User talk:Léna/2009-2012

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Léna!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Léna!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tree (for subtrees).png is uncategorized since 15 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Replacement pénalité ST Racing 2011.jpg was uncategorized on 12 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Mêlée écroulée ST Racing 2011.jpg was uncategorized on 12 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Replacement aile pénalité ST Racing 2011.jpg was uncategorized on 12 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Mêlée ST Racing 92 2011.jpg was uncategorized on 12 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Nieuwe Kerk (Amsterdam).jpg was uncategorized on 17 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Musée école Nancy.jpg was uncategorized on 1 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 08:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Musée de l'École de Nancy garden.jpg was uncategorized on 1 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 08:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Monument funéraire de épouse de Jules Rais, détail 6.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Façade musée école de Nancy 3.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Le Peintre sur Faïence.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Monument funéraire de épouse de Jules Rais, détail 3.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Façade musée école de Nancy 2.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Stained glass windows in the Musée de l'École de Nancy.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Huiles, muséum Toulouse.jpg was uncategorized on 18 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Université de Barcelone, nouveau.jpg was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:University of Barcelona, verre.jpg was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Christ à la croix par Antoine Guépin, visage.jpg was uncategorized on 1 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Sainte femme, ou Vierge de l'Annonciation.jpg was uncategorized on 7 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Centaure et harpie, côté harpie.jpg was uncategorized on 8 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Escalier Darcy, détail.jpg was uncategorized on 8 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Vallée du Tibre, campagne romaine, détail 1.jpg was uncategorized on 11 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Vallée du Tibre, campagne romaine, détail 2.jpg was uncategorized on 11 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Vallée du Tibre, campagne romaine.jpg was uncategorized on 11 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Musselière à veau.jpg was uncategorized on 13 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Musée basque, puit de lumière.jpg was uncategorized on 14 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Buste de jeune homme, ra 73b 3.jpg was uncategorized on 24 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Buste de Trajan 3.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 7.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 9.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 8.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 5.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tête de Trajan 5.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 3.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 10.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 2.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Buste de Trajan 4.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 4.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:L'Image et Le Pouvoir 11.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Église Saint-Exupère de Toulouse 10.JPG was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Église Saint-Exupère de Toulouse, autel, détail.JPG was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POTY 2010 voting

Hello Léna, please correct your voting. You can vote "only for one" image! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khorugv.jpg‎

it is not a painting. It is embroidery, broderie, made with needle and threads. Paintings are painted, it is embroided cloth.Shakko (talk) 11:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coins

I saw you created a new category: Category:Coins of Achelous. The standard name for this kind of category is "xxx on coins", so Achelous on coins is correct (He never minted coins;-))

These categories are categorized in this way

Category:Gods on coins

Category:Achelous

--Carlomorino (talk) 11:27, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. Je comprend le français mais avec beaucoup des problèmes dans l’écrire

Arf

J'allais déplacer tes photos dans la catégorie 2011, mais pas eu le temps avant que tu ne le fasses ! :) guillom 08:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ben je pensais le faire pendant que mes miennes s'uploadaient, vois-tu ;) guillom 08:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrouilles automatiques

Salut, je t’ai donné les droits d’Autopatrolled : désormais, tes modifications ne seront plus marquées du disgracieux point d’exclamation rouge (et les patrouilleurs de Special:RecentChanges et Special:NewPages sauront qu’il n’y a pas besoin de vérifier tes contributions en quête de vandalisme ou d’erreur de débutant). Concrètement, cela ne changera rien dans ta manière de contribuer à Commons. Si tu le souhaites, tu peux demander d’autre privilèges sur COM:RFR ou ma PDD. Amicalement, Jean-Fred (talk) 16:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:tulips field

It is not category: tulips field, please create it :) Wuhazet (talk) 12:29, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, have a nice afternoon... :)

Intersect categories

Hello,

Pour faire ce genre de choses facilement, tu peux essayer {{Intersect categories}}.

Later! Jean-Fred (talk) 11:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! July 22, 2011 Nicolas Bézy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 12:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vase aux raisins détail.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Photos de l'hôtel de ville de Ludres

Bonjour Léna,

Tu as téléchargé récemment certaines photos de l'hôtel de ville de Ludres sur Commons, et créé la catégorie correspondante. Sauf erreur de ma part, ce bâtiment semble être une œuvre architecturale récente : il donne en effet l'impression de dater d'après les destructions de la seconde guerre mondiale. Si c'est bien le cas, il faudrait passer l'ensemble des photos de cette catégorie en suppression immédiate.

Cordialement, Croquant (talk) 08:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Après recherches, j'ai trouvé la date de construction : 1986 (source : site de la commune). Croquant (talk) 08:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street lights Place Stanislas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Coyau 20:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deshimaru.JPG

In your nomination for File:Deshimaru.JPG saying that the subject sculpture was still in copyright. Could you explain on the nomination page how you know this, so we can resolve the deletion discussion.

James F. (talk) 17:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fleur violette sur fond orange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice--Holleday 17:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hop

	The Fabulous Facing Left barnstar
	Because you Get It™. Jean-Fred (talk) 18:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Vous avez déplacé les chapelles Saint Martin, Saint Jérôme, du Sacré Coeur etc ... de la catégorie Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Bayonne vers la catégorie Dais et Autel (Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Bayonne) ce qui est une erreur manifeste.
Les chapelles sont les chapelles radiales au delà du déambulatoire, elles pouvaient rester dans la catégorie Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Bayonne, au pis dans la catégorie Interior of ... vu qu'il est fort peu probable de les trouver à l'extérieur, mais surement pas dans la catégorie Dais et Autel (Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Bayonne).
Le dais et l'autel sont dans le chœur, et doivent être référencé en tant que tels, séparément, car il sont classés MH dans la base Palissy.
Pourquoi de façon générale a-t-on vandalisé toutes les catégories faisant référence à la classification à la base Palissy des Monuments Historiques ? Chaire à prêcher etc .... Si vous tenez tant au titre en anglais une traduction fidèle et une redirection me paraissent la moindre des choses pour le respect des indigènes qui ont commis ce travail.
L'en-tête de ces catégories était pourtant sans équivoque, avez vous consulté un membre du goupe «Projet Monuments Historiques français» qui porte ce projet au préalable ?
Daniel Villafruela (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Lena ! La dernière partie ne vous concernait pas ! Il y avait eu des modifications intermédiaires! Le fait de privilégier l'américain à conduit au saccage de plusieurs catégories que j'avais eu le malheur de nommer en français (disparition du chapeau mld, de reférences wikipédia ...) lors de changement pour une catégorie en Anglais. D'où ma réaction déplacée. Ne vous fatiguez pas à reclasser tout cela, après tout, cela est de peu d'importance. Avec mes excuses.
Daniel Villafruela (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci

J'aurai au moins importé quelques photos de Thoiry. Je crois que je vais arrêter là ma participation, je ne suis semble-t-il pas assez douée. Je ne doute pas que certains photographes iront prendre en photo un certain nombre de MH, pour remplacer le millier d'images de piètre qualité que je n'importerai pas . Bises aux chatons. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 14:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:StadeMichelinRentree2010.JPG

You put the following comment on my file :

Photography in France, country with no FoP, of a 2010 copyright photography Léna (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

I do not understand it frankly, but I do not see why you want to remove my photograph ! You must have more serious issues to discuss...

File tagging File:ME 456 Fairness fr.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ME 456 Fairness fr.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

_→AzaToth 23:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phoebus

Bonjour Léna,

Nous nous sommes rencontré à la médiathèque de Toulouse, et à cette occasion vous m’avez parlé du projet Phoebus.

J’ai regardé les nombreuses photos appartenant à ce projet et en particulier l’énorme travail de prise de vue d’Archaeodontosaurus, PiereSelim, Rama, Ludo29.

Y a-t-il besoin d’aide pour ce travail de fourmis ? Si Oui quel serait le meilleur moyen de m’informer sur l’organisation de ce projet ?

PS: Je serai Samedi 8/oct au muséum pour l’inauguration de l’exposition « Sur les traces d'Eugène Trutat » où j’ai quelques photos.

--Photon Libre (talk) 00:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of Panorama

Merci pour votre article du Monde. Je suis content de lire qu'il est encore possible de faire pression pour des causes nobles.

Le principal soucis que j'ai avec la politique Commons n'est pas tant le fait qu'il faille maintenir Commons libre de tout matériel sous license mais le fait que un très grand nombre d'images aujourd'hui effacées provenaient de Wikipedia. Une fois effacées de Commons, elles sont perdues pour Wikipedia malgré le fait qu'une utilisation sous fair use était possible. Je l'ai déjà fait à de nombreuses reprises mais bonjour la convivialité du procédé. Je ne parle même pas, pour un nouveau venu, d'uploader de nouvelles images sur Wikipedia tout en by-passant le nouveau Wizard vers commons.

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi ces images ne pourraient pas etre stockées dans une partie privée du site jusqu'a ce que le copyright l'autorise dans 1 an ou 10 ans. Amicalement --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 15:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phoebus

J’ai contacté archaeodontosaurus. Je serai mercredi au Muséum pour le projet Phoebus. --Photon Libre (talk) 22:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Léna,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Undelete in 2077

When you add an undelete category to a DR, you must enclose it in noinclude brackets:

<noinclude>[[Category:Undelete in 2077]]</noinclude>

Adding the noinclude function means that the category will not be transcluded when the DR is included in the daily and monthly log and the archive. If you fail to use it, all three will be included in the category. This will quadruple the size of the category and waste resources.

I would appreciate it if you would go back through your contributions and do this where required. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 01:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! I'm really sorry for the mistake, and am currently correcting it. You spend enougth time deleting noFOPFrance I find without having to deal with this :) Léna (talk) 10:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's a very technical problem -- one that many users won't understand. I made it myself when I first started using Cat:Undelete in.... Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:41, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

English | Nederlands | +/−

Dear Léna,

We've already thanked you for your contribution to the Wiki Loves monuments photo contest. But with a contest, there are prizes to win!

The award ceremony will be held in Utrecht on Saturday the 5th of November, at the end of the Dutch Wikimedia Conference at Media Plaza, held the same day. Media Plaza is located next to the Central Station in Utrecht, in the middle of the shopping mall.
Admittance is free from 3pm onwards, just in time to catch the last few presentations at the WCN. Off course you can join us for the full day conference as well and enjoy a day full of information on wiki's and cultural heritage. After the ceremony, our location sponsor generously offers a free drink to everyone!

Remember: in order to make a chance to win, you need a confirmed e-mail address added to your Commons settings.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team and the Dutch Wikimedia Conference team

Sent by Lucia Bot^talk in 23:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation Phoebus

Bonjour,

Nous nous réunissons samedi prochain dans le cadre du projet Phoebus, ta participation est la bienvenue.


	Date	Samedi 29 octobre 2011 à 10h
	Lieu	Carré du Muséum de Toulouse
	Objet	Au programme: Fonctionnement du projet: Qualité des images, date des prises de vues, matériel, etc. Présentation technique spécifique pour Phoebus (Combine Zp, etc.) Faire quelques photos

Cordialement, PierreSelim (talk) 09:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Fabien Rofes

Bonjour,

Il y a erreur de personne sur la photo Fabien Rofes, je pense qu'il s'agit plutôt de Silviu Florea (à confirmer).

Cdt, ArnoDe4 (talk) 11:10, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oué mais nan…

…tu copyfraudes, mon amie. :-( Jean-Fred (talk) 00:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phoebus 5 novembre

Le programme de samedi (pour s'inscrire aller sur la page Commons:Projet Phoebus/Meetings/2011/November 5):


	Date	Samedi 5 novembre 2011 à 10h
	Lieu	Carré du Muséum de Toulouse
	Objet	Au programme: Photos au labo Nous ne pouvons être que 3 (4 avec Archaeodontosaurus)

, PierreSelim (talk) 07:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scène de reproches.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:58, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Peresecenie2011-expo-2076.jpg

Please give me some advice. How must I shoot such scenes, provided I cannot manage the exposition and cannot remove disturbing side elements? And wrong crop is about the blue top, yes? Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The aim of this photo was about the glass case, and the blue top thing did not matter for me while shooting. That's why I didn't mind cutting it. How do you think, if I crop more from the top, will it add any QI chances to the photo?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality pictures

