Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/01/15
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake Shekpeer 0000 (talk) 18:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Shekpeer 0000 (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong file. מתן י (talk) 04:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
ERREI FEIO E FIZ ERRADO Cumbuco Silva (talk) 04:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
social media propaganda trash, missing description, out of context https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=987451855163440&set=gm.824885748156606 ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete but I've tagged it as a speedy too. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied by Wutsje as F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Foto: REAL MURCIA https://murciaplaza.com/el-real-murcia-apuesta-por-pepe-luna-para-que-sea-el-entrenador-de-su-filial ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
by uploader AT (talk) 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - within window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Image is the same as the one deleted after the second discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Historisches deutsches Sprachgebiet.PNG; see also w:en:Talk:Germany (terminology). --Wutsje 07:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
source: YG official twitter https://www.kpopmap.com/who-do-you-think-is-winner-fotg/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
non free - Single Album 'ASTERUM' cover https://twitter.com/plave_official/status/1632758182073470976 ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
made by mistake Kaka Derabassi Wala (talk) 09:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): see Commons:Deletion requests/File:KakaDerabassiWala.jpg#
Page is racist TdG432 (talk) 10:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - user also indef blocked as a vandal/troll after looking at their (deleted) uploads. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Blade39850108 (talk) 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Blade39850108: There is no need for a full deletion request. Next time use just use {{Speedydelete|1=REASON FOR DELETION}} instead. --D-Kuru (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Curse of the puppet master főcím.jpg
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + their other two uploads. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The file is taken from the AP's website. WikiEditor50 (talk) 11:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy: Recreation of deleted photo (see above). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. publ. 4 Dec 2008 in El Pais: https://web.archive.org/web/20190613183558/https://elpais.com/diario/2008/12/04/madrid/1228393463_850215.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Yes delet because is very old Zaner13 (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: prompt uploader request (stated "reason" makes no sense, but uploader request same day as upload does not need reason). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
source: Instagram https://www.20minutos.es/noticia/5133276/0/quien-es-nil-ojeda-el-streamer-que-esta-triunfando-con-su-nuevo-estilo-de-directos/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of focus badly lit snapshot of very common object we have many good images of. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- So how is this not educational enough? It's the same as most of these pictures of Penises. I don't see how this isn't any different Estix88 (talk) 03:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom & low quality, it's blurry. --Achim55 (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, badly photographed snapshot of very common object we have many good quality images of. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded to create a harrassement-page on de.wp, probably no permission from the person in the picture Emergency doc (talk) 12:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, & OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Because it is Random photo from internet Syced (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Blatant advertising. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per above, dubious license, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This photo come from the official website (https://www.baumer-vendome.com/) under copyright laws gpesenti (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a photograph by Mike Windle/Getty Images. From what I can see it is a copyrighted photo. 212.247.159.229 13:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
From what I can see this it is a copyrighted photograph. 212.247.159.229 13:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
From what I can see this it is a copyrighted photograph. 212.247.159.229 13:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
From what I can see this it is a copyrighted photograph. 212.247.159.229 13:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
From what I can see this it is a copyrighted photograph by the Institut de Science et d’Ingénierie Supramoléculaires. 212.247.159.229 13:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Die Datei ist schon vorhanden als WAK BALI 006.jpg .... EACC80 (talk) 14:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
An sligthly lighter version of this image was deleted on 2022-11-25 after Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paul Kuijpers bust in Gra Ligia.jpg. Wutsje 14:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
This deletion request also applies to:
- File:บัญชีผู้ใช้.jpg
- File:โปเกมอน.jpg
- File:บัญชีดำ.jpg
- File:ผู้ใช้.jpg
- File:ความเป็น.jpg
- File:ส่วนตัว.jpg
I doubt that the file was created before 1929 or that is AI generated. After searching the file on tineye and Google Lens I don't think that the calims are true and that the uploader has the licence or is allowed to upload this image here D-Kuru (talk) 10:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven: Nonsense (G1): Mass deletion of pages added by เสือกพะยูน
I think this simplistic logo was not created by the authors of the software, instead they simply took an image they found on the web. Either way, I am well acquainted with them and I'm pretty sure they won't mind having it here at all. Jack234567 (talk) 11:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This file was marked with speedy {{Logo}}. 185.172.241.184 11:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
PHOTO: ADEEL AHMED/EXPRESS https://tribune.com.pk/story/977706/history-lesson-in-hyds-concrete-jungle-colourful-alams-dot-the-skyline ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
scene from short animated movie Zhyli-byli mysli https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6210218/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
screenshot with "close" button in the left corner. unlikely to be own work. ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 07:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
stolen from the web Dead.rabbit (talk) 00:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 07:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Low quality, not used and better version at File:Bell Center.svg 2A07:23C0:8:D000:0:0:0:4199 07:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 07:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 09:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F1 as a copyright violation, uploader identifies it as Google Maps content. Belbury (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion; obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Incompatible license Trade (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (the fourth section with multiple files) for this file, and note that the file is also sent for Speedy Deletion. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 07:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Not "Own work". Credit given as "by Christian Mai". User Olivia31032002 has added another photo as "Own work" with credit "by Gerardo Garciacano" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uwe_Stickert,_lyrischer_Tenor.jpg) Suchfaktor (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Picture is from the artists website in 2014. Photos from the same session are shown on this page, where the copyright is given as Eleanore Marguerre, use of the pictures is restricted for editorial use only. ("Die Pressefotos sind für redaktionelle Zwecke und für Veranstalter in Zusammenhang mit Engagements von Eleonore Marguerre freigegeben bei Quellenangabe." - The press photos are released for editorial purposes and for organizers in connection with engagements by Eleonore Marguerre provided the source is cited.) Speedy deletion request added. Suchfaktor (talk) 09:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Not "Own work". Credit given as "by Gerardo Garciacano". User Olivia31032002 has added another photo as "Own work" with credit "by Christian Mai" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20130426_Elonore_2_028.jpg) Suchfaktor (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Copyright is held by the photographer, Gerardo Garciacano. Photo was used on the artist website to promote concerts in December 2013. Credit in html alt text on the artists website: "Pic by Gerardo Garciacano". Speedy deletion request added. Suchfaktor (talk) 09:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcko Benzaga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional personal files outside of COM:SCOPE. In addition, the uploader appears to be the subject of all these photos and at least one has a someone else's credit in a watermark, so the claims of "own work" for all of them appears to be false.
- File:MMff photoshoot.jpg
- File:PDG. Maleficent production.jpg
- File:High fashion model.jpg
- File:National costume for Mr grand ph.jpg
- File:Results cx united nation.jpg
- File:Philippines designers gala.jpg
- File:High fashion model ph.jpg
Marbletan (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Not licensed https://ga.de/news/wirtschaft/regional/deutsche-bank-zwei-postbank-manager-entlassen-v1_aid-104766689 2A01:C22:7A00:E300:FC61:73B9:E83:713C 15:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Youtube video from which this file is extracted is not the original upload. Original video is from the youtube channel "Mama's Geeky", and was not uploaded under a CC licence. Original video link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA6-ikLaWj4&ab_channel=Mama%27sGeeky Boardwalk.Koi (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo by non-Wikipedian: out of scope.
-- Karim (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
© Cross Creek Pictures Pty Ltd Andrew Garfield and Luke Bracey in Hacksaw Ridge 2016 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2119532/mediaviewer/rm1034879232 ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Above threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, the website I obtained this from explicitly states that all the content there is able to be used under CC BY-SA, which this image falls under the said rules and guidelines. Is there a correction that needs to be made? Please let me know. Theinteluserwhocould (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the Multiplayer Piano Wikia or the Multiplayer Piano website itself? Trade (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Trade (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. published in media in april 2018 https://vtc.vn/chuan-bi-cat-noc-toa-nha-cao-nhat-da-nang-ar393733.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
source: Sulivan Gwed Instagram https://www.public.fr/Dossiers/Public-Buzz/Les-Youtubeurs-qui-buzzent/Youtube-Sulivan-Gwed-signe-un-contrat-avec-la-production-de-Secret-Story-1356266 ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Continuous-tone images like this one are unsuitable for SVG, and there's no advantage or reason to hold onto this image when the raster version exists. Rubýñ (Talk) 02:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Rubýñ: While I agree with you, the SVG is currently in use. I recommend you replace it with one of the png versions everywhere where it appears so it can be deleted when this nomination hits 7 days. Otherwise, we're stuck with it. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
The file is a derivative work of Kullervo (Q55449915), a 1983 sculpture by Nina Terno (1935–2003; Q11884547), located in Hämeenlinna, Finland. The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2074-01-01. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland. Apalsola t • c 02:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
© 2024 Elsevier B.V. ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy S.C. Dept. of Corrections https://wach.com/news/local/quincy-allen-execution-date-set ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo: Presidential press service https://kun.uz/en/news/2022/11/11/shavkat-mirziyoyev-awards-erdoan-and-berdimuhamedow-highest-order-of-the-turkic-world#! ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Provided by Phil Bayly https://www.timesunion.com/books/article/Former-Newschannel-13-anchor-Phil-Bayly-finding-17683896.php ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan, note the people nearby were blurred to focus on the copyrighted work A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
wrong license on Flickr chosen by uploader, who has a big collection of images grabbed from all over the web. Image was published before added to Flickr > https://klankosova.tv/me-20-shkurt-1991-u-rrezua-monumenti-i-enver-hoxhes-ne-tirane/ — https://www.observatorikujteses.al/26-vjet-nga-rrezimi-i-bustit-te-enver-hoxhes/ and many other. No indication that uploaded by original photographer to Flickr: low quality, no meta data Albinfo (talk) 03:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, this image was uploaded to vandalize a page on es.wikipedia putting the photo of this guy as one of the most wanted criminals of USA (which is not). Seeing the description and the categories is easy to check that is a joke. 190.193.245.242 03:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Adsci8 (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation: COM:PACKAGE.
- File:Teenage diş macunu.png
- File:Çocuk diş macunu kids.png
- File:Kolostrumlu koruyucu diş jeli.png
- File:Çocuk diş macunu junior.png
Omphalographer (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Redundant with File:Kantor Desa Pendarungan, Banyuwangi.jpg Exagren (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChushpanCoin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: logos and T-shirts (!) of a non-notable cryptocurrency token.
- File:Слово пацана ЧУШПАН - Chushpan Coin (CHUSH).png
- File:Слово пацана - Чушпан, чушпанкоин, Chushpan Coin.png
- File:Кто такой чушпан - Chushpan Coin (CHUSH).png
- File:ЧУШПАН коин мем - Chushpan Coin (CHUSH).png
- File:Chushpan Coin (CHUSH).png
Omphalographer (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Advertisement. Adsci8 (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cryptonummus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: logos of a non-notable cryptocurrency.
Omphalographer (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Advertisement. Adsci8 (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: logos of a non-notable cryptocurrency.
