User talk:Racconish/Archive5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image without license

File:Schuhpalast Pinkus (1916) .webm

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


File:The Ballet Dancer (1911) - Dir. August Blom.webm

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

File:1927. Каток.ogv

File:1927. Каток.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

File:'Russia’s Tibet’ Opens to Jet-Age Tourism.theora.ogv

The video used to be available on VOA's website as "download" link on the top of this archived page shows. Then it has been moved to Youtube. Unfortunately, on Youtube it is licenced under "Standard YouTube License". On the other hand IMO it hasn't any meaning as VOA is US Government's entity. I leave licence review for you as more experienced person in this area. --jdx Re: 18:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jdx: ✓ Done thanks. — Racconish ☎ 19:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Roger-Michel Allemand.jpg

File:Roger-Michel Allemand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 11:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Photos insérées dans différents articles et retirées

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xavierd80

Bonjour User talk:Racconish,

Je travaille avec Xavier DEBEAURAIN, pseudo XavierD80 sous WIKIPEDIA, qui contribeur essentiellement dans le domaine de la peinture et de la gravure. Moi même, je participe à ses articles pour l'illustration de ses articles, tableaux et gravures et photos des artistes pour l'infobox. Ces photos sont déposées sur Wikicommons sous le pseudo XavierD80, Il y a plusieurs mois, nous avons eu la très désagréable surprise de constater qu'un bon nombre d'illustrations avaient été retirées, sans même avoir été prévenus. Vous imaginez notre déception Comment peut-t-on remédier à cette situation ? Merci de vous reporter aux images importées sur "Xavierd80" La plupart ont été refusées pour "violation du droit d'auteur" alors que les autorisations vous ont été adressées en bonne et due forme, selon vos instructions. Par ailleurs des photos de portrait ont été retirées et remplacées par des photos plus anciennes, de façon arbitraire. Moi-même ai fourni une autorisation en tant qu'auteur des photos.

Quelques exemples:

José San Martin peintre : image JSM22 toujours dans wikicommons mais retirée pour être remplacée par vos services par JSM1 plus ancienne. Pour quelle raison? Pour le même artiste des œuvres sont restées, d'autres ont été retirées. Pour quelles raisons?

Jean Labellie peintre :deux illustrations, un tableau (Labellie Jean 2) toujours présent. Par contre la photo que j'ai prise moi même (Labellie Jean) a disparu de Wipedia et Wikicommons. Pour quelle raison?

Georges Feher : Ne reste que 6 images sur les 9 déposées, les Georges Feher 1, 3 et 4 ont été supprimées de wikicommons, et l'infobox remplacée arbitrairement. Pour quelles raisons?

Eugène Dabit : image "Eugène Dabit 2" supprimée. Cette oeuvre fait partie d'une collection privée et l'auteur est décédé il y a plus de 70 ans., Nous ne comprenons pas.

Ci joint liste selon lien ci-dessus

Il nous semble avoir suivi vos instructions à la lettre depuis plusieurs années. Merci de nous éclairer de façon explicite. Le mieux, compte tenu des précautions prises, serait que vous pussiez rétablir l'ensemble de notre travail comme il était auparavant.

Très cordialement Xavierd80 (talk) 15:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Xavierd80 vous pivez faire une demande de restauration argumentée ici. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 20:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Plan 9 From Outer Space

Can speech samples from this movie used in a song that will be published commercially? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.254.190.31 (talk) 12:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

I think so, since it has fallen in the public domain... but please note this is not a legal advice. — Racconish ☎ 12:59, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Respublika Narodnaya

In the website, the copyright was stated right, and the copyright was based on the law. I had also changed the copyright tags. Why you still nominate to delete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Respublika Narodnaya (talk • contribs) 14:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Respublika Narodnaya: the source was not indicated. Please answer on the deletion request page. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 16:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish: The copyright is stored here. Look at paragraph two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Respublika Narodnaya (talk • contribs) 01:01, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
@Respublika Narodnaya: again, comment at the DR, not here. — Racconish ☎ 06:11, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Nathalie Charlotte Marie van den Steen de Jehay.jpg