Hi! I reverted both pictures. It didn't help too much. Now on the page Commons:Quality images candidates changes are visible, but still there is the problem with preview in 800 × 531 pixels on pages File:PL - Jaślany - kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia Najświętszej Maryi Panny - Kroto 008.JPG and File:PL - Jaślany - kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia Najświętszej Maryi Panny - Kroto 009.jpg. Kroton (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montils (Charente-Maritime) Détail de la rue de la Gîte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Les trois tours de Grenoble

Bonjour,

Je trouve que tu vas trop vite en besogne pour supprimer à tout va certains fichiers sur le motif de l'absence de la liberté de Panorama en France. Or, La cour de cassation en France, a initié la jurisprudence pace des Terreaux lequel la prise de vue se fonde « dans l’ensemble architectural de la place des Terreaux dont elle constituait un simple élément, la cour d’appel en a exactement déduit qu’une telle présentation de l’œuvre litigieuse était accessoire au sujet traité » Ainsi, une prise de vue générale peut être libre diffusée car les bâtiments protégé par les droits d'auteurs ne forme qu'un accessoire. Plusieurs photographies entrent dans ce cas de figure et n'auraient jamais du être proposées à la suppression. En allant au bout de ta logigue, il faudrait supprimer toutes les photographies prises en France.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 23:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

En fin de compte, tu peux tout balancer, j'ai posté deux réponses sur la page de discussion. Bravo pour ton combat pour le libre panorama en France. Il faut contourner la loi comme le font ceux qui la vote pour leurs intérêts particuliers. Pour ma part, le libre panorama va se restreindre encore plus, je suis convaincu d'ici à une ou deux législatures, les délais vont être prorogés. On parlerait de 100 ans. Jadis, le domaine public était la règle, maintenant elle est devenu une excpetion et, peut-être, un jour, disparaîtra. Ceci amputera de nombreuses œuvres littéraires et artistique les projets wikimédia, je pense à Commons, bien sûr, mais aussi à Wikisource. Les éditeurs et certains ayant-droits sont particulièrement hargneux à cet égard; je pense aux œuvres de Gaston Leroux qui ont fait un foin pas possible le projet. Je me rappelle d'une certaine ordonnance d'un juge d'un TGI en France qui a demandé aux FAI français de filtrer l'accès à la lecture d'œuvres françaises publiées au Canada sur le site de Wikilivres (projet n'appartenant pas à Wikimédia). Cela n'a jamais pu se faire. On rejoint, à ce titre, l'Iran, la Chine et autres grandes démocraties. Bon courage pour ton combat. Je vais aller sur le site de l'Assemblée pour collecter les noms des députés qui ont voté contre ou qui se sont courageusement abstenus.-- Bertrand GRONDIN

→ ^(Talk) 14:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Premières recherches

La liste nominative des députés est indisponible sur le Net. Par contre, on a déjà des indications sur les positions prises par ceux qui ont pris la parole. J'ai pour liste :

pour

M. Lionel Tardy (UMP, Haute-Savoie)
M. Jean Dionis du Séjour (Nouveau Centre, Lot-et-Garonne)

contre

Mme Marie-Hélène Thoraval (rapporteur) (UMP, Drôme)
M. Dominique Le Mèner (UMP, Sarthe)
M. Marcel Rogemont (Socialiste, Ille-et-Vilaine)
M. Patrick Bloche (Socialiste, Hauts-de-Seine)
Mme Martine Billard (PC, Paris)
M. Frédéric Mitterrand, (membre du gouvernement)

À l'approche des présidentielles et des législatives, Ce sera l'occasion de faire du lobbying auprès de nos élus. Les majors ne s'en privent pas dans les couloirs de l'Assemblée et du Sénat. Déjà, ce serait une sage décision, et la moindre des choses de n'accorder aucune voix à ceux qui se sont manifestés. P contre l'amendement Tardy. Pour la présidentielle de 2007, je me rappelle que l'actuel hôte du Château, fut le seul candidat, sur les 18, à se manifester clairement pour les logiciels propriétaires au détriment du libre. J'espère que je ne t'ennuie pas avec cela. Je préfère que tout le monde lise ma prose pour organiser, chacun à sa manière, une ligne de combat.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 15:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Manet

Not every painting in the Alte Nationalgalerie in Berlin is by Manet as you categorized (in fact four or so, and the other 60 files are by other painters), please revert your vandalism there... Regards--Kresspahl (talk) 03:30, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For you

	Happy birthday!
	N’anniv’ ! Meow. Jean-Fred (talk) 09:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Léna

Je crois que tu parle la langue française? Otherwise we can discuss together in the English language ? Je lisai le wikimedia commons et comme un hasard je suis tombée sur ta page d'utilisatrice. Tu donnes sur ta page quelques conseils pour la photographie sportive. j'apprécie. Mais c'est pour le football je crois sur des terrains de gazon extérieurs. Je ne connais absolument rien au foot cela n'est pas dans ma culture nordique. Je suis canadienne et mon sport est le hockey sur glace en particulier le hockey féminin vidéo d'un match montage par un ami. Le probleme est le mauvais éclairage des arénas de hockey ( c'est chauffé dans un stade intérieur recouvert ). Souvent je photographie des scènes de jeu mais mes photos sont sombres. Je me sert d'un petit compact Hp et d' un reflex sony 5N à objectifs interchangeables (X55, X210) Peut être voudras tu regarder mes photos sur ma page d'utilisatrice et me donner quelques conseils. Je te remercie, Geneviève du Canada. --Geneviève (talk) 22:03, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Wow wow wow. Cela fait beaucoup de bâtiments récents que j'ai pris à Annecy... Évidemment ce sont tout des vieilles photos (ça doit dater de 2008 je dirais sans revérifier) et n'avais alors aucune connaissance de toutes ces problématiques des bâtiments récents... (ah, 18 ans, jeune, insouciant, innocent...) Je ne m'opposerai donc pas, bien sûr, à la suppression de ces images.

Hum, toutefois, toi Léna, penses-tu que je (ou un autre) doive réimporter ces fichiers sur Wiki sous l'"excuse" du Fair use histoire de ne pas rendre les articles ou sections d'articles se rapportant à ces photos complètement nus... Ou s'il vaut mieux les voir disparaitre purement et simplement?

