Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/11/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
File:Albert Marquet, 1919, La femme blonde, oil on canvas, 98.5 x 98.5 cm, Musée national d'Art moderne, Centre Georges Pompidou.jpg
[edit]This image was meant to be uploaded to Wikipedia, not Wikimedia Commons. Please delete. Thanks, CC Coldcreation (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: OK. JuTa 08:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Restored because it is now PD. Green Giant (talk) 19:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Low quality penis pic. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Redirection inutile François GOGLINS (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept. Nous ne supprimons pas les redirections, sauf ils sont insultes. We do not delete file redirects except they are insulting. C.f. m:Don't delete redirects. -- Rillke(q?) 13:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 21:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: All done! Thanks! High Contrast (talk) 21:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
terrible quality image, we have more than enough better. Not usable in an educational way and the image always let me think of a guy who only wants to show us his gut (= exebitionism) Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
terrible quality image, we have more than enough better. Not usable in an educational way and the image always let me think of a guy who only wants to show us his gut (= exebitionism) Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
terrible quality and we had better one Semi-Brace (talk) 00:18, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
We have the flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unueable small, unused nearly dublicate JuTa 06:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unueable small, unused nearly dublicate JuTa 06:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unueable small, unused nearly dublicate JuTa 06:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unueable small, unused nearly dublicate JuTa 06:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unueable small, unused nearly dublicate JuTa 06:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unueable small, unused nearly dublicate JuTa 06:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 21:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unueable small, unused nearly dublicate JuTa 06:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Apparently cropped magazine cover or product package, not own work. whym (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Info User:Rito199719971997 (uploader) asserts that it was provided by Ōkura Eiga (大蔵映画). It is unclear if we can expect getting an OTRS permission. --whym (talk) 10:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion per uploader's request [1]. whym (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
incorrect airport name and minimally populated category — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xnatedawgx (talk • contribs) 2013-11-23T18:25:19 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 09:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Fair use image; false own work claim Prokurator11 (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:57, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This file is a replicate of Newton.png Temporabile (talk) 12:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 20:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2013-11-21T05:49:13 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Couldn't get a license for it. Albatalad (talk) 11:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Magog the Ogre. Yann (talk) 08:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE due to unusable low image quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
out of scope McZusatz (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Photo of private / personal email, no educational value Torsch (talk) 10:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete Agree with nominator, this is a text statement, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:50, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
The person on photo has not given permission to be depicted and identified on Wikipedia.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.199.81.176 (talk • contribs) 2013-11-22T01:17:30 (UTC)
Kept: Apparently taken in a public place. Yann (talk) 09:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Missing proof to be used on commons. There exists no page with correct license of the file 77.218.253.11 08:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep: File in use, therefore in scope. Also, this file already survived a DR, and no newer and stronger reasons for deletion provided. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Per statements above. AcidSnow (talk) 14:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. Soupforone (talk) 15:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete:No licence provided for file that shows permission to use file on WP. Image removed from source page. Uploader known for uploading CV images.Richard0048 (talk) 22:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, the file is still there [2]. It is also licensed for reuse under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike [3]. Soupforone (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- You're right Soupforne. However, Richard0048 saw fit to remove the link that indicated permission from the file (see here: [4]) and claimed that permission was never granted (see here:[5]). This is all quite interesting. AcidSnow (talk) 17:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, the file is still there [2]. It is also licensed for reuse under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike [3]. Soupforone (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Spurious DR. --INeverCry 18:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Image doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria in the licence. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- I would like to submit the following Non-free use rationale because I believe that the image is important to illustrate the article and should not be deleted. Karrattul (talk) 17:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
{{Non-free use rationale | Description = Image of commemorative postage stamp depicting portraits of the four Nepalese martyrs executed in 1941. | Source = http://www.rajan.com/stamps/st1965.htm | Article = Gangalal Shrestha | Portion = | Low_resolution = Yes | Purpose = The image of the stamp will be used to show what kind of stamp was issued to honor the memory of the subject as stated in the article. | Replaceability = This is the only postage stamp issued to honor the subject. | other_information = The stamp was issued in 1965 and the subjects were executed in 1941. }}
- No fair use on commons; COM:FU. --Dschwen (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- The file can be deleted from Commons as I have uploaded a duplicate file to English Wiki with the proper non-free use rationale. Thank you for pointing out the error. File:Stamp_of_four_martyrs_of_Nepal_1965.jpg Karrattul (talk) 16:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-free software ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
by copyright Arenaltour (talk) 11:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied (uploader request) Dschwen (talk) 15:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Image doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria in the licence. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- I would like to submit the following Non-free use rationale because I believe that the image is important to illustrate the article and should not be deleted. Karrattul (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
{{Non-free use rationale | Description = Image of commemorative postage stamp depicting traditional clothing of Kathmandu. | Source = http://www.rajan.com/stamps/st1973.htm | Article = Traditional Newar clothing | Portion = | Low_resolution = Yes | Purpose = The image of the stamp will be used to show the recognition given to traditional clothes by the issuance of a postage stamp. | Replaceability = This is the only postage stamp issued showing the traditional clothing of Kathmandu. | other_information = The stamp was issued in 1973. }}
- No fair use on commons: COM:FU. --Dschwen (talk) 17:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- The file can be deleted from Commons as I have uploaded a duplicate file to English Wiki with the proper non-free use rationale. Thank you for pointing out the error. File:Traditional_dress_of_Kathmandu_1973.jpg Karrattul (talk) 16:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
As with the other file from the same user that I just nominated for deletion, I don't believe that this is indeed Montreal. While we do not see signage language in this case, and there are few distinguishing marks, I believe we see a street sign at upper left reading Lake Road? If so, there is no such road in Montreal, nor was there in the 1960s. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- If you maximize the image and look at the yellow truck at centre it appears to say Pittsburgh on its front., fwiw. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, it's Duluth, Minnesota. See nominated image "C", from the same 3-picture set. It's clearly this block. Rename to Duluth in 1964 or some such. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep and rename. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- In fact, I see the same editor did upload a fourth image from what looks like the same set correctly to Duluth, on the day back in 2008: File:Duluth-1.09.1964.jpg. Sloppy, sloppy work and he ought to be trout-slapped. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Renamed to File:Duluth, Minnesota, 15 avril 1964.jpg, redirect not needed. Yann (talk) 08:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm fairly certain that this is NOT Montreal. The 100% English language signage is a giveaway. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- The mention of "Norshor" on the movie marquee at left and "North City Bank" on image C would seem to make this Duluth, Minnesota, according to my Google work. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, it's Duluth, Minnesota. See nominated image C, from the same 3-picture set. It's clearly this block.
