User talk:Yann/archives

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Procedure

[edit]

Please do not delete requests at Commons:Deletion requests. All discussion are transferred to the archive. Thuresson 11:14, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Timbres français récents

[edit]

La Poste-SNTP (Service national du timbre) a acquis au 1er janvier 1986 les droits de reproduction des timbres émis après cette date. Les droits d'exploitation et de reproduction appartiennent à La Poste. Les artistes conservent leur droit moral (inaliénable). Pour les timbres-poste émis avant 1986, les droits de reproduction appartiennent aux créateurs des œuvres. Si tu te rends sur http://www.laposte.fr/timbres/ et que tu cliques sur l'onglet "Conditions de vente", tu constateras que La Poste respecte le droit moral des artistes en mentionnant les titulaires du droits d'auteur sur le graphisme des timbres. Dans tous les cas de figure, ceci n'a rien à faire sur Commons.

S'agissant des protraits officiels, je te confirme la réponse de Soufron. Ciao ! villy ♦ ✎ 20:51, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Merson LeHavre1929.jpg

[edit]

Hi, you nominated this picture (Template:Featured_pictures_candidates#Image:Merson_LeHavre1929.jpg). It would be great, if you could provide an english description for it. Can you do this, please? Kind regards, norro 20:52, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bobmarley.jpg

[edit]

Hi there - I'm afraid the painter of the wallpainting may have rights to the image - the image shows the painting only, in a near-flat angle. Since it shows a pice of work as the main part of the image, it'S not free i'm afraid, especially in france. In other countries it would be ok if the image was on the outside of a building. -- Duesentrieb 10:09, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Yes, I know it's in a public place - but in france this (sadly) does not change a thing (you may have noticed the discussion about the Eiffel Tower at night). I don't know how this is handeled for anonymous work, though - it would probably be good to ask an expert. -- Duesentrieb 10:16, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Chirac

[edit]

The official photograph of JC has been deleted, since the copyright owner do not allow commercial use. Thuresson 00:54, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Utiliser le modèle sur "photo de qualité"

[edit]

Bonjour Yann, désolé mais c'est bien ce que j'ai tenté de faire de manière lamentable.

Je n'ai pas compris comment utiliser ce template. Et ma très mauvaise compréhension de l'anglais ne ma pas aidé.

Si j'ai bien compris, le template c'est l'exemple en dessous de la page comme ceci:

Jacques Chirac

[edit]

Hi. Please excuse me for not asking first. I'm glad to see the image is properly tagged now. Thanks. --Dodo 14:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the origin size image has been uploadee

[edit]

For your request on the image water lily [1], I have uploaded the original version of that image.--Yongxinge 13:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mohandas K. Gandhi

[edit]

Salut Yann, None of the images you have uploaded in the Category:Mohandas K. Gandhi have any source informtion. Are you not required to provide info about where you downloaded these images from?

Thanks --Spundun 17:44, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding on my talk page, shouldn't you addd that note to all the images? --Spundun 15:43, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Young gandhi.jpg

[edit]

Hello, the above image has been listed for deletion, see Template:Deletion_requests#May_26. --213.54.200.244 04:23, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Giscard.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Giscard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Teofilo 10:02, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

{{Publication officielle}}

[edit]

Je crois que ce tag, dans sa formulation originale, ne soit légalement erroné. J'ai eu le Conseil Constitutionnel en email aujourd'hui, et leurs photos officielles sont faites par des photographes extérieurs qui cèdent ensuite un droit d'usage à l'État. Nous ne pouvons donc prétendre qu'elles sont « domaine public ». Pour le site du Premier Ministre, c'est pareil : une partie de leurs photos sont faites par des fonctionnaires (et ils peuvent accorder une licence d'usage moyennant crédit), mais une autre partie est faite par des extérieurs. David.Monniaux 17:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hello Yann. Nice to know that you are interested in Gandhi (Bapu, as I would like to refer to him). It was also interesting to know of your interest in Indian languages such as Hindi and Gujarati. Cheers! --Miljoshi 08:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

image de l'arche

[edit]

salut, j'ai utilisé la photo Essais nucleaires manif.jpg pour l'article fr:antinucléaire. Est-ce que la communauté de l'arche permet une telle utilisation de ses photos? merci de me prévenir si ça pose un probleme.--Enr-v 20:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de souci, c'est fait pour ça. Yann 20:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:DavidCobb.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DavidCobb.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 20:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons-l subscription

