Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/05/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Station_concourse_artwork_intro_April_2024_R12S.jpg){kind=link}
_Artcover.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_crop.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Não tem nada a ver com o artigo Kayke Pellegrini (talk) 00:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wow. This is a more creative nonsense cause for a deletion request. Marcus Cyron (talk) 02:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; in use in multiple projects. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified low-resolution image of some people walking in a forest, with watermarks indicating it may have been cropped from a web page. Omphalographer (talk) 00:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation per reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate with File:KMB YX6462 112.jpg upload before. ThirdThink (talk) 01:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- 01:40 and 01:42. Huh. Somehow Upload Wizard didn't detect it. Anyways I'll tag it with a CSD. S5A-0043Talk 01:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 02:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag uploaded as part of a hoax article draft on enwiki. Omphalographer (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear case, OOS personal fiction or prank. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Uploader has posted his statement on the image-talkpage [1]:
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Zinnia_kumar.jpg&oldid=875879647){kind=link}
- "Image was uploaded without permission from the original photographer Ian. I did not know about copyright at the time of upload and now I'm being threatened to be sued if it is not removed. Your help would be appreciated to remove this image".
-- Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted content titled as "own work" , this one comes with a massive watermark too, obviously a copyvio. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 21:12, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a user-generated fantasy flag that was already deleted once as OOS a few years ago. So it should be redeleted for the same reason as last time. Commons isn't a personal file host. Adamant1 (talk) 05:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The issue has already been fixed here: as long as it's used is not out of scope. Blackcat 
14:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 10:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by EugeneZelenko राजकुमार(talk) 15:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 10:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by EugeneZelenko राजकुमार(talk) 15:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 10:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by EugeneZelenko राजकुमार(talk) 16:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 11:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete copyvio. Book cover. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)- Deleted by EugeneZelenko राजकुमार(talk) 16:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted images and inappropriate Monkeyeiei (talk) 12:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted images and inappropriate Monkeyeiei (talk) 05:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete Not inappropriate but a simple copyright violation; here is the original source. --Msb (talk) 08:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted images and inappropriate Monkeyeiei (talk) 12:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I incorrectly duplicated the same file instead of uploading a new version to the existing file Johnlexcameron (talk) 11:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Please delete this file as I have uploaded a personal file by mistake. WhitePhotos1991 (talk) 11:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Please delete this file as I have uploaded a personal file by mistake. WhitePhotos1991 (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded it erroneously - it has some persons on it. Hermann Luyken (talk) 13:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AstakosCopenhagen21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: AI-generated portraits; fictitious coats of arms.
- File:Royal family of new egypt coa dgr3hkl-375w-2x.png
- File:IMGverai.jpg
- File:IMGjarronii.jpg
- File:IMGarthurnorth.jpg
- File:IMGviviansouth.jpg
- File:Isabeliii.jpg
- File:IMGsouthsidoncrest.jpg
- File:Edwiniv.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
No source for where this graphic is taken from. Reverse image searches turn up modern DVD covers, and the description itself here says 2006. (Description also says it's AI generated and out of copyright for being published before 1929, neither of which is true.) Belbury (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Category of File and Wiki Sister Projects about Samarth Kaimliya an Indian Actor and YouTuber. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 106.204.227.6 (talk) 06:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Promotional by a socking SPA. --Achim55 (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty category (C2). --Эlcobbola talk 22:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
used for cswiki vandalism, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 12:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope personal file without educational value, only in use on an April Fools' page Nutshinou Talk! 21:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS and COM:PACKAGING --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't want to editing this in Wikimedia Commons anymore (requested by uploader) JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment The nominator is NOT the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 23:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't want to editing this in Wikimedia Commons anymore (requested by uploader) JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The nominator is NOT the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 23:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
file missing a license after someone removed clearly incorrect cc-by license Jarekt (talk) 02:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
This is copyrighted to a person named Anuja Sinha, as per the digital watermark on the image (right corner). Gpkp (talk) 06:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Has no content identifiable as being the title or description topic (or identifiable as really anything definite at all). DMacks (talk) 07:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Unidentifiable (has no source or specific description (page-name is "experimental diagram" per Google-translate). Uploader made no edits anywhere in Wikisphere other than this upload to be able to figure out a use-case. So no COM:EDUSE. DMacks (talk) 07:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, unusable. Random O, B, N, S, C (or Si?) and H atoms unbound to anything. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused contextless personal picture, bot-imported Fl.schmitt (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no clarity of location, or person of interest; no clear educational purpose — billinghurst sDrewth 12:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Random software, no indication of what this is, out of COM:SCOPE —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot of a game, or a news image. Need evidence sent to COM:VRT if uploader is copyright holder. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Paintings by Otto Pippel (1878 - 1960) are copyrighted in Germany. The copyright in Germany will expire 70 years after the artist's death. 0x0a (talk) 16:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with pixelated/jagged bonds & small resolution. Replaced by File:1,2,4-Triazole-2D-numbering.svg as high-quality SVG version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry screenshot of a 1970s or early 1980s video, out of commons scope. Abzeronow (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Likely to be copyrighted design on the tomb. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Similar case to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ireneo Villangca Mausoleum5.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Digital1Photography (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo material of questionable notability.
