Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(6).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_-_November_14,2013_-_Muharram_10,1435_-_Main_Street_of_Nishapur_232.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free photographs. Eleassar (t/p) 11:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
_(6).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting as part of cleanup (per nom) russavia (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
_(6).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free map. Eleassar (t/p) 11:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting as part of cleanup (per nom) russavia (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
This file is obsolete and is not required. Dsroxx (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept, speedy keep, free licenses are irrevocable. The file has been in Commons 1½ years, it has proper license and big resolution. It illustrates well writing on sand. It has no categories, but I try to add some. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
It was uploaded without the correct release rights. Burkejt (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. JuTa 20:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but I failed to upload the picture due to the ".com" in the file name. SSYoung (talk) 11:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete The file exists at File:Seth Meyers, 2 May 2009, by PandamicPhoto.jpg, so this file information page is unneeded. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)- Delete per Stefan4's comments. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 07:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
ref. User talk:Sridharbsbu February 16 + 19, 2014, and before, as well as one of several duplicates uploaded by user, Roland zh (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität SuperJulietta (talk) 20:48, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete A bit low quality and maybe not notable person. --Kulmalukko (talk) 00:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
The person in the photo crop is not Menard, it is Laurie Hawn. Mr. Hawn's office contacted OTRS to request removal of the photo from Menard's article in en.wiki, but this image should be deleted as well since it is misleading and already seeding the error to search engines. ticket:2014021910019031 §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Surely that calls for renaming, not deletion? Geo Swan (talk) 14:22, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- I renamed the article. Geo Swan (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep the renamed version (which is still tagged for deletion & linked here, otherwise I wouldn’t have reason to comment).—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: renamed McZusatz (talk) 21:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
This is a press photo:https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitwvUMDVUwyHDYFdqC40XMEfgZCb6Jlx13o_1TvfFCeo-RdOwmbv1-BolEFv2D3I_1pttJsh3Tp5wiZ9ZwfY2T3aSeno_1YbMOYwFGR9AyN-zpuxDm50A21BStMRBaysvMnkz87X4hcFrUvMGLDGg22QEjREF_14loCwA_1q35Qk9NGjYl3t1R2zHBtgqVUs8swYV4XEfUuyI_1A_14D_162-7iIb_1i9no7yFM-SqzYn_1RK--9MxgJ8MRkX7CYvoFk0iB2OszAjt0JE5rgyMxT-_1LzUQ8F_10fYBjchsHg2L0aRh2dWFzMCOSG1-SDcRVWQycxk5jLuZH0METzao9QkxWJEUzpXhv96lej9NDPLuNjdYb_1qVXWX_1GdjS4wgZthmbj_1RwWWwXxWkT88tkCVVDPYr1ZzQ1RAB5Fq7S44Cg5bvgF_1ZfwOBBYvPQxYe27OnuVKPFnYISQPIPszcSsdG-eHu6CNrSxQbwnZ-OaM5YEqD7Oh_1kMvEinwjOkNqf2UhUjpBCx2U_1nZmN_1aM_1LO3OzwKRKq4FJj9gPbgh1Eo0KMMXhdu7XRWYgmVUJCd2V1Max60b0xobJytM1Me90zmPkeTkrElNc-Z_1PdBvwqnLpwrFqgwGiFRsQMuLu-XOeehL5lgcG1i_1_1BlM71NjcZOnC13ena1jtrovmQHUUoL9e3CfdHBq05CLGV4xas3uYz7SZEm417vwXyFW875hznQ-Tw7vcXt6_145uZeql_1O7Ap8Zfw_1fOyrjviY2L9jqdzdT9RWpTZeHyN0aE2wbm83D1hwXDTi1rcOuUDQzbhPxgnn96DmEqnO3mgxDys6TUt-YAU4E3P5xyD_1Uf28a3bQCMkt6nXWfL8Dku054B2wHI3edDSVlsaA28sPKO5wSCKNBj-qUtQDGNiAJN5bOMqCyYWWEX7Em9Jrw-LvEHZYA7SYfhlIGmRzTB4Fcri9RZv5hET4zasXXI6fn-T9saey8nI6pK3bd4wDn7oJ6D1yD3A6YOaDwXbaaku6XbvXMfJtwfMvgolX57jwjAsS_1EC-XxnunntQEkr0_1ZDffHuKOwmwbTrG7VWpq_1G8wxr5Gsx3bGYrWYiyu_16D1EXvk-YiU_1YPsYI7yU_1Q6mJfk3lepXehBSH671NblpmGv8k6UQmrfBILC3QdObasVoe7wpNVjXLuUCFX7-kcaxG7s1d-1q5SnsnZAFrgnGcRY8yuMrPQ0cOssRKc9gq8UfXYpvRZM3E7rs1m5oiYm46Vo6YAiqgI5RUZC0naJEduolrUHdwP8g5wkMQ32lemIdPQOSn9t_1afureftR8lsX6HGXq6pkfzGWjyhfP2uLomE&btnG=Search%20by%20image Puramyun31 (talk) 14:48, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Superior SVG exists, no use. Fry1989 eh? 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- It was a temporary stop-gap as far as I'm concerned, no objection... AnonMoos (talk) 21:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: See File:Flag-map_of_Libya.svg McZusatz (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Commons:SELFIE. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Clear copyvio. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Superior SVG exists, no use. Fry1989 eh? 21:16, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: See File:Flag map of Libya (1977-2011).svg McZusatz (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Clear copyvio. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Clear copyvio. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
10 non-free photos Sasha Krotov (talk) 23:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. --High Contrast (talk) 17:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
4 non-free photo. One of them[1] Sasha Krotov (talk) 23:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajitvermaak47 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HBO Lesterlyn Babor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos with little educational use per COM:EDUSE.
- File:HBO Lesterlyn Babor.JPG
- File:Lesterlyn Babor9.jpg
- File:Lesterlyn Babor 8.jpg
- File:Lesterlyn Babor 7.jpg
- File:Lesterlyn Babor 6.jpg
- File:Lesterlyn Babor 5.jpg
- File:Lesterlyn Babor 4.jpg
- File:Lesterlyn Babor 1.jpg
- File:Lesterlyn Babor 3.jpg
- File:Lesterlyn Babor 2.jpg
Green Giant (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Veneto Hotel Casino (talk · contribs)
[edit]promotional, out of scope, copyvio http://www.booking.com/hotel/pa/veneto-a-wyndham-grand.de.html
- File:Hotel veneto vip.jpg
- File:Buffet de bodas 2.jpg
- File:SALON vbar de rumbas.jpg
- File:SPA1.jpg
- File:SPA RECEPTION.jpg
- File:RECEPCION.jpg
- File:SALA DE BELLEZA.jpg
- File:POOL COCKTAIL.jpg
- File:MAQUINITAS7.jpg
- File:Maquinitas.jpg
- File:Habitaciones 2.jpg
- File:Habitaciones 1.jpg
- File:VIP Salon.jpg
- File:Salon Conferencia.jpg
- File:VBar.jpg
- File:Buffet 5.jpg
- File:Buffet 4.jpg
- File:Buffet 3.jpg
- File:Buffet bodas.jpg
- File:POOL2.jpg
- File:Piscina del Veneto.jpg
- File:Veneto Logo.png
Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bionicbuun (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:AdulSmileCaptureSmall.jpg
- File:AdulSmileSmallCapture..jpg
- File:AdulSmile.jpg
- File:SmallAdulSmile.キャプチャー有り.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thistrackted (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolution of the photos, the missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's track record.
