Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/01/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 15th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Shekpeer 0000 (talk) 18:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Shekpeer 0000 (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong file. מתן י (talk) 04:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ERREI FEIO E FIZ ERRADO Cumbuco Silva (talk) 04:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

social media propaganda trash, missing description, out of context https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=987451855163440&set=gm.824885748156606 ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete but I've tagged it as a speedy too. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Speedied by Wutsje as F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto: REAL MURCIA https://murciaplaza.com/el-real-murcia-apuesta-por-pepe-luna-para-que-sea-el-entrenador-de-su-filial ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by uploader AT (talk) 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - within window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is the same as the one deleted after the second discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Historisches deutsches Sprachgebiet.PNG; see also w:en:Talk:Germany (terminology). --Wutsje 07:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy G4. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: YG official twitter https://www.kpopmap.com/who-do-you-think-is-winner-fotg/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free - Single Album 'ASTERUM' cover https://twitter.com/plave_official/status/1632758182073470976 ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

made by mistake Kaka Derabassi Wala (talk) 09:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by D-Kuru: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): see Commons:Deletion requests/File:KakaDerabassiWala.jpg#

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page is racist TdG432 (talk) 10:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - user also indef blocked as a vandal/troll after looking at their (deleted) uploads. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Blade39850108 (talk) 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by D-Kuru: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Curse of the puppet master főcím.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + their other two uploads. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is taken from the AP's website. WikiEditor50 (talk) 11:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy: Recreation of deleted photo (see above). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. publ. 4 Dec 2008 in El Pais: https://web.archive.org/web/20190613183558/https://elpais.com/diario/2008/12/04/madrid/1228393463_850215.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yes delet because is very old Zaner13 (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: prompt uploader request (stated "reason" makes no sense, but uploader request same day as upload does not need reason). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: Instagram https://www.20minutos.es/noticia/5133276/0/quien-es-nil-ojeda-el-streamer-que-esta-triunfando-con-su-nuevo-estilo-de-directos/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of focus badly lit snapshot of very common object we have many good images of. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So how is this not educational enough? It's the same as most of these pictures of Penises. I don't see how this isn't any different Estix88 (talk) 03:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: per nom & low quality, it's blurry. --Achim55 (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, badly photographed snapshot of very common object we have many good quality images of. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded to create a harrassement-page on de.wp, probably no permission from the person in the picture Emergency doc (talk) 12:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, & OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Random photo from internet Syced (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Blatant advertising. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above, dubious license, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo come from the official website (https://www.baumer-vendome.com/) under copyright laws gpesenti (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph by Mike Windle/Getty Images. From what I can see it is a copyrighted photo. 212.247.159.229 13:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From what I can see this it is a copyrighted photograph. 212.247.159.229 13:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, false license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From what I can see this it is a copyrighted photograph. 212.247.159.229 13:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From what I can see this it is a copyrighted photograph. 212.247.159.229 13:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From what I can see this it is a copyrighted photograph by the Institut de Science et d’Ingénierie Supramoléculaires. 212.247.159.229 13:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Datei ist schon vorhanden als WAK BALI 006.jpg .... EACC80 (talk) 14:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An sligthly lighter version of this image was deleted on 2022-11-25 after Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paul Kuijpers bust in Gra Ligia.jpg. Wutsje 14:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion request also applies to:

I doubt that the file was created before 1929 or that is AI generated. After searching the file on tineye and Google Lens I don't think that the calims are true and that the uploader has the licence or is allowed to upload this image here D-Kuru (talk) 10:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven: Nonsense (G1): Mass deletion of pages added by เสือกพะยูน

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this simplistic logo was not created by the authors of the software, instead they simply took an image they found on the web. Either way, I am well acquainted with them and I'm pretty sure they won't mind having it here at all. Jack234567 (talk) 11:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PHOTO: ADEEL AHMED/EXPRESS https://tribune.com.pk/story/977706/history-lesson-in-hyds-concrete-jungle-colourful-alams-dot-the-skyline ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scene from short animated movie Zhyli-byli mysli https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6210218/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot with "close" button in the left corner. unlikely to be own work. ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 07:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from the web Dead.rabbit (talk) 00:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 07:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, not used and better version at File:Bell Center.svg 2A07:23C0:8:D000:0:0:0:4199 07:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 07:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 09:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete F1 as a copyright violation, uploader identifies it as Google Maps content. Belbury (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion; obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible license Trade (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (the fourth section with multiple files) for this file, and note that the file is also sent for Speedy Deletion. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 07:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "Own work". Credit given as "by Christian Mai". User Olivia31032002 has added another photo as "Own work" with credit "by Gerardo Garciacano" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uwe_Stickert,_lyrischer_Tenor.jpg) Suchfaktor (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Picture is from the artists website in 2014. Photos from the same session are shown on this page, where the copyright is given as Eleanore Marguerre, use of the pictures is restricted for editorial use only. ("Die Pressefotos sind für redaktionelle Zwecke und für Veranstalter in Zusammenhang mit Engagements von Eleonore Marguerre freigegeben bei Quellenangabe." - The press photos are released for editorial purposes and for organizers in connection with engagements by Eleonore Marguerre provided the source is cited.) Speedy deletion request added. Suchfaktor (talk) 09:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "Own work". Credit given as "by Gerardo Garciacano". User Olivia31032002 has added another photo as "Own work" with credit "by Christian Mai" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20130426_Elonore_2_028.jpg) Suchfaktor (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Copyright is held by the photographer, Gerardo Garciacano. Photo was used on the artist website to promote concerts in December 2013. Credit in html alt text on the artists website: "Pic by Gerardo Garciacano". Speedy deletion request added. Suchfaktor (talk) 09:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcko Benzaga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotional personal files outside of COM:SCOPE. In addition, the uploader appears to be the subject of all these photos and at least one has a someone else's credit in a watermark, so the claims of "own work" for all of them appears to be false.

Marbletan (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not licensed https://ga.de/news/wirtschaft/regional/deutsche-bank-zwei-postbank-manager-entlassen-v1_aid-104766689 2A01:C22:7A00:E300:FC61:73B9:E83:713C 15:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube video from which this file is extracted is not the original upload. Original video is from the youtube channel "Mama's Geeky", and was not uploaded under a CC licence. Original video link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA6-ikLaWj4&ab_channel=Mama%27sGeeky Boardwalk.Koi (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gacj99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo by non-Wikipedian: out of scope.

-- Karim (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Cross Creek Pictures Pty Ltd Andrew Garfield and Luke Bracey in Hacksaw Ridge 2016 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2119532/mediaviewer/rm1034879232 ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the website I obtained this from explicitly states that all the content there is able to be used under CC BY-SA, which this image falls under the said rules and guidelines. Is there a correction that needs to be made? Please let me know. Theinteluserwhocould (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you talking about the Multiplayer Piano Wikia or the Multiplayer Piano website itself? Trade (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination --Trade (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work. published in media in april 2018 https://vtc.vn/chuan-bi-cat-noc-toa-nha-cao-nhat-da-nang-ar393733.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: Sulivan Gwed Instagram https://www.public.fr/Dossiers/Public-Buzz/Les-Youtubeurs-qui-buzzent/Youtube-Sulivan-Gwed-signe-un-contrat-avec-la-production-de-Secret-Story-1356266 ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Continuous-tone images like this one are unsuitable for SVG, and there's no advantage or reason to hold onto this image when the raster version exists. Rubýñ (Talk) 02:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Rubýñ: While I agree with you, the SVG is currently in use. I recommend you replace it with one of the png versions everywhere where it appears so it can be deleted when this nomination hits 7 days. Otherwise, we're stuck with it. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a derivative work of Kullervo (Q55449915), a 1983 sculpture by Nina Terno (1935–2003; Q11884547), located in Hämeenlinna, Finland. The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2074-01-01. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland. Apalsola tc 02:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2024 Elsevier B.V. ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy S.C. Dept. of Corrections https://wach.com/news/local/quincy-allen-execution-date-set ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Presidential press service https://kun.uz/en/news/2022/11/11/shavkat-mirziyoyev-awards-erdoan-and-berdimuhamedow-highest-order-of-the-turkic-world#! ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Provided by Phil Bayly https://www.timesunion.com/books/article/Former-Newschannel-13-anchor-Phil-Bayly-finding-17683896.php ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan, note the people nearby were blurred to focus on the copyrighted work A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license on Flickr chosen by uploader, who has a big collection of images grabbed from all over the web. Image was published before added to Flickr > https://klankosova.tv/me-20-shkurt-1991-u-rrezua-monumenti-i-enver-hoxhes-ne-tirane/https://www.observatorikujteses.al/26-vjet-nga-rrezimi-i-bustit-te-enver-hoxhes/ and many other. No indication that uploaded by original photographer to Flickr: low quality, no meta data Albinfo (talk) 03:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, this image was uploaded to vandalize a page on es.wikipedia putting the photo of this guy as one of the most wanted criminals of USA (which is not). Seeing the description and the categories is easy to check that is a joke. 190.193.245.242 03:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. Adsci8 (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BonnyTiny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation: COM:PACKAGE.

