User talk:Peter Zelizňák
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Filnik 20:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Architektúra - drevené kostoly
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
autor: Peter Zelizňák source: vlastné delo
Image deletion warning | Image:Bodružal_-_cerkov_sv._Mikuláša_1658_ZeliP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Jusjih 21:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Pohľad_na_Bodružal_z_Leštinca,_križovažka_do_Prikrej_ZeliP.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Jusjih 03:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. Patrícia msg 19:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Ešte po 95 rokoch v obci Bodružal, sú badateľné stopy po prvej svetovej vojne v lesnom masíve. Zákop má dĺžku skoro 200 m.
{{Information |Description={{sk|sk:Zákop z prvej svetovej vojny (október 1914) v obci Bodružal
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
Ahoj Peter
[edit]Ahoj Peter! Je super že pridávaš nové obrázky, mohol by si ich ale zaraďovať do jestvujúcich kategórií, aby v tom nevznikal chaos. Skús sa prosím poobzerať ako sú riešené iné slovenské obce ;) Želám Ti pekný deň, --Pescan 15:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Dobrý deň, ďakujem za povzbudivé slova. Usiloval som sa vziať model z niektorých obci Slovenska. Žiaľ malo je toho, aby sa to dalo kategorický členiť. Napríklad drevenú cerkvu som chcel dať do súboru 27 národných kultúrnych pamiatok, ale žiaľ malo je foto z týchto objektov.
Bodružal, preto som tak rozšíril, lebo v júli v Kanadskom meste cerkov sv. Mikuláša mala by byť zapísaná do zoznamu svetového kultúrneho dedičstva. Chcem, aby novinári a zaujemci o tento objekt mali čo najobjektívnejšie informácie.
Pre informáciu chcel som zobraziť foto zo zákopu z prvej svetovej vojny, čo je skoro po 95 rokoch rarita. Pred dvomi rokmi z mínohľadačkou sme tam našli náboje do pušky. Prach z týchto nábojov ešte dal zapaliť zápalkou. neviem v čom tkvie príčina, že fotografia nie je zobrazená. Ja anglický neviem, všetko čo som nahral ma stalo veľa času. Možno to ani za to nestalo, lebo svoj voľný čas som mohol inák využiť.
PS: Ak môžeš tak do textu daj foto pohľad na cerkvu z východu. Kdekoľvek. Ak niečo bude zaujímavejšie alebo objavím na Slovenskej stránke v každom prípade zaradiť podľa kategórii.
S pozdravom Zelizňák
- Ahoj Peter! Určite stojí za to aby si tu trávil čas! Sám viem koľko času zaberá táto práca... Tiež nerozumiem prečo sa Ti nezobrazujú obrázky, ale môžeš ich znovu skúsiť nahrať pod tým istým menom, pôvodný obrázok sa nahradí novým. Ak by si potreboval poradiť, tak sa pokojne obráť na mňa, rád poradím v rámci svojich vedomostí ohľadom Commons. Ešte by som Ťa chcel upozorniť na fungovanie diskusie, ak chceš odpovedať, stačí ak pripíšeš text do svojej diskusie... Ak by si písal v budúcnosti nejakému redaktorovi tiež píš do jeho diskusie a nie do stránky používateľa (tak ako si to urobil mne ;). Ak chceš potom sledovať zmeny v danej diskusii, alebo akékoľvek zmeny na akejkoľvek stránke, tak označ políčko v spodnej časti upravovanej stránky "Sledovať úpravy tejto stránky". Neskôr môžeš zmeny sledovať po kliknutí na "sledované stránky" vpravo hore... Želám Ti pekný deň a veľa úspechov na Wiki, --Pescan 18:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Wikikuchárka/Gazdovské tvarohové pirohy, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. garden 20:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Ahoj Peter!