- File:Gabriel Naouri.jpg – taken with a Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro on 2011-01-26.
- File:Guillaume Poitrinal.JPG – missing metadata.
- File:Xavier Bout de Marnhac.png – missing metadata.
- File:Laure Debreuil.jpg – low resolution photo without metadata. Previously published at http://www.metronews.fr/debats/michel-mercier-un-ministre-en-terrain-mine/mjko!fktsvbXmST5B2/ (upscaled from approximately the same resolution).
- File:Nicolas Princen.jpg – taken with a Canon EOS-1D on 2000-02-20. Previously published (albeit in lower resolution) at https://plus.google.com/photos/100052607540984681964/albums/5830711668109481937/5830711617753290050?pid=5830711617753290050&oid=100052607540984681964 and http://2011.leweb.co/2011/nicolas-princen.
- File:Walter Iooss.jpg – scanned with a Nikon LS 9000 slide and film scanner on 2005-08-11. Previously published in this resolution at http://lukes-photo-blog.blogspot.com/2011/04/walter-iooss.html and in lower resolution at http://allfamousphotographers.blogspot.com/2011/05/famous-sports-photographers.html.
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajeetbindki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. The photos are obviously old, but we don't know whether the photos are published or not. Unclear when the maps were made or published.
- File:Figure 7ab.JPG
- File:Figure 18a.JPG
- File:Figure 17a.JPG
- File:Figure 16a.JPG
- File:Figure 15a.JPG
- File:Figure 13a.JPG
- File:Figure 12a.JPG
- File:Figure 11a.JPG
- File:Figure 8a.JPG
- File:Figure 10a.JPG
- File:Figure 9a.JPG
- File:Figure 5a.JPG
- File:Figure 6a.JPG
- File:Figure 4a.JPG
- File:Figure 24.JPG
- File:Figure 23.JPG
- File:Figure IV-10.JPG
- File:Figure 20.JPG
- File:Figure 21.JPG
- File:Figure 22.JPG
- File:Figure 19.JPG
- File:Figure 14.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted characters.
- File:Skullberry.svg
- File:Skull Boy on the street.svg
- File:Pinkie's vector.svg.2013 10 17 10 09 37.0.svg
- File:Parchment Scribble.svg
- File:Coloring page 1.svg
- File:Ruby's wedding dress.svg
- File:Skullboy's wedding tux.svg
- File:Scarface (Pony).svg
- File:Puzzler.xcf
- File:Party Pop.svg.2013 10 17 11 49 38.0.svg
- File:Brony resource for the artistically impaired.png
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
User own art, not used, out of scope.
- File:Winged Lion.svg
- File:Element Chronicle.svg
- File:Mountain scene vector.svg
- File:Slenderman in his natural habitat.svg
- File:Freedom.svg
- File:The Cloudfire amulet.svg
- File:Skull Boy base.svg
- File:The reckoning (Stormy Daze).svg
- File:Stormy Daze coloring page.svg
- File:Atom Split.svg
- File:Darkwings.svg
- File:Splits (Stormy Daze).svg
- File:Stormy Daze.svg
- File:Heart-tato.svg
- File:Equestrian flag.svg
- File:Doom Kitty.svg
- File:Pewdiepie x Bro-ny.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please file a separate DR for the remaining McZusatz (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:6 Varios modelos MK (a,b,c,d,e,f).jpg
- File:MK grande Negro, Bronce , PLateado y Dorado modelo 0011.jpg
- File:MK grande Dorado , PLateado, y Bronce modelo 0011.jpg
- File:MICHAEL KORS PLATA modelo 0010.jpg
- File:MK bronce modelo 009.jpg
- File:MICHAEL KORS bronce modelo 0008.jpg
- File:MK bronce modelo 007.jpg
- File:Fucsia MK -Dorado de Goma modelo 005.JPG
- File:MK dorado modelo 006.JPG
- File:Azul-Bronce de Goma modelo 004.JPG
- File:Dorado MICHAEL KORS modelo 002.JPG
- File:Negro-Dorado de Goma modelo 003.JPG
- File:Dorado MK modelo 001.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by similar, clearer image File:Amin al-Islami House at Night - 7-3-2013 - Nishapur 10.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
the logo of prosche has been designed in the 1950's by Ferdinand Porsche, who died in 1998 80.215.133.70 12:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. Superseded by similar, clearer image File:Amin al-Islami House at Night - 7-3-2013 - Nishapur 10.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. On the other hand better image (face shown better) of this person exists File:Blue clothed little cyclist boy - cycling near Nishapur railway station 10.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. If we want to keep an image of this person, let's keep the better one (face shown better): File:Blue clothed little cyclist boy - cycling near Nishapur railway station 10.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. If we want to keep one image of this person, let's keep the better photo (face shown better): File:Blue clothed little cyclist boy - cycling near Nishapur railway station 10.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Dramatic (Shabih) - November 14,2013 - Muharram 10,1435 - Main Street of Nishapur 232.JPG
[edit]_-_November_14,2013_-_Muharram_10,1435_-_Main_Street_of_Nishapur_232.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_November_14,2013_-_Muharram_10,1435_-_Main_Street_of_Nishapur_232.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo is not focused anywhere. Better image of the same horse walking on the same street (without of the man with grey jacket) is File:Dramatic (Shabih) - November 14,2013 - Muharram 10,1435 - Main Street of Nishapur 233.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
_-_November_14,2013_-_Muharram_10,1435_-_Main_Street_of_Nishapur_233.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This image is elsewhere on the internet, and uploaded by a drive-by new account. Doubtful authorship claims. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by similar, a bit better straightened image File:Planetarium of Omar Khayyam - Nishapur 12.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant, almost identical image is File:Snapshots of Bazaar of Nishapur 23 02.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image (maybe a bit better straightened) is File:Planetarium of Omar Khayyam - Nishapur 47.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit blurred. Superseded by similar, less blurred photo: File:Snapshots of Bazaar of Nishapur 19.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
see w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sean Brisbon Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Ruins of an Old brick thatch house - North Qavvani ave - near Al-Reza Mosque - Nishapur 03.JPG
[edit]
A bit blurred. Superseded by almost similar image (the details are clearer shown): File:Ruins of an Old brick thatch house - North Qavvani ave - near Al-Reza Mosque - Nishapur 02.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar view (maybe a bit better focused) is File:Snapshots of Ferdowsi st of Nishapur 02.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
No educational value per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Stephanie BowmakerHer face is swollen, her left eye badly bruised and her lips bloodied---These were the appalling injuries inflicted when Stephanie Hewson was battered in a sex attack---The assault was so vio 2014-02-06 23-05.jpg
[edit]
As touching as this is, it may be out of the project scope. We also have issues regarding Commons:Personality rights. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit blurred. Superseded by clearer image File:Watermelon - Fruit Bazaar - near Besat sq - Nishapur 01.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Wrong licence, this is not a two dimensional artwork, we need a free licence from the photographer. Ras67 (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Photographer is me :). I'll change the license and the problem disappears :).--Хомелка (talk) 07:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Thank you! --Ras67 (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 09:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Blurred. A bit less blurred image of the same object is File:Zarih of Mohammad al Mahruq Mosque - Nishapur 04.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit blurred. Superseded by similar, clearer image File:Wooden door of a store - Bazaar of Nishapur 2.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Wrong licence, this is not a two dimensional artwork, we need a free licence from the photographer. Ras67 (talk) 00:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Photographer is me :). I'll change the license and the problem disappears :).--Хомелка (talk) 07:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Thank you! --Ras67 (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 09:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files violate the "no advertising/self-promotion" policy. Perhaps a few images are keep-able, but only if the the promotional watermark is removed.
