User talk:Tuvalkin/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SLicons

Hello and excuse me. These files are not SLicons and are not planned to be in this category. Just now I am trying to request converting SLicons to svg and need the category to be free of files that don't belong. Could you explain why you undid my edit? Vcohen (talk) 12:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

  • @Vcohen: Those new SVGs are replacements for the equivalent PNGs, which are this category. I suppose they may not be funcional ones, not being passible of transclusion by template due to the filenames, but that’s an internal SLicon matter. I suggest that new subcats under Category:SLicons be created, one of SVGs and another for PNGs, while it is necessary. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
  • They are not replacements, because they don't correspond them by their shapes and names, and even by their number. The original SLicons were created by me (SL stands for Station Layout) and are used in a series of templates on the Russian Wikipedia (I tried to create similar templates on the English Wikipedia too, but they eventually were not used). SLicons is the subcat that you mentioned, and its parent category Category:Icons for station layouts is intended for all files that are not SLicons. Vcohen (talk) 09:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Let it be for now. However, it's only a temporary storage. After the svg version is created, it will become the main version and will not need such a disambiguator. Vcohen (talk) 12:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Proper venue

«I suggest that you bring the matter of plotting for manipulation of consensus to the «proper venue». Ahá, again to Commons:AN/U? For what? To treat me as idiot and laughing on my face again? No, thanks, I had enough yesterday. Manuchansu (talk) 23:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Icon Line 9B4908 small.svg

File:Icon Line 9B4908 small.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 04:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

XXX / Barrels in art

Are you sure of this? It seems to me to apply to only about half of the photos in the category. - Jmabel ! talk 02:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Well, I guess we could create subcats for "Logo of Triple X Root Beer" and for "Roof of Triple X Root Beer restaurant", both with parent cat "Barrels in art", and then dissiminate the few photos we have, but that’s maybe overkill for now? Either way, the nexus between this retaurant and barrels is there, even if not shown in all the photos. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jc86035 (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

File:BSicon umABZgr'.svg

File:BSicon umABZgr'.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jc86035 (talk) 10:33, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

File:BSicon tv-STR+1eg.svg

File:BSicon tv-STR+1eg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jc86035 (talk) 15:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Big thanks

Dear Tuválkin, Fæ, Túrelio, Guanaco, and Jeff, this is a simple word to express my appreciation for your support and nice messages of solidarity. Thanks a lot to all 5 of you. - Basile Morin (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

@Basile Morin: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ 17:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jc86035 (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jc86035 (talk) 08:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

File:กัลยาณิวัฒนา.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:กัลยาณิวัฒนา.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Paul_012 (talk) 20:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ 04:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Most of the times

Hi Tuvalkin. I can understand this. But 'most of the times' in my view does not justify categorizing every photograph that shows the fingers of the photographers as a mistake. It can even have an artistic or otherwise deliberate motive to include them, as we can see in that category. Is this a mistake? Of course not. Then we shouldn't suggest it is by classifying it as such. Perhaps the deliberate and undeliberate situations could be split into separate categories.
Further, you might also consider whether the category "Self-portrait photographs" is in place there. Regards, Apdency (talk) 17:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

  • You’re wrong, but I’m done fighting windmills. Good luck with determining whether an instance of this was intentional or not. I’ll create the a new subcategory to be categorized as a mishap and which you’ll be happy to leave alone, as it doesn’t endanger the chimaera of perfectly nested categories in deteriment to useful categorization. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
  • This was «of course» a mistake, as your condescending tone is also. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you for creating the new category. I think the name is well chosen too. I took a closer look at the Google Books fingers and, yes, it seems likely they weren't supposed to be there, while the image is derived from a book scan. So, everything OK. Apdency (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Roman numerals

Hi Tuvalkin, here are two very special Roman numerals for you: MDXVC (instead of MDXXXV) and (1590). All the best, Edelseider (talk) 09:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

A kitten for you!

You enter my your edit of my upload! Thank you!

