't be used as references for Wikipedia. As such they are out of scope for Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. Peer articles/publications do not belong on Commons -FASTILY 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)
[edit]No notable own publication, out of scope.
- File:LATACUNGA -LA CATEDRAL.ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..pdf
- File:CORPUS CRISTI. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..pdf
- File:COTOPAXI-MEDICINA. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..pdf
- File:TRADICIONES DE COTOPAXI. AUTOR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..pdf
- File:MAMA NEGRA SENDIP 1.982.- POR LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA.pdf
- File:COTOPAXI-TITULOS NOBILIARIOS. LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..pdf
- File:FOLCLOR DE COTOPAXI.-AUTOR EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA.pdf
- File:PANGUA-ECUADOR. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ BAUTISTA..pdf
- File:FUNDACION DE LATACUNGA. LIC. EDUARDO PAREDEZ ORTEGA..pdf
- File:VICENTE LEON. ARCHIVO PAREDEZ..pdf
Yann (talk) 11:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)
[edit]per previous deletion requests, see here
Trijnsteltalk 16:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. January (talk) 08:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
This poster may be copyrighted by the movie studio or distributor. Rybec (talk) 03:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
No permission, unlikely to get a permission by Playboy, out of scope. ireas (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted but not by me Natuur12 (talk) 10:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Blatant advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted architecture, no FOP in Russia ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete photo of recent Russian building Rybec (talk) 12:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
can't read it but a salary is highlighted - suspect its advertising or solicitation Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
It is a cropped and framed version from this artwork. The uploader is probably not the copyright owner, therefore the status is unclear. Ras67 (talk) 14:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- and of very poor quality too and also unneccessary pdf-format is not good for images. So the uploader should upload as jpg with proper copyright status anyway., delete this one. - Andy king50 (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see this Google reverse image search. Uploader's claim of self-ownership is false. -- 李博杰 —Talk contribs 07:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Non free logo with no evidence of being in the free domain. It does pass Threshold of Originality but since there is possible doubt, nominating for deletion Soni (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unidentified work, possibly a passport cover, related to the first version of File:X2x2.JPG, also unidentified. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, image is too corrupt to be useful. Rybec (talk) 07:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
This is a derivative work and the design of the medal may be copyrighted. Rybec (talk) 07:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Portrayed is en:Bertrand Russell (1872—1970), a British nobleman, philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, and social critic. Licensed with a {{PD-old}}-fail as author is unknown. Sourced with a random source (here a 2011 blog in Portuguese from Brazil or Portugal = http://novaspensatas.blogspot.pt/2011/05/em-homenagem-ao-nascimento-do-filosofo.html). No creation date (dated with upload date "2013". May be in PD but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted architecture, no FOP in Russia ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete photo of recent Russian building Rybec (talk) 12:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused user file 91.66.153.38 10:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
We have the Mexican flag in SVG, this is a scaled down PNG duplicate. Fry1989 eh? 01:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Unuseful duplicate... --Taichi (talk) 06:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Watermarked. Is Atos flickrwashing? ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - I think so, found this in a blog from September 2013..I also went through their sets last weeks, I felt most images were a bit shady..--Stemoc (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete If I had noticed it I wouldn't have uploaded it. Obviously not taken by Atos, since most of the others in the set are members of staff at venues, or showing a screen of technology/statistics at a venue. Flickrworker (talk) 09:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Promotional images of speakers from Bose used to make this image for self-promotion on Wikibooks The Haz talk 18:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Licence looks wrong. Image was grabbed from here: http://www.thepotteries.org/did_you/011.htm Uploader unlikely to be owner of picture. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. No metadata and small size suggest COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
The photographer is "Bernard A. Brun" (Watermark), and it seem to be the official photographer of the Cabourg festival. So, to be deleted. The only way to keep the picture is a OTRS from "Bernard A. Brun". --MGuf (d) 08:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
The card is circa 1930s. Station WCFL didn't exist before 1923. We hope (talk) 21:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- en:WCFL (AM) first went on the air in 1925. The photo is from eBay. Seller dated it as circa 1930's but there's no dating or back shown. We hope (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
I question whether this is truly the uploader's own work, because of the low resolution (95,540 pixels) and lack of EXIF metadata. The same person uploaded File:Метромост Харьковский.JPG which has an EXIF tag, is much larger, and is in colour. Rybec (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- File:Метромост Харьковский.JPG was uploaded by a completely different user, not me. Open your eyes. This is not even an argument -- Homme (talk) 15:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Low resolution and lack of metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.66.153.38 10:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unresolved legal situation XRay talk 20:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, unfortunately, this is outside the scope of § 59 UrhG (COM:FOP#Germany). If, as it seems, the photo was taken from the roof of the Reichstag building, aside from the fact that a roof is not a public way, street or place (similar BGH, I ZR 192/00 = GRUR 2003, 1035 – Hundertwasserhaus for a balcony), there are strict admission controls at the entrance of the building; this is generally held to disqualify from invoking the exceptional provision the photographer relies on. The depicted object itself is clearly copyright-protected. — Pajz (talk) 11:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP -- Steinsplitter (talk) 11:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Singer Chorão died in march 2013, so uploader could not photograph him in february 2014 / there is no metadata (camera source). Yanguas (talk) 15:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (per file title and exif: "2009") and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}} ("(...) [a] clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given"). If created after 1987 not in PD in Argentina and elsewhere. Eventually misconfigured by uploader (could be "own work") but who knows it... Gunnex (talk) 12:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: contains shootings of non-free text and non-free architecture (F. Krasny, d. 1947); the atlants though are work by F. Berneker (d. 1932) and could be cropped out. Eleassar (t/p) 20:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Wrong name, and I upload new one,File:Coat of arms of Andrew Yeom Soo Jung.svg--Iflwlou (talk) 16:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
bastian_ikhyjh 200.73.210.28 23:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
These three files should be deleted because not used, bad names, quite meanless as well--Bioneer1 (talk) 23:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
1938 photo, apparently German, claimed (by the license tag) to be Anonymous-EU. But German law says that for for pre-1995 (German) images to be anonymous in a legal sense, the author must never have been mentioned anywhere, not even by telling his name (without writing it) in a public lecture or such. There is no way to prove this, so the German law for pre-1995 anonymous works (see de:Anonymes Werk (Urheberrecht)) is useless for Commons and Wikipedia, we simply cannot apply it. A 1938 photo is also too recent to assume that the author is dead for at least 70 years anyway; the photographer could very easily have lived another six years and maybe many more. Rosenzweig τ 18:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Probably Photo Booth and therefore OK. --Itu (talk) 22:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- "Probably" is only that: Probably. Unless we have robust evidence that this photo was indeed taken in a photo booth, we have to assume it wasn't and that a regular photographer made it. --Rosenzweig τ 23:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, unfortunately, the uploader does not provide information on how he came to determine this to be an anonymous or pseudonymous work within the meaning of § 66 dUrhG. (Let me add that he would also have to show that the photo was actually published in 1938 or shortely thereafter for such works enjoy protection until 70 years after publication (§ 66(1)(1) UrhG; Dreier/Schulze, UrhG, 4th ed. 2013, § 66, marg. no 5). I shall also point out that it follows from the image description page that the image was published in 2001 and 2001 is within 70 years from 1938.) // While the distinction between Lichtbildwerke (70 years) and Lichtbilder (simple photographs, shorter term -> may no longer be protected) would be relevant here, it is long-established practice on Wikipedia/Commons to always assume such photographs to be Lichtbildwerke. — Pajz (talk) 12:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no valid EXIF and uploader has a history of copyrightviolations including holywood hall of fame stars. Natuur12 (talk) 23:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No metadata, possible band CD or album cover or promotional image. Possible COM:COPYVIO, not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
"Photoshopped" picture from a non free picture from the Internet (http://www.ofuxico.com.br/noticias-sobre-famosos/amaury-jr-se-diverte-com-emilio-surita-na-festa-do-panico/2009/12/16-87968.html). The same applies to File:Id5g1s.jpg. Dantadd✉ 13:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
out of scope SecretName101 (talk) 03:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Emilio nair gomez (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Photo of class ring, means that the image is a Commons:Derivative work. No evidence that the ring is PD or freely licensed. GrapedApe (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
"Own work" in 1965, Moscow?? (Same as File:CheinMoscow.jpg) Yanguas (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Camera metadata says "Erick Daniel Cerna Torres" was the author, yet the uploader claims "own work." Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
it seems like a copyvio, watermarket says the owner is Nanchuz Martìnez Ezarateesteban 21:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{PD-AR-Photo}}-fail as this is most likely NOT an Argentine work. Photo shows explosion of en:HMS Antelope (F170), a frigate of the Royal Navy that participated in the Falklands War and which sunk by Argentine bombs on 24 May 1982. On enwiki available via en:File:HMS Antelope (F170).png, authored with "Martin Cleaver, 1982. From www.navyphoytos.co.uk". Gunnex (talk) 16:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
).jpg){kind=link}
Nominating also (same context: not an Argentine work)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 16:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
).jpg){kind=link}
{{PD-AR-Photo}}-fail (not for drawings or other pieces of art), considering artwork from (as indicated) "1975" by es:Raúl Shaw Moreno (1923—2003). Not in PD in Argentina and elsewhere (+70 pma). Gunnex (talk) 12:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of 1 image (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bertrand Russell 01 edit.png) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 12:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Subimage was replaced (again).--Sinuhe20 (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: one of the four images was previously deleted from Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Image is found all over web, on facebook and etc. see [3] here. Suggest from small size, low rez and lack of metadata that this is possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Image from here [4] predates upload. No metadata, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia:non-free monument. Eleassar (t/p) 09:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Obviously a scan from a yearbook, no evidence of PD status GrapedApe (talk) 00:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I took the picture when I was a junior in high school. I was editor of the sports section of the Royal Purple. I own the picture. Contact me if you have a problem with that. Ky1958
Deleted: image was scanned from publication. Original image could be uploaded by original photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
No indication that this is the editor's work. 1939 date and previous publication suggest this is a copyvio. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete: the uploader hasn't made an "own work" claim, but instead says that the movie studio and the distributor have granted the right to republish with attribution. I doubt they did that. The poster might be in the public domain due to being published in the United States before 1976 without a copyright notice, or because the copyright wasn't renewed. We don't know that, though. This could be uploaded to the English Wikipedia for continued use there. Rybec (talk) 11:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- No issues with uploading locally to Wikipedia. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, image to be uploaded to Wikipedia. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Persons in the photo don't want to be published, there was a missunderstanding. (Fotografierte Personen haben ihr Einverständnis zur Veröffentlichung nicht gegeben, Missverständnis lag vor.) Asymo (talk) 12:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete request by uploader and upload was about 5 days ago. -- Rybec (talk) 21:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete, plausible reasoning. The persons in the picture are protected by § 22 KUG, under which pictures can only be disseminated or exposed to the public eye with the express approval of the person represented. — Pajz (talk) 11:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Photo of class ring, means that the image is a Commons:Derivative work. No evidence that the ring is PD or freely licensed. GrapedApe (talk) 00:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. No metadata and small size suggest COM:COPYVIO. Image is unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