En tout cas désolé pour le travail que je t'ai donné à faire... =/

Au fait, bien bonne année 2012 à toi (malgré tout..) Et bonne santé bien sûr. Amicalement, --Floflo (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir ! Aucun soucis, je me trouve à Annecy en ce moment, donc je prends plein de photos, donc je trie la catégorie Commons et donc propose des DR sur les cas qui me "choquent", ce n'est donc pas une charge supplémentaire pour moi :) Alors, tu as la possibilité technique de réimporter ces photos sur fr-wikipédia. Personnellement, je trouve que c'est une très mauvaise idée (j'ai même proposé qu'on supprime cette exception), car ce sont des contrefaçons, que ça la fout mal pour un projet libre surtout quand on joue les vierges effarouchées quand Houelbeck reprend le texte sans nous citer et que ça mine notre crédibilité. En plus, ça empêche les gens de se rendre compte qu'il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France et rend donc le lobbying de Wikimédia France pour avoir cette exception au droit d'auteur plus absurde. Mais, ça, c'est mon opinion personnelle à moi que j'ai, la communauté wikipédia-fr trouve que ce n'est pas assez important pour qu'on se prive d'illustrer des articles, donc si tu les mets sur fr-wikipédia, personne ne te les supprimera. Bonne journée à toi et désolée d'avoir spammé ta PDD avec des demandes de suppression :( Léna

Bonsoir, et merci pour ta réponse. Au passage je te souhaite aussi une bonne année 2012 (l'année de Liberté de panorama en France, peut-être? ^^) mais surtout une bonne santé pour toi.

Bien sûr je sais que tu es très engagée dans la lutte contre l'illégalité (normal et louable en même temps, même si je ne me suis pas montré ni Pour ni Contre la dernière Prise de décision que tu as engagé sur l'exception au droit d'auteur, c'est vrai qu'il est dur de trancher une telle question :/)

En fait je voulais quand-même avoir ton avis à titre indicatif. Au vu de ton implication dans ce "domaine" notamment. Je sais que si mes photos sont réimportées sur wp.fr elles ne seront pas supprimées. Mais en fait je m'étais dit la chose suivante: si les photos représentant des bâtiments importants d'Annecy (il faut le dire: gare, Bonlieu, Brise-Glace...) je pense que l'on risque de se retrouver avec d'autres photos, prises par d'autres personnes qui ne seront pas plus au courant du droit d'auteur que je ne l'ai été "à mon époque"... Alors à moins d'écrire clairement dans l'infobox qu'une image n'est pas possible (ce qui n'existe pas à l'heure actuelle me semble-t-il?) on ne fera selon moi que retarder le problème. C'était juste ce à quoi j'avais pensé... Au passage, tu trouves vraiment le Brise-Glace "original" même au sens juridique du terme? Ce carré de béton? ^^

J'attends pour l'instant la suppression des photos... Je verrai bien ce que je décide finalement (j'avoue que c'est dur à choisir). Mais bref, merci tout de même :) --Floflo (talk) 22:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Former players

Salut Léna,

J'ai vu que tu as créé plein de catégories intitulées Former players of ... Je ne comprends pas l'intérêt. Un joueur du Stade toulousain reste un joueur du Stade toulousain qu'il ait joué en 1902, 1966 ou 2011. M'est avis que toutes ces catégories sont inutiles. Udufruduhu (talk) 09:45, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cela permet d'être plus précis surtout avec la professionnalisation du rugby et les joueurs qui finissent par avoir fait beaucoup de club. On a ainsi pour un joueur les catégories de clubs:

Former players of A, Former players of B
Players of C

Cela permet d'avoir son club actuel et ses anciens clubs. Bien entendu il faut le maintenir à jour. :-D --PierreSelim (talk) 10:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Si on veut avoir ce genre d'infos, on ne consulte pas commons mais l'article wikipédia du joueur. Un lecteur vient sur commons pour voir les photos du joueur pas pour savoir s'il joue toujours au RC Truc ou FC machin. Au final, tous les joueurs deviennent des Former player of une fois leur carrière terminée.

Cette différenciation n'est pas faite sur les autres wiki, je ne vois pas pourquoi on la ferait ici : en:Category:Stade Toulousain rugby union players et fr:Catégorie:Joueur du Stade toulousain.

Enfin et surtout, le problème de la mise à jour est à prendre en compte. Quand je vois le b*** sans nom qui règne dans les catégories du rugby, comment peut-on esperer que cette mise à jour soit faite régulièrement ? Le rapport entre plus-value apportée par ces catégories et le travail de maintenance régulier est astronomiquement petit. Je pense qu'on peut très bien s'en passer. Udufruduhu (talk) 10:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Tu as peut-être raison, mais il ne faut jamais oublié que Commons n'existe pas que pour les autres projets Wikimédia tel que Wikipédia, c'est aussi une médiathèque de contenus libres (dans l'ensemble plus ou moins éducatif). On essaye d'être précis, y compris dans les catégories: ça permet de meilleurs recherches (grâce à CatScan entre autre). A bien y réflechir je pense qu'on aurait même du faire ainsi:

Club
- Players of Club
  - Actual players of Club
  - Former players of Club

:-). Après il parait que je suis un peu tordu. --PierreSelim (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ça prend plus de temps à mettre à jour. So what ? On est sur un wiki, on est pas pressés, et cela ne concerne que les joueurs dont on a déjà une catégorie Commons (il y en a proportionnellement très peu) et les joueurs qui changent de club. Ca ne gêne pas la nagivation / consultation, et ça m'est personnellement utile : quand j'ai une photo d'un joueur et que je n'arrive pas à le reconnaître, ou pour voir d'un seul coup d'oeil quels sont les joueurs d'un club donnés dont on ne dipose pas de photos correctes. Bref, je ne vois pas ce que l'on gagne à supprimer ces catégories "former players of", mais je vois ce qu'on y perd (du temps et des fonctionnalités). Léna (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Avec la nouvelle arborescence, cela me convient bcp mieux. Par contre, si cela reste pertinent et objectif pour les clubs, cela ne me semble pas utile pour les sélections nationales, tout simplement parce qu'on ne peut définir avec précision ce qu'est Actual players of country national team. Udufruduhu (talk) 16:48, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On en avait discuté, pour nous "actual player of country national team", c'était encore actif + déjà sélectionné. Léna (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mais dans ce cas il faut bien le préciser en entête de la catégorie. Udufruduhu (talk) 20:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai fait le tri pour le Stade toulousain : Category:Actual players of Stade toulousain‎ et Category:Former players of Stade toulousain‎. Udufruduhu (talk) 21:57, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Courtesan

