Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/09/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Вид_на_Храм_Рождества_Христова_(1839г.),_западная_сторона..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4103274079).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(53988096513).jpg){kind=link}
_(53988174614).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Jundiaí.png){kind=link}
Out of scope: likely fictitious flag; was unused outside a userspace sandbox about a fictitious war. Omphalographer (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, likely fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, likely fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, likely fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Atakhanli as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Anthony2106 (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 08:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I did not realise my location would be revealed Вячеслав молодец (talk) 10:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry Kaneeshktoriya209 (talk) 12:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is an important source for the life data of Adolf Badt Nortix08 (talk) 13:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
i uploaded this with incorrect copyright details so i want it deleted (only protected by fair use) Cooltankguylovewiki (talk) 12:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Andreslence2 (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article, totally blurry, nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Andreslence2 (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, does not meet any notability criteria, this is not facebook The tag was removed out of process by RZuo in special:diff/928483698. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- describe "process". RoyZuo (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- @RZuo: "If anyone disagrees with the speedy deletion of a particular file, please convert to a regular deletion request" per Commons:Deletion policy#Speedy deletion. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- i'll put down everything once and for all before you even reply.
- the deletion reason is bogus.
- it's not a selfie.
- there's no com:csd about "notability criteria".
- i added it to two categories, one of which Category:IMovie shows this is for now the only file showing a person using imovie. i dont expect a deletion request based on com:scope would even be plausible.
- i clicked one of the two buttons "remove this tag". rejection of bogus templates by any commons user is self explanatory. what process? i expect an explanation for the rash accusation.
- the deletion reason is bogus.
- RoyZuo (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Yann: did you just delete "the only file showing a person using imovie"?--RoyZuo (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't see how you could argue that this file illustrates that. If anything, this could illustrate a teenager's desktop, but nothing else. Yann (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: how do you argue that https://www.flickr.com/photos/fabola/23491654620/ is not someone using imovie on a mac and moving the mouse?
- even if you cannot see the software is imovie, there is only 1 other file File:Video Producer in Cape Town.jpg showing a person and cat:video editing software, which shows a man who's not using the software but instead looking at the camera.--RoyZuo (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- "someone using iMovie" is different than a picture that could illustrate that use. The screen is blurry, and since it is a free software, anyone can create a useful picture or video. This is not one of them. Yann (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't see how you could argue that this file illustrates that. If anything, this could illustrate a teenager's desktop, but nothing else. Yann (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Undeleted after request at COM:UDR in order to start a new request to delete. Previous deletion request was Commons:Deletion requests/File:A fabulous birthday (23491654620).jpg. The file was nominated for deletion for the following reason: "This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, does not meet any notability criteria, this is not facebook" Thuresson (talk) 11:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Ping to interested parties: @Belbury: , @Abzeronow: , @Yann: , @Jameslwoodward: , @Bastique: , @RoyZuo: . Thuresson (talk) 11:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep demonstrates the use of iMovie without violating copyright. The composition of the photograph is also good. The photograph is interesting. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)- @Thuresson: the author of the picture is User:Fabrice Florin, an active Wikimedian who is also now an employee of the WMF. Should they be pinged as well? I do not believe that should influence one way or the other whether we keep it or not, particularly as they uploaded it to Flickr and not to Commons, but since it does involve their photo and a person that they know well, I wonder if they should be directed to this conversation? Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete as per my previous comment. Yann (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)- Keep for the reasons stated by Bastique. Abzeronow (talk) 16:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep one of the few commons files that show a girl using video editing software.
- and i dont see how this flickr image is in any way inferior to commercial stock photos of the same motif https://www.gettyimages.de/search/2/image?phrase=girl%20edit%20video https://www.shutterstock.com/search/girl-edit-video .
- the background is what a natural, realistic bedroom/study looks like, unlike the fake setups that give a commercial stock photo vibe.
- on top of that, imovie is proprietary software by apple. the slightly blurry screen is just a perfect middle ground such that it cannot be considered a copyright violation of the proprietary software but still is recognisable enough as a girl editing videos.--RoyZuo (talk) 07:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, this looks to be the only image on Commons that could meaningfully illustrate the concept of home video editing, and it would be a good fit at en:Video editing#Home video editing. It's not really a selfie, it barely shows one side of the person's face. The focus is the video editing that they're doing. Belbury (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Roy and Belbury, I've now added the image. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: consensus for keep. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
I am the original uploader and owner of this photo. I no longer wish to have this image publicly available on Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majharul Islam Tayef (talk • contribs) 14:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
delet photo محمدحسین میناوند (talk) 18:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Promotional Materials: Not a hosting site Michel Bakni (talk) 08:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
as per F10 राजकुमार(talk) 11:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10/G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded a wrong photo 45.125.6.41 21:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC) Go t
I uploaded a wrong photo TO4848 (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please delete a photo as soon as possible,I hae no own right to the photo. TO4848 (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- {{speedy delete|Uploaded Wrong Photo}} 45.125.6.180 02:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 06:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Depicts a fictional election as seen in the creator's sandbox. Out of scope N Panama 84534 22:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Alt history, fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 22:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
I made a mistake this should be deleted D.B0924 (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per G7/F2. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- this pic is underr my personal use category not for knowledge purpose , so u cant report me for it... Imagangsta123 (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. This is not your personal playground. --Achim55 (talk) 19:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. A low resolution image of man. Plenty of better quality pictures of similar subject on Commons. No meaningful Description, Filename, Caption or Category⁶ Headlock0225 (talk) 09:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- no , so stating those reasons u cant delete my picture , its a pic depiciting love for my teacher and nothing inappropiate , even i saw some pics in ur page havig the same problem which u mentioned for this , there should be some sense before reporting my pic for deletion i guess... Imagangsta123 (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. A very low resolution image of man. Plenty of better quality pictures of similar subject on Commons. No meaningful Description, Filename, Caption or Category⁶ Headlock0225 (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- no , so stating those reasons u cant delete my picture , its a pic depiciting love for my teacher and nothing inappropiate , even i saw some pics in ur page havig the same problem which u mentioned for this , there should be some sense before reporting my pic for deletion i guess... Imagangsta123 (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
File:President Bill Clinton and daughter Chelsea Clinton arrive at Aukland Airport, New Zealand on 11 September 1999.jpg
[edit]
Redirected, but not deleted. Quick1984 (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
useless pic, nonsense text - might be bullying Mateus2019 (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Aafi. --Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate file and requested by the uploader AsianStuff03 (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I cropped out the frame. --RAN (talk) 03:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate file and requested by the uploader AsianStuff03 (talk) 06:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep One is cropped and the other has the full edges per the Library of Congress archive standards. --RAN (talk) 03:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded because I thought it was public domain, but after upload, metadata says it's copyrighted. HalfHazard98 (talk) 07:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
copyvio from http://www.kungfurouen.fr/pages/wing-chun/le-wing-chun.html Culex (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour
- J'ai l'autorisation de Lance Pun qui vie à Foshan(banlieue Canton - Chine) car je gère sa communication en France. L'association de Kung fu utilise des images sans validation du maitre...
