User talk:EdouardHue

File:Faces nord et ouest du manoir de la Meriais (Vitré, Ille-et-Vilaine, France).jpg

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki loves Monuments.

Cependant, la photo File:Faces nord et ouest du manoir de la Meriais (Vitré, Ille-et-Vilaine, France).jpg ne représente pas le monument historique mentionné dans l'arrêté du ministère de la Culture lié. Aussi suis-je obligé de le retirer du concours.

N'hésitez pas à ajouter d'autres clichés, en vérifiant bien que l'édifice concerné est celui pris en photo ! Bonne participation, Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 20:13, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Trizek ! J'avais un doute, c'est donc bien uniquement l'étuve qui est classée...

J'ai aussi un doute sur cette maison. L'inventaire la situe au n°23, mais la plaque dit 21. Ceci dit, la photo de l'inventaire correspond. Je suis allé voir les voisines : la 19 selon l'inventaire correspondrait à la parcelle cadastrale K1 145, mais celle-ci n'existe pas sur le cadastre en ligne. Je soupçonne une renumérotation, d'autant que le n° 23 réel n'a rien de remarquable.

--EdouardHue (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Il y a bien eu un changement de numérotation, comme on le voit sur les photos du n° 19 (aujourd'hui) / 21 (au moment du classement). Je m'occupe de rectifier le tir sur les photos de Pym.

--EdouardHue (talk) 12:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ben non, Pym avait déjà remarqué le souci...

--EdouardHue (talk) 21:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo Édouard !

Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 17:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

Hi, sorry for speaking English. I updated your recent images for Wiki Loves Monuments 2011. You added {{Wiki Loves Monuments}} instead of {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011}}. If you are planning to add more: please make sure to use {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011}}. HenkvD (talk) 12:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for fixing this, I made a typo in Commonist and only noticed it after the upload was over. I was actually planning to fix it tonight. I still need to add the {{Mérimée}} template and geolocation anyway. Regards,

--EdouardHue (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear EdouardHue,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, EdouardHue!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cabalistes en goguette dans la Grande Rue (Redon, Ille-et-Vilaine, France).jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Extrémité est du mail François Miterrand, Rennes, Ille-et-Vilaine, France.jpg was uncategorized on 22 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Immeuble Odorico

Bonjour cher coéquipier ! Merci d'avoir ajouté tes photos :) Mais tu me vois désolé de devoir demander la suppression des photos de l'immeuble émaillé avenue Janvier : Odorico fils est mort en 1945, ses œuvres sont encore protégées jusqu'au premier janvier 2016. Là, on pourra se faire plaisir et chasser le moindre carreau de mosaïque ! --EdouardHue (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de souci, j'avais pas vérifié. Merci de l'avoir fait.--Sammyday (talk) 14:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lisardo Lombardia au Festival interceltique de Lorient 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:41, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collatéral est, Basilique Notre Dame de Bonne Nouvelle, Rennes, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restes du château de la Dobiais (Saint-Jean-sur-Couesnon, Ille-et-Vilaine, France).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hangar à dirigeables d'Écausseville, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice image.--ArildV 05:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crypte de l'église saint Marcouf, Saint-Marcouf, France-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 00:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église saint Marcouf, Saint-Marcouf, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A lens for you

	A lens for you
	Cadeau ! Wikilovement, VIGNERON (talk) 09:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stèle à Marie Ravenel, Fermanville, France.jpg

File:Stèle à Marie Ravenel, Fermanville, France.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ComputerHotline (talk) 11:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear EdouardHue,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

FIL 2012 again

Salut,

Juste pour t'informer que je viens d'ajouter le modèle {{Supported by Wikimedia France}} sur toutes tes photos dans Category:Festival Interceltique de Lorient 2012 - Supported by Wikimedia France.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bien vu, merci ! J'ai du passer à côté de l'existence de ce template...

EdouardHue (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

prix WLM 2012 du MH non illustré

Coucou :) Tu as gagné le prix du MH non illustré avec File:Crypte de l'église saint Marcouf, Saint-Marcouf, France-2.jpg :) Léna (talk) 09:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

\o/ Cool ! Merci au jury :) --EdouardHue (talk) 10:17, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fronton de l'ancien hôtel des Nétumières, Rennes, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment tilted and noise imo. --Rjcastillo 22:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed tilting, stronger NR. --EdouardHue 11:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Comment acceptable for me --Rjcastillo 18:25, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fronton de l'hôtel de Marbeuf, Rennes, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I like, but think slightly unsharpness imo --Rjcastillo 22:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sharpened, stronger NR. --EdouardHue 11:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Comment OK for me --Rjcastillo 18:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pack Fañch - Canon TS-E 17 mm f-4 - Décentré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pack Fañch - Canon TS-E 17 mm f-4 - Basculé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me. --A.Savin 09:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pack Fañch - Canon EOS 5D Mark III - Avant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Crypte de l'église saint Marcouf, Saint-Marcouf, France-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crypte de l'église saint Marcouf, Saint-Marcouf, France-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De l'absence du MSM dans les QI de la Manche

Bonjour Edouard,

m'étant permis de soumettre ta fameuse photo de la chapelle Saint-Aubert aux QI, elle est jugée penchée par user:Poco a poco. Puis-je tenter de sortir mon niveau à bulle ou as-tu deux minutes pour le faire (si jamais tu le souhaites) ?

