User talk:A1Cafel/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pay attention to copyright
File:Question de violence (9339132732).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photos from Paule Bodilis in description, not own work
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

219.79.126.5 05:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Duplicates

Well, excuse me, B dash, but why are you flagging the files I uploaded over a month ago as duplicates from files you uploaded today? It means the files I uploaded will be deleted, which to me is totally unacceptable – this is no way to behave. I insist that you flag your own files as duplicate, immediately. I really can't believe you are doing this. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2019 (UTC).

I removed your flags myself already, I expect you to flag your duplicates yourself. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 15:22, 13 January 2019 (UTC).
@Jürgen Eissink: I marked them wrong, sorry for this. --B dash (talk) 15:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:夏威夷颶風強度降低 但仍攜帶豪雨暴風 (粵語).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: 0:40-1:11 Reuters, 0-0:40 a logo which I cant identify exists in upper left
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Roy17 (talk) 00:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:熱帶風暴佛羅倫斯為卡羅來納帶來災難性影響 (粵語).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: AP footage first 50s
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Roy17 (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:特朗普打破沉默公開感謝麥凱恩對美國的貢獻.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: 0:59-1:35 AP AFP etc
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Roy17 (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:颶風佛羅倫斯威力加強吹向美國大西洋沿岸.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: 0-0:10 AFP 1:06-20 1:27-32 AP
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Roy17 (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

VOA videos

Hi! I found some VOA videos of your uploads containing substantial portions of non-free footage and nominated them for speedy deletion. I believe you understand the copyright issues, but might have overlooked this in the past. In future I would not notify you with the template messages for any problematic VOA files uploaded before 2019. Please remember to only import VOA contents. Thanks!

I also do not consider listing VOA files for reviews to be necessary, because VOA contents normally contain at least one of the following: a tiny VOA logo on top left, a big VOA logo on bottom right, or the VOA microphone tag. Review is necessary only if contents cannot be identified with VOA by themselves.--Roy17 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File:飓风佛罗伦萨登陆北卡 海水漫过12号公路波及周围社区.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roy17 (talk) 01:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:North Korea Kim Jong-un (6545249183).jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:North Korea Kim Jong-un (6545249183).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

About your notifications

Hello B dash,

Thank you for your message. I am surprised that for two years no problem has been shown and it is just today when I have no way of contacting the author. I will explain the reason that there is no information mentioned. The author in question passed me her images through Telegram, so they were not direct uploads and made that data was lost.

There is no doubt about the authorship since she herself, last year, uploaded several images of the last trips made in the same category that I created.

Maybe I can contact her to send what is needed to keep them in Commons.

Greetings, --Galahad (sasageyo!) 05:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Gallows for Macron (45326284135).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.76.15.9 10:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Gallows for Macron (45326284135).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch  English  magyar  português do Brasil  italiano  norsk  norsk bokmål  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  suomi  українська  svenska  sicilianu  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Blobclipse (46097444314).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 13:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

File:The Eclipse visitor map had filled in quite a bit (36407067934).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.96.94 15:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Total lunar eclipse woos sky watchers (31885776297).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HyperGaruda (talk) 16:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Please pay attention

I think Roy** requested deletion were remain maciously complainment. I'm come from Cantonese Wikipedia. Just tell it, Roy17 was a dangerous user due to he had committed some kinds of provoked behaviours approach to any other users.--PQ77wd (talk) 07:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Do not edit other user pages

You are not supposed to edit other user pages. Please do not edit my user page in any manner without authorisation. Thank you.--Roy17 (talk) 10:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Mass low-quality uploads

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Village pump#Mass low-quality uploads. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