- cdt
- TYWC Taiyin (talk) 08:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
From Youtube. Tolga Theo Yalur (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
From Youtube. Tolga Theo Yalur (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Нижняя Добринка (Жирновский район). Вид на Храм Рождества Христова (1839г.), западная сторона..jpg
[edit]._%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B4_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%A5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%A5%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_(1839%D0%B3.),_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B4_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%A5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%A5%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_(1839%D0%B3.),_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake MikhailHw8 (talk) 18:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks (by living aertist)
Martin Sg. (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024092910002534 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep We have permission from the artist who is also the photographer, see Ticket:2024092910003113. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: files have VRT permissions now. --Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate file and requested by the uploader AsianStuff03 (talk) 05:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 08:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete xq no es un elemento de "relebancia". 186.172.220.38 01:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manojnath484 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Its manojjakhar.jpg
- File:Manojnathjakhar.jpg
- File:Its manoj jakhar.jpg
- File:Manojd484.jpg
- File:Manojnath484.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, F10. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
copyright infringement of Tom and Jerry Mateus2019 (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Please delete File:Tash metro 2023.jpg. It is stolen from this sources:
https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2023/08/30/metro-map/
UmirovaDilshoda (talk) 00:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC).
- @UmirovaDilshoda: I tagged it as such. You could have done that yourself. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Done by Túrelio. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy and @Túrelio: Thanks! — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Renamed user 9220109728 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: various unused, largely unidentified, and likely fictitious flags and emblems, and one unused, unidentified parliament diagram.
- File:UAF.svg
- File:Unitedamerica.svg
- File:Svgfiles-2016-09-06-21-00-23-506085-5258369926020430268.svg
- File:OSR.svg
- File:Nova Scotia.svg
- File:New Quebec flag.svg
- File:Nova Iberia.svg
- File:Lawrence.svg
- File:Nova Anglo.svg
- File:Niagara.svg
- File:FlagKeystone.svg
- File:Chisasibi.svg
- File:Auzia.svg
- File:Zvendseal.svg
- File:Ngu flag.svg
- File:Seal of ngu.svg
- File:Flag of independent Cayman Islands.svg
Omphalographer (talk) 01:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sunilsinghyadavmp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for self promo on en.wp
- File:Ssy11.jpg
- File:Ssy5.jpg
- File:Ssy4.jpg
- File:Ssy3.jpg
- File:Ssy2.jpg
- File:Ssy1.jpg
- File:Sunilsinghyadav9.jpg
- File:Sunilsinghyadav8.jpg
- File:Sunilsinghyadav7.jpg
- File:Sunilsinghyadav5.jpg
- File:Sunilsinghyadav4.jpg
- File:Sunil singh yadav1.jpg
- File:Sunilsinghyadav.jpg
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kairos-kcr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused diagrams without context. Out of project scope.
- File:Dvpcplx21b.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx21a.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx48.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx47.jpg
- File:Dvpvplx46.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx45.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx44.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx43.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx42.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx41.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx40.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx39.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx38.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx37.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx37.pdf
- File:Dvpcplx36.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx35.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx34.jpg
- File:Dpvcplx33.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx 32.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx31.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx30.jpg
- File:Dvpcpl29.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx28.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx27.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx26.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx25.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx24.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx23.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx22.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx21.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx20.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx19.jpg
- File:Dvpcpl16.jpg
- File:Dvpcpl15.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx17.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx14.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx13.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx11.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx12.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx10.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx09.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx08.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx07.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx06.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx05.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx04.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx03.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx02b.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx02a.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx02.jpg
- File:Dvpcplx01a.pdf
- File:Dvpcplx02.pdf
- File:Complstruct14.jpg
- File:Complstruct13.jpg
- File:Complstruct12.jpg
- File:Complstruct09b.jpg
- File:Complstruct11.jpg
- File:Complstruct09.jpg
- File:Complstruct08.jpg
- File:Complstruct07.jpg
- File:Complstruct06a.jpg
- File:Complstruct06.jpg
- File:Complstruct05a.jpg
- File:Complstruct05.jpg
- File:Comlstruct04.jpg
- File:Complstruct03b.jpg
- File:Complstruct03a.jpg
- File:Complstruct03.jpg
- File:Complstruct02.jpg
~TheImaCow (talk) 12:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MPS España (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low quality diagrams without context. Out of project scope.
- File:LogosMPSProducto.png
- File:Sostenibilidad2.jpg
- File:Resumenempresa.jpg
- File:LogosMPS.jpg
- File:Cualificacionabc.jpg
- File:Clasificacion10.jpg
- File:Clasificacion9.jpg
- File:Clasificacion8.jpg
- File:Clasificacion7.jpg
- File:Clasificacion6.jpg
- File:Clasificacion5.jpg
- File:Clasificacion4.jpg
- File:Clasificacion3.jpg
- File:Clasificacion2.jpg
- File:Clasificacion1.jpg
- File:Sostenibilidad.jpg
- File:Sostenibilidad, tres circulos.jpg
~TheImaCow (talk) 12:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablo1985bis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshots of unidentified software, out of project scope
- File:Final correccion.PNG
- File:Correccion diferencial 2.PNG
- File:Posicion de referencia.PNG
- File:Confirmacion.PNG
- File:Correccion diferencial.PNG
- File:Archivo base.PNG
- File:Transferencia.PNG
- File:Sist. coord.PNG
- File:Proyecto 3.PNG
- File:Proyecto 2.PNG
- File:Proyecto 1.PNG
- File:Añadir huso.PNG
- File:Config huso.PNG
- File:Equipotenciales en altimetria.PNG
~TheImaCow (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
unclear com:ev.
- File:Michi ahabal koch 5.png
- File:Michi ahabal koch 6.png
- File:Oyoyoy1.png
- File:Oyoyoy2.png
- File:A-fortiori talmud 3.png
- File:Um mistake.png
- File:Rashi mistake.png
RZuo (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality diagrams/photos without context, out of scope
- File:Graf 22.jpg
- File:Ele 01.jpg
- File:Diapositiva1.jpg
- File:B-140420106292-a.jpg
- File:Eleusa 2ca.jpg
- File:Madona 1ab.jpg
~TheImaCow (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality diagrams without context. Out of project scope.
- File:Learn12.gif
- File:Learn11.png
- File:Learn10.png
- File:Learn9.png
- File:Learn8.png
- File:Learn7.png
- File:Learn6.png
- File:Learn5.PNG
- File:Learn4.png
- File:Learn3.png
- File:Learn2.PNG
- File:Learn1.jpg
- File:Learntech0111.png
- File:Learntech4.png
- File:Learntech3.jpg
- File:Learntech0000002.jpg
- File:Learntech8.jpg
- File:Learntech7.jpg
- File:Learntech6.jpg
- File:Learntech5.jpg
- File:Learntech9.png
- File:Learntech10.png
- File:Learntech010.png
- File:Learntech009.png
- File:Learntech008.jpg
- File:Learntech007.jpg
- File:Learntech006.jpg
- File:Learntech005.jpg
- File:Learntech004.png
- File:Learntech003.jpg
- File:Learntech001.jpg
- File:Body language.jpg
- File:Learntech2.jpg
~TheImaCow (talk) 13:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Unused low quality diagrams without context. Out of project scope.
