Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/12/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-_2013-07-03_02-46.jpg){kind=link}
,_Palmera_que_dio_Origen_al_Nombre_Tarapoto..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-Email_-_Shantanudas5373@gmail-com-Contact-_+918906922723-_--_2013-12-31_18-46.jpg){kind=link}
![141 File:NAME- Mark Tito Cardeño-DATE OF BIRTH- Aug-17,1995-PLACE OF BIRTH- Bobon N- Samar-ADDRESS- Tandang sora Quezon city-CONTACT-- 09199963617-EMAIL- cardeno17@gmail-com---For more info-Just type "mark tito carden 2013-10-31 19-53.jpg](#File:NAME-_Mark_Tito_Cardeño-DATE_OF_BIRTH-_Aug-17,1995-PLACE_OF_BIRTH-_Bobon_N-_Samar-ADDRESS-_Tandang_sora_Quezon_city-CONTACT--_09199963617-EMAIL-_cardeno17@gmail-com---For_more_info-Just_type_"mark_tito_carden_2013-10-31_19-53.jpg){kind=link}
-_2013-06-05_14-38.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
RRRR.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-07-25_19-12.jpg){kind=link}
.GIF){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Västergötland,_Sweden_(6052868756).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_datato_12_Marzo_1939.jpg){kind=link}
Reasons for deletion request - i've uploaded this image in 2009, i want to delete the picture for privacy. Thanks. Mollilinux
Deleted: No file here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - i've uploaded this image in 2009, i want to delete the picture for privacy. Thanks. Mollilinux
Deleted, such file does not exist and has never existed. Taivo (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - i've uploaded this image in 2009, i want to delete the picture for privacy. Thanks. Mollilinux
Deleted: No file here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - i've uploaded this image in 2009, i want to delete the picture for privacy. Thanks. Mollilinux
Deleted, such file does not exist and has never existed. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
this is a very bad picture of this man who is applying in politics. I have downloaded another picture File:T.Schaffauser.jpg. FeeStival
Hello,
Again I am asking to delete the picture and / or put the one I downloaded. It is a bad picture. How long can it take ? I've been discussing about it with the french administrators for 2 weeks. Please delete the picture.
Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FeeStival (talk • contribs) 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Taking a quick look at this image and comparing with File:T.Schaffauser.jpg shows this image is higher resolution, shows the subject's whole face and appears to be of him speaking publicly. I actually rather like the photo it is intimate and shows him speaking with some passion as a gay activist, he actually looks like quite a nice attractive Croydon lad in this shot to my eyes, so I find it hard to accept that this is unacceptably bad to be of potential educational use, or that this is intrusive or misrepresents the subject. Unless there are other reasons presented, such as objections by Schaffauser himself that may warrant a courtesy deletion, I would stick to
Keep. I'm afraid that French Wikipedia admins have no special authority for this project, though a few have trusted roles here too. If there is a reason you would like to raise non-publicly for deleting this photo, please do email in to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org and an OTRS volunteer like myself can discuss this with you off-line. --Fæ (talk) 12:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Fæ (and happy new year!): I'm the french admin (sorry for my english) who talked with the user FeeStival and I want to add that I only said him to do a deletion request on Commons (because he wanted to delete the picture on the article on fr.wikipedia). It doesn't mean that I support the deletion request: I agree with you: I think this image is better than the other one. Best regards, Jules78120 (talk) 17:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- As the user who uploaded this photograph, I would very strongly support Fæ, and Keep. I cannot accept it is "a very bad picture", and consider that it is better than the new one for illustrating what the subject looks like. But there is surely no problem in keeping both pictures on Wikimedia Commons: many subjects are illustrated by several images giving different views of the subject. Perhaps User:FeeStival is confusing Wikimedia Commons with the French Wikipedia! --Ross Burgess (talk) 16:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- As the user who uploaded this photograph, I would very strongly support Fæ, and
- Keep Image in scope and of good quality. Tm (talk) 21:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept, this is a good photo and well in project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Empty category Leitoxx 04:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily. Taivo (talk) 13:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://www.indiancarsbikes.in/cars/2011-maruti-suzuki-swift-bookings-accepted-maruti-dealers-33970/ — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 07:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Source says taken from a Google search with no licensing for the file. Should be deleted as per COM:PRP. We have other images of Uiros. Rahul Bott (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Just a copyright violation. JuTa 09:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:ADVERT. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: snow Jcb (talk) 15:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
I made a mistake and uploaded the gif version rather than the png (needed for the template) - I then tried to upload the png but now can't because the file name is used. So I want this deleted so I can upload the correct version. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:39, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support - request from file uploader. Tucoxn (talk) 19:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
It seems that this image was uploaded as a test - the title "Depois eu apaguo" (Portuguese) means "I'll delete it later" - and that is violating the copyright of known photographer Isabel Cutileiro 85.240.143.46 02:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, as per nom. Also, it is mangled Portuguese, too (should be "apago"). -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, clear copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, nominent to the "Freak of the year" title. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Kreml of Moscow and me ... Which of them is more important? Taivo (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Unused lower-res equivalent of file:Diphenyl ether.png in same format (also have File:Diphenyl oxide.svg as alternative) DMacks (talk) 04:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete both unused files. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pretty background, but out of scope, random group photo, not "realistically usable for an educational purpose" Tortie tude (talk) 04:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope random snapshot with no subject, not "realistically usable for an educational purpose" Tortie tude (talk) 04:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:53, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope random group photo, not "realistically usable for an educational purpose" Tortie tude (talk) 04:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Group photo with no subject, out of scope with no "realistically usable for an educational purpose" Tortie tude (talk) 05:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyviolation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raso mk (talk • contribs) 2013-12-30T12:55:32 (UTC)
Deleted, by INeverCry due to copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Church of christ gnangarra-2.jpg Mattinbgn (talk) 05:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Evident screenshot from a video (see bottom of image); very likely holds copyright ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 06:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, the image brings into my mind "The most stupid criminals". Taivo (talk) 12:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Third-party creation; either some sort of multiple-accounts user or just simple misuse of someone else's userspace. DMacks (talk) 07:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: user is indef'ed on en.wp as duplicate account of User:Pandaravadai, the editor who created this page. DMacks (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Small size, poor choice of bond-spacing (difficult to recofnize double-bonds as such). Have plenty of png and svg alternatives in Category:N-Bromosuccinimide DMacks (talk) 09:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, also consider N-bromosuccinimida.png for deletion (same reasons). --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- That one's not even the correct structure for the title chemical. The alkene in the ring makes it N-bromomaleimide not N-bromosuccinimide. DMacks (talk) 10:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, both. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Very low quality; can't see what it is JurgenNL (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - It is even impossible to see if it's human or a statue... resolution is just too bad. Dqfn13 (talk) 09:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --SJ+ 10:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
COM:PORN + see older DR. Plenty dic.. alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 10:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - that is pretty awful. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, typical example about what kind of photos Commons does not need. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raso mk (talk • contribs) 2013-12-30T12:54:03 (UTC)
Deleted, by INeverCry as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
selfie, out of scope McZusatz (talk) 15:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal file, the user's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
possible copyviolation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raso mk (talk • contribs) 2013-12-30T12:55:52 (UTC)
Deleted, by INeverCry as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Something went wrong with uploading from Flickr! The Yeti 21:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: empty file Ymblanter (talk) 21:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Fairly low quality penis pictures.