And more… there are scores of Commons users needing baby-sitting. But what is principal difference between B_dash and, for example, Ayratayrat‎? B_dash uploads from Flickr – that is, any Commons user handy with upload tools may do it. Whereas Ayratayrat‎ uploads many own photos and, if had the account blocked, couldn’t do it unless resorted to sock puppetry Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Kim Jong-un (14970940142).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.96.105 08:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, you claim this file is a duplicate of your own upload of the same VOA file. It seems to me on the contrary yours is a derivative: could you please kindly explain why the size of your uploaad is bigger than the original ? Thanks, — Racconish💬 09:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Racconish: just merge two files, as long as you are a sysop here. Where is the problem? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
@B dash and Incnis Mrsi: I asked because I checked and found the original size was the other upload, not yours; and the same problem occurs for other files from VOA for which you requested a duplicate deletion, e.g. File:23 Jan 2019 protest against Maduro.jpg, which has been deleted in the mean time and transformed in a redirection to your own later upload by Túrelio, although I found the deleted file was matching exactly in size the image at the source, while yours is bigger. Again: the original image is 1,023 x 682, not 1,080 × 720. — Racconish💬 11:06, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
@Racconish: the 1023 px-wide image is certainly not original – it has severe JPEG artifacts presumedly resulting from resampling. Moreover, it is overcompressed. Why should I beg a sysop to make an obvious correction job? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Did Racconish look at the https://gdb.voanews.com/B7CFD90C-D540-4FE3-9CA0-A110E02DE4FE_w1023_s.jpg URL? It has an obvious (and spurious) “_w1023” infix. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: thank you for drawing my attention on the “_w1023” which I had not noticed (hence my hesitation). This makes it clear for me and I will hasten to delete the related file. — Racconish💬 15:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
File:-i---i- (46340549312).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Trump and May's special relationship. (32604626371).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.180.43 00:05, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 22:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

File:东方明珠塔亮起法兰西色向巴黎表达哀思.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.126.183 00:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:联合国糖尿病日上海东方明珠塔点亮蓝灯.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.126.183 00:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:联合国糖尿病日东方明珠塔塔身现蓝灯.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.126.183 00:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:东方明珠塔为2015年世界提高自闭症意识日点亮蓝灯.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.126.183 00:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Support for Je Suis Charlie (32787718978).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Les Gilets Jaunes (46397720734).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.126.152 02:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 12:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

File:8 mars 2019 - Paris République (40355992933).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 13:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Dover Banksy (34009568363).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mys_721tx (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

平面作品在英国没有全景自由法国的全景自由十分有限,摄影师不能以自由版权释出仍受版权保护的雕塑与建筑物的图片。请在转移图片时注意。-Mys_721tx (talk) 23:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Savannah Image

Please note that scaled up/scaled down versions are considered duplicate images. In this case, the 421 one is a duplicate of the 420. Hurricane Noah (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rewetting canal 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

158.182.173.241 06:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rewetting canal 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

158.182.173.241 06:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Green Selfridges - from Milk Street, Digbeth (8562435651).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

158.182.170.73 03:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:DSC 0687 (4422225597).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.126.84 02:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Brexshit (27266638814).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ham II (talk) 18:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Majora (talk) 14:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Can we talk about this?

Hi there,

You seem to be working your way through all 1,856 photos I've uploaded and flagging anything you can for deletion. This began immediately after I intervened to help a new user whose photo you'd flagged at Commons:Deletion requests/File:"This is your home" artwork at Christchurch mosque shooting memorial, Monday 18 March 2019.jpg. I've already raised a question about your interpretation of Freedom of Panorama to apply to business storefronts; could you address that, please?

If you want to claim that a business's frontage is a "graphic work", not a "work of artistic craftsmanship", you're making a distinction that the copyright holder themselves – the business – would not recognise, because they themselves chose to put their signage on the street, as visible as possible. A court in NZ would laugh at anyone who tried to claim taking a photo of a storefront was violating copyright. So who, exactly, are you protecting from copyright violation by this sort of policing? —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

You've also just flagged all the photos brand-new user EvokeArt has just uploaded for deletion because of the default Exif settings on their camera. I have been trying to organise public uploads of files to c:Category:Christchurch mosque shootings as part of w:Wikipedia:GLAM/New Zealand Wikipedian at Large/Chch mosque shootings, and this sort of action won't help. Please, can we try to explain problems to the newcomers and ask whether they can fix them, rather than threaten to immediately delete their work? —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