[edit]

Hello Yann,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news

[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Gandhi_costume.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gandhi_costume.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Fred Chess 11:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Gandhi_dandi.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gandhi_dandi.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Fred Chess 11:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gandhi

[edit]

I have in fact intended to dispute all images you have uploaded of Gandhi, because hardly any of the images have a source what so ever.

Fred Chess 22:38, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer.

Since you tag them with {{PD-India}}, changes the issue completely! I can't know the copyrights of all countries.

However, you refered me to Image:Gandhi dandi.jpg. On that page, you are actually making two claims: first you claim PD-India, then you claim PD-Anonymous work.

If you want to tag all your photos with PD-India, then I have no problem. But then please remove the text refering to the Bern Convention. It is wrong, because you must prove that the photographer was anonymous.

Fred Chess 21:42, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Gandhi studio 1931.jpg

[edit]

Yann,

Your caption for the photo Gandhi studio 1931.jpg says "The photographer is unknown and the photo is more than 70 years old. According to the Bern Convention and the law of most countries, this photo is in the public domain."

This does not appear to be true.

The photographer is Vithalbhai Jhaveri.

An organization called Gandhi Serve Foundation claims copyright to this photo on its Web site: http://www.gandhiserve.org/cgi-bin/if2/imageFolio.cgi?action=view&link=Photographs/Personalities/Mahatma_Gandhi/1931-1932&image=PEMG1931505003.jpg&img=&tt=)

The caption on the GandhiServe site reads "Rare studio photograph of Gandhi taken in London at the request of Lord Irwin, 1931 --- Copyright: Vithalbhai Jhaveri/GandhiServe"

The site also says: "As per the Berne Convention images of Mahatma Gandhi are copyright protected in most countries, depending of the Copyright Law of the respective country (e.g. USA: 70 years after the death of the photographer). Any use of those images without the specific permission of the copyright owner or its representative forms an infringement of copyright."

The photographer, Vithalbhai Jhaveri, died in 1985, so the copyright would remain in effect until 2050. http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/our_photographers/vithalbhai_jhaveri.html

Also: you have misspelled "Berne" Convention.

69.232.230.73 04:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)69.232.230.73 04:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I know quite well the claim from Gandhiserve Foundation, and they are bogus. I don't believe that he took this photograph when he was 15 years old. This Foundation even claims that Vithalbhai Jhaveri (1916-1985) took photographs before he was born... See [2] and [3]. Don't believe all what you find on the Internet. And please login. Yann 10:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Ganesha.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ganesha.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Tempshill 05:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Applying copyright on such images is quite stupid. This actual painting is maybe not so old, but it's a copy of another one, which is a copy of another, back to the dawn of time. People made these to be copied and others copy these everywhere. What can I say more? Yann 17:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Charles de Gaulle.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Charles de Gaulle.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 02:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

La série des présidents de la Vème

[edit]
Image deletion warning La série des présidents de la Vème has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Touriste 22:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

closing deletion requests

[edit]

Hi Yann!

Thanks for deleting copyrightes images liste at Commons:Deletion requests. But it would be very helpful, if you could also close the discussions with {{Delh}} and {{Delf}} giving - were necessary - a short reasoning for your decision. Thanks! --ALE! ¿…? 22:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:E2gope.jpg

[edit]

Me gustaria saber por que razón borraste lo siguiente: "Image:E2gope.jpg" y una serie de imágenes relacionadas. Lo mínimo habría sido decirme en mi página de discuciones.

JavierADM25 File:Chile COA.jpg (algo que decir??)