- File:Detailed-site-plan.webp
- File:Cbd343 710d487b07954c8d849236bd2a6d8fd1 mv2.gif
- File:RENOVATION FLOOR PLANS.webp
- File:FACTORY FLOOR PLAN.webp
- File:Real-Estate-Floorplans---Black-&-White j.webp
- File:Cbd343 59a20b9c10354cb0a4e2b00dd3b7e54b mv2.webp
- File:Cbd343 88a33a59ee194839bd9165efa2733c78 mv2.webp
- File:Cbd343 a7f6df890aec4f9c8a841b560ad2a595 mv2.webp
- File:Before and After 2.webp
- File:Leonay - Pergola photograpy (1).jpg
- File:POOL PHOTOGRAPH AT TWILIGHT.jpg
- File:Digital-1 3846.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 09:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaungkinlay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. SVG versions exist, see Category:SVG Creative Commons icons as example.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 09:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Death Soul XIV (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal files
- File:Book Design With Symbol Pixel Art.gif
- File:THE GOD KIII SWORRDDD.gif
- File:Overseer (Toxic Rain).gif
- File:Corruption.gif
- File:Elemental Relic.gif
- File:OG DNA SWORD.gif
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Nutshinou Talk! 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 09:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miku Yumiya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal drawings that probably do not satisfy the project's scope
- File:Sketch by Miku Yumiya.jpg
- File:Japanese sunset by Miku Yumiya.jpg
- File:Peaches by Miku Yumiya.jpg
- File:Sunset by Miku Yumiya.jpg
- File:OC sketch by Miku Yumiya.jpg
- File:OC drawing by Miku Yumiya.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 09:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Just a normal private photo of someone. Trijnsteltalk 16:10, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:15, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Text only, out of scope image Nutshinou Talk! 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 09:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Renekoenders (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, unuseful, unlikely to be useful, so out of the project scope (see also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Xbeng.jpg)
- File:Zbeng.jpg
- File:Ybeng.jpg
- File:Wbeng.jpg
- File:Ubeng.jpg
- File:Tbeng.jpg
- File:Sbeng.jpg
- File:Rbeng.jpg
- File:Qbeng.jpg
- File:Obeng.jpg
- File:Nbeng.jpg
- File:Mbeng.jpg
- File:Lbeng.jpg
- File:Kbeng.jpg
- File:Jbeng.jpg
- File:Ibeng.jpg
- File:Hbeng.jpg
- File:Gbeng.jpg
- File:Fbeng.jpg
- File:Ebeng.jpg
- File:Dbeng.jpg
- File:Cbeng.jpg
- File:Bbeng.jpg
- File:Abeng.jpg
- File:Capital P, in black on pink-fading-to-red.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 09:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richardgrayson3451 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation: some of these images are copied from comic books and are copyright violations; others appear to be AI-generated derivative works of comic book characters. None of them are freely reusable.
- File:Nighwing-Huntress Cover.jpg
- File:Orcale (Barbara Gordon).png
- File:Batgirl a Female Icon.jpg
- File:Batgirl and Nightwing.jpg
- File:Nightwing (Richard Grayson) and Batgirl (Barbara Gordon).jpg
- File:Nightwing From DC Comics.jpg
- File:Dick Grayson's Iconic Robin Costume.jpg
- File:Nightwing's Costume from DC Comics.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_Batgirl_(Barbara_Gordon).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 00:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Late addition:
- Same issues as above files. Omphalographer (talk) 04:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, also promotion for LTA case (see file's history) Taichi (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- No borrar porfavor 181.33.191.74 04:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work, F10 and G10 (Read description). 186.175.173.53 01:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
The image quality is bad. There is a better picture that can be used instead. [1] -𝙏𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙗𝙚𝙜💬 01:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
![[1]](/wiki/File:IEEE_Edison_Medal.png){kind=link}
Keep The image quality is not bad. We have 3 photos of Edison Medals, all of which show some detail or another better. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 寶安區 BaoAn District Metro Airport (T3) Station concourse artwork intro April 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]_Station_concourse_artwork_intro_April_2024_R12S.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Station_concourse_artwork_intro_April_2024_R12S.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Freedom of panorama of Text in China. メイド理世 (talk) 02:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Russia.svg メイド理世 (talk) 03:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- replaced with a quick delete template as obviously a complete duplicate. Miikul (talk) 01:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
......... Alexkerner2 (talk) 05:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Image has a copyright tag on it. However, the user who uploaded it stated on their talk page that they have permission from the copyright holder Bait30 pls ping me when you reply? 08:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- We have been trying for many months to get the photo of Grace Strobel reinstated to her Wiki page. By "we" I mean Grace's mother, Linda Strobel, and I, who was paid a very small fee to help her establish a page for her daughter. We filed the copyright ownership form last year and received no response. Penultimately, Linda acted on her own with promising results--at least in communication--but again, we were frustrated that the photo was not undeleted. Finally, I added the copyright information to the photo and uploaded this fresh version of the photo.
- Trying to build this page (for the wife of a client) has been the most frustrating experience of my writing life. The process is overly complicated, necessitating the consumption of many, many pages of information, following links to more indiscernible instruction, and repeatedly failing to satisfy governance. Don't worry; I'm almost gone forever. Once the Grace Strobel page is in good condition, I shall leave this to those of you who live in it. Clearly, Wiki newcomers are discouraged from participating.