Au passage, bravo pour les vues superbes de la Procession des saints de Bretagne, des FP en force à mon humble avis, IMHO comme on dit par ici.

Bonne continuation!

--Selbymay (talk) 08:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salut ! Merci d'avoir proposé la photo, je vais me pencher sur son redressement ce soir même :)

J'ai hésité à proposer les photos de la procession, mais compte tenu de l'éclairage moyen, du redressement pas orthogonal au dixième de degré près et d'un bruit de fond encore présent, je crains que certains ne les retoquent. Mais ça passerait sûrement en valued set !

--EdouardHue (talk) 08:46, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Procession, Licence, PD-Art

Coucou,

Un petit moment que j’oublie de t’en parler : il ne faut pas utiliser {{PD-Art}} quand tu es l’auteur de la photographie. {{PD-Art}} sert à dire « je sais pas qui a pris cette photo et sous quelle licence il la met, mais je m’en tamponne parce-qu’aux USA une telle image est pas copyrightée donc je la pompe sur Commons quand même » (en gros ^_^) − cf COM:PDART. L’ennui, c’est que le statut de ces photos n’est pas clair dans plein de pays − cf. COM:PDARTREUSE.

Quand tu es l’auteur de la photo, le mieux est que tu la places explicitement dans le domaine public avec {{CC-zero}}, histoire que tu déclares renoncer à tous les droits qu’une législation pourrait avoir envie de te donner. On emballe le tout dans {{Licensed-PD-Art}} et hop ça donne {{Licensed-PD-Art|PD-old-auto|CC-zero|deathyear=1884}} !

Woilà :)

Jean-Fred (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Et pendant que j’y suis :

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Jean-Fred (talk) 23:40, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angle sud de la chapelle Saint-Aubert (Le Mont-Saint-Michel, Manche, France).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not perfect, but close enough --Poco a poco 19:39, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Procession des saints de Bretagne, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Procession des saints de Bretagne has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte du donjon de Dinan, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nef de l'église Saint-Malo, Dinan, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tableau du retable de la chapelle de la Sainte-Famille de la basilique Saint-Sauveur, Dinan, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment tilted and a bit noise --Rjcastillo 23:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done with the folding mark in the middle of the painting as a vertical reference. Applied stronger NR. --EdouardHue 09:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 12:01, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chœur et nef de l'église Saint-Malo, Dinan, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you brighten the lower levels? Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Is it better like this ? --EdouardHue 06:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that looks fine. Mattbuck 19:36, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dominique Camus, Rencontres de l'imaginaire de Brocéliande 2013, Paimpont, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. Please add English descriptions to your QI candidates. --Kadellar 12:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Claudine Glot, Rencontres de l'imaginaire de Brocéliande 2013, Paimpont, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 21:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maître-autel et retable, église Notre-Dame, Montfarville, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brucéro, Rencontres de l'imaginaire de Brocéliande 2013, Paimpont, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique des Vernes, Livet-et-Gavet, France-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Site minier des Brandes, Huez, France-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de Ambre Troizat

Super jolies les photographies. Merci Edouard Hue. --Bel Bonjour, Ambre Troizat (talk) 20:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diapason Wittner à branches carrées à 440 Hz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Missing contrast at the coin, but I think it is still QI. --XRay 09:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear EdouardHue,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear EdouardHue,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Copyright tag removal

I assume this edit was a mistake, with which you removed the copyright tag from the image I found in Category:Media without a license: needs history check today. Please be more careful when editing such image details because it could well have been deleted for lack of a licence except that I reviewed the history and found the problem. Ww2censor (talk) 12:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out, this was a mistake indeed. Regards, --EdouardHue (talk) 12:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found another one here. And another two File:Lomentaria articulata Brest.jpg and File:Lomentaria clavellosa.jpg. I reinstated the licences. I hope that is all of them, but you might check the category to see if you recognise any images you may have edited. There are currently at least 8 more similar images, so I'll leave them to you or another editor as tis cat is still quite populated. Ww2censor (talk) 11:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I should have fixed them all this time. I double-checked the category, hope I did not miss any. --EdouardHue (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikiPermanence, Rennes, 2013-12-20-4.jpg

File:WikiPermanence, Rennes, 2013-12-20-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola _talk 22:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Template:Photo Information

Bonjour Edouard,

J'espère que tu vas bien ! Lors de ta super démonstration de ton logiciel ComeOn!, j'avais évoqué le modèle d'information de prise de vue de l'image : Template:Photo Information. Penses-tu qu'il serait possible que le logiciel l'utilise en allant chercher les informations dans les données exif ?