Omphalographer (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Advertisement. Adsci8 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency. Omphalographer (talk) 05:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Advertisement. Adsci8 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Image obsolète et de mauvaise qualité. Dawko (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, being outdated is not a valid reason for deletion, and the technical quality is adequate. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Verbcatcher -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo obsolète et de mauvaise qualité Dawko (talk) 06:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, being outdated is not a valid reason for deletion, and the technical quality is adequate. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Verbcatcher. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-free logo which is probably above the threshold of originality in France, see COM:TOO France Verbcatcher (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- w:en:Centre commandant Millé confirms that this is a French work. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreas.stockhausen (talk · contribs)
[edit]User with bad history, small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Elternhaus-1978.jpg
- File:Rudolf-Volz-1981.jpg
- File:Rudolf-Volz-1961.jpg
- File:Mephisto-Schueler.jpg
- File:Gretchen-Kerker.jpg
- File:Fassritt-Rockoper.jpg
- File:Walpurgisnacht-Faust-Rockoper.jpg
- File:Hexe-Faust-Rockoper.jpg
- File:2008-Harvey Mudd.jpg
- File:2008-Bridges Hall.jpg
- File:Narrenfigur-Wendelgard.jpg
- File:Bahnhof in Drei Annen Hohne.jpg
- File:Brockenbahn mit Faust-Wagen.jpg
- File:Betriebsgelände Wernigerode 2015.jpg
- File:HSB am Brockenbahnhof 2016.jpg
- File:Bahnhof-Drei-Annen-Hohne-2016.jpg
- File:HSB-Bahnhof Brocken 2016.jpg
- File:Brockenbahn 2016.jpg
- File:Faust-Wagen-2010.jpg
- File:Mädler Passage Eingang Auerbachs Keller.jpg
- File:Rudolf-Volz-als-Goethe-2006.jpg
- File:Faust-Rockoper-Gretchen-Marthe-Schwerdtlein-2006.jpg
Yann (talk) 09:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Andreas.stockhausen. Yann (talk) 09:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete them all. You either respect other people work or you don't. There is no evidence these images are the uploader's own work. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 12:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
There are no permission from the author of a text which is on the screenshot. It is a copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
There are no permission from the author of a text which is on the screenshot. It is a copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
There are no permission from the author of a text which is on the screenshot. It is a copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
unused logo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
My own picture that i want removed from this site. Ollle97 (talk) 10:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:ПСД «ВодоходЪ» Олерский Виктор Александрович и соучредитель «Эмпериума» Правдин Андриан Юрьевич.jpg
[edit]Flickrwashing, account has 0 followers and 2 photos Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I found a version here in 2022 -https://www.collectif-archytas.com/concerts/ - i think we need permission to keep Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Fake letter, please see this discussion. Gazal world (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- delete as per discussion. Nizil Shah (talk) 10:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No author, the source website is a student website. Claimed PD-USgov but this is uncertain without knowing the source or author. Florida state images are public domain, but Republican party images might not be. MKFI (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Source = Retail World Magazine, author = Michele Aboud. VRT permission from Michele Aboud needed to verify CC-license. MKFI (talk) 12:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Readthispage (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:VAGINA/COM:NOTHOST - AI (fanart) porn garbage
- File:Naked girl model bathtub 14.jpg
- File:Naked girl model 13.jpg
- File:Naked girl swimsuit model hot 12.jpg
- File:Naked girl model beach brunette 08.jpg
- File:Naked girl brunette model 11.webp
- File:Naked girl korean 10.jpg
- File:Naked girl korean 09.jpg
- File:Naked girl candles 02.jpg
- File:Naked girl big breasts 05.jpg
- File:Naked girl big breasts 07.jpg
- File:Naked girl thin model 06.jpg
- File:Naked girl thin model 04.jpg
- File:Naked girl portrait 03.jpg
- File:Naked girl candles 01.jpg
- File:Sexy wet brunette girl in white unbuttoned crop shirt, cleavage, with panties 01.jpg
- File:Sexy wet brunette girl in white unbuttoned crop shirt, cleavage, with panties 02.webp
- File:Nude girl woman naked body ai standing pose by co1ei dg8utxy-414w-2x.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 12:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The uploader does not appear to be here for building Wikimedia Commons. Single purpose account. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. AI fantasy objectified women; OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. No educational value. Omphalographer (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete user’s only contributions to either Commons or Wikipedia are stupid edits/uploads/personal pages about breasts. I didn’t know it was possible to get sick of seeing breasts so quickly, but this user proved me wrong. Dronebogus (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unanimous support for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Readthispage (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:ANU#User:Readthispage. Out of scope.
- File:Lana Rhoades 2-2017 cleavage (cropped).jpg
- File:Tanya Tate at AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2016 (25037741523) (cropped).jpg
- File:Julia Ann AVN Expo 2015 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jessica Drake at AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2008 (cropped).jpg
Yann (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep cropping larger images down to bust-length, or cropping an image down to a specific body part to illustrate that part, isn’t inherently disruptive irregardless of why it’s done. Dronebogus (talk) 04:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Images not in use, COM:PIP issues concerning the crop focus, and the clear non-educational intention of the uploader. funplussmart (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - if there's ever a need for a crop that's going to be used constructively, someone can always take a new one. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Center of the Milky Way Galaxy IV – Composite.jpg Artem.G (talk) 12:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
sadly we dont have many photographs of kiwis but still, quality is just to bad to be useful in any way. This one can go too imho: File:Kiwi 2 (31641216266).jpg Amada44 talk to me 12:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep we have {{Low quality}} for that. Multichill (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- imho it is out of scope. I dont see any possible usecase for this image. Amada44 talk to me 16:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Amada44 talk to me 13:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless upload: unclear who it represents Dormskirk (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Likely personal fantasy image; OOS, useless. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless upload: unclear who it represents Dormskirk (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Pointless upload: unclear who it represents Dormskirk (talk) 13:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Quality is terrible. Have no idea what purpose this serves, the person is not identifiable. 1989 (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This image is useful for an educational purpose. No other exist. - Premeditated (talk) 06:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused, horrible quality. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Apparently it is used on multiple projects. Jianhui67 T★C 13:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Renominate if ever replaced with a better image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Per conclusion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:070 Shake (2019).png. Premeditated (talk) 14:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; usage replaced, fortunately we now have alternative images that are not horrible like this very blurry barely visible file. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Nasheed albi valhan -- Best Ever Arabic Song - Emotional Arabic Song - Sad Arabic songs 2022.webm
[edit]Possible copyright issues Trade (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright issues Trade (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright issues Trade (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyright concerns Trade (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyright issues Trade (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of scope. YouTube video of text (which doesn't even answer the question). Omphalographer (talk) 18:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Absolutely. Also, I added a user to my blacklist because his videos are mostly inconsequential, but worse, they've flooded the search. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 23:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 00:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I dont even know what this is supposed to illustrate
Trade (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- My best guess based on description is the results of mewing, a viral craze that has little evidence backing it. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep, quite notable, far-right meme. But the image quality is trash. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This is useful for what exactly? Trade (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete no idea what this is Dronebogus (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS personal fantasy illustration. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Dubious PD claim. The ISASI isn't part of the federal government. Adsci8 (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The three individuals were members of the federal government. They were attending the conference which was sponsored by the SASI in pursuit of Aviation Safety and their attendance was paid for by the U.S. Government/Taxpayer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wdallen49 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't address the copyright to the image at all. Adsci8 (talk) 19:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- These are officials of the U.S. Government and representing the U.S. Government at this event. Thus, this information is public domain. Wdallen49 (talk) 13:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- What about the photographer? Adsci8 (talk) 05:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- These are officials of the U.S. Government and representing the U.S. Government at this event. Thus, this information is public domain. Wdallen49 (talk) 13:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope - poorly scanned document. Adsci8 (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:B074:5822:241:3EFF 16:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Published previously on facebook. --Achim55 (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:PERSONAL Hypnôs (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:PERSONAL Hypnôs (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
probably above ToO Adsci8 (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File already found on the Internet since at least 2020, with credits on the photo: no proof the uploader is the author, and strong presumption of the contrary. Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope. No encyclopedic value whatsoever. Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, out of scope Hypnôs (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope. Unused. Adsci8 (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, out of scope Hypnôs (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, out of scope Hypnôs (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete this harmful sexual picture Iamabdullahalmahmud (talk) 18:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope. Amada44 talk to me 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope. Amada44 talk to me 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope. Amada44 talk to me 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo from a book from an unidentified origin CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It's a screenshot taken from a video posted by Al Qassam Brigades (Hamas), Al Jazera has no copy rights to this video and this is the original video without Al Jazera logo (https://twitter.com/war_noir/status/1732477336195379477/video/1) Amr F.Nagy (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- How do you suggest to go about this then? The copyright thing has always been an issue for me and I saw that since the Al Jazeera logo is present it may be used The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Music album cover, Still from a music video CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- We don’t delete on “possible”. 24.228.35.252 00:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dear IP, please, read the description of the picture. I am just being polite to the uploader, if she or he wants to counter my claim. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, low-quality photo of an unremarkable classroom scene (a lunchbox sitting on a desk; a whiteboard with text projected on it). Omphalographer (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AdventureStoryFanGamer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bulk screenshots of Google Street wiew--low res, no EXIF, abundant Google watermarks (far left in File:I-75 Exit 259B Ramp 03.png, center left sky in File:US 78 West approaching Wire Road, Aiken County, SC.png, in overgrowth in File:South Carolina Utility Pole 29.png, rightmost cloud in File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 7.png, etc.) Also hard to imagine how blurry images of random utility poles are in COM:SCOPE.
- File:US 41 SR 3 South (Cobb Parkway) - Marietta, Cobb County, Georgia.png
- File:I-75 Exit 259B Ramp 03.png
- File:I-75 Exit 259B Ramp 01.png
- File:I-75 Exit 259B Ramp 02.png
- File:Oklahoma Powerline 1.png
- File:SC Utility Pole 38 NC Utility Pole 1.png
- File:US 78 West approaching Wire Road, Aiken County, SC.png
- File:U.S. 178 (Chestnut Street) - SR-S-38-1637 Intersection.png
- File:U.S. 178 (Chestnut Street) - Unnamed Road Intersection.png
- File:US 41 and SR 3 South - Cobb County, Georgia (U.S. State).png
- File:US 123 South-US 76 West - Keowee, SC.png
- File:Utility Pole Southeastern United States 9.png
- File:Utility Pole Southeastern United States 8.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 37.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 36.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 35.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 34.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 33.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 10.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 32.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 9.png
- File:Southeastern United States Utility Pole 7.png
- File:US 1-US 78 Truck - Aiken, SC.png
- File:Utility Pole Southeastern United States 6.png
- File:Utility Pole Southeastern United States 5.png
- File:Utility Pole Southeastern United States 4.png
- File:Utility Pole Southeastern United States 1.png
- File:Utility Pole Southeastern United States 3.png
- File:Utility Pole Southeastern United States 2.png
- File:US 278-GA 12 Norwood, GA.png
- File:Traffic Lights in Cherokee County, GA.png
- File:Love's Truckstop & Arby's - Elgin, Kershaw County, SC.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 31.png
- File:Virginia Traffic Lights 1.png
- File:Cobb County Traffic Lights 1 Georgia.png
- File:I-20 Eastbound Exit 6.png
- File:I-20 Westbound Exit 6.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 27.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 30.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 28.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 29.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 7.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Utility Pole 5.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 8.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 6.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 5.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Utility Pole 4.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 4.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Utility Pole 3.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Utility Pole 2.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Utility Pole 1.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 2.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 3.png
- File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 1.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 26.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 23.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 25.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 24.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 22.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 21.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 20.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 19.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 18.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 16.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 15.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 17.png
- File:US 501 Westbound, Carolina Forest Blvd, West Perry Road Intersection in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.png
- File:SC 6 & I-95 Intersection in South Carolina (Southbound & Westbound).png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 14.png
- File:SC 6 and I-95 Intersection (South Carolina) (North & East).png
- File:US 21 (Chestnut Street) & US 601 (Magnolia Street) Intersection (South Carolina).png
- File:US 301 US 601 intersection in Orangeburg, SC.png
- File:Traffic Lights in Orangeburg, South Carolina.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 13.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 11.png
- File:Heritage Highway & US 301 Intersection in Bamberg, South Carolina.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 12.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 10.png
- File:Georgia Utility Pole 1.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 9.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 8.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 7.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 6.png
- File:South Carolina Traffic Lights.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 5.png
- File:South Carolina Utility Pole 4.png
Эlcobbola talk 20:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Only a stand in MP, he's not doing this full time. Scot land9991 (talk) 21:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- This photo is very much still an appropriate photo for the commons, get your opinion on his job away from this unbiased website, thank you! HoopaRoopa (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aleixriera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Source is "Flickr" but it doesn't specify the exact page. These images are low resolution scans, unlikely uploaded by its creator it:Francesco Tonucci.
- File:Frato 28.jpg
- File:Frato 27.jpg
- File:Frato 26.jpg
- File:Frato 25.jpg
- File:Frato 24.jpg
- File:Frato 23.jpg
- File:Frato 22.jpg
- File:Frato 21.gif
- File:Frato 20.jpg
- File:Frato 19.jpg
- File:Frato 18.jpg
- File:Frato 17.jpg
- File:Frato 16.jpg
- File:Frato 15.jpg
- File:Frato 13.png
- File:Frato 12.jpg
- File:Frato 14.jpg
- File:Frato 10.jpg
- File:Frato 9.jpg
- File:Frato 8.png
- File:Frato 7.png
- File:Frato 6.png
- File:Frato 5.jpg
- File:Frato 4.jpg
- File:Frato 3.jpg
- File:Frato.jpg
- File:Frato 2.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Abzeronow as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Kadı Message 21:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is an unused, blurry photograph with just "baum" in the description. I doubt this would have any educational value. Abzeronow (talk) 21:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Elizabeth Loaiza
[edit]The specified source on vimeo does not contain any information about a CC-BY license.
