User talk:Iflwlou

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Iflwlou!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)
Image deletion warning Image:Pochuetam.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Simon Shek 03:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Iflwlou!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Arnold_Bax.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 11:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Aaron_Copland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

24.189.173.67 13:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:RMS Titanic 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Эlcobbola talk 22:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikolai_Roslavets.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alban_Berg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:City seal of Taichung.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 13:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franz Schmidt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wang Jin Bao.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biligebatuer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fu ding.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Li Yu Zhi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lu Zhan Kui.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Barringer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chen Chong Hui in Tsinghua University.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chen Chong Hui.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:City seal of Tainan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:City seal of Kaohsiung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zhu Dan Hua.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tian Wen Lie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:William M Lang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lin Jie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlo Airoldi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sergei Lyapunov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bohuslav Martinů.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Warlock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard Adolf Zsigmondy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldry

[edit]

Hola!

Veo que usted está interesado en la heráldica eclesiástica. Hice el escudo de armas del cardenal John Baptist Wu Cheng-chung, pero no pude agregar los caracteres chinos que están junto a la paloma, esta es la imagen de la versión oficial del emblema. Si usted puede distinguir los caracteres de la versión oficial ¿podría por favor usted enviarme los caracteres chinos para luego ponerlos en el escudo?. No hablo ingles ni chino. (Online translation: Hello! I see you are interested in ecclesiastical heraldry. I made the coat of arms of Cardinal John Baptist Wu Cheng-chung, but I could not add Chinese characters that are next to the pigeon, this is the image of the official version of the emblem. If you can distinguish the characters from the official version. Could you please send me the Chinese characters to put on the coat?. I do not speak English or Chinese.) --SajoR (talk) 04:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Muchas gracias por la ayuda. Realmente no se como quitar ese cuadro negro, la única forma que conozco para solucionar ese problema es copiar y pegar el dibujo en un nuevo archivo. Acá puedes ver el archivo sin el cuadro negro, lo subí en Test.svg. Recomiendo que cuando usted suba un nuevo archivo, primero lo haga en Test.svg, especialmente si tiene texto, por alguna razón desconocida ese cuadro negro esta relacionado con el texto. (Online translation: Thank you very much for the help. I really do not know how to remove the black box, the only way I know to solve this problem is copy and paste the drawing in a new file. Here you can see the file without the black box, I got in Test.svg. I recommend when you upload a new file, first do it in Test.svg, especially if you have text, for some unknown reason that black box is related to the text.) --SajoR (talk) 22:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hola!. Analizando tus escudos de armas, me pregunto, ¿usted cuanto sabe de heráldica?, sinceramente tus escudos me confunden, por lo cual busqué las imágenes oficiales de algunos escudos para ver donde esta la incongruencia y me di cuenta que los colores de tus versiones no concuerdan con los colores de las versiones oficiales. Para la representación monocromática de los escudos (grabados, escultura, etcétera) los colores son representados por rayados convencionales. (Online translation: Hi. Analyzing your coats of arms, I wonder, do you know of heraldic?, Your shields honestly confuse me, so I searched the official images of some shields to see where this inconsistency and I noticed that the colors of your versions not match the colors of the official versions. For the monochromatic representation of the shields (prints, sculpture, etc.) the colors are represented by conventional scratched.)
Convención

Por ejemplo, esta es la imagen oficial del escudo de monseñor Francis Hsu Chen-Ping, y según la convención, el escudo se debe ver así, a no ser que usted tenga otras imágenes que indiquen lo contrario. (Online translation: For example, this is the official image of the shield of Bishop Francis Hsu Chen-Ping, and according to the Convention, the shield should look like this (I got to Test.SVG), unless you have other images that indicate the contrary.) --SajoR (talk) 07:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola!. Para salir de dudas pregunta lo que quieras. Sobre los diferentes tonos de azul, en la heráldica solo se usan dos tonos, el mas usado es el llamado "Azur", es uno de los principales colores heráldicos y su tono debe ser parecido como en la gráfica de arriba. El segundo es el llamado "Azul Cielo" variante del azur y es muy poco usado, su tono debe diferenciarse del azur y del blanco. En la heráldica no se debe usar dos o mas tonos del mismo color, acepto el azul cielo o cuando un escudo tiene algún elemento al natural, como por ejemplo un paisaje. No se debe abusar del termino al natural. Este escudo me tiene desconcertado, usa hasta 5 tonos de azul, ademas no entiendo porque el sombrero y las borlas son rojas, es un color exclusivo de los cardenales. Quiero dejar algo bien claro, los obispos y arzobispos tienen el sombrero y las borlas de color verde, no entiendo por que algunos obispos chinos tienen el sombrero y las borlas de otros colores, eso no existe en la heráldica eclesiástica.

