User talk:Yann/archives 29

Derivative image

Yann, File:Kuvempu-konkani vishwakosh.jpg is a derivative of File:Konkani Viswakosh Vol2.pdf (page 766 I think), I'm not sure how to fix the licensing and review, could you take a look at it please? cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 17:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

@SpacemanSpiff: Hi,

I fixed the source, but I don't know anything more. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Sorry for not being clear, I meant to ask whether the "review tag" on the original pdf should be appended to the derivative or not and also whether this should be tagged as a derivative work. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 19:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, you can tag this as derivative work. However I am not sure what the license should be, and therefore if the review tag should be added or not. Usually the copyright owner is the photographer, but there is no information. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Ah, right. I hadn't thought of that, I assumed it'd follow the book's license but it's entirely possible that the images used there are fair-use. —SpacemanSpiff 01:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Екіпажі літаків російської авіагрупи в Сирії.png

Hi, File:Екіпажі літаків російської авіагрупи в Сирії.png and materials of the site https://informnapalm.org/ are licensed under a license CC-BY-4.0 as stated in the description at the bottom of each page. Please restore this file. --Yakudza (talk) 14:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

@Yakudza: OK done. Restored, and created DR instead. This one looks OK, but for other files the source needs to be fixed. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks , I will correct the source. --Yakudza (talk) 15:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I have uploaded a new version of a file without non-free image, please close the nomination and remove the primary version. --Yakudza (talk) 15:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Help Uploading Pictures

Recently my pictures were taken down. I uploaded them through Wikimedia Commons. They were my own personal pictures that I allowed to be published on Wikimedia Commons. Why were they deleted? Did I not upload them properly? Can you tell me the proper way to upload the pictures?--Melissa.leanda (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

@Melissa.leanda: Hi,

"Own work" means pictures or videos taken by you with your camera. Also any content previously published elsewhere, either on the web or paper, needs a formal written permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your comment that accompanied the edit closing the discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DanielPenfield

You wrote "Clear copyright violations". So your claim is that every single icon in each screen capture was more than "simple geometric shapes or text"? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 06:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

@DanielPenfield: Hello, for your question, it depends on the simplicity of the icon. For the icons of your uploaded images (Yahoo!, Google, AOL, Bing) , they are not simple as simple geometric shapes or text, as it is a little bit complex. Also, the icons on your images can't be applied for De minimis, as the images also focuses on the icons. Thanks, ★Poké⁹⁵ 10:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

1) "they are not simple as simple geometric shapes or text". I like how you proclaim that as if you are the world's One True Authority on what constitutes "level of originality for copyright protection". Wikipedia, Wikicommons, etc. are full of people pretending to be something they aren't. 2) "Also, the icons on your images can't be applied for De minimis " I'm not sure why you addressing this to me as I've never claimed that. Perhaps you should notify User:Taivo as that editor is the only one so far who has made some claim regarding this, presumably because s/he did not read the discussion carefully. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 11:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

@DanielPenfield: 1) I am not like the "One True Authority" you are saying, I am following what is said in Commons:Threshold of originality. The threshold of originality is a concept in copyright law. I recommend you to read it to understand which icons or logos are allowed on Commons, and which are not. So that's why we have logos like this as they do not meet the threshold of originality. Also there is no authority or bureaucracy in Wikimedia. See WP:BURO.

2) Even though you never claimed that, it is still connected with the deletion discussion. De minimis is just a support in the deletion discussion.

3) Can you just move on? Deletion discussion is over, I don't see any reason to continue that issue.

Regards, ★Poké⁹⁵ 23:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Danicmend-3.jpg

File:Danicmend-3.jpg[değiştir] This photo is taken from an old map. So this photo is a public good. I think it should be delated. --Ruzigar (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Annulation

Bonjour, pourquoi cette annulation ? Je voudrais laissez seule version du photo qui est utilisée et supprimer la version inutilisable. И. Максим (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

@Massalim: Hi,

This is not a reason for a speedy deletion. The file is not an exact duplicate, and it is even better. Please create a regular deletion instead. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

You sent me a warning please reply

the pictures i uploaded are my book covers they are my creation i am the writer and i want to upload them please reply as soon as possible when i uploaded them you sent me a warning of copyright issues so please fix this problem or tell me what to do. Dr.Kamel Farhan Saleh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamel saleh (talk • contribs) 16:58, 08 November 2015 (UTC)

@Kamel saleh: Hi,

The copyright of book covers is usually owned by the book publisher (or sometimes by the designer). As for all previously published content, the copyright owner needs to send a formal written permission for a free license, then the files can be undeleted. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Summer Brielle

Turkish=Neden sayfayı sildin? Mehk63 (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Because a category is better suited that a gallery. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Pl-dźwięk.ogg

Hi. You broke links (for example from here) when removing this file. --Derbeth ^talk 06:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Please help there

in choosen pictures without copyrigths, because you sent me a warning and I only try to help the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiplayer99 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

@Wikiplayer99: Hi,

You are not allowed to copy files from the Internet, unless 1. you have a permission from the copyright owner, or 2. the file is in the public domain, and you have to show why it is not under a copyright. I fixed your first upload, which was fine, but others are not. File:Muerte de Anita Garibaldi.jpeg may be in the public domain due to age, but you need to provide the author, date, and source. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Freda Dudley Ward images

Thank you for undeleting File:Freda Dudley Ward.jpg per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2015-10#File:Freda Dudley Ward.jpg. Unfortunately the other two images in the same DR (File:Freda Dudley Ward01.jpg and File:Freda Dudley Ward - 1918.JPG) which were also undeleted are not also by Bassano, they are by photographers who died less than 70 years ago so are still unfree in the UK. Please could these be re-deleted – I will list them for undeletion in the appropriate years? January (talk) 08:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Echinocereus reichenbachii

Hello, Yann. I tried File:Echinocereus reichenbachii by RO.jpg at featured pictures, but it failed. Can I try again, or is it one time and out? Rationalobserver (talk) 23:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@Rationalobserver: Hi,

There is no rule which prevent a failed nomination to be done again. But experience shows that unless there is some improvement, renominating failed pictures usually get even less support votes than the first. In short, you better try something else. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Figura 1118.jpg and copyright violations

Hello Yann

I'm having several problems to upload files and attach images on my work.

I created a picture (Figura 1118.jpg) and you send me a messenge to perform some changes.

That was did.

Now i've some doubts about copyright violations and upload files.

I Found (Figura 1111.jpg,Figura 1112.jpg,Figura 1113.jpg,Figura 1114.jpg,Figura 1115.jpg,Figura 1116.jpg,Figura 1117.jpg) In a public forum and i used that to explain my work, these pictures completed the main goal of the page.

