Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/07/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 22nd, 2012
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully own work, found on several websites Funfood 00:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:35, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully own work, e.g. here http://blog.staicu.com/puofzm/wallpaper-of-hanuman-god/3 as a wallpaper and on several other websites in better resolution. Funfood 00:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple text, advertising purpose, out of COM:PS Funfood 00:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted image copied over from the English Wikipedia (as the source actually indicates). — Fourthords | =/\= | 09:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, clear copyright violation, false license -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a simple text/shape logo.   ■ MMXX  talk  12:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? The shape of the borders?-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The claim that this is not original graphic design is absurd. --ELEKHHT 01:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC) However looking to some of the US court rulings on this matter (such as this), I am not so sure whether is copyrightable. --ELEKHHT 01:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The only things there that may be eventually considered copyrightable are the boomerang shapes on each side, but they look quite simple to me to grant a copyright.-- Darwin Ahoy! 06:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ultimately any graphic design is composed of simple shapes, and can be reduced to points, lines and surfaces. For an artistic work what matters is the overall appearance. However I understand that US courts have their own logic, independent from how creativity is seen in the design profession. --ELEKHHT 22:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on several websits in better resolution [[1]], doubtfully own work, authorship unclear. Funfood 10:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, unknown person, single upload from user Funfood 10:19, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not significant logo. Not used, not categorized. Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 11:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Damaged historical image with unknown destination - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 11:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted; private joke or prank image; orphan, uncat since Dec 2011, no description other than "YEEEAAAHHH!", no in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.sm-land.com/cpg/?p=1716&aid=7725 - likewise File:One_e_com_center.jpg 92.41.210.116 12:02, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - per File:Two E-Com Center.jpg 92.41.210.116 12:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 12:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use. Improper McZusatz (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 19:28, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Here is the corrected File:Armoiries of Ęgeniusz Ąderko.svg Ęgeniusz Ąderko (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on several websites, doubtfully own work Funfood 19:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:25, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, only upload/edit from user, out of COM:PS Funfood 20:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, only upload from user, out of COM:PS Funfood 20:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, only upload from user, out of COM:PS Funfood 21:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified image, single upload from user Funfood 21:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found in better resolution on many websites, doubtfully own work. Funfood 21:51, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture, single upload from user, out of COM:PS Funfood 22:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source unknown and possible copyright infringement according to [2] and [3]. Peter E. James (talk) 19:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawn: Copyvio allegations withdrawn by IP. 90.203.39.47 16:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A QR barcode which points to a external website described in the article seems not be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Mys 721tx (talk) 00:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonfree logo Samuell (talk) 00:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully own work, source of map unclear. Funfood 00:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar rationale than with Commons:Deletion requests/PD-AR-Photo de la Guerra de Malvinas 2. All photos that were still protected on the URAA date (1996 in Argentina) had their copyrights restored in the US. With a protection of 25 years, only the photos from 1970 or earlier are free.This photo is from 1977. The main discussion about the files like those, free in the source country but not in the US because of the URAA restoration, was discussed here. It was decided to delete them as soon as we confirm that they are still protected. Cambalachero (talk) 02:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text is simple. Its just a movie name. But it is not made in a simple font. The background is not simple either. Sreejith K (talk) 02:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File quality (especially the blurring and the distortion) indicates this is a screenshot, not the uploader's original work. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing in the TOU of Instagram that place all files posted on the site in the public domain. In addition, the author did not place the file in the public domain. Guerillero 03:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Very sorry about my ignorance. I will contact the band asking them to release some of the photos (that are of their own work) to a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. I apologize again, I hope I won't get "banned" because of my multiple violations. Abody97 (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing in the TOU of Instagram that place all files posted on the site under the CC BY-SA. In addition, the author did not put the file under a free licence. Guerillero 03:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Very sorry about my ignorance. I will contact the band asking them to release some of the photos (that are of their own work) to a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. I apologize again, I hope I won't get "banned" because of my multiple violations. Abody97 (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing in the TOU of Instagram that place all files posted on the site in the public domain. In addition, the author did not place the file in the public domain. Guerillero 03:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Very sorry about my ignorance. I will contact the band asking them to release some of the photos (that are of their own work) to a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. I apologize again, I hope I won't get "banned" because of my multiple violations. Abody97 (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing in the TOU of Instagram that place all files posted on the site in the public domain. In addition, the author did not place the file in the public domain. Guerillero 03:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Very sorry about my ignorance. I will contact the band asking them to release some of the photos (that are of their own work) to a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. I apologize again, I hope I won't get "banned" because of my multiple violations. Abody97 (talk) 10:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a crop of this photo. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mal subido Moishindia - Comunicación Visual (talk) 04:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Liliana-60 (talk) 05:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need for this uncompressed TIFF, plain duplicate of File:Microsoft SQL Server 1 11 Network Enhancements.png Liliana-60 (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo used in a now-deleted article on enwiki. No educational value: out of scope. This, that and the other (talk) 05:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, not sure what the copyright status on computer-generated voice is Liliana-60 (talk) 05:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also found at http://www.ourladyofmountcarmel.org/scrapbook041103.html. The picture seems to be scanned from a book that is not old enough to be PD. Razvan Socol (talk) 05:49, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP for 2D works in the UK Liliana-60 (talk) 06:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to deletion. Kenavonflag (talk) 20:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and privacy violation portrayed persons, not notable amateur choir whose article was not kept in nl-wiki MoiraMoira (talk) 06:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright. The argument "Beacuse user itself has used this photo for one of the Wikipedia article" is not a valid one. Wouter (talk) 06:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

