Commons:Administrateurs
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
Cette page explique le rôle des administrateurs (parfois appelés admins ou sysops) sur Wikimedia Commons. Veuillez noter que les détails concernant ce statut, et la façon dont les administrateurs sont nommés, peut être différente des autres sites.
Si vous avez besoin de l'aide d'un administrateur, veuillez poster un message sur la page Requêtes aux administrateurs.
Il y a actuellement 180 administrateurs sur Commons.
Qu'est-ce qu'est un administrateur?
Administrators as of novembre 2024 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 180
If 180 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Rôle technique
Les administrateurs sont des utilisateurs ayant la possibilité technique de :
- supprimer / restaurer des images et d'autres fichiers téléversés et restaurer des versions supprimées
- supprimer / restaurer des pages et visualiser / restaurer des versions supprimées
- protéger / déprotéger des pages et modifier des pages protégées
- bloquer / débloquer des utilisateurs, des adresses IP individuelles ou des plages d'adresses IP
- modifier certains messages de l'interface (voir aussi Commons:Administrateurs d'interface)
- renommer les fichiers
- ajouter et supprimer des groupes d'utilisateurs
- configurer l'assistant d'Upload
- supprimer / restaurer des entrées de journal spécifiques et des révisions de pages
- importer des pages à partir d'autres wikis
- fusionner l'historique de pages
- modifier les filtres anti-abus
- ne pas créer de redirection depuis la page d'origine lors du renommage de pages
- passer outre les contrôles de spoofing et la liste noire des titres et noms d'utilisateurs
- envoyer un message à plusieurs utilisateurs à la fois (massmessage)
- Disposer de limites plus élevées lors de l'utilisation de requêtes API
Tous ces éléments sont connus sous le nom d'outils de l'administrateur.
Rôle communautaire
Les administrateurs sont des membres expérimentés et fiables de la communauté, qui se chargent d'un travail d'entretien en sus de leurs activités en tant qu'éditeurs, et qui ont obtenu pour cela les outils d'administrateurs moyennant un consensus/vote public. Chaque administrateur a ses centres d'intérêt et son expérience donnée, mais les tâches typiques qu'ils réalisent incluent notamment de traiter et clôturer les demandes de suppression de fichiers, de supprimer les fichiers violant les droits d'auteur, de restaurer des fichiers lorsque c'est nécessaire, de protéger Commons contre le vandalisme, et de travailler sur les modèles et autres pages protégées. Bien sûr, quelques-unes de ces tâches peuvent également être effectuées par d'autres utilisateurs.
Les administrateurs doivent comprendre les objectifs de ce projet et être prêts à travailler de manière constructive avec les autres dans ce but. Les administrateurs doivent également comprendre et respecter les règles et recommandations de Commons et, le cas échéant, respecter le consensus de la communauté.
Mis à part les tâches qui nécessitent l'usage de leurs outils propres, les administrateurs n'ont pas d'autorité particulière en matière éditoriale du fait de leur statut. Leurs contributions ont la même valeur que celles de tout autre contributeur. Bien-sûr, quelques administrateurs sont influents ; cela ne vient pas de leur position d'administrateur, mais de la confiance qu'ils ont acquise auprès de la communauté.
Conseils pour les administrateurs
Merci de lire le guide de l'administrateur.
Retrait des droits d'administrateur
Selon les règles de révocation des administrateurs, les droits d'administrateur peuvent être retirés en cas d'inactivité ou de mauvaise utilisation des outils d'administration. Lors d'une demande de retrait des droits d'administrateur, les règles normalement applicables pour déterminer un consensus dans une demande de droits administrateur ne s'appliquent pas. Au lieu de cela, il faudrait utiliser un « consensus majoritaire », par lequel tout consensus en faveur d'un retrait des droits de plus de 50% est suffisant pour valider le retrait des droits d'administrateur.
Comment devenir administrateur ?
Tous les candidats au rôle d'administrateur doivent passer par cette étape et soumettre leur demande à la communauté via une RFA, y compris les anciens administrateurs qui souhaiteraient retrouver leur rôle.
Tout d'abord, allez à Commons:Administrators/Howto et lisez les informations qui s'y trouvent. Revenez ensuite ici et faites votre demande dans la section ci-dessous.
- Après avoir cliqué sur le bouton approprié et créé la sous-page, copiez le lien vers cette sous-page (par exemple « Commons:Administrators/Requests/Votrenomd'utilisateur »), éditez la page Commons:Administrators/Requests et collez le lien en haut de la section. Ensuite, placez-le entre deux doubles accolades pour le . Faites une demande de notification de liste de suivi sur MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, ou modifiez MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice pour ajouter une demande si vous êtes administrateur.