So if that was a copyright violations, have i another way to share these pictures on wikipedia ?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClaudiaSasaki (talk • contribs) 17:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

@ClaudiaSasaki: Hi,

It seems that your files are scanned from a book. So the book author and/or publisher owns the copyright. If you are one of them, or have a permission, please send it via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I see your point, if i didn't found the copyright permission, how should i procede to show the image or refer that in wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClaudiaSasaki (talk • contribs) 21:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

@ClaudiaSasaki: You may also upload it instead locally at the English Wikipedia. They accept non-free images and fair use, but you must include a fair use rationale there. But don't upload it here at Commons. Commons only accept free content, and doesn't allow fair use. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 04:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Vid

Hi,

Please see File:Raja Harishchandra- 1913- India's First Silent Film- FULL FOOTAGE.webm. Uploading it as a .webm file worked. (This is the one more trick I mentioned) Natuur12 (talk) 23:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Images you request for delete

Images Files you request for delete in Greek Wikipedia Παλούμπα, Δημήτρης Πλαπούτας, Γεωργάκης Πλαπούτας, In few hours I will add the source in all jpegs, most of them are mine, others from village blogspot. please give me some time.

most pictures are from my personal file of photos that I captured with my Nikon , others from local historic book. So I have to replace the "own" word with the source title? right? please leave me a message. Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Viliop. Viliop (Talk Viliop)

@Viliop: Hi,

For old paintings, you need to provide the painter's name, and the date of the painting (at least approximately). For photographs, you need the formal written permission from the photographer. Since I don't speak Greek, I can't do it for you from the page you linked. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Its Ok, I checked the images og the article Παλούμπα some are mine some are from websites. please check. Danke --Viliop (talk) 19:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Υann I edited the source of a picture File:Paloumpaioi.jpg you request license, it's mine, I edited, it's ok. please remove the caution sign. thank you for the copyright sensitivity. Danke --Viliop (talk)

Removing Images

Hi Yann,

I can't seem to fathom what I'm doing wrong with images. I've checked with the publisher of the content who provided email permission allowing us to use the image. I can't find it posted online ANYWHERE other than our personal flickr page. Could you enlighten us to what we are doing wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 375mon (talk • contribs)

@375mon: Hi,

You uploaded files from the Internet without providing a permission from the copyright owner. For all content previously published elsewhere, you need a formal written permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Raja Harishchandra- 1913- India's First Silent Film.webm

Hello Yann, le statut des droits sur les 21 premières minutes de cette version du film n'est pas clair. Il ne s'agit pas du film original mais d'un documentaire à son sujet, avec un générique de fin. C'est pourquoi j'avais téléversé de mon côté File:Raja Harishchandra (1913).webm, au demeurant dans une meilleure résolution. Il est notoire que si le film original faisait environ 40 minutes, il n'en subsiste pas une copie complète [1]. J'ai téléversé une version sans le documentaire initial. Il faudrait supprimer la version antérieure. Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 10:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

@Racconish: Bonjour,

OK merci. J'ai caché l'ancienne version. Il faut aussi noté qu'il existe une autre version, produite en 1917. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete

Can you delete it? I accidentally upload this file: File:Рак_в_аквариуме.jpg. DeletedUser (talk) 08:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, A deletion request is open. Let's wait. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

I accidentally uploaded it file, there must be something to wait? DeletedUser (talk) 08:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done by Geagea. Usually, we don't (speedy) delete files uploaded after one week. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Map of Greek colonies on the northern Black Sea coast.

You have reversed Simferopol and Sevastopol. Sevastopol is on the coast, Simferopol is inland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.53.29.33 (talk • contribs)

Hi, I can't understand what you are talking about. Can you explain? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Beals socks

Please check my post - I added a second sock, please block it as well. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArchiveOfTheArts

(src) Tan I am the creator and some owner the material I uploaded. Please undelete the files now. My name is David Donohue. You can see my name on the posters imdb.com and everywhere else. You can reach me at 323 363 0562 if you have any quest. Now please undelete all files for ArchiveOfTheArts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchiveOfTheArts (talk • contribs) 2015-11-20T19:11:21 (UTC)

@ArchiveOfTheArts: Hi,

Please send a permission to COM:OTRS, also as instructed by Jim on COM:UDR, then the files can be undeleted. Here the uploader has to prove than the files are free, not the opposite. Please contact us again when you have a ticket number with a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Shree Krishna Janma (1918).webm

Hello, toutes mes excuses, j'ai omis le commentaire de révocation : retour à la version muette, la bande son n'étant pas dans le domaine public. Il faudrait supprimer la version sonorisée . Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 07:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Project

For this edit, see here.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 Hi,

I have seen this page before removing your thumbnail. You should use a logo instead. A thumb like this is quite disturbing, and doesn't bring any additional value. BTW your nomination is much too small to be a featured picture. Please read the guidelines and check the images before nominating. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

What are you talking about?

I gave full credits to the author. Get out of my face. I am uploading it again, whether you like it or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liamgmack (talk • contribs) 13:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your Mailadress ?

Hi Yann, do you have an email adress? The bernina International want to send you the licences of the two pictures via mail. Is this ok? Can you send me an PM ? Best, Mike

Why you delete my page ?

Hello, Yann. I wrote information about me, but everything was delited. Why ? p.s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropion here i upload my own photos of my patient and my surgery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oleg*vet eye*Yastrebov (talk • contribs)

uploading photos for professional soccer player

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs) 17:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

@Goodfellabear: Hi,

You must read COM:L before uploading anything here. If the files are not made directly by you, the copyright owner needs to send a formal written permission. Idem if the content has been previously published elsewhere. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Please ask me if you have more questions. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Yann, this is becoming annoying because the OTRS helpdesk gave HappySquirrel instructions on how to load up our 2 very personal and very important images on to our article. 1 is from Loyola's yearbook which I took and Loyola has told us many times that all of their yearbook stuff is good for public use and the other one is from a newspaper clip Tasos was mentioned on in the Herndon Observer - the newspaper does not exist anymore but that newspaper clip has been distributed in all of Herndon, all of Reston, within high schools and Tasos himself has given us permission to use. Please allow us to complete this wikipedia story the way we want without being such a strict Wikipedia police officer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs) 00:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Also Yann, I see you remove many images from all over - our images our personal images of Tasos Vatikiotis as he himself has give permission to use the Herndon Observer newspaper article as well as his picture in his college's yearbook - happysquirrel and the tea party (both wikipedians) got permission from the OTRS in June, near 5 months ago and everything has been fine until you came along and absolutely deleted both images - if you are so well round and such a good Wikipedian tell us the correct licensing code to put so we can go about our way with peace of mind - *STOP threatening us and embarassing us and HELP us - HappySquirrel helped us back in June and now you have ruined it for us. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs) 00:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

@Goodfellabear: Hi,

As I wrote above, please send a permission and the files can be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

• • Yann, please undelete the photos and put the correct permissions on there since you are an active Wikipedia editor - these are normal and down to earth photos of the mentioned person playing soccer in college and being highlighted in a local newspaper - we are not creating a gateway to Mars or anything - please get permission via the OTRS or classify them with correct licensing code - these are simple images, nothing complexed about them. There is nothing private about them - they are public images that have been printed by the thousands. Please lead by example and get this sort it out. Thanks.

• • Yann, please lead by example and help with this issue. As Ghandi said, "be the change you want to see in the world" and as your front page reads - A novice was once curious about the nature of the Edit Count. He approached the Zen master and asked, "Zen master, what is the nature of the Edit Count?" "The Edit Count is as a road," replied the Zen master. "You must travel the road to reach your destination, and some may travel longer roads than others. But do not judge the person at your door by the length of the road he has traveled to reach you." And the novice was Enlightened.