simple enough, or not? Liliana-60 (talk) 07:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

why exactly does PD-old-50 apply here? Italy doesn't have 50 years pma. Liliana-60 (talk) 07:41, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1969 -> can't be PD-old-50 Liliana-60 (talk) 07:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1965 -> can't be PD-old-50 Liliana-60 (talk) 07:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication why PD-old-50 would apply here; neither Hungary nor USA have 50 years pma Liliana-60 (talk) 07:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Agree current tag is unsupported. Might be PD for some reason (for example, if first published in USA with no copyright notice), but more info would be needed to make such a determination. Should be deleted if no further info is provided. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned; redundant to File:Colours of Cork.svg and of poorer quality. Alkari (?), 22 July 2012, 07:55 UTC 07:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 187.206.3.221 08:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's my own work.I take this photo on a trip: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ironman_br/sets/72157629151624948/with/6814313376/ Ironman br (talk)
It's a derivative work of a work protected by copyright of the sculptor. If there's no Freedom of Panorama in the source country we need a permission of the sculptor for use with a free license. --Denniss (talk) 14:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no FOP in country of origin FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyright violation, taken from http://www.evanescencerd.freeiz.com/galeria/evanescence/?dir=FAN%20ENCOUNTER/Mexico%20City%20%2825-01-12%29. Note different dates, larger image size. Basically, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder, and given uploader's lengthy history of copyright violations, I have no good faith that this image, or any of the other uploaders, is his. Huntster (t @ c) 09:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the copyrighted seal. Rapsar (talk) 09:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a radio station. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 09:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potographers name mentioned in file name, so doubtfully own work Funfood 10:04, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution promo photo - doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear image, out of scope, no meaningful content? Plus this user vandalized numerous times on the Dutch Wikipedia. Trijnsteltalk 11:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bron: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun-synchronous_orbit I guess the picture is part of the sun-orbit article as proof shown?

VinneOverwinner

Let´s make all our names just blue..??