- File:Male penis normal.jpg
- File:Penis male.jpg
- File:Penis loose.jpg
- File:Penis normal.jpg
- File:Penis Australia.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 01:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please delete, pure quality penis pics are already in tons at commons. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 10:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, give us this day our daily penises ... Taivo (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, I deleted also his userpage as out of scope. He promoted there himself as real estate developer and soap oil producer. Taivo (talk) 14:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shatrudhanpalsaniya (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope
- File:College group.jpg
- File:Shimla Snow.jpg
- File:Royal biking.JPG
- File:Shimlatrip.JPG
- File:Profilepicure.JPG
Mjrmtg (talk) 02:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, go to Facebook. Taivo (talk) 18:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
"I have a good faith belief that this content violates my privacy or the privacy of the person I represent" Walterpro4755 (talk) 04:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - I am guessing by your username that you are in fact the flickr user who originally uploaded this. While there are no copyright issues (image is flickrreviewed), I see no harm in deleting it as a courtesy - it's hardly irreplaceable. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per mat. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy as a courtesy deletion Considering the nature of the photo, please speedy this reasonable request. I am unsure why the nomination is in quotation marks, however I see the related Flickr account has a good track record as well as specializing in glamour photography and it is perfectly reasonable to assume in good faith that a mistake may have been made for this one photo. --Fæ (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as a courtesy deletion per above. As noted, it would not be hard to find a replacement with a good ground regarding consent. whym (talk) 09:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
It's actual license is non-commercial. See [1] (current source page) or [2] (earliest version of source page with a CC license). Kaldari (talk) 07:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted Natuur12 (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Looking source flickr user's gallery, I think this file is COM:FLICKRWASHING. --레비Revi 11:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per flickrwash --Leoboudv (talk) 00:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 07:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but if this photo was taken in India, then it likely violates the copyright of the photographer(s) of the original bird-shots, as India has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for 2D works. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete agree, it has to be deleted - MPF (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 07:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 07:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-_2013-07-03_02-46.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-_2013-07-03_02-46.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
-_2013-07-03_02-46.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep for its esthetic interest: It is a good image in its type. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright violation also here before it came to Commons --High Contrast (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per High Contrast, file is a modified printscreen from a youtube video uploaded under a standard youtube license Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
-_2013-07-03_02-46.jpg){kind=link}
This is image is not a work of the person who uploaded it to Commons. It can easiliy be find on the web. besides, the image!s title and the file description is total bullsh*t 91.57.94.225 19:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Checked and can be found on several websites Natuur12 (talk) 06:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Wild unicorns appear normally at night and disappear at day- At 8-00 PM, there is a 33% chance a wild unicorn will appear in the neighborhood-2-- They usually spawn at fishing spots and on the map, where the p 2013-08-16 19-33.jpg
[edit]
Appears to be a video screenshot; if this screenshot should be free, we need more and certain evidence that the software allows screenshots that are published under free licenses 91.57.94.225 19:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Sims screenshot Natuur12 (talk) 06:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted drawing 91.57.94.225 19:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No correct source and no evidence that the file is under a free license Natuur12 (talk) 06:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation Tallisguy00 (talk) 22:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, by Fastily due to no license. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
No source given. The license is a guess. Without better source information we cannot keep this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Huge guess. The file discription doesn't even say if it is a federal governant. Natuur12 (talk) 07:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Terms of use incompatible with any of our licenses. Jcb (talk) 00:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Photo is using an old ticket, which is probably a blanket permiassion for Łukasz Wójcik's photos from some websites (at least three):[3], but is not necessarily a some kind of global permission for every photo that Łukasz Wójcik released or will release on any website. Oleola (talk) 00:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that it is sufficiently simple for {{PD-textlogo}}. Oleola (talk) 01:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I add for deletion other logos of the same club. None of them is simple:
- File:Czarni Radom logo.png
- File:Czarni Radom logo 1.gif
- File:Czarni Radom logo in 1997-00.png Taivo (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not pd-textlogo's and not his own work either. Natuur12 (talk) 17:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status of source map unclear. Jcb (talk) 01:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
If found this file all over the internet, also in higher resolutions. E.g. here. Jcb (talk) 01:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
,_Palmera_que_dio_Origen_al_Nombre_Tarapoto..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Palmera_que_dio_Origen_al_Nombre_Tarapoto..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
It's a Czech stamp, not German, copyright 70 years from death of the artist. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2066 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2071 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
</noinclude> This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
</noinclude> This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2080 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2071 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2076 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 01:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed and there are several high resolution version available throughout the web. Not likely to be his own work. Natuur12 (talk) 16:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
File:شركة الكفراوى للصناعات الهندسية-مهندس- أحمد الكفراوى-00201227151694 موبايل مصر-مواليد محافظة القليوبية عام 1963م-صاحب مجمو 2013-12-30 20-19.jpg
[edit]
Unused image, unclear if this image is in COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Product feature (the focus of the picture), for promotional purposes only. Lakokat (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Product feature (the focus of the picture), for promotional purposes only. Lakokat (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Product feature (the focus of the picture), for promotional purposes only. Lakokat (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Product feature (the focus of the picture), for promotional purposes only. Lakokat (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Product feature (the focus of the picture), for promotional purposes only. Lakokat (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Product feature (the focus of the picture), for promotional purposes only. Lakokat (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Product feature, for promotional purposes only. Lakokat (talk) 05:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