Los emblemas heráldicos pueden entenderse como la reproducción de signos gráficos contenidos dentro de un contorno en forma de escudo. La heráldica es una serie de reglas establecidas hace varios siglos, que ayudan a entender y a diseñar escudos de armas. Te recomiendo que leas varios libros sobre heráldica para que entiendas mejor el tema. Para tu comodidad, los próximos mensajes los puedes dejar en ingles. --SajoR (talk) 09:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesante información, ahora entiendo. ¿esta variante de la heráldica eclesiástica en China se encuentra documentada en algún libro o pagina web? esta información debe aparecer en la enciclopedia y debe estar respaldada por alguna fuente confiable. También quiero saber si esta variante de la heráldica eclesiástica en China esta debidamente reglamentada o si cada obispo decide el color del sombrero. ¿Las cuerdas y borlas de color verde, también tienen el mismo significado que el sombrero verde?. (Online translation: Interesting information, I now understand. This ecclesiastical heraldry variant in China is documented in a book or website? this information should be in the encyclopedia and must be supported by a reliable source. I also want to know if this variant ecclesiastical heraldry China is properly regulated or if each bishop decides the color of the hat. The ropes and tassels of green also have the same meaning as the green hat?.) --SajoR (talk) 11:00, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Estoy enterado de la situación de la Iglesia Católica en China, solo Macao y Hong Kong tienen libertad religiosa. Ya es tradición que el obispo de Hong Kong sea nombrado cardenal, y Macao esta inmediatamente sujeta de la Santa Sede, no hace parte de ninguna provincia eclesiástica de China. Por el momento, sugiero que en los escudos de armas que has hecho, agregues una nota explicando que algunos obispos chinos por cuestiones culturales no usan el sombrero verde, es para evitar confusiones. También sugiero que leas todo lo que puedas sobre la heráldica, en especial la eclesiástica, así tendrás un mayor conocimiento del tema y a la hora de hacer un escudo podrás discernir correctamente, y si lo ve conveniente le haces algunas mejoras. Por ejemplo, está mal que los elementos internos salgan del escudo, como en el escudo del cardenal Joseph Zen Ze-kiun, donde el ancla y la Custodia salen del escudo, en mi versión todo quedo por dentro, como debe ser. (Online translation: I am aware of the situation of the Catholic Church in China, Macau and Hong Kong only have religious freedom. It is tradition that the bishop of Hong Kong is made ​​a cardinal, and Macao is immediately subject to the Holy See, is not part of any ecclesiastical province of China. For now, I suggest that in the coat of arms you've done, you add a note explaining that some Chinese bishops cultural issues do not use the green hat is to avoid confusion. I also suggest you read all you can about heraldry, especially ecclesiastical, and have a greater knowledge of the subject and the time to make a shield can discern correctly, and if it is convenient you make some improvements. For example, it is wrong for internal elements out of the shield, the shield as Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-kiun, where the anchor, and the Custody leave the shield, in my version, everything was left inside, as it should be.) --SajoR (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lo ideal es que los elementos internos del escudo queden dentro del escudo, todo debe quedar en el interior. Los ornamentos externos son secundarios, lo mas valioso es lo que está en el interior del escudo, cada elemento interno tiene su significado, que junto con los otros elementos forman un mensaje, por ejemplo los obispo de Hong Kong les gusta poner en sus escudos como referencia la ciudad y el mar, indicando la estrecha relación cultural e histórica de la ciudad con el mar, esto lo combinan con elementos culturales como un barco tradicional o la muralla, para indicar sus raíces chinas, junto con elementos religiosos. Al final todo forma un mensaje. Recomiendo que agregues una nota explicando que por cuestiones culturales, algunos obispos chinos no usan el sombrero verde, también agrega la dirección web que sirvió como fuente, como como en este ejemplo. (Online translation: the ideal is that the internal elements of the coat of arms are inside the shield, everything should be on the inside. External ornaments are secondary, the most valuable is what is on the inside of the shield, each inner element has its meaning, which along with the other elements form a message, for example the Bishops of Hong Kong like to put on their shields as a reference the city and the sea, indicating the close cultural and historical relationship of the city with sea, this combined it with elements such as a traditional boat or the wall, to indicate their Chinese roots, along with religious elements. In the end everything is a message.
I recommend you to add a note explaining that for cultural reasons, some Chinese bishops do not wear green hat, also add the web address that served as a source, as in this example.
) --SajoR (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola!