Renameto Duluth in 1964 or some such. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC) - Keep and rename. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- In fact, I see the same editor did upload a fourth image from what looks like the same set correctly to Duluth, on the day back in 2008: File:Duluth-1.09.1964.jpg. Sloppy, sloppy work and he ought to be trout-slapped. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- God, what a mess. I see now that this image is in fact a duplicate of File:Duluth-tower avenue-1964.jpg, which the same editor had apparently uploaded a year earlier. So we can delete, after all. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm... Give the uploader the benefit of doubt – He might have been raised up being told Minnesota is Montreal, and vice versa. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 05:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate. HR copied to other name. Yann (talk) 08:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
The third such image from this user claimed as Montreal. It is not. There would be some French on those street signs, even back then, if this was indeed Montreal. It must be in English Canada or somewhere in the United States. What's more, fwiw, I was born in Montreal in1958 and have lived here my entire life: in none of the three claimed images do a see a single building or corner that I recognize. All three images are mistakenly titled imo. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Upon closer examination, the office building at left has "Northern City Bank" above its entrance. There is no such bank in Canada, now or then. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, it's Duluth, Minnesota, as indicated by Norshor on image "B" and this bank name. See here. It's clearly the same block. Rename to Duluth in 1964 or some such. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep and rename. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- In fact, I see the same editor did upload a fourth image from what looks like the same set correctly to Duluth, on the day back in 2008: File:Duluth-1.09.1964.jpg. Sloppy, sloppy work and he ought to be trout-slapped. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Renamed to File:Duluth, Minnesota, 15 avril 1964 c.jpg, redirect not needed. Yann (talk) 08:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete per description, really. Of no education value: "The view from our hotel room in Montreal. I don't actually know where in Montreal it was cause I slept through the entire bus ride. Montreal, Quebec." I don't see anything of educational value, neither the sunset nor the small parking lot. WP's NOTGUIDE guideline would seem to apply here. I'm sorry the user had a bad hotel view but WikiCommons is not Tripadvisor. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Why dont you edit the description, instead of nominating this image to DR? Just because an image has a bad description, it doesnt mean we trow it away. Image is of good quality, in scope and has educatiobal value. Remember that WP's NOTGUIDE applies here, but not to this image but instead to the DR rationale, as "English Wikipedia is not Wikimedia Commons" and so the en Wikipedia policies dotn apply in Commons and vice versa. Also uploader doesnt show why is this image out of educational value. I also ask how many images has Commons of parking lots in Montreal? Besides this one it has Zero. Tm (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- I've added it to the car parks category -- that's about all I can do. But I do believe that COM:EDUSE applies here, as this not a very illustrative example of either a parking lot, or even less, a sunset in Montreal. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 08:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: work by Gustav Schmidtcassel (d. 1954). Eleassar (t/p) 16:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:Riga peter the great statue.jpg, File:Рига памятник Петру Великому открытка.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: see text in {{PD-RusEmpire}}. Не имеет никакого значения, кто автор и когда он умер: это почтовые типографские открытые письма Российской Империи, в которую входила Рига, отпечатанные до Первой мировой войны и до оккупации Риги немецкими войсками. Рига (Курляндия) - не ВКФ и не Царство Польское. --Vizu (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ok.
I withdraw my nomination. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ok.
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 09:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Very low resolution, so it's probably a copyright violation of http://www.feathersite.com/Poultry/CGP/Sri/SriHen8.JPEG Chipmunkdavis (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
User request: misdiagnosis of medical condition; not scientifically accurate. CS87 (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No educational use. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This Sword is with his design a work of art. The Artist is definetly not dead since 70 years. So in my opinion we have to delete this image. Marcus Cyron (talk) 05:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep If you haf bother to waste 30 seconds researching instead of wasting 1 minute opening this DR, you would see that the flickr source of this image is an official page of Albion Europe ApS the maker (or artist) of this sword, so we have permission of the maker of this sword, that is an utilitarian object and not an work of art. It is so lovely to open an frivolous DR, with no research of its source, so lets open an DR to waste everyones time and latin.Tm (talk) 10:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - I would say to keep this photo, as it does provide something usable. However, there are two apparently identical photos of this sword with one other file name slightly different. Since 'edition' in the other file name is misspelled, I would recommend to delete that particular file. Wpollard (talk) 02:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. In addition, I don't think there is a copyright of the object. Yann (talk) 08:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
In's modern monument. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Watermark. Small size. Yann (talk) 09:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
A sculpture was created in the 2000s. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Also out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
No educational value to this image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Latvian Academy of Arts
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Latvia: the building is work by Wilhelm Bockslaff (d. 1945).
- File:Latvijas Makslas akademija (P).jpg
- File:Latvijas Mākslas akadēmija (2).jpg
- File:Latvijas Mākslas akadēmija.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 16:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Latvia: "Note that the Latvian law was 50 years pma until 6 April 2000, so that works made by people who died on or before December 31, 1945 were PD on the URAA date, January 1, 1996." --Eleassar (t/p) 16:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 09:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:13-08-06-Scheich-Zayid-Moschee-RalfR-05.jpg. --79.242.56.131 13:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Same applies for
- --79.242.56.131 13:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Not his own work, claims to be pre 1900. Could be in the public domain but there is no direct evidence to support this. Maybe it is still copyrighted. As long as there is no evidence that this file is in the public domaine it can better be delted. Nontheless the licening information is wrong. Natuur12 (talk) 22:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: the facade is work by Frederick Ernest Giesecke (1869-1953).[6] The architecture is not in the public domain yet, because 70 years have not passed yet since his death. Eleassar (t/p) 15:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
File:A young girl getting her face painted at Cirque du Soleil's "La Fēte Foraine" circus festival.jpg
[edit]Per the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting.JPG: copyrightable. Eleassar (t/p) 22:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern architecture and monument. Eleassar (t/p) 20:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: sculptural work by Spartak Chatshaturowitsch Babajan (still living). Eleassar (t/p) 20:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:Al-Khorezmi near Ata-Darwaza-(western-gate) Khiva Uzbekistan .jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 1998 monument. Eleassar (t/p) 20:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 2004 monument. Eleassar (t/p) 17:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Correct version exists as File:America FC (MG).svg. This one is identical with File:America FC.svg, the logo of America Football Club, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. OAlexander (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 2000s monument. Eleassar (t/p) 20:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Small, unused, and SVG is available (File:America FC (PE).svg). OAlexander (talk) 09:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: sculpture by Rashit Suleymanov (still living). Eleassar (t/p) 21:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: the statue of Andrejs Upits in Riga. Upits died in 1970, so the sculpture must be of a later date. Eleassar (t/p) 16:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Logo consisting of more than simple geometrical shapes. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Logo consisting of more than simple geometrical shapes. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, PD-Textlogo. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Logo consisting of more than simple geometrical shapes. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This image is a derivative work of the recently deleted image Aplysia66-300.jpg (see deletion discussion here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Aplysia66-300.jpg). As a derivative work it is also subject to removal from Wikimedia Commons, its publication in any other venue notwithstanding, pending permission of the copyright holder (which so far has not been given). KDS444 (talk) 06:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Feel free to delete. I removed possibly copyrighted body shape and uploaded the reproductive system under the new file File:Aplysia californica reproductive system.png. --Snek01 (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
No indication whatsoever that these images can be used 'free of rights' or under CC-BY-SA. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Arriva.jpg Pbech (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
No indication whatsoever that these images can be used 'free of rights' or under CC-BY-SA. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Arriva.jpg Pbech (talk) 13:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
No indication whatsoever that these images can be used 'free of rights' or under CC-BY-SA. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Arriva.jpg Pbech (talk) 13:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1967). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1967). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
COM:FLICKRWASH - EXIF data doesn't match other uploads, image appears elsewhere on Google Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:12, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