While this image has camera data, it is also of extremely small size and low resolution suggesting it was rephotographed from possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. Suggest COM:COPYVIO. Unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. No metadata and small size suggest COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-AR-Photo}}-fail (not for drawings or other pieces of art), considering album cover art from (as indicated) "1964", authored with es:Jorge López Ruiz who appears to be still living. Argentina has +70 pma. Not in PD in Argentina and elsewhere. Restriction: The cover may be based on a "real" photo which was previously created & published in Argentina, turning this cover into a derivate work from a {{PD-AR-Photo}} which also would pass COM:URAA, but further input needed. Gunnex (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is a cover art of a music album, not PD neither in Argentina nor in the US. - Fma12 (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Apperantly a copyrighted cover Natuur12 (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
While this image has camera data, it is also of extremely small size and low resolution suggesting it was rephotographed from possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. Suggest COM:COPYVIO. Unused and no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
While this image has camera data, it is also of extremely small size and low resolution suggesting it was rephotographed from possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. Suggest COM:COPYVIO. Unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
While this image has camera data, it is also of extremely small size and low resolution suggesting it was rephotographed from possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. Suggest COM:COPYVIO. Unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Small size, low resolution, no metadata suggest COM:COPYVIO on this unused image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. No metadata and small size suggest COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. No metadata and small size suggest COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
small picture in large white area, not used Motopark (talk) 10:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused artistic image possible album cover, cd or poster for non-notable band, out side of COM:SCOPE for notability and a possible COM:COPYVIO for the artwork. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Dated with (as I understand) in the 1970s, portraying en:José Mujica (President of Uruguay since 2010) in an Uruguayan prison and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}} ("(...) [a] clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given"). Sourced with "Photo of Latin American media " and authored with "Latin photograph" (Google translate) and uploaded by a ruwiki-based user ru:Участник:Vladlen666 who (per babel) understands only Russian and en-2 = most likely NOT an Argentine work. Additional, I doubt that this "photo" is real, considering cropped from (example) http://i1169.photobucket.com/albums/r512/tinredhot/524109_3376802296660_246573608_n.jpg. May be PD somewhere else but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 21:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Undated and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}} ("(...) [a] clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given"). es:Jonathan James lived 1983—2008 and was an American hacker who was the first juvenile incarcerated for cybercrime in the United States. Most likely NOT an Argentine work. Sourced with "Datos publicos" and author = "La web libre" = IMHO grabbed from internet. Gunnex (talk) 19:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 10:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
It is not free-use image. [5] Namoroka (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable band, uncategorized and no metadata, possible CD or album art, unlikely to be uploaders own work and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Uncategorized artwork by unidentified artist. Based on user's other uploads this may be a CD or Album artwork for a non-notable band. Out of COM:SCOPE for lack of use, non-helpful description and possilbe COM:COPYVIO for use as CD or Album artwork. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
The photo is from here and probably a copyright violation. Ras67 (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused, looks like advertising IMO. The uploader says "plz dont share or copy for any illegal works..." - not sure if they have released it under CC Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete: per the nomination and because it looks like a derivative work made with clip art. Rybec (talk) 13:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Biography (actually noted to be autobiography based on uploader name) that does not fall within scope of Commons. Perhaps it would be better on another project. The Haz talk 19:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
_Royal_Purples.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Royal_Purples.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
School logo, no evidence of PD or free license GrapedApe (talk) 00:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
_Royal_Purples.jpg){kind=link}
I created the file using photoshop. It's an original work. [[User:Ky1958|Ky1958]
Deleted: Unused school logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
_Royal_Purples.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope for Commons The Haz talk 19:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, unused personal image Rybec (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Photo of class ring, means that the image is a Commons:Derivative work. No evidence that the ring is PD or freely licensed.GrapedApe (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- I will try to find out what the licensing is on the ring. It is designed at least in abstract by a student committee, and so the work may have a more complex authorship than a normal piece of jewelry. Thanks for pointing this out, forgot it would count as a derivative work. Calamaridudeman (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- No matter who made it (one guy, a committee), someone has copyright on it (since it was crated post-1989), and you'll have to get those authors to release the design via WP:OTRS.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Non-free logo, not simple enough. Eleassar (t/p) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused image of presumably living male, with no camera metadata and no description to show educational purpose of image, out of COM:SCOPE and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
_class_ring_(1976).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_class_ring_(1976).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of class ring, means that the image is a Commons:Derivative work. No evidence that the ring is PD or freely licensed.GrapedApe (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
_class_ring_(1976).jpg){kind=link}
I took this picture of my class ring. What's the problem? Ky1958
- The design of the ring may be under copyright. Owning the ring doesn't make you the owner of the copyright for the design. It's explained at length at the linked page Commons:Derivative works. Rybec (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
_class_ring_(1976).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: derivative work Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
_class_ring_(1976).jpg){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
The picture is from here and the uploader is probably not the copyright owner. Ras67 (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- and of very poor quality too and also unneccessary pdf-format is not good for images. So the uploader should upload as jpg with proper copyright status anyway., delete this one. - Andy king50 (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 19:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be taken from website GrapedApe (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I took the pictures and edited them with photoshop. I took nothing from a website. Ky1958
Deleted: Original images can be reuploaded without the text overlays as uploader's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot from YouTubes including [6], unlikely to be user's own work, and likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of license or permission, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a tightly cropped news photo. The uploader's other contribution, File:Ole Gunnar Solskjaer.jpg, indicates this is not an original work. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- The same person also uploaded a third photo of the same subject, File:Ole G Solskjaer.jpg. Rybec (talk) 12:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: non-free image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- My comment seems to have been mistaken. It seems that a different contributor uploaded File:Ole G Solskjaer.jpg. I misread Crystal1986's edits to that file ([7] and [8]). Rybec (talk) 00:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ole_G_Solskjaer.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=30994052){kind=link}
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ole_G_Solskjaer.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=30993636){kind=link}
No evidence given that this work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties High Contrast (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
small picture in large white area, not used Motopark (talk) 10:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 21:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
small picture in large white area, not used Motopark (talk) 10:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
obvious copyright violation (Google maps screenshot), based on this file which is clearly Google maps: http://www.asteroidoccultation.com/misc/HIP_49669_by_163_Erigone_on_2014_Mar_20.htmTiml (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- License is valid but image by be considered a derivative work. - Denniss (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Bizarre reupload of File:Masai women.jpg. Technically a copyvio by virtue of false authorship claim, but an unnecessary duplicate regardless Эlcobbola talk 19:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Image from [9] here, marked copyright. Possible COM:COPYVIO. This webpage was not given as source by uploader who put "own work." Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Also:
- File:PamelaRojas-KWMulticultural-2.JPG
- File:PamelaRojas-KWMulticultural-3.JPG
- File:PamelaRojas-KWMulticultural-4.JPG
- File:PamelaRojas-KWMulticultural-5.JPG
- File:PamelaRojas-KWMulticultural-6.JPG
- File:PamelaRojas-KWMulticultural-7.JPG
Photos of paintings. No evidence is provided that the artist has released her paintings under a free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Absolutely. I thought FoP applied here, but it clearly does not. My mistake. Sorry. Procede with deletion. - Illustratedjc (talk) 11:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Asclepias - you should probably continue proposing deletion all of the files in Category:Murals in Canada. I doubt any of them are in the public domain, or properly released with a creative commons license. - Illustratedjc (talk) 11:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted artwork, no FOP in Russia ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete photo of recent Russian building with murals Rybec (talk) 12:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 18:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
derivative work of something that looks recent enough to be under copyright, and Italian freedom of panorama law doesn't make an exception for this Rybec (talk) 10:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Image metadata reads "Copyright holder AnnaŁuczyńska/migavvki", no apparent connection to uploader, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Image watermarked (c) by creator, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Sadly, there is no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures in Lithuania. This 3D art is very new. Leoboudv (talk) 06:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
The photo is from here. "Photos provided courtesy of Shahzada Aliwaqar Idris Bhaisaheb Badruddin DM". Please send a mail to Com:OTRS if you are the real copyright owner. Ras67 (talk) 14:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- and of very poor quality too and also unneccessary pdf-format is not good for images. So the uploader should upload as jpg with proper copyright status anyway., delete this one. - Andy king50 (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free costume. Eleassar (t/p) 22:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope for Commons The Haz talk 20:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete, unused personal image. Rybec (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Under an ARR license Lady Lotus (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- License is valid but image by be considered a derivative work. --Denniss (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 10:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: it is unlikely that the advertisement was made by a person who died before 1945. Eleassar (t/p) 23:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep almost certainly as this is the oldest inn in Ljubljana. --Sporti (talk) 07:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nonsense. This is not an 18th-century advertisement. For comparison, see this image from before 1945. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Here it doesn't show it, see where the portal is. --Sporti (talk) 09:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- You may also compare it with this image (pg. 85); the article was written in 1940. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:42, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Photo of class ring, means that the image is a Commons:Derivative work. No evidence that the ring is PD or freely licensed. Also, this image is clearly a publicity image taken from the internet.GrapedApe (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Hand-drawn screenshot with many typed versions of this existing at Category:Electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions The Haz talk 21:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality and size of photo, the PNG format and the original uploader's history indicate the license is probably incorrect and this is a non-free image. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
It is a distorted version from the first picture e.g. here. Large amount findings on the Net, probably a copyvio, Com:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- pro delete: far to low quality for any use. - Andy king50 (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Not needed "PDF accident" for this correct crop. Ras67 (talk) 16:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- and of very poor quality too, delete this crop with unwanted text caption. - Andy king50 (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible band Album or CD cover, with logo art applied above photograph. Suggest COM:COPYVIO. Unused and uncategorized. No metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cwbm (commons) as no license. Well there is an obsolete {{PD}} tag, but it looks like a copyrighted comic character or similar. JuTa 20:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
This map is unidentified, and the previous version of this file name is a completely different image, which is also not identifiable. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- The first version looks like a page from a German passport. As an official work of the German federal government, it may be in the public domain ({{PD-GermanGov}}). Rybec (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Regarding the old version: Even if it is in the public domain as an official work (which I doubt), there already is a picture of a sample passport without blackened parts. And the new file version is not usable due to missing information. Delete --ireas (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Regarding the old version: Even if it is in the public domain as an official work (which I doubt), there already is a picture of a sample passport without blackened parts. And the new file version is not usable due to missing information.
