User:Yann/Valued images/2017-2019

2017

Alfred Vincent, tombe

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alfred Vincent, tomb.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose I am not convinced about the notability of this person. The requirement of "notability" in the English Wikpedia is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". I cannot find any such coverage. Martinvl (talk) 08:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - It's used in an article in fr.wp that consists of a list of the tombs in this cemetery. I don't understand objecting that this _used_ photo is not useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: "an article in fr.wp that consists of a list of the tombs in this cemetery" is not "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". Charles (talk) 11:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi Charles, All people in this cemetery are notable. It is a requirement to be inhumated there. This man has an entry in the DHS (Historical Dictionary of Switzerland), which makes an article on him acceptable on Wikipedia, and a street on his name in Geneva. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks, Yann. Charles, since when did Commons turn into Wikipedia, such that we have to cite non-original research sources to justify the value of a picture? Sorry, friend, but that's absurd. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
      •  Comment Not a problem now that Yann has answered Mantinvl's valid question. A list of tombs on fr.wp doesn't confer notability! Charles (talk) 14:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
        • For our purposes, the fact that it's considered important enough for there to be a fr.wikipedia article should be all that's sufficient to demonstrate usefulness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
          • @Ikan Kekek: The French Wikipedia articles are about the cemetry and its list, not the man! Martinvl (talk) 18:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
            • So what? This photo is obviously useful for illustrating that article. Your cramped views of what's notable in a Wikipedia sense are hurting this project, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Yann: Maybe you could write a stub about him in the French Wikipedia - after all your native language is French and the local language in Geneva is French. There is enough information in DHS to create such a stub. Martinvl (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  • @Martinvl: I follow my nominations, so you don't need to ping me. ;o) Yes, I could write an article, but would that change anything to this nomination? Anyway, I don't understand your vote, as quite a lot of VI nominations are much less notable than this. Yet, I don't see you opposing them. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
    • I'm afraid we absolutely don't care about the english wikipedia criteria of notability... Here it is Commons.--Jebulon (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
      • I agree that this is Commons, but the VI rules state that VI's must be useful in online content within other Wikimedia projects. All such projects have notability criteria so it follows that a VI must meet the notability criteria of at least one Wikimedia project ([my wording]). I don't care if you use the English Wikipedia (en:Wikipedia:Notability), the German Wikipedia (de:Wikipedia:Relevanzkriterien) or the notability criteria of any other Wikimedia product, but a VI must subscribe to at least one of them. Martinvl (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
• @Yann: Writing an article about Albert Vincent would clear up a number of points.

• Your nomination of him in Wikidata is currently contrary to Wikidata rules which state that Wikidata links to Commons Category pages must be backed up by links to other Wikimedia pages - see Wikidata:Notability.

• This is obviously wrong. Any external reference is sufficient to have a Wikidata entry. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• This is not the place to discuss the merits or otherwise of the Wikidata project. Are you willing for me to raise a "request for deletion" of the page in Wikidata where you can debate the page's notability properly? Martinvl (talk) 20:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• See d:Wikidata:Requests for deletions. Such a request is doomed to fail. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• If you check this archive you will see that my request for deletions was honoured. Clearly the people at Wikidata agreed with me that there was insufficient evidence that your entry be retained. Martinvl (talk) 18:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

• FYI, it was immediately restored. I also reported you there: d:Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#Martinvl. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

• You can improve the description of the image that you are submitting as a VI by wikilinking the French text to the French language article.
• Any other users of the image would not be in the position that I was in when I asked myself "Who is Alfred Vincent?" and I was unable to find any links to him in Wikipedia (English or French).

Martinvl (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• Martinvl, you are trying to enforce a policy that was specifically voted down at Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list#VI going from bad to worse. Photos do not need to be used in Wikimedia articles to be considered VIs. And what's worse is that this photo actually is used in a Wikipedia article, but that's not good enough for you: It has to meet some stricter standard of "notability" that you're the arbiter of. I think that you are behaving in a way that abuses this project by irregularly adding extra criteria that are not agreed upon as standards for judging the usefulness of a picture. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I think that the differences between User:Yann and myself have now been cleared up. I wrote a stub article in the French Wikipedia and Yann corrected my grammar. I have also withdrawn my "Oppose" vote. Martinvl (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks Martinvl for changing your vote. Since there is no opposition now, do you agree to change the status to "supported"? However the issue is not fondamentally solved: there is no requisitive that an article exists for an image to be promoted VI. It suffices that it is potentially useful. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Info My original objection came from my inability to find out anything about Alfred Vincent without using Google. Your link in Wikidata was also inappropriate because Wikidata is an index of what already exists in Wikimedia projects, not what might exist. In addiiton, the VI rules state "There should be a full and informative description of what the image depicts, along with any relevant auxiliary information." I have long advocated that the phrase "along with any relevant auxiliary information" means that the Commons description should either link to Wikipedia, or where this is not possible, should be properly referenced. Martinvl (talk) 08:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Allison M. Macfarlane