Please use Category:The Courtesan by Vincent van Gogh instead of the general portrait category. – Editør (talk) 11:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Léna

Suite de mon message du 23 décembre 2011

Dommage de n'avoir pas eu signe de vie de ta part Léna, j'aurai bien aimée tes conseils et ton opinion. Je suis certaine que tu aurai pu m'aider afin d'améliorier mes photos sportives.--Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 21:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chiragan au Musée Saint Raymond

Bonjour Léna J'ai créé l'article sur la villa de Chiragan il y a quelque temps et il est dans mes projets de le développer encore. J'ai constaté avec plaisir tes apports sur commons sur le sujet. Aurais tu des photos des travaux d'Hercule, des boucliers et des reliefs ? Merci par avance. Bien cordialement, Pradigue (talk) 14:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Léna et merci de ta réponse. Tes photos sont magnifiques et la façon dont elles sont classées est exemplaire. Je regrette encore de ne pas avoir amené mon reflex lorsque je suis allé à Toulouse pour motif professionnel même si je pense y retourner en avril mais l'expo au Saint Raymond sera terminée. Par hasard saurais tu si le site de la villa conserve des vestiges visibles ? Bien cordialement, Pradigue (talk) 09:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sitting with legs crossed (knee-on-ankle) =

Nice find! Completes the others. Thanks. -- Docu at 13:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs Agen 2012 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 12:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nommage

Coucou, quand tu crées des catégories pour des objets de musée contenant un numéro d'inventaire, il faudrait également nommer le musée. Je ne suis pas sûre par exemple que le préfixe « Ma » soit unique au Louvre par exemple. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis assez pour. Cela dit il faudrait peut-être en cause sur le Commons:WikiProject Museums pour essayer d'avoir un standard/une recommandation sur la question. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je re-fais chier... « Louvre » est suffisant pour dissiper l'homonymie et est plus court, je dirais. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je dirais Louvre tout court est le Louvre, Paris, mais le Louvre Abu Dhabi est préciser que c'est celui d'Abu Dhabi, puisque l'un tire son nom de l'autre — un peu le même raisonnement que souris tout court = bestiau, et souris-mulot -> souris (informatique). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admin suggestion

Hello Léna Nice to see you again. I just let you know that I'd like to nominate you for adminship on Commons. I think you are a good candidate who contributes to the project many quality images and participates frequently in DRs involved in FoP problems. Besides that, you are an admin at fr.wp and an OTRS volunteer. And an edit count of over 10000 is totally fine. Please let me know if you agree and whether you want me to nominate you or you want to do it yourself (though I prefer to make it). Kind regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly support such a nomination. Jean-Fred (talk), just passing by, 23:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Me, too. -- RE rillke questions? 23:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done it's here. Please sign your acceptance. Thanks--Morning Sunshine (talk) 01:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For others searching for a prelim. acceptance from Lena: here at 2012-03-07, 23:27:05. --Saibo (Δ) 01:53, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Léna, je ne sais pas si tu as vu le message que j'ai laissé sur Template talk:Temporary Exhibition. A mon avis, il vaudrait mieux que {{Temporary Exhibition}} soit un peu plus discret, et qu'il soit réutilisable pour les expositions dans lesquelles l'objet a été exposé, même lorsque la photo n'y a pas été prise. J'ai essayé de faire ça sur {{Temporary Exhibition/sandbox}}:

Petits théâtres de l'intime, Category:Musée des Augustins de Toulouse, 22 October 2011-22 January 2012

Ca irait ? --Zolo (talk) 08:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Léna, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin ^webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

Welcome aboard Léna. russavia (talk) 10:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Léna. Welcome to the admin team--Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats :-) --Katarighe (Talk) 13:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2012

Hi, I wonder whether you can take a look at my abstract at Wikimania 2012 and if my article is selected, I would like to invite you for my talk (I have no idea about the fate of my paper at present :) )--C.R.Selvakumar (talk) 23:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

merci !

Bjr Léna,

Impossible de trouver comment on répond directement dans Le bistro. mille mercis pour votre réponse rapide sur le droit des images. Patricia

Wiki Loves Monuments NL

Beste Léna,

Alle winnende foto's van Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 zijn ondertussen gedrukt als kalenders.

Wikimedia Nederland stelt er hier 100 van beschikbaar voor alle uploaders van de afbeeldingen. Geef op de bijgevoegde link je naam en adres en we sturen je kosteloos een exemplaar toe, als dank voor je deelname! Let op: op = op!! Bestel hier één kalender per adres.

Ook dit jaar zal er in september weer een Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments plaatsvinden, als onderdeel van de internationale wedstrijd. Meer informatie vind je tegen die tijd op http://www.wikilovesmonuments.nl/.
Ook zoeken wij nog vrijwilligers die het leuk vinden om mee te helpen met het organiseren van de landelijke wedstrijd of van locale evenementen (een "Wiki takes..." in je eigen woonplaats dus!). Meer informatie daarover vind je op de wiki van Wikimedia Nederland.

Sent by Lucia Bot^talk in 14:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket OTRS

Hello, Léna. J'aurais voulu savoir si, pour un ticket OTRS, la description suivante des photos concernées est suffisante :

I hereby affirm that I, xxxx, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the photographs uploaded later by VonTasha with the mention "taken by xxxx".