PD-Russia does not apply, because author is stated to have died in 1948, which is not before 1 January 1943. Jcb (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Blurry, the uploader do not even check his pictures before uploading them. Briarfallen (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for you message. Actually, I noticed the rather blurred photo, however, I also noticed therein a mysterious object which may interest paranormal study on this, so I uploaded this. Respectfully, submitted, no objection to the deletion. Best regards.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 23:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Is being blurry a valid rationale? A keep is justified as this illustrates a cathedral, albeit in a blurry manner. Also, Briarfallen, grammar, grammar. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 05:50, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Too lazy to do some investigation. Since I now know that there are better images, kudos to Elin Beltz, I opine for a delete. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 16:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The project has other less-blurry images of the same part of the same cathedral. See File:BatangasCathedraljf8730 07.JPG, File:BatangasCathedraljf8730 04.JPG, File:BatangasCathedraljf8730 12.JPG and File:BatangasCathedraljf8745 11.JPG for more views of same place. I don't think we need a blurry view when we have better ones. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, the paranormal object, which looks like a flying spaghetti monster, is better seen here. An elaborate glass lamp, hanging from ceiling. I solved the mystery and now we can close the case. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: no evidence that the monument is in the public domain, presumably post-Soviet. Eleassar (t/p) 21:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Mistake - the Bretagne regiment didn't exist before 1758, then the regiment [:File:Hocquincourtt inf 1757.png] has been renamed into Bretagne L' empereur Charles (talk) 11:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Incomplete map, was forked from File:CA2012House.svg but never filled out. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This is evidently an image from a newspaper, the name of which is not provided in the file description. That it comes from a collection of genealogy documents is irrelevant. Source needs clarification or image must be removed. KDS4444 (talk) 03:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Obviously a copyright violation 188.104.100.218 12:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern statue. Eleassar (t/p) 21:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Poorly-edited selfpic used for promotional article in eswiki, already deleted. Also, we’re not Flickr. —Fitoschido (talk) 20:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: no evidence that this building is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 21:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Since I learnt that FOP didn't apply to Uzbekistan I actually had the intention to check my former uploads and all the photos of Uzbek buildings in the various categories concerning this country. I think there are lots of pictures we need to delete because of that. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:28, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Not his own work, claims to be pre 1900. Could be in the public domain but there is no direct evidence to support this. Maybe it is still copyrighted. As long as there is no evidence that this file is in the public domaine it can better be delted. Nontheless the licening information is wrong. Natuur12 (talk) 22:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This would-be Czech pronunciation is entirely wrong. Dan Polansky (talk) 18:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Germany, the stamp is not in the public domain. It features a copyrighted photo. Eleassar (t/p) 15:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in Italy. May be copyrightable. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: modern architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 15:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Despite the CC licence, the description states "COPYRIGHT TO Gabi Butcher© / DiaPositivo Fotografia© / DiaPositivo Atelier Fotográfico©. DO NOT USE MY PHOTOS FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT MY EXPLICIT PERMISSION." I feel we should honour this. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that we should honor the copyright statement in the description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
superseded by File:Flag of Yaroslavl Oblast 1998.svg 
McZusatz (talk) 23:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Very poor quality, replaceable. Yikrazuul (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed. --Leyo 14:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 12:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Permission claims PD-textlogo, but the image contains a drawn picture of a sealed letter which is not a simple geometric shape. I think the image passes the threshold of originality. Note: It has many uses on projects. Odie5533 (talk) 08:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
n utilise pas gmail 92.143.172.156 08:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Frivolous DR. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Source appears to be invalid. Source provided can be found here, but without this image anywhere on it: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6786 KDS4444 (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted license plate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Really different from the reliable picture: File:Cainteoirí Gaeilge - Irish Speakers.svg Franxo (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Now I say keep as reliable sources have been provided supporting the information given.--Franxo (talk) 10:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Really different form File:Norwegianmalforms.png Any reliable source for Norwegian in Sweden as spoken language? Franxo (talk) 22:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Reliable sources have been provided and then the description of the light blue colour should be changed into where it is not majority because the word minority implies it is hardly spoken. Finally, keep.--Franxo (talk) 10:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: will now change the description Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This file is inaccurate. Norwegian is the official language and also the majority language in the whole mainland, except for Kautokeino municipality. Even there the majority of the population speaks Norwegian, even if 90% is said to have Northern Sami as native language. At Svalbard there are two communities with other majority languages, but I'm not sure if both of them should count in this respect. In Barentsburg the population is Russians and Ukrainians, while in Hornsund there is a Polish research station. In Sweden the official and majority language is Swedish, but note that the Nordic languages are very closely related. In all I think there are to many errors here and the map should be deleted unless it can be promptly fixed. It is removed from the article about Norwegian language at nowiki. [7] Jeblad (talk) 11:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Delete. It is not possible to understand what this file is supposed to illustrate the distribution of.All of Norway speaks Norwegian. All of Sweden speaks Swedish. Sweden does not have Norwegian speaking areas or a Norwegian speaking minority as shown in this file. In both Sweden and Norway we do have our brethren from the other side of the border mostly working in the big cities. This said, Swedish and Norwegian are very closely related and we can understand each other (mostly though on occation we misunderstand each other). A Swede can live in Norway and speak Swedish in Norway and he/she will be understood (and vice versa). Both languages have a plethora of dialects. The areas in Sweden this file shows as partly Norwegian speaking areas are the areas Båhuslen, Jämtland and Härjedalen which was lost to Norway and became Swedish (1177/78-1645 and approx.1000-1658) with the consequenses this had for both the spoken and written language in the areas. Although nobody spoke modern Norwegian or Swedish at the time. They do not have a Norwegian speaking minority, the northernmost area does have a Swedish dialect that is closer to Norwegian than other Swedish dialects though.
- In a few areas in Norway such as Kautokeino a considerable part of the population is bilingual and has a choice as to which language they consider their main language and prefer to learn in school (and if they chose Sami they also learn Norwegian). Some municipalities also have Sami as an option to chose in communication with Norwegian authorities. More than 50 years ago quite a few in these areas were not able to speak Norwegian and only spoke Sami or Finnish. This is no longer the situation. This file does not show which areas this was. The Norwegian government netsite: Samelovens språkregler og forvaltningsområdet for samisk språk has a map of the municipalities that has elected to use both Norwegian and Sami as official languages to communicate with their inhabitants (see section Forvaltningsområdet for samisk språk (dark grey areas has Sami and Norwegian both and equally as official languages)). Especially in these areas there is a large portion of the population who are bilingual. This file does not correspond to the Norwegian goverments map of municipalities having chosen Sami as official language along with Norwegian due to having a large part of the population being bilingual and preferring to use Sami.
- This file clearly does not correspond with actual language usage in either Norway or Sweden. This file is inaccurate beyong redemption. My apologies for beeing a quite upset on behalf of my country and my country's languages and not politely understating my opinion of this file. I do understand that the file is the result good will and hard work, but unfortunately not a success and the file should not be used in any article on Wikipedia or elsewere. This is the case for some other files on Commons which is or will also be requested deleted. -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 17:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Strong oppose Commons:Project_scope#File_in_use_in_another_Wikimedia_project: It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope.
- If you think the image shouldn't be used, you can try to convince local communities not to use it, but this is not a reason to delete it while it's used.
- By the way, you don't need to spend your time here giving reasons to say it's inaccurate or even plainly false. It just it isn't Common's matter.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Answer, the description of the file does reflect reality/the real world. It is not possible to understand what this file is supposed to show. It is always possible to change the description, but do not know to what except to describe a warning not to use the file and I did not feel free to do that. As long as this description is kept the file will be included in articles in good faith. -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 15:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter in Commons. Commons is here to host files for other projects, not to editorialise them or tell them what images to use. If you think the file shouldn't be used in Wikipedias, go to the Wikipedias and ask them not to use it, but while it's in use in other projects, it can't be deleted from Commons per commons:scope. Later, you can ask for deletion in Commons since it won't be in use.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- And what happens when the author has added his image/map in some Wikipedia's articles? Is it enough to maintain it? Why can't any warning be posted to warn users about its accuracy? I understand that I just can make up a map like Aragonese spoken in Norway and nobody could delete it.--Franxo (talk) 19:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification Pere prlpz. Another question, who decides the description of the file? Or rather, is it ok to do anything about the description somewhere on the file page? As far as I understand it if files are deleted on Commons there is a procedure to remove links to the files on other projects (which is easier and less of a burden on the creator), if deletion is not possible another procedure should be followed as suggested. Posting comments on several other projects to prevent use or explain removal of file is also a heavy burden on the creator of the file. Which is a reason I would prefer deletion, easier on the creator. -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 20:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about policies about placing conflicting warnings in file descriptions, although messages in file talk pages are OK. I suggest asking in village pump.
- Anyway, the process should start finding or making a better map - maps in Commons are freely licensed, so you can edit a copy as you want. Then you can propose local communities to use the new map - a message in the talk page of articles using it and changing images if there is no answer in some days or a few weeks would probably be fine.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again. This https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nordiska_språk.PNG is a better map, but as you can see it does not say much except that Norwegian is spoken in Norway, i.e. not a very interesting illustration. What is interesting about the language situation in Norway is the fact that we have three official written languages and that we have a plethora of dialects. For files depiction the official situation of the two written norwegian languages see: Category:Linguistic maps of the Norwegian language Adding the interesting files will however not be possible in language versions where I am not able to speak the language, the files needs explanatory texts which I am not able to produce (and given the quality of machine translations being close to Gobbledigook or Kauderwelsch it will end up as belonging to Jabberwocky).
