Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/12/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 26th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Travels in West Africa, Congo Français, Corisco and Cameroons - Page 356.png Chrisguise (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 02:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Travels in West Africa, Congo Français, Corisco and Cameroons - Page 362.png Chrisguise (talk) 00:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 02:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Travels in West Africa, Congo Français, Corisco and Cameroons - Page 365.png Chrisguise (talk) 00:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 02:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Travels in West Africa, Congo Français, Corisco and Cameroons - Page 370.png Chrisguise (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 02:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Travels in West Africa, Congo Français, Corisco and Cameroons - Page 377.png Chrisguise (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 02:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Travels in West Africa, Congo Français, Corisco and Cameroons - Page 379.png Chrisguise (talk) 01:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 02:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Travels in West Africa, Congo Français, Corisco and Cameroons - Page 446.png Chrisguise (talk) 01:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 02:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ponle GIdeon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 07:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio source=https://www.walygatorparc.com/sudouest/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/radjariver-low.jpg Eliedion (talk) 11:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Julien Domec Studio©. --Yann (talk) 13:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eliedion (talk) 12:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Julien Domec Studio©. --Yann (talk) 13:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 02:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreated file after deletion. First version was source=Google, said to AI-generated. Now "own work"??? Yann (talk) 10:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appears here (13.09.2023) without a free licennse. Google lense reports an even earlier post on facebook (c. 06.07.2020), but I'm unable to track that one down. I'd say  Delete unless we get WP:VRT confirmation. Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
both images are of same hindu temple, but the image which I uploaded is taken by me. If you compare both image you can see clearly that image taking angle are different. 1Aayush Raj (talk) 14:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I new to wekimedia I don't know how to upload and this was my first image so by mistake I marked it as AI-generated and I also know know how to edit it but as you delete my first image and I don't know how to request for undo deletation. So I simply reuploade the image. This time as this photo was taken by me so I uploaded it as my own work. I have even some more images of that place in which I am also present in photo. If you that I can even share it with you. 1Aayush Raj (talk) 14:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So please don't delete it. 1Aayush Raj (talk) 15:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the last version seems OK. Yann (talk) 15:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZI Jony as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from Facebook. PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 13:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fixed file informations. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The media may be meeting the criteria for speedy deletion, hence why it should be deleted. Please let me know why it is meeting this. IndianGuyWhoLovesAnimalCrossing (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 17:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya no me sirve J.-.54-54-54 (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ya no me sirve J.-.54-54-54 (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 15:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of billboard - No FoP in India for 2D works Эlcobbola talk 15:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nevermimd - photograph itself is a COM:NETCOPYVIO - [1] - Speedying as F1. --Эlcobbola talk 15:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of this map, Walter Kuhn, was a member of the Nazi Party, which he joined in 1940. Given the ideologocal importance of german east settlement to the Nazi party, this is propaganda without liability. It is like writing about the theory of relativity, citing only Philipp Lenard and Johannes Stark, two physicians who rejected this theory in the name of the Pseudo-Science «German Physics» which they invented. Please remove this map as fast as possible. - Thylacin (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep See COM:NPOV. S5A-0043Talk 00:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: speedy kept: in use. file description can be corrected. --Krd 08:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ancien logo Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep "old logo" is not a reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. --Rosenzweig τ 17:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, obviously, and bad user name alert. -- Tuválkin 02:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: It’s also in use, at w:Q8423370. -- Tuválkin 02:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Commons hosts old and outdated logos to show history. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ancien logo Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, obviously, and bad user name alert. -- Tuválkin 01:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. We never delete logos for not being current. We simply mark them as no longer current. If you are with Wikimédia France, surely that should not come as news to you. - Jmabel ! talk 07:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Commons hosts old and outdated logos to show history. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bright-D(iamond) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant self-promotion of another famous rapper. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm prjects.

Achim55 (talk) 19:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Source is a screen grab from the location noted. However, there is no indication at the source that the video is available under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Source is a screen grab from the location noted. However, there is no indication at the source that the video is available under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Source is a screen grab from the location noted. However, there is no indication at the source that the video is available under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 23:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Source is a screen grab from the location noted. However, there is no indication at the source that the video is available under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 23:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Source is a screen grab from the location noted. However, there is no indication at the source that the video is available under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Shekpeer 0000 (talk) 19:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shammari932 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files are fictional and out of scope --N Panama 84534 21:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map is fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 21:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luca1717 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful

A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete penis spam Dronebogus (talk) 06:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luca1717 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful

A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map is fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 21:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 13:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

absurdly low quality Watchduck (quack) 14:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1Aayush Raj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Ganga Water Supply Scheme (02).jpg is here; File:Ganga Water Supply Scheme (01).jpg is here; File:Nawada Railway Station (05).jpg is here; File:Adarsh Water Park, Nawada (1).jpg is here; File:Sri Jain Guniyaji Tirth, Nawada.jpg is here; etc.), uploader copyvio history, etc.