- The Mustermann file is tagged as {{PD-GermanGov}}. Why is that tag wrong? The redactions in the X2x2 file may be less of a problem than publishing someone's personal details. The X2x2 file is less pixellated, and the missing information could readily be filled in. Rybec (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Rybec:
- {{PD-GermanGov}} refers to § 5 I UrhG. This paragraph only applies to laws, edicts, official orders, announcements and court decisions (as stated in the license template and in the law itself). A passport does not match to one of the listed types of official works.
- There is also § 5 II UrhG, but in my opinion, this pargraph is not applicable either and furthermore, it does not make the works free (no derivative works allowed).
- And regarding personality rights: Erika Mustermann is the German Jane Doe; the depicted passport is a dummy released by the Ministry of the Interior.
- Regards, --ireas (talk) 21:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- The Mustermann file is tagged as {{PD-GermanGov}}. Why is that tag wrong? The redactions in the X2x2 file may be less of a problem than publishing someone's personal details. The X2x2 file is less pixellated, and the missing information could readily be filled in. Rybec (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The discussion is about the uppermost image of the stack which is an unidentified map with a nonsensical description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
incomplete upload, corrupt Mjrmtg (talk) 11:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete per the nomination. The damage leaves this too small to be much use. Rybec (talk) 20:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
redundant to File:Thomas_Carlyle_1867.jpg Rybec (talk) 03:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, out of project scope, not used Motopark (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
On the source page, I don't see a licence granted. I do see Facebook attempting to claim copyright. Rybec (talk) 08:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted but not by me Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Non-free text; not a simple accunt of facts. Eleassar (t/p) 21:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
It is not free-use image. [10] Namoroka (talk) 14:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
It is not free-use image. left image Namoroka (talk) 14:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Мы начали встречаться 21-ого ноября 2013 года,на данный момент мы встречаемся 3 месяца,мы любим друг друга очень сильн 2014-02-25 23-25.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope The Haz talk 20:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Non-free lyrics. Poet Pavel Gorinshteyn (ru:Павел Григорьевич Горинштейн) died in 1961. Juggler2005 (talk) 10:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Lyrics were composed in 1920. Author's estate does not appear to retain copyright, nor does any copyright claim appear to exist anywhere else. Furthermore, according to U.S. copyright law (source: http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm), as a work written and published before 1923 by a foreign national outside of U.S. jurisdiction, for all intents and purposes in the U.S. the work is in the public domain and therefore the lyrics are indeed free. Ecthelion83 (talk) 10:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Anyway you aren't "the copyright holder of this work" and you can't "release this work into the public domain". You aren't a poet, you aren't a composer, you aren't a record label, and you aren't a chorus that performed this song. --Juggler2005 (talk) 23:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: non-free file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chiune Sugihara
[edit]Commons:FOP#Lithuania: freedom of panorama in Lithuania does not allow for commercial use
- File:Chiune Sugihara monument in Vilnius1.JPG
- File:Chiune Sugihara monument in Vilnius2.JPG
- File:Chiune Sugihara monument in Vilnius4.JPG
Rybec (talk) 12:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chiune Sugihara
[edit]This statue is in the United States, where freedom of panorama applies only to buildings (Commons:FOP#United_States).
Rybec (talk) 23:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, out of project scope, not used Motopark (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gigiomiquiztli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused images, uncategorized of people playing musical instruments. Many of the images are blurry. The group is out of COM:SCOPE for lack of use since time of upload, and lack of apparent educational purpose to which to put the images.
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf - Roger - Daniel.jpg
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf - Leo - Gigio - Angel (1).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (47).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (46).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (45).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (44).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (42).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (43).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (41).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (39).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (40).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (38).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (36).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (37).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (35).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (33).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (34).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (32).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (31).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (29).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (27).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (28).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (26).jpg
- File:Dmh aguascalientes (24).jpg
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf - GigioMiquiztli (7).jpg
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf - GigioMiquiztli (4).jpg
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf - GigioMiquiztli (3).jpg
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf - GigioMiquiztli (1).jpg
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf - GigioMiquiztli (2).jpg
- File:Kind mit puppenkopf sep 2013 2.jpg
- File:Kind mit puppenkopf gigio.jpg
- File:KIND MIT PUPPENKOPF 2013.jpg
- File:KIND MIT PUPPENKOPF 2013 ROCK AND DRINKS.jpg
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf 2005 (7).JPG
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf 2005 (8).JPG
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf 2005 (5).JPG
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf 2005 (6).JPG
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf 2005 (4).JPG
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf 2005 (2).JPG
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf 2005 (3).JPG
- File:Kind Mit Puppenkopf 2005 (1).JPG
- File:Kind mit puppenkopf - Rogelio.jpg
- File:Kind mit puppenkopf - Daniel, Gigio, Roger.png
- File:KIND MIT PUPPENKOPF 2013 RCK.jpg
- File:GiGio - Kind mit puppenkopf - XIII.jpg
- File:KIND MIT PUPPENKOPF JDMH.jpg
- File:KindmitpuppenkopfXIII62.jpg
- File:KindmitpuppenkopfXIII62 (1).JPG
- File:KindmitpuppenkopfXIII (16).jpg
- File:KindmitpuppenkopfXIII (31).JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Architectural renderings, drawings and plans, some marked copyright, all from websites cited, but with no evidence of permission, possible COM:COPYVIO. Uploader has older pictures covered by an OTRS, these are not.
- File:CeNT I wnętrze 3.jpg
- File:CeNT I wnętrze 2.jpg
- File:CeNT I wnętrze.jpg
- File:CeNT I 04.jpg
- File:CeNT I 03.jpg
- File:CeNT I 02.jpg
- File:CeNT I 01.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Opole 2014.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Warszawa 4.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Warszawa 2.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Warszawa 3.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Wrocław 5.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Wrocław 6.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Wrocław 4.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Wrocław 2.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Wrocław 3.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Opole.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Warszawa.jpg
- File:DomEXPO Wrocław.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall - projekt rozbudowy II.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall rozbudowa - wizualizacje IV.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall rozbudowa - wizualizacje II.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall rozbudowa - wizualizacje.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall rozbudowa - wizualizacje III.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy III.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy I.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall wnętrza III.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall wnętrza II.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall wnętrza.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall widok z zewnątrz.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall widok z zewnątrz II.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy VI.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy IV.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy V.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt III.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy II.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall rzut piętra.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall zdjęcie i rzut drugiego piętra.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall zdjęcie i rzut pierwszego piętra.jpg
- File:Sadyba redevelopment case study 2013-09-20 11.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall rzut parteru II.jpg
- File:Dyplom ICSC.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall rzut parteru.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy 5.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy 6.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy 4.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy 3.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy 2.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall projekt rozbudowy.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall 03.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall 08.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall 07.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall 05.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall 06.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall 04.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall 02.jpg
- File:Sadyba Best Mall 01.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 10:54, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:Cauê Moura.jpg
- File:Anamara no litoral.jpg
- File:Os serranos.jpg
- File:Cleber Machado no Programa Altas Horas.jpg
- File:Grupo Domino nos anos 80.jpg
- File:Edgar.Scandurra1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashleymivida (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Uploaded in row in 11.2006 and configured with "su hijo con permiso" or "su hijo Carlos/© Carlos Grätzer"(permission from his son) and/or sourced with "el propio compositor" + "libre de derechos", = File:MarianoII.jpg, per exif taken in 2004 versus es:Guillermo Graetzer, lived 1914—1993. Some files (if not all) apparently previously circulating via http://www.guillermograetzer.com/ ("Last update: 05/2005" and "©Carlos Grätzer - All rights reserved 2003/2014"). Permission via COM:OTRS needed.
