User talk:M0tty/archives 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, M0tty/archives 1!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, cela donne : `Image:Foo.jpg` Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : `{{bad name\|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}}` Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

Siebrand 20:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Classification des images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Bonjour !

Merci de contribuer à Wikimedia Commons. Gardez à l'esprit que les images déposées sur le serveur doivent pouvoir être utilisées par l'ensemble des utilisateurs des projets Wikimedia. Ceci n'est possible que si vos images peuvent être trouvées par d'autres que vous.

Nous avons élaboré un système de classification par catégories dans lequel vous devriez intégrer les images que vous déposez ici, de façon à permettre aux autres de les trouver en parcourant l'arbre des catégories. Ceci signifie que vous devez ranger les images dans les bonnes catégories et éventuellement les ajouter aux galeries, ces pages qui couvrent un sujet donné (voir Commons:Catégories).

Pour trouver des catégories pertinentes pour vos images, vous pouvez vous aider de l'outil CommonSense. À travers cette galerie, vous pourrez obtenir un récapitulatif pratique des fichiers que vous avez déposés sur Commons.

Ce qui est important, c'est que les images soient placées quelque part dans la structure générale. Il y a actuellement un grand nombre d'images sans aucun lien avec notre système de classification par catégories. Si vous désirez donner un coup de main pour ranger certaines de ces images à un endroit judicieux où on pourra les trouver, n'hésitez pas !

Merci. Siebrand 20:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ganymede_carthage_black_font.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ganymede_carthage_black_font.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 20:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Salut M00tty,

Pourrais-tu aussi t'occuper du fond de cette photo en passant le fond en noir ? Merci d'avance Moumou82 19:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup !! C'est parfait Moumou82 16:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, M0tty!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Image:Similitude CC.svg is uncategorized since 2 July 2009.
Image:Schéma de principe d'une turbine.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Schéma de principe d'un compresseur.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Héraldique - meuble - Roue.svg was uncategorized on 17 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 1715301405f30bfcdf72839015b15029

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token c8033fd17765e8a6dcc3eba087e8459b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Erreur sur File:Tram Paris T3 Plan.svg

Salut,

Je n'arrive pas à modifier le fichier moi même, mais il me semble qu'il y ait une erreur sur le plan de ligne. La station "Porte de Vanves" est orthographiée "Portes de Vanves". Est-ce que tu peux le corriger ? Merci beaucoup! Lucasbfr (talk) 17:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

QI

Quand tu voulais supporter en QI il faut changer le mot "Nomination" á "Promotion" et signer encore une fois --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrail01 - Saints-Michel-et-Gudule.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very Good. -- Der Wolf im Wald 21:55, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhamphorhynchus munsteri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would erase the number --Mbdortmund 15:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC) Info Removed number, thx ! --M0tty 15:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Vitrail03 - Saints-Michel-et-Gudule.JPG

Bonjour. Il y avait quelque chose qui me gênait, en effet, dans la perspective de ton image. Je voudrais bien maintenant participer à la promotion de ce vitrail en QI, mais désormais, il penche nettement. Les lignes qui devraient être horizontales ne le sont pas du tout. Pardon de te harceler ! Crois-tu pouvoir améliorer ça ? Cordialement --Jebulon (talk) 09:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assyrian Relief - British Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrail03 - Saints-Michel-et-Gudule.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Something wrong in the perspective, which must be corrected in the right above side IMO.--Jebulon 08:18, 21 August 2010 (UTC) Info I have modified the perspective. Better ? --M0tty 16:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC) Info A new version, again... --M0tty 11:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)much better now. Last questions: Are you sure of the scale (wideness)? Is the rosace above oval in reality ? ;)--Jebulon 14:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Yes, i'm sure, the rosace is circular ;) thx ! --M0tty 16:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Staline_and_Kliment_Iefremovitch_Vorochilov.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Staline_and_Kliment_Iefremovitch_Vorochilov.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Staline_and_Kliment_Iefremovitch_Vorochilov.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sciurus carolinensis in St James's Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit blurry but great composition IdLoveOne 09:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chocolate truffle - Godiva 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, lighting and decent depth. -- IdLoveOne 06:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chocolate box - Marcolini 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great sharpness. IdLoveOne 00:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macarons Marcolini 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great quality dessert. IdLoveOne 00:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coupole du Palais de Justice de Bruxelles 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 17:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Needs more aligning I think IdLoveOne 00:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Blason du National Socialist Movement usa.svg