- File:Clock out Page.png
- File:Screenshot Name 1.png
- File:Navigation Flow of Volunteer Tracking System.png
- File:Business Workflows Diagram.png
- File:Business Work Flow Diagram of Volunteer Tracking System.png
- File:Element Relationship Diagram.png
- File:Element Relationship Diagram of Volunteer Tracking System.png
- File:System Boundary Diagram.png
- File:System Boundary Diagram of Volunteer Tracking System.png
- File:BenefitsChain Of Volunteer Tracking.png
- File:Benefits Chain Diagram.png
- File:Return on Investment Analysis Graph.png
~TheImaCow (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Global change ecology (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low quality diagrams without context. Out of project scope.
- File:Event Experiment.jpg
- File:Module ABC.JPG
- File:Module C.JPG
- File:Module B.JPG
- File:Module A.JPG
- File:Modules GCE.JPG
- File:Fourth Semester.JPG
- File:Third Semester.JPG
- File:Second Semester.JPG
~TheImaCow (talk) 13:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esraahefney (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low quality diagrams without context. Out of project scope.
- File:موانع التأكسد.JPG
- File:ملخص لبعض الأجزاء الهامة في صناعة الصلب والمواد الحرارية.JPG
- File:Wet-ability.JPG
- File:تكون نسبة الـ Refractory Oxides عالية (أكبر من ضعف نسبة الـ Fluxing Oxides).JPG
- File:المكونات الأساسية للخبث.JPG
- File:Recammended pre-heating schedule.JPG
- File:درجات الانصهار.JPG
- File:المواد الحرارية المستخدمة في الصناعات الميتالورجية.JPG
- File:الحراريات.JPG
- File:درجات حرارة انصار المواد الحرارية المختلفة.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~TheImaCow (talk) 14:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TivaSerano (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - no educational value - low quality
- File:Frame with and Without Blink images.png
- File:Edging over the camera frame.jpg
- File:Color inversion over the camera frame.jpg
- File:Monochromatic Conversion over a camera frame.jpg
- File:LP integral transform transformation over a camera frame.jpg
- File:Infrared effect on human eyes.jpg
INeverCry 22:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Lymantria (talk) 09:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TivaSerano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low quality diagrams without context. Out of project scope.
- File:Flow Char of Pupil Tracking over consecutive frames.jpg
- File:Image of size 9X9 and kernel matrix.png
- File:Shifted Vertical Kernel Matrix.png
- File:Shifted Horizontal Kernel Matrix.png
- File:General Kernel Matrix.png
- File:Vertical and Horizental Kernel Matrix.png
- File:Hyper optical pointer extension is a fast Eye-Computer control system prototype.png
~TheImaCow (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Diagrams without usage
[edit]Unused low quality diagrams without context. Not realistically useful for educational purposes, out of project scope. Commons is not a webhost. COM:NOTHOST
_dos_Paises_da_zona_Euro_2011.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~TheImaCow (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Diagrams without usage
[edit]Unused low quality diagrams generally without context. Out of project scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~TheImaCow (talk) 20:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment Nomination say without use but File:Tinted glass object insiide.gif is used on en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/October 2005. We can ofcourse discuss if old talk pages count as use but I think the nomination should say if files are in use somewhere so those that read this DR knows that if we delete the files we will "break" some old talk pages. Have you checked all the files or was the files nominated based on the category name? --MGA73 (talk) 20:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's no advantage to deleting diagrams used on old pages. Such diagrams should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Must have slipped through. I've removed it from the nomination. I checked all ~340 file description pages again, and removed from the nomination File:Steps.png and File:Pedubast II.jpg. File:FP Profession - Expanding the Body of Knowledge.pdf is in use, but only on an sandbox of an inactive user using WP for free webhosting, and File:Fordeling av destinasjoner KSU.png is also in use, but only on a massive, indiscriminate collection of "infographics". The rest is now certifiedly unused.~TheImaCow (talk) 22:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's no advantage to deleting diagrams used on old pages. Such diagrams should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ORIGINAL RAPKILLER (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:ORIGINAL RAPKILLER music 🎵 04.jpg
- File:ORIGINAL RAPKILLER music 🎵 05.jpg
- File:ORIGINAL RAPKILLER music 🎵 03.png
- File:ORIGINAL RAPKILLER music 🎵 02.jpg
- File:ORIGINAL RAPKILLER music 🎵 01.jpg
- File:DO ME DAT BY RAP KILLER FT SAMZ 110832.wav
Achim55 (talk) 15:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stevenmaidtofit (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 15:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stevenmaidtofit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, not used anywhere, uploaded probably only for promotional purposes, low resolution, missing permission
Jianhui67 T★C 15:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
xq es un elemento d relebancia para extraccion d documentis i mal uso de documentis 38.194.235.96 01:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I don't know what you're talking about (the Google translation didn't make any sense), but this file is COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
i made a mistake, background is not transparent Wikiuser3315 (talk) 05:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It looks like the mistake has been fixed by overwriting with a transparent version. Nakonana (talk) 19:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: apparently solved. Wikiuser3315: If you still want to delete the file, please open a new deletion request. It should be deleted per courtesy deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cloventt as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Appears to be an incorrectly attributed publicity photo
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE, but is it really taken by the uploader? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- After some digging I have found the image appears on a 2016 Stuff article here, and the article credits the image to Scott McAulay / Stuff. Therefore I think this image is not owned by the uploader and is not freely licensed. Cloventt (talk) 02:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Great sleuthing! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 14:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
This modern self-created image clearly violates the Neutral point of view and is an example of Polish nationalism with clearly false claims (propaganda) towards Poland's neighboring countries, so this nationalistic modern image has absolutely no educational value and should be deleted because it is only a false personal interpretation of history, not based on historical facts.
The main issue with this image is that in the title and in the legend it is claimed that it is the "border changes in history of Poland", however with the 1569 Union of Lublin the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was not incorporated into the borders of the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland (there are no such words in Union's text) and after concluding the Union these two countries remained with separate territories (borders), armies, treasuries, but since the adoption of the Union both countries (Poland and Lithuania) were ruled by one monarch who held two separate monarchial titles: King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania. The Union created a new state Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (Commonwealth of Both Nations) but claims that the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth "is equal to Poland" are absolutely false Polish nationalistic propaganda and Wikimedia Foundation projects clearly have no place for nationalistic self-created propaganda content which seeks to purposefully confuse its users. Keeping such content is only damaging the reliability reputation of Wikimedia Foundation projects.