Gunnex (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jrdphotography (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, advertising
SamuelFreli (talk) 00:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Lack of sources, low resolution, lack of useful metadata suggest these are COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Ogaden land.jpg
- File:Abdi Mohamud Omar.jpg
- File:Shekosh.jpg
- File:Kebri Dehar Town.jpg
- File:Unnamed (2).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 10:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Portals in Ljubljana
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern door reliefs of Ljubljana Cathedral.
- File:Ljubljana (8898028981).jpg
- File:Ljubljana (8898033547).jpg
- File:Ljubljana (8898646968).jpg
- File:Ljubljana (8898763926).jpg
- File:Ljubljana Slovenia (9041776772).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 11:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Firstofficer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Ali+Ghamsari.jpg
- File:2مهیار علیزاده.JPG
- File:در انتهای اجرای حریق خزان.jpg
- File:مهیار علیزاده.JPG
- File:حریق خزان در وین 6.JPG
- File:حریق خزان در وین 5.JPG
- File:حریق خزان در وین 4.JPG
- File:حریق خزان در وین 3.jpg
- File:حریق خزان در وین 2.jpg
- File:جشن موسیقی ما.jpg
- File:استدیو - ضبط حریق خزان.jpg
- File:حریق خزان در وین.jpg
- File:پویا-main.jpg
- File:Pouya سرایی.jpg
- File:مهیار علیزاده و علیرضا قربانی در حال ضبط آلبوم حریق خزان.jpg
- File:مهیار علیزاده و بروفسور مارتون ايسراليان.jpg
- File:مهیار علیزاده و کیوان ساکت.jpg
- File:پویا در پروژه سیمرغ.jpg
- File:ضبط آلبوم بی من مرو.jpg
- File:Pouya sarai - didar.jpg
- File:سخنرانی در فرهنگستان 1388.jpeg
- File:Pouya.jpg
- File:بیداد - پویا سرایی.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Firstofficer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Missing or inconsistent EXIF data, small size, probably not own work.
- File:MahyarAlizadeh.jpg
- File:پویاعلیرضا.jpg
- File:پویاتهران.jpg
- File:پویاتک3.jpg
- File:پویاتک.jpg
- File:پویا تک2.jpg
- File:مهیارمشکی.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion File:پویاوسنتور.jpg. Copyright holders are claimed soroush and Jalal. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)}}
Deleted. INeverCry 01:05, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ggrandellis (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Rybec (talk) 03:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Si Griffiths (talk · contribs)
[edit]A number of images that appear *not* to be the work of the author as claimed. Many appear to be moderately old, but not clearly out of copyright. While the majority of this user's uploads appear to be his own work, a significant number appear to have been taken from commercial sources without the explanation and/or justification that would indicate clearly that they could be used.
I have not nominated *all* potentially problematic images, and some of the ones I *have* nominated may be legitimate, but too many appear to be within- or quite possibly within- the UK copyright law time limits (which I assume apply here) and should at least be checked.
Ultimately, I don't like to waste some *potentially* good uploads, but if the origins aren't clear because the correct source and licensing information weren't provided by the uploader, then we can't take a chance with them.
- File:Vending Machine UK.jpg
- File:Mural 4 UK.jpg
- File:Noddy Book 4.jpg
- File:Mural In Woking UK.jpg
- File:Maserati Cigarette Card By Players Cigarrettes UK.jpg
- File:Noddy Book UK.jpg
- File:Scalextric Postcard UK.jpg
- File:Willum And Me 45rpm Record UK.jpg
- File:Sinbad The Sailor 45rpm Record UK.jpg
- File:An Album Of Cricketers 1938 Cigarette Card Album.jpg
- File:Radio Celebrities Cigarette Card Album UK.jpg
- File:Noddy.jpg
- File:Young Folks Favourites 78rpm record.jpg
- File:William Boyd 45rpm record UK.jpg
- File:Treasure Island 45rpm Record UK.jpg
- File:Noddy Stories 45rpm Record UK.jpg
- File:Childrens Choice 45rpm Record UK.jpg
- File:Noddy Book.jpg
- File:Train Cigarette Cards (Wills Cigarettes).jpg
- File:Film Stars Cigarette Card (Players Cigarettes).jpg
- File:Film Stars Cigarette Card (Wills Cigarettes).jpg
- File:Fish Cigarette Card (Players Cigarettes).jpg
- File:Grayling Cigarette Card (Players Cigarettes).jpg
- File:Delahaye Sports Drop-Head Coupe Cigarette Card.jpg
- File:Cars Cigarette Cards (Players Cigarettes).jpg
- File:Ford Anglia Cigarette Card.jpg
- File:Airedale Terriers Cigarette Card.jpg
- File:Airedale Terriers.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ubcule (talk) 21:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 10:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Si Griffiths (talk · contribs)
[edit]Arty, very processed-looking images which severely limits potential in-scope use. (Not a judgement on quality, merely on whether they fit Commons' intended purpose of educational images only).
- File:Retro Car Adapted With Photoshop In Weybridge Surrey UK.jpg
- File:Pins Adapted With Photoshop. Surrey UK.jpg
- File:Artist's Paint Brushes Adapted With Photoshop. Surrey UK.jpg
- File:Artist's Oil Colour Paint Adapted With Photoshop. Surrey UK.jpg
- File:Kodak Ektachrome 35mm Film Tin Adapted With Photoshop UK.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal art is out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katherinertmilena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of promo images. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Jaime medina.jpg
- File:Jamesvalderrama.jpg
- File:Carlitooooosssss.jpg
- File:Diegopulecio.jpg
- File:WALLPAPER 1 1024x786.jpg
- File:Don tetto.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Austin.brany (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope
- File:Salamuddin Shaikh00.jpg
- File:Salamuddin4.jpg
- File:Salamuddin3.jpg
- File:Salamuddin1jpg.jpg
- File:Salamuddin loves football.jpg
- File:Salamuddin LEE.jpg
- File:Salamuddin shaikh2.jpg
- File:Salamuddin witj stars.jpg
- File:Salamuddin without shirtjpg.jpg
- File:Salamuddin5.jpg
- File:Salamuddin6.jpg
- File:Salamuddin6jpg.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by John.worne (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope
- File:Salamuddin at lunch1.jpg
- File:Salamuddin at luch.jpg
- File:Salamuddin at funny poss.jpg
- File:Salamuddin angry.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ricky.symond (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope
- File:Salamuddin with Google Specialist (Deepak).jpg
- File:Salamuddin 8.jpg
- File:Salamuddin 7.jpg
- File:Salamuddin (MIB).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aizan.hadi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MTGnation1973 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only documents which could be replaced with wiki-tables.
- File:VAN11.pdf
- File:TOAN11.pdf
- File:VAN10.pdf
- File:TOAN10.pdf
- File:TIN10.pdf
- File:TIN11.pdf
- File:THONGKEHUYCHUONG.pdf
- File:SU11.pdf
- File:SU10.pdf
- File:SINH11.pdf
- File:SINH10.pdf
- File:PHAP11.pdf
- File:LY11.pdf
- File:PHAP10.pdf
- File:LY10.pdf
- File:HOA11.pdf
- File:HOA10.pdf
- File:DIA11.pdf
- File:DIA10.pdf
- File:DANHSACHTRUONG.pdf
- File:ANH10.pdf
- File:ANH11.pdf
- File:DANHSACHHOCSINHNHATMON.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
This file contains nude body. Thermicien (talk) 08:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep, it is used and many other nude too — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ada Unda (talk • contribs) 07:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's in use now, but wasn't when I first commented. diff Rybec (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use and a selfie Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
New ask for deletion
[edit]
I think this page had been classified too quickly ; I'm asking again it to be deleted.
Reasons :
- The file contains explicit nude contains, as it was mentioned before
- It depicts identifiable person, with no way to tell wether it the downloader is the person pictured or not : by what we know, it could be a stolen photo published without permission.
- It has been objected that the file was in use on the wiki : the only page using it is User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2014 February 24 18:00, wich only lists new files ; it, indeed, indicates that the file is marked with a deletion request, and that the user already has a DR notice. No real page in any wiki uses it as a pertinent illustration.