- Si quelqu'un d'autre a proposé votre candidature, merci de signaler si vous l'acceptez en indiquant « J'accepte. » ou quelque-chose de similaire, et de signer vous-même au bas de la candidature. La sous-page aura encore besoin d'être transcluse par vous ou le proposant.
Utilisez la boîte ci-dessous ; remplacez « Username » par votre nom d'utilisateur. |
Voter
N'importe quel utilisateur enregistré peut voter ici, mais leur vote pourrait ne pas être pleinement pris en compte s'ils n'ont à leur actif que peu ou pas d'édition. Il est préférable donner les raisons pour lesquelles vous votez « pour » ou « contre » afin d'aider le Bureaucrate qui doit fermer la nomination à prendre une décision informée. Un vote argumenté possède un plus grand poids qu'un vote simple, et ce d'autant plus s'il apporte des éléments matériels pour appuyer son argumentation.
Le statut d'administrateur est accordé à partir de 75 % des voix et un minimum de 8 votes de soutien. Les votes d'utilisateurs non enregistrés ne sont pas comptabilisées. Toutefois, le bureaucrate clôturant le vote dispose d'un pouvoir discrétionnaire ; sa décision ne sera pas forcément basée sur les résultats bruts. Les bureaucrates peuvent, à leur discrétion, prolonger la période d'une demande de droits d'administrateur s'ils pensent que cela peut aider à obtenir un meilleur consensus de la communauté.
Les votes Neutral ne sont pas décomptés. Pour autant, ils alimentent les discussions, peuvent servir à convaincre les votants, et apportent des éléments de compréhension de la position de la communauté aux bureaucrates qui clôtureront le vote.
Purge the cache Utiliser ce lien pour purger le cache de la page.
Candidatures au statut d'administrateur
Une fois traitées, les pages listées ici devraient être archivées sur Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Veuillez lire la page Commons:Administrateurs avant de voter ici. Tout utilisateur connecté peut voter, bien que ceux qui n'ont pas ou peu de contributions à leur actif à la date du vote peuvent voir leur vote non ou partiellement comptabilisé.
No current requests.
Candidatures au statut de bureaucrate
Une fois traitées, les pages listées ici devraient être archivées sur Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Veuillez lire la page Commons:Bureaucrates avant de voter ici. Tout utilisateur connecté peut voter, bien que ceux qui n'ont pas ou peu de contributions à leur actif à la date du vote peuvent voir leur vote non ou partiellement comptabilisé.
No current requests.
Demandes des droits de vérificateur d'adresse IP
Une fois traitées, les pages listées ici devraient être archivées sur Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Veuillez lire la page Commons:Vérificateurs d'adresses IP avant de voter ici. Tout utilisateur connecté peut voter, bien que ceux qui n'ont pas ou peu de contributions à leur actif à la date du vote peuvent voir leur vote non ou partiellement comptabilisé.
No current requests.
Demandes du droit technique "masqueur de modifications"
Une fois traitées, les pages listées ici devraient être archivées sur Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Veuillez lire la page Commons:Masqueurs de modifications avant de voter ici. Tout utilisateur connecté peut voter, bien que ceux qui n'ont pas ou peu de contributions à leur actif à la date du vote peuvent voir leur vote non ou partiellement comptabilisé.
Kadı (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
Scheduled to end: 00:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello I am Kadı. I am an administrator in Commons. Also, I serve as a VRT personnel and global renamer. Sometimes users request oversight actions from me. 3 days ago, I changed visibility of edits on a file because of the uploader's request and I forwarded it to the oversighters but there is no action. I request to be an oversighter, to handle this requests and suppress the edits. Kind regards, --Kadı Message 18:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Votes
- Support We have a need, and I trust the candidate. Concerns about future actions of governments is en:WP:Crystal. Hopefully my country doesn't chose the candidate that admires autocrats like Xi and Putin. Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing against the candidate in person, but per below there appears to be no strong need, and creating a mountain out of a single example appears like an attitude to me. In general, especially Commons should have as few oversighters as possible as they perhaps not only address privacy issues like other wikis but also images with unlawful content. I would prefer to have this in few hands, and the most trusted ones. --Krd 17:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Rather Support. Having a 4th oversighter would be a benefit rather than a disadvantage. Yann (talk) 09:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are only 3 oversighters currently, only 2 of which are regularly active on this wiki, and I recognize none of their names from my general course of editing. I would like to see a name I recognize added to this group, and Kadı fits perfectly for that criterion. I also trust this candidate to do the right things with the tools. Clay (talk) 10:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. It's good to hear that there isn't a backlog and it's just that oversighters place a lower priority where the material already has limited visibility but oversight requests are often time-sensitive so having an extra member of the team could be beneficial. If the WMF hasn't expressed concern with having oversighters from Turkey, I don't think it's for the community to disallow it. If we have a trusted and experienced admin offering to volunteer, I think we should take the offer. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support no concerns --TenWhile6 12:19, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per HJ Mitchell. Regards, Aafi (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per a number of the above Herby talk thyme 14:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann and Abzeronow. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:57, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
{{Oppose}} modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)- aslında bunun denetçi başvurusu olduğunu düşünmüştüm. alelacele karşı verdim. ama değilmiş.