Эlcobbola talk 15:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published under Crown Copyright at https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2023/10/a-new-relationship-formed-with-her-majesty-the-queen/. I couldn't see anywhere it said it was published under the OGL. DrKay (talk) 15:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DrKay Perhaps you might want to add File:Queen Consort and Chaplain General 2.jpg to this nomination. Don't know if it's possible at this stage or not. Keivan.fTalk 06:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Added. DrKay (talk) 07:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:52, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo does not correspond to the source link. The link contains the old logo, which was recently updated in August 2023, and can be found here. The image is unrelated to Oil India, potentially causing confusion and spreading misinformation.- AjayDas (talk) 15:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It looks like the correct logo, it's PD-textlogo, and it's heavily in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: It doesn't appear to be the correct old logo as it's missing two main details: the line below the words 'Oil India Limited' and the inclusion of 'A Government of India Enterprise' written in both English and Hindi. This differs from the source indicating the original old logo, which doesn't match this logo. Furthermore, Oil India has recently changed its logo, so the new logo should be used instead of this confusing one.AjayDas (talk) 06:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't appear to be the correct old logo as it's missing two main details: the line below the words 'Oil India Limited' and the inclusion of 'A Government of India Enterprise' written in both English and Hindi. This differs from the source indicating the original old logo, which doesn't match this logo. Furthermore, Oil India has recently changed its logo, so the new logo should be used instead of this confusing one. original logo can be found here AjayDas (talk) 15:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. If the new logo hasn't already been uploaded and it's within COM:TOO India, it should be uploaded, but the old logo shouldn't be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: The logo in question is not the original old logo of Oil India Limited. In fact, it has never been the official logo of OIL in its entire history. Therefore, it is incorrect to claim it as the official logo of Oil India. This logo appears to be a derivative of the old logo, not the original. I have no objection to using the original old logo, but I strongly object to using this derivative version. AjayDas (talk) 10:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Not a valid reason to delete. The file is used and as said by Ikan above, the new logo should be uploaded as a new file if it's below COM:TOO India. I see you've uploaded the new logo to enwiki here. It also seems to be {{PD-textlogo}} as well as below TOO India and can be uploaded here. Any thoughts, Ikan Kekek? --Ratekreel (talk) 04:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
None except to agree with you and thank User:AjayDas for uploading the current logo. AjayDas, if you want to replace the thumbnail used in Wikipedia articles, go ahead and do that, but that doesn't involve Commons and certainly doesn't involve deletion here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I will upload the current logo here. However, I strongly believe it's incorrect to keep the self-proclaimed derivative logo as an official one. The uploader failed to mention that it's a derivative work. If you still consider keeping it, I suggest renaming it as a derivative work to maintain accuracy. Failing to do so will spread misinformation. The original old logo can be found here AjayDas (talk) 11:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can edit the file description, you know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I don't get to make decisions about keeping or deleting files. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader has uploaded the file from a now-dead webpage (archived here) which has same logo as is on the document that you've provided. I would still not prefer to delete this one. The file name can be renamed and can be kept under a different name. Meanwhile, new logo can also be uploaded. Ratekreel (talk) 11:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I would like to highlight that the link provided by the uploader contains the original old logo. However, the image he uploaded does not match the source link. It lacks some vital details, such as "A Government of India Enterprise" written in both Hindi and English below the company name, and a black line. Both elements are essential parts of the logo. The uploader has uploaded a derivative image where both details are missing. Claiming it to be the logo of the company is not correct. It should be renamed and the description changed, if not considered for deletion. AjayDas (talk) 18:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you edit the file description and request COM:File renaming if you want that? Do you understand that wikis operate on the efforts of volunteers? No-one is paid to do the things you want them to do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The incorrect logo, uploaded long ago, has been widely used by many individuals and third-party websites, potentially harming the company's reputation. Renaming alone may not suffice. However, through this discussion, I now consider keeping the file with renaming as an alternative.
As a contributor from a linguistic minority and underrepresented group, I understand Wikipedia's volunteer-driven nature. I apologize if my concerns seemed misguided.
Your comment, although well-intentioned, was perceived as dismissive, causing unintended hurt. I appreciate your dedication to Wikipedia and value our collaborative efforts. AjayDas (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think you are currently posting on Wikipedia? This is Wikimedia Commons, not Wikipedia. And I don't have much dedication to Wikipedia. My main wiki is Wikivoyage, and my secondary one is Commons. I take the Commons COM:INUSE policy seriously and believe in letting Wikipedias make their own decisions, which they should do in the interest of encyclopedic accuracy. Citing Commons' COM:INUSE policy is not dismissive. You will never see me state on Commons deletion request threads that Wikipedias should keep inaccurate images in their articles, only whether a file should be deleted or kept on Commons per Commons policy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image previously appeared elsewhere and to the extent uploader (ताराचंद सारस्वत = Tarachand Saraswat) purports to be the subject (Tarachand Saraswat), copyright initially vests in the author (photograper), not the mere subject. Evidence of permission from the actual author is needed.

Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate painters copyright. Created after 2020. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the painter. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ancien logo de Wikimédia France Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 16:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - nominator has already had this explained to them at an admin noticeboard. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ancien logo de Wikimédia France Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 16:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - nominator has already had this explained to them at an admin noticeboard. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ancien logo Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - nominator has already had this explained to them at an admin noticeboard. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Unclear where the photograph comes from. Could possibly be free if the source was clear. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is just fantasy and/or OR, but no real coat of arms of an existing family. Otherwise it has to be proved. So for now: Out of scope GerritR (talk) 21:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 13:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New attempt: the proper reason for deletion is copyvio. I think this image shows no real coat of arms, but a fictional design (artwork). Artwork is under the protection of copyright. GerritR (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: this appears to be a mass-produced “bucket shop” offering, hence dubious in terms of both educational value and originality—the individual graphic elements being most likely copied from old PD sources. (Moreover the charges on the shield, at least, might not pass the US TOO.) The arms are probably not completely fictional: the characteristic MO of these outfits is indiscriminate ‘scraping’ of historical material, as opposed to outright fabrication. That said, without knowing for certain that the artwork itself is old, and given the explicit copyright claim at the bottom, I feel inclined this way by COM:PCP and the lack of detailed provenance.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ancien logo Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai finalement placé ce visuel dans les archives. Merci de ne pas le supprimer :-) Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 17:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please withdraw using the "withdraw" template. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - nominator has already had this explained to them at an admin noticeboard. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ancien logo Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 16:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - nominator has already had this explained to them at an admin noticeboard. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ancien logo non officiel Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 16:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - nominator has already had this explained to them at an admin noticeboard. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not in the public domain discospinster (talk) 17:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image 2600:100C:A115:208A:9403:985E:95AD:FA24 18:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image is in use. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freely licensed photograph contains a screenshot from the Jumbotron which was not taken by the photographer Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo by non-contributor Till (talk) 19:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo by non-contributor Till (talk) 19:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Trade (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted film poster Trade (talk) 20:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The photo shows prominently a poster for a film festival. It would require a confirmation of permission from the copyright owner. (The photo also presumably shows the uploader. It could be a self-portrait or taken by someone else.) -- Asclepias (talk) 21:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    La photo est de moi, cette photo a été prise par mon téléphone portable, j'ai demander à un membre du festival où je suis allé pour me prendre en photo avec mon propre téléphone. La personne à donner son consentement, et le festival aussi, pour faire la communication autour. Kondotikodro (talk) 19:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


@Asclepias: --Trade (talk) 21:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 20:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 21:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 21:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Dagestan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Dagestan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

visualization of a TV show joke from 17 years ago, not encyclopedic or educational 170.213.22.187 21:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Dagestan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random photo in pocket imported from Panoramio Svetlov Artem (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this logo exceeds the threshold of originality and it’s too complex to be considered a text logo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dangerous procedure illustrated 73.189.126.192 23:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Macau. Solomon203 (talk) 11:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Taken from a broader document CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All their uploads were wiped as CSD F10 + G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Medeirosjosue (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + OOS. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Murbaut1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Malcolma as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LEO FERRETT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 23:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LEO FERRETT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + OOS. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jackpot369 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as the the metadata

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Music album cover, Pretty sure the image comes from One Piece CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary whitespace, unused, redundant to File:Cognitio Analytics Logo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently in incorrect colours, replaced with File:Contentverse extralarge rgb fixed.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Okisantoso210 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muslik setiabudi76 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. Copyrighted characters

Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test and useless file. SCP-2000 13:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Dictatorship 99 (talk) 23:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. Claims to be "own work", but the image uses copyrighted characters from the Tom and Jerry cartoon. Ari (talk) 02:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What license do you suggest I release it?
Actually, these are not the original Tom and Jerry cartoon characters. I recreated it myself to introduce this scene in the 'Tom and Jerry - Salt water tabby' which is not in the original cartoon.
These are my characters as the original Jerry does have a manhood. I agree, they look like the original characters but they're not.
Kindly let me know your suggestions.
Thank you Goodman Andrew (talk) 00:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot release this picture under any license suitable for Commons because it's derivative work containing copyrighted characters. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard is quite clear in what you cannot upload: "We can't accept works created or inspired by others. This includes material such as drawings of characters from TV, comics, or movies - even if you drew them". Ari (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
NOT a good way of thinking as almost everything around us is deriatative work.
For example automobile was invented by Karl Benz in the 80s. Therefore, almost any car today is inspired by or a deriavative of Benz, and by your logic, it doesn't matter whether one has added significant improvement to the original work or not.
I sincerely hope that you understand my concern?
Kindly let me know the most appropriate license to release this work on. Tom and Jerry were created in the 1940s and their original creators are all dead now, although, not upto 70years the died. Goodman Andrew (talk) 06:12, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Speedy delete obvious vandalism Dronebogus (talk) 06:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low graphical quality and non-free source. File:Pinealon.svg is de-novo free and higher quality DMacks (talk) 04:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not very large and with opaque background from a non-free source. File:TAK-653.svg is de-novo free and higher quality DMacks (talk) 04:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ambiguous stereochemistry and the tropane-ether, and colored background. Have File:JHW-007-d9 Structure.svg as better chemistry and graphical quatliy DMacks (talk) 04:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the Philippines, artist Kublai Millan is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I posted this photo, I got the photo from him directly as I am writing a book on his paintings and am working closely with him. He has given his permission for use of this and all photos in this page - Karlo Antonio Galay David KidapawanSnake (talk) 15:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KidapawanSnake so is this not your image? Then double issues: the image itself and the artwork shown. The sculptor should send explicit permission allowing commercial licensing of this image and his artwork (not non-commercial[!]), through email shown at COM:VRTS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low graphical quality and ambiguous stereochemistry at tropane-ether (As tagged). Have File:JHW-007 Structure.svg as replacement DMacks (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MC Digital Media (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Found here https://christosmarangos.com/ - dubious claim of own work, needs permission to keep

Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Romania A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


And what would be the infringement here? The build seems old, the statue is not big enough in the frame. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in UK, artist Jim Vision is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dvisionentmt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work as claimed. PCP. And scope?

Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Temporary poster within an building -> no freedom of panorama -> copyvio 88.70.204.201 20:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zainul abideen runner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multiple cameras, different sizes, quality, 1 batch of files are watermarked. Permission needed.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4thchild (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lleeaa192408 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Most have author name in exif. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 16:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old photos dated 1948 and 1984. Unlikely to be own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 16:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sahupankaj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, no source and no evidence of a free license provided.

Yann (talk) 13:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 16:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency token. Omphalographer (talk) 04:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. czar 01:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fuzul Holding (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not own work, 2 have author name in exif

Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: lacking permission or explanation of connection to the image's EXIF-stated author; no stated educational purpose for unused photos. czar 01:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD: Image from the 60s, author cannot be dead for 70 years Karl Oblique (talk) 12:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of first publication. czar 01:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This maybe a copyrighted image [2] (please check before the deletion). Sriveenkat (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of author permission to use stated license. czar 01:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason= Arquivo em desuso de longo período |subpage=File:Estação de Pavuna-São João de Meriti.jpg |day=26 |month=December |year=2023 }} Jos yet (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. czar 01:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 02:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 02:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 02:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 02:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency token. Omphalographer (talk) 04:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency token. (Note that this is not Bitcoin; it's an unrelated token with a confusingly similar name.) Omphalographer (talk) 04:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency. Omphalographer (talk) 04:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency token. Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency company. Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency. (Note that this is not the same as Bitcoin; it's a Bitcoin fork which was largely ignored.) Omphalographer (talk) 04:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as no permission (No permission since) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 07:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peerj-12742.pdf — PeerJ articles are licensed under CC licenses. PDF states "Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0". Tol (talk | contribs) @ 07:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn My bad Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yowepe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All but 1 have author info in exif, not own work

Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pihlak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a gallery for displaying personal art works. Out of the project scope.

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lombardo MF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Music album covers, G10 and F10, Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters in Macau. Solomon203 (talk) 11:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters in Macau. Solomon203 (talk) 11:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Infogreenclown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

F10, Unrecognisable person

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie posters in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie posters in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted map in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted map in China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harshit Himachali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Watermarks appear on every pictures

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional studio shot, own work of AIAgency questionable, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 14:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linziyu1823 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution and lack of EXIF data. Photos can be found on the Internet. Contacting Volunteer Response Team or uploading full resolution version of photos is needed.

SCP-2000 14:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1926 published photograph by a named author. We'd need to have a death date before 1953 in order to keep this. Abzeronow (talk) 02:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably copyrighted article that does not appear to have been created by the author. Abzeronow (talk) 02:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undated cartoon (likely 20th Century) depicting a historical event. It looks like the authors name was E. Reubert or Ereubert. Would need publication information to determine its actual copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 02:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, broken SVG --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from personal archive, needs more info to determine PD state and SCOPE? Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work of architecture in Ukraine that does not grant freedom of panorama for commercial uses of public space works. See my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kiev Flying Saucer.jpg for authorship details of this unfree building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this complex enough for a copyright? Yann (talk) 10:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, redundant to files at Category:Green check marks. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small resolution without EXIF information, probably not own work. Regasterios (talk) 16:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

British photograph that features a locomotive class built in 1907. Could be public domain (Flickr source marks it with Public Domain Mark) but as a late 1900s/early 1910s photo, the PMA 70 license would be false without some evidence that a reasonable search was done for the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 05:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore БРИАН.Ю.М (talk) 23:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuel Portero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 00:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, fictitious flag. While this design is based on some content from File:Flag of Rhodesia.svg, it's not a design which was ever used by the country. Omphalographer (talk) 00:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious hybrid flag. Omphalographer (talk) 00:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: tiny, unused, unidentifiable (possibly fictitious?) flag. Omphalographer (talk) 00:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moncif_ait_ahmed_2020.jpg 7amosatv (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not suitable for commons; copy of this image exists in appropriate file format in English Wikipedia ItsCheck (talk) 01:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Image unlikely to be from 2020, is credited from Bettmann/Getty Images on this article https://timeline.com/the-kkk-started-a-branch-just-for-women-in-the-1920s-and-half-a-million-joined-72ab1439b78b CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can be in public domain, the article says it is from 1956.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, PD claim needs to be established. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 02:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12704883/Russias-Wagner-Group-Hezbollah-air-defense-Israel-Hamas.html?ico=most_shared_articles_mol.web.desktop_ Bremps... 02:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works by Virgil Ortiz

