Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/09/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 28th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: likely fictitious flag; was unused outside a userspace sandbox about a fictitious war. Omphalographer (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, likely fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, likely fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, likely fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10 applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Atakhanli as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Anthony2106 (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 08:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not realise my location would be revealed Вячеслав молодец (talk) 10:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is totally blurry Kaneeshktoriya209 (talk) 12:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is an important source for the life data of Adolf Badt Nortix08 (talk) 13:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i uploaded this with incorrect copyright details so i want it deleted (only protected by fair use) Cooltankguylovewiki (talk) 12:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Andreslence2 (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article, totally blurry, nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Andreslence2 (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test or nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, does not meet any notability criteria, this is not facebook The tag was removed out of process by RZuo in special:diff/928483698.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

describe "process". RoyZuo (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RZuo: "If anyone disagrees with the speedy deletion of a particular file, please convert to a regular deletion request" per Commons:Deletion policy#Speedy deletion.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i'll put down everything once and for all before you even reply.
  1. the deletion reason is bogus.
    1. it's not a selfie.
    2. there's no com:csd about "notability criteria".
    3. i added it to two categories, one of which Category:IMovie shows this is for now the only file showing a person using imovie. i dont expect a deletion request based on com:scope would even be plausible.
  2. i clicked one of the two buttons "remove this tag". rejection of bogus templates by any commons user is self explanatory. what process? i expect an explanation for the rash accusation.
RoyZuo (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: did you just delete "the only file showing a person using imovie"?--RoyZuo (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I don't see how you could argue that this file illustrates that. If anything, this could illustrate a teenager's desktop, but nothing else. Yann (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: how do you argue that https://www.flickr.com/photos/fabola/23491654620/ is not someone using imovie on a mac and moving the mouse?
even if you cannot see the software is imovie, there is only 1 other file File:Video Producer in Cape Town.jpg showing a person and cat:video editing software, which shows a man who's not using the software but instead looking at the camera.--RoyZuo (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"someone using iMovie" is different than a picture that could illustrate that use. The screen is blurry, and since it is a free software, anyone can create a useful picture or video. This is not one of them. Yann (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted after request at COM:UDR in order to start a new request to delete. Previous deletion request was Commons:Deletion requests/File:A fabulous birthday (23491654620).jpg. The file was nominated for deletion for the following reason: "This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, does not meet any notability criteria, this is not facebook" Thuresson (talk) 11:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping to interested parties: @Belbury: , @Abzeronow: , @Yann: , @Jameslwoodward: , @Bastique: , @RoyZuo: . Thuresson (talk) 11:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep demonstrates the use of iMovie without violating copyright. The composition of the photograph is also good. The photograph is interesting. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thuresson: the author of the picture is User:Fabrice Florin, an active Wikimedian who is also now an employee of the WMF. Should they be pinged as well? I do not believe that should influence one way or the other whether we keep it or not, particularly as they uploaded it to Flickr and not to Commons, but since it does involve their photo and a person that they know well, I wonder if they should be directed to this conversation? Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as per my previous comment. Yann (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for the reasons stated by Bastique. Abzeronow (talk) 16:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep one of the few commons files that show a girl using video editing software.
and i dont see how this flickr image is in any way inferior to commercial stock photos of the same motif https://www.gettyimages.de/search/2/image?phrase=girl%20edit%20video https://www.shutterstock.com/search/girl-edit-video .
the background is what a natural, realistic bedroom/study looks like, unlike the fake setups that give a commercial stock photo vibe.
on top of that, imovie is proprietary software by apple. the slightly blurry screen is just a perfect middle ground such that it cannot be considered a copyright violation of the proprietary software but still is recognisable enough as a girl editing videos.--RoyZuo (talk) 07:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, this looks to be the only image on Commons that could meaningfully illustrate the concept of home video editing, and it would be a good fit at en:Video editing#Home video editing. It's not really a selfie, it barely shows one side of the person's face. The focus is the video editing that they're doing. Belbury (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the original uploader and owner of this photo. I no longer wish to have this image publicly available on Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majharul Islam Tayef (talk • contribs) 14:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delet photo محمدحسین میناوند (talk) 18:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional Materials: Not a hosting site Michel Bakni (talk) 08:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per F10 राजकुमार(talk) 11:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10/G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a wrong photo 45.125.6.41 21:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC) Go t[reply]