• • Yann, please follow up on [Ticket#: 2015112310024445].: Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2015112310024445]. Yours sincerely, The Volunteer Response Team

licence

Hi, why you deleted this picture : File:Mairie de Vesoul.jpg ? 90.26.183.130 00:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

@Dfs748: Hi,

This image contains a watermark "A. R. Photographie", so the copyright owner needs to send a permission through COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ok guy, can you delete "File:Mairie de Vesoul 4.jpg" and "File:Mairie de Vesoul 2.jpg" ? 86.197.122.171 15:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 17:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Trueno Azul 2015.png

Hi Yann,

You have previously had my file deleted. I had that work commissioned and is therefore my own.

Here is a screenshot of my emails: http://imgur.com/a/slwNP

Could I have it restored please?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therealflea (talk • contribs)

@Therealflea: Hi,

As for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

picture

At first, I didn't see your mother tongue is French. Je vais donc communiquer avec vous en français. Est-ce que la présence de cette photographie (File:Vesoul Agglomération sud.jpg) est légal sur Commons ? 86.197.122.171 22:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Peut-être pas. Demande de suppression créée. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Et donc comment peut-on savoir le code EXIF ? 86.197.122.171 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Tout en bas de la page, section "Metadata". Yann (talk) 14:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Merci pour votre réponse. Et donc, en fait qu'est ce que le EXIF ? 86.197.122.171 15:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Ce sont des données enregistrées par l'appareil en même temps que la photo elle-même. Outre des infos techniques, elles peuvent inclure le nom de l'auteur, le copyright, une description, la date de création, etc. Voir fr:Exchangeable image file format. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Merci pour votre réponse détaillée. Je pourrai donc à nouveau vous signaler des photos illicitement présente dans Commons. Cette photo (File:Place de la République - Patinoire.jpg) n'est pas légale si j'ai bien compris, mais celle-ci (File:Place de la République (Vesoul) 2.jpg) oui ? 86.197.122.171 23:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Pas de souci pour ces deux photos. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Britneyspearspress.jpg

I was in the process of digging further into the image's background when I saw you'd changed it to a DR. You beat me to the punch on the change, as it's an odd lil' duck. Tabercil (talk) 23:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Fake Copyright Violation

File:Serrania_de_Motilones_y_Perija.jpg As seen here the picture was a natural landscape of public domain besides that otorge author and the source of which was directed by the author himself, I appreciate to stop to remove such files since it clearly does not constitute a violation of the rights of author and could be considered a false claim (YonedgeHp (talk) 23:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC))

@YonedgeHp: Hi,

This file is copied from the Internet © All Rights Reserved by edwintpu without the permission from the author. So yes, it is a copyright violation. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bikini car wash at Twin Peaks, Round Rock

Hi, Yann, I noticed your edit without andy summary and wonder why. thank tou for your time. Lotje (talk) 17:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

@Lotje: the DR has been closed, no further edits should be made to it. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry sorry, I didn't pay attention. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 17:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Château de Franchevelle

Bonjour Yann, j'ai ajouté le château de Franchevelle pris en 1923.

ChateauFranchevelle1923

Je n'ai pas réussi à mettre la catégorie > 70 ans. Idem pour mes daguerréotype du Saint-Mont. Comment faut-il procéder ? Merci d'avance. Cordialement --Amage9 (talk) 12:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

@Amage9: Bonjour,

Il ne faut pas mettre {{Own}} si tu n'as pas pris la photo toi-même. Il faut donner la source (scan d'une carte postale, copie sur Internet, etc.). Dans l'état, il n'y a pas assez d'info. C'est souvent le cas des images trouvées sur Internet. Qui est le photographe ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

@Yann: merci, je n'ai pas trouvé les photos sur internet, les photos du Saint-Mont sont inédites sur le net elles viennent de la famille mais nous n'avons pas le nom du photographe. Pour le château c'est bien une carte postale que l'on retrouve sur Delcampe, elle m'appartient je peux éventuellement mettre le verso qui n'est pas sur le net mais il n'y a que des informations personnelles sans nom de photographe ou éditeur.

Cordialement--Amage9 (talk) 16:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

@Amage9: Oui, ce serait utile de mettre le verso. Cela permet d'être sûr que le photographe n'est pas mentionné. Pour les photos de Saint-Mont, il n'y a pas de problème vu la date, mais il faut quand même indiquer correctement la source. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

@Yann: je te remercie pour ces conseils, j'espère être dans les clous après les modifications et l'ajout du verso.

ChateauFranchevelle1923Verso

Bonne soirée, --Amage9 (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

User:Pdir

May you have some look at his upload list? You just deleted three of this pictures of snowmobiles as copyvio, but there is a bunch more Special:ListFiles/Pdir. All this xxkB and 1xxkB stuff is taken from here (not only page 30, but also earlier and later). Thanks a lot. --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Deleted 4 more. Also DR created for all small images without EXIF data. Thanks for reporting. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

deleted within one day

Hi, These photos are given by the owner of the photographs , If you guys want to delete you need to give us time to prove these are original or not (deleted within one day ) .How do know is it copyrighted or not??? If its on a web, you can't guarantee its copyrighted or not(you don't know who is the copyright owner), These photos are owned by Darshana Ruwan Dissanayaka , some photos took by His Cameraman (Hired),and some are purchased . So, why don't you give us the time to prove it ??.. anyway we love to contribute to Wikipedia but these type of activities cause to disappointment of users!!

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknownlabz (talk • contribs)

@Unknownlabz: Did they give you the permission to publish their photographs into a free license? If they did, please forward the permission to OTRS. Almost everything in the web is copyrighted. Please read first Commons:Licensing and Commons:Precautionary principle before uploading images that are not your own work. Thanks, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 09:34, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, @Pokéfan95: Thank you for the info , In here they are(Web Admins) not worrying about online copyright, They uploaded users photographs on to the webs without his permissions. i contacted the user he will send an email within seven days.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknownlabz (talk • contribs)

@Unknownlabz: Please say to him that when e-mailing the OTRS, it is recommended to use Commons:Email templates (link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates). Thanks! ★ Poké⁹⁵ 04:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Suppression d'une photo

Bonjour, je reçois un mail disant que vous avez supprimé ma photo, Jacques Brasseul.jpg. Quelle mouche vous a piqué ? C'est une photo personnelle, qui m'appartient, tirée de ma bibliothèque, je ne vois pas bien la raison de cette suppression. Merci de la laisser tranquille si je la remets, bien à vous, JB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrasseul (talk • contribs)

