User talk:A1Cafel/Archive 13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Find the Space Shuttle (259208823).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 09:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Your edit error.

Please, fix your error, which altered the file's license review tag here: [1] Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 05:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

File:April 2024 Eclipse (53641021335).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0459 (53657780323).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0461 (53658023290).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0462 (53657780393).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0464 (53657779868).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0465 (53657557041).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0469 (53657557096).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0470 (53657780438).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0472 (53656683937).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0473 (53658023990).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0471 (53657557081).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:ESPR 0474 (53658023985).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Flickr import

Hello, would you mind importing 2024 Web Summit Rio photographs (categorized, preferably)? [2] RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Will take sometime to do it. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

DR category question

Hi @A1Cafel, hope you are doing fine. I have a little question regarding DR categories. How do you categorize an "Out of scope" DR such as this one? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 02:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

@Paradise Chronicle: Should be "Quality-related deletion requests"--A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Thats a helpful answer. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

PDM

Hi! I noticed you fixed some files like this: Special:Diff/869426645. If you add {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} instead and {{Flickrreview}} the bot will pass the files. You should of course only do that if you think it looks like own work and not copyvios :-) --MGA73 (talk) 14:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IDCM (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Trade (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Putin, the Hague is waiting for you banner (52625526430).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 23:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

I would like to note that my intention and hope here is that this block is not permanent. As I posted on my talk page in response to concerns (link, permalink), my intention here is that the bar for a successful unblock request is quite low. (A1Cafel: that link also contains some advice for an unblock request.) I ask that I be pinged in any unblock request (ideally by A1Cafel, but alternatively by someone else, and regardless whether a reviewing admin is thinking of granting or declining) so that I can hopefully help facilitate this. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, // sikander { talk } 🦖 16:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, // sikander { talk } 🦖 01:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Charlotte und Marlon von der Letzten Generation verteilen Flyer am Ende der Friday for Future-Demo. (52380262463).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marlon Profuß (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Green Boston City Hall on 2017 St. Patrick's Day.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SecretName101 (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Request: Please, name files with good file names, before you upload.

You recently uploaded this File:-i---i- (53606436734).jpg.

You later added [3] this file to Category:Files from Flickr with bad file names

Since you have used com:flickr2commons tool for many years, you know that users can change any file name before you upload the file(s). Additionally, any original file name can be changed with any "prefix" descriptive wording that users choose- which will create "good file names." This just takes a few seconds, before you upload a file.

Upload Wizard also allows user to change file names before uploading files.

This Category:Files from Flickr with bad file names already has over 45,000 files. You can help prevent creating even more work by other volunteers, by taking a little of your time to make good names before uploading files with "bad names." Can you do that? Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

See also files in Category:Reactions to the Breonna Taylor Grand Jury ruling in Columbus. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
And also the one starting with "DIG15" in Category:Solar eclipse of 2024 April 8 in Texas. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

A1Cafel, you know, you reasonably expected responses when you post to others talk pages. I checked to see if you responded, and you did not. Your behaviour is incredibly problematic, and can be seen on the ANU report. Your lack of response on this issue is not helping you in any way. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

I will make use of the "Prefix selected names" function to added meaningful filenames before uploaded. Even I missed it, I will submit a file rename request to change it. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "After nearly a month of collecting myself, I think it's an appropriate time for me to submit an unblock request.

The main reason of getting block is the attempt of removal the AN discussion involving myself, despite starting by an IP. I understand that I shouldn't be the one to remove such discussion, even it is disruptive in nature. It should be removed by other users or admins, and they are able to give a fair judgement on this. I also learned to respect IP users as most of them are also contributing properly on Commons. They should be treated as the same as registered users.

Another reason of getting a block is lack of communication, as stated in the AN thread. I think I keep myself away from such AN thread is not a big problem, but it ended up reflecting my reluctant to communicate with others to deal with some issues. I need to make meaningful response to such thread to show my communication and the wills to collaborate with other users to deal with the issues identified in the thread.