Image:Crystal_discussion_philosophy_3.png

[edit]

Hello, I noticed you delete the icon Image:Crystal_discussion_philosophy_3.png (see [[4]]) for copyvio.
Is it possible to restore it? This is not a copyvio, the icon has been made by a french user Jmtrivial from already on Commons pictures (actually this one and this other), so there's no way the image is not free. The user has probably forgot to put the licence, I reminded him to do so for other pictures he made, but he may have pass over this one. Seeing Image:Crystal_discussion_philosophy.png and Image:Crystal_discussion_philosophy_2.png, which are early versions of the delete icon, I guess we could restore the picture and add the same licence that on thoses ones. Thanx Sh@ry tales 17:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I restored it, you have to provided the source for each of these images. Thanks, Yann 19:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
C'est bon comme ça? (J'ai vu un peu tard que tu parlais français) Je crois que les images ont toujours été sur Commons, j'ai mis un lien vers la discussion qui a abouti à la création des images à tout hasard. Mais la "source", si on peut dire, c'est Commons : on a pris des images sur Commons, on mixé, et reinjecté sur Commons. Sh@ry tales 20:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, très bien. Yann 20:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RosaIceBergBeijin.jpg

[edit]

Salut, merci pour ton aide, j'ai uploader une nouvelle fois maintenant je dois rajouter cela pour modifier le nom ? {{Image:Dscf0961.jpg|Image:RosaIceBergBeijin.jpg}} Youen 11:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome.

[edit]

But apparently, the Wikimedia Commons are as prone to POV-pushing as Wikipedia itself. Shem 23:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. I am not new to wikipedia, by the way (en:User:Asterion). Asterion 00:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am here for some months, but thank you anyway!!--Juandelenzina 17:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image: date and time

[edit]

Hello! May you help me please with the following situation?: I have uploaded the image Image:AgrCHARLIE KFOR P1010005.jpg; however, the info "Metadata: Date and time of data generation" has a wrong data (year 2006) since I have uploaded a copy; I have the original (year 2000), how can I replace now the photo? Thank you in advance. --Utad3 20:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Filipe Teixeira - António Mora.jpg (copyvio)

[edit]

Could you tell me the copyviolation you found in this and other pictures i upload. "Image:Luis Filipe Teixeira - António Mora.jpg" (copyvio) Im the author... thank you Bott 03:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

24/7 NO es coyrigth

[edit]

http://www.wtpfilm.de/english/press/press.html, es la dirección de© wtp international GmbH, y tiene una galeria para la prensa y para bajar las imágenes promocionales del film. --IK 12:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome and question

[edit]

Hello Yan. Thanks for the welcome. I do a lot of welcoming over at Wikipedia and I'm glad to see it's done at other Wikimedia projects. Can you take a look at my first upload and give me some feedback? Properly done, good license? Improper but fixable? Poorly done, likely to be deleted? I'm paraphrasing what I already asked over at Commons talk:Licensing, but figured since you're online or at least were a few minutes ago and are likely experienced, you;d be a good bet to ask. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

[edit]

Yan: Thanks for the welcome. HiTe 00:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KANSAS7E1.jpg

[edit]

Hi Yann,

I didn't understood your question about the original source of this image.

If you followed the provided link to the english Wikipedia you will find this image licensed by his creator as public domain: [5].

I had to rename the file for compatibility with WikiCommons, as asked when I was uploading this image.

The image is a photo from Bill Douglas, founder of the World Tai Chi & Qigong Day, uploaded by himself to the World Tai Chi & Qigong Day's article in the english Wikipedia.

What else do you need?

--TarcísioTS 00:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hazy Hamlet Picture

[edit]

Hi, I have uploaded this picture twice, and you have deleted it both times. Image:Hazy_members_promo.jpg Why? Is there anything missing? Thanks for your attention. Arttie br

Image:102936.jpg

[edit]

Hello, I want to know if you have some trouble with this argentine telenovela pic? I mean you have deleted it although it has the right permission & licensing. Thanks for your attention. User:Ziget

Bonjour

[edit]

Namaste and thanks for the welcome. Cheers! Arjun 19:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merci!

