Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/05/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This appears to just be a copyright violation, as this is an official logo and is not uploaded under a fair use license. However, Yann claims that it's in the public domain because it's a simple logo. Not sure where this is heading. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, no valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 09:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vicky atanacio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unofficial Yann (talk) 09:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Rodrickk (talk) 01:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KylieTastic as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not own work - user had been blocked on enwiki for text copyright issue - probable source is https://jimcrowmuseum.ferris.edu/question/2018/march.htm Yann (talk) 11:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep A version of the image is found here. According to the Center for Arkansas History and Culture, this was published in 1916, making the image {{PD-US-expired}}. Fix the file information and license. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)- Keep Per Tcr25 good enough for me. It's clearly a published photo on the postcard and the post stamp looks to agree with the date which makes sense with the subject as well. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can someone upload an image of the postcard from which our image is cropped? FloridaArmy (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- A version without watermark is here: https://ualrexhibits.org/snyder/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/nggallery/mosaic-templars/ualr-ph-0037_na_na_pho0049_web.jpg —Tcr25 (talk) 14:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Because I don’t want my nudes online Xxmicrodudexx (talk) 15:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Because I don’t want my nudes online Xxmicrodudexx (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Because I don’t want my nudes online Xxmicrodudexx (talk) 15:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Because I don’t want my nudes online Xxmicrodudexx (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
I don’t want it up anymore Xxmicrodudexx (talk) 16:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Own userspace. --Achim55 (talk) 16:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
G3. Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack Fenpedia (talk) 08:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedily kept (non-admin closure). Obvious bad-faith nomination. Omphalographer (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
G3. Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack Fenpedia (talk) 08:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedily kept (non-admin closure). Obvious bad-faith nomination. Omphalographer (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This picture does not comply creative commons. JeBapdeLu (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, replaced by File:Joseph Wolfram (lithogr de) (...)Sprick Johann btv1b8425954t 1.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
No overwriting Finals123 (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 08:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator has been indeffed. Nonsense request. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Please Remove Protection RandomGamer6029 (talk) 19:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Henri Matisse died in 1954, still copyrighted in France its country of origin. Yann (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Not an actual tweet, just a made up image for some French online game. Delete per COM:NOTHOST and COM:SCOPE. Nosferattus (talk) 01:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted, OOS prank/fiction. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Greiqpro (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 06:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Il est irrespectueux et insultant envers les supporters de l’AS Saint-Étienne. Scomari (talk) 20:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Cette image est irrespectueuse et insultante envers les supporters de l’AS Saint-Étienne. 109.89.124.23 22:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Cette image est insultante et irrespectueuse envers les supporters de l'AS Saint-Étienne (2). Scomari (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That is still not a valid reason for deletion. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Please delete Angelcloversissy (talk) 14:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Please delete! Angelcloversissy (talk) 14:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, please delete! 191.126.36.248 23:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Upgrade to HD RandomGamer6029 (talk) 19:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
No Such Thing As I-199 RandomGamer6029 (talk) 19:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 03:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of old version of File:I-274.svg Finals123 (talk) 23:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 20:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate RandomGamer6029 (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 13:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- この画像の人物は永田洋一本人です公開してもかまいません 永田洋一 (talk) 20:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
AP images are not licensed under Creative Commons TaurusEmerald (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted as obvious copyright violation. Available at [1], "Charlie Colin appears at the Friendly House Los Angeles' 24th Annual Awards Luncheon on Oct. 26, 2013 in Los Angeles. Colin, bassist and founding member of the American pop-rock band Train, best known for their early-aughts hits like “Drops of Jupiter" and “Meet Virginia,” has died. He was 58. (Photo by Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP, File)" Thuresson (talk) 15:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio: These Apple icons are not CC licensed. Most of them are clearly over the threshold of originality. A couple of them might not be (e.g. File:Mac Help Viewer Icon.png, File:Mac Terminal Icon.png, File:Mac Bluetooth File Exchange Icon.png), but these images have little educational use on their own. Commons already has icons similar to these which are unambiguously freely licensed (e.g. respectively File:Emblem-question.svg, File:Utilities-terminal.svg, File:Bluetooth.svg); there's no compelling reason for us to use Apple's versions.
