User talk:Philweb

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Philweb!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--Legobot^Operator_talk 18:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monument aux morts

Bonjour, il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en france, donc les photos de statues sont des oeuvres dérivées de cette statue, et le droit d'auteur de leur sculpteur doit être pris en compte. Si ce sculpteur, ou le possesseur des droits de propriété intellectuelle, est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, alors cette oeuvre est dans le domaine publique et il n'y a pas de problème (encore qu'il faut quand même dans ce cas indiquer le nom de l'auteur). Sinon, ces photos risquent grandement d'être supprimées de commons... --Lilyu (talk) 08:18, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, Toutes les statues ont été réalisées il y a plus de 70 ans. Généralement, il n'y a pas d'auteur. Par contre, quand il y en a, je le mentionne bien évidemment (Cf: http://ps1.free.fr/Monuments-aux-Morts/picture.php?/1094/category/8) Philweb (talk) 11:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tu veux dire qu'il n'y a pas d'auteur connu, ou pas connu de toi ? La réalisation il y a plus de 70 ans ne vaut que si le nom du sculpteur est inconnu... et j'entends par là que l’œuvre a été installée sans que personne ne sache qui était l'auteur (j'en doute). Le fait que ce ne soit pas indiqué sur le monument ne signifie pas que l'auteur est inconnu, il est peut être mentionné sur un bon de commande dans de vieilles archives, dans des journaux de l'époque etc. Tu es sûr que File:Monument aux Morts - St Urbain-29 2.jpg a plus de 70 ans ? Peux tu fournir la date de construction des différentes stèles ?

Il est préférable que tu importes sur commons les photos de monuments dont tu connais l'auteur, sa date de mort, et la date de "publication" de l’œuvre. En l'état, la description des images que tu as uploadé est trop lacunaire pour permettre de déterminer que l’œuvre photographié est réellement "libre" ou pas.--Lilyu (talk) 11:41, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je dis pas ça pour t'embêter, c'est juste que photographier des oeuvres d'art ou monuments en France est hyper problématique en raison de l'aspect très restrictif du code sur la propriété intellectuelle, et que les recommandations de commons requièrent une claire identification du statut de copyright d'une oeuvre.--Lilyu (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, excusez moi de m'introduire dans votre échange. Mais c'est vrai que quand on voit la quantité de photos qu'il y a dans la Category:War_memorials on ne pense pas que cela puisse poser problème de les importer. Comme celle-ci. A partir du moment où la photo est prise depuis un lieu public, c’est pas bon ?--Gaëlle FILY (talk) 22:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

La liberté de panorama existe en Angleterre (see Commons:FOP#United_Kingdom ) , mais pas en France. --Lilyu (talk) 22:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je rentre d'une semaine de congés. je reprends la discussion. Bon, OK pour les sculptures. Mais les monuments avec juste une croix ou un obélisque ne sont pas forcément considérés comme des sculptures? 82.245.192.27 17:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rien à voir avec être une sculpture ou pas... c'est plutôt une question de créativité, et c'est un sujet plutôt compliqué... à voir au cas par cas si l'argument "pas assez original pour ouvrir à des droits d'auteur" peut suffire. --Lilyu (talk) 22:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

D'accord je comprends que la créativité doit être prise en compte mais je reviens sur mes croix et autres obélisques des monuments aux morts. Je ne pense pas qu'il ait beaucoup matière à créativité dans ces cas là !!! En matière de monuments aux morts, il y a peu de monuments avec des statues. Philweb (talk) 22:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

écoute, j'ai été sympa, je t'ai averti en français d'un possible problème concernant un nombre important de tes photos, je t'ai fournit un lien vers la page de recommandation de Commons sur la liberté de panorama, et je n'ai pas proposé tes photos à la suppression. Maintenant tu es averti et informé, et il y a une chance élevée qu'un jour ta page de discussion soit recouverte de dizaines d'avis de suppressions pour travail dérivé de matériel sous protection du droit d'auteur. Comme ça tu es préparé et ça réduira un peu le choc si ça t'arrive. --Lilyu (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour tes avertissements et pour la liberté de panorama en France. Mais personnellement, je trouve qu'un monument aux morts avec une croix dessus n'est pas forcément une oeuvre d'art... Donc, je continue et on verra. Philweb (talk) 19:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Philweb!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Monument aux morts - La Roche Maurice-29.jpg was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Sous-marin Narval.jpg was uncategorized on 21 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Square Mathon (1).jpg was uncategorized on 21 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ségalen.jpg was uncategorized on 21 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Sous-marin Narval (1).jpg was uncategorized on 21 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Square Mathon.jpg was uncategorized on 21 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montcalm.jpg was uncategorized on 21 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Séparation Eglise Etat.JPG was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brest 2012 - Toile de mer1.jpg

File:Brest 2012 - Toile de mer1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Badzil (talk) 15:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ships_at_Tonnerres_de_Brest_2012

Ships at Tonnerres de Brest 2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Badzil (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brest 2012 - Toile de mer2.jpg

File:Brest 2012 - Toile de mer2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 14:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anse Taupin-1.jpg

File:Anse Taupin-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 11:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Anse Taupin-2.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 12:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-33-rue-Gilloux.jpg

File:Fresque-33-rue-Gilloux.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 12:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Recouvrance au centre ville de Brest.jpg

File:Recouvrance au centre ville de Brest.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 12:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-1-rue-st-Martin1.jpg

File:Fresque-1-rue-st-Martin1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 12:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Si vous avez la permission des artistes (la permission d'autres personnes n'est pas nécessaire), il faut suivre la procédure décrite ici. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK pour la procédure OTRS mais comme vous pouvez le remarquer, j'ai un grand nombre de photos prises en ville... cela va me demander beaucoup de temps pour le faire... Philweb (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK je viens d'envoyer une demande d'autorisation pour toutes les photos à permission.commons. J'espère qu'il ne faudra pas envoyer un mail par photo !!! Philweb (talk) 14:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non, je crois qu'un mail suffit pour toutes les oeuvres qui ont le même auteur. BrightRaven (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Brest2012-Philweb 231.jpg

And also:

File:Pont de Recouvrance.jpg

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour

2 de mes photos doivent être enlevée... 1) la photo "Brest2012-Philweb 231.jpg" n'a pas été prise pour le pont mais pour les bateaux du 1er plan lors de la fête nautique de Brest 2012. Je vous ferais remarquer que ce pont est au 2ème plan et donc n'est pas le sujet principal de cette photo.

2) la photo "File:Pont de Recouvrance.jpg" ne représente absolument pas le pont !!! ce n'est pas parce que le nom du fichier s'appelle Recouvrance qu'il faut forcéement l'enlever !!! Elle représente une plaque commémorative qui existait avant les travaux du tram.

Donc, je ne suis pas d'accord pour supprimer ces 2 photos. Philweb (talk) 10:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-10 rue de Madagascar1.jpg

File:Fresque-10 rue de Madagascar1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-10 rue de Madagascar2.jpg

File:Fresque-10 rue de Madagascar2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-13-rue-Professeur-Chrétien-1.jpg

File:Fresque-13-rue-Professeur-Chrétien-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-15-rue-Kerbriant-1.jpg

File:Fresque-15-rue-Kerbriant-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-2-rue-Albert-de-Mun-1.jpg

File:Fresque-2-rue-Albert-de-Mun-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-2-rue-Albert-de-Mun-2.jpg

File:Fresque-2-rue-Albert-de-Mun-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-2-rue-Neuve (1).jpg

File:Fresque-2-rue-Neuve (1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-2-rue-Neuve.jpg

File:Fresque-2-rue-Neuve.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-6 rue Maissin.jpg

File:Fresque-6 rue Maissin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-6 rue Maissin1.jpg

File:Fresque-6 rue Maissin1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-58-rue-Navarin-2.jpg

File:Fresque-58-rue-Navarin-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-58 rue Navarin.jpg

File:Fresque-58 rue Navarin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-9-rue-Shakespeare-1.jpg

File:Fresque-9-rue-Shakespeare-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-Anse Taupin-6.jpg

File:Fresque-Anse Taupin-6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-9-rue-Shakespeare-2.jpg

File:Fresque-9-rue-Shakespeare-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-Descente de Kervallon-2.jpg

File:Fresque-Descente de Kervallon-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-Descente de Kervallon-3.jpg

File:Fresque-Descente de Kervallon-3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-Rond-point-Palaren-2.jpg

File:Fresque-Rond-point-Palaren-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-Rond-point-Palaren-1.jpg

File:Fresque-Rond-point-Palaren-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-rive-de-Penfeld-4.jpg

File:Fresque-rive-de-Penfeld-4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-rive-de-Penfeld-3.jpg

File:Fresque-rive-de-Penfeld-3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque-rive-de-Penfeld-2.jpg

File:Fresque-rive-de-Penfeld-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument aux Morts - St Urbain-29 1.jpg

File:Monument aux Morts - St Urbain-29 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

82.124.24.47 15:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument aux Morts - St Urbain-29 2.jpg

File:Monument aux Morts - St Urbain-29 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

82.124.24.47 15:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ploare-29.JPG

File:Ploare-29.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.44.71.234 17:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Plaque-Huelgoat.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Plaque-Huelgoat.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Tombe-segalen-Huelgoat.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, je sais qu'il manque l'autorisation de l'auteur des 2 photos. Je lui ai envoyé une demande hier. J'attends sa réponse (attention: ce sont les vacances...). Merci de patienter un peu avant de supprimer les photos. --Philweb (talk) 13:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarekt: My collegue Philweb had only an oral authorization to verse those two files on Commons and went too fast

. We are waiting for the written confirmation for those. We'll send it by the OTRS system as required but the author is on vacation right now. Thank you for your understanding and sorry for my basic level of english. --El Funcionario (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Philweb, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Plaque-Huelgoat.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

File:Tombe-segalen-Huelgoat.jpg

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 00:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaque-Jean Cras.jpg

File:Plaque-Jean Cras.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.43.158.171 19:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monuments aux morts Aisne et France

Bonjour, Connais-tu le site sur les Monuments aux morts Aisne http://www.genealogie-aisne.com/old_genealogie/newmam/index.htm ? --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, non je ne connais pas mais je vais jeter un oeil pour le compte de l'université de Lille. Merci pour l'info. --Philweb (talk) 16:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Et connais-tu : http://www.geneanet.org/gallery/?action=geolist&rubrique=monuments&country=FRA&p=2&0=country pour toute la France --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, j'y participe aussi mais je préfère cette entrée: http://www.memorialgenweb.org/memorial3/html/fr/index.php. Cela permet de voir les noms des soldats, les conflits, et... les monuments. Site très sérieux et très complet. --Philweb (talk) 17:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chose et gens de ce pays.jpg

