User talk:Minorax/Archive/2019

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Renaming files

Shouldn't you have done this before making the move?

I do not support the name change. The name you changed was meant to preserve consistency throughout a large number of files, as well as to make it as short as possible. Adding a space inbetween the words does not make it any more clearer, just longer, since you are not changing anything else, but breaking consistency along the way and disrupting the original name's intended purpose. I have requested the files to be re-named to their original names. Cheers. Impru20 (talk) 11:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

No, I will not support file names just to fit your own personal tastes. What you propose it's exactly what was being done before you requested the move, so this is meaningless. And it's "Spanish", not "Spainish". Impru20 (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons_talk:File_renaming#Move war: 大诺史 and CAPTAIN_RAJU vs Impru20. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Problem solved. 大诺史 (talk) 13:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Supercopa do Brasil de 1990.png

File:Supercopa do Brasil de 1990.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: I only cropped the file. If you have any queries please go to El Stickmeister. 大诺史 (talk) 13:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Barcelona en Comú logo.svg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Barcelona en Comú logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: I only edited the svg source code. If you have any queries please go to Capa23. 大诺史 (talk) 13:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Supercopa do Brasil de 1990.png

Copyright status: File:Supercopa do Brasil de 1990.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Supercopa do Brasil de 1990.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 18:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: I only cropped the file. If you have any queries please go to El Stickmeister. 大诺史 (talk) 13:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Climax.svg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Climax.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ju Ta 16:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: I only edited the svg source code. If you have any queries please go to Oogolbod. 大诺史 (talk) 01:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

File:CBR.com logo.svg

Good of you for your fix to the code. I did not see that you had already made the change when I kept safe my change. I am happy to see somebody another person has an attention for making certain small details are right. Senator2029 12:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

@Senator2029: You're welcome! If you are interested, you can join COM:GL/ILL to help to convert files to svg. There are a ton of files that requires svg format and some of them are in my sandbox but I do not have the time to do it. 大诺史 (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 12:49, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:StGrigolPeradze.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:StGrigolPeradze.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@Sealle: added the source & license, do kindly help me check. Thank you. 大诺史 (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

1. This is definitely a piece of contemporary artwork, so PD claim is dubious. 2. 2009 upload can't be a source for the earlier one (see 2004-04-19 05:09) Sealle (talk) 17:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

This apparently was taken from [1] and you're to provide evidence this is PD. Sealle (talk) 18:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@Sealle: would it be better if you were to ask User:Levzur? Afterall he is the original uploader of this file on en.wiki which also had this license/source problem. 大诺史 (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Why, you are delete my photos

My photo, I want for took my photo to wikimedia commons only, I don't want to famous--บุญพฤทธิ์ ทวนทัย (talk) 13:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

@บุญพฤทธิ์ ทวนทัย: your uploads violates commons policy. 大诺史 (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Umm--บุญพฤทธิ์ ทวนทัย (talk) 13:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Logo of the Communist Party (Switzerland)

Hello, I would like to understand why do you think that the logo of the Communist Party (Switzerland) (File:Partito Comunista (Svizzera).tif) meets the criteria for speedy deletion. I represent the Communist Party (Switzerland) and I would like to know how to publish our logo on Commons with the following licences:

This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD § Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.

This work includes material that may be protected as a trademark in some jurisdictions. If you want to use it, you have to ensure that you have the legal right to do so and that you do not infringe any trademark rights. See our general disclaimer.
This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing.

Thank you in advance for your kind reply. --EgonCanevascini (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@EgonCanevascini: See the reason provided by Billinghurst. 大诺史 (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Thank you for your reply. The problem is that I don't want to publish that logo under the CC-BY-SA license. How can I change the license back as it was before? I have seen that many Swiss parties publish their logo under that license (example: File:SVP_UDC.svg). I think that our logo meet the criteria to be labeled as a simple design. --EgonCanevascini (talk) 17:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Redirected to Commons:Help_desk#File:Partito_Comunista_(Svizzera).tif 大诺史 (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Warning

Hi, You are not allowed to close deletion requests. Only admins are allowed to do that. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: Sorry & noted. 大诺史 (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: Even if the file has been deleted? 大诺史 (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

RE: File:Women's Stand Up Paddle Surf Women's Marathon ROS19 23-03-2019 (123).jpg

Hi, thanks for noticing it, all the files in the category are duplicated (i messed up the thing in the raw processing). I'll be fixing it as soon as possible. Cheers! Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 02:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Minorax/Archive/2019, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Sme rodina logo.svg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Merely validated svg. 大诺史 (talk) 10:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

what?

Possible copyright violation, from copyrighted logo, see en:File:BIC logo.svg ???. this file File:Big logo.svg it's very different from this . logo on commons has only text. english wikipedia is full with the man pen. You nominate for deletion . Possible copyright violation, from copyrighted logo, see en:File:BIC logo.svg. --EEIM (talk) 00:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: Can you address this issue since you are the deleting admin? I nominated the file for copyright as it was a COM:DW of a copyrighted logo. The same use who uploaded the deleted file recently uploaded the same file with a different name and he requested a move to the File:Bic logo.svg. 大诺史 (talk) 02:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, we are continuing on my talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 05:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

sykescapital.png

Regarding the sykescapital.png file (File:sykescapital.png) you cropped, what was the reason for this? I understand if there is a valid reason for so, but would like to know this. Thank you! @Haloiate: The original file had a lot of unnecessary whitespace, so I just removed it at my own discretion since it was uncontroversial. 大诺史 (talk) 13:09, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

HSGoldenwiki.svg

Can you help me with turning this image into a real .svg? I do not know a lot about .svg-files, so I just converted a .png to .svg with Inkscape.

Greetings, Koreanovsky (talk) 14:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

@Koreanovsky: I've requested it for you at COM:GL/ILL#Wikipedia puzzle piece trophies. 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Why?

Hi, 大诺史. Sorry for inconveinence but the pictures that i upload now are different and these pictures are usable because the author doesn't mention any copyright policy.

Your's sincerely, Abu bakar 34

@Abu bakar 34: The original uploader not mentioning his/her copyright policy does not mean that the image is not under copyright. You will need their permission and you can submit it via COM:OTRS. 大诺史 (talk) 16:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

kenapa foto saya di usulkan dihapus?

kenapa ya min alasannya, kan bertujuan untuk pendidikan wikimedia? dan kenangan serta karya milik foto sendiri juga merupakan pendidikan? mohon penjelasan admin, Dirham Prof (talk) 04:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (talk) 16:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Galaxy A80 front.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Galaxy A80 front.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Galaxy A80 front.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 13:42, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: I only cropped the file. 大诺史 (talk) 13:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, 大诺史.I sorry again for wasting your time.I have read the copyright policy and next time i will avoid it.Thanks for your guidance.

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

PPi symbol.svg

Your revision as of 13:11, 8 June 2019: Thank you for using the script! Unfortunately, it cannot know about the history, and it destroyed the data about its simplification. The script is a powerful help, but all its suggestions need a short check; normally everything will be fine, but in special cases (as it was with this file) the user is responsible to correct the suggestions. No problem, now it is fixed again. Good further success! -- sarang♥사랑 11:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

@Sarang: Hello, and yea sometimes I do overlook some of my edits and the script may screw up the things in the table. However, thank you for notifiying me about this. 大诺史 (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Commons:File renaming

Please re-acquaint yourself with the criteria for renaming. That one has a preference for something different, or that others are different, are not criteria. Renames are there to capture errors, and where there is a clear and important reason for a renaming. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Yea I will read through it again. Also I thought that renaming that file from Garden -> garden is part of the sync criteria (crit 4). Sorry about that. 大诺史 (talk) 09:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

AIZphoto.jpg

Dear Sir/Madam, The photo AIZphoto.jpg is my own [Alik Ismail-Zadeh's] photo. I do not understand the reason of deleting it. I am creating a Wikipedia article about myself and hence downloaded the photo. Actually I do not know well how to manage this, and perhaps you can help me. Many thanks. Alik

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Carmarthenshire Hundreds.svg and Norfolk Hundreds.svg

I am puzzled by your observations on File:Carmarthenshire Hundreds.svg and File:Norfolk Hundreds.svg. Both were drawn on Inkscape (importing a Geospatial PDF, then amending it as an SVG as to colours, object labels etc. I have not been fiddling with any deep code, nor do I know the significance of the lines of code you refer to. They display perfectly both as SVGs in Inkscape and on Commons, so there does not appear to be any fault in the coding. Hogweard (talk) 22:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

@Hogweard: I used a script to auto detect the error. So it seems like the errors I’ve mentioned is somehow “not accepted” by the server. If you don’t mind I’ll make the changes for you to validate the code by removing the errors. If you’re wondering, this won’t change anything to the image. 大诺史 (talk) 23:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

That's fine - as long as it looks the same! Hogweard (talk) 06:32, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

@Hogweard: I’ll do it over the weekends. 大诺史 (talk) 23:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. It is already in the maintenance category, so someone else can go through it too. 大诺史 (talk) 02:40, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Reply: Ahimsa Jainism PNG.png Deletion Request

From this Deletion request;

Hello, I'm the creator of both files (PNG and SVG). I uploaded the file in different file types, assuming that it would be beneficial to have a variant for the file. I don't really understand the thread here, is that anything I need to add or fix to remove it from the deletion. Sorry that I'm really new in the SVG and PNG uploading here, please advise me. Thank you!

Best regards, Chainwit. (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

@Chainwit.: Hello and welcome to Wikimedia Commons. First of all, there is nothing wrong with your uploads. Just letting you know that Commons prefer SVGs over any other file types for logos, and it is also redundant to keep the png file when a valid svg is available. 大诺史 (talk) 15:50, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Thank you a lot! That would be useful for my future uploads.

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 02:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Reuploading just to validate is undesired

I saw you validated several files.

Please read User:JoKalliauer/Optimization, especially User:JoKalliauer/Optimization#invalid_elements_that_should_be_kept.

If you validate you should be more precise what you changed, see Special:ListFiles/TilmannR for good examples, or if there is a rendering-bug please you can also use {{Rsvg bug}}

<flowRoot: Due due the update of librsvg phab:T43424 in April 2019 it is undesired to remove flowRoot, see User:JoKalliauer/RepairFlowRoot#replace_notempty_flow-text_using_(Inkscape) and Category:Images_with_SVG_1.2_features for more informations,
- File:JESC_2019_Map_(with_small_Australia).svg
aria-label: please do not remove aria-label, since it a readable text, see also User:Glrx's post on my talkpage
<inkscape:grid should not be removed, since it is used to align elements in the Inkscape
<sodipodi:guide is used to align things
data-name is used to name an element, see also Glrxs post on my talkpage, id in contrast is an unique identifyer which can be used for referencing.

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 14:52, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

@JoKalliauer: Hi, thanks for letting me know about this and I hope that you can answer my query. Will changing from the top to bottom be ok? 大诺史 (talk) 12:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

  <g
      id="text1451"
      ....
      aria-label="١">

  <g
      ....
      id="١">

The error can be found in the mentioned files.

If the <data-name is the same as the <id, can the data-name be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 大诺史 (talk • contribs)

I created those IRN-Fwy 1.svg images. Personally, I feel like my contributions are being stalked. That's probably not the case, but I agree with JoKalliauer's sentiment. I would not reupload unless the image does not render at all. –Fredddie ™ 13:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

@Fredddie: If I know some problematic files, I dig deeper into this category and therfore I would look into other contributions of this user, therfore I would consider stalking is not a bad thing. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: First there is not rule about it, so there are different opinions on this. When I was "Wikimedia-young" I validated several SVGs on Wikimedia, just to validate them. From discussions with SVG-experts like Glrx or Sarang I learned the uselessness of validating/scrubbing files without visual change.

I personally prefer to use id= instead of data-name=, since it is valid, but id= is an unique identifier that can be computationally-refereed to e.g.<use or filters or clipPath, therefore I do understand that some think different. id= must not contain spaces and must not start with a number. Optimizers change id='s to reduce file-size (depending on there configuration). Since some prefer id and other prefer data-name, it should be in my opinion the decision of the main author (e.g. original uploader). I assume that some Editors (Software) might display the data-name and that's the reason why they introduce such invalid attribute, and that also the reason why changeing to id is degrading informations in some Editors.

aria-label, could theoretical be used for blindness people and could be also be used to reproduce this character/word. If it is a single special character, I would remove it is my own picture, but I would keep it if it is not my own picture. I prefer to put the original text e.g. 1000px to the right, then you easyly can recreate a text with a uniform font.

In my opinion the only serious thing was the removement of the text in File:JESC 2019 Map (with small Australia).svg. (The legend with text is below the visual pagesize, therefore you only see it in editors and helps you editing.)

But my point was that source-code-edits are undesired. There is as far as i know (afaik) no rule for that in commons, but in the german Wikipedia source-code-edits are not allowed:

Important: An edit should always lead to at least an externally visible or effective change ; In addition to a substantive change, for example, a typo correction, a PDfix or a typographic refinement, provided that it has no taste or cosmetic background. A pure syntax modernization or source code formatting does not justify a new article version and persistent database load. Also, no edits should be executed whose sole purpose is to resolve redirects .

translator: Google Translate via — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Since reuploading

needs some disk-space (generally more than a page-edit, therefore source-code-edits on files are IMHO less desired than in de.wikipedia)
tickles users whatchlist and sends E-Mail-Notifications (Quote of Glrx >>More significant is tickling editor's watch lists. That's a big consideration in the restriction on robot editing of WP articles. A robot can make a trivial change to an article, and that can cause a hundred people to look at the updated article. That's a cost in man-hours.<<)
needs rendering-time (if you read phab:T40010 or meta:SVG_benchmarks, rendering-time is a serious issue, otherwise we would not use the buggy librsvg-Renderer)

I would argue that generally every reupload should contain a visible change (with some exceptions).