I uploaded a wrong photo TO4848 (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete a photo as soon as possible,I hae no own right to the photo. TO4848 (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{speedy delete|Uploaded Wrong Photo}} 45.125.6.180 02:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 06:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicts a fictional election as seen in the creator's sandbox. Out of scope N Panama 84534 22:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alt history, fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 22:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a mistake this should be deleted D.B0924 (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted per G7/F2. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: No realistic educational value. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this pic is underr my personal use category not for knowledge purpose , so u cant report me for it... Imagangsta123 (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. This is not your personal playground. --Achim55 (talk) 19:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: No realistic educational value. A low resolution image of man. Plenty of better quality pictures of similar subject on Commons. No meaningful Description, Filename, Caption or Category⁶ Headlock0225 (talk) 09:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no , so stating those reasons u cant delete my picture , its a pic depiciting love for my teacher and nothing inappropiate , even i saw some pics in ur page havig the same problem which u mentioned for this , there should be some sense before reporting my pic for deletion i guess... Imagangsta123 (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: No realistic educational value. A very low resolution image of man. Plenty of better quality pictures of similar subject on Commons. No meaningful Description, Filename, Caption or Category⁶ Headlock0225 (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no , so stating those reasons u cant delete my picture , its a pic depiciting love for my teacher and nothing inappropiate , even i saw some pics in ur page havig the same problem which u mentioned for this , there should be some sense before reporting my pic for deletion i guess... Imagangsta123 (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirected, but not deleted. Quick1984 (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sreejithk2000: . Quick1984 (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless pic, nonsense text - might be bullying Mateus2019 (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Aafi. --Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file and requested by the uploader AsianStuff03 (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file and requested by the uploader AsianStuff03 (talk) 06:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded because I thought it was public domain, but after upload, metadata says it's copyrighted. HalfHazard98 (talk) 07:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.kungfurouen.fr/pages/wing-chun/le-wing-chun.html Culex (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour
J'ai l'autorisation de Lance Pun qui vie à Foshan(banlieue Canton - Chine) car je gère sa communication en France. L'association de Kung fu utilise des images sans validation du maitre...
cdt
TYWC Taiyin (talk) 08:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Youtube. Tolga Theo Yalur (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Youtube. Tolga Theo Yalur (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake MikhailHw8 (talk) 18:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adamdoter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artworks (by living aertist)

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We have permission from the artist who is also the photographer, see Ticket:2024092910003113. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: files have VRT permissions now. --Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file and requested by the uploader AsianStuff03 (talk) 05:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 08:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Delete xq no es un elemento de "relebancia". 186.172.220.38 01:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manojnath484 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, F10. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement of Tom and Jerry Mateus2019 (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete File:Tash metro 2023.jpg. It is stolen from this sources:

https://kun.uz/ru/news/2023/08/30/ministerstvo-transporta-opublikovalo-obnovlennuyu-kartu-tashkenskogo-metropolitena

https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2023/08/30/metro-map/

UmirovaDilshoda (talk) 00:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@UmirovaDilshoda: I tagged it as such. You could have done that yourself.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done by Túrelio. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy and @Túrelio: Thanks!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Renamed user 9220109728 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: various unused, largely unidentified, and likely fictitious flags and emblems, and one unused, unidentified parliament diagram.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunilsinghyadavmp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Used for self promo on en.wp

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kairos-kcr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused diagrams without context. Out of project scope.

~TheImaCow (talk) 12:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pablo1985bis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots of unidentified software, out of project scope

~TheImaCow (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aatzkach (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unclear com:ev.

RZuo (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ggomez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low quality diagrams/photos without context, out of scope

~TheImaCow (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 09:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Global change ecology (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low quality diagrams without context. Out of project scope.

~TheImaCow (talk) 13:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TivaSerano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - no educational value - low quality

INeverCry 22:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope Lymantria (talk) 09:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TivaSerano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low quality diagrams without context. Out of project scope.

~TheImaCow (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality diagrams without context. Not realistically useful for educational purposes, out of project scope. Commons is not a webhost. COM:NOTHOST

~TheImaCow (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low quality diagrams generally without context. Out of project scope.