File:Blason du National Socialist Movement usa.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Béria Lima ^msg 09:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Blason_du_National_Socialist_Movement_usa.svg

File:Blason_du_National_Socialist_Movement_usa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--MGuf (d) 09:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

French subs

Hi M0tty, I see you edite4d the subs of the italian videoguide about Wikisource. i would like to ask you if it's ready, so I can upload it on Youtube... --Aubrey (talk) 08:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tintoret - La Resurrezione.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Ximonic 13:29, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conegliano - Madonna Dell'Arancio tra i santi Ludovico da Tolosa e Girolamo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Ximonic 13:29, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Francesco Hayez - Distruzione des tempio di Gerusalemme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 08:18, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arsenale - Dantes - Inferno - Venise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good contrast, fine sharpness, very good crop! Looks like a picture in a frame!--PereslavlFoto 17:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Chocolate box - Marcolini 03.jpg

File:Chocolate box - Marcolini 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Miguel Bugallo 16:09, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Resurrection by Tintoretto (the Academia Galleries, Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Comment The scope is not suitable. We should discuss whether the painter's name followed by the name of the work is admissible. Who has an opinion? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment - This scope name means that the nominated painting is the most representative piece of the whole creative work by Tintoretto. It is almost impossible proposition. Obviously, the scope is too broad. The scope names in VI project when works of art are nominated is: ""Name of the work by Name of the author". In this case the scope name should be: The Resurrection by Tintoretto. However, here comes a complication because of the name. It is very likely for an artist of this period to have more than one painting with this name. This means that the nominated image presents the best depiction of the Resurrection by Tintoretto. With this remark, this is OK for me. The open question is: Since Tintoretto is a prominent artist what if we want all reproductions of his works to obtain a VI status? --MrPanyGoff 20:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment - This painting is the most representative of the Venetian painting and the painting of Tintoret. Tintoret painted some resurrection, but this one is significant. --M0tty (talk) 22:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment The Resurrection is not mentioned by en:Tintoretto and I don't see La Resurrezione in it:Tintoretto either. I don't dispute that this work is significant, but Miracle of the Slave may be more notable than this work. This image is not geocoded, but could be (criterion #5. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment The picture is geocoded via the model {{Institution:Gallerie dell'Accademia (Venice)}} and I think that the scope could be "Resurrection in painting" maybe. --M0tty (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Comment Geocoded: yes, but I think it would be helpful if the cited template would produce a link to toolserver.org/~para/GeoCommons in the same manner as {{Location}}. It is kind to the reviewer to choose an existing category or gallery as a scope, e.g., Category:Resurrection of Christ so that the reviewer may easily see the competing images. But that scope may be too broad. I'm not sure that this image is more valued than one of en:Resurrection of Christ (Raphael)/it:Resurrezione di Cristo (Raffaello). Please see Commons:Valued image scope for more on choosing a scope. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:09, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Comment - So, to sum up, you should choose the main purpose of your nomination: The Resurrection of Christ as a theology event or The particular painting by Tintoretto. In other words, considering the VI topics - Concepts and ideas/Religious or Works of art/Paintings and pictorial arts. Choose one of them please and then we can go ahead.--MrPanyGoff 06:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment - Ok ! I understand. I think that The particular painting by Tintoretto is a good scope. It's ok for you ? --M0tty (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

If you choose as your target this particular painting by Tintoretto then the scope name is: The Resurrection by Tintoretto. As I mention above there are more paintings by Tintoretto called The Resurrection (here one of them). So we should add the place of the painting and scope become The Resurrection by Tintoretto (Gallerie dell'Accademia, Venice).--MrPanyGoff 12:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC) The problem is that I searched for this painting in big web galleries (here 1 and here 2) but couldn't find it. Are you sure that this painting is by Jacopo Tintoretto? Isn't it a fragment of some wall fresco? Can you provide some links which give information about it?--MrPanyGoff 12:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

I am sure that this photography is of Tintoretto, its number of category is 215 in the accademia di belle arti of Venice.