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 12:28, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is tagged as cc-by but the source page says the image may not be resold. Angela (talk) 12:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution professional photo without original exif - doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 13:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, a little blurred, and almost an exact duplicate of File:Asher_Brown_Durand_-_A_Stream_in_the_Wood_-_WGA6887.jpg Rsberzerker (talk) 14:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Five other photos uploaded by this user were copyvios, these shirts are probably pasted from photos he found on web. Oleola (talk) 14:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two higher resolution verisons are available (File:Asher_Brown_Durand_001.jpg and File:Asher_Durand_Kindred_Spirits.jpg. Both are color versus this picture's almost monotones. Therefore, I believe there is little or no value in keeping this version. Rsberzerker (talk) 15:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is a tribute to a man who died in 2001, so most probably published in 2001 and thus still copyrighted. The COM:FOP#United States has an exception for buildings, not sculptures. Léna (talk) 15:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Second photo User:Mzu 95 uploaded on the same day File:Berrabeh1.jpg was cropped from photo he found on web. This also is likely to be as it is in low resolution. Oleola (talk) 16:33, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - low resolution, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 16:57, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work. Unused, unknown destination - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 17:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, not significant logo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 17:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of these document. Doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that Egypt is the country of first publication (contry of origin). The photo is from the international press, taken in London and rights-managed by an U.S.image agency [4]. Martin H. (talk) 17:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took from another wikipedia project thinking that the uploader had the correct licensing, sorry. I agree wit the deleting the image. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 09:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:31, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of first publication in Egypt. This is a scan from a newspaper, and the file description not even mentiones from what newspaper. Martin H. (talk) 17:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Poorly photographed penis snapshot of quality inferior to many other images in cat "erect human penis"; description of subject as as "boy" may bring up legal issues. Infrogmation (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vector version available at file:ETC.svg Tiger66 (talk) 18:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 18:28, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused trivial test image - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was a placeholder for a photo of Apollo 12 landing site, which is now available (e.g. ) Torsch (talk) 20:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image probablement non libre Edoli (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sign that the source page has a free content license. (May want to move to en.wiki where it is being used and would meet NFC there). Masem (talk) 22:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:34, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

No evidence that the author is Pakistan Air Force, the website "pakdef.info" is not of Pakistan government but a private entity in the United States, but more importantly the photo does not meet the minimum 50 years requirement for PD-Pakistan because noticing that this is a color photo it suggests that it was likely created in the 1960s. This gives you an idea how much Pakistan lacked cameras in those decades, especially color. So unless we get this essential information we need to delete this image. Officer (talk) 23:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

In 2011 an image of Hamid Gul was deleted w:File:Gen.Hamidgul.jpg and later in the same year User:Paksoldier uploaded this file so I feel that it is stolen from google and should be deleted. Not only is the file size too small, an indication that the uploader quickly copied it from google to here, but the subject in the photo is not someone who would just allow anyone to take his picture. He was Pakistan's head of Inter-Services Intelligence. Officer (talk) 23:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be PD. No source, clearly a still image from a copyrighted film from 1964 with an incorrect year (circa 1960) attributed to it. The film, The World of Henry Orient is an American film released in 1964, making the permission tag of it "published in the United States between 1923 and 1963" demonstrably false. Possibly a candidate for a FUR on WP, but not a correctly licensed PD image. Doc9871 (talk) 05:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was uploaded from Wikipedia so if there's some fault its not mine. See the licence out there. Second, The World of Henry Orient could be released in March 1964 (in US), the beginning of the year, but this is a promotional photo and those images are distributed to the press in advance, maybe 1963? Who knows. MachoCarioca (talk) 22:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other than the lack of cropping, this picture is a duplicate version of File:Asher_Brown_Durand_-_The_Catskills_-_Walters_37122.jpg Rsberzerker (talk) 15:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Of course it is the same image: one with the color key and one without. Color key is useful to measure how accurate is this copy of the painting. --Jarekt (talk) 22:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The technical name is ColorChecker. It is my belief that this is a leftover from the original photograph in order to verify the image is an accurate representation of the painting. If so, it has served its purpose. The color of each pixel in the image is what it is. The presence of the chart will not change that. It only results in what is, essentially, a duplicate image, and duplicate images can be deleted. --Rsberzerker (talk) 03:27, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that "the color of each pixel in the image is what it is [and] the presence of the chart will not change that." but with the ColorChecker one can check if the color is correct or not. Also if image is digitally altered in the future, than one can verify if the changes improved or worsen the color quality of the image. --Jarekt (talk) 17:14, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Image valid per se as this shows a ColoChecker amd spo can be used in a article about it (as there is one in English Wikipedia) side by side with the image of the painting. Tm (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no explanation why PD-old-50 would apply here Liliana-60 (talk) 17:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I do not know, which the type of copyright of this photo is write. The photo is from the France, 1944. Could you put pleace the write PD-old? (Sorry for my bad english.). It is for my article. Dulamas (talk) 17:58, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is no reason to believe that a 1944 French image is not still under copyright. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, better files exists Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:14, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep it is in use in two wikis, and we have no one with this viewing angle and this old kind of photography. --AtelierMonpli (talk) 08:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)--AtelierMonpli (talk) 08:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear authorship (see watermark in the upper right corner). A.Savin 21:07, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Could likely be the same person and the file was not published before. --McZusatz (talk) 08:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There is no doubt that mr. REED is eugeneREED1984 user. But it's much more important that watermark is not a legal document and has no meaning. This watermark will be cleared in time.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:55, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:26, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Global use replaced by referenced SVG Cycn (talk) 13:12, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. MBisanz talk 23:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Antwerpen-Flagge.gif