The legal statuses of Poland and Lithuania were equal in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, so claims that the "Commonwealth is equal to Poland" is an identical absurd to claims that the "Commonwealth is equal to Lithuania". By concluding the Union both countries had sacrificed equal amounts of their sovereignty to form a new federative state which was nor Poland, nor Lithuania. The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth's principles quite reminiscent the monarchial variant of the European Union, which also created a new international subject (European Union), but its member states and their borders did not cease to exist. So this map has as much educational value as would have an image with the map of the European Union but titled as "borders of Belgium".
Moreover, having "U. S. S. R." (Soviet Union) and "Holy roman german empire" in a single map which feature medieval/modern borders is an absurd of its own kind.
So I request to delete this image to avoid confusing users with a clearly false content. -- Pofka (talk) 16:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep in use makes it in scope. You're welcome to make your own drawing and upload it under a different filename. It's up to the Wikipedia's to decide what image they want to use. Multichill (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It violates neutral point of view and has no educational value. Two very important points. -- Pofka (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Pofka: since you mentioned NPOV, please have a look at Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view. Multichill (talk) 18:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per above. The nom confuses Commons with Wikipedia. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Pofka: since you mentioned NPOV, please have a look at Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view. Multichill (talk) 18:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- It violates neutral point of view and has no educational value. Two very important points. -- Pofka (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was part of the bigger construct that was the PLC the same way that, let's say, the kingdom of Bohemia was part of the Habsburg dominion, with the Polish Crown playing the role of the Archduchy of Austria -- that is, for all intents and purposes, a part of a bigger confederation encompassing both policies. There's no doubt that the Crown and Lithuania had separate administration and treasuries and so on, but, at the end of the day, this is all historical nitpicking. In foreign eyes, the whole construct was seen as "the kingdom of Poland", and the internal division between Poland and Lithuania was mostly irrelevant. Also, given that the PLC was mostly Polish in its culture and administration, i think that putting it on par with a former Polish state is, although a big simplification, not wrong per se -- and that especially on a map showing border changes throughout history, for such a map will necessary sacrifice accuracy to readability. I think we should keep the map. The legend even mentions the PLC! Also in my opinion the comparison with the EU and Belgium is pointless and almost a strawman. AmbroiseL (talk) 09:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- As a compromise, it might be worth discussing whether {{accuracy}} should be added, if the image is kept. Nakonana (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use, feel free to discus accuracy or remove it from different projects. --Strakhov (talk) 14:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a strange "village"; unclear what this is meant to represent. Omphalographer (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. If the creator explains what UBL stands for and how the image plausibly reflects that I'd be open to keeping. Sdkb talk 01:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 14:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
California allows government educational places to claim copyright, so this would likely be a copyrighted photo. Abzeronow (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence provided that the author (per EXIF) releases the image in open, missing necessary licensing information, and as nom. describes. Regards, Aafi (talk) 19:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Everything about this is questionable, given that the uploader was blocked as a sock and the image was used in a now-deleted hoax on en.wp. Not in use+sus copyright claim=delete it. Just Step Sideways (talk) 22:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Marchjuly's response at Commons:Help desk#Licensing status of a photo that was used under false pretenses was that this is speediable per COM:CSD#G3 or COM:CSD#F6. According to the nominator's statement at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fretïmio Assocão di Planka, the source is this page. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Es libre subir fotos irrelevantes y dejarlas sin categorizar? 186.175.164.142 20:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- 'Is it free to upload irrelevant photos and leave them uncategorized?' (Google translate)
Speedy keep No valid reason to delete.- To the Chilean IP: Why don't you do something useful instead of trolling, and go categorize the images you see with no categories? Darwin Ahoy! 20:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Of the potential policy-based reasons for deletion, which do you claim would apply here? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Because such a building no longer exists in the city of Beylagan.The building with the inscription 'Beylagan' shown in the picture has already been demolished. I can provide better pictures of Beylagan city to replace this one. I kindly request that you remove this image, which was uploaded in 2011. Ulviiz (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The fact that this building doesn't exist anymore doesn't make this image invalid, and this image is in use across dozens of different wikis. Omphalographer (talk) 23:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
This is not anonymous work. The work is attributed. Alex Spade (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- The attribution is
something like"P. Leyat" - most likely Paul Joseph Leyat (1870-1955) (see this his work attributed as "P. Leyat"). Alex Spade (talk) 23:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC) - UPD: The attribution is "P. Leyat" indeed, see title page of source book. Alex Spade (talk) 23:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Good catch! Undelete on January 1, 2026. --RAN (talk) 22:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 14:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Santiago, «Rebelde ayer, hospitalaria hoy, heroica siempre» - Lema santiaguero - panoramio.jpg
[edit]
Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4103274079).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4103274079).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
_(4103274079).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
_(4103274079).jpg){kind=link}
used for self promo --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 00:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no reliable secondary source supporting this flag. The republic of Tamrash was not de jure an independent state and never had an official flag. Jingiby (talk) 09:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE in many articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 00:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Not public domain, nor US governments publication Urang Kamang (talk) 09:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 00:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that the source website has released the image under the mentioned license C.Fred (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 00:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The uploader definitely did not make this. But I also don't know if it qualifies for PD since the design seems to be beyond just shapes, albeit slightly. Probable re-upload on Wikipedia with Fair Use? SDudley (talk) 15:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unless there is evidence of permission. This logo is well above the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 15:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 00:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Delet delet 186.172.15.109 21:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded an edited version. TheJazzFusion (talk) 22:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can you explain what the purpose of these audio files is, and provide sources for all of the (24 hours! of) audio they include? Omphalographer (talk) 23:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded a new version. TheJazzFusion (talk) 00:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination of author. --Sadads (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Its duplicated file. WatersignKing (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination by author. --Sadads (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KwonEunbifanatic (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 01.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 02.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 04.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 05.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 06.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 07.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 08.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 09.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 10.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 11.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 12.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 13.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 14.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 15.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 16.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 17.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 18.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 20.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 21.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 22.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 23.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 24.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 25.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 26.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 27.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 28.jpg
- File:230802 Kwon Eun-bi at The Flash showcase 29.jpg
There is no concrete evidence that the photo was taken directly. (per COM:SPEEDY) YeBoy371 (talk) 09:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting it was captured from a TV show or something? Why do you suspect that these are not photographs taken live? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- https://x.com/MinguriLOVE0205 ← It appears that you have accessed someone else's X account and downloaded photos. YeBoy371 (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment To be precise, he lied by saying that he accessed the link below, downloaded it, and took the pictures himself.