For the issues brought in the AN thread. One of them is the mass uploading from Flickr having DW/FoP issues, I will spotcheck the files before importing them to Commons, especially for a set of files. For the duplicate issues during Flickr upload, I will spotcheck the Flickr ID of the files before importing them to make sure they are not already uploaded here. I will also make use of the "Flickr tag" options of F2C as I discover that it is also an effective way to check those files already on Commons. If I uploaded images with DW/FOP issues, I will submit it to speedy deletion. For duplicate images, now OptimusPrimeBot has the function to tag the files uploaded later as duplicates, so the duplicate "mistag" will not happen as mentioned by Mdaniels.

Lastly, I apologize for those who affect by my inappropriate behaviour (including the IP users). Also, pinging @Mdaniels5757: as he requires me to ping him in any unblock request, regards.--A1Cafel (talk) 14:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
"
Unblock reason: "—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)"
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

File:Oh! eclipse photo on my Apple watch (53664903243).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 11:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

File:2024 Solar Eclipse (53710535335).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

File:2024 Solar Eclipse (53710290148).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Unwelcome uploading behavior - Comportamiento de carga no deseado -Unwillkommenes Upload-Verhalten

3 minutes after I uploaded this album [4] from that same United States Deputy Secretary of Defense Flick account, you uploaded the next sequential Flickr album [5] from the same account. Both of these two albums have been available for you to upload, since May 23rd. You have done this same unwelcome behavior in the past, so I know it is not a coincidence. As you know through your personal experience of 10,000's of uploads, that there are 1,000's of Flickr accounts from which to choose new uploads. Please, do not upload on the same Flickr account at the same time that I am uploading those files. Thank you in advance, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't think this is unwelcoming, as everyone has the rights to choose the file of their uploads, but I will still try to do so. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Darwin (46668621484).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Removal of category

Alright, dear, let's get to it: I won't even bother mentioning your usual harassing behavior, of which I will soon have evidence, materialized in countless diffs – this will be addressed in due course in the topic I will open as soon as possible on the Administrators' noticeboard. It seems you haven't learned anything from the last time. The issue here is vandalism, which I will not revert using the Rollback button because you, unfortunately, are a well-established member of this project you harm so much. Please do me and the community the favor of explaining why on earth you removed Category:50th G7 summit from these seven first files or these ten first files (there's probably more); there is no justification for it. I also won't mention the lazy categorization in files like this, even though politics is a subject you seem to want to contribute to (whatever contribute means in your head) – if it's going to be like this, it would be better if you did nothing at all. Something like this would be slightly better. RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Oh, and even removed the only category from files you uploaded, like this one! RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
I check a few as they already appears to be at the child category of the 50th G7 Summit. Probably I missed some. Will do the checking more carefully, and I will add back those I accidentally deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 11:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Use of AWB

Hi! I have a question not related to Commons.

I would like to change {{GFDL}} to {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}} on a number of wikis for perhaps 2,000 files.

It is easy to do with a bot however it requires a bot flag. But what about AWB? As far as I know it is allowed to do edits with AWB without a bot flag?

I have never used AWB but as far as I know you use it and with great success. Would you be willing to do the task if I point you to the wikis?

One example is ku:Wîkîpediya:Dîwan_(teknîkî)#GFDL where I made my suggestion but there is no one around making comments or saying "Hey, I can do that for you with my bot".

In case you wonder I made m:User:MGA73/GFDL files and I'm trying to clean up in files using GFDL. First step is to make sure no new files are uploaded with disclaimers. --MGA73 (talk) 15:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

@MGA73: I'm not familiar with AWB, so I'm afraid that I cannot help you. Sorry. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Question about CfD nominations

Please note (and respond to) the question at Commons:Categories for discussion/2024/06/Category:Files from Flickr (uncategorized 2016), if you haven't bookmarked it or received the ping. Enhancing999 (talk) 22:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

File:20.March.March4Gaza.KStreet.WDC.13January2024 (53513227728).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SDudley (talk) 01:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

FOP in Hong Kong

Hi @A1Cafel, can checking in hong kong photograph category, anime artwork and film poster is "graphic works" not "artistic craftsmanship" thanks. メイド理世 (talk) 11:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Will find some time to check. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi