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allison Macfarlane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Studio shot, so no geolocation. Yann (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

• Maybe should you add "portrait photograph" to the scope...--Jebulon (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

 Support - A good shot which suports all the criteria for a VI - geolocation not needed as this is a studio photo. (For the record, I wikilinked the description to the English Wikipeida). Martinvl (talk) 16:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Margaret Doane

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Margaret Doane (Nuclear Regulatory Commission).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Studio shot, so no geolocation. Yann (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

• "portrait photograph"?--Jebulon (talk) 23:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  • This is the only available photograph, and we are very unlikely to have anything else than a photograph, so I don't see the point to add "portrait photograph". Regards, Yann (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Decent portrait (slightly goofy facial expression), and could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I suggest that the scope be changed to "Margaret Doane (Nuclear Regulatory Commission)" in order to distinguish her from, amongst others, Margaret Doane, Professor of English at California State University, San Bernardino. For the record, Doane (NRC) has been employed by the NRC since 1991. Martinvl (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

• OK fine. Ikan Kekek, OK for you? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

• Of course. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
• @Yann: Technically you should have used the Scope change template below. I don't know if not using uit will mess up any automation that goes on behind the scenes. If anybody knows about that, will they please comment. Martinvl (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I am happy to support this nomination. Although as yet there is no Wikipedia article about Doane, there is a citation to tell us who she is. Martinvl (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Tombe de Jean-Étienne Dufour

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean-Étienne Dufour, tomb.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 22:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Yukiya Amano

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yukiya Amano, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 22:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Yellowcake

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yellowcake.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment scope is too broad - see description on File:Uranium conversion 2.jpg. Charles (talk) 10:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  • According to the source, this is "Yellowcake", so why is it not appropriate for the scope of "Yellowcake"? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

• It may be, but I assumed from File:Uranium conversion 2.jpg that yellowcake covered many different compounds. Perhaps they all look the same. I'm not opposing, just checking we have best scope. Charles (talk) 13:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

• It does contain different compounds, as per w:Yellowcake: "Typically, yellowcakes are obtained through the milling and chemical processing of uranium ore forming a coarse powder that has a pungent odor, is insoluble in water, and contains about 80% uranium oxide[...]The compounds identified in yellowcakes include uranyl hydroxide, uranyl sulfate, sodium para-uranate, and uranyl peroxide, along with various uranium oxides. Modern yellowcake typically contains 70% to 90% triuranium octoxide (U3O8) by weight." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Aung San Suu Kyi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aung San Suu Kyi, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Theresa May

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theresa May, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Kitty Joyner

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kitty O'Brien Joyner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Geocoded to NASA Langley Research Center. Yann (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Arbre généalogique des Rougon-Macquart

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Family tree for the Rougon-Macquart,.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Les Rougon-Macquart is a cycle of twenty novels by French writer Émile Zola. Yann (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Élisabeth Guigou

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Élisabeth Guigou, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Chanda Kochhar

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chanda Kochhar, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I like her animated expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Chanda Kochhar at the India Economic Summit 2009 cropped.jpg: -1
2. Chanda Kochhar - India Economic Summit 2011.jpg: 1 <--
=>
File:Chanda Kochhar at the India Economic Summit 2009 cropped.jpg: Declined.
File:Chanda Kochhar - India Economic Summit 2011.jpg: Promoted. <--

--DeFacto (talk). 19:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Luciana Carro

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Luciana Carro, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope Ezarateesteban 22:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Brigitte Lecordier

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brigitte Lecordier, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Laura Flessel-Colovic

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laura Flessel-Colovic, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Arlette Laguiller

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arlette Laguiller, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope Ezarateesteban 12:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 19:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Kshama Sawant

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kshama Sawant, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Looks to me to be best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 22:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Sally Q. Yates

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sally Yates, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Camille Thoman

