User talk:Pe-Jo

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pe-Jo!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Pe-Jo!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Plášťovce-vlajka.gif is uncategorized since 1 June 2009.
Image:Dacsókeszi.JPG is uncategorized since 1 June 2009.
Image:Kosihovce Dacsókeszi-church.jpg is uncategorized since 1 June 2009.
Image:Plastovce-coat.gif is uncategorized since 1 June 2009.
Image:Štiavnické Bane 1906.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
Image:Palásthy-manor house.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2009.

File:Plášťovce-church.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Josephinische

Hartile inca nu sunt complete cu informatii, urmeaza sa le introduc. Am facut de la 000 la 118 si cateva din sudul transilvaniei. Daca doriti sa introduceti linkuri, bagati-le acolo unde exita tabele , de ex. de la 000 la 118. Merci.Asybaris01 (talk) 08:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, find people to implement the Kingdom of Hungary maps, see here.Asybaris01 (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make a map was shown schematically in the territory of Slovakia's Hungarian counties? I need this to create a collage of the Hungarian Kingdom map similar to what i have achieved in Maramures County, here and Arad county, here. Asybaris01 (talk) 11:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you from your answerPe-Jo (talk) 12:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about this map?Asybaris01 (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link GrosHonterTemplate....Asybaris01 (talk) 17:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tévedés

Csak az lehetet a baj, mivel több képet is töltöttem föl az adott időpontban, ilyenkor előfordul, hogy egy-kép felcímkézését eltévesztem. Doncsecz (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Az a baj, hogy tudom hogyan lehet átnevezni a képet, vagy lehet átnevezni. A legegyszerűbb ha letöröljük és újra fetöltjük. Doncsecz (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm a jókívánságot. Doncsecz (talk) 12:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plášťovce interwiki

Ahoj Pe-Jo! Prečo interwiki na Hornú Seč? Ďakujem za odpoveď, všetko dobré, --Pescan (talk) 19:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dik Pescan, pre Hornú Seč som robil šablónu a nechtiac som uložil, Ešte raz ďakujem. Mea culpa...Pe-Jo (talk) 05:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalvaria-Ipolysag-2007-7.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Krensdorf-Tormafalu-old windows.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Zrínyi sisakja.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Szilágysomlyó-cat church-int1.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Szilágysomlyó-cat church-int5.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Palócok-Szécsény.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Mezőkövesd- Kimnach.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Késmárk-railway st-19th century.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:54, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Késmárk-railway st-1920.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:54, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Késmárk-railway st-1914-16.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Késmárk-railway st1.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Balaton-ship.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Žemberovce-panorama.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

category:Equestrian portrait paintings

"Portrait painting" is not the image of Saint George or Atilla. Image of George is "sacral painting", and Athilla - "history painting". Please read the defenition of portrait genre en:Portrait - it is always the image of real existing person painted during his life or soon after his death. If somebody painted Napoleon in early 19th century, during emperor's life - it is portrait. And if somebody do it right now in 21nd century - it is again "history painting" or "history portrait" (more related to history, than portrait). If in that category are still images of saint, added by you, please remove. Shakko (talk) 07:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC) Thank you Shakko. Pe-Jo (talk) 07:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Danubius Pannonico-Mysicus

Thanks for the help in categorizing Category:Danubius Pannonico-Mysicus, and the files. Do you happen to know of any site where I could find the digital version of the book? Regards and happy holidays.--Codrin.B (talk) 19:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was found so only maps of Danube by Marsigli on pages [1] , [2], pictures and maps in the book: DR. MÁRKI SÁNDOR II. RÁKÓCZI FERENCZ [3] , for exemple : A DUNA TÉRKÉPE MARSIGLI »DANUBIUS«-ÁBÓL. trans. Map of Danube in »DANUBIUS« by Marsigli.

Good work and happy holidays.Pe-Jo (talk) 06:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I found that site. Looks like a nice work, but unfortunately I don't understand Hungarian. Any images there which are also from the book Category:Danubius Pannonico-Mysicus? Most of them seem already on commons, but just wondering. --Codrin.B (talk) 22:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

címer

Üdv, a képet elnézve szerintem nem az a fő téma, pusztán egy homlokzati elem :) Ha kitöltetné a képet, vagy az lenne középen, már beleillene a kategóriába, amiből kiszedtem. --VinceB (talk) 15:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Van rajta hó is (erre még csak közelíteni sem kell), ne tegyem a snow kategóriába is egyúttal? Próbáld megérteni, a 250-300px-es méretben, ahogy egy cikkben szerepel(ne) úgy az teljességgel kivehetetlen, a címer ábrázolására alkalmatlan. Vesd össze ezzel: File:Erdeszet.jpg --VinceB (talk) 11:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olvass tovább a kérdőjelnél, mert láthatóan nem tetted meg. Ha sikerült végigolvasni, akkor próbáld értelmezni is. A képed témája a Grassalkovich-kastély és nem a címer. --VinceB (talk) 12:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Hi Pe-Jo, pleas be so kind and have a look to your talk-page - thx K@rl (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Saint Michael church in Levice

Hi Pe-Jo, could it be that this church is not Sv. Michal, but sv. Jozefa, the church is in the Sv.Michala ul. 43, it's so written from monument board. --regards K@rl (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, monuments in Levice:

Saint Michael church in Levice- Sv. Michala 30,

Monastery and Church of Saint Joseph- Sv. Michala 43 (rectory),

Ref. church - Sv. Michala 36,

good day for you, Pe-Jo (talk) 10:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Change of monumentnumber

Ahoj Pe-Jo, A little change was necessary with numbering of monuments in Slovak republic. The number consists now at begin the okresy number, because the number as standalon is not unique in slovakia. You can see es sample Category:Cathedral Basilica of St Emmeram, Nitra 403-1483/4 with 403 as number of okres nitra. regards K@rl (talk) 16:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,Danke Pe-Jo (talk) 06:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monuments in Slovakia

Ahoj Pe-Jo, at first I say thank you for the good fotos. Second I want to inform you, that now you can find lists in the german wikipedia about each community (obec) about the monuments. Thea are de:Denkmalgeschützte Objekte in der Slowakei.I think, if you cannot speak german, you can understand the lists too. The descriptions are in the origin slovak language and the templates are similar to yours in the lists in sk:Zoznam kultúrnych pamiatok na Slovensku. You would help me to add fotos from you, because you know, what you stored as foto :-) The fotos theyrself are marked here with the template. You will find there in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Slovakia with known IDs -- I hope you will help me to make more complete the lists - thamk you in advance from Vienna K@rl (talk) 15:16, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Karl,thank you. Pe-Jo (talk) 11:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P-Jo, I want inform additional too, that the slovak wikipedia participate on Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 The official begin was per 1. septembre, but the real begin yesterday. Perhaps you have photos to upload. I would be glad, if you can help in this project too with Wiki Loves Monuments 2012|sk --regards K@rl (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, danke Karl Pe-Jo (talk) 09:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, látom szépen fotózol a környéken. Szép munka, hajrá! :) Taz666 (talk) 22:17, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, köszönöm a biztatást, minden jót neked isPe-Jo (talk) 11:05, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Pe-Jo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 02:36, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Moved incorrectly named category

Hello Pe-Jo, I just did

Rename Category:Aerial photographs of Danube to Category:Aerial photographs of thr Danube (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.

because your category name was gramatically incorrect. If you are not sure about such things please ask somebody else how to name categories correctly in English.