I must rename the image, or simply the scope? --M0tty (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

I fixed the scope in the way that I think it should be. It links to the category created by me, which collects the Tintoretto works in Gallerie dell'Accademia. Hope all to be happy now ;)--MrPanyGoff 20:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Support Good for me with this scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:00, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macadam-1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. We don't have that many good textures. Usefull picture. --Coyau 09:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sable02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. We don't have that many good textures. Usefull picture. --Coyau 09:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sable03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chocolate truffle - Delacre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 17:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macadam-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sable02-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 00:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arche - Rhodes 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Remembers me something, but what ?...--Jebulon 15:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Yes, I took the same image as you one year ago ;-) --M0tty 15:40, 22 May 2011 (UTC) It's a nice place, isn't it ?--Jebulon 15:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Yes, it is ! And beautiful weather ! --M0tty 16:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC) hum hum, not every day in april, as you can see...--Jebulon 16:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavés02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments May be the right side should be really vertical. --Coyau 09:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC) Comment Ok, I corrected. --M0tty 20:47, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
QI now. --Coyau 00:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biscuit - Delacre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 05:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your own QI-Category

Hi M0tty,

I have setup the Category:Quality images by M0tty. Please add in the future new QI in this category. Thank you. Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granite ram of Amun with King Taharqa - British Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guard at Horse Guard Parade building - London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great quality. --Tomer T 16:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Info It is british Royal Horse Artillery--Jebulon 23:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Now used in articles.--Jebulon 23:47, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Ton avis

Bonjour. J'aimerais avoir ton avis concernant une retouche que j'ai faite. L'original est mon fichier File:Roland 1.JPG. Comme on ne voit pas bien la sculpture devant les bâtiments, je l'ai "détouré". En fait j'ai coupé et fini avec la gomme. Il y a probablement une façon plus élégante, mais je n'ai pas trouvé mieux. Le résultat

. Ma question: Dois-je reprendre les contours, surtout autour de la tête? Merci de donner ton avis. Traumrune (talk) 19:49, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

J'ai essayé de suivre tes conseils. Mais j'ai dû prendre les mauvaises outils dans gimp (sélection par couleur). Résultat: entre la statue et le fond gris-noir j'ai un trait clair irrégulier. Je n'ai pas téléversé l'image. Je reprendrai le tout plus tard. Je réussirai bien de comprendre un jour. Traumrune (talk) 22:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour tes conseils. Je crois qu'un de mes problèmes est ce canal alpha. Je suis très lent à comprendre le fonctionnement de Gimp et comme ma vue fatigue vite, je ne peux jamais passer plus qu'une heure sur un logiciel de retouches photos. Ce qui m'intrigue en plus: la coloration d'une image n'est pas identique sur mon ordinateur et la même téléversée sur commons. Je reprendrai le tout à partir de l'original. En attendant, est-ce mieux de reverter la version avec fond foncé? N'hésite pas de le faire directement, si nécessaire. Amicalement Traumrune (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Que penses-tu de la dernière version? Je crois que je n'ai pas réussi de suivre tous tes conseils, mais pour l'instant je ne peux pas faire mieux. Il me faut encore quelques mois d'entrainement sur le logiciel. Traumrune (talk) 15:21, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Oui, la version me convient. D'ailleurs, ton analyse de mes erreurs est tout à fait exacte. Mais entre le constat du problème et la solution.... Traumrune (talk) 21:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coca-cola 50cl can - Italia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 20:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The Life of St. Ursula cycle by Vittore Carpaccio.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The Life of St. Ursula cycle by Vittore Carpaccio.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Ca' d'Oro

Tes 3 photos du pavement sont bonnes, je les ai re-catégorisées car elles font partie du bâtiment pas des collections. Si tu faisais un Set de ces 3 images dans VI je serais heureux de le soutenir. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Très bien seul problème le scope. Le libellé peut prêter à confusion avec le "Terrazzo alla veneziana" qui désigne tout autre chose, je suggère : "Ca' d'oro (Venice)- Pavement". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Voilà. si tu veux le rajouter c'est du marbre blanc, du porphyre et de la serpentine. Reviens souvent dans ce label qui est un peu délaissé mais qui est pourtant utile. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ca' d'Oro - pavés 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ca' d'Oro - pavés 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ca' d'Oro - pavés 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Ca' d'oro (Venice) - Pavement.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Ca' d'oro (Venice) - Pavement.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:01, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Ambigu