- Thanks for the clarification Pere prlpz. Another question, who decides the description of the file? Or rather, is it ok to do anything about the description somewhere on the file page? As far as I understand it if files are deleted on Commons there is a procedure to remove links to the files on other projects (which is easier and less of a burden on the creator), if deletion is not possible another procedure should be followed as suggested. Posting comments on several other projects to prevent use or explain removal of file is also a heavy burden on the creator of the file. Which is a reason I would prefer deletion, easier on the creator. -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 20:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- And what happens when the author has added his image/map in some Wikipedia's articles? Is it enough to maintain it? Why can't any warning be posted to warn users about its accuracy? I understand that I just can make up a map like Aragonese spoken in Norway and nobody could delete it.--Franxo (talk) 19:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter in Commons. Commons is here to host files for other projects, not to editorialise them or tell them what images to use. If you think the file shouldn't be used in Wikipedias, go to the Wikipedias and ask them not to use it, but while it's in use in other projects, it can't be deleted from Commons per commons:scope. Later, you can ask for deletion in Commons since it won't be in use.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Answer, the description of the file does reflect reality/the real world. It is not possible to understand what this file is supposed to show. It is always possible to change the description, but do not know to what except to describe a warning not to use the file and I did not feel free to do that. As long as this description is kept the file will be included in articles in good faith. -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 15:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Another question: Is it acceptable to create a category Category:Linguistic maps which are questionable or wrong pr Category:Maps which are questionable or wrong?
- This procedure will however move the problem from the creator of the problem (the mapmaker) to someone else who now has to do a lot of fixing on a whole lot of projects and it will produce a hole lot of edits announcing that the original creator of the file made a mistake (which decidedly is not fun for the creator). What if the original creator asked for deletion, what would happen then? -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 13:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Strong oppose I am the creator of the file. If you have something better to say about this map, I invite you to modify it. Please, dont delete the work of other users. Moreover when there are not other maps like this about norwegian like single language map. If you give me the correct parameters I will modify it by myself, like I did once before when a norwegian user make me a petition of include the Svalbard Islands.--
Fobos | ¿algo que decirme? 13:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC
.svg){kind=small}
_CC.svg.png){kind=link}
THe.png){kind=link}
The.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![48 File:A young girl getting her face painted at Cirque du Soleil's "La Fēte Foraine" circus festival.jpg](#File:A_young_girl_getting_her_face_painted_at_Cirque_du_Soleil's_"La_Fēte_Foraine"_circus_festival.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Logo.png){kind=link}
_-_Name.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_215.JPG){kind=link}
_(6226195689).jpg){kind=link}
b1.png){kind=link}
![185 File:Здание банка "Кубань Кредит".jpg](#File:Здание_банка_"Кубань_Кредит".jpg){kind=link}
![215 File:Скульптура "Сказка".JPG](#File:Скульптура_"Сказка".JPG){kind=link}
![219 File:Торгово-развлекательный центр "Галерея Краснодар".jpg](#File:Торгово-развлекательный_центр_"Галерея_Краснодар".jpg){kind=link}
_CC.svg.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_CC.svg.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_CC.svg.png){kind=link}
_CC.svg.png){kind=link}
THe.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
THe.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
THe.png){kind=link}
THe.png){kind=link}
The.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The.png){kind=link}
The.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=File%3A%E4%B8%89%E6%9D%A1%E3%81%BE%E3%82%86%E3%81%BF.jpg×tamp=20131124120955&diff=prev){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Eritrean_Women.jpeg&diff=203082291&oldid=203068518){kind=link}
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Eritrean_Women.jpeg&diff=202979379&oldid=202958522){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Khiva_Uzbekistan_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_-_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Logo.png){kind=link}
_-_Logo.png){kind=link}
_-_Name.png){kind=link}
_-_Name.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Name.png){kind=link}
_-_Name.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Sorry again about being upset. Just drop the light blue colours and stay within the borders of Norway (Spitsbergen included, Sweden is not). Which means all of Norway and Spitsbergen in dark blue and Swedish areas in grey. To try to extinguish between habited and inhabited areas will be a different map (most of Spitsbergen is not habited and the official and majority language is Norwegian, quite large areas of Norway can also be considered as uninhabited (mountain areas), but this it not a necessary accuracy). Now this discussion takes place on several deletion pages, do we have a better discussion page to use (due to this deletion request I mistakenly proposed several pages for deletion for the same reasons), after all we are talking about something like 4-5 (or more?) files all having the same problems (accuracy and categories (and usage as a result of categories)). -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 13:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, but I have doubts yet.
- 1. what we do with the Sami areas in the north. Should not make clear what there are cities where Sami languages are spoken? Marking a Norwegian use as non native in these areas with a lighter color. Maybe the current usage its not correct, but the Sami languages exist in regions of northen Norway.
- 2. In Svalbard Islands I marked in light color the areas that are the main Russian base where the Russian language is the majority, does the map should not make it clear that?
- 3. In border areas in Sweden are people who have knowledge of Norwegian, they are not majority but I think those areas should also check if there are Swedish people with knowledge of Norwegian.
- What do you think about this questions? -- Fobos | ¿algo que decirme? 21:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Good questions is what I think.
- 2. As far as I know Barentsburg is the only place where Russian is the spoken language on Spitsbergen. This is a mining community where people come and stay for 3 years. The situation of the Svalbard Islands is internationally unique with it's right for f.ex. Russia to establish a business on the islands. There is nothing like the Svalbard_Treaty anywere else in the world. Barentsburg had approximately 439 inhabitants in 2012 although it has had around 1000 inhabitants years ago. In addition to Barentsburg Russia used to mine in Pyramiden as well, but the last resident left in 1998. There are also other abandoned mining communities. The islands can boast a population of 2,642 i 2012, most of whom live in Longyearbyen. In addition the islands has a Norwegian research settlement in Ny-Ålesund with a winter population of 30-35 persons (se also Svalbard#Population). There are 10-12 polish researchers at Polish_Polar_Station,_Hornsund. Sveagruva is not really populated anymore, it is a sleeping facility for miners working the mine, but they are resident in Longyearbyen. There is Hopen,_Svalbard with 4 employees manning the meteorological station and which belongs to the Svalbard islands. And belonging to the jurisdiction of Svalbard we have 9 persons on a meteorological station on Bear_Island_(Norway) (Bjørnøya). There is also a tradition for hunters to stay the winter in remote areas along the coast, not many and less than before. If you want to show the actual areas where there is a population actually living and speaking any language you end up with little more than dots on the map, the islands are very big and mostly quite uninhabited. There is a lot of snow and ice (File:Spitzbergen-2 hg.jpg) and quite a few File:Polar-Bear-Warning-Longyearbyen.jpg roaming the islands.
- Good questions is what I think.
- 2b. In addition to Svalbard, Norway has about 40 scientists on 12 research stations on our territory Queen_Maud_Land, no one residing on Bouvet_Island and Peter_I_Island. We have about 18 persons on Jan_Mayen. And we used to have a community big enough to have a church at Grytviken, but this is British (or contended). Probably forgot something.
- 3. The difference between Norwegian and Swedish is less than between Spanish and Portuguese and I guess it is probably closer to the difference between Brazilian Portuguese and Portuguese in Portugal. All Norwegians can speak their own language when talking to a Swede and vice versa. So all of Sweden has a working knowledge of Norwegian. They are considered to speak Swedish though.
- 1. The situation of the Sami languages is really a case for separate maps (I think). We have three Sami language groups. Category:Linguistic maps of the Sami languages contains several maps. Sami is as Fobos probably already know (but not all the readers of this discussion knows) not a Germanic language or a Indo-European language. Today the Norwegian Sami people speaks fluent Norwegian. The sad situation is however due to the forced assimilation policy many years ago a lot of the Sami people do not speak any Sami language (see Sami_people#Sami_groups_and_languages). This map I think is probably quite right File:Sami_languages_large_2.png and the dark yellow areas shows areas where there is a consentration of Sami speaking people. The dark yellow areas does however cover a lot of very sparsely or not populated areas.
- An important question is what should the map show?
- 4. Areas where the language is spoken (see Category:Dialect_maps_of_the_Norwegian_language).
- 5. Areas showing written language (we have two written Norwegian languages) (see Category:Linguistic maps of the Norwegian language).
- 6. Should the map show the situation for Norwegian alone? Is it at all possible to do a good representation of the situation for the Sami language and the Norwegian language in one map? Will a combination be fair to the Sami languages?
- 7. Areas of origins of languages is another matter. Languages travel and change with the people speaking them. Of this we know some, guess some, but this would really be a map of where ethnic groups have been resident in different periods of time.
- Sorry, I think you could add some territories, but should stay to the areas which are considered to be part of Norway.