And you've claimed that those photos are derivative works because they depict hand-drawn hearts and messages, but you yourself just uploaded c:File:"Peace_&_love"_message_card_for_Christchurch_shooting.jpg, c:File:Flower tributes at Kilbirnie Mosque.jpg, and c:File:Drawing to show support to the shooting victims.jpg, which depict exactly the same thing. Should we flag those for deletion too? Again, who is being protected from copyright violation here? —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 15:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

@Giantflightlessbirds: Simply a heart logo is in PD per PD-shape. --B dash (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
you realize how many museum scans have "all rights reserved" exif? and we had an editor photoshopping them and changing the exif to PD mark? wouldn't those facts suggest that it would be prudent to contact the uploader, not speedy template spam their talk page? you should expect to have yet more people exif washing, shouldn't you? what will you do then, say email me a copy of the OTRS for every upload? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 22:54, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

LX (talk, contribs) 23:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, clpo13(talk) 19:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

File:12.TStreet.NW.WDC.20January2016 (23901505493).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.96.116 02:21, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Trump not welcome in France (45828942991).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

File:West Midlands Police.png

I noticed that you marked this file for speedy deletion as a copyvio. The file originates from West Midlands Police who released it under a cc-by-sa-2.0 license and it bears no copyright markings. Its status was checked and reviewed by the FlickreviewR bot. Please consider withdrawing the speedy template. I realise I am able to remove it and instead nominate it for a deletion discussion, but this appears to be a fairly obvious case of a misunderstanding so I'm suggesting we avoid further unnecessary process. Thanks. Neil S Walker (talk) 08:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:LA SOIREE DE C. CASTANER (47364903732).jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:LA SOIREE DE C. CASTANER (47364903732).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fridays For Future Vicenza.jpg

Hi B dash, I saw your message about File:Fridays For Future Vicenza.jpg, as I wrote in the file (in Italian) the picture has been given to me by a friend of mine, I didn't want to put "I'm the author" because I thought it would have been correct to insert her name, but the source of the image is just that, she physically gave me the file.

What should I do?

Thank you very much --Pottercomuneo (talk) 12:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Pottercomuneo: I changed the tag to no permission. You can ask your friend to send the permission via COM:OTRS. --B dash (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Wooferendum

As one of the files in the DR is by you: I contacted the wooferendum website owner after the DR via the contact form on the website, and first got a positive reply, but he never sent a permission to OTRS and I haven't heard of him for some time now. Maybe you can also try to talk to him, otherwise I do not intent to do more about this DR. --C.Suthorn (talk) 12:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

@C.Suthorn: I don't know much about this, maybe you have to do more. --B dash (talk) 13:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
English is not my native language, and talking about license questions is delicate. I tried my best, but if I try to do more I might do more damage than good. --C.Suthorn (talk) 13:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Chaîne humaine à Paris avant l’ouverture de la COP21 - Human Chain in Paris before the opening of the COP21 (23032220579).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wdwd (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi, B dash I was wondering why you added the Category:Univision to that file. Maybe the file should be renamed? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

  • @Lotje: That's a file that I uploaded from Flickr one and a half year ago. At that time I don't know much on COM:F2C. I probably press the button "Automatically detect categories if none are given manually" of the tool. You are feel free to rename the file based on COM:FR. --B dash (talk) 13:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
The question is: find a short name that says it all. Do you have any suggestion? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Cats on DRs

Hi. DRs like Commons:Deletion requests/File:2017 Tax March 1010532.jpg are transcluded to archive pages like Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/04/07. Please noinclude any cats you add to them, to avoid categorizing the archive pages, and avoid adding extra whitespace.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:56, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:May Day 2018 (40943015245).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:May Day 2018 (40943015245).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Pa. Capitol in honour to victims of Sri Lanka bombings.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.96.91 02:08, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Shek Mun Station MTR damaged logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.130 13:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Extinction Rebellion - Marble Arch (46862823255).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.96.253 02:21, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi B dash. There are 69 files I uploaded from the People's Vote march in October 2019, which you later transferred from my Flickr stream in December. Can you arrange to delete the Flickr duplicates please. I hope there is an easier way than editing all 69 files with specific duplicate templates. -- Colin (talk) 17:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