red colour incorrect - better SVG available - not in use on any page Jaho (talk) 00:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Already deleted --Denniss (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunanda.mallick (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution photos without exif - doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 08:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ingvar1973 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - photos without exif in low resolution and photos with exif, but taken with thirteen different cameras.

Art-top (talk) 09:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hystrix (talk) 00:17, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dogmstr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bad quality penis photos. COM:PORN.

Art-top (talk) 21:23, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And also these files - low quality sex images.

Art-top (talk) 11:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crowned Rebellion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with unknown destination and doubtful authorship and photo in low resolution without original exif. Look like as self-promo.

Art-top (talk) 11:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NECIRWAN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - low resolution photos without original exif. Some of them can be found in Internet, for example here, here.

Art-top (talk) 11:38, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guney azerbaycan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - collages, based on images with unknown status. Photo in low resolution without exif. Map of dubious origin.

Art-top (talk) 12:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaiser Backform (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All contribution of user consist of: unused not significant logo, aero photo in low resolution without exif, promo cake photo. Doubtful authorship, look like as promo action.

Art-top (talk) 12:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CameLT-KZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sattelite image as "own work", other - taken with 2 different cameras, one - low resolution, without exif. Doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orlie oko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution professional photos - doubtuful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Delcesar18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution promo photos without original exif - doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 14:06, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ad/spam Denniss (talk) 14:15, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patwintab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos/documents of some kind. May be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All uploads by this user are collected from other sources, this scans of old material of course, but also all the recent photos are stolen from ebay auctions (see watermark on files) or from flickr or similar pages (see filesize of 500px). All is collected from elsewhere, nothing is own work. --Martin H. (talk) 00:17, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Files scanned from unfree sources, taken from ebay auctions, taken from other websites, etc., all uploaded with wrong "own work" claims. Martin H. (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SU27Imam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution photos without exif or taken with different cameras - doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lutaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused banners with unknown destination, unused private photos - out of project scope. Photos in low resolution without original exif - doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DynamoDegsy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If these images originate in British Empire, why USA copyright law applied?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katmorro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bandmetronus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom (unless the uploader can create a well-sourced article on his notable band, for instance on Portuguese Wikipedia). A mentor familiar with the Portuguese language and inclusion standards for bands on Portuguese Wikipedia would help. The uploader has so far been unresponsive re File:Banda Metrônus.jpg and its move target File:Banda Metronus.jpg, both since deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ 22:41, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PattyDawn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moose21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danel843 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - low resolution professional photos without original exif. Probably unused private photos - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deriver1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken with different cameras or low resolution without exif photos - doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 17:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Radoste (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I have serious doubts if all these images are really "own work" of User Radoste. Some are record covers, others are obviously scanned press cuttings, yet others have a certain Juergen Krueger named as author, of whom we do not know if he is User Radoste or not. I didn't see any OTRS tags either. So I must come to the conclusion that this user has problems with understanding the concept of authorship and own work and think that the images should be deleted per the precautionary principle, as other files uploaded by this user have been before.