Thanks for your support. Happy editing. --High Contrast (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello High Contrast, thank you Pe-Jo (talk) 07:39, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milano duomo-door- pieta.jpg

File:Milano duomo-door- pieta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milano duomo-door1.JPG

File:Milano duomo-door1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milanói dóm-kapu-Szent család.jpg

File:Milanói dóm-kapu-Szent család.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milano duomo-door-Maria.jpg

File:Milano duomo-door-Maria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 21:35, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you JuTa Pe-Jo (talk) 07:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magyar labdarúgó-válogatott-Sárosi.jpg

File:Magyar labdarúgó-válogatott-Sárosi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Psychonaut (talk) 20:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cluj-Napoca Coats of Arms

Please do not add keys for the coats of arms with Cluj-Napoca. All coats of arms are name by a standard (ROU_County_City_Name_CoA), so the images are sorted by default. I'm putting order in the coats of arms section, so have a little patience. The coats of arms will be put in the right categories probably tomorrow. Musichistory2009

 Thank you Musichistory2009 ...Pe-Jo (talk) 10:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong category for Gheorgheni, Cluj

You've putted the Category:Gheorgheni, Cluj in Category:Cities and towns in Cluj County. The wright categories are Category:Villages in Cluj County and the Category:Feleacu, Cluj. The coat of arms image you've putted in Category:Gheorgheni, Cluj is also wrong. You're confusing Category:Gheorgheni, Cluj (village in Cluj County) with Category:Gheorgheni (city in Harghita County). Musichistory2009

 Thank you Musichistory2009 , Pe-Jo (talk) 10:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rakoczi Museum images

I removed category:Francis II Rákóczi from all the images of Rakoczi Museum since that category is the parent category of the category:Rakoczi Museum anyway. We do not need to include this category. Thank you for your cooperation. Cheers. --CeeGee (talk) 12:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your cooperation. Pe-Jo (talk) 12:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Banská Bystrica

Hi Pe-Jo, at first I want thank you for the help with categorisation of the images of Banská Bystrice. Additional I have a question subject the Category:Beniczky mansions. Should the name be better only Beniczky mansion? because it's only the one building in BB. Than the complete category could be a part of SNP-namestie.-- regards from Austria --K@rl (talk) 13:33, 22 September 2015 (UT

Hi Karl, on namestie SNP 16 is the Beniczky House (restaurant) , this house wos built in 17th-century.Pe-Jo (talk) 15:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So only one Category:Beniczky mansion or Category:Beniczky House is necessary --K@rl (talk) 16:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I saw, that you have done it :-) --thx K@rl (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bende Imre, nyitrai püspök, Borovszky szerint.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bende Imre, nyitrai püspök, Borovszky szerint.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hősök tere

Thanks for your help getting the right parent categories on each of those statue categories. It was a lot for me to keep track of. - Themightyquill (talk) 13:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Themightyquill for your good works Pe-Jo (talk) 11:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1821_in_Serbia

1821 in Serbia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Zoupan (talk) 00:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings_of_John_of_Nepomuk_in_Serbia

Paintings of John of Nepomuk in Serbia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Zoupan (talk) 00:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1821_in_Serbia

1821 in Serbia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Zoupan (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Belgrade_in_1521

Category:Belgrade_in_1521 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Zoupan (talk) 21:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Inner_City_(Budapest)

Category:Inner_City_(Budapest) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Globetrotter19 (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Globetrotter19 remélem sikerül tisztázni a kategóriát, nagyon örülök a mélyreható szerkesztéseidnek. Sok sikert Pe-Jo (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Pe-Jo én is remélem. És köszönöm a sok segítséget amit adtál. Sok sikert - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Örülök, ha egy picit segíthettem. Üdv, Pe-Jo (talk) 23:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Franciscan church and monastery in Fiľakovo

Ahoj, pridal si ku kategórii kategóriu Category:Former monasteries in Slovakia, vzhľadom k tomu, že podľa stránky http://www.frantiskani.sk/filakovo/kontakty je v predmetnej budove aj v súčasnosti kláštor som kategóriu odstránil.--LacoR (talk) 13:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ďakujem LacoR za opravu, budem dávať väčší pozor. Veľmi užitočnú prácu robíš. Pe-Jo (talk) 06:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Playgrounds in Slovakia

Szia Pe-Jo! Láttam, hogy több focipályát is betettél ebbe a kategóriába, pedig ez (szerintem) a 'játszótér'(gyerekeknek) kategória avagy nem? Üdvözlettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, talán belekerültek pl. iskolák melletti füvesített sportterületek (nem csak én tettem oda), vagy hasonló területek, melyek a játszótér és a többfunkciós sportpálya között vannak. Azóta ( 2 év) színesebb a skála, át lehet helyezni nyugodtan, de csak focipályának nem nevezném mindegyiket. Majd még megnézem. Kösz az észrevételt , eredményes tevékenységet kíván Pe-Jo (talk) 23:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1956

Szia! A Category:Hungarian Revolution of 1956 in Budapest kategóriában 800 – nagyrészt a Fortepanról származó – kép van. Nincs kedved alkategóriákra bontani (pl. helyszínek, események vagy dátumok szerint)? --Rlevente (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Tartalmas gyűjtemény. Megtisztelsz, hogy gondoltál rám. Megpróbálom előtte egy kicsit áttanulmányozni... Pe-Jo (talk) 06:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm, remélem, mostanában nagy igény lesz ezekre a képekre. --Rlevente (talk) 09:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Örülök, hogy részt vehetek benne. Így áttekinthetőbb lesz.Pe-Jo (talk) 09:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gallerie dell'Accademia

Please stop! Let me do the work to a mainstream category line, then you can add new categories by subject later on... It's a huge job. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way It doesn't make much sense to have a "religius paintings" category, because it would be overcrowded very soon, as 95% of the paintings in any italian museum are religious, so I would not have it, but we can discuss it later, first make me recategorize all the images. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok Pe-Jo (talk) 16:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hungarian scouts in Slovakia