- File:Elizabeth Loaiza 2016.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Loaiza en 2016 2.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Loaiza en 2016.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Loaiza en 2016 3.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 21:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It does contain CC-BY license under the "See more" section on Vimeo RevengerTime (talk) 22:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RevengerTime. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Adidas Tennis Campaign featuring Andy Murray, Ana Ivanovic, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, Kei Nishikori https://detlefschneider.com/gallery/adidas-tennis-01/#image by Detlef Schneider ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal resume (in Nepali). Omphalographer (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is a troll post. Please delete Rixia1 (talk) 22:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
© Copyright 2000-2024 Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A. // Not free Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 22:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}} is the correct license. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Mature woman seated in her home, submerged in deep water, smoking a cigarette,in flood conditions (1835).jpg
[edit]Source link on Flickr is not accesible. Also, the metadata states photographer is Fabrice Fabola. But it is wrong. The creator is Gideon Mendel's [1][2] and there is no evidence his work has a free license. Günther Frager (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. As the uploader I would support deletion in this case. Best Jason.nlw (talk) 08:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:OOS unused logo Yeeno (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo. Probably done by mistake while doing a bulk upload using flickr2commons. Günther Frager (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
we have two significant better quality images of this painting: 1919 Filonov Komposition Schiffe anagoria.JPG; Filonov ships.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 23:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - recreated as redirect. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For some of my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio © 2024 Teen Fidelity Free_Michelle Taylor - School Girl 2 (Teenfidelity) https://teenfidelityfree.com/Michelle_Taylor_School_Girl_2_36591_18.htm (NSFW) ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For some of my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. Also, the file is in use (COM:INUSE). --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You already shared it back in 2020. Too late for courtesy deletion with no reason. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- In 2020 you shared it here, and granted a perpetual free license. What changed since 2020? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep See previous request, also without any actual reason given. I'm open even to late courtesy deletions if there is a compelling reason, but just "dont want share it" isn't one when it's too late for a COM:CSD#G7. As I was the admin processing the previous request, leaving for another to close. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- You already did share it, and free licensed it, back in October 2020. What has changed, why should it be deleted? (Say in any language if you wish, someone can translate.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- You already shared it here in 2020. Keep unless there is some reason it should be deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- You already shared it here in 2020. Keep unless there is some reason it should be deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
no source Sriveenkat (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
Violates COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. es:Mezquita Sheikh Zayed tells that the building was finished in 2007.
Some of the images of people might be de minimis.
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque - Prayer Hall 01.jpg
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque - Prayer Hall 02.jpg
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque.jpg
- File:Beautiful Chandelier.jpg
- File:Crystal Chandelier in the Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque.jpg
- File:Defense.gov News Photo 100311-D-7203C-002.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-003.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-004.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-005.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-006.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-017.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-018.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-019.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-021.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-022.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-023.jpg
- File:Minaret Schaich-Zayid-Moschee.jpg
- File:One of the 7 imported chandeliers..jpg
- File:Opulence and Majestic.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque Courtyard Arcade 01.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque Courtyard Arcade 02.jpg
- File:Soft beautiful carpet..jpg
- File:Swarovski Crystal Chandelier in Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque 01.jpg
- File:Swarovski Crystal Chandelier in Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque 02.jpg
- File:The Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque 01.jpg
- File:The Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque 02.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- We seem to be stuck in a merry-go-round of images of this mosque being deleted and then a whole load more being uploaded again. Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Sheikh Zayed Mosque only happened in July. If the category is kept because of some images being de minimis, then a note should be put-up on the category page about the lack of FOP - that might of least slow down the amount of inappropriate uploads. CT Cooper · talk 21:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've added {{Nouploads}}. Let's see if that helps. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
See discussions immediately above. These images weren't included in the previous nomination because they hadn't been added to the relevant category when I nominated the other files for deletion.
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque Entrance Gate.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque Side View.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the opposite side..JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the roadside. 01.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the roadside. 03.JPG
- File:The sun setting behind the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque..JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United Arab Emirates.
- File:Abu Dhabi- Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (14281040608).jpg
- File:Grand mosque Abu Dhabi (44438067762).jpg
- File:Oasis of Dignity.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37567364540).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37567370080).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37825596581).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (52566909455).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15424401753).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15856605778).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15858086109).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (16018361986).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15421779894.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424399703.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424413633.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424487883.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424491923.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856606508.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856767520.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856771020.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856856690.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856858080.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858000519.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858082909.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858084459.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858084649.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858277597.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858281077.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858284077.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858367487.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018267226.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018268376.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018270486.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018271336.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018274396.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043350652.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043434852.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043436562.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044044755.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044048725.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044136375.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044137955.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044141545.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque in Abu Dhabi DSF3637-HDR FUJIFILM X-T1 + Mitakon Zhongyi Lens Turbo Focal II Reducer Adapter for M42 + M42 Tokina RMC 17mm f3.5 (37961413742).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 1.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 10.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 11.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 12.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 13.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 14.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 15.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 16.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 17.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 18.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 19.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 2.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 20.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 21.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 22.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 23.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 24.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 25.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 3.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 4.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 5.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 6.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 7.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 8.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 9.jpg
- File:Sunset at Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque.jpg
- File:The Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Нет источника. Она могла быть и памиркой 212.154.56.32 03:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- The Nominator says 'No source. She could have been a Pamir.' If the uploader says its an Uyghur, its OK with me to Keep as long as the uploader has a good upload record. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Non valid copyright MRTFR55 (talk) 19:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in the United States for non-architectural works. Reise Reise (talk) 19:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot; user has uploaded a series of blatant copyright violations. I did not find the source of this one in a short reverse images search but doubt claims are more reliable on this one. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
non-notable individual, article on enwiki is up for deletion Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cupido1999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyrighted packaging, not used in any articles - appears to be uploaded solely for promotional purposes
- File:DM Assortiment.png
- File:Dark Mark 700ml.png
- File:PartyMark 700ML Family Ingrediënten .png
- File:Groepsafbeelding DarkMark.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
no apparant educational value Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This looks like an illustration from a book, but with modified captions. Uploader had blanked the file but it's in use at Basque Wikipedia. Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Pornographic image with no clear educational aspect. No metadata about the copyright status of the image, the original source (NSFW, https://www.furaffinity.net/view/52346796/) has no notice of copyright and was published May 31st, 2023. Allottl (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused machine-generated image; a semi-nude "pinup" with no obvious educational purpose. (NSFW.) Omphalographer (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There are some obvious errors here (such as missing the areola and nipple). Unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS fantasy woman image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The deleting admin should salt the file name as overly generic. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
OOS fantasy AI illustration Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You want to delete one one of the only few images illustrating the concept of science fantasy genre fiction and art among several other subjects and don't consider it necessary to provide an explanation for why it would be out of scope.
- Why are you so obsessed with my AI images in particular? They are of better quality than most AI images. It's the only image illustrating a wizard metropolis, and only showing a science fantasy city as well as one of very few showing flying vehicle. It seems like you don't like that I oppose indiscriminate deletion of images made using AI tools so you just nominate without even explaining why it would be out of scope.
- There are thousands of photographs of the same thing including mundane things but this image that is the only one for several subjects of culture is out of scope? Why? No explanation needed I guess, just vote against whatever you don't like. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am no more "obsessed" with your AI images than I am "obsessed" with drawing of make-believe flags of make believe countries, or low-quality selfies uploaded by people who otherwise don't participate in Commons, or poorly lit snapshots of penises. I just think such things are not reasonably useful additions to Wikimedia Commons. Such is my perspective. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- This wasn't my point. I just mentioned that I don't understand why you nominate so many of my images in particular when these are arguable more useful for specific illustration use-cases, have less misgeneration, and are higher quality than like 90% of AI images here which usually have either of these three issues. Kind of suspicious to me but it's probably near irrelevant, my points that you didn't address are in the remainder if my text such as the question for Why it would be out of scope when there is at least one clear realistic educational use-case. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've stated my opinion that it is out of project scope, and you've stated your disagreement - our respective opinions are are already noted. If you think there is a large amount of worse AI images here with even less claim to be in scope, I have no objection to listing those for deletion as well should they be pointed out to me, or you are free to list them yourself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes you only did that while explained specific ways this image can be useful per COM:EDUSE. DRs outcomes seem to merely be what the opinion of the majority of people browsing DRs votes for, not actual arguments, explanations and policies. To me that is a problem in the context of Wikipedia aiming to have decisions based on rationales not mere votes, and because that means a very small group (even worse: unrepresentative) can censor/exclude/remove any arbitrary contents they object to for no good reason.
- I guess you can do what you want and keep the most bizarre noneducational useless files hundreds of times over while at the same time excluding a handful of images that are unique / nearly unique without even addressing the explained specific use-cases since a vote is all that's needed. Maybe one could call it tyranny of a tiny majority – that is 10 people or how many browse these DRs. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've stated my opinion that it is out of project scope, and you've stated your disagreement - our respective opinions are are already noted. If you think there is a large amount of worse AI images here with even less claim to be in scope, I have no objection to listing those for deletion as well should they be pointed out to me, or you are free to list them yourself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- This wasn't my point. I just mentioned that I don't understand why you nominate so many of my images in particular when these are arguable more useful for specific illustration use-cases, have less misgeneration, and are higher quality than like 90% of AI images here which usually have either of these three issues. Kind of suspicious to me but it's probably near irrelevant, my points that you didn't address are in the remainder if my text such as the question for Why it would be out of scope when there is at least one clear realistic educational use-case. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am no more "obsessed" with your AI images than I am "obsessed" with drawing of make-believe flags of make believe countries, or low-quality selfies uploaded by people who otherwise don't participate in Commons, or poorly lit snapshots of penises. I just think such things are not reasonably useful additions to Wikimedia Commons. Such is my perspective. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep illustrative of the genre of science fantasy. Dronebogus (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unused and unlikely to be used because of low quality (wizard face, details of ship, etc.). If there's an encyclopedic need for an AI image in a sister project, one can be generated on demand, so there's no "loss" to getting rid of this one now. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
publ. 26 May 2018: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=224627868134033&set=ecnf.100069083641674 (Gallerry Potdantaman) ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mar26Mon14 (talk · contribs)
[edit]cs:Otakar Hůrka died in 1966 -> his paintings will be in public domain since 2037
- File:Otakar Hůrka Podzimní krajina.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Západ v zimě.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Za vsí.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Krajina s břízou.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Močál.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Chalupa na podzim.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Večer 1916.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Cesta podle řeky.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Bílé stavení.jpg
Harold (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mar26Mon14 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Otakar Hůrka died in 1966. Unfree until the end of 2036.
- File:Otakar Hůrka Zimní krajina.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Z lesa.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Talmberg.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Slunce v lese.jpg
- File:Otakar Hůrka Na hrázi.jpg
– Gumruch (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I am concerned about privacy regarding the photo Erfan rabiei (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason, but what is your privacy concern? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, no privacy topic & no new infos. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 18:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- You already shared it here in 2020. Keep unless there is some reason it should be deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Either out of COM:SCOPE as personal art or COM:DW if Lady Emilia is an actual character that this is a close representation of. Regardless, unused and unlikely to be used considering that there are ample higher quality alternatives.
- File:Pixai-1697284611293180650-0.png
- File:Pixai-1697285925973310578-1.png
- File:Pixai-1697286878740584671-3.png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS personal fantasy illustrations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unusably low quality (look at the 'humans' at the bottom) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unusably low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS bad quality AI fantasy image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unusably low quality - nonsense characters, nonsense geometry (center outdent, 2nd row gap) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Gibberish text where proper text is of importance and unusably low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and above comment. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as unusably low quality - nonsense architecture, nonsense anatomy, nonsense layout, etc
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Gentile User:The Squirrel Conspiracy sono d’accordo per la cancellazione dei Files in Category: Dante shown holding a copy of the Divine Comedy.