@Jbrasseul: Bonjour,

Nous avons une politique très stricte en ce qui concerne les droits d'auteur, qui dans ce cas, appartiennent au photographe. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure pour envoyer une autorisation. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Jbrasseul écrit : Mais c'est moi le photographe !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrasseul (talk • contribs) 07:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Jbrasseul: Ça m'étonnerait : c'est une photo de vous, et ce n'est pas un selfie. En plus, il y a une copie sur [2]. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Non, non, rassurez-vous, il n'y a là rien d'étonnant, c'est une photo que j'ai prise moi-même avec mon appareil et le retardateur, elle date de 2004, a été prise à l'Île de Ré et n'appartient qu'à moi, j'ai d'ailleurs déclaré cela sur votre site. S'il-vous plaît, remettez cette photo, il n'y a aucun problème de copyright. Encore une fois, ELLE M'APPARTIENT. Quant à son utilisation sur le site que vous citez, Atlantico, c'est moi qui leur ai donné, vous voyez bien que l'article est de moi, et ils m'ont demandé une photo pour illustrer cet interview. Merci beaucoup et bien cordialement, Jacques Brasseul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrasseul (talk • contribs) 11:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Jbrasseul: OK, je vous crois, mais il serait quand même préférable que vous envoyez une confirmation, car l'image a été publiée ailleurs auparavant, à moins que vous pouviez importer la photo originale. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Merci, c'est gentil, j'ai remis la photo en place, sur ma page Wikipedia. Mais à qui dois-je envoyer la confirmation ? Par ailleurs, j'ai du mal à comprendre pourquoi c'est si simple d'écrire ce qu'on veut sur sa page, et si compliqué de mettre une banale photo personnelle ? Bien à vous, Jacques — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrasseul (talk • contribs) 11:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Jbrasseul: Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure, et ajoutez {{OTRS pending}} dans la description si vous ne voulez pas que la photo soit supprimée. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

OK, merci, ça a l'air compliqué...Jbrasseul (talk) 12:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

What did I do?

Yann, you left a message that I did some form of vandalism. What did I do? I don't edit on wikimedia commons, but I've been a faithful contributor to Wikipedia for many years. Please advise me more specifically what I did wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.107.61.87 (talk • contribs)

Hi, I don't know sine you added this message while logged out. Please log in, and tell me what's your account. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

i responded from my mobile device. this message has my log in. --Ahodges7 (talk) 03:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Ahodges7: You moved Commons:File renaming to Commons:SE Asia Memorial, United States Military Academy, which is vandalism. If it is a mistake, you should have reverted your move. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 05:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

My apologies for my mistake in trying to fix an error on my part. When I created the image file "SW Asia Memorial, United States Military Academy.jpg", I incorrectly titled it as the "SW Asia Memorial", when it actually should be the "SOUTHEAST Asia Memorial". I was contacted by a member of the Class of 1962 who asked me to rename the file correctly. In my attempt, I just made it worse. My apologies and I request that you or another admin change the name of the image to accurately reflect the name of the memorial.--Ahodges7 (talk) 11:54, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Ahodges7: Hi,

To move/rename a file, please add {{Rename}} on the page description. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

question

but if want to upload Real Desperado logo and the new Wild order logo what do i have to do?

thank you

NoahPuroresu123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoahPuroresu123 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@NoahPuroresu123: Hi,

On Commons, you need to provide a formal written permission from the copyright owner (see COM:OTRS). You can do it on the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

User:Bwag

Just for your notification: Bwag doesn´t want to discuss with me. Chaddy (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your early closure

You deleted a whole bunch of car wash images recently. You seem to have deleted them early, without allowing a full discussion. User:Tm had just added a whole bunch more images on November 23rd, and you deleted the whole lot, just two days later.

I just voiced a keep opinion on the discussion of the category for these images, and was going to slightly modify it for the discussion of the individual images, only to find the discussion seems to have had an early closure.

I think the point someone else made, as to how policy does not place a limit on how many in scope images we have is a good point. We have thousands of images of monuments like the Statue of Liberty. I don't come here to be an art critic. I don't think it is our role to judge the artistic merit of our images.

A few years ago an image of an excursion vessel that plied the Danube was nominated for deletion. The nominator's justification was that we had a dozen other images of that excursion vessel, and they thought that this image was of inferior quality, because it showed some tourists, in the background. Well, of course, a dozen images is not actually that many. Further, as a vessel employed to carry tourists, I thought that the tourists in this image enhanced its value, rather than detract from its value. It was this discussion which made me critical of the argument repeated here -- that we already have enough images of this type.

In your closure you did not explain why you supported the reasoning of the "we already have enough images of this type."

So, I am going to ask you to re-open the discussion, to allow the usual discussion period. Geo Swan (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Here is the argument I was going to adapt for the discussion i think you closed prematurely

Keep - I am a proponent for documenting articles and events that seem beneath notice. This kind of car wash, where young, scantily clad women, wash cars, may seem common enough that we should regard it as beneath notice, but I think this is a mistake. It is a common meme in movies and television. I think that makes these events in scope, as images of these events help reach an understanding of today's society -- and the societies of the last several decades. For all we know, changes in automotive technology, or petroleum product use, or morality, could mean people stop holding this kind of event. One might argue that anyone who read about this kind of car wash can always look for a movie or TV show that dramatized one. First, images of an actual event are superior to images from a dramatization of this kind of event; second, the movies are all proprietary, and still images from them could not be freely used in an academic paper or newspaper article. Two decades ago the arterial streets of the city I live in were lined by individual parking meters. There was one per parking spot. They were coin operated, mechanical devices. It seemed gradual, at first, but over a period of just a couple of years, every one of those rows of old mechanical parking meters was replaced by a computer controlled meter. It could accept credit cards, and bank cards, as well as coins and bills; it was solar powered; it had a little antennae for communicating with HQ. What this meant was that anyone who wanted to study the old style parking meter had to cross their fingers and hope enough people had decided to document an article that seemed beneath notice. I think the same applies to these images. What does the genuine scholar, who wants to study this phenomenon, do, if we delete all these images on the grounds they are trivial, and beneath notice? Geo Swan (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

• Excuse me. I wrote that Tm placed additional images in the discussion on November 23. It looks like you, yourself added the additional images. Geo Swan (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, You are a bit late. See the discussion on the VP. 1. I didn't close the DR early. 2. These files are junk from Flickr, have little education value, and we don't need to have 190 of them. If you want them undelete, please ask on COM:UDR. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

• Okay, now I have looked at the VP discussion. I don't see any explanation, from you, as to why you felt authorized to delete a large number of images that weren't given the normal seven days of discussion.
• I don't see you offering an explanation as to why you think you can limit the number of in-scope images we have of an event.
• There is a very uncollegial meme, "never explain, never apologize". I don't like pointing this out to you, but you do recognize that it looks like you choose to follow this model? Geo Swan (talk) 06:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Look, I won't repeat myself 36 times. The DR was for the whole category, and this is very clearly stated at the beginning. These images are out of scope. I already said that on the VP. If you want to watch them, there are still available on Flickr, so nothing is definitely lost. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

• If the DR was for the whole category, then every file under consideration should have had a notice placed on it, and should only have been deleted seven days after that notice was placed. Anything short of that means that people who had THAT image on their watchlist weren't given fair notice its deletion was under consideration.