File:Chose et gens de ce pays.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.61.175.3 20:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hi, in response to your email message: There are no bots looking into our received email messages. All messages are processed by hand and we are a bit understaffed, so that we have quite a backlog. It's a pitty that files get deleted in the meantime, but we can restore them as soon as the permission has been processed. Jcb (talk) 18:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

avel mor

Salut, l'Avel Mor est une vedette militaire qui date de 1991 (et non de 1988 comme tu le dis). Ce n'est pas un vieux gréement. C'est juste le bateau que j'ai utilisée pour voir la grande parade de Brest 2016. Vas voir la page http://wiki-brest.net/index.php/La_Grande_Parade_(Brest_2016) et tu comprendras tout. Merci pour tes corrections --Philweb (talk) 18:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

Désolé pour la confusion... C'est vrai que je n'ai pas poussé mes vérifications. J'espère que ce sera la seule erreur que j'aurais faite. Bonne soirée, --Fab5669 (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ne t'en fais pas... je veille. Il va y avoir tout un boulot de recherche d'infos sur chaque bateau que j'ai pris en photo à mettre peut être sur wikidata ? J'ai encore 500 photos dont je n'ai pas le nom !!! Ca va être un boulot de fourmis pour retrouver les noms... a+ --Philweb (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elbe - Brest 2016 - Copie.jpg

File:Elbe - Brest 2016 - Copie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gaëlle FILY (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belle Poule+Etoile.jpg

File:Belle Poule+Etoile.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gaëlle FILY (talk) 10:14, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atelier Graff 07.jpg

File:Atelier Graff 07.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 15:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Village mélanésien - Danses (9).jpg

File:Village mélanésien - Danses (9).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gaëlle FILY (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Cabon-livre.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cabon-livre.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cabon-livre.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, Дима Г (talk) 22:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I send a mail with the autorisation at permissions-fr@wikimedia.org - Friendly from Brittany (France) --Philweb (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Expo-photo.jpg

File:Expo-photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK - pas de problème pour la suppression. --Philweb (talk) 07:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Monument aux morts

Salut Fab J'ai dans l'idée de télécharger les photos que j'ai prises des monuments aux morts de 14-18 (MAM) du Finistère. Ce sont des photos qui ne posent aucun problème de copyright car j'ai écarté ceux qui ont été sculptés par des artistes pour ne garder que des obélisques, calvaires et autres portails d'église. Ma question est: que dois je mettre comme catégorie ? Il y aura la catégorie de la commune. War memorials in France War memorials in Finistère World War I memorials in Finistère

Par ailleurs, j'ai remarqué qu'une photo Fouesnant-Monument aux morts.jpg ne devait peut-être pas se trouver sur WP car le sculpteur René Quilivic est décédé en 1969. Idem pour les photos du MAM de Carhaix: Carhaix_44_Le_monument_aux_morts.jpg Idem pour les photos du MAM de Le Faou: Le Faou Monument aux morts.JPG. Le sculpteur Etienne Camus est décédé en 1955 Idem pour Monument_aux_morts_Guerlesquin_01.jpg

La catégorie: « Statues of poilus in Finistère » n'est pas conforme non plus car les statues ont été réalisées par des artistes dont le travail n'est pas dans le domaine public. Qu'est ce que tu penses de tout ceci ? Merci --Philweb (talk) 12:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

Sur la catégorisation, il faut être le plus précis possible. En l'occurrence, dans ce cas, Category:World War I memorials in Finistère, puisque celle-ci est incluse dans Category:War memorials in Finistère, elle-même incluse dans Category:War memorials in France. Cela évite une inflation de photos dans les catégories (si chacune des 36000 communes françaises a un MàM, la catégorie nationale serait vite victime d'embonpoint !).

Si des images violent les conditions d'utilisation ou, pire, la loi, les processus et signalement se font sur la page Commons:Demandes de suppression. Après, il faut pouvoir le justifier : il est souvent bien difficile de connaître l'architecte/sculpteur de ces monuments et, plus encore, leurs dates de disparition. Bonne continuation, --Fab5669 (talk) 17:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monument aux morts

Salut Marianne

Co-administrateur de la base de données de la fac de Lille sur les monuments aux morts, j'ai téléchargé ta photo sur l'Hospitalet (04). Te souviens tu où tu l'as prise ? Il se trouve au dessus d'une prise d'eau le long de la route.

Aurais tu d'autres photos de monuments aux morts ?

Merci --Philweb (talk) 16:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, De mémoire, il est sur le parvis de l'église de l'Hospitalet, et donc presqu'en face de la mairie. Mais 8 ans après, et au vue du nombre de photos que j'ai mise en ligne, je ne pourrais le confirmer à 100 %. Pour les autres monuments, je les ai mis systématiquement en ligne, dans les communes concernées. Marianne Casamance (talk) 15:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Merci. Je vais voir. Sinon, quand tu passes devant un monument aux morts, penses à moi !!! Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, je penserais à toi. Sinon, va voir du coté des généalogistes amateurs, sur Geneanet [1]. Tu trouveras pas mal de photos, dans tous les départements. Marianne Casamance (talk) 17:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

oui, oui, Merci pour l'info mais je connais et je participe à leur site. Maintenant, j'essaye de trouver les personnes qui habitent dans les départements et qui peuvent se déplacer en pensant à prendre des photos...--Philweb (talk) 18:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monuments aux morts

@Philweb: J'ai fait de mes photos sur commons un petscan war memorials in France by department. Ouvrez ce lien, patientez un peu et clicquez thumbnails pour choisir parmi les 2097 fichiers ceux qui vous peuvent servir. Faites-moi savoir si cette methode marche pour vous, puisque j'ai encore les photos de cet été a telecharger. --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:15, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Super et merci, cela fonctionne... comme tu as du le remarquer sur le site de Lille, il me faut renseigner les décorations et les noms des morts sur chaque mam. Donc, en général, je prends les photos sous plusieurs angles ainsi que les listes de morts. Est il possible de classer tes photos par département et ensuite par nom? je pourrais ainsi visualiser les photos qui me permettent de remplir mes fiches avec photo générale, photo des inscriptions, photo des morts et photo de détail. Pour l'instant, je reprends les photos par département en vérifiant si les mam sont (ou non) dans la base de Lille
- Tu peux changer la cat in the petscan, et choisir sur le menu output puis sort cocher title, par exemple pour l'Aisne par alphabet ; pour les Ardennes par alphabet. --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:58, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Depuis 2012, lancement du fr:Projet:Illustration des communes françaises par @Gzen92: et moi, j'ai par préférence photographié dans des communes qui n'avaient pas encore des photos, et je faisais toujours attention à photographier les Monuments aux morts, mais pas toujours avec les détails que tu souhaites. J'ai testé quelques communes : c'est prometteur : tu auras pas mal de nouveaux monuments. --Havang(nl) (talk) 18:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Pour le petscan, il faudra rafraichir par bouton keyboard F5, ne pas copier les categories mais les fraichement taper à la main, et rafraichir chaque case voulu. Je t'enverrai un mail avec déjà des liens petscan préparés pour quelques départements. Si dans les categories il y a des anomalies (inversion dans l'arborescence de parentcategorie et de subcategorie) le petscan peut donner des images hors propos. Amicalement --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:21, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Un grand merci... tu me donnes du boulot jusqu'à la fin de l'année... J'ai beau être wikipédien depuis longtemps, je ne suis pas habitué aux outils. Moi aussi j'ai participé au projet sur les communes dans le Finistère et j'ai un grand nombre de mam à télécharger mais je n'ai pas le temps ! Ce serait bien d'avoir un outil pour le faire en masse. --Philweb (talk) 07:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ah, oui, moi aussi, j'ai encore 3500 photo's à telecharger, dont appr 5% de mam. Et pour ce qui concerne l'anomalie dans les mam, une des anomalies est cachée dans la Category:Inscriptions on the Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile , cross-section qui se gonfle : https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=10531934. --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

À ce moment Petscan ne marche pas, ?!--Havang(nl) (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sculpteur Daniel Dorillac

Done

Rebonjour. Je dois avoir dans mes dizaines de milliers de photos quelques-unes de Daniel Dorillac sur des monuments aux morts en Dordogne que je n'ai jamais déposées par manque d'information sur sa date de décès. Pas de nouvelle info à son sujet ? Père Igor (talk) 17:34, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je vais poser la question à l'administratrice de la base de données. Elle est peut-être en congés. --Philweb (talk) 07:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voila ta réponse... Tu vas pouvoir télécharger plein de photos !!! Dorillac est décédé en 1939 comme l'annonce une revue de société savante de Dordogne. La mention concernant Dorillac se trouve page 5. --Philweb (talk) 08:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Superbe ! Pour l'instant, il va falloir que je retrouve sur quelle commune du Mussidanais de l'avais photographié et quand. Ensuite, ce sera au petit bonheur la chance pour trouver d'autres occurrences car mon ancien système de traitement de photos (géré par windows vista) où j'avais tout classé par mots-clés (Dorillac Daniel) a été perdu lorsque mon ancien micro a été remplacé par un nouveau avec Windows 10 qui ne connait pas les mots-clés mais fonctionne avec des catégories, qu'il me faut reconstituer (petit à petit) sur plusieurs dizaines de milliers de photos. Snif ! Père Igor (talk) 10:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est tout récent mais tu avais déjà la plupart des informations, sauf celle de l'auteur, Daniel Dorillac. Bonne continuation. Père Igor (talk) 12:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je viens d'ajouter ta photo de l'auteur. Si tu as d'autres photos qui posent des problèmes de droit sur Wikipédia, tu peux me les envoyer directement. Je suis pour l'instant arrivé à l'Eure et Loir dans "war memorial in..." ! Bonne continuation --Philweb (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sur la page de ce sculpteur sur ton site, peux-tu remplacer « Référence de sont décès » par « Référence de son décès » ? Père Igor (talk) 17:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Philweb. L'orthographe est restée fautive. Père Igor (talk) 16:27, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Philweb. Sur ton site, la faute d'orthographe « Référence de sont décès » me pique les yeux

. Père Igor (talk) 18:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Père Igor. Effectivement cela fait tâche... Ce sera corrigé prochainement, pas de soucis.--Philweb (talk) 18:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ! J'ai moins mal aux yeux aujourd'hui

. Père Igor (talk) 14:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Essay telechargement MaM

