Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a crop of a TV screenshot of CID; the episode Khooni Gulaal (9 March, 2012) http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk122/DemonStar89/Screencaps/m9c3.png --Auric (talk) 05:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonad97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: unused, poor quality, non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 21:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Udine2812 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Technical qualities suggest this is a photograph of an existing photo (i.e. derivative work). No permission for underlying image. Other images in uploader stream are obvious derivative works (e.g., File:Gmmanuale.jpg)

Эlcobbola talk 21:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Uploader indicated here that the underlying photo is indeed his/her original work. I'm willing to AGF and retain the images on that basis. However, the uploader has since uploaded a superior version of this picture (File:Driussi.jpg - not nominated here), so the images above should probably still be deleted as inferior quality duplicates. Эlcobbola talk 16:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination High Contrast (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo, dubious user name, probably used for vandalism somewhere, no educational value, watermark on photo Mjrmtg (talk) 16:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleted by Fastily High Contrast (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martin blanco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, commons is not a personal photo gallery, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 20:37, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:05, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 20:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 21:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unidentified person. Stefan4 (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot of a website. Stefan4 (talk) 21:40, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kieramcdiarmidx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 01:07, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 2D works like this in Canada. Stefan4 (talk) 01:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubt this is own work. Looks like a page from Autocar or Dailymail.co.uk Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, clearly not original file, and there is "Graphic John Lawson" in bottom of file. Otherwise, interesting file. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giancarlo 29 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Low quality. No foreseeable use.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's both other edits were vandalism, which I reverted, so I decided to delete all these files also. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement http://www.promipool.de/artikel/nach-btn-sofi-muss-jetzt-auch-alina-gehen-91450/ Der Checkerboy (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Obvious cases may use {{Copyvio}}. Эlcobbola talk 17:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, per High Contrast. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PENIS Эlcobbola talk 17:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, give us this day our daily penises ... Taivo (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, text-only contribution and quite short (17 words in Spanish), the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abanjariya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Book photo potentially copyvio (if there is enough to pass the threshold of originality).

Stefan4 (talk) 19:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No need to even bother with a discussion on these. Just mark them {{Speedy}} in the future. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense, out-of-scope personal picture Ricordisamoa 19:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some unknown person, name not known Motopark (talk) 19:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, this is probably uploader Andrea S. Pyles. Small and blurry photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mdlukman92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 01:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PENIS Leitoxx 02:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Closed: Already discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Giancarlo 29. Let's keep the discussion at one place. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be the uploader's own work. El Grafo (talk) 09:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 13:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused personal picture, a pic for her user site is allowed, but she has not done it. --Ras67 (talk) 15:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is an «user site»? -- Tuválkin 16:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the personal user page on Commons is meant. --Ras67 (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the image. Jespinos (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:53, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Here is the cutest possible kitten for you
Self promotion with little or no educational value. Commons is not Flickr. COM:NOTSOCIAL Commons is not a social network and uploaded images COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sorry to have marked your photo/s for deletion, but Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album! Please read up on COM:SCOPE to find out more about what is and what isn't a file which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I hope you read up on all this and add some more photos of your own! Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose, redundancy, quality. Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 17:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a pretty clear copyvio. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears to be a screenshot of a television programme. Jespinos (talk) 21:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 23:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 23:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out-of-scope, also possible personality rights issue Ymblanter (talk) 10:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose, PORN! Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 00:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 00:50, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, unused personal picture -Pete F (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, personal photo outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, personal photo outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, personal photo outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, personal photo outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Michael Barera as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No EXIF metadata, likely copyvio (also note team logo in background). Sven Manguard Wha? 05:52, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio (speedy) Sven Manguard Wha? 20:21, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture is of a fake Sesame Street DVD box, mis-leadingly used on Wikipedia as an official DVD cover. Falls out of scope as a self-created artwork with no educational use, namely being misguiding. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 06:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Obviously self-created, whether by a child, a hopeless incompetent, or a prankster. Postdlf (talk) 01:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial uses and is not compatible with COM:L