- PS: I see your note to ping you when I reply, but I have no idea how to do that, but I will try. AllianceWriter (talk) 13:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you simply took a photo of hers with a cell phone and uploaded it, the problem should have been solved ages ago... 186.175.97.100 17:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Nonsensical AI-generated locksmithing tools, out of COM:SCOPE as misleading. Belbury (talk) 09:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Misleading, fictional; outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not useful. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING. 0x0a (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete: While the picture and the (original) text are not the main subjects of the picture, I think they're probably too much of the picture to claim COM:DM. --bjh21 (talk) 15:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 12:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 12:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 12:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 12:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
_Artcover.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Artcover.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Music album cover, The uploader is not the author, as per description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
_Artcover.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
_Artcover.jpg){kind=link}
I dont like someone re-editing or any kind of changes done to my pictures, which i consider it as a disrespect to the Artist Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. You agreed to derivative works when uploading the file. --Rosenzweig τ 23:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You agreed to license this under a CC license. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. Yann (talk) 11:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per above. – Aristeas (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not the correct file image Catleaf (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I dont like someone re-editing or any kind of changes done to my pictures, which i consider it as a disrespect to the Artist Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. You agreed to derivative works when uploading the file. --Rosenzweig τ 23:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You agreed to license this photo under a CC license. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. Yann (talk) 11:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per above. – Aristeas (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I dont like someone re-editing or any kind of changes done to my pictures, which i consider it as a disrespect to the Artist Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. You agreed to derivative works when uploading the file. --Rosenzweig τ 23:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per above. You uploaded the photo under a CC license, so people are free to rework it; this is explicitly stated in the template. BigDom (talk) 08:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You uploaded your work under a CC license (which is irrevocable), now you have to live with it. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry whoever it might be, you should hold your tone a bit in saying “you have to live with it”, just because we are not well educated with the copyrights you have in your organisation doesn’t mean I take such words, this is second time I’m seeing such comment from you which is not acceptable. Little respect is expected for the contribution, atleast for the art and artist. Please, just before I lose myself.. hope you will understand. You can’t define how I got to live with. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 07:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, I agree that the CC license can't be revoked. However, I can understand Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi's point of view. A lot of other photographers who upload their work here feel the same about their photos being overwritten. Example texts/templates in this photo and this one, and I'm not very keen on it either since attempts are often not improving the photo. Yes, I have sinned against the overwrite in the past, but now I know better. So, I hope that Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi can agree to alterations being done if the new versions are uploaded as separate files (with appropriate explanations about what has been done and by whom), and the original remain untouched.
- So far this discussion has been very polarized, which is most unfortunate. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi is not acting so differently than most of our top photographers would if they found themselves being sidestepped and their work overwritten, yet FPC regulars come here an say (in very harsh language I might add) that he must endure having his files overwritten. Why is no one even considering the middle ground of creating new files? When this option is clearly stated in Commons's rules. Just because Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi is new and still unknown to the project, doesn't mean his work shouldn't be respected the same way you would that of say Poco, Diliff, Charles, etc. No one would dare to treat their photos, or them, this way. This has all been badly handled from both sides. --Cart (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Carter for understanding, I may be new or not yet educated with the new copyrights doesn’t mean I can put my concerns and request. And if you see this is second time I received comment from same person saying “I have to live with it”, is it the tone expected in return of contribution? I’m super confused if I’m sacrificing my dignity here with unknown people, not sure at what cost. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 07:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can’t* put my concerns ( typo) Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi, it is very regrettable that you (and many newcomers to FPC) are met with this sort of language. I would prefer that new contributors could be treated more like honored guests than intruders. With the amount of images to review and this being the internet after all, users tend to be short and impatient in their comments. We have all been at the receiving end of such. The rules of Commons licenses are usually ok, it's only this site's possibility of overwriting images that causes problems. New ideas of how to handle this are being discussed, and hopefully things will improve.
- I hope that you will stay and contribute, despite your initial difficulties. Once the community of voters on FPC and QIC get to know you and your work, things will improve and people will respect you and your photos better. The beginning is always hard here, before you learn how to navigate the obstacles of such an open site. --Cart (talk) 11:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can’t* put my concerns ( typo) Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Carter for understanding, I may be new or not yet educated with the new copyrights doesn’t mean I can put my concerns and request. And if you see this is second time I received comment from same person saying “I have to live with it”, is it the tone expected in return of contribution? I’m super confused if I’m sacrificing my dignity here with unknown people, not sure at what cost. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 07:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep keep. At the same time I can only second Cart’s comment. IMHO any signficant edits of photos by other users should be uploaded as derivative versions under a new filename. We should update our overwriting policy in that respect. Fixing a dust spot and the like may be considered as an uncontroversial improvement (when done right), but denoising, perspective correction and similar changes are significant changes and the result should be uploaded under a new filename. – Aristeas (talk) 07:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for considering, can you please check and let me know if denoise is really needed for the picture.. you can go with exit details too. I don’t think my 10 years experience go bad for such small things.
- Thanks again. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 07:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) I will drop in and answer this too. Your photo is not at all too noisy for a normal photo site, but QIC and FPC are far from normal. All photos are examined at 100% and at that magnification, noise is one of the easy things to spot and complain about. Over the years, as photo equipment and editing programs have improved significantly, this almost obsession has become worse. The root of this comes from the guidelines: Commons:Why we need high resolution media#Extracted images. With less noise in an image, it is easier to extract good quality cropped versions from photos. The higher the resolution of an image, the more noise will be tolerated at 100%. Best, --Cart (talk) 11:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos.