Cyrus noto3at bulaga (talk) 02:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Bricked_up_doors

Category discussion warning

Category:Bricked_up_doors has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ies (talk) 11:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:U kun hoketo 1.svg

Saluton,

vi forprenis de la bildo File:U kun hoketo 1.svg la kategorion Unicode 0300-036F Combining Diacritical Marks kaj aldonis Diacritic entering through keyboard, skribante

  • Tamen jes: ĝi bonege ilustras la funkciadon de t.n. seka klavo (kaj cetere ĝi ne rilatas al kodigo: pribildigo de "Unicode canonical decomposition" bezonus malan sagon.

Unue, la kodopunkto U+0306 estas en la bloko Combining Diacritical Marks (U+0300 – U+036F), do mi ne komprenas kiel ĝi ne povas esti en la precize samnoma kategorio. Per la sago → mi volis diri ke la kombino de la kodoj U+0075 kaj U+0306 (ekzemple en dosiero) rezultigas prezentadon de „u“ (ekzemple sur ekrano), kodebla ankaŭ kiel U+0160. Mi konsentas ke ankaŭ duflanka sago ↔ estus ebla. Pri „regula unikoda malkompono“ (Unicode canonical decomposition) mi nenion diris; jes, tiuokaze la sago estu inversa.

Due, klavaroj ne uzas Unikodon por komuniki al komputiloj, sed specialajn klavarkodojn. Do la kodoj de la „kombiniĝantaj simboloj“ ne estas uzataj por realigi mortajn (aŭ sekajn) klavojn. Krome, la mortaj klavoj ĉiam estas puŝataj antaŭ la normalaj, do la hoketo devus tiam esti antau la „u“.

Se vi insistas, bone, lasu la kategorion Diacritic entering through keyboard (kvankam mi opinias ĝin erara), sed bonvolu lasi ankaŭ Unicode 0300-036F Combining Diacritical Marks, kiun plene trafas la bildo.

-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Koncerne klavarenigo, vi pravas pri tio ke klavaroj ne signalas unikode, sed ne tion mi celis: Mi diris ke la diagramo bone pribildas la koncepton de “seka klavo” = senpaŝa klavo (senkonsidere pri la mekanismo, eĉ povus temi pri mekanika skribmaŝino). Aliflanke, kiel vi prave atentigas, mi eraris pri tio, ĉar ja la sekan klavon oni surtajpu unue kaj poste sur ĝin la bazliteron, ne male. Do vi pravas ke via bildo ne taŭgas en Category:Diacritic entering through keyboard (malkrom se ekzistas iu vaste uzata klavareniga reĝimo kiu permesas logikordan enigon de diakritoj — mi konas kelkajn sed nure eksperimentajn).
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

U+AC00–U+D7AF

There was a diff 3 years ago, and you might have improvements since, but anyway… these characters are Hangŭl. This script is no more Chinese than Latin is runic. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  • You’re right and I was wrong. Annyoing, too, since this is a subject I think is very important and on I’m knowledgeable about more than average. Thanks for fixing. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

A third-party opinion needed

Hello. There is a discord about linguistical aspects of {{Original upload date}}. Could you look here? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Extincts