- Link 1 Link 2 Link 3 Link 4 Link 5 Link 6 Link 7 Link 8 Link 9 Link 10 YeBoy371 (talk) 16:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Thanks, that is clear. It's always best to be clear in deletion request threads. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- https://x.com/MinguriLOVE0205 ← It appears that you have accessed someone else's X account and downloaded photos. YeBoy371 (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Apparently a self-portrait by the subject. Fine. But the uploader is someone different and this should therefore go through the Volunteer Response Team (VRT) to have the license tidied up. Schwede66 05:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
The photo was taken by Roberto Cifarelli as per metadata and description, not by the uploader who has a different name. Chiyako92 (talk) 09:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as plain text. Can be recreated as LATEX if needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as plain text. Can be recreated as LATEX if needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as plain text. Can be recreated as LATEX if needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as plain text. Can be recreated as LATEX if needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Eastern statistical region North Macedonia ethnic population by municipalities census 2021.jpg
[edit]
Dubious own work claim. Uploader recently took two images off LinkedIn and claimed them as own work using ChatGPT. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
why would this be useful? low-quality shaky video of nothing in particular Prototyperspective (talk) 11:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 16:06, 2 October 2024 UTC: Unused and implausible redirect (G2): author's request on creation week --Krdbot 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
out of scope: fictional election apportionment diagram. In fact, the Landtag of Bavaria had 180 seats in early 2018 (after the 2013 election), and 205 seats in late 2018 (after the 2018 election), but not 200 seats. 2003:E5:370E:2600:2CDA:6D16:4AE7:CC5D 01:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Я ошибся. Это не южная служба, а южная часть вокзала. Atributz (talk) 04:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Beyond the 1-week automatic courtesy deletion period. Atributz, why don't you just edit the file description and request COM:File renaming, if needed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- No need in deletion; renamed.
- Нет нужды в удалении; переименовано. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Я ошибся. Это не южная служба, а южная часть вокзала. Atributz (talk) 04:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- No need in deletion; renamed.
- Нет нужды в удалении; переименовано. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Two images of June 2010 Arkansas floods
[edit]
These files are sourced to a National Weather Service website.
Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.
Photos like these of the aftermath of severe weather events might be taken by NWS damage surveys, but in many cases, were taken by County Emergency Management teams, County Sheriffs, and other county- or state-level agencies. Therefore, we simply can't assume the origin of photos like these.
Unfortunately, these images are no longer published by the NWS, and the only source information provided here is the URLs of the images themselves; we no longer have access to their copyright and licensing information.
I reached out the to NWS office that published these photos (Little Rock). They were unable to provide me with any further information about them, citing changes in their web hosting arrangements over the years and that "there was just way too much information to transfer each time".
I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024092810001681).
Because we cannot verify that they are (or were ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If these are truly orphan images, they will enter the public domain 120 years after they were taken, in 2131.
In their places, I have uploaded known free, equivalent images from NWS Little Rock website:
 | Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
--Rlandmann (talk) 11:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.
Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.
Photos like these of the aftermath of severe weather events might be taken by NWS damage surveys, but in many cases, were taken by County Emergency Management teams, County Sheriffs, and other county- or state-level agencies. Therefore, we simply can't assume the origin of photos like these.
Unfortunately, this image is no longer published by the NWS, and the page it was hosted on is not preserved in the Internet Archive. We no longer have access to its copyright and licensing information.
I reached out the to NWS office that published this photo (Little Rock). They were unable to provide me with any further information about it, citing changes in their web hosting arrangements over the years and that "there was just way too much information to transfer each time".
I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024092810001681).
Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If it is truly an orphan image, it will enter the public domain 120 years after they were taken, in 2129.
In its place, I have uploaded a known free, equivalent image from NWS Little Rock website:
.jpg){kind=link}
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
--Rlandmann (talk) 11:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
This statue, which is located in Tsuyama High School in Aichi Prefecture, is a work by living sculptor Naomi Tsutsumi (堤直美)[1]. Such statues are not allowed by COM:FOP Japan.--ノボホショコロトソ (talk) 01:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - copyrighted work, no COM:FOP Japan for statues. Consigned (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
{{Incomplete upload}} Neither used nor useful NearEMPTiness (talk) 01:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
as per F10 राजकुमार(talk) 06:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Regardless, it's almost definitely not a selfie. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - per nomination, it can't be own work. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Inappropiiate captions, which look like a personal attack. "The House Where the Heartless Rot Lived" and "A detestable being lived there." without encyclopedic vallue; see also File:La Casa Donde Habitó La Podredumbre Que No Tiene Corazón.jpg from same uploader Fl.schmitt (talk) 09:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation? see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 09:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Actually the exif data indicates the opposite of a copyright violation. The uploader's username is Senya. Now, if we assume that the username is a hint for their real name then it's likely that Senya stands for Shenya or Zhenya (Женя) which is short form for the name Evgeny (see Ru wiki: w:ru:Женя). And Evgeny is the given name of the photographer in the exif data. Nakonana (talk) 19:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- It was later found pre-published in 2020 on a website (https://incrussia.ru/understand/yar-andreev/), which also credited "Evgeny Apin" as the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for giving it another look. The pre-publishment is indeed a tricky thing, but as I said in my comment above S(h)enya (uploader's name) is the short form of the name Evgeny (photographer's name). I'll also ask Valmin for their opinion as another Russian speaker and the speedy deletion nominator. Nakonana (talk) 20:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- You might contact uploader Senya12345. If he provides a plausible explaination resp. sends a permission to OTRS, the image can be undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Colleague Túrelio, you are right. And colleague Nakonana transcribes the name Evgeniy a little incorrectly. The full name for Senya in Russian would be Semyon, but not Evgeniy. Moreover, the lack of metadata always looks very strange, if not suspicious. I have posted many photos for quick deletion and have some experience in such matters. Valmin (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just a note that there are various transliteration systems for Cyrillic to Latin, and I know for a fact that some languages use versions starting with S for the letter Ж, so it doesn't seem too unreasonable for me. For example: w:de:Shenia Franz.
- But ultimately I'm OK with the deletion. Nakonana (talk) 21:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Colleague Túrelio, you are right. And colleague Nakonana transcribes the name Evgeniy a little incorrectly. The full name for Senya in Russian would be Semyon, but not Evgeniy. Moreover, the lack of metadata always looks very strange, if not suspicious. I have posted many photos for quick deletion and have some experience in such matters. Valmin (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- You might contact uploader Senya12345. If he provides a plausible explaination resp. sends a permission to OTRS, the image can be undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for giving it another look. The pre-publishment is indeed a tricky thing, but as I said in my comment above S(h)enya (uploader's name) is the short form of the name Evgeny (photographer's name). I'll also ask Valmin for their opinion as another Russian speaker and the speedy deletion nominator. Nakonana (talk) 20:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- It was later found pre-published in 2020 on a website (https://incrussia.ru/understand/yar-andreev/), which also credited "Evgeny Apin" as the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: file is already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Probably over any country's COM:TOO and certainly over COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Prilly menerima penghargaan Piala Citra sebagai Pemeran Pendukung Wanita di Festival Film Indonesia 2023.jpg
[edit]
Taken from Instagram account, not creative commons license Urang Kamang (talk) 10:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.
Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.
Photos like this one of the aftermath of severe weather events might be taken by NWS damage surveys, but in many cases, were taken by County Emergency Management teams, County Sheriffs, and other county- or state-level agencies. Therefore, we simply can't assume the origin of a photo Iike this.
