User talk:HoopaRoopa
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Please note that the category is for "representative in the House of Commons of the Parliament of England to 1707". Mike Rohsopht (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Please do not overwrite files
[edit]
0x0a (talk) 11:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Why don't you just keep the original copy of File:Michael Shanks MP Portrait full quality.jpg? 0x0a (talk) 11:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- its just the way I'm uploading it, I'm avoiding the upload wizard. HoopaRoopa (talk) 11:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't get it. The official versions are enough for most uses. 0x0a (talk) 11:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- That's what I used HoopaRoopa (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't get it. The official versions are enough for most uses. 0x0a (talk) 11:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- its just the way I'm uploading it, I'm avoiding the upload wizard. HoopaRoopa (talk) 11:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Michael Shanks 1x1 Portrait (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
0x0a (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
File:YFM2022BandLineup.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: not including year, month, or day; not creating the subpage; not notifying; and not transcluding. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:52, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Michael Shanks politics signature.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
File copyright status
[edit]Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Michael Shanks MP Portrait 3x4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Scot land9991 (talk) 21:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Donald Tusk KPRM HQ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Max19582 (talk) 20:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kirsty McNeill Labour STC.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kirsty McNeill Labour STC.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Official portrait of Nigel Farage MP (crop 2).png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Official portrait of Nigel Farage MP (crop 2).png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 19:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- It has since been removed, it was s on there at the time HoopaRoopa (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- So you're saying the Farage portrait was at https://members.parliament.uk/member/1591/portrait when you uploaded it, but now there's another guy there? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Official portrait of James McMurdock MP (crop 2).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:56, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
What’s the deal? Who took the photo and did they really publish it with such a cavalcade of licenses? The file is currently attributed to an unknown photographer but simultaneously it’s stated that Harry Cavanagh ‘wrote’ it (just to point one illogical disparity). --Geohakkeri (talk) 11:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am Harry Cavanagh, and I wanted all those licences to ensure everyone's use case is satisfied. HoopaRoopa (talk) 11:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can see that. But my question was who was the photographer. Only the copyright holder can give a valid license, you know. --Geohakkeri (talk) 13:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- oh, me mum, she's alright with is being released under the aforementioned licences. HoopaRoopa (talk) 14:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can see that. But my question was who was the photographer. Only the copyright holder can give a valid license, you know. --Geohakkeri (talk) 13:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)