moved to User_talk:Liné1#Unicorns.21

Problem with a user

Dear Tuválkin, Fæ, Túrelio, Guanaco, and Jeff, I'm contacting you today because you helped me greatly last september, when I had a problem with an admin, and I feel the communication is fine with you. Since this bad experience (I was nearly blocked for a totally unfair reason), I've lived in peace until recently and became an active member in the QI and FP sections. Many of my photos have been promoted, and I enjoy talking with most of the other members there. Unfortunately I have a trouble now with the user Colin. See this page Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Evolution of a Tornado.jpg. That person will end up with exceeding me soon if he continues to twist my words and make me look like a trash. I try to stay mellow, but it's difficult, and too much is too much. I've never insulted anyone, but Colin alleges such mistake, and of course because he's Scottish he speaks much better English than me, to be able to transform my comments. Thus, if ever anyone of you had a hint to resolve the comunication problem, through the complexity of the discussion. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Dear @Basile Morin: good luck with that issue, that’s my sincere desire. Sadly, I cannot help you. I’m not an admin (not I want to ever be), I don’t have any interest nor experience in the QI/FP area (frankly seems to be too much drama for what’s worth, and clearly one bit of Commons activity that could be taken elsewhere, like Flickr, with no losses for anyone), and, most importantly, I have no constructive suggestions about dealing with Colin. There were maybe 3 or 4 occasions ever when I managed to interact with him normally; all other times it has been nothing by fruitless, inexplainable conflict. I hope you’ll find a way to deal with the matter. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks a lot, Tuválkin, for your constructive answer. I also got nice hints from other people, then now I see better what to do (or not to do) with Colin. All of them share the same feeling which you expresses here of a conflictual mentality. Agree also with your impression of "too much drama for what's worth", although it's disturbing to work in an oppressive context, and as a user new in activity here, I also try to find efficient ways to solve such kind of issues, without making too much waves. Apart from that, I totally respect your desinterest for the QI/FP area, and am aware how useful you are elsewhere. Just for me this area is really great, very interesting, and not only constructive for myself but also for Commons. As for example I wouldn't have uploaded so many files about Laos (where I live), now used in Wikipedia, without this emulating and rewarding section. Just my feedback. So, well, enjoy your job where it is, no worry, it will be fine I think -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Request

Hello,

In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Portuguese?

 
Belgium: The Flemish speaking region occasionally produces its own dialect dubbing versions, otherwise solely subtitles. The French speaking region of Wallonia and the German speaking region of East Belgium use exclusively a full-cast dubbing, both for films and for TV series.

Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 12:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Sure:
 
Bélgica: Na região flamenca faz-se ocasionalmente dobragem/dublagem no dialeto local; em geral faz-se apenas legendagem. Na região francófona e na região germanófona faz-se sempre dobragem/dublagem com elenco completo, tanto para filmes como para séries de televisão.
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
  • @A2D2: After I made the translation 1st thing after logging in and seeing your request, I checked the images and found out that the requested translation was already done by someone else, rendering my effort moot. A few clicks show me that you had made the same identical request to no less than four Portuguese-speaking fellow users, causing up to three of us to utterly waste our time. Please do not contact me again. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Date templates

Hello! Sorry for bothering you... Do you know how to create a new template for another country or who can do that? I'm talking about template used for instance here: Category:March 2016 Thailand photographs. There are templates for some countries, but there aren't for others, like Myanmar, Malaysia or my country - Poland. Do you know something about this issue? --Halavar (talk) 17:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Another color removing attempt

Hey Tuvalkin! Just wanted to thank you for your color removing attempt: File:Draisine at Codeçoso train station (26588678469).jpg. However, your version got a bit pinky, so I tried another and overwrote your version. Cheers, --Jcornelius (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Deletion nominations of BSicon redirects

Hi, sorry for nominating your redirect for deletion again. I've put it and   (REPAIR) in use at w:en:WP:RDTS so that they don't get picked up when I'm searching for them semi-automatically (Achim55 wrote a Quarry script to find in-use redirects); Commons pages, user pages and talk pages are excluded since a lot of redirects are only in use in unmaintained catalogues and user sandboxes. You might want to upload PFERD as a square, since the image is currently a rectangle. Jc86035 (talk) 08:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Blackletter black letters

Hi. I was not under the impression that the category is for letters in black. The problem is that the source I cited in the description (a qualified art historian) describes the lettering as scriere gotică, which is generally the Romanian for "Blackletter". I am agnostic as to whether the style is or isn't (primitive) Blackletter, but I tend toward acknowledging what the source says as a benchmark, unless contradicted by another source. Thoughts? Dahn (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

  • @Dahn: Hello, and thanks for contacting. I think that regardless of the original text this is clearly not blackletter; I suggest that this is a kind of uncial. I don’t want to challenge the original description, but it maybe that in Romania "scriere gotică" means usually not (only) "blackletter", just like in popular English usage "crest" means actually "coat of arms", or in Portuguese use a cruz templária is an orbicular cross, not a beauceant. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
You may be right overall, in the sense that Romanian authors will probably include all Germanic uncial scripts under the "Gothic" nomenclature, whereas English ones will place a neat border between the two. I assume this kind of "Gothic" uncial in the image has some arcane name, and we will probably have a category under that name at some point. Um grande obrigado, this has been productive. Dahn (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:10_as_angle