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camille Thoman, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Studio shot, so no geocoding. Yann (talk) 20:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose nice photo but IMHO VI must be in colors, not B&W Ezarateesteban 21:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Ezarate, there is absolutely nothing in the guidelines that mentions that a color image is required. This is a professional portrait of very good quality, there is no reason for your opposition. And we have several back and white valued images of people. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • 3. Must illustrate its subject well. if color is abscent, and in this case there isn't none reason for that, a significant information of the person is missing Ezarateesteban 21:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      • That's nonsense. Which information is missing? Yann (talk) 21:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
        • But this person already lives, and historical photo can be B&W but we can obtain and color portrait of that person, we need the opinion of another user Ezarateesteban 22:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support At the moment we have no other image. Relying on Article 3 seems to me to be excessive. Despite the fact that I do not like the black and white images one can not reject it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Seriously, this is a world in which some people find the absence of color in a portrait to be damning? Wow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I can't help but agree with Ezarate when he says that the absence of colour does take away a lot from a given image. However, this an image of a person, so shouldn't be that controversial. Let me elaborate – if it were an image of a nature scene, or a building, ect., absence of colour would be a problem, in my opinion, because colour helps give the audience a better visual understanding of the scenario. For example, blue lake = clean lake, brown lake = dirty lake. However, since it's expected and implied from the white tones of the image that this woman has a white skin tone, it doesn't matter that much in this case. People would naturally know what the colour of a human being such as this one would look like anyways. The colour of the clothes are irrelevant, since the subject of the image is the person, and she can easily be found in any number of other outfits. Long story short, it's a portrait of a person, so colour is a lot less important here. -- Philip Terry Graham (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Katherine Wallace

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katherine Wallace, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Studio shot, so no geocoding. Yann (talk) 13:02, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Unique in scope on Commons, high resolution. The photographer's name is not known? Surely this is not a selfie, is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  • No, it is a work for hire. Yann (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't understand the phrase 'work for hire'. The history on this image with the copyright concerns is interesting. Can you elaborate please @Yann: on copyright and the e-mail received by Wikipedia. We cannot see this. Charles (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Please see en:Work for hire. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:50, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

• Ah! American. So how does this mystery e-mail system work and how do we know what's going on? Charles (talk) 22:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Just until question on copyright answered. Charles (talk) 09:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

• • Hi Charles, Sorry, but I don't understand what you want. IMO this image has a valid permission. What do you want more? Yann (talk) 14:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

• I'm not trying to be difficult, but before you edited this image there was a copyright warning which you removed. Can you elaborate please @Yann: on the e-mail Wikipedia received to convince you that copyright was OK. I have no access to these secret e-mails and I think there should be transparency. Charles (talk) 14:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

• There is a copy on IMDB, but it is not the source. Katherine Wallace says that the photographer is Peacemaker Photography, and that she owns the copyright. I made some research about Peacemaker Photography, and I don't see any reason to doubt her statement. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks. Charles (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

• Hi Charles, Do you agree to put back the status as "supported"? Regards, Yann (talk) 23:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes of course. Charles (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Judith A. Resnik

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Judith Resnik, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ÂkBY$ 11:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Christa McAuliffe

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christa McAuliffe, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Now here's and example of a good VI submission. Notable person. Quality image. Shown in her 'uniform' reflecting why she was notable. Ticks all the boxes. RIP. Charles (talk) 11:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 14:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Kalpana Chawla

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kalpana Chawla, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Laurel Clark

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laurel Clark, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Peggy Whitson

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peggy Whitson, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Valentina Tereshkova

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valentina Tereshkova, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Of course this is useful! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Anousheh Ansari

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anousheh Ansari, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Statue du Général Dufour, place Neuve, Genève

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Guillaume-Henri Dufour, Geneva.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Amelia Earhart

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amelia Earhart, portait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful, but I think that it could be used more (for example, in another wikis and mainly, in the Wikidata item because it could be synced automatically. Ivanhercaz | Discusión 13:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Good idea, I added it in Wikidata. Yann (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Barbara Askins

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbara Askins.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Yasmine-Belkaid

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yasmine Belkaid, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Not as good or useful as the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - This seems to be the better portrait of Belkaid, as there isn't anything distracting behind the viewer - she is the one, sole and central subject of the photograph. It is also a more neutral photograph. The other nominee, File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine Belkaid - 1290.jpg, depicts her gleefully smiling. -- PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 06:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Santamarcanda (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. 2017-03-31 - Yasmine Belkaid - 1290.jpg: -1
2. 2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg: +4 <--
=>
File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine Belkaid - 1290.jpg: Declined.
File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg: Promoted. <--

--DeFacto (talk). 21:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Nancy Roman

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nancy Roman, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Shamsia Hassani