Hungarian scouts in Slovakia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The Hungarian Scout Association in Slovakia is a non-profit organization that is engaged in education of young people. Its target group is the Hungarian youth living in Slovakia, it has an educational programme worked out for them in the first place [4]Pe-Jo (talk) 06:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I got it, I'm a supporter, the issue is just renaming, as Scouting is always capitalized in this sense in English, per Scouting WPMOS. Légy Résen!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:34, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks , new name : "Hungarian Scout Association in Slovakia" ? Pe-Jo (talk) 06:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - Fő utca 1900.jpg

File:Kassa - Fő utca 1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - Hadapród iskola 1918.jpg

File:Kassa - Hadapród iskola 1918.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - Hadtestparancsnokság.jpg

File:Kassa - Hadtestparancsnokság.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - Honvéd szobor.jpg

File:Kassa - Honvéd szobor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - királyi ítélőtábla.jpg

File:Kassa - királyi ítélőtábla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - Rákóczi út 1899.jpg

File:Kassa - Rákóczi út 1899.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:49, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - Szathmáry György utca a Dómmal.jpg

File:Kassa - Szathmáry György utca a Dómmal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - Széchenyi liget.jpg

File:Kassa - Széchenyi liget.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - színház3.jpg

File:Kassa - színház3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - színház4.jpg

File:Kassa - színház4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 18:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - szószék a Dómban 1901.jpg

File:Kassa - szószék a Dómban 1901.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa - vegyes.jpg

File:Kassa - vegyes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa, mozaik.jpg

File:Kassa, mozaik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa, Orbán torony.jpg

File:Kassa, Orbán torony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa-Dóm.jpg

File:Kassa-Dóm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassa.jpg

File:Kassa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Námestie_Slobody,_Bratislava_(fountain)

Námestie Slobody, Bratislava (fountain) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Category:Things_named_after_freedom

Things named after freedom has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Civa (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vážený pán Pe-Jo,

Dlhodobo som sa rozhodoval, že sa Vám ozvem. Dôvodom môjho kontaktu na Vás, bolo moje pohoršenie s Vašimi zásahmi do zobrazených umeleckých diel. Okrem Vás sú ešte ďalší ľudia, ktorí takto nesfunkčňujú prehľadanie výtvarných diel.

Ako príklad uvediem súbor Statues in Bratislava. V tomto súbore plastik nie je socha M.R. Štefánika. Je začlenená do súboru Pamätník Milanovi Rastislavovi Štefánikovi.

A teraz si dajme príklad, že ste výtvarník a hľadáte inšpiráciu. Otvoríte si súbor Statues in Bratislava, kde sa Vám objaví celý súbor plastik. Na úrovni Media in category v pravej časti je zelená ikonka na, ktorú dáte kurzor a otvoríte ju. Objaví sa Vám Categoria Slode slideshow. Kurzor dáte na šípku a pokračujete plynule v prehľadaní plastik.

Tak ako je to teraz v súbore Statues in Bratislava, na plastiku Štefánika musíte ísť do súboru Pamätník Milanovi Rastislavovi Štefánikovi a to je zdržanie, pokiaľ sa táto kategória otvorí.

Verte mi, že stránku umeleckých diel navštevuje veľa ľudí z umeleckej fronty zaoberajúcimi sa tvorbou výtvarných diel. Tým, že umelecké diela dávame separátne (sólovo) komplikuje záujemcom život. A určite oddeľovaním jednotlivých plastik nezvýšime záujem o túto stránku.

Osobne som presvedčený, že sme veľmi skomplikovali súbory v • Slovak National Uprising • World War I memorials in Slovakia • World War II memorials in Slovakia. Tak ako dnes sú rozdelené do jednotlivých regiónov mali zostať aj v pôvodných. Tam bolo od 150 – 180 pamätníkov. Na prehľadanie, tak ako som hore uviedol bolo vynikajúce. Dnes vyhľadanie niektorých pamätníkov je veľmi komplikované a človek sa k tomu dlhodobo musí prepracovať.

S pozdravom Peter Zelizňák

Zdravím Vás!

Len na upresnenie ja som "Category:Pamätník Milanovi Rastislavovi Štefánikovi" začleňoval do "Category:Monuments and memorials of Milan Rastislav Štefánik (ktorú kategóriu som ja vytvoril kedže je viac pamätníkov )a nie súbor ... Kategória "Statues in Bratislava" už tam bola. Podľa môjho názoru bratislavský pamätník pred novým divadlom by bolo vhodné premenovať z "Category:Pamätník Milanovi Rastislavovi Štefánikovi" tak, aby bolo jasné, že je to v Bratislave a nie inde a pre cudzích radšej po anglicky. Nemyslím si že by som robil komplikované veci, skôr naopak niektoré pamätníky neboli vôbec zaradené do takých kategórií , ktoré si zaslúžia ( sculptures, resp. statues ). Veľmi si vážim Vašu prácu tu a ďakujem, že Ste sa ozvali. S pozdravom Pe-Jo (talk) 11:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Saint_George_by_Maderno_in_Bratislava

Saint George by Maderno in Bratislava has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lincoln Square in Bellevue, Washington

I'm reverting this edit by you. Just because a building has "Square" in its name doesn't make it an "urban square." - Jmabel ! talk 14:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Category:Things named after Abraham Lincoln ? Pe-Jo (talk) 15:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. That's presumably who it's named after. - Jmabel ! talk 23:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jmabel ! Pe-Jo (talk) 05:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Things_named_after_grand

Category:Things_named_after_grand has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 07:29, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1521_in_Belgrade

1521 in Belgrade has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Zoupan (talk) 16:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Szatmárnémeti

Szatmárnémeti has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 11:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The_Condemned_Cell_(1880)_by_Mihály_Munkácsy

The Condemned Cell (1880) by Mihály Munkácsy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Latemplanza (talk) 10:44, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Icons_inTurkey

Category:Icons_inTurkey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Cobija (talk) 20:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Frescos_of_the_adoration_of_the_Magi_by_the_Three_Wise_Men

Category:Frescos_of_the_adoration_of_the_Magi_by_the_Three_Wise_Men has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Oursana (talk) 11:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Zolta

Zolta has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Golden_Beach,_Siófok

Golden Beach, Siófok has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Virgin_Mary_by_Giovanni_Bellini

Virgin Mary by Giovanni Bellini has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Oursana (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Republic Patai Tamás es Boros Csaba 2010 SzeptemberFest.JPG