[edit]

Non-free content, derivative works, no FoP. Images contain copyrighted sculptures by a living artist (Virgil Ortiz), photographed in the United States (no FoP). --19h00s (talk) 02:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signature of a non-notable person, likely to be out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete I’m sure he’s famous to someone! Dronebogus (talk) 02:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndreaVaverkova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No need to have 5 of the same logos. Only File:Flowmon Networks logo.svg is used. Remaining 4 (listed) that were uploaded together should be deleted.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katshet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Redundant to File:BXP Logo Horizontal-Color-RGB.png.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo of a photo. Since we don't have provenance for the original, it's impossible to know whether the image is properly licensed. Old image, what about FoP? Yann (talk) 13:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FoP does not apply to a photograph of another photograph in a frame. If we were to blur or crop out the potentially copyrighted elements from this image, would it still be useful? No, it would not. DS (talk) 16:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it depends on the country of origin. It seems you confuse freedom of panorama with de minimis. Yann (talk) 19:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then. Was this photo taken in a public place? We can reasonably infer that it was taken in Iran, because it's in use on Farsi Wikipedia, so which of the criteria in template:PD-Iran apply?
How old is the photo? When was it first published? When did the photographer die? DS (talk) 20:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it is from Iran, that it is in the public domain if the original image is older than 30 years, which quite probable. There is a legend under the picture in Arabic script. Someone who knows the language may help to fix this. Yann (talk) 21:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PD-Iran isn't "30 years after creation", it's "30 years after publication or public presentation". When was this photo first published? DS (talk) 21:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that it is displayed in this frame is publication. Yann (talk) 21:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And when was it first put in the frame? DS (talk) 23:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. We need to know more about the origin of the photo to determine PD or FOP status. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: On the internet since mars 2015 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, tight crop, no exif, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a lower resolution version of this file 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 15:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AIAgency (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional studio shot, own work of AIAgency questionable, COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 15:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AIAgency (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Origin questionable, COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 15:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reddylohithp22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Simhapuri12.jpg is a screenshot stolen from ca. 5.06 of this video; File:Ajanta200.jpg is here (direct); etc.) Duck/PRP issue

used in Ajanta Express
used in Ajanta Express
used in Ajanta Express
used in Ajanta Express
used in Ajanta Express

Эlcobbola talk 15:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely taken from https://indiarailinfo.com/ as well. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © Theresa Watzlawik M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted when we have permission. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fenikals as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work; no source cited, put before community  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, needs permission. And scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 10:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hjart as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hjart as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hjart as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Diploma CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of Scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KWESI VOCALS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mazlummroni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:CMUNClogo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WillGzmn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unnecessary downscale of File:Logo conviasa.png.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file currently hosted on Wikimedia Commons, which I believe violates copyright regulations as there is no evidence supporting its public domain status. Upon thorough examination, it appears that there is no clear indication or verifiable evidence suggesting that the file in question is in the public domain. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I created this file long time ago. It is on a very renownded Indian singer. He is not related to me in any ways and I created the page just keep him in Wikipedia. So the page should be there. Best Regards, -Soomit 11:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination, An image "in our family's photo collection" is absolutely not "own work" -- it is the work of whoever actually was the photographer. He or his heirs hold the copyright and your ownership of a paper copy of it does not give you the right to license it. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Reppop as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work; crop of photograph from card http://thehesperos.blogspot.com/2005/01/happy-100th-birthday-lolo-undo-davide.html How old is this? Yann (talk) 13:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs more info to determine PD status. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wallu2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See Photo courtesy description in source "PTI Media Cell"|url=https://www.urduvoa.com/a/imran-khans-step-daughter-joins-pti/4515586.html  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot. Solomon203 (talk) 11:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - derivative work issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bach'sGoldberg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

more info about authorship of the text and calligraphy is needed. otherwise no permission from the authors is established.

RZuo (talk) 11:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Cnvv logo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Cnjpq2015.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr.ahmedibrahim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Codux-logo-big.png.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:COGI PNG.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:CK Birla Hospital for Women Transparent logo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has opaque white background and is unused. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 12:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Nominated image is graphically weak (not large, not high-resolution, some needless in-image caption text). But alternative is File:Phloroglucinol synthesis.svg that has a different (and less-common, not in sync with wikipedia pages using it) representation of the benzene ring and is factually poorer (need specifically hydroxide not just a generic "base" in third step, and specifically "Raney Ni" not just some Ni–Al alloy in second step). DMacks (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. Also, the nominated image also just says "base", not hydroxide. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alfa-ketosav: Why don't you apply en:MOS:Structure drawing? --Leyo 22:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't contain information about how one should draw aromatic compounds like phloroglucinol (e. g. whether one has to draw alternating single and double bonds or one can draw circles to mark aromaticity). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was rather referring to the proportion (see section Suggested molecule editor settings). Your settings are not even close to those. --Leyo 20:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Герб ИПП.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:CorratelLogo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Several web-hits Probably not OK, but... Yann (talk) 13:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noting also uploader's history of claiming a range of others' works are own. DMacks (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per DMacks - maybe out of scope too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fenikals as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo. Yes, this is a logo, but it's all text. Is it above or below the revelant TOO? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It seems not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently first published in and credited by the Greenville News newspaper. Likely copyvio Fastily 01:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently first published in and credited by the Greenville News newspaper. Likely copyvio Fastily 01:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Already on the internet in 2014 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:CD logo 87-89 png.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, wrong shape. Replaced with File:Seal of United States Central Command.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Simone Buzzetta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded for it:Chb studio. No other use.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source https://digitalmilieu.net/ says (C) we need permission

Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lobsterslam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely not own work; created by sock of Betteruser (talk · contribs) (see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Betteruser) and uses various different names for the different images ("Rob Samuel", "Hugo Ross", "Joe Burgos").

reppoptalk 08:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:How to use icon.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably Flickrwashing. EXIF data mentions "© Corbis. All Rights Reserved" and a whole bunch of other things relating to this former stock photography company. According to en:w:BENlabs, Corbis's images now belong to Getty Images. HyperGaruda (talk) 08:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:CilusLogo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:CinemAsia Film Festival Logo.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:Logo ADREXO+baseline.PNG. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Logo; community should make the decision whether they consider geometric or not  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The company based in UK so it is likely above the ToO needed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hjart as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10; long held image, should be community decision  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: although the user made a few hundred contributions, the user is inactive since more than 20 year and the image unused. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation
TKsdik8900 (uploader) says "Source=https://www.env.go.jp/park/minamialps/5_miraihe.pdf". However, his explanation was false. TKsdik8900 uploaded this photo on 05:29, November 13, 2023. This photo does not come from 5_miraihe.pdf. This photo came from the website of the Foreign Press Center Japan. This website says "Copyright © 2015- Foreign Press Center Japan. All Rights Reserved". Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 17:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment That is not a reason to disguise the source. And it's not a reason to misrepresent the license.
The photo that uploaded by TKsdik8900 on 05:29, November 13, 2023 did not change the resolution of the image subject to the Terms of Use for Using the Content of the Ministry of the Environment's website (Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use Ver.2.0). The photo that uploaded by TKsdik8900 on 05:29, November 13, 2023 has a larger shooting range than the image subject to GJSTU-2.0, so there is no way to make derivative works of the image subject to GJSTU-2.0. There is no problem to make derivative works of the image subject to GJSTU-2.0. But the photo that uploaded by TKsdik8900 on 05:29, November 13, 2023 was reprocessed from the another website. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 02:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understood your claim. This disagreement is not likely to be resolved by talking on this page, so let's discuss this once on your talk page. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 05:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
After discussions with Nnkrkrhhdi, I found that he and I have fundamentally different perceptions about licensing. I would expect, as have been the cases above in the past, a consistent decision by an administrator as Commons, even if I do not know which administrator will make it, but if a decision is made that differs from previous precedents, I will respect it and take it into consideration. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It's an old photo that Shizuoka prefecture (2015) used. It seems likely that the prefecture, one this person is the governor of, is the original author of the picture, and the one who can license it (so the central government including the environment ministry is not in the position to license it). Shizuoka's copyright policy available on their website is "All Rights Reserved", and I don't see specific license about this picture either. An unlikely situation where copyright transfer (to the central government, or to FPCJ) happened is not impossible, but we would certainly need specific evidence for that. Without further evidence, I would say the first possibility I gave above is most likely - that means that the work is not licensed by the copyright holder. whym (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: mostly per whym - likely to be from Shizuoka Prefecture, which does not grant the GJSTU. --Yasu (talk) 15:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio source=https://www.walygatorparc.com/sudouest/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Walygator-S01-HD-096-scaled.jpg Eliedion (talk) 11:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as F1. Blatant copyvio, no indication of being released under a compatible license. https://www.walygatorparc.com/sudouest/ Alachuckthebuck (talk) 20:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See en:User talk:Thesazh, this is a picture of a picture claimed as the work of the uploader. 331dot (talk) 13:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all remaining contributions of Thesazh (talk · contribs) as copyvios. File:Photograph of Muduganti Jithender Reddy demise.jpg is very unlikely own work. Per EXIF, file:Sekhar VS.jpg is taken from Facebook and file:Manohar Siddham.jpg from Instagram. File:Duvvuru Varshitha.jpg has author and copyright holder KUSHALGS in EXIF. The rest have always different camera data, if it exists at all. Multiple photos have notability problem as well (look en:draft:Muduganti Jithender Reddy and en:draft:Siddam Manohar). Taivo (talk) 10:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission; post-1975 Italian images are copyrighted in the United States per PD-Italy. QuestFour (talk) 17:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted work with no clear authorisation. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 19:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload comment (Uploaded while editing "Jens Dunker" on no.wikipedia.org) and File:Bilde Baroda kirke.png on no:w:Jens Dunker suggest this is an architectural drawing by Jens Dunker, who died in 1981. According to COM:Norway, this work will remain in copyright until 2052. HyperGaruda (talk) 08:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted work. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 19:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author given. No EXIF-data. And no FOP in Estonia Estopedist1 (talk) 07:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, multiple other view of Gagra already exist Alaexis (talk) 09:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Yikes, this was a really bad photo. holly {chat} 17:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlicensed {{User|POS78}}talk 09:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All Content by Mehr News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You can see this statement on the link provided for the image. Ehsanbasafa (talk) 17:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ehsanbasafa This picture is not for Mehr news agency. There is nothing to prove that it was taken by the photographers of this news agency. {{User|POS78}}talk 21:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Mehr News photos must be watermarked with clear attribution. holly {chat} 17:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 0x0a as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2023 ternatekota.go.id. All right reserved. Hak cipta Diskomsandi.|source=https://ternatekota.go.id/; source cited as noted, and cited as exempt  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to notes in Template:PD-IDGov, images taken from Indonesian government websites with copyright sign are considered to be copyrighted. 0x0a (talk) 04:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Once published by government websites, they're in the public domain. Indonesia is unitary state, which means the central government law is binding on its entire region and local government. In this case, Ternate government is not exempt from the copyright law because they use public funds to create this image (their "All Righs Reserved" claim can be easily ruled out by the court). Afif Brika1 (talk) 20:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; COM:Indonesia#General rules is clear that the law allows for copyright statements on websites to override the general PD declaration. holly {chat} 17:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 0x0a as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © Sejak 2018 Copyright Maluku Barat Daya News. All Rights reserved.|source=https://news.malukubaratdayakab.go.id/; cited as government published and exempt  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to notes in Template:PD-IDGov, images taken from Indonesian government websites with copyright sign are considered to be copyrighted. 0x0a (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Once published by government websites, they're in the public domain. Indonesia is unitary state, which means the central government law is binding on its entire region and local government. In this case, Maluku Barat Daya government is not exempt from the copyright law because they use public funds to create this image (their "All Righs Reserved" claim can be easily ruled out by the court). Afif Brika1 (talk) 20:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; COM:Indonesia#General rules is clear that the law allows for copyright statements on websites to override the general PD declaration. holly {chat} 17:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the artist died in 2011, this 2017 upload cannot be own work. VRT-permission from heir is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the artist heir and I have permission to publish this image. Please remove the deletion request. 2A02:A03F:6487:DF00:BD2F:7D07:5B27:8D09 10:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the reasoning does not make sense. The work of art is property of my family, regardless of lineage. As such, I can take a picture of it and publish it, this is the definition of "own work". 2A02:A03F:6487:DF00:BD2F:7D07:5B27:8D09 11:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(sorry I was not logged in. Both messages above are from me). Blackberu (talk) 11:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please open COM:VRT page (French version) and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent to Wikimedia permissions department at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ticket:2024011510005652 applied. Thank you for your contribution! holly {chat} 17:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission (No permission since)