I think it is irrelevant if the nominator encountered some kind of technical difficulty. The files under consideration, are the ones that were properly nominated, and their intentions aren't relevant, particularly since, if it was really important, they could have completed the nomination process, more slowly, through brute force. Geo Swan (talk) 22:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Yann

Hi Yann, I am contacting you re: File:'No Joke' Poster.jpg.

The poster has the proper CC license and the ok from the rights holder. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! betty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettywilly (talk • contribs) 04:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Whoops, forgot to sign :)

Bettywilly (talk) 08:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

I am also wondering why File:Camp Death Poster Creative Commons Sharealike.jpg was also deleted. Again, both posters have a CC Sharealike license. Please undelete. Thanks Yann!

Bettywilly (talk) 08:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

As for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hello. You might not return the original appearance of the file. User "Bobyr" lock member should be extended. He vandals, many articles in the Russian Wikipedia with corrupted files. Please take action. I apologize for the bad english. Farsizabon (talk) 14:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

AN FYI

FYI Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#DR closed as kept, without file having a license. Josve05a (talk) 09:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

speed

Hello.This file does not need to a discussion.Why do not you delete it speedily?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: Hi,

Please read COM:DR for what are acceptable reason for deletion. "Being small" is not one of them. Also you need to inform the uploader. The is best done with the gadget. See in your preferences. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Derri Berkani, "Une résistance oubliée. La Mosquée de Paris de 40 à 44", documentaire, 1991.jpg

File:Derri Berkani, "Une résistance oubliée. La Mosquée de Paris de 40 à 44", documentaire, 1991.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 11:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Bissorte : licences corrigées sur les 120 fichiers

Bonjour,

J'ai procédé à la correction des licences sur les 120 fichiers en discussion, selon les indications fournies notamment par Havang(nl).

Cordialement.

--Bissorte (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

restore File:Bandeira20151119 143602.jpg and File:Brasao20151119 143100.jpg

Why you removed the pictures I sent regarding Iraquara page? Symbols officials in Brazil are of public domain. Please ask to review

• File:Brasao20151119 143100.jpg
• File:Bandeira20151119 143602.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by MidiaBahia (talk • contribs) 13:52, 02 December 2015 (UTC)

@MidiaBahia: Hi,

These files were copied from a website which has a copyright mark. Please ask undeletion on COM:UDR, to gain support for more people. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Could you reopen this:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bugatti Veyron (4664325064).jpg, you don't gave even a minute to discuss, and from my point of view, you are loosening the law. -- RTA 16:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

OK. Better to ask a more general question, see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Bugatti logo. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Yann

Hi - I hope you are having a wonderful day. I saw you recently deleted a page of mine. Could you please explain your thoughts for it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eallotey (talk • contribs) 21:56, 02 December 2015 (UTC)

@Eallotey: Hi,

Please read COM:SCOPE. Wikimedia Commons is for hosting multimedia content for educational purpose. Articles are for Wikipedia, and pages about business are out of scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

@Yann: Apologize Yann...I'm new to this platform. Frankly I could use the help create this company page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eallotey (talk • contribs) 22:13, 02 December 2015 (UTC)

Photos de santons de marque

Bonjour Yann, avant de prendre des photos de mes santons personnels de marque Fouque, Carbonel, je voudrais savoir si elles sont éligibles dans Commons ou s'il faut l'autorisation du fabriquant. Merci d'avance--Amage9 (talk) 15:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@Amage9: Bonjour,

Il faut probablement l'autorisation du fabriquant. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Merci Yann, bonne fin de semaine.--Amage9 (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

"Fffdiesel" account for block

Hi,

Please block a Fffdiesel (talk · contribs) account for indefinite time, doing to massive copyright violations (uploading non-free television screenshots, non-free film screenshots etc.). Files, uploaded by "Fffdiesel", is ready to uploaded only as fair use files in English Wikipedia and any other Wikimedia projects with fair use media approved.

Thanks, Adrianwo 14:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for 2 weeks. Files deleted. Yann (talk) 14:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

• Please block this account not for 2 weeks, but for "indefinite" time, so this user still continues uploading copyrighted media after the block was expired. Adrianwo 22:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Block/deleted images

Hello, Thank you for your message. When I checked my mail and received 20+ deleted/blocked images, well you can imagine the shock!!! I work hard to contribute to Wiki and wish to continue to do my part. So, I may have more to learn, especially about image sources. I have learned more over the years regarding Wiki copyright rules and I frequently deal with sources worldwide, so there is much to keep up with these days. Thank you for listening. I misunderstood that just because I upload an image, I am not the 'author'. There is often conflicting information on Wiki regarding what is allowed and what is not allowed. The admin that blocked/deleted my images INCORRECTLY told me that collages are prohibited. Collages are permitted, but you must first upload the individual images and then upload the collage. Again, thank you.InfoDataMonger (talk) 20:47, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

@InfoDataMonger: Hi,

We are building encyclopedias and collecting free multimedia documents with educational purpose, and we are very strict about copyright. So we require that contributors provide an accurate source, and correct information about authors and licenses. For all content not directly made by you or previously published elsewhere, you need to provide a formal written permission from the copyright owner. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Please ask if you need help. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Copvio

Hi, why did you a revert of my copyright violation Pictures? It is a fact, that someone needs a permission in Germany for taking inside Photos when the photos are published. At that time I did not know that but at some time I was told about this. And now I want to solve my mistake. --Netzhering (talk) 08:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

@Netzhering: Hi,

Please see Commons:Non-copyright restrictions. You published the pictures under a free license, which is irrevocable, and anyway this is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Please give me my peace, i get nervous because of the homerule violation, may be this can cause trouble, please accept the reason in this case thank you, please stop torture... thank you--Netzhering (talk) 11:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Violaciones de los derechos de autor

Sorry but Declarations of Consent of the different photographes will been sent by their authors to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in the following days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lprietoc (talk • contribs)

@Lprietoc: Hi,

OK, very well. The files can be restored by the OTRS volunteers as soon as the permission is received. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Ali-la-pointe.png

Hello Yann, pourrais tu stp jeter un coup d’œil sur cette image ? Selon moi elle est {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Ton avis ? Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 07:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

La photo date d'avant 1957, et il y a peu de doute qu'elle n'ait pas été publiée peu après l'indépendance de l'Algérie, vu la renommée du sujet. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Donc c'est bon ? Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 15:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Oui. Yann (talk) 16:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

197.86.165.168

Hi Yann, I don't know what's wrong with my pictures I uploaded last October. They all are my own work. I uploaded them already under my full name to "Treckearth.com" in 2007. How can I violate licence-rules with my own pictures? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.86.165.168 (talk • contribs)

Hi, Please log in and sign your message. For all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission from the copyright owner is necessary. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:10, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your threat

Dear Yann, The said copyright violations occurred a long time ago, the pictures were (are) part of a book (or books), and thus I did not know they were violations. Accordingly, there is no possible way I could get permission for them. Everytime I have receieved these notifications about deleting files, I have repeatedly asked that the files are removed. You should know that for a long time I have not uploaded any photos, thus please do not ask me to stop, I stopped ages ago. In relation your threat to block me, please do not threaten me, if you have authority and must, please do. For avoidance of doubt, will post a copy of this message on your talk page. Thanks--Raul Gutierrez (talk) 14:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Need clarification

