User talk:Gbawden/Archive 7

Two Deleted Photos

File:Jon Carin - Orange.jpg and File:Jon Carin - Roger Waters Us & Them Tour.jpg have been deleted: I edit Wiki items in the Pink Floyd space and I think I added the Orange file to his article. These pictures are from the artist, I'm quite sure his own wife took them. How can we restore them for public use? I ask because I think his wife donated them so I'm not sure what she may have overlooked doing. I would certainly put the time in to help the owner of this photography resubmit it correctly. --1987atomheartbrother (talk) 23:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

@1987atomheartbrother: Hi. The photos mention that they are directly from the photographer. The person who takes the photos owns the copyright and they need to give Commons permission to host the files. Take a look at COM:L. Ask them to send permission via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

From My Recent Deletion Requests

Hey there, thank you for reviewing my deletion request concerning the file Turtle Back Zoo Railroad July 2020.jpg. After reviewing the file more closely,. I now agree that it's actually good enough to stay on Wikipedia. My reason may have not been the best, but the main reason is because it was a screenshot from a YouTube video (which I also own): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNz7OAjaMSw

I have also nominated three other files for deletion, which I will list below. All but one are also screenshots from YouTube. If you have time, I would also appreciate your feedback so we can figure out whether or not these should be deleted.

Jenkinson's Boardwalk Train 06-28-2019.jpg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StbdwxRuhfA

Jenkinson's Boardwalk Train 08-2-2019.jpg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9PejD7ZJGY

NYC Subway Holiday Train.jpg: No source but it's a really poor depiction.

Davidng913 (talk) 20:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

@Davidng913: Hi. The first problem is that the video license is not Creative Commons at the moment. You would need to change that if you use the youtube video as a source - we check the source license to verify the cc claim. Secondly, using the whole video on commons would be a problem as the music you added is not free. However this wouldn't be a problem if you just use stills. Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Thank you. At this point, I'll probably have all three files deleted since again they are screenshots from videos without a Creative Commons license, and I have no intention on changing the video license. I may as well renominate the Turtle Back Zoo Railroad file for deletion for the same reason, as I unfortunately cannot find a better resolution. Davidng913 (talk) 22:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Machan_Taylor_by_Maria_Chiara_Freddura.jpg

Hi: my understanding is the photographer has submitted an email to the link provided in the note warning that the file will be deleted without proof of their consent.--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 18:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Life sized cardboard cutouts of the Moe Character(Monami Gentsuki and friends).jpg

Hello. Sorry to bother you. I noticed that you are an administrator. Please help me. There are photos I took and uploaded with the permission of the copyright owner. Evidence of the license is published on the official website of the original author(license page). I also provided a link to the license page when I uploaded. Despite that situation, a deletion has been proposed. If there is no problem, I would like you to kept. Please point out any problems. I'm sorry to cause you trouble.--SetoMonamer (talk) 08:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

@SetoMonamer: The issue here is whether the CC license also covers the characters in the picture. I think it should be OK but I would let another admin review it Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your busy schedule.

I consulted with other administrators too, but there is no response.

All mascot characters included in the photos are copyrighted by "Monami Gentsuki project steering committee".

The Monami Gentsuki project steering committee has allowed the use of this photo under a GFDL and CC-BY-SA license[1].

The license page shown above is managed by Monami Gentsuki project steering committee.

There is a similar description on the license page.--SetoMonamer (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

I had my photo reviewed.--SetoMonamer (talk) 07:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

thank you for helping me.

Thank you for your cooperation.--SetoMonamer (talk) 08:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Potential block

I have not "uploaded photos I found on the internet."

How about you be nice and stop leaving me threatening messages on my talk page? Thanks. PidgeCopetti (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy Christmas and new year holidays

	Merry Christmas and new year, Gbawden
	Hi Gbawden, Have a sweet and a safe Christmas and New Year holidays. Wishing you a colorful Christmas season. , --Contributers2020Talk to me here 10:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

LassiNummi1967.jpg

We went over this the last time, but now you're at it again. Only a few months ago, I told you this: "You demanded more evidence for the inclusion of this image in the Commons. This use is within the CC BY 4.0 license of this image. You could have seen the evidence for yourself if you had visited the link given below the image. Please retract your error. In the future, please try to show the minimum amount of care before wasting other users' time with nonsense like this." Remember? Read it a few times more until it sticks. --Inehmo (talk) 10:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your nomination for deletion of the 2 images of myself on wikipedia page referring to me

Both images are of me. The left-most (dated a shown in photo) by Professor Peter Ratoff of ad Lancaster University, England who gave his permission permission to me to distribute and use it, releasing his copyright to me. The right-most (dated as shown in title attached to photo) was taken by a friend at my request on my camera, and I own the copyright.