~TheImaCow (talk) 20:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ORIGINAL RAPKILLER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 15:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevenmaidtofit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 15:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevenmaidtofit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, not used anywhere, uploaded probably only for promotional purposes, low resolution, missing permission

Jianhui67 TC 15:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

xq es un elemento d relebancia para extraccion d documentis i mal uso de documentis 38.194.235.96 01:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't know what you're talking about (the Google translation didn't make any sense), but this file is COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i made a mistake, background is not transparent Wikiuser3315 (talk) 05:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It looks like the mistake has been fixed by overwriting with a transparent version. Nakonana (talk) 19:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: apparently solved. Wikiuser3315: If you still want to delete the file, please open a new deletion request. It should be deleted per courtesy deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cloventt as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Appears to be an incorrectly attributed publicity photo
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 14:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This modern self-created image clearly violates the Neutral point of view and is an example of Polish nationalism with clearly false claims (propaganda) towards Poland's neighboring countries, so this nationalistic modern image has absolutely no educational value and should be deleted because it is only a false personal interpretation of history, not based on historical facts.
The main issue with this image is that in the title and in the legend it is claimed that it is the "border changes in history of Poland", however with the 1569 Union of Lublin the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was not incorporated into the borders of the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland (there are no such words in Union's text) and after concluding the Union these two countries remained with separate territories (borders), armies, treasuries, but since the adoption of the Union both countries (Poland and Lithuania) were ruled by one monarch who held two separate monarchial titles: King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania. The Union created a new state Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (Commonwealth of Both Nations) but claims that the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth "is equal to Poland" are absolutely false Polish nationalistic propaganda and Wikimedia Foundation projects clearly have no place for nationalistic self-created propaganda content which seeks to purposefully confuse its users. Keeping such content is only damaging the reliability reputation of Wikimedia Foundation projects.
The legal statuses of Poland and Lithuania were equal in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, so claims that the "Commonwealth is equal to Poland" is an identical absurd to claims that the "Commonwealth is equal to Lithuania". By concluding the Union both countries had sacrificed equal amounts of their sovereignty to form a new federative state which was nor Poland, nor Lithuania. The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth's principles quite reminiscent the monarchial variant of the European Union, which also created a new international subject (European Union), but its member states and their borders did not cease to exist. So this map has as much educational value as would have an image with the map of the European Union but titled as "borders of Belgium".
Moreover, having "U. S. S. R." (Soviet Union) and "Holy roman german empire" in a single map which feature medieval/modern borders is an absurd of its own kind.
So I request to delete this image to avoid confusing users with a clearly false content. -- Pofka (talk) 16:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was part of the bigger construct that was the PLC the same way that, let's say, the kingdom of Bohemia was part of the Habsburg dominion, with the Polish Crown playing the role of the Archduchy of Austria -- that is, for all intents and purposes, a part of a bigger confederation encompassing both policies. There's no doubt that the Crown and Lithuania had separate administration and treasuries and so on, but, at the end of the day, this is all historical nitpicking. In foreign eyes, the whole construct was seen as "the kingdom of Poland", and the internal division between Poland and Lithuania was mostly irrelevant. Also, given that the PLC was mostly Polish in its culture and administration, i think that putting it on par with a former Polish state is, although a big simplification, not wrong per se -- and that especially on a map showing border changes throughout history, for such a map will necessary sacrifice accuracy to readability. I think we should keep the map. The legend even mentions the PLC! Also in my opinion the comparison with the EU and Belgium is pointless and almost a strawman. AmbroiseL (talk) 09:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As a compromise, it might be worth discussing whether {{accuracy}} should be added, if the image is kept. Nakonana (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use, feel free to discus accuracy or remove it from different projects. --Strakhov (talk) 14:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a strange "village"; unclear what this is meant to represent. Omphalographer (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 14:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

California allows government educational places to claim copyright, so this would likely be a copyrighted photo. Abzeronow (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es libre subir fotos irrelevantes y dejarlas sin categorizar? 186.175.164.142 20:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Is it free to upload irrelevant photos and leave them uncategorized?' (Google translate)
 Speedy keep No valid reason to delete.
To the Chilean IP: Why don't you do something useful instead of trolling, and go categorize the images you see with no categories? Darwin Ahoy! 20:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Of the potential policy-based reasons for deletion, which do you claim would apply here? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because such a building no longer exists in the city of Beylagan.The building with the inscription 'Beylagan' shown in the picture has already been demolished. I can provide better pictures of Beylagan city to replace this one. I kindly request that you remove this image, which was uploaded in 2011. Ulviiz (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. The fact that this building doesn't exist anymore doesn't make this image invalid, and this image is in use across dozens of different wikis. Omphalographer (talk) 23:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not anonymous work. The work is attributed. Alex Spade (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 14:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]