@Colin: Done, thanks for notify me. --B dash (talk) 09:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
What did you do to get the files deleted? -- Colin (talk) 10:36, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
@Colin: Simply tagged them as {{Duplicate}}. --B dash (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
That doesn't sound "simple" if there are 69 files to edit. Did you include the template parameter linking to the original-to-keep? -- Colin (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
File:The Dubai Mall (8668428852).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

funplussmart (talk) 02:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:View from the Burj Khalifa (6788598832).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.191.93 16:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Freedom of panorama

There was a consensus that FOP is not applicable to Jordanian buildings. Please reconsider your nominations of [1], [2], [3]. Makeandtoss (talk) 15:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

@Makeandtoss: The DR means that the architect of the memorial is died before 1949, thus the memorial is in PD and no longer be protected by copyright. However, the buildings the architects of the buildings in above DRs are very likely to be died on or after 1949 (may be they are still alive), therefore they are subject to copyright. Since there is no freedom of paronama exception in Jordan, unless you get the permission from the architects, or the building falls under de minimis, you can't upload them to Commons, regards. --B dash (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Actually, looking at the de minimis cases, they could be argued to be case 1 and 3. Especially as, for example, the first picture is cropped from a wider picture. Makeandtoss (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
@Makeandtoss: I'm sorry, but none of them falls under de minimis. The buildings are definitely the subject of the photo, as this is the reason of taking the photos, removing them would make the works useless. --B dash (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Justice fiscale (46692445731).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.97.3 06:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Maduro supporters marching against Chávez and Trump.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.79.127.250 04:16, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Tokyo Skytree light up in US flag for Trump's visit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.66 02:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Twitter logos

I am sorry about the mistake. I did not know the previous ones deleted. Thanks for the warning. --Jorge Abellán (talk) 13:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Rainbow White House, 2015 (crop).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.191.250 16:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Tabby cat photo.jpg

You ask me to send permission for File:Tabby cat photo.jpg to OTRS, but this has been done 2 years ago already. What is your point? I see your images have been deleted due to several (c)-reasons, is this just a kind of "punishment", or what? Edoderoo (talk) 05:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

@Edoderoo: simply putting the OTRS ticket is not enough. Please send an email to COM:OTRS and get a formal permission like File:UK-cat-20120615 132253.jpg. --B dash (talk) 10:26, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
I have no more access to OTRS, but I had two years ago. The ticket is inside the OTRS system. Ask one of the OTRS operators to check it for you. Edoderoo (talk) 11:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Trump and May in Blenheim Palace, July 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Gladstone at Open House London 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.187 03:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

File:10 Downing Street lit in green for 2019 MHAW.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.187 03:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Trevi Fountain, Rome (9130825255).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Per © vivre libre, likely flickr-washing file
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

219.78.190.187 09:09, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Red in No. 10 Downing Street.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout 219.79.96.250 03:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 182.239.85.202 05:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate 廣九直通車 ([[User talk:廣九直通車|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.78.190.245 08:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

What's the problem ?