No source. Original uploader did not give any info about date as 1900s or commented that it is his/her own painting Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
out of scope: facebookery Qwertyus (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image (and won't be used, as uploader is indef'ed) DMacks (talk) 06:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it seems very unlikely that this photograph was created by the uploader. It appears to be a scan, and is most likely still copyrighted. Kaldari (talk) 07:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/swift-dzire-automatic-road-test/12112/1 — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 07:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; user's other uploads also include copyright violations. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 07:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Promotional content which is not being used on any project pages. Out of project scope in my opinion. Rahul Bott (talk) 07:52, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The same goes for File:Mine C old logo.jpg and File:Mine C Logo.jpg. I nominate them also for deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Likely a copyright violation - image taken from a car listing; uploader's other uploads were confirmed copyright violations ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 08:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; It's a horrible shot, anyway. - Areaseven (talk) 13:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Can be found on the web elswhere. If you are in fact the copyrightholder please contact commons:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 17:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I noticed, that one boy is giving a gesture of horns, pointing towards the other boy, suggesting, that the other boy is actually ... I looked all 114 files in Category:Horn gestures, but the only other such gesture was File:Michael Angelo Batio with a fan.jpg. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
We already have much better SVG images in Category:Android logos, e.g., File:Android sample.svg. This one serves no extra purpose. Rahul Bott (talk) 08:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
too blurry. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
May be upscaled version of image at http://www.remixtures.com/2009/10/estudo-revela-que-estudantes-preferem-copiar-de-borla-do-que-pagar-por-rap-mau/. Tagged in 2010 as a copyright violation. -- Trevj (talk) 09:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The flickr photo was taken in April 10, 2009 but this article photo was used in October 23, 2009...after the flickr photo. So, it appears that the flickr photo was taken first--and it has some camera metadata. I think that is the usual interpretation. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It was indeed tagged as a possible vio in 2010 but I explained on the tagger's Talk page here why I thought the argument that this was a copyvio was dubious (in fact there wasn't much "argument" that it was a copyvio, just a (mistaken) assumption that because it was on the set of a music video this photo was a screen grab from that video). This photo was uploaded to Flickr as a free image in April 2009, used on remixtures.com in October 2009, and uploaded to the Commons in September 2010.--Brian Dell (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Claim of 'own work' is highly doubtful going by the style of the portrait. At best, it might be a derivative work. Rahul Bott (talk) 10:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Probably not a free image. Photography used for the promotion of one of her books [4] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shev123 (talk • contribs) 2013-12-31T10:39:03 (UTC)
![[4]](http://www.images.hachette-livre.fr/media/imgAuteur/429/V_deMargerie.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: The exact same file could be found here. If you are the copyrightholder please send confirmation to Com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1. Mein Foto
2. Mein Hund
3. Ist tot, hat für Wiki keine Bedeutung mehr
--CTHOE (talk) 20:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Great picture and in use. I'm sorry but you agreed tot a non revocable license. Natuur12 (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1. Mein Foto 2. Meine Hunde 3. Sind tot, haben für Wiki keine Bedeutung mehr. 4.--CTHOE (Diskussion) 20:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Great picture and in use. I'm sorry but you agreed tot a non revocable license Natuur12 (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Better Version of the file is given here File:Clickpolymer.png. This file is nowwhere used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minihaa (talk • contribs) 2013-12-27T21:03:23 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works Byfserag (talk) 12:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works Byfserag (talk) 12:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 11:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not-in-use profile picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Unsharp photo, badly cropped. Not usable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not-in-use profile picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 17:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
It is an advertisement Adam850 (talk) 13:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not-in-use profile picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 17:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of a bottle label. Jespinos (talk) 14:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but if this photo was taken in India, then it likely violates the copyright of the photographer(s) of the original bird-shots, as India has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for 2D works. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but if this photo was taken in India, then it likely violates the copyright of the photographer(s) of the original bird-shots, as India has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for 2D works. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but if this photo was taken in India, then it likely violates the copyright of the photographer(s) of the original bird-shots, as India has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for 2D works. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation; Samsung logo used. Author claims that it is his work and released under a free license. Ethically Yours (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Derative work Natuur12 (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
此文件属于测试文件，上传测试效果 Stone.xiao (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 15:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2067 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2067 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2066 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069d (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 15:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2068 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 15:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No permission from Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. 77.184.133.181 15:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment by original nominator: Also, this work may be a two-dimensional work (it's hard to tell), in which case freedom of panorama in Singapore doesn't apply to it at all even if it is permanently located in a public place (which it isn't). If there's doubt, I think our precautionary principle would apply here. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 16:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 16:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
The SOHO (ESA & NASA) joint project implies that all materials created by its probe are copyrighted and require permission for commercial non-educational use. /St1995 17:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Forgive me for the silly question, but I thought used in wiki can be regards as non-commercial or educational use? EwingTaiwan (talk) 02:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No, see Commons:Licensing, you must be allowed to use it for commercial purposes and other purposes than education as well. Natuur12 (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1. Mein Foto