Bonjour, Je ne suis pas spécialiste de l'importation d'image, mais je ne comprends pas le problème : il s'agit d'une photo ancienne prise au plus tard en 1919... Merci ! Salignac (talk) 19:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Salignac, il faut prouver que l'auteur est mort depuis plus de 70 ans ou rapporter son autorisation. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 20:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
L'auteur est inconnu et non identifiable. Cela dit, la photo figure sur le faire-part de décès de cette personne, morte en 1919 - d'ailleurs sans descendance. C'est donc quelqu'un de sa génération qui a pris la photo - par exemple son mari, mort en 1924. Il me semble donc admissible de penser que l'auteur de cette photo est mort depuis plus de 70 ans. Non ? Salignac (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
@Salignac: je suis d'accord. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 06:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Official Poster of Ka Kha Ga Gha.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Official Poster of Ka Kha Ga Gha.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Poster. Previously deleted a few times.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

I know the poster was uploaded by a different user. But, I am from the production house of the movie and have uploaded the poster. Please do not mark it as a copyright violation as I have already declared the license required. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhranil1234 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

@Abhranil1234: , I put the file up for DR to allow community discussion. Kindly refrain from removing the template. Instead, please feel free to express your point of view at the DR page. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 19:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish:

I have emailed as you requested. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhranil1234 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard

Excuse me Racconish, I've replied to your comment about the case "Arbalete" here. May you give me your opinion about it? You and @Zhuyifei1999: were the only ones who didn't ignore my report, and I thank you very much for that! It seems strange to me that no other admins have cared about this report yet... 2A01:7C8:AAAE:2B3:F1F7:B510:880E:7368 12:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

You are welcome. Please note I am not an administrator. — Racconish ☎ 12:11, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Oh, sorry! Is there anybody among admins on commons that you can advise me to call on about this issue?
2A01:7C8:AAAE:2B3:F1F7:B510:880E:7368 13:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
No, you were at the right place.— Racconish ☎ 13:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Then I have one question: isn't there any problem if I rollback his non-consensual renaming on the bases of what's written here, right?
2A01:7C8:AAAE:2B3:F1F7:B510:880E:7368 16:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
How about simply dropping it Clin ? — Racconish ☎ 18:52, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
What's the meaning of "dropping" in this context? I'm Italian and I haven't understood exactly what you said, really.
2A01:7C8:AAAE:2B3:F1F7:B510:880E:7368 19:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Lasciare perdere. — Racconish ☎ 19:04, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Ah, okay. Well, if no admin takes care of this case, I'll "drop" it. But my hope is that a vandal who does such edits against sources without consensus and has already been blocked permanently in his home wiki won't be just let do. Anyway, thank you for your advice :-)
2A01:7C8:AAAE:2B3:F1F7:B510:880E:7368 19:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Issledovanii︠a︡ na nerazdelivshikhsii︠a︡ bliznetsakh.webm

File:Issledovanii︠a︡ na nerazdelivshikhsii︠a︡ bliznetsakh.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

De pire en pire

Hello. Ca va pas mieux aujourd'hui : un nouveau fou furieux s'est mis en tête de supprimer toutes mes photos, y compris celles que j'ai réalisées moi-même et postées sous balise "own work". Le but est-il de me rendre fou et me faire démissionner de Wikimédia ? Je n'ose plus rien dire car je prends des RA, mais là on a dépassé les bornes du harcèlement... Merci pour ton aide, FredD (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

FredD, je pense que le problème est dû à ce changement. S'il s'agit d'un compte "collectif", il faut produire l'autorisation de Frédéric_Ducarme par OTRS en plus de celle des autres photographes ; et si le compte est individuel, celui de Frédéric Ducarme, il ne faut pas prétendre qu'il est collectif. Le plus simple me semble être que tu reviennes à la situation précédente et que tu transmettes par OTRS les autorisations des autres photographes. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 08:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
C'est changé. Peux-tu aller leur dire d'enlever les bandeaux ? Je n'ose plus rien faire par moi-même... Merci ! FredD (talk) 10:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Où ça ? Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 10:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
C'est bon, on dirait que ça commence à s'arranger... Mais je ne suis pas sûr que tous les photographes pourront faire l'OTRS à temps, et ça risque de faire un paquet de trous dans des articles wiki, dont des AdQ... FredD (talk) 09:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Il n'y a pas d'urgence, les fichiers peuvent être restaurés après suppression. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 14:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Certes il n'y a pas d'urgence, mais les messages d'erreur dans les infobox sur des dizaines de pages wiki ça fait moche... :( FredD (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Salut!