Bonjour, Phil, j'ai fait quelques essais d'envoi de photos sur le site de Lille. J'ai vu que tu en as rédigé un. Est-ce que je peux me restreindre à l'envoi des photos par commune? --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Henk, Te serait il possible de les mettre sur commons avec la localisation dans la catégorie "War memorials in Sarthe" car je suis entrain d'écumer les catégories. Pour l'instant, je suis sur la Dordogne (24)... Pour info, tu te trompes d'onglet. Il faut aller voir si la commune existe en cliquant sur l'onglet "Monument". Ensuite si elle n'existe pas il faut cliquer sur dépôt (menu du haut). Bon courage pour les mettre sur commons.--Philweb (talk) 07:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Donc, seulement sur commons te suffit. Merci. --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

oui, oui, du moment que les photos sont dans la bonne catégorie et bien localisées. Je préfère remplir les fiches moi même pour avoir une intégrité dans les données. Tu ne perdras pas de temps en allant regarder sur ma base pour voir si elles y sont ! Bonne journée. --Philweb (talk) 07:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sarthe, juin 2019 upload on commons terminé. 89 photo's : https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=10541847 . je n'ai pas noté la location précise, mais la localité y est toujours. Attention, la GPS de ma camera n'est pas toujours fiable, malheureusement. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:32, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monument aux morts

Salut Philweb, please pardon me for responding in English to Commons:Bistro#Monument aux morts. I've already photographed some monuments in Manche which are not yet included in your database:

Fermanville, Église Saint-Martin: File:Fermanville Église Saint-Martin Nef Bas-Côté du Sud Vitrail 3 Morts Pour La France 1914–1918 2013 09 01.jpg, File:Fermanville Église Saint-Martin Nef Bas-Côté du Nord Vitrail 3 Morts Pour La France 1914–1918 2013 09 01.jpg. Please see the detailed description which is based on the book Philippe Chéron and Sophie Delauney, Vitraux de Normandie, une histoire de la Grande Guerre, ISBN 978-2-36219-150-3.
Le Vast: File:Le Vast Cimetière Aux enfants de la commune du Vast morts pour la France 1914–1918 2018 08 19.jpg
Théville: File:Théville À la memoire des enfants de Théville Morts pour la France 2016 08 21.jpg

Cordialement, AFBorchert (talk) 21:42, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank's Andreas, I will upload the files today.--Philweb (talk) 06:25, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pressignac-Vicq

Bonjour Philweb. Tu dis avoir apparemment fini la Dordogne pour les catégories de commons. Sur la commune de Pressignac-Vicq, ton site ne mentionne aucun monument aux morts. Or, ma photo de 2014 semble donc t'avoir échappé alors qu'elle était bien catégorisée dans la Category:War memorials in Dordogne, avec trois autres photos du même village (stèle du champ de martyrs de 1944 + coq du monument aux morts + monument paroissial). As-tu pensé à visualiser les photos non catégorisées du bas de la catégorie (342 photos sur deux pages aujourd'hui) ? Père Igor (talk) 15:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, Effectivement je ne l'avais pas remarquée car elle est un peu sombre mais on peut lire les noms ce qui est pour moi important. Donc, je vais la télécharger. Pourquoi tu ne la mets pas dans la catégorie de la ville puisque tu as 2 photos ? Pour info, pour l'instant, je me cantonne à 14/18 puisque les mam ont été construits généralement dans les années 20. Ton lien sur la base de Lille n'est pas le bon. Il faut aller sur l'onglet "monument" et utiliser le module de recherche. Il en restera certainement un certain nombre à retrouver sur commons... --Philweb (talk) 16:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

conflit d'édition. Je ne crée des catégories pour les monuments aux morts que depuis quelques années, donc il y en a plein en vrac en bas de page.

Idem pour Meyrals alors qu'il existe cette photo sur la même page commons. Je m'étais noté sur un document que Daniel Dorillac était le sculpteur sur ces deux communes. Ce bulletin de la Société historique et archéologique du Périgord le confirme pour Pressignac (page 117). L'ensemble du chapitre (pages 108 à 121) concerne les monuments aux morts du canton de Lalinde et tu pourrais y trouver des descriptions et des photos intéressantes. Pour Meyrals, un panneau à côté du monument aux morts indique que Dorillac l'a fait et que le monument a été érigé en 1936. J'ai transféré la photo de Meyrals dans la Category:War memorial of Meyrals que je viens de créer en y ajoutant deux autres photos. Père Igor (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, je traite Pressignac et j'arrête pour aujourd'hui... J'irai voir demain matin. Attention, ton lien vers la commune n'est pas le bon. Relie mon dernier message.--Philweb (talk) 16:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne peux pas prendre ton mam de Pressignac car il me manque la moitié des morts. Il manque les autres faces du mam !!! Sorry.--Philweb (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne vois pas quel lien vers quelle commune ne serait pas le bon : les 4 photos de Pressignac sont reliées à Pressignac-Vicq, ou à son église pour le monument paroissial. À défaut de l'ensemble des morts, tu as quand même la description du monument avec la photo. Père Igor (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Civray, Vienne

Done

Bonjour. Ayant retrouvé mon pense-bête sur les sculpteurs de monuments aux morts, j'en ai profité pour importer 12 photos du Poilu victorieux de Civray dans la Category:War memorial of Civray (Vienne). Ton site est déjà bien fourni en informations mais j'ai fait un relevé exhaustif des plaques, y compris victimes militaires, victimes civiles, guerre d'Algérie et guerre d'Indochine, et la signature d'Eugène Bénet. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 20:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, là pour Civray, je suis preneur. Pour notre base, il nous faut un maximum de photos des mam avec les listes. Je ne peux pas mettre juste une seule photo d'un mam. Généralement, il y a toujours des ornementations sur les différentes faces ou à ses pieds. Donc, je cherche sur wikipédia ce type de photos ainsi que les photos d'archives. --Philweb (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. C'est parfait pour les soldats mais au niveau inscriptions, il y a également A NOS MORTS POUR LA PATRIE GUERRE 1939-1945 sur ce fichier. Père Igor (talk) 10:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Just (Dordogne)

Bonjour Philweb. Je continue de mettre à jour les monuments aux morts que j'avais laissés de côté. Aujourd'hui, je te propose le Poilu mourant de Jules Déchin à Saint-Just (Dordogne) : Category:War memorial of Saint-Just (Dordogne) (photos prises il y a huit ans). Question d'ordre général : est-ce que je continue à te prévenir en ouvrant à chaque fois une nouvelle section sur ta page de discussion, ou préfères-tu que je regroupe un certain nombre de monuments aux morts et que je t'envoie ça tous les 15 jours ou tous les mois, ou autre ? Père Igor (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Père Igor. Tu peux me prévenir quand tu en as plusieurs, par exemple. Mais c'est comme tu le sens. Je vais recadrer les listes de noms grâce à la bonne résolution de tes photos. c'est le cas pour St Just. Pour l'instant je suis dans le Gers... Je voyage...--Philweb (talk) 13:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voila c'est dans la boite...--Philweb (talk) 13:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

En bas de liste, il doit s'agir de LAGRANGE R au lieu de LAGRANGER R mais je me demande si par hasard les deux derniers noms (avec POINTEAU M) ne concerneraient pas 1939-1945, car il y a une séparation marquée par rapport aux noms précédents (qu'on voit nettement sur cette photo). Je vais essayer de me renseigner auprès de la mairie. Père Igor (talk) 14:41, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Si on se réfère au site http://www.memorialgenweb.org/memorial3/html/fr/resultcommune.php?idsource=26486, ils mettent tous les soldats sur 14/18. --Philweb (talk) 15:57, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajout de monuments aux morts

Salut Philweb, j'ai ajouté quelques photos de monuments aux morts :

Ain

Aisne

Loiret
- Malesherbes

Oise
- Crépy-en-Valois (Guerre franco-prussienne)

Seine-et-Marne
- La Chapelle-la-Reine
- Trilport

Chabe01 (talk) 10:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK thank's. Je vais voir... Merci --Philweb (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, quelques ajouts de monuments aux morts de mon côté :

Gisors : trois monuments
Dreux

Chabe01 (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK c'est mis à jour - Merci --Philweb (talk) 10:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gramat

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Dans le Lot, le monument aux morts de Gramat est signé de Carlo Sarrabezolles et voici la photo de sa signature, si elle t'intéresse. Je n'ai pas vu sur ton site si tu avais la localisation ; je l'ai entrée sur la category:War memorial of Gramat. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, ce type de photo m'intéresse aussi. Je vais aller la chercher. Merci --Philweb (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eyzerac, Dordogne

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Sur la commune d'Eyzerac, les informations de ton site sont incomplètes : au verso du monument sont gravés les noms des morts de 1939-1945, ainsi que la croix de guerre et la représentation de deux médailles. Les photos de toutes les faces du monument sont sur cette page. Le monument est situé au parking de l'église. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 13:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK Je fais le nécessaire. Merci--Philweb (talk) 13:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je viens de voir que les 5 noms situés en haut de cette photo n'ont pas été enregistrés mais il manque l'indication de la guerre à laquelle les rattacher. Je vais essayer de joindre la mairie dans la semaine qui arrive. Je te tiendrai au courant. Père Igor (talk) 16:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La secrétaire de mairie d'Eyzerac m'a confirmé que deux d'entre eux, FOUCAUD J et GOLFIER J, sont bien morts pour la France lors de la Première Guerre mondiale. Elle suppose que les 3 autres habitaient Eyzerac sans y être nés. Tu vas pouvoir les faire ajouter. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est fait. --Philweb (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deux petits détails à régler :

pour 1870-1871, remplacer BOURDINAU L. par BOURDINAU P.
pour 1939-1945, supprimer un S à BOUSSSARIE L.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creyssac, Dordogne

Done

Rebonjour. Tu n'as apparemment rien concernant Creyssac. Je viens de créer la Category:War memorial of Creyssac, avec une bizarrerie, une petite plaque sur laquelle est indiquée « Sicaire Eugène Grand de Luxolière de Bellussière né le 30 mai 1802 mort le 18 janvier 1892 ». J'émets l'hypothèse que la commune, ayant peu de moyens, a transformé cette sépulture en monument aux morts. Père Igor (talk) 13:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tu dois avoir raison. Cela arrive assez souvent (comme pour les croix de mission ou les calvaires). Il a du mourir lors de la guerre au Dahomey. --Philweb (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peux-tu faire ajouter né le 30 mai 1802 mort le 18 janvier 1892 pour ce dernier et remplacer l'inscription CREYSSASC À SES ENFANTS par CREYSSAC À SES ENFANTS ? Père Igor (talk) 17:05, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Le Change, Dordogne

Done

Re-rebonjour. Pour Le Change, tu as déjà pris en compte le monument situé dans le cimetière. Pour le principal, situé au bout du parking de la poste, voici la page. J'ai eu beau chercher, aucune signature apparente. Père Igor (talk) 14:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Récupères-tu aussi les monuments commémorant la déportation ? Sur Le Change, il y a la stèle du château du Roc. Père Igor (talk) 14:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK Merci je vais ajouter les 2 mam. Les modifs seront effectives en principe ce soir. Je récupère les mam 14/18 mais aussi 39/45. Mais je priorise 14/18 !!!--Philweb (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pour ce monument, peux-tu pour 1914-1918 remplacer L. BRETON par L. BRETOU, I. FARGEOT par M. FARGEOT et G. LASSAIGNE par G. LASSAIGNE LT (ou G. LASSAIGNE Lieutenant) ? Père Igor (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marsac-sur-l'Isle

Done

Pour Marsac-sur-l'Isle, ton site connait déjà le monument aux morts. Il n'est pas sur rue ou route mais juste à côté de l'hôtel de ville (entre celui-ci et le parking situé à l'est). J'ai créé la Category:War memorial of Marsac-sur-l'Isle. Au verso figure un bas-relief représentant le V de la victoire et la croix de Lorraine (cette représentation particulière a-t-elle un nom ? ).