According to User:Glrx: ivalid XML should be fixed, but invalid SVG generally not. Afaik most SVGs which are invalid XML won't render at all.

PS I have User:SVGWorkaroundBot that can remove some invalid elements:

you can try a very simmilar code at https://tools.wmflabs.org/svgworkaroundbot/ , but validating is only maintained upon personal request, since I do not recommend it. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

@JoKalliauer: I'm using an out-of-the-box version of Inkscape, I can't believe that would cause problems. –Fredddie ™ 22:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

The attribute aria-label is appropriate markup for the g element. Commons:Overwriting existing files is an official guideline that permits minor improvements to files, but it does not permit controversial changes. In general, I would consider removing aria-label a controversial change. An editor put the attribute there, and the editor probably meant to include it.

Removing the attribute does remove a W3C validation error, so it can be viewed as an improvement. I do not see that as a reason to modify the file. The "error" is harmless because the attribute is syntactically correct and harmless in most agents. If the W3C validator were using SVG 2.0 validation rules, it would not be flagged as an error.

In other words, I think the error is not in the SVG file but rather in the validation. The validation should be permissive of well known attributes such as aria-label.

In this particular instance, the aria-label appears to be machine generated. When some software converts a text element to curves, it replaces the text element with a g element. The original string (.textContent) is placed in an aria-label attribute, and each character is drawn as a separate child path element. Keeping the aria-label around makes it easy to recover the string. (Inkscape leaves other hints around. The font is Markazi Text at 135px and centered. It is possible to reconstruct much of the original text element.)

Moving the value to the id attribute would be inappropriate. In the general case, aria-label does not conform to the required syntax of an id (which is ncname, a no-colon alphabetic name). Also, id attributes are uninterpreted names; an aria-label is meant to be interpreted.

Yes, files that have validation errors and warnings are annoying, but there is little reason to go around fixing those problems right now. Especially if the alleged "error" is not an error at all. That some programs claims something is wrong does not mean that it is actually wrong.

Glrx (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

@JoKalliauer and Glrx: Thank you for explaining to me about this and I'll take my time to read through all of the above. Rest assured that I'll only validate obvious errors. 大诺史 (talk) 08:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 08:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

File:LogoHuracanTresArroyos.svg

Hi, to remove the {{TracedSVG}} template in that SVG, what more is needed? Thank for review my pictures!!! Ezarateesteban 13:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ezarate: The file looks ok to me. Maybe you could ask the user that tagged {{TracedSVG}}. 大诺史 (talk) 17:24, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ezarate and Piotr Bart: the ballon is not symmetric and instead of red areas, you might should use lines with thickness. It is a {{TracedSVG}}, therefore I would not remove the template also the tracing is done in a good quality. To remove {{TracedSVG}} you should not trace a bitmap, see de:File:CA_Huracán_(2011).svg for a not traced svg. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

SVG Validation

Hello 大诺史, please don't use your SVG-validation tool for my files! You used it for example here. I use my own (I think the same) SVG-validation tool and then I manually change the creation field (most of the time to ChemDraw). Thank you for your understanding! Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001: Hello, sorry for the inconvenience and noted! 大诺史 (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Have a good day! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 09:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

User signatures

Please leave user signatures, such as mine, the way they are. Notice the difference between my signature before you have edited it (Fry1989 ^eh?) and after you have edited it (Fry1989 ). Fry1989 ^eh? 16:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I've reverted most of it after I spotted it. I may have left out a few. 大诺史 (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

File:ICC Cricket World Cup 2019 logo.svg

File:ICC Cricket World Cup 2019 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Merely valdiated file. 大诺史 (talk) 04:26, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

autopatrol rights nomination

Thanks for the recent nomination. Hmains (talk) 02:56, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

@Hmains: no problem :) 大诺史 (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 大诺史 (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Wappen Landshut.svg

File:Wappen Landshut.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Didym (talk) 10:17, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: I only validated the svg. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Uploads by Judgefloro

@LGA, Natuur12, Christian Ferrer, Jcb, and Patrick Rogel:

Hi all, can we discuss about the uploads by the said user? I believe that majority of his/her uploads fall under COM:FOP Philippines. 大诺史 (talk) 07:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I made a DRs for some of the recent uploads, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas, note that some objets in this category are utilitarian and likely exempted from copyright protections. I have not checked the rest of the uploads and the potential issues regarding architecture. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:35, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for putting up my candidacy for autopatrol right! Powermelon (talk) 05:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

@Powermelon: No problem! 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

About renaming

Is aircraft registration and airport code ambiguous? I still reserve my opinion. For similar cases, you may refer to Special:Diff/348593041. --N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 16:17, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Another issue is that simply omitting the photo date in the file name doesn't help distinguishing files clearly. --N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 16:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry that you didn't sign properly in my talk page, so I failed to reply you in time, but I am still doubtful of your changes. Everyone has their own naming customs as long as the most descriptive information is provided. --N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 16:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: Hi, I would say that the airport code/aircraft reg is ambiguous. I tried to include the aircraft reg in most of the renamed files (as long as it is seen or categorised). As for the airport code, the 3 letter code assigned to the airport may not be known by all? I would like to listen to your comments on this. As for the second issue, I’ve also tried to include the year into the file names if there are numerous files depicting the same thing (e.g. a specific aircraft landing).

I believe that a file name Singapore Airlines A350-941 (9V-SMA) taxiing at Beijing Capital International Airport is more descriptive as compared to 9V-SMA@PEK (numberstring)

If you do not want any more files to be renamed, do let me know and I’ll stop. But I do want to let you know that my motive is that to make the file “more accessible” by allowing people that do not know anything about aviation to fine the files more easily. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:37, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

But what about others' opinion? Now I'll try to upload something with a name which you may consider "accessible", but I think your suggestion may result in a longer file name. Please try to undo your changes as I didn't reply for agreement. Sorry for inconvenience.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 16:46, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: I’ll try to undo the changes, if not I’ll request an sysop to do it. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:49, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

This works similarly to trains and buses with unique fleet numbers. If you really want to rename them according to your suggested customs, the work will be extremely large, but why not take time photographing something by yourself and uploading them? You may help contributing Wiki Loves China.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 16:53, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: Seems like I can “undo” the move. I’ll start undoing tomorrow. P.S.: It’s my bad in the first place so you don’t have to be sorry. :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:54, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

I also do have a suggestion of renaming the files to SQ A350-941 (9V-SMA)@PEK (number string). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Still reserve my opinion here. Some business jets may not have their IATA/ICAO code disclosed.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 16:59, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: I’ll try to think of the most suitable way to rename the files to. Do want to discuss this with you. You cool? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

In fact, more details can be provided in file captions, as they are often displayed with larger priority when searching. Searching categories with relevant keywords can also link to files.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 17:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

I just found that ordinary users can't revert renamings, and trial 1 and trial 2 only resulted in a loss of files. Hope you can help reverting those reckless edits.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 17:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: Hi, those 2 edits was deleted by an admin. So I can't do anything with it. Is it possible for you to reupload the file? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Because I don't know how you did this edit.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 03:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: as I have file mover rights on commons, I can delete a redirect by overwriting (provided that the only content was moving the page). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

I've requested an admin to do that for you (trial 1 and trial 2). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay. Well I just thought your previous edits are a bit autocratic, resembling some municipal governments forcing shops to use unified signs, no offense.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 03:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: but when will those municipal governments admit their mistakes? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for being angry with you last night.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 03:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Its ok. Its my fault anyways. However I do hope that you can consider adding in the airline & aircraft model as some registeration codes are reused and planes may get transferred from 1 airline to another. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Re:Move

Creator template? You mean something like User:Baycrest/info?--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 08:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: Yes. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

I haven't decided yet, but the possibility of making such template certainly exists.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 08:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: would you mind if I draft up something for you? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Maybe I'll inform you later (but possibly several months?).--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 08:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Yeah ok, I'm fine with that :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Eiffel Tower (bottom view).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Automatic edits

Can you kindly wait about 24 hours before adding the SVG genesis tags to my newly added files? I still do a lot of edits after uploading, and an edit conflict would hinder my workflow. --Minoa (talk) 11:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

@Minoa: Alright. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Hello again, I am sorry about the rushed message, but if it is okay, could you tweak the SVG genesis script to run only between 00:00 and 08:00 in London? The only concern I have about the SVG genesis script is the timing: when adding new files, I usually to do it in daytime, and then tweak the new uploads to add the necessary sort keys, etc. Best, --Minoa (talk) 21:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

@Minoa: They aren’t automatic edits. I add them in by hand but the script fills it in for me. What is the timezone in London? Or should I wait for 3 days before adding the Igen in? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 22:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry about the confusion and being unclear, London is currently observing British Summer Time (UTC+01:00): in the winter months it’s UTC. -Minoa (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Seems something haven't all been done

Like B-2487, B-HYB (Special:Diff/357158707) and others (see this set. Could you please revert them as well? --N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 11:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: I'll bring this matter up to an admin as I can't seem to move it. Sorry for the inconvenience once again. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

@N509FZ: All moved back already. Is there anymore that I left out? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of South Yemen (1967-1970).svg AND File:Coat of arms of South Yemen (1970-1990).svg

What was the nature and purpose of your edits to these files? It's a little annoying that there were no meaningful upload summary messages... AnonMoos (talk) 13:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

@AnonMoos: I changed the version="1" to version="1.1". If it's wrong, please revert the edits. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:47, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

It's not "wrong" exactly, but it's rather superfluous and pointless unless an SVG file makes use of version 1.1 features -- and if you don't supply a meaningful file upload message, that leaves other people guessing at what you did... AnonMoos (talk) 06:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Help regarding copyvio warning template

Hello there. I saw your message on User talk:Sri5044 about possible copyright violation. I found the source image and I have taken care of it. Can you please issue a warning to the uploader about properly giving sources and not tagging images as their own work in future? I would have done it myself but I couldn't find a warning template (if it exists) and also am not thorough with the copyvio warning policies. Thanks. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 02:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

@Sarvatra: Thanks for fixing the source! Also is that warning on the said user page ok? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Looks good. Did you use a template? Which one? —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 06:49, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

@Sarvatra: I used the button “Notify this user”. The button is on the left, under “tools”. You have it? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:50, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Solving errors & validating a SVG file

Hello 大诺史, are you able to solve those Batix errors in this file? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001:

Done 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

An opinion

In my opinion, the graphics lab isn't suitable for mass posting every svg you can find with a validation error. I don't think it's particularly fair to other users, whose requests you are drowning out by monopolising the page. If you want to fix validation errors that's great, and if you have some tricky ones you can't understand, fine - but I honestly feel the sheer volume of requests you are posting is just too much. As I say, it's an opinion, that's all - please don't take it as a personal criticism, just my view of what is fair, and how the lab should be used. Cheers. -- Begoon 15:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

@Begoon: Aite! I'll try to only nominate those that is highly used throughout all wikiprojects. Is that ok? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Yeah - I don't want to come across as critical, but if you're only talking about validation errors you could usually just fix them as quickly as you could post a request. It's generally just a matter of looking at the w3c page, seeing what errors it gives you, with line and column numbers, and editing the text as indicated. Obviously you always have to check you haven't had a visual impact on the image, but usually it's straightforward.

Folks usually come to the lab to ask for particular files to be converted or particular visual issues to be addressed, and that's what the graphists there enjoy doing. When someone starts going through whole categories and posting boatloads of files with minor technical issues but visually ok, it can be rather off-putting, and either you get upset because nobody does them or everyone else gets upset because the page becomes overloaded and they're too polite to say: "Hey, slow down, man." I'm probably less reserved than most, so that's why I'm bringing it up. I guess what I'm saying is please be selective, and try to bring files that really need visual work rather than just technical "fixes". As I say, asking about tricky validation errors is cool, but mostly people aren't going to be that interested in minor tech fixes or code reduction for the sake of it.