[edit]Nepridávaj prosím na Commons články. Tie patria do Wikipédie. Tiež sa prosím vyvaruj toho, aby si pridával obrázky do kategórií a zároveň do podkategórií. Bronzovú sochu stačí pridať do kategórie bronzové sochy na Slovensku a táto kategória je už pod bronzové sochy podľa štátu. Ďakujem za pochopenie, --Pescan (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Ahoj...mám na Teba jednu prosbu. Ak pridávaš fotografie, skús pre ne pohľadať tiež vhodnú kategóriu. Ďakujem a pekný deň, --Pescan (talk) 12:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Ahoj...predpokladám že aj na Tvojej klávesnici sa nachádzajú interpunkčné znamienka, tak ich prosím používaj pri tvorení kategórií. Napríklad ‘Category:Nizny Komarnik’. Vďaka, --Pescan (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Ahoj...ak vypĺňaš infobox k fotografiám, tak prosím nepridávaj "pd self" do "other versions". Je to miesto na iné verzie toho istého obrázku... Licencovanie môžeš dávať pokojne do "premission". A prosím nezabúdaj o kategorizovaní obrázkov. Pri pridávaní sôch skús presnejší opis (autor, rok, miesto). Pekný deň, --Pescan (talk) 17:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Ahoj Peter! Ptrepáč že som nereagoval na otázky z mojej diskusie...odpovedám na ne do Tvojej. Medaila Kolomana Sokola má návrh na zmazanie preto, že k tomuto dielu nie je jasné autorské právo. Ak zaraďuješ do kategórií nejakú sochu, bolo by dobré aby bola vo všetkých kategóriách ktoré ju charakterizujú. Môžeš ju zaradiť podľa autora, materiálu, obsahu, miesta kde sa nachádza... Treba sa len trochu poobzerať po už jestvujúcich kat. alebo vytvoriť podľa vzorov ktoré už sú. Želám Ti pekný deň, --Pescan (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Slavnost.jpg is uncategorized since 6 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Bratislava Spitalska Kostol Klarisiek kral sv Stefan.JPG is uncategorized since 21 March 2009.
Image:Kulich Jan Koloman Sokol medaila relief .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Patrícia msg 21:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I don't understand slovak, but from what I could understand, I should just say that I didn't put the image for deletion myself, another user did and I just told you about it :), so I have not looked into the request itself. Regards, Patrícia msg 14:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Olá Peter e Ivana, peço desculpas por não ter respondido atempadamente, estive ausente. Eu não havia colocado a imagem para eliminação, apenas completei o processo de pedido de eliminação que outra pessoa iniciou. No entanto, vejo que a imagem já foi eliminada. Infelizmente, não há muito que eu possa fazer: de facto, fotografias de objectos com relevo como a medalha são consideradas obras derivadas, é um pouco estúpido mas é assim... e o artista Ján Kulich pelos vistos ainda é vivo, pelo que de certeza que o desenho está sob copyright. No Commons só aceitamos trabalhos sem copyright ou sob licenças livres, e uma foto ou reprodução fiel de uma medalha sob copyright é considerada também ela própria como estando sob copyright. Por favor, diga-me se tiver mais dúvidas. Saudações, Patrícia msg 20:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
your images
[edit]Hi Peter Zelizňák, may I ask, are you Peter Valach? If not, from when to when did he live? --Túrelio (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:56, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Valach_francuzsky_text.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.103.254 16:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Biografia pri sochároch
[edit]Ahoj Peter, commons je skladisko súborov...informácie o ľuďoch patria do wikipedie. Zváž prosím rozsah informácií ktoré pridávaš na commons. Všetko dobré, --Pescan (talk) 11:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:5000 Slovenskych korun.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:5000 Slovenskych korun.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:5000 Slovenskych korun.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Closeapple (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Wit Stosz ? Veit Stoß
[edit]Zdravím Ťa! (Wit Stosz) Category:Wit Stosz nebude náhodou Veit Stoß (Category:Veit Stoß)? S pozdravom Pe-Jo (talk) 08:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Pri uvádzaní autora som vychádzal z údajom pamiatkového úradu v BB. Meno sochára si môžem overiť na SK encyklopédii. Mám obavu, že encyklopédia z 80. rokov, nemusí mať meno švajčiarskeho sochára. Poprípade z Ottovho naučného slovníka. Ak udaje nezmením musíme len veriť údajom z BB.
