Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/09/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Birgit Virnich hat persönlich um die Löschung gebeten, es handelt sich um ein Privatfoto. Sie hält die Rechte an dem Bild persönlich und hat einer Veröffentlichung nicht zugestimmt. The portrayed Birgit Virnich demanded deletion personally. It is a private photo, she holds copyright and does not grant permission to publish it. Scoop1006 (talk) 08:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted, regardless of copyright, German personality rights laws mean that we have to delete this image.--KTo288 (talk) 17:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded by user with history of uploading copyvios Mattythewhite (talk) 09:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio of http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/spl/4275280/Now-its-Watt-for-Scotland.html. Uploader blocked. January (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded by user with history of uploading copyvios Mattythewhite (talk) 09:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted, copyvio of http://talentshunter.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/fernando-canesin/. January (talk) 20:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded by user with history of uploading copyvios Mattythewhite (talk) 09:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio of http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Arkadiusz+Milik/Republic+Ireland+v+Poland+International+Friendly/uT7pTXSnlLW. January (talk) 20:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded by user with history of uploading copyvios Mattythewhite (talk) 09:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio of http://mattinopadova.gelocal.it/sport/2013/08/12/news/pasquato-esordio-super-1.7570403. January (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded by user with history of uploading copyvios Mattythewhite (talk) 09:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio of http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Giulio+Donati/Italy+v+Netherlands+UEFA+European+U21+Championships/Mhl8bQwKFHI. January (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Obsolete because a more recent image from Grayson's 113th term in Congress has been added here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Alan_Grayson_Updated_Headshot.jpg#file. This image was from 2008. Ldl766 (talk) 03:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Strong keep, suggest speedy close. Commons is not just for the most recent image only of notable people. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:53, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Closed as kept. I see no reason to leave this open, I think the nominator does not understand the purpose of Commons. If you want to use a more recent photo of the person in their Wikipedia article, fine. That is not a reason to delete good quality high res images of notable people from Commons. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Copy of this file http://www.cardinalfang.net/biographies/chapman_biog.html which is uploaded as a Non Free file on Wikipedia Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, blatant copyviol with false info. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Based on this, and the lack of response from the uploader (seen here), and the multiple notices of deletion due to copyright as mentioned here, I propose that this particular image was improperly uploaded and should be removed. DS (talk) 13:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete Most likely grabbed from (as indicated: "wordpress") http://octaviasvintage.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/portland-maine-enter-through-the-back-door-part-ii-the-old-port/ (01.2012) = http://octaviasvintage.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/old-port-portland-maine-portland-maine-gccb.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 08:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
A composite of present-day and historic images of unknown provenance (but not old enough to be PD, see truck -> suspect copyvio). Kaluga.2012 (talk) 00:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Info Historical part coming from http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/brotherpilot/tags/%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB/view/244416?page=0 (2010 by "BrotherPilot") = http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/9/brotherpilot.1/0_3bac0_d4944f68_orig. Gunnex (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of permission, most possibly not “own work”. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Most likely (derivated) grabbed from internet. Historical photos may be in public domain in U.S. and source country but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, orphan yoinked photo with no description, false license, false source. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Bucket dog (1700091105).jpg. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, similar to what was published via (example) http://www.ajc.org/site/c.fmJZKhOWJfI6G/b.8505133/k.604E/Energy_Independence_Event_III__October_24_2011__Save_the_Date.htm (2011, AJC © 2013) = http://www.ajc.org/atf/Account16283/images/_21711910259619.jpg (last modified: 2011, lower res, not the complete frame but identical exif) Gunnex (talk) 08:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work (uploaded in 05.2013): small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, considering also (smaller res, not the complete frame) https://plus.google.com/photos/100642289109174245753/albums/profile/5843383411500149394?pid=5843383411500149394&oid=100642289109174245753 (02.2013) or http://arnona.co.il/index.asp?Article=1133 (2009) = http://arnona.co.il/files/israel_zinger2.jpg (last modified: 2009) Gunnex (talk) 08:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Most likely derviated & cropped from (example) http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4325438,00.html (2012, credits: "Foto: Gerard Alon", lower res) = http://images1.ynet.co.il/PicServer3/2012/12/27/4361891/43543221987100408257no.jpg or (similar) http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/TNXQRwhqLqA/maxresdefault.jpg Gunnex (talk) 09:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
rubbish 91.66.153.214 09:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Tin Eye has found 13 copies. All other uploads by this user are dubiuos, especially an "own work" of 1914. 91.66.153.214 09:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Uploaded by Dan Gallard in 09.2011. Per http://animalnewyork.com/2013/murders-mishaps-and-mayhem-caught-on-camera-by-enrique-metinides/mexico-city-september-19-1985/ = http://content.animalnewyork.com/wp-content/uploads/slide_280651_2102414_splashmetinides.jpg exif available which indicates to photographer and copyrights by "Enrique Metinedes". Previously published by several media via Google, including http://www.noroeste.com.mx/publicaciones.php?id=709069 (08.2011) which credited the photo (here in lower res and watermarked version) to above cited Enrique Metinedes = "El mexicano Enrique Metinides, es apodado en París como "el fotógrafo de los desastres"". Gunnex (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Flatoitlikealizarddrinking (talk) 10:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Tagged with copyvio via http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/lynn-whitfield-talks-new-film-kings-faith_n_3051607.html (04.2013, credits: "Nancy Ostertag/Getty Images") = http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1079544/thumbs/o-LYNN-WHITFIELD-KINGS-FAITH-facebook.jpg (exif available). Gunnex (talk) 07:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Taken from http://im.rediff.com/sports/2013/sep/15la-liga1.jpg Mattythewhite (talk) 10:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
can blatant advertising really be allowed on here, other suspect images by user then also Mjrmtg (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Bad quality (low rez, overexposed) and unnecessary as it shows trivial subject and composition (see Category:Ponte 25 de Abril from Lisbon). -- Tuválkin ✉ 10:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 12:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Logo of non notable company. Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; website screenshot, seems of little use. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused user signature 91.66.153.214 12:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
It does not fit the category "Cultural Monument" Denjinman (talk) 12:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- I have changed the categories. 91.66.153.214 13:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
It does not fit the category "Cultural Monument" Denjinman (talk) 12:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Comment Now they are in Category:Chocolate Hills. BTW: ..."they have been declared the country's third National Geological Monument and proposed for inclusion in the UNESCO World Heritage List" according to w:Chocolate Hills. 91.66.153.214 13:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep Any problem looks to have been resolved. Image seems ok and in scope. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in France. This statue is a work by the sculptor Noël Bonardi, died in 2012 only. Myrabella (talk) 13:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete It is from a German user used only in de:wikipedia. Can onyone upload this picture in de:wikipedia to preserve it? Or only the author? Before deletion i would upload it to German wikipedia. --Ras67 (talk) 16:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Postcard from 1960s is probably copyrighted. Gumruch (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
This so-called "own work" comes from http://www.clipartguide.com/_pages/0511-0903-2722-5551.html Copyright © Acclaim Imagery, Ltd. All Rights Reserved 91.66.153.214 14:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 15:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Logo of a non-notable website. Rapsar (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
La imagen original en resolucion mas alta https://www.google.com.mx/search?hl=es-419&q=ciudad+de+mexico&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSYRpfCxCo1NgEGgIIAQwLELCMpwgaOAo2CAESELYB9gP8A_1IDmgP0A_1cDkwMaIIag13BSVtxm9_1aoZapYdal0oq-rfd_1bVbdbK7qV-JfMDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEPi-v_1Qw&sa=X&ei=ltU5Urz4GIOp2QXx3IDoBw&ved=0CCMQ2A4oAA&biw=1280&bih=921&dpr=1#facrc=_&imgrc=1JF2uw314XdPqM%3A%3BbrbrWUN-OYr-GM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fdla-turistov.ru%252Fstatyi%252Ffoto%252Ffoto-mexico-12_neboskreb-to.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fdla-turistov.ru%252Fview_post.php%253Fid%253D35%3B700%3B818 189.232.78.136 16:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Similar to what was previously published via http://joodshistorischm.m14.mailplus.nl/genericservice/code/servlet/React?encId=YkrUmjjTCvgjYqa&actId=314138924&command=openhtml = http://images.m14.mailplus.nl/mailing314138924/motzkin.jpg (last modified: 2011) and most likely grabbed from http://www.vanleer.org.il/ar/people/%D8%AC%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A6%D9%8A%D9%84-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%B3%D9%83%D9%8A%D9%86 (All rights reserved to Van Leer) = http://www.vanleer.org.il/sites/files/image_field/motzkin.jpg Gunnex (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
EXIF attributes to photographer Joshua Berson, who would normally be expected to publish his photos under his name. Although an internet image search did not find this photo, it seems unlikely that the uploader is that photographer, considering the uploader's other deleted uploads that were taken from the internet. This would at least need OTRS confirmation from the photographer. Asclepias (talk) 16:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Causing Ethnic tensions 46.225.32.247 16:47, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: This is makes no sense why it should be deleted, and there is no Ethnic tensions, just some people changing the map without showing sources. This is irrelevant, removed the deletion tag from the picture. --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Nonsense rationale, bordering on censorship attempt (boils down to “protect” people from reality). However, HistoryofIran, NEVER remove a DR notice from a file page, unless you’re the DR closing admin. (I restored it.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: HistoryofIran, nobody changed it without showing sources. My sources are official and more reliable than yours. -- Hami232 5:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Correction: by this source [1] and this user very Unusual, but he has Pan-persinsim idea--Eight for Eight (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
![[1]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Iranian_lang_rus_2.png){kind=link}
this image comes from a blog at http://tatparade.blogspot.com/2009/01/rachel-sweet.html but I'm not seeing any proof os information relating to the copyright of the photo the uploader said it was Copyleft but I'm not seeing anything on the blog post that supports that unless their is something I missed I'm not seeing it. Dman41689 (talk) 17:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of SCOPE,private, unused file. Revi (discuss|SUL) 17:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: If only it had been better composed (move the camera slightly down and left) and properly lighted (flash, or, better, another lamp at the left), it would be a nice photo of a beaby being “held out” — a common position we don’t seem to have documented. Pity. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Poor-quality penis photograph (part of subject cropped out, visual watermark) that does not bear any particular educational value. — Scott • talk 18:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
It's Georg Wilhelm von Siemens, not Drumann. Copyright situation unclear. Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Blurred beyond reasonable usability, even after possible sharpening considered Ubcule (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Commons is not a repository for (in user's own words "random" material) and none of the objects in this image are displayed in a manner likely to render the image usable (i.e. all are excessively cropped). Ubcule (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Low-quality image of mystery cable. If description had been given and/or cable was clear enough to identify it *might* have been useful, but it wasn't given and the image isn't useful without it. Ubcule (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a pencil sharpener, but without description that's just guesswork and severely limits value of image. Ubcule (talk) 18:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Yes, a sharpner, but bad photohraphy. The same for all other uploads of the same user, maybe except for the two CD photos. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:16, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- I wouldn't go that far; some of them are fine. Others aren't so great, and many go from being "useful" to "useless" because the uploader didn't provide a description.