Category discussion warning

Category:10_as_angle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:33, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

GLAM Direção-Geral do Património Cultural

Caro Tuvalkin,

Estamos a iniciar uma colaboração GLAM com a Direção-Geral do Património Cultural. A DGCP irá doar aos projetos Wikimedia diversas imagens de elevada resolução das coleções dos museus nacionais. No próximo mês iremos dar formação e acompanhamento aos funcionários da DGPC e dos museus nacionais para ampliar e melhorar a qualidade dos artigos dos museus e das peças mais significativas das coleções nacionais.

Trata-se de um projeto de grande dimensão, pelo que gostava de contar com a sua colaboração. Há várias formas de ajudar, entre as quais rever o carregamento de imagens no Commons, categorizando, inserindo nos artigos e propondo as melhores imagens para destaque; prestar ajuda online aos funcionários dos museus, estando disponível para tirar dúvidas de edição e para preparar os melhores artigos para destaque. Caso tenha interesse e disponibilidade, pode inscrever-se página da iniciativa ou entrar em contacto comigo.

Atenciosamente, JMagalhães (talk) 15:37, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Caro JMagalhães: nem pensar, desculpe. O que faço aqui no Commons é estritamente desobrigado, em horas vagas, sem compromisso. e-Mails troco-os para assuntos de obrigação, e não tenho disponibilidade para adicionar este projeto a tais. Não foi porém por falta de compromisso que me faltou o empenho que me pôs aqui ou que pôs em ordem esta vastíssima categoria. Colaborarei “feralmente” e farei o meu melhor. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Ok. Era mais no sentido de facilitar via mailing list a comunicação em simultâneo a todos os envolvidos na iniciativa de progressos (ou atrasos) no andamento. No fundo, uma mailing list. Mas, claro, respeito o seu desejo. Caso haja necessidade de qualquer comunicação urgente fá-lo-ei aqui. Neste momento estamos apenas pendentes de uma autorização para dar início aos trabalhos. JMagalhães (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Lincoln’s_Lucky_Nose

Category discussion warning

Lincoln’s Lucky Nose has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Closeapple (talk) 02:50, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Template Tramtransportyear-Aarhus

I am replacing de template Tramtransportyear-Århus with Tramtransportyear-Aarhus. I am systematicaly in the categories the templates, so I dont need a troughlink to the old template.Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  • @WMF Surveys: Neat trick at «Activity 1 of 11». You want people to say the love VE and you found a way. You guys always come up with something even worse than what any paranoid caricature a rabid anti-WMF agitator could prop up — amazing. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Rua_Gomes_Freire_(Oporto)

Category discussion warning

Category:Rua_Gomes_Freire_(Oporto) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JotaCartas (talk) 04:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Avenida_Dom_Carlos_I_(Oporto)

Category discussion warning

Avenida Dom Carlos I (Oporto) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JotaCartas (talk) 04:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Campo_dos_Mártires_da_Pátria_(Oporto)

Category discussion warning

Category:Campo_dos_Mártires_da_Pátria_(Oporto) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JotaCartas (talk) 04:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Rua_do_Almada_(Oporto)

Category discussion warning

Rua do Almada (Oporto) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JotaCartas (talk) 04:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Bank_buildings_in_Oporto

Category discussion warning

Bank buildings in Oporto has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JotaCartas (talk) 05:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

File:AmericanoCampanha~.cp19 4.png

File:AmericanoCampanha~.cp19 4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JotaCartas (talk) 17:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Ongarue Spiral (done)

✓ Done

Dear Tuvalkin. I temporarily used your File:BSicon KRZl-KRZ+lu.svg in the new article about en:Ellis and Burnand Tramway, Ongarue, although it has the wrong colour. Are you coincidentally able, to change the colour appropriately? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

I will "keep my eyes open", as the Germans say. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

