Commons:Deletion requests/User:111Alleskönner/Copyright tag
- Also related files: Special:PrefixIndex/User:111Alleskönner/Copyright tag
This is basically a non-free licence tag, and currently unused. This licence tag grants a "permission for Wikimedia", but other licence tags such as GFDL or CC-BY-SA also include a "permission for Wikimedia" (indirectly, since the tags include a "permission for anyone"), so it doesn't add anything to the other licences. Since it is an unfree licence, it would always have to be used together with a free licence such as GFDL or CC-BY-SA, but if used on a file information page, it would be confusing to reusers since it looks as if permission is required, although the permission requirement automatically is dropped by the other licence template (i.e. GFDL or CC-BY-SA). Thus, the licence tag would cause us nothing but trouble. Stefan4 (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep: This tag is currently in work and therefore it is unused. It would not have to be used together with another licence tag, so the argument with the "the licence tag would cause us nothing but trouble" is simply not true. --111Alleskönner (talk) 02:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- All files have to have at least one licence which has all of the following attributes:
- Anyone must be allowed to use the file for both commercial and non-commercial purposes.
- Anyone must be allowed to alter the file.
- Anyone who wishes to do either of the above shall be allowed to do that without having to notify anyone about this.
- Your licence doesn't have all of the above attributes, so I am afraid that it would indeed have to be used together with a different licence in all cases. --Stefan4 (talk) 08:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- All files? This does not seem to has one of these attributes... If Wikimedia uploads non-free pictures with the limitation to use it only inside the Wikimedia-projects, there can't be a problem by using this licence option as an "normal user", too. Pictures with this tag are copyrighted, but free to use inside the Wikimedia-projects (just like the Wikimedia-tag) - if Wikimedia is allowed to do so, they can't forbid their users to do the same. --111Alleskönner (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- There is an exception for Wikimedia logos for administrative purposes. Other images have to be available under a free licence, see {{Permission}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- All files? This does not seem to has one of these attributes... If Wikimedia uploads non-free pictures with the limitation to use it only inside the Wikimedia-projects, there can't be a problem by using this licence option as an "normal user", too. Pictures with this tag are copyrighted, but free to use inside the Wikimedia-projects (just like the Wikimedia-tag) - if Wikimedia is allowed to do so, they can't forbid their users to do the same. --111Alleskönner (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- All files have to have at least one licence which has all of the following attributes:
Deleted: This is effectively 111Alleskönner's sandbox and (s)he should have wide lattitude to experiment with template layout, etc. However, I caution 111Alleskönner that this template cannot be used in its present form, and all files on the Commons *must* meet the attributes listed by Stefan4. Even if this template were to be used with another license, I agree with Stefan4 that it would be inappropriately confusing and give users the wrong impression. This page is being kept solely because it is a work-in-progress, not because it could ever be used in its current form. Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/User:111Alleskönner/Copyright tag The Haz talk 20:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)