- I have already nominated quite a few- mainly the "random" ones, because those are not useful without a description (and some are borderline cases or clearly out-of-scope even with a description). Ubcule (talk) 20:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused Ubcule (talk) 19:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Image of "vocalist" (self-portrait/upload??) with no indication of in-scope purpose. Not used on personal page. Ubcule (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Low quality genital photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the best quality here, -- Cirt (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, poor lighting, heavy artifacting, blurry, mediocre size, and probably shot using a "camera" that doesn't really deserve that name. Therefore, no added EduValue. - 217.255.177.157 05:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps using Commons to host pictures? No encyclopedic use. Ryūkotsusei (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps using Commons to host pictures? No encyclopedic use. Ryūkotsusei (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps using Commons to host pictures? No encyclopedic use. Ryūkotsusei (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Jcb (talk) 21:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
High probable copyright violation. For example please see http://cdn.blogosfere.it/sportemotori/images/melissa-satta-infophoto-big1.jpg Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 21:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Own work seems unlikely. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis image. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the best quality here, -- Cirt (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work (uploaded in 2013). Most likely grabbed from http://www.shaqra3.net/vb/showthread.php?t=49262 (2012) = http://www.1ss1.com/data/2010/1ss1_13470627201.jpg (last modified: 2012, identical exif, watermarked but easily removable due to black background) Gunnex (talk) 22:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Invalid license, 70 years have not yet passed after 1947 Jcb (talk) 22:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
unlikely own work as stated, and the given date 2013 cannot be correct as Mr. Sadat dies in 1981. JuTa 22:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Aliousaidou15@yahoo.fr 195.24.206.122 18:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Seems to be an “unwilling” DR. The photo is in scope, in use, and with no apparent licinesing issues. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar image (better focused) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 08:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
No use, we have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 20:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Source stated as "from a site that is the Alonso history." Hvd69 (talk) 08:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
This image also doesn't come under WLM 2013 event and has personality rights
|
Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
Deleted: Personal image -- out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
"Own work", but: Uploader is only the compiler, not the photographer. Pic 2 and 3 with different watermarks 91.66.153.214 10:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:51, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Useless without a description 91.66.153.214 12:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Google can't find an Areza District http://www.google.de/#psj=1&q=Areza+District 91.66.153.214 12:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: That's Google's problem, not ours -- see Areza, and Eritrea, both of which show it as part of the Debub region. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unable to find evidence on the claimed source site that they license their material under CC-SA 1.0. Someone not using his real name (talk) 03:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
I have serious doubts that a piece of satelite imagery from this user (with only one edit) is legitimately "own work". Likely ripped from somewhere else. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
poor quality, we have other images of this type of device, such as File:Metal herb grinder-cannabis inside.JPG Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar picture (better straightened) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this image. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright holder:CJ E&M (per EXIF data) Puramyun31 (talk) 04:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Looks like an error (9 kb) 91.66.153.214 08:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Too small to be useful -- we have several other pix of the subject. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag map in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
No use, we have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 20:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. This, the uploader's only contribution here is, I feel, of no educational value as being only of a corridor in some student flat- and I doubt they would now wish to have possible evidence of the theft of a road sign lying around. Perhaps best to regard it as a test upload. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
If the photo was taken before March 31, 1949, the country of origin is not Canada but Newfoundland and Labrador. Regardless, we don't have enough information to determine the copyright status of the image either in its source country or in the United States. We don't know what year the photo was taken, and we have inadequate source information; the original uploader for the copy on en.wiki did not provide a source at all; the source information "Image by the Canadian Coast Guard, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca" was added some time later. Diannaa (talk) 01:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Isn't Canada the w:Successor state for Newfoundland and Labrador? In that case, I believe that works from Newfoundland and Labrador would be treated identically as works from Canada. Compare with works from East Germany, which are treated in the same way as works from West Germany. In either case, what matters is the country of first publication, not the country of creation. I agree that we don't have enough source information. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The ship was in service 1954-1987. That determines the earliest and latest possible years of publication of this photo. There is no reason to assume that this photo was first published outside Canada. This photo would need to have been published before 1946 to be in the public domain in the United States. The ship was launched in 1954. How would the photo be taken before 1949? There never was a country named "Newfoundland and Labrador". The source country policy is an internal policy of Commons with unclear justification, but presumably it is that people in the source country might be likely to have an interest in those photos. That would be actual people in current countries. Previous countries are irrelevant unless the situation has an influence on the current copyright status in actual countries. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC) Also, what does not matter is the name of the ship. If the Canadian Navy names a ship Luxembourg, that doesn't make Luxembourg the source country of photos of that ship. ;) -- Asclepias (talk) 02:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Must have been taken by 1962 (if not by 1957) - see here . As it is a Canadian Navy photo, Crown Copyright has consequently expired by statute (Copyright Act 1985, S12) - 50 years from end-of-year-of-production. I cannot see how US law can impute a copyright holder where none can exist - "people in the source country might be likely to have an interest in those photos" clearly doesn't apply to Crown Copyright. Davidships (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- We don't have any actual proof that it is a Canadian Navy photo; there's inadequate source information provided for us to determine its provenance. I just discovered that the original uploader was blocked in 2006 on en.wiki for faking OTRS permissions and impersonating another user on Commons. en:User talk:Jcmurphy#Blocked. Here is the location of the image on en.wiki: en:File:CCGS Labrador.gif-- Diannaa (talk) 22:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Considering that without evidence to the contrary, the reasonable default assumption can be that the source country of the photo is Canada, then the fact that it is attributed to the Canadian Navy or to someone else makes no difference for its copyright status in the United States, because it can't have been created nor published before 1946 and thus, unless explicitely released, its copyright can't possibly have expired before 1996 in Canada. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately for us, the copyrights in the United States often subsist on works even after their copyrights in their countries of origin are expired. Please see the page Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights for details. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- We don't have any actual proof that it is a Canadian Navy photo; there's inadequate source information provided for us to determine its provenance. I just discovered that the original uploader was blocked in 2006 on en.wiki for faking OTRS permissions and impersonating another user on Commons. en:User talk:Jcmurphy#Blocked. Here is the location of the image on en.wiki: en:File:CCGS Labrador.gif-- Diannaa (talk) 22:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Must have been taken by 1962 (if not by 1957) - see here . As it is a Canadian Navy photo, Crown Copyright has consequently expired by statute (Copyright Act 1985, S12) - 50 years from end-of-year-of-production. I cannot see how US law can impute a copyright holder where none can exist - "people in the source country might be likely to have an interest in those photos" clearly doesn't apply to Crown Copyright. Davidships (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal data that has no valid use. Not clear that it can actually be licensed. QU TalkQu 16:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Personal data. Apparently, the uploader wants to use this image on wikibooks [2], but delete until the uploader explains what they are trying to do and that they have the right to do it. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Temporary speedy deletion to protect the visible personal data. May be restored pending uploader permission and verification via OTRS. DR is not closed yet pending an answer from the uploader. --Denniss (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 17:28, 18 September 2013 by Denniss, closed by . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
OS is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
OS is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Copy of http://ismaeleljardineroarte.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/ismael_el-_jardinero_retrato_2.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- 95% probably uploaded by the artist or an art gallery. OTRS case. --Dereckson (talk) 15:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Professional portrait. Named author does not match watermark. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Cover from slovak statistics book published in 1958, unknown source Vegetator (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
totally wrong and impossible configuration of asymmetric carbon Starless (talk) 19:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- This diagram was supposed to represent both enantiomers of ketamine without looking more like one than the other. Ben (talk) 21:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete That's an important kind of diagram to have. Would be clearer to have it with the cyclohexanone core as just a flat hexagon (no geoemetry at all) rather than conformational. And we have File:Ketamine.svg to fit that niche. DMacks (talk) 23:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:48, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:51, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright holder:CJ E&M (per EXIF data) Puramyun31 (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Please delete this Kingswood College crest as it is flawed. I would like to load the corrected crest Smutsd (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not a reason to delete. Click on "Upload a new version of this file" below "File History" . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Commons is not supposed to host non-free fair use images (and the crest is apparently outdated although it looks the same to me on the school's website). HelenOnline 10:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Update: I have uploaded the logo currently used on the school's website (there are minor differences) directly to Wikipedia with a fair use licence.HelenOnline 10:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)- Update: I have uploaded another version that was uploaded here in 2013 directly to Wikipedia with a fair use licence and nominated it for deletion here, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kingswood crest 2013.jpg. HelenOnline 12:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:PRP. INeverCry 04:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
La pyramide est l’œuvre de Ieoh Ming Pei qui est toujours en vie ; son œuvre n’est donc pas encore entrée dans le domaine public. De plus, il n’y a pas de liberté de panorama en France. VIGNERON (talk) 07:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright holder:CJ E&M (per EXIF data) Puramyun31 (talk) 05:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright holder:CJ E&M (per EXIF data) Puramyun31 (talk) 05:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Scanned from a magazine ? 91.66.153.214 15:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 01:13, 25 September 2013 by INeverCry, closed by . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant and a bit blurred. Similar image with better quality is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- True, but it is in use, therefore cannot be deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be generic. The logo doesn't seem to be simple geometry, so possible CSD for copyvio. みんな空の下 (トーク) 17:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
No use, no source. Probably did not exist. Fry1989 eh? 03:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
possible copyright violatrion Znppo (talk) 04:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 06:16, 19 September 2013 by Fastily. closed by . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Correct me if I am wrong, but this file is not free. Images on kongehuset.dk are not copyrighted unless explicitly released, and this one does not appear to have been released. Surtsicna (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:48, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Place de La Défense con Arc de Triomf al fondo.JPG & File:Rascacielos y Place de La Défense.JPG
[edit]
Modern buildings on La Défense, Paris. No freedom of panorama in France Trizek from FR 08:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar image (a bit less blurred) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
At the time of upload, the source website stated "Copyright (c) Department of Women of the Ministry of Wommen [sic] & Children Affairs. All rights reserved." (The website has since gone offline; there is no record of what the other pages said.) I'm doubtful, without more evidence, that this was released as CC-1; rather, I suspect the new uploader may have been confused about what picking a license entailed. Jarry1250 (talk) 12:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
probably a portrait of the uploader https://twitter.com/REALWISHALL, unused 91.66.153.214 14:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 18:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It looks like a reflection of a window, but even then is a borderline out-of-scope case. Any thoughts? Ubcule (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
If someone can identify this, please do so as image *might* be useful after cropping. Otherwise, I'd say it wasn't useful (and hence out of scope) without that information. Ubcule (talk) 18:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife is not a "Federal" US office (afaik). PD-claim as "PD-USGov" is invalid. GermanJoe (talk) 06:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
User signture, not used 91.66.153.214 17:47, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
redundant file. article not published. Chi2 (talk) 22:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC) redundant file. article not published. Chi2 (talk) 08:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Although this is not a valid reason for deletion, the uploader is not the author and there is no evidence of permission. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright holder:CJ E&M (per EXIF data) Puramyun31 (talk) 04:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright holder:CJ E&M (per EXIF data) Puramyun31 (talk) 05:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Погрешна идентификация на вида. Utar Sigmal (talk) 12:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not a reason or deletion. Please use {{Rename}} or correct the description or both. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Al Arab 1[edit]No COM:FOP in the UAE.
russavia (talk) 19:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC) Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Al Arab 2[edit]These images include architectural works in the UAE, where there is no freedom of panorama.
Guanaco (talk) 07:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I would also prefere de minimis, similar to the Eifeltower at night case (check de:Eiffelturm#Beleuchtung_und_Lichtkunst. And the interiors are not copyrighted cause of TOO or design protection.--~~ Files in Category:Burj Al Arab 3[edit]Burj Al Arab is a copyrighted building in a country without Freedom of Panorama. If you'd like to claim that one of these images is simply a photo of the city's general skyline and that Burj Al Arab is therefore de minimis, the photo should probably not be named "Burj Al Arab" or be in Category:Burj Al Arab (both of which suggest it's the focus of the image). [Sorry for the double nomination here. I didn't realize these were already under discussion. I've removed duplicated nominations.] Themightyquill (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: the files that were dm, deleted the others. NB: A cityscape/skyline is by definition dm. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Al Arab 4[edit]No FoP in the UAE
Saqib (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Al Arab 5[edit]No FOP in UAE
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per dm except 1 (and consistency with previous closures). — Racconish 💬 13:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC) |
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4607671651).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Burj Al Arab 6
[edit]Elegant interior architecture/designs. No freedom of panorama in UAE, and COM:OTRS permission from architect Tom Wright and involved interior designers is required. Unless, have FOP introduced in the country.