Laurence Godfrey, France DrLGodfrey (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

File:At the End It's You Lucifer.pdf

Hello. Thought I let you know that Commons:Deletion requests/File:At the End It's You Lucifer.pdf was closed by you as delete but the file is still active at File:At the End It's You Lucifer.pdf. No worries if the picture didn't get deleted due to a script error. Thanks! :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Cynthia Maung.jpg

Hi. I just noticed Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Emily Khine, and I'm quite positive there was consensus to delete. It should also be clearer now since the current version of the image (uploaded September 2020) has Exif info stating, "Copyright (C) James Mackay / enigmaimages.net". --Paul_012 (talk) 16:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@Paul 012: Hi. This was kept as it was supposedly a VOA work but as you point out the new version makes it clear that this is not the case. I have nominated the files for deletion Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

NARA TIF files

Bonjour,

I mostly follow the directions of admins on the Commons regarding my categorization of files. I received the following message on my talk page from Pi.1415926535 some months ago:

"Just an FYI re your categorization of this file: for files from NARA that have identical JPG (for article use) and TIF (lossless version for editing), only the JPG needs to be categorized. (See Category:NARA TIF images with categorized JPGs)."

Since then I have been following this advice and as I go through categories I am understanding the reason behind this view. Krok6kola (talk) 12:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

@Krok6kola: Thanks for that. I have always thought that both had to be in the same category to make it easier to find them.

@Pi.1415926535: Hi Pi. Can you give me some guidance on how to categorise these TIFF's then? TIA Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

You can see both versions if you look towards the bottom of the .jpg file. e.g. File:INTERIOR OF AN AMTRAK DOME PASSENGER CAR HAS BEEN STRIPPED AT A PLANT IN MIRA LOMA, CALIFORNIA, NEAR RIVERSIDE. IT IS... - NARA - 555956.jpg (I know from experience Pi.1415926535 is very busy and does not answer me at least). Krok6kola (talk) 15:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Re: Human Erected Penis.jpg

This file is clearly blurry and badly lit, and there’s a ton of better images of penises on commons. I’d like if you withdrew your premature “keep” close and let the debate run out normally since this isn’t a clear case of COM:PORN like the exhibitionism spam. Dronebogus (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Lil Loaded.png

Hey, I saw that you deleted the image File:Lil Loaded.png because it was a "Personal photo by non-contributors (F10)". I think I'm the one who uploaded from there, as it was from this video and was a creative commons license (see my edit). Yet, I never got any notification of deletion and it doesn't seem like it wasn't useful (as it would be used in his article). Did something happen to the image that caused it to be deleted? --Reppop (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

@Reppop: That was an oversight on my part. I have undeleted it Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I've removed the brackets so it doesn't screw up your page. --Reppop (talk) 22:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ukraine solidarity protest Hannover 2022-03-13

Bitte aufhören, dieses Kat. zu löschen. Da war eine Friedensdemo und eine Illumination. --AxelHH (talk) 13:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Want to contact with you

My friend wanted to contact with you to discuss something ( Vip_gov@hotmail.com ) 88.155.64.223 19:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

User photo, student from Russian Wikiversity

Experience and perspectives of PetrSU students in Wikipedia, Wikiversity and Wikidata. My report at Wikimania 2021.

Hello. You deleted the file File:Marina Frolova.png with the comment: "Personal photo by non-contributors (F10)".

I am teacher from Russian Wikiversity, see my video at Wikimedia conference (video above). Marina Frolova was my student, she made contribution in Russian Wikiversity, see link.

She uploaded her photo to Commons upon my request to all my students at Wikiversity.

Please, could you restore her photo? --Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 07:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

@Andrew Krizhanovsky: Marina last contributed to any project in Sept 2021 - so not a "valid" user. How else would this be in COM:SCOPE? I will restore and allow for comment at a RfD process. Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! --Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 10:12, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Deleted talk pages

Hi, are these file-talk pages deleted by mistake? These talk pages do not seem to need to be deleted because the corresponding file pages are not deleted. I believe this was a result of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp (8 January 2022).

• File talk:Boy I like these mugs (12546393925).jpg
• File talk:Bondage Doll.png
• File talk:Bohemian Glass Exhibition NMK 01 (16291625600).jpg
• File talk:Bklynpride 5 (537988217).jpg
• File talk:Fowl (121873339).jpg
• File talk:"No a Bolonia", "No te vacunes" (4135838632).jpg
• File talk:2020 08 27 Wien 154236 397 (50376007971).jpg
• File talk:2019 11 05 IMG 172113 (49167438822).jpg

whym (talk) 10:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

@Whym: Hi. I think there was an issue with the mass delete tool that day. I marked the ones to be kept as kept then used the mass process tool to delete the rest - except the mass delete tool deleted everything so I had to restore these and didn't restore the talk pages. Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Should these talk pages exist and have the "kept" template, then? It's not a huge issue, either way, though. whym (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Markus Gsell