- File:Chunky Necklace.JPG
- File:Mistika Floor Mirror by Jojo Vito Designs Gallery.jpg
- File:"Sunburst".jpg
- File:Mistika Lamp.jpg
- File:"Capriciosa",.jpg
- File:"Tropika" Mask.JPG
- File:Group of Masks by Jojo Vito Designs gallery.jpg
- File:Decorative Mask by Jojo Vito Designs Gallery.jpg
- File:Entrance of Jojo Vito Designs Gallery.jpg
- File:Jojo Vito Designs Gallery Entrance.jpg
- File:Jojo Vito Designs Gallery.jpg
Senator2029 (talk) 12:48, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Configured with multiple sources/authors = permission from "www.carburando.com" and "Campeones.net/Daniel Girala" needed. File:Franco3.jpg cropped from (example) http://americancrumpet.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/n639422127_382252_646.jpg.
Gunnex (talk) 12:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marianoguarino76 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering mass copyvio via User talk:Marianoguarino76. File:María Eugenia Vidal.jpg: permission from - per exif - photographer "Estudio Sisso Chouela" needed and used in several social sites (like Flickr and Facebook. File:Hector Baldassi.jpg grabbed - as some other copyvios - somewhere from Facebook and circulating since 2010. File:Pablo Canda editando Wikipedia.jpg = out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 12:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Galatà Maria Grazia (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user files
91.64.241.57 08:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Spam (food) 1
[edit]See COM:PACKAGING and COM:TOYS.
- File:Pecan Street Festival.jpg
- File:Spam (2848174803).jpg
- File:Spam 2.jpg
- File:Spam figure.jpg
- File:Spam spread snack kit.jpg
- File:Spam with cans.jpeg
- File:SpamInACan.jpg
- File:The Spam-mobile.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- The fotografic part on the spam-box of File:Spam 2.jpg was pixelised by intent. The Rest is IMHO pure Textlogo and ineligible. Keep. compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spam 2.jpg --JuTa 08:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- While considering this specific category, the following additional images may also be problematic:
- File:Champ_luncheon_loaf.jpg
- File:HK Sheung Wan Parkn Shop goods canned 梅林牌 Ma Ling B2 午餐肉 Pork luncheon meat Aug-2013.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan Parkn Shop goods canned 午餐肉 Pork luncheon meat 三花 Tulip 楊崢Vanessa Yeung Aug-2013.JPG
- File:HKCEC WC HKTDC Food Expo 2009 DKSH SH Maling B2 Canned Luncheon Meat.JPG (the labels are not that easy to read)
- File:MikeWallace1997Pocono.jpg (the "SPAM" may be a case of PD-textlogo)
- File:Spam_Jam_2009.jpg (see COM:COSTUME)
- File:Spam_wall.jpg
- For the following images, it seems that COM:DM might apply although it is not clear:
- --Gazebo (talk) 02:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: one kept as ok, rest deleted. FASTILY 09:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Spam (food) 2
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.
- File:7483Foods deli of Bulacan 03.jpg
- File:Nelo's Food re... (11867027443).jpg
- File:Pumpkin Spice Spam.jpg
- File:Replenished. Thanks for the hookup, @jasminemurcia! -SPAM -tocino -Filipino (15858719100).jpg
- File:Spam bacon flavored (30837143230).jpg
- File:Spammers ARE Turkies (5911153146).jpg
- File:Teriyaki SPAM, now at your local Costco (at least in the Bay). IMHO, the Tocino SPAM is way better. Wish that was still available in the States. (15655794115).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._IMHO,_the_Tocino_SPAM_is_way_better._Wish_that_was_still_available_in_the_States._(15655794115).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ƏXPLICIT 05:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; actually, I just kept these for memories sake since these were given to me as token by my sibbling, respectfully submitted and very sincerely yours Judgefloro (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Seals of Arunachal Pradesh
[edit]How exactly is this in the public domain because of age? The copyright term in India is 60 years from publication and the copyright term in the United States is 95 years from publication. w:Arunachal Pradesh tells that the state was established in 1987, which is less than 60 years ago.
Stefan4 (talk) 00:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - not a problem will move to WP for non-free use - FOX 52 (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note that some of the Wikipedias which use this image do not accept non-free files, or local files at all for that matter. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Replaced in all instances with appropriate SVG files conforming to the location map scheme.