I want to learn form you 102.176.94.115 20:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome. Did you have any account? Since IP address are fluctuated, I can't recognize who are you if you don't have an account. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Macys Thanksgiving Parade (37733860665).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IDCM (talk) 15:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

@A1Cafel: please nominate this file for deletion, it appears to be COM:COPYVIO from Facebook, according to EXIF metadata. 197.140.142.46 07:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Stop Putler sign.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stop Putler sign.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 12:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Free at Last (5348588795).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Graffiti, Market St (158728378).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

File:EU2024BE 240530 FAC Trade Council European Union Council JNZT 0069 (53756470272).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Mural deletion

I look forward to you tagging everything at Category:Murals in the United Kingdom for deletion, rather than just a couple of files. - SchroCat (talk) 04:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Two selective deletion requests (DR's) in a small category, while no DR for your favored image used in Wikidata.

Here on Wikidata you replaced an image and then did a Deletion Request (DR) for the image file you removed from wikidata here. The reason was "No FoP," but the image you recently placed in wikidata is also subject to this same exact DR reason ("No FoP"). However, you did not nominate for deletion the image you personally favored. You also nominated for deletion (DR), another similar image of the same building, and subject to the exact same "No FoP."

Would you please explain, why? I'm also, pinging @SchroCat Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 00:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 1.jpg appears to be de minimis, but File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 2.jpg isn't. I have no preferences on which image to be used. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
You wrote, "I have no preference on which image to be used," but you did have a preference by your nomination File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 2.jpg for deletion. So, why write that you "have no preference?" -- Ooligan (talk) 15:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
I said no preference on which image to be used on Wikidata, not no preference on the deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
The words you wrote before this most recent reply- did not include the word "Wikidata," so you meant to write Wikidata, but didn't. I can't guess what you mean unless you write it.
Your latest reply is deliberately misleading. Are you actually reading the links I provided above? -- Ooligan (talk) 20:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your use of speedy delete SD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)- instead of more specific and accurate "duplicate."

As you know how to use the "duplicate" tag very well. This is the second time, that I'm aware that you used speedy delete reason G7, instead of the more accurate and specific "duplicate" tag. That earlier time you also used "SD|G7," instead of "duplicate" was just after your recent unblock.

Also, you used a deceptive edit summary by writing "doing 1 replacements" on these 5 duplicate files:

File:V20240429LJ-1091 (53893697533).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1173 (53893871105).jpg, File:V20240506LJ 0480 (53893871090).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1069 (53893460146).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1178 (53893460086).jpg.

I added the recommended specific duplicate tag to these files. In the future, please use duplicate tags per COM:SPEEDY. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Seems this bulk edit of theirs stuffed a number of things up - see my question below Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your edit

Hi. I am curious - why did you mark File:Historical coal mine Hoym-Ignatius (8855330335).jpg as uncategorized? Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Should be a miss when performing a batch task. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
File:熱帶風暴戈登襲美國墨西哥灣沿岸地區.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IrishSurfer21 (talk) 21:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Overhaul

Hi, please help me to check the upload from this user. It is suspected to be using fake license and claims. Exagren (talk) 02:32, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
That's for defending against CP. Lemonaka (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Secretary Blinken Visits NEC Future Creation Hub (53888808696).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Pleiades (51381212690).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

// sikander { talk } 🦖 14:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Milkyway and Perseid (51379448137).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

// sikander { talk } 🦖 14:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

OK to merge Co-op tea DRs?

Would you mind if I merged these DRs that all relate to the same mural?

This will avoid copying essentially the same discussion across four pages. --bjh21 (talk) 14:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done--A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! --bjh21 (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your deletion request Category The Virgin of Quito Monument in El Panecillo

The fact that you claim to be a supporter of the public domain on your user page can only be a bad joke. The fanaticism with which you want to delete entire categories shows that you are actually striving for a complete privatization of public space. Please change this mendacious self-disclosure, it's ridiculous. Arabsalam (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

That's FoP issue, not Public Domain. I personally still support PD. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service

I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.