LGA talkedits 08:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep
 Delete
Thanks. --Idh0854 (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is with the copyright the architect has on the stadium not with the person who took the photo. LGA talkedits 10:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You can do it if need be. Thanks. --Idh0854 (talk) 11:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep at least these:

Not much architecture is seem here. LGA, you need to better select what you nominate. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP in South Korea. Two files kept because the stadium is not the subject of the picture. Léna (talk) 11:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in South Korea for architecture.

russavia (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.Kwj2772 (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found license of Seoul World Cup Stadium is KOGL Type 2 from this site. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, I think we should follow the license written on this site. KOGL Type 2 is noncommercial use license. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 11:52, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial uses and is not compatible with COM:L

LGA talkedits 09:11, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand about your opinion. There are no problem.--Fetx2002 (talk) 02:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Read the FOP page above. --레비Revi 09:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What probrem of FOP? I can't understand your opinion too.
FOPのどこが問題なのか、条文を明示してください。--Waka77 (talk) 12:45, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In order for a file to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons, it has to be available for reuse for any purpose, including commercial purposes. See COM:LICENSING. Apparently, in South Korea, photos like this are not reusable for commercial purposes. Our general page on freedom of panorama may be useful to read. -Pete F (talk) 19:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, except one, where no copyrightable details are seen. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder and obtain this image from this website - http://www.mtviggy.com/lists/11-reasons-why-were-obsessed-with-the-voices-tessanne-chin/ Axb3 (talk) 11:10, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wpwjdgus1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios or images out of project scope.

Jespinos (talk) 14:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Also description pages are advertising external site - spam. --레비Revi 07:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above, Yann (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal unused photo - out of score St1995 16:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, personal photo outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rondakalitus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 22:50, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, no evidence that these are not COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As of this request, this is unused on any project, and thus falls out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Person on the photo has no article on Dutch wikipedia, because there was not enough information to make him relevant for an encyclopedia. There will be little chance the photo will be used. Mbch331 (talk) 09:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request. I have uploaded a better version, Sayur asem.JPG. SpartacksCompatriot (talk) 02:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleted per Uploaders request. Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is very likely a copyright violation (not user's own work; appears to be a screenshot from a music video?); used solely for vandalism on Wikipedia ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 07:32, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete AGree with nominator this is some kind of screenshot and unlikely to be user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotor - 13 year old boy who thinks he would be a pastor... - not really done anything for a Wikimedia project. But Commons is not Webspace for self promotors.. Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: That's true, but as long as WP:EN allows it to stay, we can;t delete it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 19:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 00:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotor - 13 year old boy who thinks he would be a pastor... - not really done anything for a Wikimedia project. But Commons is not Webspace for self promotors.. Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: That's true, but as long as WP:EN allows it to stay, we can;t delete it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Settai3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already gone McZusatz (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be crop of album art for "Hot Couture" see: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/hot-couture-single/id475061264 or https://www.tineye.com/search/be958ca92e5e4ea700af40e900a8bb566c9f3b01/ 69.24.174.220 22:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Blatant copyright violation High Contrast (talk) 23:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 12:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:27, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per nom and it has a bad quality. Natuur12 (talk) 20:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 15:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Vandalism/out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because i habe ad it by mistake Zitrone48 (talk) 19:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


because i habe ad it by mistake 212.89.218.172 17:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be a screen cap from one of the subject's films and not an original photo. Dismas (talk) 07:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright, PORN ! Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 14:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Porn and probably copyrighted. Skarz (talk) 15:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcissara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal images, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 吳瑾瑩 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:DW.