I think the request has really been classified too quickly ; both Thermicien and Rybec argued against keeping it ; I think the argument that it is used can't stand, and being a selfie can't be a sufficient criter to keep it. The only person asking to keep it is the downloader itself, that, by the way, forgot to sign... -TheF (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - As I said, unappropriate nude picture of an identifiable person ; no use on educative purpose -TheF (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete : Picture useless, too identifiable person, nothing says she is agrees. Rome2 (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Consent could be shown by showing permission, which should be done because it is the only upload from that account. The photo was removed today from the "Selfie" article on the Swedish Wikipedia diff, on the grounds that there were too many images in the article. The line through my comment was meant to show that I had changed my mind because the reason I had given was no longer valid. Rybec (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Useless file with nude body. In my opinion Wikimedia Commons is not a place for erotic photos. -- Thermicien (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per "Low-quality pornographic images that do not contribute anything educationally useful to our existing collection of images are not needed on the Commons." However, Thermicien, your statement that "Wikimedia Commons is not a place for erotic photos" is troubling because my understanding is that Commons is NOT censored and that erotic photos in and of themselves are absolutely fine if they contribute in an educationally-useful context, no? JDanek007Talk 01:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, identifiable. — Revicomplaint? 08:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-AR-Photo}}-fail (not for drawings or other pieces of art), considering book cover art from (as indicated) "1951". {{PD-AR-Anonymous}}-fail due to COM:URAA and... I doubt "anonymous", considering an artwork configured to be Eva Perón's official portrait. There must be a painter. Eventually related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Evita Peron.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:María Eva Duarte de Perón.jpg.
Nominating also (same context):
- File:Maria eva duarte de peron official portrait.jpg
- File:Razon.jpg
- File:Flickr - bastique - Eva Peron autobiography.jpg
- File:Bicentenario116.jpg
- File:Mundo Argentino.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Update: Painter is — per http://agenciapacourondo.com.ar/secciones/cultura/6369-polemicas-en-torno-a-las-imagenes-de-eva-peron-por-andrea-giunta.html ("11. Numa Ayrinhac: Retrato de Eva Perón publicado en Eva Perón, La razón de mi vida, Buenos Aires, Ediciones Peuser, 1951.", .jpg) — en:Numa Ayrinhac (1881—1951), a Franco-Argentine artist (born in France, died in Argentina), famous for painting portraits of Eva and Juan Domingo Perón. Argentina has +70 years pma. Copyrighted till the end of 2021. Gunnex (talk) 12:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 10:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Montréal34 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A photo from circa 1934 (File:1934-35. Lucien Lange.jpeg) is said to be the uploader's own work. While that's possible, it's also possible that these are derivative works, in which case more information should be added so we can know about the copyright status.
- File:Surrey.jpeg
- File:Vernissage Masson 1942.jpeg
- File:Vernissage Fortin 1946.jpeg
- File:Fortin et Mme Lange.jpeg
- File:Fleurimond Constantineau.jpg
- File:1934-35. Lucien Lange.jpeg
- File:Apres la tempête tout le monde est occupé.JPG
- File:Bonheur d'occasion.jpg
- File:Miyuki Tanobe.jpg
Rybec (talk) 01:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The photo of File:Miyuki Tanobe.jpg seem to be a original work. Note that pictures in Canada before 1949 are PD, at least if we have the right information. The paintings (File:Fleurimond Constantineau.jpg, File:Apres la tempête tout le monde est occupé.JPG, File:Bonheur d'occasion.jpg) sould be deleted. --Fralambert (talk) 03:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 10:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Clearly an image of an informational sign with numerous images of unknown status, copyright almost certainly owned by the State of Alaska. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
The State of Alaska allows "fair use": http://library.alaska.gov/vilda_rights.html http://gov.alaska.gov/parnell/copyright-statement.html Pi3.124 (talk) 11:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete Every copyright holder allows fair use, but that's not good enough for Commons purposes. The photos used in making the sign are almost certainly in the public domain--the caption for one says it was taken in 1913. However, the main text dates from around 2008 (centennial of a 1908 discovery) so it would still be under copyright. If this sign is in Independence Mine State Historical Park, it probably belongs to the state. Rybec (talk) 12:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
The sign is a historical marker found alongside Highway 1, Glenn Highway, north of Palmer. Looks like Wiki has lots of examples: Historical_marker Pi3.124 (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- You seem to be saying that freedom of panorama applies, but it doesn't (Commons:FOP#United_States). What would make this allowable (in my opinion) would be if the sign is on federal land, or if the state has waived its copyright on this sign. Rybec (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I am in contact with the State of Alaska. They are trying to determine ownership and any copyright.Pi3.124 (talk) 02:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
The State of Alaska's permission may be found below.Pi3.124 (talk) 19:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
From: "Elizabeth Bluemink (DNR)" <elizabeth.bluemink@alaska.gov>
To: xxx
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:10:59 PM
Subject: FW: Historical Marker
Hi xxx: Here is your answer. As far as we’re concerned, you have permission to use the attached image or your own image. We’d appreciate if you could provide the credit suggested.
Best regards,
Elizabeth
From: Lochart, Emily S A (DNR)
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:09 AM
To: Bluemink, Elizabeth (DNR)
Subject: RE: Historical Marker
That’s definitely a panel that was developed by Alaska State Parks. It was part of a very large Gold Rush Centennial project that we worked on with the Office of History and Archaeology too. Most of the panels are at DOT waysides. I suppose all that agency-mixing is why there were no logos. If it needs a credit, you could always say “Developed by Alaska State Parks.” We are, after all, the ones who have the files.
This panel seems to have seen better days. I have attached a digital version that will look much better on the web. We love when our work is desired on the web!
Emily S. A. Lochart
Natural Resource Manager II
Interpretation and Education Program
Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation
p 907.269.8742 / f 907.269.8917
From: Bluemink, Elizabeth (DNR)
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:06 PM
To: Lochart, Emily S A (DNR)
Subject: Fwd: Historical Marker
Hi Emily: This looks like one of ours. Do you know anything about it? He said the sign didn't indicate who it belonged to. Thanks! Elizabeth
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: xxx
To: "Bluemink, Elizabeth (DNR)" <elizabeth.bluemink@alaska.gov>
Subject: Historical Marker
Elizabeth,
Thanks for taking my call today. Pleae find attached an image of the marker in question. As I pointed out, the sign is on the Glenn Hwy, Interstate A-1, turnout overlooking the Matanuska River, which is just north of the intersection with Fishhook-Willow Rd.
I am interested in:
1) Who owns the sign and any associated copyright.
2) Would the owner be willing to let the image be used in Wikipedia (e.g. Wikimedia Commons specifically)
Best regards, xxx
No copyright
From: "Elizabeth Bluemink (DNR)" <elizabeth.bluemink@alaska.gov>
To: xxx
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 6:15:37 PM
Subject: RE: Historical Marker
I don’t believe that the State can assert copyright on your image of public property, just on our own image. While I’d encourage you to caption the photo as being a historic panel developed by Alaska State Parks, or the State of Alaska, it is not a copyright matter.
I think that some property owners in the wider world have sought to restrict photos of certain public or private property, but that’s not an issue in our case :)
From: xxx
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:08 PM
To: Bluemink, Elizabeth (DNR)
Subject: Re: Historical Marker
Elizabeth,
Great! So does this mean there is no copyright associated with the image I took?
Best regards,
xxx
From: Soukup, Michael D (GOV)
To: xxx
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 4:11 PM
Subject: Hatcher Pass Sign
Dr. xxx,
Thank you for contacting us regarding your photo from Hatcher Pass. Since you took the photo, it is your property, and you do not need permission to upload it to Wikipedia. Let us know if we can help with anything else.
Best,
Michael
Michael Soukup
Press Assistant
Office of Governor Sean Parnell
(907) 269-7450
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 09:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
This photo, apparently from 1942, is claimed to be "{{PD-because|Amtl. Werk Transnistriens (rumän. Besatzungsgebiet)}}", meaning something like "Official work of Transnistria" (Romanian occupied territory). Why should a photo used in a driving license be an "official work" of that territory? Which law says so? And even if we would assume that the photo is an official work of Transnistria, which law says that such works are in the public domain? It's the duty of the uploader to provide evidence for those two claims ( 1): is an official work; 2): official works of that territory are in the public domain). If he is unable to do so, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 19:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- The same is true of
- File:Siegfried Jägendorf Führerschein 1942.jpg. The blank form itself, and even the filled-in form, can be assumed to be below the threshold of originality, but not the photograph affixed to it. --Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Disussion ist in der de.wp hier geführt worden. Der Melder ist in der de.wp Admin. - All was discussed in the German Wikipedia. Rosenzweig is very familiar with that Wikipedia. --Atomiccocktail (talk) 20:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it seems the image was discussed there (I hadn't noticed that discussion before), but there was no actual consensus. The last post of that particular thread (de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen/Archiv/2013/01#1942 in Rumänien) even postulated that the image might not have been truly published until 2009 and would therefore be protected until Dec. 31, 2079. Nobody actually supported the claim that the photo was an "official work".
- And yes, I'm an admin of the German wikipedia and know it rather well. What exactly do you want to tell us with your last sentence? What does that fact have to do with this deletion request and the copyright status of this image? --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, I do not see why this would be an official work. I also fail to see, as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ernst Fraenkel Passfoto 1938.jpg, why another exceptional provision (i.e. that for anonymous or pseudonymous works) would apply. The discussion referred by Atomiccocktail above suggests the same thing. As Syrcro rightly points out, a work isn't published just because it is used as a driver's license photo. The earliest year of publication we know of -- as long as nothing has changed from this discussion -- was 2009, which is less than 70 years from 1942, so it would still be protected even if it were an anonymous work (which itself is dubious, see the other deletion request). — Pajz (talk) 13:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Steinsplitter as no license. Well there is a CC license. But it looks like a privat snapshot an out of scope. JuTa 20:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- this is not private, they are sitted front of their store. i dont know are stores in western countries are private place or not? . and about scoop: wikimedia commons is full of pictures of unknown , not notable people.they will be delete? what is commons? a database of freely usable media files for what western people like?!--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 23:36, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: License is now correct, uploader's own photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Also related files: Special:PrefixIndex/User:111Alleskönner/Copyright tag
This is basically a non-free licence tag, and currently unused. This licence tag grants a "permission for Wikimedia", but other licence tags such as GFDL or CC-BY-SA also include a "permission for Wikimedia" (indirectly, since the tags include a "permission for anyone"), so it doesn't add anything to the other licences. Since it is an unfree licence, it would always have to be used together with a free licence such as GFDL or CC-BY-SA, but if used on a file information page, it would be confusing to reusers since it looks as if permission is required, although the permission requirement automatically is dropped by the other licence template (i.e. GFDL or CC-BY-SA). Thus, the licence tag would cause us nothing but trouble. Stefan4 (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: This tag is currently in work and therefore it is unused. It would not have to be used together with another licence tag, so the argument with the "the licence tag would cause us nothing but trouble" is simply not true. --111Alleskönner (talk) 02:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- All files have to have at least one licence which has all of the following attributes:
- Anyone must be allowed to use the file for both commercial and non-commercial purposes.