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shamsia Hassani, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Too small resolution and lacking sharpness. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
• Palauenc05: This is not QI. The size and sharpness are adequate for VI. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, but criterion 3 requires "reasonable sharpness". IMO VI should at least take care of a minimum quality standard. Otherwise, there will be an inflation of less than mediocre pictures. Other reviewers may think differently. --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Santamarcanda (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support. I understand that the photograph could be technically better, but it is the best portrait of Shamsia Hassani in Commons, even with the detailed indicated by Palauenc05. Yann, the photograph is useful but it isn't used, so I recommend you to use the photograph in its article or its Wikidata item. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - What did I indicate? But since you pinged me: I would have to say this photo is useful; however, the blurriness is unfortunate, and I don't think every useful picture ipso facto merits the "VI" label. Because of my conflicting feelings about this photo, I have not voted pro or con on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment: oh, excuse me Ikan Kekek, I wanted to mention Palauenc05. I was wrong, probably I copy the username to not make a mistake, but I made it. One more time, excuse me; I am going to replace your username in my last comment. Of course, all the opinions and votes are respectable, the only requirement (I think) is to argue if there is any conflict. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I added this image to 2 articles. Yann (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment This is probably the wrong place to discuss the issue, but we should think about certain criteria which guarantee a minimum quality to get the VI label. As I mentioned above, for me, 98 KB is way below any acceptable size. Yann, where would be your limit now? 50 KB or 10 KB? Or even less? According to the existing rules, theoretically a 5 KB image would also deserve the label. Strange, isn't it? Besides, back to the image we are talking about, it's a pity for the fine composition which would deserve a decent quality. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

• @Palauenc05: the criterion is "looks good on-screen at the review size" (which is the size you see on the individual review subpage, not the thumbnail on the candidate list) - see COM:VICR #3. In any case, file size is not a good indicator of quality, as it depends on what is shown in the image. For example, unless you use a completely uncompressed file format, shooting a flower in the studio in front of a plain, single color background will most likely result in a much smaller file size than shooting the same flower in your garden – simply because the plain background compresses well and needs much less storage. However, the "smaller" studio file may very well be much better than the garden picture. If you want to raise the bar, make the review size larger (in terms of pixels). There is actually a quite recent discussion on this at Commons_talk:Valued_image_candidates/candidate_list#Valued_images_and_thumbnail_size (which would have been a better place for this discussion, by the way) Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 15:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

2018

Jeanne Guionie

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jeanne Guionie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - My initial reaction is that the other two photos of her in the category (including the other version of this photo) are probably better in scope, though the ideal thing would be a good digital restoration. I'd like to consider your argument, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  • This one is high resolution, and grayscale, as it is a black and white picture. However I could make a second nomination. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, engraving by Ambroise Tardieu.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Battle of Dreux, 4th onslaught, engraving

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Battle of Dreux, 4th onslaught, engraving.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Blanche Toutain

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blanche Toutain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Natacha Trouhanova

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natacha Trouhanova.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Odette Valery

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odette Valery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Gertie Millar

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gertie Millar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Gabrielle Ray

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gabrielle Ray.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope; nice crop. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Yvonne Garrick

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yvonne Garrick.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 30 June 2018

(UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Juliette Darcourt

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Juliette Darcourt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Marguerite Vaillant-Couturier

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marguerite Vaillant-Couturier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Jeanne Rolly

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jeanne Rolly.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Sandhya Jane

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sandhya Jane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Sir Benegal Rama Rau

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sir Benegal Rama Rau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Arlie Arlington

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arlie Arlington.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:32, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Agnès Borgo

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agnès Borgo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:33, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Lucienne Bréval

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lucienne Bréval.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:33, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Anna Held

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anna Held, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Difficult choice, I hesitated with File:Anna Held, by Léopold-Émile Reutlinger, ca. 1908.jpg. Yann (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I had a good time with the portraits of this lady, we did not hesitate in the same place, the choice is the best possible. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Saharet

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saharet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Complete restoration by Yann (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & used. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Marguerite Ugalde

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marguerite Ugalde.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment IMO the scope is too broad, because we have other pictures of her at a different age (see File:Marguerite Ugalde.jpg). Marguerite Ugalde in 1883 would be better. Skimel (talk) 20:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

This one is not OK: too small. The point is to have the best image of her, not 10 images. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Paul Mounet

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Mounet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Aimée Campton

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aimée Campton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Marguerite Brésil

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marguerite Brésil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 05:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Marcelle Lender

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marcelle Lender.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 05:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Albert Lambert

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albert Lambert.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Agnes Freund

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agnes Freund.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful and best in scope Ezarateesteban 13:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Suzanne Lenglen

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Suzanne Lenglen, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in rich category --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Hortense Debério

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hortense Debério.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment And this? Why not? Ezarateesteban 18:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Not bad, but I think this one is better. It is the usual hair style of the time, while the other looks like a out-of-bed sensual portrait. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support ok, per Yann explanation Ezarateesteban 18:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:29, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Paulette Filliaux