Sorry to ramble on, but I thought it was worth putting the thoughts into words. -- Begoon 15:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

@Begoon: Can you explain to me what is the purpose of the element "midPointStop"? Can you possibly edit this File:2-BMW.svg to show an example so I can understand it better? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

midPointStop ia an adobe Illustrator bit of markup that it uses internally to manage gradients, but is ignored otherwise. It's not part of the Svg language specification. The reason that file contains them is that it incorporates two 'copies' of BMW.svg (one for each 'wheel'), which is one of the files I "cleaned" for you yesterday. When I did that I couldn't find any significant way the midPointStop tags were affecting the image, either in Illustrator or otherwise, by testing, so I just removed them. It should therefore be safe to do that to this file too. To remove them you just remove every tag that looks like:

<a:midPointStop
         offset="0"
         style="stop-color:#DFF4FF" />

Therefore I made just those removals and no other changes and uploaded a new version for you. There were 118 of these tags, which is what you'd expect because there were 59 in BMW.svg before I edited it, and there are 2 "wheels" in this file. Just remember that when making removals like this it's critical that you don't affect the file's visual rendering, so you need to check, check, check... If you're not sure what a tag is/does - google it - if you don't understand the results of that then ask. I run across esoteric tag names and language quirks I've never seen before all the time, so googling (and asking) is a habit. -- Begoon 07:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 23:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Invalid SVG

Hello 大诺史, can you solve those SVG errors in this file? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:33, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001: Hi, these errors should be kept per User:JoKalliauer/Optimization#invalid_elements_that_should_be_kept. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:51, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Ah okay, I see! So the best way to fix those errors is to replace & then delete the file via an official deletion request? Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001: If you can clean the code properly, overwriting it shouldn't be much of an issue. An SVG usually won't get deleted just because of the errors. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Alright, thanks for your help! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

out of policy renames

Hi 大诺史, you did two incorrect renames:

File:Plane crash into Hudson River.jpg is not a meaningless or ambiguous name
File:Plane crash into Hudson River (crop).jpg is nt a valid harmonize the names of a set of images

Looking at your logs you seem to have missed the core principle of the renaming policy "In general, Commons aims to provide stable filenames as there might be external file clients and file moving involves significant human and computing resources. " . You're just renaming these file to make them a look a bit better. Please stop doing that. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 20:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

@Multichill: Hi Multichill. Sorry about those 2 file renames. Also, I’d like to explain my rationale about renaming the majority of the other files. Taking A-1111 as an example, I will move it to a more descriptive name by adding the airline and aircraft type. Purpose of doing so is to make it clearer as A-1111 may be used by 2 or more airlines or may refer to 2 different aircraft types (reused reg). I would say that this falls under criterion 2. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 23:02, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

File:KLM Cityhopper.png

File:KLM Cityhopper.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wcam (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your idea

...at User_talk:Perhelion#User_script for differing between W3C error counts: I do not think that it will be useful; you know, we deny the necessity to "repair" invalidity! Error count and W3C-invalidity is just an information and a categorizing criterion but not a maintenance request or a demand to validate something. If a file is new, or gets a new version, it should be W3C-valid if possible - but to upload a new version of an invalid file only for validation will not be useful. BTW I did a lot to sort files in a descending order by error count, so that files with most W3C errors are always the first ones within their "invalid..." category. All categorizing as you suggested is not done by the script but by the template - so it's not Perhelion but me who could do it. I thought it over, and we can discuss it with others, but I am sceptical of any advantage -- sarang♥사랑 07:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Questions about File:Caroline Konstnar.jpg

Did you know this file is the same image as is on IMDB? See IMDB: https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNjI5MjA5NDU1Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMzA2NzI4OTE@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,667,1000_AL_.jpg --Kai3952 (talk) 14:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: EXIF states that it is photoshopped, even if not, I don't think that it is own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Deletation Nomination for File:DawnChiedza.png

Hie. The files you nominated for deletation do not infringe copyrights and secondly, the repeat upload was an issue of size, the first one i uploaded, since i have the original files as owner, it was too big so i had resize then re-upload only, that is why there seemed to be a repeat.

Thank you

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Oni-Adil.jpg

Hi, Please explain me the reason for the nomination for the deletion. Risu43 (talk)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Do not licence review

Hi! I noticed you recently added licence reviews to 38 files. Do not do that when you are not a licence reviewer.--Roy17 (talk) 23:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

@Roy17: Noted. Sorry. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

About File:Sori in 2019.png

I was wondering why was Sori's image given a notice when other YouTube screenshotted images on here have not? From what I read from the YouTube template, it stated that "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license." Sorry for the inconvenience. --ThatOneSweetNote (talk) 14:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

@ThatOneSweetNote: There is no permission given at the source for re-use. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:31, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: I see. Again, I'm so sorry for the inconvenience. --ThatOneSweetNote (talk) 14:49, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

marking Files as DR or as CopyVio?

To be honest I'm not an expert in TOO, but in my opinion controversial cases should be taged as DR not as copyvio, expecially if they are on commons since years. Maybe some of them could just be trimmed to meet TOO.

Examples of {{Copyvio}} by 大诺史 converted to {{Delete}}

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Explantation: {{Copyvio}} is a speedyDelete, DR is a 7-Day-Disscussion — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 05:57, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Noted and will pay more attention on these. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Validating SVG

Hello 大诺史, are you able to solve those Batix errors in this file? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 10:49, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001:

Done. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Thanks, wish you a nice weekend! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 10:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001: You too! 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:53, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:53, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

photos

Hi, My father died in 2017, and he was a photographer for about 25 years. I have been scanning and uploading photos from the 20th century to commons. You recently nominated a few of them for deletion citing BLP as a reason - The images are from 1970 or so. I'm aiming to have this category be as complete as possible: [2] . The images were taken in the United Kingdom around 1970. My father was a commercial professional photographer at the time, and he owned the images. I'm happy to fill in as many details as I can? Victorgrigas (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

@Victorgrigas: Was consent given by the woman for the publication of the nominated files here? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:50, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

I don't know her name even. The two of them (this woman and my father) were dating for a time, I know that. It's obvious when looking at the photos that she wanted to be photographed but while she is in many of his photos, I have no written anything from her, and have no way to know if she is alive or not. She may or may not have given my father written consent, but if she did, I don't have those forms. Does this help?Victorgrigas (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

To be honest, I don’t know. Perhaps you could send an email to COM:OTRS claiming what you said above and send in a picture of you and your father (if you’re comfortable)? An advantage of writing in is that an OTRS ticket will be generated and placed on the file’s information so that editors will not nominate the file for the same reason as I did. In addition, your father passed away recently, so his works are still under copyright protection for at least the next 50 years (taking the shortest time possible as I don’t know which country you’re from). To sum up, COM:OTRS is probably the best way to go. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 23:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrolled for me

Please check my contributions and see if I am good enough for autopatrolled. I see many good contributions made by me and no talk page issues or other sorts of issues. I believe that I am trusted. If I am good enough for autopatrolled, please request this right for me. --VKras (talk) 17:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

@VKras: If you think that you are up for it, you can request for the right at COM:RFR. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 22:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Description of Uploads

More a request, than a complaint:
I saw Commons:Administrators/Requests/大诺史 and therfore checked Special:ListFiles/大诺史
I noticed your upload-description, is not telling/meaningfull as it could be (Yes I know I'm also often too lasy, but it really helps others to not check every edit in every detail and saves much more time, than the lasyness of not writing a good upload-description)

several times you used the upload-description: "remove raster" in all case I checked you removed a raster image in metadata (which is there for copyright-reasons, that you know who added when what, so it adds sometimes several pictures to know the contribution of each author), but "remove raster" could also mean:

removing <inkscape:grid to align elements
removing the grid of a checked paper (german: kariert)
removing a hidden raster-image (e.g. used for tracing)
replacing a rasterimage with vector-data

Because "removing raster" could mean alsmost everything "remove rasterimage from metadata" (or shorter "del meta-pic") would be a more selfexplaining description. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

@JoKalliauer: Thank you for letting me know about this! :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:17, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

(not) clickable image and CC-BY

It is true that |link= does not agree with CC-BY, see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/12#|link=_does_not_agree_with_CC-BY, but you could use mw:Extension:ImageMap for you userpage.

It is explained on de:Hilfe:Bilder#Von_der_Dateibeschreibungsseite_abweichendes_Linkziel and on meta:Help:Images_and_other_uploaded_files, but afaik(as far as i know) not on commons. @A.Savin: maybe we should add this information to mw:Help:Images#Syntax and to Commons. I have also seen an admin "adding" |link= to a CC-BY-SA image.

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 16:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Tombstones

As to whether tombstones are considered art works: If you mean legally, I don't know. They are under art in our category structure (because they are under monuments and memorials, which are under art), but that doesn't mean they're art for purposes of determining whether images violate FOP restrictions. I suggest either asking at the village pump, or nominating one or more of the files and see what happens with the nomination. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@Auntof6: I've already asked at COM:VP. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Commonwealth Games logos

Can you please delete those Commonwealth Games already? I'd like to reupload them locally on Wikipedia.

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Ocean Reef ARIA QR+ natural breathing.jpg

Hi, you tagged File:Ocean Reef ARIA QR+ natural breathing.jpg as a copyright violation because it's from Facebook. However, could you please supply the link to the Facebook page? I could not find this in https://www.facebook.com/pg/OCEANREEF.INC/photos. Thank you. —howcheng {chat} 16:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

@Howcheng: As seen from the metadata/EXIF, it shows that the file was taken from Facebook (beside the special instructions, FB.......). All I can say is that the file may be deleted from Facebook by the account holder. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

It might also be posted by a user with a private page, so you probably won't see it. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

And it may be the uploader's own photo, just taken from their FB page. Without more evidence, I don't think I can act on this. —howcheng {chat} 17:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

@Howcheng: But why would he upload an image to Facebook then reupload it to commons when he can upload the file straight to commons? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 23:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

The simplest explanation is that he could be at a different computer (work vs home). I don't mean to imply that he works for this company, but let's AGF that this is his own picture, and it's on his home computer, which he used to upload to Facebook. Now he's at work and is killing time for whatever reason and decides to upload this to Commons. He doesn't have access to the file at the time, so he goes to his FB page, downloads the photo, and re-uploads it. I'm not saying this is what happened, but it is a plausible scenario. I also used tineye.com to search for the photo and it didn't find it on the web. —howcheng {chat} 15:47, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Question

Hi T Cells. As I am new with the LR right, I have a question to ask. If the stated source of the file is no longer available, how should the file be dealt with? See File:(직캠)(4K 60P) 폴킴 - 좋은사람 (180415 2018 H.A.N.D 페스티벌) by.JAS.webm for the file I'm talking about. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

大诺史 by "no longer available" do you meant the source is no longer accessible and you have no idea of under which license it was previously uploaded to Commons? I am away from home and currently on a mobile device but Davey2010 may be interested in this. Regards. T Cells^Talk 05:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for not being clear. The source of the mentioned file is no longer accessible. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:43, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Try archive.org. As the link was not found there, try Google cache. As it's not there either, try finding it in Bing cache. (doesn't seem to be there either) You can contact the uploader, but at this point it's probably a loss. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 06:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

大诺史, chances are that the video has been deleted from YouTube. That happens most of the time and there is nothing Commons can do about what happens on external websites. That being said, the image was imported from YouTube by a trusted user, User:Explicit, and I assumed they verified that the file was available there under the stated license on that date prior to importing here. Thus, if this is the case, the license cannot be revoked even thou the source link is broken or the license has changed, the same way a license cannot be revoked if any Flickr file change their license in the site after they have been verified here on Commons. T Cells^Talk 06:39, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

So it's ok to verify the license? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

You can't verify the license as you cannot access the source but may be passed if User:Explicit confirm that the file was available there under the stated license on that date prior to importing here. T Cells^Talk 07:07, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping, Alexis Jazz is bang on - The only way you can verify it would be to view a cached version however there's no longer cached versions available so as such the only option we have is to decline the licence and delete. –Davey2010^Talk 11:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: I forgot one method: search Commons. (insource:"X-TuJSVGbeY") Sometimes there is another file uploaded from the same source (like a screenshot) that has already been reviewed. In this case no such luck. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz and Davey2010: & T Cells. Thanks for explaining this to me :) I'll be copying this to my own talk page archive for easy reference. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Should I just request a DR/speedy for the file? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:06, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

I've DR'd it as at the time of uploading it could have been under a CC licence, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:08, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Generally prefer DR. The uploader (Explicit) is an admin/license reviewer so it's best to let the uploader handle it in this particular case. If any other (reasonably trusted) user can confirm it was available under a CC license at the time, Explicit could review it. Of course, we have to take into consideration why the YouTube account was terminated. We don't actually know, but copyright violations are a common reason for account termination. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:14, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Another one I forgot! http://archive.is/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-TuJSVGbeY It's actually there, license confirmed. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Altınordu Municipality picture

Dear 大诺史,

You have notified me of a missing source of one picture on the page of the city Ordu in Turkey. Since I'm fairly new on changing things on Wikipedia and don't know my ways around with Wikimedia Commons, I'm wondering what was wrong? The picture prior to my change was a wrong picture of the governmental body, actually with a false layover of the LGBT movement. I corrected this, by entering the correct logo, which was downloaded from the website of the Altınordu Municipality. What is wrong with it?

I do not understand why this picture gets claims of missing sources, whilst falsely made pictures have been on the page for years without any proper review. So false doesn't matter, even with false sources?

Hope to hear from you, YC61 — Preceding unsigned comment added by YC61 (talk • contribs) 06:31, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

@YC61: You can just add in the link of the website of the Altınordu Municipality. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

From User: AustralianJasmine

Please do not delete all photos under user: AustralianJasmine as I am the copyright holder. See below my attached email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org today, August 4, 2019

Subject: Photos uploaded in Wikimedia From: "Gary Goh" <info@garygoh.com.au> Date: Sun, August 4, 2019 10:07 pm To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Priority: Normal I hereby affirm that I, Jasmine Koh, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following media work:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:File_Photo_2_–_Dr_Gary_Goh_in_his_ligh

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:File_Photo_3_–_Dr_Goh_with_his_light_a

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Jasmine Koh 2019-08-04 Director/Business Partner and Wife of Gary Goh Website: http://www.garygoh.com.au [generated using relgen.js] — Preceding unsigned comment added by AustralianJasmine (talk • contribs) 12:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

@AustralianJasmine: The files will be processed by an OTRS member and the ticket will be pasted on the Deletion Request, as such, the files will not be deleted as no permission. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

From user Jum Bae Bi (re: Laguna Lake Development Authority General Manager images)

Good day 大诺史!

I was notified that some my photos in the Wikimedia commons are for deletion due to "dubious claim of work, no EXIF".

I would like to clarify that these media material are really mine as I am the copyright holder, as these images are actually my edited work of the scanned pictures of archived and old actual printed photos which were given by the previous General Managers of the Laguna Lake Development Authority for archiving and records purposes, that which we scanned in order to digitalize and immortalize such files by uploading it on the internet, which is my I cannot provide the EXIF because there is none. Kindly check my email to the permissions-commons@wikimedia.org today, August 05, 2019:

"Marie Ernileth Uy <marieernileth@gmail.com> 3:40 PM (7 minutes ago)

to permissions-commons

Good day!

I am Marie Ernileth Uy, Media Production Specialist I of Laguna Lake Development Authority. The photos in question, which I uploaded in the Laguna Lake Development Authority Wikipedia page are actually actual printed photos which were given by the previous General Managers of the Authority for archiving and records purposes, that which we scanned in order to digitalize and immortalize such files by uploading it on the internet.