File:EN English Language Symbol ISO 639-1 IETF Language Tag Icon.svg it seems to me own work of user without references. If there was reference, it should have mentioned. Can it tag as "No license" or "Derivative Work No Source"? I handover the file for your action and I would note it for my future reference. --AntanO 18:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

@AntanO: Hi,

This is {{PD-textlogo}} or {{PD-ineligible}}. So no need for a source. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

File:GCO 3364 (23404295596).jpg

Why do you think this file needs a DR? It's so obvious it's a copyright violation. The source of the photograph isn't from the author of the work:you can clearly see the pixels of the screen that was photographed in the creation of this photograp, mamaking it a derivative work. Vera ^(talk) 01:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

 OK Yann (talk) 09:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

GLAM Lille - Musée d'histoire naturelle

Bonsoir Merci pour le coup de main, j'ai pas mal galéré avec les templates... Et le moral faiblit avec le sentiment d'incompréhension devant les suppressions et blocages un peu rapides à mon goût (même si je comprends au final leur démarche)... Un des prochaines points du projet GLAM est la création d'un ticket OTRS pour le webmestre (Denis Demarque, dont le compte était bloqué par "Jim") du Muséum de Lille. C'est d'ailleurs ce qui est préconisé dans sa réponse (si j'ai bien compris) et aucun des wikimédiens actuellement impliqués dans le GLAM ne sait faire. Donc un nouveau coup de main nous ferait gagner effectivement pas mal d'énergie ! Mon idée était d'avoir au final un rendu comme Template:Biblioteca_Museu_Víctor_Balaguer-cooperation, le bandeau GLAM + le bandeau OTRS. Comment s'y prend-on ? Bien cordialement, Dominique --Cbyd (talk) 22:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

@Cbyd: D'abord envoyer une autorisation générale en suivant la procédure à COM:OTRS/fr. Ensuite, me faire signe (ou un autre volontaire OTRS) pour inclure le ticket avec la permission dans le modèle. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

File:KSnH (Logo).png

Good afternoon

Please review the image, i think that now it is a simple textlogo. Thanks for the advertising, i ever try upload images with care, and now i will more care in the future.

Danyel3096 (talk) 15:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Assume ta responsabilité

Je constate que tu es rapide quand tu peux gêner ceux qui font des contributions constructives (ou quand tu veux protéger des utilisateurs nuisibles). Dès qu'il s'agit d'autres demandes, tu es beaucoup moins réactif. J'ai demandé la suppression inconditionnelle et immédiate de tous mes fichiers jusqu'au 9 décembre, au plus tard. C'est la conséquence logique de vos actes hostiles qui ont montré que mes contributions sont quasiment considérés indésirables ici et que mes photos n'ont donc rien à faire sur les projets Wikimedia. Aujourd'hui, nous sommes le 10 décembre et mes photos ne sont toujours pas supprimées.

Je pense que tu dois enfin assumer la responsabilité de tes actes et donc leurs conséquences aussi. --Jwaller (talk) 15:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Sachant que vos photos sont parfaitement in scope et que les licences CC ne sont pas révocables, ni Yann, ni les autres administrateurs n'ont l'obligation de supprimer vos photos. Personne n'est hostile envers vous, veuillez supposer la bonne foi de vos contradicteurs et cesser les attaques personnelles et les harcèlements. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Cross-wiki copyvios

Take a look at File:Martinsen-9032.jpg. This one made me laugh; there's a huge watermark thru the center of the image that says "copyright", and a copyright notice in the EXIF, and still that doesn't hinder the cross-wiki uploader... INeverCry 21:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

File:KSnH II (Logo).png

Good afternoon

Please review the image, i think that now it is a simple textlogo. Thanks for the advertising, i ever try upload images with care, and now i will more care in the future.

Danyel3096 (talk) 03:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

It's that time of year....

Christmas tree worm, (Spirobranchus gigantic)
	Time To Spread Some Happy Holiday Cheer!!
	I decorated a special kind of Christmas tree in the spirit of the season. What's especially nice about the digitized version is that it doesn't need water, and it won't catch fire.
	Wishing you a joyous holiday season... ...and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉
	Atsme 📞 03:26, 11 December 2015 (UTC)	Pure pun-ishment. [3]

REVIEW SOURCE OF ANY PHOTOS

Good afternoon

Please review the image, i think that now this photos have a right source and licensing.

File:Tatsuya Katou.jpg
File:Fukuyama Jun.png
File:Chihara Minori.jpg

Thanks for the advertising, i ever try upload images with care, and now i will more care in the future. For the last license, i take how example to File:Akira Toriyama.jpg.

Danyel3096 (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Hi, I indeed uploaded these photos. The thing is, that I am the owner of these pictures, so technically I didn't upload copyright violations and because these photos haven't been officially registered. I would like these pictures to be there and free to use for everyone, what should i do to make it official for wikipedia?

Best,

Kaarel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaarelta (talk • contribs) 22:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

@Kaarelta: Hi,

All content which was previously published elsewhere needs a formal written permission for the copyright owner. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. The files can be undeleted once he permission is received. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Yann - Ahmed Nisar

I don't know what copy right violation you are talking about, as these files I have collected from the authors. And even you are threatening me to block my account. All of a sudden you have given number of notifications at a single time. If you find any documentation needed for the files you can notify me, instead of warning me to block my account. Let me know what documents for the files are needed, stop the warnings. Ahmed Nisar (talk) 23:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ahmed Nisar: Hi,

For all content previously published elsewhere or not directly created by you, a formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:32, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Ortelli 2015.jpg

Hola como estas? Veo que has borrado una fotografía de mi autoría, sin previamente consultarmelo. Esa imagen era un fragmento de la una fotografía que tomé en el año 2011. Si quieres cerciorarte de que lo que te digo es verdad, te invito a que veas la imagen en mi sitio de Facebook, donde observarás la foto completa. Puedes ver esa imagen entrando aquí. Si hay algo que me puedas aconsejar, hazmelo llegar. Saludos. --Diego HC (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Diego HC: Hi,

Sorry, I don't speak Spanish. The link you give is dead. Anyway, if the photo was published elsewhere previously a formal written permission is necessary. Please see COM:OTRS/es (in Spanish) for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Please forgive me. I was wrong. I hope you continue well. (It had been that it was easier to use the Bing translator to write in English, ha ha ha!) Best regards!!! --Diego HC (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

HR?