- File:Mac Feedback Assistant Icon.png
- File:Mac Directory Utility Icon.png
- File:Mac Archive Utility Icon.png
- File:Mac DVD Player Icon.png
- File:Mac ControlCenter Icon.png
- File:Mac Screentime Icon.png
- File:Mac Help Viewer Icon.png
- File:Mac Finder Icon.png
- File:Mac Screen Sharing Icon.png
- File:Mac Migration Assistant Icon.png
- File:Mac PrintCenter Icon.png
- File:Mac Disk Utility Icon.png
- File:Mac Script Editor Icon.png
- File:Mac Terminal Icon.png
- File:Mac Screenshot Icon.png
- File:Mac Console Icon.png
- File:Mac System Information Icon.png
- File:Mac Keychain Access Icon.png
- File:Mac VoiceOver Utility Icon.png
- File:Mac Activity Monitor Icon.png
- File:Mac Grapher Icon.png
- File:Mac Boot Camp Assistant Icon.png
- File:Mac Digital Color Meter Icon.png
- File:Mac ColorSync Utility Icon.png
- File:Mac Bluetooth File Exchange Icon.png
- File:Mac AirPort Utility Icon.png
- File:Mac Audio MIDI Setup Icon.png
- File:Mac News Icon.png
- File:Mac Contacts Icon.png
- File:Mac Weather Icon.png
- File:Mac Find My Icon.png
- File:Mac Clock Icon.png
- File:Mac Stocks Icon.png
- File:Mac Photos Icon.png
- File:Mac Dictionary Icon.png
- File:Mac Reminders Icon.png
- File:Mac Notes Icon.png
- File:Mac Messages Icon.png
- File:Mac Maps Icon.png
- File:Voice Memos Icon.png
- File:Mac Preview Icon.png
- File:Mac Home Icon.png
- File:Mac Podcasts Icon.png
- File:Mac Freeform Icon.png
- File:Mac Textedit Icon.png
- File:Mac Books Icon.png
- File:System Settings Icon.png
- File:Mac Shortcuts Icon.png
- File:Mac Stickies Icon.png
- File:Mac Calender Icon.png
- File:Mac Chess Icon.png
- File:Mac Apple TV Icon.png
- File:MacOS Time Machine Icon.png
- File:Siri Icon.png
- File:QuickTime Player Icon.png
- File:Photo Booth Icon.png
- File:MacOS Mission Control Icon.png
- File:Launchpad Icon.png
- File:Image Capture Icon.png
- File:Font Book Icon.png
- File:MacOS App Store Icon.png
- File:MacOS Calculator Icon.png
- File:MacOS Mail Icon.png
Omphalographer (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdiel ramos10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scan from an article that seems to be published by the Technology University of Monterrey. It has several problems 1) The text doesn't seem to have an historical importance thus it is not in COM:SCOPE 2) It is not clear that the text itself has a free license as it lacks a source 3) It contains several images without an author and license.
- File:Foto reportaje Ana Graciela García Alcántara 2.png
- File:Foto reportaje Ana Graciela García Alcántara 3.png
- File:Foto reportaje Ana Graciela García Alcántara 1.png
- File:Foto reportaje Ana Graciela García Alcántara.jpg
- File:Foto reportaje Ana Graciela García Alcántara 2.jpg
- File:Foto reportaje Ana Graciela García Alcántara 3.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 13:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
The person who took this video does not work for Mehr News. Therefore, it comes from a third-party source. Examples: https://x.com/conflict_live/status/1792445319072170071/video/2 , https://x.com/potkazar/status/1792440285630288174 Ishagaturo (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete CaesarIran (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Own poetry of the uploader, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Image of artwork, reverse image search suggests copyright violation, no indication that uploader is the artist nor has authority to grant license. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Somebody removed it from the user page. User is not active though. 191.126.152.85 14:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused contextless personal pic Fl.schmitt (talk) 15:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Promotional photo, out of scope. Seems it was uploaded for an article (draft) on the English Wikipedia that has since been deleted. 95.91.226.3 15:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Bedivere (talk) 03:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Promotional photo, out of scope. Seems it was uploaded for an article (draft) on the English Wikipedia that has since been deleted. 95.91.226.3 15:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please also delete Category:Davie Fogarty once it's empty. --95.91.226.3 15:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Bedivere (talk) 03:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sonosoloparolesono (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: Pictures from Instagram https://www.instagram.com/giordanaangi/p/C7T2X1FsIWE/, Screenshots, VRT authorization required https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10
- File:Hakeem Music's pictures.jpg
- File:Photo of Hakeem Music.jpg
- File:Hakeem Music.jpg
- File:Images of Hakeem Music.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Riskit 4 a biskit (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE requires media files, which is a defined term that excludes such text ("The following are not considered media files, and may not be hosted here [...] Files which are representative merely of raw text")
Эlcobbola talk 18:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused poor quality image of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 18:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
copyvio from a local newspaper XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal privacy 永遠快樂 (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
private issues 永遠快樂 (talk) 18:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
private reason- request for quick selection 永遠快樂 (talk) 05:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment I see no valid reaspon for deletion. Please check Commons:Policy scope and come back with a valid reason for deletion beyond your preference. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: although that is not a valid reason for deletion, the file is unused, the person is apparently unknown and so this is out of scope. --Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marc Mumbrú (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a COM:WEBHOST.
- File:THE FINAL OF TCE.png
- File:TCE LOGO.png
- File:TCE PRODUCTIONS.png
- File:Marc Mumbrú.png
- File:TCE THE DOCUMENTAL.png
Günther Frager (talk) 19:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
copyvio by globally blocked account Balyozxane (talk) 20:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded by error Crusdelsur (talk) 21:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Source, author? Kadı Message 21:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Source, author? Kadı Message 21:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Upload by error Crusdelsur (talk) 21:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
per COM:NETCOPYVIO, cf. File:Malika_Ménard.JPG H4stings (talk) 22:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
per COM:NETCOPYVIO, cf. File:Malika_Ménard.JPG H4stings (talk) 22:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded this edited image as a joke for my grandfather on his wikipedia page about a year and half ago. I only left it up for a few minutes but recently someone added this image back to his page. I removed it again but the image is still in the wikpedia commons and comes up when you search his name in google. Obviously he doesn't like it and it should be removed. JohnDoe887 (talk) 23:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I have additionally tagged File:John Darnton 2022 restaurant (cropped).jpg as being part of this deletion request as I believe that would almost certainly have been intended by the nominator. Tollens (talk) 01:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I probably should have elaborated more. Basically I edited this image and gave him a goofy hairstyle on faceapp and everything for a joke. I it could harm his professional career and I already feel horrible about it. He just released a book too. I didn't realize that it would be here forever even after I changed it back. Its not just that he doesn't like it, it is not even what he looks like. JohnDoe887 (talk) 01:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Additional context is also available at the English Wikipedia Teahouse (see en:Special:Diff/1225373559). Tollens (talk) 01:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – doesn't have any value to the project as it isn't an accurate depiction of the subject. Tollens (talk) 01:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Practical joke gone wrong. The uploader admits that the image has been modified and does not accurately portray the person's appearance. I am an adminstrator on the English Wikipedia and saw the Teahouse discussion there. Cullen328 (talk) 03:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Bedivere (talk) 03:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I do not see the claimed free license at either of the given links. Unused, uncat. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Definitely a case of {{PD-FLGov}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 03:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I do not see the claimed license at either of the links given. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Definitely a case of {{PD-FLGov}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 03:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Davao Clock Tower Kublai.jpg. Same author of sculpture, and same no-FoP issue. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