[edit]

Thanks for the welcome! You can also discuss with me on my polish user talk page - pl:Dyskusja Wikipedysty:Garcia. Garcia 00:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hello thank you for the greeting i have a question the license that says uploaded to flickr what do those two mean? User:TigranMets 05:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for the welcome! (in polish: Dziękuję za powitanie! ;)). Mlepicki 17:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

for the welcome. Jorcoga (talk) 06:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome

[edit]

Really much thanks for noticing my existence here ^^. In fact I'm quite familiar with the rules here, being a sysop of the Cantonese Wikipedia (zh-yue) and an active participant of the English Wikipedia.

But at any rate, really a big thankyou! --Deryck Chan 12:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GP Imola2005 SchumiAlonso.jpg

[edit]

Hi,

You deleted the above image as a 'copyvio'. Firstly no message was left on my talk page to advise me the image might be deleted. Secondly permission to use the image was logged in the Wikimedia OTRS system. Could you please review this and restore the image. Thanks, 82.152.194.30 20:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I posted the above whilst logged out. Just to clarify two points, the website it was taken from says the images are copyrighted but email permission to use this particular picture was obtained from the author and logged in the OTRS system (the author provided a higher res. version for use on Wikipedia than was available on the website) and the person who logged it on the OTRS system stated this on the image description page. Another image from the same author was done in the same way, this can be viewed at Image:GP_Imola2005_Podium.jpg. Alexj2002 21:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

[edit]

Could you please close the deletion requests using {{Delh}} and {{Delf}} after deleting an image listed at Commons:Deletion requests? Thank you! --ALE! ¿…? 13:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bvsmlogo.gif

[edit]

Hi, could you please explain why you did delete this logo? The German Wikipedia shows logos of even the hugest companies, why not this one of the main German BDSM-lobbying organisation registered with the German parliament? Regards Nemissimo --217.227.42.62 16:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I' d would be be very nice if you'd answer.--Nemissimo 08:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any particular reason why you permanently ignore my question?. --Nemissimo 10:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for the welcome. Greetings from Bavaria----Dark Avenger 14:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion comments

[edit]

If you delete an image as a duplicate then please ad the name of the replacing image in the deletion comment. This is the only way for non admins to replace the deleted image. Currently it is impossible for me to find which image Image:Escut de Barcelona.jpg was deleted in favour of. /Lokal_Profil 15:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry. It is Image:Escut de Barcelona.svg. Yann 16:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour l'accueil

[edit]

Merci pour ton message de bienvenue, Yann. ~ Sémhur 18:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete image of Audi Allroad quattro

[edit]

Hi. Why did you delete the image Image:1999 Audi Allroad quattro.jpg ? It was use in the german article de:Audi_Allroad_Quattro. Borsi112 09:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The license of the image was All rights reserved, not compatible with Commons policy. Regards, Yann 09:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
o.k. thanks. Borsi112 09:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LhamaLhama.jpg

[edit]

You haven't unlinked the image you deleted as copyvio. Please do it. --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 00:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, it seems someone took care of it. --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 18:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:rostafinski.jpg

[edit]

You deleted the file and so I have a question: the book is mine and i did the scan of its cover, is this still a breach of copyright to post the image? all online bookstores do so. thanks! JezWegierski

Image:Nap.jpg

[edit]
  • Salut,

Est-ce que ça ressemble à une blague ? Yann 11:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello, j'ai rien contre l'image mais en regardant un peu l'excellente composition et qualité des images déjà promues à featured pictures on se rend compte facilement que cette image fait un peu tâche. Et autant pour moi si j'ai tort, c'est le résultat du vote qui décidera d'ici 15 jours. --Atoma 13:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ДмитрОст

[edit]

Hello, Yann. Thank you for your advices and help. I’m debutant in the project Wikipedia, but i’ll try to make my lovely work as much as possible. Good luck, buy. ДмитрОст P.s. Do you know russian or ukranian language?