New uploads from Medpro

Hello Tuvalkin, there is a lot of new files of 16th-century books from the Médiathèque protestante de Strasbourg: see here. I am sure that you will find new and exciting typographic stuff among all these treasures! Have a nice day or night, --Edelseider (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

I just added 30 more. Cheers, --Edelseider (talk) 21:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

File:ISO639yo(PNGbug).png

File:ISO639yo(PNGbug).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Institution:Museu do Ipiranga

Tuvalkin, blz cara? Você reparou na sua última edição nessa página? Você viu que o estado ficou a cidade de São Paulo? Eu não soube arrumar, estava esperando uma pessoa me responder para ver o que fazer ali. Mas do jeito que está, está errado. :/ -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 04:47, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Estava a dar erro ISO 3166-2 (afetando mais de uma centena de imagens, também, em vez de só o template, por cretinice da Wikidata), e eu corrigi para SP, que é o código ISO 3166-2 para o Estado de São Paulo. Parece que o template do museu (ou outra coisa que este transclui) não está bem ajustado aos dados que se esperam, resultando esse «São Paulo São Paulo» que não faz sentido, mas é aí que se deve corrigir, não “martelando” dados inválidos no preenchimento do template do Museu, que espera um código ISO 3166-2-BR válido — duas letras ("SP", neste caso) e não texto livre ("São Paulo (state)"), que de resto não fica internacionalizado. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Commons_User

Hello.
The case initiated by you took a path you likely didn’t intend. Can you—as a backup device—speak to Portuguese Wikipedians on behalf of this wrongfully blocked editor? Too much thoughtlessness in Wikimedia and too little responsibility. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

  • The matter I raised had merit (no «thoughtlessness» in calling a bad name bad) and it eventually followed through. Its complications in pt.wp are unfortunate but unrelated. Besides, meanwhile it seems solved. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
    Don’t take “thoughtlessness” too personal; I agree that the username had to be changed. Complications became related because of ambiguous policy; of course it’s not your fault. I wary about this practice where local wikis control global matters in an inappropriate manner. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Convite: Wikidata Lab VIII

Oi! Boa noite. Escrevo para convidá-lo para o evento ao lado, em que, com dois dos principais wikimedistas da comunidade global, vamos entender a conexão entre bases de dados e os projetos. Pareceu-me que poderia ser de seu interesse. Note que é preciso inscrever-se: w:pt:Wikipédia:Edit-a-thon/Atividades em português/Wikidata Lab VIII. Se achar que alguém mais por aqui pode se interessar, não hesite em divulgar. Saudações e boas edições! --Joalpe (talk) 02:08, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Abdeljalil fenjiro.jpg

File:Abdeljalil fenjiro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

About renaming categoris from Oporto to Porto

Hi, I dont want to make a case of this renaming, nor write this in the discussion page, nor make any kind of discussion with you. But, if you do want to do so, please make real arguments in the discussion page, and not only attack the intentions of the person o proposed de renaming with words like "sneaking" . This is not the way to discuss, at least for me. End of the matter as far as I am concerned, best regards --JotaCartas (talk) 12:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Public_urination

Category discussion warning

Public urination has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Hällefors–FredriksbergsJärnvägar(monogramm).jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 09:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Yann

Thanks for the note over on his talk page. I'd post on the User Problems page, but it doesn't really seem like it's set up to deal with issues with administrator behaviour? The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