As we reach our 50th year, we aim to update all of our information and education materials, which includes our Wikipedia page that was last updated back in 2017.

Thus, I would like to clarify and affirm that as an employee of the Authority and the current handler of the social media platform and other multimedia materials, I hold the copyrights of these media materials, as it is part of my duties and responsibilities:

File:Lopez-deleon-pacifico-bw.jpg File:Teodoro-rey-jr-2.jpg File:Santiago-amado.jpg File:Mendoza-joaquin.jpg File:Lopez-miguel.jpg File:Lavidez-vicente-jr.jpg File:Limcaoco-conrado-1.jpg File:Baguilar-teodoro.jpg File:Almendral-ariel-2.jpg File:Valdez-fatima.jpg File:Santiago-alejandro.jpg File:Tomboc-carlos.jpg File:Cataquiz-calixto.jpg File:Ynares-jun.jpg File:Manda-edgardo.jpg File:Cabrera-rodrigo.jpg File:Medina-jaime.jpg File:Acosta-nereus.jpg

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Respectfully yours,

-- MARIE ERNILETH UY"

As for the photos linkages to the Authority's website, as of the moment, it is not uploaded there as we only post the image of our current General Manager, which is General Manager Jaime Medina. All other information regarding the past General Managers were uploaded in our Wikipedia page for reference to our stakeholders who wish to know more about us and the previous administrations of the agency.

Thus, we have used Wikipedia here as the medium where we can actually post all these historic materials and archived documents for we believe in Wikipedia as a "go-to" site when people wish to search or learn something, aside from the social media accounts and main site.

In line with this, kindly allow these photos uploaded by Jum Bae Bi (my username) and please do not delete them as it is not just for the archiving and record-keeping of the Authority's data but more than anything else, it is for our stakeholders' awareness and knowledge.

Also, I added a note on the said pictures stating that those pictures were only the scanned copy of the actual printed version of it.

Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jum Bae Bi (talk • contribs) 08:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC) @Jum Bae Bi: Don't worry! Your files will be reviewed by an OTRS member, and if it is valid, they will sound it out on the deletion request and the concerned files won't be deleted. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Validating SVG file

Hello 大诺史, are you able to solve those Batik errors in this file? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Chem Sim 2001, that was straightforward - 'id' and 'name' attributes must begin with a letter, there were four in that file starting with a digit, so I added 'a-' to the start of each. -- Begoon 12:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Begoon: Ah okay, thanks a lot for the help! Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

midia to be deleted

I would like to ask you to delete the medias: "música nova para cavaquinho" and "livro choro". This was a mistake. Sorry the misunderstanding! Marilia Figueiredo (talk) 17:33, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

eliminação a pedido do autor e de quem carregou a midia

I would like to ask that the media "Henrique Cazes.jpg " to be deleted, because it was a mistake the upload. thanks Marilia Figueiredo (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Please revert immediately

Please revert your Category:SVG text logos changes - You've inserted a category with the licence[3] - Categories should only be at the bottom, I cannot undo c#your changes due to there being over 9 thousand images and it only loads 30 at a time for me .... Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 18:05, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Could be the wrong cat - Please see your changes here, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:33, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

@Davey2010: I’ll be cleaning it up 1 by 1 and that’s the only way VFC allows me to add in the cat. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:05, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Apologies if the message seemed rude, I paniced more than anything but it can still be fixed,

It's hard to explain but your error can be fixed with VFC, anyway thanks –Davey2010^Talk 01:18, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@Davey2010: Its ok, I'l already in the midst of fixing it. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:19, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Meh mistakes happen, I've made plenty so all's cool :), Many thanks for fixing it and again apologies for the panicky note, –Davey2010^Talk 01:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

File:PressReader for Android.jpg deletion

Hi! Saw that you marked this file as a possible copyright violation, but I think it should fall under fair use - it's a screenshot of software (that I made), and the images of the magazine/newspaper front pages in the screenshot are low resolution. As per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fair_use_newspaper_covers and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Software_screenshots#Screenshots_of_proprietary_software, it seems to me that the image fits pretty comfortably under the commonly accepted fair use guidelines? Let me know if I'm missing something! --RomikQ (talk) 21:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

@RomikQ: en.wiki's policies has no effect here. The file mentioned can only be tagged as fair use and fair use files are not allowed here. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: OK, got it, didn't realize that non-free but fair use content should be uploaded into en.wiki and not commons - thanks for the clarification! --RomikQ (talk) 23:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Categories with VFC

I don't know how that tool works but here it went wrong. – GeMet [talk] 17:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@GeMet:

Done Thank you for notifying me and just to let you know that I'm already in the midst of fixing all of the files. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

What was done? I had to fix several of "my" images. – GeMet [talk] 18:24, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@GeMet: It’s hard to explain but I’ve already started to fix those issues. I just used a script to cleanup the files and manually sort if required. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 18:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion request

Hi, I was a bit puzzled by your SD tag: this user has over 500 edits in Russian Wikipedia. Do they still belong to the 'non-contributor' group? — Le Loy (talk) 00:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

@Ле Лой: My bad on that. I've already removed the tag. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Copying from Category:PD textlogo to Category:SVG text logos

I saw you did add some categories in https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20190808144441&contribs=user&target=%E5%A4%A7%E8%AF%BA%E5%8F%B2&namespace=&tagfilter=&start=2019-08-08&end=2019-08-08

I think it might be more intelligent to categorize all filetpye:SVG with {{PD-textlogo}} also in Category:SVG text logos, by just editing the template?

I'm not an expert but I would ask @Sarang: for help if you want to recategorize files by template and filetype.

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 16:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

The categories are very crowded, some diffusion might help for a better overview. Everything will by possible by just updating the template:{{PD-textlogo}} if somebody creates a good concept what to do. IMHO some investigation of the current situation is needed. I am always open for each useful change, which makes things better! -- sarang♥사랑 06:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@Sarang and JoKalliauer: Can I continue sorting it, just filtering simple ones out into Category:Simple SVG text logos, or should we settle on how to split it first? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi @大诺史: we need a strategy: currently we have 116K transclusions of {{PD-textlogo}}, but many files don't use it and instead a wrong PD is used, e.g. .NET Core Logo.svg uses {{Cc-by-4.0}} - it needs correction! Whatever we do, a great lot of manual work becomes necessary.

Not any problem to expand PD-textlogo that it categorises SVG to SVG text logos but this category contains now 9700 files, which are "hard" categorized; this has to be removed afterwards (VFC?). An additional parameter of PD-textlogo can categorize to Simple SVG text logos which contains now 2350 hard-categorized files. The removal of that categoriation is very easy, but the large amount makes it laborious. Will you do it??

The strategy can be:

checking and repairing wrong PD-templates (this part can begin immediately)
expanding the PD-textlogo (I can do it swiftly) 0 Done (see docu) -- sarang♥사랑
all now in Simple SVG text logos get the "simple" parameter (e.g. VFC)
removal all hard-cats in both categories (e.g. VFC)

Shall we do it? -- sarang♥사랑 09:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@Sarang: I wouldn't mind doing it for the next month or so as I am relatively free and VFC can make it even easier. However, I do need to know what to add in to swap with the SVG text logos cat. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

I'll toggle between doing this and patrolling uploads by new users at Ogrebot's page (eg). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:36, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@Sarang: I'm bad with templates, can you explain on what to sub in so that I don't create a mess that will be very difficult to revert? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:09, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

From the 2352 items in Simple SVG text logos I changed extlogo}} to extlogo|simple}} for the first 300. When you VFC the others, you can see where the change is not performed. The first 300 are o.k., all other not-performed ones you must edit manually. After all 2352 are changed (not earlier!), you can remove the hard category with another VFC. You need not to touch the template. -- sarang♥사랑 13:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

At en.wiki if you guys did this without a bot flag people would scream blue murder every time you deluged their watchlists with these changes. I've edited a large number of these files so they are on my watchlist and I get screenfulls each time It doesn't bother me too much but some folks get upset by that kind of thing. -- Begoon 14:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@Begoon: Sorry about that but this is part of a cleanup process to further split {{PD-textlogo}}. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:05, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Heh - as I say, it doesn't bother me much at all - and it's not going to bother most people because they won't have the same large numbers of them on their watchlists - just something to have at the back of your mind if you start doing tens of thousands rather than just thousands... -- Begoon 14:13, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@Begoon: I really would prefer to do that with a bot (than with VFC), but I do not know any that I can ask. Do you know ? -- sarang♥사랑 15:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry - I don't know what the Commons rules are for bots exactly. You'd probably need to ask about the rules at a Village Pump or Admin noticeboard. -- Begoon 00:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

@Begoon: It seems too difficult to request bot work; but I will set up something at the Village Pump! -- sarang♥사랑 06:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

@Sarang: I'm more or less done with adding the simple para already but I may have possibly missed out a few. However, looking at your edits to {{PD-textlogo}} showed that you added some stuff which will automatically detect if the file is an SVG and categorise it under Category:SVG text logos without a change in template. In other words, the template remained as {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, should I remove the hard added cats from all files in Category:Simple SVG text logos and add in the simple para by going thru Category:SVG text logos? 15:05, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Using {{PD-textlogo}} does nothing other than until now when not SVG. For SVG files, it will add SVG text logos, only when the par1 "simple" is added it will diffuse to Simple SVG text logos: so all files in hard-coded Simple SVG text logos will also categorize to SVG text logos, until "simple" is added. And then the hard-coded category should be removed (it does not really disturb, but such double categorizing, hard and by template, should not occur). -- sarang♥사랑 15:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@Sarang: What I mean is that should I remove all hard coded cats from files in Simple SVG text logos and manually convert them by adding in the para while looking through SVG text logos? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Now you have successfully completed all work with the "Simples"; the more than 100.000 SVG text logos are another case. To remove the (now redundant or obsolete) hard-coded category is not urgent (like the wrong cat at "Simples"), and I will look for a bot - which is the only adequate tool for that. Do not use VFC for such a mass edit! Thank you.

When you want to swap some (only some!) files from SVG text logos to Simple SVG text logos, of course you may do that, and VFC can ease that work. There are some other errors, esp. wrong licenses - they are more difficult to find, at the moment I have no idea how to locate them. -- sarang♥사랑 06:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Not so perfect work

You removed (all?) hard-categorized SVG text logos, but you did not first check that they use the correct template:PD-textlogo. Many uploaders use very complicated licenses, where PD-shape, PD-ineligible or others like PD-textlogo would be much more appropriate for trivial drawings.
As an example, Arduino Logo hi.svg uses {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Now it is not any more a textlogo! More bad: on August 10 you added image generation but without any topic. The script suggests often, but not always the correct topic, which in this case would have been "tl". The topic is a very essential parameter for Image generation, it is displayed with the description and it is used for proper subcategorizing. -- sarang♥사랑 12:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

@Sarang: I only removed the first 600 ones and I'm trying to locate some of the missing ones already. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

I'll pay more attention when adding the Igen too. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Question Validity of Fort Zachary Taylor: A Sleeping Giant Awakens

Howard S. England is my father. I inherited the rights to his original book Fort Zachary Taylor: A Sleeping Giant Awakens when my father passed in 1999. I started my own publishing business in 2013 and have published a number of books on Fort Taylor. In 2013, I re-set and re-published his original work which had been long out of print as a Second Edition. In 2015, I published an expanded and revised 3rd Edition. I own the copyright to the book and only wish to give my father credit for the original work he did. I am listed on the copyright and the Library of Congress ISBN as Editor. What more do I need to do to retain the photo on my father's web page? Englandel — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2605:A000:1330:A069:E84B:60CC:DD7:4556 (talk) 16:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

@Englandel: Please see the instruction on OTRS, thank you :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Out of scope F10

Hi. If you like you don't have to DR out of scope images, you can take them as SD|F10. There is also a useful addon to the Ajax gadget - you will need to add some code to your common.js file. You can find mine here User:Gbawden/common.js - credit to Jeff G. for the code though Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Can't seem to notice any difference after installing. Help me out please :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:42, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

You won't see it until you open a file. Then you will see options for copyvio FB, SD selfie etc Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Nope, still no diff. It's supposed to be installed into common.js right? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes. Jeff G might be the best person to troubleshoot it as he wrote the code Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Can you help? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

I have never tried using mw.loader.load to load a window.AjaxDeleteExtraButtons section. I used the instructions at Help:QuickDelete. If you can't get it to work by copy/paste, please ask at MediaWiki talk:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js. Of course, you will need the AjaxQuickDelete gadget enabled in your preferences, and you can start small with just the F10 part. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Didn't know that I'm supposed to configure it myself. Thanks for helping! 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

May I suggest to change 'tag': '{'+'{speedy|1=COM:CSD#F10, Personal photos of or by non-contributors.}}', to 'tag': '{'+'{SD|F10}}', so it can go to the personal file maintenance category. 1989 (talk) 17:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@1989: Thanks, I made that change and I will try to use it when the situation arises. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 20:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 20:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Files

@大诺史: Could you please approve these files?File:Fanart deltarune by lenorachan.jpg, File:Alfredo Jalife.jpg , File:Dan Osorio.jpg , File:Fall Country Road (Macadam).jpg , File:Mehdi Sanai.jpg , File:Ramadhan Greetings Image.jpg , please--Mauro Joan (talk) 17:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Please reply--Mauro Joan (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion for File:Rumah di Ubud Bali.jpg

Hi! Thanks for reminding me about the incompatibility of noncommercial CC images - I wasn't aware of it, nor on the incompatibility of non-derivative CC pictures. If the image's expected to be speedily deleted, please do so. Sorry for not being aware of that. Dhio270599 (talk) 03:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Files