The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.

Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).

Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello

thumb|

Since we can't be certain if his photo is from before 1963 or possibly after, and whether it can be freely used without copyright restrictions, do you think we should consider removing it? Baginda 480 (talk) 14:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

His other photo also write taken before 1963, I think I need to ask you Baginda 480 (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
@Baginda 480: Mr. Hussein Onn became a member of Malaysian Parliament in 1971, then became a deputy PM in 1973 (later PM in 1976). Assuming the photo was taken when he took the oath of office as MP of Malaysia, it was definitely after 1963. I really doubt the date that marked by the uploader. If you feel this is unfree, you can submit it to DR. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm a newcomer here and still learning the ropes. Could you kindly assist me? I'd be very grateful. Thank you! Baginda 480 (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
@Baginda 480: Sure. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
thumb|
This image also write before 1963 Baginda 480 (talk) 15:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Also nominated. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you🙏Hope we can continue work together Baginda 480 (talk) 15:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Presidential portrait of Michelle Bachelet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Symbols discussion

Please discuss about these symbols in the public domain (and threshold of originality) at:

2001:4452:152:2600:75FD:A8E4:FCD3:969 12:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not familiar with Malaysian TOO, so I cannot comment on these. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Just a little hint. With all due respect

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6zaCV4niKk&ab_channel=Yusuf%2FCatStevens

There are people who always manage to turn a good day into a bad day for others. And there are also people like you who make it almost impossible to take further part in this project.

Think about it. Just keep your own problems to yourself and start having a little more respect for others. The world is beautiful, and it's beautiful because there are people who are constructive. I realize this won't even affect you emotionally, but I just wanted to let you know. Hubertl 17:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

good music. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
but rude message. // sikander { talk } 🦖 22:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I see sincerity in the message. This account is still tolerated in this project only because it acts like a worm that decomposes garbage, and nothing more. It's a pity that it doesn't focus on the real garbage – copyright violations – but on images related to freedom of panorama. Being autistic like them, I understand their hyperfocus, but I would like them to realize it and start acting constructively instead of being so harassing as they are now. Please note that nominating images to deletion due to violating freedom of panorama is not and has never been the issue with this account. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@Hubertl, Modern primat, and RodRabelo7: Actually this account is bordering the problem user. We should also face the matter of users with whom interaction is difficult to impossible. -- Blackcat 09:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
@Blackcat - I noticed the Commons link you provided below. @Hubertl to your point, there is "history" here in a similar link for English Wikipedia, where they were indefinately blocked for "abusing multiple accounts." -- Ooligan (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
PS Moreover. It's a problem user who abused the patience of administrators. If it were for me I wouldn't have unblocked because they's disrupting the project. 12.26, 14 Ağustos 2024‎ Blackcat (A)
  • i still believe this user is trying to contribute in good manner. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
    @Modern primat: really? Please, tell us how, since it's hard to believe. -- Blackcat 23:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
    While I get frustrated by A1Cafel's calls on what to delete and I do believe there is sometimes bias on their part (hopefully unintentional), I do believe that A1Cafel is acting in good faith. I have seen a lot of good work from them. At least on my end I have not seen A1Cafel intentionally trying to bully or troll people. I have only seen A1Cafel make absolutist judgement calls that I would consider on the side of excessive caution rather than in the interest of Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia's mission. Myotus (talk) 20:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

I learned something new

I didn't know that deletion requests need to be categorized manually, but I now noticed that you've been doing such categorizations. I've used those maintenance categories at least once or twice to get an idea of what could fall under TOO, for example. Very helpful categories. Thanks for keeping track of those things this way :) Nakonana (talk) 13:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

I probably should include an example of what I'm talking about haha:[6]. — Nakonana (talk) 13:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Obisk predsednika vlade Roberta Goloba in predsednice Evropske komisije Ursule von der Leyen v Črni na Koroškem. Ogled razstave fotografij o posledicah opustošenja ujme avgusta 2023 v prostorih občine. (53965190461).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Save urls of South Africa FoP deletions