S pozdravom Zelizňák_Peter Zeli Bodružalský
Ako som predpokladal v SK encyklopédii ani v Dejinách SK, toto meno nie je spomenuté. Taktiež ďalšia umenovedná literatúra takého sochára neuvádza.
V malej CS encyklopédii zv. 5 str. 886 je uvedené meno sochára Stoss (Stwosz) Veit 1447/8-1533. Ponechávam Ti na úvahu, či meno prepíšes tak ako uvadzajú česi. V knihe Slovensko kultúra 1. časť, Obzor 1979, Bratislava na str. 710 je sochár prepísaný v slovenskom jazyku na Víta Stossa.
S pozdravom Zelizňák
Monuments in Slovakia
[edit]Ahoj Peter, leider weiß ich ja nicht welche Sprache du sprichst oder verstehst ;-). Ich spreche leider nicht slowakisch oder tschechisch :-(. Danke für die vielen Fotos aus der Region Svidník. Ich habe sehr viele verwenden können in den Listen über de:Denkmalgeschützte Objekte im Okres Svidník. Vielleicht kannst du mir helfen, andere Fotos in die Listen einzutragen. Es ist nicht schwer, da du die slowakischen Bezeichnungen besser verstehst und die Gegend kennst.
Ahoj Peter, unfortunately I don't know, which language you speak or understand. I don't speak whether slovak nor ceský. Thank you for so many photo of region Svidník. I can many of there link in the lists in the german wikipedia de:Denkmalgeschützte Objekte im Okres Svidník (Protected objects in the okres über Svidník). Perhaps it's possible to help me and you add some fotos morte in the lists. It's easy, because you understand the slovak descriptions and know the area.
Ďakujem za pomoc :-) -- regards from vieden K@rl (talk) 13:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
A.Savin 17:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Moskva Marsal Zukov detail.jpg
- File:Moskva Marsal Zukov.jpg A.Savin 18:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Peter, Russia has no freedom-of-panorama exemption. Therefore, you need to provide the name and life dates of the original sculptor. --Túrelio (talk) 18:26, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
your licensing
[edit]Also I wonder why you put some of your photos, such as File:Sladkovicovo PlastikaTalamona Alfonza.jpg, under a CC-license and PD-self. That doesn't make any sense. By declaring them as PD-self, you are loosing nearly all your rights and no re-user would see the need to credit you per the CC-license. --Túrelio (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Socha Krista.jpg and File:Bratislava Dom sv Martina Jazdecke susosie sv Martina dielo G. T. Donnera.jpg
[edit]This sculpture seems to be located inside a building. I doubt that it is covered by the FOP exemption of Slovakian copyright law. --Túrelio (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Is this mural located outside or inside a building? --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Vojaci armady vojnovej SR 1943 Tigri skok, Tri Duby.jpg, File:Vojaci armády Slovenskej republiky 1943 Žiaci padákovej školy po dobu výcvku na trenážeri.jpg
[edit]Honestly, did YOU really shoot these images from 1943? --Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Bodružal vysviacka.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Bodruzal vysviacka.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Turelio dovoľte, aby som sa pousmial nad Vašim záverom, že som porušil autorské práva.
Nie som nebol zbávený svojprávnosti a v čase konania som bol na mieste činu, kde som uvedenú fotografiu zhotovil. Taktiež som autorom ostatných plagátov, súvisiacich s obcou Bodružal. Ak máte záujem tak Vás to možem naučiť v programe Indizajn. Takže plagát Vysviacka je moje autorstvo.
S pozdravom Peter Zelizňák
PS: Pri likvidovaní budúcich fiktívnych obrazokov, ktoré "porušujú" autorské práva Vám želám veľa úspechov.
Ak by ste vedeli, ktoľko času a námahy je potrebne vydať na zhotovenie takého plagátu, tak by ste deštruktívnu činnosť ta horlivo nevykonávali.