Omphalographer (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with File:Kantor Desa Pendarungan, Banyuwangi.jpg Exagren (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChushpanCoin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: logos and T-shirts (!) of a non-notable cryptocurrency token.

Omphalographer (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Advertisement. Adsci8 (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cryptonummus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: logos of a non-notable cryptocurrency.

Omphalographer (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Advertisement. Adsci8 (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bitsignal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: logos of a non-notable cryptocurrency.

Omphalographer (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Advertisement. Adsci8 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency. Omphalographer (talk) 05:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Advertisement. Adsci8 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image obsolète et de mauvaise qualité. Dawko (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo obsolète et de mauvaise qualité Dawko (talk) 06:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo which is probably above the threshold of originality in France, see COM:TOO France Verbcatcher (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

w:en:Centre commandant Millé confirms that this is a French work. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreas.stockhausen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User with bad history, small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 09:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Andreas.stockhausen. Yann (talk) 09:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no permission from the author of a text which is on the screenshot. It is a copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no permission from the author of a text which is on the screenshot. It is a copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no permission from the author of a text which is on the screenshot. It is a copyright violation. Kharkivian (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own picture that i want removed from this site. Ollle97 (talk) 10:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing, account has 0 followers and 2 photos Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found a version here in 2022 -https://www.collectif-archytas.com/concerts/ - i think we need permission to keep Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake letter, please see this discussion. Gazal world (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete as per discussion. Nizil Shah (talk) 10:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author, the source website is a student website. Claimed PD-USgov but this is uncertain without knowing the source or author. Florida state images are public domain, but Republican party images might not be. MKFI (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source = Retail World Magazine, author = Michele Aboud. VRT permission from Michele Aboud needed to verify CC-license. MKFI (talk) 12:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Readthispage (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:VAGINA/COM:NOTHOST - AI (fanart) porn garbage

Эlcobbola talk 12:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. No educational value. Omphalographer (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete user’s only contributions to either Commons or Wikipedia are stupid edits/uploads/personal pages about breasts. I didn’t know it was possible to get sick of seeing breasts so quickly, but this user proved me wrong. Dronebogus (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Unanimous support for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Readthispage (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See COM:ANU#User:Readthispage. Out of scope.

Yann (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep cropping larger images down to bust-length, or cropping an image down to a specific body part to illustrate that part, isn’t inherently disruptive irregardless of why it’s done. Dronebogus (talk) 04:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Images not in use, COM:PIP issues concerning the crop focus, and the clear non-educational intention of the uploader. funplussmart (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - if there's ever a need for a crop that's going to be used constructively, someone can always take a new one. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Center of the Milky Way Galaxy IV – Composite.jpg Artem.G (talk) 12:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sadly we dont have many photographs of kiwis but still, quality is just to bad to be useful in any way. This one can go too imho: File:Kiwi 2 (31641216266).jpg Amada44  talk to me 12:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

imho it is out of scope. I dont see any possible usecase for this image. Amada44  talk to me 16:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Amada44  talk to me 13:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless upload: unclear who it represents Dormskirk (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless upload: unclear who it represents Dormskirk (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless upload: unclear who it represents Dormskirk (talk) 13:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality is terrible. Have no idea what purpose this serves, the person is not identifiable. 1989 (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Unused, horrible quality. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Apparently it is used on multiple projects. Jianhui67 TC 13:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Renominate if ever replaced with a better image. --P 1 9 9   15:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per conclusion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:070 Shake (2019).png. Premeditated (talk) 14:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright issues Trade (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright issues Trade (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright issues Trade (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright concerns Trade (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues Trade (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Out of scope. YouTube video of text (which doesn't even answer the question). Omphalographer (talk) 18:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete: Absolutely. Also, I added a user to my blacklist because his videos are mostly inconsequential, but worse, they've flooded the search. - THV | | U | T - 23:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 00:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amolpide (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I dont even know what this is supposed to illustrate

Trade (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My best guess based on description is the results of mewing, a viral craze that has little evidence backing it. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]




Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is useful for what exactly? Trade (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete no idea what this is Dronebogus (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious PD claim. The ISASI isn't part of the federal government. Adsci8 (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The three individuals were members of the federal government. They were attending the conference which was sponsored by the SASI in pursuit of Aviation Safety and their attendance was paid for by the U.S. Government/Taxpayer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wdallen49 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't address the copyright to the image at all. Adsci8 (talk) 19:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These are officials of the U.S. Government and representing the U.S. Government at this event. Thus, this information is public domain. Wdallen49 (talk) 13:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about the photographer? Adsci8 (talk) 05:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - poorly scanned document. Adsci8 (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:B074:5822:241:3EFF 16:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Published previously on facebook. --Achim55 (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PERSONAL Hypnôs (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PERSONAL Hypnôs (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably above ToO Adsci8 (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File already found on the Internet since at least 2020, with credits on the photo: no proof the uploader is the author, and strong presumption of the contrary. Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. No encyclopedic value whatsoever. Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, out of scope Hypnôs (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, out of scope. Unused. Adsci8 (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, out of scope Hypnôs (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, out of scope Hypnôs (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this harmful sexual picture Iamabdullahalmahmud (talk) 18:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Amada44  talk to me 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Amada44  talk to me 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Amada44  talk to me 18:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Photo from a book from an unidentified origin CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a screenshot taken from a video posted by Al Qassam Brigades (Hamas), Al Jazera has no copy rights to this video and this is the original video without Al Jazera logo (https://twitter.com/war_noir/status/1732477336195379477/video/1) Amr F.Nagy (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you suggest to go about this then? The copyright thing has always been an issue for me and I saw that since the Al Jazeera logo is present it may be used The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Music album cover, Still from a music video CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don’t delete on “possible”. 24.228.35.252 00:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear IP, please, read the description of the picture. I am just being polite to the uploader, if she or he wants to counter my claim. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, low-quality photo of an unremarkable classroom scene (a lunchbox sitting on a desk; a whiteboard with text projected on it). Omphalographer (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdventureStoryFanGamer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk screenshots of Google Street wiew--low res, no EXIF, abundant Google watermarks (far left in File:I-75 Exit 259B Ramp 03.png, center left sky in File:US 78 West approaching Wire Road, Aiken County, SC.png, in overgrowth in File:South Carolina Utility Pole 29.png, rightmost cloud in File:Georgia (U.S. State) Traffic Lights 7.png, etc.) Also hard to imagine how blurry images of random utility poles are in COM:SCOPE.

Эlcobbola talk 20:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only a stand in MP, he's not doing this full time. Scot land9991 (talk) 21:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is very much still an appropriate photo for the commons, get your opinion on his job away from this unbiased website, thank you! HoopaRoopa (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aleixriera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source is "Flickr" but it doesn't specify the exact page. These images are low resolution scans, unlikely uploaded by its creator it:Francesco Tonucci.

Günther Frager (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Abzeronow as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Kadı Message 21:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unused, blurry photograph with just "baum" in the description. I doubt this would have any educational value. Abzeronow (talk) 21:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The specified source on vimeo does not contain any information about a CC-BY license.

GeorgHHtalk   21:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RevengerTime. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Adidas Tennis Campaign featuring Andy Murray, Ana Ivanovic, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, Kei Nishikori https://detlefschneider.com/gallery/adidas-tennis-01/#image by Detlef Schneider ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal resume (in Nepali). Omphalographer (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a troll post. Please delete Rixia1 (talk) 22:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Copyright 2000-2024 Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A. // Not free Hyméros --}-≽ Yes ? 22:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-textlogo}} is the correct license. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source link on Flickr is not accesible. Also, the metadata states photographer is Fabrice Fabola. But it is wrong. The creator is Gideon Mendel's [1][2] and there is no evidence his work has a free license. Günther Frager (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. As the uploader I would support deletion in this case. Best Jason.nlw (talk) 08:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS unused logo Yeeno (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Probably done by mistake while doing a bulk upload using flickr2commons. Günther Frager (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we have two significant better quality images of this painting: 1919 Filonov Komposition Schiffe anagoria.JPG; Filonov ships.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 23:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - recreated as redirect. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For some of my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio © 2024 Teen Fidelity Free_Michelle Taylor - School Girl 2 (Teenfidelity) https://teenfidelityfree.com/Michelle_Taylor_School_Girl_2_36591_18.htm (NSFW) ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For some of my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. Also, the file is in use (COM:INUSE). --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In 2020 you shared it here, and granted a perpetual free license. What changed since 2020? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep See previous request, also without any actual reason given. I'm open even to late courtesy deletions if there is a compelling reason, but just "dont want share it" isn't one when it's too late for a COM:CSD#G7. As I was the admin processing the previous request, leaving for another to close. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You already did share it, and free licensed it, back in October 2020. What has changed, why should it be deleted? (Say in any language if you wish, someone can translate.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source Sriveenkat (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

There is no freedom of panorama in the UAE, therefore these photos can't be hosted on Commons until/if UAE law changes, or the building falls out of copyright.

russavia (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

Violates COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. es:Mezquita Sheikh Zayed tells that the building was finished in 2007.