À propos de l'image File:Titian - L'arcangelo Raffaele e Tobiolo.jpg, j'y lis Merci de ne pas copier l'image en ignorant les termes de la licence ci-dessous, comme si elle était dans le domaine public. Cela ne rentrerait pas en contradiction avec la licence figurant au dessous indiquant « Cette image est dans le domaine public car son copyright a expiré. ». J'avoue ne pas bien comprendre cette précision contradictoire et j'aimerai de plus amples explications (étant l'auteur également de photographies d'œuvres exposées. Question posée également au bistro). --- Salutations. louis-garden pinxit (On en cause) 09:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Photos de synagogue de Wasselonne

Bonjour, Mille mercis pour le travail réalisé et sa rapidité d'exécution. --Ctruongngoc (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments

Hello M0tty, The File:Vanne de dérivation d'eau - Château de Dieupart à Aywaille.jpg doesn't contain the identifier, and because of that this file isn't eligible for Wiki Loves Monuments in Belgium and Luxembourg. All files must contain the identifier. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 03:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia_Belgium_logo.png

File:Wikimedia_Belgium_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Benn Newman (talk) 16:40, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

architecture en Belgique

Je suis un peu ennuyé avec votre initiative visant à enforcer des règles d'auteur plutôt stricte et ridicule (concernant les œuvres d'architecture en Belgique). Je sais que ce n'est pas ma place de décider quelle est la loi, mais certaines de ces photos ont été en usage pendant des années, apparemment sans problème. Une politique de supprimage tellement stricte est à mon avis une perte de temps. Jusqu'à ce que le propriétaire de l'immeuble ou la famille de l'architecte se plaint, et l'auteur du photo est clair, quel intérêt y at-il à supprimer ces photos? Je vous supplie de mettre votre énergie dans une une autre direction. Si vous insistez sur une politique stricte à cet égard, une certaine forme d'avertissement devrait être placé sur les pages wiki pertinentes pour empêcher les gens de perdre leur temps en prenant et en téléchargeant ces photos. cordialement, Peregrine981 (talk) 13:37, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

It is certainly true that the law in Belgium isn't that much clear that there can be drawn an easy policy out of that. What I read about the matter is that files can be used unless the family specifically does not want that. When the family does not want that, like witht he Atomium, than it should be removed, otherwise there is in Belgian law no reason for that.This matter isn't straight lined as it sometimes is projected. If no lawyer is consulted on this matter, conclusions for deleting are taken too early. User:Peregrine981 is right. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 21:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Je comprends vos préoccupations, M0tty. Cependant, je suis intéressé par l'opinion de Romaine à ce sujet. Peut-être cette affaire n'est pas aussi claire que vous le dites? S'il ya une situation légalement definsible pour couvrir ces photos, je pense que nous devrions essayer de l'utiliser. Des pensées? Peregrine981 (talk) 09:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel communal de Schaerbeek (2) - 2264-0007-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality, good perspective but the street on the lower right side is underexposed --Someone35 11:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park of the Cinquantenaire - Royal Museums of Art and History, Brussels, 2010 (HDR 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality although it looks a bit blurry for some reason --Someone35 11:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église du Sablon - Brussels - Stained glass (09) - 2043-0007-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for meJean-Pol GRANDMONT 15:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église du Sablon - Brussels - Stained glass (06) - 2043-0007-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 15:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église du Sablon - Brussels - Stained glass (08) - 2043-0007-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, almost identical filenames and images. Please do not upload 5 images that look exactly the same with an almost identical filename.--Someone35 16:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC) Is the name of the file important? The main thing is the photo taken individually. In what is it more difficult to judge these photos because they have the same name and because they represent similar things? --M0tty 21:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC) It is more difficult to judge it because reviewers can easily confuse between the photos because they look almost identical and have an almost identical subject...--Someone35 12:58, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Support QI for me. Jakubhal 07:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église du Sablon - Brussels - Stained glass (05) - 2043-0007-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, almost identical filenames and images. Please do not upload 5 images that look exactly the same with an almost identical filename.--Someone35 16:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Support QI for me. Jakubhal 07:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église du Sablon - Brussels - Stained glass (02) - 2043-0007-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, almost identical filenames and images. Please do not upload 5 images that look exactly the same with an almost identical filename.--Someone35 16:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
For me it is QI. --Jakubhal 08:46, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église du Sablon - Brussels - Stained glass (03) - 2043-0007-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Image moves

Please be aware that image moves such as [1], [2], and [3], are not in line with policy, and should not be performed in the future. The old names were long, but fully accurate, and thus should not have been renamed. Thank you. Courcelles (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

No big deal, just remember that the rename templates are written by editors who are usually not familiar with the rules for renaming files, so a lot of requests that shouldn't be done to get asked for. Happy editing, and thanks for helping with that perpetual backlog :) Courcelles (talk) 06:53, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

I made a mistake in an ending

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:UTC_hue4map_X_region_Europe.png.svg&diff=60643312&oldid=60280613

can you change UTC_hue4map_X_region_Europe.png.svg -> UTC_hue4map_X_region_Europe.svg ?