Par ailleurs, je vais tenter de faire fonctionner ce logiciel, et si ça t'intéresse, je te donnerai les retours d'un néophyte...

Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 12:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis allé voir ce fameux modèle. Je pense qu'il avait un intérêt en 2008 quand les appareils ne produisaient pas tous des EXIF mais aujourd'hui, il me semble plutôt obsolète : MediaWiki sait maintenant afficher ces informations automatiquement, sans avoir à ajouter de modèle (comme ici par exemple), et la grande majorité des appareils produisent des EXIF corrects. J'ai quand même un contre-exemple avec mon objectif Voigtländer qui s'identifie avec un laconique « 20 mm ».

Nonobstant l'intérêt du modèle, ComeOn! serait tout à fait capable de le renseigner, quasiment toutes les informations se trouvent dans les EXIF.

--EdouardHue (talk) 20:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ComeOn!

Hello !

Me revoilà donc. J'ai trouvé la page permettant de lancer le logiciel, ça ne fonctionnait pas, parce que Java n'était pas à jour. Donc j'ai mis à jour, et maintenant, lorsque je lance ComeOn, je vois le logo apparaître une seconde puis il me dit Vos paramètres de sécurité ont bloqué l'exécution d'une application auto-signée et je ne peux rien faire que cliquer sur Ok et tout se ferme... Les paramètres de Sécurité de Java n'y font rien... Impossible de lancer l'application même avec le niveau de sécurité le plus bas. Y aurait-il un certificat d'identification quelque part à installer ?

Cordialement. --M0tty (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello !

Merci pour tes tests, c'est très intéressant d'avoir ce genre de retours. Effectivement, en l'état, avec le certificat auto-signé que j'utilise pour signer l'application, Java refuse de la lancer avec ses paramètres de sécurité par défaut. Mais sur ma machine, si je passe le niveau de sécurité à « moyen », ça passe avec juste un avertissement. Une autre solution et d'ajouter l'adresse « http://edouardhue.github.io/ » à la liste blanches des sites autorisés.

J'ai découvert un nouveau problème avec les dernières versions de Java, qui doivent être plus strictes encore sur les droits alloués aux applications téléchargées du Net : au moment d'uploader les images, une exception de sécurité est lancée et le téléchargement échoue... Je vais regarder ça.

Un dernier point qui n'est pas décrit dans le README : tu peux télécharger un premier jeu de modèles depuis [1] : tu n'as plus qu'à le décompresser dans un coin et déclarer un à un les modèles du répertoire velocity dans les options de ComeOn! (l'encodage à indiquer est UTF-8).

--EdouardHue (talk) 20:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question complémentaire : quelle version de Java utilises-tu ? La première ligne du « à propos » du panneau de contrôle (quelque chose comme « Version 8 mise à jour 5 (build 1.8.0_5b13 ») fera l'affaire. --EdouardHue (talk) 21:14, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edouard !

Je n'avais pas mis ta page en suivi, du coup, j'ai loupé ta réponse... Pardon pour le temps de réaction donc.

En fait, j'ai 2 logiciels de gestion des paramètres java : IcedTea Web Control Panel et Oracle Java 7 plugin control panel... Et c'était le second que je n'avais pas repéré, qu'il fallait utiliser. Le logiciel se lance correctement. Je vais maintenant pouvoir l'essayer un peu dans tous les sens et je reviendrai vers toi avec quelques retours s'il y en a !

Ma version de Java est la build 1.7.0_67-b01.

Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 20:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Edouard !

J'espère que tu vas bien, et je te t'envoie tous mes vœux pour cette nouvelle année !

Je reviens vers toi, car suite à un atelier avec un centre d'archive hier, je cherche un logiciel qu'ils puissent utiliser pour uploader des images avec insertion de métadonnées depuis un fichier annexe.

Comeon sait le faire il me semble, mais il semble également buggé, car il m'est désormais impossible d'importer des images dans le programme. Lorsqu'on clique sur le bouton pour importer des images, rien ne se produit... Peut-être ai-je fait une fausse manœuvre quelque part ? Peux-tu m'aider ? Bien cordialement. --M0tty (talk) 16:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salut @M0tty: ! Meilleurs vœux à toi aussi :)

Ce bug est étrange... Est-ce que le bouton d'import est grisé ? Si c'est le cas, c'est qu'il n'y a pas de modèle déclaré dans les préférences (voir la section First run sur Github). Si le bouton n'est pas désactivé, c'est plus grave. La dernière version (le logiciel se met à jour tout seul, c'est normalement celle que tu utilises) permet de déposer les images par drag & drop dans la fenêtre de ComeOn!, est-ce que ça coince aussi comme ça ?