Some of the images of people might be de minimis.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

See discussions immediately above. These images weren't included in the previous nomination because they hadn't been added to the relevant category when I nominated the other files for deletion.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Pictures of the Sheikh Zayed Mosque can not publish under a free licence without permission of the creators.

Ras67 (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 16:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

As before, no COM:FOP in the UAE nor eligible for de minimis.

HyperGaruda (talk) 18:30, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

There is no "Freedom of Panorama" in the United Arab Emirates. The building is modern and still under copyright, as are the sculptures, frescoes, etc. within it. These photos may be transferred to local wikis that allow FOP-encumbered photos, but cannot be hosted on Commons.

Storkk (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates. The Grand Mosque was constructed between 1996 and 2007. It was designed by Syrian architect Yousef Abdelky.

Ras67 (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. See also previous deletion requests in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque.

HyperGaruda (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates. The Grand Mosque was constructed between 1996 and 2007.

Ras67 (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:17, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United Arab Emirates.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет источника. Она могла быть и памиркой 212.154.56.32 03:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Nominator says 'No source. She could have been a Pamir.' If the uploader says its an Uyghur, its OK with me to  Keep as long as the uploader has a good upload record. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non valid copyright MRTFR55 (talk) 19:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the United States for non-architectural works. Reise Reise (talk) 19:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot; user has uploaded a series of blatant copyright violations. I did not find the source of this one in a short reverse images search but doubt claims are more reliable on this one. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable individual, article on enwiki is up for deletion Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cupido1999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyrighted packaging, not used in any articles - appears to be uploaded solely for promotional purposes

Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no apparant educational value Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like an illustration from a book, but with modified captions. Uploader had blanked the file but it's in use at Basque Wikipedia. Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic image with no clear educational aspect. No metadata about the copyright status of the image, the original source (NSFW, https://www.furaffinity.net/view/52346796/) has no notice of copyright and was published May 31st, 2023. Allottl (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused machine-generated image; a semi-nude "pinup" with no obvious educational purpose. (NSFW.) Omphalographer (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There are some obvious errors here (such as missing the areola and nipple). Unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS fantasy AI illustration Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You want to delete one one of the only few images illustrating the concept of science fantasy genre fiction and art among several other subjects and don't consider it necessary to provide an explanation for why it would be out of scope.
Why are you so obsessed with my AI images in particular? They are of better quality than most AI images. It's the only image illustrating a wizard metropolis, and only showing a science fantasy city as well as one of very few showing flying vehicle. It seems like you don't like that I oppose indiscriminate deletion of images made using AI tools so you just nominate without even explaining why it would be out of scope.
There are thousands of photographs of the same thing including mundane things but this image that is the only one for several subjects of culture is out of scope? Why? No explanation needed I guess, just vote against whatever you don't like. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment I am no more "obsessed" with your AI images than I am "obsessed" with drawing of make-believe flags of make believe countries, or low-quality selfies uploaded by people who otherwise don't participate in Commons, or poorly lit snapshots of penises. I just think such things are not reasonably useful additions to Wikimedia Commons. Such is my perspective. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      This wasn't my point. I just mentioned that I don't understand why you nominate so many of my images in particular when these are arguable more useful for specific illustration use-cases, have less misgeneration, and are higher quality than like 90% of AI images here which usually have either of these three issues. Kind of suspicious to me but it's probably near irrelevant, my points that you didn't address are in the remainder if my text such as the question for Why it would be out of scope when there is at least one clear realistic educational use-case. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      I've stated my opinion that it is out of project scope, and you've stated your disagreement - our respective opinions are are already noted. If you think there is a large amount of worse AI images here with even less claim to be in scope, I have no objection to listing those for deletion as well should they be pointed out to me, or you are free to list them yourself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yes you only did that while explained specific ways this image can be useful per COM:EDUSE. DRs outcomes seem to merely be what the opinion of the majority of people browsing DRs votes for, not actual arguments, explanations and policies. To me that is a problem in the context of Wikipedia aiming to have decisions based on rationales not mere votes, and because that means a very small group (even worse: unrepresentative) can censor/exclude/remove any arbitrary contents they object to for no good reason.
      I guess you can do what you want and keep the most bizarre noneducational useless files hundreds of times over while at the same time excluding a handful of images that are unique / nearly unique without even addressing the explained specific use-cases since a vote is all that's needed. Maybe one could call it tyranny of a tiny majority – that is 10 people or how many browse these DRs. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep illustrative of the genre of science fantasy. Dronebogus (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Unused and unlikely to be used because of low quality (wizard face, details of ship, etc.). If there's an encyclopedic need for an AI image in a sister project, one can be generated on demand, so there's no "loss" to getting rid of this one now. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

publ. 26 May 2018: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=224627868134033&set=ecnf.100069083641674 (Gallerry Potdantaman) ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mar26Mon14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

cs:Otakar Hůrka died in 1966 -> his paintings will be in public domain since 2037

Harold (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mar26Mon14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Otakar Hůrka died in 1966. Unfree until the end of 2036.

Gumruch (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am concerned about privacy regarding the photo Erfan rabiei (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion, no privacy topic & no new infos. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 18:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For my concerns Erfan rabiei (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sorry, but unspecified "concerns" are not a valid reason for deletion. Upload was too long ago for a simple courtesy deletion (COM:CSD#G7), you would need to give an actual reason. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omisiah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Either out of COM:SCOPE as personal art or COM:DW if Lady Emilia is an actual character that this is a close representation of. Regardless, unused and unlikely to be used considering that there are ample higher quality alternatives.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unusably low quality (look at the 'humans' at the bottom) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unusably low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unusably low quality - nonsense characters, nonsense geometry (center outdent, 2nd row gap) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Gibberish text where proper text is of importance and unusably low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unusably low quality - nonsense architecture, nonsense anatomy, nonsense layout, etc

Files nominated

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gentile User:The Squirrel Conspiracy sono d’accordo per la cancellazione dei Files in Category: Dante shown holding a copy of the Divine Comedy.
Cordiali saluti Toni Pecoraro Toni Pecoraro (talk) 10:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work judging by the watermark

Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unusably low quality - these are supposed to be weapons per the file description but they are unrecongizable The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unusably low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unusably low quality - these are supposed to be buildings but look nothing like... anything really The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unusably low quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unusably low quality - these are supposed to be buildings but look nothing like... anything really The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unusably low quality Prototyperspective (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theworldsally (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Created in conjunction with a rejected Wikipedia draft of the person these supposedly depict. These are out of scope as unused, unlikely to be used, and replaceable with an actual photo of the person depicted.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Intended to nominate it as well. So far I don't see why they would be within scope and there seems to be a further issue. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unusably low quality - nonsense geometry The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unusably low quality - glass helmet becomes hair on one side and background on the other The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chronikhiles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: The uploader apparently generated a ton of AI images of people (generally ones that look like anime or video game characters) in Hindu garb and decided that they were suitable to illustrate the figures in the file names. There's nothing to suggest that the AI outputs look anything like the figures or their traditional/historical representations, and many of these images have the classic hallmarks of bad AI (mainly nonsense clothes and jewelry that merge into things they're not supposed to).

If you don't want to go looking through all of these, File:Ambalika - Divya Chitram Series.jpg is an excellent example of everything wrong with the series - inhuman proportions, weird hand, nonsense jewelry in the center, nonsense sleeve on the left.

Files nominated

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and uncategorised: seems out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Adsci8. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timmytheman234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files of a non-contributor. Low quality and/or unidentified - all outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all: some file names also look nothing sense. - THV | | U | T - 08:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 08:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clips of cartoon TV shows, reactions to those clips, full movies, reactions to scenes from those movies, reactions to video games. The original YouTube uploaders did not own the copyright to the original material when uploading their videos as CC-BY. Some of the original YouTube file descriptions explicitly say things like (for example, from the first file here) "I DON'T OWN THIS. ALL RIGHTS GOES TO FOX."