PS: Dôrazne Vás žiadam, aby plagát "Vysviacka" bol zaradený do kategórie do ktorej som ho určil.
Hi Túrelio,
I ask you to put the phototgraphy "vysviacka" back on the wikimedia. I didn't break the copyright, it's my work.
Peter Zelizňák
socha poliklinika Ružinov
[edit]AUTOROM sochy Poliklinika Ružinov JE ERNA MASAROVIČOVÁ 1926-2008
socha Ochrana života 1978, beton -hydronálium
neviem prečo sa určujete za autora ?
socha poliklinika Ružinov
[edit]AUTOROM sochy Poliklinika Ružinov JE ERNA MASAROVIČOVÁ 1926-2008
socha Ochrana života 1978, beton -hydronálium
neviem prečo sa určujete za autora ?
Vážená pani alebo pán,
pokiaľ má pamäť neklame tak autorom plastiky v exteriéri polikliniky Ružinov, by mala byť Ľudmila Cvengrošová. Myslím, že je to uvedené na exponáte plastiky. Ja som autor fotografie.
Je na škodu veci, že je veľa kritikov, ale už malo tých, ktorý by predmet kultúrnej hodnoty vyfotografovali a spristupnili pre ďalších, na dnes už tak dostupnom internete. Ak ste presvedčená-ý, že autorom je Erna Masarovičová tak to môžte editovať. Vyhľadavač nastavte na EDIT a uvedený text prepíšte, tak ako to má byť. Určite nebolo mojim zámerom zavádzať. Ak patríte medzi znalcov výtvarného umenia môžte uviesť autora sadrovej sochy v interiéri. S pozdravom Peter Zelizňák
conflicting license tags
[edit]Hi Peter Zelizňák, yesterday you had, probably inadvertently, added[1][2] "cc-by-3.0" to File:Bratislava Ruzinov plastika v areali Ruzinovskej nemocnice.jpg and File:Bratislava Ruzinov plastika v areali nemocnice.jpg, though you had both images released as PD-Self more than 4 years ago. I've therefore removed the "cc-by-3.0" as such a restriction is not possible. Also, please take care to add {{FoP-Slovakia}} to all your photos of works of art in Slovakia which may still be copyrighted (i.e., original arist not death for >70 years). --Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Dezider Milly ZENA V KROJI 1958.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
All paintings of Dezider Milly are copyrighted til end of 2041. --Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Peter Zelizňák, where is this bust located, at a street or inside a building? --Túrelio (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Túrelio,
- busta is located in the interior of Dezider Millý Gallery in Svidník. The director of the gallery agreed with my photography.
- Best regards, Peter Zelizňák.
- Thanks; though then it is not covered by freedom-of-panorama exemption. The problem is that only the creator/artist can give a permission to distribute a reproduction/photo of his work under a free license. The owner of a work of art has no rights beyond the possession of the material object. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, the author of the bust is 40 years dead already. I know every author will be happy to see his work on the internet and people can see it worldwide. PZ
Zdravím. Jak jste přišel na to, že autorem dřevořezby na obrázku File:Moravcik Drevorezba.jpg je režisér Vladimír Morávek. Vždyť je to nesmysl. Předem díky za opravu. --Issus (talk) 19:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Ospravedlňujem sa za nepodarok. Vediel som, že to bol človek od filmu. Takže preto ten omyl. Ešte jedenkrtát sa ospravedňujem. Ale dúfam, že je to v poriadku, keď vzájomne sa upozorníme na nedostatky, ktoré napríklad som ja zapričinil.