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paulette Filliaux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Marguerite Carrère-Xanrof

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marguerite Carrère.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Renée Desprez

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renée Desprez.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I changed the image, as this one is even better. Do you agree? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:56, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Effectively and unquestionably: it's better. I agree--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Charles Marville

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charles Marville.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Reinhard Müller (talk) 11:21, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:30, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Lilian Greuze

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lilian Greuze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 11:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Berthe Bovy

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Berthe Bovy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 11:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Cécile Eyreams

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cécile Eyreams.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support: Out of the availabe photographs, this shows her face best. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 12:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Charlotte Wyns

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charlotte Wyns.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best choice from the available portraits, and your color and contrast changes were a good improvement. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 19:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Suzanne Derval

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Suzanne Derval.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful, well corrected, well described and used. Skimel (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Meg Villars

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meg Villars.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Mary Garden

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Garden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Pluto

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pluto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Elizabeth L. Gardner

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elizabeth L. Gardner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Two mohurs gold coin, India, 1835

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 mohurs gold coin, 1835.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Lies Noor

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lies Noor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Aminah Cendrakasih

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aminah Cendrakasih.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, used and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Olympus Mons, Mars

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olympus Mons.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Gold 20-stater of Eucratides

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gold 20-stater of Eucratides.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Albert Reiss

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albert Reiss.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Apollo 11 crew

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apollo 11 crew.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I'm new here, but I'm pretty sure a featured picture is good. Also, nice picture of the crew, clearly a good picture and best in its scope. -- Boothsift (talk) 01:28, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Bruno Doucey

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bruno Doucey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Bruno Doucey.jpg it is more natural and less retouched --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

• That file is a copyright violation. It deleted it. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Support Best in scope now. Skimel (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Rouge-gorge

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erithacus rubecula rubecula (European robin).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Les Deux Sœurs (Sur la Terrasse)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Two Sisters (On the Terrace), by Pierre-Auguste Renoir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 04:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Le Déjeuner des canotiers

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Déjeuner des canotiers (Luncheon of the Boating Party), by Pierre-Auguste Renoir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:45, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful & used -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 04:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

La Chambre à Arles (Musée d'Orsay)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Chambre à Arles (Bedroom in Arles), by Vincent van Gogh, Orsay Museum version.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

promoted

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 04:14, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Fatata te Miti

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fatata te Miti, by Paul Gauguin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 04:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Brick au clair de lune

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brick au clair de lune (Brig upon the Water), by Gustave Le Gray.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Der Kaufmann Georg Gisze

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Der Kaufmann Georg Gisze (Portrait of Georg Giese), by Hans Holbein the Younger.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Incoronazione della Vergine

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Incoronazione della Vergine (Coronation of the Virgin), by Gentile da Fabriano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - At review size, File:Gentile da Fabriano 047.jpg is better lit and has more details. I would get vehemently attacked for opposing this nomination, but I'd ask someone to explain to me where it says in the rules anything other than that we are to judge the pictures at review size, not at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Gentile da Fabriano 047.jpg is closer to reality and more informative. The FP label is not specified for VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek and Archaeodontosaurus: Seeing the difference of resolution, I think it is better to improve this one. The file is actually not used outside Commons, so I uploaded a corrected version based on the colors of the other file. In addition, the reproductions are not identical, and since the painting is in the Getty Museum, it is much better to have a reproduction from Getty itself. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support It is indeed a very good initiative. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:33, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Great solution! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Abigail Harrison

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abigail Harrison.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:33, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Vincent van Gogh - Irises

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iris (Irises), by Vincent van Gogh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Benjamin Franklin by Joseph Siffrein Duplessis

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benjamin Franklin, painting by Joseph Duplessis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Danish West Indian 10 daler gold coin, 1904

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Danish West Indian 10 daler gold coin, 1904.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Excellent quality and best in its category. --Dr. Schorsch (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Magdaleine Pinceloup de la Grange, by Jean-Baptiste Perronneau

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magdaleine Pinceloup de la Grange, painting by Jean-Baptiste Perronneau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Elisa Bonaparte with her daughter Napoleona Baciocchi, by François Gérard

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elisa Bonaparte avec sa fille Napoleona Baciocchi (Elisa Bonaparte with her daughter Napoleona Baciocchi), painting by François Gérard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Hollow Horn Bear

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hollow Horn Bear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:28, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - certainly a useful photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

The Tower of Babel, by Pieter Bruegel the Elder (Vienna)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Tower of Babel, by Pieter Bruegel the Elder (Vienna version).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Either this one or the Rotterdam version, but not both. I support both going into a Most Valued Review. Martinvl (talk) 14:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