Thanks a lot!

TZ master (talk) 18:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Je voudrais ton avis

Salut M0tty !

Ayant intégré depuis peu l'équipe des filemovers, je voudrais ton avis sur mes interventions, notamment sur celle concernant File:Lithuania coa.gif dont la synthèse se trouve sur sa PdD.

Suis-je excessif ? Correct ? Merci de m'éclairer. Papatt (talk) 07:23, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

P.S. : une copie quasi conforme du cas se présente pour File:Coat of arms Lithuania Grand.png.

Hello,

Je suis moi-même un tout nouveau Filemover, et je préfères donc laisser aux plus expérimentés que moi s'attaquer à des cas complexes. Pour le moment j'essaye d'y aller avec des pincettes, même si j'ai déjà fait des erreurs. Le mieux c'est de bien consulter les règles de renommage et de toujours s'y rapporter.

Cordialement. --M0tty (talk) 07:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Oui, c'est clair que renommer des "Uploader requested" ne pose pas de souci. :)

Bin sinon j'analyse les éléments qu'ils donnent pi si je trouve une raison concordante dans la liste je fais.

Bon, je sais aussi dire non (la preuve) et quand je doute je laisse trainer. Va bien y avoir quelqu'un pour ramasser. :)

Dommage qu'il n'y ait pas de "club des filemovers", on pourrait échanger nos impressions et notre expérience.

@ + ! :) Papatt (talk) 08:06, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear M0tty,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 23:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Move

Thanks for moving File:An Exposition of the Old and New Testament - vol 1.djvu. Heyzeuss (talk) 12:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

File:A New School on the old Ashgrove Estate and its history - geograph.org.uk - 919317.jpg

Merci beaucoup d'avoir deplace cette image. -- Trevj (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Friendly reminder

Hello. Just a friendly reminder: please follow all of the instructions when nominating files for deletion including listing the DR in the public log and notifying the uploader. Thank you. Wknight94 ^talk 14:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Justus Lipsius building

You may be interested in developments at : Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Justus Lipsius building, dealing again with Belgian FOP law. Best, Peregrine981 (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Merci

Juste un petit merci pour ta rapidité d’exécution concernant ma demande de renommage de File:Galérie d'évacuation du Tunnel de Ponserand.jpg et de File:Accès au Tunnel de Ponserand.jpg
Cj73 (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Head of a statue of a youth, semi-nude, in heroic pose (so-called Britannicus) - Mostra di Nerone - Palatin hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, even with this high resolution. For a better composition, it needs maybe a crop above because of too much empty space. IMO, try to have the same distance between ears and edge, and between top of head and edge.--Jebulon 16:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Modèle "boite déroulante" sur Commons

Bonjour Motty ! Je suis en train de classer mes photos sur ma page [4] (voir ma page Utilisateur) et je souhaiterai utiliser une boite déroulante pour limiter la hauteur des pages (nombreuses photos). Le modèle ne fonctionne pas sur Commons. En connais-tu un STP ? Merci d'avance ! Etxeko (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Résultat du Concours Wiki Love Monuments (Belgique) 2011

Bonjour Motty,

Merci pour vos félicitations et votre réponse rapide. Je vais suivre votre conseil et prendre contact avec l'utilisateur MADe comme vous le préconisez.

Amicalement.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Could you please help clarifying this question? Thanks! Samat (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Renommage de fichiers

Merci pour le prompt renommage de mes deux photos ! Ariadacapo (talk) 12:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

感謝

Bonjour Motty, Merci beaucoup ! pour renommer le File:Gabriel Voisin and Henry Farman.jpg.