- ben kadı'nın kişisel bilgileri gizleyeceğini gayet iyi biliyorum. ancak https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Kad%C4%B1 buradan da gözükeceği üzere sekiz(8, !) tane vikide yetkisi bulunuyor. bu kadar çok yetkiye sahip olmak ilgili vikilere zaman ayırmak için sorun olur diye düşünüyorum. mecbur olarak birinden alırken birinden götürmek zorunda kalacaksın. bundan dolayı karşı. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Modern primat, görüşün için teşekkürler. Türkçe yazmışsın Türkçe cevap vereyim ben de. Halihazırda birçok vikide birçok yetkisi olan kullanıcılar bulunuyor. Birinden alıp birinden götürmek zorunda kalmayacağım merak etme :) "ben kadı'nın kişisel bilgileri gizleyeceğini gayet iyi biliyorum." bu bilinçte olmana sevindim, olumsuz görüşünün dayanağı zaman ayıramayacağım ise ayıracağımı taahhüt ettiğimi bilmeni isterim. İyi vikiler diliyorum. Kadı Message 19:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not convinced especially with the response to Krd and my additional safety concerns. GPSLeo (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo, thank you for your vote. If I become elected, I will prove my guarantee of safety with my actions. My aim is to serve for community. Best wishes from Istanbul! Kadı Message 18:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just to make sure that this is not a misunderstanding: I do not accuse you to work for an intelligence agency I just fear that you could be deported to jail for not collaborating with the intelligence agency. This is primarily about your personal safety. GPSLeo (talk) 18:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo, I am also in VRT. Sometimes, Turkish court decisions are forwarded to info-tr. I forwarded them to WMF Legal Department. I am personally safe. Thank you for thinking of me. Kadı Message 18:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just to make sure that this is not a misunderstanding: I do not accuse you to work for an intelligence agency I just fear that you could be deported to jail for not collaborating with the intelligence agency. This is primarily about your personal safety. GPSLeo (talk) 18:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo, thank you for your vote. If I become elected, I will prove my guarantee of safety with my actions. My aim is to serve for community. Best wishes from Istanbul! Kadı Message 18:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I trust Kadı's judgment and experience, an additional active oversighter would be beneficial. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I am concerned about the user's understanding of the RevisionDelete functionality (as mentioned by Abzeronow in the comments section below). I worry that this will negatively impact their ability to suppress very sensitive content that is routinely raised to oversighters. odder (talk) 23:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I trust him. Jianhui67 T★C 16:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Three oversighters is too few. I would trust Kadı Andy Dingley (talk) 16:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support trustworthy. --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support nothing wrong with having another oversighter. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 20:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC) - Support -Fastily 01:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only one of the three existing oversighters has voted thus far and they oppose. For something like this, I give a lot of weight to the people already doing the work, so at least until the others weigh in, I'm landing here. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Adamant1 (talk) 05:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per GPSLeo —Mateus2019 (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. no confidence.--RoyZuo (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- There definitely is a need for another oversighter. I'm not sure if unwanted location data (which is still present in the metadata, file should be overwritten with changed EXIF to purge the unwanted data) merits oversighting rather than hiding it from non-sysops but maybe others can convince me that it's appropriate. Abzeronow (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- And now the issue was dealt with. Abzeronow (talk) 17:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Like in your last request, I think the community would like to hear how many requests for OS you made in the last 12 months, and how many of them lead to actual oversight. Feel free to add how long it took to have the OS requests processed. (The last 2 or 3 requests I made were processed within few hours, so I don't actually see any problem.) --Krd 07:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd, hello. Thanks for your question. Oversight actions are very important which includes users' privacy, and personal datas. I do not remember the number of my requests but 4 days ago I evaluated a request then forwarded to OS mails. 4 days passed, no answer. The request is so basic, it may take approximately 5 minutes. In addition, I do not indicate directly here the requested files for protecting the user's privacy.