The file format is en:tiff and based on the EXIF data, it was probably created by the uploader. It also appears to be a proposed logo for the meta:Chinese-Urdu Community Collaboration project and it is in scope. SCP-2000 13:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would first be thankful for the assistance of User:SCP-2000 in the response to my pleading in the instant messaging channel as I cannot use the "Challenge" function described in Commons:But it's my own work!. It might possibly be the most ridiculous speedy deletion I have ever seen. That file is a TIFF file with all drawing layers and sized 1.7MB where there should be no reason to exclude it as an original file. I uploaded the original file and released it per CC BY-SA 4.0. I can see no ground to suspect at all. -- (Dasze) 14:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be written by Qingge Zhao (Q65051438) (1914-1999) Midleading (talk) 14:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FoP does not apply to photographs in Hungary. I think, the original photo may remain by COM:DM Regasterios (talk) 16:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 1948 item cannot be a pre 1928 publication, Furthermore such items at IA are under an incompatible NC clause. I didn't see an obvious notice in the first few pages however. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment. There is no copyright notice, but is this actually a 1948 publication? It was made in 1948, but these are just typed up field notes. You can see hand corrections at various parts of the manuscript. I don't know that this was ever distributed in a meaningful way until it was digitized. The author died in the 1970s, so it doesn't meet the US unpublished PMA threshold of 1954. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I think that these field notes would qualify as a work made for hire for the Museum (which funded the expedition), in which case they are copyrighted until the earlier of 95 years from publication (which would be 2017, when they were uploaded to BHL under an incompatible CC license) or 120 years from creation (1948), and thus until 1948+120+1=2069. If the writer of the notes is considered to be the copyright holder, then the copyright expires in 2042 (as he died in 1971). TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: probably unpublished, but IA indicates CC-BY-NC-ND, so that's that. holly {chat} 18:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jan Myšák as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.top-expo.cz/smart-city/smart-city-2017/tee-2017/ A 2017 page cited as the source, yet we have a 2012 image, possible that we are the soure of their image  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This photo is his LinkedIn profile picture, so it's more likely that the uploader got it from there. holly {chat} 17:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a studio portrait, looks professional, also this is the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 17:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. A "dubious" DR. "Looks professional" is not a valid reason to delete photographs on Commons. Quality photos on Commons are valued. There are many other photos with clear reasons for a Deletion Request, but this is not one of them. --Ooligan (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:MYWORK #4, the image looks very professional, such as a studio portrait, book cover, movie poster, etc. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to the link,
"It is not a Commons policy or guideline, and editors are not obliged to follow it." --Ooligan (talk) 10:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete A very similar photo (clearly from the same photo session) appears at https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/xmVZxG where credit is given to "KKBOX". We need VRT confirmation that the uploader represents this company or photographer. holly {chat} 18:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a studio portrait, looks professional, also this is the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 17:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. A "dubious" DR. "Looks professional" is not a valid reason to delete photographs on Commons. Quality photos on Commons are valued. There are many other photos with clear reasons for a Deletion Request, but this is not one of them. --Ooligan (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:MYWORK #4, the image looks very professional, such as a studio portrait, book cover, movie poster, etc. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to the link,
"It is not a Commons policy or guideline, and editors are not obliged to follow it." --Ooligan (talk) 10:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Image is available at https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/21/2/10/n12745090.htm where credit is to Taiwan TV. holly {chat} 18:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These four files, apparently showing older German postcards, were uploaded without naming an author or a source other than just "old postcard" or "old postcard before World War II". So while three of them are said to be from 1939 (or earlier), the fourth could be even much later, like the 1950s or the 1960s.