- File:Burdj al Arab in Dubay 1.jpg
- File:Hotel Burj al Arab in Dubay 3.jpg
- File:Hotel Burj al Arab in Dubay 6.jpg
- File:Hotel Burj al Arab in Dubay.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Burj Al Arab 7
[edit]Same as above nominations: no FOP in UAE and violation of architect Tom Wright's copyright in using CC/PD licensing. Also, while de minimis may be used as a defense, the building is an essential element in each of these images, and cropping will render all of them useless.
- File:Burj Al Arab (3481085868).jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab Hotel, Dubai, UAE (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 01.jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab Hotel, Dubai, UAE (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 02.jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab Hotel, Dubai, UAE (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 03.jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab Hotel, Dubai, UAE (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 04.jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab Hotel, Dubai, UAE (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 05.jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab Hotel, Dubai, UAE (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 06.jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab Jumeirah (23804162143).jpg
- File:The Burj Al Arab.jpg
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep File:The Burj Al Arab.jpg as I have cropped and remove the tower. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: by cropping it I doubt it is usable as it became redundant to existing imags at Category:Dubai. Its COM:EDUSE seems to have been diminished after removal of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- I reviewed the cropped File:The Burj Al Arab.jpg again. I'm convinced it must be deleted now as out of COM:SCOPE. A dull street angle (not a true street scene) in which the only interesting object is a banner or ad in the distance, which may violate COM:DW. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Al Arab.jpg is borderline post crop but not really in scope. --Geni (talk) 05:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kislovodsk Circus
[edit]The photos of the 1973 building are unfree due to the absence of Freedom of panorama in Russia
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 01.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 02.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 03.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 04.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 05.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 06.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 07.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 08.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 09.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 10.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 11.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 12.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 13.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 14.JPG
- File:Circus, Kislovodsk, Russia 15.JPG
Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 7billionideas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope:Promotional materials of application with questionable notability.
- File:Website Explanation.jpg
- File:Think. Write. Like Logo.jpg
- File:7billionideas Logo.jpg
- File:7billionideas App Logo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of fan/promo photos/logos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:En vivo en The Roxy Quilmes3.jpg
- File:Arte disco.JPG
- File:Alma del disco.jpg
- File:Qw.jpg
- File:Kjufd.jpg
- File:Asas.jpg
- File:En vivo en The Roxy Quilmes.jpg
- File:Arde rock.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from action figures.
- File:Thor de Phecda Gamma.png
- File:Shaina de Oficuo.png
- File:Aldebaran de Tauro.png
- File:Hyoga de Cisne.png
- File:Shiryu de Dragon.png
- File:Ikki de Fenix.png
- File:Nachi de Lobo Mith Cloth.png
- File:Ban de Leon Menor Mith Cloth.png
- File:Jabu de Unicornio.png
- File:Gekki de Oso Mith Cloth.png
- File:Krishna de Chrisaor.png
- File:Baian de Hipocampo.png
- File:Sorrento de Sirena Mith cloth.png
- File:Zyd Mith cloth.png
- File:Cristal Mith Cloth.png
- File:Argol de Perseo Mith Cloth.png
- File:Sho de Tucan Mith Cloth.png
- File:Saint Seiya Senki Figura.png
- File:Santos de Bronce.png
- File:Caballero de Acero Terrestre Mith Cloth.png
- File:Caballero Acero Maritimo Mith Cloth.png
- File:Afrodita de Piscis Mith Cloth.png
- File:Aioria de Leo Mith Cloth.jpg
- File:Mith Cloth Crown Sagitario.png
- File:Saint Seiya Mith Cloth.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of historical photos, not own work.
- File:Raynold Brown.png
- File:Sigfrido 2.png
- File:Ramfis Trujillo.png
- File:Francisco Alberto Caamaño.png
- File:Amado Garcia Guerrero.JPG
- File:Lancha rapida mdg.png
- File:Imbert Mcgregor.png
- File:Paulino Alvarez.png
- File:Cuervo Gomez.png
- File:Perez Feliz.png
- File:Aquino Garcia.png
- File:Peña Antonio.png
- File:Soto Jimenez.png
- File:Sigfrido Pared Perez.png
- File:Barjan Mufdi.png
- File:Ramiro Matos Gonzales.png
- File:Elias Wessin y Wessin.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
A collection of logos and types associated with 1970's & 80's Animes including Gundam with claims of own work and licenses given as "CC-By-SA". Probable COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Logotipo de Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann para wikipedia en castellano.svg
- File:Gundam reconguista in g wikipedia en espanol.svg
- File:Valvrave the liberator Logotipo.svg
- File:Gundam serpentine.svg
- File:MSG0080 WAR IN THE POCKET.svg
- File:Logo tamashinations wikipedia en espanol.svg
- File:The Series of Judau Ashta.svg
- File:Logotipo Original de Mobile Suit Gundam Wikipedia en Espanol.svg
- File:After War Gundam X.svg
- File:Aura Battler Dunbine Logo Wikipedia espanol.svg
- File:Akira Pelicula logo wikipedia espanol.svg
- File:Gundam age.svg
- File:Logo de Megasize modelo gundam wiki espanol.svg
- File:Turn a Gundam Kanji wikies.svg
- File:Mobile fighter G Gundam Logo wiki es.svg
- File:Gundam Sentinel Wikipedia espanol.svg
- File:Logotipo de la Serie Gundam Evolve.svg
- File:SpeedgradeCollectionModelogundam.svg
- File:Perfect Grade Modelo gundam.svg
- File:EX-Model Modelo gundam.svg
- File:U.C.Hard Graph Modelo Gundam.svg
- File:Real Grade Modelo Gundam.svg
- File:Master Grade Distintivo Modelo Gundam.svg
- File:High Grade Modelo Gundam.svg
- File:Papers please.svg
- File:Logo de MobileSuit Gundam Stardust Memory ESwiki.svg
- File:Brain Powerd.svg
- File:Mobile Suit Gundam Unicorn Wikipedia en Español.svg
- File:Mobile Suit Gundam Chars Conterattack Wikipedia Español.svg
- File:Mobile Suit Z Gundam Wikipedia en Español.svg
- File:Logo Cardcaptor Sakura Wikipedia en Español.svg
- File:Gundam8MSTeamamarilloRomaji.svg
- File:Mobile Suit Gundam The 8th MS Team Wikipedia en espanol custom.svg
- File:Samurai Jack wiki vector.svg
- File:Yu-Gi-Oh logo Wiki.svg
- File:Nobunagas ambition logo Wiki.svg
- File:Ehrgeiz Logo.svg
- File:Gundam build Fighters logo.svg
- File:Gunpla Logo.svg
- File:Endless Waltz Custom Wiki.svg
- File:Gundam Wing Logo Wiki Custom.svg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 21:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cloclo7272 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality penis photos.
-mattbuck (Talk) 21:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the best quality here, -- Cirt (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not only poor quality (mediocre lighting, low resolution) but also silly names (not a deletion criterion, but a possible indication of uploader intent). "Repos"? Don't get me started about "Ercetion", which isn't even a word. 217.255.177.157 05:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain in U.S. and source country but relevant info must be provided. 1 file from 2013, the rest from 2011 and 2010. Per User talk:Drank already some recent copyright problems stored.
Additional info:
- File:Sb3ahdd4.jpg --> tagged with "not for publication ©reserved" and equipped with text
- File:BTYAN.JPG --> retouched version of File:Sb3ahdd4.jpg
- File:Sba3ahtto.jpg --> mysteriously watermarked
- File:Raccanbn.jpg --> mysteriously equipped with text
- File:Suliman f46.jpg --> mysteriously watermarked and {{PD-Kuwait}}-fail (taken in 2010?)
- File:New7.jpg --> licensed with {{PD-Algeria}} for a (per category) writer from Kuwait? Anyway, {{PD-Algeria}}-fail (per date - 2010 - and context) and additional apparently permission from "OSAMA SLUMAN" needed.
- File:Stsluman.jpg --> some handwritings from ar:سليمان فليح السبيعي (signature? poem?). Eventually {{PD-signature}}/{{PD-ineligible}} but certainly not own work.
- File:BTYAN.JPG
- File:Stsluman.jpg
- File:SLUMAffffN.jpg
- File:Sluuumannn.jpg
- File:Sb3ahdd4.jpg
- File:Sb3ahdd2.jpg
- File:Sba3ahtto.jpg
- File:Raccanbn.jpg
- File:Suliman f46.jpg
- File:New7.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Blantant advertising on every photo, screenshots from website or tv ad
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 9.JPG
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 8.JPG
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 7.JPG
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 6.JPG
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 4.JPG
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 5.JPG
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 3.JPG
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 1.JPG
- File:Bad Credit Business Loan 2.JPG
Mjrmtg (talk) 10:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete All those images are clearly out of COM:SCOPE. GermanJoe (talk) 12:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FSCEM45212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of historical photos. No proper source/license.
- File:General musa khan.jpg
- File:Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan.jpg
- File:General Pervez Musharraf.jpg
- File:General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq.jpg
- File:General Aslam Beg.jpg
- File:General Asif Nawaz.jpg
- File:General Jehangir Karamat.jpg
- File:Abdul Waheed Kakar.jpg
- File:Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani.jpg
- File:Ch Pervez Elahi.jpg
- File:Ch. Pervaiz Elahi and Moonis Elahi warmly welcomed by the people of Kasur.jpg
- File:Ch Pervez Elahi with his son Ch Moonis Elahi.jpg
- File:Ch Zahoor Elahi.jpg
- File:Chaudhry Zahoor Elahi.jpg
- File:General Ayub Khan.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Tables uploaded by FSCEM45212 (talk · contribs)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Tables which could be replaced with wiki markup.
- File:Top parties Vote Bank - ecp.gov.pk - Elections 2013.jpg
- File:Election Commission of Pakistan - 15 September, 2013 - Party Position.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all. This uploader simply has no idea of image copyright. It took only a moment to establish that File:Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani.jpg is a copyvio from this page. They have also done a load of copyvio uploads on en: — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by FSCEM45212 (talk · contribs)
Flickrwashing. The files were "reviewed" by the uploader, who is not a license reviewer or administrator.
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
I,FSCEM45212, did not know that "uploaders" can review their uploads. I swear, I did not know. I thought that I am in list of "Trusted Users" who can review their uploads. Therefore, Wikipedia Commons is requested to not to delete my images which are as followsː
— Preceding unsigned comment added by FSCEM45212 (talk • contribs)
- Uploaders are not permitted to review their own uploads. Users who are not license reviewers or administrators are not permitted to review any uploads. You are neither a license reviewer nor an administrator, and with your history of uploading copyright violations, you will most likely never be either.
- Taking someone else's photo and uploading it to Flickr without their permission constitutes copyright infringement. It is both illegal and a violation of Flickr's Terms of Service. You cannot issue a valid copyright license to someone else's work. Attempting to do so constitutes copyright infringement and is illegal. Attempting to transfer an image that you uploaded to Flickr under a false license to Wikimedia Commons is called license laundering. It is yet another example of also copyright infringement. It is both illegal and a violation of our policies.
- Even if we assume that you did not understand that you weren't allowed to attempt to bypass our copyright policies in this way, the images must still be deleted, as they are copyright violations. The true copyright holders have not approved publication under a free license. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
I copied these images from my Flickr account. I can provide you evidence if you demanded because I have uploaded these images on my Flickr account. I am their owner. It is my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FSCEM45212 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have no doubt that you copied them from your own Flickr account. That's part of the problem. A photo is only your own work if you created the photo yourself – in other words: if you held the camera when the shutter was released. Again, taking someone else's photo and uploading it to Flickr without their permission does not make it your own work, it makes what you're doing a violation of copyright law. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:30, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete both. FSCEM, thank you for confirming that asad.warraich… is your flickr account. File:Gen-Ashfaq-Parvez-kayani.jpg is a blatant copyvio - I have found a couple of other copies on the web. Marquis Hainse is probably a copyvio since the largest size is only 640×640px. File:Pyotr Tikhonovsky.jpg is another blatant copyvio from this page. Please stop wasting our time. You probably are not going to find free images of Pakistani military. If you want to submit images, do what you suggested in your email to me: go out and photograph interesting buildings, etc. with your own camera and upload them. (Failing that you are liable to find yourself blocked here and on en:) — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Not own author's work. Derivative image by another photographer. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- FSCEM45212 Thanks a lot for your help. I have understand you that "Upload only thos images on Wikimedia which are captured from your own camera or smart phone(?)". Now, please tell me that how can I delete these images so that I can prevent my account from blocking.