Like I said in the discussion. Markus Gsell is a good friend of mine. We work together since many years. So there is no problem with this image I posted. But anyway you can contact mgs@update-fitness.ch to clarify this. He is imformed. Valanagut (talk) 19:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

FoP in Switzerland

Hi Gbawden; I think that your decision here was made in error, i.e. Verbcatcher possibly didn't read COM:FOP Switzerland fully when adding their "keep" vote, as freedom of panorama in Switzerland generally doesn't apply to works in interior spaces. To quote from COM:FOP Switzerland: "Following the majority view in the legal literature, freedom of panorama does not apply to interior spaces" (with lots of references in the footnote). So, I would appreciate it if you could revise your decision, the case actually seems pretty clear to me (modern work of art in an interior space in Switzerland, therefore no freedom of panorama). For transparency, I was made aware of this case through a question in German Wikipedia's copyright discussion forum by Goesseln, here. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

@Gestumblindi: Hi. I read the FOP and missed the interior requirement. Thanks for pointing out my error- I have fixed it Gbawden (talk) 19:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 19:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

@Gestumblindi: I clearly made a mistake. Thank you for sorting this out. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

closing deletion requests and undelete

Please remeber when you close a deletion proposal for fop or copyright issues to add the correct "Undelete" category. --Sailko (talk) 13:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

@Sailko: Thanks for the heads up Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

DR

It seems like there was an issue with the DelReqHandler on this DR, two files still remain not deleted. --Didym (talk) 16:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks @Didym: I am having issues with DelReqHandler lately Gbawden (talk) 04:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kilaruness

I see you deleted two images at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kilaruness for lacking VRT. The thing is, the user is claiming to be the photographer. Therefore, once a single VRT is accepted confirming the photographer's identity, no further VRTs are necessary. We are convinced that the user is the same person as Meher Kilaru on social media, so uploading the images to Commons is the free license release; no further VRT release is necessary. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: Fair enough. I would have preferred OTRS for these as well but will AGF Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Deletion Request

This discussion is regarding a deletion request reportedly been uploaded through copyright. I (PUECH P.-F.) am concerned by: Deletion requests/File:Deposizione (Deposition) 1915 Yules P Van Biesbrueck.jpg I agree and ask you to withdraw the picture. Please accept my thanks PF Puech — Preceding unsigned comment added by PUECH P.-F. (talk • contribs) 17:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

I've request to delete my stuff why you keeping it . Admib dosen't make you deside to keep whats not yours . Usacin (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Arezzo's Chimera.png plus other files

Is there a reason why you (correctly) deleted Logo Petrarca Calcio.png and Bandiera Arezzo.jpg but left Arezzo's Chimera.png?, Also could you please check Farmaco senza obbligo di ricetta.png and Farmaco senza obbligo di ricetta.svg? Thanks in advance.--Carnby (talk) 05:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Carnby: . I have been plodding through old DR's and hadn't got to them yet but have done them for you now Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!--Carnby (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alexander Labas - Alien.jpg

Hello Gbawden,

it looks like you missed to delete one file which is part of this DR. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 22:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Closing of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jtg5drev.JPG

Hi Gbawden. I noticed you closed this DR as keep because "The WP article lists the designer for this coin as John Mercanti who was Chief Engraver, thus a mint employee". However, according to the article, John Mercanti only designed the obverse of the coin, while Susan Gamble designed the reverse. You may note that the reverse is the one depicted in this file.  Mysterymanblue  02:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Mysterymanblue: If you think I made a mistake please re-open the DR so others can weigh in Gbawden (talk) 06:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Gbawden This mistake seems glaring to me and appears to plainly be the result of the closer misreading a source. But if you insist on me starting another DR that will not be closed for months, I will do it.  Mysterymanblue  08:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Photo

The photo you erased in my wiki page was taking and authorized by Miguel Coyula. 152.207.245.37 13:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sarah Godlewski (OST).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jill Underly (DPI).jpg

Dear Gbawden,

Why did you delete two files that are in the public domain? In Wisconsin, it is up to each state agency to decide whether documents and media created by it are in the public domain. For example, both the Wisconsin Office of the State Treasurer and the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction have a policy of all their works being in the public domain per subchapter II of chapter 19, Wis. Stats., and written confirmation from the respective state agencies. On the other hand, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue - which you used as an example - indeed does enforce copyright on its works. Besides that, the photos that I uploaded to the Commons were originally from the Wisconsin Blue Book, which is an annual directory and guide of state government in Wisconsin. The Blue Book has always been in the public domain ever since Wisconsin joined the Union in 1848. With that being said, can you please undelete the files when you have the time? Please advise at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely, Mcvayn 17:42, 10 May 2022