- File:Alagoas MicroAlagoanaDoSertaoDoSaoFrancisco maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroArapiraca maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroBatalha maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroLitoralNorteAlagoano maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroMaceio maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroMataAlagoana maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroPalmeiraDosIndios maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroPenedo maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroSantanaDoIpanema maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroSaoMiguelDosCampos maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroSerranaDoSertaoAlagoano maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroSerranaDosQuilombos maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MicroTraipu maploc.png
Mahir256 (talk) 02:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Superior SVG exists, no use. Fry1989 eh? 21:16, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 13:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
blurry personal image, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This is definitely advertising, which is out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement; is not a free image Escudero (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes, Bufod is probanly copyrighted Natuur12 (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Ramón Sánchez Martos es un estudiante de la facultad de Farmacia de Granada, conocido por ser organizador de eventos en la misma capital con su empresa de eventos Martollini S-A- 2014-01-09 14-55.jpg
[edit]
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 12:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
ref. User talk:Sridharbsbu February 16 + 19, 2014, and before, as well as one of several duplicates uploaded by user, Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:With a garbled caption, from A New and Complete System of Universal Geography, published by Thomas Kelly, London.jpg
[edit]
ref. User talk:Sridharbsbu February 16 + 19, 2014, and before, as well as one of several duplicates uploaded by user, Roland zh (talk) 19:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep treat the file on its merits. Not exact duplicate, colouration and quality of file different, can co-exist. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
ref. User talk:Sridharbsbu February 16 + 19, 2014, and before, as well as one of several duplicates uploaded by user, Roland zh (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep judge the file on its merits. Colouration different, sufficient difference to retain — billinghurst sDrewth 11:27, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Sutteeism on the Banks of the Ganges--Preparing for the Immolation of a Hindoo Widow, from vol. 3 of 'The Indian Empire' by Robert Montgomery Martin, c.1860.jpg
[edit]
ref. User talk:Sridharbsbu February 16 + 19, 2014, and before, as well as one of several duplicates uploaded by user, Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep the reason for deletion is nonsensical. Treat the image on its merits, it is education and out of copyright. The colouration is different, it is reasonable to keep it. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
ref. User talk:Sridharbsbu February 16 + 19, 2014, and before, as well as one of several duplicates uploaded by user, Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Very poor quality. Also, the image infringes on the copyright of the tickets. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
First of all, sorry for my basic english, I am Uruguayan. I really do not know that the tickets have copyright. if so, I understand that this picture may be deleted. Moreover, I do not think that the issue of the quality of the photo is important in deciding whether this photo should be removed or not. --Laln93 (talk) 21:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Before deleting this picture, would not be better to find out if really infringes on the copyright of the tickets? --Laln93 (talk) 17:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The desing on these tickets is copyrighted and com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Andoni Sesen es el puto amo rapeando, esque no hay palabras para describirle- Es un tio al que todos envidian- 2014-02-19 22-34.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
advertising, unused 91.64.241.57 14:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Professional work, small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This file is missing evidence of permission. The painter died in 2008, there is no proof that the copyrightholder(s) agreed to license the file under the given license. Ronn (talk) 09:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, cropped from (example) http://www.salta21.com/IMG/arton1946.jpg Gunnex (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
blurry, personal picture, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP/User talk:ProgFilozof: 3 uploads = 2 copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 11:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
small size, no EXIF 91.64.241.57 07:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
uploader is not the author 91.64.241.57 14:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
movieposter from a one-upload-account 91.64.241.57 07:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This file is missing evidence of permission. The painter died in 2008, there is no proof that the copyrightholder(s) agreed to license the file under the given license. Ronn (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.64.241.57 14:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This file is missing evidence of permission. The painter died in 2008, there is no proof that the copyrightholder(s) agreed to license the file under the given license. Ronn (talk) 09:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This file is missing evidence of permission. The painter died in 2008, there is no proof that the copyrightholder(s) agreed to license the file under the given license. Ronn (talk) 09:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This file is missing evidence of permission. The painter died in 2008, there is no proof that the copyrightholder(s) agreed to license the file under the given license. Ronn (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://www.yann-unhommebio.fr/wa_91_p/pa_24huzk16xnnkwbmu/big__MG_8869.jpg?2dtadshrt0ffbk Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Very bad quality, not used, out of scope. Also looks like a screenshot. Yann (talk) 16:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 19:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Source is dead, no indication that the image was ever released under a copyleft license — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Iam Mr- Hemlal mainaly from Ferderal Republic of Germany--Present Address--Heidekreis District-Niedersachsen State, Germany---Address in Bhutan- -Tshring Dzongkhag-Tishrang Dara Dungkhag- -Dallani Gewog--Studied at Tri 2013-05-26 11-02.jpeg
[edit]
out of scope Jarekt (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
self-promotion Fixertool (talk) 04:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
photo has no permission from its original author and was uploaded by someone else unless we have proper documentation we can't use this image Dman41689 (talk) 07:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Ridiculously low resolution, to the point of being unuseable, and quite possibly a copyright vio (web resolution, no exif data) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
self-promotion Fixertool (talk) 03:48, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Dubious claim of authorship; appears copied from this 1996 article with no sign of claimed authorship NatGertler (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Нет официального разрешения на использование данного логотипа от журнала Dogad75 (talk) 20:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- По данному вопросу я уже обращалась в редакцию журнала "Музыка и время". Со стороны редакции было дано согласие на использование Логотипа журнала в Википедии. Вот содержание этого письма из Редакции:
«Уважаемый(ая) Lightfairy! В качестве иллюстрации логотип объектом авторского права не является. Используйте, пожалуйста! С уважением, редакция.» (Музыка и время <music@tgizd.ru> Кому: "Lightfairy Lightfairy" <lightfairy9@mail.ru> Дата: Чт 16 июн 2011 16:57:15)
Но на мою просьбу прислать официальное разрешение Редакция, видимо, так и не отреагировала. Если кто-то возьмётся этот вопрос урегулировать, то я буду рада, а в остальном оставляю судьбу этого файла на Ваше усмотрение. Спасибо! С уважением, -- Lightfairy (talk) 20:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Боюсь, как PD-trivial логотип не пройдёт. Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This file is missing evidence of permission. The painter died in 2008, there is no proof that the copyrightholder(s) agreed to license the file under the given license. Ronn (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Not acceptable according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 15:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
upload mix up with https://secure.flickr.com/photos/milbot79/6445243763/ . sorry! Atlasowa (talk) 09:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MrMiteshSanghvi). MER-C 11:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope → personal photos/snapshots Senator2029 (talk) 11:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete: it's also a derivative work because of the statue at the left. Rybec (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://www.yann-unhommebio.fr/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Нет разрешения на свободное использование файла http://motor-roller.su Dogad75 (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 11:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence that the logo is free. Eleassar (t/p) 12:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 12:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This photo is missing evidence of permission. There is no proof that the photographer agreed to license the photo under the given license. Ronn (talk) 09:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING. Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Not acceptable according PD-Text/Logo Aga (d) 20:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1985, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2080 (+95 years).
Nominating also the related crop:
Gunnex (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: According to clarification of the legal, we are waiting for a takedown notice Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
SVG exists, no use. Fry1989 eh? 04:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Old image, wrong date, not used, no source, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Ugly map with some mistakes, substituted by a svg version (File:Karte der S-Bahn Magdeburg.svg). I'm the author of both Friedrichstrasse (talk) 11:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Implausible that a supposedly official photo of a British politician would be a work of the United States government. January (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 11:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep sorry, there was another photo which is used in en:Quinton Flynn, so it seems to be him. I renamed the files. --Indeedous (talk) 12:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 20:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, lack of metadata, and the fact that all other files uploaded by this user have been blatant copyright violations. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Pictures and drawings of Nepalese personalities, most probably not own works, wrong date, no source, no permission, bogus license. Suharto died in 2008, so the date is wrong too.