Rosenzweig τ 17:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cindy Bert-Schwarz-Ferdl-1990.jpg has several derivatives:

--Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the talk page of this user, it seems he has uploaded several of these images before under different filenames (deleted since). --Rosenzweig τ 17:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oken10b (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all images only show copyrighted material by google

Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 18:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adriancontreras (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private images - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 18:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elurisrinivas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Different problems files, doubtful authorship. Low resolution without exif, different cameras, watermarked. Unused, unknown destination.

Art-top (talk) 18:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Black91rose (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional photos in low resolution (one of them taken with 39mp Hasselblad, uploaded in 640x480px). Part of these photos can be found on the Internet.

Art-top (talk) 18:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panos.haliotis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution without exif photo (doubtful authorship) and not significant logo (out of project scope).

Art-top (talk) 18:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SU24Hesti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution photos (including scanned, amateur, professional, and promo images in different styles) without exif or taken with different cameras - doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pac Satori (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private images, not artistical, not educational. Out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 19:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taree Yallah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution photos taken with different cameras or without exif. Doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:31, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bentamtz

[edit]

Not in use on any project and text tables only. Out of scope, Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content.

Martin H. (talk) 21:56, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wahidchs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small and out of COM:PS.

Funfood 22:26, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:31, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because 68.118.54.158 05:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and trolls are not welcome here--Sanandros (talk) 11:29, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Mbdortmund (talk) 10:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:AK-74 NTW 12 92.jpg

The United States didn't require any copyright formalities in 1992. See en:WP:Non-U.S. copyrights#Subsisting copyrights. Stefan4 (talk) 22:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Yes but it was until 1994 PD in Poland and so doesn't fall under URAA--Sanandros (talk) 10:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

URAA only re-copyrighted works which had already entered the public domain for some reason. This photo never entered the public domain in the United States and is still copyrighted there. See the link I gave in my initial post and read the template {{PD-1996}} and you'll see that this photo isn't compatible with that template. A requirement for {{PD-1996}} is publication before 1 March 1989 without copyright notice. This has not been published before 1 March 1989. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Meets requirements of both {{PD-Polish}} and {{PD-1996}}, which are essentially the same:

  1. First published outside USA
  2. First published after 1978 without copyright notice (published 1992)
  3. PD in home country on 1/1/1996

Please note that

"A requirement for {{PD-1996}} is publication before 1 March 1989 without copyright notice"

is not in the template. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

потерян интерес 37.186.126.89 04:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Not a reason to delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WARNING: The following pro-deletion rant contains strong language because it reflects my emotional reaction to this image.