Szia! A Csaba Boros a Republic (band) része. Miért tetted vissza? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Az együttes fellépéséről is szól a kép. Patai Tamásnak sem volt kategóriája, ő is a csapat tagja. Ha csak az utcán volnának lefényképezve, akkor nem kellene a Republic (band).  Én így értelmezem. Nem szeretném , ha ez miatt neheztelnél, nagyon jók a szerkesztéseid. Üdv,  Pe-Jo (talk) 10:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Nem 'neheztelek', de szerintem akkor sem jó. Akkor inkább Republic (band) 2010-09-05 kellene, hogy legyen (akkor a 2010 concerts in Hungary, Concerts in Budapest, SzeptemberFeszt 2010 kategóriák 'alá' lehetne tenni) vagy Republic (band) in 2010 is lehetne. Egyébbként túl van kategórizálva. Az nem lehet, hogy csinálok egy csoportképet 1 vagy több embert név szerint kategórizálok, de beteszem az emberek közé mert a nincs mindenki nevesítve - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Igen , vagyjából az is volt az elképzelésen, hogy évekre, vagy eseményekre felbontani az együttes képeit. Tavaly készítettem róluk több képet is ... Egy zenekarhoz nem csak a személyek tartoznak, de sok minden még, pl. a dobfelszerelés, ki volt az énekes egy időszakban...stb. Nem kell velem egyetérteni, de nem tudom , hogy miért csinálsz ebből ügyet. Üdv. Pe-Jo (talk) 13:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Azért 'ügy', mert a kép készítője reklamált a vitalapomon, hogy miért került 'láthatatlan' kategóriába a fotó. Erre én mondtam, hogy az az alkategóriája, ennek viszont a sima Republic (band) kategória ellentmondott. Köszönöm, Republic (band) in 2010-t. A te szerkesztéseid is nagyon jók. További jó munkát! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rendben, nem volt időm az évek szerinti kategóriákra (néha dolgoznom is kell), csak előkészítettem a "talajt", de Te inspiráltál. Ha van valami kérlek szóljál nyugodtan máskor is.Pe-Jo (talk) 06:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weszprémi-medal.jpg

File:Weszprémi-medal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Regasterios (talk) 13:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vehicles_in_the_Hungarian_Revolution_of_1956

Vehicles in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm kedves Globetrotter19. Esetleg indoklás? Pe-Jo (talk) 08:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nem értelek kedves Pe-Jo. Az 56-os forradalom,-illetve annak a járművei,-elvben országos volt. A jelen kategórianév ennek felel meg szóval nem a Category:Vehicles in Budapest hanem a Category:Vehicles in Hungary része és elvben minden képet külön be kellene tenni Category:Vehicles in Budapest kategóriába is. A korábbi névben Category:Hungarian Revolution of 1956 in Budapest-vehicles szerepelt a Budapest szó is vagyis egyértelmű volt csak budapesti járművek vannak benne. Ráadásul ha csak a budapesti járművek szerepelnek akkor Category:Hungarian Revolution of 1956 in Budapest kellene szülőketegóriának és nem a jelenlegi Category:Hungarian Revolution of 1956.

Szóval vagy át kellene nevezni (és a Category:Hungarian Revolution of 1956 in Budapest kategóriába átteni) vagy talán még jobb lenne az alkategória pl. Category:Vehicles in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 (Budapest) a (Category:Vehicles_in_the_Hungarian_Revolution_of_1956, a Category:Hungarian Revolution of 1956 in Budapest és a Category:Vehicles in Budapest-ből megcsinálni és oda áttenni vélhetően minden jelenlegi járművet tartalmazó képet mert jelenleg minden 'járműves' fotó budapesti (szerintem pl. A forradalom egyik jelkepe, Mento es tank 1956 is). Remélem érthető voltam. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Globetrotter19, köszönöm a kimerítő választ, a gond. Sajnos most nem tudok vele foglalkozni. Nyugodtan lehet változtatni, csak szerettem volna tudni a lényeget. Mindent lehet finomítani, örülök a közös tevékenységnek. További sok sikert.Pe-Jo (talk) 05:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Pe-Jo, az sajnos elég komoly gond, hogy plusz munkát csináltál. Az, meg hogy 'Nyugodtan lehet változtatni' szerintem nem megfeleló hozzáállás. Az nem 'finomítás' ha helytelent helyesre kell változtatni. Legközelebb ügyesebben! További jó munkát! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 08:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Globetrotter19. Kikérem ezt a hangnemet. Ha lesz időm majd megoldom, ha a többiek is hozzászólnak, hisz feltetted a megbeszélésekhez, amivel semmi gondom. Most a "koronamegelőzéssel" töltöm napjaimat. Ehhez viszonyítva írtam a "komolyabb dolgot". Kicsit utánanéztem a történetnek : a Category:Hungarian Revolution of 1956 in Budapest-vehicles" nem én irányítottam át a Category:Vehicles in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956- ba. Egy éve volt megbeszélés ezzel kapcsolatban , én a változtatásokkal nem foglakoztam... Pe-Jo (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Pe-Jo. Nem értelek! Te kérted, hogy ne az átnevezési vitalapon beszéljünk, pedig ott volt indoklás! Én azt hiszem nagyon korrekt módon válaszoltam. Erre Te ilyeneket irtál azt hittem, hogy komolyabb meg hogy Mindent lehet finomítani Ez milyen hangnem? Kérlek ne sértödj meg! Csak a félreértéseket, a szerkesztési visszavonásokat akartam elkerülni! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nem tudok annyit angolul, hogy megvitassam a vitalapon.Nem tettem semmit,ami miatt ilyen hangnemben írjon valaki, hogy én felesleges munkát csinálok, stb. Amikor a kb. 500 fényképet kategorizáltam az 1956-os forradalommal kapcsolatban, akkor nem segített senki. Később lettek a kategóriák bizonyos módon változtatva. Azt gondolom, hogy magyar ember magyarral magyarul jobban meg tudja beszélni a több éve fent lévő dolgokat. Ha jobb ötlet van, akkor nyugodtan lehet változtatni. Már említettem, hogy nem én változtattam a kategórián úgy , hogy nem megfelelő, hisz át van irányítva. Több iszteletet kérek és kevesebb személyeskedést. Pe-Jo (talk) 10:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tudom, hogy nem Te változtattad a kategóriát csak részt vettél a megbeszélésen! Mivel az eredetit Te csináltad így nálad is megjelent a mostani üzenet (egyébbként nem neked akartam üzenni). Mível rákérdeztél így válaszoltam. Ugye ez nem sértés vagy tiszteletlen vagy éppen személyeskedő? Egyetértek, hogy mindenki próbáljon mások felé tiszteletet mutatni.