S pozdravom Peter
Ahoj Peter,
toto je Socha Rastislava nie Svätopluka. Prosim zmen to. Pozdrav --Trimnapaschkan (talk) 02:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Krajná Poľana erb.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Krajná Poľana erb.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 19:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
contact
[edit]Dear Mr Zeliznak, How can I contact you about your new publication? Your ad was removed from bazos.--Col r (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I am autor of this publication and my contact is: zeliznak.peter@gmail.com Best regards Peter Zelizňák
Thank you Mr. Zeliznak. Message sent.--Col r (talk) 22:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 09:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:17, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Podľa zákonov Slovenskej republiky a autorského zákona 618/2003 Z.z. ZÁKON zo 4. decembra 2003 o autorskom práve a právach súvisiacich s autorským právom (autorský zákon) umelecké diela, ktoré sú v exteriéri je ich možné fotografovať a publikovať v rôznych periodikách.
Preto Vás žiadam, aby ste uvedené mince ponechali na strankách wikimedie. S pozdravom Peter
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Žiadam Vás, aby uvedenú fotografiu pamätníka kpt. Jánovi Nálepkovi, ste nechali na pôvodnom mieste.
S pozdravom Peter
Yours sincerely, [[>Peter Zelizňák talk]]) 00:28, 29. April 2014 (UTC)
Postove karty Mojmirovcov
[edit]Dobry den pan Zeliznak, mohly by ste prosim vas zverejnit vsetky postovne karty z portretom Rastislava, Kocela, Pribinu a Mojmira II. tak ako ste zverejnili tento subor. Su na tejto stranke. Pozdrav --Trimnapaschkan (talk) 02:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Dobrý den, filatelia nie je mojim zaujmom.
Mojmira som prevzal z 5000 SK, z roku 1944, ako detail vytvarneho riesenia bankovky. Predmetom mojho zaujmu je socharska tvarba slovenskych vytvarnikov.
Takisto ma zaujala Bartfayova kresba Svatopluka. Bartfay je popredny slovensky sochar a je pozoruhodny jeho kresebny experiment.
Lutujem, pozadovane postovne karty (znamky) nemam.
S pozdravom--Peter Zelizňák (talk) 10:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Poděkování za fotku
[edit]Děkuji za fotografii sochy Pilot, českého sochaře Františka Pacíka. Můžete mi prosím napsat, kde se socha nachází? Všiml jsem si, že fotografujete sochy často. Nemáte náhodou soubory soch ze sympozií Vyšné Ružbachy, sochy Piešťanských parkov ze 60.-70. let? --NoJin (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Odpoveď:
Dobrý deň, ospravedlňujem sa za oneskorenú odpoveď. Ale pracovne som bol vyťažený, takže som sa na wikipédiu nedostal. Socha pilot českého sochára Františka Pacíka sa nachádzala v objekte vojenskej leteckej školy v Košiciach. Tento vojenský objekt bol odovzdaný univerzite v Košiciach a policajtom.
Pieskovcová plastika bola majetkom Ozbrojených síl Slovenskej republiky a preto v roku 2012 ju premiestnili na Leteckú základňu Sliač. Bol som prítomný pri demontáži z ktorej mám aj fotografiu. Pri inštalovaní sochy na letisku Sliač som nebol prítomný. Ministerstvo obrany Slovenskej republiky by malo byť schopné Vám podať vyčerpávajúcu odpoveď.
V Ružbachoch som do dnešných ešte nebol. Sochy, ktoré boli na wikipédií som priradil k autorom. Ide asi o 7—10 sôch a s nimi sa môžete stretnúť na
Sculptors from Slovaki (Category:Juraj Bartusz, Category:Jiří Svoboda. František Patočka, Category:Zdeněk Palcr. Autor fotografií je Ing. Mgr. Jozef Kotulič.