Salut! PLEASE don't delete my message! Thanks!--Nickispeaki (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Apologies. — Racconish ☎ 21:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 01:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Motd description page

Hello! I didn't catch, why you blanked the description of the page: see history. I restored this description:

{{Motd description|Personnel training and fire training alarm in {{w|Karelian Research Centre of RAS}}, 2018.|en|2018|04|26}}

What is incorrect here? -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

@AKA MBG: Apologies for the mess-up. When creating {{Motd/2018-04-27 thumbtime}}, I made a mistake and created {{Motd/2018-04-26 thumbtime}} instead (which should be blanked). Then I realized my mistake and tried to correct it, but did a second mistake, blanking the captioned English description instead of the related thumbtime. Sorry about that. — Racconish ☎ 08:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
OK. Thank you for your explanation! I wish you good day :) -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


Photo de Guy de Maupassant à bord de Bel-Ami

Je vous prie d'effacer la photo que vous venez de télécharger sur mon site sans que vous m'ayez prévenu. Je sais parfaitement de quoi je parle quand je fais référence au site Voiles & Voiliers puisque c'est moi-même qui avait publié cet article à l'époque. Quant au droit d'auteur : oui, l'auteur de la photo est à ce jour inconnu et les ayants-droits éventuels aussi et toutes les hypothèses sont possibles. Ce qui ne vous autorise en rien de la balancer sur wikimedia. Je ne fais pas de commerce avec cette image dont je suis propriétaire du seul tirage connu à ce jour. Nous pouvons poursuivre cette conversation de manière privée si vous le souhaitez, un contact étant accessible via mon site web. Cdt/LC /SuperRollex — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperRollex (talk • contribs) 20:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Comme déjà expliqué sur la page de suppression, la propriété d'un tirage ne confère aucun droit patrimonial sur l'image. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 08:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Bourget à gauche sur bel ami de Maupassant (Rocca).jpg

File:Bourget à gauche sur bel ami de Maupassant (Rocca).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SuperRollex (talk) 08:08, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by Nadar

Hi Racconish. Please can I know the reason why you add this category at so much files? It's a nonsense. I distinguish Photographs by Portraits, and Portraits are a sub-cat of Photographs, so that you add the category "Photographs by Nadar" at portraits files by Nadar, simply it's an overcategorisation, and that is not correct. Then you add the category Photographs by Nadat at files that are not of Nadar, like this or this or this, and a lot of other files. Please rollback all this nonsense! Thank you. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

@DenghiùComm: thanks for catching this mistake. Will do. — Racconish ☎ 07:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much ! Cheers. --DenghiùComm (talk) 07:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
@DenghiùComm: ✓ Done — Racconish ☎ 08:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
And the files of the unknow american photographer? --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
@DenghiùComm: please kindly check again. If not done, could you give me an example? Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 08:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Now it's all right. Sorry, it was the cat page opened before your corrections. Thank you so much again ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

@DenghiùComm: you are welcome. Cheers, — Racconish ☎ 08:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Illustration on WP

Hello Racconish

J'avais un petit quelque-chose à te demander : penses-tu que je puisse utiliser ce fichier sur wp fr ? Amicalement, Ruyblas13 (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC). Ruyblas13 (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Plutôt non. Voir COM:QFI. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 16:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok, ça marche ; je te remercie pour ta réponse. J'étais pas à 100 % sûr de validité du fichier et maintenant je le suis. Encore merci. Amicalement, Ruyblas13 (talk) 17:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC).
Bienvenu. — Racconish ☎ 18:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

File:The Boy in the Plastic Bubble (1976).webm

Pay attention to copyright
File:The Boy in the Plastic Bubble (1976).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The movie has been released in 1976 so
Public domain
This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1963, and although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart and the copyright renewal logs.
Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (70 years p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 years p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 years p.m.a.), Mexico (100 years p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 years p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ українська ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Flag of the United States
Flag of the United States
doesn't apply here. Perhaps
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart as well as a detailed definition of "publication" for public art.
Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (50 p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 p.m.a.), Mexico (100 p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties.

العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Flag of the United States
Flag of the United States
does… Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

jdx Re: 08:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Jdx, I took it myself to DR. — Racconish ☎ 12:47, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Alice Guy-Blaché

I deleted (with regrets) her films you rightly nominated for deletion. I suppose you didn't nominate File:Burstup Holmes Murder Case (1913) - ALICE GUY BLACHE.webm because this is an American film and therefore likely out of copyright in the source country. Do you agree with my warning/note on the category page? Gestumblindi (talk) 00:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

PS: I changed the note as I see that all her American films were published before 1923, so I think we can confidently say that these are in the public domain. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Gestumblindi, I agree with you, including the regrets, particularly for the hand colored pre-1900 shorts. — Racconish 💬 05:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Isabelle Saporta.jpg

File:Isabelle Saporta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 21:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Antonin Artaud 1926.jpg

Hi Racconish, I reverted your recent upload of File:Antonin Artaud 1926.jpg. That file is a restored image, please upload other versions as a separate file. Thank you and cheers. Bammesk (talk) 16:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Bammesk, you are perfectly right. Cheers, — Racconish 💬 19:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Images Flickr

Hello Raccoon,

J'ai importé trois fichiers issus de Flickr : celui-ci, celui-ci et celui-là. Les trois fichiers sont sous licence CC by 2.0. Est-ce que l'utilisation de ces fichiers te semble valide ? Bien à toi, --Ruyblas13 (talk) 09:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC).

Ruyblas13, pas de problème . Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 11:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
C'est cool  ! Merci pour ta réponse ; Bien à toi --Ruyblas13 (talk) 12:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Fantômas

Bonjour, Racconish.

Je me suis permis de remettre le fichier d'origine ici puis de télécharger le nouveau fichier dans cette nouvelle page.

Pourriez-vous indiquer la source du nouveau fichier, s'il vous plaît ? Par avance, merci beaucoup.

Bien cordialement. --Guise (talk) 13:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done — Racconish 💬 14:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Mark Twain

Bonjour Racconish, je ne suis pas du tout contributrice sur Wikipedia et je ne sais pas comment faire ni à qui m'adresser pour signaler un sous-titrage inapproprié de la vidéo de 1909 que tu as mise sur l'article de Mark Twain en 2014. J'imagine que quelqu'un est venu par la suite écrire des obscénités et autres définitions inapropriées sur la vidéo, mais je n'ai aucune idée de comment et où modifier cela... Peux-tu voir ce qu'il convient de faire? Merci d'avance! Lucile — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB19:2BF:3500:48EA:2F09:7105:2CD8 (talk) 14:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Suppression immédiate demandée. Cordialement — Racconish 💬 14:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Merci! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB19:2BF:3500:48EA:2F09:7105:2CD8 (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 11:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 11:55, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 07:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Clair de Lune Espagnol (1909).webm

File:Clair de Lune Espagnol (1909).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 07:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

About File:2008TIBE Day4 Hall1 ChinaTimesPublishing DennisNieh.jpg

I'm the ONLY photographer of this photo and fixed the original image.

Why not suitable for Commons although I take this photo by myself ten years ago in TWTC?

And I also fixed this image to suit with Commons' Policy.

Should I make a request from the PR of CTimes? Rico Shen contact... 21:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

My bad. — Racconish 💬 07:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Pearsall Smith Family.jpg

Hi, Racconish, the question is: who's who in this image? Can you help? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 08:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Lotje : ✓ Done — Racconish 💬 09:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)


Opinion?