Belbury (talk) 12:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete. Numerous blatant copyright violations, including several full-length movies (!). Just because the upload form will let you import any video from YouTube doesn't mean it's legal to do so. Omphalographer (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nominator. I swear YouTube is ongoing enshittification and is worse than Flickr in general while caring about money. Most videos are irrelevant, low-quality, copyright infringement, short-form, or other junk that should be downranked or taken down.
Can anyone warn or block that user for disobeying the policies while uploading rubbishes that don't belong here?
The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 10:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC); edited: 23:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Huge number of OOS Islam-related videos culled indiscriminately from YT

Dronebogus (talk) 02:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Some of the people in these videos are notable enough for a Wikipedia article (e.g. en:Zakir Naik, en:Assim Al-Hakeem), but that doesn't mean that everything they've created is in scope for Commons, even if it's freely licensed. Omphalographer (talk) 04:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep All of these videos covers a wide variety of topics and public figures. If we are gonna start a DR, it should be a seperate one for each video --Trade (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe there’s one or two that are hypothetically in scope but even if they are they’re still likely under fake licenses. Honestly everything by this user should be deleted under COM:PRP because the net loss is minimal. Dronebogus (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I dont think it's unlikely that most of the videos were released under a free license by the copyright havers as part of their daw'ah
Either way, the videos with copyright issues should probably be nominated seperately from the videos with scope issues Trade (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Either way, there is still a chance any deletion based on this request could be undone for being "too broad" so we are running a risk with this DR Trade (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ps. the uploader's block expired so i hope you look forward to seeing these DR's for the rest of January Trade (talk) 05:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t understand why you’re so adamantly defending a collection of videos that are a) probably almost all out of scope, and b) if in scope are either under dubious licenses or are so low-quality they’ll never actually be used. Dronebogus (talk) 12:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No consensus to delete all (and no specific discussion about which to keep and which to delete). Closing this listing with no prejudging renomination of individual files or related subsets. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope junk

Dronebogus (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various mostly OOS files under very dubious copyrights

Dronebogus (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Motivational Nasheed - Lightning - Ahmad -Muqit (Slowed-Reverb - NCN Release).webm for File:Motivational Nasheed - Lightning - Ahmad -Muqit (Slowed-Reverb - NCN Release).webm, and note that the file is also sent for Speedy Deletion. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all. Most of these videos appear to have been uploaded to YouTube by someone other than the copyright holder. Omphalographer (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This poster was created by Alvin Hariz, not the uploader. Nurhan Danish (talk) 08:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from FB per MD, not own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source provided Sriveenkat (talk) 14:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work - see metadata and google lens (source: TikTok?) Established 1620 (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. (https://www.shutterstock.com/tr/image-photo/istanbul-turkey-march-4-2019-skyscrapers-1341294983) MarinaMann (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. (https://www.kathimerini.gr/economy/562718152/toyrkia-anakta-stadiaka-tin-axiopistia-tis-stis-agores/) MarinaMann (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - while the images look slightly different, it's just a filter - the cars in the bottom right appear to be identical, as do the crane positions, etc. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Description fixed. El Salvador has a 70 year term and had a 50 year term when this was taken, and it was taken in 1932. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality screenshot of stock video https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-11604827-close-lord-ganesha-statue-blur-christmas-lights ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magnesium hydroxide is an extended three-dimentional solid (like this), not a group of discrete ions. Also, since the positive charge on magnesium is shown, then the negative charges on the oxygen atoms need to be shown too to balance the charges. Marbletan (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 23:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude Female Wolf Archer (Photo was Created By Ketty on Patreon).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Agapito Sanchez, Baylor College of Medicine https://peterhotez.org/photos/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2023 Національна спілка журналістів України ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo may be above COM:TOO US with the complex pawn design. Yeeno (talk) 07:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tubi2021 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

VRT-permission from the artist is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 13:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Longlong789 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low-resolution, incomplete EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

0x0a (talk) 14:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunday123321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all small and have no EXIF which raises the question of whether they actually are the work of the uploader as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source link is dead and all the backups at archive.org. From the description it suggest it was work for hire and therefore they don't hold the copyright. The likely copyright holder is Worldfolio. The video is available at Worldfolio YouTube channel [3] and has no free license. Günther Frager (talk) 21:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK delete Victuallers (talk) 10:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GN2Uploader (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Highly unlikely own work. Low quality, blurry, images has no metadata. Also uploader has history of uploading screenshot.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No discernible purpose Dronebogus (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Since the uploader also uploaded File:Forplay logo.png, I'm guessing this is a map of where the service is available, but considering that neither is used in a project mainspace, I'd say it's out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per user The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Wdwd (talk) 10:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1069710. "Der Giftpilz" ( The Poisonous Mushroom) (1935) is copyright protected ZimskoSonce (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This video is clipped from https://vimeo.com/125095515, which is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. I can't find any evidence that Luke Turner, who uploaded the vimeo video, owns the MotivaShian channel. Maybe someone could ask him to release this specific clip under a free license? Huaqin (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The listed source is the YouTube video which is under CC-BY. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, realse on youtube is under " Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike licence" (NC) which is not useable on commons. --Wdwd (talk) 10:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission visible, author of this book is not graphic artist, who made the title Alabasterstein (talk) 07:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Alabasterstein. Entgegen deiner Annahme IST der Autor dieses Buches (also ich) auch graphic artist - wie man aus meiner Tätigkeitsbeschreibung "Autor UND ILLUSTRATOR" eigentlich schlussfolgern kann. Ich bin Urheber und Nutzungsrechtsinhaber der grafischen Buchgestaltung inklusive des Covers. Dies ist sowohl den Impressumsangaben des Buches selbst zu entnehmen (einsichtig etwa in der Buchvorschau bei Amazon) als auch meinen Meldungen bei der VG Bild-Kunst bzgl. der Bildrechteverwertung. Gleiches gilt für die anderen Buchcovergestaltungen. Ich könnte dir zur zusätzlichen Bestätigung auch noch die offenen Arbeitsdateien im Photoshopformat zusenden, falls nötig. Ich hoffe, damit können die von mir hochgeladenen Bilder zur Veranschaulichung meiner Publikationen wieder in den Artikel einbezogen werden. Viele Grüße aus Bochum, Volker. Volker Dornemann (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRTS. @ Volker Dornemann: Bitte die Freigabe per E-Mail via Support-Team durchführen. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission visible, author of this book is not graphic artist, who made the title Alabasterstein (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Alabasterstein. Entgegen deiner Annahme IST der Autor dieses Buches (also ich) auch graphic artist - wie man aus meiner Tätigkeitsbeschreibung "Autor UND ILLUSTRATOR" eigentlich schlussfolgern kann. Ich bin Urheber und Nutzungsrechtsinhaber der grafischen Buchgestaltung inklusive des Covers. Dies ist sowohl den Impressumsangaben des Buches selbst zu entnehmen (einsichtig etwa in der Buchvorschau bei Amazon) als auch meinen Meldungen bei der VG Bild-Kunst bzgl. der Bildrechteverwertung. Gleiches gilt für die anderen Buchcovergestaltungen. Ich könnte dir zur zusätzlichen Bestätigung auch noch die offenen Arbeitsdateien im Photoshopformat zusenden, falls nötig. Ich hoffe, damit können die von mir hochgeladenen Bilder zur Veranschaulichung meiner Publikationen wieder in den Artikel einbezogen werden. Viele Grüße aus Bochum, Volker. Volker Dornemann (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRTS. @ Volker Dornemann: Bitte die Freigabe per E-Mail via Support-Team durchführen. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission visible, author of this book is not graphic artist, who made the title Alabasterstein (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Alabasterstein. Entgegen deiner Annahme IST der Autor dieses Buches (also ich) auch graphic artist - wie man aus meiner Tätigkeitsbeschreibung "Autor UND ILLUSTRATOR" eigentlich schlussfolgern kann. Ich bin Urheber und Nutzungsrechtsinhaber der grafischen Buchgestaltung inklusive des Covers. Dies ist sowohl den Impressumsangaben des Buches selbst zu entnehmen (einsichtig etwa in der Buchvorschau bei Amazon) als auch meinen Meldungen bei der VG Bild-Kunst bzgl. der Bildrechteverwertung. Gleiches gilt für die anderen Buchcovergestaltungen. Ich könnte dir zur zusätzlichen Bestätigung auch noch die offenen Arbeitsdateien im Photoshopformat zusenden, falls nötig. Ich hoffe, damit können die von mir hochgeladenen Bilder zur Veranschaulichung meiner Publikationen wieder in den Artikel einbezogen werden. Viele Grüße aus Bochum, Volker.
PS: Gleiches gilt auch für die Comicbeispiele aus meinem Buch STEINE, die ebenfalls aus dem Artikel entfernt wurden. Ich frage mich, wie du darauf kommen konntest, dass ein Illustrator und Publizist von Comic- und Cartoonbüchern nicht Urheber der darin enthaltenen illustrativen Werke, also Comics und Cartoons sein sollte, zumal dies im Artikel unter "Publikationen" geschildert wird. Ich bitte dich daher auch hier um Wiederherstellung der Bildverweise. Volker Dornemann (talk) 13:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRTS. @ Volker Dornemann: Bitte die Freigabe per E-Mail via Support-Team durchführen. --Wdwd (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of a correct license Vcohen (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete License is correct at the original source (Flickr [4]) but this is just a small duplicate and we already have the original. File:R211 Cars Unveiled on Staten Island Railway (53265963240).jpg Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, duplicate file. --Wdwd (talk) 12:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by メイド理世 as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from website|source=https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2020/07/avoid-these-paypal-phishing-mails%7Chelp=off: Redundant to File:PayPal Logo2014.svg & File:Paypal 2014 logo.png. 0x0a (talk) 08:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This .webp no source from website. メイド理世 (talk) 08:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also, This .webp is from random website on google image search. メイド理世 (talk) 08:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicated, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wahrscheinliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 2014 verstorbenen Künstlers Stepan SigetijLutheraner (talk) 10:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW, missing permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wahrscheinliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 2014 verstorbenen Künstlers Stepan Sigetij Lutheraner (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW, missing permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wahrscheinliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 2014 verstorbenen Künstlers Stepan SigetijLutheraner (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW, missing permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable people, not in use, out of scope.