- Cordiali saluti Toni Pecoraro Toni Pecoraro (talk) 10:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. OOS and particularly bad AI renderings. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all, out of scope. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nguyễn Hữu Hảo 0109 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work judging by the watermark
- File:HOC VIEN KHXN CS HCM.png
- File:HOC VIEN KHXN ĐN.png
- File:HOC VIEN KHXN HCM.png
- File:HOC VIEN KHXN BMT.png
- File:HOC VIEN KHXN HA NOI.png
Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as unusably low quality - these are supposed to be weapons per the file description but they are unrecongizable The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unusably low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as unusably low quality - these are supposed to be buildings but look nothing like... anything really The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unusably low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as unusably low quality - these are supposed to be buildings but look nothing like... anything really The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unusably low quality Prototyperspective (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & above comment. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Theworldsally (talk · contribs)
[edit]Created in conjunction with a rejected Wikipedia draft of the person these supposedly depict. These are out of scope as unused, unlikely to be used, and replaceable with an actual photo of the person depicted.
- File:Image of Sociology Instructor Textbook Author Naomi Latini Wolfe; edited using Fotor AI. 06.png
- File:Image of Sociology Instructor Textbook Author Naomi Latini Wolfe; edited using Fotor AI. 05.jpg
- File:Image of Sociology Instructor Textbook Author Naomi Latini Wolfe; edited using Fotor AI. 04.jpg
- File:Image of Sociology Instructor Textbook Author Naomi Latini Wolfe; edited using Fotor AI. 03.jpg
- File:Image of Sociology Instructor Textbook Author Naomi Latini Wolfe; edited using Fotor AI. 01.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Intended to nominate it as well. So far I don't see why they would be within scope and there seems to be a further issue. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & above comment -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as unusably low quality - nonsense geometry The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also: File:Flasks2.png
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as unusably low quality - glass helmet becomes hair on one side and background on the other The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chronikhiles (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: The uploader apparently generated a ton of AI images of people (generally ones that look like anime or video game characters) in Hindu garb and decided that they were suitable to illustrate the figures in the file names. There's nothing to suggest that the AI outputs look anything like the figures or their traditional/historical representations, and many of these images have the classic hallmarks of bad AI (mainly nonsense clothes and jewelry that merge into things they're not supposed to).
If you don't want to go looking through all of these, File:Ambalika - Divya Chitram Series.jpg is an excellent example of everything wrong with the series - inhuman proportions, weird hand, nonsense jewelry in the center, nonsense sleeve on the left.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised: seems out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I know what r and K selection are. This seems legit enough. Adsci8 (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Adsci8. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Timmytheman234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files of a non-contributor. Low quality and/or unidentified - all outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Smashed rice krispies 2.jpg
- File:Smashed rice krispies.jpg
- File:Thingbfhbhhngnmsrnshnschnfvressfgmernhakkjvre.png
- File:Hhfvrhvbrfvbnmhdcvdhjvhdcv.png
- File:Untitledyrhbfjhbrhfmsjr.png
- File:Ehhbhfrhfvhrvfjnhshnvrjvhsvn,fjgshbcjfh.png
- File:Krunker scope v2.png
- File:Krunker arrow scope.png
- File:Stick figure.png
- File:Nfrhfb hrzlnbv ndblsjdbfhjoawnftbjbe.png
Marbletan (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all: some file names also look nothing sense. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 08:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 08:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clips of cartoon TV shows, reactions to those clips, full movies, reactions to scenes from those movies, reactions to video games. The original YouTube uploaders did not own the copyright to the original material when uploading their videos as CC-BY. Some of the original YouTube file descriptions explicitly say things like (for example, from the first file here) "I DON'T OWN THIS. ALL RIGHTS GOES TO FOX."
- File:The Simpsons - There's A Gremlin On The Side Of The Bus!.webm
- File:The Simpsons- Wiggum's Pizza Delivery Disguise.webm
- File:¿Cuando y Por Que Decayeron Los Simpsons-.webm
- File:The Simpsons - Homer eats venus fly trap.webm
- File:The Simpsons Butterfinger Commercial Reanimated.webm
- File:The Simpsons Lisa becomes Lady Thor..webm
- File:The Simpsons - Hulk Ralph smashing Loki.webm
- File:Homer New Gun - The Simpsons S9 Ep5.webm
- File:Homer Gets Robbed - The Simpsons S23 Ep1.webm
- File:Stewie as a teenager.webm
- File:Family Guy - Rollercoaster Failure Scene.webm
- File:YTP - Pea Tear and His Friends Do Some Stupid Jackass Stunts.webm
- File:Family Guy - God creates Rosie O'donnel.webm
- File:Family Guy - Chris is Dating a Barrington.webm
- File:Family Guy - Sesame Street Count a Vampire.webm
- File:Joe Rogan Interview With Boss Baby - Family Guy S21 Ep14.webm
- File:Peter Build A Pool - Family Guy S2 Ep18.webm
- File:Family Guy - The Electric Company intro (Original JNL Video).webm
- File:Herbert Save Chris - Family Guy S18 Ep3.webm
- File:Family Guy - Brian in Rocky montage (Original JNL Video).webm
- File:Peter Extreme weight loss Family Guy 2019.webm
- File:The Shining Reference.webm
- File:They Put Us In Family Guy.webm
- File:Why Quagmire Hates Brian (with clips).webm
- File:Peter Become A Lizard - Family Guy S12 Ep2.webm
- File:Peter Weight Loss - Family Guy S21 Ep8.webm
- File:Family Guy - Harvey Weinstein And Minion Audition -Banana Banana !!!!!!!!!!!.webm
- File:New Hollywood movie in Hindi dubbed-- golden egg -- full movie in Hindi dubbed--.webm
- File:IT SEEMS TODAY.....webm
- File:Chatarpathi New Blockbuster Full HD South Hindi Dubbed Movie 2023 - Bellamkonda, Krithi Shetty Movie.webm
- File:FAMILY GUY- TOY STORY (YOU GOT A FRIEND IN ME).webm
- File:Peppa Pig Goes to New York - Peppa Pig World Adventures.webm
- File:Please Hold (2020) Movie explained in Hindi - With English Subtitles - 365 Movie Explain.webm
- File:Made in China - Full Hd Movie New Bollywood 2020 - Rajkumar Rao, Boman, Mouni.webm
- File:Riteish Deshmukh Comedy Total Dhamaal Full Movie Hindi Movies Dhamaal.webm
- File:Hindi Movies 2014 Full Movie - Horror Story Full Movie - Horror Movies.webm
- File:Udaan Movie scene - Hindi Dubbed Movie - Soorarai Pottru - Surya - Bollywood Movie scene -.webm
- File:Mohammed Hijab VS Lars Gule - Debate Trailer - 2019.webm
- File:Peppa Pig - -JackSucksGreenscreen.webm
- File:My Friend Peppa Pig Pirate Adventures Part -10 Belinda Bear`s House.webm
- File:SCARY Piggy.exe videos (Pt 3).webm
- File:SCARY Peppa Pig.exe videos.webm
- File:A PEPPA PIG HORROR STORY (SCARY Piggy.exe videos).webm
- File:My Friend Peppa Pig - 100% Achievement Guide & Walkthrough *EASY FREE Gamepass 50 Min Completion*.webm
- File:Peppa Pig Kills Lucina - S6 E87 (Finale).webm
- File:I'm Peppa Pig With The Best Effects in The Entire Planet!.webm
- File:Peppa Pig Remix.webm
- File:My Friend Peppa Pig Anti-Piracy-Screen (Full Part I-XII).webm
- File:Peppa pig horror!!!.webm
- File:MOHAMMED HIJAB FINISHES FIFA.webm
- File:Lagu Jihad Islami - Nasyid Kebangkitan & kemenangan Islam.webm
- File:Iranian Song for Qassim Soleimani (MAY HIS SOUL REST IN PEACE) (REACTION).webm
Belbury (talk) 12:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Numerous blatant copyright violations, including several full-length movies (!). Just because the upload form will let you import any video from YouTube doesn't mean it's legal to do so. Omphalographer (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I swear YouTube is ongoing enshittification and is worse than Flickr in general while caring about money. Most videos are irrelevant, low-quality, copyright infringement, short-form, or other junk that should be downranked or taken down.
Can anyone warn or block that user for disobeying the policies while uploading rubbishes that don't belong here?- The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 10:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC); edited: 23:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Huge number of OOS Islam-related videos culled indiscriminately from YT
- File:MOHAMMED HIJAB DESTROYS Q&A (AND ME).webm
- File:Mohammed Hijab finally putting out The Challenge! - Don't be a coward!.webm
- File:Mohammed Hijab Reacting to Quran Burner Car Crash!.webm
- File:Israel or Hamas- Who is to Blame for the War- - Mohammed Hijab vs Rabbi Shmuley.webm
- File:Do you condemn Hamas- - Mohammed Hijab vs Rabbi Shmuley.webm
- File:Mohammed Hijab explains Israel-Palestine... BUT is he a hypocrite-.webm
- File:Is Porn Bad for Society- - Vaush Vs Daniel Haqiqatjou - Debate Podcast.webm
- File:Indian Lady Converts to Islam After She Got Her Answer - Dr. Zakir Naik 2017 -.webm
- File:Is Zakir Naik Right- The Shocking Truth About ALL Prophets!.webm
- File:Zakir Naik SHOCKS Christian After Answering his 6 questions That Made Him Convert To Islam.webm
- File:Christian reacts to Dr Zakir Naik (This Guy is Convincing!).webm
- File:INDIAN NEWS BLAMES DR ZAKIR NAIK FOR COVID.webm
- File:Christian has some TRICKY Questions for Dr Zakir Naik.webm
- File:Life Insurance - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:Human Rights or Sharia- - Atheist vs Muslim - Harris Sultan Vs Daniel Haqiqatjou - Podcast.webm
- File:David Wood Vs @MuslimSkeptic - Does Islam Require Violence Toward Christians- (11-7-22).webm
- File:DEBATE- Is Veiling for Women in Muslim Countries Good- - @MuslimSkeptic Vs @HolyHumanist.webm
- File:INDIAN GOVERNMENT TRY TO BRIBE DR ZAKIR NAIK.webm
- File:Hatikvah (National Anthem of Israel) Organ Cover.webm
- File:Are Atheists Consistent Skeptics- - Daniel Haqiqatjou Vs TJump - Debate Podcast.webm
- File:Dr Zakir Naik On World Cup- Funny Parody.webm
- File:Is the hadith about music being Haram in Islam weak fatwa shopping.webm
- File:FIERY Debate- Aron Ra Vs Daniel @MuslimSkeptic - What 's Best for Society, Islam or Atheism-.webm
- File:DEBATE David Wood ( Acts17Apologetics ) Vs Daniel Haqiqatjou ( Muslim ) - Violence & Tolerance.webm
- File:Matt Dillahunty Vs @MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou - God, Islam & Ethics.webm
- File:DEBATE- Does Liberalism Require Domination of Islam- Destiny Vs Daniel Haqiqatjou.webm
- File:Daniel Haqiqatjou's Story From Shia to Sunni.webm
- File:Liberal Imam EXPOSED in 4K by Daniel Haqiqatjou.webm
- File:DEBATE Is Minor Marriage Moral- @MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou Vs @InspiringPhilosophy Mike Jones.webm
- File:Evidence for God- Matt Dillahunty Vs Muslim Skeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou.webm
- File:This Debate Was A Flop, Christian Caught Lying (Muslim Body Language Analysis).webm
- File:Should Every Muslim Consider Hijrah- Exploring Perspectives with Ustadh Daniel Haqiqatjou.webm
- File:A tribute to Shaheed Qassem Soleimani.webm
- File:The Power of Tasawwuf- Daniel Haqiqatjou on Imam Al Ghazali & self-development (Tazkiyah al nafs).webm
- File:Top Muslim Debater Daniel Haqiqatjou complains "Islam is ONLY 5% Killing" (PBD Podcast).webm
- File:Dua and Dhikr - Sheikh Assim Al Hakim - Journey Of Faith Kenya 2017.webm
- File:Imam Tawhidi on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.webm
- File:Giving takfeer is a Theoretical part and a Practical part - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:Video Games - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:Flu Vaccination - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:Why do Scholars say the opinion of Hanafi or Shafi madhab is wrong, what is authentic.webm