Hi, Racconish, as you have been involved in the review of various Hannah Arendt photos, may I ask what is your expert opinion of this Flickr photo. It appears to be licensed with CC BY 2.0, and the photo appears on various other sites stating the same author and licence. Would that be OK to upload in Commons, or do you think it is nonetheless questionable? Antilope (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Antilope, the photo is on Getty' image bank with credits to the Bettmann Archive, with a mention of 1963. [1] This might indicate it comes from a press agency. — Racconish 💬 17:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Well, as far as I can see, that's a clearly a different photo, albeit most likely taken at the same occasion. But I guess you mean that it does raise doubts about the authorship. Antilope (talk) 18:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes, that's exactly right. — Racconish 💬 19:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Administrator

Hi, Racconish. You work often with media of the day. But main page is fully cascade-protected, so if a mistake is discovered in today's media of the day, then you cannot repair it, because you are not an administrator. Do you want to become an administrator? Taivo (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Taivo, thanks for the suggestion. This would at least allow me to speedy delete my own uploads with typos instead of giving the hassle to somebody else Clin. I appreciate the local tradition of proposing somebody else for adminship. Should you feel confident enough to propose my name to the community, I would feel honored. — Racconish 💬 18:51, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! Now I created a request in Commons:Administrators. Taivo (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrator

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Offert au nouvel administrateur par ses confrères…

Félicitations Racconish ! Tu es maintenant pourvu des droits d'administrateur sur le site. Avant de te lancer dans les effacements de page, protections de page, blocages de compte ou modifications de pages protégées, il n'est pas inutile de relire attentivement la page Commons:Administrateurs et de placer dans ta liste de suivi les pages s'y rapportant (notamment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, Commons:Demandes de suppression). La plupart des actions d'administrateurs sont réversibles par les autres sysops, à l'exception des fusions d'historiques qui doivent donc être traitées avec précaution.

Il est possible de discuter directement avec d'autres admins sur IRC : #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Il existe également un canal dédié aux admins de Commons, qui peut être utile pour les sujets sensibles ou la coordination entre administrateurs : #wikimedia-commons-admin.

Tu peux également rejoindre #wikimedia-admin, le canal de coordination inter-wiki pour les administrateurs Wikimedia. Demande à n'importe quel channel operator de t'accorder une dispense d'invitation (alternativement n'importe qui sur le canal peut t'y inviter temporairement). Tous les admins de tous les projets y sont bienvenus.

La lecture de Commons:Guide to adminship peut s'avérer enrichissante.

Merci de vérifier ou d'ajouter ton nom à la liste des administrateurs et les autres listes, par langue et par date, qui y sont mentionnées.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Oops, je n'avais même pas vu ta candidature. Félicitations ! Yann (talk) 14:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Merci EugeneZelenko et Yann. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 14:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Shooting 'Film Ghetto Theresienstadt'.jpg

File:Shooting 'Film Ghetto Theresienstadt'.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Catrìona (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Motd/2018-11-03

Hi, I am writing to let you know that the song (its other version) has been already chosen MOTD for 24th September, so perhaps you might consider changing the MOTD for 3rd November. --jdx Re: 03:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Thanks Jdx. — Racconish 💬 07:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 21:41, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg

File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 11:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Confusion over File:Pattern Grid 40x40.png vs. File:Pattern Grid 32x32.png

I'm a bit confused by your recent renaming of File:Pattern Grid 32x32.png back to File:Pattern Grid 40x40.png, and I think it may have been a mistake. The file is obviously a 32×32 grid, but it was originally uploaded as File:Pattern Grid 40x40.png. It was nominated for deletion on the basis that the name was wrong, so I renamed it (under citerion 3: obvious error) to File:Pattern Grid 32x32.png. You have now closed the deletion request  Keep, and renamed the file back to File:Pattern Grid 40x40.png, "per request". Is this a simple mistake, or is there some request for renaming back to what appears to be an incorrect name? --bjh21 (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

bjh21, my bad. Thanks for pointing it out. — Racconish 💬 18:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Motd/2018-11-15