After your modifications on some files I'd uploaded from Flickr (which I don't understand), those files have been deleted and I don't think it's a correct decision. See my message here. Regards. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.79.126.237 02:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.78.190.25 07:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Accusing people of fraud

What is it with you that you think it proper to accuse fellow editors of fraud without the flimsiest of evidence? I guess I'm not the first victim of your cheap accusation. Don't go around making this vile allegation on the basis of nothing more than omitted EXIFs on images. It is not right. It is appalling that your carefree allegation puts me in the position of having to spend time and effort defending myself OR similarly having to go through the adding EXIFs and reinstating image hoops OR shrugging my shoulders, walking away and thinking what a lousy community WP really is. You do too much damage with this gay abandon. You don't seem to understand just how serious an accusation it is you are making. You have a moral duty to exercise restraint and not make such accusations without a modicum of evidence. You say "unlikely to be own work". Why? Explain this remark. sirlanz 00:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Re Small image without EXIF data is the evidence, see also cases of Commons:Deletion requests/File:南道賢.jpg, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kritika Kamra.jpg. This means that the photo may be cropped from a larger photo, and pretend to be own work. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.79.97.4 15:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.79.97.4 14:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Why do you think this photo was taken in "Tainan"?--Kai3952 ([[User talk:Kai3952|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Before your reply to me, please take a look at this web page: https://tavis.tw/files/13-1000-13242-1.php. The 4th Simple Life is held in Taipei.--Kai3952 ([[User talk:Kai3952|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:31, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

A series of Railway Maps

Hi, I've stated the sources of the background of the maps. However, it still shows that there are missing source. Take File:Route map of whampoa railway without logo.png as an example, all parts of the map are drawn by me. May I understand the situation and suggestions that can solve the issues? Thanks. Cypp0847 ([[User talk:Cypp0847|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Hurricane Barry Rescue Duplicate

A1Cafel, I notice that you nominated File:Hurricane Barry Louisiana rescue (48291734447).jpg for speedy deletion as a duplicate. This surprised me for several reasons. First, you nominated this very image for deletion a week ago, and withdrew the nomination when I conclusively showed it was freely licensed, so you were clearly aware of its existence when you uploaded this duplicate, so I'm not sure why it was uploaded again in the first place. Second, it is usually the originally uploaded, older file that should be kept, not the new one (see Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#File #8). Third, the old file is already being used in multiple projects, and it is usually the unused file that should be deleted. Fourth, and most importantly, the old file has a good descriptive name, while the file you uploaded is nonsensical and counter to guidelines.

I am changing the CSD tag to the new file you uploaded for all of the above reasons. If you disagree, I would request you open a full nomination for deletion rather than try to speedy delete. I would also request that in the future when you nominate files I have uploaded for deletion that you alert me on my user talk page.

As I mentioned on your talk page on the English Wikipedia, if I've done something to offend you that you keep removing my images from articles, and nominating my files for deletion, please let me know. MarginalCost ([[User talk:MarginalCost|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Could you please in future try to file closely related DR in a bundle, by using COM:VFC or manually listing the files in a single DR? It would facilitate the debates. Alternatively, you should first nominate only one file for deletion to test your argument. If it succeeds then you nominate others in a bunch. Thanks!

This message was motivated by your

  1. Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Bercow Speaker's Chair.png
  2. Commons:Deletion requests/File:UK Commons Chamber 2012.jpg
  3. Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Bercow 2012.png
  4. Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Speaker Explains - Bobbing in the House of Commons Chamber.webm
  5. Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Speaker Explains - Keeping Order in the House of Commons.webm
  6. Commons:Deletion requests/File:How the Chamber Works (UK).webm
  7. Commons:Deletion requests/File:The House of Commons Chamber.webm --Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Gyrostat ([[User talk:Gyrostat|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Sanandros ([[User talk:Sanandros|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:30, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:13, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Shrek792.jpg

Hello, I am Derpdadoodle. You seemed to have deleted this file after I edited it to give it proper credit. Can you please restore it? Thank you, Derpdadoodle ([[User talk:Derpdadoodle|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Why are you uploading duplicates of the files I uploaded yesterday? They were all reviewed yesterday, so I don't see any reason. You are also not providing the required description. The file name is not sufficient description. --SVTCobra 13:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry if I was rude to you. I was confused about the situation. I see now that your versions which are superseding mine are of higher quality. I have asked at the Help Desk if there's a problem with the Upload Wizard, but a second thought occurred to me. Perhaps the full-size version wasn't ready on Flickr when I grabbed them. They are very large (often 10+MB) and maybe Flickr has a 'rendering' period. Do you know if it "takes time" for Flickr to have the full size available? Cheers, --SVTCobra 18:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Do no create DRs without a valid reason. Thanks, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.79.96.47 02:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