  • @Alexis Jazz: The matter here is not that humans err, but that some (most?) admins act in a way that would still be obnoxious if they were faultless. When it turns out they are not, it’s hard to accept the agressive attitude as useful or even legitimate. Do you think this would have happened with (say) JMabel, Steinsplitter, Hedwig in Washington, or Jameslwoodward? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Other admins may have responded differently. Had it been Jcb or Blackcat, I wouldn't be surprised if The Drover's Wife would not have complained about a thing. Because they would have been indefblocked. I don't see how a discussion on ANU could lead to anything in this case. I'm not sure how to put it into words, but Yann does things the way Yann does things. He did drop the ball on this case, maybe he overlooked something or was having a bad day. Sometimes he may skip a few steps or do something that comes across as impolite, but at the end of the day I think he does good work and is fair. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Yann overlooked something. Special:DeletedContributions/The Drover's Wife shows all deleted contributions, including edits, not just file uploads. The Drover's Wife had edited the file pages of the files from Thescrubbythug when he nominated them for deletion and those contributions were deleted along with the files. Mystery solved. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
  • This is a case of «other things exist», sorry: That worse admins would behave even worse is no reason to excuse merely bad behaviour. The only mystery here is why most admins are always ready to excuse their own (and their pals’) apalling behaviour and yet are adamant in demanding irreprehensible conduct from anyone else. In the case at hand the victim did absolutely nothing wrong and yet you say she* was very lucky because other admins would have silenced her. That’s horrifying and shows how much the system has gone corrupted. This is not just because there is a huge backlog and the few working admins are overworked. It is a prevalent culture of despotic entitlement that values trampling basic rights in the name of expediency — and it allows little bad things (like scoring two admin actions due to trivial deletions that should never have happened) and huge bad things (such as the whole INC tragicomedy or the stonewalling of Fæ). And it needs to change. *(I’m using female pronouns for a user named wife; lemme know if this is wrong.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Warning

Do not call colleagues a 'vandal' like you did here. That's not acceptable behaviour. Jcb (talk) 15:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Latin, redux

Rather than derail that thread further, could you please enlighten me on what exactly your comment meant? "Futbolhondureñoimgs*" and "Futbollatinoimgs" are Latin-language user names, or what was your point? I'm not trying to "school" you on anything - I'm trying to understand the point of your comment. Storkk (talk) 21:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

  • @Storkk: Yes, but more to the point those are Spanish (or, better, Castillian) language filenames. And I did chose the wrong time and place (and target) to groan aloud at the pernicious U.S.-inspired silliness of equating the very specific notion Spanish in the Americas with the much wider Latin/Romance. Apologies for that. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
No worries... we've all seen enough silliness in the last few days (/weeks/years) I think, to get frustrated at times. Storkk (talk) 21:41, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

BS

I look forward to your article about "number tags, pinacotheca curation, artwork storage and handling, et. c., et. c., et. c." - Broichmore (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

  •  Comment:: What do you look like. Reducing the watermark, thereby reducing the image's value as exhibit 1 in your pinacotheca article. The watermark has equal value to all the artifacts the picture carries illustrating museum storage. You defended retention of this image, you should not degrade it. Broichmore (talk) 13:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Bullets

Hi. Please don't change my colons to bullets, which should only be used for lists per m:Help:Formatting. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Please, enlighten me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Images_with_JPG_compression_artifacts

Category discussion warning

Images with JPG compression artifacts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:34, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 14:00, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

File:CharityWakefield(asCassandraKing).jpg

File:CharityWakefield(asCassandraKing).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Salaita Tweets.png

File:Salaita Tweets.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 09:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:IHS

Why did you rename Category:IHS as Category:IHS (Jesuit monogram) when Jesuits did NOT originate the Christian symbolic significance of "IHS", and "IHS" is NOT used exclusively by them?? Maybe you should have discussed it with someone who knew a little more than you do about the subject before just charging ahead... AnonMoos (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Your work on Template:Lettercombo and Template:Az2rgb is excellent! The addition of variable color backgrounds and bold typography to Wikimedia Commons is like a garden of bright flowers planted in front of drab house. Thank you!  Senator2029 ➔ “Talk”  14:20, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Lisbon tram 327 at Crich

Hi Tuvalkin.

As you have probably realised from the side-effects on the tram numbering categories, I've been working through all the photos of the National Tramway Museum at the Crich in the UK, trying to make sure there is a consistent categorisation. I've now come across Category:Lisbon tram 327 (standard), which back in 2015 you added to Category:Tramcars of the National Tramway Museum. The trouble is that I can find no other reference to Lisbon 327 being, or ever having been, at the National Tramway Museum. It does indeed seem to have been brought to the UK, because I found this report, dated about the same time you added the category, saying that body is in outdoor storage at Walton on the Naze. But that isn't an NTM location I recognise; most MTM vehicles that are not at Crich are in indoor storage at Clay Cross. Can you remember what caused you to add it to the NTM category?.