I don't think the English description is proper. AFAIR in this context "by John Bowers" means "directed by John Bowers", but according to the IMDB page Bowers played "just" male main role. --jdx Re: 22:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Thanks Jdx. The subtleties of the Polish genitive being unfortunately beyond my grasp, I leave you with apologies the burden of fixing the Polish MOTD description. — Racconish 💬 06:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

I saw that you deleted some of the images of which I have requested the deletion with criterion G7. I want to thank you very much for your work and also to apologise to have give you a lost of time because of my big mistake in uploading images from Flickr. Mercie beaucoup, --Civitas13 (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Civitas13, you are welcome. Now it' time to make some good uploads Clin. Cheers, — Racconish 💬 18:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

bilder

lieber racconish - sie haben alle bilder gelöscht - ich habe jedoch für alle bilder schriftliche erlaubnis - können sie behilflich sein, die bilder wikipediagerecht hochzuladen?? danke sehr. freundliche grüsse --Bavona (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Bavona. Please forgive me for answering in English. For your record, your deleted uploads are
To have them undeleted, you must provide an authorization of the copyright owners of the photographed works (likely Frey's heirs), following the procedure explained in German here (the English version is maybe more detailed). Thanks, — Racconish 💬 06:32, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

File:The Point Purakanui Inlet Blueskin Bay Otago New Zeand.jpg

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Point Purakanui Inlet Blueskin Bay Otago New Zeand.jpg as kept based on the idea that the photographer was W. A. Taylor, who died in 1952. That would be fine, if the photographer was W. A. Taylor (as User:Geo Swan claimed). The problem is that the person who uploaded it to Flickr admits they don't know the source of the image. The image does not appear in the book Geo Swan cited. When I pointed this out to Geo Swan in the DR he simply refused to confirm this. The text is from Taylor's book, but the photo is not. In fact, it appears to be a scan of a loose photo rather than a scan of a printed image from a book. Lastly, if you look at the image itself, there is text in the lower right corner. It isn't completely legible, but clearly does not say Taylor. Can you reconsider your closure? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

@World's Lamest Critic: ✓ Done You are right, the signature cannot read as Taylor. Thanks, — Racconish 💬 17:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:45, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:3,001-Liter-Cola Bild1.jpg

Hi Racconish, may I ask: Did you forget to delete File:3,001-Liter-Cola Bild1.jpg or is there a reason to keep picture #1 and delete #2 and #3 of this series?--Wdwd (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

@Wdwd: ✓ Done Thanks, — Racconish 💬 17:36, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Song of the Dervishes Maqam Dil (1931).ogg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Song of the Dervishes Maqam Dil (1931).ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:23, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, typo fixed. — Racconish 💬 07:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Tutorizing photographers

Hello Racconish, for some years now I have been tutorizing some photographers, and Unnika is one of them. I convinced her to collaborate with the wikimedia project to upload some interesting photos for us. She just followed my instructions and now is disappointed with the project. Let me talk to her again and I'll try to convince her again to avoid stop collaborating. What steps should she take to restore the images? --Yuanga (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