- File:Don't hate the sinner, hate the sin - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem - JAL.webm
- File:He wanted to take a 2nd wife without telling the first, now she wants divorce, how to convince her t.webm
- File:Burda Shareef - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:Feminism and Equality Between Genders - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:Tawba and Istighfar - Sheikh Assim Al Hakim - Journey of Faith Kenya 2017.webm
- File:Confused about Modern Day Scholars, who are the trustworthy Scholars- - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:How do you move your index Finger in the Tashahuud- - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:Is Allah capable of creating what man creates- - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem - JAL.webm
- File:Hatikvah- National Anthem of State of Israel - With Lyrics.webm
- File:I have Tattoos, what to do- - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
- File:Human Rights Explained- Insights by Shaykh Assim Al-Hakeem.webm
- File:Understanding the Punishment of the Grave - Shaykh Assim Al-Hakeem.webm
- File:Excessive Eating - Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem.webm
Dronebogus (talk) 02:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Some of the people in these videos are notable enough for a Wikipedia article (e.g. en:Zakir Naik, en:Assim Al-Hakeem), but that doesn't mean that everything they've created is in scope for Commons, even if it's freely licensed. Omphalographer (talk) 04:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep All of these videos covers a wide variety of topics and public figures. If we are gonna start a DR, it should be a seperate one for each video --Trade (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe there’s one or two that are hypothetically in scope but even if they are they’re still likely under fake licenses. Honestly everything by this user should be deleted under COM:PRP because the net loss is minimal. Dronebogus (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I dont think it's unlikely that most of the videos were released under a free license by the copyright havers as part of their daw'ah
- Either way, the videos with copyright issues should probably be nominated seperately from the videos with scope issues Trade (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Either way, there is still a chance any deletion based on this request could be undone for being "too broad" so we are running a risk with this DR Trade (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- ps. the uploader's block expired so i hope you look forward to seeing these DR's for the rest of January Trade (talk) 05:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t understand why you’re so adamantly defending a collection of videos that are a) probably almost all out of scope, and b) if in scope are either under dubious licenses or are so low-quality they’ll never actually be used. Dronebogus (talk) 12:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- ps. the uploader's block expired so i hope you look forward to seeing these DR's for the rest of January Trade (talk) 05:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Either way, there is still a chance any deletion based on this request could be undone for being "too broad" so we are running a risk with this DR Trade (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus to delete all (and no specific discussion about which to keep and which to delete). Closing this listing with no prejudging renomination of individual files or related subsets. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope junk
- File:ISIS - Altered Course @ Dublin,Ireland 2009.webm
- File:Trevor Aaronson, AMERICAN ISIS.webm
- File:MOHAMMED HIJAB DESTROYS Q&A (AND ME).webm
- File:Mohammed Hijab finally putting out The Challenge! - Don't be a coward!.webm
- File:Mohammed Hijab Reacting to Quran Burner Car Crash!.webm
- File:Israel or Hamas- Who is to Blame for the War- - Mohammed Hijab vs Rabbi Shmuley.webm
- File:Do you condemn Hamas- - Mohammed Hijab vs Rabbi Shmuley.webm
- File:Mohammed Hijab explains Israel-Palestine... BUT is he a hypocrite-.webm
- File:Is Porn Bad for Society- - Vaush Vs Daniel Haqiqatjou - Debate Podcast.webm
- File:Indian Lady Converts to Islam After She Got Her Answer - Dr. Zakir Naik 2017 -.webm
- File:Is Zakir Naik Right- The Shocking Truth About ALL Prophets!.webm
- File:Zakir Naik SHOCKS Christian After Answering his 6 questions That Made Him Convert To Islam.webm
- File:Christian reacts to Dr Zakir Naik (This Guy is Convincing!).webm
- File:INDIAN NEWS BLAMES DR ZAKIR NAIK FOR COVID.webm
- File:Christian has some TRICKY Questions for Dr Zakir Naik.webm
- File:DEBATE- Is Veiling for Women in Muslim Countries Good- - @MuslimSkeptic Vs @HolyHumanist.webm
- File:INDIAN GOVERNMENT TRY TO BRIBE DR ZAKIR NAIK.webm
- File:Are Atheists Consistent Skeptics- - Daniel Haqiqatjou Vs TJump - Debate Podcast.webm
- File:FIERY Debate- Aron Ra Vs Daniel @MuslimSkeptic - What 's Best for Society, Islam or Atheism-.webm
- File:Matt Dillahunty Vs @MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou - God, Islam & Ethics.webm
- File:DEBATE- Does Liberalism Require Domination of Islam- Destiny Vs Daniel Haqiqatjou.webm
- File:Daniel Haqiqatjou's Story From Shia to Sunni.webm
- File:Liberal Imam EXPOSED in 4K by Daniel Haqiqatjou.webm
- File:DEBATE Is Minor Marriage Moral- @MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou Vs @InspiringPhilosophy Mike Jones.webm
- File:Evidence for God- Matt Dillahunty Vs Muslim Skeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou.webm
- File:Should Every Muslim Consider Hijrah- Exploring Perspectives with Ustadh Daniel Haqiqatjou.webm
- File:The Power of Tasawwuf- Daniel Haqiqatjou on Imam Al Ghazali & self-development (Tazkiyah al nafs).webm
- File:Top Muslim Debater Daniel Haqiqatjou complains "Islam is ONLY 5% Killing" (PBD Podcast).webm
Dronebogus (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various mostly OOS files under very dubious copyrights
- File:Ode to Isis Astara (the Hymn of the Rose).webm
- File:Hatikvah (National Anthem of Israel) Organ Cover.webm
- File:A tribute to Shaheed Qassem Soleimani.webm
- File:Ayatollah Khomeyni letter to president of Soviet Union Michael Gorbachev in 1989 about communism.webm
- File:Footage of death of Ayatollah Khomeini by Iranian television.webm
- File:The Question Of The Jews - Imam Khomeini.webm
- File:Patriotic Pro-Saddam Iraqi Song 2.webm
- File:Arabic Music with a Beautiful Female Vocal.webm
- File:Nasheed albi valhan -- Best Ever Arabic Song - Emotional Arabic Song - Sad Arabic songs 2022.webm
- File:Zamil Zamil Arabic Love Song - theMASTERMIND.webm
- File:HaTikva - Israeli Anthem - Orchestral Instrumental Version (Vyas O'Neill Arrangement).webm
- File:Ya Mekkah - Background Nasheed.webm
- File:Karbala10 Muharram video.webm
- File:I Need You -- Vocal Only Nasheed.webm
- File:Your Wound is an Honour - Syrian Arab Army Song - english subtitles.webm
- File:Smile - Background Nasheed.webm
- File:Tala‘ Al Badru ‘Alaynā (Nasheed) By Mufti Menk With Lyric.webm
- File:EID MUBARAK NASHEED 2023! @TheDailyReminder @deenzoneofficial.webm
- File:Do not forget me - Background Nasheed.webm
- File:My Life - Background Nasheed.webm
- File:Muslim Belal - Journey ft Castillo.webm
- File:Motivational Nasheed - Lightning - Ahmad -Muqit (Slowed-Reverb - NCN Release).webm
- File:La Illahi Ill'Allah Muhammadan Rasul'Allah Nasheed Sufi Meditation Center.webm
- File:Jihad Pashto Nasheed by ABDUL HAKEEM SAJJAD 2012 .wmv.webm
Dronebogus (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Motivational Nasheed - Lightning - Ahmad -Muqit (Slowed-Reverb - NCN Release).webm for File:Motivational Nasheed - Lightning - Ahmad -Muqit (Slowed-Reverb - NCN Release).webm, and note that the file is also sent for Speedy Deletion. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all. Most of these videos appear to have been uploaded to YouTube by someone other than the copyright holder. Omphalographer (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This poster was created by Alvin Hariz, not the uploader. Nurhan Danish (talk) 08:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, not own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
no source provided Sriveenkat (talk) 14:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Probably not own work - see metadata and google lens (source: TikTok?) Established 1620 (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Probably not own work. (https://www.shutterstock.com/tr/image-photo/istanbul-turkey-march-4-2019-skyscrapers-1341294983) MarinaMann (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://www.kathimerini.gr/economy/562718152/toyrkia-anakta-stadiaka-tin-axiopistia-tis-stis-agores/) MarinaMann (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - while the images look slightly different, it's just a filter - the cars in the bottom right appear to be identical, as do the crane positions, etc. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Francisco Sánchez, uno de los líderes del movimiento campesino, después de ser fusilado en la plaza principal de Juayúa.jpg
[edit]not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Description fixed. El Salvador has a 70 year term and had a 50 year term when this was taken, and it was taken in 1932. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
low quality screenshot of stock video https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-11604827-close-lord-ganesha-statue-blur-christmas-lights ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romanusas2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. 3 screenshots and the others have no exif. PCP
- File:Ho-Sung Lee @ Naro Space Center.jpg
- File:Ho-Sung Lee for Nuri Rocket.jpg
- File:Ho-Sung Lee of KARI broadcasting Nuri Rocket Launching Event @ Naro Space Center.jpg
- File:Professor Amiya K. Mukherjee & Ho-Sung Lee @ Korea.jpg
- File:Professor Ho-Sung Lee of University of Science and Technology with Russian Missiles.jpg
- File:Professor Ho-Sung Lee at APE2007.jpg
- File:Professor Ho-Sung Lee at Advances in Production Engineering 2007.jpg
- File:Sikorsky 004.jpg
- File:Professor Ho-Sung Lee visiting Sikorsky.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 16:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Magnesium hydroxide is an extended three-dimentional solid (like this), not a group of discrete ions. Also, since the positive charge on magnesium is shown, then the negative charges on the oxygen atoms need to be shown too to balance the charges. Marbletan (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 23:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude Female Wolf Archer (Photo was Created By Ketty on Patreon).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS personal fantasy image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This is the only yiff we have involving foxes--Trade (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo by Agapito Sanchez, Baylor College of Medicine https://peterhotez.org/photos/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
© 2023 Національна спілка журналістів України ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Logo may be above COM:TOO US with the complex pawn design. Yeeno (talk) 07:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
VRT-permission from the artist is needed.
Estopedist1 (talk) 13:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Longlong789 (talk · contribs)
[edit]low-resolution, incomplete EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
0x0a (talk) 14:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sunday123321 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all small and have no EXIF which raises the question of whether they actually are the work of the uploader as claimed.
- File:Serina Acting.jpg
- File:Serina Allam Acting.jpg
- File:Serina Allam Model.jpg
- File:Serina Allam Dance.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
The source link is dead and all the backups at archive.org. From the description it suggest it was work for hire and therefore they don't hold the copyright. The likely copyright holder is Worldfolio. The video is available at Worldfolio YouTube channel [3] and has no free license. Günther Frager (talk) 21:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- OK delete Victuallers (talk) 10:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GN2Uploader (talk · contribs)
[edit]Highly unlikely own work. Low quality, blurry, images has no metadata. Also uploader has history of uploading screenshot.