@Mcvayn: I see no mention of the Blue book in the source? I also cannot find any evidence of a license on the source site. You can request undeletion at COM:UDR and if WI is indeed PD we must update en:Copyright status of works by subnational governments of the United States Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Yasminkaa#Files_uploaded_by_Yasminkaa_%28talk_·_contribs%29

Hello Gbawden please could you check this Ticket#2022051310008195 because the direction of EPFL MEDIACOM give a clear explanation et permission that I used for the pictures to illustrate the topic of the school. Thank you very much if you can restoring the pic. --Yasminkaa (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Yasminkaa: Permission was only granted for one of the pics, raise this at COM:OTRS to check that the ticket did cover those deleted files or at COM:UDR to request undeletion Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok thanks @Gbawden Yasminkaa (talk) 10:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

One missed!

Dear G: I think the system missed a delete, please see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Dmitrovka Thank you for all your hard work on the project! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

NARA TIF images

Hello,

Some of the problem with these images was the result of SteinsplitterBot that was later fixed. For an explanation see User talk:Steinsplitter under topic "Category:Media needing categories as of 15 December 2021". Perhaps you were a victim of this, as I was. Krok6kola (talk) 18:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of images in category freelancers

You mass speedy deleted images in the category Freelancers. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Freelancers They were in use on Wikipages, and had the right license. If you believe some of them don't belong to Commons, you could nominate them one by one and start a discussion, but speedy deletion should not be used. Could you please undo this? --Hannolans (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Sound Logo

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:People of Bamyan.jpg

I didn't see the photo, but what was the basis for deletion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: scope - as I said it was a weak delete Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

 Question I can't see what would be wrong with the scope. Please explain. Photographs of people are obviously on topic for various wikis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

I'll look forward to your clarification, because I'm considering nominating this file for undeletion, purely on the basis that "people of x" is a totally on-topic scope, but I feel a little dopey because I haven't seen the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Sorry have been off ill for a few days - As I said originally it was a weak delete. Its a very naive photo, of which we have hundreds. I have already undeleted it to confirm my decision. I have no objection to undeleting Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, it's marginal. Now that I've seen the photo, I have no objection to it remaining deleted. I'm really sorry you've been ill, and I hope you have a speedy, complete recovery! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Deleting of RuthAmos.jpeg

Hi I own this image so it does not breach any copy write

Thanks Ruth 148.252.128.134 09:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robin Houston c1983.jpg

Hello. I noticed that you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robin Houston c1983.jpg as deleted but the image is still live at File:Robin Houston c1983.jpg. Did the script miss the file? Thanks! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:46, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Please undelete files used on OSM

You deleted these files last year under CSD F10. However it turns out they were and are used on OpenStreetMap. I think that makes them of realistic educational use under COM:EDUSE and hence more than mere personal files. You can see (I think) all the uses here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=image~%22^https%3A%2F%2Fcommons%5C%5C.wikimedia%5C%5C.org%2Fwiki%2FFile%3AProject_1_202104%22+global&R

Would you be willing to undelete these files, please? --bjh21 (talk) 14:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

I've found a second batch, whose uses on OpenStreetMap can be found with https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=image~%22^https%3A%2F%2Fcommons%5C%5C.wikimedia%5C%5C.org%2Fwiki%2FFile%3AImag%22+global&R:

--bjh21 (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@Bjh21: Busy with it - there seems to be an issue with undeleting at the moment and will complete shortly. Please can you assist with categorising these images when done? Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Bjh21: File:Project 1 20210423 113545854.jpg was deleted as part of a DR. File:Imagesaley20.jpg gives an error whenever I try undelete it. Otherwise all are done Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Thank you! I can see why they were deleted, but I've made an attempt at categorising them properly. --bjh21 (talk) 16:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Delete of my cards

What are you doing dude? You delete my cards, about busroutes. in some cities in Denmark? In the danish LAW. its ALLOWED to take a picture by already shared art and pictures. Go to read our danish law. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2014/1144 § 24 Stk 2. I am allowed to take the pictures in the public around in Denmark and upload them here. because of the pictures is taken by me. IN a public forum. because of the authors. already had set them to a bus stop in the public forum. - Cheers User:Erobran

@Erobran: There is no disputing that they are your photos but per COM:FOP Denmark they cannot be used for commercial purposes, which is against Commons policies, even if they met the requirement to be Permanent - which I am not sure those were. Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

I have gone through the rules for Denmark, and I can't immediately see which rule they break there? They are both permanent. rather it is "internet" websites with the maps that have been uploaded. Thereby they should not break any rules?.. Erobran (talk) 10:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

"Works of art may be reproduced in pictorial form and then made available to the public if they are permanently situated in a public place or road. The provision of the first sentence shall not apply if the work of art is the chief motif and its reproduction is used for commercial purposes."[1144/2014 Art.24(2)]"