source of the photo is Facebook per metadata. Abzeronow (talk) 00:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be in scope The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned personal pic, useless without a minimum of context (location, time, subject). Fl.schmitt (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 羅湖 Luohu 東門 Dongmen 太陽廣場 Lilian Sun Plaza Shopping Mall cinemas sign August 2023 Px3.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted Film poster in China. メイド理世 (talk) 06:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Image is part of stills taken during a film interview: [2], [3]. Unlikey the work of uploader. Gpkp (talk) 07:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Commons is not for your selfies. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal file of a non-contributor. Uploader is blocked as sockpuppet too. Marbletan (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Inappropriate cross-wiki self-promotion attempts using multiple accounts. Marbletan (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Poster of a 1967 Cambodian film Syrus257 (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Túrelio as copyvio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No incoming links, not needed - FlightTime (open channel) 14:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No incoming links, not needed - FlightTime (open channel) 14:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No incoming links, not needed - FlightTime (open channel) 14:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No incoming links, not needed - FlightTime (open channel) 15:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No incoming links, not needed - FlightTime (open channel) 15:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No incoming links, not needed - FlightTime (open channel) 15:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No incoming links, not needed - FlightTime (open channel) 15:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No incoming links, not needed - FlightTime (open channel) 15:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused unidentified location without any landmarks. No context and wrong coords (part of a Flickr upload, so no hope of ever getting this corrected). Unusable and redundant to numerous better alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Privacy reason 永遠快樂 (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by wdwd as CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Contemporary artwork in an (temporary?) exhibition in Olso. Notice that there is no FOP in Noway. We need a permission form the artist to keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 19:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Fictional image of a real person. No way to know how accurate - if at all - it is to the real person, so should never be used. Should any photographs exist, they would likely be in the public domain by now. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Flickr source is a deadlink, and nothing on the Wayback Machine, so license can't be verified. Abzeronow (talk) 21:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused uncat photo from Flickr without evident usefulness, possible DW problem. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Source of the photograph is Facebook per metadata Abzeronow (talk) 23:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Black and white photograph, metadata says source is Facebook. Abzeronow (talk) 23:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that User:Ashina released this under a free license on kkwiki. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I should note: User:Ashina, if this is your own work, please add a copyright template (like w:kk:Үлгі:CC-BY-SA-4.0 or w:kk:Үлгі:CC-Zero to the file on kk.wikipedia.org (w:kk:Сурет:Фариза_Оңғарысынова.jpeg) and ping me, and I will import it to Commons. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Its not my work Elton7777 (talk) 11:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Unrecognizable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Amitbalani (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Amitbalani: your wishes will not result in a deletion. Please look at the criteria for inclusion as a reason for deletion. Start at Com:Project scope and work from there. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep on Commons since 2011, categories show in scope usefulness, no reason for deletion offered nor evident. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 10:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Too small to be usable The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete small image of a painting, reverse image search suggests copyright violation, no indication that uploader is the artist nor has authority to license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: AI-generated image used in (reverted) hoax content on enwiki. Omphalographer (talk) 03:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
photo from instagram without permission and it's not free to use KodokunaSmile (talk) 04:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Kadı Message 10:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
From the biographical figure's Instagram account KodokunaSmile (talk) 04:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Kadı Message 10:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, no realistic educational purposes. Ari (talk) 07:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: A watermark appears on the bottom right and is not the same as the uploader's. Authorisation is requested here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Unusable, resolution is so low, image is meaningless Poliocretes (talk) 16:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, seems like a screenhot from a video. --Kadı Message 10:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, seems like a screenhot from a video. --Kadı Message 10:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, seems like a screenhot from a video. --Kadı Message 10:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 18:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, seems like a screenhot from a video. --Kadı Message 10:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Only used in an old, unfinished promotional article draft on the English Wikipedia that I just tagged for speedy deletion. 95.91.226.3 19:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 11:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
unnecessary and possibly vandalizing image - - Wiki Libre - - (talk) 21:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Marco Sommer M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Still no license. --Yann (talk) 21:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Because the registration plate is shown 122.108.241.194 08:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploader has created similar deletion requests, so this deletion request is likely by the uploader as well. Brianjd (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Registration plate is shown 122.108.241.194 08:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploader has created similar deletion requests, so this deletion request is likely by the uploader as well. Brianjd (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Registration Plate is shown 122.108.241.194 08:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploader has created similar deletion requests, so this deletion request is likely by the uploader as well. Brianjd (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Flickr washing. Flickr account holder has only 3 images in the account, which are all copyrighted to somebody else. Gpkp (talk) 09:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible CopyVio: No license information in the source link. The uploader has no other contribution and is unresponsive. ImamAnik (talk) 10:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
registration plate is shown RegionVisitor90 (talk) 10:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