Részemről lezártam a vitát. Kivánok jó "koronamegelőzést" (én is ezt teszem). - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minden jót Pe-Jo (talk) 07:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Estonian_Open_Air_Museum-windmills

Estonian Open Air Museum-windmills has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cities_and_villages_in_the_Kingdom_of_Hungary_by_county

Cities and villages in the Kingdom of Hungary by county has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings in the Gallery of Palazzo Rosso (Genoa)

Hi, Pe-Jo. Could you let me know when you're finished working on this category? I got some edit conflicts from your work. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I finished the Category:Religious paintings in the Gallery of Palazzo Rosso (Genoa). If you found a mistake please write or correct it. Thanks Pe-Jo (talk) 09:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fyi File:Agnolo Bronzino - Maria (di Cosimo I) de' Medici.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AAgnolo_Bronzino_-_Maria_%28di_Cosimo_I%29_de%27_Medici.jpg&type=revision&diff=342433237&oldid=342432072--Oursana (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings in National Museum of Capodimonte (Naples)

I'm in the process of doing a lot of work with the paintings here. I wasn't finished, so your creation of Category:Paintings of Jesus Christ in the National Museum of Capodimonte (Naples) got in the way of it. Can you let me work on it, or are you going to? I don't want to keep having edit conflicts. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry Pe-Jo (talk) 05:47, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to stop working on it for now. If you'd like to continue, go ahead. Thanks for stopping before. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Pe-Jo (talk) 06:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings_by_Zanobi_Strozzi_in_the_Musée_des_Beaux-Arts_de_Strasbourg

Paintings by Zanobi Strozzi in the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Strasbourg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Edelseider (talk) 07:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vatican Museums: sub-categories by subject and by author put into top-category by century.

Hi, Pe-Jo. Excuse my poor english (I'm Italian and I write in english with extensive help of google). Since April I'm committed to clean up in the category and sub-category of Vatican Museums. For each museum and exhibition space in Vatican Museums, I'm trying to categorize each item by criteria (if known and when appropriate): i.e. by century, by object type, by artist (for paintings in the Pinacoteca and in the Contemporary Art Collection), by material, by place of discovery (for archaeological findings exposed in museums of antiquities), by production area (for example Roman antiquities or Etruscan Antiquities) and by room. I'm afraid that the work will last a lot of time.

In some categories of the criteria "...by century" of the paintings in the Pinacoteca Vaticana, you're adding entire sub-categories, like "Paintings by (artist) in the Pinacoteca Vaticana" and like "16th-century paintings of Madonna and Child in the Pinacoteca Vaticana".

I think that it is not the right method to classify these categories.

1) Categories as "Painting by Sassetta in the Pinacoteca Vaticana" have stardard name, since they are created in function of the Author, and not of the century in which he produced his works. Even when an artist has produced all his works in a single century. Unfortunately, maybe someone could add more files, in the future, with works of that author made in different centuries. You could not use the same method, for example, with Orazio Gentileschi, who worked in 16th and 17th century.

2) You could create over-categorization, when leaving one or more files in the "root" of the top-category, i.e., "15th-century paintings in the..." AND in the sub-category "Painting by Sassetta in the...", in the same branch in the category tree.

3) You could create over-categorization when you tie the sub-category "16th-century paintings of Madonna and Child in the Pinacoteca Vaticana" into the top-category "16th-century paintings in the Pinacoteca Vaticana", when one or more images are classified into both categories.

To avoid these inconveniences, you should put into the category "YYth-century..." only individual paintings: specific painting, not all the paintings of a certain author.

In addition, sub-categories such as "Paintings of Madonna and Child in the Pinacoteca Vaticana" should be placed into a new category "by criteria". For example, creating "Paintings in the Pinacoteca Vaticana by subject". Better, also inserting into it sub-categories for other important subjects, for example "Paintings of Saints", "Paintings of Epic heroes". And "16th-century paintings of Madonna and Child in the Pinacoteca Vaticana" should be placed into a new category "Paintings in the Pinacoteca Vaticana by century by subject" (or "by subject by century").

For now, for the reasons above, I'm detaching these sub-categories from the top-category "Paintings...by century". For reminder, I will insert a "See also" template link to sub-categories concerning subjects (Madonna and Child). If you would like to help me, please put into the categories concerning the century of production only individual artistic works, and not sub-categories with all works by an author. And please put sub-categories concerning subjects, like Madonna and Child, as part of a new top-category "Painting by subject in the Pinacoteca Vaticana".

What do you think about it?

Thanks for your attention. With kind regards. Fabrizio Garrisi (talk) 23:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fabrizio Garrisi

thank you for your important informations and your work in creating the categories in the Pinacoteca Vaticana.I will try to match both artists and other criteria (subcategories) to the best of my knowledge. I wish you useful work in the Commons. Pe-Jo (talk) 06:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PIETRO BUSSOLO

Ciao, I saw that you made a new classification for Pietro Bussolo, I think the division by categories is very useful, but the "Sculptures by Pietro Bussolo" category is useless, it is better to divide it by different sub-categories, such as "Altarpiece", "Saints" , "Madonnas with Child" etc.. Title like SCULPTURES is generic and useless, Pietro Bussolo is a sculptor and it is obvious that these are sculptures StefenettiE (talk) 10:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Pe-Jo (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pe-Jo,

there is a lot of useless categories, that made to find the files in a difficult way.

When an Artist has a small catalogue like Bussolo, we don't need so many categories and sub-categories. If you would like to organize the file please follow the basic rules of the general category in commons: main categories is the name of the artist "PIETRO BUSSOLO", sub-categories should be "Saints by Pietro Bussolo" - "Madonna and Child By Pietro Bussolo" - "Crucifix by Pietro Bussolo" - "Altarpiece by Pietro Bussolo".

Categories like "Madonna by Pietro Bussolo" with subcategories like "Virgin and Child" etc... are not necessary.

Everything should me much more clear and easy.

thanks StefenettiE (talk) 10:46, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Pe-Jo (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szent Vendel mint állat

Szia! Ennél a kategóriabeszúrásnál sejtésem szerint arra gondolhattál, hogy Vendelt általában állattal (juhhal, marhával, kutyával) ábrázolják, de azért ez messze nem mindig van így, azaz magányos Vendel-figurák is az állatszobrok kategóriájába kerültek így. Pasztilla (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szevasz! Igen jól sejtetted. Természetesen nem a szent... , csak az ábrázolások javarésze van állattal. Köszönöm az észrevételt. Pe-Jo (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assumption of the Virgin by Titian (copy)

