User talk:JukoFF/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Do you have a better version of File:Bizon-Treck-Show Russia Rostov-on-Don 2009 may-6.JPG?
If you can supply the same exact image as File:Bizon-Treck-Show Russia Rostov-on-Don 2009 may-6.JPG at a larger resolution (or media at a higher bitrate, etc.), please just upload it over the original, users will get the new higher quality version with no further effort on your part. If on the other hand, the content is only similar, it is best to select a new image name, as there may be uses already where some aspect of the existing media was key to the usage. In the latter case, if you can provide a crosslink reference to the new image in the older one and vice versa, that will be extremely helpful.
Again, thank you very much for your contribution, it is appreciated.High Contrast (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Image transfer from Wikipedia to Commons
Hello JukoFF!
Thanks a lot for your contributions! If you transfer images from Wikipedia to Commons, please use this tool. This tool retains all relevant information with correct sourcing and licencing. And by the way it makes file transfers faster and easier for the uploader.
Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 13:05, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
TUSC token 854022798fee0c98205279b5b9cd0285
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Hi, Please look, thanks.
File:Gennafamily.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hold and wave (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Udodov Ivan Vasilievich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Filipp Sergeyevich Oktyabrskiy - Hero of the Soviet Union.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Kurochkin Pavel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 18:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Portnova Zina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Olympic Diver Tom Daley of Great Britain.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 18:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
File:David Michael Bentle 16 09 2012 Rostov on Don stadium Olimp 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Savhñ 20:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Памятник Чукарину.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File:Parasitic isopod (ver b-w).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 00:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Hilary Rhoda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rillke(q?) 09:27, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Dubosekovo - place feat Panfilov's Twenty-Eight Guardsmen 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A.Savin 21:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 22:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:Constance Jablonski 0.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear JukoFF, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear JukoFF, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 Results
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear JukoFF,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Эта и следующие - закопирайченные фотки AP. У них в EXIF даже об этом написано. Посмотри внизу раздел Метаданные. --sasha (krassotkin) 13:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Жаль :) JukoFF (talk) 13:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Уфф... остановил. Ну ты даёшь, полдня пытаюсь до тебя достучаться:). Да, так бывает, ничего страшного, найдём ещё хороших источников. По опыту, лучше их самому на быстрое выставить, чем сейчас админы начнут твою СО месагами украшать. --sasha (krassotkin) 13:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Да я на форуме чирканул что бы разом все прибили. Во все надо искать плюсы, зато категорий сколько создал :) JukoFF (talk) 13:37, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Поудалял. Если нужен сисоп на Викискладе - пинайте меня rubin16 (talk) 14:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Croatia and Cameroon match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-18 (17).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Croatia and Cameroon match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-18 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Croatia and Cameroon match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-18 (10).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Croatia and Cameroon match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-18 (11).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Croatia and Cameroon match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-18 (12).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Croatia and Cameroon match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-18 (13).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Croatia and Cameroon match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-18 (14).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Croatia and Cameroon match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-18 (20).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PeeJay2K3 (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (10).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (11).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (12).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (13).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (14).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (15).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (16).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (2).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (3).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (4).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (5).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (6).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (7).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (8).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17 (9).jpg
- File:Brazil and Mexico match at the FIFA World Cup 2014-06-17.jpg
I believe you're aware of the confusing licensing issue at the World Cup portal. Sorry about the extra talk message. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:11, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 23:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
File:2013 World Championships in Athletics (August, 12) - Lukáš Melich.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
C messier (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Estadi Comunal d'Aixovall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Айсберг в районе ЗФИ.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Айсберг в районе ЗФИ.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:По гротам пещеры 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:По гротам пещеры 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Centro Cultural Banco do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro).jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 09:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
ESPC 2015
Could you please add a Russian translation here. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Test image for ESPC-RU.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Cornaredo Stadium FC Lugano vs. FC Basel - 22.08.2015.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Cornaredo Stadium FC Lugano vs. FC Basel - 22.08.2015.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 06:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Vitalie Rotaru - Digital Feelings -- Tunguska E.M.S. for Creative Commons (track 12).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 08:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stolbovsky (talk) 22:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Two nominations per user
You can have just 2 nominations at one time. First one is this, second is Ginko biloba, so other two have to wait till someone close. --Mile (talk) 10:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC) p.S. Since i reccomend just one nominee, there would be huge mess if everyone could have more than 2 nominees.
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Поперечный срез стебля Ginkgo biloba.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Поперечный срез стебля Ginkgo biloba.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Color SEM 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Color SEM 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Проводящий пучок Pteridium aquilinum.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Проводящий пучок Pteridium aquilinum.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Taekwondo at the 2016 Summer Olympics - 80 kg 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 03:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Здравствуйте
Здравствуйте, Вы мне писали сообщение, но оно не открывается(
Илья Бунин (talk) 17:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Tasnim News images
Hi JukoFF, I saw you uploaded loads of images from the Tasnim News website to commons. Great job. I don't have time to do it myself, but I'm making a list of other albums that should be uploaded to commons. If you are willing to upload some of them, that would be a great contribution!!