Par rapport aux morts de 1914-1918, il y aurait quelques noms à rectifier :

le deuxième ROUSSELET (sans prénom) est ROUSSELET J.
CLUNEL R. est en fait CLUNEL F.
pour LAVAUD C., j'ai un doute avec LAVAUD G. (tu fais ce que tu veux)
VEYL H. est en fait VEYRI H.
BOISSAVY C. me parait être BOISSAVY G. (comparer la forme avec le G de CHASSAING en bas du livre)
FAURE P. est en fait FAURE R.
les prénoms sont indiqués par l'initiale suivie d'un point mais bizarrement, chaque nom propre est également suivi d'un point.

Bon courage ! Père Igor (talk) 15:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Houla si tu rentres dans la typographie... on n'est pas couché ! Mais je vais faire les modifs sur les noms. Tu comprends pourquoi il faut une bonne définition pour les photos de listes. Pour le V et la croix, je n'ai pas de nom particulier. Je prends surtout le nom de la croix de Lorraine. Il faut savoir qu'à la base nous devions faire l'inventaire des mam de 14/18. Pour info, dans le nom de tes fichiers, tu pourrais ne mettre que "mam". C'est moins long que Monuments aux Morts... encore merci--Philweb (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Par rapport aux morts de 1914-1918, je réitère mes suggestions :

le deuxième ROUSSELET (sans prénom) est ROUSSELET J.
CLUNEL R. est en fait CLUNEL F.
pour LAVAUD C., je pense qu'il s'agit de LAVAUD G. (comparer la forme avec le C de CLUNEL et le G de CHASSAING en bas du livre sur cette photo)
VEYL H. est en fait VEYRI H.
BOISSAVY C. me parait être BOISSAVY G. (comparer la forme avec le C de CLUNEL et le G de CHASSAING en bas du livre sur cette photo)
FAURE P. est en fait FAURE R.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Philweb. Effort méritoire : VEYL H. est devenu VEYLI H. ; il n'y a plus qu'à le transformer en VEYRI H. et je pourrais clore cette section. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 19:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neuvic, Dordogne

Done

Un autre monument aux morts que j'ai photographié dimanche dernier : celui de Neuvic (sur ton site) sous la Category:War memorial of Neuvic (Dordogne).

Au niveau de la description, il manque la précision du drapeau tenu dans la main gauche et dans sa main droite, il me semble que ce ne sont pas des palmes mais une couronne de laurier.

Pour les inscriptions, le mot PATRIE figure en haut de la face principale du monument.

Au-dessus de cette inscription figurent les morts de 1870-1871 :

AYMARD AUGUSTE
LAFON MARTIN
LAPORTE JEAN
MERLET ALPHONSE

-

MICOINE ANTONIN
PEYTOUREAU DELPHIN
VERGNAUD FREDERIC

Parmi les morts de 1914-1918, j'ai relevé quelques anomalies :

AUREIX Raoul est AUPEIX Raoul
DONMARTY Chéri est FONMARTY Chéri
MANET Martial est MANEM Martial
POUBLANC Maurice a été oublié après PLANCHE Joseph
DUEYROL Jules est QUEYROI Jules
RAPNOUIL E est RAPNOUIL Eloi
le changement de colonne n'est pas marqué après DUBOS JOSEPH

Ceux de 1939-1945 sont gravés à la base du socle :

H. ALLEMANDOUX
P. COLINET
L. DOCHE
J. DUTOUR

-

R. FONMARTY
A. FONMARTY
R. FREY
F FLIEG

-

Y. MENJOULOU
J. MAZEAU
A. RAMBAUD
N. REYNAUD

-

P. REYMONDIE
A. SCHUSTER

Pour les autres guerres, deux petites plaques ont été ajoutées au-dessus de la couronne mortuaire et des palmes :

INDOCHINE MOUTY PIERRE
ALGERIE CAILLE CLAUDE

C'est tout pour aujourd'hui. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 17:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est corrigé - Merci --Philweb (talk) 09:59, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est mieux mais pas tout à fait fini. Je vois qu'il reste à ajouter PATRIE parmi les inscriptions du monument en haut de cette photo, sur le socle de la statue, et à remplacer sur 14-18 :

AUREIX Raoul par AUPEIX Raoul
QUEYROL Jules par QUEYROI Jules.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Savignac-les-Églises

Done

Bonjour. Pour Savignac-les-Églises (sur ton site), le poilu incarnant la Résistance a dû trouver le temps long sans bouger depuis 1921. Il s'est offert une petite balade. Voici la catégorie commons avec la signature de Charles-Henri Pourquet et la date de 1921, inférieure de deux ans à la date de l'inauguration. Père Igor (talk) 16:31, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pour la date sur le mam, c'est normal car il a été fait en série en 1921 et vendu dans toute la France. Les modifs sont faites. Merci - --Philweb (talk) 10:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Félix-de-Sorgues

Done

Bonjour Philweb. En ce qui concerne le monument aux morts de Saint-Félix-de-Sorgues (cette page sur ton site), je l'ai pris en photo le 30 juin dernier (Category:War memorial of Saint-Félix-de-Sorgues). Il est situé au pied du transept sud de l'église. J'ai repéré quatre différences :

BIAU Louis oublié après BARASCUD Paul ;
CORCORAL Émile oublié après BONNAFÉ Célestin ;
JORDY Pierre au lieu de JOROY Pierre ;
RECOULES Sylvain oublié après PRIVAT Émile.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 15:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

En cours de correction - --Philweb (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Vincent-sur-l'Isle

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Pour démarrer en douceur la semaine, je te propose la category:War memorial of Saint-Vincent-sur-l'Isle. Père Igor (talk) 10:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

En cours de création - Merci - --Philweb (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lanouaille

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Faute de photo proche de la face principale du monument aux morts de Lanouaille, ton site n'a pas répertorié quelques informations. Tu trouveras dans la category:War memorial of Lanouaille les informations suivantes à ajouter ou rectifier :

une plaque métallique de la FNACA indiquant

19 MARS 1962

CESSEZ le FEU en ALGERIE

A la mémoire des 30.000 Soldats

Morts en AFN

un mort supplémentaire en 39-45 : BONNET R.
parmi les morts de 1918, remplacer LASFARGEOS J. par LASFARGEAS J.
dans ceux de 1916, le dernier de la liste PARADINAS J. est suivi de la mention 15, me laissant penser qu'il est peut-être mort l'année précédente
pour information, dans les morts liés à la Résistance en 39-45, la mention Pont LASVEYRAT correspond à ce pont de Payzac sur l'Auvézère, où les Allemands ont tué au proche moulin de la Papeterie (nom figurant sur les cartes IGN) 34 résistants le 16 février 1944 (voir cette catégorie sur la commune de Beyssenac). Je suppose que les cinq noms qui suivent cette mention et que l'on retrouve dans la liste des 34 étaient originaires de Lanouaille. Le sixième nom LAVAUD R. est séparé des cinq précédents par une ligne : je suppose donc qu'il s'agit aussi d'un résistant mais mort lors d'un autre fait
photos des noms de l'architecte CHABROL et du sculpteur HONORAT.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

En cours de modification. Merci pour pont Lasveyrat et les noms. Concernant les photos de l'archi et du sculpteur, j'ai gardé les miennes qui étaient dans la rubrique "Inscription" ! Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 08:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help ! Les morts de 1914-1918 et 1939-1945 ont disparu ainsi que les informations sur l'architecte et le sculpteur. Tu peux regarder ce qui s'est passé ? Père Igor (talk) 08:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de panique, ne t'en fait pas, c'est normal... la fiche que j'ai corrigée est partie chez l'admin qui gère le département. Il devrait faire les modifs dans la journée... --Philweb (talk) 09:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf ! Je pensais que c'était toi qui modifiait directement les fiches. Rendez-vous à la section suivante, le temps que je l'écrive. Père Igor (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est moi qui administre quand il y a beaucoup de mam à faire dans un département. Moi, je m'occupe principalement du grand ouest.--Philweb (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Éloy-les-Tuileries

Done

Voilà, voilà : un monument inédit : Category:War memorial of Saint-Éloy-les-Tuileries. Père Igor (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Petite précision d'ordre général concernant mes photos : plutôt que Wikipédia, il vaudrait mieux indiquer CC-BY-SA qui est la licence libre sous laquelle je les place. Voir cette page pour plus d'explications. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Les photos de la base de Lille sont déjà en CC-BY-SA - J'ai ajouté wikipédia derrière ton nom car cela permet 1° de rechercher les photos sur commons et 2° de préciser que les auteurs (en général des noms d'utilisateur un peu bizarre) proviennent de wikipédia (commons est inconnu du public !) - Voili voilà. Autre chose, ne préfères tu pas qu'on discute directement par mail ? ou préfères tu continuer sur la page de discution ? --Philweb (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai jamais activé le mail sur wikipédia ou commons, et ne le souhaite pas franchement. Je préfère continuer la discussion ici, si tu n'y vois pas d'inconvénient. Père Igor (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, pas de soucis.--Philweb (talk) 16:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

mam en Aveyron

Done

Salut - Après une synthèse des téléversements (https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/blog/actualite/27883/le-point-par-departement-fevrier-2019/), il ne resterait que 2 communes sans fiche en Aveyron: 12048 Campouriez et 12800 Castelmary. Aurais tu cela dans tes trésors ? Sinon, un jour, si tu passes par là, essayes de penser à nous !!! Bonne journée - --Philweb (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne sais pas à qui tu t'adresses dans cette section. Si c'est à moi, je n'ai pas ça dans mes cartons, et je ne suis pas près de passer de nouveau dans ce département. Sinon, pense à notifier la bonne personne. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 14:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ben je m'adressais à toi puisque tu es plus près de ces communes que moi !!! Mais ce n'est pas grave. --Philweb (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'habite en Dordogne, et l'Aveyron n'a été qu'un lieu de villégiature temporaire limité à une semaine, à deux reprises. Père Igor (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, j'ai essayé de te sortir de Dordogne...!!! Mais, quelqu'un du coin nous fera ca très bien un jour prochain... --Philweb (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Antonne-et-Trigonant

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Ce n'est pas parce qu'un monument aux morts se trouve au bord d'une nationale avec possibilité de se garer juste à côté que tu as déjà les informations. Je te présente donc la category:War memorial of Antonne-et-Trigonant, en bordure de la route nationale 21, juste devant la mairie. Compte tenu de la qualité du calcaire, deux faces sur trois ont été fortement endommagées par les intempéries, et la troisième un peu. Heureusement, des plaques ont été récemment ajoutées pour reprendre tout ça, lors de l'appel des morts.