-- Chris j wood (talk) 09:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

  • My source is Mário Vieira (compil.): Lisboa – Listagem de Eléctricos. Lisboa, 2014.02 (an unpublished document circulated among CCFL enthusiasts). Concerning 327 it says:

    Após sair de serviço foi vendido, indo para a Ribeira de Sintra, onde esteve até 02/1998. Posteriormente seguiu para a Grã-Bretanha, estando o equipamento no museu de Crich e a caixa em Walton-on-the-Naze.

    (That’s why I also tagged as Category:Former Lisbon trams in Sintra, for that 1995~1998 period.) So the body («caixa») is in Walton-on-the-Naze and the “equipment” (engines, controllers, cabling, trolley pole, truck?) is in the “Crich museum” («museu de Crich»), which I take it to be the National Tramway Museum. I (wrongly) presumed that the location at Walton-on-the-Naze is also a National Tramway Museum facility. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:33, 9 October 2018 (UTC) @Chris j wood: 10:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Ericeira

Olá Tuvalkin. Para não fazer porcaria de novo, gostava que me explicasses a lógica de Category:Lisbon tram 328 (standard) e Category:Lisbon tram 337 estarem inseridas na categoria Category:Transport in Ericeira, já que eu não consigo perceber. Obrigado. Um abraço. Paulo Juntas (talk) 09:24, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:BSicon/road/RP4/uw

RP4c2 RP43+1
RP4s+1

The dotted lines on the curves don't match up with the ones on the diagonals. Which should be changed? Useddenim (talk) 22:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

  • @Useddenim: I suppose It’s desirable to have matching and homogenous icons, of course. If the length of the gaps and strokes needs to be adjusted, I’m not at all against that. These icons were originally designed in an amateurish way, meanwhile we come a long way.
(I wanted to inspect the matter in more detail and was going to add PX=64px to the lines of your sample diagram, but alas it’s created using that unparsable inhuman notation: Not touching it. )
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

cat q

Hey! Did you put this file into the Thomson SA category by mistake? I thought it was an electronics manufacturer. --Palosirkka (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Category: Travessa do Oleiro

Honestly, given his experience in Commons, I was surprised by his defense of such an obvious mistake. With regard to its expeditious reversion in [Category: Travessa do Oleiro], and applying 'precision' when categorizing in Commons, I would like you to consider a couple of observations: 1) By systematic and general rule, the categories of people, categorize people. Only in the very unlikely case - and that it would have to be justified by a reference - that the people who appear in the photo were "oleiros" would have a place, very tangentially, in the category of potters. 2) If it had taken a few minutes to consult my history or my discussion page I would probably have inferred that I am a basic editor on pottery and ceramics issues. Not in vain I have been collaborating for six years in the project that WP-ES dedicates to this subject. As I have Galician friends I know the meaning of oleiro, and I have had the pleasure of creating some articles dedicated to oleiros such as Niñodaguía or Buño. 3) I find it interesting to look for a relationship between this photo and the pottery, but correctly. If something happens to me and you're interested, I'll tell you. Thanks for your attention.