- File:PerthGloryColours2.png
- File:WesternUnitedColours.png
- File:BrisbaneRoarColours2.png
- File:WellingtonPhoenixColours2.png
- File:CCMarinersColours.png
- File:MacarthurBullsColours.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- why Nzs9 (talk) 14:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
CopyVio: Watermarked by E-Sushi.fr Enyavar (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
source is Shutterstock https://www.tatler.com/article/prince-emanuele-filiberto-of-savoy-is-running-for-political-office-in-italy Albinfo (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreas Berz (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; permission by photographer via vrt is needed.
- File:Hans-Ulrich Ernst (Maler) Atelier Monbijoustrasse 27 Bern ca. 1970.jpg
- File:Hans-Ulrich Ernst (Maler) Portrait ca. 1978.jpg
_Atelier_Monbijoustrasse_27_Bern_ca._1970.jpg){kind=link}
_Portrait_ca._1978.jpg){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Der Urheber dieser Fotos, Jürg Ulrich Ernst (*1950), Schwarzenburg BE, stellte mir diese Fotos zur Verfügung und autorisierte mich, sie mit der gewünschten Lizenz auf Wikimedi Commons online zu stellen. Andreas Berz (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 09:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreas Berz (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; no permission for artworks (whose author died in 1980) nor photographer (living).
File:Hans-Ulrich Ernst (Maler) Collage 1966.jpgFile:Hans-Ulrich Ernst (Maler) Undinger 1976.jpgFile:Hans-Ulrich Ernst (Maler) Die Schnaffen 1968.jpgFile:Hans-Ulrich Ernst (Maler) Die Vögel kommen 1967.jpg- File:Hans-Ulrich Ernst (Maler) Fragmente 1955.jpg
_Collage_1966.jpg){kind=link}
_Undinger_1976.jpg){kind=link}
_Die_Schnaffen_1968.jpg){kind=link}
_Die_V%C3%B6gel_kommen_1967.jpg){kind=link}
_Fragmente_1955.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Jürg Ulrich Ernst (*1950), wohnhaft in Schwarzenbrg BE, ist der Sohn und Nachlassverwalter des Malers Hans-Ulrich Ernst. Er ist Inhaber der Rechte sowohl an den Bildern seines Vaters als auch an den von ihm selbst erstellen Fotos davon. Er stelle mir diese Fotos zur Verfügung und autorisierte mich, sie mit der gewüscnhten Lizenz auf Wikimedia Commons online zu stellen. Andreas Berz (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Das mag sein, geht aber nur mit gültiger Freigabe; siehe Commons:VRT/de. Gruss, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept 4 per ticket permission. --Krd 09:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion (kept files with VRTS tag, deleted last one without permission). --Wdwd (talk) 12:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Source is Getty Images https://www.gettyimages.ie/detail/news-photo/victor-emmanuel-of-savoy-holds-his-italian-passport-at-the-news-photo/51347788 Albinfo (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Facebook is not a public license – please check all uploads by this user https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TurtleBlossomOwnsTheNight Albinfo (talk) 15:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Akhtar Hameed Khan passed away on October 9, 1999. It's unlikely to find any new photographs of him in 2022. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 12:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
suspected CopyVio: Uploader claims satellite picture as "Own work" Enyavar (talk) 17:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Despite source description (the link cannot be opened in my case), this looks suspiciously like a GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
repeated watermark pattern in image doesn't match uploader; Copyvio instead of "own work" ? Enyavar (talk) 18:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kratant maps (talk · contribs)
[edit]Suspected Copyvio: repeated watermark patterns in images don't match uploader's name; Copyvio instead of "own work" ? If "maps_by_vishal" and "kratant_maps" are describing the same person, I think a VRT ticket should be opened by uploader. (Great-looking maps by the way; the only bad thing are the repeated watermark patterns that obstruct the maps - if the copyright is cleared, I suggest the uploader should overwrite the previous uploads with more subdued watermarks, so that the maps are possible to use in Wikipedia.)