• Martinvl: These are 2 different paintings, so there is no duplicate. They even have a separate category for each. This is not a valid oppose, please withdraw it. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Martinvl, toggle back and forth between the two versions, and you will see very clearly that they are quite obviously not the same painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus, Ikan Kekek, and Jacek Halicki: On the other had, the section on Valued Image works of art states "... A scope is justified for instance if the work is the most significant work (or one of the most significant works) of an artist having an article on its own on any Wikipedia, or if it is a seminal work in some way." I notice that there is one article in the English Wikipedia that covers both paintings - see The Tower of Babel (Bruegel), similarly with the German WIkipedia (Turmbau zu Babel (Bruegel), the French Wikipedia (La Tour de Babel (Brueghel), the Spanish Wikipedia La torre de Babel (Brueghel) and probably every other Wikipedia. That is why I wished to select one of the images. -- Martinvl (talk) 20:03, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Respectfully, my friend, I consider that very poor reasoning. Obviously, that article needs to use images of both versions, so both are useful and valuable. In addition, Breugel is one of the major artists in history, not even a great master of secondary fame or importance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

The Tower of Babel, by Pieter Bruegel the Elder (Rotterdam)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Tower of Babel, by Pieter Bruegel the Elder (Rotterdam version).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Either this one or the Vienna version, but not both. I support both going into a Most Valued Review. Martinvl (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

• Martinvl: These are 2 different paintings, so there is no duplicate. They even have a separate category for each. This is not a valid oppose, please withdraw it. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support two scopes good. Charles (talk) 10:11, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
• I agree with the crowd. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 20:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 18:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

2019

Charon

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Raja Lala Deen Dayal

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lala Deen Dayal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Mohandas K. Gandhi, 1931

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mohandas K. Gandhi, 1931.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Maybe it would be good to put the date of shooting; it allowed to be able to promote other images of him. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

• OK, done. --Yann (talk) 07:15, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Edgar A. Poe, drawing

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Edgar Allan Poe, drawing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Why Drawing? Why Drawing? Is not this a retouched photograph initially? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

• It is a drawing made from a photograph (or several photographs), notably the “Ultima Thule” daguerreotype. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks for the explanation --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 22:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Dali Atomicus

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salvador Dalí (Dali Atomicus by Philippe Halsman).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 22:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Lansdowne Herakles

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lansdowne Heracles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 22:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

The Steerage

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Steerage, by Alfred Stieglitz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support pity that it is not the most used. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 22:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Mars et Vénus, allégorie sur la Paix

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mars and Venus, Allegory of Peace (Mars et Vénus, allégorie sur la Paix, by Louis-Jean-François Lagrenée).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 22:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Marie-Antoinette et ses enfants

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marie Antoinette and her Children (Marie-Antoinette de Lorraine-Habsbourg, reine de France et ses enfants, by Louise Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 22:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

John Herschel by Julia Margaret Cameron

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of John Herschel by Julia Margaret Cameron.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 22:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Atlas catalan

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catalan Atlas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Should the name or coverage of the map be given? It appears that there are other pages in the atlas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• Here we have the whole map. The other 4 pages are text and diagrams, notably about the zodiac. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• OK.  Support as obviously very useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Carina Nebula

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carina Nebula.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Atypical picture, no? Is HDR a legitimate modification of a scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: I don't understand. What do you mean? Yann (talk) 14:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• Please disregard. I was confusing this with another photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful and impressive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Definitely a valued image. --BoothSift 23:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose But unfortunately, this is a cropped version of the original. Charles (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Question - Can you link the original? This one is an FP, having passed 18-0, and I even remarked "Seems best on Commons." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

• Being familiar with this image I Googled it, but here is the original File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima USMC-100224-M-9247F-003.jpg and here File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, positive.jpg. There was a debate on copyright but no one mentioned the status of using a cropped image on Commons or Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 09:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

• This is not cropped from these images, but imported from another source. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Waiting, by Edgar Degas

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Waiting, by Edgar Degas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Compared with the other photo in the category, here the colours seem more real and it is used --Llez (talk) 05:41, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

One mohur coin, 1862

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
One mohur coin, 1862.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. --BoothSift 23:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Julia Margaret Cameron

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Julia Margaret Cameron, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--BoothSift 03:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Waldseemüller map

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Waldseemüller map.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Why the choice of this resolution?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Question - Further to Archaeo's question, what about File:Waldseemuller map, complete 100%.jpg, which is bigger? I'm guessing it's missing part of the map? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
• @Archaeodontosaurus and Ikan Kekek: This is the FP version. I guess this was chosen as FP because the original version at 100% is too big to be used directly on the projects, although it is great to have it as an archive. This also applies to VI. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:49, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Question - Does it matter when the photo is just being used as a thumbnail? I have a hard time picking which version is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Ok for me, it's the best compromise between the different problems --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Emma, Lady Hamilton, by George Romney, NPG 4448