Flickrwashing. The files were "reviewed" by the uploader, who is not a license reviewer or administrator.
Therefore, I, uploader of these images request you to delete these images. DELETE THEM!
This file was nominated for speedy deletion. Therefore, I request you to delete it immediately.
NOTE: This file is at Commons. --FSCEM45212 (talk) 13:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: All files deleted by other admins McZusatz (talk) 09:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gustavo guerrero92 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probable copyright violations to my mind. I deleted one clear one, but given lack of date and metadata these others seem suspect.
- File:Diane Rodr̟íguez Zambrano 09.jpg
- File:Diane Rodr̟íguez Zambrano 08.jpg
- File:Diane Rodr̟íguez Zambrano 07.jpg
- File:Diane Rodr̟íguez Zambrano 04.jpg
- File:Diane Rodr̟íguez Zambrano 05.jpg
- File:Diane Rodr̟íguez Zambrano 02.jpg
- File:Diane Rodr̟íguez Zambrano 01.jpg
- File:Diane Rodr̟íguez Zambrano 03.jpg
- File:Diane Rodríguez.jpg
- File:Carla Antonelli.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 21:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harry baradiy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Table which could be replaced with wiki markup.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masterdul123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of software with questionable notability.
- File:970x70.png
- File:DataValuesBeta.png
- File:Ostrzezenie.png
- File:Badlogin.jpg
- File:Ftp111.png
- File:Ftp112.png
- File:Ftp114.png
- File:Ftp113.png
- File:Ftp117.png
- File:Ftp116.png
- File:Ftp115.png
- File:Ftp2132152131.png
- File:Wom done.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pistasonline (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of fan/promo photos, not own work.
- File:Baby estudio.jpg
- File:Baby congas.jpg
- File:Pop on reggae.jpg
- File:Baby rasta band 1.jpg
- File:Baby Chollette Oh Karol.jpg
- File:Grupo Baby Rasta Band.jpg
- File:Baby+Rasta+Band+babyrastaband.jpg
- File:Biografia de Baby Chollette 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SHIRAN1911 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used in hewiki for the 2007 filmdrama en:August Rush (Warner Bros.) and showing actor en:Freddie Highmore. Unlikely to be own work: most likely film scenes and derivated & photographed from television.
Gunnex (talk) 16:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sreejiththulaseedharan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Azeezia view from top.png
- File:Onam at Azeezia Medical College.jpg
- File:AZEEZIANS.jpg
- File:Azeezia medical college 3.jpg
- File:Azeezia medical college2.jpg
- File:Azeezia medical college.jpg
- File:Azeezia Medical College 2013.jpg
- File:Azeezia Institute of Medical Science.jpg
- File:Dr.Y.M.Fazil Marikar.jpg
- File:Azeezia Medical College.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Collection of fan/promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Leandro quiroga el fhater.jpg
- File:Leandro quiroga vivarapk r.jpg
- File:Z4j3ShNV7M.jpg
- File:Sw9hNjJS6aLq8pn.jpg
- File:OFJ39huXRSW6CN.jpg
- File:Ic7jDF3VTASBIv.jpg
- File:K6iwCoZRY1QKMh.jpg
- File:HSBoUbhk7v8y6.jpg
- File:34787653 CjGGIBU 1379352673.jpg
- File:BLfc2JiIyq7.jpg
- File:FCzzagkYqGv.jpg
- File:34787470 p9bJivzbM 1379352607.jpg
- File:34786793 p2c8XDo 1379352348.jpg
- File:34785028 f4mbZiF 1379351688.jpg
- File:34784663 Lm5ViMcWE 1379351555.jpg
- File:34784373 TXLTd 1379351445.jpg
- File:34783973 9C3TN 1379351310.jpg
- File:34783820 V9KIVg 1379351250.jpg
- File:34783615 VQGJS2I4 1379351176.jpg
- File:34783041 xqhCXVAw 1379350960.jpg
- File:3lJfNXFp3V.jpg
- File:Leandro 654.jpg
- File:Leandro quiroga es el mejor.jpg
- File:Real madrid leandro quiroga.jpg
- File:El mejor del siglo.jpg
- File:Rey de la musica.jpg
- File:Leandro 8.jpg
- File:Leandro quiroga vivarapk.jpg
- File:Leandro quiroga.jpg
- File:Vivarapk.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by XxxAlkatheerixxx (talk · contribs)
[edit]Considering User talk:XxxAlkatheerixxx (+35 copyvios/otherwise deleted uploads): IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.
- File:اتحاد الشنافر الكونفيدرالي في حضرموت سنة 1930 ب 9 ألف مسلح تقريباُ.jpg
- File:معاهدة الصلح بين السلطنة الكثيرية و القعيطية.jpg
- File:طابع بريدي لسلطنة أل كثير.png
- File:جندي من جنود السلطنة الكثيرية.jpg
- File:السلطان عبدالله محسن بن حسين الكثيري.jpg
- File:السلطان حسين بن علي الكثيري أخر سلاطين أل كثير.jpg
- File:جندي كثيري من جيش البادية في حضرموت عام 1959 م.jpg
- File:شجرة سلاطين الدولة الكثيرية اليمن.jpg
- File:رجال ثمريت بيت كثير الكثيري.jpg
- File:رأس وعل يمني رمز القبائل.png
- File:هبوت الكثيري في ظفار.jpg
- File:سالم بن كبينة و سالم بن كبينة من قبيلة الرواشد الكثيرية مرافقين مبارك بن لندن 1.jpg
- File:زوامل قبيلة أل كثير همدان في السعوديه..jpg
- File:سلاطين القبائل في الجنوب.jpg
- File:شيوخ و رجال أل كثير همدان في أستقبال أمير نجران مشعل بن عبدالله بن عبدالعزيز في شرورة.jpg
- File:زامل رجال قبيلىة أل كثير همدان بشرورة بمناسبة زيارة الأمير مشعل بن عبدالله أل سعود.jpg
- File:زامل شباب أل كثير في السعوديه.jpg
- File:المنشد السعودي أحمد الكثيري.jpg
- File:صاحب السمو الملكي الأمير مشعل بن عبدالله بن عبدالعزيز في حديث ودي مع الشيخ علي بن طالب الكثيري في شرورة.jpg
- File:عملة السلطنة الكثيرية 1..png
- File:جنبيه 1.jpg
- File:شيخ همدان 1.jpg
- File:هبوت قبيلة الرواس الكثيرية 1.jpg
- File:قبائل حضرموت 1.jpg
- File:قصر حصن الفلس الكثيري 1.jpg
- File:سالم بن كبينه و الرحال الأنجليزي مبارك بن لندن 1.jpg
- File:قبائل أل كثير في حضرموت 1.jpg
- File:رجال بيت كثير الكثيريه في الربع الخالي 1.jpg
- File:الشيخ محمد بن عمر بن الشين ( بن صالح بن محمد ) شيخ أل عمر الباديه. 1.jpg
- File:بعض أفراد قبيلة أل كثير في الربع الخالي 1.jpg
- File:رجال أل كثير في النيد ( القف ) 1.jpg
- File:الشيخ محسن بن عبدالخالق الكثيري 1.jpg
- File:الشيخ فيصل بن غالب بن سيف الكثيري شيخ قبيلة ال سيف بيت الدوله 1..jpg
- File:الشيخ صالح أل كلوت الراشدي الكثيري شيخ عام الرواشد و أمير منطقة ذعبلوتن في السعودية 1.jpg
- File:الشيخ فريح بن بخيت مسن الكثيري الملقب ب(بن شويغل ) من قبائل بيت كثير 1.jpg
- File:السلطان حسن بن علي الكثيري أخر سلاطين أل كثير 1.jpg
- File:سالم بن غبيشه في شبابه 1.jpg
- File:1 الرحال الأنجليزي مبارك بن لندن و شيوخ قبيلة الرواشد الكثيرية.jpg
- File:جواز السلطنة الكثيرية.png
- File:السلطان علي بن منصور الكثيري.jpg
- File:شجرة قبيلة أل كثير الجد كثير بن مالك.jpg
- File:قبائل همدان.jpg
- File:خريطة قبائل اليمن و ظفار و السعوديه.jpg
_%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%AE_%D8%A3%D9%84_%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%87._1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D9%85%D9%86_%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%84_%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AA_%D9%83%D8%AB%D9%8A%D8%B1_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 22:52, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF (Sony SLT-A57, Canon IXUS 230 HS, Aigo F100). File:Nf 3845 370297.jpg mysteriously watermarked. File:בקונצרט חזנות בבית הכנסת הגדול במץ.png (uploaded in 06.2013) apparently previously published via heymann-photographe.fr (2011, unable to load the page, cached version)
- File:Nf 3845 370297.jpg
- File:עם אנריקו מסיאס.JPG
- File:שמואל שפירו באולפן.JPG
- File:שמואל שפירו בהופעה בצרפת.png
- File:בקונצרט חזנות בבית הכנסת הגדול במץ.png
- File:שמואל שפירו עם הרב יאשיהו פינטו.JPG
- File:שמואל שפירו עם הזמר אנריקו מסיאס.JPG
- File:שמואל שפירו בהופעה.jpg
- File:שמואל שפירו 2.jpg
- File:שמואל שפירו.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by JVC3ETA
[edit]- File:Juan O. Hernandez 45.JPG
- File:El primi Maradiaga.JPG
- File:JOHdez.Partdo Nacional.JPG
- File:Carlo Costly Drawing.JPG
- File:Jose de la Paz Herrera Chelato Ucles.JPG
- File:Rafael Callejas.JPG
I just spotted that other photo uploaded recently by this user: File:Pepe Lobo Sosa.JPG, was actually a retouched screencap from a youtube video. The nominated photos seems to be obtained in the same way, based on their quality. --Oleola (talk) 00:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete considering the low resolution, lack of metadata and the uploader's history of uploading copyright violations (which he or she attempts to obscure by repeated talk page blanking). —LX (talk, contribs) 22:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant and blurred. Similar (less blurred) image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. whym (talk) 12:36, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant and blurred. Similar (less blurred) image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. whym (talk) 12:36, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charging Bull 1
[edit]The sculpture is still covered by copyright, and there is no FOP in the US for artworks.