Détail : le médaillon représentant Louis Munat correspond à Louis Murat, aussi bien sur le monument que sur l'appel des morts.

Parmi les morts de 14-18, je vois deux différences entre les anciens noms gravés et ceux des plaques : BAREYROU CAMILLE au lieu de BABEYROU Camille et l'oubli en bas de la face principale du monument de LALET GEORGES.

Les 13 noms du 12 juin 1944 qui se retrouvent ici et là correspondent aux otages fusillés au lieu-dit les Piles dont tu trouveras la stèle érigée sur place sur cette photo (45°15′08″N 0°48′41″E / 45.252209°N 0.811515°E / 45.252209; 0.811515), le long de la route départementale 8, sur la même commune d'Antonne-et-Trigonant. Père Igor (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est en cours... merci. Sais tu si le monument est signé car il est original ? j'en ai jamais vu de ce type ! --Philweb (talk) 16:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai fait le tour du monument sans trouver de signature. Père Igor (talk) 08:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK merci - A la prochaine --Philweb (talk) 08:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pour les soldats de 14-18, il y a toujours BABEYROU Camille à remplacer par BAREYROU Camille, et l'absence de LALET Georges, qui ne figure pas encore sur les plaques de l'appel des morts mais se trouve écrit en bas de cette photo ; je l'ai signalé à la secrétaire de mairie. Père Igor (talk) 17:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rudeau-Ladosse

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Tu n'as pour l'instant aucun monument pour la commune de Rudeau-Ladosse. Cette commune s'appelait Ladosse avant d'être renommée en 1950 mais le monument aux morts se situe bien dans le cimetière de Rudeau, et non celui de Ladosse. Compte tenu de la végétation envahissante, j'ai été obligé de faire 4 photos de la même plaque pour avoir tous les noms ; voir Category:War memorial of Ladosse.

Comme certains noms sont plus ou moins lisibles, je te reporte ci-dessous les inscriptions :

DIEU PATRIE
1914 1918
AUX ENFANTS DE LADOSSE
MORTS POUR LA FRANCE

PAUL HERIARD CAPINE D' ARTRIE
ANDRÉ AUDIGIER
JOSEPH GRANGETEAU DUCONGÉ
JEAN MALLET
GEORGES FAURE
PAUL BOYER
LOUIS SOUMAGNAC
LOUIS FAURE
HENRI BOURINET
PIERRE JARDRY
MATHIEU AUDIGIER
PIERRE MAZEAU
JEAN PICARD

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 10:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok je vais récupérer les photos. Merci pour les noms. Pour ton info, vas voir le lien sur MemorialGeneWeb --Philweb (talk) 10:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vas voir la photo du mam sur http://www.memorialgenweb.org/memorial3/html/fr/resultcommune.php?idsource=67226. Ca a l'air la même plaque mais ce n'est pas la même croix. Il n'y a pas de Christ et le haut est différent. Qu'en penses tu ? Y a t il un bourg s'appelant Rudeau ?--Philweb (talk) 15:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rudeau 45°28′52″N 0°33′00″E / 45.481°N 0.550°E est le bourg principal avec mairie, chapelle et ancienne école. Ladosse 45°29′10″N 0°30′14″E / 45.486°N 0.504°E est un petit village d'une vingtaine de bâtiments, trois kilomètres et demi plus à l'ouest. J'ai pris les photos à l'entrée du cimetière de Rudeau mais je ne suis pas allé voir le petit cimetière de Ladosse. Si je passe à nouveau dans le coin, j'essaierais de résoudre ce cas. Père Igor (talk) 16:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK bonne idée d'y passer qu'en tu auras le temps.--Philweb (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS: D'après google view, je n'ai pas vu de cimetière à Ladosse (à part celui de Beaussac sur la D87) ? --Philweb (talk) 14:46, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voir 45°29′30″N 0°30′09″E / 45.491782°N 0.502379°E, 600 mètres au nord du village de Ladosse. Père Igor (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah voui, il est bien caché... A toi de jouer quand tu passeras par là. Merci - --Philweb (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est bien ce que je supposais. Tu trouveras les deux monuments aux morts regroupés sous la Category:War memorials of Rudeau-Ladosse. Fais-en bon usage. Père Igor (talk) 17:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Les 2 mam sont en ligne... --Philweb (talk) 11:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roquefort-sur-Soulzon

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Sur le monument aux morts principal de Roquefort-sur-Soulzon (sur ton site), j'ai déniché la signature d'Auguste Verdier en 1922. J'ai également précisé l'emplacement. Voir Category:War memorial of Roquefort-sur-Soulzon.

J'ai relevé plusieurs erreurs ;
en 1914-1918, il faut lire :

DUFIEU Hippolyte au lieu de DUFLEU Hippolyte
VERNIERES Joseph - caporal au lieu de capitaine
GAUBERT Henri - caporal au lieu de capitaine

Deux onglets portent la mention de la guerre d'Indochine. Le premier correspond en fait à 1939-1945.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 10:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est fait (en cours). Merci --Philweb (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Il reste les trois modifications des morts de 1914-1918 DUFLEU → DUFIEU et les deux capitaines à rétrograder en caporaux. Père Igor (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai fait la modif mais l'admin n'a pas pris les corrections. Je relance...--Philweb (talk) 14:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voila c'est fait... A la prochaine --Philweb (talk) 15:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Marie-Hélène Prouteau Stéphan 2016.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Hélène Prouteau Stéphan 2016.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai demandé à la personne qu'elle m'envoie un mail avec son autorisation. Je l'enverrai à l'adresse indiquée. Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 06:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

L'autorisation vient d'être envoyée à Permission-fr avec le numéro Ticket#2019101310003785 - Merci d'enlever le bandeau. --Philweb (talk) 16:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:ARCHIVES MUNICIPALES de BREST-3Fi007-042 - BREST (FINISTERE) - VUE GENERALE.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai du mal à comprendre pourquoi ces photos provenant des archives municipales de la ville ne seraient pas dans le domaine public. Elles sont toutes en ligne sur leur site https://archives.mairie-brest.fr et représente Brest d'après guerre. Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 06:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est pourtant simple: elles ne sont pas assez anciennes pour être dans le domaine public en France mais merci de répondre dans la section dédiée. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Il faudra attendre quelques jours pour que je puisse avoir l'accord écrit du conservateur qui est en ce moment en déplacement. Merci d'attendre.--Philweb (talk) 14:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Champeaux-et-la-Chapelle-Pommier

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Sur ton site, il y a déjà le monument aux morts de Champeaux ([2]). Précision : il se trouve effectivement en bord de route sur la grande place devant l'église de Champeaux. Dans la Category:War memorial of Champeaux (Dordogne), regarde File:Champeaux 24 monument aux morts (5).jpg qui te fournit la première partie alphabétique manquante, avec 9 soldats morts pour la France.

Ne récupère pas la photo File:Champeaux 24 monument aux morts (3).jpg, avec une poubelle en arrière-plan, qui est un doublon de File:Champeaux 24 monument aux morts (4).jpg, car je vais en demander la suppression. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 15:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK modif en cour merci --Philweb (talk) 12:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est bien d'avoir ajouté les 9 premiers noms, mais les 20 autres ont été dupliqués une deuxième fois. Il faut donc supprimer les 20 noms de la fin, doublon qui va de COURTAZELLES Pierre à SEMENTERY Jean. Père Igor (talk) 17:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Photo aérienne 1955.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Photo aérienne 1955.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Photo aérienne 1955.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Puyrenier

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Le monument aux morts de Puyrenier est déjà identifié sur ton site. Au niveau de sa situation, il est adossé à un contrefort de la chapelle Saint-Jean (ce n'est pas une église), en bordure de route. Une légère erreur à rectifier dans les inscriptions : remplacer PUYREMER par PUYRENIER. Voir Category:War memorial of Puyrenier. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 18:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour l'info sur la localisation mais nous ne faisons pas la différence entre une chapelle, une église, une cathédrale !!! Par contre, je vais corriger le nom. Bon WE et bonnes vacances avec les petits zenfants !!! --Philweb (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monument aux morts très ancien

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Pour le côté original, je te signale la category:Stèle des Bernardières, « monument aux morts » de la guerre de Cent Ans. Père Igor (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Euh, oui merci mais là c'est peut-être un peu vieux ! En plus il n'y a pas les noms des soldats... --Philweb (talk) 16:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mémorial paroissial de Saint-Sulpice-de-Mareuil

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Pour l'ancienne commune de Saint-Sulpice-de-Mareuil, ton site ne dispose d'aucun monument. J'ai pris en photo le mémorial situé à l'intérieur de l'église (Category:Église Saint-Sulpice de Saint-Sulpice-de-Mareuil) et qui concerne, outre le village de Saint-Sulpice, ceux de Rudeau (Rudeau-Ladosse) et de Puyrénier (Puyrenier) : voir File:Saint-Sulpice-de-Mareuil église mémorial (1).jpg et File:Saint-Sulpice-de-Mareuil église mémorial (2).jpg. D'après une autochtone, il n'y aurait pas d'autre monument aux morts à Saint-Sulpice-de-Mareuil. Père Igor (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut @Père Igor: L'autochtone a raison ! La plaque d'église fait office de monument aux morts. Je vais l'ajouter à notre base. Merci --Philweb (talk) 10:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, c'est dans la boite - A la prochaine - --Philweb (talk) 21:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est déjà la prochaine : un nom a été oublié dans la première colonne : André DOUCET (après Eugène LACHAUD). De plus, pour 39-45, des informations concernant le seul -soldat GAUTHIER André peuvent être ajoutées : Sergent 23e R.I.C. Mort pour la FRANCE le 17-12-44.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 10:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Père Igor: , ma chef a mis à jour certaines listes des mam qui nous manquent comme le 24. Tu les trouveras sur la page https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/blog/actualite/27883/le-point-par-departement-fevrier-2019/. Bonne lecture --Philweb (talk) 10:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Philweb. Si la liste pour la Dordogne est à jour au 29/10/2019, je m'étonne d'y voir encore figurer Antonne-et-Trigonant, Le Change, Saint-Just et Saint-Vincent-Sur-l'Isle déjà traités ci-dessus. Merci pour cette liste qui me permettra de mieux programmer certains déplacements.