The maps you photographed can loosely be called works of art. Read the bold sections. Commons requires that all works are licensed for commercial purposes. This section of the law states that it may not and thus we cannot keep it. If you disagree with my assessment you may request undeletion at COM:UDR Gbawden (talk) 14:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:7-PET structure.png

Hi Gbawden. Regarding a deletion discussion you recently closed, Commons:Deletion requests/File:7-PET structure.png, I notice that there were two files nominated but only one file was deleted. Since the discussion didn't lead to any distinction between the two files, I assume this was just a little oversight. Can you please have a second look? Thank you. Marbletan (talk) 19:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

i made the picute you deleted

Hey, i just received an email, that you deleted tge image I myself created and uploaded. I credited everything, yet it seems like wikipedia staff is trolling me in this manner. JakubD47 (talk) 12:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

@JakubD47: The issue was that the cover you photographed was copyrighted. You can't just photograph someone else's work Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Once more, the photography of the guys was shot by my friend, who's written consent I have, then I made the edits, by finding royalty free images, that can be CC0 sublicensed, compiled them together and published it on the album cover for the band. Then I used that image in the wiki page, which uploaded it to commons. I had to idea I have to previously clear any images uploaded to wikipedia with their staff. Or I don't still understand what the problem is? JakubD47 (talk) 10:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

@JakubD47: My bad. I didn't check the photo before replying to you. The issue is that the photo is out of scope. I have started a deletion request Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

I think I got this confused with the edited picture. This unedited one was posted just for proof to the deleted edited one. I am confused. JakubD47 (talk) 10:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Downing Street, Earth Hour 2021.jpg

Hello. Asking for a clarification of this closure before I check and probably batch-nominate 87 other files.

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Downing Street, Earth Hour 2021.jpg, deleting an image from the @10downingstreet Twitter - was that deleted "due to Crown copyright" in Xasley's comment, or due to the IP's reasoning that in this (unusual?) case of the Twitter image being OGL and the same image being on Flickr as NC-ND, the Flickr licence must take precedence?

If it was the former, does that mean all other 87 images taken from @10downingstreet Twitter should be deleted? If it was the latter, should we delete any which also appear on Flickr? Lord Belbury (talk) 18:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

@Lord Belbury: Hi. I couldn't find confirmation that this twitter account falls under OGL and there was enough doubt that I felt that it should be deleted under PCP. If you think I made a mistake please let me know Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Travelling

I am travelling overseas till 21 September and will not be active on Commons and cannot respond to messages Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Unauthorized publication: Image that should not be published on commons should be deleted

Puteri Indonesia 2006 Winners

this is unauthorized publication, this captured image should not be published here, because the license is not even a free common use, it is just a captured youtube browser image. please deleted this non-free common picture. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: source does not hold copyright, therefore CC license does not apply Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Thalialioo (talk) 19:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

TUSC token c41f4f16d81d5c2668f1c279511a92cb

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Deletion Request/Copyrighted images

File name (image): Dambuhalang_titi_ng_Negro_na_hindi_tuli_at_lubasan_naka_tayo.jpg ‎(316 × 316 pixels, file size: 31 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

In my defense, the image was not uploaded contradicting to copyright due to the file was of my own works for educational and health purposes. But, the image was taken from the internet from a personal reliable source which some of my works are contributed to. However, some viewers or users may find the image displays an inappropriate file which undoubtedly does contain a graphic image or a file uncommonly portrayed and used. Therefore, I will accept the deletion request if the file is partly reported stated above.

If the file is requested through its file name, then I will simply rename the file. However, my conclusion of the file is not copyrighted or taken from other sources according to any whatsoever degree of illegal licensing.

Regards, Parker Phy

Deletion Request/Copyrighted images

This discussion is regarding a deletion request reportedly been uploaded through copyright.

File name (image): Dambuhalang_titi_ng_Negro_na_hindi_tuli_at_lubasan_naka_tayo.jpg ‎(316 × 316 pixels, file size: 31 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

I would like a viable reason for the deletion request. However if it is a copyright file, I would like a strong copy of the reported copyright file or link but greatly want the returned for educational purposes of the matter not mainly because of its graphic content to the eyes of certain viewers.

I WOULD STRONGLY WANT A FEEDBACK.

Parker Phy

File:Older Lamborghini Front View.jpg Deletion of the Image

Hello Gbawden, I understand to the regard of File:Older Lamborghini Front View.jpg that is blurry and obscured. You may delete my image but originally I was going to save that image later on in my car album in my gallery. --MTSRider18 (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2017 (UTC)MTSRider18

Photo license

Dear Gbawden,

The photos sources are come from HKJC.com, basically I am on behalf of HKJC to upload those visuals to wikipedia under free license. About this issue, I have already send a email to one of wikipedia representative, he named Chris Brown. And he will help to made the necessary adjustments to all the files. So there are no license problems here, I could share the relevant documents or email if needed.

