Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Almaty
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Almaty
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Kazakhstan: no evidence these works would be free.
- File:3d central museum.jpg
- File:Al-Farabi University.jpg
- File:ALA Celinnyi kinoteatr.jpg
- File:ALADomAuezova.JPG
- File:ALAdomKino.jpg
- File:ALALibrary.JPG
- File:ALAShinhanBank.jpg
- File:ALASymbat.JPG
- File:Almatis Panfilov Guardsmens Square.jpg
- File:Almaty AlFarabi ave.jpg
- File:Central Asia games coming to Almaty (3992612942).jpg
- File:Deutsch-Kasachische Universität in Almaty (1), Kasachstan.JPG
- File:Deutsch-Kasachische Universität in Almaty (2), Kasachstan.JPG
- File:E8607-Almaty-boulevard.jpg
- File:E8635-Almaty-Zoo-gates.jpg
- File:E8636-Almaty-Central-Park-Aquapark.jpg
- File:High Fashion in Almaty (13214999).jpg
- File:National Mourning in Kazakhstan 2012-06-05.JPG
- File:P1050183+.JPG
- File:Resey Trade Market.JPG
- File:Temirbank almaty.JPG
- File:Tvcentr.jpg
- File:Алматы - На Новой площади.jpg
- File:Главный корпус №1 Казахский национальный аграрный университет.JPG
- File:Есентай.JPG
- File:Фонтан "Яблоко" на вершине Кок-Тобе..JPG
Eleassar (t/p) 22:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom, except for the following: File:High Fashion in Almaty (13214999).jpg (its costumes, albeit for a cat), File:View from Xeniyas Balcony (3992603738).jpg (the building in the front is a Soviet-style industrial type building which are a dime a dozen and hardly copyrightable, the building in the middle is under construction, there is a crane on the left, and the building on the right would be de minimis in terms of the view), File:ALADomAuezova.JPG (the view is almost totall obstructed by trees), File:Temirbank almaty.JPG looks to me like the Brezhnev-style Soviet office blocks with no creativity and are a dime a dozen throughout the CIS -- this is a weak keep), russavia (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with keeping File:View from Xeniyas Balcony (3992603738).jpg and File:ALADomAuezova.JPG. For the other images, I've nominated them due to the following reason:
- File:High Fashion in Almaty (13214999).jpg - jewelry is copyrighted [1]
- File:Temirbank almaty.JPG - hard to judge for me, but we have no evidence of any TOO from Kazakhstan, therefore all architecture must be presumed copyrighted. Even if there are countless like it, at some point, its design required creative input. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with keeping File:View from Xeniyas Balcony (3992603738).jpg and File:ALADomAuezova.JPG. For the other images, I've nominated them due to the following reason:
- File:National Mourning in Kazakhstan 2012-06-05.JPG. Mourning in Kazakhstan was the unique event in Kazakhstan and also the flag is on building of akimat of Almaty which is standard building and are a dime a dozen in the CIS. --Mheidegger (talk) 03:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hard to judge for me, but it is a notable building that was built upon the plans of an architect. We have no evidence of any TOO from Kazakhstan, therefore all architecture must be presumed copyrighted. Even if there are countless like it, at some point, its design required creative input. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- But main object of the photo is not the building which was not even 10% shown but the flag during the mourning. --Mheidegger (talk) 08:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- In my opinion, this qualifies as very unlikely DM per COM:DM#Guidelines: "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work radically different, but potentially still useful." The building is one of the key parts of the image. It is clear that removing it would make the derivative work radically different. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hard to judge for me, but it is a notable building that was built upon the plans of an architect. We have no evidence of any TOO from Kazakhstan, therefore all architecture must be presumed copyrighted. Even if there are countless like it, at some point, its design required creative input. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Прошу прощения - а можно мне на русском объяснить: почему надо удалять файлы File:Главный корпус №1 Казахский национальный аграрный университет.JPG и File:Фонтан "Яблоко" на вершине Кок-Тобе..JPG? По какому именно критерию они не подходят Википедии? Есть --Kalabaha1969 (talk) 10:30, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep what is the use of this voting if there is a rule? And the rule was not even quoted here, there is no link on the page to see it and even the reason about deleting was not put down. Wright down somewhere it is about architecture and put the link saying - 'any building are classified as non free architecture unless the opposite have been stated'. I have no evidence saying this buildings and the pattern of dirt on it is in a common domain --Deviloper (talk) 03:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- The rule has been mentioned right in the beginning: COM:FOP#Kazakhstan. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Kazakhstan FASTILY 00:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)