@Yuanga and Unnika: the deleted files come from unniks.com and are indicated in the EXIF as "Cristina R. All rights reserved". I am willing to acknowledge a mistake and help out, but please understand that there is no obvious link between the uploader and the copyright holder. Maybe some clarification is needed here to start with Clin. If it implies personal information, feel free to email me. Otherwise, I am willing to explain in more detail the OTRS process. — Racconish 💬 22:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
True, she uploads their images to unniks.com (and she is unnika, can you see the relation?) and some of these files are upoloaded to wikimedia too. She uploads the files using {{Own work}} template, but now I realize that it is not enough. What do you need? Maybe an email from any @unniks.com mail address saying something? Thanks! --Yuanga (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Here you can see a bio page in unniks.com where you can link her to "Cristina R.". --Yuanga (talk) 20:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
@Yuanga and Unnika: : the usual way would be for her to forward to OTRS as unnika, the Commons user, her authorization as Cristina R., the photographer, to release Cristina R.'s images uploaded by unnika under cc-by-sa. I would undelete the files and she would mark each of them as {{OTRS pending}}. Once the OTRS ticket will be approved, you can use it for future uploads. Does this work for you? — Racconish 💬 23:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
I understand. I will mark unnika's files with {{OTRS pending}} template. In the future, she will continue tagging with the same template and sending an e-mail to commons for each photo or this will not be necessary? Exist eany option to avoid this long procedure? About the e-mail, a text generated by Wikimedia OTRS release generator is ok? --Yuanga (talk) 07:20, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
I am undeleting these files with a reference to our discussion. I think the best is to apply the ticket to Category:Images by Unnika, to put {{OTRS pending}} in the category and to add a mention such as "See Category:Images by Unnika in the permission section of the file description. Not sure about the ticket generator, might not be suited to such a case. A clear email might be better. — Racconish 💬 09:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
An OTRS ticket has been received and is being processed. The OTRS pending tag at Category:Images by Unnika has been modified. If you notice any images being tagged please let me know, because a custom license template may be created for all the images. Ww2censor (talk) 15:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
@Yuanga and Unnika: see comment above. — Racconish 💬 16:02, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
@Ww2censor and Racconish: Thanks for the ping. Should we create the template or will you do it? --Yuanga (talk) 20:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
@Yuanga and Racconish: : I've only made one and that was with help for another OTRS agent. If either of you are familiar with how to make one, please do and let me know. Then I'll add it to the images. Ww2censor (talk) 22:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
See here. — Racconish 💬 21:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish, Yuanga, and Unnika: I've created this custom license template {{Unnika}} for these image and if it's ok, will tag the current images with it and let the uploader know who to proceed. Can someone assist with the Spanish translation? Ww2censor (talk) 14:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish, Ww2censor, and Unnika: It's ok, but what do you mean when you say "the Unnika collection of Cristina Ruiz"? --Yuanga (talk) 23:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish and Yuanga: The template has been locked, so someone will have to unlock it to make edits. I did a Google translate, which is likely not great, but someone also need to set up the language switching, or whatever that is called. I thought "the Unnika collection of Cristina Ruiz" was the best way to describe the images as she goes by her own name and Unnika even though here website is Unniks. If you have a better way, please modify for better clarity. Ww2censor (talk) 23:13, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Let me know if unprotection is needed. — Racconish 💬 10:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish and Ww2censor: I'd put "This file comes from the Cristina Ruiz collection (Unnika)". I can translate into catalan too if you're interested. --Yuanga (talk) 12:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done — Racconish 💬 12:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish and Yuanga: Please, yes and yes. Unlock and refine the languages. Do either of you know how to get the language to switch over? I have no idea. If not I'll ask someone else. Ww2censor (talk) 12:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish and Ww2censor: I can't modify the template. By the other hand, Unnika has asked me if she can proceed to upload new files. Merry Christmas! --Yuanga (talk) 09:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
@Ww2censor and Yuanga: template temporarily unprotected. Please ping me when you are done. Of course, Unnika can proceed to upload new files Clin. — Racconish 💬 09:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish and Ww2censor: Thanks, but: [Edit=Allow only administrators] I'm not a commons administrator :P Can I proceed to tag all Cristina's files with the template? --Yuanga (talk) 10:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done — Racconish 💬 10:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish: Thanks!

@Racconish and Yuanga: All the current 51 files here Category:Images by Unnika have the custom template {{Unnika}} and on 22 December from OTRS she was sent details and confirmation uploads can restart with the custom template. This email included details on methods for bulk uploading. I'm unsure why you, or even she, is asking this question? Ww2censor (talk) 11:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: She told me that you wrote "I'll let you know when and how to proceed". That's why she is waiting. I'll tell her that she can continue uploading images. Thanks!
@Yuanga: The email to hold on was sent to her on 18 December and I followed up with instructions on 22 Dec. I'll resend it anyway. Ww2censor (talk) 14:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Does the template still need to remain unprotected ? — Racconish 💬 14:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
@Racconish: No, not for now as no one has added the language switcher (or whatever it's called). We can always ask for unprotection when we find someone who knows how to add that feature. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 23:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
@Yuanga: The template is unlocked right now and has an Italian version added by a trilingual admin I know. I tested the language switch, by changing my language preferences and it does work. I've added a Catalan version but it was done by Google translate so may not be too accurate. You should review it and the Spanish version too, edit as necessary and then ask Racconish to lock it again. Thanks in advance. Ww2censor (talk) 18:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Reprotected. — Racconish 💬 09:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Bruno Motta