- File:Narayon Chandra Chanda.jpg
- File:Farhad Hossain MP.jpg
- File:Shafiqur Rahman Chowdhury, MP.jpg
- File:Cabinet Secretary Md. Mahbub Hossain.jpg
- File:Dr. Samanta Lal Sen.jpg
- File:Kujendra Lal Tripura.png
- File:Ahasanul Islam Titu.jpg
- File:Farhad Hossain (politician).jpg
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
No discernible purpose Dronebogus (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Since the uploader also uploaded File:Forplay logo.png, I'm guessing this is a map of where the service is available, but considering that neither is used in a project mainspace, I'd say it's out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per user The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Wdwd (talk) 10:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1069710. "Der Giftpilz" ( The Poisonous Mushroom) (1935) is copyright protected ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
This video is clipped from https://vimeo.com/125095515, which is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. I can't find any evidence that Luke Turner, who uploaded the vimeo video, owns the MotivaShian channel. Maybe someone could ask him to release this specific clip under a free license? Huaqin (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The listed source is the YouTube video which is under CC-BY. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, realse on youtube is under " Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike licence" (NC) which is not useable on commons. --Wdwd (talk) 10:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
no permission visible, author of this book is not graphic artist, who made the title Alabasterstein (talk) 07:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Lieber Alabasterstein. Entgegen deiner Annahme IST der Autor dieses Buches (also ich) auch graphic artist - wie man aus meiner Tätigkeitsbeschreibung "Autor UND ILLUSTRATOR" eigentlich schlussfolgern kann. Ich bin Urheber und Nutzungsrechtsinhaber der grafischen Buchgestaltung inklusive des Covers. Dies ist sowohl den Impressumsangaben des Buches selbst zu entnehmen (einsichtig etwa in der Buchvorschau bei Amazon) als auch meinen Meldungen bei der VG Bild-Kunst bzgl. der Bildrechteverwertung. Gleiches gilt für die anderen Buchcovergestaltungen. Ich könnte dir zur zusätzlichen Bestätigung auch noch die offenen Arbeitsdateien im Photoshopformat zusenden, falls nötig. Ich hoffe, damit können die von mir hochgeladenen Bilder zur Veranschaulichung meiner Publikationen wieder in den Artikel einbezogen werden. Viele Grüße aus Bochum, Volker. Volker Dornemann (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRTS. @ Volker Dornemann: Bitte die Freigabe per E-Mail via Support-Team durchführen. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
no permission visible, author of this book is not graphic artist, who made the title Alabasterstein (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Lieber Alabasterstein. Entgegen deiner Annahme IST der Autor dieses Buches (also ich) auch graphic artist - wie man aus meiner Tätigkeitsbeschreibung "Autor UND ILLUSTRATOR" eigentlich schlussfolgern kann. Ich bin Urheber und Nutzungsrechtsinhaber der grafischen Buchgestaltung inklusive des Covers. Dies ist sowohl den Impressumsangaben des Buches selbst zu entnehmen (einsichtig etwa in der Buchvorschau bei Amazon) als auch meinen Meldungen bei der VG Bild-Kunst bzgl. der Bildrechteverwertung. Gleiches gilt für die anderen Buchcovergestaltungen. Ich könnte dir zur zusätzlichen Bestätigung auch noch die offenen Arbeitsdateien im Photoshopformat zusenden, falls nötig. Ich hoffe, damit können die von mir hochgeladenen Bilder zur Veranschaulichung meiner Publikationen wieder in den Artikel einbezogen werden. Viele Grüße aus Bochum, Volker. Volker Dornemann (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRTS. @ Volker Dornemann: Bitte die Freigabe per E-Mail via Support-Team durchführen. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
no permission visible, author of this book is not graphic artist, who made the title Alabasterstein (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Lieber Alabasterstein. Entgegen deiner Annahme IST der Autor dieses Buches (also ich) auch graphic artist - wie man aus meiner Tätigkeitsbeschreibung "Autor UND ILLUSTRATOR" eigentlich schlussfolgern kann. Ich bin Urheber und Nutzungsrechtsinhaber der grafischen Buchgestaltung inklusive des Covers. Dies ist sowohl den Impressumsangaben des Buches selbst zu entnehmen (einsichtig etwa in der Buchvorschau bei Amazon) als auch meinen Meldungen bei der VG Bild-Kunst bzgl. der Bildrechteverwertung. Gleiches gilt für die anderen Buchcovergestaltungen. Ich könnte dir zur zusätzlichen Bestätigung auch noch die offenen Arbeitsdateien im Photoshopformat zusenden, falls nötig. Ich hoffe, damit können die von mir hochgeladenen Bilder zur Veranschaulichung meiner Publikationen wieder in den Artikel einbezogen werden. Viele Grüße aus Bochum, Volker.
- PS: Gleiches gilt auch für die Comicbeispiele aus meinem Buch STEINE, die ebenfalls aus dem Artikel entfernt wurden. Ich frage mich, wie du darauf kommen konntest, dass ein Illustrator und Publizist von Comic- und Cartoonbüchern nicht Urheber der darin enthaltenen illustrativen Werke, also Comics und Cartoons sein sollte, zumal dies im Artikel unter "Publikationen" geschildert wird. Ich bitte dich daher auch hier um Wiederherstellung der Bildverweise. Volker Dornemann (talk) 13:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRTS. @ Volker Dornemann: Bitte die Freigabe per E-Mail via Support-Team durchführen. --Wdwd (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
no evidence of a correct license Vcohen (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete License is correct at the original source (Flickr [4]) but this is just a small duplicate and we already have the original. File:R211 Cars Unveiled on Staten Island Railway (53265963240).jpg Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, duplicate file. --Wdwd (talk) 12:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by メイド理世 as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from website|source=https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2020/07/avoid-these-paypal-phishing-mails%7Chelp=off: Redundant to File:PayPal Logo2014.svg & File:Paypal 2014 logo.png. 0x0a (talk) 08:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- This .webp no source from website. メイド理世 (talk) 08:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- also, This .webp is from random website on google image search. メイド理世 (talk) 08:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicated, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Wahrscheinliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 2014 verstorbenen Künstlers Stepan SigetijLutheraner (talk) 10:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW, missing permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Wahrscheinliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 2014 verstorbenen Künstlers Stepan Sigetij Lutheraner (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW, missing permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Wahrscheinliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 2014 verstorbenen Künstlers Stepan SigetijLutheraner (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW, missing permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable people, not in use, out of scope.
Komarof (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. Based on style it is a piece of modern art, but no date or author for the piece is given but supposed licensing claims it was published before 1928. Chariotrider555 (talk) 00:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: dead source, no author, while this is heavily in use it's not possible to keep. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Centralize (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files with vague claims of own work, may not be free.
- File:AJ 20 Jaguar XK RS.jpg
- File:AJ 7 XJS Cabrio.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 2 Coupé.jpg
- File:Arden Bentley AB 2.jpg
- File:Arden Bentely AB 1.jpg
- File:Arden Mini AM 2.jpg
- File:Arden Mini AM 1.jpg
- File:Arden Range Rover AR 9.jpg
- File:Arden Range Rover AR 8.jpg
- File:Arden Range Rover AR 10.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AR 9.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AR 8.jpg
- File:Arden Range Rover AR 7.jpg
- File:Arden Range Rover AR 6.jpg
- File:Arden Range Rover AR 5.jpg
- File:Arden Range Rover AR 4.jpg
- File:Arden XF Sportbrake.jpg
- File:Arden XKR-S.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 25.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 24.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 23 SVR.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 23.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 22.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 21.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 20.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 19.jpg
- File:Arden Jaguar AJ 18.jpg
Spinixster (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, we are a agency working for Arden Automobilbau GmbH and Burg Zelem. We are editing and uploading the pictures in the name of the said companies. So I would be very thankful, if the media doesn't get deleted. I will add the source "Arden Automobilbau GmbH" on every marked pricture.
- Thank you very much!
- Best regards
- Max from Centralize Digitalagentur Centralize (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Centralize: Because it is not obvious from your user name that you are representing that company, please send an E-Mail to COM:VRT to confirm that. Then that attribution can be stored in our archives and it is clear that you had the right to upload them. Please do not add watermarks to the images, that is discouraged here. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @PaterMcFly, I'm sending an E-Mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Is that correct? Centralize (talk) 14:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you should get a ticket number as a reply and eventually further questions if things are unclear. Since that Mailbox is handled by volunteers, expect some delay. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Ticket#2024011810006726. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Нет АИ. В Туркестан включены таджикские и памирские земли. 212.154.56.32 03:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE - Accuracy should be discussed on local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Нет источников. Выдуманный флаг 212.154.56.32 03:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE - Accuracy should be discussed on local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, MTV OMG closed down in July 2020, just 13 months before the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020. 2605:BA00:4138:155:FD66:6234:D89A:C194 21:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, for the same reason we don’t delete all photos of dead people because they are dead. Also, COM:INUSE (Here’s hoping this was the last time I wasted time dealing with a DR filed in by an ip.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
The logo is non-free in its home country, the United Kingdom. 84.15.184.24 07:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot off a YouTube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOzRPynRgoM&t=489s&ab_channel=TheTrainGuy4), which in turn doesn't appear to credit the original author either. Per File talk:Cafcivitynsw.png, the original uploader of this image (User:DeRailer50) appears to consent to file deletion, as I originally suspected that this was a copyvio due to the lack of image metadata and blurry image quality. Fork99 (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded by user, whose all other contributions are blatant copyvios. Komarof (talk) 08:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Crudely edited image by a user with bad history, no mention of retouching, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is a photograph of a deformed person in a play. If necessary I can make the picture a little nicer. Andreas.stockhausen (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- First, are you the photographer? Could you please upload the original image with complete EXIF data? Then I don't understand the need to show this "deformation". May be you can explain (even in German if you like). Yann (talk) 10:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. Not sure if this is old or new. See https://www.wendelgard.com/ Yann (talk) 09:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- wurde durch Rudolf Volz erstellt.
- Genehmigt. Andreas.stockhausen (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Andreas.stockhausen: Then we need the formal written permission by Rudolf Volz. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure (can be done in German).
- (Google translation) Dann benötigen wir die formelle schriftliche Genehmigung von Rudolf Volz. Das Verfahren finden Sie unter COM:VRT (kann auf Deutsch durchgeführt werden). Yann (talk) 10:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - undelete if VRT permission arrives. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://news.owlting.com/articles/307835: Not the same picture. 0x0a (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per 0x0. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Two different wharfs. No redirection 水餃喵 (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I doubt that this file is licenced under CC-0 by it's original author. From the "TERMS OF USE" subpage of the source section "COPYRIGHT": "Material on Our Site is protected by copyright law. Except as expressly indicated otherwise in these Terms or on Our Site, you may download one copy of articles, podcasts, and other information posted on Our Site ("Site Content") solely for your limited, personal, non-commercial use as long as you do not alter the Site Content or remove any trademark, copyright, or other notices displayed on the Site Content." D-Kuru (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @D-Kuru, if it doesn't meet the requirements of Wikimedia, I'm fine with deletion. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Omnis Scientia: The issue is that only freely licenced material is allowed on Wikimedia Commons (local Wikipedia project may differ). Freely licenced material are files that are already in the public domain or copyrighted material that are published by the author or the copyright holder under a free licence. You as the uploader has to check and ensure that your file follows these guidelines. --D-Kuru (talk) 11:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @D-Kuru, I will keep this in mind. I don't tend to upload images because I struggle to understand which license applies where. I uploaded this one for an article I'm working on and I found this program image on numerous sites (not just baseballhall.org - which I used as the source), including on e-commerce sites.