- File:Ratna Shumsher JBR.jpg
- File:Rom Bahadur Thapa potrait.jpg
- File:Durlav Kumar Thapa potrait.jpg
- File:Nar Shumsher JBR young.jpg
- File:Nar Shumsher JBR.jpg
- File:Crown Prince Dipendra Shah of Nepal.jpg
- File:Nepal Police Flying Squad.jpg
- File:I.G.P. Khadgajeet Baral (fourth from right) observing the inauguration of the Nepal Police Flying Squad..JPG
- File:K.J.S. Baral with late President Suharto after presenting the credentials..JPG
_observing_the_inauguration_of_the_Nepal_Police_Flying_Squad..JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, and I'd also add File:I.G.P. K.J.S. Baral being greeted by police officers at the Tribhuwan Airport..JPG, File:I.G.P. Baral at his office in the Police Headquarters..JPG and File:I.G.P. Baral talking with the then Valley chief D.B. Lama (first from right) at the Tribhuwan Airport..JPG. The date of birth of the subject and his apparent age in the photos are not consistent with the camera and date of creation indicated by the metadata, so these are obviously photos of pre-existing photos. Based on the upload habits and the camera used, I'm guessing PurNep = Dblama. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
_at_the_Tribhuwan_Airport..JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- It's not causing me any problems, but your uploading of copyright violations creates legal risks to you, to Commons, and to reusers of the content. What I mean by PurNep = Dblama is that I have reason to believe that you are abusing multiple accounts to upload copyright violations. Snubssulky appears to be another sockpuppet of yours. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Dear LX,
- I have never and am not using additional accounts on Commons, Snubssulky and Dblama are not my 'sockpuppets'; I only have one account, i.e. PurNep. Please reconsider your decision to delete the above mentioned files; I would like to request for some more time to provide Yann with the permission for uploading the above mentioned files. Please respond to the message I have left on my talk page.
- Thanks, regards
- —PurNep (talk) 12:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- I've seen the message on your talk page. The decision to delete or not is not mine to make, but at this time, I'm not satisfied that you are the author and copyright holder of all the works for which you have claimed authorship and copyright, and I find it extremely difficult to believe that the similarities in your editing habits on English Wikipedia and your uploads here and the fact that you use the same camera are coincidental. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 11:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
This photo is missing evidence of permission. There is no proof that the photographer agreed to license the photo under the given license. Ronn (talk) 09:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Invalid use of {{PD-old-100}}: not a 2D artwork Fantes 007 (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Though Narendra Modi has many caricatures used in print and other medias, this one is not any notable. Its un-encyclopedic fan art. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Though Karunanidhi has many caricatures used in print and other medias, this one is not any notable. Its un-encyclopedic fan art. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
A bit blurred. Superseded by almost similar (sharper) image File:Bags - wall of Grand Mosque of Nishapur 1.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Superior SVG exists, no use. Fry1989 eh? 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Deletion is only for the violation of copyrights, "Superior SVG exists" are not a good reason. Moreover, when I made this file in 2009, this was the first file using the flag of Kingdom of Libya on the map of Libya, before the flag itself was adopted as the official flag of Libya in 2011!!!!!!!!--Maher27777 (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- That's not true at all. Files get deleted every day because a superior SVG exists. Do you want me to link you a few dozen DRs? Also, the flag of the Kingdom of Libya and the current flag of Libya are exactly the same, as are the territorial borders. They're the same image. Fry1989 eh? 18:35, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: What FRY says is true, but unfortunate and contrary to policy, which says we keep pre-existing raster versions. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Ruins of an Old brick thatch house - North Qavvani ave - near Al-Reza Mosque - Nishapur 68.JPG
[edit]
A bit blurred. Superseded by similar image (clearer): File:Ruins of an Old brick thatch house - North Qavvani ave - near Al-Reza Mosque - Nishapur 69.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep: Invalid use of {{PD-old-70}}: relief is not a 2D artwork Fantes 007 (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Photographer was Eugène Druet (d. 1916). Fantes 007 (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. This work is in the public domain in its source country. It need not be 2-D artwork. This is a photograph of the work shot by an unknown or anonymous photographer that was published in Fechter, Paul, Der expressionismus; mit 50 abbildungen ... 5. bis 9. tausend 1920. See here. Paul Gauguin died in 1903 (over 110 years ago), so this is PD-old-100, just as all the other works by Gauguin now in Commons. Coldcreation (talk) 06:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- I have just modified the tag to PD-old-100. There is now no problem in keeping this file in Commons. Coldcreation (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- The point is that the photographer' estate might have had rights. But I see from your link that the photographer was Eugène Druet who died in 1916, so it's out of copyright. Can I ask you to upload the relevant tag please? You might like to know there are a couple of very nice free-to-use images on Sharon Mollerus' Flickr photostream here and here. The licenses are cc-by-2.0, which is Commons compliant. See here how to download Flickr files if you need help. Or if not you perhaps someone else can pick up on it. Please credit Sharon, perhaps message her. Thank you. Fantes 007 (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lufsig
[edit]Derivative work of non-free wolf.
- File:2014 Hong Kong new year march 07.jpg
- File:2014 Hong Kong new year march 08.jpg
- File:2014 Hong Kong new year march 09.jpg
- File:Lufsig 1.jpg
- File:Lufsig 2.jpg
- File:Lufsig 3.jpg
- File:Lufsig 4.jpg
- File:Lufsig 5.jpg
- File:Lufsig 6.jpg
- File:Lufsig 7.jpg
- File:Lufsig@ikea2013.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 22:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note that File:2014 Hong Kong new year march 09.jpg is the photograph of a costume and might be kept as per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Costumes and cosplay (although consensus on the matter is obliously not clear). Millevache (talk) 01:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- There have been a couple of cases where Swedish courts have found that clothes have been copyrighted by the tailor (see for example this case about a copyrighted knitted tunic). The clothes are a derivative work of a Swedish toy, and per Commons policy, the photo needs to be free to use in the source country of the toy, so the question is whether these clothes are copyrighted in Sweden. I would say that these clothes potentially are copyrightable in Sweden, but it's a bit unclear, and there are not that many cases about copyrighted clothes. Also, there have not been any cases about photos of copyrighted clothes, only cases where someone has produced substantially similar clothes. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Clothes are utilitarian and therefore not copyrightable in most countries (except Sweden, apparently), but the wolf's head makes this a costume, not utilitarian, and therefore clearly copyrightable. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
How is this in the public domain because of age? According to w:Andhra Pradesh, the state was established in 1956. If the seal was made after the state was established, then the seal doesn't satisfy the term of 60 years from publication in {{PD-India}}, and it is in that case also {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Stefan4 (talk) 00:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Redundant, almost similar image already exists: File:Tree - Jalale ale Ahmad st - Nishapur 2.JPG. (The difference between these photos is not remarkable.) Kulmalukko (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of a document. Stefan4 (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Invalid use of {{PD-old-100}}: relief not a 2D artwork Fantes 007 (talk) 05:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC) File now has a valid license. Fantes 007 (talk) 09:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- I took this picture myself so I changed the license accordingly. Ji-Elle (talk) 05:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- 007 should have better things to do... artist died in 1903, picture was taken by uploader. Close the case. --Edelseider (talk) 07:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- The file didn't have a valid license for the photograph. It said it was a 2D artwork. It's not. Fantes 007 (talk) 09:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
The book covers are almost certainly copyrighted Snowmanradio (talk) 21:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Have tried making it more non-substantial. Would showing only the spines be ok by Commons:De minimis? Shyamal (talk) 09:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think that the image now in the file history would need deleting together with the new image uploaded over the top of the old image. Snowmanradio (talk) 12:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No, a picutre of the spines would not be acceptable since the spines contain more than just text. DM applies only if A appears incidently in a photograph that is mainly B and B has no copyright. If the photograph contains only A, B, C, D, E... and all of them are copyrighted then DM cannot apply, even if there are tens of objects in the photo. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Generally misleading title and not correct nowadays. I provided the correct modern version. --Крушевљанин Иван (talk) 02:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think, this file is more interesting for Non-Serbians than for Serbians. Therefore a title in English is more helpful than a title in Serbian. Many people don't know that Cyrillic alphabet has special versions for almost every language it is used for. But to anybody who knows this fact, the title "Serbian writing" explains with few words that this file shows the (or a) Serbian version of Cyrillic writing. There fore my vote is keep this flie with this title.--Ulamm (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete — This title, "Serbian writing" is now misleading, incorrect — image shows outdated Serbian Cyrillic, around year 1900. So I renamed this to proper title like "Serbian writing style around 1900, now partially incorrect.png". Titles like "Serbian writing" are highly generic, and, in this particular case, now outdated/incorrect. I have provided correct modern version for Serbian Cyrillic alphabet with description in several languages (English included, of course), so that's why I want this outdated/incorrect title to be deleted. It's about correctness. --Крушевљанин Иван (talk) 01:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Each file has space for a description. If User:Крушевљанин Иван complains that that style of writing is a bit out of date, the title ought to be File:Serbian writing 1900. The description can tell that the compilation is outdated and which forms are out of use nowadays.