Unfortunately, this image is no longer published by the NWS, and the only source information provided here is the URL of the image itself; we no longer have access to its copyright and licensing information.
Research by @WeatherWriter: uncovered a similar image in the Damage Assessment Toolkit used by federal agencies to record the details of damage caused by severe weather. It's clearly the same location, and taken from very close to the location that this photo was taken from and from the same general direction.
I hoped that there would be EXIF data in both images that would help determine whether they were taken with the same camera, close together in time, but neither image file contains this information.
I am struck by the difference in the colours in both images, and this impression was strengthened by running colour analyses of them, which are wildly different. (I used https://mk.bcgsc.ca/ if anyone cares to repeat the experiment).
Given that the photos were taken so physically close together and from a similar general direction, I am left with very significant doubt that they were shot with the same camera, close together in time, and therefore whether this image was shot by the damage survey team that shot the image that's publicly visible in the DAT.
Due to this doubt, I reached out the to NWS office that published this photo (Little Rock). They were unable to provide me with any further information about this image, citing changes in their web hosting arrangements over the years and that "there was just way too much information to transfer each time".
I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024092810001681).
Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If this is truly an orphan image, it will enter the public domain 120 years after it was taken, in 2134.
In its place, I have uploaded the known, free image from the DAT as File:Tornado Damage to Farm South of Halley, Arkansas (DAT).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
I have also reached out to the Jackson WFO for comment, since the image in the DAT is attributed to them.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Neutral until NWS Jackson, MS answers back. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Will probably eventually support deletion. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep - I know what Rlandmann stated above. However, I actually do not find "significant doubt" that it wasn't taken by NWS. NWS does not send a single employee out to survey, but several go out in teams. Given we have confirmed evidence NWS did survey the site and take photos of it, the shear fact it is (was) on an NWS site with no attribution does not bring significant doubt to it not having been taken by NWS. Based on the color difference, I would say it was taken by different employee cameras/phones during the survey. For some clarification on why there are two NWS offices being discussed here: NWS Little Rock is the one who published this photo on their weather.gov website. On the DAT, the tornado started barely in NWS Jackson, MS's jurisdiction (by like a mile) and subsequently, this damage point, on the DAT, is in their jurisdiction. NWS offices are not confined to their area's by rule, so if there is slight crossover, sometimes they do survey the same point/points as another office. Given color difference and the NWS office crossover being fairly confident (in my opinion), I feel confident to say NWS took this photo, just like NWS took the DAT-based photo at this location...from like 10 feet away from this one. So, subsequently, I do not find any reason to believe the precautionary principle can be used, thus, my weak keep. WeatherWriter (talk) 23:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Just to clarify where my doubt is coming from: it's certainly possible that it was taken by a second team member with a second device; but no more likely (to my mind) than this one being taken by somebody else (the farmer? an EMA volunteer? the sheriff?) who sent it to the NWS ahead of their own visit on the second day after the event. Given the differences in the sky and lighting, I'm far from certain the two photos were even taken within hours of each other, maybe not even on the same day. --Rlandmann (talk) 00:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I totally get that. But, given there is no evidence that anyone other than NWS took the photo, and we know they surveyed it, I do not believe we crossed the threshold to call doubt "significant", which is what PRP states. That is my opinion though, while yours is obviously that it does cross the PRP "significant" threshold. WeatherWriter (talk) 05:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Just to clarify where my doubt is coming from: it's certainly possible that it was taken by a second team member with a second device; but no more likely (to my mind) than this one being taken by somebody else (the farmer? an EMA volunteer? the sheriff?) who sent it to the NWS ahead of their own visit on the second day after the event. Given the differences in the sky and lighting, I'm far from certain the two photos were even taken within hours of each other, maybe not even on the same day. --Rlandmann (talk) 00:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Update -- Jackson WFO replied very quickly. They do not know who took this photo:
"we do indeed have a copy of the image hosted on Wikipedia in our folder for this weather event. Unfortunately, I cannot confirm whether or not we took this picture. We often receive damage pictures from the public or local officials, and it is possible it was passed along to us by someone else."
- I have passed this response along to the VRT. (Ticket:2024092910006781)
- Before I read this email, I thought this image was probably taken by the NWS damage survey, but there was significant doubt in my mind (enough to request precautionary deletion). Now, I think it was probably not taken by the NWS damage survey, because even based on things like image filenames, or comparison with other photos in the archive that we don't have public access to, I find it hard to imagine a scenario where this photo was actually taken by the damage survey and that this was not obvious.
- It was also nice to have an NWS employee confirm (without any prompting) exactly the problem we have with many images from NWS sites: "We often receive damage pictures from the public or local officials, and it is possible it was passed along to us by someone else." --Rlandmann (talk) 22:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Ignore my previous neutral !vote. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 21:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Misleading AI-generated image of what the aurora borealis might look like but doesn't, going against COM:EDUSE. Category:Aurora borealis has hundreds of genuine photographs of the phenomenon. Belbury (talk) 11:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
According to a TinEye search, this file has existed long before the upload date. Permission is needed. Spinixster (talk) 11:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.
Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.
Photos like these of the aftermath of severe weather events might be taken by NWS damage surveys, but in many cases, were taken by County Emergency Management teams, County Sheriffs, and other county- or state-level agencies. Therefore, we simply can't assume the origin of photos like these.
Unfortunately, this image is no longer published by the NWS, and the only source information we have is the bare URL itself. We no longer have access to its copyright and licensing information.
I reached out the to NWS office that published this photo (Little Rock). They were unable to provide me with any further information about it, citing changes in their web hosting arrangements over the years and that "there was just way too much information to transfer each time".
I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024092810001681).
Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If it is truly an orphan image, it will enter the public domain 120 years after they were taken, in 2133.
FWIW, A very similar image, obviously taken within a shot time of this one, was published without attribution by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette at the time: https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2012/dec/20/strong-storms-down-trees-spawn-possible-tornado/
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Rlandmann (talk) 11:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Photos of aftermath of 1925 Tri-State Tornado by unknown creators
[edit]- File:Tri-State Tornado JCHS06.jpg
- File:Tri-State Tornado JCHS10.jpg
- File:Tri-State Tornado JCHS12.jpg
- File:Tri-State Tornado JCHS13.jpg
The uploader sourced these four files from a page of the National Weather Service website about the 1925 tri-state tornado. They were supplied to the NWS by the media collection of the Jackson County Historical Society (as attributed on the page).
Correspondence with the Society (VRT ticket:2024092210004312) confirms:
- the Society supplied these images to the NWS
- the Society has no record of who took these photos
- they are not aware of any previous publication of these photos, and have done a search of contemporary newspapers without turning them up (I have searched too)
As photos taken in the United States prior to 1989, considerable uncertainty surrounds their copyright status, and much rests on whether, when, and in what context they were first published. If this publication happened after March 1, 1989, the identity, and in particular the date of death, of the photographer becomes significant.