2. Meine Hunde
3. Sind tot, haben für Wiki keine Bedeutung mehr.
4.--CTHOE (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Sorry but you agreed to a non revocable license and it is a great picture which is unique in the category Category:Side views of dog heads Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Namanya zia zahra fazila dilahirkan pada tanggal 26 Desember 2006 dari pasangan Supriyatno dan melya armilawati- Pada usia 2-5 tahu sudah diponis kena penyakit sinusitis yang alhamdulillah sembuh setelah bero 2013-10-01 02-39.jpeg
[edit]
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Name - Shantanu Das-City - Purulia-Occupation - Singer-Nationlity - Indian ( Westbengal)-Email - Shantanudas5373@gmail-com-Contact- +918906922723- -- 2013-12-31 18-46.jpg
[edit]-Email_-_Shantanudas5373@gmail-com-Contact-_%2B918906922723-_--_2013-12-31_18-46.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Email_-_Shantanudas5373@gmail-com-Contact-_%2B918906922723-_--_2013-12-31_18-46.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
File:NAME- Mark Tito Cardeño-DATE OF BIRTH- Aug-17,1995-PLACE OF BIRTH- Bobon N- Samar-ADDRESS- Tandang sora Quezon city-CONTACT-- 09199963617-EMAIL- cardeno17@gmail-com---For more info-Just type "mark tito carden 2013-10-31 19-53.jpg
[edit]
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Name- Muhammed Sarjan Lebbe-Sure Name - Sulaimalebbe -Year Of Birth - 1989-oct-16-Origen- Srilankan -Town- Kalmunai -Religious- Muslim (Sunni)- 2013-06-05 14-38.jpg
[edit]-_2013-06-05_14-38.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-_2013-06-05_14-38.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as copyvio by Jacklee, with this description: "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Singapore only applies to three-dimensional artworks that are permanently located in a public place. These photographs show artworks from the Singapore Biennale 2008, which is a temporary exhibition held every two years." - could be true, but a regular DR seems more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
RRRR.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
RRRR.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused logo out of scope McZusatz (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
RRRR.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
RRRR.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope - unused personal image - self-promo INeverCry 18:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2080 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
_2013-07-25_19-12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-07-25_19-12.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Educational use of this photo is impossible. Commons is not a media repository for private bad quality photos 91.57.94.225 19:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2080 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 18:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2070 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This is in Canada and is in memory of a bishop who died in 1942. It seems to me unlikely that the stained glass artist died before 1944. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- The picture was taken in a church (which is considered a public place - this church is now owned by the city of Granby). I asked the parson (priest? "curé" in french...) if it was ok to put those pictures under this license. I beleive the freedom of panorama can be applied here. --SamuelFreli (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- There is no FOP for 2D works in Canada. The copyright belongs to the artist, so the priest has no authority over, and probably little knowledge of, licensing the work. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Jim and Commons:Fop#Canada. Permission from the copyrightholder of the work of art is required. Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 12:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
The OTRS template was added by the uploader, and it refers to an OTRS ticket that was deemed invalid in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bocajuniors2000.PNG Snowolf How can I help? 19:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Este es el permiso de la imagen y el autor: {{PermissionOTRS|id=2009111810076787}}
|
This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Carlos A. Cermele. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: Carlos A. Cermele grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.
|
Deleted: Invalid ticket. I checked. Natuur12 (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
wrong map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrejj (talk • contribs) 2013-12-30T22:15:50 (UTC)
- Keep wrong isn't a real reason. Indeed, the Austrian city is called Klagenfurt (not Klangenfurt). But is there any mistake showing the rivers? If you don't give a detailed description of mistakes the request should be rejected. -- Juergen (talk) 15:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Map is in use, can be used, no consensus tot delete the map and can be fixed. Natuur12 (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This looks like a posed photo. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:39, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, not his own work Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Not educationally useful / Photographs of identifiable people Magnolia677 (talk) 20:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Not educationally useful / Photographs of identifiable people Magnolia677 (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2071 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2071 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.GIF&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.GIF&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.GIF){kind=link}
- We need a method for keeping all those files that in their original countries fall into PD but not in the US :(.--Coentor (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.GIF){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2079 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2080 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. 84.61.176.82 22:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no FoP in UAE Ymblanter (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Advertisements are a major portion of the picture (therefore not de minimis) and are copyrighted with no evidence of permissions Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2080 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2080 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 22:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 22:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 22:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Category:Neuve-Chapelle Indian Memorial
[edit]- File:Carved column at the Neuve Chapelle Indian Memorial.JPG
- File:Close-up of carved symbol at the Neuve Chapelle Indian Memorial.JPG
- File:Close-up of the column at the Neuve Chapelle Indian Memorial.JPG
- File:Column at the Neuve Chapelle Indian Memorial.JPG
- File:Entrance shelter at the Neuve Chapelle Indian Memorial.JPG
- File:Neuve-Chapelle - Mémorial indien - 2.JPG
- File:Neuve-Chapelle Cimetière Indien 1.jpg
- File:Neuve-Chapelle Cimetière Indien 3.jpg
- File:Neuve-Chapelle Cimetière Indien 4.jpg
- File:Stone of Remembrance and column at the Neuve Chapelle Indian Memorial.JPG
- File:Wider view of the entrance shelter at the Neuve Chapelle Indian Memorial.JPG
- File:Ypres Salient 21.jpg