--EdouardHue (talk) 18:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Edouard !

Le bouton est bien actif, un modèle est bien déclaré, et j'avais également essayé par drag&drop, rien ne fonctionne... Merci pour ton aide ! --M0tty (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@M0tty: Peux-tu essayer de lancer ComeOn en activant la console Java et m'envoyer tout ce qui sort dessus quand tu cliques sur le bouton ? Pour activer la console, ça se passe dans les paramètres cités plus haut, onglet « avancé », « afficher la console ». Tu devrais avoir une fenêtre supplémentaire en arrière-plan et, avec un peu chance, le détail de l'erreur qui fait que rien ne se passe... --EdouardHue (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Edouard !

Il semblerait que ça soit ma version de java (jre1.8.0_25) qui ait un problème, car impossible de faire afficher la console d'erreur... Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 10:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@M0tty: J'utilise cette version-là (ainsi que la 7) sans problème. Si tu es sous Linux, tu peux commencer par un javaws -viewer pour afficher la fenêtre de configuration de Java, puis télécharge le fichier .jnlp dans un coin et lance javaws <chemin du fichier jnlp>. Si la console ne s'affiche pas, c'est un problème de configuration du JRE, ComeOn n'intervient pas dans son ouverture. --EdouardHue (talk) 11:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, voici donc les messages qui apparaissent lorsque je clique sur le bouton :

INFO  [ComeOn!]: ComeOn! uses "ComeOn!/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/edouardhue/comeon; Édouard Hue) org.mediawiki:api:1.4-SNAPSHOT" as User-Agent
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-1" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
	at comeon.ui.actions.AddPicturesAction$1.run(AddPicturesAction.java:42)
	at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:312)
	at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:733)
	at java.awt.EventQueue.access$200(EventQueue.java:103)
	at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:694)
	at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:692)
	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
	at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76)
	at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:703)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:242)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:161)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:150)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:146)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:138)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:91)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: resource comeon/ui/addpictures_huge.png not found.
	at com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument(Preconditions.java:148)
	at com.google.common.io.Resources.getResource(Resources.java:229)
	at comeon.ui.add.AddPicturesDialog.<clinit>(AddPicturesDialog.java:18)
	... 15 more

Et visiblement, il y en a encore 15 autres...

Qu'en penses-tu ? Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 11:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gast ! Le PNG en question devrait pourtant être là... Peux-tu essayer de purger le cache du JRE ? Relance javaws -viewer, clique droit sur l'entrée ComeOn et fais supprimer. Il devrait tout retélécharger au prochain lancement, peut-être as-tu une archive corrompue (mais j'en doute) ? Tant que tu es dans la configuration du JRE, tu peux aussi vérifier que le niveau de sécurité est au plus bas (niveau « moyen »). --EdouardHue (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tout est rentré dans l'ordre après le purge de JRE. Merci pour ton assistance ! Cordialement. --M0tty (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmanuel Couet, président de Rennes Métropole, septembre 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The DoF is very shallow but it still depicts well the eyepart, nose and mouth. QI for me and EV. --Cccefalon 18:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Merci pour les images du rallye à Rennes hier. Ils sont très bons et je utiliseront une sélection dans un article sur Wikinews anglais. Se il vous plaît continuer à faire de belles photos. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anne-Laure Prévost at Wikimania 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buste de Paul Mougin dans la montée du col du Télégraphe.jpg

File:Buste de Paul Mougin dans la montée du col du Télégraphe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abbaye Blanche à Mortain

Bonjour à vous, j'ai supprimé le bandeau car il n'est pas indispensable de le mettre pour chaque fichier lorsque la catégorie mère l'intègre déjà, mais surtout parce que ce type de bandeau Mérimée, destiné à un élément protégé donc référencé PA, doit obligatoirement comporter le type de protection (classé ou inscrit) afin qu'il ne soit pas relégué dans une des catégories de maintenance: erreur pour absence de type de protection. En bref, si vous tenez à apposer ce bandeau Mérimée, il faut écrire dans le cas de cette abbaye: Mérimée|type=classé|PA00110521 puisqu'elle est classée, ce qui donne

This building is classé au titre des monuments historiques de la France. It is indexed in the base Mérimée, a database of architectural heritage maintained by the French Ministry of Culture, under the reference PA00110521

.

brezhoneg ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português do Brasil ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ +/−

pour un édifice inscrit Mérimée|type=inscrit|PA...... soit

This building is inscrit au titre des monuments historiques de la France. It is indexed in the base Mérimée, a database of architectural heritage maintained by the French Ministry of Culture, under the reference PA......