StopTheCoup

Are the files StopTheCoup.webm and Brexit Demonstrator.webm no longer videos but still images? Just wondering. --C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping They are moved to a new category. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
there is no technical limit for the number of categories a file can belong to. --C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping The two rallies Category:Defend Our Democracy and Stop the Coup were not held on the same day. It is totally unrelated to the number of files in the category. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
  1. I was not speaking of the number of files in a category, but the number of categories of a file.
  2. StopTheCoup
    1. Both files have the date september 4, 2019 in the info template
    2. according to https://www.stopthecoup.org.uk/calendar/ there was a StopTheCoup protest on september 4, 2019 in London (SODEM)
    3. One of the files actually is named StopTheCoup.webm
    4. according to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmKVQjtYB6Q Defend our Democracy was on september 7, 2019 in London (Paul Mason)
    5. Both files were uploaded on september 5, 2019
--C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate And also:

Yours sincerely, Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Complaint

I just issued a complaint at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#A1Cafel. Eissink ([[User talk:Eissink|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:44, 28 September 2019 (UTC).

Template:Autotranslate 137.189.240.31 03:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

RFA Support

Hi. Since I cannot edit on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Fitindia anymore, I wanted to thank you for your support on my recent successful RFA, Your trust and faith in my candidature is much appreciated and I could not have done it without your support. Warm regards FitIndia Talk Mail 15:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate --Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Duplicates

Hi I can't help but notice that you have tagged a huge number of duplicates - which are duplicates of files uploaded by you in the first place. Please can you try be more careful when you upload files to prevent this happening - you are creating unnecessary work for admins. TIA Gbawden ([[User talk:Gbawden|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:AutotranslateSpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 16:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Cjp24 ([[User talk:Cjp24|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion requests

I saw that you deleted some of the pictures that I uploaded, and proposed to delete almost everithing (Files_uploaded_by_Prof.lumacorno).

First of all: I declare thet all these pics were taken by m,e and that never copied them.

I suppose the problem is that you cant't see the metadatas of the camera (EXIF). That's is exactly the remark which the user Threecharlie made me some months ago. I answered him here, in Italian, and I hoped I already had clarified the matter.

Shortly resuming: I don't like to show the exact location where the pictures were taken, also because some of them represent wall writings which sometimes are consedered illegal. So I use a free sw to save as a screenshot the picture, obtaining a .jpg file without the metadata of the camera. Tell me if I can do semething useful to save these pictures. --Prof.lumacorno ([[User talk:Prof.lumacorno|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

You are absolutely correct, Prof.lumacorno. If one looks at the policy documents, it is plain that absence of EXIFs is not sufficient reason for any proposed deletion; there must be more. I have faced the same issue with this aggressive delete user and call on him/her to cease this annoying waste of time. sirlanz 09:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks a lot Template:Ping! So I wonder if it would be possible to restore the previous deletede files.--Prof.lumacorno ([[User talk:Prof.lumacorno|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
Dear A1Cafel,
Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films?. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag.
You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome !
-- Eatcha (talk) 15:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.79.96.15 07:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.79.97.58 04:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 137.189.240.20 02:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate --Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.78.191.117 02:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Apalsola tc 15:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Explain

Dear A1Cafel, I am the person who has taken the photos of all the images that you have indicated in the message of my discussion page and I have published them in Commons with the templates and licenses compatible with this project. Most of these images have been in the project for more than 10 years and related metadata can be visualized in each of them. Please explain to me what is the process to follow to remove the template you placed. Thanks a lot. I appreciate your kindness and I hope you answer me soon. --Baiji --> (Opinión) 21:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Thanks for your explanation. I have fixed and remove the npd template. --A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 87.91.51.235 09:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.79.97.80 07:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 219.78.191.85 15:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)