Felicitaciones, ya tienes muchos escudos, ha este ritmo terminaras muy pronto todos los escudos de obispos. Necesito tu ayuda, quiero hacer el escudo del cardenal Ignatius Kung Pin-Mei, pero necesito una imagen de la Basílica de Sheshan, como esta pero mucho mas grande, el templo tiene muchos detalles. También necesito una imagen de Nuestra Señora de Sheshan, como esta [1] pero mucho mas grande, la virgen y el niño tienen muchos detalles. Ayúdame por favor a encontrar imágenes grandes para poder hacer el escudo. Hice nuevas versiones de tres obispos chinos, si te gustan subelas: [2], [3], versión 1, versión 2.
(Online translation: Congratulations, you already have many shields, has this rate very soon end up all the shields of bishops. I need your help, I want to do the coat of arms of Cardinal Ignatius Kung Pin-Mei, but I need an image of the Basilica in Sheshan, like this but much more big, the temple has many details. Also I need an image of our Lady of Sheshan, like this [4] but much more great, the Virgin and the child have many details. Please help me to find large images to the shield. I made new versions of three Chinese bishops, if you like upload: [5], [6], versión 1, versión 2.). --SajoR (talk) 19:06, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abercrombie & Fitch Model 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Enrico Valtorta.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 22:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Andrew Yeom Soo Jung.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Video

[edit]

Hola!

Mira, hice un video de cómo hacer los escudos de armas. Como hay varios usuarios que piden consejos y el problema lingüístico, me decidí a hacer el video, una imagen en movimiento vale más que mil palabras. Véase especialmente la forma en que puse el texto en el pergamino.

Online translation:

Hello.

Look, I made a video of how to do the coats of arms. As there are several users asking for tips and the linguistic problem, I decided to make the video, a moving picture is worth more than thousand words. See especially how I put the text on parchment.

--SajoR (talk) 17:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms problem

[edit]

Hi Iflwlou!

I've noticed that you've been making SVG Simplified Ecclesiastical Heraldry. I just wanted to say that can you please stop extending or making the whole coat of arms wider. Please use the templates properly and don't make changed to the template. It makes it very unorganized. I've re-done the coat of arms you've made to make it more organized.

Thanks. John Ronn talk 14:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Commons LIcense Infringement

[edit]

As a person who loves the Creative Commons, I am disappointed to see someone who is such a copyright advocate infringe on the rights of the creative commons. I found http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007XVW50C/ infringing on your image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Female_model_A_04.JPG he does not cite you as the author and he also is not releasing his work in the creative commons as per your sharealike. I would hope that you request a DMCA takedown notice to Amazon to let him know that being a copyright bully means also obeying copyright.

Administrators' noticeboard post

[edit]

Please see here. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of Haikou.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Dolls are protected by copyright law. Yours sincerely, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, by the way. I made the same mistake too and had a number of my doll pictures deleted. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why I am concerned about your images

[edit]

First, I want tell you that I think you are a good editor. Please do not be upset with me. This is not personal. This is about files, not you. I am just trying to do what is best for the project.

Now, about your coats of arms images that you created. I see issues here:

1. The sources are sometimes blogs. Those may not be reliable sources.

2. Some sources show black and white. You made colour images from them. How did you know what colours to choose?

3. Some parts of the images are different from the source images. In some cases, the differences are great. What you have produced in some images seems very inaccurate.

Best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I has a litte bit upset, but not because of you, because I fight for long time have no results. You are a good editor too, although you are some style, I do not appreciate, I guess you have the same thought of me.

1. Because this sources is only sources I can found, and the blogs is maintained by Catholic priests.

2. Some colour is told by pattern provider, some reference by this.

3. How can I explain to you the concept of Heraldry in my pitifu English, no. I learning Heraldry from User:SajoR, you can ask him, if his say I make mistakes, so I make mistakes.--Iflwlou (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your coats of arms image creations

[edit]

Ping: Yann, Jmabel, Jeff G., Wikicology, Philg88, Underbar dk

Hi Iflwlou. I am posting here to engage you and others in a discussion about your coats of arms creations. The problem is that many are quite different from the source. Many sources are blogs. There may also be copyright issues.

These emblems now appear in a lot of articles. I do not want to see incorrect content in this Encyclopedia, whether it is text or imagery. I worry that, over time, these emblems will be used in more and more articles.

Here is an example:

The source is a blog. The emblem differs from the source in that the bishop's hat is different. The "L" thing to its right becomes a swirly thing.

Here is a list of the roughly 100 emblems. Many are sourced from non-blogs, so that is good.