Hello Respected Sir,

I asked the website webmaster @ Tourism of India and @ indianvisit. They told me that I can use their picture. I am sure, Wikipedia will not get any copyright issue or any violating issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123adityakumar (talk • contribs) 12:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

@123adityakumar: Please ask them to send their permission to OTRS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

German Flag

Hi 大诺史, I am new here and I did not know that one can use a picture uploaded from someone else in a post. I had to change a flag in the page Distribuição do tipo sanguíneo por país yesterday because it was the Belgium flag instead of the Germany one. I made a flag myself and uploaded it to use in the page. I'll try to change it to the other one. Sorry for the inconvenient. Debbymarques (talk) 08:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Update: I could not find Dt (2).svg: to replace the German flag. Debbymarques (talk) 08:35, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

@Debbymarques: Hi, you can use File:Dt (2).svg. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

請注意弘道幸助

大诺史您好，請您注意弘道幸助，此用戶多次上傳同一張受版權保護的潘家儀（咖滋咪）接受三立新聞網專訪照片。 --Solomon203 (talk) 09:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

@Solomon203: 您能给我相关的文件名吗？大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: 在User talk:弘道幸助裡，從2019年8月開始被提報侵犯著作權的文件名都是。 --Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: Can you check 弘道幸助's August copyvios? They might be the same file uploaded under different names per Solomon203. Thanks. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

User Elgatocepedaom1

Hi. I just saw the pictures uploaded by user Elgatocepedaom1. Thank you for the delition request. In my opinion some of the pictures might be eligible for speedy delition because .. well what they show and how they show it. I don't want to go into details. The others might be uploaded to distract. I saw a similar tactic years ago with gifs. ̴̴Akinom (talk) 11:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

@Akinom: Hello! I’ll take note of this and pay more attention to the mentioned user. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 22:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank youǃ Akinom (talk) 08:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

疑似傀儡帳號

維基共享資源至少從2013年起，出現多個同樣上傳香港與台北街景照片、文件命名方式相似、Commons:Overcat情形同樣嚴重的疑似傀儡帳號，例如Kwongning210、KOityema F、Hangz Leundra Rumma、Diamo Laung Bobpuao、SHSU hgo Laih等等。--Solomon203 (talk) 04:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

@Solomon203: 我已在两三个星期前在COM:RFCU要求查核，但被拒绝。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

這些帳號大多是上傳完同一批照片就不再活動，明顯意圖繞過封禁。而且不清楚的事物還亂分類，例如台北市承德路一段至三段屬於大同區，原始文件命名卻被劃歸中正區。必須花很多時間修正分類。--Solomon203 (talk) 10:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

台北市南京西路不經過中正區，原始文件命名卻同樣被劃歸中正區。--Solomon203 (talk) 10:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Beisaleigh HGIIarie也是此類帳號，編輯傾向與Diamo Laung Bobpuao相同。--Solomon203 (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Yaushi Kwong Laimwoo也是此類帳號。--Solomon203 (talk) 14:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Kemgung YAMSAUM OOI也是此類帳號。--Solomon203 (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

@Solomon203: 根据在COM:AN的条文，有几名用户曾举报过这些账户。他们觉得没必要封禁户口因为这些傀儡账户是一次性使用的，封禁后，用者也可以再创新账号来编辑。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

@Solomon203: 我已在撤除不需要的分类（COM:OVERCAT），请看（File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 新台北 New Taipei tourism bus view August 2018 SSG 94.jpg）。若您需要帮助，我很乐意帮忙。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:41, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

@Solomon203: 等会儿我会在COM:ANU再次举报这件事。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

@Solomon203: 我已经在COM:AN举报。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

@Cohaf and Catherine Laurence: Any of you familiar with this matter? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Pardon me but I am not familiar with this case. Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: 請問是否能封禁相關IP網段？--Solomon203 (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

@Solomon203: 根据Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 74#Accounts seems like owned by the same person，各个用户觉得没必要封禁户口/IP。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

FB in Metadata

Hi. A tip - if you see Special instructions FBMD01000a890d0000a8620000b0150100043001004e470100ba2a02006d3d0300cd4b0300c16503003b7d03004874050 in the exif its an indication that the image came from FB and you can nom for speedy. If you know this already I apologise - came across it in one of your DR's Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Hi, and there isn't a need to apologise right?? Probably missed them out when nominating the files. Thank you for letting me know :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

My photos

You are right - I downloaded photos from FB page that I manage but photos are taken by me. Unfortunately I deleted them from my archive so I uploaded them from Facebook. Please let me know what will happen to them on Commons. Cheers, Mixapirgossi (talk) 22:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

@Mixapirgossi: They will get deleted (most probably) as they do not have a valid source/permission. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello.. Friend

Actually That Doreamon Handkerchief Photograph Taken by Me.. With My Phone Camera.. I Need That Photograph For Tamil Language Wikipedia Article. Suggesting Reconsidering That Photograph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santhosh Marvel (talk • contribs) 14:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

@Santhosh Marvel: Fair use media is not allowed on commons. Consult your home wiki if fair use uploads are allowed. Regards, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

deletion of File: The Labors of Hercules... and File: Michael E. Arth Introspective...

I'm Michael E. Arth, the author of both of these books. I put up low Rez thumbnails images of my book covers (and artwork) to which I own the copyrights. Why are you deleting it when other people routinely put up book cover thumbnails with the justification they do not harm the copyright holder? Having thumbnails of my books and art work does not harm me or threaten my copyrights. Do I need to use another license? I was not claiming "fair use" MichaelEArth (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@MichaelEArth: If you are the author of the books, you may consider sending your permission to OTRS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

My books are described on my websites at www.michaelearth.org and www.michaelearth.com, and mentioned on the wikipedia page about me at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_E._Arth. My user page specifically identifies me as the same Michael E. Arth. Do I need more proof than that? Also, what is the story with others who routinely put up thumbnails of other books? MichaelEArth (talk) 16:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: I need a little help here. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Thumbnails of books may be uploaded as Fair Use locally at English Wikipedia, but not at Commons, we don't accept Fair Use. If you want to release previously published own work into a free license, please contact OTRS for verification. Jcb (talk) 16:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

The file I uploaded wasn't fair use. it was PD

The file I uploaded wasn't fair use. it was PD --Jakeukalane (talk) 03:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Malaga Corsairs Logo

Hi there, I saw you flagged me yesterday about a logo. I made a mistake and put an open license on this logo, but I think that it should be now fixed. Can you please check it?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M%C3%A1laga_Corsairs_Logo.png

Thanks

--Carlosmorentedev (talk) 11:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@Carlosmorentedev: I don't think the license is valid. Furthermore, I believe I tagged the file as no permission. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

And how do you think that I should tag the logo of a sports team? Other sports teams have it licensed like I put the file now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosmorentedev (talk • contribs) 11:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@Carlosmorentedev: From what I know, the logo is still copyrighted. The only way is someone related to the club to send in their permission to OTRS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Imagen retirada

Buenas tardes @大诺史: agradezco tu observación, sin embargo me queda una duda, estoy buscando forma de subir una imagen de la revista Comunicar, primero hice un arte y después tomé una fotografía de una edición reciente, pero me han bajado las dos, por favor me podrías decir como debe ser la imagen que suba de la revista para que no transgreda copyright, incluso me puse en contacto con la revista de manera que autoricen el uso de la imagen para ilustrar el artículo que habla de su revista y estuvieron de acuerdo con dar permiso, pero no se que debo hacer para validar eso, por favor me puedes ayudar. --TanixBa (talk) 20:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC) 5-09-2019

@TanixBa: If it is a derivative work, you'll need the source author's permission to reuse via OTRS. (i.e. magazine publisher) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, these pictures are from my photography. I work as a photographer for the city of Tulkarm in the State of Palestine and I send photos to Facebook pages. Glad to communicate with you.. Greetings.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Karmi (talk • contribs) 06:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@Mr.Karmi: If so, please send in the original file to OTRS for verification. Regards, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:56, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: How much time there .. I have a large number of photos will be deleted .. Please help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Karmi (talk • contribs) 07:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Karmi (talk • contribs) 07:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@Mr.Karmi: It depends, as there is a backlog. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion?

Hi, I wonder why you put Speedy Deletion on my files: File:Anke Drescher (2019).jpg and File:Maite Maiora Elizondo (2019).jpg

As a former runner, a huge fan and so one I was at the UTMB 2019 and I took photos from Pau, Courtney, Kerstin, Maite, and Anke and more. You will never find them in any social media format, because I, the photographer, had not posted them in such formats. I uploaded the photos last few days to Commons and want to go on. Can you give me an explanation, why Speedy Deletion? Came via Facebook? Is that a joke? I can´t understand. --....HMS (talk) 07:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@PaulasBunt: Hi, File:Courtney Dauwalter (2019).jpg has this (FBMD01000aa20d0000bd3c00008ea60000a4b4000063c10000d448010081e20100abea010009f80100c7040200c5e00200) in its metadata. This suggests that the file was uploaded to Facebook before the commons upload. If this is your own work, I would suggest that you send in the permission to OTRS for verification. Sorry for the hassle. Regards, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I understand the problem. I took the photos with my smartphone and transfered it via facebook (only me) to my notebook to crop them before the upload. Hope with OTRS things will go fine. Thanks for answer. --....HMS (talk) 08:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@PaulasBunt: Please send in the original file, thanks and happy editing :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Request

I'm curious why you marked my uploaded file: Agbogbloshie, Ghana - September 2019.jpg for speedy deletion?

I'm the owner of the work. What would you like me to do?--Synth85 (talk) 09:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@Synth85: Hi. As the metadata states that the copyright holder is Muntaka Chasant and your username is no where close to it. I nominated the file as speedy as it is a possible copyvio. Hope you understand my POV. Regards 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Hi, thanks for the prompt response. I understand your POV, of course. I didn't have to use my real name as my user name. That is not necessary. I add the name for the purpose of credit, as this is important given the subject matter. I regularly see my works credited, and it will be a shame if it's not credited under my real name. Anyway, I sent permission granted for publication to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from my stated email as the tag requested. You can review it if you are one of the volunteers. Let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to do. Thanks!--Synth85 (talk) 10:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@Synth85: I’m not an OTRS volunteer but I believe that it’ll be cleared soon and no actions are needed at the moment. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: If not now, I'll appreciate it if you can remove the tag whenever this is resolved. Thanks!--Synth85 (talk) 10:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@Synth85:

Done 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:05, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Thanks!--Synth85 (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-09-01 Scott Morrison and Taur Matan Ruak 2.jpg

Any further questions about? ;-) --JPF (talk) 12:42, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

FYI: Commons:Village pump/Archive/2019/03#Working with low resource organisations that publish only on Facebook and also publish under an open license --JPF (talk) 12:52, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Nope :) I accidentally press enter and didn't realise after clicking on the same image again. Sorry. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:19, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

No problem. Just to be sure. The Facebook medium discussion was maybe not for everyone on the screen. --JPF (talk) 13:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

nominating because used on FB

Thanks for your work on checking that images are compatable with policies. I know it's no fun job :) I came across this nomination, and was curious if you could be persuaded to adapt your reasoning-message a bit. With competitions like Wiki Loves Monuments, we expect a lot of new contributors that don't know much about our policies, and may indeed make mistakes (although in my experience the vast majority has good intentions). If you see an image like this, it would be helpful if you could add a bit more instructions in your message on how to address the issue (working from the assumption that someone is indeed the true author). Jeff G.'s response at the help desk was a good suggestion, and I don't see why we would wait until people ask about it :). The abbreviations also look a bit.. scary. With a little bit of luck, such constructive approach will convince newcomers every now and then to stick around and contribute more.

How about, for example, adding something along the lines of "For example, add 'Licensed cc-by-sa-4.0' to the Facebook photo page/post and link it from the photo description page in the source field" to the message? That gives the contributor a good handle to quickly address the issue if they indeed own the FB page/post. If you then link the post/page where you found the picture, that would be even better (I was unable to find it myself). Effeietsanders (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@Effeietsanders: Hi. What do you suggest in replacing the text me and Jeff G. use? Will something like “This file will soon be deleted as it was derived from Facebook and has violated their terms of use. If this is your own work, you can either reupload the original file or explicitly state a commons acceptable license on the page where the file was taken from and link it in the source field” be ok? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 22:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I wonder if this should be included in the license review process. Yes, the user can place the license to allow reuse but what if it is removed? Is there a way to check if this occurs? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 22:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Once a License Reviewer confirms the license is there, they can place the appropriate template on the file description page. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 23:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Request

I'm curious why you marked my uploaded file: Photo_of_Jack.jpg for speedy deletion?

I'm the owner of the work and I took the photo of Jack. I have the rights to it. --Gettechy (talk) 18:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

@Gbawden: I forgot what/who is depicted in the file although I'm more towards it being a personal photo, can you help me out? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Gettechy: The photo you upload is out of scope. Commons does not accept personal photos or selfies - see COM:SELFIE Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Evidence

I send evidence my identity card of media and photos signature. So please don't make me panic my all deta is totally correct if you find any wrong detail then you can take legal action on me but please don't remove my pic Journalist Ayush Singh (talk) 08:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Journalist Ayush Singh: Permission for the photo is needed. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Evidence

I send my media certificate on given mail id and all media data I sent by my my email.my English is poor so please resolve the problem you....https://hi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:%E0%A4%8F%E0%A4%AE_._%E0%A4%9C%E0%A5%87_._%E0%A4%86%E0%A4%AF%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B7_%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%B9 Journalist Ayush Singh (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Minorax/Archive/2019,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Photo deletion appeal

Just letting you know that I am getting the permission to use the photo, The photo I uploaded is me and the imdb that you found the photo is mine.

But I will get the permission to use the photo and get this resolved.