Merci d'avance pour ta réponse, cordialement, VonTasha (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coucou :) Non malheureusement, il faut aussi que la personne précise qu'elle comprend bien les conséquences de la mise sous licence CC-by-SA (droit d'utilisation commerciale et de faire des oeuvres dérivées). Demande plutôt à User:Bapti, c'est lui l'expert des autorisations OTRS ^^ Léna (talk) 19:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ! oui, oui, bien sûr, la suite (license, compréhension, etc.) sera là aussi, mais ma question ne portait que sur la description des images concernées, c'est pour ça que je ne mentionnais que cette partie. Mais OK, je vais demander à Bapti. Cordialement, VonTasha (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture porte 2 Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile d'Albi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 16:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

à virer

Coucou Léna,

à peine arrivée, et déjà du boulot :)

Notre ami POMPIERS continu, une magnifique photo pas cadrée mais surtout copyright, puisque le bâtiment de la nouvelle maternité d'Angers est hyper récent et unique (Prix départemental de l'Architecture 2011). Je doute très fortement de son droit à l'image. Comme je n'ai pas la moindre idée de comment proposer une suppression sur commons, je te laisse t'en charger. Merci d'avance. Espérant que ton séjour à Angers t'a plu. Mith (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Petits théâtres de l'intime

Bravo pour ton travail. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Sébastien de Nancy horloge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballon rugby Stade toulousain mains.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Mattbuck 19:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais des Ducs de Lorraine sculpture 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Notable red and green CA on the upper part of the image. --Iifar 08:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC). Done Done Léna 09:20, 18 May 2012 (UTC). OK now --Iifar 11:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bourse des marchands of Nancy Mascaron 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Crop below maybe a bit tight...--Jebulon 10:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bourse des marchands of Nancy Mascaron 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 10:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bourse des marchands of Nancy Mascaron 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good series. Maybe the file description is a bit "short"...--Jebulon 10:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signature en QI

En voulant proposer deux de mes photos, je me suis aperçu, lors de la prévisualisation, que les vôtres portaient ma signature. J'ai aussitôt annulé la manœuvre en cours mais vos images restent sans signature, avec seulement quatre tildes. J'ignore d'où provient ce bug : avons-nous téléversé nos photos au même instant ? -- J'ai essayé de rectifier, mais rien à faire. À vous de jouer. -- Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 23:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ta fructueuse expédition à la Galerie David d'Angers

Bonjour, et bravo pour tes très belles photo à la Galerie David d'Angers. Comme l'a déjà dit Jébulon, Jeune fille...01 est une excellente idée de point de vue.

Je me suis permis d'uploader des versions détourées de Jeune fille...03 et Jeune fille...05. Sinon, concernant File:Statue in the Galerie David d'Angers 3.JPG, est-ce qu'il ne s'agirait pas d'Abraham Duquesne ? Elle me rappelle beaucoup File:Duquesne mp3h9378.jpg et la statue de Concarneau.

Encore bravo et merci pour ces contributions ! Rama (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeune fille, allégorie de la Grèce, par David d'Angers 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, and nice point of view. Very interesting monument.--Jebulon 23:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Venise, la Salute.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Venise, la Salute.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Une messe en mer en 1793.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Une messe en mer en 1793.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Le salut, coup de canon.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Le salut, coup de canon.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:La Solitude.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:La Solitude.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:La Courtisane.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:La Courtisane.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gaulois revenant de la chasse by Evariste Vital Luminais.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gaulois revenant de la chasse by Evariste Vital Luminais.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:13, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Flight of King Gradlon by Evariste Vital Luminais, Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rennes.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flight of King Gradlon by Evariste Vital Luminais, Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rennes.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:13, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Cheval de Gaada, cheval de soumission.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cheval de Gaada, cheval de soumission.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:13, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Trompe l'œil à la gravure de Sarrabat.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Trompe l'œil à la gravure de Sarrabat.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Le Carrefour de l'épine, forêt de Fontainebleau.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Le Carrefour de l'épine, forêt de Fontainebleau.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:The Count of Comminges Recognizing Adélaide by Claudius Jacquand.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:The Count of Comminges Recognizing Adélaide by Claudius Jacquand.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lens

Coucou :) Je suis allée à Lens en début de semaine et j'ai pris quelques photos (pas encore en ligne), du coup j'en ai profité pour regarder les catégories associées. Déjà, bravo, c'est rare que les photos d'une ville soient aussi "bien rangées" :) J'ai juste été suprise de voir plein de fosses au niveau de la catégorie mère, du coup je me suis dit que ça serait bien de créer Category:Fosses des mines de Lens, mais j'ai l'impression que ça fera un gros doublon avec Compagnie des mines de Lens. Tu penses que je révoques mes modifs sur Category:Fosse n° 1 des mines de Lens ou je poursuis sur les autres fosses ? Je suis un peu gênée par le nom de Category:Grands Bureaux de la Compagnie des mines de Lens (j'ai pris des photos de l'université et j'allais créer Category:Faculté des sciences Jean Perrin). Je ne sais pas ce qui est le plus connu (à la fois "localement" et "dans le monde"), mais je mettrais bien une redirection de catégorie de l'un vers l'autre. Je pensais créer Category:Monuments historiques in Lens et plus généralement les classiques Category:Churches in Lens ou Category:Buildings in Lens, est-ce que tu trouves ça pertinent ? Enfin :) J'ai pris quelques bâtiments en photo autour de l'université, malheureusement sans système de géolocalisation (en gros, rue Jean Souvraz, rue de la Bassée, et Boulevard Emile Basly). Est-ce que tu saurais à quelles fosses/cités ces rues "correspondent" (si c'est le cas) et éventuellement pourrais-tu obtenir plus d'infos sur ces bâtiments, juste d'après photo ? Voila, c'était un gros pavé :) Merci d'avance ! Léna (talk) 15:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je vais répondre point par point, sinon, je risque de m'embrouiller dans les réponses.