Komarof (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Based on style it is a piece of modern art, but no date or author for the piece is given but supposed licensing claims it was published before 1928. Chariotrider555 (talk) 00:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dead source, no author, while this is heavily in use it's not possible to keep. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Centralize (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files with vague claims of own work, may not be free.

Spinixster (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, we are a agency working for Arden Automobilbau GmbH and Burg Zelem. We are editing and uploading the pictures in the name of the said companies. So I would be very thankful, if the media doesn't get deleted. I will add the source "Arden Automobilbau GmbH" on every marked pricture.
Thank you very much!
Best regards
Max from Centralize Digitalagentur Centralize (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Centralize: Because it is not obvious from your user name that you are representing that company, please send an E-Mail to COM:VRT to confirm that. Then that attribution can be stored in our archives and it is clear that you had the right to upload them. Please do not add watermarks to the images, that is discouraged here. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @PaterMcFly, I'm sending an E-Mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Is that correct? Centralize (talk) 14:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you should get a ticket number as a reply and eventually further questions if things are unclear. Since that Mailbox is handled by volunteers, expect some delay. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ticket#2024011810006726. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет АИ. В Туркестан включены таджикские и памирские земли. 212.154.56.32 03:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE - Accuracy should be discussed on local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет источников. Выдуманный флаг 212.154.56.32 03:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE - Accuracy should be discussed on local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, MTV OMG closed down in July 2020, just 13 months before the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020. 2605:BA00:4138:155:FD66:6234:D89A:C194 21:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, for the same reason we don’t delete all photos of dead people because they are dead. Also, COM:INUSE (Here’s hoping this was the last time I wasted time dealing with a DR filed in by an ip.) -- Tuválkin 22:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is non-free in its home country, the United Kingdom. 84.15.184.24 07:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot off a YouTube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOzRPynRgoM&t=489s&ab_channel=TheTrainGuy4), which in turn doesn't appear to credit the original author either. Per File talk:Cafcivitynsw.png, the original uploader of this image (User:DeRailer50) appears to consent to file deletion, as I originally suspected that this was a copyvio due to the lack of image metadata and blurry image quality. Fork99 (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded by user, whose all other contributions are blatant copyvios. Komarof (talk) 08:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crudely edited image by a user with bad history, no mention of retouching, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photograph of a deformed person in a play. If necessary I can make the picture a little nicer. Andreas.stockhausen (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First, are you the photographer? Could you please upload the original image with complete EXIF data? Then I don't understand the need to show this "deformation". May be you can explain (even in German if you like). Yann (talk) 10:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Not sure if this is old or new. See https://www.wendelgard.com/ Yann (talk) 09:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wurde durch Rudolf Volz erstellt.
Genehmigt. Andreas.stockhausen (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Andreas.stockhausen: Then we need the formal written permission by Rudolf Volz. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure (can be done in German).
(Google translation) Dann benötigen wir die formelle schriftliche Genehmigung von Rudolf Volz. Das Verfahren finden Sie unter COM:VRT (kann auf Deutsch durchgeführt werden). Yann (talk) 10:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - undelete if VRT permission arrives. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://news.owlting.com/articles/307835: Not the same picture. 0x0a (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per 0x0. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two different wharfs. No redirection 水餃喵 (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that this file is licenced under CC-0 by it's original author. From the "TERMS OF USE" subpage of the source section "COPYRIGHT": "Material on Our Site is protected by copyright law. Except as expressly indicated otherwise in these Terms or on Our Site, you may download one copy of articles, podcasts, and other information posted on Our Site ("Site Content") solely for your limited, personal, non-commercial use as long as you do not alter the Site Content or remove any trademark, copyright, or other notices displayed on the Site Content." D-Kuru (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru, if it doesn't meet the requirements of Wikimedia, I'm fine with deletion. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Omnis Scientia: The issue is that only freely licenced material is allowed on Wikimedia Commons (local Wikipedia project may differ). Freely licenced material are files that are already in the public domain or copyrighted material that are published by the author or the copyright holder under a free licence. You as the uploader has to check and ensure that your file follows these guidelines. --D-Kuru (talk) 11:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@D-Kuru, I will keep this in mind. I don't tend to upload images because I struggle to understand which license applies where. I uploaded this one for an article I'm working on and I found this program image on numerous sites (not just baseballhall.org - which I used as the source), including on e-commerce sites.
If you don't mind, would you guide me as to which license, if any, could apply here? If none does then I would support the nomination. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Omnis Scientia: In general all material is protected by copyright and it's reuse is prohibited unless you are allowed to do so. A file can be in the public domain due to age (last famous example would be the very first Mikey Mouse clip), but this would more than likely not apply here since it's not old enough (usually it's author's year of death + 70 years). A file can also be published under a free licence by it's author or copyright holder. This could apply here, however I see no indication for that. Just because the file is used on multiple websites does not mean that it's freely licenced. You have to check the source website if there is any note on that. The only indication I could find on the website is that the file is copyrighted (and therefore not freely licenced). Information on a website with a freely licenced file could look like this image on flickr: On the right side you see a Some rights reserved note which links you to the webpage of a Creative Commons licence that tells you what you are allowed to do and which restrictions apply to this image. Since I have no idea where information about copyright for this image could be found I can only help you that far. If you find a different note, I can check if there is a licence on Commons that can be applied here. --D-Kuru (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@D-Kuru, I will take a look and get back to you if I can find one with a different note. And thank you for your help; much appreciated! Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The design looks above COM:TOO, even for Italy (the Roman helmet in particular. No VRT permission from the organizers. Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non capisco il problema circa il nostro logo. HuntJames86 (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HuntJames86 I diritti d'autore del logo appartengono probabilmente all'organizzazione dell'evento. Serve la loro autorizzazione scritta per poter pubblicare il file. Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sono il Responsabile della Comunicazione e Co-Organizzatore dell'evento. Che autorizzazione devo mandare? HuntJames86 (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HuntJames86 Vedi COM:VRT. In pratica devi scrivere all'indirizzo indicato un'autorizzazione a pubblicare il logo in base ai termini della licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale. Pensa a usare una mail "ufficiale" della competizione e non la tua email personale. Saluti Ruthven (msg) 14:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image lacks COM:EVIDENCE of being Own Work/Creative Commons. No other uploads from this user. Muzilon (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea for the steel plate artwork in the center. -EditQ (talk) 13:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The building was constructed absolutely no later than 1914 (likely well before) and is extremely simple and utilitarian. Almost certainly in the public domain both due to age and lack of originality. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Datei ist schon vorhanden als WAK BALI 031.jpg EACC80 (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This version is of a much better quality. Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works by Dandolo Bellini

[edit]