See en:User:Sander.v.Ginkel/TasnimNewsImages
Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Летний Олимпийский марафон 2016
Поздравляю с заслуженной наградой!--KSK (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
.
- Благодарю:) JukoFF (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Вид на Исторический музей в сторону Красной площади.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Вид на Исторический музей в сторону Красной площади.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Плоская Башня Псковского Кремля.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Плоская Башня Псковского Кремля.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
File:2016 Summer Olympics opening ceremony - photo news agency Tasnimnews 08.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
lNeverCry 01:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Misidentified image
File:Judo at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 kg 26.jpg comes from the same source as the mens 100kg, but this is a photograph of two women competitors. I'm hoping you'll be able to figure out what competition this image is from so the file name and information can be corrected. Thanks. Daphne Lantier 02:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- File:Judo at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 kg 3.jpg and File:Judo at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 kg 9.jpg have the same problem. Luckily, they're in Category:Judo at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Women's 78 kg, so I can do file renames and partial corrections of the descriptions. You'll have to update the non-English descriptions. Daphne Lantier 02:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Many thanks that found the forced error :) Description of the photos is universal and with the change of categories will not change. JukoFF (talk) 08:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Is there any way you can update the descriptions in the other languages besides English to show that these three images are Women's 78 kg? I had to remove the mens 100kg from these descriptions. Daphne Lantier 09:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Скала Англичанка 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Скала Англичанка 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:V78A5310.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:V78A5310.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Около Дурман-горы.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Около Дурман-горы.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Поезд на фоне горы Шатрище. Воронежская область.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Поезд на фоне горы Шатрище. Воронежская область.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Маяк Анива.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Маяк Анива.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Yaroslavl ElijahProphetChurchInterior 7302.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yaroslavl ElijahProphetChurchInterior 7302.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Pinus heldreichii Den Ouden.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pinus heldreichii Den Ouden.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Mohammad Hassanzadeh
Please credit Mohammad Hassanzadeh as it is written in the credit, not "Mohammad Hassansadeh". Thanks! - Alexis Jazz 09:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Слепень (серия 1 из 2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Слепень (серия 1 из 2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Pteridium pinetorum ssp. sibiricum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pteridium pinetorum ssp. sibiricum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
File:2013 World Championships in Athletics (August, 12)- Usain Bolt.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
About the results of WSC2017 for Russia
Hi. In Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2017/Winners There are some Russian finalists but not a lot of them, IMHO. Since you were active on the set-up of the summary pages here and on the ruwikimedia wiki, I suppose you were involved.
It's the same "problem" with Ukraine, you both underperform this year. It might be random but since it occured to both and you are quite similar it's worth to just think about it. I'd like to give you some advise for next edition.
First of all, we asked on the international mailing list of the organizers months ago to provide some international jurors from the network of local chapters. I did my best to give a balanced jury but I really could not find anyone in the area of Eastern Europe. I don't think the jurors prefer on purpose a country or another (no information was given in the summary page about that), but taste is a strange matter and the more miscellaneous the jury is, the better it is. Please next year whichever expert jurors from your country you can provide (I am sure you have some after many editions), let us know. Jurors from Wiki Loves Monuments or Wiki Loves Earth are also fine, we need more photographers.
Secondly, I did my best to add more finalists for some countries in their own interest. I think we sent an email about that too, it's a way to increase the chances and engage people who did not win a prize. I did not want to decide for them, but some said they weren't interested so I asked the second-level jury. For example this image was picked a third choice for Spain, they did not want to add more files than the winner. It ranked however much better than the national winner, that's why Spain is there.
The problem with Russia and Ukraine is that with so many images I did not have enough time to add one or two with the help of the second-level jurors. I could do that for small countries when they gave no additional finalists, but not with such a big one. I had to fix unexpected problems with Saudi Arabia, Brasil and Poland so it was really busy. You had three so I said, fair enough.
Next time please think about selecting not just three "winners" but more runner-ups, I'd say a total of six considering your upload. This will give a much wider choice for the taste of the international jury.
That's it. Good luck for WSC2019.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
2018 Science Competition in Russia - Results post
Hi!
I saw that you have a lot of nice pictures at User:JukoFF/WLS-2018_-Final from the Russian 2018 competition. Would you be willing to write a post to be published on the main competition website? Would be great to have something posted about it there :) --Reosarevok (talk) 10:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Болотные Кипарисы.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Болотные Кипарисы.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Лежка моржей на острове Нортбрук.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Лежка моржей на острове Нортбрук.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Остров Белл и Убежище Эйры.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Остров Белл и Убежище Эйры.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
shoten
Hi, Could you please explain what do you mean by your comment on FPC. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
WSC2019 meeting
FYI this meeting is planned at the WikiSummit in Berlin at the end of March. All organizers and representatives of national chapters are invited or should take a look at the end at the summary of the event.
This message is left to everyone who was involved in the 2017 edition. Please spread the news to whom might be interested.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)