Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/08/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 17th, 2012
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was originally uploaded by en.WP user Tgurlcandi, as their one and only upload. That should be a clue right there. Then it was transferred to Commons by the notorious Max Rebo Band Handcuffed, which should be another clue. This is a copy of this MySpace image, with the email of the actual owner cropped off the bottom. It is a fairly obvious copyright violation, now you have the source. How many more examples do you need before things change around here? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As we keep telling you, you need to provide some evidence before things will be deleted, so it's no good just casting aspersions. Also, you need to bring these things to our attention. Commons has a lot of files, and it's simply not possible for the cabal you seem to believe runs this place to go back and look at every single one. Your aspersions against longtime contributors however are not welcome. There is no conspiracy against you, there's simply a lot of stuff to do and not many people to do it. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know where yo get the idea that I think there is any kind of conspiracy against me, Matt. I do not. I am not casting any aspersions - images uploaded by certain users tend to be later deleted as copyright violations or COM:IDENT problems at a much higher percentage than is desirable. I'm not so much interested in specific images as I am in showing reasonable people that there is a pattern here. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file that I just uploaded seems to show specific EXIF information of my camera which I do not want to be made public. Kindly delete the image and its EXIF data. Thank you very much. Bouzoukijoe (talk) 02:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have completely removed all meta data from the original image version, uploaded it as a new version and then deleted the original version. So, no more EXIF data are available. Is that now o.k. for you? --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I'm not sure how you did that, but very cool. Thanks Túrelio. Excellent work! --Bouzoukijoe (talk) 04:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Meta-data removed. Sreejith K (talk) 22:42, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

он не красивый Orxan (talk) 09:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. INeverCry 18:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution for own work, no original exif - doubtful authorship. Probably unused private or promo photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 17:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from copyrighted image http://www.panoramio.com/photo/48972838 --Baycrest (Talk) 18:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, {{Copyvio}}. LX (talk, contribs) 20:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:06, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 19:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:08, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 19:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:08, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 19:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the file information this image was sourced from google, yet the uploader claims it as his own. It appears to be a publicity photo taken from in the ring (hence the lack of ropes), and therefore is not the uploader's own work. The uploader has also uploaded File:John Cena eliminates cm punk movement stf.jpg, which is tagged as a copyvio and has uploaded a similar image at en.wikipedia that is a copyvio from wwe.com. Given the uploader's record, it's likely this image too is non-free. There is a similar, although taken from a slightly different angle, photo used at the official WWE website. File:Rock and Cena shake hands.jpg, which appears to have been taken at the same time from yet another angle, shows the two wrestlers in the ring from further away. AussieLegend (talk) 21:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 20:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 10:53, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Yes. Accepted. You can delete. :) + I've uploaded many blurry images like this. Please find them in my uploads & delete them too. Previously I've asked for the deletion of these files but it was accepted then. Now you're doing good. :) go on!!! :) thanks. -- SuryaPrakash  Talk... 13:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 20:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all images uploaded by this new Czech user are for speedy deletion.--Kacir (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File has been deleted. INeverCry 20:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Accepted. You can delete. :) + I've uploaded many blurry images like this. Please find them in my uploads & delete them too. Previously I've asked for the deletion of these files but it was accepted then. Now you're doing good. :) go on!!! :) thanks. -- SuryaPrakash  Talk... 13:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 20:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, single upload, out of COM:PS. Funfood 19:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 21:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The new user contacted me on fr:wp and made an honest mistake assuming that image taken from a website was free. I did not see any hint in that sense so I suppose that it should be deleted Erdrokan (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is blurry and unidentifiable Thiotrix (talk) 08:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 04:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable tiny resolution, many other good photos at Category:Cave of the Patriarchs. P199 (talk) 12:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed photo, unusable bad quality. P199 (talk) 12:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC) My bad, withdraw request. --P199 (talk) 16:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's just saved as progressive jpg, the full resolution is ok.--Funfood 08:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)  Comment I uploaded a new version.--Funfood 08:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 04:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website screenshot, probably with copyrighted content. A.Savin 19:10, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably taken from [1] or other, no details on permission. A.Savin 19:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copied from [2] or another website, no detail on permission ever given. A.Savin 19:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing exif, low resolution, other files by uploader considered as copyvios as well. A.Savin 19:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - derivative work from image with unknown status. Look like as spam. Art-top (talk) 20:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Justass (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 04:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrights violation - one cannot just take a picture from Google and put it in the Commons Ldorfman (talk) 21:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation - took it from a news site and just uploaded it to the Commons Ldorfman (talk) 22:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, not needed please delete soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulboost (talk • contribs)


Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 04:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused essentially dup of File:4,4'-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate.svg DMacks (talk) 02:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO the shape of the “O” is too wide in the alternative. --Leyo 10:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No objection to having two separate orientations available. However in that case, may as well send the one with the more standard "O" shape (the Isonate file) to overwrite or replace the 4,4' one (which I agree looks a bit strange now that you mention it!). That way we have two orientations and an improvement in the existing orientation. DMacks (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I've overwritten the file, hence my version is truly obsolete. --Yikrazuul (talk) 08:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 13:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user who uploaded this has uploaded other copyright violations, here and on the English Wikipedia. Admittedly, I haven't found an exact match for this image online, but there's no metadata, so I'm not convinced this is usable. Zagalejo (talk) 03:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just found it: [3] Zagalejo (talk) 02:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user who uploaded this has uploaded other copyright violations, here and on the English Wikipedia. Admittedly, I haven't found an exact match for this image online, but there's no metadata, so I'm not convinced this is usable. Zagalejo (talk) 03:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Found it here: http://mark-hoffmann.com/shsalumni/htdocs/index.html Lobo (howl?) 11:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user who uploaded this has uploaded other copyright violations, here and on the English Wikipedia. Admittedly, I haven't found an exact match for this image online, but there's no metadata, so I'm not convinced this is usable. Zagalejo (talk) 03:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user who uploaded this has uploaded other copyright violations, here and on the English Wikipedia. Admittedly, I haven't found an exact match for this image online, but there's no metadata, so I'm not convinced this is usable. Zagalejo (talk) 03:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations Aoke1989 (talk) 03:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations Aoke1989 (talk) 03:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned, out of scope. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As above, plus doubtfully humorous. Fma12 (talk) 22:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 19:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted 1931 composition. While there's no problem with the photograph's copyright status, the music and lyrics can't be published under a free license without the copyright holder's permission. Jafeluv (talk) 06:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Same picture can be seen in here, official web site of Kastamonu University. Rapsar (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 01:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepThe usage of every file of a category was never a criterion for keep or delete. In contrary, it would be better to create the still missing files for Unicode Block Miscellaneous Symbols (2600–26FF). sarang사랑 12:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 11:59, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepThe usage of every file of a category was never a criterion for keep or delete. In contrary, it would be better to create the still missing files for Unicode Block Miscellaneous Symbols (2600–26FF). sarang사랑 12:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 12:00, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepThe usage of every file of a category was never a criterion for keep or delete. In contrary, it would be better to create the still missing files for Unicode Block Miscellaneous Symbols (2600–26FF). sarang사랑 12:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Completes the coverage for the Unicode block containing it and the set of Go icons. -- Tuválkin 15:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 12:00, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 12:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 12:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 12:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 12:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 12:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usage for this file Manslay (talk) 09:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is 'realistically useful for an educational purpose'. Lobo (howl?) 12:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above. INeverCry 16:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubts about "own work", as this image was found also on this November 24, 2011 page and also here, while it was uploaded to Commons only in 2012. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cropped this from an image by PB85, which has been deleted as a copyright violation. Kafuffle (talk) 10:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There is no doubt if it's a derivative work of a copyvio. Lobo (howl?) 12:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Same picture has been used in several web sites before uploaded here. Rapsar (talk) 10:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no proof that the uploader took this picture. Rapsar (talk) 10:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source: The singer's photo album. There is no evidence of releasing the image under CC-BY-SA 3.0 Gikü (talk) 11:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographed screenshot, text only, out of COM:PS. Funfood 11:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I understand that this image is "correctly" licensed on Flickr. However that does not stop it being a copyright violation as these are book covers and so are copyrighted by the publishers IMO. Herby talk thyme 12:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I understand that this image is "correctly" licensed on Flickr. However that does not stop it being a copyright violation as these are book covers and so are copyrighted by each of the publishers IMO. Herby talk thyme 12:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 12:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

who is this man? Agent001 (talk) 12:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the official website "Steal This Film" is copyrighted: http://stealthisfilm.com/Part2/faq.php Smooth_O (talk) 13:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was a Testupload with Uploadwizzard, it is incomplete and defect. Andreas Werle (talk) 13:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Close but not exact duplicate of File:1000 manat 2005 f.jpg  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own work. I attended WKU as a photojournalism student and I hold all rights to this picture. I continue to use this photo in my own portfolio. The small file size is so that large reproductions are not possible.