- Anyone must be allowed to alter the file.
- Anyone who wishes to do either of the above shall be allowed to do that without having to notify anyone about this.
- Your licence doesn't have all of the above attributes, so I am afraid that it would indeed have to be used together with a different licence in all cases. --Stefan4 (talk) 08:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- All files? This does not seem to has one of these attributes... If Wikimedia uploads non-free pictures with the limitation to use it only inside the Wikimedia-projects, there can't be a problem by using this licence option as an "normal user", too. Pictures with this tag are copyrighted, but free to use inside the Wikimedia-projects (just like the Wikimedia-tag) - if Wikimedia is allowed to do so, they can't forbid their users to do the same. --111Alleskönner (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- There is an exception for Wikimedia logos for administrative purposes. Other images have to be available under a free licence, see {{Permission}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- All files? This does not seem to has one of these attributes... If Wikimedia uploads non-free pictures with the limitation to use it only inside the Wikimedia-projects, there can't be a problem by using this licence option as an "normal user", too. Pictures with this tag are copyrighted, but free to use inside the Wikimedia-projects (just like the Wikimedia-tag) - if Wikimedia is allowed to do so, they can't forbid their users to do the same. --111Alleskönner (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- All files have to have at least one licence which has all of the following attributes:
Deleted: This is effectively 111Alleskönner's sandbox and (s)he should have wide lattitude to experiment with template layout, etc. However, I caution 111Alleskönner that this template cannot be used in its present form, and all files on the Commons *must* meet the attributes listed by Stefan4. Even if this template were to be used with another license, I agree with Stefan4 that it would be inappropriately confusing and give users the wrong impression. This page is being kept solely because it is a work-in-progress, not because it could ever be used in its current form. Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/User:111Alleskönner/Copyright tag The Haz talk 20:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image kept with no valid reason, due it has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: following the advise of the legal Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2075 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep According to this manifesto published by the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation on February 20 [11] "The WMF does not plan to remove any content unless it has actual knowledge of infringement or receives a valid DMCA takedown notice. To date, no such notice has been received under the URAA. We are not recommending that community members undertake mass deletion of existing content on URAA grounds, without such actual knowledge of infringement or takedown notices".
- Furthermore, right now is being developed a long debate within the Commons community, to decide whether correspond stop deleting the images achieved by URAA, and even restore the previously deleted. It would be completely unwise to continue this kind of erased while its pertinence is disputed and the relative consensus so far seems to lean towards their maintenance. --Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Although the URAA issue may be under discussion, the manifesto cited expresses an opinion (or a wish) rather a legal status. We have to focus on the verdict of the Supreme Court about the copyrights restored, which is still into force. Stating that the deletion of such images is "unwise" does not add more than a subjective opinion, but nowadays we have to follow the rules. As far as WM servers are located in the US all the images hosted at Commons must be PD in that country beyond they have entered to the PD in Argentina. - Fma12 (talk) 19:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I find it completely unacceptable that the recommendations of the Board of the WMF are not taken into account, nor the discussion that is being carried out within the community of Commons, where the dominant position is to stop the massive deleted. While there has never been a single intimation for the removal of any image achieved by URAA, the fact emptively delete is just a simple opinion, objectionable as any.
- In view of the generalized debate on this issue that is ongoing, I suggest stopping this kind of deletion until a consensus is reached on what to do. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep At the very least, wait for the end of the current vote about URAA-affected files before deleting anything related to URAA. Doing the opposite would highly disregard for the community. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:20, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment To date, no consensus has been reached on the discussion cited above. Therefore I understand that Commons should continue deleting the files with URAA problems. - Fma12 (talk) 14:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment You say there is no consensus? Have you read the number of users who were in favor of stopping deleted? And how many were against? I think the consensus is very clear. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep. The last statement from the Legal and Community Advocacy staff from the WMF is pretty clear about the URAA situation: "very few works on Commons are likely to be affected due to the various requirements of this statute (...) It requires information that may not be available to a Commons volunteer trying to make a decision without a takedown notice". At this moment, no valid DMCA notice has been received to analyze the impact of URAA regarding several files, that is why the WMF advises not to delete contents because of "general concerns about the URAA". Besides this, there is currently an important discussion within the community to find a consensus regarding this issue, so there should be prudence regarding the potentially affected files. Deleting more images only hurts the project, specially taking in consideration the recomendation from the WMF staff. --B1mbo (talk) 03:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted until 2075 FASTILY 12:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
I was happy to see this file restored, but unfortunately it looks like it still can't be hosted at Commons, even after the recent decision regarding URAA. This image didn't have it's copyright restored by the URAA, as it never lost its US copyright since it was originally published in compliance with U.S. formalities (see image of CD at [12]). As US is not one of the countries with the rule of the shorter term, its U.S. copyright will expire 70 years after the death of the author (or if a work of corporate authorship, 95 years from publication). —RP88 10:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi,
- 1. I suppose you mean this image (please correct if you mean something else). I don't see here compliance with U.S. formalities. It should show the (c) sign, the name of the copyright holder, and the year of publication. I see no copyright sign and no year.
- 2. I may have other objections, but these can wait. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, I was referring to the rear (see [13]), i.e "Reservados todos los derechos..." and the fine print around the edge of the CD (see [14], I can make out "Reservados todos" but I can't tell if there is a © or a year)). Post 1978 the U.S. copyright notice requirement was greatly relaxed, but yes, despite the obvious intent to make a copyright notice, it is possible that these notices wouldn't be accepted by a U.S. court. —RP88 12:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly. See my comment on COM:VPC. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The copyright notice exclusive applies to the music on the disc. The copyright notice says "All the rights of the phonographic producer and of the authors of the recorded works in this disc are registered." It doesn't say a thing about the photo cover, so there is no copyright notice about it. --B1mbo (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I have the original record on my hands, edited in vinyl in 1980, and the cover has no copyright notice, the album only mentions the phonograph and producer rights, but nothing about the image. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 00:18, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly. See my comment on COM:VPC. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, I was referring to the rear (see [13]), i.e "Reservados todos los derechos..." and the fine print around the edge of the CD (see [14], I can make out "Reservados todos" but I can't tell if there is a © or a year)). Post 1978 the U.S. copyright notice requirement was greatly relaxed, but yes, despite the obvious intent to make a copyright notice, it is possible that these notices wouldn't be accepted by a U.S. court. —RP88 12:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
![[13]](http://s794.photobucket.com/user/plutonenano2o10/media/MERCADO%20LIBRE%202/DSC02473.jpg.html?t=1280243600){kind=link}
![[14]](http://i794.photobucket.com/albums/yy221/plutonenano2o10/MERCADO%20LIBRE%202/DSC02474.jpg?t=1280243600){kind=link}
- Delete Copyright in the US, either it never lost it or it was restored by the URAA and absent any proof that it is not copyright in the US then it must be removed. LGA talkedits 01:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep PD in Argentina and hasn't copyright signs so PD in USA Ezarateesteban 16:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- You need to provide proof that it was published in the US within 30 days and thus did not have it's copyright restored by the URAA. LGA talkedits 22:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- LGA, no need for such, LGA, stop asking for useless requirement. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- In which case we have to assume it had it's copyright restored by the URAA. LGA talkedits 08:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- And yes, URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. See COM:DIU. Yann (talk) 08:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- and as you know full well we can't choose to ignore the law because a majority of editors don't like the law; so as this is copyrighted in the US it cant be hosted on commons and has to be deleted, and as an admin with knowledge of such a copyright infringement it is your duty to remove it. LGA talkedits 09:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Did you finish your rhetoric? Yann (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete If I followed the WMF statement, I should vote "keep" on this, but I prefer to give my opinion based on law. The same law that the WMF decided to ignore. - Fma12 (talk) 12:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Did you finish your rhetoric? Yann (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- and as you know full well we can't choose to ignore the law because a majority of editors don't like the law; so as this is copyrighted in the US it cant be hosted on commons and has to be deleted, and as an admin with knowledge of such a copyright infringement it is your duty to remove it. LGA talkedits 09:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- And yes, URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. See COM:DIU. Yann (talk) 08:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- In which case we have to assume it had it's copyright restored by the URAA. LGA talkedits 08:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- LGA, no need for such, LGA, stop asking for useless requirement. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- You need to provide proof that it was published in the US within 30 days and thus did not have it's copyright restored by the URAA. LGA talkedits 22:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Apparently still covered under copyright -FASTILY 21:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Vermerk Besprechung mit Regierungsrat Feldscher verfasst von Walter Labs Januar 1942 -BA R6 74, Bl. 54.jpg
[edit]