russavia (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC) Deleted, speedy would have been more appropriate than a DR.--KTo288 (talk) 10:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charging Bull 2
[edit]No FOP in the US for sculptures
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 11:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charging Bull 3
[edit]No FOP in the US for statues.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 23:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charging Bull 4
[edit]US FOP does not cover works of art or replicas of such work
- File:"Charging Bull" replica.jpg
- File:ReplicaCharging Bull.jpg
- File:ReplicaCharging Bull1.jpg
- File:ReplicaCharging Bull2.jpg
- File:USA-NYC-Charging Bull.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 18:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charging Bull 5
[edit]No FOP in the US for artwork/sculptures
- File:-i---i- (2315240491).jpg
- File:-i---i- (4018723188).jpg
- File:Arturo Di Modicas New York Charging Bull.jpg
- File:Bowling Green Area - panoramio.jpg
- File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 78.jpg
- File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull.jpg
- File:Bull (781864253).jpg
- File:Bull from behind (46709018762).jpg
- File:Bull Market (14240717915).jpg
- File:Bull Wall Street (6173547669).jpg
- File:Bull Wallstreet.webm
- File:Bull-3112617.jpg
- File:Charging Bull (28919670730).jpg
- File:Charging Bull (8825706602).jpg
- File:Charging Bull (9619086816).jpg
- File:Charging Bull - NYC, Set2011 (6177838958).jpg
- File:Charging Bull in 2020.png
- File:Charging Bull, Bowling Green, Manhattan, New York (7237057222).jpg
- File:Charging Bull, Bowling Green, Manhattan, New York (7237058674).jpg
- File:Chief Sitting (on) Bull ) (5871046255).jpg
- File:El Toro de Wall Street.webm
- File:Financial District, New York, NY, USA - panoramio (73).jpg
- File:I think he's running away from Wall Street... (3007506886).jpg
- File:More Bernie Less Bull.jpg
- File:New york (9787993752).jpg
- File:New York City (4890606552).jpg
- File:New York City NYC June 2010 (4739150916).jpg
- File:New York City, Wall Street The Charging Bull, 2013 (11435305495).jpg
- File:NYC The Bull (6542136151).jpg
- File:NYC The Bull (6542138021).jpg
- File:NYC – Broadway - Charging Bull or Wall Street Bull - panoramio.jpg
- File:People bringing offerings to the bull statue down on Wall Street. Someday, after Wall Street has fully hollowed out the US economy, we will be asked to explain what was going on here. (4985649767).jpg
- File:Shooting Charging Bull 2.jpg
- File:Taking The Wall Street Bull by the horns.3gp.webm
- File:The Wall Street Bull.webm
- File:Wall street (9071954241).jpg
- File:Wall Street Bull (11376739555).jpg
- File:Wall Street Bull (32840395088).jpg
- File:Wall Street IMG 3044 (5503618960).jpg
- File:Where's the bull? (4650882388).jpg
- File:“Charging Bull” of Wall Street (29061011327).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06_-_26_Broadway,_Charging_Bull.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Bull_)_(5871046255).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 78.jpg and File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull.jpg since they do not violate COM:FOP US, due to de minimis usage. The Cunard Building and 26 Broadway, which are depicted in these images, were completed before December 1990 and as such is exempt: for buildings completed before December 1, 1990, there is complete FoP, without regard to whether the building is visible from a public place, because the building is public domain, except for the plans. The bull is such a minor portion of these images that it doesn't infringe on the copyright of the original artist, but it is nearly impossible to take images of the specified vantage points without also including the bull in a de minimis capacity.
- Delete the remaining images as they are FOP violations without de minimis use. epicgenius (talk) 22:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: In File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 78.jpg, it seems to me like the Bull is the focus of the image. In File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull.jpg, it does seem that the area the Bull is in is the focus, rather than the actual Bull, but the title seems to suggest otherwise. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: For File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 78.jpg, which was taken by me, the Cunard Building was intended to be the focus, rather than the Bull. I was trying to get a picture of the entire building (see File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 77.jpg), but the street is too narrow so I had to take two images: 77 and 78. However, there is no way to get a direct shot of the lowest few stories, i.e. this view, because the Bull is in the way. I can theoretically take that image from beside the Bull, but I'd have a bunch of angry tourists. So i took 78 instead, with what I hoped was de minimis usage.
- For File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull.jpg, I can't speak for Tdorante10, but I think the key part is that he was trying to take a picture of that particular vantage point, but the main features are 26 Broadway and the Bull. I would personally interpret it as an image of 26 Broadway, with the Bull as a de minimis incidental. epicgenius (talk) 02:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: I understand now for File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 78.jpg. I'd support a de minimis usage for that. --Elisfkc (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: In File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 78.jpg, it seems to me like the Bull is the focus of the image. In File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull.jpg, it does seem that the area the Bull is in is the focus, rather than the actual Bull, but the title seems to suggest otherwise. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep File:Shooting Charging Bull 2.jpg as de minimis: subject of the photo is the people taking photographs of the statue, which is not even shown in its entirety, just the top. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep
- as de minimis. It is because the bull is so small that it is obviously not the main subject of the first two photos. For the remaining one, there are many people surrounded the bull and we can't identify the bull clearly. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, but some are kept. Taivo (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charging Bull 6
[edit]No FoP in USA. Some of the images have a "de minimis" template. and some have been kept before. However none is de minimis. In the case of kept images there was never given a rationale in the keep decision of the deciding admin (or added next to the entry), why a specific image could fall under de minimis. The categorization "charging bull" alone tells the none is de minimis. Not in the DR: an image of the covered charging bull.
- File:26 Broadway (15526932196).jpg
- File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 04.jpg
- File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 13.jpg
- File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 15.jpg
- File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 79.jpg
- File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 80.jpg
- File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull (cropped).jpg
- File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull.jpg
- File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 07.jpg
- File:Bull from behind (46709018762).jpg
- File:Bull Wall Street (6173547669).jpg
- File:Charging Bull (28919670730).jpg
- File:IMAG7199 (34138459952).jpg
- File:New york (9787993752).jpg
- File:New York 2010, (20100324-DSC01214).jpg
- File:New York City (4890606552).jpg
- File:New York City Mai 2009 PD 034.JPG
- File:New York Film Academy (48126534366).jpg
- File:Shooting Charging Bull.jpg
- File:The Line to be Photographed with the Charging Bull, Broadway, Manhattan, New York (7237048326).jpg
- File:The Wall Street Bull (5934546528).jpg
- File:USA-99-Wall Street.jpg
- File:Wall Street bull (15467605171).jpg
- File:Wall Street Bull (and a bunch of Japaneese) (2783130469).jpg
- File:Where's the bull? (4650882388).jpg
- File:美國紐約68.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_06_-_26_Broadway,_Charging_Bull_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2783130469).jpg){kind=link}
C.Suthorn (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- The nominator's claim "The categorization "charging bull" alone tells the none is de minimis." is untrue. Some of these files have categories that describe even minor things in the image. For example, File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 15.jpg also contains Category:1 Broadway, which is only visible as a sliver, and Category:Exterior of the Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House, which is partially visible in the background (unlike sculptures, buildings in the USA do have FOP). I find it very hard to believe that Charging Bull is not de minimis in that picture, given that it's a very tiny portion of the picture itself; there are so many people in front of the sculpture that it actually is de minimis. There are other images where the Charging Bull is clearly not the focus of the image. File:美國紐約68.jpg is a view up Broadway where the sculpture is mostly hidden behind flagpoles. In File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 07.jpg, the focus of the image is clearly the cement truck, and the bull is an incidental object in the background. File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull (cropped).jpg has been cropped significantly so that the clear focus of the image is 26 Broadway; however, its source file, File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull.jpg, is eligible for deletion. One of the strangest files listed for deletion here is File:Wall Street Bull (and a bunch of Japaneese) (2783130469).jpg, where Charging Bull is so clearly not the object of the picture that, if you did not know what the bull looked like, the brown objects on the right could be just about anything.That said, there are some images which definitely should be deleted, e.g. File:USA-99-Wall Street.jpg and File:Bull from behind (46709018762).jpg. Epicgenius (talk) 13:04, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- As for a formal vote, Delete File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 04.jpg, File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 79.jpg, File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 80.jpg (these three are my own pictures but I have no problem with deletion), File:Bowling Green td (2018-12-13) 06 - 26 Broadway, Charging Bull.jpg, File:Bull from behind (46709018762).jpg, File:Bull Wall Street (6173547669).jpg, File:Charging Bull (28919670730).jpg, File:IMAG7199 (34138459952).jpg, File:New york (9787993752).jpg, File:New York City (4890606552).jpg, File:The Wall Street Bull (5934546528).jpg, File:USA-99-Wall Street.jpg, and perhaps File:Wall Street bull (15467605171).jpg and File:Wall Street bull (15467605171).jpg. Keep the remaining files. Epicgenius (talk) 13:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- As for a formal vote,
- Keep all, please stop trying to remove entire photographic backgrounds of reputable topics. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- How is File:Bowling Green, New York City (20100324-DSC01214).jpg not de minimis? The Charging Bull is not the subject of the photograph (a photo taken from a distance and is of the street and buildings, which have FoP in the US) and is mostly blocked by people and only the top of the rear is visible if you’re looking hard enough.
- I’ve not looked at all of the others yet. Bidgee (talk) 22:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think the nominator even bothered to check any of the images, instead indiscriminately nominating all files in Category:Charging Bull except for the covered bull (which has no chance at being deleted). To me, this is a very careless DR made simply because "the image is in the category, that means Charging Bull is not de minimis". Epicgenius (talk) 13:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- I'd agree that one passes de mimimis. But is it worthwhile keeping as a generic NYC street scene? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I agree tat the nom did not investigate the images for whether or not the use of the sculpture was de minimis or not. Certainly my image, File:Shooting Charging Bull.jpg is pretty much the definition of de minimis, as thre focus of the picture is not the sculpture itself, but the photographers taking images of it. Keep all until the nom take the time and effort to separate the wheat from the chaff, and a trout to boot Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:35, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No FoP for this.
- I'm unconvinced by the de minimis claims. Maybe for this one, File:USA-99-Wall Street.jpg, because there's a focus to that which isn't the Bull. But the others are either the Bull (a problem) or else they have no focus and they're a crowd of people blocking sight of the Bull. Now those might pass for de minimis, but I think that same argument then makes them fail COM:SCOPE! I see little need for a photo which describes as "A row of bollards, stopping anyone getting near, or us photographing, a copyrighted sculpture". If anyone wants to claim that these do have scope value (I think the 99% one does, maybe File:Wall Street Bull (and a bunch of Japaneese) (2783130469).jpg too) then I wouldn't argue. But for general street scenes, we can and have done better with other images. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:51, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think these really count as generic street scenes. These scenes are of a very specific location in NYC that can be easily identified. For example, File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 15.jpg is a very identifiable image of the southern end of Broadway facing southward; it would be fine if not for the bull. And File:Bowling Green, New York City (20100324-DSC01214).jpg is an image of the same location facing northward. Both have clear educational use, as they can be used to illustrate the southern terminus of en:Broadway (Manhattan). Epicgenius (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleting some of these images would be sending the message that certain places cannot be photographed for Commons in any way, because of the existence of copyrighted sculpture there. The entire purpose of the de minimus standard is to allow those places to be photographed as long as the appearance of the copyrighted object is minimal not non-existant and therefore does not abrogate the rights of the copyright holder. With many of these images, if they were advertised for sale as images of the bull statue, the sellers would be laughed at, the amount of the bull showing is so minimal.
This entire nomination is an exercise in overreach and carelessness. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleting some of these images would be sending the message that certain places cannot be photographed for Commons in any way, because of the existence of copyrighted sculpture there. The entire purpose of the de minimus standard is to allow those places to be photographed as long as the appearance of the copyrighted object is minimal not non-existant and therefore does not abrogate the rights of the copyright holder. With many of these images, if they were advertised for sale as images of the bull statue, the sellers would be laughed at, the amount of the bull showing is so minimal.
- I don't think these really count as generic street scenes. These scenes are of a very specific location in NYC that can be easily identified. For example, File:Bowling Green NYC Feb 2020 15.jpg is a very identifiable image of the southern end of Broadway facing southward; it would be fine if not for the bull. And File:Bowling Green, New York City (20100324-DSC01214).jpg is an image of the same location facing northward. Both have clear educational use, as they can be used to illustrate the southern terminus of en:Broadway (Manhattan). Epicgenius (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep all per above. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Based on the discussion above and the few images I checked, this is just another indiscriminate DR. Keep all, without prejudice to more targeted nominations with specific rationales. Brianjd (talk) 06:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: without prejudice to renomination of smaller groups. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charging Bull 7
[edit]No FOP in the US for artwork/sculptures
- File:'Charging Bull', Broadway, Manhattan, Feb. 2008 (2295717216).jpg
- File:'Charging Bull', Broadway, Manhattan, Feb. 2008 (2295723628).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fairly clear case here. PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 11:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dragon Bridge (Ljubljana)
[edit]No FOP in Slovenia.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dragon Bridge (Ljubljana)
[edit]No FOP in Slovenia
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 19:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete The dragon is copyrighted until 2017. The building in the background will remain copyrighted until 2028. --Eleassar (t/p) 23:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dragon Bridge (Ljubljana)
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: now that we have COM:DM#Slovenia, another look at these images is warranted. They all show the Dragon Bridge, work by Jurij Zaninović (Giorgio Zaninovich; 1876-1946). Its inclusion in these images is not incidental and unavoidable as demanded by the cited guideline, the bridge features prominently in all of them, and it can't be replaced at will with another work without radically changing the content of the image.