I'm surprised that someone would actually masturbate just so they can snap a picture of semen coming out of their own dick and upload it to Commons. The uploader even used the subject's own name in the filename. It's not used in any Wikimedia project and I think it will serve more as gross than as educational. So Huff. 68.173.113.106 03:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:44, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, no educational value and no additional value to existing better pics. Achim Raschka (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 03:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work Sreejith K (talk) 02:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a comment on the file's talk page. Apdency (talk) 09:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This looks de-minimis to me. If the posters are copyright infringements, we can blur them and keep the image here. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I request the deletion, if possible, of the poster http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop#Delete_posters Ezarateesteban 16:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 09:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No proof of that  Keep Fry1989 eh? 21:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean? It's a logo of a TV channel.--Rapsar (talk) 15:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And how does that by itself make this copyrighted??? We have hundreds of tv channel logos on Commons which aren't copyrighted. Look around. Fry1989 eh? 18:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Beyond the reasons exposed above, it is too simple to be copyrighted. Fma12 (talk) 17:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo Ezarateesteban 16:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful license - author dead no later than 1949 (see other photo of this author). Art-top (talk) 13:26, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep While the author may have died in 1949, that does mean the picture can't be in the public domain. The author, or his heirs, can release it into the public domain, which apparently has happened in this case. If you click on the source links to both pictures, the page clearly states the pictures are in the public domain. --Rsberzerker (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As Rsberzerker has noted, photographs can be free licensed for reasons other than the date of the photographer's death. Per the source University of Houston website, the photographer or his heirs seem to have donated rights to reproduction. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: It is in PD, see web page Ezarateesteban 16:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: in sourcepage will be read © 2002-2012 Fotolog, Inc. Fotolog ® et Flodo™ are registered trademarks of Fotolog, Inc. All rights reserved. Sreejith K (talk) 17:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That licence tag refers to the website, not to the images uploaded (just like Flickr page is also copyrighted but the images can be uploaded using a CC licence). The author gave an authorization in 2006 to upload images for Spanish Wikipedia -before es.wiki decided to use only Commons images. At Fotolog page, the author had a note saying he released his images under GFDL, something that is not available currently. I'm contacting the author to revalide the original permission (if it was intended at 2006). --B1mbo (talk) 17:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per B1mbo Ezarateesteban 16:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Islamic POV-pushing. 82.124.61.128 13:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ?!? Denniss (talk) 14:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:3504796495 b-spring-fest-016.jpg

Hijab + V sign = Non neutral Islamic PoV pushing. 90.44.69.128 22:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept POV doesn't apply in Commons Ezarateesteban 17:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is this really ineligible for copyright as claimed? I have my doubts. We've never before considered graphical screenshots of copyrighted software ineligible for copyright, so this would seem to merit discussion. Liliana-60 (talk) 08:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The screenshot is composed of text, basic geometric shapes and a gradient. The composition of shapes or text themselves also has nothing original in it. Meanwhile, I see more creative images like Microsoft Office logo, Microsoft Windows logo and Bing logo are hosted on this server as copyright-ineligible. So, if the standard of the threshold of originality is so high, then this image definitely falls below it. Fleet Command (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 02:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is the logo of the national soccer team really an "act of State government"? I don't really think so. Liliana-60 (talk) 07:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The coat of arms IS, the rest is just a blue ring and basic text.  Keep Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It looks very different from File:Coat of arms of San Marino.svg though... -- Liliana-60 (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SO WHAT? The Sammarinese coat of arms goes back to the 14th century, wayyyy too old for any copyrights to apply. Fry1989 eh? 19:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: keep? FASTILY (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is doubtful that this image is the creation of the indicated author given its high quality and the dangerous nature of the subject (armed rebels in a secluded area of Ethiopia). More importantly, the cited copyright and upload date of 2008 for the picture is well before this earlier appearance elsewhere online of the same photograph, in a blog post from March 2007. 70.53.207.27 09:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the uploader was User:Pfctdayelise, who provided attribution to User:Jalpeyrie. That individual is a photographer (Jonathan Alpeyrie), and has a website at jonathanalpeyrie.net; the photograph in question is found here. The photographer's user page was created and edited only by IP editors, not by the user, so we'd need some verification that the photos were indeed uploaded with the author's permission. Upload details indicate this permission was provided by email. Is there an entry in OTRS about this? The upload of the file NKR war.JPG suggests that the photographer has granted permission for this and seven other photographs to be hosted at Commons with the specified licence. Finally, the contact email address in the licence info on the document page matches the email address on the contact page of the photographer's website. Mindmatrix 14:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I know it was also suspicious for me that this pic is here on Commons (and researched a little bit after that) but it's really Jonathan Alpeyere who released them with a CC license.--Sanandros (talk) 04:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: keep? FASTILY (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The United States didn't require any copyright formalities in 1994. See [[:en:WP:Non-U.S. copyrights#Subsisting copyrights]]. Stefan4 (talk) 22:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

