User talk:Udufruduhu

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Udufruduhu!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Sébastien Chabal

Attention ! http://www.flickr.com/photos/steve_chilton/2321174743 Pas de droit commercial : je crois que ce n'est pas bon. Ddfree (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Sébastien_Chabal_3.jpg

File:Sébastien_Chabal_3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ciell (talk) 21:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Attention ! http://www.flickr.com/photos/steve_chilton/2321174743 Pas de droit commercial : je crois que ce n'est pas bon. Ddfree (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Comment ça? il y a marqué licence creative commons mais je ne vois pas en quoi l'importation sur commons est une utilisation commerciale. Udufruduhu (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

TaraO saurait nous dire si c'est bon... Sinon l'administrateur Modèle:flickrreview... Ddfree (talk) 21:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

salut les gars. Non ce n'est pas bon : le $ est de trop. Toute photo importée sur commons peut être vendue (voir Commons:À propos des licences). --TaraO (talk) 21:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

C'est bien ça... Ddfree (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Images on Flickr with CC license moduls ND (non-derivative) and NC (non-commercial) are not accepted here. If you use the advanced search on Flickr you must check all checkboxes in the licensing section: Creative Commons; for commercial use; for derivative works. --Martin H. (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 2863980bd61e4a3c6250214f1128550b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File tagging Image:Prince-Alexander-Obolensky.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Prince-Alexander-Obolensky.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Prince-Alexander-Obolensky.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Bapti ✉ 09:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

J'ai transféré le mail que j'ai reçu de Lordprice. Le mieux est de voir directement avec lui. A plus, Udufruduhu (talk) 14:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Tu l'a transféré où ? C'est bien à toi de faire en sorte qu'il y ait une permission claire pour l'image que tu importes sinon elle sera rapidement supprimée.--Bapti ✉ 09:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Ben oui, c'est bien pourquoi j'ai contacté lordprice. Mais après avoir reçu son mail, je ne savais pas quoi faire, ni si sa réponse était suffisante pour retirer le bandeau sur l'image. Je ne sais pas comment ça fonctionne OTRS. C'est pourquoi j'ai besoin d'aide. J'ai donc envoyé sa réponse à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, mais j'ai pas eu de réponse en retour... Udufruduhu (talk) 19:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Tu as envoyé ce mail hier après mon message sur ta page de discussion : les volontaires OTRS, dont je fais partie sont des bénévoles, donc il est normal que tu n'ai pas forcément une réponse en 24h chrono (surtout que tu as envoyé le mail à l'adresse utilisée par des anglophones). C'est un peu dommage de ne pas avoir fait suivre AVANT cet échange, d'autant que sur le bistro de Wikipédia, des personnes t'ont clairement averti du problème.--Bapti ✉ 20:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Oui j'ai transféré le mail hier après ton message car avant je ne savais pas quoi faire jusque-là. Si j'avais su qui contacter j'aurai bien évidemment transféré le mail de lordprice avant. Je te signale quand même que je ne suis pas resté sans rien faire car j'ai écrit un message à Guillom. Ce n'est qu'à la lecture de ton message qui me donnait une adresse email que j'ai eu une info sur les personnes à contacter à ce sujet. Si je l'ai envoyé à l'adresse utilisée par les anglophones c'est parce que c'est celle que tu m'as donnée (voir le cadre ci-dessus). Pour éviter ce genre de problème, je te conseille de modifier ton modèle en conséquence avec l'adresse pour les francophones.

Ensuite, lorsque j'ai transféré l'image sur commons (directement après ce diff), je n'avais aucun avis vraiment négatif sur le bistrot. Seul Manuguf émettait une réserve mais sans en être certain. Il m'a écrit : « si la licence est bien celle dite, et si l'autorisation en bonne et due forme a été donnée par OTRS pour mettre ce document sous cette licence, ça peut être mis sur Commons sans plus de formalité. Si l'autorisation est assortie de restriction, on ne peut pas transférer, mais alors ce n'est pas une CC-BY-SA 2.5. ... et il y a un souci quand à sa présence sur wp:en ». Je me suis dit, avec le recul je l'admets bien naïvement, que si les anglais avaient laissé l'image c'est que la licence était bonne et donc j'ai fait le transfert. Ce n'est qu'après que j'ai eu des messages sur le bistrot me déconseillant de faire le transfert, mais c'était trop tard. Alors, oui on m'a averti mais pas dans le bon timing. Je veux bien admettre que mon upload n'était pas opportun mais par contre je trouve fort de café qu'on me dise que j'y suis allé franco contre les avis exprimés.