- File:SOLANKI RAJPUTS.png
- File:ARAVIDU VIJAYANAGARA.png
- File:MUGHAL INVASION OF INDIA.png
- File:Rajput Confederacy under Maharana Sanga.png
- File:Gupta Empire under Samudragupta. Prayag Prashasti of Samudragupta.png
- File:Maratha empire under Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.png
- File:Mughal Empire 1512.png
- File:GAHADAVALAS.png
- File:India 1950.png
- File:United provinces of agra and oudh 1941.png
- File:Blank map south asia with rivers maps by vishal.png
- File:Bagar Region (INDIA).png
- File:EAST PUNJAB PRINCELY STATES PNG BLANK.png
- File:INDIA 1947 BRITISH RAJ.png
- File:MAP OF BRITISH INDIA WITH PRINCELY STATES.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Missing permissions. --Wdwd (talk) 11:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope (Eigengewächs eines Vereins, keineswegs offiziell) und zudem urheberrechtlich problematisch. GerritR (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Das Wappen wurde vom Verschönerungsverein erstellt und ist laut diesem gemeinfrei. (Siehe: Hohe Wappenrolle von Woltersdorf, 2021, S. 32) Ich habe eine Version dieser Wappen für Wikipedia erstellt. Das Wappen wird in der Nachbarschaft verwendet und ist im Heimatmuseum einsehbar. Mehlitz (talk) 15:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since)
Drawing by Ernest Mamsboury, who died in 1953 so it's public domain in the EU, but we'd still need a publication date to determine US copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Source has a 1933 work in the bibliography section, so this won't be public domain in the US until 2029. Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable COM:SPAM, see en:User talk:Akesc, en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIX1, en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhadir Recordings Amsterdam
Nutshinou Talk! 18:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope photograph being used to promote the individual pictured. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio (Image from facebook). --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
_crop.png){kind=link}
_crop.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File is not correct Catleaf (talk) 19:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
_crop.png){kind=link}
- Please clarify. It is not Deelman? The copyright is not correctly stated? Something else? David Eppstein (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid/unspecified reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
_crop.png){kind=link}
Unused low quality copy of File:هذا اليوم.png, unlikely to be useful Nutshinou Talk! 20:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused test-image/F7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jean Droit
[edit]Copyrighted work by Jean Droit (d. 1961), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Birth of Adonis by J.Droit.jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578541799).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578571479).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578575729).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578579248).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578579799).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578658738).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578755237).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14586549970).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14586639229).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14586646618).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14586822177).jpg
- File:Jean Droit - Courcelles Verrerie 1930.jpg
- File:LES BOUES DE LA SOMME.jpg
_(14578541799).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578571479).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578575729).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578579248).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578579799).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578658738).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578755237).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586549970).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586639229).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586646618).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586822177).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Keep Published before 1924. Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr.Nostalgic: American law is irrelevant since the works are French and France has 70 years p.m.a. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- File:No 3906 page 45.jpg
- File:Paris 1924 Olympics poster.jpg
- File:Somewhat homoerotic poster for the 1924 Olympics in Paris (5773831073).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete As the works were first published in France, the copyright term is +70 since the death of the author. - Fma12 (talk) 15:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, every Commons file must be free in two countries: source country and USA. This file is free from copyright in USA as pre-1924 publication, but copyrighted in France per Patrick Rogel. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jean Droit
[edit]Jean Droit is a French artist. This is not in the public domain in France or in Italy.
- File:Aperitivo Rossi - Jean Droit. LCCN2008680278.jpg
- File:Aperitivo Rossi - Jean Droit. LCCN2008680278.tif
Yann (talk) 20:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, also adding File:Smiling sun art detail, Aperitivo Rossi - Jean Droit. LCCN2008680278 (cropped).jpg Nutshinou Talk! 19:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Improper use of jpg file format, same file was properly uploaded as a png here: File:Build and push.png Nutshinou Talk! 20:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
because is been publish by real owner see this link https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pendroo-jalalmajid1968.jpg Khoshhat (talk) 21:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused copy, replaced by File:Pendroo-jalalmajid1968.jpg. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Gunnar Elfgren (Wikidata:Q11870123), died in 1976. Unveiling year of memorial Fädrens gärning not known. No Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures. Not in PD. Htm (talk) 22:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
This file doesn't provide any knowledge about any institute or anything. This is just here as a personal photography of no use in commons. KEmel49 (talk) 22:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. In use on zhwiki (zh:元朗襲擊事件); appears to document a notable event. Omphalographer (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed a notable event: w:en:2019 Yuen Long attack. S5A-0043Talk 05:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in scope (in use). --Wdwd (talk) 10:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Photo from copyrighted source. Tomasz Raburski (talk) 22:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
A picture of the railway station that was not intended for uploading, was accidentally included among them, and does not carry any relevant information. The maker.
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 14:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
These graphs make zero sense due to the break in the line and overlap between them in 2010. So they should be deleted as OOS due to the inaccurate data. Or did the population completely die off while being replaced to about the same level at exactly the same time?
Adamant1 (talk) 05:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello,
- The graphs rely on the official figures of the statistics department of Brandenburg and Berlin. Due to the census 2011 there have been two figures for the yearend of 2011. Under Bevölkerungsentwicklung und Flächen der kreisfreien Städte, Landkreise und Gemeinden im Land Brandenburg 2011 you find that the population of Ahrensfelde on December 31st, 2011 was 13002 inhabitants. When you open Bevölkerungsentwicklung und Flächen der kreisfreien Städte, Landkreise und Gemeinden im Land Brandenburg 2012 you find that the population of Ahrensfelde started the year 2012 with 12727 inhabitants. This drop of 275 within a day was the result of the new figures that came up with the census in 2011.
- This gap of nearly 2% of the population of Ahrensfelde resulted from the difference between the yearly update of the local registers and the data collection from scratch done by the census. The city of Berlin lost about 180,000 inhabitants due to the census. The single big reason were foreign students. In order to start their studies they had to register with the local authorities. But when they finished their studies and went home, they often forgot to check-out. So they stayed as sleeping members in the statistics. Only the census made evident that they weren't inhabitants of Berlin any more.
- When I devised the graph I thought about just let the "figures flow". But this would have lead to steep unaccountable drops with a lot of municipalities. So I decided to have an overlap and a break in 2011. This is explicitly to show that there is a special situation. I admit that I should give a hint about this interruption of the line. Since in 2024 the figures of the 2022 census will be published with new breaks and overlaps I will include a remark in to the graphics when update it.