- All of us are volunteers here, I do not blame anyone. Commons is a very large project, for example in trwiki we have 4 oversighters, Commons is a very enormous project than trwiki definitely, but in Commons we have only 3. This is definitely not adequate for Commons. I am volunteering here to handle oversight requests faster. In my previous request, you can see this link A steward self assigned OS access to themself in order to handle and emergency action. Kind regards, Kadı Message 09:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- An emergency is no relevant example. Also, two Commons OS have edited today. Can we rule out that there is just some communication problem? Krd 13:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd, I disagree with you. It is a relevant example. Large wikis should use local OS' We are not a small wiki. Kadı Message 15:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Even with more local OS, let it be 10, you will have situations where no one is present for an emergency situation. Volunteers are generally not required to meet emergency situation standard, so and emergency example IMHO is moot. Krd 17:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd, I disagree with you. It is a relevant example. Large wikis should use local OS' We are not a small wiki. Kadı Message 15:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Minorax, Odder, et Raymond : Can you comment if you received the request, and if there is any relevant backlog? --Krd 13:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd: I can confirm we did receive the request. There is no backlog, but we place lower priority on requests where content has already been revision deleted by an administrator as opposed to content that's visible on the wiki. I had limited access to e-mail throughout last week but I will action the request shortly. I do have to say that this whole discussion is striking me as quite strange where a user is requesting advanced permissions because one (one!) request they filed hasn't been answered to their satisfaction. As demonstrated in our activity statistics, we get a fairly steady number of requests every month and nearly all of them are answered a in a prompt manner as a few of our more active contributors can attest to. odder (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Odder, as I said before I do not blame anyone. I am a very active user among the Wikimedia projects. My aim is to help oversighters. Best wishes, Kadı Message 16:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- As someone who has sent a fair deal of oversight requests, I can confirm that 95% of the time, I get a 0-2 hr Response. I don't see any downsides with another oversighter. Normally the overnighters are very active, but I have had reports that took more than 24 hrs (IMHO the max time an oversight request can take), and another OS would be helpful, especially with @Kadı's timezone and editing patterns. As to @GPSLeo's concerns, WMF Legal will make the call as to if being in turkey is a problem, that's not our job. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- On my concerns: I just think we need to be more careful with such problems. For the other topic: For real emergencies there is the WMF T&S team and emergency cases do not have to be handled by volunteers. And it is always possible to contact a regular admin in parallel to perform a regular deletion before the suppression by an oversighter. GPSLeo (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- As someone who has sent a fair deal of oversight requests, I can confirm that 95% of the time, I get a 0-2 hr Response. I don't see any downsides with another oversighter. Normally the overnighters are very active, but I have had reports that took more than 24 hrs (IMHO the max time an oversight request can take), and another OS would be helpful, especially with @Kadı's timezone and editing patterns. As to @GPSLeo's concerns, WMF Legal will make the call as to if being in turkey is a problem, that's not our job. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Odder, as I said before I do not blame anyone. I am a very active user among the Wikimedia projects. My aim is to help oversighters. Best wishes, Kadı Message 16:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd: I can confirm we did receive the request. There is no backlog, but we place lower priority on requests where content has already been revision deleted by an administrator as opposed to content that's visible on the wiki. I had limited access to e-mail throughout last week but I will action the request shortly. I do have to say that this whole discussion is striking me as quite strange where a user is requesting advanced permissions because one (one!) request they filed hasn't been answered to their satisfaction. As demonstrated in our activity statistics, we get a fairly steady number of requests every month and nearly all of them are answered a in a prompt manner as a few of our more active contributors can attest to. odder (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- An emergency is no relevant example. Also, two Commons OS have edited today. Can we rule out that there is just some communication problem? Krd 13:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- You live in country that blocked Wikipedia in the past and the situation regarding democracy did not become better since then. I have the fear that giving you access to such sensitive information you bring you and the project into danger as authorities could try to force you to give information to them. GPSLeo (talk) 16:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo, In trwiki we have OS user group. All of the trwiki oversighters do not gave information to anyone. Your fear is irrelevant. Kadı Message 16:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- There were multiple of such cases in other countries where the WMF had to ban the users to protect them. GPSLeo (talk) 16:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo, I am also in VRT. I guarantee that I would never do that. Kadı Message 16:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- There were multiple of such cases in other countries where the WMF had to ban the users to protect them. GPSLeo (talk) 16:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GPSLeo, In trwiki we have OS user group. All of the trwiki oversighters do not gave information to anyone. Your fear is irrelevant. Kadı Message 16:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)