- As Serbs have learnt their actual script alt scool, also the title of the graphic file showing the actual script ought to get a title understandable for Non-Serbians.
- Both changes are nowadays possile by a move legitimzed by reasons.--Ulamm (talk) 08:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no need to delete Denniss (talk) 14:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Complicated, Korean Justice Party seems not provided their logo in CC0. No permission, or copyvio. —레비Revi 02:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I doubt that the flickr user is the photographer. The photo is taken with a Nikon D700, the only other photos of modells come from a large number of different other cameras and ([2]) contain names of other photographers in the EXIF. Apparently the flickr user is collecting photos he found on the web. --Martin H. (talk) 07:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Includes File:Anastasiya Barashkova.jpg. The third photo we have from that flickr user is File:Vasily Klyukin & Anna Vishnevskaya.jpg, the strange source description there makes me wonder if there is a relation between Commons uploader and Flickr user and if this is flickr laundering. We had this kind of abuse already in the other deletion requests from this Commons user (Special:Contributions/Lozove). --Martin H. (talk) 07:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per flickrwash. Should the flickr account be blacklisted or is this a bit harsh? I don't know --Leoboudv (talk) 04:22, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment: This image should be deleted too as the uploader says it is available online on facebook. Clearly he does not mention flickr which suggests he took it from the Internet somewhere. The camera model is a HTC smartphone from Taiwan. The uploader's talkpage does not inspire confidence and he may possibly be Vito Timosh on flickr. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)- Comment: How interesting. This last image from Vito's flickr account here by uploader Lozove is from an apple camera whereas the image above under DR is by a Nikon D700 camera. How many cameras does this flickr account owner have? This is really suspicious. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted, I know that the last file was only mentioned today but is is a clear case of flickr washing if you aks me so starting a diffrent DR for this file seems like a waste of time to me. Natuur12 (talk) 10:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Wrong decription Kiberboy2013 (talk) 16:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JurgenNL as no permission (no permission since). A regular DR seems more apropriate for this one. Could be com:TOO but some more input on this one seems a better solution. Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
MOTIVO(obbligatorio) 93.151.125.106 19:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
ref. User talk:Sridharbsbu February 16 + 19, 2014, and before, as well as one of several duplicates uploaded by user, Roland zh (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität SuperJulietta (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Wird nicht verwendet SuperJulietta (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Wird nicht verwendet SuperJulietta (talk) 20:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Wird nicht verwendet und ist zu groß SuperJulietta (talk) 20:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Wird nicht verwendet und ist zu groß SuperJulietta (talk) 20:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Wird nicht verwendet SuperJulietta (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Zu groß, wird nicht verwendet SuperJulietta (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Porsche crests
[edit]The logo of the company Porsche has been designed in the 1950's by Ferdinand Porsche. As he died in 1998 and as Porsch Is not a body regulated by public law but a private society, the design is still copyrighted
- File:1987 Porsche 928 S4 - Flickr - The Car Spy (14).jpg
- File:2003 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S - Flickr - The Car Spy (13).jpg
- File:2003 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S - Flickr - The Car Spy (9).jpg
- File:2005 Porsche 911 GT3 - Flickr - The Car Spy (11).jpg
- File:2006 Porsche 911 (997) Turbo - Flickr - The Car Spy (11).jpg
- File:2006 Porsche Cayenne 4.5 Turbo S - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:2007 Porsche Cayenne Turbo - Flickr - The Car Spy (2).jpg
- File:2008 Porsche 911 C2S Cabriolet - Flickr - The Car Spy (3).jpg
- File:2008 Porsche Cayman S Sport Limited Edition - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:2009 Porsche 911 Turbo - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:2009 Porsche Cayman S - Flickr - The Car Spy (15).jpg
- File:2010 Porsche 911 GT3 RS - Flickr - The Car Spy (25).jpg
- File:997 GT3 3.8 Front Bumper with Air Vents and Porsche logo on front lid.jpg
- File:Arms of Porsche.svg
- File:Austria Gmuend Porsche Museum04.jpg
- File:Hubcap with Porsche coat of arms 2010.JPG
- File:Porsche 911 (997) Carrera - Flickr - The Car Spy (5).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 (997) Carrera S - Flickr - The Car Spy (13).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Carrera 2 - Flickr - The Car Spy.jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Carrera 2S - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Carrera 4S - Flickr - The Car Spy (34).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Carrera 4S - Flickr - The Car Spy.jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Turbo (4208592954).jpg
- File:Porsche Birthday Cake made at Couture Cakes By Nika.jpg
- File:Porsche Boxster 2.7 - Flickr - The Car Spy (9).jpg
- File:Porsche Boxster S - Flickr - The Car Spy (4).jpg
- File:Porsche Cayenne 3.2 V6 - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:Porsche Cayenne 3.2 V6 - Flickr - The Car Spy (38).jpg
- File:Porsche Centre sign, Woodbridge Meadows, Guildford - geograph.org.uk - 1449024.jpg
- File:Porsche emblem on a blue Porsche.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Turbo_-_Flickr_-_The_Car_Spy_(11).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Carrera_-_Flickr_-_The_Car_Spy_(5).jpg){kind=link}
_Carrera_S_-_Flickr_-_The_Car_Spy_(13).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
80.215.133.70 12:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep All files. This topic has already been discussed.--FAEP (talk) 13:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Golden ferrari symbol 2010.JPG: The Porsche coat of arms is derived from the coat of arms of the former state of Württemberg and that of the city of Stuttgart. Both are in the public domain. The derivation in itself is below the threshold of originality. Hence, this coat of arms can be photographed without infringing a copyright. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Per AFBorchert and last discussion. -- Avi (talk) 16:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Let's not assign too much weight to Commons:Deletion requests/Automobile manufacturer logos as a precedent, because it features a mix of valid and invalid arguments, and the main problem with that nomination was that it didn't identify any specific files to delete. But as AFBorchert has shown, this particular logotype combines two designs which are in the public domain without adding any copyrightable elements of its own. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Porsche crests
[edit]per en:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_November_27#File:Porsche_logotype.png this logo seems copyrighted. Since it was converted to fair use, I think a detailed discussion about this is needed again.