S pozdravom P. Zelizňák
Hello, Peter Zelizňák. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Dobrý den, děkuji za lokalizaci sochy Františka Pacíka i za odkaz na soubory vašich fotek. Velmi oceňuji, že si dáváte práci s určením autora. Sochy, které vyfotil pan Kotulič, jsem už kdysi našel, ale jeho fotky bohužel nejsou moc kvalitní a můj vzkaz zůstal bez odpovědi.--NoJin (talk) 21:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Translating the interface in your language, we need your help
[edit]Please register on translatewiki.net if you didn't yet and then help complete priority translations (make sure to select your language in the language selector). With a couple hours' work or less, you can make sure that nearly all visitors see the wiki interface fully translated. Nemo 14:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Moskva plastika Viery Machuno.jpg
- File:Moskva plastika venovana vytvarnikovi Repinovi.jpg
- File:Moskva plastika Sergeja Alexandroviča Jesenina.jpg
- File:Moskva plastika mecena ruského umenia Pavla Michajlovica Tretiaka.jpg
- File:Moskva Plastika Cechova.JPG
- File:Moskva Plastika cara Petra Veľkého11.jpg
- File:Moskva plastika Abaja Kunanbajeva1.jpg
- File:Moskva Park pri Kremelskom mure.jpg
- File:Moskva Jurij Dolhoruky11.jpg
- File:Moskva bronzove susosie.jpg
- File:Moskva bronzove susosie v parku arealu Puskinovho muzea.jpg
- File:Moskva bronzova plastika Vasilija Ivanovica Surikova.jpg
- File:Moskva bronzova plastika Alexandra II.jpg
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Дорогие друзья, Я не понимаю, почему Фотографии должны быть удалены. В мемориальном памятнику незнакому солдату это выражение благочестия, тихий дань людям, которые погибли, за защиту Родины. Статуя маршала Жукову этот памятник однoму из величайших полководцев 20-го века. Статуя К. Маркса, который первым проанализировал капитал. С уважением Петр Зeлизняк
odkaz
[edit]Peter, na stránke https://books.google.sk/books?id=OWwFAQAAQBAJ&pg=PT3&lpg=PT3&dq=ing.mgr.+jozef+kotuli%C4%8D&source=bl&ots=DcJlT_f3Tm&sig=XfP7vsBVXPQ5nicFY3Ljy2a9xqk&hl=sk&sa=X&ei=wrh2VZOuMsn5UqKsgaAF&ved=0CB4Q6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=ing.mgr.%20jozef%20kotuli%C4%8D&f=false som náhodou našiel aj tvoje meno uvedené ako autora fotografií. Gratulujem --Doko (talk) 10:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Peter, where (country) did you shoot this image? --Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Peter, I assume that this photo has been taken indoors, right? When did the sculptor (Stefana Kukuru ?) die? --Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
File:KDO Vysny Komarnik 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gumruch (talk) 19:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Dobrý deň, Nechápem komunitu prečo uvažuje o zrušení fotografie. Fotografia vznikla v jeseni 1944 a autor fotografie zahynul pri ďalšej bojovej činnosti na území ČSR. Fotografia je dokumentačný materiál pre návštevníkov Vyšného Komárniku.
S pozdravom Peter
- Autora jste neuvedl. Pokud je uveden v knize, napište ho i se životními daty. Vy systematicky falešně uvádíte jako autora sebe, i když nejste autorem původní fotografie, jen přefocení nebo skenu. Stejně tak systematicky zveřejňujete fotografie 3D děl, která nejsou PD-old a zároveň nejsou venku, aby podléhala FoP. Gumruch (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
To čo píšete je veľmi dehonestujúce. Sochárske diela sú z verejných priestorov, ktoré sú publikované v médiách bez uvedenia autora.
Som členom Zväzu výtvarných umelcov a teoretikov Slovenska. Ani jeden sochár neprotestoval proti publikovaniu jeho umeleckého diela. Ba skôr naopak, boli radi, že majú vytvorenú stránku na wikimedí.
Fotografia z Vyšného KOMáRNIKA bola daná na wikimediu v roku 2009. Takže, aby som uviedol zdroj musel, by som venovať tomu značnú pozornosť a to nehodlám. Ak ste presvedčený, že je potrebné ju odstrániť nech sa páči.
Fotografia mala poslúžiť k osvete miestnych obyvateľov a skutočne aj poslúžila.