- File:Dragon bridge in Ljubljana (2).jpg
- File:Dragon Bridge, Ljubljana, in 1910.jpg
- File:Laibach - Jubiläumsbrücke.jpg
- File:Regulacija Ljubljanice pri Zmajskem mostu 1908-35.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep 2, 3 and 4 as aleady discussed here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Dragon bridge (Ljubljana). --Sporti (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as per Sporti. Yann (talk) 06:32, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dragon Bridge (Ljubljana)
[edit]Work by J. Zaninović (d. 1946). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, copyrighted until 2017.
- File:Dragon bridge (16279586261).jpg
- File:L'art nouveau à Ljubljana (9354881385).jpg
- File:L'art nouveau à Ljubljana (9361173568).jpg
- File:L'art nouveau à Ljubljana (9361174164).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 08:40, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, as much as I can see, identical. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar file is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, as much as I could see, identical. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]- File:Atomium pic-.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-001.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-002.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-003.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-004.JPG
- File:Atomium pic-007.JPG
- File:Atomium, Helsey Park, Brussels, Belgium.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. The Atomium is © SABAM 67.87.46.39 15:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Not that it matters, but Atomium seems to be © fr:André Waterkeyn's heirs. SABAM is a legal entity representing copyright holders in certain situations. For example, legal claims may come from SABAM on behalf of the copyright holder. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
These images show a building by w:André Waterkeyn. Belgian law doesn't allow photos of buildings without the permission of the architect unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years.
- File:AtoniumEvening BrusselsB.JPG
- File:AtoniumNightView BrusselsB.JPG
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687216588).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687226638).jpg
- File:AtomiumBrusselsBanner.JPG
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690433388).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690447552).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690451676).jpg
- File:THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690456822).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 12:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all images. The Atomium is clearly the subject of these photos. 67.87.46.39 01:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom russavia (talk) 09:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No FOP in Belgium
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No freedom of panorama in Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
No FOP in Belgium
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
The architect died less than 70 years ago.
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
The architect died less than 70 years ago.
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687216588).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM HEYSEL BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7687226638).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690433388).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690447552).jpg
- File:INSIDE THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690451676).jpg
- File:THE ATOMIUM NEAR HEYSEL BRUSSELS BELGIUM JULY 2012 (7690456822).jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 10:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, --Túrelio (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Atomium
Derivative works of texts around and/or inside Atomium.
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (19).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (20).jpg
- File:ATOMIUM-BRUSSELS-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (25).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Keep Nothing copyrightable shown in the image: all of them fall under {{PD-ineligible}} and/or {{PD-text}}. No FOP-issue. --High Contrast (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- There's no chance that something as long as this is {{PD-ineligible}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Stefan, I'm at least as respectful of literary copyright as you are, but I'm not sure about these. Although presented in sentence form, they amount to lists of names (in the first and third cases) and lists of dimensions (in the second case). I think these would fail copyright in the USA -- I don't really have any idea about the TOO for literary works in Belgium, but I think we can keep them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, PD-text or PD-ineligible --Denniss (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]See COM:FOP#Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]No FOP in Belgium.
Stefan4 (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Aside from the Atomium, which is obvious, I also doubt that the copyright to all of the other images in this poster belong to the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. --Krd 17:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atomium
[edit]Non-free architecture.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Belgium --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj_Khalifa[edit]There is no FOP in the UAE, and thence these images can't be hosted on Commons.
russavia (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Hi, First of all, thanks for reviewing some articles on wikimedia. To be honest, I have not understood yet the problem with some of my pictures and I haven't got any further explanation on your words (I could see something on the "FOP" link you left) I guess you mean that there are some policies related to the buildings on UAE that my images don't follow. I can say that I took some pictures in there and I have't asked anyone on the UAE if he/she mind about using images of his country. I didn't know I was breaking some rules (I just wanted to contribute with some of my pictures) but in that case, I hardly believe that all of the pictures of the UAE shown on Commons are following that directives So, if it is possible, I just want to know what's the difference between my pictures and "almost every other" picture of UAE shown on wikicommons Thanks for your help, --KeDaO (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 18:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 2[edit]No FOP in the UAE
russavia (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 3[edit]No COM:FOP in the UAE.
russavia (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 4[edit]No FOP in the UAE
russavia (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 5[edit]No FOP in the UAE russavia (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 6[edit]No COM:FOP in the UAE for buildings.
russavia (talk) 06:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 7[edit]Copyrighted building exteriors and interiors. No Freedom of Panorama in UAE.
Themightyquill (talk) 07:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Burj Khalifa and Dubai Metro perfect timing.JPG and Tallest tower vs. the palm trees (5373615733).jpg could be de minimis. I'm not a judge, where is the border between permissibility and copyright violation? --Ras67 (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Deleted four, kept two per DM. --Krd 16:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 8[edit]Copyrighted building in UAE which has no freedom of panorama.
Themightyquill (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination --Krd 11:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 9[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! None of this buildings are free to photograph!
Ras67 (talk) 19:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 10[edit]Building under copyright, no Freedom of Panorama.
Themightyquill (talk) 13:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 13:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 11[edit]The same as usual: no COM:FOP.
HyperGaruda (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC) Deleted per nomination. Jcb (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 12[edit]Can we have some clarification as to why these illustrations of a copyrighted building are okay for commons? I don't know how the rules apply here. The copyrighted architecture of the buildings is clearly depicted, but maybe there's some exception I don't understand. Themightyquill (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted per above: this is clearly a reproduction of the architectural work. Guanaco (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 13[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 23:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC) Deleted per nomination --Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 14[edit]No freedom of panorama in the UAE Themightyquill (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 15[edit]no FoP in the UAE Saqib (talk) 04:11, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Deleted - per nomination - Jcb (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 16[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!
Ras67 (talk) 15:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I believe there is no copyright to these public images in the UAE .Category:Burj Khalifa. Is it possible to give us one reason to delete these images which are public photos and there is nothing wrong with posting them here!?.Usamasaad 17:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted - per nomination. Kept only File:Fog on Burj Khalifah.Dubai. - panoramio.jpg and File:برج خليفة في دبي2.jpg. --Ruthven (msg) 18:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 17[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!
Ras67 (talk) 22:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Majora (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 18[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Burj Khalifa was designed by Adrian Smith.
Ras67 (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. It is not de minimis if what is being photographed is the main subject of the photograph. The entry way would still be part of the copyright and we cannot keep any of these. --Majora (talk) 20:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 19[edit]No FOP in UAE
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
|
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_tower.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 20
[edit]Derived work from copyrighted photos/buildings/designs what we cannot host here! We need the permission of the actual creators for a free licencing of their work.
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 04.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 05.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 06.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 07.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 08.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 10.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 12.jpg
- File:The making of Burj Khalifa, Dubai (Ank Kumar) 13.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 01.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 02.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 03.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 04.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 05.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 06.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 08.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 09.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 10.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 11.jpg
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ras67 (talk) 17:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete as derivative work copyvios. No permissions or OTRS authorizations from model creators, images uploaded by a problematic user (who has uploaded dozens of DW/no FOP violations, as seen in their talk page. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per COM:FOP UAE. Uncensored Burj Khalifa is not something we should ever host in Commons until Adrian Smith gets a bail. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 15:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per COM:FOP UAE. All the above photos are of copyrighted works of some sort - the architecture or museum exhibits. -M.nelson (talk) 20:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 21
[edit]To the 21st one and eternal further, no freedom of panorama in UAE! Why we are the sole ones who protect Adrian Smith's rights? It seems to me, that the rest of the world is not interested in this case. IMHO the skylines are copyrighted too.
- File:084-DSC07190 (25199382909).jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (15514231368).jpg Delete Other copyrighted building is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (16260269606).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393167816).jpg Delete Other copyrighted building is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393239271).jpg Delete Other copyrighted building is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393322877).jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (Pexels-1537493).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa -4 (10764135213).jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa Dubai UAE (14159904937).jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa Fountain - Downtown Dubai (6985576394).jpg Delete Other copyrighted building is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Downtown Dubai skylines (Pexels 2403251).jpg
Unsure Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent, but I think it's general cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC) - File:Dubai Burj Arab Burj Khalifa Mall UAE - 043 (15656282153).jpg Keep Focus changed to the garden--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- This must be renamed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Rename request send - you could do it in the time of writing your comment Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- This must be renamed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Fountain show (Pexels 692105).jpg Keep Focus changed to the fountain--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:DUBAI IN COLORS.jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai mall-2011-7.JPG Delete Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai mall1.jpg Keep Focus changed to the lake--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Night Time (Pexels-804915).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines (Pexels 1537493).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Alex Azabache (Pexels 3214995).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Alex Azabache (Pexels 3848412).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines at night (Pexels 3787839).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines at night (Pexels 3787840).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Night (Pexels 804915).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai skyscrapers at night 2011.jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai skyscrapers.jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai street view.jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Sunset (5614220391).jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai, United Arab Emirates (Unsplash suv4vuJsH6g).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 17:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Flying from Burjkhalifa.jpg Keep Main object is a bird. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Fog on Burj Khalifah.Dubai. - panoramio.jpg Keep COM:DM per previous discussion--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - not really de minimis. The title implies the image's main intention: the tower itself. See also Explicit closing input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giant Rubber Duck invades Pittsburgh (10023967385).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- @JWilz12345: If so, we can change this file name and keep this file. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: And we can also undelete deleted file and rename deleted file. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Fountain (4067634603).jpg Keep Focus changed to the fountain--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Jaguar C-X17 crossover concept in Dubai (10818367515).jpg Keep COM:DM: Focus is on the car--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Jaguar C-X17 crossover concept in Dubai (10818386576).jpg Keep COM:DM: Focus is on the car--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Jaguar C-X17 crossover concept in Dubai (10818644523).jpg Keep COM:DM: Focus is on the car--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- The illuminated background is an essential part of the photos and not a casual element. The whole background consists of copyrighted skyscrapers. --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Comment I think main object in this image is the car. Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Panoramic of Dubai - Nov 2009.JPG Keep COM:DM per previous discussion--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:People taking photos of Burj Khalifa at night.jpg Keep Main object is a smartphone. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- No, the main object is the Burj Khalifa seeing in the smartphone. Without the Burj the picture would not have been taken in this manner. --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Come on - just a general skyline of Dubai in the smartphone. Besides, it could just as well have been any other city in the world. --Botev (talk) 00:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Scene outside Dubai Mall (4067633027).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Skyline Downtown Dubai 140514-2096-jikatu (14167168656).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg Keep COM:DM per previous discussion--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Souk Al Bahar @ Downtown Dubai (15691803028).jpg Delete Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Sunset of Dubai Terrace.jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Taking photos of Burj Khalifa.jpg Keep Main object is a smartphone. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- No, the main object is the Burj Khalifa seeing in the smartphone. Without the Burj the picture would not have been taken in this manner. --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:Tall buildings in Dubai Alex Azabache (Pexels 3254725).jpg Unsure Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent, but I think it's general cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