The image was taken in Poland, scanned from a Polish monthly under the Polish law as {{PD-Polish}}.   Szczebrzeszynski ([[User talk:Szczebrzeszynski|talk]]) 09:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but see COM:L: Commons files have to be free in both the Unites States and in the source country. This image is not free in the United States. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep According to Template_talk:PD-Polish#URAA PD-Polish photos are PD in USA (URAA date is 1996 and this photo was PD in source country then); if still in doubt, start deletion debate at {{PD-Polish}} (because your claim possibly affects all PD-Polish photos), but prepare solid rationale first. A.J. (talk) 10:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That discussion is faulty. {{PD-1996}} requires publication before 1996 without compliance of the required US copyright formalities at the date of publication. When this was published, the United States didn't require any copyright notice, so the publication complied with all US copyright formalities. It is not enough that a photo is in the public domain in the source country on the URAA date. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When exacly did US stopped to require copyritht notice? If your claim is right, then
Public domain

For background information, see the explanations on Non-U.S. copyrights.
Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings.
is wrong too, because doesnt mention any date after 1978 when copyrigt notice was no longer required. A.J. (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The United States dropped the copyright notice requirement on 1 March 1989. Photos published on that date or later are copyrighted in the United States even if they were published without a notice. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - but we are talking about the picture taken in Poland by Polish citizen. Therefore the primary, applicable copyright law is Polish. It is copyrighted in US only if it is or ever been copyrighted in Poland, as based on Berne, WIPO and TRIPS treaties. This picture is not and never been copyrighted in Poland, so it is not in US as well. URAA refers only to the works which were copyrighted in the country of origin and then went to PD and then the copyright was revoked. Polish 1994-PD clause refers to the works which have never been under copyright protection - in the past and also now. Polimerek (talk) 12:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is my understanding that the image became copyrighted in Poland upon creation and that the image entered the public domain in Poland upon publication. Thus, it seems that the image was copyrighted in Poland for a short period of time between creation and publication. Wouldn't this change things? My understanding is that {{PD-US-no notice}} is invalid in Germany (see Template:PD-US-no notice?uselang=de) for this exact reason: the works were copyrighted in the United States between creation and publication and due to the lack of the rule of the shorter term, those works never entered the public domain in Germany when the US copyright expired upon publication. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Before 1994 photographs in Poland did not enjoy automatic copyright protection upon creation; creator had to put clear copyright restriction on it. So typical "copyright lifecycle" for photograph was: shooting, dark room developement, author put copyright restriction on either negative or positive, photo became copyrighted, author possiby decided about publication, copyright expired 10 years after publication. Copyright law in 1994 restored copyright only for restricted photos and prolonged it to default full 70 years after author's death, unrestricted ones were never copyrighted and still are in public domain. A.J. (talk) 09:07, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Polimerek. That is also my understanding of the law. --Jarekt (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Also see the discussion at COM:VPC which shows that the current wording of {{PD-1996}} is wrong. See also the interesting text at en:Rule of the shorter term#Situation in the European Union: it says that a German court concluded that a bilateral treaty between Germany and the United States says that "works of either country were copyrighted in the other country by the other country's laws". According to en:Bilateral copyright agreements of the United States, Poland also has a bilateral treaty with the United States, possibly with the same wording. This photo is obviously a work of Poland. If "works of either country [are] copyrighted in the other country by the other country's laws", doesn't this mean that the United States gives copyright protection to any Polish works, regardless of whether they have at some point been copyrighted in Poland? --Stefan4 (talk) 00:38, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot shows Google website, which is non-free. Mardus (talk) 00:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Fair use, maybe. But fair use files are not allowed per commons policy. --Rsberzerker (talk) 14:50, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I stand corrected. Trademark files are allowed, and I think this would be trademarked rather than copyrighted. --Rsberzerker (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot shows Google website, which is non-free. Mardus (talk) 00:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Fair use, maybe. But fair use files are not allowed per commons policy. --Rsberzerker (talk) 14:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I stand corrected. Trademark files are allowed, and I think this would be trademarked rather than copyrighted. --Rsberzerker (talk) 02:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rocks roy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rocks roy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private photos - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 17:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]