Image:Soriano-leon.jpg

[edit]

so, you deleted the image for the cover of a book I created an article about. Is there any way around that? Can I link to the image if it is stored somewhere else? Dariopy

Image:D2_Police_Combo.jpg

[edit]

Please undelete this image. Drive Square LLC is a copyright owner hereby authorize to relese the image into public domain. Konstantin Sizov, President.Konstantin Sizov

Mis imágenes

[edit]

Why have you erased the images I've upload??? They're in an article from in Spanish. Pepeowen

Image:Antimasonry French 1914.png

[edit]

Bonjour,

Je viens de répondre à ta question sur ma page de discussion. Pourrais-tu y jeter un oeil et me dire si c'est OK?

Cordialement

--Christophe Dioux 22:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for your welcome, mais I am french aussi ;-) P-e 12:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC) (anciennement Pe.nataf, admin sur wp fr)[reply]

Thank you for your welcome, pero hablo castellano también :P --Jtico 13:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Egg.jpg

[edit]

Yeah, I just forgot it :) -- Kangel 14:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oooups :) -- Kangel 14:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know

[edit]

I know not to upload images twice, thanks anyways. Quadzilla99 14:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lucía y el sexo poster.jpg

[edit]

Pourquoi cette image n'est pas accepté pour illustrer la page de "Paz Vega" alors qu'elle est présente sur la version anglaise de Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Luc%C3%ADa_y_el_sexo_poster.jpg) ? Gregcybergal

Thanks for the welcome

[edit]

Hi! Thanks for the welcome message. About the gandhi photo, I had just transferred it from the en wiki. I don't have any good image processing abilities :-( Merci et au revoir. Shushruth 18:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Front.JPG, Image:Rear.jpg

[edit]
  1. 2007-01-26T15:56:17 Yann (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Front.JPG" (copyvio, no source, wrong licence)
  2. 2007-01-26T15:56:03 Yann (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Rear.jpg" (copyvio, no source, wrong licence)

Could I ask you why they are copyvio? Did I mistake to write descriptions?--っ [Café] [Album] 22:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they come from Image:Rood.jpg. Is this also copyvio?--っ [Café] [Album] 22:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. Will you delete Image:Rood.jpg, too?--っ [Café] [Album] 00:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

don't delete my pictures

[edit]

I am the owner of lvivlviv.com, and owner/photographer of all the pics I uploaded here. Graham Wellington

I updated each picture I uploaded with a statement affirming my ownership of the pictures I uploaded. Please remove the copyright flags. Thanks. Graham Wellington

prove it either putting a small note on the site (so we can see that you own it) or mail us from some email in the lvivlviv domain to permissions@wikimedia.org. -- Drini 23:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Hi Yann, thank you very much for your welcome! ;) I hope I can be useful. Kind regards, --Bruno de Giusti 21:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:rostafinski.jpg

[edit]

I didn't writen the book, I own a copy. Is this really against copyright to publish the image of the cover? JezWegierski

Image:IVOA_logo.jpg

[edit]

... is "Copyright-free", as stated on the website: http://www.spacetelescope.org/copyright.html

Including images; they are fairly explicit. Quoting... "The Hubble material you see on these pages is copyright-free and may be reproduced without fee, on the following conditions: ESA is credited as the source of the material (images/videos etc.). [...]" BrunoRino

You have forgotten the correct and required credits! But anyway, this does not cover the organization logos which are protected marks. Reread the notices! In general logos are exgtremely rarely acceptable (unless they are a very minor part of the composition) Verdy p 01:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EuroVO_logo.jpg

[edit]

I am convinced about the logo issue. Please delete this other one too.

BrunoRino

Why did you delete my image?

[edit]

The image Image:Disp-med-ppe.jpg I own! I submitted it with Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 License. I sent notice to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.

Drewk 02:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello & thanks!

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for adding the new user info to my talk page! I've marked the flubbed image with the bad name template. --RJCraig 08:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salut et Merci

[edit]

Salut et merci pour le "info box". Je voudrais te faire une question. Wich copyright should i put in the pictures of old newspapers?? --Leonudio 22:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

¿Por que se borra mi foto personal?

[edit]

Hola Yann, no entiendo por qué razón has borrado varias veces mi foto personal. ¿que tengo que hacer o decir, para que no la borres más?

Saludos. Cesarosofo 00:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my file Image:Taiguara.jpg ?