** Delete this Pexels-sourced derivative work. focus is on tall buildings. Not a skyline image: for UAE, only true skyline images are fine for unrestricted commercial reuses. See also this Adobe help guide, which lists copyrighted buildings and artworks, their copyright holders or authors, and permitted use in images meant for stock/commercial reuses without authors' licensing permission. For both Burj Khalifa and Burj al Arab, skyline image is only allowed, not close cityscape images. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @JWilz12345: I read this page carefully. In this page, I found this sentence. "Cityscape, skyline, or vista photos may be acceptable if no single building is the primary subject." It means that both cityscape photos and skyline photos are allowed. And this page contains outdated content. For example, Atomium in Belgium is allowed now because Belgium has freedom of panorama now, but this page explains that Atomium is not allowed. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: slashed my vdel input. While the page is outdated for Atomium, it is still relevant for Burj Khalifa and Burj al Arab, as long as there is no acceptable FOP from UAE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I read this page carefully. In this page, I found this sentence. "Cityscape, skyline, or vista photos may be acceptable if no single building is the primary subject." It means that both cityscape photos and skyline photos are allowed. And this page contains outdated content. For example, Atomium in Belgium is allowed now because Belgium has freedom of panorama now, but this page explains that Atomium is not allowed. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Tall buildings in Dubai at night (Pexels 1381722).jpg Unsure Other copyrighted buildings are too prominent, but I think it's general cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Bottom Part of the World's Tallest Building (9827329494).jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Burj Khalifa from the East at sunrise (16398415591).jpg Keep General skylines--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Burj Khalifa from the East at sunrise... - see Explicit's input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giant Rubber Duck invades Pittsburgh (10023967385).jpg. The file name already establishes the image's intention: to include Burj Khalifa. The rest of the skyline seems insignificant (making the tower the chief motif). Cropping that tower away will leave this image as redundant to other good Dubai skyline images we already hold. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Dubai Fountain & Burj Khalifa Pixabay.jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is too prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: Focus changed to the lake. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:The tallest building.jpg Delete Burj Khalifa is main object. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:View of Dubai (Unsplash Zf8fagTPYTo).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- File:एक इमारत जो सपनो को हौसला देती है और जज़्बो को हिम्मत- बुर्ज ख़लीफ़ा - UAE.jpg Keep COM:DM per previous discussion--A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ras67 (talk) 02:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Keep Already in past discussions, it has been concluded that some images were kept covered by DM. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Comment In my opinion, some of other files you didn't marked maybe to be kept. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: You may also mark those you think can be kept. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections (except those given keep reasons by A1Cafel or Ox1997cow). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel and Jeff G.: I marked whether delete or keep. I will respectfully accept any objection. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the skylines are not {{Deminimis}}. Every building in these images is copyrighted, it's not in the "sense" of the law to "stack" copyrighted objects and so make them free. The "deminimised" objects have to be "nonessential" and "casual" elements, what is not the case in the skyline photographs. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Comment Already in past discussion, it has been concluded that the skylines are DM. Ox1997cow (talk) 22:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67:
- Comment @Jeff G., Ox1997cow, A1Cafel, and Ras67: if some of the images are skylines, then why categorize them here in the first place??! IMO they should be removed from this "reddish" category and confined only to Category:Skylines in Dubai. Once I inquired Bidgee about removal of FoP templates on categories of objects from countries FOP (User talk:Bidgee/Archive13#FoP templates), and they replied that it only causes clutter. They added: "if there was no FoP, there shouldn't be a category for the object/item/building/memorial/statue etc." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Lack of freedom of panorama does not mean that we cannot create categories of copyrighted buildings or sculptures. So, why does categories of copyrighted games exist? (Such as Category:StarCraft, Category:Overwatch, Category:Call of Duty, etc...) Ox1997cow (talk) 12:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- If the skyline photo incidentally contains copyrighted buildings, these photos are allowed under de minimis. Categories of buildings or sculptures in countries without freedom of panorama exist for this kind of situation. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: see Category:Sólfar (a copyrighted sculpture in Iceland, with all files deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sólfar). See also Category:SM City San Pedro. For buildings, they can go under Category:Buildings in Dubai or Category:Skyscrapers in Dubai. This category has been abused IMO, and it seems new uploaders ignore warnings on top. Also if the category needs to be nuked, this should be locked until the year the building falls PD or UAE changes their copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: That's an extreme case. When uploading to the category of copyrighted things, there is no problem if we follow the warning and upload. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: By the way, why are you taking the extreme case and giving it as an example? In the previous deletion discussion, you used that only examples of misuse of NoFoP templates were taken as examples, and you claimed that all NoFoP templates should be changed with something like {{NoFoP-Japan}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: the simple answer is that the {{NoUploads}} are, in my opinion, ineffective. I doubt most uploaders will understand what the template means in relation to copyrighted FOP-reliant works: works like buildings, sculptures, statues, monuments, memorials, and public murals/frescoes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: My opinion is different. The reason is that many users don't know that freedom of panorama varies by country. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: the simple answer is that the {{NoUploads}} are, in my opinion, ineffective. I doubt most uploaders will understand what the template means in relation to copyrighted FOP-reliant works: works like buildings, sculptures, statues, monuments, memorials, and public murals/frescoes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: see Category:Sólfar (a copyrighted sculpture in Iceland, with all files deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sólfar). See also Category:SM City San Pedro. For buildings, they can go under Category:Buildings in Dubai or Category:Skyscrapers in Dubai. This category has been abused IMO, and it seems new uploaders ignore warnings on top. Also if the category needs to be nuked, this should be locked until the year the building falls PD or UAE changes their copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete
allwhere Burj Khalifa is prominent per COM:FOP UAE. Uncensored Burj Khalifa is not something we should ever host in Commons until Adrian Smith gets a bail. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 15:50, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974:
Oppose Some images were kept due to DM before. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Burj Khalifa should be a trivial landmark (i.e. should not be at the centre of an image) per COM:DM, but it is too prominent in most of the listed images. Apologies for !voting all listed images to delete without seeing them individually. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974: I and A1Cafel have already marked "deleted" and "kept" on images that are likely to be deleted and images that are likely to be kept. Also, already in the previous deletion discussion, it was concluded that the skyline image is DM as the single buildings might be copyrighted, but the whole panorama is not. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Some skyline images are under discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Burj Khalifa-related. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974: I and A1Cafel have already marked "deleted" and "kept" on images that are likely to be deleted and images that are likely to be kept. Also, already in the previous deletion discussion, it was concluded that the skyline image is DM as the single buildings might be copyrighted, but the whole panorama is not. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Burj Khalifa should be a trivial landmark (i.e. should not be at the centre of an image) per COM:DM, but it is too prominent in most of the listed images. Apologies for !voting all listed images to delete without seeing them individually. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
To end all this mess because of limited exception (broadcasting programs only) in UAE copyright law, are there any attempts by Wikipedians in UAE and Arab Wikipedians to have FOP introduced in the desert kingdom? At the very least, FOP for architecture only (similar to US and Russian exceptions)? @A1Cafel, Ox1997cow, Ras67, Botev, Jeff G., and Soumya-8974: JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I'm sorry, but I've never heard of such a thing. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
"Why we are the sole ones who protect Adrian Smith's rights" note that I do not care about Adrian Smith's right, I do not care about UAE law. If I nominate things for deletion I do it to protect users of Commons. This law is unjust, though if for some reason I would have influence on UAE I would start from far worse laws being present there Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- Well said. Dronebogus (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
And for this nomination: keep everything, nominate actually problematic ones for a proper review Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep as indiscriminate. Cut out any skyline pictures, they are clearly de minimis. Individually nominate the rest. We aren’t here to “right great wrongs” by protecting the copyright of an architect who has low enough ethical standards to work in a country where being gay is illegal. Dronebogus (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: followed remarks of @Ox1997cow and A1Cafel: and many thanks for your efforts. In some case followed arguments of other users. General skylines kept according consensus. Thanks all for your efforts. --Ellywa (talk) 15:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 22
[edit]The architecture is copyrighted e.g. by Adrian Smith, see COM:TOYS!
Ras67 (talk) 02:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ras67: Delete They are clearly {{Copyvio}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete derivative work copyright violation: appears to be toys or small-scale models. May also fulfill User:Elcobbola/Models. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOYS--A1Cafel (talk) 07:56, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
deleted, per nomination and discussion. Elly (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Burj Khalifa 23
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates, per COM:FOP UAE. The Burj Khalifa is still copyrighted. Also derivatives (such as lego models) are copyrighted. Reason: the building was completed in 2008.
- File:084-DSC07190 (25199382909).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is blurry. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393167816).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa (48393322877).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa (8276722353).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is not prominent. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Burj Khalifa (Pexels-1537493).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This image is deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Khalifa (Pexels-1537493).jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Burj Khalifa (worlds tallest building) and the Dubai skyline (25781049892).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa -4 (10764135213).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa -5 (10764136183).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa Fountain - Downtown Dubai (6985576394).jpg
- File:Burj Khalifa from a ferry, Dubai.jpg Keep General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa from the sea, Dubai.jpg Keep General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa IMG 5776 (25901811255).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa Interpretation Centre.jpg
- File:Downtown Dubai skylines (Pexels 2403251).jpg
- File:Dubai (11535337084).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is blurry and General Road View. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Burj Khalifa (40219696641).jpg Keep General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:DUBAI IN COLORS.jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai mall-2011-7.JPG
- File:Dubai Police Agusta A-109K-2 in flight at sunset.jpg Keep Main object is a helicopter. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Chronus (talk) 21:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)- File:Dubai skyline 2010.jpg Keep General cityscape photo. Chronus (talk) 21:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Alex Azabache (Pexels 3214995).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines Alex Azabache (Pexels 3848412).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines at night (Pexels 3787839).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Skylines at night (Pexels 3787840).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai skyscrapers at night 2011.jpg Keep General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai skyscrapers.jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai street view (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai street view.jpg Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai Sunset (5614220391).jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dubai, United Arab Emirates (Unsplash suv4vuJsH6g).jpg Keep General aerial view. Ox1997cow Ox1997cow (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Lego Architecture Dubai.jpg
- File:Lego burj khalifa 21008.jpg
- File:Lego burj khalifa 21031.jpg
File:Muslims looking at Burj Khalifa.jpg. Is cropped to remove largest part of building.- File:Panoramic of Dubai - Nov 2009.JPG Keep General cityscape. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Scene outside Dubai Mall (4067633027).jpg Keep Main object is a lake. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Souk Al Bahar @ Downtown Dubai (15691803028).jpg Keep cropped and now Burj Khalifa is not prominent. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Bottom Part of the World's Tallest Building (9827329494).jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 02.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 03.jpg
- File:The Making of Burj Khalifa, Models (Ank Kumar, Infosys) 06.jpg
- File:The tallest building.jpg
- File:एक इमारत जो सपनो को हौसला देती है और जज़्बो को हिम्मत- बुर्ज ख़लीफ़ा - UAE.jpg Keep Burj Khalifa is silhouette and General skyline. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
_and_the_Dubai_skyline_(25781049892).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Elly (talk) 21:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Agree not to delete File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg, because the tower is blackened and details cannot be seen. Elly (talk) 21:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all but File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg per Elly. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all but Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg and Dubai street view (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg, where I have blackened the tower. I will black the other instances of Burj Khalifa in Commons. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have blacked out एक इमारत जो सपनो को हौसला देती है और जज़्बो को हिम्मत- बुर्ज ख़लीफ़ा (censored) - UAE.jpg (Hindi for "A building that gives encouragement to dreams and courage to the spirit - Burj Khalifa (censored) - UAE") as a separate file. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It looks like File:Muslims looking at Burj Khalifa.jpg has correctly been withdrawn from this nomination for deletion. If so, shouldn't the deletion nomination tags be removed from the file? I wanted to check so as to not risk taking a unilateral action someone might object to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