Je vais voir le problème.... sinon, il y a aussi la possibilité de demander sur le site la carte du département avec les mam. On peut ainsi voir les communes qui n'ont pas été traitées. --Philweb (talk) 12:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A priori, la cheffe a du zapper des lignes... Je lui ai demandé de refaire une mise à jour. Désolé. Rien ne vaut une petite vérification sur le site ! --Philweb (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comme tu peux le voir, je veille

. Et de toutes façons, dans le doute je vais maintenant prendre les monuments aux morts en photos systématiquement pour commons. Inutile de vous fatiguer pour la carte : je connais suffisamment les communes de la Dordogne pour savoir où sont approximativement celles qui n'ont rien. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 16:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajout de MAM

Bonjour Philweb,

J'ai pris de nouvelles photos de monuments aux morts :

Ain (01)
- Ambérieux-en-Dombes
- Bâgé-le-Châtel (monument déplacé sur la place du 19 mars 1962)
- Bouligneux
- Lapeyrouse
- Monthieux
- Lapeyrouse
- Relevant
- Saint-André-de-Corcy
- Saint-Bernard
- Saint-Jean-de-Thurigneux
- Sainte-Olive
- Sandrans

Loire (42)
- Saint-Étienne

Seine-Saint-Denis (93)
- La Courneuve
- Seine-Saint-Denis

Val-de-Marne (94)
- Chevilly-Larue
- Monument à la Résistance de Chevilly-Larue
- Choisy-le-Roi
- Créteil
- Fontenay-sous-Bois
- Monument de la Guerre civile espagnole, Fontenay-sous-Bois
- Mémorial des Martyrs de la Résistance, Fontenay-sous-Bois
- Sucy-en-Brie
- Thiais (monument aux morts, monument aux morts de la guerre de 1870, monuments dans le cimetière communal)
- Monument à la Liberation du Cimetière nouveau de Vincennes

Chabe01 (talk) 16:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut @Chabe01: , je vais les ajouter prochainement. Si tu t'intéresses particulièrement à un département (ou plusieurs), on peut t'envoyer la liste des communes qui nous manquent dans la base de données. Merci de penser à moi!!!... --Philweb (talk) 16:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ça m'intéresserait d'avoir la liste ! Pour information, je peux faire des photos dans la région de Mâcon et Bourg-en-Bresse (donc Ain, Saône-et-Loire, Jura, Rhône). De plus, étant dans la région proche de Paris, je peux aisément me déplacer dans sa proche banlieue. PS : j'ai oublié de mentionner le monument aux morts de Bondy et ceux de Montfermeil. Chabe01 (talk) 20:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Chabe01: , ma chef a mis à jour certaines listes des mam qui nous manquent. Tu les trouveras sur la page https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/blog/actualite/27883/le-point-par-departement-fevrier-2019/. J'ai fini le 01 et St Etienne !!! Je continue car le temps est à la pluie sur Brest... --Philweb (talk) 10:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tu pourrais ajouter une rubrique sur les photos du mam de Chevillé-Larue (94) - "Congrégation du Saint-Esprit"- car il y a une plaque avec la liste des morts (=spiritains) de cette congrégation dans les guerres 14/18 et autres. --Philweb (talk) 15:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pour information, j'ai une page Commons qui recense les monuments aux morts du département de l'Ain : Chabe01/France/01/War memorials. Par contre, je n'ai mis que les monuments principaux pour chaque commune. Pour Chevilly-Larue, les photos qui représentent la plaque "Congrégation du Saint-Esprit" ont été ajoutés dans Séminaire des Missions. Enfin, je te remercie du lien que tu m'as envoyé. Par contre, je ne comprends pas comment je peux voir les communes qui manquent. Merci, Chabe01 (talk) 02:55, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai fini de télécharger tes photos. La région parisienne m'a donné du boulot pour taper parfois 500 à 600 noms...!!! Mais, c'est dans la base. On est obligé de retaper les noms des morts pour savoir comment ils sont orthographiés, savoir qui a été rajouté, savoir quels renseignements sont notés sur le mam, etc.

Pour voir les communes qui n'ont pas de photos, j'utilise assez souvent au niveau de la recherche, au lieu du module "liste", le module "carte" (recherche/France/Ain) car en zoomant suffisamment les communes sans mam sont identifiables car elles n'ont pas le logo de la base de données ; et surtout, cela permet de les localiser sur la carte (alors que ce n'est pas évident avec la liste !): https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/cartographie/?pays=1&departement=Ain&type_search=simple_search - Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 07:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je vais regarder de plus près ta page sur l'Ain. Je m'aperçois que l'horloge de commons n'est pas passer à l'heure d'hiver ! Merci --Philweb (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mam en Corrèze

Done

Bonjour Philweb. La liste des communes de la Corrèze non pourvues de photos (111 sur 191) me parait particulièrement difficile à exploiter. Il m'arrive d'aller parfois dans ce département et si je peux vous aider, autant ne pas s'en priver. Père Igor (talk) 16:48, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ton aide nous est précieuse. Tu sais maintenant ce qu'on peut mettre dans notre base. Moi aussi je veille, mais un petit message pour me prévenir que tu as mis de nouvelles photos m'aiderait car si vous êtes 3 à faire les photos, je ne sais plus où donner de la tête. Chabe01 m'a fait 3 cadeaux empoisonnés: j'ai du recopier 500 à 600 noms... sur des monuments de la région parisienne !!! à la prochaine - --Philweb (talk) 17:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est ce que je fais à chaque fois : j'ouvre une nouvelle section dans ta page de discussion. Je te signalais simplement que la page qui répertorie les monuments aux morts de la Corrèze non photographiés est inexploitable, par moi comme par d'autres, parce que les noms des communes en sont absents (seuls les codes postaux sont indiqués). Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 10:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pour le message sur les nouveaux mam, c'était juste un petit rappel. Par contre effectivement pour la Corrèze, ce n'est pas normal... je n'avais pas vérifié... Je vais en référer à la cheffe.

Moi, j'utilise assez souvent au lieu du module "liste", le module "carte" (recherche/France/Corrèze) car en zoomant suffisamment les communes sans mam sont identifiables car elles n'ont pas le logo de la base de données ; et surtout, cela permet de les localiser sur la carte (alors que ce n'est pas évident avec la liste !): https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/cartographie/?pays=1&departement=Corr%C3%A8ze&type_search=simple_search - Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 11:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Père Igor - C'est bon, tu peux aller voir la liste des communes manquantes de Corrèze https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/19-Correze.pdf Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 07:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mareuil (24340)

Done

Bonjour Philweb. En Dordogne, pour la commune de Mareuil, tu as déjà un monument aux morts mais qui concerne l'ancienne commune de Saint-Pardoux-de-Mareuil, fusionnée en 1827. Pour la commune principale, je viens de créer la Category:War memorial of Mareuil (Dordogne), avec tout plein de noms, et la signature du sculpteur R. Durieux, dont je vois sur ton site qu'il a déjà réalisé un autre monument en Dordogne, à Saint-Pompont. Bonne retranscription. Père Igor (talk) 13:33, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Après les mam du 94 et 93 de Chabe01 avec leurs 500 ou 600 noms, les affaires reprennent... je m'en occupe. Il n'y a que 120 noms. Merci --Philweb (talk) 14:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Philweb. Merci d'avoir créé ce monument. Dans les soldats de 1914-1918, j'ai relevé :

manque BARRAUD Roger entre BARRAUD Albert et BARRET Alfred ;
retirer un S à CUSSSAGUET François ;
manque NAUGE François entre NADEAU François et NAUGE Jean.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 11:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci d'avoir corrigé. Père Igor (talk) 17:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Séreilhac

Done

Rebonjour Philweb. Ton site connait déjà le monument aux morts de Séreilhac.

Cependant, pour 1914-1918, il y a quelques anomalies :

il manque un soldat L. GAYOT (après M. GAYOT et un autre L. GAYOT). Au total, ça fait trois L. GAYOT pour la commune ;
il manque également F. MATHIEU (après P. MASSALOUX) ;
il faudrait remplacer J? PATAUD par J. PATAUD ;
l'ordre alphabétique serait plus logique si la 2^e partie (commençant par AUBISSE) était mise en premier.

Pour 1939-1945, remplacer BALLAFEAS Jean par BALLAGEAS Jean.

Voilà la Category:War memorial of Séreilhac que j'ai créée. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 16:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok je fais le nécessaire... bon WE---Philweb (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

L'ordre alphabétique est maintenant correct. Il ne reste plus qu'à traiter les quatre anomalies signalées. Père Igor (talk) 10:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'avais fait mais l'admin qui gère le département ne l'a pas pris en compte... je recommence !!! Heureusement que tu vérifies --Philweb (talk) 10:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

À propos, serais-tu d'accord pour que je mette le template:done (qui se traduit par

Done) sur chaque section de cette page pour laquelle j'aurais vérifié la conformité entre ton site et mes suggestions ? Père Igor (talk) 11:45, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK pas de soucis. ca mettra un peu de couleur. --Philweb (talk) 12:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On est sur la bonne voie

: deux des modifications demandées ont été effectuées ; il n'en reste donc plus que deux :

pour 1939-1945, remplacer BALLAFEAS Jean par BALLAGEAS Jean ;
pour 1914-1918, il manque un soldat L. GAYOT (après M. GAYOT et un autre L. GAYOT et avant M. GORCE). Au total, ça fait trois L. GAYOT pour la commune ; j'y peux rien, c'est inscrit comme ça sur cette photo.

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Même remarque que ci-dessus. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 11:18, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci d'avoir corrigé. Père Igor (talk) 17:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Jean-d'Alcas (commune de Saint-Jean-et Saint-Paul)

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Ton site connait déjà les deux monuments aux morts de Saint-Jean-et-Saint-Paul. J'ai photographié celui de Saint-Jean-d'Alcas que tu trouveras dans la Category:War memorial of Saint-Jean-d'Alcas.

De la même manière que celui de SAINT-PAUL-DES-FONTS, il serait intéressant de préciser pour l'autre SAINT-JEAN-D'ALCAS.

Il y a juste une chose à rectifier : supprimer le doublon « FABRE Gaston 20-2-1917 ». Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 11:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, c'est en cours de traitement... As tu trouvé la date de fusion des 2 communes ? Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dans les toutes premières années de la Révolution française (de 1790 à 1794) source [3]. Père Igor (talk) 11:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK merci --Philweb (talk) 12:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cressat

Done

Bonsoir Philweb. Pour Cressat, tu as déjà toutes les informations sur ton site.

J'ai relevé une inscription supplémentaire : AUX MORTS DE LA GUERRE 1939-1945.
Pour 1914-1918, il y a deux noms mal orthographiés : ce n'est pas MARSAILLON (Emile et Joseph) mais MARSALLON.