- What I will do is ping User:Jon Harald Søby (who made one of the maps and who is a linguist) and User:Orland (who does know a lot about both the Sami languages and Norwegian). They might have some ideas and know about useful and accurate language maps on the net.
- I hope this was at least a little bit helpful, and again I apologise for being upset in the beginning. I really did not know what to do and I would not have started any mass removal of images whithout being shure of the procedure since this would be unnecessary hard on a good faith creator of the file/s. Anything else first, but even so a wrong choice!! -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 13:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, then I gonna proceed to do this: First, I go to change the Svalbard Islands for dark blue all less the Russian city with people living today of Barentsburg, I will ignore the uninhabited regions because I should change many regions of inner Norway too, so I will colored all island territories like now. Second I will colored all Norway in dark blue, ignoring the Sami languages because it use is minority. Third I will put the Swedish territory in grey like you indicated me, actually it was something rare to me because I already know about the ineligibility of Norwegian, Swedish and Danish (even Icelandic and Faroese probably too), so I already sospected about maps on which I relied, good example with brasilian and european Portuguese, but I want to say something about, there is a linguistic fenomenon between Portuguese an Spanish named Asymmetric intelligibility, because Portuguese people can understand well Spanish, but for Spanish people is more difficult understand Portuguese, it ocurre bettween Hispanoamerica and Brasil in the same way, and between Portuguese an Galician language too. It was just a remark that may interest you. -- Fobos | ¿algo que decirme? 16:29, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, then I gonna proceed to do this: First, I go to change the Svalbard Islands for dark blue all less the Russian city with people living today of Barentsburg, I will ignore the uninhabited regions because I should change many regions of inner Norway too, so I will colored all island territories like now. Second I will colored all Norway in dark blue, ignoring the Sami languages because it use is minority. Third I will put the Swedish territory in grey like you indicated me, actually it was something rare to me because I already know about the ineligibility of Norwegian, Swedish and Danish (even Icelandic and Faroese probably too), so I already sospected about maps on which I relied, good example with brasilian and european Portuguese, but I want to say something about, there is a linguistic fenomenon between Portuguese an Spanish named Asymmetric intelligibility, because Portuguese people can understand well Spanish, but for Spanish people is more difficult understand Portuguese, it ocurre bettween Hispanoamerica and Brasil in the same way, and between Portuguese an Galician language too. It was just a remark that may interest you. --
- Thanks a million for your kind understanding Fobos. Barentsburg is a bit big, but to show on the map at all it has to be, don't change it. Really a good job. To your questions, I am not shure of the linguistic term Asymmetric intelligibility, but yes there is assymetries in how well Scandinavians understand each other. Swedes does quite often have more problems with Norwegian than the other way around. This could be a consequence of Norwegian television showing more Swedish programs than the other way around. Norwegians are more exposed to the Swedish language from an early age. Scandinavian TV-programs are quite often bought and published by the other Scandinavian countries. Sweden is bigger and produces more programs. The programs are not dubbed, but texted (but so are Norwegian programs in Norway). We also have the fact that Norwegians have a habit of traveling to Sweden or Denmark to shop groceries and this gives us more experience in understanding our brethren. We are quite used to listen to each other. Danes understand non-dialect Norwegian very well, but Norwegians can have serious problems with Danish pronounciation even though the differences between the written languages are less than between Swedish and Norwegian. Norwegians should avoid speaking dialect when visiting Denmark, but I must admit some dialects spoken strongly will also give me problems. Danish and Swedish are more different than Norwegian and Swedish or Norwegian and Danish. Danish pronounciation is an obstacle which creates assymetries and written Danish is slightly more differend from Swedish than written Norwegian. -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 17:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I can change my mind, the map is fixed. Thanks again. -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 20:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 10:30, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Newspaper scan: unclear copyright status. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2013-11-21T05:48:34 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2013-11-21T05:48:54 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2013-11-21T05:47:49 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern monument (the town was founded in 1935), no evidence that it is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 21:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I see the image comes from here: [8]. I don't see any evidence that the image is in the public domain. See Commons:Hirtle Chart. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Newspaper scan: unclear copyright status. Educational value unclear. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this tiny image which appears copied from a newspaper due to the halftoning and fading. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
It's modern building (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: 2003 monument by Arne Lukševics. Eleassar (t/p) 16:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:Kārlis Ulmanis, Riga.jpg, File:Ulmanis monument.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 00:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Can someone please tell me where in Ljubljana the place with such a view is?! I know Ljubljana very well, and as far as I'm concerned, this is a montage. It is not Barjanska,[9] as someone presumed here, because there is no such turn there and the mountains are not visible this way. Eleassar (t/p) 00:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Don't know if this is a convincing or valid reason to delete. --Sporti (talk) 14:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, do you really think that some admin would decide, whether this is situated in Ljubljana or not? I have once even been in Ljubljana in 2001 summer, I do not remember any more! The file is used and therefore in scope, the license is correct, so I keep the file. I have played a game with my friends/relatives: I have a picture book from my hometown, which everybody knows well, and we try to recognize, where the photos are made and which places are on photos. There are some photos, where nobody has yet recognized the place. If new evidence arises, then the file could be renamed or again presented for deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The image is ok (I've been there today). --Eleassar (t/p) 14:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Taken from http://www.magtymguly.net, no evidence or even claim that it would be own work or public domain by the uploader. Eleassar (t/p) 21:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Turkmenistan: no evidence that the monument is in the public domain, seems modern. Eleassar (t/p) 21:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Presumably still copyrighted drawing on a carpet. Eleassar (t/p) 21:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Turkmenistan: 1971 monument by В. Н. Высотин. Eleassar (t/p) 21:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Russia: 2009 monument. Eleassar (t/p) 21:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Ukraine: 2001 monument. Eleassar (t/p) 21:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Iran: 1999 architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 21:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, no freedom of panorama in Latvia. This page tells that the building got an architectural award when it was finished in 2011, so it appears to be a very recent building. Stefan4 (talk) 01:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- I did not know about it. Then delete. --Andreykor (talk) 07:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Would this be free in the US and so usable on en.wp? I ask because the photo post collapse is marked as free in the US but potentially non-free in Latvia. Thryduulf (talk) 11:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete "Marked as free" just means that the uploader selected a license which would mechanically permit the upload to Commons. The work of art is not free in the U.S., because it's in Latvia; the relevant U.S. freedom of panorama law applies to works (the building in this case) located in United States. -Mardus (talk) 06:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- It should probably be tagged with {{Fair use delete}} to be moved to English Wikipedia where it can be tagged with w:Template:FoP-USonly. The US FOP law applies to buildings, but does not require that the building is located in any particular country. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
1. Address is incorrect - #20 on Priedaines iela.
2. This is a record of what the building looked like before the disaster. Suggest this jpeg be kept with the appropriate note.