useless, requested by uploader Abiyoyo (talk) 11:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Image sourced to Photo by Rogan/Fever Pitch. If this is the same as the uploader, please submit statement to COM:VRT Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be free, may be a case of license laundering. The image might have come from a DVD or other non-free source. Aasim (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not own work; if the angle is not obvious enough, the watermarks from Google Maps are still left at the bottom. The license is incorrect and dubious. Yue🌙 22:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Genehmigung des Fotografen fehlt Barbasca (talk) 22:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Source page claims image is in the public domain, but uploader claims CC0. I don't think either is true or that blackpage.org has the ownership necessary to release the image into the public domain. William Graham (talk) 02:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we do not know the correct date this picture was taken. 2007 is unlikely, as the image doesn't seem to be of a 90-year old woman. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 19:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like it's practically a duplicate of File:(Venice) Bagnante by Max Kinger - Museo d'arte moderna.jpg. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate file, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Its not my work Elton7777 (talk) 11:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 19:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Its not my work Elton7777 (talk) 11:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 19:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Its not my work Elton7777 (talk) 11:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 19:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate, a better version exist (the logo is less precise, example the first "a" top is not pointy) Bruce The Deus (talk) 12:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Looks like old photo from printed reproduction in newspaper or magazine; I doubt uploader is the author and copyright holder. --Infrogmation (talk) 18:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete} It could very well be PD. But without a clear verifiable source, we cannot be sure. Its not own work certainly. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep en:Máximo Gómez died 1905. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, no source/author/date. Kameraad Pjotr 19:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
(different photo from previous images of the same name deleted earlier.) OOS personal photo, user only made a few edits here and on fr:w, mostly attempts to use Wikimedia as personal social media &/or copyright violations, none useful. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover, VRT required https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 19:39, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Unclear educational use and probable DR issues Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies, I meant DW. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 04:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Europese Zwemkampioenschappen, Frank Wiegand (Oost-Duitsland) kop, Bestanddeelnr 919-4777.jpg
[edit]löschen, Bild stellt falschen Sportler dar 79.140.117.241 17:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wen stellt es denn dar? Dateinamen und Beschreibung kann man ändern, wenn nötig. Nakonana (talk) 20:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 19:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Sriveenkat (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --Wdwd (talk) 19:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
The photo, apparently assumed to be a self-portrait, is sourced from the website of the subject [4], which states this permission (in French): "La photo ci-dessous est libre de droits et peut être utilisée pour un usage respectueux et raisonnable." (Translation: This photo is free of rights and can be used for a respectful and reasonable use.) It sounds like the subject reserves the possibility to disallow uses that he might subjectively consider not reasonable. Is the photo really free? -- Asclepias (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Oui, cette photo est vraiment gratuite étant l'auteur de la photo et ayant permis à Akos de l'utiliser sur son site personnel. Je n'ai pas reçu d'argent pour cette image et cette photo est libre de droit. // translation: Yes, this photo is really free being the author of the photo and having allowed Akos to use it on his personal website. I did not receive any money for this image and this photo is free to use. --Frankybobit (talk) 01:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Vous êtes l'auteur de la photo ? Ok, mais alors pourquoi avoir écrit que c'était Akos Verboczy au lieu de vous ? Pourquoi sourcer de sa page web, qui ne comporte pas la licence CC BY 4.0 que vous utilisez ici, plutôt que verser directement une copie qui inclurait les données EXIF ? Bon, en tout cas, étant donné cette situation effectivement confuse, il serait souhaitable que vous fassiez parvenir un courriel à Wikimedia selon les indications prévues à la page Commons:VRT/fr, afin de confirmer que vous êtes l'auteur et le propriétaire des droits d'auteur et que vous offrez la licence CC BY 4.0. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Bonsoir. Je ne savais pas que le protocole de gestion d'une image dont j'étais le producteur demandait autant de démarches. N'étant un abonné à temps plein de Wikipedia, ni un producteur à temps plein de contenu visuel à verser dans ces plateformes (il faut comprendre que j'ai d'abord versé cette photo prise l'automne dernier pour permettre à cette personne de faire son propre site personnel pour présenter son livre). Donc, tout cela pour dire, je vais écrire un courriel en transmettant les informations que vous m'indiquez en espérant que le tout sera conforme. Frankybobit (talk) 02:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
After a week, there is apparently no indication that anything was sent to VRT. Things have only become more confused. In his comment above, the uploader now claims that he is the photographer, despite still indicating someone else as author in the description page. And there are now four different and contradictory licensing claims. 1. The one on the website of the subject, possibly not sufficiently free, 2. the CC license by the uploader, 3. a public domain mention added by the uploader in the structured data, and 4. the mention all rights reserved at a publishing house which seems to be the actual source of this file. The website of the subject, claimed by the uploader to be the source of the photo, is actually merely displaying the photo from the website of the publishing house [5], which is all rights reserved and claims the copyright on all its contents [6]. The file needs to be deleted from Commons unless a convincing and not ambiguous statement is received, preferably directly from the publishing house which actually hosts the source photo. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Firstly, the four sources of confusion are essentially generated by the difficulty of understanding the rules for transmitting an image in Wikidata. Three of the four sources of confusion are therefore my responsibility. Finally, as far as Akos' personal site is concerned, it was I who allowed him to use this photograph, which he added to his site. As for the mention on his site, it's the formula he chose and he's not a subscriber to the rules of free access copyright management. Meilleures salutations Frankybobit (talk) 02:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024060510001701 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 04:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Akos Verboczy-2023.jpg” under ticket:2024060510001701. --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merci pour le suivi. Frankybobit (talk) 01:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: VRT ticket received. (non-admin closure) — doclys (❀) 08:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Includes copyrighted content 2A0C:5A82:8208:2F00:3593:44AE:5DCF:3E2 18:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Sperriger Dateiname, Bild doppelt, auch unter File:Kulmbach MGF-Gymnasium 04.jpg vorhanden Dagoheri (talk) 10:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support deletion, valid reasons by uploader. --h-stt !? 17:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Becouse its not my work Elton7777 (talk) 11:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
can't find this at the source; also can't find the data in the data source: maybe it was removed on purpose because it's incorrect? Prototyperspective (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- The image is here. It looks as though they have just moved things around. Please do not delete. Jason.nlw (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing the source, I couldn't find it, retracting this DR. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ettelbruck
[edit]This sculpture in Ettelbru/ück, Luxembourg is a work of sculptor de:Wil Lofy, wo died in 2021, so it is still protected in Luxembourg. Per COM:FOP Luxembourg, there is no freedom of panorama in Luxembourg. Only incidental inclusion is allowed, which this is not. The files should therefore be deleted. They can be restored in 2092.