These works were created by the Italian artist Dandolo Bellini, who died in 1982. According with Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy, copyright lasts for the author's life and for until 70 years after his death. Previously these files were tagged with {{PD-Italy}}, but that clause applies only for "simple photograhs" and Dandolo Bellini's works doesn't look to be photographs, but watercolors or engravings. We can undelete these files in 2053, when 70 years since Bellini's death had been passed. 83.61.247.43 15:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - happy to undelete if the IP's interpretation turns out not to be correct. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x71la9ni8OY&t=22s) 22nd second and later MarinaMann (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as best as I can tell, the color and angle are different between the video and the picture. Please feel free to renominate if you can find an exact timestamp though, as it's possible I missed it. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from the video. The same angle and details. It's an ongoing construction and you can't catch the same details. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is stated that the author is Instanbul FC themselves. There is no evidence of their permission, so the photo could be deleted after 7 days without permission provided. Nyuhn (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x71la9ni8OY&t=22s) 22nd second and later MarinaMann (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not correct: If you look at the position of the EMAAR buildings in the background at right, their placement in relation to the buildings in the foreground is different. 88.244.92.193 21:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even the height is different. 88.244.92.193 21:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as best as I can tell, the color and angle are different between the video and the picture. Please feel free to renominate if you can find an exact timestamp though, as it's possible I missed it. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the good licence, not own work. AT (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Foto is geen copyright violation of screenshot uit de video. Ik heb deze foto zelf gemaakt en kan daar het bewijs van opsturen :)
Foto is gemaakt op 3 december 2023 tijdens het anti Geert Wilders protest. Original File: 20231202_131159 {internal storage} Ik ben zelf Journalist en was daar toevallig. Mocht u bewijs willen kunt u mij een mail sturen samydury@journalist.com
Ik zal later nog fotos op wikipedia zetten van die demonstratie :)
Own Work I can send GB's of files and data made that day Samy Dury (talk) 15:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Antonius6317 please send me an email Samy Dury (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hoi @Samy Dury, Uit de foto die u bedoeld kon ik niet de indruk wekken dat die zelf gemaakt is. Mocht u zelf toch de fotograaf hiervan zijn dan raad ik u aan contact op nemen met VRT door een mail te schrijven naar: permissions-nl@wikimedia.org .
Hier bekijken ze dan uw vraag of de foto toch op Commons mag staan en er de juiste toestemmingen aan verleend kan worden.
Voor de zekerheid kan je altijd al je bezwaren, bewijzen en uitleg over de foto meesturen die ervoor zorgen dat de foto er op mag komen staan.
Ik zou de foto (of de titel: File:Benderbij tegenover Luka van LS Nieuws.jpg ) dan voor de zekerheid meesturen.
Echter wil ik wel benadrukken dat ik niet de behandelaar van jou casus dan ben omdat ik simpelweg niet tot dat team behoor.
Meer informatie kan je bijvoorbeeld ook op https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contactpunt/Mijn_eigen_afbeelding terug te vinden.
ps: dit overleg vind nu plaats op een pagina van een afbeelding waar je vraag niet over gaat voor de volgende keer kan je dit beter op de overlegpagina van de betreffende foto of nominator/verwijderaar stellen als het bestand al is verwijderd.
Ik hoop je voldoende te hebben geinformeerd bij vragen of verdere antwoorden, mag je me altijd een bericht sturen. (Dit kan ook op Nlwiki onder dezelfde naam :).)
Met vriendelijke groeten, AT (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: changed to pd-textlogo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is doubtful that the creator of this image knows Votic, considering it is likely based on material of the now-deleted Votic Wikipedia, which was deleted recently due to language inaccuracies. 2001:999:2E0:6E7:4BBC:73B:9420:8A4 17:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is doubtful that the creator of this image knows Votic, considering it is clearly based on material of the now-deleted Votic Wikipedia, which was deleted recently due to language inaccuracies 2001:999:2E0:6E7:4BBC:73B:9420:8A4 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very low quality and not in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is doubtful that the author of this actually knows Votic, and the image is very likely based on texts from the Votic Wikipedia, which was recently deleted due to language inaccuracies. 2001:14BB:A4:5F8:E804:E151:9A0A:777F 17:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very low quality and not in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Puliesteban (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible F10, The model is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - G10 or F10 also likely applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - G10 or F10 also likely applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mostafa Ghazal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - G10 or F10 also likely applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Virginiaconti1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: the model is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - G10 or F10 also likely applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a CC-licensed "own work"; this is the logo for radio station WZJZ, and that stylized "splotch" (for lack of a better word) in the background might be above TOO. WCQuidditch 18:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: background behind numbers is too complex for COM:TOO. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a CC-licensed "own work"; this is the logo for radio station WMIA-FM, and that stylized "splotch" (for lack of a better word) behind "93.9" might be above TOO. WCQuidditch 18:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: background behind numbers is too complex for COM:TOO. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on copyright Dronebogus (talk) 18:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a free license at source. Why would it not be valid? Yann (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
License laundering and derivative work of unfree source material Dronebogus (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that uploader has previously shown zero concern for copyright Dronebogus (talk) 08:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is https://ulp.edu.ar that has a CC-BY 2.5 license, an image dating back to 2011. However, an older version from 2008 is found here with a slightly better resolution, and what it is more important it is not cropped (see the doorknob). The older page has, no free license as far as I can see. Günther Frager (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--hjdhLL5bA ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liis Järv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Estopedist1 (talk) 21:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://library.uintah.gov/Author/Home?author=%22Rae%2C%20Issa%2C%22. identical watermark ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That link likely got it from File:Issa Rae.jpg, which was uploaded by the same uploader a few years ago; the images are identical except for color balance, and Issa Rae.jpg has all the metadata. The uploader states in their EnWiki edits that they took the photo. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Squirrel Conspiracy. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023" distorted images

[edit]

