Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain text decorated with a small number of not self-created images. Out of project scope, Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Contenido educativo excluido. The project to participate in writing articles is Wikipedia.

--Martin H. (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More

Martin H. (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans of various publications, most probably not own work.

Yann (talk) 11:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment They are not scans, but original works. That can be checked to see that they are not photographs but generated files directly to PDF format. You can check this by opening any of them. For original works upload, permission in OTRS is required? I need to read them all, but seem to be valid sources for Wikipedia articles. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But (important!) all say: "Edición limitada sin fines de lucro. Prohibida la reproducción." In English: "Limited Edition nonprofit. Do not reproduce." This contradicts the license CC-BY-SA. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If these are his own works, then they are out of scope. Yann (talk) 04:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My analysis
 Keep Biography of Fausto Eduardo Paredes Ortega, journalist, broadcaster and governor of the w:Cotopaxi Province, Ecuador. Is not an autobiography and maintains a neutral point of view. Useful source of information for future article w:Fausto Eduardo Paredes Ortega.
 Keep Article about w:Rumiñahui Canton, source very useful.
 Delete Curriculum Vitae
 Delete Brief history of the city of w:Quito, totally useless and a little promo of the author.
 Keep History of w:Latacunga. 41 pages extract a more complete work of 540, very useful.
 Keep History of w:Cotopaxi Province, brief but useful source.
 Keep Lacatunga city during the war of independence of Ecuador.
 Keep Book "Mitas" (2010), 2nd edition. Source about w:Mita (Inca) with images in public domain.
 Keep History of the broadcasting in Cotopaxi Province, useful.
 Keep Biography of w:Victoria Vasconez Cuvi (1891-1939), Ecuadorian writer.
 Keep More history and images in public domain.
 Keep History of w:Salcedo Canton, very useful.
 Keep Source about w:Tungurahua volcano, useful.
 Keep More history and images in public domain.
 Keep More history and images in public domain.

--Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 17:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles are maybe in scope of Wikipedia but out of scope of Wikimedia Commons. So File:FAUSTO EDUARDO PAREDES ORTEGA.pdf and other articles are not accepted here. For the rest: In absence of any source information or authorhip information and in absence of any evidence that a file is public domain we cant keep those. So Delete. If a file is PD we can also take it from the primary source, we not need it wrapped up in some trashy pdf. --Martin H. (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They are not articles, but publications that at the time were printed and the author now published under a CC license. Each correctly mentions the author, date of publication, and in some cases publishing and edition number. What I said is that these works are valid for use in Wikipedia and in some cases, very good quality sources. Also you can extract from them many images in the public domain, which can be displayed using just the page number of the file, instead of having to upload one by one. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:FAUSTO EDUARDO PAREDES ORTEGA.pdf is not a CV, is a brief biography (not autobiography). But you can not compare to that file with others, as they are very different. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If there is useful text, it should be copied to Wikipedia. Individual pictures created by the uploader should be uploaded to Commons in JPEG format. As these are not peer-reviewed publications, they can't be used as references for Wikipedia. As such they are out of scope for Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Out of scope. Peer articles/publications do not belong on Commons -FASTILY 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardo paredes ortega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per previous deletion requests, see here

Trijnsteltalk 16:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]