どうもありがとう！

--Tokorokoko (talk) 11:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

	Hello, M0tty. You have new messages at Rotatebot's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Central and Eastern Europe around 950 AD.png

Merci beaucoup!--Codrin.B (talk) 02:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

File:North Santaim River at Niagara County Park.jpg

Hi M0tty; Please take care to follow the criteria of Commons:FR#What_files_should_be_renamed.3F.[5] Many of our editors are not familiar with the enumerated rename criteria. Also, please avoid introducing obvious errors in file names (e.g. wrong proper noun; Santiam not"Santaim"). Please note that it is "best to leave all files with generally valid names at their locations, even if slightly better names may exist." Thank you, --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cima da Conegliano - L'Arcangelo con Tobiolo e due santi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment To much grainy with ISO 1600 -- Focus finder 18:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

The Dakar Rally map

Hello! I saw your fantastic map of the 2012 Dakar Rally and wonder if I can translate it into Swedish? Of course with you as the original uploader. Sincerely, Green Yoshi (^t_c) 12:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Tour Eiffel de nuit (réponse)

Un grand merci pour l'info, je vais pas tarder à ajouter ma photo dans la flaque d'eau;) --213.189.165.3 17:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anton Raphael Mengs, The Triumph of History over Time (Allegory of the Museum Clementinum), ceiling fresco in the Camera dei Papiri, Vatican Library, 1772 - M0tty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks like a QI to me. --Villy Fink Isaksen 09:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Triumph of History over Time by Anton Raphael Mengs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pietro - Lorenzo Veneziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Pourrais-tu ajouter une description en français ? --Yann 07:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nicolò di Pietro - San Lorenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Pourrais-tu ajouter une description en français ? --Yann 07:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Anton Raphael Mengs, The Triumph of History over Time (Allegory of the Museum Clementinum), ceiling fresco in the Camera dei Papiri, Vatican Library, 1772 - M0tty.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anton Raphael Mengs, The Triumph of History over Time (Allegory of the Museum Clementinum), ceiling fresco in the Camera dei Papiri, Vatican Library, 1772 - M0tty.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Communes france-fr.svg

15:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC),

Bonjour,

Nous nous sommes croisés sur cette page. J'espère ne pas avoir commis d'erreur. Je n'ai surtout pas voulu vous froisser.

Très cordialement,

Βερναρδ [✍]-

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Early replicas of Mona Lisa..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Adminship

Bonjour,

Dis, ce n'est pas la première fois que tu demandes une édition d'une page protégée sur Commons. En outre, tu as suffisamment d'expérience pour connaître les usages de ce projet.

Vois-tu une objection à ce que je te présente pour l'adminship ? --Dereckson (talk) 08:08, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Voilà, c'est fait sur Commons:Administrators/Requests.

Il ne te reste plus qu'à valider avec un petit mot signifiant que tu acceptes celle-ci, genre I accept the nomination., en bas de la présentation. --Dereckson (talk) 19:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Merci pour ta photo Marcolini, elle est très réussie et va m'être utile dans le cadre d'une petite présentation sur l'historique de la praline. Dereckson (talk) 20:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jehan Bellegambe - Panneau central d'un triptyque - la vierge à l'enfant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

QI Candidates du 28 Février

Bonjour,je viens de regarder vos quatre photos de statues sur des fonds unis. La photo elle-même est parfaite à chaque fois, et j'aime beaucoup le choix de la couleur de fond, mais le détourage pose problème sur trois d'entre elles (un seul endroit à droite sous la signature pour le buste d'André Lens, pratiquement négligeable ; la jambe droite et le bras droit de l'Hercule ainsi que son épaule gauche ; le bras droit et le pied droit de l'ange ainsi que son front, où le contour semble même modifié). J'ai déjà remplacé l'arrière-plan de plusieurs photos et je sais que la sélection automatique n'est pas fiable à 100%. Pour les zones "à risque", je préfère utiliser dans Photoshop le lasso polygonal réglé à 1 pixel en agrandissant fortement l'image, mais ce n'est qu'une suggestion. En vous souhaitant une bonne journéee, --Vassil (talk) 13:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gilles Lambert Godecharle - André Lens, peintre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much better crop and detail compared to the ones with the red background. --Niabot 10:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gilles Lambert Godecharle - Jeanne Catherine Offhuys, épouse de Gilles-Lambert Godecharle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--Vassil 12:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Administrator

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Félicitations M0tty ! Tu es maintenant pourvu des droits d'administrateur sur le site. Avant de te lancer dans les effacements de page, protections de page, blocages de compte ou modifications de pages protégées, il n'est pas inutile de relire attentivement la page Commons:Administrateurs et de placer dans ta liste de suivi les pages s'y rapportant (notamment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, Commons:Demandes de suppression). La plupart des actions d'administrateurs sont réversibles par les autres sysops, à l'exception des fusions d'historiques qui doivent donc être traitées avec précaution.