Rosenzweig τ 23:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 金田路 Jintian Road 深圳博物館 Shenzhen Museum interior August 2023 Px3 10.jpg
[edit]A 2D work only, There no Freedom of panorama in China. メイド理世 (talk) 07:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 金田路 Jintian Road 深圳博物館 Shenzhen Museum interior August 2023 Px3 11.jpg
[edit]A 2D work only, There no Freedom of panorama in China. メイド理世 (talk) 07:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect license. This image is a photo of the subject in the uniform of the Oklahoma City Fire Department and was taken before his tenure as a FEMA/USFA appointee. So PD-USGov-FEMA is incorrect. William Graham (talk) 02:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio from https://kids.kiddle.co/Richard_Marx WWGB (talk) 02:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Kiddle is a Wikipedia mirror. The site attributes Candy156sweet on the file page, so it can't be a copyvio. SWinxy (talk) 01:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
out of date Isilwell (talk) 03:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- What? Keep. 186.172.6.153 12:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. Günther Frager (talk) 16:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
A text only, There no Freedom of panorama in China. メイド理世 (talk) 06:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 南山 Nanshan 留仙大道 Liuxian Blvd parking Excavator bucket 鏟泥車 construction machine rule sheet sign August 2023 Px3.jpg
[edit]A text only, There no Freedom of panorama in China. メイド理世 (talk) 06:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @メイド理世
Question, can this prose-type literary work qualify for author's copyright protection? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Letter scan without educatiuonal use Drakosh (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- The letter concerns an Uzbek politician (who seemingly got accused of damaging a company but was aquitted of such accusations, judging by the Russian file description). I've added the relevant categories to make the connection to said politician (Hasanboy Burxonov) clear. There are articles about Hasanboy Burxonov on Uzbek, Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia (and there's a currently declined draft on him on English Wikipedia: Draft:Hasanboy Burhanov), so I'd say that the guy is notable enough to keep documents that concern him. Nakonana (talk) 16:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I can't read the letter, but the copyright is almost certainly held by its writer, not by the uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: File has not been deleted. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Letter scan without educatiuonal use Drakosh (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- The letter concerns an Uzbek politician. I've added the relevant categories to make the connection to said politician (Hasanboy Burxonov) clear. There are articles about Hasanboy Burxonov on Uzbek, Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia, so I'd say that the guy is notable enough to keep documents that concern him. Nakonana (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination I can't read the letter, but the copyright is almost certainly held by its writer, not by the uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Letter scan without educatiuonal use Drakosh (talk) 07:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- The letter concerns an Uzbek politician. I've added the relevant categories to make the connection to said politician (Hasanboy Burxonov) clear. There are articles about Hasanboy Burxonov on Uzbek, Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia, so I'd say that the guy is notable enough to keep documents that concern him. Nakonana (talk) 16:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination I can't read the letter, but the copyright is almost certainly held by its writer, not by the uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This picture is taken from a YouTube video. However, the video isn't licensed under Creative Commons. Puppe100 (talk) 08:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Video is not under CC. The carefree nature of the file description appears to demonstrate that the uploader has little concept of how seriously we take copyright. MFTP Dan (talk) 23:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RIP B1058 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo is Boeing propertiary GMGtalk 11:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure that the logo is Boeing or NASA, who has a long history of making unique patches for missions. Even if the logo is non-free, but the photo is free from NASA, it could probably be cropped and still serve an educational purpose. GMGtalk 11:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the logo is de minimis and why this photo has to be deleted or cropped and this one not? --Ras67 (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I support deletion of that one too as cropping means derivative of image containing non free logo@GreenMeansGo@Ras67 RIP B1058 (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Read my talk page discussion at User_talk:RIP_B1058#File:Boeing_Starliner_Crewed_Flight_Test_Patch.jpg RIP B1058 (talk) 13:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's significantly more complex than what would normally be covered under de minimis. GMGtalk 14:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just to make sure I clarify, complex things can be covered under DM, but they generally need to be incidental to the image. This normally doesn't apply to photoshopped images where every piece is intentional. GMGtalk 14:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I support deletion of that one too as cropping means derivative of image containing non free logo@GreenMeansGo@Ras67 RIP B1058 (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
more than just blurry, very bad quality, waste of time MenkinAlRire (talk) 16:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a better copy of this somewhere else on Commons? If not, then keep. - Jmabel ! talk 17:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Photo only used in an old promotional draft in a user sandbox on the English Wikipedia. Draft has already been tagged for speedy deletion. 95.91.226.3 16:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Scan of book published in Sweden. Author en:Gunhild Bergh died in 1961, which is less than 70 years ago. Thuresson (talk) 16:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: File has not been deleted. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 15:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. Nanahuatl (talk) 19:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Disagree As can be seen from here, @Oguzhanakkok claims that this is his own work, he claims that he is holding the legitimate right to share the illustration with Creative Commons licence. For this reason, I object to its deletion. TarantaBabu (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. It's funny that it's cited as a copyright reason. I am the author. These character designs are from the content of my book Turkish Mythology Monster Corpus, which has not yet been released. Since I am a utilitarian-oriented person, I personally uploaded their 4K resolution printouts as creative commons. If you can prove that the work does not belong to me, I will delete it myself. If you wish, I can prove it with all the raw files from the sketch stages. Oguzhanakkok (talk) 20:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uploader's own work, there's no copyright infringement Necatorina (talk) 22:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. Nanahuatl (talk) 19:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Disagree As can be seen from here, @Oguzhanakkok claims that this is his own work, he claims that he is holding the legitimate right to share the illustration with Creative Commons licence. For this reason, I object to its deletion. TarantaBabu (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. It's funny that it's cited as a copyright reason. I am the author. These character designs are from the content of my book Turkish Mythology Monster Corpus, which has not yet been released. Since I am a utilitarian-oriented person, I personally uploaded their 4K resolution printouts as creative commons. If you can prove that the work does not belong to me, I will delete it myself. If you wish, I can prove it with all the raw files from the sketch stages. Oguzhanakkok (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Not own work, although the original photograph may be free under Canadian public domain laws. This can only be confirmed after the proper source information and licensing is given, which this file does not have. Yue🌙 22:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - "All photographs (except those subject to Crown Copyright, for which see below) taken before 1 January 1949 are in the public domain.". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The ed17 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Nominating for deletion under COM:GCSD #7 because I'm pretty sure this violates COM:FOP US — billinghurst sDrewth 22:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- To expand on my rationale there, I'm assuming that the text and images on the sign are covered under COM:FOP US (the artworks section). The bottom image is of a 1987 parade, so the sign was installed after that date. If that FOP thought is incorrect, I apologize. (Note that I am the original uploader.) Ed [talk] [OMT] 02:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hokkaido Kannon
[edit]There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Japan for public sculptures, so commercial Creative Commons licensing permission from the sculptor (or his heirs, whoever they may be) is still required. The statue is from 1989 according to enwiki.
- File:2021-09-08 Hokkaido Dai Kannon in Ashibetsu city(北海道大観音)DJI 0492.jpg
- File:2021-09-08 Hokkaido Dai Kannon in Ashibetsu city(北海道大観音)DJI 0498 (cropped).jpg
- File:2021-09-08 Hokkaido Dai Kannon in Ashibetsu city(北海道大観音)DJI 0498.jpg
- File:2021-09-08 Hokkaido Dai Kannon in Ashibetsu city(北海道大観音)DSCF8329.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. While certainly creatively ornamented as a figure, this would be a building/architectural work according to US law (note that people can go into and look out from the figure) and I don't see any evidence that Japanese law would classify it differently. Japan allows freedom of panorama for works of architecture. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle Japanese legal literature treats architecture more restrictively. There is a past discussion before (at Commons talk:Freedom of panorama/Archive 1#Hideyuki Murata), in which from an insight of some lawyers like Murata, buildings that are too artistic should not be considered as architecture for purposes of Article 46 (the FoP provision), but as artistic works. A specific example mentioned by the lawyer is the w:en:Tower of the Sun, which is a building technically but not an architecture. A common agreement among many lawyers there is that such types of buildings cannot be shared or distributed for selling of copies purposes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think this is necessarily comparable with Tower of the Sun. That is a big open chamber inside and the exterior details are much more superficial. Those are what may be protected. Here there are multiple floors, interior elevators, and an exterior balcony which is integrated with the work. That integration of the practical with the aesthetic would push this towards architectural. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle no, there is no evidence that Japan follows the U.S. approach in definition of architecture. The legal literature in Japan differentiate architecture and artistic works in terms of aesthetics, not the mere existence of indoor facilities like rooms and elevators inside the statue. For sure, Japanese courts will yield negative views on commercial uses of images of this and all other contemporary life-sized Buddha statues in Japan that contain indoor spaces. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that Japanese and US standards are the same. I looked more closely at the archived webpage cited in the 15+ year-old discussion. The Japanese lawyer (Murata) cited isn't even saying that Tower of the Sun is an artistic work. He is saying that if it was an artistic work it would have protection from photographic reproduction. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle you may want to post a new discussion at VP forum if there's a need to contest current consensus regarding Japanese FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that Japanese and US standards are the same. I looked more closely at the archived webpage cited in the 15+ year-old discussion. The Japanese lawyer (Murata) cited isn't even saying that Tower of the Sun is an artistic work. He is saying that if it was an artistic work it would have protection from photographic reproduction. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle no, there is no evidence that Japan follows the U.S. approach in definition of architecture. The legal literature in Japan differentiate architecture and artistic works in terms of aesthetics, not the mere existence of indoor facilities like rooms and elevators inside the statue. For sure, Japanese courts will yield negative views on commercial uses of images of this and all other contemporary life-sized Buddha statues in Japan that contain indoor spaces. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think this is necessarily comparable with Tower of the Sun. That is a big open chamber inside and the exterior details are much more superficial. Those are what may be protected. Here there are multiple floors, interior elevators, and an exterior balcony which is integrated with the work. That integration of the practical with the aesthetic would push this towards architectural. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle Japanese legal literature treats architecture more restrictively. There is a past discussion before (at Commons talk:Freedom of panorama/Archive 1#Hideyuki Murata), in which from an insight of some lawyers like Murata, buildings that are too artistic should not be considered as architecture for purposes of Article 46 (the FoP provision), but as artistic works. A specific example mentioned by the lawyer is the w:en:Tower of the Sun, which is a building technically but not an architecture. A common agreement among many lawyers there is that such types of buildings cannot be shared or distributed for selling of copies purposes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍華區 Longhua District 景龍建設路 Jinglong Jianshe Road 壹方天地 Uniwalk Mall shop Smartphones OPPO September 2023 R12S 16.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted Screenshot. メイド理世 (talk) 07:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 南山 Nanshan 桃園路 Taoyuan Road 聖淘沙酒店 Sentosa Hotel shopping mall breakfast menu October 2023 R12S.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menu in China. Solomon203 (talk) 07:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: plain text list, not copyrightable prose. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 南山 Nanshan 桃園路 Taoyuan Road 聖淘沙酒店 Sentosa Hotel shopping mall breakfast menu October 2023 R12S.jpg
[edit]A text only, There no Freedom of panorama in China. メイド理世 (talk) 07:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @P199 why kept this image? メイド理世 (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Because the text of a menu is not copyrightable. There's no art involved in creation of this menu list (e.g. it has no pictures). PaterMcFly (talk) 06:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- 4 Chinese characters ("活力早餐") in this picture are copyrightable. See examples at COM:TOO China. Teetrition (talk) 06:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Because the text of a menu is not copyrightable. There's no art involved in creation of this menu list (e.g. it has no pictures). PaterMcFly (talk) 06:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Image has appeared in multiple news websites: Indian Express, TV9 Kan, Udayavani. Low resolution image and no EXIF, so unlikely the work of uploader.