Voir Category:War memorial of Cressat. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aizenay

Done

Rebonjour. En Vendée, pour Aizenay, ton site connait le monument aux morts mais n'a absolument pas listé les soldats morts pour la France. J'espère qu'avec la Category:War memorial of Aizenay, vous pourrez l'établir (200 morts en 14-18 et 22 en 39-45). Juste une petite observation : il y a une faute de syntaxe sur l'inscription générale : ce n'est pas LA COMMUNE D'AIZENAY qui est gravé mais LA COMMUNE DE AIZENAY.

Il est situé à côté de la chapelle Saint-Joseph et j'ai trouvé cette page qui parle de son inauguration en juin 1921 et affiche une carte postale de son ancienne implantation dans le cimetière. Bon courage ! Père Igor (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok je m'en occupe ce WE. Merci --Philweb (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Philweb. C'est presque parfait. Deux petites choses à rectifier :

P. CHEVOLLEAU au lieu de P. CHEVOLEAU (en haut de la 2^e colonne),
J. DENIEAU au lieu de J. DENIAU (bas de la 3^e colonne).

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 19:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, il me semble que le problème est réglé... https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/depot/complet/31648/ bon WE --Philweb (talk) 19:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne vois rien de tel sur ce lien mais sur celui-ci, je vois toujours les deux noms non corrigés. Père Igor (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Là tu chipotes ! le premier lien que je t'ai envoyé c'est la fiche en cours de traitement et le lien que tu m'envoies c'est le lien de la fiche qui a été traitée et donc c'est celle qui est dans la base de données. Les corrections sont faites...--Philweb (talk) 10:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Philweb. Je ne comprends pas la cuisine interne à ton site. Je chipote peut-être mais ce que je vois sur la page visible par les internautes, c'est que les deux noms n'ont pas été rectifiés. Rappel des modifications à effectuer :

P. CHEVOLLEAU au lieu de P. CHEVOLEAU (en haut de la 2^e colonne),
J. DENIEAU au lieu de J. DENIAU (dans la partie basse de la 3^e colonne).

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 11:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, non tu ne chipotes pas! Il faut que tu saches que c'est moi qui fait les modifs mais c'est un autre admin qui met en ligne les départements qui ne sont pas situés dans le grand ouest de la France dont je suis l'administrateur. Donc, si les changements comme ici à Aizenay ne sont pas effectués, il est possible que l'admin n'a pas validé mes corrections. je vais donc les refaire et lui dire quel champ j'ai modifié. Joyeux noël --Philweb (talk) 11:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Deepsea Miner II.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Deepsea Miner II.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allassac

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Certes ton site connait deux monuments aux morts d'Allassac (au bourg et dans l'église) mais ils n'ont pas été exploités faute de photos précises.

Sur ce site, tu verras des informations concernant le déplacement du monument aux morts principal dans les années 1990, ainsi que sur le troisième monument, au cimetière.

J'ai créé la Category:War memorials of Allassac avec les trois sous-catégories. Je ne remplirais celle de l'église qu'après avoir décrypté les noms des soldats car j'ai été obligé de faire de nombreuses photos et les noms ne sont pas aisés à comprendre. Je t'avertirais quand elle sera prête.

En attendant, tu as le monument du cimetière Category:War memorial of Allassac cemetery, minimaliste, à côté du carré militaire, et le monument principal Category:War memorial of Allassac où tu vas pouvoir iniquer les soldats des deux guerres mondiales. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 11:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je m'en occupe et je vais voir tes photos. Pour retrouver les noms, tu as http://www.memorialgenweb.org/memorial3/html/fr/resultcommune.php?idsource=69407 Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 11:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai vérifié et revérifié les noms et j'ai trouvé plusieurs différences entre ta liste ci-dessus et le mémorial (1er nom GenWeb/2e nom Mémorial) :

BOURNAIX/BOUNAIX
DELTHÉRAL/DELTÉRAL
DURANTIE/DURANTHY
FARGE/FARGES
LIDHOME/LIDHOMME
MALIVER/MALIVERT (2 fois)
PATRIGEON/PARTRIGEON
PERRIER/PÉRIER
ROUDIER FERDINAND/ROUDIER FERNAND
ROUHAUD/ROUHAUT (3 fois)
SERRE LÉONARD/SERRE LÉON

Voici donc les noms figurant sur ce mémorial (en italique gras, les noms de lieux). D'avance, je te prie de m'excuser pour la place que ça va prendre sur cette page de discussion :

ALLASSAC

BAYLE JOSEPH
BOUNIE LÉON
BOURDARIAS HENRI
BOUTOT LÉONARD
CÉPAS JEAN BAPTISTE
CHARBONNEL J.JOSEPH
CHARBONNEL JEAN
CHASTAING PIERRE
CHIGNAC JOSEPH
CHOUZENOUX JEAN
CHOUZENOUX JOSEPH
CLAUZADE JEAN
CLAUZADE PIERRE
CLAUZADE HENRI
COMBROUX PASCAL
COUNIL BERNARD
DAUDY PIERRE
DELORD FRANÇOIS
DELORD HENRI
DELPY RENÉ
DUMAS JEAN
DUMEZ LOUIS AL^DRE
DURAND JEAN
FAUGERON MARTIAL
FAYE ANTOINE
FÉRAL HENRI BERNARD
GÉNIER BAPTISTE
GÉRAUD JULES
GOURSOLAS ANTOINE
GUIONIE ANTOINE
HÉBRARD LOUIS
JAUGEAT JEAN
LAFON PAUL
LAGRANGE FRANC
LACHÈZE JEAN
LAMOTHE ALBERT
LAJUGIE PAUL
LAPORTE ANDRÉ
LASTEYRIE FRÉDÉRIC
LAVIGNAC PAUL
LAUMOND MARCELLIN
LIDON JOSEPH
MALAVAL PIERRE
MARGERY JEAN
MONIER GEORGES
MONTEIL PIERRE
PELINARD BAPTISTE
PEYRAT FAUSTIN

---

PIGNOL JEAN
PRADIER PIERRE
REILLIER RAYMOND
ROUDIER FERNAND
SERRE LÉON
SOUBRENIE JULIEN
SOULIER AYMARD
SOULIER JEAN
SOULIER MATHIEU
TEYSSANDIER BAPTISTE
TOURNADOUR HENRI
TOURNET ALEXANDRE
TOURNET BAPTISTE
TREUIL HENRI
VALADE BERNARD
VAREILLE BAPTISTE
VERLHAC JEAN
VIDALIE ANTOINE
VIDALIE PAUL

--
GAUCH

BEAUDET PIERRE
BLAIZAC HENRI
BLAIZAC PIERRE
CHAMPSIAUX HENRI
DUMINY LOUIS
DUVIALARD LÉON
EYNARD FRANÇOIS
GOUNET PIERRE
GOUNET FRANÇOIS
TOURNET ANTOINE

--
VERDIER HAUT

COUDERT LOUIS
GÉRY JEAN
LACHEZE PIERRE
LASCAUX PIERRE
POUCH PIERRE L
TREUIL JOSEPH

--
MOSREDONS

CHAMPSIAUX JEAN

--
VERDIER BAS

DUMOND JEAN BAPTE
LACHÈZE A^NE LÉON
LAUDY JULIEN
LAUZANNE AUGUSTE
REYNIER JEAN
ROLAND GEORGES

---
EYZAC

CHOUZENOUX JOSEPH
DAVID HENRI
FAYA PIERRE
PORCHER LOUIS PIERRE
TAUPE FIRMIN
TRONC JOSEPH

--
LA MEYRANIE

JUDEAU FERNAND
LASCAUX PIERRE

--
BROCHAS

ANDRÉVIE ANTOINE
BORIE ANTOINE
PEYRAT PIERRE
PEYRAT LOUIS
RAIMOND PIERRE

--
MONTAURAL

BOURDU ANTOINE
COMBY EMILE

--
BORDERIES

CHOUZENOUX JEAN
SAUVAGE JEAN BAP^TE

--
GARAVET

GUY HENRI
MALIVERT EMILE
MALIVERT HENRI
PÉRIER JEAN
ROUSSELIE JEAN

--
LASTEYRIE

BOUNAIX LOUIS
GOULOUMY JEAN

--
GORSAS

CHANTALAT JEAN
DALIS BAPTISTE
DELON PIERRE
ROUVERON JOSEPH

--
LA CHAPELLE

BOURDICAUD BAP^TE
CEYSSAC HENRI
ROUCHETTE LOUIS

---
LE PUY

DURANTHY JEAN

--
PUY L'EPINE

POMMEPUY LOUIS
POMMEPUY PIERRE
SAUVAGE PIERRE

--
LA FAURIE

PARTRIGEON PAUL
ROUHAUT AUGUSTE

--
LA PRADE

CHAMBARET LÉON

--
BRIDAL

RELIER ETIENNE
SIMON LOUIS

--
SAINT-LAURENT

DELTÉRAL LOUIS
LAMOTHE ANDRÉ
LIDON FRANÇOIS
MALAVAL HENRI
SAGE PIERRE
SAGE MARTIAL

--
LA CHARTROULLE

MAYRE BAPTISTE
ROUHAUT BAPTISTE
TÉRAL JEAN

--
LA PLEUGE

CHATRAS LOUIS
PONCHARAL HENRI

--
LA PIALEPORCHIE

BREUIL BAPTISTE

--
SAILLANT VIEUX

BOUNIE LÉONARD
CESSAC PIERRE
DELMAS FRANÇOIS
FARGES PIERRE
FURAUDET FRANÇOIS
FURAUDET JEAN
DE LASTEYRIE ROBERT

---
PONT DU SAILLANT

BORDAS PIERRE
CHASTANET PIERRE
DUFAURE LOUIS
THOMAS JEAN
VILLENEUVE LOUIS

--
LA BORDE

ROUHAUT BAPTISTE

--
BLONDINERIE

BOUTOT JEAN

--
ROUQUET

BEYNET JEAN

--
LA SUDRIE

CHASTAING JOSEPH

--
LAUGERIE

CHAZARAIN JEAN

--
LA GENESTE

DANDALET BERTRAND

--
LA ROCHE

CHASTAING JEAN
LIDHOMME HENRI

--
LA BESSIÈRE

BOUILLAC ANTOINE
BARDON BAPTISTE
DUTHEIL JEAN

--
LAUJOUR

BOUILLAGUET BAPTISTE
GEORGES LOUIS

--
BARDOUX

JONCHÈRE PIERRE

--
VINZÉLAS

DANDALET BAPTISTE

--
BOUCHAILLOU

DUMOND BAPTISTE

---
LA CÔTE

FROIDEFOND ANTOINE

--
CHARTROUX

CHAUFFIER PIERRE

--
GALUBES

CHANOURDIE MATHIEU

--
BOIS COM^AL (Communal)

LATEYROUX ANTOINE

--
CHEYRAL

CHATRAS LOUIS

Bon courage. Père Igor (talk) 18:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour ta liste, beau travail de patience... Pour ton info, notre site de Lille ne récupère que les noms qui sont physiquement sur le monument, dans le même ordre et à l'identique. Cela permet aux historiens de suivre l'évolution du monument (par ex, connaître les noms qui ont été rajoutés après l'inauguration...). Tu remarqueras que le site de genweb propose des noms par ordre alphabétique avec parfois des incertitudes et même des coquilles. Ceci dit, je ne comprends pas où tu as trouvé les noms par lieux ? J'ai recopié tous les noms qui se trouvent sur le mam. C'est en cours de traitement - Cordialement --Philweb (talk) 10:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai apparemment oublié de te dire que ce travail correspond à Category:War memorial of Allassac church, le mémorial de l'église. Père Igor (talk) 11:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK je n'avais pas vu tes photos de l'église. Je vais mettre à jour la page avec ta liste. Merci. --Philweb (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pour le monument aux morts du bourg, parmi les soldats de 14-18, ont été oubliés :

en première colonne, BLAIZAC H. au tout début, après LAUDY J.
en 2^e colonne, 3 soldats après MALIVERT H.