Il est possible de discuter directement avec d'autres admins sur IRC : #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Il existe également un canal dédié aux admins de Commons, qui peut être utile pour les sujets sensibles ou la coordination entre administrateurs : #wikimedia-commons-admin.

Tu peux également rejoindre #wikimedia-admin, le canal de coordination inter-wiki pour les administrateurs Wikimedia. Demande à n'importe quel channel operator de t'accorder une dispense d'invitation (alternativement n'importe qui sur le canal peut t'y inviter temporairement). Tous les admins de tous les projets y sont bienvenus.

La lecture de Commons:Guide to adminship peut s'avérer enrichissante.

Merci de vérifier ou d'ajouter ton nom à la liste des administrateurs et les autres listes, par langue et par date, qui y sont mentionnées.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Félicitations et bonne chance! -- RE rillke questions? 16:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Bonne chance avec tes outils. --Dereckson (talk) 19:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Enough!

Stop deleting my own work!!!! I admitted the others were copyright, and you deleted it anyways. Well, if you delete mine, then you add the perfect roommate poster yourself. It looks plain without the poster.

--97.119.202.169 22:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)AshleyLeggat26--97.119.202.169 22:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Deleting duplicates

Hi,

When you delete duplicate files, can you ensure that you create a redirect at the same time? For example, File:SGN-PL SW ambasada BW.PNG should now be a redirect to File:SGN-PL SW ambasador BW.PNG. The best way to do this is to use the green "process duplicates" button on the duplicate template, not the bin.

If the file has been uploaded recently (~a week) then this doesn't matter.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

The button should work OK, I'm won't be much help in working out why it doesn't for you. It may be a conflict in your browser or javascript. If you can't figure it out, I suggest you contact User:Rillke and explain the problem - he is more likely to be able to help.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter Paul Rubens - L'adoration des Mages.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 00:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

File:OMON-AK-74.jpg

What do you mean on "File not exist"? If you have tried to undo my edit, first colon in redirect also must be removed. And after for what purpose you have kept redirect? Alex Spade (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, there are no reason to delete the redirection. So I prefer keep them. Regards. --M0tty (talk) 13:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

I disagree with keeping of junk, but don't want to argue. However you haven't answered on second sentence - why did you keep first colon in redirect (use construction REDIRECT [[:File: instead initial REDIRECT [[File:) instead full undo? Alex Spade (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

File:NASA Evolution of the Moon.ogv

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Macedonian Presidential CoA

You can explain why you think the PNG is not a scaled down duplicate of the SVG at this DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seal of the President of Macedonia.png Fry1989 ^eh? 19:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you, M0tty, for your help in dealing with User:Prescotte. It was getting so frustrating to find copyrighted photos on Wikipedia's "TheBus (Honolulu)" article daily and see the same copyrighted photos over and over again. Thanks for your quick action! Aoi (talk) 15:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

File:BSicon_vexSTR-exBHF.svg

Bonjour. Porquoi tu a créé cette «redirect»? Le nom est controversée, et encore en discussion. Merci.

~~(vexSTR-exBHF)~~ OK: (exvSTR-BHF). Useddenim (talk) 01:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Image moves #2

Did you notice that the rename request for File:Coreopsis bigelovii NPS.jpg had just been refused and the requester had just re-requested it? Such rename requests (to make minor improvements) do not actually conform with guidelines. This specific type of request is actually cited in Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_not_be_renamed.3F. --Tony Wills (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Quinten Metsys - Triptyque de la confrérie de Sainte-Anne à Louvain.jpg

Please fix the small error across the top of the middle panel. Wonderful work... suggest FP once fixed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Bravo !