Not an official work as claimed. The author died in 1988, so this text is still protected by copyright until January 1, 2059. Rosenzweig τ 19:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nonsens. Labs served as a clerk of Reichsministerium für die besetzten Ostgebiete / Reich Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories. This is a document of the same type as Wannsee Protocol. So start study history and stop your silly Deletion requests. --Atomiccocktail (talk) 19:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest you study copyright, or to be more precise Urheberrecht. The license tag (Template:PD-GermanGov) says it all: In Germany, an official work (as far as copyright is concerned) is primarily "a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment". Or in German "Gesetze, Verordnungen, amtliche Erlasse und Bekanntmachungen sowie Entscheidungen und amtlich verfaßte Leitsätze zu Entscheidungen" (§ 5 Abs. 1 UrhG). This text is none of the above. There are other types of official works, mentioned in § 5 Abs. 2, but those are unfit for Commons (also for de.wp) and not covered by the license tag used. --Rosenzweig τ 20:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ob es sich um Werk im Sinne des § 5 Absatz 1 oder Absatz 2 UrhG handelt, kann dahingestellt bleiben. Zuvorderst ist zu prüfen, ob es sich um überhaupt um ein Werk handelt. Ein Werk, auf das die Vorschriften des Urheberrechtsgesetzes anwendbar sind, liegt nur vor, wenn es sich um eine persönliche geistige Schöpfung handelt, § 2 Absatz 2 UrhG. Hier handelt es sich um einen nicht literatischen Text, also einen Gebrauchstext. Bei diesen ist nach der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofes - vgl. Loewenheim/Dietz/Schricker, Urheberrecht, Rdzf. 35 zu § 2 - Schöpfungshöhe (und damit ein Werk im Sinne des Gesetzes) erst beim „deutlichen Überragen der Gestaltungstätigkeit gegenüber der Durchschnittsgestaltung“ gegeben. Hier handelt es sich aber um einen höchst durchschnittlichen Gebrauchstext im behördeninternen Verkehr, bei dem das „Handwerksmäßige, Alltägliche und Banale“ trotz seines perfiden Inhaltes nicht überschritten ist. Der Löschantrag ist daher unbegründet, die Datei zu behalten. --Alupus (talk) 07:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- I have doubts about the protectability of the text in question. Half of the content has the author documenting what another person said, reproducing these statements in indirect speech, maybe paraphrasing at times; this does not usually attract any new protection right (in addition to that potentially held by the speaker, but it seems highly questionable to me why these statements would entail the required level of creativity and individuality). The remaining part does not appear creative. I would suggest Keeping this, provided this is also in conformity with U.S. law. — Pajz (talk) 13:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- When reviewing the uploads of this user, I took the threshold of originality into consideration and chose not to file deletion requests for several files which to me seemed to contain only rather formulaic or very simple texts, telegrams and such. This text however is not a standard meeting transcript, but a first-person account, so I chose to file the deletion request. Only a court could really decide in a binding way if the text is actually below the threshold of originality. In my opinion, we should rather err on the side of caution (the precautionary principle) and interpret the "below the treshold of originality" exemption narrowly rather than broadly. --Rosenzweig τ 17:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 12:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Image in use on YouTube as user logo here [15], due to small size and low resolution, this copy is unlikely to be the original, instead possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment User left his/her reply on the discussion page of this deletion request, not the main space, I am moving it here:
- My apologies: The image I posted is original and has been confused with the image of an avatar of a youtube user, which is different. I hope my request is considered, so that the image is not deleted. Thanks so much. ((unsigned ... 18:41, 26 February 2014 Nikos3194 talk ))
- The image on the YouTube account is only different by the letters added / removed to it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated (dated with upload date "2013") and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}} ("(...) [a] clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given") + a {{PD-old}}-fail (an url can´t be an author). No biographical data available. Apparently a president of an Argentine football club. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. If created after 1987 not in PD in Argentina and elsewhere. Gunnex (talk) 09:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominating also (duplicate)
Gunnex (talk) 09:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Not the work of the flicker user. But is it pd old? MorganKevinJ(talk) 04:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- This image is in the public domain because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Argentina, has expired. (Both at least 25 years have passed after the photograph was created, and it was first published at least 20 years ago, 11.723, Article 34 as amended, and Convention Article 7 (4)) . —Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 04:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination Withdrawn per Moebiusuibeom-en MorganKevinJ(talk) 04:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
{{PD-AR-Photo}}-fail (not for drawings or other pieces of art), considering poster art related to es:Ford Ranchero (Argentina), produced in Argentina 1973—1991. Most likely created in 1973, would also fail {{PD-AR-Photo}} due to COM:URAA. Gunnex (talk) 08:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 12:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Argentine work, undated ("unknown") and licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}} ("(...) [a] clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given"). es:Gerardo Gandini lived 1936—2013. If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. If created after 1987 not in PD in Argentina and elsewhere.
Nominating also (same context)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2071 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep According to this manifesto published by the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation on February 20 [16] "The WMF does not plan to remove any content unless it has actual knowledge of infringement or receives a valid DMCA takedown notice. To date, no such notice has been received under the URAA. We are not recommending that community members undertake mass deletion of existing content on URAA grounds, without such actual knowledge of infringement or takedown notices".
- Furthermore, right now is being developed a long debate within the Commons community, to decide whether correspond stop deleting the images achieved by URAA, and even restore the previously deleted. It would be completely unwise to continue this kind of erased while its pertinence is disputed and the relative consensus so far seems to lean towards their maintenance. --Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Although the URAA issue may be under discussion, the manifesto cited expresses an opinion (or a wish) rather a legal status. We have to focus on the verdict of the Supreme Court about the copyrights restored, which is still into force. Stating that the deletion of such images is "unwise" does not add more than a subjective opinion, but nowadays we have to follow the rules. As far as WM servers are located in the US all the images hosted at Commons must be PD in that country beyond they have entered to the PD in Argentina. - Fma12 (talk) 19:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I find it completely unacceptable that the recommendations of the Board of the WMF are not taken into account, nor the discussion that is being carried out within the community of Commons, where the dominant position is to stop the massive deleted. While there has never been a single intimation for the removal of any image achieved by URAA, the fact emptively delete is just a simple opinion, objectionable as any.
- In view of the generalized debate on this issue that is ongoing, I suggest stopping this kind of deletion until a consensus is reached on what to do. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment To date, the files are still copyrighted in the US. Furthermore, the debate cited above has not reached a consensus yet so I understand that Commons should follow the Suprem Court's verdict about this issue. - Fma12 (talk) 14:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment You say there is no consensus? Have you read the number of users who were in favor of stopping deleted? And how many were against? I think the consensus is very clear. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:33, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep. The last statement from the Legal and Community Advocacy staff from the WMF is pretty clear about the URAA situation: "very few works on Commons are likely to be affected due to the various requirements of this statute (...) It requires information that may not be available to a Commons volunteer trying to make a decision without a takedown notice". At this moment, no valid DMCA notice has been received to analyze the impact of URAA regarding several files, that is why the WMF advises not to delete contents because of "general concerns about the URAA". Besides this, there is currently an important discussion within the community to find a consensus regarding this issue, so there should be prudence regarding the potentially affected files. Deleting more images only hurts the project, specially taking in consideration the recomendation from the WMF staff. --B1mbo (talk) 03:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted until 2071 FASTILY 12:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Like File:León Gieco 1980.jpg deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:León Gieco 1980.jpg this image does not show proof that when it was published it did not meet the requirements of US copyright, for example this version of the image has the (p) mark on it. Absent proof it failed to meet the requirements this would not have needed the URAA to have it's copyright re-instated this should be deleted. LGA talkedits 09:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Hazmat2 as no license. Well, there is a CC license, but the "badge" itself isn't own work of the uploader. JuTa 21:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- You're correct in that I was referring to the license of the subject, not the photograph itself. The Haz talk 21:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 12:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was uploaded using the license tag Template:PD-JORF-nor-conso, which says: "This document is a facsimile from an official text (law, regulation etc.) published in the Journal officiel de la République Française, the official gazette of the French Republic. As such, it is not eligible for copyright." That is obviously not true; this is a facsimile of a typewritten letter from General Pétain, not a facisimile from the Journal officiel. So the normal copyright applies, the author of the text is General Pétain, who died in 1951. This means that this letter is still protected by copyright until January 1, 2022. It can be restored then, but for now it should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 18:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Currently I don't have the time to translate the text, but has it enough creativity to be above COM:TOO for France and thereby be copyrightable? --Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think so, else I would not have filed the deletion request. When reviewing the uploads of this user, I took the threshold of originality into consideration and chose not to file deletion requests for several files which to me seemed to contain only rather formulaic or very simple texts, telegrams and such. This text however is a personal letter which consists of more than formulaic text and very simple sentences, so I chose to file the deletion request. Only a court could really decide in a binding way if the text is actually below the threshold of originality. In my opinion, we should rather err on the side of caution (the precautionary principle) and interpret the "below the treshold of originality" exemption narrowly rather than broadly. --Rosenzweig τ 17:17, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This is not at all a work. It is just a very average text of administrative communication between a military person and a politician. There is no threshold of originality. The deletion request is unfounded, so keep the file in question. --Atomiccocktail (talk) 19:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 12:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [17]. Yann (talk) 15:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
![[17]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=626902873#File:Les_Mutineries_de_1917_Lettre_de_P%C3%A9tain_au_ministre_de_la_guerre_29_mai_1917.jpg){kind=link}
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1952, licensed with {{PD-AR-Anonymous}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2047 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 00:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominating also (same context):
Gunnex (talk) 01:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Move to enwiki, if they can be included in current articles as non-free images. Ww2censor (talk) 13:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm willing to temporarily restore these upon request for transwiki. Just drop me a note FASTILY 12:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Planet trails
[edit]No FOP in France
- File:Sentier planetes panneau 1 soleil.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau 2 mercure.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau 3 terre.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau 3 venus.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau 4 mars.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau 5 ceinture asteroides.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau jupiter.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau neptune.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau saturne.jpg
- File:Sentier planetes panneau uranus.jpg
Vera (talk) 14:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
OK I understand the story about the FOP (something I did not know before).