_-_UAE.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete all except File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg per Elly SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Could some of these image be covered under the de minimis exception? --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't understand. Surely most/all those other buildings are subject to copyright as well. Either all buildings in this image (including Burj Khalifa) de minimis or all are subject to copyright restrictions, no? -- Themightyquill (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: Already the decision has been made that the single buildings might be copyrighted but the whole panorama is not. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: That was my understanding as well - so I didn't see the need to black out the tower in that image. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe a sub-category like Category:Skylines in Dubai including the Burj Khalifa would be useful? -- 06:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: Not bad. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- And we can make a sub-category like Category:Skylines in Seoul including Lotte World Tower. (There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, too.) Ox1997cow (talk) 06:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow and Themightyquill: impractical, and can lead to abuse. The best approach is that all skyline inages must be categorized under Category:Skylines in Dubai and similar categories. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I don't think it's impractical, but I suspect you're right about leading to abuse. Just a thought - I'm not determined. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow and Themightyquill: impractical, and can lead to abuse. The best approach is that all skyline inages must be categorized under Category:Skylines in Dubai and similar categories. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe a sub-category like Category:Skylines in Dubai including the Burj Khalifa would be useful? -- 06:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: That was my understanding as well - so I didn't see the need to black out the tower in that image. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: Already the decision has been made that the single buildings might be copyrighted but the whole panorama is not. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have marked {{vk}} on images that can obviously applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: I have signed your markings for you. Please sign such markings yourself in the future. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Oh, that's my mistake. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Has anyone contacted Adrian Smith to request permission? If so, then I'm assuming he said no? Ixfd64 (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- If I've not misheard, Adrian Smith is currently in a jail in Saudi Arabia. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974 and Ixfd64: for a more eternal or longterm approach, has anyone including Arab Wikipedians and Wikipedians based in UAE have taken steps to introduce FOP there, at least "for buildings only" (yellow countries)? I expect dozens of more copyvio images to be uploaded here, including: this one. I'm not sure if people aren't aware of no FOP there or just intentionally "testing our no-FOP policy on UAE". I would also want to suggest filtering out exactly the words "Burj Khalifa" so that new users will no longer be able to upload images either containing the said words in their file names or in their file descriptions, at least temporarily (while UAE has no FOP for photos). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- If I've not misheard, Adrian Smith is currently in a jail in Saudi Arabia. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Excessive file name restrictions are bad. Suppose someone uploaded a file name of the Dubai Skyline with Burj Khalifa as "Remote view of Burj Khalifa". Skyline photos with Burj Khalifa are allowed even if there is no freedom of panorama in UAE, as last deletion discussion concluded that they were OK. If you ban the use of "Burj Khalifa" in file names, we won't be able to upload acceptable skyline or cityscape photos. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: And many people do not know freedom of panorama. I also mistakenly thought that the copyright of a building or sculpture photo belonged to the person who took it, until I saw numerous photos of the building or sculpture deleted from Wikimedia Commons. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: no, de minimis photos can still be uploaded, thru titles like "Dubai skyline 20211103.JPG", "Skyline of Dubai, UAE as seen from the Marina in 2019.jpg." If images bearing such file names continue to be uploaded, the location filled with millions of deleted files from late-2006 may become "crowded" in the very distant future. Besides files do not get "deleted" in real life, but rather all "deleted" files are still there, just hidden from non-admins (as per Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) on his reply here). See also w:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-06-19/Image undeletion on the mechanism of files deleted on Wikipedia (which also applies to all Wiki sites). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: And many people do not know freedom of panorama. I also mistakenly thought that the copyright of a building or sculpture photo belonged to the person who took it, until I saw numerous photos of the building or sculpture deleted from Wikimedia Commons. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: You're thinking too extreme. A lot of users will use the copyrighted building name in the file name, but can we ban the copyrighted building name in the file name? And did you think about typos? (For example, "Bur Kalifa", "Buri Khaljfa", etc.) Ox1997cow (talk) 15:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I've known you're an extreme claimant since you had the deletion discussion related NoFoP templates. Even in that discussion, you brought only cases where NoFoP templates were misused and insisted that use of NoFoP templates should only be used in category namespace. Even if use of NoFoP templates is changed to be used in category namespace, there is no guarantee that it will not be misused. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: I look on longterm solutions and not "band-aid" solutions. Thus it is best to filter out such names. Actually Commons has already did a version of what you call very extreme approach: indefinite protection of file names that is comonly misused. Example: File:Burj Khalifa.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- That approach of locking the file name prompted me to suggest such. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I've known you're an extreme claimant since you had the deletion discussion related NoFoP templates. Even in that discussion, you brought only cases where NoFoP templates were misused and insisted that use of NoFoP templates should only be used in category namespace. Even if use of NoFoP templates is changed to be used in category namespace, there is no guarantee that it will not be misused. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Keep that in mind. Such long-term solutions can hurt many users. Even though it is forbidden to use only "Burj Khalifa" in a file name, I know that using a file name containing "Burj Khalifa" is difficult to ban. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: and also take note of COM:CARES. The copyright holders include the architects and artists of national monuments. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Keep that in mind. Such long-term solutions can hurt many users. Even though it is forbidden to use only "Burj Khalifa" in a file name, I know that using a file name containing "Burj Khalifa" is difficult to ban. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Soumya-8974: I couldn't find anything about Adrian Smith being incarcerated. His article on the English Wikipedia doesn't say anything either. Could you provide a source? Ixfd64 (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, thank you! I have probably misheard a piece of news related to the still-unfinished Jeddah Tower, also designed by Adrian Smith. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- As a compromise, how about using the edit filter to just warn the user if they try to upload a picture containing the name? Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ixfd64: It's not bad. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa from a ferry, Dubai.jpg Keep General skyline despite the name. —Jpbowen (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Burj Khalifa from the sea, Dubai.jpg Keep General skyline despite the name. —Jpbowen (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
And see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Khalifa Interpretation Centre.jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep skyline images. De minimis use of the Burj Khalifa, there’s a precedent for this. The freedom of panorama page of English Wikipedia literally shows a skyline in a non-FOP country. I struggle to see why the images that just show the base aren’t de minimis but that’s not my expertise. The blacked-out version is artistically interesting but a ridiculous solution to a nonexistent problem (buildings are not more copyrighted because they’re famous and impossible not to notice in a generic panorama!) Dronebogus (talk) 15:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept General DR like this one is clearly not helpful. Yann (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Only 3 images on this flickr account. Is this own work? Leoboudv (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:53, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
El Boricua Aleman 17:38, 17. Mär. 2011 Cmcworld (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Нет подтверждения заявленной свободной лицензии Dogad75 (talk) 22:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Presence of Watermark Balablitz (talk) 23:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Origin unclear. Absent further information I'm inclined to think assuming FBI authorship is reasonable and so should keep but a discussion is in order.--Brian Dell (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: a pro forma deletion discussion seems very strange to me. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:23, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: I'm sure we can find a proper place of origin and license for this photo. Good photo as well. -- Martinillo (talk) 01:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I think the most likely origin of the photo is the civilian contracting company that Alexis worked for -- "The Experts". When would the FBI have taken this photo? The only possible GOV source would be the Navy while he was enlisted. Jujutacular (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Good point, most likely taken by the navy or contracting company that Alexis worked for, not the FBI. Can you find a proper license for the photograph? 142.32.208.235 (talk) 15:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I doubt the FBI had anything to do with taking this picture, but the picture is extremely likely to have been taken by a federal government employee for a government ID, probably Alexis' CAC badge. We know he had a valid CAC, which would have been issued in summer 2013 when he began his current position, and the picture taken for it would have been easily accessible by the FBI and other agencies, so it's hard to imagine why, when issuing a current photo, the FBI would be releasing some other non-government picture. (Theoretically possible? Yeah. A concern worth deleting the photo over? Not in any realistic universe.) 152.121.18.254 15:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep If not FBI-created, most likely created by DoD. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This is most likely either from his CAC or his clearance badge, either way a gov employee would've taken the photo. Dainomite (talk) 15:49, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
UK FOP law indicates that for FOP to apply the work needs to be on permanent display. As this is not on permanent display, but rather an exhibit which can be removed at any time, FOP does not apply to this image. russavia (talk) 17:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep What about FOP you can be right, but it is not a sculpture but just a costume... Electron ツ ➧☎ 15:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it's not that simple. [3], [4], [5], plus others demonstrate that there is copyright involved. In the US, George Lucas owns the copyright, in the UK he doesn't someone else does. russavia (talk) 02:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I've read the article. What about UK: The court upheld an earlier ruling finding that he could continue selling the replicas because they were deemed to be industrial works rather than creative pieces of art, and therefore not subject to the full protections of copyright. That ruling found that as 3D objects, but not sculptures, the Stormtrooper helmets were only subject to a 15-year copyright, which has since expired. Electron ツ ➧☎ 09:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- The problem here is that for us to host images on Commons it needs to be free in both the source country and the United States. This is obviously something that needs to be explored fully, not just in relation to this image, but all stormtrooper images. russavia (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Generally you are right, but e.g. there is no FOP in US for e.g. new squlptures, yet there are plenty of images with squlptures from other countries, where FOP egsists -> Category:21st-century sculptures... So, your statement: to be free in both the source country and the United States is not the truth for all cases; not for all pictures gather here... You know that there are many exlusions of this rule. And it can be another one. Electron ツ ➧☎ 12:58, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- The problem here is that for us to host images on Commons it needs to be free in both the source country and the United States. This is obviously something that needs to be explored fully, not just in relation to this image, but all stormtrooper images. russavia (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I've read the article. What about UK: The court upheld an earlier ruling finding that he could continue selling the replicas because they were deemed to be industrial works rather than creative pieces of art, and therefore not subject to the full protections of copyright. That ruling found that as 3D objects, but not sculptures, the Stormtrooper helmets were only subject to a 15-year copyright, which has since expired. Electron ツ ➧☎ 09:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it's not that simple. [3], [4], [5], plus others demonstrate that there is copyright involved. In the US, George Lucas owns the copyright, in the UK he doesn't someone else does. russavia (talk) 02:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons FASTILY 05:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused user portrait 91.66.153.214 17:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: It is however a nice example of the use of this filter; together with the original, could be clearly educational — as it is it is esthetically pleasing and could have widespread use as it seems to be properly licensed. Needs more categories, of course. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal image, out of scope FASTILY 05:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Buildings in Dubai
[edit]No COM:FOP in the UAE.
- File:Apartment building in Dubai.jpg
- File:Burj Dubai em segundo plano (4128596333).jpg
- File:China Cluster.jpeg
- File:Dubai Medical Center.jpg
- File:DUBAI.JPG
- File:Dusit Hotel, Dubai.jpg
- File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (4).JPG
- File:EIAST building.jpg
- File:Emirates Cluster.jpeg
- File:England Cluster.jpeg
- File:France Cluster.jpeg
- File:Italy Cluster.jpeg
- File:ITS location.jpg
- File:Ski dubai-2011 (4).JPG
- File:The Gate, Dubai International Financial Centre.tif
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete But before we had to add the year of restoring files e.g.
[[Category:Undelete in 2037]]for each image (depending to the author's death). Replace 2037 by the date the photo will be in public domain. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 05:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Buildings in Dubai
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!
- File:Al Shiata Tower Dubai Media City - panoramio.jpg
- File:Buildings in Dubai.JPG
- File:Burj Khalifa and around it (11925054775).jpg
- File:Dancing fountains (7272782890).jpg
- File:Deira and Dhows (3981439092).jpg
- File:Deira Skyline on 31 May 2007.jpg
- File:Downtown Dubai (5684173657).jpg
- File:Downtown Dubai by Emaar Properties.JPG
- File:Dubai (12915219875).jpg
- File:Dubai (4695989528).jpg
- File:Dubai - Nakheel Developments.jpg
- File:Dubai 0701-0497.JPG
- File:Dubai 08.JPG
- File:Dubai 10.JPG
- File:DUBAI 2.JPG
- File:Dubai Business Bay.jpg
- File:Dubai Creek - 4 (4128589683).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (1).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (10).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (165).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (166).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (167).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (168).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (169).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (170).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (171).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (172).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (2).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (293).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (45).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (46).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (47).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (48).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (49).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (50).jpg
- File:Dubai Darafsh (51).jpg
- File:Dubai Office Tower (12849527325).jpg
- File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (2).JPG
- File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (6).JPG
- File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (7).JPG
- File:Marriott Marquis Dubai jul2014.jpg
- File:Perspectiva de Dubái..JPG
- File:The Dubai Marina Torch.jpg
- File:The Torch aug2012.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ras67 (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Dubai Mall Hotel
[edit]No FOP in the UAE.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 05:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)