[edit]

Sorry, but I've been struggling to add an image to the Brazilian page dedicated to my father (Taiguara, a popular Brazilian artist before he passed), and just came across a message that says you deleted the image page I created. I'm fairly new to this and have been trying to do my best here, for the last 2 hours... Could you tell me why you deleted it? I'm to the point of giving up!

There were no copywrite violations since I retain the rights and fully released them as public domain. So, why is this seemengly impossible?! (I guess what I'm really asking is: Why did you delete it? :(

Thanks, Imyra

Image:Delain p60.JPG

[edit]

I undeleted this image, I can assert that the photographer has uploaded it, I asked him to upload it to commons. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Je m'incruste :-) En présence de données EXIF, mieux vaut faire attention... On en voit rarement sur les photos de prese. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 17:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marseille_vu_de_La_Vesse.jpg

[edit]

Je ne comprend pourquoi cette image génère ce problème car elle est bel est bien présente sur le site vu qu'on peut la voir grandeur réelle mais pas en miniature. Peut-être que c'est un problème lié à Média wiki qui ne saurai pas prendre en compte des images de tel format (22009x1080) ?

Si tu sais comment remédier à ce problème dis moi le ou télécharge la en grandeur nature et re loade là.

Cordialement,

Nepomuk 20:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Il semble que le logiciel Mediawiki ne puisse pas générer de miniature pour les images de plus de 16384 pixels de large en 32 bits (64 Ko par ligne en codage RVB, soit 1Mo pour une rangée de blocs 8x8 en JPEG). Pourtant l'image contient bien une miniature utilisable; j'ai réduit la taille à 4Mo en utilisant un taux de compression identique en qualité avec le bien meilleur codeur présent dans The GIMP, ce qui la passe à 4Mo une fois compressée en JPEG au lieu de 5Mo (j'ai utilisé le codeur DCT en virgule flottante pour minimiser les erreurs); mais malgré cela, MediaWiki n'en veut toujours pas.

De toute façon, la qualité de l'image est très mauvaise:

  • beaucoup trop de bruit causé par l'appareil de prise de vue (probablement trop chaud, ou pas à température, ce qui rend les capteurs CCD instables); pour faire ce genre de photos destinées à un montage en panorama, il est absolument nécessaire de préparer l'appareil photo en lui évitant toute exposition directe au soleil et en veillant à stabiliser sa température, sinon on génère beaucoup trop de bruits. (l'élimination du bruit réduirait sa taille codée mais cela la pixellise énormément et fait perdre toute profondeur de champ),
  • balance de blancs et noirs mal réglée (impossible à corriger car il n'y a pas assez de précision à cause du niveau élevé de bruit),
  • couleurs mal réglées,
  • focale très imprécise (les immeubles sur les collines et fonds sont beaucoup trop floutés et noyés dans le bruit),
  • flous de bougé sur la partie droite
  • la lumière ambiante a été mal choisie: il aurait mieux vallu faire cette prise de vue à une autre heure probablement assez tôt le matin avant qu'il y ait trop de pollution ou de brume d'évaporation marine, et si possible juste après la pluie pour avoir une atmosphère très pure, à cette distance, y compris pour les collines. Marseille se photographiera certainement mieux en intersaison au printemp.
  • Attention au logiciel de montage: il semble qu'il fasse trop de floutage aux zones de raccordement des clichés, et que dans les zones de superposition, il accentue encore plus le bruit et applique un floutage beaucoup trop fort!
  • Note que la partie extrème-gauche n'a pas le même profondeur pour la scène de rochers la plus proche et est aussi floutée et peu contrastée et mal colorée. Il faut traiter cette partie spécialement dans le montage.
  • Est-il indispensable de conserver toute la partie droite? Vérifie que les profondeurs de champ sont compatibles pour un tel montage.
  • Si tu as les photos avant montage, je suggère que tu les montes en panorama avec un bien meilleur logiciel... il vaut mieux traiter le bruit sur les clichés individuels, mais faire très attention à ce que tu ne modifie pas les balances entre les différentes images. Verdy p 01:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann/archives&oldid=4444495"