Now my question is : is there a way to keep these images ? For example after getting the agreement of the author ? How ?
Additional details that can help :
- I am the author of there artworks !
- They were made from license free materials, or license authorized for education purpose (NASA images).
- The photographer explicitly agreed to give up any copyright on the images themselves. I asked him before uploading.
So I hope a solution can be found. I am not an expert in licenses and I understand that things must be clear, but such administrative problems on wikimedia and others are really annoying.
--Frip0uille69 (talk) 09:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS. FASTILY 12:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Also:
Photos of a 1999 painting. No evidence is provided that the artists have released their painting under a free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I've emailed Marc Pelech, the curator of Canada Youth Visions Art Gallery and copyright holder, and was granted permission to use these images on Wikipedia. I can have him also email a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to be archived as an official record. I have OTRS access and can verify it immediately. Will this be enough? -- OlEnglish (talk) 06:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note also that the students that created the mural have submitted their artwork to Marc Pelech via a Student Application Form in which they "grant permission to display their artwork for non-commercial, educational purposes only". -- OlEnglish (talk) 07:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission and non commercial only is not allowed on commons Natuur12 (talk) 18:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Uploader denies connection to the subject w:en:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cecil_Jay_Roberts Sintaku (talk) 00:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Also noted here w:en:User_talk:Cowhen1966#Cecil_Jay_Roberts. Uploader claims the file is his own work (in the copyright for the upload), however also claims he is not connected to the subject in the wikipedia AfD (linked above). Sintaku (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- I found a comment which says "So far, only assertions have been made. Even to the extent of naming the editor of this article as Mr Roberts himself. Now, that to me is libellous at best and defamatory to Mr Roberts. Auto biographical articles not allowed on Wikipedia." That could be taken as an assertion that he isn't the subject of the article and photo. I don't see where he says he has no connection to the subject. Am I not reading carefully enough? Rybec (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- I find it difficult to reconcile Cowhen1966's comments with anyone who had sufficient connection to have taken a photograph of the subject when they were young (bearing in my the image is claimed to be their own work). For example
I do not have a conflict of interest in this article. I am just a perfectionist and this would have been the first of a series of articles that I was going to seek to write about. Within the Christian arena there is something called the gospel of grace <snipped> me start to research current pastors who are talking about it. I was therefore going to research others as well. But I could not talk about this individual without making mention of other things that he is known for past and present.
- I found a comment which says "So far, only assertions have been made. Even to the extent of naming the editor of this article as Mr Roberts himself. Now, that to me is libellous at best and defamatory to Mr Roberts. Auto biographical articles not allowed on Wikipedia." That could be taken as an assertion that he isn't the subject of the article and photo. I don't see where he says he has no connection to the subject. Am I not reading carefully enough? Rybec (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- and
to other notable people from Ghana ranging from politicians, to education to culture etc, And here in the uk this pastor seems to have spearheaded this move via his tele-evangelist programme. I also checked Faith TV for the individual's name on their listings but could not find it.
- These all seem that the subject was simply someone they started researching recently and was perhaps aware of from their TV programmes, not someone they knew when the subject was younger (sufficiently to take this photo).
- However I may have read too much in to their repeated denial of any conflict of interest. (Although I was hoping they would nominate it themselves or at least comment here, something I'm not sure is going to happen.)
- I was thinking this implies they had never contacted Cecil Jay Roberts or someone associated with him. But in fairness, if they contacted them asking them to release images under a free licence this isn't actually uncommon and wouldn't normally be consider a COI (although most would disclose it to avoid confusion). So it's nominally possible the image has been released under the licence by the copyright holder based on contact by Cowhen and Cowhen has simply mistagged the image.
- Of course even if image has been released by the copyright holder, we would need confirmation of this via OTRS and we should change the licence to make it clear it isn't the work of Cowhen. Personally, if I AGF the user is telling the truth about having no COI, I think the much more likely possibility is they found the image somewhere (although I couldn't do so myself) and don't understand our copyright requirements.
- Either way, unless Cowhen1966 offers an explaination I think the image has to be deleted since they've raised sufficient doubts they are the copyright holder. Note that two previous images File:Cecil Jay Roberts 2.jpg and File:Cecil Jay Roberts 5.jpg have already been deleted. One was a photo from Cecil Jay Robert's profile which they claimed their own work, another a newspaper clipping which I can't remember what they claimed.
- Nil Einne (talk) 12:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- P.S. There was a suggesting the acting was in a semi public place [18], specifically Wikipedia:Osu Castle. But even if this is the case and the Cowhen didn't really know the subject even though they saw and took a photo of the subject when the subject was younger, it seems a bit confusing for Cowhen to never mention this anywhere considering all else they said hence why I never really considered it. Also the timelines of the claim don't seem to add up and the image looks to be in a more intimate setting suggesting this may have been a previous time. Nil Einne (talk) 13:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 07:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mascots of the 2014 Winter Olympics A.Savin 09:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Эм, фото идет под лицензией сайта Президента РФ, права на олимпийские символы принадлежат МОК и России, так как это их олимпиада и их символика, в чем проблема? Или выходит Президент РФ недостаточный вес имеет? Также выходит надо удалить вообще все символы всех олимпиад по такой логике... Опять же фото было сделано в общественном месте, на официальной церемонии закрытия Олимпиады 2014. Плюс, это механические костюмы, в которых находятся люди и управляют талисманами, а не игрушка. --Kodru (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Добавлю, на фото есть также люди и флаги государств или это не в счет? Можно сказать, что фото сделано на фоне символов, фотография людей, которые принимали участие в церемонии. Или людей тоже нельзя фотографировать? Здесь же фотография не только 3 символов игры, но и людей принимавших участие, целой церемонии, которая многим запомнилась и запомнится. Мне кажется нельзя так однобоко подходить, делается множество фотографий на фоне подобных предметов или если есть там человек, уже можно фотографию оставлять. Здесь же десятки и сотни людей. Вот сайт, где кратко написано из чего сделан мишка. Также я понимаю, что эти гигантские талисманы принадлежат России и сделаны были специально для шоу. --Kodru (talk) 10:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Мне кажется, что уже давно пора создать лицензию МОК, так как Олимпиады регулярно проводятся и талисманы нужны для иллюстрации статей, а также для наших потомков и истории. Мы же все создаем для будущих поколений. Ну или хотя бы для талисманов игр продумать лицензию, раз в два года проводятся игры, плюс еще и юношеские. --Kodru (talk) 10:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Все изображения на Викискладе должны быть разрешены и для коммерческого использования. COM:Licensing/ru. Сайт Кремля даёт такое разрешение только на свои фотографии, насчет прав создателей оригинальных скульптур, произведений искусства и пр. там не парятся. --A.Savin 19:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Мда уж... а если в МОК обратиться за разрешением или создать лицензию МОК, что они являются правообладателями всего, что связано с Олимпиадами... Ведь регулярно выходит сталкиваются с этой проблемой... Опять же талисманы на марках и монетах, если так подумать, тоже нарушают правила лицензии... В общем двоякая ситуация выходит, марки и монеты можно, а фото больших движущихся фигур во время церемонии нельзя, хотя, как я писал выше, там есть и люди. --Kodru (talk) 07:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Может Вы как один из Администраторов Викимедии выступите с инициативой создания лицензии МОК? Как раз вот для таких случаев, да и везде где символика Олимпиады его использовать. --Kodru (talk) 07:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Мда уж... а если в МОК обратиться за разрешением или создать лицензию МОК, что они являются правообладателями всего, что связано с Олимпиадами... Ведь регулярно выходит сталкиваются с этой проблемой... Опять же талисманы на марках и монетах, если так подумать, тоже нарушают правила лицензии... В общем двоякая ситуация выходит, марки и монеты можно, а фото больших движущихся фигур во время церемонии нельзя, хотя, как я писал выше, там есть и люди. --Kodru (talk) 07:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Все изображения на Викискладе должны быть разрешены и для коммерческого использования. COM:Licensing/ru. Сайт Кремля даёт такое разрешение только на свои фотографии, насчет прав создателей оригинальных скульптур, произведений искусства и пр. там не парятся. --A.Savin 19:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete no IOC licence for the mascots. LGA talkedits 08:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
I believe this photography is not copyright free. It is found on this site with the Purepeople logo : http://www.la-couronne.org/album/mgr-le-comte-de-paris/2/
Deleted: FASTILY 07:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Image appears to have been printed (halftoning), and has no metadata, which suggests this is not the own work of the user but a rephoto or scan from something else and a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, the image has been scaned. It was previously made by Jacek Ejsmond, my friend, who died recently, and who left this photo to me before he died. It was his old self-portrait. I am its owner nowadays. --Ciaszek (talk) 09:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 07:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