- File:1987 Porsche 928 S4 - Flickr - The Car Spy (14).jpg
- File:2003 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S - Flickr - The Car Spy (13).jpg
- File:2003 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S - Flickr - The Car Spy (9).jpg
- File:2005 Porsche 911 GT3 - Flickr - The Car Spy (11).jpg
- File:2006 Porsche 911 (997) Turbo - Flickr - The Car Spy (11).jpg
- File:2006 Porsche Cayenne 4.5 Turbo S - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:2007 Porsche Cayenne Turbo - Flickr - The Car Spy (2).jpg
- File:2008 Porsche 911 C2S Cabriolet - Flickr - The Car Spy (3).jpg
- File:2008 Porsche Cayman S Sport Limited Edition - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:2009 Porsche 911 Turbo - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:2009 Porsche Cayman S - Flickr - The Car Spy (15).jpg
- File:2010 Porsche 911 GT3 RS - Flickr - The Car Spy (25).jpg
- File:997 GT3 3.8 Front Bumper with Air Vents and Porsche logo on front lid.jpg
- File:Austria Gmuend Porsche Museum04.jpg
- File:Hubcap with Porsche coat of arms 2010.JPG
- File:Porsche 911 (997) Carrera - Flickr - The Car Spy (5).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 (997) Carrera S - Flickr - The Car Spy (13).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Carrera 2 - Flickr - The Car Spy.jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Carrera 2S - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Carrera 4S - Flickr - The Car Spy (34).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Carrera 4S - Flickr - The Car Spy.jpg
- File:Porsche 911 GT2 RS 3.6 2010 (9077055285).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 logo (466401730).jpg
- File:Porsche 911 Turbo (4208592954).jpg
- File:Porsche Birthday Cake made at Couture Cakes By Nika.jpg
- File:Porsche Boxster 2.7 - Flickr - The Car Spy (9).jpg
- File:Porsche Boxster S - Flickr - The Car Spy (4).jpg
- File:Porsche Cayenne 3.2 V6 - Flickr - The Car Spy (1).jpg
- File:Porsche Cayenne 3.2 V6 - Flickr - The Car Spy (38).jpg
- File:Porsche emblem (2170818849).jpg
- File:Porsche emblem on a blue Porsche.jpg
- File:Porsche emblem on a red Porsche.jpg
- File:Porsche emblem on a steering wheel.jpg
- File:Porsche emblem.jpg
- File:Porsche GT3 RS 5 (5893891088).jpg
- File:Porsche hood emblem.png
- File:Porsche Logo (4219377677).jpg
- File:Porsche of Stuttgart (5222526903).jpg
- File:Porsche symbol.jpg
- File:Porsche-911-capot.jpg
- File:Porsche-MZ-35mm low.jpg
- File:Porsche924PorscheSchild.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
again with this!? - Keep for ALL OF THE REASONS LISTED IN THE SECTION ABOVE, RESTED THE LAST TIME WE TALKED ABOUT THIS.
the porsche logo is the COAT OF ARMS OF STUTTGART, superimposed (in traditional heraldic matter) on the COAT OF ARMS OF BADEN-WURTEMBURG, whish is where stuttgart is located; with the words "porsche" & struttgart" added to it, in a fairly plain/standard typeface.
the arms of stuttgart & of baden-wurtemburg are "ancient" & PD.
the arrangement of the arms in this manner is COMMON/STANDARD HERALDIC PRACTICE.
adding 2 words to the design does NOT meet the threshold or "originality".
& tl,dr - the cited "discussion" @ wikipedia involved a grand total of 3 people, each of whom posted ONE SHORT SENTENCE, & an admin who uncritically & unthinkingly passed it. all 3 of the commentors posted within 1 week of each other, then the discussion sat dormant & IGNORED for the rest of a month, before some admin doing "housecleaning" wrongly closed it, without taking any time to research the matter, or look any further than the discussion on the page. not the best of "precedents".
THERE, & now, we have "discussed it"! ^__^ again, ...again....
best,
Lx 121 (talk) 05:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Lx 121 and Commons:Deletion requests/Automobile manufacturer logos. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
It is marked with the website of a commerical mannufacturer, but is claimed as "own work" CombatWombat42 (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- It appears after further review that this content is truly cc3 as claimed, this deletion request can be ignored.
Delete I don't understand. The first version is clearly marked with a manufacturer's web site and that site has an explicit copyright notice. It does not look like "own work". Even if CC, an attribution is required unless it is CC-0. Therefore it looks like a delete to me. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Austrian stamps are copyright for 70 year pma per Category:Stamps of Austria, so at the earliest will be PD in 2070. Ww2censor (talk) 18:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: see OTRS-Ticket ChristianBier (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
This came up at OTRS/N (permalink) and I deleted it, but after speaking with a native German-speaking OTRS agent, I'm not 100% sure I made the right decision. I can't verify
- Whether the clients are the artist who created the stamps (as they claim to be),
- Assuming they are, whether the ticket includes permission for all four stamps and the decorative border,
- Whether the rights are owned by the artists (whether they're the OTRS clients or not) or by the Austrian Post Office.
Input from German-speaking OTRS agents and from copyright experts would be appreciated. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, here's what we have and which should be ok to keep the file:
- A statement from the Austrian Federal Post Office, with a permission to use the stamps when the artists of the stamps give their permission
- A statement from artist Margreiter with a permission to use the two 32 valued stamps under cc-by-sa 3.0 de
- A statement from artist Tuma with the permission to use the third stamp valued 27 under cc-by-sa 3.0 de
- The ticket was closed with a thank you to all those artists by a long term and trusted OTRS volunteer with lots of experience and expertise. Alice Wiegand (talk) 08:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. It is most unusual to get permission from a postal administration and the artists, but what still appears rather odd is the application of a German licence when these are Austrian stamps. Do you have answer to that? Either way I think these facts should be well stated in the file so that it does not get nominated again. Ww2censor (talk) 14:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- It is well stated, that's what the OTRS ticket is made for. All information about the different artists can be found on the description page. As far as I know there is no cc-deed for austria, but I may be wrong. The simple reason for the license i taht the user who made the contacts used the common template on de:wp which was set up with the cc-by-sa 3.0-de at that time. Alice Wiegand (talk) 21:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. It is most unusual to get permission from a postal administration and the artists, but what still appears rather odd is the application of a German licence when these are Austrian stamps. Do you have answer to that? Either way I think these facts should be well stated in the file so that it does not get nominated again. Ww2censor (talk) 14:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I also rechecked this ticket and there is no reasonable doubt. Permission is valid. --Krd 19:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
kept: Ticket seems valid. Natuur12 (talk) 20:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Replaced in all instances with appropriate SVG files conforming to the location map scheme.