FOP France, per Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2013-12#Files_in_:Category:Beaumont-Hamel_Newfoundland_Memorial and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Memorial. Designed by Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) --Labattblueboy (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Although nominating this case I am in opposition. I made the nominated because the question of status of WWI memorials in France remains rather ambiguous in terms of copyright status. It would appear this monument is subject to French FOP but the clear intent of this monument, it being on both land donated to the Commonwealth War Graves Commission by France, is that Crown copyright would apply. There are no shortage of publications in France that have employed the image of this memorial so I see a pure FOP claim in this case as suspect. Quite frankly, if this memorial goes, so does every Commonwealth War Graves Memorial in the Commons. --Labattblueboy (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The source country is the country where the work is located, i.e. France. French law doesn't contain any separate copyright terms for works by Commonwealth governments. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Thanks to Labattblueboy for notifying me of this discussion. I took part in one of the earlier discussions relating to the Vimy memorial images. I feared back then that issues would keep cropping up with these WWI memorial images in France (does Belgium have similar FOP rules or is that different). Anyway, there are some people who know far more about French law than I do, and I've asked if they will comment here. What I want to add is something about the history. The memorials were mostly erected between 1923 and 1938 by the Imperial War Graves Commission, an organisation established by Imperial Charter in 1917. They directly employed architects and sculptors to work on the cemeteries and memorials, so they are presumably works-for-hire if that makes any difference. In all cases it has been 70+ years since the memorials were erected, but in many cases not 70+ years since the architects and sculptors died (but close to 70 years in some cases - I really hope we won't get situations where images will be deleted and then undeleted a few years later providing anyone remembers to request undeletion). The other aspect of the history is the granting of the land in perpetuity. This was explicitly done under French laws which it is possible to go and read. Rather than compare this to arguments made previously about embassy lands, I think the situation here is different. I hope this can be resolved sensibly, as I don't think any of those who created these memorials would have dreamed that theoretical arguments over copyright would take place as is happening here. Put to one side for a moment the legalistic arguments, and think for a moment about why they were creating the memorials and what was and is still being commemorated, in perpetuity. Were copyright laws really written to cover that sort of thing? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 03:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Most probable that the photographic rights comprised part of the contract for the statue's design signed by the commissioning British/Indian authorities (would be normal practice in the modern period), making the photography compliant, as far as I'm aware, with both British and Indian national law and policy as well as French law. Hchc2009 (talk) 13:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Noting here that the commissioning authority would have been the Imperial War Graves Commission (as it was then known) - India was then the British Raj and a personal possession of the crown and treated differently to the independent Dominions (South Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Newfoundland). As far as the relationship between the Commission and France goes, it is important to realise that the Commission had (and as far as I know still has) a special place in French law as the authority that deals with its cemeteries and memorials - the technical term, as used in French law, is 'regularly constituted authority'. This was established by a French law (the land expropriation bill) that passed the chambers of the French government and became law on 29 December 1915. It was introduced into the Chamber of Deputies by Millerand, the French Minister for War. One of the decrees provided for a sepulture perpetuelle. The language used by the politicians speaking in its favour included exhortations for France to "adopt as her child and to honour ... every soldier who has fallen on her soil for justice and the freedom of the nations" - quoted from p.12 of The Unending Vigil (Longworth, 1967). Now, that is clearly emotionally laden language, used in the midst of the war, but it does indicate the spirit in which the land was granted, and if that spirit is still alive today then I doubt there is any risk of a challenge (whether under freedom of panorama or other considerations) to photographs of war memorials in France. Whether that is sufficient to over-ride the Commons precautionary principle, I don't know. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Several comments. First, the special ownership of the land is not relevant. Even embassies are subject to local law in copyright matters -- we have a solid opinion on that. I can't image that this memorial has a higher status than an embassy. Second, while the memorial may be the property of the UK government, that does not change its copyright status. It is possible -- unlikely, but still possible -- that the UK government owns the copyright. If so, it could release it into PD worldwide, but absent knowing that that was the case, we must assume that the sculptor or his heirs own the copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Category:Pennsylvania Memorial
[edit]- File:Monument offensive Argonne Varennes.JPG
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial 1.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial 2.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial 3.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial 4.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Memorial 5.jpg
- File:VarennesMémorial.JPG
FOP France, per Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2013-12#Files_in_:Category:Beaumont-Hamel_Newfoundland_Memorial and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Beaumont-Hamel Newfoundland Memorial. Designed by Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) --Labattblueboy (talk) 00:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Although nominating this case I am in opposition. I made the nominated because the question of status of WWI memorials in France remains rather ambiguous in terms of copyright status. It would appear this monument is subject to French FOP but this memorial lies of land that was donated by France to the US. Further as the memorial was constructed by a state it seems questionable whether FOB would apply. There are no shortage of publications in France that have employed the image of this memorial so I see a pure FOP claim in this case as suspect. Quite frankly, if this memorial goes, so does every American WWI and WWII memorial in the Commons. --Labattblueboy (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Most probable that the photographic rights comprised part of the contract for the memorial's design signed by the commissioning US authorities (would be normal practice in the modern period), making the photography compliant, as far as I'm aware, with US national law and policy as well as French law. Hchc2009 (talk) 13:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - having read up on all this a bit more, I think there is a very good chance that all war memorials in France (and Belgium) are actually in the public domain (though I have seen other opinions that they are 'unpublished'). Some serious effort should be put into establishing whether that is the case or not. It would be good to get clarification on a per country basis on whether war memorials are a special case or not. I do also have a question that I hope some of the regulars at Commons will be able to answer. In this case, the life of author + 70 years terms ends on 9 September 2015. If the images are deleted, is it usual for Commons to add a tracking category to the deletion discussion so that a bot can make an undeletion request on that date? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 16:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Paul Cret was working in the US from 1907. It is very unusual for a US commission for works of art to transfer copyright to the government. It is very unlikely that the copyright is not held by Cret's heirs -- certainly way beyond our standard of "significant doubt". I see no reason why a war memorial should be a special case -- there is no extraterritoriality for copyright. Even if there were, US law also does not have FOP for this. This will be PD on 1/1/2016 (note that in almost all countries the 70 years is counted from the January 1 following the death of the creator. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.176.82 21:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The amateur offensive caricature of emeritus Pope Benedict as a Nazi is neither kind nor notable. In line with the Pricasso resolution, see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jimmy_Wales_by_Pricasso_(the_making_of).ogv, I see no reason why Pope Benedict should be treated with any less courtesy than Jimmy Wales. Fæ (talk) 09:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- My understanding of that close is that it was explained as "sexual harassment of an editor". So while it's an utterly terrible decision, my interpretation of it is going to stick to what it actually says - namely, that if ex-Pope Benedict doesn't like this picture, he's going to have to sit his ass down at a terminal and sign up for a free account first and THEN the morality enforcers can complain about how we're harassing him by allowing a copy of this. It's not great but at least it preserves the content about the vast majority people who can't be bothered with this snake pit. Wnt (talk) 00:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Keep from me btw. russavia (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC).jpg){kind=link}
Question What is the copyright status of the caricature of then-Pope Benedict, or (if it's copyrightable, not sure about that) of the pig mask? As-is, it looks like a derivative work copyvio to me, and should be deleted on that basis. darkweasel94 21:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Comment. I agree with Wnt. The closing of the deletion request relates to sexual harassment against editors, and to my knowledge His Holiness is not an editor. However, if it can be demonstrated that this photo violates someone's copyright, then it should be deleted as a copyright violation; otherwise, it should be kept. ALH (talk) 23:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- I have done some of my usual image searching, but have yet to spot a similar line drawing of Pope Benedict of which this may be a derived work. I have found other photographs of the No Vat event in 2009 showing the same poster in use, see [6] and [7] though not the same photographer as far as I can tell. --Fæ (talk) 23:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Uh, how do you know that the uploader drew the caricature on this flag? It's more likely that the {{Own}} claim only applies to the photo, and that the uploader doesn't even assert that they drew the caricature. darkweasel94 23:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, that's right, we don't know anything about the poster. However, if I found a copyrighted cartoon this was based on, then it would be the end of any discussion here. --Fæ (talk) 23:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Uh, how do you know that the uploader drew the caricature on this flag? It's more likely that the {{Own}} claim only applies to the photo, and that the uploader doesn't even assert that they drew the caricature. darkweasel94 23:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- I have done some of my usual image searching, but have yet to spot a similar line drawing of Pope Benedict of which this may be a derived work. I have found other photographs of the No Vat event in 2009 showing the same poster in use, see [6] and [7] though not the same photographer as far as I can tell. --Fæ (talk) 23:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep – Per freedom of expression. Amateurs should have as much right to share caricatures as professionals. If we delete this image, then Commons would continue (yes, we're already on that path. A video and a satirical GIF were recently deleted) on a path towards a dark age where only "kind" images are permitted to be shared. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I think the pig mask has a copyright and the poster has a copyright. Without evidence of permssion from either of those artists, I don;t see how we can keep this. As for the other issues, this is not sexual harassment and as noted, Pope Benedict is not an editor here, so the Pricasso closing is not a relevant precedent. If we were somehow to obtain a license from the two artists, I would keep this as a legitimate image of a public protest. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate file, there is a vector version here - Fma12 (talk) 22:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: We do not generally delete pre-exisiting raster files when a vector file is added. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} later. But is this painting realy older than 50 years? JuTa 09:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: In order to use "anonymous", the uploader must show that the work was actually anonymous, not merely that we do not know who the artist was. We also have no date. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
FOP France - designed by Peter Corlett (born 1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Most probable that the photographic rights comprised part of the contract for the statue's design signed by the commissioning Australian authorities (would be normal practice in the modern period), making the photography compliant, as far I'm aware, with Australian national law and policy as well as French law. Hchc2009 (talk) 13:53, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- This statue was erected in 1998 and the sculptor/designer is still living. Is it acceptable to contact them in cases like this and ask what the situation is as regards photographic rights? I did that once several years ago and it can get awkward to explain how Commons works. Most living artists, understandably, want to retain some degree of control over reuse of depictions of their artistic creations, and that tends to mean use on Commons is not permitted unless they explicitly allow it. Are there examples of living artists allowing this and would that over-ride the French FOP considerations here? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: The relevant law is French, not Australian, and unless the Australian government both bought the copyright (very unlikely) and released it into the PD worldwide (even more unikely), this still has a French copyright. There is also the matter of the considerable text on the plaque, not all of which is simply names and dates. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Previously published with no copyright at https://www.facebook.com/GuvnaMusic (https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/c0.108.851.315/p851x315/1534944_10152167498363982_1998263493_o.jpg) Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Idtenti are responsible for management of Guvna B and commissioned and hold copyright for this photograph which has been used elsewhere as marketing collateral. We are also the author of Govna B's Wiki page
I hereby affirm that I, Ivan Brown of Idtenti, am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of File:Guvna B performing at BCDO Festival 2013.jpg and agree to publish that work under the free licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation Licence (unversioned, with no invariant sections,front-cover texts or back-cover texts. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the licence and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work,and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the licence chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I am aware that the free licence only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights,trademark restrictions, etc. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikipedia project