Could you decode the HR in "HR with EXIF" for me please? Bazj (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

@Bazj: Hi,

HR means high resolution. And as you can see, there is metadata, so I think it is better to have a regular deletion. Sorry for the jargon. ;o) Regards, Yann (talk) 17:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Carmen Verlag1460

Hi, I got your last warning because of copyright issues. I am part of the Verlag1460 which owns the licences for the 2 pictures. So I can upload them in their name. I helped also creating them, so how do I proceed to upload them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carmen Verlag1460 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

@Carmen Verlag1460: Hi,

For all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission from the copyright owner is necessary. Please see COM:OTRS/de (in German) for the procedure. The files can be restored once the permission is received. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Request for right

As you can see, most of the recent copyvios deleted by you were tagged by me. Have been active for quite some time now with 4k edits. I request you grant me patroller and rollbacker rights so that I can do my work more efficiently. Have been a Filemover and Autopatrolled in Commons for so much time and rollbacker in other projects too. Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 17:32, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

@Strike Eagle: Hi,

Please ask on Commons:Requests for rights‎. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Dear Yann, Can you tell me what violations are you talking about? thank you. --Doctor01~itwiki (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

@Doctor01~itwiki: Hi,

You uploaded 4 files copied from the Internet without a permission from the copyright owner. These are therefore copyright violations. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Davide Carlo Caparini PICS

I'm the administrator of Caparini's official facebook page and I follow Caparini's web communication. I've taken pics from the FB Page and Caparini allowed me to publish this ones. I've taken some of this pics (File:Caparini comizio temù 2015.jpeg, File:Caparini salvini.jpg, File:Caparini salvini martinazzoli.jpg) other pics are from Caparini's collaborators (File:Caparini maroni.jpg, File:Caparini camera.jpg) or from Caparini (File:Caparini bossi.jpg, File:Caparini zaia.jpg) . Theriddle

@Theriddle: Hi,

Please see my answer there: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Theriddle. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't have the originals anymore. I've sent an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Thnx Theriddle 10:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Imagine (3100245291).jpg

Hi Yann, as Russavia is blocked and he was the uploader of that file, I have a question: There is this Brimz who keeps saying I cannot insert that file in the text. Would you take a look at it and let me know? Otherwise it should be deleted. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 17:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

I already had the file deleted. Woodcutterty (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

 Thank you. Lotje (talk) 17:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

footage of Hash production

Hello Yan,

My name is Ricardo and I am working on a short web video about different forms of extracting oils from cannabis. I was interested in using your footage of the Indian woman making hashish. Can I use this footage? What would your credit be? "Footage courtesy of Yann, Wikimedia Commons"?

Please respond at your earliest convenience — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.47.98.186 (talk) 08:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

Please use "(c) CC-BY-SA, Footage courtesy of Yann Forget, Wikimedia Commons". Yann (talk) 12:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

sorry

I didn't read all the licenses to upload a photo, I've uploaded some photographs which 're taken by me. And previously some map of out locality. But I did a mistake by uploading the photographs of Oriya film poster from different websites with the source code, but those were deleted. But I've a photograph taken on July 30 about Rasagola has also been deleted. Now, I'm sorry what I did. I never upload those pics.. Gapu (User talk:Ssgapu) 18:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

photo

Bonjour, j'aimerais savoir si cette image à sa place dans Commons (File:Feux d'artifice à Vesoul.jpg). Cordialement. 90.33.80.19 00:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.33.80.19 (talk) 17:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Pourquoi pas ? Yann (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Bonsoir, car il y a un feu d'artifice dessus, et je croyais que les feux d'artifices faisait l'objet de spécificités au niveau des droits. 90.33.80.19 18:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

A priori, non. De plus c'est une vue générale. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Merci de l'info. 90.33.80.19 20:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

MORE CARE WITH UPLOADS

Good Afternoon

I wonder if I may consult with an administrator or license reviewer to give approval or not this multimedia file. For example, in the discussion page links to stop a media file and consider the license should have and more information, if it is possible.

My purpose is to continue contributing to Commons as well as I do with Wikipedia, and keep my block because of it, since they never look hurt somehow Commons (not if I did understand), on the other hand hope to contribute much more in the future.

Danyel3096 (talk) 22:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

@Danyel3096: Hi,

For all content created by a third party, you need a formal written permission unless the source has a clear free license. For free pictures depicting a copyrighted work, you need to read COM:DW and COM:FOP (this is complicated and you should probably ask on COM:VPC). Regards, Yann (talk) 22:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

@Yann: Hello!

It is a example of i know you before (i can ask you again, if i think or found "value images" for Commons?), this files are right to upload it on Commons?:

1. First Image <- I don't know.
2. Second Image <- Probably OK.
3. Third Image <- Probably OK.

The next files i are not convenced if are appropiated, because it are books (why we can't upload book's photos?):

1. First Image <- Probably not OK.
2. Second Image <- Probably not OK.
3. Third Image <- Probably OK. We can't see any cover design.

All photos with the next licenses: {{flickrreview}} and {{cc-by-sa-2.0}}.

Danyel3096 (talk) 00:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

@Danyel3096: Hi,

I gave you my assessment. The book design is under a copyright, which remains in the photo. For details, see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. I am not sure about the logo, so you better ask on COM:VPC. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

@Yann: Hello

Please verify if this files are right to upload it on Commons:

1. First Image
2. Second Image
3. Third Image

This are books that not reveals any cover design (if it are aproved, in the future i don't ask you again about books, because i now to know the valids.)

1. Fourth Image
2. Fiveth Image
3. Sixth Image
4. Seventh Image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danyel3096 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

All photos with the next licenses: {{flickrreview}} and {{cc-by-sa-2.0}}.

Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks for the help :) Danyel3096 (talk) 01:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

@Danyel3096: Hi,

I understand that this account on Flickr is yours. Is that right? But the images are small and don't have EXIF data. You should upload the original unmodified images if they are yours. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi Yann,

why did you delete my speedy delete request? I want to delete a photo that was uploaded by ME. File:Novel Interventions for Diabetes Panel WCITD Sep 28 2015.JPG. I just readded the deletion request.

Best, Mario

 Done Yann (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

REVIEW File:KSnH II (Logo).png

@Yann: Good Evening

In nomination page of the file in the subject of this discussion i answer and modified the file, and now it not have any design of original, it is made 100% for me. I too add some licenses that valid that image. Please i consider that you will remove the template {{delete}} and the thumbnails that not are valids, at the same that here: File:KSnH (Logo).png Danyel3096 (talk) 13:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

I answered in the deletion request. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hi Yann, I see you've deleted the logo of Mohun Bagan A.C. I uploaded. Actually I want to understand the need you had to do so because that photo was completely created by me so how could it be a possible copyright violation. So please leave me with a reply quickly because you also know that there needs to be a logo of the club in the infobox of the club. Realmmb (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

@Realmmb: Hi,

This logo is copied from [4], so a formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

But how can it be Yann, I really did it myself...is there any app or something like that so that I can match the pics. Believe me I created it myself. Still if you don't trust me then can you teach me how to upload copyrighted images cause I ain't a good 'commons' editor ☺. Realmmb (talk) 07:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

@Realmmb: Hi,

You can request undeletion on COM:UDR. Other admins will give their opinions. Please mention this discussion. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, @Yann: I did as you asked but didn't mention this discussion as I was a bit like confused as if what to write. Thanks, Realmmb (talk) 13:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

HELP TO SOLICIT AN IMPORT

@Yann: Good evening I want know how write a solicitude for import a image (specificlly File:Hrsblogo.png), because i think that it can uploaded in Commons with the licenses: {{PD-textlogo}} and {{trademark}}. Or if we can upload and specify in the "autor" parameter the user that upload the image with the same source that it use (additionally writing that it was import of x wikipedia).