- I feel offended by the accusation of using inaccurate data. As you have seen I only use the officially published data. I would have preferred that you contacted me in order to find out what the reasons of the graphically anomalities are. Please retire the deletion request.
- Greetings Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. Just to clarify, by "inaccurate data" I meant the graph was inaccurate, not the data that you based it on, which it seems like you agree with. I guess you could explain the overlap and disparities better in the file descriptions or something, but graphs don't usually have breaks or overlaps like that to begin with. Usually there's a dotted line or something going up or down like in File:Bevölkerungsprognosen Ahrensfelde.pdf to signify a major change in the numbers. Otherwise it looks like the population was both the old and new numbers at the same time and that they are separate data points, which is clearly wrong. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello,
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (files are in use == in scope). --Wdwd (talk) 11:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Low res, redundant to File:Logo Balmain Wikipedia.jpg --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't want to editing this in Wikimedia Commons anymore (requested by uploader) JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 08:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The nominator is NOT the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 18:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, anyway. --Wdwd (talk) 11:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The png format is quite unusual, the picture is also taken quite close from the artist. I think a VRT is needed https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio (different web sources). --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Wurde von mir durch bessere Datei [2] mit selben Motiv ersetzt Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 08:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SW_Alte_Reichsburg_(randlos_%2B_dunkler).png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 12:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Habe diese Datei durch bessere Datei [3] mit selben Motiv ersetzt. Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Suspected CopyVio: Uploader claims satellite picture as "own work" Enyavar (talk) 09:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Diese Datei wird nicht mehr benötigt, da sie von mir durch andere Dateien mit zielführenderen Ausschnitten ersetzt wurde. Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 09:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Datei wurde durch bessere Dateien ersetzt Foxy5 (talk) 20:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no now reasons given. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Diese Datei wurde von mir auf Commons gesetzt, wird aber nicht mehr benötigt und überfrachtet unnötig die Kategorie. Foxy5 (talk) 09:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hadiarabi200 (talk · contribs)
[edit]suspected DOUBLE copyvio: watermarks in images indicate that they were published in tic toc by "mr eshaqi". However, the satellite picture itself is also unexplained, it cannot be "Own work".
- File:Ahwazhistorymaps1.jpg
- File:Ahwazhistorymaps6.jpg
- File:Ahwazhistorymaps5.jpg
- File:Ahwazhistorymaps3.jpg
- File:Ahwazhistorymaps4.jpg
- File:Ahwazhistorymaps2.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 10:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Uploader has a history of copy right violations ,This file has Insufficient copyright information and a watermark that supposedly belongs to the copyright owners. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note there's also an AI "enhanced" version of this picture here [4] which should also be deleted aswell if this file is to be deleted. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Enhance_Ausa_Fort_Image.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ratnahastin as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|https://www.pinterest.com/pin/site-of-the-mughal-empire-in-champanerpavagadh-near-vadodara--445786063111310100/ Yann (talk) 11:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ratnahastin as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|https://www.travelandleisureasia.com/in/news/hyderabad-the-city-of-nawabs/ Yann (talk) 11:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Uploader tagged it as "own work" however it was taken from here [5] the site states "©Gujarat Tourism" at the bottom of the page. Should be deleted for copyright violation. Ratnahastin (talk) 11:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Taken from here [6] and uploaded as "own work" without permission of the person who took these shots (@rewritingpraveen) Ratnahastin (talk) 11:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Taken from here [7] and tagged as own work Ratnahastin (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Copy images from other websites. Modify images. Karizaki sign (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work, but image appears also eg. here: https://www.rli.uk.com/tamdeen-group-great-places-exceptional-experiences/ DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fictional flags without educational of historical value. We have plenty of files in Category:National flag proposals of the Confederate States of America for flags that were actually historically proposed.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious reason.--Antemister (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
These are supposedly fictional flags of the "Confederate States of America." Although there doesn't appear to be any historical precedent for any of these flags being used IRL in the Confederacy. So the images should be deleted as OOS. Commons isn't a personal file host.