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emma, Lady Hamilton, by George Romney, National Portrait Gallery, Accession number NPG 4448.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose The colors have been modified after FP labeling, this FP argument is not very rigorous. It is not possible in the state of the scope to give a label VI because there are many portraits of this lady, and this one who is far from the best can not represent them all. It would be good to reduce the scope by giving the place of exposure but in this case it will not be enough because there are two tables I suggest to also give the inventory number.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

• The scope is only for this painting. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:48, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
• @Archaeodontosaurus: The scope I give is the officiel name of the painting. See the source at National Portrait Gallery. Her clothes should obviously be white, so the color correction looks OK to me. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

• Color is an anecdote. There is only one problem: There are several different tables that can correspond to this scope, hence the need to characterize the one we are talking about by the place of exhibition and in this case by the number inventory that must be added to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

• It's better but it's like a license plate you have to give the country for what is a value, so you have to give the exhibition place first. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus: Like this? Yann (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Binocular compound microscope, Carl Zeiss Jena, 1914

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Binocular compound microscope, Carl Zeiss Jena, 1914.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 20:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Usain Bolt at the 2008 Summer Olympics

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Usain Bolt at the 2008 Summer Olympics.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Event not specified. Charles (talk) 17:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

• @Charlesjsharp: "2008 Summer Olympics", it is the best we have from that event. The description says "after his 100m victory at Beijing Olympics 2008, breaking the world record". What do you want more? Regards, Yann (talk) 18:02, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I would add after 100m to scope. Charles (talk) 19:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

• I don't see the point: VI is to illustrate a scope. The current scope covers a period of a few weeks at most. This is very short compared to usual scopes. Usain Bolt didn't look different before and after running the 100m in Beijing. So a scope with after 100m is completely meaningless. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
• In the broad scope, one of the pictures of him actually sprinting would be more valuable. Charles (talk) 14:39, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

• Which one? I don't see better image of him. There are all small. Those with a long shot would be very small after a necessary crop. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

• I agree with Yann.  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Jeune fille se défendant contre Éros

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jeune fille se défendant contre Éros, by William-Adolphe Bouguereau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --BoothSift 16:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Falcon 9 Flight 32, world's first reflight of an orbital class rocket

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falcon 9 Flight 32, world's first reflight of an orbital class rocket.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Edgar Allan Poe, daguerreotype "Annie"

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good restoration, best in scope Ezarateesteban 22:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Célestine Galli-Marié

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Célestine Galli-Marié, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Charles de Courcy

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charles de Courcy, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Pierre Ciceri

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pierre-Luc-Charles Ciceri, by Nadar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

François Cantin

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
François Cantin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support another good restoration, useful Ezarateesteban 20:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Emmanuel de Coëtlogon

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emmanuel de Coëtlogon, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Alfred-Henri Darjou

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alfred-Henri Darjou, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 22:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Michael William Balfe

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michael William Balfe, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Edmond Becquerel

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edmond Becquerel, by Nadar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Yes, I guess this is more useful as an illustration for articles than the original framed version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Joseph Desmazes

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joseph Desmazes, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Raymond Deslandes

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raymond Deslandes, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Henri Becquerel

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Henri Becquerel, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charles (talk) 08:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Aline Duval

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aline Duval, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Aruna Roy

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aruna Roy, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Diana Arbenina

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diana Arbenina, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good portrait. The micro is a bit disturbing, but for me nevertheless best in scope --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:19, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Helen Sjöholm

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helen Sjöholm, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Émilienne d'Alençon

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Émilienne d'Alençon, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

La Promenade, by Pierre-Auguste Renoir

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Promenade, by Pierre-Auguste Renoir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Simeis 147

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Simeis 147.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Leonardo da Vinci, presumed self-portrait

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
So-called self-portrait by Leonardo da Vinci in the Biblioteca Reale in Turin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Leonardo da Vinci, by Francesco Melzi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Leonardo da Vinci by Francesco Melzi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Salvator Mundi

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salvator Mundi by Leonardo Da Vinci.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 03:11, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe, par Manet

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe by Manet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Centaur mosaic

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centaur mosaic, in Antikensammlung, Berlin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:56, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Garçon au gilet rouge, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garçon au gilet rouge (Boy in a Red Waistcoat), by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I think this is a case in which the high resolution distinguishes several images that are similar-looking at file page size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:34, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