.

brezhoneg ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português do Brasil ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ +/−

et pour partiellement inscrit et partiellement classé |type=inscrit+classé|. Pour vous motiver, sachez que la catégorie de maintenance: Mérimée without type parameter comporte à ce jour plus de 65 000 fichiers erronés, ce qui la rend parfaitement ingérable à moins de passer de long mois à plusieurs volontaires pour l'apurer. Ceci écrit uniquement pour votre bonne information, sans aucune intention de vous fâcher et dans l’intérêt du projet Monuments historiques. Cordialement.Finoskov (talk) 21:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir @Finoskov: Merci pour ces précisions. Cependant, je ne suis pas totalement d'accord :) Il me semble important de conserver les modèles Mérimée / Palissy sur chaque page. Supprimer ces bandeaux retire des informations de la page de description qu'il est fastidieux d'aller chercher dans les catégories du fichier. Fragmenter les éléments de description d'une image dans les catégories rend le système inutilisable : vous imaginez-vous aller inspecter chaque catégorie pour vérifier si une photo représente un MH ? Et il ne s'agit pas d'élément de classification, contrairement à l'arborescence des catégories.

Par ailleurs, il me semble que le consensus au sein du projet MH est de placer ces bandeaux à la fois sur l'image et sur la catégorie du monument, tout comme la géolocalisation. Tout changement de nature à changer ce consensus devrait au préalable être discuté sur la PDD du projet.

De plus, il est bien pratique de trouver à plat dans une même catégorie tous les fichiers représentant des MH, Category:Mérimée with PA parameter par exemple. Je l'ai utilisée pas plus tard que ce week-end pour compter les photos de chaque MH et identifier ceux qui avaient été photographiés pour la première fois au cours de WLM 2015.

Enfin, quant à l'ajout du type de protection, c'est un travail ingrat et répétitif qui pourrait tout à fait être réalisé en quelques heures par un bot. Toutes les données nécessaires sont disponibles : les bases Mérimée et Palissy sont en open data.

--EdouardHue (talk) 22:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir @Finoskov: je ne suis pas d'accord non plus. Il me semble utile et nécessaire de mettre le bandeau sur chaque fichier. En tout cas, c'est ainsi que l'on procède depuis 2009 (notamment dans le cadre de WLM ; d'autres pays procèdent de même avec leurs propres bandeaux, les 138 000 fichiers avec {{BIC}} pour l'Espagne par exemple) et je ne vois aucune raison de faire autrement. Concernant la catégorie de maintenance, ce n'est pas vraiment un problème et elle ne contient pas de fichiers erronés per se, juste des fichiers en attentes de vérifications (et dans 99 % cas, c'est juste un problème d'inférence de l'information qui pourrait être facilement régler pas un robot, poke EdouardHue ce serait bien de faire tourner un tel bot ; cela ne me semble donc vraiment pas un problème). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 23:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Depuis des années, je rattache le bandeau Mérimée sur la catégorie du monument historique et ne l'indique plus du tout sur l'ensemble des photos correspondant à cette catégorie (exemple : Category:Château de Sainte-Fortunade). Le bandeau attaché individuellement aux photos ne sert que dans le cadre du WLM, auquel je ne participe pas. Pour info, lorsqu'on n'indique ni classé, ni inscrit, le bandeau permet de donner des informations sur un bâtiment recensé dans l'Inventaire général du patrimoine culturel (exemple : Category:Manoir de la Calonie). Il est donc utile de conserver cette possibilité. Père Igor (talk) 11:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pas d'accord non plus. Le principe de lier le description d'un fichier au contenu de la page de catégorie est mauvais. Il suffit que la catégorie soit retirée (c'est fréquent en cas de réorganisation) et hop, plus de description. - Bzh-99 (talk) 17:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Finoskov, EdouardHue, VIGNERON, and Bzh-99: lorsque un MH est signalé dans la base Mérimée, la catégorie de ce MH (château de ..., Église de ..., Pont de ..., Retable de ...) doit obligatoirement indiquer le lien avec la base Mérimée, ou Palissy. Par contre, le fait de l'ajouter aux photos me parait facultatif. Dès l'instant où le lien base Mérimée ou Palissy figure sur une catégorie, il est évident que toutes les photos de cette catégorie doivent correspondre au MH concerné. Ce n'est que depuis l'apparition du WLM que l'ajout du lien MH sur les photos s'est étendu, sans être une obligation. Pour information, les modèles Palissy et Mérimée indiquent tous deux depuis leur création « Ce modèle est prévu pour être utilisé dans les espaces de noms suivants : l’espace de noms Catégorie (Category) », et rien d'autre. Il va peut-être falloir faire évoluer ce texte. Père Igor (talk) 11:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

La suite de cette discussion qui intéresse l'ensemble des participants du projet MH est à faire sur Commons talk:Projet Monuments Historiques français#Déplacer les bandeaux Mérimée et Palissy sur les catégories ?, où je l'ai recopiée. Merci. Père Igor (talk) 11:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question on Comeon!