S pozdravom Peter
Dobrý deň, nemáte náhodou informáciu o autorovi pamätníka A. Kmeťa v Bzenici? Rád by som do popisu doplnil informáciu o autorovi.--LacoR (talk) 09:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
File:SK znamka Svatopluk Tibor-Bartfay.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
LacoR (talk) 11:07, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Pariz Plastika generala Stefanika.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
LacoR (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Pariz Plastika generala Stefanika.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Amitie 10g (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Táto fotografia M. R. Štefánika z Paríže neporušuje autorský zákon Francúzskej republiky. Francúzska republika respektíve autor sochy daroval mestu Brezno túto plastiku. (Pre ilustráciu uvádzam https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brezno16Slovakia24.JPG).
Autorský zákon USA, ktorý aplikujete na Wikimédii nie je identický s európskym zákonom o autorských právach.
Pred niekoľkými dňami v európskom parlamente bola debata, aby sa zmiernili, niektoré ustanovenia zákona, aby ľudia mohli objekty postavené z verejných zdrojov voľné publikovať. Z fotografie som vyretušoval osobu, ktorá bola na zájazde. S pozdravom Peter
- Napísal som vám odpoveď na Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pariz Plastika generala Stefanika.jpg--LacoR (talk) 20:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Peter Zelizňák: Neexistuje žiadna sloboda panorámy vo Francúzsku pre sochárskych diel, takže fotky z nich sú deriváty autorsky chránených obsahov a nie sú vo verejnej doméne. S pozdravom, Sealle (talk) 04:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Bratislava nam M- Benku Milénium.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bratislava nam M- Benku Milénium.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 09:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Vojaci armády Slovenskej republiky 1943 Žiaci padákovej školy po dobu výcvku na trenážeri.jpg
[edit]File:Vojaci armády Slovenskej republiky 1943 Žiaci padákovej školy po dobu výcvku na trenážeri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buidhe (talk) 15:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Vojaci armady vojnovej SR 1943 Tigri skok, Tri Duby.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buidhe (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
File:KDO Vysny Komarnik 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buidhe (talk) 05:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Bratislava hrad 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buidhe (talk) 06:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Over-categorization
[edit]Dobrý dne, prosím prostudujte si COM:OVERCAT. Editace jako [3] jsem revertoval, protože se jedná o klasický případ over-categorization. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 22:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
File:500 KS rub.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Harold.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
File:SKK 5000 korun slovenskych.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Harold.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
File:50 korunova bankovka Slovenskej republiky.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Harold.
And also:
- File:Rubova strana 50 korunovej bankovky Slovenskej republiky.jpg ( Nominator : Harold - Reason : per COM:CUR Slovakia )
- File:200 korunova bankovka Slovenska republika.jpg ( Nominator : Harold - Reason : per COM:CUR Slovakia )
- File:Rubova strana 200 korunovej bankovky Slovenska republika.jpg ( Nominator : Harold - Reason : per COM:CUR Slovakia )
- File:1000 KS lic.jpg ( Nominator : Harold - Reason : per COM:CUR Slovakia )
- File:1000 KS rub.jpg ( Nominator : Harold - Reason : per COM:CUR Slovakia )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
File:100 KS averz autor Stefan Novotny.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Harold.
And also:
- File:100 KS reverz autor Stefan Novotny.jpg ( Nominator : Harold - Reason : per COM:CUR Slovakia )
- File:20 halierov SK 1993.jpg ( Nominator : Harold - Reason : per COM:CUR Slovakia )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:KOSICE Plastiky.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:KOSICE Plastiky.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:KOSICE Plastiky.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:TN Alexander Dubcek.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:TN Alexander Dubcek.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:TN Alexander Dubcek.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:ZA Budatin hrad.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:ZA Budatin hrad.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:ZA Budatin hrad.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Moskva Marsal Zukov1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 20:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:BA Gorazd.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:BA Gorazd.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:BA Gorazd.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Male dejiny Rusinov.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Male dejiny Rusinov.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Male dejiny Rusinov.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gumruch (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Dejiny grekokatolikov.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Dejiny grekokatolikov.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dejiny grekokatolikov.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gumruch (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Zablatie76.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Zablatie76.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Zablatie76.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)