E. Benedict — The preceding comment by EBenedict (talk) was added on 24.11.2013, 23:32 EET
3. This article seems to imply that it is allowable for non-commercial use. Perhaps that use could be clarified before such an action takes place because this picture is of a building that no longer exists as the site of the largest disaster in the country.--37.221.244.23 16:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, Commons can't keep images which can't be used for commercial purposes. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama on Latvia. Fair use is not allowed in Commons. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
The photo is obviously (per description) by Daniel Rothbart - permission is missing for a free use High Contrast (talk) 00:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader removed the words "Photo: Daniel Rothbart". I think, that this is not enough. OIRS-permission from Daniel Rothbart would be good. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Too low-rez to be of use; Montreal night skyline categories contain much better examples. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: work by Oļģerts Ostenbergs (d. 2012).[10] Eleassar (t/p) 16:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 1984 monument. Eleassar (t/p) 17:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: work by Ļevs Bukovskis (1910-1984). Eleassar (t/p) 16:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted license plate. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern monument from Chirciq (established in 1935), no information about the year of death of the sculptor. Eleassar (t/p) 21:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: no evidence that this monument is in the public domain, presumably post-Soviet. Eleassar (t/p) 21:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
one source image of this compilation had been deleted Denniss (talk) 12:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
我日你先人，啷个没得参考资料哟 27.9.33.110 08:47, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- The reason for deletion is not apparent; Bing provides no constructive rationale in its translation. TEDickey (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason given. INeverCry 17:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to have been published until recently in Obama's book, and thus is not PD. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment - also File:Pallet20wTVVHFPROMO.jpg and File:PS100048PROMO.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work, unclear status: see w:File:NewYorkYankees PrimaryLogo.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: work by Gustav Schmidtcassel (d. 1954). Eleassar (t/p) 16:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I am this map's author and I have updated it to show additional location information in another file named: File;Phalaenopsis hieroglyphica locator map.png. ChristineBushMV (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unused. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: modern architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 15:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: 1993 sculptural work. Eleassar (t/p) 16:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: sculpture by Gerhard Marcks (d. 1981). Eleassar (t/p) 16:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:Town Musicians of Bremen sculpture in Riga.JPG. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
_215.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_215.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: modern monument, no information about the year of its creation. Eleassar (t/p) 16:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
_215.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
_215.JPG){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: work by Burkards Dzenis (d. 1966). Eleassar (t/p) 16:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern monument. Eleassar (t/p) 17:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building. No FoP in Russia. Shukhov tower on the other side of this building. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: modern post-WWII monument, no evidence that the creator died before 1950. Eleassar (t/p) 17:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It seems a screenshot from Bing Maps. Incola (talk) 07:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It seems a screenshot from Bing Maps. Incola (talk) 07:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
FoP in Lithuania is not OK. Since the subject is created in 2012, it's not in PD and may only be depicted as fair use. Niklem (talk) 14:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
_(6226195689).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6226195689).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 1991 monument ("Monument of Independence"). Eleassar (t/p) 17:34, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
_(6226195689).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
_(6226195689).jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 1975 monument. Eleassar (t/p) 17:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: Петрович died in 1985, the plaque must be newer. The OTRS refers to the photo. Eleassar (t/p) 17:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This photo is evidently a derivative of an existing portrait photo found near the grave of the depicted who died already in 1978. Regrettably, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. However, it might be debated whether the original photo falls under PD-Italy. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: copyrighted sculptural work (reconstruction of a Neanderthal). Eleassar (t/p) 21:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: no evidence that the monument is pd. Eleassar (t/p) 17:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Italy: the plaque has been made after 1922, and there is no evidence that the sculptor of the relief died before 1943. Eleassar (t/p) 15:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
No indication whatsoever that these images can be used 'free of rights' or under CC-BY-SA. It may be PD-shape, but I leave that to others to decide. Pbech (talk) 13:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Latvia: work by Mirtadjiev Ravshan (2004). Eleassar (t/p) 17:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: non-free architectural model. Eleassar (t/p) 17:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Sculptural work by Mikhail Mikhaylovich Gerasimov (d. 1970). Eleassar (t/p) 17:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: the monument is dedicated to the 1966 earthquake. Eleassar (t/p) 17:34, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted license plate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
b1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
b1.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Afterwards, I uploaded a better version with a better title.--Ulamm (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
b1.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 17:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
b1.png){kind=link}
It's a modern sculpture (1980s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
![18:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/11/23#c-Yuriy75-2013-11-23T18:33:00.000Z-File:Здание_банка_"Кубань_Кредит".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
![17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/11/23#c-INeverCry-2013-11-30T17:44:00.000Z-File:Здание_банка_"Кубань_Кредит".jpg){kind=link}
It's modern building (1967). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building (1972). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
image would seem out of scope, no educative purpose, and of poor quality — billinghurst sDrewth 08:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:12, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Should this be the image that depicts the same 3D artwork as that of a deleted file, then this is not OK as Russia has no commercial FOP for non-architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern monument (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: no evidence that the monument is in the public domain, presumably post-Soviet. Eleassar (t/p) 21:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern monument (1999). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 1970 monument. Eleassar (t/p) 17:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
-02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern monument. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:12, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 1981 monument. Eleassar (t/p) 17:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern monument. Eleassar (t/p) 17:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern monument. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern monument (2000s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern monument (2010s). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern sculpture. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
![13:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/11/23#c-Yuriy75-2013-11-23T13:05:00.000Z-File:Скульптура_"Сказка".JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 17:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
![17:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/11/23#c-INeverCry-2013-11-30T17:27:00.000Z-File:Скульптура_"Сказка".JPG){kind=link}
It's modern building. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern buildings. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's modern building. No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern (post-Soviet) monument.
Eleassar (t/p) 17:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Amir Timur statue in Shahrisabz
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: work by Ilkhom Jabbarov (still living).
- File:Amir Temur.jpg
- File:Amir TemurZoomed.jpg
- File:Amir Timur statue in Shahrisabz 1.JPG
- File:Amir Timur statue in Shahrisabz 2.JPG
- File:La statue de Tamerlan (Shahrisabz) (6018902016).jpg
_(6018902016).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 20:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arena Riga
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Latvia: non-free architecture.
Eleassar (t/p) 16:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arena Riga
[edit]2006 building, no FOP in Latvia per COM:FOP Latvia.
- File:2013 - panoramio (42).jpg
- File:2013 Arena Riga - panoramio.jpg
- File:Arena nakti.jpg
- File:Arena Riga (LAT).jpg
- File:Arena riga - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Arena Riga - panoramio.jpg
- File:Arena riga - panoramio.jpg
- File:ArenaR.jpg
- File:Arēna Rīga (2).jpg
- File:Arēna Rīga (3).jpg
- File:Arēna Rīga (4).jpg
- File:Arēna Rīga (5).jpg
- File:Arēna Rīga (6).jpg
- File:Arēna Rīga - panoramio.jpg
- File:Arēna Rīga naktī. Arena Riga at night - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Arēna Rīga naktī. Arena Riga at night - panoramio.jpg
- File:Jāņa Dikmaņa iela (5).jpg
- File:Skanstes iela (5).jpg
- File:Арена Рига - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
kyykaarme (talk) 18:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry. What about "or included in works for non-commercial purposes"? Maybe, template {{NoFoP-Latvia}} or another licence in Commons can be used to save these images?
- If not, does it mean that no images of any object built in Latvia after 2000 are appropriate for Commons? And, for example, there is no possibility to illustrate articles about sport events on Arēna Rīga, such as FIBA Women's EuroBasket 2019?
- Some photos, e.g. File:Skanstes iela (5).jpg, were taken not for Arēna Rīga exactly, but rather for common landscape view. Arēna Rīga keeps less than 10% of the image. — Olgerts V (talk) 06:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Olgerts V: According to this PDF, creative works in Latvia are protected by copyright during the creator's life + 70 years. In this case I assume that means the architect and I mentioned the year because I didn't have info about the architect, but for a modern building it seems apparent that the copyright still stands. Because there is no FOP in Latvia, it's my understanding that Commons won't host images of such buildings. There are several categories of modern Latvian buildings and some have also had previous deletion requests, but unfortunately there is no warning in the categories, and they have been repopulated like this category has, for example Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Saules Akmens. I started with this category, and if these images are deleted, I will probably check other categories and nominate more images to be deleted. -kyykaarme (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Commons requires that images be free for commercial use. The argument that one of the images shows only two buildings and a field, with the buildings relatively small is not valid. For "de minimis" to apply, the removal of the copyrighted object will not be noticed by a casual viewer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern monument by Ilkhom Jabbarov (still living).
- File:Amir Timur in Tashkent.JPG
- File:Amir Timur-monument tash.JPG
- File:AmirTimurDenkmol Taschkent.jpg
- File:Emir Timur statue (mini)- Tashkent.jpg
- File:Emir Timur statue - Tashkent.jpg
- File:Stans08-283 (3134209489).jpg
- File:Statue of Amir Timur in Tashkent.jpg
- File:Tamerlane (8145402378).jpg
-_Tashkent.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 17:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lenin monument (Riga)
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Latvia: this sculpture is work by Veniamin Bogolyubov (d. 1954).
Eleassar (t/p) 16:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lev Bukovsky
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Latvia: sculptures by Lev Bukovsky (1910-1984).
- File:Salaspils Area 3.JPG
- File:Salaspils Concentration Camp Memorial near Riga.JPG
- File:Salaspils concentration camp.JPG
Eleassar (t/p) 17:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 1990s monument.