--Gpkp (talk) 07:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Replacing the image with the owned image of the user with his mother. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.2.234.210 (talk) 08:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Puneetsinghbb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo or similar of bnirdeline complexity to may remain here, hence a discussion
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Redundant: Text is not able to read, this is ancient Tamil literature verses are available in WS and websites Sriveenkat (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Logo: looks simple to pass COM:TOO to me, but second opinions would be nice. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: consolidated at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jesús Gibb7. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Logo: Looks simple enough to be beloww TOO to me, but second opinions would be nice. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: consolidated at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jesús Gibb7. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
the writer has the copyright now . pls remove this image that i uploaded. when i uploaded it was free but now, the writer has the copyright now. IQR (talk) 18:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sriveenkat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted flick image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11245198@N04/4253910346: Clearly below COM:TOO, but scope may be a bit of an issue. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 23:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Even if there is an SVG, the other version should be kept (one reason being that it may not always be inferior to the SVG). Also, the motto mark in the original is not included in the SVG, making it an incorrect flag. If the other is deleted, no versions will contain the correct flag Alexander vee (talk) 11:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: @Alexander vee: The motto can be added to the SVG by an editor; but photographs of the flag show it without a motto. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 04:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please do so, in an official portrait of the new chief (2024) the motto can be seen (small and blurry, but it is there) portrait can be found at x.com/Politie/status/1763236371060105490 I stand by my claim Alexander vee (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; we can host png and svg, allow users to choose. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Coat of arms is erronously attributed to the archbishop. The shield is the coat of arms of a monastery in Guatemala: [7] Nominated for deletion per request of uploader/author. GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 08:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is not a naming issue. The coat of arms of the monastery only bears a crosier as seen in the attached image, and the original uploader mistaken it to be the coat of arms of the archbishop, thus the galero and the cross was used. It cannot be kept as is because of the incorrect external ornaments. GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 06:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Isn't this just a naming issue?
Deleted: evidence indicates that the coat of arms is not as stated. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This image is from the Behar et al 2010 study, as it says, to which material we unfortunately do not have the rights. For some reason the source is marked as a completely different study that has nothing to do with this image. Finncle (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since). However, the original uploader explicitly claimed it as their own work. If there is evidence that it was copyright violation, that should presumably be presented; otherwise, what is the basis not to assume good faith? Jmabel ! talk 14:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC) That said, a TinEye search shows one posting to the web (Synth_Electronic.html - First found on Jul 21, 2008) that predates the Commons upload; that posting does not credit an author. - Jmabel ! talk 14:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I tagged as no source to give an opportunity to tag it as PD, if justified. Right now it's an abvious CV. Here you have it in this context: [8] Masur (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It appears to be a publicity image, sources added, I can find no copyright registration for an image in the database that goes up to 1989. I can find patents and trademark registrations. --RAN (talk) 00:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep While Norlin, the then-current owner of Moog Synthesizers could had copyrighted some of their advertisements or pamphlets by print or by registration (which I remember seeing it in some Gibson guitars ads), in this case, not even I could find a copyright registration for the brochure attributed to Norlin or R.A. Moog under the Copyright Office's Books and Pamphlets for 1973 and 1974. Misterpither (talk) 06:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I have created a set of the future replacement candidate files using nine Creative Commons files and one PD-self file on Wikimedia Commons. I'm happy if these could be useful when the currently media became unavailable in the future.For example, we can overwrite current media (File:Bob Moog3.jpg) by new file File:Bob Moog3 new.jpg before removing all old-revisions. --Clusternote (talk) 13:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
-
Bob Moog3 new.jpg -
Bob Moog3 new (without face).jpg -
Bob Moog3 new (without silhouette).png -
Bob Moog3 new color.jpg -
Bob Moog3 new color (without face).jpg -
Bob Moog3 new color (without silhouette).png
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.svg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![93 File:Paja Patak koji izgovara njegovu čuvenu rečenicu "Čemu opvo služi, a uz o i ne radi".png](#File:Paja_Patak_koji_izgovara_njegovu_čuvenu_rečenicu_"Čemu_opvo_služi,_a_uz_o_i_ne_radi".png){kind=link}
![94 File:DžoEn Vorli kao gošća u epizodi "Konji".jpg](#File:DžoEn_Vorli_kao_gošća_u_epizodi_"Konji".jpg){kind=link}
_4-door_sedan,_Virginia_Gardens_11_January_2024.jpg){kind=link}
_Bagnante_by_Max_Kinger_-_Sculptures_in_the_Museo_d'arte_moderna.jpg){kind=link}
_kop,_Bestanddeelnr_919-4777.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_(...)Sprick_Johann_btv1b8425954t_1.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![18:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/05/23#c-Ђидо-20240523185500-File:DžoEn_Vorli_kao_gošća_u_epizodi_"Konji".jpg){kind=link}