Hi EdouardHue,

I found your (awesome) uploadtool ComeOn and am trying to get it to work. I have no problem with uploading images and modifying templates, but I am not able to get the information from an CSV file into the tool. Unfortunately that's precisely the part that's not yet in the manual on GitHub. Do you have any tips for me or a short description of the steps I should take? Thanks! PS, I apologize that I write to you in English, but feel free to reply in French if you're more comfortable with that!--AWossink (talk) 08:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Église Sainte-Onenne, Tréhorenteuc, France.jpg

Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région australienne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région orientale, boîte 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région orientale, boîte 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région holarctique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for QI. --Peulle 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région afrotropicale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks all right. Good for QI. --Peulle 08:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région néotropicale, boîte 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 08:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région néotropicale, boîte 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak pro --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 08:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correction de deux photos de papillons

Bonjour, je voulais juste vous prévenir que les photos OBER-EXPO-008.jpg et OBER-EXPO-009.jpg, qui étaient identifiées comme Satyrus actaea, sont en réalité des Minois dryas. J'ai fait la correction. Cordialement --LamBoet (talk) 00:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fonds Brumter (SUN-1984-1) - 22.jpg

File:Fonds Brumter (SUN-1984-1) - 22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Off-shell (talk) 12:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Demandes de renommages d'images d'églises

Salut Edouard,

je viens de tomber sur ta liste de remandes de renommages, p.ex. ici. Tu y tiens? Avoir deux versions d'un fichier sous des noms différents n'est pas si gênant, à mon avis, puisqu'on peut utiliser les "other versions" das le {{Information}}. Ne pas effectuer ces renommages évite un travail quelque peu inutile (cela serait un boulot d'administrateur car la destination existe déjà, ce qui bloque les possibilités d'un filemover). Salutations, Grand-Duc (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salut @Grand-Duc: ,

C'est une bête erreur de manipulation de ma part que j'aimerais corriger. Garder les deux versions côte-à-côte n'a pas d'intérêt et va rendre le contenu de la catégorie moins lisible. J'ai hésité entre un speedy delete (pour renvoyer proprement les nouvelles versions ensuite) et un renommage... Dans tous les cas, il faut un admin :-/ EdouardHue (talk) 12:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oui, avoir une catégorie bien rangée est avantageux, c'est juste. J'ai collé un speedy aux fichiers que tu avais mis dans les "renommages"... à toi de jouer, ensuite! À+, Grand-Duc (talk) 12:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Erminig avec un sous-bock Wikipédia.jpg

Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 14:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Griffe à molette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool ;) --PierreSelim (talk) 07:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alène aux pinces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abat-carre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marteau ramponneau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compas à pointes sèches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Formoir en bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région néotropicale, boîte 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région orientale, boîte 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région afrotropicale, boîte 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région néotropicale, boîte 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cute. Wish they'd cleaned the walls, though --Daniel Case 06:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université de Rennes 1, collection Charles Oberthür, papillons, région holarctique, boîte 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Same as the other one --Daniel Case 06:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear EdouardHue,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

File:OBER-EXPO-012.jpg

Bonjour EdouardHue, un petit problème avec cette photo qui n'est évidemment pas Argynnis paphia ;-) Pouvez-vous vérifier de quel Lycaena il s'agit, et corriger ? Merci --LamBoet (talk) 13:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@LamBoet: En effet, il s’agit d’une erreur de recopie de ma part. L’étiquette dans sa boîte d’exposition l’identifie comme un Lycaena alciphron. Merci d’avoir repéré et signalé l’erreur ! --EdouardHue (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

En effet, voilà qui est plus logique, merci pour la correction :-) Je vois que c'est de cette même boîte que proviennent les deux Minois dryas que je vous avais signalés un peu plus haut. --LamBoet (talk) 15:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello EdouardHue, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adrienne Charmet ou Adrienne Alix

Bonsoir Edouard Hue,

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu indiques qu'il s'agit d'Adrienne Alix sur cette photo, alors que l'intéressée s'appelle Adrienne Charmet, comme indiqué dans la catégorie ?