Ivan Brown at ivan@idtenti.com Copyright holder 1st January 2014Idtenti (talk) 02:51, 01 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure you can change the copyright for an image that has already been published. I will allow a copyright expert discuss that. Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Idtenti/Ivan Brown originated the image and held the copyright before it was ever published. We currently hold copyright on several Guvna B images that will be published in the future and may subsequently be submitted to Wiki. We are not seeking to change copyright for the photograph of File: Guvna B performing at BCDO Festival.jpg. Regards. Idtenti (talk) 03:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- I suspect that the presence of EXIF data is a good sign. I'll allow those more knowledgeable in copyright laws here on the commons discuss if this further. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no Idtenti.com, so the assertions here are suspect. This can be restored if we receive a proper license using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
,_V%C3%A4sterg%C3%B6tland,_Sweden_(6052868756).jpg){kind=link}
,_V%C3%A4sterg%C3%B6tland,_Sweden_(6052868756).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:G%C3%B6teborg_%28Gothenburg%29,_V%C3%A4sterg%C3%B6tland,_Sweden_%286052868756%29.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oaktree b (talk • contribs) 2013-12-28T22:27:10 (UTC)
Kept: Yes, it is a duplicate of itself. THe two file names are the same, although the one shows the ASCII codes and the other does not. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
,_Västergötland,_Sweden_(6052868756).jpg){kind=link}
File:Name - Anulak Wanwong-Nickname - Boom-Birthday - 5 November 1988-Nationality - Thai-Religion - Buddhidt-Birth Place - Bangkok, Thailand-Height - 165 Cm-Weight - 50 Kg-Status - Single-Best friend - Nichapoj Lapthanakornv 2013-06-16 13-34.jpg
[edit]
unused user image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
A file of superior quality exists. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 06:39, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Both images cite the same source (http://malacanang.gov.ph/presidents/fifth-republic/benigno-aquino-iii/) and neither claims any sort of retouching by commons editors. The image I see displayed there matches this nominated image rather than the proposed replacement, and I don't see links to any alternative or collections of images. Is there something I'm missing? What is the actual source of the other image? DMacks (talk) 07:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- There was no retouching done by commons users (afaik). I think File:PNoy Official Portrait 11x13.75.jpg is the original image and this one is a cropped version uploaded on the government website. Perhaps the uploader (User:Aleaiacatest) is the photographer of the image and decided to upload it. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 08:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The replacement image does not open in my computer. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- The page loads fine on mine[8]. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 14:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
![[8]](http://s1271.photobucket.com/user/raykyogrou0/media/loads_zps7175128f.png.html){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
not good version — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amonet (talk • contribs) 2013-12-31T14:30:52 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason given for deletion. If your English is not good, please feel free to renominate this with a reason in your own language. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Delete: I created this file in Gimp, but I uploaded not good version - it is only my mistake in uploaded process. Good files are File:Wikipedia logo new year sk.png and File:Wikipedia logo novy rok 2014 15.png. Therefore I request to delete this file. Thanks. --Amonet ✉ 19:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Please, delete this file. I wrote the reason on page Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikipedia logo novy rok 2014 14.png: I created this file in Gimp, but I uploaded not good version - it is only my mistake in uploaded process. Good files are File:Wikipedia logo new year sk.png and File:Wikipedia logo novy rok 2014 15.png. Therefore I request to delete this file. Thanks. --Amonet ✉ 11:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angkasaraya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:HALIM (1).JPG
- File:Abdul Halim88.jpg
- File:Halim88.jpg
- File:Stage (2).JPG
- File:Abdul Halim 3.JPG
- File:Abdul Halim Yusof.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
unused user images, out of project scope
- File:Nama panggilan - -Waktu lahir sampai umur 4 tahun saya dipanggil mamang kotel sama keluarga besar saya bahasa jawanya yg artinya paman kecil--Waktu umur 5-10 tahun saya dipanggil Baim vampire sama teman-teman- 2013-09-15 04-22.jpg
- File:Nama lengkap orangtua- Legiwo (alm-bapak) & Ngatinah (Ibu)-Saya ada 7 bersaudara, 1 female & 6 male & (saya anak terakhir-lastchild)- 2013-09-15 04-10.jpg
- File:Nama lengkap - Ibrahim Nur-Jenis kelamin - Male-Tempat & tanggal lahir - Medan, Sumatera Utar - 23 January 1991 2013-09-15 04-04.jpg
_%26_Ngatinah_(Ibu)-Saya_ada_7_bersaudara,_1_female_%26_6_male_%26_(saya_anak_terakhir-lastchild)-_2013-09-15_04-10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 17:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ilham ajie bhaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user images, out of project scope
- File:Nama- ilham -Nama lengkap- ilham ajie bhaskara-Nama panggilan- seniman ilham,ibhas,bhaskara,ilham-Tempat tgl lahir- sukabumi,08-08-99 (14)-Hobi- koleksi,main sepak bola,basket,dan badminton-Agama- islam-Pekerj 2013-12-09 22-11.jpg
- File:Seniman ilham(ilham ajie bhaskara) berkunjung ke musium dirgantara jogjakarta 2013-12-09 19-07.jpg
- File:Ilham ajie bhaskara adalah kolektor uang kuno termuda di indonesia 2013-12-09 19-00.jpg
-Hobi-_koleksi,main_sepak_bola,basket,dan_badminton-Agama-_islam-Pekerj_2013-12-09_22-11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_berkunjung_ke_musium_dirgantara_jogjakarta_2013-12-09_19-07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jose Pablo OK (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jose Pablo OK (talk · contribs)
[edit]False authorship claims - none of the images by this uploader are from various websites (File:Jardín Botánico de Castilla-La Mancha.jpg). Note the small pixel count and the low resolution of the images.
- File:Jardín Botánico de Castilla-La Mancha.jpg
- File:F8B42C95F5D8DE53C1257BF90028A91FT20.jpg
- File:5E0497B31C4B4182C12576710046EEF5T20.jpg
- File:B02057899B28B46BC125771C0034CA56T20.jpg
- File:5E0497B31C4B4182C12576710046EEF5T40.jpg
- File:TLP albacete.jpg
- File:TLP SPAIN.jpg
- File:TLP OTAN.jpg
- File:Frontpage2a.jpg
- File:Aa2 (1).jpg
- File:Tlp.jpg
- File:80519F372F2D4823C125745F0045EB59T10.gif
- File:Maestranza Aérea de Albacete 2.jpg
- File:A67140ad0106a54839b4b0bd8bf7693d.jpg
- File:Bdfb93a29b7d3b224a11e8079c091b12.jpg
- File:629479ab7e337cd6bbaf28fa527bc3a0.jpg
- File:471cb125e24ffa12b169152bbd8aa454.jpg
- File:550a5004837514e9f5702525289bada5.jpg
- File:7448d794e2c3165b7bebe391fb0ed289.jpg
- File:Maestranza Aérea de Albacete.jpg
- File:TLP.jpg
- File:Instalaciones TLP.jpg
- File:Logo TLP.jpg
- File:Real Conservatorio Profesional de Música y Danza de Albacete.jpg
- File:Conservatorio Profesional de Música Tomás de Torrejón y Velasco de Albacete.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
High Contrast (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khalilkhan k khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files meant for self-promotion alone. Commons is not a private album. Out of project scope in my opinion.
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-41.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-40.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-39.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-38.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-22.jpg
Rahul Bott (talk) 09:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete Commons is not facebook --High Contrast (talk) 11:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khalilkhan k khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mostly unused, personal images, some of them incorporating probably copyrighted material (e.g. File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-38.jpg or File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-36.jpg). Nothing has changed since the last DR: Commons is still not Facebook (see Commons:Scope).