These are copies of File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 33.jpg and File:Street installation with photos of the kidnapped - Iron Swords War 2023 36.jpg, but digitally distorted (color/brightness balance). They are unused and unlikely to be used in light of the unedited versions (33 and 36), and the distortions add no educational value.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understood your considerations, I would love to keep number 35 - I do think it has a unique artistic effect. The rest can be waived. Chenspec (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, the distortions add no educational value. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:" happy-looking Gandalf" The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's not low-quality and is one of the only few images illustrating the concept of science fantasy genre fiction and art among several other subjects. Like the other image and even more so the person in the image does not look like Gandalf at all and neither like "Dumbledore".
There are thousands of photographs of the same thing including mundane things like pencils or low-resolution random streets but other aspects of human culture can't even have a mere handful of images of high-resolution modern digital art?
It illustrates science fantasy in that the wizard is using alien technology, implants, and aircraft like advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic (Clarke's three laws) (especially when not understood even by the user) and moreover is flying into a base on some Moon or planet of the Solar system in a fantasy context. There are nearly no other images available that could be useful illustrating this notable genre and this approach and that they are here doesn't mean they need to be used on Wikipedia. There isn't really a proper deletion nomination either. I'm not sure Gandalf was even used in the prompt but if it was, it was just as a workaround technique to make it have a wizard hat because that term is centric to the images it trained on where the figures had wizard hats not samurai hats or whatever the tool generated as hats earlier; it wasn't meant to look like Gandalf nor does it look like him. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete OOS fantasy image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And illustrating fantasy, art genres, and the depicted subjects can also be valuable, useful and educational.
    Why would it be out of scope? You just say OOS but don't support it with anything but your vote such as quoting some policy or providing an explanation for why it would be OOS. There's also lots of other fantasy art even though artists only rarely license their images under CCBY. Like I said it can be useful for example for illustrating Science Fantasy among other things. I don't think I've ever seen you vote/… for delete in any AI-related DR so I consider it possible you indiscriminately vote delete for all images of that kind. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The image is unused personal fan art that serves zero educational usefulness. And no an image doesn't magically become educational or in scope just because it can supposedly be used to illustrated some artist genre or whatever. Every image illustrate a genre of art. Plus this image is based on pre-exiting, copyrighted IPs anyways. But the main issue here is the lack of educational usefulness. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I described why it is useful above. No, not every image illustrates a genre of art. It's not based on copyrighted IPs; if you don't know what a wizard is it can help to name a few examples. Moreover other art images are kept and usually have far more images available to illustrate the respective genre or are missing images as well. In contrast to other Keep discussions, specific educational uses have been described in detail and explicitly. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Stop responding to everyone you disagree with. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope, non-notable personal art work. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:" happy-looking Gandalf" The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's not low-quality and is one of the only few images illustrating the concept of science fantasy genre fiction and art among several other subjects. Like the other image and even more so the person in the image does not look like Gandalf at all and neither like "Dumbledore".
There are thousands of photographs of the same thing including mundane things like pencils or low-resolution random streets but other aspects of human culture can't even have a mere handful of images of high-resolution modern digital art?
It illustrates science fantasy in that the wizard is using alien technology, implants, and aircraft like advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic (Clarke's three laws) (especially when not understood even by the user) and moreover is using gesture control to control a ultra-speed aircraft. There are nearly no other images available that could be useful illustrating this notable genre and this approach and that they are here doesn't mean they need to be used on Wikipedia. There isn't really a proper deletion nomination either. I'm not sure Gandalf was even used in the prompt but if it was, it was just as a workaround technique to make it have a wizard hat because that term is centric to the images it trained on where the figures had wizard hats not samurai hats or whatever the tool generated as hats earlier; it wasn't meant to look like Gandalf nor does it look like him. Gesture control in the context of science fantasy rationalizing "magic" is also a WMC-unique subject of the image. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete OOS fantasy image -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And illustrating fantasy, art genres, and the depicted subjects can also be valuable, useful and educational.Why would it be out of scope? You just say OOS but don't support it with anything but your vote such as quoting some policy or providing an explanation for why it would be OOS. There's also lots of other fantasy art even though artists only rarely license their images under CCBY. Like I said it can be useful for example for illustrating Science Fantasy among other things. I don't think I've ever seen you vote/… for delete in any AI-related DR so I consider it possible you indiscriminately vote delete for all images of that kind. "illustration[s]" are useful, I'd argue especially useful, and relatively rare among the giant volume of photos on WMC. (Same comment as in other DR.) Prototyperspective (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep illustrative of science fantasy Dronebogus (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as barely illustrating any of the mentioned concepts. The intended focal point of the image - the hand that is gesturing - is badly malformed, and the Minority Report gesture user interface part of the prompt seems to have been skipped, it looks more like he's a passenger trying to order a drink from the cabin crew. Belbury (talk) 15:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well you have a point there, not arguing about this but just as a brief note to consider:
things like that are (and especially will be) easily correctable using img2img&txt2img editing and a new revision could be uploaded over the imperfect image which could be tagged with Template:Bad AI. I just haven't got much of a handle of the post-generation editing (btw maybe somebody else has) where one can e.g. use inpainting to regenerate only the hand so that the image doesn't only visualize the concept but is also free of any 'bugs' so to say. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope, non-notable personal artwork. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:" happy-looking Gandalf" The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's not low-quality and is one of the only few images illustrating the concept of science fantasy genre fiction and art among several other subjects. Like the other image and even more so the person in the image does not look like Gandalf at all and neither like "Dumbledore", he even has a substantially Asian face.
There are thousands of photographs of the same thing including mundane things like pencils or low-resolution random streets but other aspects of human culture can't even have a mere handful of images of high-resolution modern digital art?
It illustrates science fantasy in that the society around the wizard is using alien technology and aircraft like advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic (Clarke's three laws) (especially when not understood even by the users) and moreover is hinting at a bureaucratic less-fantastical or even dystopian society as in social science fantasy. There are no other images available that could be useful illustrating that, this notable genre and this approach. That they are here doesn't mean they need to be used at all or on Wikipedia in particular. There isn't really a proper deletion nomination either. I'm not sure Gandalf was even used in the prompt but if it was, it was just as a workaround technique to make it have a wizard hat because that term is centric to the images it trained on where the figures had wizard hats not samurai hats or whatever the tool generated as hats earlier; it wasn't meant to look like Gandalf nor does it look like him. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete OOS fantasy illustration -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And illustrating fantasy, art genres, and the depicted subjects can also be valuable, useful and educational.
    Why would it be out of scope? You just say OOS but don't support it with anything but your vote such as quoting some policy or providing an explanation for why it would be OOS. There's also lots of other fantasy art even though artists only rarely license their images under CCBY. Like I said it can be useful for example for illustrating Science Fantasy among other things. I don't think I've ever seen you vote/… for delete in any AI-related DR so I consider it possible you indiscriminately vote delete for all images of that kind. (Same comment as in other DR.) "illustration[s]" are useful, I'd argue especially useful, and relatively rare among the giant volume of photos on WMC. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Why? Commons:Project scope/Summary#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. IMO this is an image that if seen some places on social media might get a reaction "that looks cool" but that is not a reason for it to be on Commons. IMO it is no more in scope than make believe flags of make believe countries that some people create for their own amusement and sometimes mistakenly believe should be uploaded to Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay but above I just explained at least one use-case for which this image is useful: illustrating the genre 'science fantasy' and an approach of it.
    Whether or not such images get such social media feedback is irrelevant but if anything would further support the case that this is useful and matches human evaluations of quality, subject relevance, and usefulness.
    Lots of other images that you supported to be within scope would seem to rather utterly fail this definition if this image doesn't even make it where I'd then ask why these, for which neither a use-case has been elaborated nor is clear, are within scope and this one is outside the scope. This one would clearly meet this quote and that scope policy since there is at least one realistic usefulness case for an educational purpose and, going even further than what the policy, there are nearly no other available images here that could be used for that purpose. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    IMO any old 20th century pulp cover would be a much better and appropriate illustration of the genre "Science fantasy", even if the artwork was mediocre, for the simple reason that it was created to illustrate actual published science fantasy. Commons has a fair sized collection of such illustrations already. We clearly have different perspectives on this (as is evident from your uploading this file). Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes and why can't there be pulp covers as well as images showing contents in high resolution? Why do you need to delete everything that you think is not as appropriate for illustration? I consider this far more appropriate especially when considering that those covers don't even show any science fantasy and are basically near useless for illustration (except as in 'this magazine had science fantasy contents' which is not an illustration). And no, WMC doesn't have that. That it's on WMC doesn't mean it has to be used on WP. Policies don't matter it seems, what matters is the subjective opinions of DR voters. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep illustrative of science fantasy Dronebogus (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete "Illustrative of science fantasy" is a non-sequitur and the image is clearly OOS amateur fan art in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It is not a non-sequitor with no explanation given for why it would be anyway. It is not out of scope why would it be. It isn't fan art per fan art Fan art or fanart is artwork created by fans of a work of fiction and derived from a series character or other aspect of that work while this image only displays a generic wizard but not any character or work-specific aspect of an existing work of fiction. This image is the only image useful for illustrating various subjects such as 'social science fantasy' similar to social science fiction. No valid rationale for deletion. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope, non-notable personal artwork. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

Originally tagged speedy by Silent Wind of Doom with the rationale: "Images of sports uniforms have been ruled fair use as per this discussion."

The images appear to be original works, but derivative of the actual uniforms worn by the players. Some of these uniform designs appear to consist solely of common property shapes (regular clothing and simple geometry), colors, and text. Others may have more complicated designs and should be considered for deletion.

Guanaco (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. Deletion requests look so different on Commons than the main site.
I was notified about a discussion happening there about my uniform images. A recent (at the time) U.S. Supreme Court decision, namely on the case Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, the design elements of a uniform are subject to copyright. As such, the designs of these uniforms are under copyright by their teams, their leagues, and the various manufacturers, whether it be Majestic, Reebok, or New Era.
The discussion came to the consensus of properly licensing uniform images as non-free sports uniforms with rationale and to remove them from Commons. As someone disrupted the ordered file names for the uniforms, and to be more precise, I reuploaded the files under new names, properly licensed them, and tagged the Commons images for deletion as per the discussion ruling them non-free. The ones that weren't moved have already been speedy deleted under request of creator. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Silent Wind of Doom: The decision about Commons images has to be made on Commons, as this wiki is autonomous. It may be more expedient to standardize and host local copies on English Wikipedia as fair use. However on Commons, we should follow the Supreme Court's ruling and apply the test to each image: "[A] feature incorporated into the design of a useful article is eligible for copyright protection only if the feature (1) can be perceived as a two- or three-dimensional work of art separate from the useful article and (2) would qualify as a protectable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work—either on its own or fixed in some other tangible medium of expression—if it were imagined separately from the useful article into which it is incorporated." The court did not address whether they met the threshold of originality, so we can evaluate these in the manner of simple vs. complex logos. Guanaco (talk) 04:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Silent Wind of Doom, you seem to misunderstand how copyright works. For a picture of a uniform, there are two copyrights:
    1. The copyright of the design of the uniform. However, per COM:TOO, some minimal originality is required, and if the design is too simple, then the design is not protected by copyright and so pictures of those designs can be posted to Commons and shouldn't be listed as unfree on English Wikipedia. The designs listed in this deletion request look very simple, although it could be debated that a few of them maybe are sufficiently complex.
    2. The copyright of the picture itself. The person who makes a drawing of a uniform needs to choose a free licence for his contribution to the image. This is the case even if the design of the uniform is copyrighted, and images which are uploaded to English Wikipedia without a free licence chosen by the artist get deleted per w:WP:FREER. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: none of the uniforms here strike me as above the COM:TOO. Just fancy text, plain colors and a stripe or two. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

Out of scope pictures.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions

This file was initially tagged by BrunoBernardino as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: <G7> The limit has been way past 7 days, not eligible for speedy.