If these details cannot be established, they will pass into the public domain as orphan works in 2046.
The COM:ONUS is now on anyone who wishes to keep any of these files on the Commons to show either that the file or files they wish to keep were published prior to 1989 without meeting the copyright formalities in effect at the time, OR that their copyright has expired (either because their registration was allowed to lapse, or because they were first published on or after March 1, 1989 and their creator died before 1954).
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- Neutral/weak delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful due to low quality. I could barely see anything in the photo. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused low-quality photo of unknown person. No indication who he is and why he's notable. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Two images of the 2023 Cole tornado
[edit]- File:The April 19, 2023 Cole, Oklahoma EF3 Tornado.jpg
- File:The April 19, 2023 Cole, Oklahoma EF3 Tornado courtesy of Sean Ernst.jpg
These images have been uploaded from National Weather Service web pages, where they are attributed to a third party. [edit: slight clarification of wording]
I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source. They confirmed that they
- own the copyright on the images
- do not want to release them into the public domain or under a free license
"I'd like to retain the ability to do things like sell the image and retain ownership, but I am ok with it being used for educational purposes (like those on wikipedia) as long as I can retain the rights to it.
The VRT was copied into the part of the conversation around licensing. (ticket:2024091210003771)
These are not free images, so we can't host them here. However, the creator is more than happy for Wikipedia to use these images under "fair use" provisions.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
--Rlandmann (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (and RFC). Third party images posted on NWS websites are not automatically public domain; educational/noncommercial and Fair Use are not allowed on Commons. Consigned (talk) 23:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 00:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Although this would probably be an excellent contender for NFF on En-Wiki Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 22:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete – Missing metadata. The uploader of stylized professional photo is unlikely to be the author. His only other file Marek Zenisek.jpg has been deleted, so he chose another one, see Talk page. Kacir (talk) 22:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahin Abbasian Official (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for self promo on enwp
- File:Shahin-Abbasian.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Foolad Novin 8.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Foolad Novin 9.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Foolad Novin 7.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Foolad Novin 6.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Foolad Novin 5.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Foolad Novin 4.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Foolad Novin 2.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Foolad Novin.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Razakan Karaj 8.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Razakan Karaj 7.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Razakan Karaj 4.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Razakan Karaj 6.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Razakan Karaj 5.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Razakan Karaj 2.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Razakan Karaj 3.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Razakan Karaj.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Shahrdari Bandar Abbas 2.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Shahrdari Bandar Abbas.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Raika Babol 2.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Raika Babol.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Gol Gohar Sirjan 6.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Gol Gohar Sirjan 5.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Gol Gohar Sirjan 4.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Gol Gohar Sirjan.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Gol Gohar Sirjan 2.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Gol Gohar Sirjan 3.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Omid National Team 4.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Omid National Team.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Omid National Team 3.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Perspolis 4.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Perspolis 3.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Perspolis.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Perspolis 2.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Asia 4.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Asia 2.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Asia 3.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Asia.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Iranian National Youth Team 2.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Iranian National Youth Team.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian Khuzestan Foolad.jpg
- File:Shahin Abbasian.jpg
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Why are photos of the Iranian National Youth Team and so forth not in scope? There might be other problems with the photos, but I'm not getting how these are all merely inadmissible promotion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Ikan Kekek, national youth teams are definitely in scope, judging by all the national youth team sub-categories in Category:National under-21 association football teams. Nakonana (talk) 19:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- The player himself might also be well in scope. There's an article on him on Fa Wiki, which was neither created nor edited by the uploader of this batch of photos, and we've had a Wikidata item on this player since 2017: Wikidata:Q30559908. Nakonana (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: not own works: subject is also the uploader, clearly taken from a variety of sources. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nagore Dargah Kalifa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for self promo
- File:Nagore Dargah Kalifa2023 001.jpg
- File:Nagore Dargah Kalifa 2023.jpg
- File:Nagore Dargah Quran Majlis.jpg
- File:NagoreDargahKalifa 01.jpg
- File:NagoreDargahKalifa 02.jpg
- File:NagoreDargahDroneView.jpg
- File:Nagore Dargah Kalifa Sahib 2024.jpg
- File:AP Usthad Grand Mufti Of India Nagore Dargah.jpg
- File:Nagore Qadir Vali Sarkar Mother.jpg
- File:Nagore Dargah Qadir vali Sarkar Mother Urs.jpg
- File:Nagore Dargah Kalifa Sahib.jpg
- File:Nagore Dargah Kalifa.jpg
- File:Governor Of Tamil Nadu , Nagore Dargah Kalifa.jpg
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Some of these photos are pretty interesting. The problem is that I don't think any of them are really User:Nagore Dargah Kalifa's own work, and therefore, whomever the real photographer was would need to give permission. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and not own works: subject is also the uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Questionable "own" claim. Photo have a metadata which start with FBMD, and that indicates it were uploaded from Facebook before contribution here Микола Василечко (talk) 08:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
BLP was deleted because the person wasn't considered notable enough. No use of this photo Saqib (talk) 08:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: still in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
license not correct Skratata69 (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is correct , Please check it , this is taken by the press , so it falls under that licesne KKiranKumar1 (talk) 09:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Images "taken by the press" are not automatically public domain. Belbury (talk) 14:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- license not specified, source not given. Taken from a copyrighted article and contents Skratata69 (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as previously published online (https://www.theweek.in/theweek/statescan/2021/07/08/we-will-turn-every-congress-worker-into-a-prashant-kishor.html, credited to P. Prasad) with no evidence of being public domain. Uploader credits no source, only stating "Google Images" as the author. Belbury (talk) 14:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Este coperta spate a unei cărți! Nu este nici o imagine grafică / desen protejat / ă. Este o simplă înșiruire de titluri! Dorucalinciobanu (talk) 11:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: plain cover, no copyrightable elements or prose. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Este coperta spate a unei cărți! Nu este nici o imagine grafică / desen protejat / ă. Este o simplă înșiruire de titluri! Dorucalinciobanu (talk) 11:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: plain cover, no copyrightable elements or prose. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Ciresarii - Cavalerii florii de cires - Constantin Chirita - Editura Roxel Cart 2022 • vol 1.jpg
[edit]
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Ciresarii - Drum bun, ciresari! - Constantin Chirita - Editura Roxel Cart 2022 • vol 5.jpg
[edit]
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Book cover. Donarius (talk) 10:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: book spines, no copyrightable elements or DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
_(53988096513).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(53988096513).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is a derivative of the screen-content at the upper-left, which cannot be considered de minimis, as the image is focussed on it. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
_(53988096513).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
_(53988096513).jpg){kind=link}
_(53988174614).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(53988174614).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This shot is a derivative of the depicted paintings, which are likely still in copyrighted and obviously not installed permanently, thereby not covered by Brazil's freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
_(53988174614).jpg){kind=link}
Same problem with:
- File:Agência Câmara Legislativa do DF 2412152EE (5) (53987861101).jpg
- File:Agência Câmara Legislativa do DF 2412152EE (2) (53988096653).jpg
- File:Agência Câmara Legislativa do DF 2412152EE (17) (53988096338).jpg
- File:Agência Câmara Legislativa do DF 2412152EE (6) (53986962927).jpg - book-cover de minimis ?