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-36.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-27.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-25.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-19.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-18.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-16.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-15.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-14.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-13.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-12.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-11.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-10.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-05.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-04.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-01.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-00.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 04-55.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-55.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-53.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-52.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-50.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-49.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-48.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan-DR ghani gharwal 2014-01-09 01-46.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan -DR ghani gharwal 2014-01-09 01-45.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan-DR ghani gharwal 2014-01-09 01-44.jpg
- File:Rakhman 2014-01-09 01-42.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-40.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-38.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-37.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-36.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-33.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-32.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-31.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-30.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-29.jpg
- File:Banuchai khan 2014-01-09 01-19.jpg
- File:Nyamatullha 2014-01-09 01-18.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-13.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-11.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-10.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-09.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-08.jpg
- File:Khlilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-08.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-03.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-02.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-58.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-56.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-55.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-51.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-50.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-49.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-47.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-42.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-40.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-39.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-38.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-37.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-49.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-47.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-46.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-45.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan- 2014-01-08 23-44.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-43.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-42.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-23.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-21.jpg
El Grafo (talk) 14:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
DeleteThe files should be speedied and the uploader should be issued a strict warning. Some even have plausible privacy issues (e.g. File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-19.jpg). Rahul Bott (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: All files are speedy deleted by Denniss. JurgenNL (talk) 07:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria José Negócio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of scope.
Savhñ 16:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Abdesed.jpg
- File:Acnss.jpg
- File:Abdeslammm.jpg
- File:Abdeslamm.jpg
- File:Seddiki.jpg
- File:Abdeslam Seddiki.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed and can be found on the web elswhere as well Natuur12 (talk) 17:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ssebbastiann (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolutions and PNG format. The images are likely not own work.
Jespinos (talk) 14:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Swagamaholic (talk · contribs)
[edit]The images look like video screenshots.
Jespinos (talk) 16:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Исправляющий и создающий (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted images and icons, taken from various sites, not own work.
- File:Black guitar XD.png
- File:Asdfghjkl.png
- File:Индекс Развития Человеческого Потенциала (ИРЧП) 2013.png
- File:3D Flag of Russia.png
- File:Flag maps of Europe.png
- File:Раша.png
- File:MegaFon logo.jpg
- File:Tea.....png
- File:Pirate....png
- File:Testtube.png
- File:Food.png
- File:Icone windows.png
- File:Beeline.png
- File:Luxembourg (Administrative division).png
- File:Букашки.png
- File:Flag map of Burma (Флаг-карта Мьянмы).png
- File:It`s 4 o`lock.png
- File:Моя страница на складе.png
- File:Plus in green globe.png
- File:Forum SMS.png
- File:Website correction (Исправление).png
- File:Error (Ошибка).png
- File:Panda Cloud Antivirus logo.png
- File:Шоу "Уральские пельмени" лейб.png
- File:Фортепиано (октава).png
- File:01-Russian alphabet-R r.svg.png
- File:Globe - West Asia.png
- File:Map of Asia (Blue).png
- File:Seven class.png
- File:Blackboard 55.png
- File:My Passports.png
- File:Fpbzz.png
- File:Fpbz.png
- File:Flag-map of Kazakhstan.png
- File:GetImage.jpg
- File:Вышивка.svg.png
- File:Outline Map of Altai Krai.svg.png
- File:Обо мне1111.png
_2013.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 10:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
This is duplicate of Srbija_-_Udeo_srpskog_jezika_po_opstinama_2011_1.gif Tresnjevo (talk) 22:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as duplicate. whym (talk) 14:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio. Non acrofan.com file. ChongDae (talk) 07:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Remove User:Soundchiri's contribution parts only. -- ChongDae (talk) 07:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This photo is acrofan.com's picture.--Fetx2002 (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: but deleted the etoday.co.kr upload Jcb (talk) 13:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Although I don;t read Russian and I may be missing it, I don;t see any free license on the source site. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS ticket attached. What does it say?--Ymblanter (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Info The ticket is shown via {{Soccer.ru}} which was discussed at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_from_Soccer.ru. Although I cannot read Russian, the previous conclusion was that there was clear permission from the soccer.ru website. --whym (talk) 15:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept, there is enough clear permission in OTRS-ticket. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Per User_talk:Jcb#File:Himno_Nacional_Mexicano.2C_versi.C3.B3n_instrumental_completa.ogg, is this Public Domain? Jcb (talk) 22:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 19:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
File:1. Documento di detenzione della Polizia Criminale Tedesca di Stato (Staatliche Kriminalpolizei), datato 12 Marzo 1939.jpg
[edit],_datato_12_Marzo_1939.jpg){kind=link}
,_datato_12_Marzo_1939.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license. Th uploader added a CC license later, but this is obviously wrong. Is is image PD by any other reasons? JuTa 22:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- It is a German identification document from 1939. Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment one could argue that creating and filling out this form doesn't require much creativity, so it might be below the TOO (
{{PD-Scan|PD-ineligible}}). Apart from that, there appears to be a personality rights issue: This is a "note to the file" that someone has been accused of bilking (leo says that's the word for Zechprellerei, meaning not paying the bill at a pub or restaurant) and the police has filed charges. Unless that's a noteworthy case and the accused is a noteworthy person, I'd feel better if we blackened the personal information. --El Grafo (talk) 10:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Template:PD-scan Alan (talk) 03:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The SOHO (ESA & NASA) joint project implies that all materials created by its probe are copyrighted and require permission for commercial non-educational use. /St1995 17:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The license of the video on their official YouTube channel is still valid (CC-BY). --McZusatz (talk) 20:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SOHO images. Licence on SOHO official YouTube channel may be wrong (contradicts this) /St1995 22:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SOHO images Alan (talk) 03:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
I cannot find any {{CC-BY-SA-3.0}} or {{GFDL}} on source site while license reviewing. --레비Revi 08:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete then sadly. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
The page i took from it was uploaded freely without a license. So fine, go ahead delete it.. next time if anyone of you uploads this file again i will nominate it for deletion for sure, because i'm tired of this license reviewing you're talking about. AceDouble (talk) 12:58, 03 December 2014 (UTC)
- If the file is free work, file must have one or more license we accept. (And, please assume good faith, and license reviewing is important because we have to verify license status.) --레비Revi 12:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep PD-shape and PD-textlogo apply, eagle is from flag and also PD. Fry1989 eh? 17:47, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: fairly simple Alan (talk) 03:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