Sorry for the inconvenience caused — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyladcarter (talk • contribs) 04:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

File:IMG-20181101-WA0012.jpg image tagging

Greetings, thanks for patrolling new files. I noticed that you added a no permission tag to the image. May I ask why? That place is a public place, and anyone can capture photos of Hawa Mahal. So I don't think they have taken the photo from elsewhere. Thanks. Masum Reza^📞 17:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

@Masumrezarock100: The tag was not for taking a picture at a public place. I tagged it as no permission as it came for WhatsApp so the photographer's permission is needed, + the file doesn't have metadata to confirm anything. My explanation might not be good but I hope you get it :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Yes, your explanation is sufficient for me to understand the reason behind your tagging. I am new on Commons, and I had doubts in my mind, so I have asked that question. Hope you are not bothered by this. Masum Reza^📞 17:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

@Masumrezarock100: Nah I'm not bothered and welcome to commmons! 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Regarding File:Python Basics - With Illustrations from the Financial Markets.pdf

Actually, Page ix to x of File:Python Basics - With Illustrations from the Financial Markets.pdf stated that the file is licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0, so I have marked the file for license review, regards. 廣九直通車 (talk) 06:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

@廣九直通車: Alright. Thank you. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 廣九直通車 (talk) 06:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Wayne123.jpg

不好意思，又打擾你了。我最近處理有關File:Wayne123.jpg的OTRS工單Ticket:2019100610001693時，版權持有人表示已經在其網頁上註明是CC-BY-SA-4.0授權，但是以中文標記，不知道平時用英文的其他圖像審查員能不能夠理解。加上又不知道版權持有人會不會在9000多個檔案的等待途中去掉授權文字之類的意外發生，所以還是希望勞煩您能夠盡快審查一下此檔案的版權情況，萬分感謝。廣九直通車 (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

@廣九直通車:

完成大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

DR input

Could you take a look at some of the DR's at the bottom of Commons:Deletion_requests/2019/04. The nom appears to be in Chinese and your input would be welcome Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Those filed on 30 April? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

@Gbawden: again because I didn't sign my reply properly. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Don't delete my screenshot Aid.jpg!!!

Read https://legal.ubi.com/eula/en-US

(except if the Product enable You through a specific feature to create, generate or submit User Generated Content and for which You will need to create an Account and comply Terms of Use)

Uplay PC let me to make screenshot of game and I can use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Mikharein: 1.1 states no commercial use. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:09, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Wikipedia is commercial project? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Mikharein: Yes. Please see COM:L. Regards 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: I'm Russian. Why I need to speak with non-russian speaking person? Find administrator from Russia, please, and contact me with him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: My English is not good. But why I can't use screenshot like illustration for the article??? EULA let me to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@George Chernilevsky: Can you help? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@George Chernilevsky: Файл — иллюстрация к статье https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Аид, но этот администратор хочет беспощадно снести мой скриншот, который был сделан добросовестно и без нарушения лицензионного соглашения с Ubisoft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Russian: Удалено правомерно в соответствии с правилами лицензированя. Внимательно прочитайте условия лицензирования, особенно пункт 2. Лицензия дает Вам право поиграть, а не создавать производные работы (скриншоты и т.п.). С уважением

English: Deleted correctly in accordance with the rules of the licensed. Read the licensing terms carefully, especially paragraph 2. The license gives you the right to play this game, and not create derivative works (screenshots, etc.). Regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

What license review?

Hi. I see you are using on a permanent basis F4 ("Failed license review") to tag for deletion images that haven't been submitted to a license review process. IMHO "License review" is a very specific procedure which these files were not involved in, since no license review tags were included. Strakhov (talk) 08:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Strakhov: Any suggestion on what I should change it to? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

When the uploader claims {{Own}} but you find the image published before somewhere-else-in-the-internet, people tend to use "F1" and/or a link to the image. Sometimes, when the copyvio is not that evident (it's based on a "FBMD-metadata-thing", but the reverse search is not successful), they start a deletion request. Strakhov (talk) 08:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Strakhov: Oh ok, but isn't it still a license review? My rationale is that I'm reviewing the license to see if it is stated at the source/or anywhere I find the file at (apparent own work). As for the FB thingy, the default FB license only licenses FB to use it for their own purposes (ad, settings, etc.) so by default, the file is a copyright violation unless stated otherwise. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

To me, it isn't, as said above. Wrt the second question, it's not, since the uploaders on Facebook still retain their rights to publish their images with other licenses. If you publish a selfie on facebook you still have the right to publish it with a CC license somewhere else. Thing is, in Commons, we often require COM:OTRS as a precaution, to be sure "大诺史" and the owner of the Facebook account are the same person. Strakhov (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Strakhov: Oh alright. I'll think of a better way to phrase the tag. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Strakhov: I've changed the FB tag to "Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation." and all instances of "License review NOT passed" to "Apparent copyright violation". 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

My image

Hello 大诺史 my image is mine and i made it i dont know what the problem is can you please specify it! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmrTGC (talk • contribs) 22:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

@AmrTGC: I've started a deletion request and you can voice your comments there, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:AmrTGC.jpg. Regards, --大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Request to delete my photos

Hi, I will know why you have reported my photos. All the photos are mine, done only by me. I hope you withdraw your report, because it is not correct. Benedetta — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenedettaMazzante (talk • contribs) 13:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@BenedettaMazzante: The files came from Facebook, as such, permission is needed by the original uploader for reuse. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

This is not correct. Photos are in Facebook because I had published them in MY page, i didn't taken them by another person. So you, please, withdraw your request. Benedetta BenedettaMazzante (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@BenedettaMazzante: It cannot be determined whether the files are yours. You claiming that you published them is no proof that the images are allowed for reuse. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Remove notification about possible deletion

Hi! I think the case with my uploaded pictures is solved by OTRS now. How do I make the notification on the individual pictures go away?

Sinistra (talk) 15:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@Sinistra: Thank you for sending in your permission. WIth regards to the notification and per COM:TALK#User talk pages, you may remove them but archiving is preferred. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of DEROUET_marie file

Hi,

You marked most (but not all) file by DEROUET_marie saying they « Came via Facebook » but could you give the actual URL where it come from on Facebook? Because, if it's published by the same person on the two websites, then there is no problem ; and if not, then the other photo should probably be deleted too.

Pinging also Ellin Beltz who performed the deletion.

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: The files I've tagged as copyvio have a "FB metadata", the problem with such thing is that there is no way to determine if that is own work, + uploader's remaining file has metadata so why wasn't the original uploaded instead? I admit that the phrasing of the tag might not be good, as such, I have recently changed the phrasing to "Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation." 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Since the photo is deleted, I can't check the metadata (no that I know of anyway) but that's strange, I don't see anything in the last photo (which seems to be all part of the same serie). I this kind of case, I would tend to assume good faith. At the very least, I think we should do a proper deletion request and not a speedy deletion. Any objection for me to restore the photo and put them on deletion? Again ping Ellin Beltz what do you think?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: No objections. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Done on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DEROUET marie. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Minorax/Archive/2019,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi

I just wanted to know regarding these images. Why these will be deleted?

File:East Bengal smoke show.jpg
File:East Bengal Ground.jpg
File:Salt lake Stadium.jpg

) Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 17:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@Arnabsaha2212: Files seems to be from Facebook, as such, permission from the original uploader is needed via OTRS.

@大诺史: I uploaded the images on Facebook. I uploaded tgem here first, then in Facebook. I don't upload other's files. if I see any possible issue regarding any image, I ask here before uploading. Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 04:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

@Arnabsaha2212: It seems that the files are from Facebook, could you send in your permission and/or original files to OTRS? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: I have sent the original files to OTRS. Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

@Arnabsaha2212: Thank you for your cooperation and happy editing. Regards --大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: thanks for helping me :) but i have a question. each time i upload a image, both here and facebook, i need to do OTRS? Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 10:55, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

@Arnabsaha2212: I would say, yes. So to avoid the trouble, just upload the original file here instead of uploading to FB, downloading it and uploading it here. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: OK, thanks :) Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 10:59, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

first time post photo's problem

hello. how are you ? May i know any problem of my post photo? thanks for your kindly advise and assitance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritzyong (talk • contribs) 12:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

@Ritzyong: Please do not use commons for self promo. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

@Ritzyong: As 大诺史 have said, Wikimedia Commons is a not a place to self-advertise. We have a project scope to provide free educational media to all. Consider using alternate outlets such as Flickr. Masum Reza^📞 13:03, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_state_of_Cabinda#/media/File:Brazilian_Post%C2%B4s_issued_stamps_with_effigy_of_President_of_Cabinda_General_of_Army_Anonio_Luis_Lopes.jpg

You are wrong. Design of this postage stamps is exclusively mine and copyright is mine too, since I AM the artist who design it. Fell free to ask me any documents you want about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmeirellles (talk • contribs) 13:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

@Hmeirellles: Please send your permission to OTRS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:39, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Help!

I posted my picture of the Australian flag but I accidentally posted my private info. UPDATE: Never mind. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 20:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi,

I am responding to the possible deletion of some of the images I uploaded.

I did upload few of them by mistake so I will try to proceed with the deletion myself, it´s a bit confusing so If you could help me also, I will appreciate it.

These are the mistaken images:

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ricondo performing in 2019.png

File:Ricondo performing in 2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ricondo performing in Germany 2017.png

File:Ricondo performing in Germany 2017.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Juan Ricondo The J.R Show Tour en Madrid 2018.png

File:Juan Ricondo The J.R Show Tour en Madrid 2018.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Juan Ricondo en directo 2019.png

File:Juan Ricondo en directo 2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

The other ones are correct. They are not screenshots and I am the copyright owner, since I was the one who took those pictures.

Thanks for your help.

Regards Angeles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angeles Pacheco (talk • contribs) 22:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:SilversageOnStage.jpg deletion

Hello! I reached out to photographer and he should be sending photo release email to Wikimedia Commons within next 24 hours. Please don't delete. Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.96.27.94 (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

@Unc219: Hi, as the file does not have permission now, it will be speedy deleted. But don't worry OTRS volunteers will request undeletion if the permission is received and valdiated. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Jatrabala Mila.jpg

AboutMedia:Jatrabala Mila.jpg.

This file was created for back up purpose. But I want to delete the image. Please delete this file.The image is not used in any wikipedia topic yet. Need deletion. FaysaLBinDaruL (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:余华作品《我胆小如鼠》封面.jpg

您好！这张照片是我自己拍的，因为我是C区新手，上传时没有加上自己的版权说明，能否麻烦您指导一下？Daniel J Zhao (talk) 15:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

@Daniel J Zhao: 您好。书籍封面，杂志封面，海报等均被视为合理使用的文件。此外，封面上的书法作品是高于中国的创意门槛（原创门槛）的元素。参见COM:TOO China。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: 谢谢您的指导！图片中的白色汉字为标准字体，红色汉字为书籍作者余华的个人签名，其余部分全黑色。请问这样的图片在C区算侵权吗？Daniel J Zhao (talk) 01:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@Daniel J Zhao: 书籍的出版地是中国，所以应该依照那儿的原创门槛。中国有很低的原创门槛，作者的签名，文字的摆放位置都算是作者的原创。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: 谢谢您指出此版权的依据范围！依据中华人民共和国著作权法2001年修正版第四章第一节第三十六条“出版者有权许可或者禁止他人使用其出版的图书、期刊的版式设计”的附加条件“前款规定的权利的保护期为十年，截止于使用该版式设计的图书、期刊首次出版后第十年的12月31日。”该书首次出版于2008年5月，封面版式设计版权保护条款于2018年12月31日失效。您指出的“作者的签名，文字的摆放位置”属于版式设计的范畴，该书的版式设计已过版权保护期，目前属于公有领域。综上，图片在中华人民共和国著作权法下不存在侵权问题。再次感谢您的沟通指导！Daniel J Zhao (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

請教上載相片方法

您好，相請問正確上載相片的方法？相片由公司授權使用，想知如何正確上載？ Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amazsara10 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: 相片由公司授权上载，请问可如何标示？谢谢 Amazsara10

@Amazsara10: 请指示公司发送他们的许可给COM:OTRS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Thanks. I will email the team and hope this work. Thanks again. I am so new to wiki. Amazsara10

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Reviewing users contributions

Thank you for Commons image reviewing effort! Please also look on other problematic user's contributions. Help:VisualFileChange.js is very useful for this purpose. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Thanks for the note! 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Bongo Cat Redraw.png

Hello, I think, no permission is required for this file. It is of simple design and geometrical shapes. We can use {{PD-ineligible}}. What do you say? Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@Tulsi Bhagat: Hello :) Even if PD-ineligible can be applied, the uploader states that the file is "a close redraw" of the bongo cat internet phenomenon. So a source should at least be provided as it is a DW. Thoughts? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Yeah! Agreed. I've received an OTRS ticket for the file. Let me ask about the source then we can keep it. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi

You may be shocked at what is happening in the Thai Wikipedia. lf you want to help, contact to w:th:วิกิพีเดีย:แจ้งผู้ดูแลระบบ (Administrators' noticeboard). Best regard --Geonuch (talk) 11:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@Geonuch: Hello, thanks for the note. Indeed, I am shocked when the user starts spamming links on my talk page. Do contact legal-reports@wikimedia.org if the situation gets out of control or the threats worsen. Thank you and happy editing. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:03, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@Geonuch: Hi, if possible, please send in a mail to legal-reports. The user did not stop and continued here as 2405:9800:BC11:BD0D:D52A:C60D:6D0D:FCFD & 2405:9800:bc11:bd0d:f4a2:6998:4fad:dd6d. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:17, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for reporting the problem. I am discussing with other users about this situation. If necessary, my community will consider contacting legal-reports. For commons, I recommend blocking users or IPs immediately if they make legal threat. --Geonuch (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

I request to Steward for global block IPs. Some user in my community are trying to screen evidence for report. Sincerely --Geonuch (talk) 03:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

@Geonuch: File:Sukavich Rangsitpol.jpg's history and GPSLeo might help. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Escudo UD Almeria.png

(File:Escudo UD Almeria.png) It's the same but with the right license. The previous file is wrong. Don't delete it. --LaMons (talk) 13:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@LaMons: I can't seem to find any permission for reuse. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

大诺史 The image consists only of simple geometric shapes and text. The tag "Template:PD-textlogo" it's perfect for it. What do you think? --LaMons (talk) 13:30, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@LaMons: IMO, it is not simple enough for PD-textlogo. Furthermore, none of the criteria by Jameslwoodward at the DR has been met for a re-upload. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: Pinging deleting admin for comment. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

See my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escudo UD Almeria.png. It seems to me well over the threshold of originality. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: I still thinking that the logo is just simple geometric shapes and text, but anyways, if I can get the club to give me permission to use it on Wikipedia, can you help me with the OTRS? I have no idea how it works. --LaMons (talk) 19:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Guild of One-Name Studies page

Yesterday I spent considerable time trying to work out how to change the logo for the organisation and to upload a book cover bearing the same name as my wikipedia account. I got up this morning and see that you had flagged the images as breaches.