- If you don't mind, would you guide me as to which license, if any, could apply here? If none does then I would support the nomination. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Omnis Scientia: In general all material is protected by copyright and it's reuse is prohibited unless you are allowed to do so. A file can be in the public domain due to age (last famous example would be the very first Mikey Mouse clip), but this would more than likely not apply here since it's not old enough (usually it's author's year of death + 70 years). A file can also be published under a free licence by it's author or copyright holder. This could apply here, however I see no indication for that. Just because the file is used on multiple websites does not mean that it's freely licenced. You have to check the source website if there is any note on that. The only indication I could find on the website is that the file is copyrighted (and therefore not freely licenced). Information on a website with a freely licenced file could look like this image on flickr: On the right side you see a Some rights reserved note which links you to the webpage of a Creative Commons licence that tells you what you are allowed to do and which restrictions apply to this image. Since I have no idea where information about copyright for this image could be found I can only help you that far. If you find a different note, I can check if there is a licence on Commons that can be applied here. --D-Kuru (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @D-Kuru, I will take a look and get back to you if I can find one with a different note. And thank you for your help; much appreciated! Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Omnis Scientia: In general all material is protected by copyright and it's reuse is prohibited unless you are allowed to do so. A file can be in the public domain due to age (last famous example would be the very first Mikey Mouse clip), but this would more than likely not apply here since it's not old enough (usually it's author's year of death + 70 years). A file can also be published under a free licence by it's author or copyright holder. This could apply here, however I see no indication for that. Just because the file is used on multiple websites does not mean that it's freely licenced. You have to check the source website if there is any note on that. The only indication I could find on the website is that the file is copyrighted (and therefore not freely licenced). Information on a website with a freely licenced file could look like this image on flickr: On the right side you see a Some rights reserved note which links you to the webpage of a Creative Commons licence that tells you what you are allowed to do and which restrictions apply to this image. Since I have no idea where information about copyright for this image could be found I can only help you that far. If you find a different note, I can check if there is a licence on Commons that can be applied here. --D-Kuru (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Omnis Scientia: The issue is that only freely licenced material is allowed on Wikimedia Commons (local Wikipedia project may differ). Freely licenced material are files that are already in the public domain or copyrighted material that are published by the author or the copyright holder under a free licence. You as the uploader has to check and ensure that your file follows these guidelines. --D-Kuru (talk) 11:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The design looks above COM:TOO, even for Italy (the Roman helmet in particular. No VRT permission from the organizers. Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Non capisco il problema circa il nostro logo. HuntJames86 (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @HuntJames86 I diritti d'autore del logo appartengono probabilmente all'organizzazione dell'evento. Serve la loro autorizzazione scritta per poter pubblicare il file. Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sono il Responsabile della Comunicazione e Co-Organizzatore dell'evento. Che autorizzazione devo mandare? HuntJames86 (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- @HuntJames86 Vedi COM:VRT. In pratica devi scrivere all'indirizzo indicato un'autorizzazione a pubblicare il logo in base ai termini della licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale. Pensa a usare una mail "ufficiale" della competizione e non la tua email personale. Saluti Ruthven (msg) 14:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sono il Responsabile della Comunicazione e Co-Organizzatore dell'evento. Che autorizzazione devo mandare? HuntJames86 (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- @HuntJames86 I diritti d'autore del logo appartengono probabilmente all'organizzazione dell'evento. Serve la loro autorizzazione scritta per poter pubblicare il file. Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Image lacks COM:EVIDENCE of being Own Work/Creative Commons. No other uploads from this user. Muzilon (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea for the steel plate artwork in the center. -EditQ (talk) 13:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly de minimis. The sign writing is illegible and the photograph is tiny and blurry. The purpose is not to depict the sign but to show the birthplace. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete.There is also no freedom of panorama in South Korea for the birthplace. EditQ (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- The building was constructed absolutely no later than 1914 (likely well before) and is extremely simple and utilitarian. Almost certainly in the public domain both due to age and lack of originality. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Die Datei ist schon vorhanden als WAK BALI 031.jpg EACC80 (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This version is of a much better quality. Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Works by Dandolo Bellini
[edit]- File:Gerusalemme-1950-Strada-della-Croce.jpg
- File:Gerusalemme-1950-Torre-di-David.jpg
- File:Gerusalemme-1950-Santo-Sepolcro.jpg
- File:Gerusalemme-1950-Nostra-Signora-di-Sion.jpg
- File:Gerusalemme-1950-Luogo-del-Tempio.jpg
- File:Gerusalemme-1950-Arco-Ecce-Homo.jpg
- File:RM-Roma-1949-chiostro-San-Giovanni-Laterano-.jpg
- File:RM-Roma-1949-Templi-del-Foro.jpg
- File:RM-Roma-1949-Castel-Sant-Angelo.jpg
- File:MI-Milano-1949-Basilica-Sant-Ambrogio.jpg
- File:MI-Milano-1949-San-Gottardo-e-Duomo.jpg
- File:MI-Milano-1949-Castello-Sforzesco.jpg
- File:MI-Milano-1949-Loggia-degli Osii.jpg
- File:MI-Milano-1949-Colonne-San-Lorenzo.jpg
- File:MI-Milano-1949-Chiostro-S-Maria-delle-Grazie.jpg
These works were created by the Italian artist Dandolo Bellini, who died in 1982. According with Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy, copyright lasts for the author's life and for until 70 years after his death. Previously these files were tagged with {{PD-Italy}}, but that clause applies only for "simple photograhs" and Dandolo Bellini's works doesn't look to be photographs, but watercolors or engravings. We can undelete these files in 2053, when 70 years since Bellini's death had been passed. 83.61.247.43 15:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - happy to undelete if the IP's interpretation turns out not to be correct. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x71la9ni8OY&t=22s) 22nd second and later MarinaMann (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: as best as I can tell, the color and angle are different between the video and the picture. Please feel free to renominate if you can find an exact timestamp though, as it's possible I missed it. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot from the video. The same angle and details. It's an ongoing construction and you can't catch the same details. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is stated that the author is Instanbul FC themselves. There is no evidence of their permission, so the photo could be deleted after 7 days without permission provided. Nyuhn (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x71la9ni8OY&t=22s) 22nd second and later MarinaMann (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not correct: If you look at the position of the EMAAR buildings in the background at right, their placement in relation to the buildings in the foreground is different. 88.244.92.193 21:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Even the height is different. 88.244.92.193 21:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: as best as I can tell, the color and angle are different between the video and the picture. Please feel free to renominate if you can find an exact timestamp though, as it's possible I missed it. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Not the good licence, not own work. AT (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Foto is geen copyright violation of screenshot uit de video. Ik heb deze foto zelf gemaakt en kan daar het bewijs van opsturen :)
- Foto is gemaakt op 3 december 2023 tijdens het anti Geert Wilders protest. Original File: 20231202_131159 {internal storage} Ik ben zelf Journalist en was daar toevallig. Mocht u bewijs willen kunt u mij een mail sturen samydury@journalist.com
- Ik zal later nog fotos op wikipedia zetten van die demonstratie :)
- Own Work I can send GB's of files and data made that day Samy Dury (talk) 15:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Antonius6317 please send me an email Samy Dury (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hoi @Samy Dury, Uit de foto die u bedoeld kon ik niet de indruk wekken dat die zelf gemaakt is. Mocht u zelf toch de fotograaf hiervan zijn dan raad ik u aan contact op nemen met VRT door een mail te schrijven naar: permissions-nl@wikimedia.org .
- Hier bekijken ze dan uw vraag of de foto toch op Commons mag staan en er de juiste toestemmingen aan verleend kan worden.
- Voor de zekerheid kan je altijd al je bezwaren, bewijzen en uitleg over de foto meesturen die ervoor zorgen dat de foto er op mag komen staan.
- Ik zou de foto (of de titel: File:Benderbij tegenover Luka van LS Nieuws.jpg ) dan voor de zekerheid meesturen.
- Echter wil ik wel benadrukken dat ik niet de behandelaar van jou casus dan ben omdat ik simpelweg niet tot dat team behoor.
- Meer informatie kan je bijvoorbeeld ook op https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contactpunt/Mijn_eigen_afbeelding terug te vinden.
- ps: dit overleg vind nu plaats op een pagina van een afbeelding waar je vraag niet over gaat voor de volgende keer kan je dit beter op de overlegpagina van de betreffende foto of nominator/verwijderaar stellen als het bestand al is verwijderd.
- Ik hoop je voldoende te hebben geinformeerd bij vragen of verdere antwoorden, mag je me altijd een bericht sturen. (Dit kan ook op Nlwiki onder dezelfde naam :).)
- Met vriendelijke groeten, AT (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Antonius6317 please send me an email Samy Dury (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: changed to pd-textlogo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It is doubtful that the creator of this image knows Votic, considering it is likely based on material of the now-deleted Votic Wikipedia, which was deleted recently due to language inaccuracies. 2001:999:2E0:6E7:4BBC:73B:9420:8A4 17:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It is doubtful that the creator of this image knows Votic, considering it is clearly based on material of the now-deleted Votic Wikipedia, which was deleted recently due to language inaccuracies 2001:999:2E0:6E7:4BBC:73B:9420:8A4 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: very low quality and not in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It is doubtful that the author of this actually knows Votic, and the image is very likely based on texts from the Votic Wikipedia, which was recently deleted due to language inaccuracies. 2001:14BB:A4:5F8:E804:E151:9A0A:777F 17:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: very low quality and not in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Puliesteban (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible F10, The model is marked as the author
- File:EstebanPuliti.jpg
- File:Puli toca el piano.jpg
- File:Estebita puli.jpg
- File:Esteban puliti.jpg
- File:Puli y su discoteca.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - G10 or F10 also likely applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - G10 or F10 also likely applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mostafa Ghazal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - G10 or F10 also likely applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Virginiaconti1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: the model is marked as the author
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - G10 or F10 also likely applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Not a CC-licensed "own work"; this is the logo for radio station WZJZ, and that stylized "splotch" (for lack of a better word) in the background might be above TOO. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and change licence tag to {{Textlogo}}. This is the logo of a US radio station, and is below COM:TOO US. Verbcatcher (talk) 05:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: background behind numbers is too complex for COM:TOO. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Not a CC-licensed "own work"; this is the logo for radio station WMIA-FM, and that stylized "splotch" (for lack of a better word) behind "93.9" might be above TOO. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and change licence tag to {{Textlogo}}. This is the logo of a US radio station, and is below COM:TOO US. Verbcatcher (talk) 05:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: background behind numbers is too complex for COM:TOO. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
No information on copyright Dronebogus (talk) 18:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- There is a free license at source. Why would it not be valid? Yann (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- License laundering and derivative work of unfree source material Dronebogus (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note that uploader has previously shown zero concern for copyright Dronebogus (talk) 08:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The source is https://ulp.edu.ar that has a CC-BY 2.5 license, an image dating back to 2011. However, an older version from 2008 is found here with a slightly better resolution, and what it is more important it is not cropped (see the doorknob). The older page has, no free license as far as I can see. Günther Frager (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--hjdhLL5bA ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
Estopedist1 (talk) 21:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- BTW. Liis Järv works in Tarty Toy Museum and images come from museum collection. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
source: https://library.uintah.gov/Author/Home?author=%22Rae%2C%20Issa%2C%22. identical watermark ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep That link likely got it from File:Issa Rae.jpg, which was uploaded by the same uploader a few years ago; the images are identical except for color balance, and Issa Rae.jpg has all the metadata. The uploader states in their EnWiki edits that they took the photo. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Squirrel Conspiracy. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
"Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023" distorted images
[edit]These are copies of File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 33.jpg and File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 36.jpg, but digitally distorted (color/brightness balance). They are unused and unlikely to be used in light of the unedited versions (33 and 36), and the distortions add no educational value.
- File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 34.jpg
- File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 35.jpg
- File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 37.jpg
- File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 38.jpg
- File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 39.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- I understood your considerations, I would love to keep number 35 - I do think it has a unique artistic effect. The rest can be waived. Chenspec (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the distortions add no educational value. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:" happy-looking Gandalf" The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It's not low-quality and is one of the only few images illustrating the concept of science fantasy genre fiction and art among several other subjects. Like the other image and even more so the person in the image does not look like Gandalf at all and neither like "Dumbledore".
- There are thousands of photographs of the same thing including mundane things like pencils or low-resolution random streets but other aspects of human culture can't even have a mere handful of images of high-resolution modern digital art?
- It illustrates science fantasy in that the wizard is using alien technology, implants, and aircraft like advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic (Clarke's three laws) (especially when not understood even by the user) and moreover is flying into a base on some Moon or planet of the Solar system in a fantasy context. There are nearly no other images available that could be useful illustrating this notable genre and this approach and that they are here doesn't mean they need to be used on Wikipedia. There isn't really a proper deletion nomination either. I'm not sure Gandalf was even used in the prompt but if it was, it was just as a workaround technique to make it have a wizard hat because that term is centric to the images it trained on where the figures had wizard hats not samurai hats or whatever the tool generated as hats earlier; it wasn't meant to look like Gandalf nor does it look like him. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS fantasy image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- And illustrating fantasy, art genres, and the depicted subjects can also be valuable, useful and educational.