En cualquier caso, todos podemos cometer errores o un mal gesto. Me he tomado la molestia de dejarle estas observaciones porque considero que los títulos que figuran en su página de usuario hay que demostrarlos.--Latemplanza (talk) 18:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Já que se assenhoreou de se me dirigir nas línguas que mais lhe apraz, respondo-lhe como se segue:
  1. Diz-me que «categories of people, categorize people», muito bem. A Travessa do Oleiro homenageia um anónimo oleiro, o qual é/foi alguém (people) — daí a categorização que apus a Category: Travessa do Oleiro está correcta e a sua reduziu-lhe a precisão. (Para o resto do argumento que ajunta, veja-se §3, infra.)
  2. Ou seja: não tem desculpa.
  3. You keep saying «this photo» (also in your §1). Pray tell which photo? I did categorize under Category: Potters not any particular photo but a category: Category: Travessa do Oleiro. Whatever photos are categorized therein have only an indirect relationship with Category: Potters.
  4. P.f. faça o obséquio de usar # para criar listas numeradas, para melhor leitura (como faço aqui). Pediria também que, já que faz uso de listas numeradas, automáticas ou hardcoded, que cinja a sua argumentação a segmentos disjuntos em cada ítem delas.
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, I do not understand half of what he says. I am afraid that my understanding of languages ​​(I use the Google translator) does not give to understand their argumentation. Does not matter. I apologize for having made an exaggerated statement about a detail with little importance.
  1. I wrote (well, the bot translator) a paragraph in his mother tongue, courtesy and considering that what was said in it could be disrespectful between two strangers.
  2. By the way, he forgot to link a notice so that I would know that you answered me on your talk page and not mine.
  3. Thank you for your timely lesson in using the keyboard on the complicated Wikipedia editing page. I have been slow to understand what he wanted to tell me, but it has been worth learning something more in this medium.
  4. Greetings. --Latemplanza (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

File:ISO639yo(PNGbug).png

Hi Tuvalkin, You recently uploaded File:ISO639yo(PNGbug).png however I don't quite understand what the problem is, It's marked as broken PNG?,
The SVG picture appears fine in all resolutions so I'm not sure what the problem is or was ?,
Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

  • The rendering issue shown in that screenshot was meanwhile fixed. The screenshot itself might still be useful as an example of that kind of libSVG rendering issues, though. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry

I'm playing a song by Alanis Morissette now.

IT'S LIKE RAAAAHIIIJEEEE - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Ping

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jcb&oldid=prev&diff=326492082

100% pure gold. *grabs popcorn*. The images are nowhere to be found. See for yourself (scaled down): [1] [2]. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Also, the user was never notified so the deletion was out of process anyway. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:42, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:WSDüker.jpg
I guess "unused" now means "delete". Also, InstantCommons users can go fuck themselves. The file was a .jpg of a BSicon like File:BSicon uexhKRZWa.svg (similar to that one but not the same). While .jpg is a bad format for this, closing the DR with the message "non controversial maintenance", implying this could have been speedied.. He's just asking for it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:47, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
We have deleted thousands of these icons in the past. Keeping them online if they don't form part of the systematic series makes no sense. Could indeed have been speedied. Jcb (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
"we have already done this thousands of times" is never a valid argument for anything. We have burned thousands of witches and held thousands of elections without female voters. The argument "but we've already done this thousands of times!" was also heard before those things ended. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Replying:
  • @Alexis Jazz: how did File:WSDüker.jpg differ from File:BSicon uexhKRZWa.svg, topologically?
  • @Jcb: In past such deletions, a link to the replacement BSicon with proper format and file name/format, used or not, was offered — either in the deletion rationale or in the DR, if any (or even both). Not this time. Why?
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:48, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Sometimes, mostly not. But all the systematic files from the coordinated effort are in the catalogue. So if such an icon is not in the catalogue and not in use, it can be removed safely as non controversial maintenance. The colors of the deleted files differ slightly from the standard, so that it could not be used. Jcb (talk) 11:58, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks, @Alexis Jazz: Looks like the line across is somewhat close to 3399FF, while the wavy line is 003399, instead the usual 069DD3. The icon semantics is line across over wet culvert — therefore closest to   (uWBRÜCKE2). Anyone looking for the deleted file can now locate this discussion and establish the nexus, even though an indication in a DR, as said above, would be a much better service. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:48, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Another thing. Jcb is deleting The Commons. Flickr's The Commons, that is. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Brno centrum Montage.jpg - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
https://imgur.com/a/ymZW0I0 (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Home eropkinsky 16.jpg). I could actually upload my version with caption here.. It educates about the scope of Commons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:22, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Fred Cheng.JPG Do you happen to know what is this.. I don't even.. It's just, you know.. like.. ?? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:29, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tuvalkin/Archive_7&oldid=333837743"