- File:Dmitry Medvedev in Uzbekistan 23 January 2009-12.jpg
- File:Dmitry Medvedev in Uzbekistan 23 January 2009-13.jpg
- File:Monument of Independence in Tashkent.JPG
- File:Toshkent fountain park.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 17:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Russia: this monument is work by the sculptors Veniamin Bogolyubov (d. 1954) and Vladimir Ingal (d. 1966) and the architect Modest Shepilevsky (d. 1982).
- File:Monument to Rimsky-Korsakov (Saint Petersburg).jpg
- File:Rimsky-Korsakov 03.jpg
- File:Rimsky-Korsakov Monument SPB.jpg
- File:Saint Petersburg 2009 tourist pictures 0237.JPG
- File:Standbeeld Rimski-Korsakov.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 16:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Riga Radio and TV Tower
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia. Gunārs Asaris appears to still be alive, so there is not yet any known undelete date.
- Keep No architecture, just antennas -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- File:Lettland Riga Fernsehturm.jpg
- File:Riga - TV Tower.jpg
- File:Riga Radio and TV Tower, overview.jpg
- File:Riga Radio and TV Tower.jpg
- File:Riga TV Tower.jpg
- File:Riga, televizní věž.jpeg
- File:Rygostelevizijosbokstas.jpg
- File:Tourtvriga.jpg
- File:TV bokstas Riga.jpg
- File:TV tower in Riga 564.jpg
- File:TV tower in Riga.jpg
russavia (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Is there anything copyrightable in the antenna? --Leyo 14:47, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: If it were just an antenna structure, the Keep comments would be entirely correct. However, it has habitable space -- a viewing gallery, and, perhaps, offices, so it clearly qualifies as a buidling and therefore architecture. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Riga Radio and TV Tower
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Latvia: 1986 work by the architect Gunārs Asara.
- File:La tour de télévision (Riga).jpg
- File:Riga tower.jpg
- File:Riga TV Tower (8228924701).jpg
- File:Torre de Radio y Televisión de Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 01.JPG
- File:Tourtvrigavuebase.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 16:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Riga Radio and TV Tower
[edit]No FOP in Latvia, see previous DRs.
- File:20150507 30 Riga - Television Tower (17431189466).jpg
- File:City scape of Riga (87582309).jpg
- File:Crow and TV Tower.jpg
- File:Fernsehturm Riga - panoramio.jpg
- File:Maskavas Forštate, Latgale Suburb, Riga, Latvia - panoramio (39).jpg
- File:Maskavas Forštate, Latgale Suburb, Riga, Latvia - panoramio (40).jpg
- File:Maskavas Forštate, Latgale Suburb, Riga, Latvia - panoramio (41).jpg
- File:Maskavas Forštate, Latgale Suburb, Riga, Latvia - panoramio (97).jpg
- File:Radio and TV tower of Riga.jpg
- File:Riga 50 (28354077509).jpg
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 01.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 02.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 03.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 04.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 05.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 06.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 07.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 08.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 09.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 10.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 11.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 12.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 13.JPG
- File:Riga Fernsehturm 14.JPG
- File:Riga Petrikirche Blick vom Turm zum Fernsehturm 1.JPG
- File:Riga Petrikirche Blick vom Turm zum Fernsehturm 2.JPG
- File:Riga Petrikirche Blick vom Turm zum Fernsehturm 3.JPG
- File:Riga skyline - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Riga Sunset - panoramio (26).jpg
- File:Riga Sunset - panoramio (27).jpg
- File:Riga Tower - panoramio.jpg
- File:RigaTVTower.jpg
- File:Rīga TV tower - panoramio.jpg
- File:Rīga's towers and bridges from froozen Daugava river. January 2010 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Rīgas teletornis 2002-07-26 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Salas, Zemgales priekšpilsēta, Rīga, Latvia - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Salas, Zemgales priekšpilsēta, Rīga, Latvia - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Salas, Zemgales priekšpilsēta, Rīga, Latvia - panoramio - alinco fan (1).jpg
- File:Skats uz TV torni - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tv tornis - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Tv tornis - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Tv tornis - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:TV tower (8654929347).jpg
- File:TV tower (8656033154).jpg
- File:Tv tower - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:TV tower - panoramio.jpg
- File:TV tower seen from Latvian Academy of Sciences.jpg
- File:TV-Tower in Riga - panoramio.jpg
- File:View of the Riga Radio and TV Tower. Riga, Latvia, Northern Europe. September 27, 2014.jpg
- File:Zaķusala TV tower, September 2018.jpg
- File:Латвия (Latvija), Рига (Rīga), Правобережный (^) район (Krasta rajons), TV-башня, 21-21 07.07.2006 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Рига (Латвия) Телебашня - panoramio.jpg
- File:Телевизионая башня в Риге. - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D0%A0%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0_(R%C4%ABga),_%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_(%5E)_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BE%D0%BD_(Krasta_rajons),_TV-%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F,_21-21_07.07.2006_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
kyykaarme (talk) 23:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: modern monument.
Eleassar (t/p) 17:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: 2000s monument by Leonid Duryabtsev.
- File:Tashkent Taras Shevchenko detail.jpg
- File:Tashkent Taras Shevchenko monument.jpg
- File:Tashkent Taras Shevchenko mosaic.jpg
- File:Tashkent Taras Shevchenko statue.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 17:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ulugbek observatory museum
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Uzbekistan: the museum was built in 1970.
- File:Ulugbek observatory museum 1.JPG
- File:Ulugbek observatory museum 2.JPG
- File:Ulugbek observatory museum 3 detail.JPG
Eleassar (t/p) 17:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Victory Monument (Riga)
[edit]Alexander Bugaev died in 2010 [11], and there is no FOP in Latvia.
- File:Riga-memorial Stars.jpg
- File:Riga-memorial321.jpg
- File:Riga. Victory Monument 01.jpg
- File:Riga. Victory Monument 02.jpg
- File:Riga.sovietarmy.statue.jpg
- File:Soviet statues in Riga (8230173312).jpg
- File:Soviet statues in Riga (8230174280).jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis (2).jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis (3).jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis.jpg
- File:Victory Memorial to Soviet Army (8229103587).jpg
- File:Victory Memorial to Soviet Army (8229104731).jpg
- File:Victory Memorial to Soviet Army (8229106255).jpg
- File:Victory Memorial to Soviet Army (8230168260).jpg
- File:Victory Memorial to Soviet Army (8230170856).jpg
- File:Victory Memorial to Soviet Army (8230175080).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 04:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Victory Monument (Riga)
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Latvia: work by Lev Bukovsky (1910-1984).
- File:Victory Memorial to Soviet Army (Riga) 2.jpg
- File:Victory Memoryal to Soviet Army (Riga) 1.jpg
- File:Victory Memoryal to Soviet Army (Riga) 3.jpg
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 17:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Victory Monument (Riga)
[edit]No FOP in Latvia. The monument was finished in 1985. It had multiple sculptors/architects, and at least two of them are still living according to the Latvian Wikipedia.
- File:Piemineklis padomju karavīriem. Uzvaras parks. Rīga 2019. gada 13. oktobris.png
- File:Riga Soviet War Memorial - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Riga Soviet War Memorial - panoramio.jpg
- File:Rīga, Uzvaras piemineklis. 2002-04-27 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Soviet war memorial - panoramio.jpg
- File:Uzvara.jpg
- File:Uzvara1.jpg
- File:Uzvaras parks - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Uzvaras parks - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Uzvaras parks - panoramio (32).jpg
- File:Uzvaras parks - panoramio (33).jpg
- File:Uzvaras parks - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Uzvaras parks. Rīga 9 maijs 2016. A-03.jpg
- File:Uzvaras parks. Uzvaras piemineklis. Rīga 9 maijs 2018.jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis - panoramio.jpg
- File:Uzvaras piemineklis. Rīga 9 maijs 2016. A-01.jpg
- File:Рига (Латвия) Памятник чему-то большому, советскому... - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%83-%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%83,_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%83..._-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
kyykaarme (talk) 23:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- I understand your desire to protect the rights of Latvian authors. Protect these sculptors from infringement of copyrights. The Latvian Copyright Law (2000) also contributes to this. http://www.gencs.eu/uploads/european_patent_trademark_registration/latvia/Copyright%20Law%20Latvia.pdf
- This "Law" (2000) permits the publication of photographs of monuments located on squares and city streets.