- File:Confederate States of America Flags.png
- File:Confederate States of America union variant.png
- File:CSA 20stars.jpg
- File:CSA Commemoration Flag.png
- File:Freedom Party Flag (Harry Turtledoves's Southern Victory).png
- File:The Confederate States of America Flag.png
- File:The South Will Rise Again.png
.png){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Freedom Party Flag (Harry Turtledoves's Southern Victory).png; this is a flag from a specific, notable work of fiction (en:Southern Victory). Delete the rest. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Same as Omphalographer--Trade (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: (with one kept) per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's a copy of another file. Tandreasen0421 (talk) 21:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- WHICH other file? From Category:Flag_maps_of_states_of_the_United_States? Is it a duplicate (then there is a different process); does the map have significant errors (then I'd vote delete)? As far as it stands here: no valid reason, Keep --Enyavar (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
It's a duplicate of another file. Tandreasen0421 (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
{{speedydelete|This is a duplicate of another file.}}
- Useless entry if you do not specify the "another file". --Túrelio (talk) 18:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion, missing alternative file. --Wdwd (talk) 14:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
there was an error in the administrative divisions shown and the year mentioned in the file name. I have since then created 2 other maps to correct these issues. these can be found here 1) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Suriname_Districten_1958-1967.png
and here 2) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Suriname_Districten_vanaf_1_jan_1968.png The new maps have higher resolution as well. The file that i proposed for deletion is my own upload and contains incorrect info, therefore i request deletion to prevent confusion. SurinameCentral (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This is a fictional proposed flag that was deleted a few years ago in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by OMT5500 but has been reuploaded against the consensus that made up flags like this aren't educational. So the image should be redeleted per the outcome of the prior DR. Adamant1 (talk) 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Reupload of fictional flag, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fictional Flag of the Republic of Ezo.svg Nutshinou Talk! 21:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
old enough map to be public domain, but please not uploading as an Alamy CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 22:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: If it's in the public domain, it can't be a "Alamy CopyVio" because Alamy then will not own any copyright, even if they're plastering their watermark all over the map, but it's not in use anywhere and the watermarks are making it hardly usable, so deleted, also because the original source and copyright status aren't determined. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
unused outline map like we have in the dozens; but also Alamy CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 23:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: As an extremely basic and rough outline map of the Americas, it's probably not copyrightable at all, so wouldn't be an "Alamy CopyVio", but per rest of the nomination - not useful, out of scope given what we have already. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Lacks a license for home country (UK). The authorship is almost certainly wrong (author is the photographer not the subject). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I was a bit confused on what to do if this occurs and referenced the subject. I think it should be deleted considering that information can't be known to prove it's acceptable for Wikimedia commons Wiiformii (talk) 03:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Agree that UK license needed. Disagree that "authorship is almost certainly wrong"; taking a time delayed photo was fairly simple for even a dabbler in photography in the 1890s. No one else is credited. There is copy of the book online at [8]. Might well be out of copyright in country of origin, unfortunately info on author George J. Nicholls seems rather thin. Anyone with experience in searching UK census & other resources? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The source provides no indication he was the photographer. As is often the case, the uploader just put the subject name into the author line. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A UK image from 1895 (published in a book in 1917) is PD in both the UK and USA. --RAN (talk) 02:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Why is it PD in the UK? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- "A photograph, which was made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) more than 70 years ago (before 1 January 1954)" There is no indication in the book that the author of the 1917 book took the image in 1895, it is anonymous. See above where you indicate that we do not know who the photographer was. --RAN (talk) 03:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per RAN above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Nuevo Logo de la Federación Panameña de Futbol y Los Nuevos Uniformes de la Selección Panameña del año 2024.jpg
[edit]
The photo is focused specifically on the logo, so it could be a derivative work of a copyrighted work. Taichi (talk) 03:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The t-shirt has intellectual property, so it could be considered a derivative work of a copyrighted work. Taichi (talk) 03:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The t-shirt has intellectual property, so it could be considered a derivative work of a copyrighted work. Taichi (talk) 03:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The logo owns intellectual property, so it could be considered a derivative work of a work protected by copyright. Taichi (talk) 04:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution, better file File:Diego Polo - St. John the Baptist - Google Art Project.jpg Oursana (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This is supposedly a self-made "flag" by the uploader. Commons isn't a personal file host though and fictional flags inherently don't serve any educational value. So the image should be deleted as OOS. Aside from just not being a flag in the first place. Adamant1 (talk) 05:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This is supposedly a self-made "flag" by the uploader. Commons isn't a personal file host though and fictional flags inherently don't serve any educational value. So the image should be deleted as OOS. Aside from just not being a flag in the first place. Adamant1 (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete We shouldn’t treat files in illegitimate use as immune to deletion just for the sake of bureaucracy. Dronebogus (talk) 10:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Fictional content such as flags are outside of the project scope. -- Nutshinou Talk! 09:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Source video is YouTube CC-BY, but the channel owner does not appear to be the copyright holder of this photo. The video seems to be a collection of material brought from somewhere else. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 14:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't know that but video is upload more than an year ago and still not strike down for copyright violation. Anoopspeaks (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are many videos on YouTube that have not been deleted even though they violate copyright. A video not being deleted does not mean that the video is legitimate. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 14:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
no longer used 4wikin9 (talk) 15:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
no longer used 4wikin9 (talk) 15:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
no longer used 4wikin9 (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Fictional content is out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
i dont like it Amirhtak (talk) 14:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment That's not a reason. COM:DICK might apply, however. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Com:Rooster may also apply. Delete. 191.126.156.248 14:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know of any such policy. Are you censoring yourself somehow? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PENIS. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fantasy. (Or which period are these borders representing?) Enyavar (talk) 17:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