Cordialement, Cymbella (talk) 19:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cymbella: Bonsoir. Il s'agit du nom qu'Adrienne portait quand la photo a été prise. Elle en a changé depuis, la catégorie a été renommée en 2015. Sens-toi libre de renommer le fichier si tu le souhaites. --EdouardHue (talk) 22:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK merci, pas de souci, c'était juste une question ! Renommer le fichier ne me semble pas nécessaire, mais indiquer les deux noms dans la description serait peut-être utile, en ajoutant par ex. une parenthèse "(aka Adrienne Charmet)" ? Cordialement, Cymbella (talk) 09:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Wikimaniacs having fun during Wikimania 2014 closing party-4.jpg

Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 09:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

This year is a world event.
The upload phase in many European countries ends on November 30th.
Here you can find more details in many languages.

This is a manually inserted message for the uploaders of the 2015 edition.

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Davidina armandi

Bonjour EdouardHue, j'ai remarqué que les photos File:OBER-EXPO-017.jpg et File:OBER-EXPO-010.jpg que vous aviez uploadées sont mal identifiées : je pense qu'il s'agit en fait d'une espèce du genre Aporia (ça ressemble par exemple à A. crataegi). Etaient-elles sous le nom de Davidina armandi dans la collection dont elles proviennent ? --LamBoet (talk) 21:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@LamBoet: Bonjour ! En effet, ces espèces semblent être très proches. Davidina armandi est bien l’identification de ces specimens dans la collection originelle. J’aurais tendance à faire confiance à cette identification : il s’agit de specimens extraits pour une expo de la collection historique d’Oberthür, qui a décrit le taxon. L’identification des spécimens de la collection a été contrôlée lors de la préparation de l’expo. --EdouardHue (talk) 06:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rebonjour ; je me permets d'insister, et si vous n'êtes pas convaincu, je vous suggère de comparer ces photos avec d'une part, ces photos de spécimens attestés de Davidina armandi, et d'autre part, ces photos de spécimens du genre Aporia (toujours sur l'exemple d’A. crataegi). Vous pourrez voir que l'agencement des nervures est fondamentalement différent, ce qui est normal, puisque ces deux taxons appartiennent à des familles différentes. Je suis surpris que l'erreur provienne de la collection originelle. Je remarque que pour le fichier File:OBER-EXPO-010.jpg, vous avez indiqué "Place of discovery : Stirovaca", qui se situe en Croatie, c'est-à-dire dans l'aire de répartition d’Aporia crataegi et bien loin de celle de Davidina armandi, qui est une espèce chinoise. Le lieu de capture de l'autre spécimen est-il également connu ? --LamBoet (talk) 09:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir @LamBoet: Je me suis contenté de reprendre les informations figurant dans le catalogue fourni par l’université, mais il ne serait pas surprenant que celui-ci contienne des erreurs, malgré les vérifications faites en préparation de l’exposition qui a permis ces photographies. Les informations indiquées sur Commons sont en tout cas cohérentes avec les étiquettes, comme vous pouvez le voir sur la vue d’ensemble de la boîte. Je transmets en tout cas votre observation à la responsable des collections, je vous tiendrai informé de sa réponse. --EdouardHue (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir EdouardHue, OK, merci ! En effet, j'ai vu après coup la photo de la boîte d'exposition, mais il serait intéressant de voir ce que disent les étiquettes de la collection originelle (en espérant qu'on puisse les retrouver). --LamBoet (talk) 22:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bon, comme entretemps cela a suscité de la confusion pour un autre utilisateur, je re-catégorise les deux photos dans Category:Unidentified Aporia. --LamBoet (talk) 11:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

@EdouardHue: you will notice I removed de Category:Ores from this and this file. Since you were the uploader, I was wondering if you could add the correct category Category:Ore maybe? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 09:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--21:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Questions sur ComeOn!

Bonjour EdouardHue !

Si jamais tu passes par là, je viens de découvrir l’existence de ComeOn! qui semble répondre à mon besoin (imports de planches d’herbier du MNHN, et import de nombreuses photos de fleurs que j’ai faites). Pourrais-tu m’aider à le faire fonctionner ? TE D 01:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour TED !

En effet, ComeOn! pourrait répondre à tes besoins. Par contre, je ne maintiens plus le code source et il ne devrait plus être possible de lancer le programme depuis la version 11 de Java. Pour le reste, les instructions sur [2] et Commons:ComeOn! sont toujours d’actualité. Tu auras peut-être plus de chance avec Vicuña !

--EdouardHue (talk) 06:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour EdouardHue !

Merci pour ta réponse. J’ai Java 8, donc cela devrait pouvoir fonctionner.

Si j’ai bien compris, ComeOn! permet de mettre un Template:Specimen pour la description des planches d’herbier (mais je n’ai pas encore compris comment), et j’ai l’impression que Vicuña ne le permet pas.