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A derivative work of w:File:12meteroptics.gif, which is a copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's the new logo, should be released next year. not right now. thanks very much Misssoleil (talk) 15:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Product packaging. 88.131.62.36 15:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work, contemporary 3D sculpture FunkMonk (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Israel has freedom of panorama, may it apply here? FunkMonk (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license does not appear to explicitly allow commercial use.

This is my first time nominating for deletion. My sincerest apologies if my request is misguided. Ssnseawolf (talk) 17:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. The GFDL explicitly allows commercial use. LX (talk, contribs) 20:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per LX INeverCry 19:06, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near duplicate of this, unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://statewarshockey.stats.pointstreak.com/playerpage.html?playerid=6008253&seasonid=8947 76.93.131.80 17:33, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - watermarked, address of third-party site on image. Art-top (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a smaller version of this photo. Vearthy (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The caption said Coupe de France 1951. So in this case, the copyright is still present (1951+70=2021....not 2012). Please remove this image 92.142.21.22 18:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Party logo, no OTRS visible, hardly to be own work. Arantz (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The caption talks about two soccer football players in 1960 (1959-66 for Serge Masnaghetti for example). So the image stil got a copyright (1959+70=2029...) 92.142.21.22 18:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1976...With no clue or clear stuff about the expired copyright, this image should be deleted 92.142.21.22 18:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of scope Ileana n (talk) 18:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soviet photo of a person died in 1971, a bad candidate for "own photo by uploader". A.Savin 19:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Symbols of party, not trivial, not text only - doubtuful license. Art-top (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned photograph uploaded by a user with a penchant for copyvios and mislabeling images. Source is unclear and usefulness is debatable. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned photograph uploaded by a user with a penchant for copyvios and mislabeling images. Source is unclear and usefulness is debatable. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old soviet b/w picture, unlikely own photo by uploader. A.Savin 19:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by user with long history of copyvio. This one pops up all over Tumblr and elsewhere on the net. Unlikely to be the uploader's work. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, not full resolution, other author in exif - doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 19:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to small size and missing metadata, own work is unlikekly, probably copyvio. Uploader is indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person died in 1984, unlikely own by uploader. A.Savin 19:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from [4] probably non-free logo. A.Savin 19:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF date on the photographer differs from what is written in file description. A.Savin 19:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Dates 2009/10/29 perfectly coherent. Own work, used in ru.wp since one year. What is the matter ? --Wuyouyuan (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
EXIF say, a certain Sumovsky is the author. Does the uploader "Nikolai Zlobin" (a real-named account, as it seems) have the permission by him/her? - A.Savin 08:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Made at a public photo opportunity by Gladkov, amateur photograph and novice user in Commons. Perhaps he did think he is not the author of the subject (a living person) so he provided the name of this person as "author". (probably same applies to file:Nikolai_Zlobin.jpg you destroyed yesterday). "Author" is a tricky problem (I recently labelled a batch of illustrations from a collection of history books with the name of the director of the collection, and did some attributions to artists using categories). "Author" in EXIF data is purely anecdotical (One of my cameras credited all pictures to some "John Doe" until a friend revealed there was such data). --Wuyouyuan (talk) 09:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Destroyed" is somewhat poor expression, a photographer named Eugenia Smolyanskaya is credited there, the column writer will probably NOT be the copyright holder of the related illustration... nevertheless, you have COM:UNDEL here on Commons. - A.Savin 10:17, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Inconsistent EXIF data - likely copyvio FASTILY (TALK) 00:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain text in a jpg, should be provided in another format. Funfood 19:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am going to retire the rjr07 user ID and will re-post when I set up a new one. Thank you Rjr07 (talk) 20:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from [5], unlikely own by uploader. Also, probably out of scope. A.Savin 21:13, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative work Ezarateesteban 21:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whats the status of images that were produced in Iraq before 2004? Thats when the Saddam Image must have been produced - Quite curious about thisVictorgrigas (talk) 18:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The official website of the group to specify the original author of this photo - В. Калинин (2009). Doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication that image is in public domain Justass (talk) 21:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This black-and-white thumbnail is hardly likely to be the author's own photograph. In addition, the uploader's identification of this bust with Diagoras of Melos is highly dubious. Pasicles (talk) 22:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depending on the (unknown country), no FOP indoor. Leyo 16:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep What should be copyrightable? The angels on the left and right? This is de minimis. No need of FOP. Deutsch Auch der Altar und sonst, da ist nichts "besonderes", was man nicht typischerweise sehen würde. --Quedel (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since we do not know the location, we cannot really judge the threshold of originality. --Leyo 17:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Info The author added information on the location (Ansbach, Germany). --Leyo 10:59, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Any elements that are copyrightable would be de minimis. Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Resume, promo page. Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 20:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There does not appear to be anything at COM:SCOPE that says this type of content should be deleted and Commons does not appear to have meaningful policy/guideline on use of user pages. This is in the user namespace, where users often post information promoting their background and activities, and is not in the file namespace.

en:Wikipedia:User pages recognizes that there is no fixed use for user pages, except that usually one's user page has something about oneself. In a sense, this CV falls within the broad category of background information usually posted on user pages. The en.wp guideline does also caution, however, to think carefully before adding non-public information to one's user page.