I have one very important request for you as you are by far the largest nominator for South African Freedom of Panorama deletion requests. Since Freedom of Panorama is included in the Copyright Amendment Bill of 2018, which looks likely to pass into law (though no one knows when), I would like to know if you could please save on commons somewhere a list of all of the South Africa Freedom of Panorama deletion requests you have made? That way, when the bill is finally gazetted into law the Admins can go through the list and undelete them. Thank you, Discott (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

@Discott: I have added [[Category:South African FOP cases/pending]] to each ZA's FoP nomination. Once the South African Parliament passed the amended FoP law, those images will be undeleted by the admins. So no worry on that. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
That's perfect. Thank you. --Discott (talk) 09:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello

thumb| Baginda 480 (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I would like to you if the image I uploaded is legal. It was taken at Mahathir Mohamad birth home and is a photo from before 1962 (taken in 1939). Baginda 480 (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
@Baginda 480: Should be OK because it is already entered PD before the URAA restoration date. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello (2)

thumb|

The image has already been repeated. Baginda 480 (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Same with this
thumb|
But this image upload in 2019, the other image upload in 2022 Baginda 480 (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
@Baginda 480: You may use {{Duplicate}} to tag the newer file, and then an admin will merge it. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
ok thank Baginda 480 (talk) 02:03, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Presidential portrait of Sadyr Japarov.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello (3)

Do you think these categories should be deleted since there are no images in them?

Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1976 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1981 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1982 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1985 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1990 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 2009

I might recreate them once I have images from that year. Baginda 480 (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@Baginda 480: Sure, please put {{SD|G2}} to these categories. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
thumb|
为什么这个你两年前创建的又符合版权?(刚才才看了你的简历发现你好像会华语,我就用华语吧我母语是华语) Baginda 480 (talk) 04:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
我是参考这个,我以为这个频道的影片都能上传 Baginda 480 (talk) 04:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
@Baginda 480: You need to pay attention, not every video on the channel has the CC-BY license. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Ok,我会再学习学习,不会的会问你 Baginda 480 (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
你可以检查我上传的每个图片,真的麻烦了 Baginda 480 (talk) 04:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
其实你上传的这只影片如何证明符合版权,因为我找不到相关内容关于版权的 Baginda 480 (talk) 04:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
@Baginda 480: Videos marked with "Creative Commons" at the bottom. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
BTW, I worried that you may be blocked, as Jeff G. has given you a final warning, and some of the files you uploaded and identified as copyvio is after that. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
谢谢你的担忧,我自己看着办,我会先去多研究版权问题 Baginda 480 (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Manif du 1er mai 2023 (52862318686).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 15:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

File:BikersForTrump1.RollingThunder.WDC.29May2016 (27672036472).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Therapyisgood (talk) 20:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Protest Tbilisi 21 April 2024 (53987798696).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Labrang (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#A1Cafel and hostile behaviour towards Flickr original sources. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

I've tagged it, so that you can see which thread it is out of the multiple already there about your behaviour. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Gaussian blurs

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:CICLOP_Building_(Bucharest)_interior_with_artwork_blurred.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=926530944 : there is nothing wrong with adding the maintenance category "Category:Censored by lack of FOP" (though I find its name contentious: do we also consider all copyright protection "censorship"?), but please do not remove Category:Gaussian blurs to avoid copyright infringement when you do so. - Jmabel ! talk 15:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Noted. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
File:2021-02-21 15-47-12 ILCE-7C DSC03177 (50970191586).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.163.69.3 09:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

您好

这个影片在youtube

DmQaJVcWC4

SATU HARI DI HARI Raya (feat. Tun Dr Siti Hasmah)

我能上传吗,影片是有creative common的,但是因为有音乐,所以我不确定可不可以上载 Baginda 480 (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Baginda 480: If you have doubt, don't upload it. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument aux morts des Armées de Champagne