Other question, i think that this image See Here is in the public domain with the licenses: {{PD-textlogo}} and {{trademark}}, it is right? Danyel3096 (talk) 03:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

@Danyel3096: Hi,

I don't think these images could be uploaded here. In the first, the background is too complex, and for the second the H is more than just simple geometric figures. Sorry. Yann (talk) 10:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Please take a look

Hiya Yann: Please take a look at this gallery. It appears to have a lot of overprocessed duplicates of images already in our collections plus a pile of made up posters. Any ideas? Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Right, I deleted quite a few. Yann (talk) 21:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

copyright violation

Several images I uploaded were deleted. There is no copyright violation, I am the photographer and when I originally published those images I stated they were free to be used by anyone. This is very annoying. --Awikimate (talk) 02:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

@Awikimate: Hi, if those images are yours, please send an e-mail to the OTRS to confirm that you are the author and want to license your files under a free license. Thanks, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 03:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks/sorry

Sorry I wasn't aware of all the details of attributing images, and I thought my work failed to save. I will try to make sure to obtain all the proper info first, please don't block me if I mess up again. I appreciate the advice and the 2nd chance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seeker Brooks (talk • contribs) 01:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

@Seeker Brooks: Hi,

OK, sure. If the copyright owner sends a permission, the files can be restored. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Flashbulb albums.jpg

Why was this deleted? I contested the copyright claim as I took this picture and uploaded it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alainbryden (talk • contribs) 16:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

@Alainbryden: Hi,

Your picture is a derivative work of album covers, which are under a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Fixed film poster.jpg

Please refrain from deleting this image. I have no interest in edit warring with you. Full permission has been granted for use by the creator and there is no copyright infringement whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SephHaroldson (talk • contribs) 02:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

@SephHaroldson: Where is the permission? If the permission is sent by e-mail, please forward the e-mail to the OTRS. Regards, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 02:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

@Pokéfan95: Permission has been sent by email on several occasions in the past week. Users need to refrain from deleting images 24 hours after upload if the OTRS cannot process information within this time.SephHaroldson (talk) 02:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

@SephHaroldson: The only thing we can do is to wait for the OTRS to process the e-mail. You may ask for its status at the OTRS's Noticeboard. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 02:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Why I Hate the Left Teaser Poster.jpg

Please refrain from deleting this image. I have no interest in edit warring with you. Full permission has been granted for use by the creator and there is no copyright infringement whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SephHaroldson (talk • contribs) 02:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

@SephHaroldson: Where is the permission? If the permission is sent by e-mail, please forward the e-mail to the OTRS. Regards, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 02:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

@Pokéfan95: Permission has been sent by email on several occasions in the past week. Users need to refrain from deleting images 24 hours after upload if the OTRS cannot process information within this time.SephHaroldson (talk) 02:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

@SephHaroldson: The only thing we can do is to wait for the OTRS to process the e-mail. You may ask for its status at the OTRS's Noticeboard. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 02:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Compte confirmé ?

Bonjour Yann, Au sujet de Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Melicolrat, étant donné que la communication reçue par OTRS a été considérée OK, cela signifie qu'elle provient bien d'une adresse confirmée comme étant associée à l'artiste ? Si oui, on peut en déduire que le compte Commons Melicolrat appartient bien à l'artiste, tel que sa question sur le Bistro l'affirmait ? Et donc, ses téléversements de ses propres oeuvres sont valides, puisqu'il les a téléversées sur Commons par son propre compte avec une licence en bonne et due forme. Et donc, ses fichiers peuvent être restaurés ? Étant donné que la raison pour laquelle ils avaient été supprimés ne tient plus et qu'il est démontré que ce ne sont pas des copyvios. Pourrais-tu te charger d'effectuer leur restauration ? Après, si quelqu'un veut en proposer quelques-uns pour suppression pour out of scope ou pour une autre raison, ça pourra faire l'objet de discussions de suppression régulières, mais ce sera autre chose. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

@Asclepias: Bonjour,

Je pense que oui, mais j'ai quand même demandé confirmation. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

@Asclepias: Tout est bon. J'ai restauré les fichiers. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Warning Ni.somrat

Yann, I notice that you warned User:Ni.somrat about copyvios. While I share your concerns, the words you used "... You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions... Last warning..." (probably from a template) do not appear to be appropriate. As far as I can see Ni.somrat has not uploaded any further copyvios since he was warned. It is possible that Ni.somrat just did not understand the rules on copyright and a less severe (and accurate) warning would have been appropriate. Can I suggest that you remove the "Copyright violations" section on his talk page? Thanks. Greenshed (talk) 01:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

 Done I changed the warning. Yann (talk) 10:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:BEN Bengalian kitten (4492540155).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:BEN Bengalian kitten (4492540155).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks for this Yann. Most people would've told me to go to hell after being such a jackass, but you handled it like a true gentleman...and you got me my 1 Featured Picture on Commons to go along with my 1 Good Article on en.wiki... INeverCry 09:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

upload_size.php

What was it for? I don't see the file in his svn repo. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

@Zhuyifei1999: I found this mentioned here Dual Freq. It seems to calculate the total volume of one user's uploads. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Cloture de proposition de suppression

Bonjour Yann j'ai constaté que tu a clôturé la page Commons:Deletion requests/File:PrayForParis.svg alors que l'argument de .js est parfaitement recevable : utilisation d'un image en CC-by-SA-ND ce qui est donc rédhibitoire. Merci de tes explications. Olivier LPB (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Ce design est trop simple pour obtenir un droit d'auteur. Le fait qu'il y ait une licence CC-by-SA-ND ne change rien. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

CC-by-SA-ND est incompatible avec commons, de plus je ne penses pas que ce "design est trop simple" soit le cas Olivier LPB (talk) 15:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

En droit français, un copyright ou droit d'auteur est le résultat d'une "création originale qui reflète la personalité de l'auteur". La silhouette de la Tour Eiffel date de 1889 et on peut difficilement prétendre à une originalité ici. Merci de se renseigner avant d'affirmer sans preuve. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, je ne met pas en cause ta bonne foit bien au contraire... Je sais effectivement que la tour eiffel en elle même est dans le domaine public, je parle du dessin lui-même de la tour eiffel que l'auteur a placé en cc-by-sa-nd qui selon notre propre interprétation peux varier du trop simple à suffisamment original. Olivier LPB (talk) 08:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

+1 --.js (((☎))) 21:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Charlotte.McMahon

Hi.. You know how many times I pleased to send me how to upload files without mistakes??? A billion times... But you never answer me .. And you tell me to stop upload files ... It's natural to do mistakes .. I need some help ..cause I'm new here Charlotte.McMahon (talk) 14:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

@Charlotte.McMahon: Hi,

It is quite simple: do not upload files copied from the Internet without a formal written permission from the copyright owner. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry.. I wasn't know.. Thank you.. Charlotte.McMahon (talk) 14:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Hallaca, bollo and hallacon

	A gift of Christmas
	During these Christmas holidays, I wanted to let you take advantage of this delight, I hope you can enjoy them with love. --The Photographer (talk) 16:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)