به دلیل رفتار بد ویکیپدیا به خاطر اینکه یک فرد شیاد نژاد پرست به راحتی عکس های بنده را حذف می کند از صفحه روستای خودمان تمام عکس ها رو حذف می کنم و فعالیتی نخواهم داشت در چنین فضای نفرت انگیز . Alexkerner2 (talk) 05:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:SS. See exif. This photo is used on a music streaming site [9]. Unlikely user own work. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Photo focused on the logo, which maintains intellectual property, so it is a derivative work. Taichi (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
bardzo słaba jakość. Są inne lepszze zdjęcia Zwiadowca 21 18:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Most likely non-free image. The source web page unfortunately doesn't exist anymore and there are no archived versions in the Internet Archive. But the URL and the description ("taken from the press material section of his company") indicate it's only meant for press use. There's no mention of a CC license on the current website. 95.90.253.75 08:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The picture is listed with a CC license on his personal website https://titusgebel.com/gallery/ 149.40.63.155 11:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Gebel is plainly not the photographer, so we need evidence that he has the right to freely license it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
This appears to have been published in 1994. According to COM:Netherlands, works published before 1995 are copyrighted for at least 50 years. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 12:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The photographer gave permission to publish. SaskiaBoesveldt (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- If so, you need to prove it. Please see COM:VRT. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Romanov Monarchy.svg メイド理世 (talk) 03:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tagged for speedy as duplicate. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment PNG and SVG are not exact duplicates as different file types (the policy). They can co-exist and on the png we add {{Vector version available}}, which I have done. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Based on source research in zhwiki, the SVG version of this file (File:CJZ1.svg) has been updated to correct possible erroneous flag representation. In order to completely eradicate calls that are still using this wrong file, I think this file should be deleted to make error be noticed to correct it to the correct file. Cwek (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
More up-to-date alts exist created by me. I have also split the image (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rhynchocyoninae_Phylogeny.png and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Genus_(Rhynchocyon)_Distribution-2024.png. Having this dup will lead to possible confusion as it won't ever get updated. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 06:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
_Distribution-2024.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Info File is in use. Please delink first.--Wdwd (talk) 11:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: file is still in use, @Azcolvin429: , please first unlink and then nominate again for deletion please. --Ellywa (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: This article from PurePeople cites BestImage, Denis Guignebourg as an author https://www.purepeople.com/media/jeremy-charvet-avant-premiere-du-film_m4635152 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Description translates as Photograph from the collection of Avraham Shabadron, an unknown photographer, processed using artificial intelligence in Photoshop. Seems to be based on the image at https://www.nli.org.il/en/archives/NNL_ARCHIVE_AL990027886170205171/NLI which looks more like a painting. If it's a photo of someone who died in 1906 then we're a couple of years short of {{Pd-old-assumed}}; if it's a painting then we'd need to know when it was painted. Belbury (talk) 08:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is a *photograph* of a painting or image from the aforementioned collection. As noted in the original, the photographer or painter is unknown. The image I uploaded has been edited using AI, based on the photograph from the collection. Refael747 (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Do we have a date for the creation of the painting? Belbury (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The original source does not mention the date, and I couldn't find any other source that does.
- Based on a slight resemblance between the figures, I assume that if it is a painting, it is based on a partial image of the figure from Wilhelm II's voyage to the Levant in 1898 in Jerusalem. This means it happened after 1898.
- Additionally, the image only shows a birth date and a title indicating that he was still alive at the time of creation. So the date range is 1898 - 1906. Refael747 (talk) 09:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Do we have a date for the creation of the painting? Belbury (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: as the creation date of the original is ultimately 1906, this image is a derivative work of a work in PD and therefore can be kept on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Use of possibly unfree images: the first appears at https://kansallisarkisto.fi/-/kansallisarkiston-paarakennuksen-historiaa, the fourth at https://www.travelgay.com/venue/allas-sea-pool Belbury (talk) 09:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The National Archives images are available under CC BY 2.0 in Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/kansallisarkisto/albums/72157653919843743/. If the Allas Sea pool image is their own (accidentally), there are several alternatives on Commons I can switch that to. I will however wish that you do not remove this image as it has been used in This Month in GLAM and would be impossible to replace with another one. Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 11:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification, attribution and the alteration to use a free image!
- The "Hacking" and "Showcase" photos aren't part of the Kansallisarkisto Flickr gallery - are they your own photos? Belbury (talk) 11:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- The rights holder has not uploaded them on Commons, it seems. If there's a problem with sharing, I will have similar images taken by myself tomorrow. – Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 15:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: deleted the old versions as the problem appairs fixed. --Ellywa (talk) 06:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
SVG version uploaded Bruce The Deus (talk) 10:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the jpg version is higly used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 06:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I incorrectly duplicated the same file instead of uploading a new version to the existing file Johnlexcameron (talk) 11:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: uploader request, not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 06:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image was uploaded by myself as an intention to fix erroneous design in File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg, when it was prohibited to upload new version. Now I successfully fixed that, so it's reasonable to delete this file. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request, per COM:COURTESY, albeit late. --Ellywa (talk) 06:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents, duplicate File:CCDC184 Conceptual translation.pdf.
- File:Conceptual translation of Coiled-coil containing 184 CCDC184 Part 1.png
- File:Conceptual translation of Coiled-coil containing 184 CCDC184 Part 2.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The whole 2-page document is currently in use. Given the document is relatively short, I could see someone wanting to make an editorial choice to show both pages simultaneously in an article. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 06:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
No obvious educational value - Commons is not an imagebin for screenshots; see Commons:Project scope Malyacko (talk) 16:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- this capture was used as an illustration for a question on wikitech ... in fact I work on the technical part of wikimedia but if it annoys the laws you can delete it but it could have been beneficial to other technicians. Christbirego (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no urgent need to delete, apperently of use in some situations. --Ellywa (talk) 06:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Kein eigenes Werk. Handelt es sich wirklich um das offizielle Wappen des Weilburger Stadtteils, so könnte die Datei gemeinfrei sein. Falls nicht, ist die Datei wahrscheinlich urheberrechtlich geschützt und zudem out of scope (erfundenes Wappen). GerritR (talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader did not comment. --Ellywa (talk) 06:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
The logo consists of defined curves grouped at specific angles, therefore exceeding the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 22:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 07:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