![10:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/05/23#c-Kadı-20240530105900-File:DžoEn_Vorli_kao_gošća_u_epizodi_"Konji".jpg){kind=link}
_4-door_sedan,_Virginia_Gardens_11_January_2024.jpg){kind=link}
_4-door_sedan,_Virginia_Gardens_11_January_2024.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Bagnante_by_Max_Kinger_-_Sculptures_in_the_Museo_d%27arte_moderna.jpg){kind=link}
_Bagnante_by_Max_Kinger_-_Sculptures_in_the_Museo_d%27arte_moderna.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Bagnante_by_Max_Kinger_-_Museo_d%27arte_moderna.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_kop,_Bestanddeelnr_919-4777.jpg){kind=link}
_kop,_Bestanddeelnr_919-4777.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
DJI_0492.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
DJI_0498_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
DJI_0498.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
DSCF8329.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Photographer died in 1991. Needs VRT permission from his estate. Undelete in 2062. Abzeronow (talk) 00:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is this from Brazil? PD-Brazil-Photo, Brazil does not use pma calculations for simple photos. --RAN (talk) 11:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe it is from Brazil. Although placement of photographs in the postcard suggests a degree of creativity beyond the photography. Abzeronow (talk) 21:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
La wiphala no representa al departamento de Tarija, ellos no se representan con banderas, y tampoco representa al sureste ni suroeste de Chuquisaca Elpepefachero (talk) 20:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Elpepefachero Esta no es razón para borrar el mapa pero sí para corregirlo. En la zona que describes que no va la Wiphala se podría poner en blanco como parte de la bandera de la flor de Patujú, saludos.Janitoalevic (talk) 03:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The map is wrong, given that the Wiphala is an official flag in all of Bolivia, according to Article 6 of the Constitution of Bolivia Ingaviano (talk) 08:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Adding information to the above: we have to read the Article 6 of the Constitution of Bolivia approved in 2009, which clearly states that the wiphala is a national symbol of Bolivia. Nowhere does it say it is only in certain regions of Bolivia, and national means that it is official in all of the country. Not only that, there is no law that states the Patujú flag is official in all of the regions that it shows. This map shows a subjective "gut feeling" of what flag is supposed to go where, but does not reflect the laws and the Constitution of Bolivia. This makes this map invalid and completely incorrect, and should therefore be deleted.--Ingaviano (talk) 08:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It makes no sense to have fun the country in two poles, when the consitutationally consitutational flag is a national symbol, Asismimo there are more indigenous flags in Bolivia, including all of them would be complex on a map, so it must be eliminated. Bodoque9903 (talk) 20:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the Wiphala being also a national flag makes this map invalid, because it is showing a wrong depiction of where the Wiphala is "official". It is not limited to just some regions, it is a national symbol according to Article 6 of the Constitution. @-akko Do you think you can please weigh in on this issue? Thank you in advance. Ingaviano (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: File is a DW of a flag that was deleted for copyright reasons. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Restored per UDR on my talk page. No prejudice against renomination for reasons stated by Ingaviano. Abzeronow (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
differs from source now and the newer version for the same year already is here: File:Domestic-material-consumption-per-capita.png Prototyperspective (talk) 14:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep This is still a true copy of the image on OWID at the time of upload and is therefore a valuable record. Keep Jason.nlw (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- If it is kept I don't the title, description etc are adequate if the source map is now different, indicating the version here is flawed. If it is useful as an example of how maps for a given year on OWID can change and be improved over time or flawed then that should be clear, for example via the file title. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is possible this version is flawed. It is also possible that a slighlty different measure has been used to plot the chart- given that the descriptions are different. It is also possible that the current version has been mislabeled as 2019 when it is infact a later date. All seem equaly plausible to me. To get to the bottom of it will require a thorough investigation and contact with the source provider and i really dont think a deletion request is a fair or proportional approach in this case. As the uploader i'm happy to look into it. But it will likely take more the 5 days. Jason.nlw (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why keep a flawed version and make much of an effort to find out why it's flawed instead of just uploading the fixed latest version? There are obviously issues if it differs this much from the current map for the same year. See the difference for Norway. Details about what was needed to be adjusted or harmonized/standardized for the map would be useful in the description of the latest version if available. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is possible this version is flawed. It is also possible that a slighlty different measure has been used to plot the chart- given that the descriptions are different. It is also possible that the current version has been mislabeled as 2019 when it is infact a later date. All seem equaly plausible to me. To get to the bottom of it will require a thorough investigation and contact with the source provider and i really dont think a deletion request is a fair or proportional approach in this case. As the uploader i'm happy to look into it. But it will likely take more the 5 days. Jason.nlw (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- If it is kept I don't the title, description etc are adequate if the source map is now different, indicating the version here is flawed. If it is useful as an example of how maps for a given year on OWID can change and be improved over time or flawed then that should be clear, for example via the file title. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Jason.nlw: Have you an update on why one of the maps is slightly different? Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}