- File:Alagoas MesoAgresteAlagoano maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MesoLesteAlagoano maploc.png
- File:Alagoas MesoSertaoAlagoano maploc.png
Mahir256 (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JurgenNL as no permission (no permission since). Well, looks simpel but I'm not entirely sure about the letter N. Natuur12 (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
What is going on with the "N"? It's an image that I created by myself for the TV channel's Wikipedia page. --Davidmarin99 (talk) 17:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC) 18:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC+1)
- So this isn't the orriginal logo or based on the original logo which could be or could be not copyrighted? Natuur12 (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's a logo made by me which is based on the original logo of the channel. But I must also say that we're talking about a file of Wikimedia Commons Spain, where there isn't much information about copyright issues. --Davidmarin99 (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 01:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused minor SCOURed variant, cf. COM:AN Be..anyone (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
It could be merged to File:Heckert GNU white.svg. Rybec (talk) 10:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's an idea. Your comment inspired me to validate the protected 24KB SVG, and unlike OptiHeckert the protected SVG is invalid. Valid beats everything including readability, update request posted in the talk page thread, thanks. –Be..anyone (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 01:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Fry1989 as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|Standard of the Prime Minister of Republika Srpska (1995-2007).svg. I believe that DR is the most proper way to solve this problem. micki 22:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete This file is a duplicate of File:Standard of the Prime Minister of Republika Srpska (1995-2007).svg. It has been uploaded twice before and both times deleted/merged with the above file as a duplicate, by two separate admins. This is a continuation of an attempt of personal control over the flag in question by Kacnepcku-Cp6uja because the linked file was edit protected after his various abuses of it, including nominating it for deletion as "a fake", but then attempting to remove that same DR tag from the file 3 times (1, 2, 3). The user was engaged multiple times on his talk page in an attempt to discuss the file, and each attempt was met with accusations rather than actually discussing the file. Fry1989 eh? 22:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept no exact duplicate.--KTo288 (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Standard of the Prime Minister of Republika Srpska (1995-2007).svg. Fry1989 eh? 02:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
It's not an exact duplicate. What has changed since the last deletion request? --99of9 (talk) 03:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- It is an exact duplicate, they're the same fucking flag!!! My god this is stupid, do you have ANY idea why this file exists? ANY idea of the history of this dispute. The user called their own upload a "fake" and tried to nominate it for deletion because they would rather exert that level of control over the image than allow any changes to it, including a fringe which I added for practicality reasons of visibility. Except for a tiny sliver of yellow on the edge, they're the exact same thing. We don't need two of the same thing, and two admins agreed because this is the THIRD TIME this user uploaded the file, both of the other two times their upload was merged or deleted into this one for same reason that it's a duplicate. This file is not used, why do we need it? Now I've removed the fucking fringe from File:Standard of the Prime Minister of Republika Srpska (1995-2007).svg, will an admin delete this stupid cold war duplicate that doesn't belong here? Fry1989 eh? 03:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- And if you want to know why I'm outraged, it's because we have admins more interested in appeasement than sensibility. Two admins could see this for what it was, and because a third was blind we have two of the same thing when one will suffice. Fry1989 eh? 03:48, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Of course I have looked at the history. In fact it is on my watchlist because you two so egregiously edit warred over it, and I'd rather not see that happen again. So I see you have now reverted to User:Kacnepcku-Cp6uja's fringeless version at File:Standard of the Prime Minister of Republika Srpska (1995-2007).svg, so now they are duplicate. Does this mean you're at peace with not having a yellow border? If so, then I guess this one can be deleted. But don't put the border back, or you'll reignite round 57. --99of9 (talk) 03:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- That user isn't even here anymore, what makes you think they will come back and make an issue of it? I don't understand admins who excuse this kind of nonsense, creating cold wars and duplication issues. I can show you a tonne of them caused directly because certain admins doesn't have the fortitude to deal with issues and rather let them sit and fester. This troll (and no I will not retract that because only such a person would do this) called their own file a fake and tried to get it deleted rather than allow any modification no matter how valid, purposeful or minor, and you people give their opinions the same weight after that behaviour. Fry1989 eh? 04:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- So you didn't actually answer my question. Are you planning to put the yellow border back as soon as this version is deleted? That would be more than a little duplicitous IMO. Regarding admins who are tolerant of "nonsense", you would of course have been caught in the same net - you were half of the edit war, so it's probably better not to argue for tougher enforcement! The fact that you warred over yellow shows that you thought the files were not duplicates, but I'm glad if you're now willing to let the yellow go. --99of9 (talk) 04:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Don't be ridiculous, and don't put words in my mouth. I edit warred regarding the yellow for a very imporatnt reason, that being it's near impossible to see this is a flag without some sort of border. And yes, I may have edit warred with this user, but I have NEVER vandalized one of my own files in an attempt to exert ownership over it. Two admins saw this exactly for what it was, and it should have been deleted the third time but instead such behaviour is rewarded without any actual purpose or benefit to the project. I don't care if I have to say it a million times, we don't need two of the same thing (and yes, I consider them to be exactly the same thing), we gain nothing from it other than encouraging these users to continue such behaviour in the future. As for your question, I have no obligation to answer a supposition. What I will say is there are other ways of adding a border. Fry1989 eh? 20:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- So you didn't actually answer my question. Are you planning to put the yellow border back as soon as this version is deleted? That would be more than a little duplicitous IMO. Regarding admins who are tolerant of "nonsense", you would of course have been caught in the same net - you were half of the edit war, so it's probably better not to argue for tougher enforcement! The fact that you warred over yellow shows that you thought the files were not duplicates, but I'm glad if you're now willing to let the yellow go. --99of9 (talk) 04:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- That user isn't even here anymore, what makes you think they will come back and make an issue of it? I don't understand admins who excuse this kind of nonsense, creating cold wars and duplication issues. I can show you a tonne of them caused directly because certain admins doesn't have the fortitude to deal with issues and rather let them sit and fester. This troll (and no I will not retract that because only such a person would do this) called their own file a fake and tried to get it deleted rather than allow any modification no matter how valid, purposeful or minor, and you people give their opinions the same weight after that behaviour. Fry1989 eh? 04:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted by Odder -FASTILY 01:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
This image is a composite of three observations. While the Chandra (X-ray) and Hubble (Optical) portions are fine -- both are NASA produced -- the Very Large Array (Radio) is problematic. I can find no evidence that the data used here falls under the CC-by-3.0 license used by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) because I cannot locate the layer in question on their website. My reading of their image use policy suggests that the CC license only applies to those images found on their site. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- What I'll probably do is just upload a composite of the Hubble and Chandra layers, since they are in the clear and contribute most of the image anyway. The questionable NRAO part is just the blue in the very middle. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Uploaded to File:NGC 1068 composite from CXC and Hubble.jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 06:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 01:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Please match this template with Template:User grc-1 (cf. the move of the corresponding page in the German Wikipedia). Thanks! Marsupium (talk) 11:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
por que la imagen esta muy grande EK144 (talk) 04:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Krd 12:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