Concernant Lens, mes contributions ne portent que sur le domaine de la mine.
Fosses des mines de Lens ferait doublon avec Compagnie des mines de Lens, puisque toutes deux listeraient les fosses de cette compagnie, qui sont au nombre de 23. Qui plus est, seule une petite partie est située dans Lens, certaines cités en revanche sont à cheval sur plusieurs communes, comme certains terrils. Enfin, cette disposition est également pratique avec la Category:Communes du Bassin minier du Nord-Pas-de-Calais, qui permet de voir le patrimoine minier (entre autre chose, mais globalement c'est l'essentiel), de chaque commune. La meilleure solution est de garder l'arborescence actuelle (catégorie mère Category:Bassin minier du Nord-Pas-de-Calais). Qui plus est, chaque élément est bien catégorisé selon qu'il soit une cité, une église, une école, une fosse. Enfin, j'ai dans le secteur des fosses sur Loos-en-Gohelle dont les cités sont soit sur Lens, ou soit à cheval sur deux ou trois communes. C'est pour cela que j'utilise à travers tout le bassin minier la forme une catégorie = une commune (voire plusieurs).
Localement et dans le monde, c'est bien Category:Grands Bureaux de la Compagnie des mines de Lens qui est le plus connu, puisqu'il s'agissait mine de rien du cœur d'une des plus grandes compagnies minières du monde. De plus, avec le classement du Bassin minier du Nord-Pas-de-Calais au patrimoine mondial de l'Unesco qui est en cours, les Grands Bureaux sont un des sites phares dans la candidature. À la rigueur, une catégorie Faculté des sciences Jean Perrin se justifierait s'il y avait des photos des salles des classes ou des amphithéâtres, en sous-catégorie.
J'ai déjà Category:Monuments historiques du Bassin minier du Nord-Pas-de-Calais et Category:Églises du Bassin minier du Nord-Pas-de-Calais avec une sous-catégorisation en fonction du nom de la commune, mais ça pourrait se justifier où certains éléments de patrimoine ne sont pas minier, que ce soit au niveau des monuments historiques qu'au niveau des églises.
Pour les rues citées, d'après Google Satellite, il n'y a pas de maison des mines pour les deux des rues, quant à la rue de la Bassée, à hauteur de l'hôpital jusqu'au nord de la commune, je classe les maisons des mines parmi les photos des cités de la fosse n^o 14. À voir si ce sont des maisons des mines, cette catégorie donne un bon exemple du patrimoine architectural de la compagnie.

Voilà une longue réponse. A priori, d'après une photo, si c'est un élément minier, je peux parvenir à le reconnaître, ceci dit, j'en apprends tous les jours sur le domaine. Cordiament, JÄNNICK Jérémy (talk) 15:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pls. correct some description pages

Hi, as I saw you undeleted some of your uploads, I wish to ask you to correct the description pages of those files. affected are:

File:Le salut, coup de canon.JPG
File:Cheval de Gaada, cheval de soumission.JPG
File:La Solitude.JPG
File:La Courtisane.JPG
File:Gaulois revenant de la chasse by Evariste Vital Luminais.JPG
File:Flight of King Gradlon by Evariste Vital Luminais, Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rennes.JPG
and possibly some more of your uploads which I didn't checked

thats because that are 2D-copies of (hopefully) old paintings. The current description indicates that you painted them youself in April 2012 and according the license the painter (thats you) died before more the 70 years. This cannot be both correct. Compare i.e. Commons:2D copying or Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. So pls. correct:

The author field: the original painter should be stated, best with his life-dates, because the artist has to be dead for more than 70 years to make the painting public domain, which is currently before 1942. (With the last image I doubt that is the case i.e., because you stated something with 1962 in th description)
the date field: pls. state the year when the paintings were originally painted by the artist as excact as possible.
The source field: If you realy took a photo of the paintings yourself, keep it as it is, but best add where ou took that photo; i.e. in which museum or gallery. If you copied the images from somewhere in the internet, scanned a book, magazin or catalog, or similar pls. state where excactly you took it from.

The first time I saw these images without a license and the stated authors, sources and dates I thought: Wow! Léna must be a very good and versatile painter :) Thx in advance. --Ju Ta 18:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former players of Aviron Bayonnais Rugby Pro

Salut Léna, quel est l'utilité d'avoir une telle catégorie (pour example, les problems pour la tenir toujours à jour...)? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Un coup de balais

Salut Léna,

Tu voudrais bien supprimer cette cat que tu as créée avec une typo ? Merci. Udufruduhu (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci

Udufruduhu (talk) 20:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo stade français

Salut Léna,

Si tu as le temps, est-ce que tu voudrais bien donner ton avis ici ? Merci Udufruduhu (talk) 14:46, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Undine.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Category: Cloister of the Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Bayonne

Bonjour Léna, Je vois que tu essayes de mettre un peu d'ordre en catégorisant les images de la cathédrale de Bayonne. Il est vivement conseillé de mettre le nom de catégories en « anglais» ... mais le globish fait des dégâts. Aussi avant que quelqu'un ne s'avise de modifier ton travail, ne serait pas plus judicieux de renommer la catégorie « Category: Cloister of the Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Bayonne » par quelque chose du genre «Category: Cloister of the Our-Lady Cathedral in Bayonne » et faire de même pour le Passage du Jugement Dernier où la catégorie «Category: Sculptures in Cloister of the Our-Lady Cathedral in Bayonne » pourrait devenir «Category: Doorway to the cloister of the Our-Lady Cathedral in Bayonne » ou «Category: Sculptures of the Cloister, Our-Lady Cathedral in Bayonne » si l'on y range aussi les sculptures du cloître proprement dit.
Enfin, tu es l'administrateur, «c'est à toi qu'appartiennent la puissance et la gloire » ....
Cordialement. Daniel Villafruela (talk) 06:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie Chapiteau de l'histoire de Job de la basilique de la Daurade

Bonjour, l’ensemble de ces images est menacé de suppression alors qu’il semble exister un ticket OTRS. Je recopie ci-dessous le message envoyé à l’administrateur qui a fait la demande. Je ne parle pas l’anglais et ne comprends rien à sa réponse. Pourriez vous jeter un coup d’œil ? Avec mes remerciements. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission OTRS

Bonjour, pour la catégorie Chapiteau de l'histoire de Job de la basilique de la Daurade il semble exister un ticket OTRS : 2012072710006551

Christelle Molinié Official user from the Musée des Augustins de Toulouse, identity has been verified in the ticket:2012072710006551

Cordialement, Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see that particular ticket. Would you consider asking at COM:OTRS/N? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

J'ai retiré le message {{otrs|2012072710006551}} sur ces images. Il n'y aucune autorisation dans ce ticket, juste une confirmation d'identité (repercutée sur User:Christelle Molinié). Si cela n'est pas suffisant, il faut demander l'envoi d'une autorisation complète.