Thanks, Chris

Eliana Krawczyk´s photos

Email sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.41.237.253 (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Mini John Cooper Works GP .jpg

I am the photographer, owner and uploader of that photo and I allow it's use on Mini Hatch wiki! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nprh (talk • contribs) 22:59, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Request keep on the photo

Pictures published by were not personal .. but was to show the capacity my in Photoshop .. and modifying photos .. I photographer .. please delete the demand deleting immediately Toufik M. Amara Toufik M. Amara 11:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik M. Amara (talk • contribs) 11:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Link added

DoryDoryDory (talk):Reference link added to HarryRaudvere.jpg

Josip Hervat's photos

Email sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josip Hervat (talk • contribs) 09:44, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Contestation droits d'auteur image Diamond DA42 sur l'article Airways College

Bonjour,

sur quels éléments vous fondez vous pour insinuer que cette photo viole des droits d'auteurs ? Je suis le propriétaire de cette photo qui a été prise avec mon téléphone et téléversée depuis mon ordinateur. Elle ne viole donc en aucun cas un quelconque droit d'auteur. Merci de bien vouloir supprimer votre signalement.

Cordialement,

Olamstack — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olamstack (talk • contribs) 11:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Images for Muqbil Al-Zahawi Page

The images used for the Muqbil Al-Zahawi page are wholly owned by the Zahawi Family. There should be no copyright issues pertaining to these images. Please do not delete or alter unless permission is explicitly granted by the original author of the page. Thank you.

Request Images Re-insert for Salim Osman Page

This Image Used in Wikipedia By Permission From Salim Osman Member Of Bangladesh National Per lament . Please If Possible re- insert the Image and I will grateful to You. Thank You. A K M Salim Osman.jpg

Image Files: Naomi Bristow

Hello Gbawden. Not sure you received the comments I left after yours open my User Talk page. Basically just marking this here so you can go and take a look at those. GavinoGavv (talk) 13, October 2019, 15:20

Deleting my pictures

I feel really angry that you are deleting all my pictures. 3 of them were taken by me so I'm pretty sure I have the copyrights and the otherS were taken on pexels a free-rights pictures bank. I hope you won't delete the last one because it was taken from Wikipedia bank. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 96.21.144.35 (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mohamed_Sayed.jpg

Hi Photographer Sent the permission [Ticket#: 2020021510003534].Ahayad38 (talk) 12:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC

File:Trade Centre UK Car Showroom West Midlands.jpg

File:Trade Centre UK Car Showroom West Midlands.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickyTCW (talk • contribs) 08:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Requesting the non-deletion of photo: "Osaman in 2018.jpg"

I got the information that you requested deleting the file: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adodo_Eddy_Osaman#/media/File:Osaman_in_2018.jpg

I want you to look at this photo on Wikipedia: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page#/media/File:Anna_Kournikova_DF-SD-04-04709.jpg and tell me how this photo is for educational purposes as you claim, yet it was featured today on Wikipedia's homepage! I can search out millions of photos of people on wikipedia which do not even meet the educational criteria you claim, yet they are on Wikipedia for years. Please do not delete Osaman in 2018.jpg as it meets the same requirements in the sample photo in the link I sent

Your guidance is requested

A sock of Gori Nadu is again and again nominating this Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ahmed Rushdi playback singer 1954.jpg which you already closed as keep. Kindly if you look into it. Regards

Timmy Trumpet performing at Tomorrowland, Belgium - 2019.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation

Photo was taken by me, Rutger Geerling, at the Tomorrowland Festival 2019 and is therefore not a copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudgrcom (talk • contribs) 10:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of user page in commons - davidleinvictor

User page deleted because of (Inappropriate use of user pages (U3) as described by you. I logged in now and saw the changes. I have made some huge changes to the user page and will implement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidleinvictor (talk • contribs) 15:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Not deleted pictures of Stadtwerke Aschaffenburg

Hi, why yo didn't delted the pictures of #205 from Stadtwerke Aschaffenburg? I uploaded picture in much better quality and didn't want that the badly quality of the old pictures are anymore here on Wikimedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by OliverZenglein (talk • contribs) 00:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

(Untitled Talk Message)

Hello,

Files are photos collected by the Larry J Gordon and his family. I am his oldest son, and the builder of larryjgordon.com. I plan to use the photos for a Wikipedia autobiography that i have drafted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Larry_J._Gordon. I am a rather confused Wiki rookie. I appreciate your understanding and support. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KentLeroy (talk • contribs) 23:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