I am reluctant to delete a user's page, esp. since the content is not per se objectionable and I am not aware of any policy or guideline that would require this to be deleted. Having said that, I worry that the user is unfamiliar with the purpose of Commons and/or his user page, and may not be aware that he has posted personal information and contact information for the world to see. My inclination is to blank the user page, leave him a note on his talk page as a courtesy, and allow him the option of reverting the blank should he so desire. It's not the optimal solution, but it seems to be the best balance that I can strike. Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TuanUt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - these map fragments look like as screenshots from navigation program.

Art-top (talk) 04:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TuanUt (talk · contribs)

Unused private photos - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 04:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very low resolution photos without original exif - doubtful authorship. Almost the entire contribution of the user is removed as copivio.

Art-top (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 09:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TuanUt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

screenshots from the project are not needed, they can be recreated by history

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helga Regin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After blocked for 1 month in 7th july 2012 (block advice removed by user from talk page) user returns at 8th august and uploaded again a bunch of copyrighted material (album covers) and images from social network VK and official band sites, related to several (russian) music groups/bands. Per COM:PRP, IMHO untrusted user so these resting images (all: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF) can't be believed either.

Gunnex (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blocked for 1 year. Copyvios. Yann (talk) 06:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabiano1823 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 20:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Monub123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private photos - out of project scope. File:Mota.PNG added in one page in wiktionary with authomatic tempate Gambar3 because the file name, nothing to do with the text of the article the image is not.

Art-top (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gutisoscar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

published here (in 2010) and on other sites

Art-top (talk) 18:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:02, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by OKLAHOMA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional and amateur photos without original exif. Other uploader contibution marked as copyvio.

Art-top (talk) 18:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Avivar Alimentos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not text only logo, there is some art work. Please discuss.

Art-top (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I also see some art work on those logos. Fma12 (talk) 22:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 01:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in the Category:Gagik Tsarukian

[edit]

Missing EXIF, small resolution, possible copyright violation. --Arantz (talk) 18:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajkumar mgs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private photoalbum - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 19:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Vivekyvivek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private photos - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 19:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stasa16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP for sculptures in Russia. These plaques are with reliefs. All of them were designed in the second half of the 20th century, so 70 years since the authors' death has not yet passed.

Stolbovsky (talk) 19:40, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Донор (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In exif as author set www.donor-tiras-biz.livejournal.com and www.donor.tiras.biz. Donor.tiras.biz also set on file names. No permission on these sites.

Before deletion, wait for OTRS. --Wuyouyuan (talk) 08:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Art-top (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Did anything arrive at the OTRS-team? --High Contrast (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 01:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Донор (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.

(tJosve05a (c) 15:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. As specified at the page of the uploaded User:Донор, one should read this post in the blog from which the images stem from. This post specifies that all images are released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. It is also obvious from this post and from the userpage that the uploaded Донор and the "donor_tiras_biz" blog owner is the same person. Many images uploaded by this user were already deleted once and then restored, as the status was clarified. --Off-shell (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, that is about the copyright of 'the photos', not the artwork on the packages (which is a separate copyright) from what I can tell. (tJosve05a (c)
@Josve05a: please read this: {{PD-PMR-exempt}}
And also you may read this: {{FoP-Moldova}}
This information about licensing can be applicable to food produced in Transnistria and in Moldova. That is applies to the following photographs:
Transnistria:
File:Мука высшего сорта Бендерского КХП - Донор.JPG
File:Горошек зелёный - Донор.JPG
File:Зелёный горошек фирмы Рустас - Донор.JPG
File:Горошек зелёный - Завод консервов детского питания - Донор.JPG
File:Сок Яблочный осветлённый - Донор.JPG
File:Икра из кабачков - Донор.JPG
File:Масло Крестьянское - Донор.JPG
File:Масло Столичное - Донор.JPG
Moldova:
File:Масло Unt - Донор.JPG
File:Соки Молдавии - Донор.JPG
File:Повидло яблочное и яблочно-сливовое - Донор.JPG
With best regards, Донор () 16:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FoP only applies for permanently placed artworks and/or buildings, not food packages. PD-PMR-exempt does not appliy either, since it is not unknown who is the copyright owners (the companies selling the product), nor part of a law or ruling, nor an official symbols (flags, coats of arms, etc.) (tJosve05a (c) 19:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. OK, I agree, the images on the packages belong to the copyright owners. --Off-shell (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Buukels (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private photos - out of project scope (here image automaticaly added throght template Gambar3 and not relevant to the article).