Peux-tu penser à me notifier dans tes réponses ? Je n’avais pas vu ta réponse, et je suis peu sur commons pour le moment. Avec une notification, je verrai plus vite ta réponse. Il suffit que tu mettes dans ton message {{Ping|TED}} et que tu n’oublies pas de signer le message en même temps. TE D 00:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TED: ,

Avec ComeOn!, le principe est de préparer trois choses en amont du versement :

Un modèle pour la page de déscription des media, où tu peux mettre absolument tout ce que tu veux ;
Un répertoire avec les médias à importer ;
Un fichier CSV décrivant chaque média : à chaque ligne, on doit retrouver le nom du fichier et toutes les informations à insérer dans la page de description.

ComeOn! va lire le fichier CSV et pour chaque ligne, générer la page de description en insérant dans le modèle les valeurs trouvées dans le CSV, présenter une prévisualisation que tu pourras retoucher, et envoyer le tout sur Commons quand tu le lui demanderas.

J‘ai déjà importé des planches d’herbier du MNHN avec ComeOn!, en 2015. J’ai perdu le fichier CSV mais le modèle est dans le pack de de base (https://github.com/edouardhue/comeon-templates/blob/master/velocity/mnhn-herbiers.vm). Les média sont dans Category:Herbarium of Muséum national d'histoire naturelle (File:Ornithogalum tenuifolium Guss.(MNHN P01775970).jpg par exemple).

--EdouardHue (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour ces informations !

J’ai déjà importé « à la main » deux planches d’herbiers, que j’ai mises dans la Category:Herbarium of Muséum national d'histoire naturelle : File:Argyeria androyensis type MNHN-P-P00298517.jpg et File:Argyeria androyensis isotype MNHN-P-P00298518.jpg. Peux-tu y jeter un œil, et me dire si j’ai fait une bêtise ?

Si je comprends bien le lien que tu me donnes pour le modèle dans le pack de base : il va chercher tout seul la plupart des informations dans la base de données du MNHN ? (tout ce qui est indiqué avec $external) Ou bien est-ce que je dois tout remplir dans le fichier à préparer à côté ? (et dans ce cas $external fait référence à mon fichier)

Comme j’ai le projet d’importer beaucoup de planches d’herbier, ce serait intéressant si j’avais le moins de chose à écrire moi-même, ce qui limitera les erreurs en recopiant… TE D 14:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @TED:

À première vue ton import me semble tout à fait correct :)

Il n’y a pas de magie, ComeOn! ne va pas lire directement de base de données externes. C’est à toi de préparer le fichier avec les données, $external fait référence à ce fichier.

Le plus efficace serait de générer le fichier à partir d’une extraction de la base de données du MNHN. Je n’ai pas l’impression que le MNHN en mette à disposition, il faudrait peut-être les contacter.

--EdouardHue (talk) 07:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour ! Du coup, je ne vois pas bien l’intérêt… s’il faut copier-coller les infos dans un fichier externe, autant copier-coller les infos directement dans l’assistant d’import de Commons. TE D 13:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TED: Effectivement, ça n’a pas grand intérêt de faire du copier-coller, mais c’est quand même plus efficace et moins sujet aux erreurs que d'importer chaque image une par une dans l’assistant. ComeOn! est surtout utile dans le cas où l’on dispose déjà du catalogue sous forme de fichier, pour éviter tout traitement manuel. Ça vaudrait le coup de prendre contact avec le MNHN pour demander une extraction. --EdouardHue (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gargouille sur la façade est du Vieux logis (Le Mont-Saint-Michel, Manche, France).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ComeOn rate limit

Hi Edouard, thanks for creating the ComeOn tool. I have spent many hours trying to figure it out today (I didn't even have java installed...) but have finally got it working. It will only let me upload about 380 files at a time, after which it says I have exceeded my rate limit and I have to wait "some time". Is this supposed to happen, and is there anything I can do to get around the limitation? I currently have about 2,000 files to upload, and more after that. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:25, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Onceinawhile: Hi! Thanks for using my tool. The rate limit is not built into ComeOn, it is enforced by Commons. There is no way to override it by yourself. It will trigger if you upload more than a number of files within a time period, and will reset after this period has ended. Whether you hit the limit or not mostly depends on the size of your files and the bandwidth of your connection. Unfortunately I can't find anymore the help pages where this limit is described. I vaguely remember that you can ask for a raise for your account. You should ask at the Village pump. Regards, --EdouardHue (talk) 09:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Edouard. It is a great tool and has saved me an enormous amount of time. Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monuments historiques sous la villa Saint-Michel (Le Mont-Saint-Michel, Manche, France).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 16:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Façade ouest de la maison de l'Artichaut (Le Mont-Saint-Michel, Manche, France).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--14:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Fonds Brumter (SUN-1984-1) - 15.jpg

Yours sincerely, Maxinvestigator (talk) 00:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--17:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ancien siège du journal Ouest-France à Rennes.jpg

And also:

File:Marquise de l'ancien siège du journal Ouest-France à Rennes.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]