File Tagging

The file uploaded here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2021_02_03_REVITALISING_TRADITIONAL_MARAPU_CULTURAL_ASSETS_IN_EAST_SUMBA_FINAL_REPORT.pdf is my own data, photographs and text. Why would you tag ti to be deleted? Please remove tag — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2404:C0:3091:2CAC:783B:A5DB:865:726D (talk) 11:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request of personal picture

Please be so kind to accept my deletion request for this picture of mine that should have never been uploadded to commons : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ruiz,_Nuria_Dec_2013.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 174.21.81.139 (talk) 01:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:7-PET3DanJ.gif

Hi Gbawden. A few weeks ago you closed the deletion discussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:7-PET3DanJ.gif. I notice that even though there were two files listed for deletion, only one was deleted. Since there wasn't any distinction made between the two files during the discussion, it seems that not deleting one file was just a small oversight. Can you please have a second look? Thank you. Marbletan (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

File talk:Mirandolmartel.JPG

File talk:Mirandolmartel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PYRDLT (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

File talk:Tourmirandol1.JPG

File talk:Tourmirandol1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PYRDLT (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tolits10

Hi, I'm Angelito Medina Jr. from Philippines, my username is Tolits10, is there a time to submit of each pictures that I uploaded? 175.176.85.206 23:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified subjects in Australia

Nice work categorising all these uncategorised images. I was able to place a few of the ones you found into more specific categories once you identified them as Australia related. Calistemon (talk) 07:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Calistemon: Thanks for that Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Rural Alberta Advantage St. Paul - Amsterdam (48069825633).jpg

Since when a photo of concert of The Rural Alberta Advantage, a band with articles in de:The Rural Alberta Advantage, en:The Rural Alberta Advantage and fr:The Rural Alberta Advantage is speedy deleted with the argument of "(Personal photo by non-contributors (F1)". How many articles is necessary to be a non personal photo?

Given that this file was uploaded from flickr and most probably by me, in the case of this was a upload by me, i also would like to ask as to, with 3 706 914 edits, how much edits are there till i become a non "non-contributor"? Tm (talk) 22:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

That was me taking a short cut for an out of scope photo - will undelete and DR Gbawden (talk) 05:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Never heard of them and the file was uncategorised and not in use - in future when uploading files please put something meaningful in the description or at least categorise it so that others can find it and know what it is Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Escarlata Gutiérrez.jpg

Hello @Gbawden. I discovered recently that the file Escarlata Gutiérrez.jpg was deleted and I would like to understand the reason. As far as I know, the image wasa photo of Escarlata Gutiérrez, a relevant Spanish fiscal. The photo was taken by Escarlata herself with her own camera (so she owns the rights) and then uploaded to Commons also by herself. Everything seems ok so, for some months, the image was link to her Wikidata item and Wikipedia article. It was a surprised to learn that it was deleted, so I would like to understand the reason, if you could kindly explain it to me I would appreciate it very much. I asked also to Fitindia a week ago, but he was not able to answer me yet, so maybe you could help me. Thanks in advance. Zapipedia (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

@Zapipedia: I have undeleted it - there was some disagreement about permission from the photographer Gbawden (talk) 06:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer, that helps me to find out what had happened. Regards. Zapipedia (talk) 15:27, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Milton Diamond.jpg

I do not understand why you want to delete this photo on the basis of "Flickrwashing". It is a photo which I took, and added to the article twelve years ago with the help of another Wikipedian, because it is the only photo I have ever uploaded. It looks as though, unbeknownst to me, the procedure involved him/her creating a Flickr account in my name in order to transfer the photo to Wikipedia. I have no access to that Flickr account, not knowing the login details, and the person who helped me all those years ago now appears to be somebody totally different under the same name, who only appeared in Wikipedia a year ago! I have entered all my explanations at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Milton_Diamond.jpg, but had no response from you. Another Wikipedian has been very helpful in directing me to COM:VRT, where I have done my best to follow the instructions and send off the appropriate e-mail from the template there; but it also says that I should "place the following code on image pages after sending an email to the Volunteer Response Team (formerly OTRS):" and gives a code { { subst:PP } } (if I didn't put the spaces in there it creates a vast amount of text right here!) - and I have absolutely no idea how one is supposed to do that. So I am begging you not to delete my photograph until there has been time and opportunity to find out how this tag is supposed to be entered; it is never easy to find out how to do something for the very first time! Thank you for your forbearance. Molly Romanov (talk) 17:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Molly Romanov: I see that permission has been accepted for the photo so you don't need to worry about it being deleted. Flickrwashing is a form of license laundering - unscrupulous editors upload a file to flickr and share it under Creative commons so that it can be copied to Commons. This is what happened here when someone impersonated you. Thankfully this has now been resolved Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Nobody impersonated me - I thought I had explained that. Twelve years ago some very kind person assisted me in the mysterious process of adding a photo, which I myself took, to a Wikipedia article in which I had a particular interest, as I was the person who wrote and maintained the academic web site belonging to the subject of the article. But I am very grateful to the powers that be at COM:VRT for responding quickly to my appeal for help, before the photo was actually deleted. Molly Romanov (talk) 08:41, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Photo of Prof. Egodi Uchendu.png