Extended content

So, thoughts? Is the blog-sourcing a problem? Copyrights? The difference in appearance? Should this be ignored and we move on to other things. Should the blog-sourced ones be removed from articles, and a caveat added to the description? I just would like the community to help decide.

See also:

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • As I already said at the Village pump, "if the user is creating his/her own graphics and correctly following a blazon, that should usually be unproblematic." Two renderings of the same blazon will not look identical, and in fact if they were identical that would be a copyright problem. As I continued, "...I don't read Chinese... so if [the] references include a blazon, I can't read it. If the relevant part of the references are just the images, it's hard to determine whether these uploaded images faithfully follow the blazon, because just from one artist's representation of a coat of arms there is no way to know how specific the blazon may be (e.g. if it just says "bishop's mitre, goules" that leaves the artist a lot of latitude)." But offhand, the images I checked look like perfectly plausible renderings of the same blazons as the images referenced. - Jmabel ! talk 04:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anna, you say "The emblem differs from the source in that the bishop's hat is different. The "L" thing to its right becomes a swirly thing." It is very unlikely that the blazon is more specific than to specify a mitre (hat) and crozier (hook), their approximate location and orientation, and their color (in broad terms, e.g. "goules"). Different artists' renderings will inevitably differ. - Jmabel ! talk 04:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough Jmabel. Thank you. If you and the community think this matter should be dropped, I would be more than happy about that. I just wanted to be sure. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Its too far for my English ability, it's very difficult for me to understand this discussionsthis discussion at the village pump. It took me a whole day to understand. I'm sorry, but I still don't quite understand. Can anyone simply tell me what this discussions are about? --Iflwlou (talk) 15:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be about two things. (1) Whether your sources are reliable. (2) A point on which I think Anna was simply confused: two artists working from the same blazon will inevitably draw a coat of arms differently, and judging by her remarks she didn't know that. - Jmabel ! talk 16:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Jmabel. --Iflwlou (talk) 12:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Jmabel. Yes, I was confused. I understand now that #2 is not a problem. As for #1, I have responded about that below. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iflwlou, again, I am so sorry. And I am sorry that communication is so difficult.

I just tagged the following files with Template:Lacking insignia source. This is because the source was either a blog, a forum, wordpress, another questionable source, or own work.

If you can please find better references to show these emblems are correct, that would be wonderful.

Extended content

My input here is finished.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sagara Chotsuna.jpg

[edit]

Hello, Iflwlou. Is the person of the photo File:Sagara Chotsuna.jpg you uploaded is definitely Sagara Nagatsuna (zh:相良長綱) ? From the appearance and wearing medals, this person looks like Kabayama Sukenori (zh:樺山資紀, see also File:Count Mr. Sukenori Kabayama, the Minister of State for Education.jpg). The Elongated cloth hanging on this person's shoulder is for wearing 1st class of the Order of the Rising Sun (zh:勳一等旭日大綬章, see also File:UsgovrisingsunGC.jpg). However, medals given to Sagara when he was alive were lower than 4th class, and these were supposed to hang on the chest.--庚寅五月 (talk)

Thank you for your response. To rename, please add Template:Rename to the file like {{Rename|(new file name).jpg|1|misidentified}}.--庚寅五月 (talk)
I confirmed that the rename has already been done and a same photograph (image quality and the shape of frame are different) was published in Taiwan Taikan (臺灣大觀, Nihon Gōdō Tsūshin Sha, 1932) as Governor-general Kabayama.--庚寅五月 (talk)
Thank you for confirmed.--Iflwlou (talk) 18:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Flag of the City of Suzhou.svg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of the City of Suzhou.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 19:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Flag of Hong Kong (black and white; variant 1).svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Hong Kong (black and white; variant 1).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:40, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Simon Peter Poh Hoon Seng.svg

[edit]

Hi. Can you change this file to a new version? Here's the link -- https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Simon_Peter_Poh_Hoon_Seng.svg Archbishop Simon is an archbishop now. Thanks. Anne4321 (talk) 10:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Iflwlou. There's an ongoing discussion about licensing issues with Black Bauhinia flags, including File:Flag of Hong Kong (black and white; variant 2).svg. The file page credits you as the author, but I want confirmation from you on whether that's true. FunnyMath (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 05:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Paul Joseph Phạm Đình Tụng.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turtle-bienhoa (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:A camel drinking Coca-Cola 20050610.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apologies for not notifying you sooner; I didn't notice that the script notified the person who transferred the file to Commons, instead of you. Emufarmers (talk) 04:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matsudaira Kiyoyasu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2404:7A85:2360:BA00:9D6:2FEB:149C:3898 06:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]