Jespinos (talk) 20:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 22:37, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYRIGHT ! Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 04:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Copyright violöation: At least the lower one of the images is taken fom a website. 2) Out of Cope. El Grafo (talk) 09:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like this is from http://de.scrubs.wikia.com/wiki/Datei:Dave_Franco.jpg. Probably copyrighted by Getty Images. Morn (talk) 14:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Niamohlordy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 17:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 17:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private image host High Contrast (talk) 18:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private image host High Contrast (talk) 18:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False authorship claims - highly likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 18:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False authorship claims - highly likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 18:10, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Jespinos (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False authorship claims - highly likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Here is the original version on this page --High Contrast (talk) 18:13, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private image host High Contrast (talk) 18:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 18:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private image host High Contrast (talk) 18:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private image host High Contrast (talk) 18:33, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by High Contrast as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: borderline, {{PD-textlogo}} may apply. Jcb (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The handwriting is not ineligible for copyright. --High Contrast (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with this argument, per e.g. {{PD-signature}} - Jcb (talk) 18:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is no signature: {{PD-signature}} can only be used for scans or photographs of an individual's personal signature. This is no individual's personal signature but some company-logo related writing. --High Contrast (talk) 22:37, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Four short words in regular handwriting can be as simple as most of the signatures we accept. I think closing administrator will understand the link. Jcb (talk) 23:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is your personal understanding of this issue. We had such cases of which the closing admin decided not to keep them. --High Contrast (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, "other stuff exists". I found it sufficiently unclear to convert 'copyvio' into a regular DR. Jcb (talk) 23:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What? So you disagree with your DR here? --High Contrast (talk) 23:24, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, but I think that the part with the red lines in the yellow is what makes this borderline. Jcb (talk) 23:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting thesis - so it should be a clear case which is not covered by the COM:PCP --High Contrast (talk) 23:32, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If there is doubt, we don't use speedy tags - you know that. Jcb (talk) 23:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I know that but in my view there ain't no severe doubts. --High Contrast (talk) 23:42, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you expressed that view. And I expressed mine. Closing admin will read both and conclude something. Jcb (talk) 23:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's a tossup for me. The "handwriting" does not have a US copyright -- it is just another typeface and a short phrase. I'm concerned about the red and yellow shape. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Questionable copyright status FASTILY 00:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A derivative work of a photograph - it is unknown under which license the original is published. We must assume that it is copyrighted High Contrast (talk) 18:45, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private image host High Contrast (talk) 18:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private image host High Contrast (talk) 18:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superfluous screenshot of a Wikipedia article. No need for this High Contrast (talk) 19:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no encyclopedic value High Contrast (talk) 19:09, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private image host High Contrast (talk) 19:15, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False authorship claims - highly likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a personal photo, unused, and probably unusable. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio, multiple Google Images hits. Rosenzweig τ 20:09, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:39, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:39, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 배종후 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation:http://www.heroesmovies.pl/index.php?page=article&id=994 Grzegorznadolski (talk) 21:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright ? Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 21:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album. Image is not used High Contrast (talk) 22:33, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A derivative work of a likely copyrighted photograph High Contrast (talk) 22:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: obviously only for self promotion only purposes; no educational use given High Contrast (talk) 22:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: obviously only for self promotion only purposes; no educational use given High Contrast (talk) 22:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album. Image is not used High Contrast (talk) 22:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album. Image is not used High Contrast (talk) 22:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: use for eduactional purposes is very doubtful High Contrast (talk) 22:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album. Image is not used High Contrast (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album. Image is not used High Contrast (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False authorship claims - highly likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 23:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:09, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: use for eduactional purposes is very doubtful High Contrast (talk) 23:14, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: use for eduactional purposes is very doubtful High Contrast (talk) 23:14, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:14, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: use for eduactional purposes is very doubtful High Contrast (talk) 23:14, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by High Contrast as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: none, only that High Contrast keeps reverting my decision. For High Contrast to leave a valid reason here. Jcb (talk) 23:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Thank you JCB for actually helping here. Unfortunately you have removed the initial rational. This "film logo" of a German film is too complex for PD-ineligible, PD-shape or PD-text to apply. The German threshold of originality isn't as high as it was before Urteil vom 13. November 2013 - I ZR 143/12. --High