The site https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guild_of_One-Name_Studies&action=edit&section=4

This was not a breach. I am a Trustee for the Charity and was asked by the Chairman to change the logo and update the page. That is what I started to do. Please upload the image you removed.

Secondly the other image you removed was a book title that I wrote for the Guild, it clearly showed my name. I therefore obviously had the right to use the image. Again please replace the image.

The Charity Commission is an England and Wales organisation where you can check the validity of a charity. If you search by either my surname or the Guild's name you will see that I am a Trustee of the Guild and acted within the copyright rules. I would have appreciated a note first to check before you removed the images and therefore wasted my time.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JulieGoucher (talk • contribs) 16:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@JulieGoucher: Hello, sorry but I can't undelete the file as I am not an admin. You can file an undeletion request at COM:UDR, or simply send in the permission(s) to OTRS. Sorry for the hassle. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Minorax/Archive/2019,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Why my photos has been nominated for deletion

Hello 大诺史, I believe the picture (File:김소현 (Kim Sohyun), 인스타그램 커뮤니티 기자간담회 스타로그 01.png) which i screenshot form AJUTV is available. If you could see at the describtion, the publisher posted

Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... (with the link)

This is my first time uploading images here.

Perghhh (talk) 12:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

@Perghhh: Hello, as said in the deletion request, I can't confirm if the person who filmed this (Yu Dae-gil (유대길)) is working for or part of AJUTV. Furthermore, the "Star Log" makes it seem like it is not own work as it doesn't link directly straight to the youtube account (AJUTV). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Code issues in User:大诺史/common.js

Hi 大诺史, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:大诺史/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 11 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 1 character 257: Unclosed string. - Evidence: {{delete|not in this project's language [[User:大诺史|大诺史]] ([[User talk:大诺史|Talk/留言/토론/Discussion]]) 07:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)}}
ISSUE: line 2 character 46: Unclosed string. - Evidence: importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js');
ISSUE: line 3 character 47: Unclosed string. - Evidence: importScript("User:Waggers/degrandparent.js");
ISSUE: line 4 character 3: Unclosed string. - Evidence: //
ISSUE: line 5 character 34: Unclosed string. - Evidence: window.AjaxDeleteExtraButtons = [
ISSUE: line 6 character 18: Unclosed string. - Evidence: {
ISSUE: line 1 character 2: Expected a string and instead saw {. - Evidence: {{delete|not in this project's language [[User:大诺史|大诺史]] ([[User talk:大诺史|Talk/留言/토론/Discussion]]) 07:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)}}
ISSUE: line 1 character 3: Expected ':' and instead saw 'delete'. - Evidence: {{delete|not in this project's language [[User:大诺史|大诺史]] ([[User talk:大诺史|Talk/留言/토론/Discussion]]) 07:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)}}
ISSUE: line 1 character 9: Expected a JSON value. - Evidence: {{delete|not in this project's language [[User:大诺史|大诺史]] ([[User talk:大诺史|Talk/留言/토론/Discussion]]) 07:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)}}
ISSUE: line 1 character 9: Expected '}' and instead saw '|'. - Evidence: {{delete|not in this project's language [[User:大诺史|大诺史]] ([[User talk:大诺史|Talk/留言/토론/Discussion]]) 07:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)}}
ISSUE: line 1 character 10: Expected '(end)' and instead saw 'not'. - Evidence: {{delete|not in this project's language [[User:大诺史|大诺史]] ([[User talk:大诺史|Talk/留言/토론/Discussion]]) 07:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)}}

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 07:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC).

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Code issues in User:大诺史/common.js

Hi 大诺史, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:大诺史/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ERROR: Cannot parse line 1 column 9: Unexpected token |

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 07:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC).

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

RFA Support

Hi. Since I cannot edit on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Fitindia anymore, I wanted to thank you for your support on my recent successful RFA, Your trust and faith in my candidature is much appreciated and I could not have done it without your support. Warm regards FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 14:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Automobilindustrie Logos

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_JackPilot

Dear all. I tried to improve site "Automobilindustrie" because of some missing Chinese Motor Manufacturer. All other manufactures have got an icon. As far as I could I tried to upload correct images.

https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Automobilindustrie&action=edit&section=4

Affected:

   File:Dongfeng-motor-logo-e68f3eda.jpg

And also:

   File:Changan.png

Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Images have been deleted. Could you help me to find images which fit? br Hans--JackPilot (talk) 06:53, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

@JackPilot: Hello, as per COM:TOO China, China has a very low threshold of originality for copyright protection. As such, you will need to obtain the permission from the creator of the logo and ask him/her to send in their permission to COM:OTRS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:18, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Our independent film poster

Hello. I Have received your message in regards to the fair use contents in some other countries. The film poster in question belongs to our own social project, which is an independent movie, directed and made by ourselves. This is the movies official website https://cromossomo21.com.br/o-filme/ We have first published the poster on our official website and that's why we submitted the CC Mark on our website after having received guidance from another administrator. I am not sure if the message you sent was to just make us aware of it but I would like to understand further as this is our first time in wikimedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RenatoBPassos (talk • contribs) 14:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

best regards, RenatoBPassos

Hello (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion). We have now managed to remove the " All rights reserved" on our website. Please let me know if this now suffices. Our official website: https://cromossomo21.com.br/o-filme/ Thank you for your clarification and assistance and I will await your further comments on the DR page. Kind regards --RenatoBPassos (talk) 00:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC) RenatoBPassos

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Files

Please review this files

@大诺史: Please respond--Roman Medellín (talk) 19:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Rollback

Please be careful rollbacking such as here[4], I'm assuming you'd accidentally caught the rollback button which is fine accidents happen however if it becomes a repeated mistake your rollback rights could be revoked, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 16:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

@Davey2010: Yea.. Thanks for the note. I've been trying to find a script where confirmation is needed when the rollback button is clicked on a mobile interface. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:04, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

You may use User:Eatcha/rollbackconf.js if you wish -- Eatcha (talk) 04:04, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

@Eatcha: Thank you :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Deleting photos from wikimedia

Hey there im MalikOo0ka the copyright holder of the both files (File:BANA.jpgand File:Hana_Shirwan_picture.jpg)i dont know what your problem is with them i have sent proves for both files and still you dont confirm them tell me what do you want from me to send ya so you are going to promote them im getting tired of reposting proves about them i might give up from uploading them like just tell me this and thats all — Preceding unsigned comment added by MalikOo0ka (talk • contribs) 18:24, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

@MalikOo0ka: Hi, please let an OTRS volunteer process the ticket. If ticket is confirmed, I have no further comments. Thanks. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:30, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

關於我上載的圖片被刪除

File:2015TVEETLOGO03.jpg
File:2017TVENEWS01.jpg
File:2019TVEHK01.jpg
File:2007TVELOGO.jpg
File:2010TVELOGO.jpg
File:TVELOGO04.jpg
上面我上載的6張圖片被刪除，這6張圖片是節目片頭的截圖，還有3個網媒公開的LOGO，並且都不是源文件。我不明白為什麼要做刪除？哪裡出了問題？麻煩可以指點一下問題所在，謝謝。SGTVE (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

@SGTVE: 您好。如你所说，圖片是節目片頭的截圖/标志，这就表示它们都只能合理使用。参见华文维基百科方针/共享资源方针。如还有什么不了解，请尽管发问。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:03, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: 謝謝你的回复，我看了一下，意思是不是只要這些圖是用作wikipedia內的圖片就可以了？可是這個我要怎麼上傳設置呢？不好意思我第一次用這個，不是很明白。如果可以的話，麻煩你是否能教我一下。謝謝。SGTVE (talk) 20:24, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

@SGTVE: 如果作者没有在公有领域发布截圖/标志，就不能在C区上载。如果您要在维基百科上载，您就要看看他们的方针。大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

@WhitePhosphorus: Can you help? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hana_Shirwan_picture.jpg

Hey i have sent all the approvement permission stuff the the commons now i want you to remove that tag on the fileMalikOo0ka (talk) 10:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Unclear license

Hi 大诺史! Do you know what this license mean (Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-ND 3.0)? Am I allowed to share the pictures from this video under this license? Perghhh (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

@Perghhh: Hello. Sorry for not replying as I forgot and since your questions are answered at the help desk. I have no further comments. Regards. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:SSF 2019-20 Logo.jpg

Hi 大诺史!

I have already send an email for permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Risu43 (talk) 20:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

@Risu43: Thank you. Please let an OTRS volunteer process the ticket. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Q11912643

Dear 大诺史, I've just try to correct that link that is not working anymore from this identity: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11912643

I'm very new using wikimedia: could you tell me what I did make wrong? If it's a mistake I will restore my changes. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noraes (talk • contribs) 11:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

@Noraes: Hi, which part of the item are you referring to? 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 11:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 13:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Battlefield Bad Company 2.jpg

Hello,

I assume that my photo looks like a downsized, low-quality copy of the original game poster. So I agree that it violates copyrights. But I also found a photo that shows game empty boxes published on Wikimedia Commons. So my question is: will a photo of the booklet with the game CD and maybe the box taken to look like a photo not a scan (or copy) will also be considered as a copyright violation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomasz Jacek Wójcik (talk • contribs) 11:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

@Tomasz Jacek Wójcik: Hello, I've redirected your question to the help desk as I'm unsure about it. Sorry. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 13:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 16:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

special:diff/373822500/373880026

hi, why do you close requests from other users? usually the requester should close his section - as you can see the generated file is still unused - instead of closing you should inform the user at his diskpage and ask him to close the resquest by himself - its also helpful to {{Ping}} the requester if all tasks are done - greets --Mrmw (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

@Mrmw: Hello. I've reverted my edit and pinged the requester. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 16:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Autopatroller

Hi, 大诺史. You have done a lot of good work and your edits do not need to be patrolled anymore, so I just gave you autopatroller right. Thank you for your work! Taivo (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the work you are doing tagging Out of Scope photos for deletion. Keep up the good work. Graham Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

English ∙ español ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ∙ Türkçe ∙ +/−

Hi Minorax/Archive,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ кыргызча ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi 大诺史, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

1989 (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jivajivaka Bird-svg-version.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named `license+` and `license-`.

Hi 大诺史, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

mw.loader.load('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

mw.loader.load('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! -- T Cells^Talk 13:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

@T Cells: Is it just me or the ‘license -‘ button doesn’t work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:40, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

I am sorry for this extremely slow response. I have been very busy offline. What response did you receive when you tried to review files? Regards. T Cells^Talk 08:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

@T Cells: I will be brought to the edit page and a small tab pops up stating that User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js is deprecated. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Try mw.loader.load('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // Regards. T Cells^Talk 13:28, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

@T Cells: Already have it in my common.js. @Majora: Pinging Majora for help. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:39, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

The loading of Visual File Changer from your .js was deprecated many years ago. mw.loader.load( 'ext.gadget.VisualFileChange' ); needs to be removed. You can reactivate VFC in your preferences. The use of that deprecated method is known to cause undesirable things when combined with the license reviewer script. Start with that. --Majora (talk) 02:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@Majora: Nope, still can't. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:46, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Please don't have multiple instances of the script imported. Use only one. You have both ZooFari's and mine listed. --Majora (talk) 21:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

@Majora: I removed ZooFari’s script and yours still in my common.js. However, I can’t seem to find any button to click whatsoever when at the file page. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Never mind, I've sorted it out. Thanks for your help anyways! 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Pixabay files

Hi, if you review a Pixabay file, please use the Pixabay template, see e.g. here. The Pixabay template includes the license, files without it will appear in the Files with no machine-readable license problem category. Jcb (talk) 16:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: I’ll take note of it. Thanks for pointing it out. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Холодный свет при -29 градусах.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 10:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Android10の写真について[About The photo of Android 10.png]

すみません、英語にあまり自信が無いので日本語で書きます...。すいません。
さて、10月に削除依頼が発声した[Andorid10.png]ですがあれは私の携帯(Pixel3XL)のスクリーンショットです。
非フリーではなく私が携帯のゲストユーザーで最低限の設定のみした上でとったものです。
なので、特に問題が無いように思います。

よろしくお願いいたします。
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Google nexus (talk • contribs) 23:19, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Doubts on comment/banning image

I have a few doubts concerning the fair use. I tried following the guidelines stated in the "Non-FreeContent" section (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Meeting_the_no_free_equivalent_criterion) and I mainly took heed to several particular elements:

"Another consideration for "no free equivalent" are "freer" versions of non-free media, typically which include derivative works. For example, a photograph of a copyrighted 3D work of art will also carry the copyright of the photographer in addition to the copyright of the artist that created the work. We would use a photograph where the photographer has licensed their photograph under a free license, retaining the copyright of the derivative work, instead of a photograph that has non-free licenses for both the photograph and work of art. "

"Very often, such as for most non-free content emanating from the news and entertainment industries, meeting this criterion is not in question. "

"where only by including such non-free content, can the reader identify an object, style, or behavior, that is a subject of discussion in the article."