Cordialement.--Bapti ✉ 14:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incertitudes Label WLM

Merci pour ta première reponse sur le bistro concernant cropped images et label WLM. J'ai une question similaire pour les vitraux dans la Category:Vitraux de l'église Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Saint-Jean-d'Angély, une souscategory de Category:Abbaye Royale de Saint-Jean-d'Angély. J'ai posé ailleurs la question si ces images peuvent être labellisés WLM 2012|fr, mais je n'ai pas eu de réponse. Ils ne sont pas encore labellisés. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC) PS. j'ai trouvé le modèle {{Wlmfr 2012 no}}, est-ce que celui-ci pourrait s'appliquer pour les deux cas? Et à quoi sert la Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 in France − early? j'ai déjà télechargé en 2012 plus de cent monuments avant septembre, est-ce qu'ils doivent être dans cette catégorie early? --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flore, Barthélemy Guibal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Notable (fixable) purple chromatic aberration on the nether side. --Iifar 19:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC). Comment Thanks, corrected :) Léna 09:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC) Support Looks like QI now. --Iifar 06:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former players of Crusaders (rugby)

Bonjour Lèna, il faut réellement de catégories comme ça? Sur Commons il n'y a pas un "avant" et un "après". -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Léna,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 16:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Chocolate_Saint_Nicholas

Chocolate Saint Nicholas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Pont Morens et le Château Branlant.JPG

Bonjour Léna,
Comment vas-tu depuis notre dernier hamburger ?
Je t'écris au sujet de cette photographie de peinture : je ne pense pas que ce soit une peinture d'annecy (même si le tableau est exposé à Annecy ; mais plutôt quelque part en Savoie vers La Chapelle et La Chavanne. Je n'en suis pas absolument sûr, je te contacte donc pour savoir si tu as plus d'informations. En fait, je voudrais éventuellement l'utiliser pour illustrer le (futur) article du Pont Morens (celui de La Chavanne et Montmélian) qui est MH.
Il n'y a bien sûr aucune urgence (tu peux me répondre sur WP si tu préfères).
À bientôt (peut-être le week-end du premier décembre ?).
--Agamitsudo (talk) 22:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,

En fait le pont Morens est bien un autre ancien pont à Annecy (voir par exemple cette autre peinture).

Désolé du dérangement. --Agamitsudo (talk) 09:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories inutiles

Bonjour Léna,

Je tombe sur des catégories de communes de Haute-Saône que tu as créées récemment, et qui doublonnent avec des catégories déjà existantes, qui ont Haute-Saône entre parenthèses pour cause d'homonymie. Juste un conseil : vérifie d'abord que les communes correspondantes n'existent pas déjà dans la catégorie Cities and villages correspondante. Merci.

Croquant (talk) 13:24, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Et une remarque que j'avais oubliée : évite de créer des catégories vides, car certains admins ne les aiment pas et les suppriment dès qu'ils les voient. Croquant (talk) 13:31, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lycurgue

Salut Léna, merci pour le correctif sur File:Musée GR de Saint-Romain-en-Gal 27 07 2011 33 Lycurgue.jpg, j'ai bien retiré la catégorie mère du musée... Mais je ne pensais pas qu'il était nécessaire d'inclure Category:Mosaïque de Lycurgue dans Category:Lycurgus (Thrace) (et au passage d'avoir mis les bonne catégories pour la mosaïque...) Merci de l'avoir fait ! J'en ai profité pour faire le ménage dans les fichiers de la catégorie Category:Mosaïque de Lycurgue... Nonopoly (talk) 15:28, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SA Rugby

I do know about it, but: most of the players were included in category "RU players from SA". Only some of them were in "Players of SA national RU team" even if they played for Springboks. I thought it is the most logical way when for the players from SA and playing for SA it will be removed category "RU players from SA" and left just "Players of SA nat. RU team" - then categories wont double itselves. Every Bok is in fact a player from South Africa. However, if "Players of national team" wont be a subcategory of "RU players from SA", then where will be no connection between Springboks and players from SA. In case of some players from SA but representing other countries like Pieter de Villiers or Richardt Strauss or Raynor Parkinson or any other, whey (as for me) should be marked as "RU players from SA" and additionally as "Players of France/Ireland/Germany national rugby union team". I haven't put Pieter de Villiers in category Players of SA national RU team, I suppose. He is placed in "Players from SA", what is true, and in "Players of France national team" (also in "RU players from France" what, in fact, is not true). Do you agree? ARvєδuι ⁺ 11:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial 02.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WLM 2012

Bonjour Léna,

le jury étant malheureusement absent sous les ors du musée de Sèvres, je n'ai pu vous remercier tous les trois. Un grand mercià toi donc pour ce travail sans doute fastidieux et bien inspiré, puisque confirmé par le jury international :) Bravo pour ton implication au sein de commons & bonne continuation!

--Selbymay (talk) 21:07, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient joueurs

Oh enfin Léna. Je te demandais il y a plus que deux mois l'utilitè de cette catégorie. Mais tu ne repondais pas. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:00, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tu crois ça? Tu réellement crois ça? bien, ce sous-catégorisation est totallement inutile parce que - au moins que tu vais mettre à jour centaines de catégories à chaque change de saison - jamais sera précise. Personne categorise pour "ancien joueur de", car sur Wikimedia project n'extiste pas un "après" et un "avant". -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Le probleme est que Wiki(p)media n'a pas un avant et un après parce que tu ne peux lier une catégorie au presente ou au un moment donné. Si lendemain Léna laisse Wikipedia et personne va mettre à jour les catégories, tu comprends bien que nous aurons beaucoup de "courant joueurs du Stade toulousain" meme s'il ont attaché leur crampons au clou il y a dix ans... La survie ou le bon fonctionnement d'une categorie ne dois pas etre laissé à la bonne volonté de quelque wikipedién -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former players of France national rugby union team

Category:Former players of France national rugby union team has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 09:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Il va falloir que la communauté parle-t-on sur cette catégories, Léna. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 09:43, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Serais tu à Rome pour voir l'équipe de France en le match d'ouverture du Tournoi face à l'équipe d'Italie? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 09:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, tu aimes l'Italie? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 13:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And the winner is...

Salut ! Je me faisais la remarque que ma photo n'apparaissait pas sur Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012_in_France/Winners. Du coup, je ne peux pas étaler ma gloire en société sans qu'on me balance un {{refnec}} auquel je suis bien embêté pour répondre, et mon ego en est fort marri ;). Crois-tu qu'on puisse y remédier ? --EdouardHue (talk) 22:41, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonn anniv

Cumpleanoa feliz, Happy Birthday, Nanniv

PierreSelim (talk) 22:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]