Dear Gbawden, My upload of the photo from Facebook was an error. I'm sorry and had noted your comments and the rightful deletion. Sincerely, Chris Prince Udochukwu Njoku (talk) Chris Prince Udochukwu Njoku (talk) 11:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Kantordesaaliyanrogojampibanyuwangi2015.JPG

This is the file I was RFDed, and you decided kept yesterday, now the keep rationale you provided is now a trouble at VPC, hopefully you can provide more inputs on the concerns. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

bad judgement, or bad explantation, or accidentially speedy-deleted, or do I overlook something?

all Wikipedia-logos on Commons have missing author information, please delete all or none of them, but not some

Hi I just noticed you speedy-deleted a screenshot with the argumentation "Screenshot of non-free content (F3)". the only problematic content I can find on the screenshot is that File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-no-text.svg under {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} has missing author information. (My understanding for CC-BY is that is is enough to name the copyright-holder "Wikimedia Foundation", but not the author.) And except from the tilte of the page nothing of the content is shown (I'm the only author of the title, I don't have to cite myself, and the name of the title is anyhow below TOO.). No browser shown, no addon modifying the page.

1. If you see an issue in not naming the authors of the Wikipedia-Logo please suggest all images in Category:SVG Wikipedia logos, v2 for deletion. (Do not speedy-delete them!)
2. If you see an issue not naming the developers of Wikipedia-software, please correct it on en:Wikipedia:Screenshots of Wikipedia#Prepare the license template. (Do not speedy-delete such images.)
3. If you choose the wrong explantation for SD, please explain it according to Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion.
4. If you accidentially speedy-deleted the image, please undelete it on your own, and consider a deletion-request (e.g. out of scope).

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

He also deleted a lot of content from African people of interest. Not sure what the agenda is here. Nick216 (talk) 04:08, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Cape Town MyCiTi IRT artwork.jpg

File:Cape Town MyCiTi IRT artwork.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Removing photos of Matthew E. White from category.

Hi @Gbawden: I have seen that you removed File:Matthew-e-white.jpg, File:Matthew e white.jpg and File:Matthew E. White.jpg from Category:Matthew E. White. Why? Wouter (talk) 19:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

@Wouter: thanks for catching those. I screwed up - I meant to only remove them from Singers to check Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of media from Tokyo Marui wiki page

Dear, First of all, I wish you a happy new year. I’m contacting you cause I got a message telling me that some pictures added to the Tokyo Marui wiki page are going to be mass deleted. Could you tell me the reason why they’re going to be deleted?

Kind regards,

Robin 2A02:A020:82:E3E4:1C78:D0E0:3846:276C 11:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Good luck getting an explanation from him. I've realized this is a full-time job for him, deleting loads of entries, pictures and information without explanation. Wish there were a way to report this. Nick216 (talk) 17:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC) ː@Nick216: it was explained in the deletion notice - the images you uploaded don't appear to be in COM:SCOPE. If you believe they were you can request Undeletion but you will also need to confirm that you took them yourself. FWIW if there are questions about why a file is nominated for deletion the discussion must happen at the DR discussion, not on my talk page 09:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Since you created the previous deletion request for this user. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Solidi of Leo I at the Byzantine and Christian Museum on January 15, 2023.jpg

Hello Gbawden, Guess both George E. Koronaios and myself somehow screwed it up with this file. Could you take a look at my userpage? You will understand immediately what happened. And now, I am standing at your doorstep for help. Thank you for looking into this. Hopefully this can be restored and the wrong file deleted. Cheers Lotje (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@Lotje to confirm - you want to keep the photo of the buttons and have the table deleted? Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@George E. Koronaios: can you explain to Gbawden? Correct me if I am wrong: you want the photo of the buttons to be restored and you also want your version, without the two black spots with the correct name: File:Solidi of Leo I at the Byzantine and Christian Museum on January 15, 2023.jpg Lotje (talk) 14:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Greetings to you both and thank you for dedicating your precious time on thisǃ I only wanted the irrelevant image to be deleted because it is not mine and I uploaded it by mistake. Mine are only those depicting the coins. Currently there are two files which I think they should be deleted in case somebody sees them and copies them. The one with the time/date (13:35, 26 January 2023) and this one (12:42, 26 January 2023). The other two are mine and the one which was reverted last is the edited one which I would like to keep. It is you call of course. I hope I did not confuse you. At any rate, thank you for your time and my apologies for the inconvenience. George E. Koronaios (talk) 14:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)