- This “Law” (2000), where a special place is devoted to monumental art and architectural objects, was created to popularize authors, protect their name and disseminate knowledge about the culture and art of Latvia.
- Kalnroze (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
I well understand that reading (too verbose) legislative acts of other states is time-consuming, therefore I am sending two quotes from the Latvian Law on Copyright, http://www.gencs.eu/uploads/european_patent_trademark_registration/latvia/Copyright%20Law%20Latvia.pdf.
- Section 19. Use of a Work of an Author without the Consent of the Author and without Remuneration
- (1) Copyright shall not be considered infringed if a work of an author is used without the consent of the author and without remuneration pursuant to the procedures specified by this Law:
- 1) a work is used for informational purposes taking into account the provisions of Section 20 of this Law;
- 2) a work is used for educational and research purposes taking into account the provisions of Section 21 of this Law; (...etc.)
- (1) Copyright shall not be considered infringed if a work of an author is used without the consent of the author and without remuneration pursuant to the procedures specified by this Law:
- Section 25. Use of a Work on Public Display
- (1) It is permitted to use images of works of architecture, photography, visual arts, design, as well as of applied arts, permanently displayed in public places, for personal use and as information in news broadcasts or reports of current events, or include in works for non-commercial purposes. (... etc. in subsequent Articles ...)
- This Law protects the rights of authors and promotes the free flow of information. Therefore, the so-called Freedom of Panorama is not relevant for Latvia.
I am the author of four photos. These photos depict the events taking place in Riga on Victory Square. The composition of these photographs includes small FRAGMENTS of a large architectural and sculptural ensemble.
- I believe that the images of these fragments do not violate (do not limit, do not infringe) the copyrights of the authors of this large memorial complex ( The Latvian Copyright Law - 2000).
- I am the author of these photos. I am the author of the compositional solution to these files. I authorize the use of these photographs for commercial purposes.
_1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files of User:Djedamrazuk
[edit]All images of this user are from hariscizmic.com without permission. --Smooth_O (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asep suryawan (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files seem to be out of scope.
- File:Isa main plosotan ayah 2013-11-23 10-08.jpg
- File:Isa beljal sekutel ayah 2013-11-23 10-07.jpg
- File:Isa foto ama bunda ya---- Ayah 2013-11-23 10-06.jpg
- File:Isa bantu kelja ayah yah----- 2013-11-23 10-04.jpg
- File:Jalan-jalan th balu ihjliah ayah 2013-11-23 10-03.jpg
- File:Keluma nenek odah yuk ayah 2013-11-23 10-01.jpg
- File:Isa belajal ama abang abil ayah 2013-11-23 09-58.jpg
- File:IIsa main ama danang ayah 2013-11-23 09-56.jpg
- File:Makan mi ayah 2013-11-23 09-53.jpg
- File:Isa ama bunda ke pasal malam ayah 2013-11-23 09-52.jpg
- File:IIsa gak mau mandi ayah 2013-11-23 09-50.jpg
- File:Isa kelumah sakit ayah 2013-11-23 09-48.jpg
- File:Isa sakit ayah 2013-11-23 09-29.jpg
- File:Musnahkan syiah 2013-11-23 09-14.jpg
Darwin Ahoy! 03:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no educative purpose -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
TV screenshot Mjrmtg (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio, poor resolution, and fails attractiveness guidelines for Asians. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Apologies to Yann for commenting on this DR after closure, however I have only just noticed the above unacceptable comment. Images are not deleted based on how "attractive" Asians are and this comment appears to be borderline racist. DRs are part of the permanent record on Commons and should not be used for defamatory remarks. --Fæ (talk) 09:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of this image appearing on the pamphlet mentioned, which can be found here: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6786 and without proper sourcing this image must be removed. KDS4444 (talk) 04:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 22:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
La rumeur court chez des photojournalistes que cette image n'est pas un autoportrait, mais un portrait, et que celui qui l'a chargée n'en possède que les droits. Juste une rumeur, mais qui mérite vérification. 86.66.166.253 08:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The authorization has been sent by e-mail April 13th, 2012 together with an identity confirmation. — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 15:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: I think this needs COM:OTRS permission. If the authorization email was sent to COM:OTRS, we could restore this file FASTILY 22:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I am OTRS member, I had this information on my e-mail as it has been quite difficult to get it from a French National Assembly representative, but you don't have to trust me. Rules are rules. — S t a r u s – ¡Dímelo! – 16:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Better alternative exists (File:Alfa FC (SP).svg). OAlexander (talk) 14:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 22:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wanwa as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|Copyright violation: logo of private company uploaded without permission Dschwen (talk) 15:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 22:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Not neded. A superior file, supporting transparency, exists (File:Ararigboya FC.png). OAlexander (talk) 15:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 22:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Unsourced. No sense in colours. Franxo (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- What about the souht region in Denmark?--Franxo (talk) 10:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 22:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Is there any reliable source? It's really different from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dialects_of_Belarusian_language.png Franxo (talk) 21:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Despite having provided some sources, it is still too different from http://www.chikyukotobamura.org/muse/img/low090827s_2.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dialects_of_Belarusian_language.png - maps with strong sources behind them.--Franxo (talk) 10:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 22:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Catalan and Esukera languages have nothing to do with Occitanian. No reason explained for colours. Franxo (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Some changes have been carried out, but there's still no reason explained for colours and no reliable source provided.--Franxo (talk) 10:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Same complaint for Ligurian: Monaco, Mentone, Tenda Briga, Ventimiglia etc have nothing to do with Occitan. --Felisopus (talk) 10:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC) PS And there's a ghost island near Corsica? o__O
Deleted: FASTILY 22:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
reconstructed under the name: Carcharodontosaurus saharicus DentIII.jpg by the same author Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Duplication error Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of a widely used Soviet poster. Never ever own work by uploader. A.Savin 08:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- This is an enhanced version from my own photo of the Soviet poster. If need really be, I have changed the specification of the source. Michaelwuzthere 15:30, 5 June 2012
- You may not declare a derivative work as your own. - A.Savin 22:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hence why the "source" and licensing has been changed. - Michaelwuzthere 17:07, 5 June 5 June 2012
- I agree it should be deleted, even if it was his own entire creation, its just an insult to Marx and so on from an ideological viewpoint. I think to avoid conflict as well just get rid of it. --90.196.241.31 06:29, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Files will not be deleted from the commons due to an individual's impertinent ideological views. That's a personal problem, not something that you need to impose upon the community.--Michaelwuzthere (talk) 04:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 20:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a two dimentional work of art whose author can easily be established via official archives. Russian copyright law applies after the fall of the Soviet Union. This is a fine art painting of a probably still living (if not recently deceased) artist. Retouching it digitally and claiming free ownership would not be OK from legal standpoint. The fact that the painting might have been mass produced in the USSR does not deprive its autor of his copy rights. Poeticbent talk 04:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: EXIF data state: (C) Ariel Ignacia David; Flickr-site states: "Fotógrafo: Maxi Casalia"; probably Flickr-washing Stefan4 (talk) 02:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- On the talk page, the uploader claims to represent the photographer and claims to have permission. I think that this should be verified through the COM:OTRS process. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- I've already left a message on the uploader's talk page to that effect. Tabercil (talk) 16:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your help. I've already sent a mail to the OTRS address to proceed with verification. edjere (talk) 18:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I already sent a mail to the OTRS address but I was told that the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for the file. I work for an agency and have direct contact with the photographer that shoot the photo and handed it over to us to use freely for the actress article. Is there a way I could demonstrate this to validate the copyright permission? Regarding Túrelio's first message, the person that appears on the EXIF data ("Ariel Ignacio DAVID") is the name the Photoshop software used for the image was registered, the material author of the image is Maxi Casalia, hence the confussion. Thanks in advance for your help.edjere (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- I've already left a message on the uploader's talk page to that effect. Tabercil (talk) 16:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note COM:OTRS has received a ticket regarding this image, for OTRS agents it can be found here 2013112510020001. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: kept for now, but tagged no permission. Awaiting confirmation of permission via OTRS FASTILY 08:42, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