Art-top (talk) 20:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Castellamadrid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, missing exif - doubtuful authorship. Almost all of the other contributions marked as copyvio.

Art-top (talk) 20:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicuav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam descriptions, watermarked photos, some in low resolution without exif, some taken with 2 cameras.

Art-top (talk) 20:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by Maistrenko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A handful of mostly old pics of Soviet personalities, all copyright protected, unlikely own work by the uploader.

A.Savin 21:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by SergeiBalakovo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional and amateur, taken with modern cameras (5 different cameras) and scanned photos. Most of them in low resolution without original exif. Doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 21:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.bergbahnen.org/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=6501 88.131.62.36 15:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 15:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license for this image is based on the claimed that it was published without a copyright notice. Fact is that the initially uploaded uncropped image version[7] carries a clear copyright note in its lower left corner, saying "(C) Evelyn Keyes # 506". -- Túrelio (talk) 09:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The copyright notice doesn't contain a year. Isn't that required for a valid copyright notice? On the back, someone has stamped two dates: 6 March 1944 and 12 November 1944. I take it that the 6 March stamp was placed there on 6 March and that the 12 November one was placed there on 12 November. I also take it that the stamps weren't placed there before the photo was published. This gives us a pre-1964 publication, so a copyright renewal is required. I don't know how US companies work, but don't you think that it would be too much trouble and cost too much to renew the copyright of a single photograph? --Stefan4 (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, images are not my main thing by a long shot (which is why my contribs here are considerably lower than on Wikipedia :D), but you're right that that number is not a date. The lack of a date that might reasonably be considered part of the notice could invalidate copyright, but not necessarily - as I understand it, given the date of publication, copyright persists in spite of errors and omissions if the work was duly registered and the publisher made "reasonable effort" to correct the omitted element of the notice on all copies that were distributed to the public. I don't know if the dates on the back would render that unnecessary, or if this copy of the photograph was distributed to the public. The (c) name configuration strongly suggests an intent to declare copyright. That said, lack of renewal is certainly highly likely, either way, so Stefan4 is probably right that the photo is PD in spite of the notice. That's something I didn't consider when pointing out the (c) at AN/U. I don't know what steps Commons generally takes (if any) to confirm that. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:10, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, the policy on Commons is that the uploader has to "convince" us that his upload either is his work or, as in this case, it is indeed PD-something. The uploader of this image, who has a long history of problematic uploads, which now even led to an official investigation on :en, has nowhere claimed/shown/proven that the copyright was not renewed. As far as I know there are lists or registers where one can check for renewal or non-renewal, which would be primarily the task of the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 12:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • FWIW, I doubt whether the "c" symbol as it's used here, was actually meant as a copyright term. I've seen that "c" symbol used, typically handwritten, alongside some other still numbers. I think it was a shorthand symbol for some other term for many reasons:
The star in the photo is obviously not getting or being given a copyright (unless she hopes to sell the photos on street corners if she is ever fired from the studios;) her name after the "c" is the star's name, not the studio's who would own it; there is a still number given, not a date; and for film publicity stills where actual notices are given, they were always printed on the front along with the film details. This one is merely handwritten. And of course, it totally goes against U.S. law about such stills. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 18:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone feels that this image of her is safer, I can add it instead. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In the meantime, I came across another image with the "c" symbol written in and another standard copyright notice on the same image, implying that the handwritten letter probably meant something totally different. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 20:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Or that the (c) means that "we intend to keep this copyrighted; make sure you put a correct notice on it."--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:13, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The original note does appear to be an intention to copyright the image, even if incorrectly applied this throws significant doubt on whether we can claim that no copyright notice can be found. On balance I believe this photographs fails to meet the precautionary principle unless someone can show good comparable examples where the consensus was to keep, even with such visible but possibly, technically, incorrect attempts to copyright the original image. -- (talk) 12:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per Fæ (COM:PRP). Gestumblindi (talk) 23:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]