1989 (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 11:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fake SVGs by Kontrollstelle Kundl

This file was initially tagged by Kontrollstellekundl as Speedy (sla) and the most recent rationale was: Outdated maps of districts of Styria, Fake SVGs by Kontrollstelle Kundl

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no consensus. --ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files nominated for speedy deletion by Davey2010

These files were initially tagged by Davey2010 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: author req

Moved to DR as G7 doesn't apply to files older than a week.

CptViraj (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 21:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept 3 as requested. --Minoraxtalk 07:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files nominated as speedy delete by Sturm

This file was initially tagged by Sturm as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: No inside pictures are / were allowed. Per COM:FOP Brazil this should be fine, definitely no speedy deletion case.

GPSLeo (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I was personally in charge of this photowalk. Although we were allowed to photograph, we were asked, a posteriori, that the photos were not uploaded to Commons. Among all other participants, we agreed not to upload these pictures. Sturm (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as above. I have uploaded most of the images and we have agreed to delete them at the request of church's maintainers. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 00:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Aren't we past the courtesy takedown period, at this point we have to rely on copyright and FOP laws. I see nothing that would violate privacy, I see images of floor tiles and stairs, and walls. I think the church should file an official takedown notice and explain why these images should be hidden from view. That way we have the name of an official from the church, and not possibly some random parishioner complaining about privacy, that does not represent the view of church council. I would assume most churches would want a visual inventory of their interiors in case of theft, vandalism, or catastrophic destruction. --RAN (talk) 12:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I also attended to this event and I have heard about the conversation with the Father responsable for the church. He was emphatic about not publishing the photos of the interior of the church. Here is the thing: the Father contacted us with this request after the photowalk; in the meantime, some pictures were uploaded. Moreover, as much as I know about the scenario of cultural heritage in Brazil (I have studied the issue for more than 10 years now), most churches in rural areas do not disseminate their interiors and their collections because these buildings are settled in the middle of nowhere and have no security systems neither watchmen. The cases of robbery, fire and other vandalism are too many in Brazil. We must avoid wikis to be the reason for other losses... Sintegrity (talk) 01:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. We should not support a discourteous lie without a more compelling reason than just to host photos of a church interior. Being given a tour on the condition of not publishing the photos is something we should respect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand all your arguments but if we start deleting these files in this case we would go away from the strict rule to only delete files for copyright or privacy reasons. This would open the gates for censorship of files. We even have files where we lost a court case Category:Images subject to Reiss Engelhorn Museum lawsuit. In this and other cases we just hide the original uploader but keep the files. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I'm shocked those images aren't being hidden, pending the results of an appeal. As for this, the analogy I'd give is that we often grant courtesy deletions to uploaders well beyond the official period when they are allowed to reconsider their uploads on Creative Commons licensing. Let's hide these photos as a courtesy deletion for the church. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imagesdomainepublic

[edit]

Uploader request well after 7 days, all unused. To be clear, I am not the uploader, I just converted to DR after the uploader tagged for speedy deletion.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Why would we want to delete beautiful PD flower pictures? Some of these images are quite good and potentially usable as thumbnails in articles. If you'd like to request the deletion of specific images you think are not useful, please do that, but I definitely oppose the wholesale deletion of all of these images. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as excluded educational content.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noting here that I converted these from speedy deletion nominations by Omphalographer as I felt that COM:CSD#G1 didn't apply to any of them, and no speedy criterion applied to most of them. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All of these files are Wikipedia pages printed to PDF, then uploaded to Commons. My take is that they're "redundant content [...] used for testing" (CSD G1) - they're redundant to the Wikipedia pages they were printed from, and they were most likely created as a result of the user messing around with the "download as PDF" and "upload file" sidebar links, rather than as a deliberate process. I can certainly send these to DR in the future if that'd be preferred. Omphalographer (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted from speedy deletion requests. These are all a few-month-old 20px by 20px images, requested for deletion by the author, and in use on template pages created by the author. These logos are so low-resolution to prevent their educational use, and are therefore out of COM:SCOPE, so they should be deleted.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. These are all resized versions of images which are, in many cases, non-free, e.g. File:AGI-VN.png is a tiny version of vi:File:Logo tỉnh An Giang.svg which is used under a claim of fair use. Omphalographer (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted from User:Atcovi's speedy request. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, reason for deletion?

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not familiar with Commons all too well, so I didn't realize there was a time limit to G7. I simply want these audio clips to be deleted because the "Mujawwad" recitations are in use and these audio clips are not avaliable on any page (therefore serving no purpose). -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not being currently in use is not a deletion reason. Atcovi, I assume you uploaded these clips because the recitation is of high quality. Do you now think it is not of high quality? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I just believed the Mujawwad recitations were better to use rather than the Murattal recitations due to the Tajweeed employed. But if not in use & my desire for these clips to be deleted is not a valid reason, then I have no problem revoking my request and leaving them to be. -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 18:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominated G7 by uploader, but ineligible due to age. These are high quality, hand drawn works and could be within scope, so kicking them to DR.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all because those variants are unnecessary. - THV | | U | T - 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 10:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: These are high quality works, I commend the uploader for their artistry, courtesy deletion is granted. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It appears to be Серге́й Алекса́ндрович Малозёмов (Ru.Wiki), which would make it within scope, but I have doubts that the uploader owns the copyright to any of their uploads, including this one. They're from a variety of cameras and are mostly professional. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I also seriously doubt this was an own work of the uploader, could have been a screenshot from a YouTube video. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: appears to have design element, and not pur geometric - Converting to DR to get more eyes on this one The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This seems below the ToO in the US to me. Abzeronow (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree with Abzeronow. Jmabel ! talk 23:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn per discussion]. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license and missing attribution, compare file talk page. Renerpho (talk) 07:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I modified an original with extended bodies and moon scaled to best estimates. What do you suggest we do? Remake it all from scratch? User:tomruen 10:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know anything about licence or attribution and I do understand that these things are important, but I would request that if it can't be fixed, we hang on until it is replaced by something similar- people really do want something like this that gives a relative picture of the big TNO's to get perpective on Pluto not being a planet etc.
  • IceDragon64 (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • What I don't understand is why we can't just change the license and attribution; why is a deletion needed here? If it's simply unusable in its current state, I would be happy to do a public-domain illustration to replace the wrongly licensed images in question. Exoplanetaryscience (talk) 06:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • To be honest, I've started to dislike this graphic because it relied on inaccurate artists' impressions that were made long before we found out about the properties of these TNOs. For example Quaoar, which was originally colored blue in the 2002 NASA/Caltech press release and then later being crudely recolored a pinkish-red in a 2004 NASA/Caltech press release. Although it attempts to depict Quaoar's "reddish" color, the depiction is still inaccurate—what "reddish" really means is a dark beige color to the human eye, resembling the true color image of Pluto. All the other "red" TNOs depicted in this graphic are also exaggerated: Gonggong, Sedna, and Makemake appear far too red instead of beige. If you're wondering how I know this, the true colors are derived from the TNOs' visible color indices and spectra with the help of my friend's "True Color Tools" software. With the recent news of the true color of Neptune and @CactiStaccingCrane: 's (and my) efforts in using them across Wikipedia, I feel that depicting true colors is necessary to dispel any misconceptions about these astronomical objects.
True colors aside, I also don't like how the phases of the objects are inconsistent. It's not possible to fix this if you only use publicly available artist's impressions; there aren't enough of them out there. With all these issues I've pointed out, I think it's better to recreate this graphic from scratch—I'll be the one to do it. My plan here is to hand-draw the objects digitally—I have some experience with digital art. I'll try to have the new version depict the ten TNOs' latest true colors, albedos, dimensions, and predicted/known surface features. I'll make sure to provide links to the scientific papers justifying the illustrated details in the file description. Nrco0e (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I love these picture and information. Until you can get into orbit and take your own pictures I don't see how you can judge these dipictions of space objects. Get real! The only reason you would have to have exact information is if you were planning a visit. Sandie Hardman (talk) 04:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing proper attribution for photographs used. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]