Tu as supprimé l'image mais comme le problème ne vient pas de lordprice (il avait envie de partager ses images avec wikipédia) je me doute qu'il y a une autre raison derrière. Quelle est-elle? Ignore ma question je viens d'avoir de lire le mail réponse des bénévoles OTRS. Au passage, il reste deux version de cette image qu'il faudrait sans doute supprimer [1] et [2], si jamais tu connais les gens qui peuvent le faire. A plus, Udufruduhu (talk) 00:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Si tes préférences sont en français, l'adresse donnée ci-dessus est déjà permissions-commons-fr et non l'adresse des anglophones. Enfin, ceci n'est qu'un détail mineur, mais qui allonge généralement le délai de traitement du courriel.

Effectivement, je n'avais pas vu que tu avais importé si vite l'image. Du coup, en deux heures, il est un peu normal que tu n'ai eu que des réponses très vagues. Au passage, il y a aussi un bistro sur Commons, moins réactif que celui de Wikipédia mais plus approprié pour ce genre de questions.

Merci pour les signalements des deux images, je vais demander leur suppression.--Bapti ✉ 10:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 0f57937a3004a50b68046a2f06295946

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File source is not properly indicated: File:Osbert_Mackie.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Osbert_Mackie.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Osbert_Mackie.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Osbert_Mackie.jpg

File:Osbert_Mackie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Double votes for POTY 2010

Just to let you know, you can vote only for one image in the final round of POTY2010. I saw you voted for more ... please remove all your votes and leave just one, otherwise none of your votes will count. Have a nice day, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

I think you are mistaken, I voted only for this picture. All my other edits concern the checking of the illegibility of the voters. Udufruduhu (talk) 11:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Catégories des joueurs par club

Bonjour!

J'ai laissé un message pour toi sur ta page de discussion francophone. Place Clichy 14:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Oui j'ai vu. Merci pour le message. Udufruduhu (talk) 14:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

File:990x990-gif.gif

Bonjour Bapti,

Pourrais-tu passer un coup de balais ? Merci, Udufruduhu (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

C'est fait, mais il aurait suffit d'attendre qu'un administrateur vienne faire le ménage ;)--Bapti ✉ 16:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Merci ! Udufruduhu (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Template:Rename

I noticed a few problems.

Sometimes the rename suceeds but the code is unable to carry on the last two steps (removing the template, posting on commonsdelinker). This happens when the target rename is filtered, ie how .JPG becomes .jpg

The code then complains how it cannot move page onto itself like here: [3]

Also consider the case where a page is moved but the template wasn't removed. There should be a button to remove the template and check if entry was posted to commons delinker and post if it hasn't been. [4]

-- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 14:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

I don't know why you're asking this to me but I can't help you with that. You should ask your question on the talk page of the template. Udufruduhu (talk) 14:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

I thought you were maintaining the template but ok. I will do that. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 09:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

POTY

Hi Udu,

Funny, our votes are on the same picture Commons:Picture of the Year/2011/Finalists/Lake Bondhus Norway 2862.jpg at the same time. What a coincidence ! Best.--LPLT (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Salut,

Oui coincidence sympathique. Udufruduhu (talk) 16:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Here we're in Florida, we speak Floridian. Ok...--LPLT (talk) 20:52, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Tu es maintenant autopatrolled parce que parce que! --PierreSelim (talk) 21:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Merci. Udufruduhu (talk) 21:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Filemover or not, that is the question

J'ai fait une demande ici Commons:Requests_for_rights#Udufruduhu. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

ha ha je t'ai fait craquer : tu n'en peux plus de passer derrière moi pour répondre mes demandes de renommages  !!

Merci pour la demande. Udufruduhu (talk) 14:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Concours du nombre de lignes par modèle d'avis.

Bonjour,

Je t'inscris au concours du plus grand nombre de lignes pour l'utilisation d'un modèle, grâce à ton subst d'un modèle de vote positif. Bilan : 42 lignes. --Dereckson (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Category:Former players of CS Bourgoin-Jallieu

Category:Former players of CS Bourgoin-Jallieu has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Current players of Stade Français

Category:Current players of Stade Français has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Current players of Racing Métro 92

Category:Current players of Racing Métro 92 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Former players of SC Albi

Category:Former players of SC Albi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)}

File:Chris Ashton2.jpg

File:Chris Ashton2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:13, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you kidding ? The orginal file was on a CC-BY-SA licence when I uploaded it, user:Leoboudv confirmed it. The licence has now been changed back, but it does not imply a deletion now. Udufruduhu (talk) 07:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

Thanks for the action and the information, cheers Udufruduhu (talk) 08:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Udufruduhu⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Udufruduhu,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)