Kedves Pe-Jo! Úgy látom, tőled ered (2012-ből) valamilyen forrás alapján(?) az, hogy Grigoletti festménye Tiziano festményének másolata. (A magyar wikin megbeszéltük Voxfaxszal [5]). Kérlek, javítsd a Category:Assumption of the Virgin by Titian (copy) alá besorolt Grigoletti mű Category:Assumption of Mary in Esztergom Cathedral leírásait és a másutt megadott besorolásokat, mert a festmény nem másolata, maximum utánérzete a Tiziano azonos tematikájú festményének. A File:Levelek, római katolikus templom belső tere 2023 16.jpg már inkább nevezhető másolatnak, mégpedig "szemérmes" másolatnak (a kassaihoz hasonlóan, amely a Tiziano félének egy részlete), mivel lepleket alkalmazott a kis angyalkáknál a festő. Nem tudom, még hova szóródott el az információ az évek során, azért kérlek téged, hogy az előfordulásoknál légy szíves te javítsd. Köszönöm szépen! Üdvözlettel, Bizottmány (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Bizottmány! Nagyon szépen köszönöm az észrevételt. A bazilikában található kiadványok alapján írtam, sajnálom, ha figyelmetlen voltam és nem néztem utána. Üdvözlettel,

Pe-Jo (talk) 05:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cat.s we do not need

Hi Pe-Jo, small categories like The assumption of Mary by Peter Paul Rubens (Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium), for one painting with two files are not helpful. They prevent to have an overview over the group of files.
The supercat The assumption of Mary by Peter Paul Rubens with 10 files and 9 subcats is not too big. Now we cannot realize without further openings what the paintings in the very small and unnecessary subcats are. It is always better to keep a good overview, without too many subcats, but well sorted. This is my opinion and also of others. While other editors prefer the opposite. I would appreciate if you at least would consider my arguments Oursana (talk) 05:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oursana, Rubens has several paintings with the same name, in different museums and from different periods. That's why I divided by museum, even if there is only one painting from that museum. If there is a different opinion, it is not a problem.Pe-Jo (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chronica

Szia!

Szeretném megkérdezni miért távolítottad el a Chronica Hungarorum kategóriát a Chronica Hungarorum képeiből? Egy példa: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Thuróczy_krónika_-_Nagy_Lajos_király.jpg&action=history

Azt értem hogy lehet több kategóriát is megadni, de szerintem elég releváns hogy a fő kategória mutassa az összes képet a krónikáról. OrionNimrod (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! A "Category:Louis of Anjou in Chronica Hungarorum" - ban benne van a "Category:Chronica Hungarorum". Akkor szoktunk/szoktak a fő kategóriát is odatenni , ha pl. írás van mellette ( jelen esetben nincs a kép mellett). Az írások is fontosak... Lehetne olyan kategóriát is csinálni, hisz sok kép mellett van szöveg is. Engem különösebben nem zavar, (nem is én döntök ilyenekről) hogy meg van "készítve " a fő téma pl. ha " címerek " lesznek " kategorizálva , hisz ezen a konkrét képen címerek is vannak és aztán más kategória is oda van csatolva a fő kategórián belül. Köszönöm az észrevételedet. Pe-Jo (talk) 12:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia!

A "Category:Louis of Anjou in Chronica Hungarorum" - ban benne van a "Category:Chronica Hungarorum"

Én ezt nem látom, hol? Ha ezt nézem, csak ugyanazokat a képeket látom, maga a krónikában egyetlen egy kép van Nagy Lajosról, nem értem miért kell külön kategória egyetlen képnek: Category:Louis of Anjou in Chronica Hungarorum

Ha rámegyek a linkre nem tudom hogyan jutok a krónika többi képéhez.

Ha erre rámegyek itt kellene mutatni a krónika összes képét, így könnyen át lehet látni az összeset: Category:Chronica Hungarorum

Egyébként meg lehet adni több kategóriát is, elférnek, miért baj ha a fő kategória is szerepel külön? Az nem zavar hogy több kategóriát is beraksz, viszont nem értem a fő kategória eltávolítását.OrionNimrod (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia Pe-Jo!

A krónika cikkeket írom és sok képet töltöttem fel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronica_Hungarorum és elég sok történelmi cikket szerkesztek, elég sok képet szoktam berakni cikkekbe.

El tudnád magyarázni a logikáját a kategória eltávolításoknak? Hogyan lehet hogy "Matthias Corvinus" "Hunyadi family" "John Hunyadi" el van távolítva olyan képekről amik Mátyást illetve Hunyadi Jánost ábrázolják?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Andrea_Mantegna_-_King_Matthias_Corvinus_of_Hungary.jpg&action=history

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Thuróczy_krónika_-_Mátyás_király_(2).jpg&action=history

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:John_Hunyadi_(Chronica_Hungarorum).jpg&action=history

Az értem hogy alkategóriákat hozzáadsz, ami szűréshez hasznos. De ha a Commonson az összes Hunyadi János képet, összes Mátyás képet, összes Thurócy krónika képet szeretnénk látni egyszerre akkor hogyan lehetséges ha a fő kategóriák el vannak távolítva? Szerintem van hely bőven sok kategóriának is. Én nem hinném hogy a legtöbb ember úgy keres képet hogy "milánói festmények 15 században" és csak akkor lát egy Mátyás képet, lényegében senki sem fogja megtalálni őket. Mit gondolsz? OrionNimrod (talk) 15:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, A Krónikában az lenne a megoldás, ha minden oldal fel lenne téve (megoldható, de erre nincs időm) és a képek meg lennének számozva. Az első oldalt így oldottam meg Chronica Hungarorum|01. A szobrokhoz, ha konkrét személyt ábrázolnak feleslegesnek tartom , hogy a családot is odahelyezzük. Sajnos nincs sok időm... Tisztelettel Pe-Jo (talk) 06:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia!

Az szeretném megkérdezni hogy a logikája annak hogy Hunyadi János kategória ki van szedve egy Hunyadi János szoborról?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Millenniumi_Emlékmű3.jpg&action=history

Ha valaki Hunyadiról lévő összes képet szeretné látni akkor mégis hogyan fogja valaha is megtalálni azt a képet? Mégis hogyan jut el addig az alkategóriáig? Category:John Hunyadi Egyáltalán mi értelme van ennek a kategóriának? Category:Hungary photographs taken on 2008-07-12 Ezt már ténlyeg nem értem, maga a konkrét személy ki van véve de egy dátum be van rakva? Mégis ki fog fotó dátuma alapján keresni valaha egy képet Hunyadiról ha a cél a fellelhetősége az összes Hunyadi képnek a Commonson?OrionNimrod (talk) 10:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, a "Hungary photographs taken on 2008-07-12" a fénykép készítésének időpontját jelöli (ebben az esetben éppen Magyarország területén) pontos dátummal. Csak megjegyzem, hogy egy szobor helyét meg is változtathatják, de lehet más is.... Ezek rejtett alkategóriák nem függnek össze az ábrázolt szemállyel.