File:BrunoZé03pq.JPG

Commons:Deletion requests/File:BrunoZé03pq.JPG

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brunomottastandup.jpg (not closed yet but similar, needs to be kept)

Brunomotta's identity was verified by the OTRS team. See File:Bruno Motta.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Brunomotta. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: , OK, I will look into this later today. Cheers, — Racconish 💬 13:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. @Sphilbrick: you said "We received an explicit permission statement for File:BrunoZé03pq.JPG but it was not needed as there appears to be an acceptable license on Flickr". Clearly that statement was needed.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:13, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: the deleted picture is this one, which is copyrighted to Washington Alves/Light Press according to the EXIF at Flickr, and released under CC0 by the sole Bruno Motta. I still consider Washington Alves permission is necessary at Commons and Bruno Motta's release is not sufficient, as he is not the copyright holder. Please note Washington Alves photos at Light Press which are available on line are copyrighted [2]. — Racconish 💬 14:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
See also User talk:Alexis Jazz/Archives/2018/June#Images for Deletion. I can't see the OTRS ticket so it's hard for me to judge. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: as far as I can see the ticket you refer to covers File:Bruno Motta.jpg, which comes from here with a copyright to Luringa. I am not sure the ticket expressly covers Luringa's own release under CC0, but even if it would, it would be most unusual that it would include also Alves release of the file we discussed first. — Racconish 💬 15:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Anca Pop August 20, 2015.jpg

What was the point of deleting that image? It was uploaded by Anca herself on Flickr before her death, and now just because it was used on an article you think it's a reason to delete it? It's so senseless and so offensive to do something like this, to completely deny her rights after she decided to upload it on a free licence. Sabinbik22 (talk) 23:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

@Sabinbik22: according to the EXIF information at Flickr [3], this obviously posed photograph is copyrighted to the Romanian photographer Marius Baragan. Hence, Anca Pop is the sitter, not the author, and cannot license herself somebody else's work. Baragan's permission through OTRS is needed for undeletion. — Racconish 💬 06:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
It makes sense, thanks for making it clear, regards. Sabinbik22 (talk) 23:41, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Hi, The (File:Peyton Rous nobel.jpg) had been transferred from En Wikipedia to Commons! also had licencing template {{PD-old-70}}, as photographer died before 1948. As it has been deleted (Speedy Deletion) Could you please inform me what was the problem?! or otherwise if you think it dose not have any problem please UN-Delete it ! Kind regards DejaVu (talk) 15:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello DejaVu, I have undeleted the file and started a regular DR to allow for community discussion. — Racconish 💬 15:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meditació.jpg

Hi! The result of the DR is OK, although I don't understand the cause: not the painter uploaded this file. No matter. But you forgot remove the template from the file. --Regasterios (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks Regasterios. — Racconish 💬 15:52, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Z15598100V,Odbudowa-zamku-w-Malborku-w-latach-60-.jpg File:Z15598101V,Odbudowa-zamku-w-Malborku-w-latach-60-.jpg

So as i understood i cant use those images. But if i can what do i need to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oleg Zaplatynsky (talk • contribs) 19:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

@Oleg Zaplatynsky: I suggest you might start by contacting the web site copyright owner . — Racconish 💬 08:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Tedi BFD.jpg, File:Tedi Boss BFD.jpg and others

I want to resurrect the images "Tedi BFD.jpg" and "Tedi Boss.jpg" to put what was required: permission, license and author and ask for support to reach an agreement. I hope you understand this and I would be grateful ... --CRAW309 (talk) 19:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

CRAW309 please clarify below. — Racconish 💬 19:23, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I continue pending... --CRAW309 (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Racconish/Archive5&oldid=638008688"