LATEYROUX A.
REYNIER J.
MALIVERT E.
BOURDY A. est en fait BOURDU A.

en 4^e colonne :

LASCOMBE L. est en fait LASCOMBES L.
LA PUSTOCH L. est à rectifier en LE PUSTOCH L.

Pour la plaque de l'église, une seule erreur sur les inscriptions : il ne s'agit pas des communes mais des villages et lieux-dits de la commune d'Allassac.

J'ignorais que ton site également preneur des carrés militaires, car je sais que j'en ai déjà photographiés quelques-uns. À ta connaissance, existe-t-il une catégorie qui leur est dédiée ? Père Igor (talk) 15:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok je vais faire les modif. Oui, on a un item pour les cimetières militaires comme ici à Allassac (carré militaire dans le cimetière communal). Bon dimanche --Philweb (talk) 16:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Église de Guéret

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Ton site connait le mémorial de l'église de Guéret mais n'a pas exploité les morts faute de photo précise. En regardant la photo du haut, je m'aperçois qu'il y a deux plaques pour 1914-1918, une de chaque côté de l'autel. Sur cette photo, tu verras en bas une autre inscription (que celle que tu as déjà) : « C'est une sainte et salutaire pensée de prier pour les Morts. II Macc. XII ». Les noms sur la photo de cette plaque sont à peu près déchiffrables mais il te manquera la deuxième plaque. Dis-moi si tu veux que je la décrypte. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 10:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Père Igor, Je vais remplacer la photo du site avec la tienne et décrypter cette plaque. Ne t'en fais pas. As tu la 2ème plaque avec le début des noms ? Merci --Philweb (talk) 11:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Je viens de mettre la liste et ta photo. Il n'y a plus qu'à attendre la mise en ligne. Pour info, j'ai noté plusieurs fautes sur http://www.memorialgenweb.org/memorial3/html/fr/resultcommune.php?act=view&insee=23096&pays=France&dpt=23&idsource=114059&table=bp&lettre=&fusxx=&debut=200 Pour l'autre plaque, c'est dommage de ne pas l'avoir car il y a le nom du graveur en bas à droite de la photo. Joyeux Noël --Philweb (talk) 12:12, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hélas, je n'ai pas l'autre plaque. Désolé. Père Igor (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pas grave, ce ne sont que des plaques d'église et non des mam... --Philweb (talk) 18:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Philweb. J'ai relevé quelques différences :

au niveau de la deuxième inscription : « C'est une sainte et salutaire pensée de prier pour les Morts. II Macc. », il manque « XII. » à la fin. Par ailleurs, je pense que cette phrase devrait être écrite en italique, comme celle du Président Poincaré.
dans la 3^e colonne, PICAUD Marcel est en fait PICAUD Jean
en dernière colonne, après VERNAUDON Raoul, VERNAUDON Fernand a été oublié
tout à la fin de cette dernière colonne, il faut ajouter un « s » à Zve (pour Zouaves).

Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 20:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Père Igor, la fiche a été mise à jour. Vas voir la page https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/blog/actualite/27883/le-point-par-departement-fevrier-2019/ avec l'état des mam dans les départements. Bon dimanche. --Philweb (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moutier-d'Ahun

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Ton site commanit déjà le monument aux morts de Moutier-d'Ahun, et a édcliné les soldats morts pour la France. En comparant avec la première photo des noms, j'ai vu que le deuxième GARAUD prenait deux R : GARRAUD Anselme. Si tu veux d'autres photos, notamment du coq, je les ai regroupées dans la Category:War memorial of Moutier-d'Ahun. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 14:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Père Igor, j'ai fait la modif et ajouter le coq. La fiche sera rentrée dans la base d'ici quelques jours. As tu remarqué que l'auteur Lecourtier a signé la boule sur laquelle se trouve le coq ? Bon réveillon --Philweb (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour la remarque, je ne l'avais point vue. J'ai ajouté la Category:Prosper Lecourtier aux deux photos du coq mais je ne sais pas s'il vaudrait mieux l'ajouter à l'ensemble de la catégorie du monument aux morts. Qu'en penses-tu ? Père Igor (talk) 07:11, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, Si Prosper est le sculpteur, tu as aussi l'architecte et la fonderie. Je ne pense pas qu'il soit nécessaire de l'ajouter à l'ensemble de la catégorie. Mais c'est toi qui voit... Bonne journée --Philweb (talk) 08:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, les fiches de Moutier, Guéret et Aizenay sont mises à jour !!! Bonne soirée --Philweb (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carré militaire du cimetière de Périgueux nord

Done

Bonjour Philweb. Si ça t'intéresse, je te signale la Category:Cimetière du Nord (Périgueux) carré militaire dans laquelle tu trouveras quelques photos d'ensemble. Père Igor (talk) 07:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Église de Guéret (suite)

Bonjour Philweb. Je te souhaite une bonne et heureuse nouvelle année. Je suis passé de nouveau aujourd'hui à l'église de Guéret pour le panneau manquant du mémorial. Ton site est ici. J'ai créé la Category:War memorial of Guéret church et les trois premières photos sont celles du jour (mémorial de gauche). En bas à droite de la troisième photo, on devine la signature de celui qui l'a réalisé : F. HONORAT Limoges. Y a plus qu'à ... Père Igor (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mémorial de l'église de Jarnages

Bonjour Philweb. Le mémorial de l'église de Jarnages est identifié sur ton site. En voici une vue rapprochée.

Les noms des soldats morts sont corrects. Par ailleurs, au niveau des inscriptions :

il manque la mention « le grand sacrifice » qu'on voit sous le bas-relief ;
à gauche le mot PATRIE est en majuscules, pour faire le pendant à AMES à droite ;
Champ d'Honneur est au singulier.

Père Igor (talk) 19:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

salut, je suis en vacances en Colombie. Je reviens début février

Bonjour Philweb. Je m'inquiète par rapport à ta réponse ci-dessus. Tu as prolongé tes vacances sur place ou tu prends le temps nécessaire pour traiter tes nombreuses photos sud-américaines ? Père Igor (talk) 11:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Père Igor. Malheureusement nous avons appris la triste nouvelle par son épouse, Philweb nous a quittés avant-hier... la communauté brestoise est en deuil. [4] --El Funcionario (talk) 09:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Père Igor, vous pouvez suggérer les modifications directement via https://monumentsmorts.univ-lille.fr/depot/complet/57579/, ça valorisera sa et votre contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OuiQui (talk • contribs) 11:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:29 Pointe-Saint-Mathieu mam.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:22 Treguier 1.jpg

And also:

File:22 Treguier 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 00:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Madagascar-South.png

And also:

File:Madagascar Island.jpg

Yours sincerely, — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kiel, pas Kiev

Bonjour File:Fresque-Rue-de-Kiev.JPG : la rue à Brest c'est la rue de Kiel (Allemagne), pas Kiev - Kyiv (Ukraine). J'ai cru qu'une action avait eu lieu pour renommer symboliquent la rue. À renommer. Les autres photos de la série sont bien nommées. OuiQui (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@OuiQui: bonjour. Pour information, le regretté Philweb est décédé depuis plus de trois ans. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, merci @Père Igor, j'avais vu votre requête et la réponse de El Funcionario ci-dessus après avoir écrit et du coup demandé aux administrateurs de renommer la page justement en tenant compte de la triste réponse que vous aviez eu. Et comme le processus n'aboutissait pas (problème informatique) j'ai oublié d'annuler mon entrée. J'ai refait la demande. Vous pouvez supprimer cette entrée après lecture. OuiQui (talk) 11:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madagascar-South.png

#invoke:Autotranslate Enyavar (talk) 23:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Enyavar: bonjour. Pour information, le regretté Philweb est décédé depuis plus de trois ans. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 09:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

bonjour aussi; et mes plus sincère consolations. Les propositions de supprimer ne sont pas y affectées. Mes meilleures saltuations, --Enyavar (talk) 10:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Philweb

Monument aux morts

Tip: Categorizing images

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Bonjour

Copyright status: File:Plaque-Huelgoat.jpg

Deleted content

Monuments aux morts Aisne et France

Email

avel mor

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

File tagging File:Cabon-livre.jpg

Monument aux morts

Monument aux morts

Monuments aux morts

Sculpteur Daniel Dorillac

Essay telechargement MaM

Monument aux morts

Pressignac-Vicq

Civray, Vienne

Saint-Just (Dordogne)

Ajout de monuments aux morts

Gramat

Eyzerac, Dordogne

Creyssac, Dordogne

Le Change, Dordogne

Marsac-sur-l'Isle

Neuvic, Dordogne

Savignac-les-Églises

Saint-Félix-de-Sorgues

Saint-Vincent-sur-l'Isle

Lanouaille

Saint-Éloy-les-Tuileries

mam en Aveyron

Antonne-et-Trigonant

Rudeau-Ladosse

Roquefort-sur-Soulzon

File tagging File:Marie-Hélène Prouteau Stéphan 2016.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Champeaux-et-la-Chapelle-Pommier

File tagging File:Photo aérienne 1955.png

Puyrenier

Monument aux morts très ancien

Mémorial paroissial de Saint-Sulpice-de-Mareuil

Ajout de MAM

Mam en Corrèze

Mareuil (24340)

Séreilhac

Saint-Jean-d'Alcas (commune de Saint-Jean-et Saint-Paul)

Cressat

Aizenay

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Deepsea Miner II.jpg

Allassac

Église de Guéret

Moutier-d'Ahun

Carré militaire du cimetière de Périgueux nord

Église de Guéret (suite)

Mémorial de l'église de Jarnages

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Kiel, pas Kiev

Navigation menu

Search