_(53987861101).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(53988096653).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(53988096338).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(53986962927).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
_(53988174614).jpg){kind=link}
It seems that the picture is a screenshot coming from a TV debate, as you can see on this link : [2]. I really doubt this TV channel releases it under CC0. 🐢 Monsieur Tortue (💬) 11:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Not a realistically usable file, this is a fake logo. (The real logo has an olive tree on it) Pennenetui3000 (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
لقطة شاشة Mohammed Qays 🗣 12:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested by the person being photographed Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 12:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- This picture shows young men wearing blue clothes in the temple then taking a picture with his smartphone. I guess you mean that man photographed by you and he requested you to delete this picture? If yes, please read COM:PEOPLE. Additionally, the picture was taken in Taiwan, but we don't seem to have information about personality rights in Taiwan. It would be greatly appreciated if you can provide some some legal references. I believe this will help us understand local laws and can speed up processing significantly for deletion requests.--125.230.85.141 05:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: I just blurred the person instead, it doesn't hurt quality much. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 19:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
He (the person being photographed) said he is annoyed, we can offer a new photo to replace this one without any person, please delete it. Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 12:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: resolved: person has been blurred and previous version deleted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested by the person being photographed Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 12:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- This picture shows young men wearing blue clothes in front of the temple then taking a picture with his smartphone. I guess you mean that man photographed by you and he requested you to delete this picture? If yes, please read COM:PEOPLE. Additionally, the picture was taken in Taiwan, but we don't seem to have information about personality rights in Taiwan. It would be greatly appreciated if you can provide some some legal references. I believe this will help us understand local laws and can speed up processing significantly for deletion requests.--125.230.85.141 05:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: I just blurred the person instead, it doesn't hurt quality much. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 20:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
He (the person being photographed) said he is annoyed, we can offer a new photo to replace this one without any person, please delete it. Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 12:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: resolved: person has been blurred and previous version deleted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
لقطة شاشة Mohammed Qays 🗣 12:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
ترويج أو إعلان Mohammed Qays 🗣 12:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, see description Xocolatl (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photo of existing photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of the license type at sansad.in/ls C.Fred (talk) 14:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
"© Toni Scholz". No permission. Reise Reise (talk) 15:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 15:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused test image, seems out of scope. Note: prueba means test in Spanish. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
copyvio, taken from https://t.me/iammilitary Altenmann (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prime_Minister_Of_Bharat_Shri_Narendra_Damodardas_Modi_with_Prime_Minister_Of_Australia_Mr._Anthony_Albanese.jpg Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable musician. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Prime Minister Of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Prime Minister Of Japan Mr. Fumio Kishida.jpg Skratata69 (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nomination. ShaanSenguptaTalk 12:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused low-quality image, does not seem to match the description. Likely out of scope. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Uploader seems not to be the author. Picture is on a publicity page and on facebook without free licence Les Meloures (talk) 17:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Beyblade 1000 (talk) 20:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Deletion was requested by the uploader shortly after upload, but file is still COM:INUSE at it:Sant'Alessio con Vialone. --Rosenzweig τ 18:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. Not used meaningfully. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
صورة لها حقوق Mohammed Qays 🗣 20:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Photo is not own work per discussion with the uploader at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#File:George Bernard Shaw ceramic head by Muriel Lanchester.jpg; questionable copyright on the statue itself. Consigned (talk) 21:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Harai goshi 1970 emlekfoto 186.172.221.134 22:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- 1970-ben készült ez a kép rólam. Ha úgy gondolják törölni kell, nem tiltakozom, bár nem tudom mért törlik, de elfogadom. Hvja (talk) 11:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Question To IP: what's the reason for your deletion nomination? You just copied the file description here which says that it's a photo (emlekfoto) that depicts the Judo technique "Harai goshi" and was taken in 1970. Nakonana (talk) 23:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Probably not "own work" but the photographer given to the certain sport society for public use. --Rodrigo (talk) 14:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing original author, source, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
These warriors are Shilluk people not the Nuer People. Mistakenly uploaded. WatersignKing (talk) 23:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: appears resolved: file has been renamed and description updated. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Steve Uwimana (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are apparently artistic works (paintings, sculptures, pottery) made by artists who are still alive or not yet dead for more than 50 years. But Burundi does not have a valid Freedom of Panorama, and these images do not appear to have licensing permissions from the artists. See also Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2024/06#Steve Uwimana's uploads of artworks.
- File:Ibisharizo vy’Ibwami.jpg
- File:Ubukunga.jpg
- File:Sculpture d'un rhinocéros.jpg
- File:Hommes et Girafes sculpturé.jpg
- File:Petits tambours.jpg
- File:Bouclier Culturel.jpg
- File:Tableau des personnes.jpg
- File:Hippopotames artistiques.jpg
- File:Dessin des Tambourinaires Burundaises.jpg
- File:Les Hippopotames en Art.jpg
- File:Tableau des giraffes.jpg
- File:Espoir africaine.jpg
- File:Une femme artistique.jpg
- File:Les Provinces du Bururndi.jpg
- File:Fishers in boats.jpg
- File:Un homme avec sa femme et son enfant su son dos.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
As the english translation indicates, this is a design by origami artist Fumiaki Kawahata, and based on previous deletion requests Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Koi" (Design by Michael LaFosse) (3600763089).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Origami by Archivaldo, are copyrighted and cannot be here on Commons. - Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
_(3600763089).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Altenmann (talk) 17:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- The file used in multiple articles. There is no need to deleted it. The can be re-uploaded with other licence
- Look here (source)[3] Nbarchaeo (talk) 10:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - provided source isn't a primary source = copyright holder, therefore its re-licensing is invalid (license laundering). --Masur (talk) 20:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Not an integral part of the video (see [4]), but a photo, taken from [5] (November 2023). Quick1984 (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Quick1984 I don't see any similar complaints about the original file. Dizenter (talk) 11:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Ezarateesteban 18:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Invalid license, also no permission from Municipality of Igram to use this, which is cannot be used in source country! TentingZones1 (talk) 10:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Not an integral part of the video stream (see [6]), but a photo, taken from [7] (November 2023). Quick1984 (talk) 12:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Ezarateesteban 18:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Although Germany has freedom of panorama, it doesn't cover temporal objects like posters. DCB (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
_Jundia%C3%AD.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jundia%C3%AD.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dubious claim of own work due to small size and lack of metadata, especially for a photo claimed to have been taken in 2011. Copyright issues aside, the quality is pretty poor. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
_Jundiaí.png){kind=link}
Deleted: COM:PCP. --Ezarateesteban 18:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
_Jundiaí.png){kind=link}
Author died in 1980. Undelete in 2051. Gumruch (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