Bonjour,

Bravo pour tes reproductions de tableaux. C'est parmi les meilleures faites par des contributeurs de Commons. Félicitations, Yann (talk) 18:24, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinten Metsys - Triptyque de la confrérie de Sainte-Anne à Louvain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Très bien. -- JLPC 10:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Convertir .mp4

Salut ! Tu pourrais me convertir un fichier .mp4 en .ogg theora s'il te plait ?
Comment te passé-je la vidéo à convertir ?
Cdlt, --Orikrin1998 15:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

[6] --Orikrin1998

11:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Si tu pouvais en même temps la zipper ça serait super gentil. --Orikrin1998

11:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernard van Orley - Triptyque Haneton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great reproduction. --Yann 18:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jacques-Louis David - Mars désarmé par Vénus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great reproduction. --Yann 18:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jan Van Dornicke ? - Triptyque de l'abbaye de Dielegem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great reproduction. --Yann 18:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieter Aertsen - La cuisinière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IdQ. --JLPC 19:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joseph Stallaert - La mort de Didon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great reproduction. --Yann 18:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gustave Wappers - Épisode des Journées de septembre 1830 sur la place de l'Hôtel de Ville de Bruxelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great reproduction. --Yann 18:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

!!!

Pour avoir zippé et converti une vidéo, cette étoile à mettre dans ta page de récompenses ! --Orikrin1998 12:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Mais, la vidéo ne marche pas ! Comme tu l'as zippée, elle est maintenant en .ogV et ce n'est pas le bon format. Il y a une manipulation simple qui m'aurait échappée ? En attendant, je garde ton étoile au frais. --Orikrin1998

12:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

+1

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Quinten Massijs - Triptych of Quinten Metsys..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:La foire d'Impruneta - d'après Jacques Callot.jpg

J'ai trouvé la source de ta superbe photo, ça se passe par par ici au musée Lorrain de Nancy. Voilà, ça m'a fait sourire. --PierreSelim (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Quinten Metsys - Triptyque de la confrérie de Sainte-Anne à Louvain.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quinten Metsys - Triptyque de la confrérie de Sainte-Anne à Louvain.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Jacopo Tintoretto

Est-ce possible que cette category obtient à toutes deux categories parentes category:Renaissance painters from Italy et category:Mannerist painters from Italy. Je voudrais préférer seulement la category:Mannerist painters from Italy. Et alors une autre question pour sorter: par exemple "Antonello da Messina" est dans lettre "D", c'est juste? MerciOursana (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

File:EURO 2012 fans.jpg et File:Polish fans on the road (2).jpg

Salut, j'ai un petit problem. J'ai importé un fiche File:Polish fans on the road (2).jpg et après j'ai le modifié (les coulerurs, un contraste etc.). Après ça quelqu'un a importe la même photo sous le nom File:EURO 2012 fans.jpg. J'ai mis le modèle Duplicate mais tu a enlevé le fiche plus tôt (et déjà modifié). Quelque chose n'est pas bon... Excuse-moi mon français. ARvєδuι ⁺ 00:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

It's not a case that I can't or I don't know how to upload a file. You just deleted already one that have already been edited, improved, and you left photo marked as a duplicate. Never mind, I fortunately still have this edited one in my bin. ARvєδuι ⁺ 11:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Conversion vidéo

Je t'avais dit que j'aurais encore besoin de tes services :-) (Cf. ma page de discussion).

Donc, voudrais-tu convertir ceci s'il te plait ?

Merci ! --Orikrin1998 17:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Je n'arrive pas à la télécharger.

Click droit, enregistrer...Et là, il me propose un format HTML et le téléchargement ne démarre même pas... --Orikrin1998

12:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Réponse chez moi. --Orikrin1998

17:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

MP4 > OGG

Je suis encore désolé pour la dernière fois, j'espère que ce n'est pas trop de travail que de faire ce que je te demande sinon c'est vraiment vache ce que j'ai fait.

J'ose espérer que tu ne m'en veux pas encore trop pour refuser de me convertir cette vidéo-ci, qui cette fois n'a aucune raison d'être annulée à la dernière minute.

[7]

Merci. --Orikrin1998 10:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Photos

Bonjour, merci pour ton intervention et pour la suppression de la photo, maintenant, j'ai une question (qui est peut être un marronnier ) - Existe t'il un moyen rapide de savoir quelles sont les photos que j'ai téléchargées qui illustrent des articles sans avoir à cliquer sur chacune d'entre elles ? bonne continuation --Lomita (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, merci beaucoup pour cette réponse, aucun problème pour le délai, moi aussi je vais bientôt partir - Bonne journée --Lomita (talk) 11:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suricata suricatta in the London Zoo (01).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goat cheese with thymus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. --Coyau 16:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Oops

This deletion as part of a replacement would seem to be a breach of process for a speedy deletion. It is a file mismatch from PNG to SVG, which usually requires a formal discussion, and you may also note cannot be undertaken by CommonsDelinker. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)