Contrast (talk) 23:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's text only. It's our policy to ignore whether the used font may be original. Jcb (talk) 23:32, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is not text only. It is not some font. The latters themselved are arranged with irregular shaddows and orientations. --High Contrast (talk) 23:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This is no "font", same letters look different at each occurence. --Krd 10:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There are some good arguments given why pd-textlogo doesn't apply. This doesn't seem like a font to me and Magog the Ogre has a good argument as well. Does German law ignore fonts? All together this is more that a reasonable doubt that this is a pd-textlogo. Natuur12 (talk) 13:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original image can be found here. Although it is in a lower resolution, it is enough to identify this one as a copyvio High Contrast (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:36, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:36, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a screenshot of a non-free program or other copyrighted material. See watermark lower right hand corner. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:37, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: use for eduactional purposes is very doubtful High Contrast (talk) 23:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a personal photograph, not in use on any project page and does not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a personal photograph, not in use on any project page and does not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. Title alone shows intent up uploader. Commons is not a social media site. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:42, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Indeed, it is not the uploader's own work and from someone employed by the WMF I would expect to get the attribution right and not to delegate this task to volunteers and not to claim own work over something that simply is not. -- Rillke(q?) 01:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: use for eduactional purposes is very doubtful High Contrast (talk) 23:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a screenshot from a website (from description), the uploader's name is the same as the website name in this image. Possible COM:COPYVIO and the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: use for eduactional purposes is very doubtful High Contrast (talk) 23:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: use for eduactional purposes is very doubtful High Contrast (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from [1] Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from [2] Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Less than 50 years old, this program or book cover is probably still copyrighted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this image has been placed in use on several wiki pages, it is of very small size and low quality, it has no helpful meta data and is likely copied from a program or book, not the uploader's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: It is in use, so we can not delete for quality reasons. It doesn't show up in a Google search, but all four of the editor's other uploads have been blatant copyvios, so we can no longer assume good faith. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is found also [3] here where it is clearly labeled Copyright by CalTech 2013. Probable COM:COPYVIO Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is in use [4] here clearly labeled copyright 2006 Regents of the University of California. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recognizable presumably living individual with no indication of permission. Title of piece shows intent. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is blurry and out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This watermarked image is the same as [5] here where there is no indication that the image is for free use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE küñall (nütramyen) 06:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:18, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE küñall (nütramyen) 07:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE küñall (nütramyen) 07:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complicated, but I am not sure... 레비Revi 08:11, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation:http://vidaenaccionradio.com/marco-barrientos-presenta-transformados/ Grzegorznadolski (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation: http://www.justjared.com/2012/07/03/cristiano-ronaldo-irina-shayk-yacht-ride-with-cristiano-jr/ Grzegorznadolski (talk) 11:28, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality, project scope. Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 13:14, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, low quality, unused personal image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of extremely low quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with nominator, I can't even tell what this photo is supposed to show. Nonetheless it's outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not free to use Mattythewhite (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So why no request for Speedy deletion? Is ofcourse not a free image. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Polarlys. Yann (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not free to use. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So why no request for Speedy deletion? Is ofcourse not a free image. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Polarlys. Yann (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is in use on dozens of travel sites worldwide, see here for others. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Blatant copyright violation: http://www.focus.de/reisen/service/dubai_did_18145.html High Contrast (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is in use on multiple other webpages, see here for examples. The description and title suggest the possibility of spoofing in addition to possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above, and probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:53, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image of a performer is in use on multiple other websites, see here for examples, and is unlikely to be uploader's own work. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Jcb. Yann (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded by a spam-account blocked at de.WP, obviously created by "picjoke.net", not "own work". FDMS (WP: en, de) 02:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See also here, here and here. Kind regards. --Jivee Blau (talk) 03:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright! Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 02:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Found several places online in higher resolution. Probablr copyright violation. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:34, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion fetishists always use that double-edge knife ainst media showing children: If daddy took a picture, then delete it because it is a personal vanity offscope image, if dady didn’t, delete it all the same because, you know, kids are scary. -- Tuválkin 09:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Bad quality, out of scope. And yes, special care should be taken about pictures of children. Yann (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, pers. rights (13 years old) Nolispanmo 14:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by DaB. Yann (talk) 20:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunnytomar2050 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]