A Category:Statue of John Hunyadi (Millennium Monument, Budapest) kategóriában benne van Hunyadi János neve angolul. Ha minden képhez meghagynánk a főkategóriát, akkor leterhelné a rendszert. Az ú.n. "járőrök" egyik feledata, hogy a rendszer terhelését könnyítsék, pl. ilyen módon (is). Ha valaki kápet keres Hunyadi Jánosról, akkor egy kattintással talál különböző formában ábrázolást róla, vagy bárkiről pl. "...in art", ha több ábrázolási forma áll rendelkezésre. Ha a fényképezések időpontjait törölni fogod, akkor sajnos jelentenem kell az adminisztároroknak, Ők döntenek a továbbiakról. Tisztelettel Pe-Jo (talk) 05:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia!

Pont azért beszélek veled, mert nem szeretnék szerkesztési háborút. Mint látod nem is nyúltam bele semmibe eddig. Engem nem zavar ha alkategóriákat vagy dátumokat csinálsz. Csak a főkategóriák eltávolítását nem értem.

Tudnál erre válaszolni: Ha valaki az összes Hunyadit ábrázoló képet szeretné látni a Commonson akkor mégis hogyan tudja őket megtalálni ha a főkategória el van távolítva? Mi a menete a képek megtalálásának így?

Mint írtam cikkeket szerkesztek és sok képet rakok be ezért is hasznos ha látom mikből lehet doglozni. OrionNimrod (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, megkérlek, hogy ne tegyél a Hunyadi János ábrázoló képek mellé még Category:Hunyadi family kategóriát, hacsak nincs a családdal kapcsolatos egyéb információ is a képen! Felesleges, hisz H. János a család tagja.

A "Category:John Hunyadi in art" tartalmazza Hunyadi János mindennemű ábrázolását. Mindenki megtalálja - szobrok -Sculpures , képek - portaits formájában + a krónikában írások és képek is szerepelnek (szerencsére), ezért külön kategóriát is kapott, de a fő kategória is megmaradt a szöveg miatt. Remélhetőleg a krónika többi oldala is felkerül és Hunyadiról is lesz még ott bejegyzés. Sajnos nincs időm mindig reagálni ....

Ilyen szavakat, hogy háború kikérem magamnak. A járőröknek vannak feledataik, pl. hogy a rendszer fel legyen szabadítva felesleges dolgoktól. Próbáljuk egymást segíteni, nem személyesen, de a rendszert - pl. ha látunk egy képen fontos dolgot, pl. címert , akkor próbáljuk azt beazonosítani. Tartalmas szerkesztést kívánok. Pe-Jo (talk) 07:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Köszönöm a választ! Mivel az angol wikit szerkesztem onnan jött ez a szó https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring

Így már jobban értem ahogy elmagyaráztad. Tehát ez a főkategória: Category:John Hunyadi alkategória innen: Category:John Hunyadi in art és alkategória innen: Category:Sculptures of John Hunyadi

Akkor ez is pl a "sculptures of John Hunyadi" kategóriába kelljen hogy kerüljön: File:Millenniumi Emlékmű3.jpg így van?

Ez az alkategória hogyhogy duplán szerepel a főkategóriában Category:John Hunyadi és az art Category:John Hunyadi in art alkategóriában is: Category:John Hunyadi in Chronica Hungarorum‎ ? OrionNimrod (talk) 18:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Ezeket a kategóriákat - "Category:John Hunyadi", "Category:Hunyadi family" Te szerkesztetted a File:Millenniumi Emlékmű3.jpg képhez. Nem tudom , hogy miért kell Hunyadi János képéhez még a családot is oda helyezni, közben ahhoz a képhez külön kategória is van, csak utána kell nézni a szobrok között, hisz ott megvannak a szobor készítésének az adatai (is). Meghagytam, hogy változtathass, nem győzök mindent. Közben a kép készítésének dátumát törölted, ami már "rongálásnak" számíthat. Ez a kép File:Millenniumi Emlékmű3.jpg (szobor) nem szerepel a "Category:John Hunyadi in Chronica Hungarorum‎"-ban, hisz ott más ábrázolási médium található, nem tudom miért írod ezt.

Bármely kép dátuma, ha tudjuk, hogy mikor készült fontos lehet különböző okok miatt, ezért kérlek ne töröld!!!!

Szép napot Pe-Jo (talk) 06:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Ezeket a kategóriákat - "Category:John Hunyadi", "Category:Hunyadi family" Te szerkesztetted a File:Millenniumi Emlékmű3.jpg képhez. Nem tudom , hogy miért kell Hunyadi János képéhez még a családot is oda helyezni, közben ahhoz a képhez külön kategória is van, csak utána kell nézni a szobrok között, hisz ott megvannak a szobor készítésének az adatai (is). Meghagytam, hogy változtathass, nem győzök mindent. Közben a kép készítésének dátumát törölted, ami már "rongálásnak" számíthat. Ez a kép File:Millenniumi Emlékmű3.jpg (szobor) nem szerepel a "Category:John Hunyadi in Chronica Hungarorum‎"-ban, hisz ott más ábrázolási médium található, nem tudom miért írod ezt.

Bármely kép dátuma, ha tudjuk, hogy mikor készült fontos lehet különböző okok miatt, ezért kérlek ne töröld!!!!

Szép napot Pe-Jo (talk) 06:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Köszönöm a választ! Amikor még töröltem a dátumot akkor még semmit nem tudtam arról hogyan van ez a kategória rendszerezés, de most hogy beszéltünk már jobban értem. Így hidd el a legjobb szövetségesed leszek a kategórizálásban a feltöltött képeimet illetőleg. OrionNimrod (talk) 11:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Örülök, hogy megértettük egymást. Nagyon sok minden van a képeken amit elsőre nem is veszünk észre, ill. valamilyen szempontból egy apróság segíthet másnak .... Ha valamiben tévednék, természetesen nyugodtan ki lehet javítani, nekem az megjelenik. További sikeres szerkesztést kívánok. Pe-Jo (talk) 12:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nepomuki-szobrok - álló férfiak szobra

Szia! Biztosan kaptál róla értesítést, hogy visszavontam egy kategorizálásodat. Nem elsősorban azért, mert a magyarországi Nepomuki-szobrok nem Aberdeenben vannak, hanem azért is, mert a hazai Nepomuki-szobroknak ugyan 96%-a valóban egy álló férfialakot ábrázol, de nem mind: vannak fekvő (ravatal), térdelő (mennybevétel) és ülő (a híd korlátján vízbe vetés előtt) szobrok is. Pasztilla (talk) 11:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, köszönöm Pe-Jo (talk) 11:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Secondary economics schools are NOT a subcategory of Category:Economics schools!

You keep on changing the parent category of Category:Secondary economics schools to Category:Economics schools, but that is not correct.