I also paid special attention to sourcing, when uploading the image, in order to meet the criteria "While there is no specific requirement in the non-free content policy to identify the source from which a non-free file was obtained, editors are strongly encouraged to make note of the source on the media's description page; many of the non-free rationale templates already include a field for this information. This can aid in the cases of disputed media files, or evaluating the non-free or free nature of the image. Lacking a source is not grounds for media removal, but if the nature of the media file is disputed, the lack of a source may prevent the file from being retained. Non-free media must be from a published source; the unpublished non-free media is forbidden. Identification of the source will aid in validating the previous publication of the material.

The source information should be sufficiently complete to allow any editor to validate that material. While completeness is not required, editors are encouraged to provide as much source information as they can. Some ways to source media files include: (...) Images from the Internet

   Identifying the URL of the image itself or web page hosting the image, and the image's copyright owner (not necessarily the same as the website's)."

I also found that the image I was trying to post is the same as "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Beowolfposter.jpg" but I did not know how to link it.

The reason for needing such image is that in a brief 15-year span, several productions containing the word "Beowulf" have appeared, they are clearly distinct versions and generally identified through the movie poster. What can I do then? Where did I make the mistake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrothgar82 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

@Hrothgar82: the mistake you made is that you uploaded it here (Wikimedia Commons / https://commons.wikimedia.org ) using the guidelines of the English Wikipedia and non-free files are not allowed here. If you want to upload non-free files like File:Beowulf 2007 Poster - Paramount Pîctures - IMDb 2019.jpg, go to English Wikipedia upload at en:Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. Multichill (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 06:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

COM:HD

@Alexis Jazz: Would appreciate if you could copy the text below to HD. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 12:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

To be honest, I really don't get it when you say that other users are annoying when you're the one making a fuss about the auto-patrolled right. Furthermore, it doesn't even change anything when you edit with the auto-patrolled right. Just that patrollers do not have to patrol your edits knowing that they are good and as Masumrezarock100 mentioned, it is a waste of space in the patrol log. You said "You are like my supervisor, but a supervisor won't take my work away from me." but please think about this, Will a supervisor prefer a worker who does the same amount of work in 30 minutes or someone who takes a whole 30 days to finish the same thing? It takes one to see one, if you think others are annoying, you're most probably annoying too. So far, you've annoyed a total of 6 (more/less, idk.) people, namely, me, Jmabel, Alexis Jazz, Zhuyifei1999, Majora and most probably, Roy17. How? They tried to help you by asked you questions so that they can understand the situation better, but instead of answering them, you misinterpret or don't give a damn about them. The only thing that changes is that your edits will not clog up the RTRC and it is seriously very difficult to sift out bad edits that are squeezed in between your good edits (~1.1k/day). I've said what I wanted to say and if you're going to misinterpret it, then so be it. I'm out. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 12:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I am not Alex but it's

Done. Masum Reza^📞 13:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I like you saying to me, "Will a supervisor prefer a worker who does the same amount of work in 30 minutes or someone who takes a whole 30 days to finish the same thing?" So, I fired myself!--Kai3952 (talk) 22:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 13:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Minorax (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Re: Will a supervisor prefer a worker who does the same amount of work in 30 minutes or someone who takes a whole 30 days to finish the same thing?

I think you asked the wrong question - because my problem is not that I have no idea about efficiency, but about how to use more advanced tools. Can you teach me how?--Kai3952 (talk) 22:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: If you are able to wait for a week, sure. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 01:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: Would appreciate if you could resend the email. Probably lost it while clearing my email. Sorry for the inconvenience. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 11:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Minorax (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Rename

@1997kB: Hi 1997kB, will a block complicate the rename process? I have plans to request an extension of my current block till 13 Dec UTC. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 09:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Hey, As long as it is self requested, there's no issues. Feel free to go for extension. Cheers! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

@~riley: Would you mind extending the block till 13 Dec UTC? 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 10:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Block extended to 13 December UTC. ~riley (talk) 17:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

@ 大诺史 Would you really like to be renamed? --VKras (talk) 10:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

@VKras: Yes, see SRUC. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 10:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Minorax (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

regarding my user account for speedy deletion

Hi, I wish to seek your assistant in regards to this matter, as I may not be familiar with wikipedia after a long period of not using my account almost 10 yers back. My main objectives is to place an image which is required for adding myself as a member of several community. And from my understanding during the old method was all personal images and other related items was to be uploaded and placed within my user profile. Perhaps this may change. I wish that you can assist me on just these few basic items as to where about i should placed these respective items so that i can use them on my other activities on Wikipedia as well as the rest of the other Communities.

Thanking you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isaacandy (talk • contribs) 16:43, 12 December 2019‎ (UTC)

@Isaacandy: I assume that you're talking about your user page on meta. Your userpage looked like a self-promo page and it violates the local policy. Regards, 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 12:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

why would I want any self promo when I've got all my self-promoting on the entire internet. Just try google info about me? And incase you dont realize, I've been a member since 2009. But anyhow, it's up to you what you're doing on these wikipedia. 'I guess if you've got nothing bout yourself to inform others who you are & using it with the intention to share about your expertise to help improve wiki, I too would consider it asself-promoting'. And if I needed to self-promote, I would just go ahead to create a page about myself rather than using the User page which is just a profile page. Afterall, my picture on the article at IndustryWired has already been approved and readily available to be used. Go check what am I contributing on Wiki, at wikitech & Phabricator, instead of being a virtual police picking on updated of profiles of person that has contributed so much to the world out there, trying to improve on Wikipedia. You may go ahead to do what you want. I'll be sure there will be an actual article about myself on wiki which you cant use these types of privileges to remove it. cheers Isaacandy (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

@Isaacandy: Firstly, I have nothing against you. If I have offended you in any way, I'm sorry. Secondly, the policy wasn't set by me but by the community. Thirdly, adding in a list of awards that you're recognized for is self promo and I wasn't the only one who removed unnecessary information from your user page. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 15:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

if there's really nothing against me, I guess these people's profile should be removed as it is as you said "userpage looked like a self-promo page" I'm sure you will do your responsibility in removing theirs as well. As otherwise I'm seeing bias in your decision. I hope that their images will be removed before mine me is, otherwise I will update my profile as how these userpage done to theirs. here's a few of them User:NTymkiv (WMF), User:Sami Mlouhi which fits your criteria as well as self promoting, as I was referencing theirs to update mine Isaacandy (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

@Isaacandy: As mentioned above, your userpage contained a list of awards that you’re recognised for. I nominated your userpage for deletion based on that. And as per what billinghurst said when removing some content from your userpage, “keep it to wikimedia relevant information....”, the userpage of the 2 users you’ve mentioned contains their basic info and what the do on wikimedia projects and not what they’re recognised for (limited to only wikimedia-related stuff). 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 17:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Minorax (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Security Switch example for smartphone.gif

There is no reason to delete this picture - there is no doubt about license this picture was done by me personally using powerpoint ! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:A040:197:D18C:3140:658F:18C9:7718 (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Minorax (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:TikTok Logo.svg

I think there is ongoing sockpuppety on the discussion, those IPs and their same comment "Music note isn't copyrightable". -- CptViraj (📧) 03:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

@CptViraj: Doesn't seem to be open proxies, so I think letting the closing admin decide if the file is to be kept or not. Minorax (talk) 05:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

No problem, Regards. -- CptViraj (📧) 05:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Minorax (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Help Desk query

for an upload of another author's pic please help him. DBig Xrayᗙ 16:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

@DBigXray: Will do. Minorax (talk) 01:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

commented Minorax (talk) 01:37, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Minorax (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

你目前的能力可以幫助哪些事情？

我想知道，你目前的能力可以幫助哪些事情？因為社群那裡有討論過，他們建議我找個中文的人，以解決溝通上問題。因此，我打算將未來遇上工作上難題，請留意「難題」二字，拿過來先找你討論，若不能獲得解決，再拿去社群討論。你意下如何？--Kai3952 (talk) 06:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 我不介意教你怎样用cat-a-lot和其他我熟悉的小工具。注：这些工具并不难用，单它们有自己的技术局限性，所以不能靠它们指望一切。Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 06:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

可是我有說「工作」二字。我覺得那二個問題應該很清楚，是不是我哪裡還有說不清楚？--Kai3952 (talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 抱歉，忘了回答那部分。好的。

This section was archived on a request by: Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 07:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

You made ~985 edits on 27/12, imagine the time taken for the user to patrol your edits

我在RFP有回答。既然你反對，我暫時先停下編輯，直到問題解決，所以我這段時間會一直討論。--Kai3952 (talk) 11:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 你误解了我要传达的意思。很谢谢您为C区所作出的编辑，您的编辑都是好的所以很多用户都要您有autopatroller权限以便他们在巡视时跟容易找出纯粹破坏的编辑。我反对您得到patroller权限只有一个理由，那就是您很少巡视新用户的编辑及上载。我并没有要您停止编辑的意思。Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 11:46, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

注：

autopatoller-自动巡查/巡查豁免权；管理员会把这个权限给可信用户。

patroller-巡查权；管理员会把这个权限给有要巡查新用户的可信用户。

是嗎？我不知道是不是我英文不好，我看到你在RFP是這麼說，所以我認為你表達的意思是：你在12月27日985筆編輯造成巡查問題。既然你意思是如此，我當然會看成你推翻了Alexis Jazz對Autopatrol所解釋的那樣，我才會更加質疑Autopatrol。由此可知，你用中文解釋「autopatoller-自动巡查/巡查豁免权；管理员会把这个权限给可信用户」是不會改變我對Autopatrol的質疑，因為這不是單單只有語言上問題，這就是為什麼社群需要我找中文的人。
Masumrezarock100剛才在RFP也表明了，你看看他在這說的話。如果不是我英文不好，那麼我會將他意思看成是：這是你的問題，沒有人想理會你是要離開還是要留下。其實我明白他要我相信Alexis Jazz，不用擔心會再發生11月29日那件事，若是我不能忘記，一直擔心只會不利於我在C区的生存（也就是他說「事情只會愈來愈糟，最後會沒人幫我」）。

以上二點，我知道你們的意思，決定權在於我，所以沒有人是要我離開Wikimedia Commons（也就是你說「C区」）。但是我知道你們有一個前提條件，就是要我不要再追著這件事不放，以免浪費你們的時間，進而造成阻礙到你們為C区貢獻。其實我也不想妨礙到你們，因為我會追這件事的原因是：

Alexis Jazz搶我的工作，既然11月29日那件事發生，那麼他就會再搶第二次、第三次。如今我有Autopatrol，可是他已經搶了，所以我相信Autopatrol不但不能解決問題，反而問題是在於他開了先例。
Alexis Jazz搶我的工作，但是Commons:Patrol並沒有要他搶別人的工作。他的解釋是說「巡查」，但巡查是用眼睛去看，當發現到不當的編輯（包括破壞），視情況去處置。問題是，他這樣一搶，等於在告訴我編輯是不當的、是破壞的；然而我對巡查的認識是，只要頁面沒有遭受破壞以及上傳的圖片沒有問題，那麼就不能因為大量編輯造成巡查問題而搶我工作。

以上二個原因都來自於Alexis Jazz搶我的工作，他做出這種事就等於是告訴我「我的編輯是不可信賴」，而且他也承認是巡查，那麼這與你們大家所說「可信」是有抵觸、是有矛盾，當然這不是我一開始拒受Autopatrol的原因。現在只要將「Alexis Jazz搶我的工作」這個問題釐清，這不僅能幫我了解為何你在RFP是這麼說，我不會再對Autopatrol感到困惑與不相信，也不會誤解你是要我停止編輯，所以我不是無理取鬧，希望你能幫我。--Kai3952 (talk) 22:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 依照目前情况来看，AJ是不会再次“抢”你的工作。他在29/11“抢”你的工作并不是不说你的编辑是破坏。如果你的编辑是破坏，他反而会回退你的编辑而不是“抢”你的工作。他自己都说了，如果你有autopatroller权限，他就不会干涉你的编辑。其他用户也说了，你的编辑会在他们巡查其他用户时造成阻碍。这并不代表你的编辑不好，而是觉得你的编辑不必被别人巡查。他们是为了方便自己在未被巡查的编辑找出破坏。再次强调，不是你阻碍他们的工作而是如果你的编辑都被自动巡查，他们会跟容易找出破坏。

事情都过了一个月也算成年往事（用词不当但有要我传达的意思），就把它忘了吧。Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 01:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

你的意思是說我在瞎操心還是鑽牛角尖？--Kai3952 (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

To be honest, this is just a waste of my time. Everyone has been trying to help you, but you're not helping yourself and that's the problem. I took the initiative to help you when you asked if you can come to me when you face any difficulties. However this is not the case, you're just nitpicking at whatever anyone else says and make a fuss over it. Again and again you misinterpret the meaning of a sentence, I (and not only me) specifically asked you to just forget about it and AJ won't put his head into any of your business anymore but you still worry about it for god knows what reason. Kindly refrain from coming to me anymore. Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 04:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 07:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Reply to your message

Hi minorax

The photo I uploaded is not under fair use, it’s entirely owned by me and created by me. I have all the rights for it. Anuragjha17 (talk) 14:22, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

@Anuragjha17: Hi, kindly send in your permission to COM:OTRS for verification. Sorry for the hassle. Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 14:37, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 07:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)