@A1Cafel: Bonjour, Savez-vous remettre en place toutes ces photos que vous fîtes supprimer en septembre 2023. L'on peut envisager de les remettre en place à partir du 1er janvier 2025 à 0H00 (c'est bientôt)
Hello, do you know how to put back all those photos that you had deleted in September 2023. We can consider to put them back in place from January 1, 2025 at 0h00 (it is soon)
Hallo, wissen Sie, wie man all diese Fotos wieder einfügt, die Sie im September 2023 löschen ließen. Es kann in Betracht gezogen werden, sie ab dem 1. Januar 2025 um 0h00 (es ist bald)
Здравствуйте, вы знаете, как вернуть все те фотографии, которые вы удалили в сентябре 2023 года. Мы можем рассмотреть их обратно на место с 1 января 2025 года в 0h00 (это скоро)

193.248.144.185 08:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

They are already marked with "Undelete in 2025". Once the time is arrived, an admin will restore them, so no worry about it. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Request

A kind request - please stay away from my Flickr and refrain from importing files the moment I release them. I see you uploaded files while I was already prepping them to upload. Thank you. I hope for your cooperation. Meanwhile, reconsider your deletion request, while you upload protest banners. Labrang (talk) 06:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

If you really don't want others to import from Your Flickr stream, why don't you choose a license that is forbidden on Commons, then you upload the work as your own work? --A1Cafel (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
And while I am at it - why do you upload a rather pointless photo like this - File:Preparations for government orchestrated event (53684050396).jpg? Or do you just use some automated algorythm to transfer snatch all license applicable photos into commons, regardless their actual value? Is that how it works? Labrang (talk) 07:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
That's the filename automatically generated by F2C. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
That's exactly the problem. Mass-import just because you can. Mind you, what's the difference according to you between this photo and this photo Labrang (talk) 09:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
I have blurred the copyrighted element.--A1Cafel (talk) 09:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
You did not when you uploaded it initially. Do I understand you correctly you now confess to violation of the rules that you apply to others?
Mind you - this derivative act takes away the whole purpose [message] of the banner - so please consider to have the photo deleted altogether, if that particular element makes it a copyright violation. Thank you. Labrang (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
And please, indicate what is the element in the other image that you nominated that is the problematic part? Labrang (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
The boots, and the icon of Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
How are the boots and the face (a drawing, not a photo) protected work? And again, please delete the other photo with the crocodile and ivanishvili. This takes away the entire purpose of the banner. This is more vandalizing than helping anything. Labrang (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
And please, confess you applied rules to me (3:46) that you deliberately did not apply to yourself (3:42). Labrang (talk) 10:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
I apologize for any inconvenience. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
At least that is clear. And the boots and the face (a drawing, not a photo) are not protected work. They are just a private drawing similarly to wall graffiti. Wall graffiti in Georgia - we have plenty of. Labrang (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Please do not do that Labrang Trade (talk) 01:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

sub reaction

""If you really don't want others to import from Your Flickr stream, why don't you choose a license that is forbidden on Commons, then you upload the work as your own work?" - that was not my message. I was preparing SOME photos to be transferred and indeed had uploaded some extra photos to my Flickr and adjusted the license appropriately - so in that case there was nothing wrong with that as such, except for the fact that I took a break from the screen and overnight you transferred the photos, while I was prepping them already in Commons with different file names - only a few hours after I had them uploaded to Flickr / changed license. This feels like prying. Also, as result, there are now some duplicates. Do you sniff Flickr and snatch any photo that you see the minute it is released under a lower license? The fact that a photo is adjusted to a lower license doesn't OBLIGE you to upload them the minute they are released. Right? Labrang (talk) 10:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I uploaded those photos 12 hours after your license change, not "minute" right? Also such photos are easily search on Flickr, and it is unfair to blame me "prying" Flickr stream. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Whatever the case, it simply feels that way. Regardless how easy it is to find such photos in Flickr. I have noticed various Commons people pry on Flickr and upload whatever they can without checking the actual (additional) value for Commons. Not saying that is the case here - although your eagerness to upload whatever is free license, while at the same time also looking for whatever you can nominate for deletion seems to make you sloppy for what you upload yourself. Anyways, have a nice day. Labrang (talk) 11:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Not like own work

183.182.120.206 10:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)