"Economics schools" are called "schools" in English, but in fact they are comparable to universities, perhaps even post university, so they are not about high schools or secondary schools. And therefor they should not be a parent category of Category:Secondary economics schools. See also the parent categories.
Instead, both should have Category:Economics education as a parent.

So please, reverse your last edit of Category:Secondary economics schools. I do not like to be involved in an edit war. JopkeB (talk) 16:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you did not react nor reverse your last edit of Category:Secondary economics schools, I did it myself. I hope that if you do not agree, you will react here first before you take any actions. JopkeB (talk) 05:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sculptures_by_Nicolaus_Gerhaert_van_Leyden

Sculptures by Nicolaus Gerhaert van Leyden has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

MenkinAlRire (talk) 18:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Pe-Jo (talk) 05:28, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tucson Jaina ceramic

Hello,

I saw you changed the categorization on the Jaina Island warrior ceramic figure I uploaded a photo of from "Art in Tucson, Arizona" to "Sculptures in Tucson, Arizona".

I don't have an inherent issue with this, but I wanted to inquire on if you knew if it was generally considered Best Practices for ceramic figures to be included as "sculptures" here on Wikimedia as far as categories are concerned: I know many Museum collections group ceramic figures in with, well, ceramics like pots and plates or jars, or as their own "figurine" category; rather then with sculptures.

Looking at Category:Jaina Island ceramic figurines, it does seem like if you go high enough up on the category tree, they do mostly end up being a subcategory of some broad categories for sculptures as well as subcategories within ceramic categories, but I still wonder if placing it within Category:Sculptures in Tucson, Arizona might be too specific, since it arguably belongs in a "Ceramics in Tucson, Arizona" category (which does not exist) just as much.

What do you think? Is moving it to Sculptures best, keeping it in just the "Art" category since it arguably is a ceramic just as much as a sculpture, or perhaps creating a Ceramics in Tucscon, Arizona category and putting it in both that and sculptures?

There's also the issue that Category:Tucson_Museum_of_Art is within the Category:Art_in_Tucson,_Arizona category, and it is obviously also in the former, though I believe it is fine for the same file to be within two subfolders of the same folder as long as they are categorizing distinct concepts?

Let me know your thoughts! MajoraZ (talk) 23:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Historical images" categories

Hi. I noticed you created a couple of "historical images" categories a few days ago. Please read Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Historical images. Essentially you might not want to create them again or they will probably just be deleted. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 07:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What part of my message are you having a such hard time understanding? Maybe respect the consensus from the CfD instead of trying to edit war me over it. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HI. Thank you for your comment. You use harsh word - war (!!). I will report to the authorities. I’ve only used categories that already exist. within for example at country - Bulgaria Category:Historical images of Bulgaria by city .... Why can't the city of Sofia have such a category? Category:Historical images of Sofia? I wish for a little more respect. I have done nothing wrong.

Pe-Jo (talk) 10:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit waring is simply a technical term for reverting someone on the same file more then three times. I didn't come up with it and it's not my issue if you think it's harsh. I'm simply asking you not to turn this into a game of us reverting each other over and over because your the one in wrong here. Anyway, I told you why the city of Sofia can't have such a category, because "historical images" categories are being phased out per the outcome of the CfD. It doesn't matter if similar categories exist or not in the interim because it's an ongoing process that will take time to clean up. Other categories Category:Historical images of Bulgaria by city will be phased out at some point to. Your just getting in the way of that happening by reverting people though. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't tend to hinder progress. Don't insult me. More respect. Thousands of cities and buildings have historical pictures here. I was just in the city of Sofia and I found a lot of pictures that, if we put them in the history category, they would be lost as pictures. That's all and no war. Thanks. Have a nice day.

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Enamels by Tóbiás Klára

Category:Enamels by Tóbiás Klára is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]

English · español · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with either:

{{SD|C2}} ("unuseful empty category") if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available

{{SD|C1}} ("improperly named category") if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused (e.g. typos).

"C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. You could also use of the following:

{{badname|current category name}}

{{speedy|empty, misspelled category name}}

The above templates (SD, speedy, Badname) expand to full speedy deletion requests.
In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. Blanked categories end up on Special:UncategorizedCategories, which is largely handled by non-admins who cannot delete the categories in question.
Thank you. (This is a standardized talk page message)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings by Martin Koeber

Category:Paintings by Martin Koeber is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]

English · español · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with either:

{{SD|C2}} ("unuseful empty category") if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available

{{SD|C1}} ("improperly named category") if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused (e.g. typos).

"C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. You could also use of the following:

{{badname|current category name}}

{{speedy|empty, misspelled category name}}

The above templates (SD, speedy, Badname) expand to full speedy deletion requests.
In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. Blanked categories end up on Special:UncategorizedCategories, which is largely handled by non-admins who cannot delete the categories in question.
Thank you. (This is a standardized talk page message)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 10:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Portraits of Heinrich Roos

Category:Portraits of Heinrich Roos is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]

English · español · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with either:

{{SD|C2}} ("unuseful empty category") if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available

{{SD|C1}} ("improperly named category") if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused (e.g. typos).

"C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. You could also use of the following:

{{badname|current category name}}

{{speedy|empty, misspelled category name}}

The above templates (SD, speedy, Badname) expand to full speedy deletion requests.
In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. Blanked categories end up on Special:UncategorizedCategories, which is largely handled by non-admins who cannot delete the categories in question.
Thank you. (This is a standardized talk page message)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 10:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Pe-Jo

Tip: Categorizing images

Josephinische

Tévedés

Plášťovce interwiki

címer

Template

Change of monumentnumber

Monuments in Slovakia

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Moved incorrectly named category

Cluj-Napoca Coats of Arms

Wrong category for Gheorgheni, Cluj

Rakoczi Museum images

Bots

Banská Bystrica

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

Copyright status: File:Bende Imre, nyitrai püspök, Borovszky szerint.jpg

Hősök tere

Playgrounds in Slovakia

1956

Gallerie dell'Accademia

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Lincoln Square in Bellevue, Washington

Category:Paintings in the Gallery of Palazzo Rosso (Genoa)

Fyi File:Agnolo Bronzino - Maria (di Cosimo I) de' Medici.jpg

Paintings in National Museum of Capodimonte (Naples)

Vatican Museums: sub-categories by subject and by author put into top-category by century.

PIETRO BUSSOLO

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Szent Vendel mint állat

Assumption of the Virgin by Titian (copy)

Cat.s we do not need

Chronica

Nepomuki-szobrok - álló férfiak szobra

Category:Secondary economics schools are NOT a subcategory of Category:Economics schools!

Tucson Jaina ceramic

"Historical images" categories

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Navigation menu

Search