- Why would it be out of scope? You just say OOS but don't support it with anything but your vote such as quoting some policy or providing an explanation for why it would be OOS. There's also lots of other fantasy art even though artists only rarely license their images under CCBY. Like I said it can be useful for example for illustrating Science Fantasy among other things. I don't think I've ever seen you vote/… for delete in any AI-related DR so I consider it possible you indiscriminately vote delete for all images of that kind. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The image is unused personal fan art that serves zero educational usefulness. And no an image doesn't magically become educational or in scope just because it can supposedly be used to illustrated some artist genre or whatever. Every image illustrate a genre of art. Plus this image is based on pre-exiting, copyrighted IPs anyways. But the main issue here is the lack of educational usefulness. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- I described why it is useful above. No, not every image illustrates a genre of art. It's not based on copyrighted IPs; if you don't know what a wizard is it can help to name a few examples. Moreover other art images are kept and usually have far more images available to illustrate the respective genre or are missing images as well. In contrast to other Keep discussions, specific educational uses have been described in detail and explicitly. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Stop responding to everyone you disagree with. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- I described why it is useful above. No, not every image illustrates a genre of art. It's not based on copyrighted IPs; if you don't know what a wizard is it can help to name a few examples. Moreover other art images are kept and usually have far more images available to illustrate the respective genre or are missing images as well. In contrast to other Keep discussions, specific educational uses have been described in detail and explicitly. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, non-notable personal art work. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:" happy-looking Gandalf" The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It's not low-quality and is one of the only few images illustrating the concept of science fantasy genre fiction and art among several other subjects. Like the other image and even more so the person in the image does not look like Gandalf at all and neither like "Dumbledore".
- There are thousands of photographs of the same thing including mundane things like pencils or low-resolution random streets but other aspects of human culture can't even have a mere handful of images of high-resolution modern digital art?
- It illustrates science fantasy in that the wizard is using alien technology, implants, and aircraft like advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic (Clarke's three laws) (especially when not understood even by the user) and moreover is using gesture control to control a ultra-speed aircraft. There are nearly no other images available that could be useful illustrating this notable genre and this approach and that they are here doesn't mean they need to be used on Wikipedia. There isn't really a proper deletion nomination either. I'm not sure Gandalf was even used in the prompt but if it was, it was just as a workaround technique to make it have a wizard hat because that term is centric to the images it trained on where the figures had wizard hats not samurai hats or whatever the tool generated as hats earlier; it wasn't meant to look like Gandalf nor does it look like him. Gesture control in the context of science fantasy rationalizing "magic" is also a WMC-unique subject of the image. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS fantasy image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- And illustrating fantasy, art genres, and the depicted subjects can also be valuable, useful and educational.Why would it be out of scope? You just say OOS but don't support it with anything but your vote such as quoting some policy or providing an explanation for why it would be OOS. There's also lots of other fantasy art even though artists only rarely license their images under CCBY. Like I said it can be useful for example for illustrating Science Fantasy among other things. I don't think I've ever seen you vote/… for delete in any AI-related DR so I consider it possible you indiscriminately vote delete for all images of that kind. "illustration[s]" are useful, I'd argue especially useful, and relatively rare among the giant volume of photos on WMC. (Same comment as in other DR.) Prototyperspective (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep illustrative of science fantasy Dronebogus (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as barely illustrating any of the mentioned concepts. The intended focal point of the image - the hand that is gesturing - is badly malformed, and the
Minority Report gesture user interface
part of the prompt seems to have been skipped, it looks more like he's a passenger trying to order a drink from the cabin crew. Belbury (talk) 15:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)- Well you have a point there, not arguing about this but just as a brief note to consider:
- things like that are (and especially will be) easily correctable using img2img&txt2img editing and a new revision could be uploaded over the imperfect image which could be tagged with Template:Bad AI. I just haven't got much of a handle of the post-generation editing (btw maybe somebody else has) where one can e.g. use inpainting to regenerate only the hand so that the image doesn't only visualize the concept but is also free of any 'bugs' so to say. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, non-notable personal artwork. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:" happy-looking Gandalf" The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It's not low-quality and is one of the only few images illustrating the concept of science fantasy genre fiction and art among several other subjects. Like the other image and even more so the person in the image does not look like Gandalf at all and neither like "Dumbledore", he even has a substantially Asian face.
- There are thousands of photographs of the same thing including mundane things like pencils or low-resolution random streets but other aspects of human culture can't even have a mere handful of images of high-resolution modern digital art?
- It illustrates science fantasy in that the society around the wizard is using alien technology and aircraft like advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic (Clarke's three laws) (especially when not understood even by the users) and moreover is hinting at a bureaucratic less-fantastical or even dystopian society as in social science fantasy. There are no other images available that could be useful illustrating that, this notable genre and this approach. That they are here doesn't mean they need to be used at all or on Wikipedia in particular. There isn't really a proper deletion nomination either. I'm not sure Gandalf was even used in the prompt but if it was, it was just as a workaround technique to make it have a wizard hat because that term is centric to the images it trained on where the figures had wizard hats not samurai hats or whatever the tool generated as hats earlier; it wasn't meant to look like Gandalf nor does it look like him. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS fantasy illustration -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- And illustrating fantasy, art genres, and the depicted subjects can also be valuable, useful and educational.
- Why would it be out of scope? You just say OOS but don't support it with anything but your vote such as quoting some policy or providing an explanation for why it would be OOS. There's also lots of other fantasy art even though artists only rarely license their images under CCBY. Like I said it can be useful for example for illustrating Science Fantasy among other things. I don't think I've ever seen you vote/… for delete in any AI-related DR so I consider it possible you indiscriminately vote delete for all images of that kind. (Same comment as in other DR.) "illustration[s]" are useful, I'd argue especially useful, and relatively rare among the giant volume of photos on WMC. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Why? Commons:Project scope/Summary#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. IMO this is an image that if seen some places on social media might get a reaction "that looks cool" but that is not a reason for it to be on Commons. IMO it is no more in scope than make believe flags of make believe countries that some people create for their own amusement and sometimes mistakenly believe should be uploaded to Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Okay but above I just explained at least one use-case for which this image is useful: illustrating the genre 'science fantasy' and an approach of it.
- Whether or not such images get such social media feedback is irrelevant but if anything would further support the case that this is useful and matches human evaluations of quality, subject relevance, and usefulness.
- Lots of other images that you supported to be within scope would seem to rather utterly fail this definition if this image doesn't even make it where I'd then ask why these, for which neither a use-case has been elaborated nor is clear, are within scope and this one is outside the scope. This one would clearly meet this quote and that scope policy since there is at least one realistic usefulness case for an educational purpose and, going even further than what the policy, there are nearly no other available images here that could be used for that purpose. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- IMO any old 20th century pulp cover would be a much better and appropriate illustration of the genre "Science fantasy", even if the artwork was mediocre, for the simple reason that it was created to illustrate actual published science fantasy. Commons has a fair sized collection of such illustrations already. We clearly have different perspectives on this (as is evident from your uploading this file). Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes and why can't there be pulp covers as well as images showing contents in high resolution? Why do you need to delete everything that you think is not as appropriate for illustration? I consider this far more appropriate especially when considering that those covers don't even show any science fantasy and are basically near useless for illustration (except as in 'this magazine had science fantasy contents' which is not an illustration). And no, WMC doesn't have that. That it's on WMC doesn't mean it has to be used on WP. Policies don't matter it seems, what matters is the subjective opinions of DR voters. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- IMO any old 20th century pulp cover would be a much better and appropriate illustration of the genre "Science fantasy", even if the artwork was mediocre, for the simple reason that it was created to illustrate actual published science fantasy. Commons has a fair sized collection of such illustrations already. We clearly have different perspectives on this (as is evident from your uploading this file). Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Why? Commons:Project scope/Summary#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. IMO this is an image that if seen some places on social media might get a reaction "that looks cool" but that is not a reason for it to be on Commons. IMO it is no more in scope than make believe flags of make believe countries that some people create for their own amusement and sometimes mistakenly believe should be uploaded to Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep illustrative of science fantasy Dronebogus (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete "Illustrative of science fantasy" is a non-sequitur and the image is clearly OOS amateur fan art in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is not a non-sequitor with no explanation given for why it would be anyway. It is not out of scope why would it be. It isn't fan art per fan art Fan art or fanart is artwork created by fans of a work of fiction and derived from a series character or other aspect of that work while this image only displays a generic wizard but not any character or work-specific aspect of an existing work of fiction. This image is the only image useful for illustrating various subjects such as 'social science fantasy' similar to social science fiction. No valid rationale for deletion. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, non-notable personal artwork. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions
[edit]Nominated G7 by uploader, but ineligible due to age. These are high quality, hand drawn works and could be within scope, so kicking them to DR.
- File:Theophilus the Wolf (separated) (without shading variant).png
- File:Harvett Fox (2021 version) (separated) (without shading and shadow variant).png
- File:Fox (Silvio B.) - Happy Fox Pop Day (separated) (without shading variant).png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all because those variants are unnecessary. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 10:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: These are high quality works, I commend the uploader for their artistry, courtesy deletion is granted. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It appears to be Серге́й Алекса́ндрович Малозёмов (Ru.Wiki), which would make it within scope, but I have doubts that the uploader owns the copyright to any of their uploads, including this one. They're from a variety of cameras and are mostly professional. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I also seriously doubt this was an own work of the uploader, could have been a screenshot from a YouTube video. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: appears to have design element, and not pur geometric - Converting to DR to get more eyes on this one The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This seems below the ToO in the US to me. Abzeronow (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Abzeronow. Jmabel ! talk 23:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn per discussion]. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Wrong license and missing attribution, compare file talk page. Renerpho (talk) 07:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- I modified an original with extended bodies and moon scaled to best estimates. What do you suggest we do? Remake it all from scratch? User:tomruen 10:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know anything about licence or attribution and I do understand that these things are important, but I would request that if it can't be fixed, we hang on until it is replaced by something similar- people really do want something like this that gives a relative picture of the big TNO's to get perpective on Pluto not being a planet etc.
- IceDragon64 (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- What I don't understand is why we can't just change the license and attribution; why is a deletion needed here? If it's simply unusable in its current state, I would be happy to do a public-domain illustration to replace the wrongly licensed images in question. Exoplanetaryscience (talk) 06:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, I've started to dislike this graphic because it relied on inaccurate artists' impressions that were made long before we found out about the properties of these TNOs. For example Quaoar, which was originally colored blue in the 2002 NASA/Caltech press release and then later being crudely recolored a pinkish-red in a 2004 NASA/Caltech press release. Although it attempts to depict Quaoar's "reddish" color, the depiction is still inaccurate—what "reddish" really means is a dark beige color to the human eye, resembling the true color image of Pluto. All the other "red" TNOs depicted in this graphic are also exaggerated: Gonggong, Sedna, and Makemake appear far too red instead of beige. If you're wondering how I know this, the true colors are derived from the TNOs' visible color indices and spectra with the help of my friend's "True Color Tools" software. With the recent news of the true color of Neptune and @CactiStaccingCrane: 's (and my) efforts in using them across Wikipedia, I feel that depicting true colors is necessary to dispel any misconceptions about these astronomical objects.
- True colors aside, I also don't like how the phases of the objects are inconsistent. It's not possible to fix this if you only use publicly available artist's impressions; there aren't enough of them out there. With all these issues I've pointed out, I think it's better to recreate this graphic from scratch—I'll be the one to do it. My plan here is to hand-draw the objects digitally—I have some experience with digital art. I'll try to have the new version depict the ten TNOs' latest true colors, albedos, dimensions, and predicted/known surface features. I'll make sure to provide links to the scientific papers justifying the illustrated details in the file description. Nrco0e (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I love these picture and information. Until you can get into orbit and take your own pictures I don't see how you can judge these dipictions of space objects. Get real! The only reason you would have to have exact information is if you were planning a visit. Sandie Hardman (talk) 04:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Should I made a new one from scratch, same phases? Tomruen (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Tomruen, all you need to do is edit the Source section of the file description and add where each image came from, and who its author is. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Tomruen: , I'm giving you a week to fix the source issue as Squirrel Conspiracy said, otherwise I'm going to delete this. Abzeronow (talk) 21:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, if anyone that wants to keep the file wants to fix the attribution, I'll let them since this is a copyright violation without the proper attribution, and attribution is a fixable thing (I don't know the authors so I cannot do that myself). So I will grant an extension until February 25th around this same time in UTC. If it is not fixed by then, I will have to delete this file. Abzeronow (talk) 22:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Tomruen: , I'm giving you a week to fix the source issue as Squirrel Conspiracy said, otherwise I'm going to delete this. Abzeronow (talk) 21:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Tomruen, all you need to do is edit the Source section of the file description and add where each image came from, and who its author is. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing proper attribution for photographs used. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)