L'Homme au bonnet de coton, by Paul Cézanne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L'Homme au bonnet de coton (Man with a cotton cap, the Artist's Uncle), by Paul Cézanne, Metropolitan Museum of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Portrait d'un moine, by Paul Cézanne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait d'un moine (Monk's Portrait, the artist's uncle), by Paul Cézanne, Metropolitan Museum of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Le Barrage de François Zola, par Paul Cézanne

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Barrage de François Zola (François Zola Dam), by Paul Cézanne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used, but I would ather link it to the Category Paintings in National Museum Wales --Llez (talk) 05:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Arlequin, par Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arlequin (Harlequin), Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Le Fils de l'artiste, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le fils de l'artiste (The artist's son), by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:49, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Château Noir, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château Noir, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Is there more than one work by Cezanne called "Château Noir"? The painting depicted in the Google Art Project photo as File:Paul Cézanne - Château Noir - Google Art Project.jpg is quite obviously a different one and is given a different dating (1903-1904, rather than 1900-1904 for the painting depicted in the photo you've nominated). So does the scope need to be disambiguated by adding the years, or is the other painting misnamed in the Google Art Project photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

• Yes, there are several works with similar subjects. Disambiguation by the museum seems sufficient to me, unless we have 2 of them in the same museum. Dates of Cézanne paintings are generally not precise, and subject to controversies. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Good point. Best in this scope, I do believe. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

L'Après-midi à Naples, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Australia

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L'Après-midi à Naples, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Australia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Antony Valabrègue

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait d'Anthony Valabrègue (Portrait of Anthony Valabrègue), by Paul Cézanne, J. Paul Getty Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antony Valabrègue, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Obviously best in scope of the two photos of this painting on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Paul Alexis lisant à Émile Zola

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Alexis lisant à Émile Zola (Paul Alexis Reading a Manuscript to Zola), by Paul Cézanne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Château Noir du Tholonet by Paul Cézanne, Museum of Modern Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château Noir du Tholonet by Paul Cézanne, Museum of Modern Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 18:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Maison et ferme du Jas de Bouffan, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery in Prague

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison et ferme du Jas de Bouffan, by Paul Cézanne, National Gallery in Prague.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I haven't seen this painting in the flesh, but just eyeballing the reproductions, this one seems clearly best in scope; for one thing, it has the most details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 23:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Maison devant la Sainte-Victoire près de Gardanne, par Paul Cézanne, Indianapolis Museum of Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison devant la Sainte-Victoire près de Gardanne (House in Provence), by Paul Cézanne, Indianapolis Museum of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 23:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Portrait de l'artiste, by Paul Cézanne, Phillips Collection

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait de l'artiste (self-portrait), by Paul Cézanne, Phillips Collection.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Useful.--Vulphere 08:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Portrait de l'artiste à la casquette, by Paul Cézanne, Hermitage Museum

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait de l'artiste à la casquette (Self-Portrait in a Casquette), by Paul Cézanne, Hermitage Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:46, 26 May 2019

(UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 23:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Les Grandes Baigneuses, by Paul Cézanne, Philadelphia Museum of Art

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Les Grandes Baigneuses (The Large Bathers), by Paul Cézanne, Philadelphia Museum of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 23:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Kristina Inhof

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kristina Inhof.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful and used. --MB-one (talk) 09:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 06:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Lunar Module 5 (LM-5)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lunar Module 5 (LM-5).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good image, useful and often used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 02:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Mae Carol Jemison

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mae Jemison.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Charles (talk) 11:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Portrait d'Ambroise Vollard, Petit Palais

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait d'Ambroise Vollard (Portrait of Ambroise Vollard), by Paul Cézanne, Petit Palais.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The colors are perfect but the proportions are wrong the table is too stretched in height. Easy to Correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus: How do you know that? What would be the right proportions? Regards, Yann (talk) 05:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

• In the category there are shorter images and others larger: so there is a proportional error for one or the other. The dimensions of the table are known. You load the image in photoshop which measures, to the pixel, the dimensions and you make a règle de trois (Cross-multiplication). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus: OK, I got it. Fixed. Yann (talk) 05:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Wow perfect! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Statues du Pont d'Iéna

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Cavalier gaulois (The Gaulish Horseman), by Antoine-Augustin Préault.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Cavalier romain (The Roman Horseman), by Louis-Joseph Daumas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good image, used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Cavalier arabe (The Arabic Horseman), by Jean-Jacques Feuchère.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Cavalier grec (The Greek Horseman), by François Théodore Devaulx.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Yuri Gagarin

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yuri Gagarin, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and is used. Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 05:56, 20 June 2019 (UTC).

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. - Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 18:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)