The license tags used for the uploads, {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} and {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}, are not correct. Not-PD-US-URAA is not allowed for new files uploaded after 1 March 2012. And PD-Germany-§134-KUG does not apply because the photographs were not "published before 1966 by a German legal entity under public law without indicating an author" (or in the very unlikely case that they were, there is no evidence at all to support it).

1939 or the 1950s/1060s is much too late for {{PD-old-assumed}}, and while some people like to claim quickly that such photos are "anonymous" or there was "no author disclosure" or something like that, we cannot even determine if that is actually the case without knowing when and how they were published first. So without any information about first publication or even just the year in which they were taken we cannot determine their copyright status, and the files should be deleted.

Rosenzweig τ 16:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich um Postkarten die ich kaufte. Bei Wikipedia sind Tausende Postkarten unter {{PD-old-assumed}} veröffentlicht. Dort ist die Sachlage genauso wie bei diesen. Willst Du sie alle löschen? Der Verlag Fotohandlung W. Vieth Hachen, von dem die Postkarten gedruckt wurden, gibt es nicht mehr. Zumindest sind im Internet nur einige Postkarten der Firma zu finden.--Falkmart (talk) 09:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dass du sie gekauft hast, hat keinen Einfluss auf die urheberrechtliche Bewertung, und dass es den Verlag nicht mehr gibt, auch nicht. PD-old-assumed ist für Werke, die mindestens 120 Jahre alt sind, und das ist hier wie oben geschrieben nicht der Fall. --Rosenzweig τ 15:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Falkmart: You have these postcards in your possession, yes? Was there any author or date information printed on the other side? holly {chat} 18:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Falkmart: bump. holly {chat} 22:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was no information about the author of the picture on the postcard. According to the postmark on the stamp, the card Hoppecketal bei Pulvermühle.png was sent in 1952. The Cards Hellhohlschanze 3.jpg, Hellhohlschanze 4.jpg and Hellhohlschanze.png must have been printed before 1939, as a comparison with pictures in a book about Brilon showed. The publishing house is closed. --Falkmart (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I think we can go witih {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} here, as photographer names were not included on the postcards, and it will be very difficult to find out who they are, given that the company is no longer in business. However, URAA restoration of copyrights means they won't be PD in the US until 2035 for the 1939 ones and 2047 for the 1952 one. holly {chat} 17:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). There is presently no license tag, but this is a trivially simple logo more or less everywhere except the U.K., and I think it's under COM:TOO. As such, I'm declining the speedy and sending to DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Almost definitely below TOO but because there's no description to indicate what this is supposed to be, I'm calling it out of scope. holly {chat} 19:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la foto tiene dueño y no soy yo 190.102.56.160 01:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Estoy esperando que me respondan,,, quiero eliminar esta foto 190.102.56.160 01:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Espera, espera. 186.172.203.249 21:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ud. se llama Elvin Flaco? holly {chat} 17:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; this is a full-res photo with EXIF and nominator has not established their relationship with the uploader and/or copyright holder. holly {chat} 19:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file won't even update on Wikimedia Commons, as this file is already placed in Wikipedia, but the file's changes won't even appear on Wikipedia. Ethanbulaon (talk) 03:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Impru20 as no permission (No permission since) Theklan (talk) 07:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The license of the image can be seen clearly in the website of the political party this candidate represents: EH Bildu. The license is cc-by-sa (not specificed 3.0 or 4.0) as stated in the footer. Now I can't go back, because the website is poorly designed and doesn't have an archive button, but the image authorship and license is clear from them. Theklan (talk) 07:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The image itself is visible here: https://ehbildu.eus/albisteak/eh-bilduren-mahai-politikoak-pello-otxandiano-proposatu-du-lehendakarigai-izateko Theklan (talk) 07:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The website's legal note states that "Sólo para uso personal y privado se permite descargar los contenidos, copiar o imprimir cualquier página de esta web. Queda prohibido reproducir, transmitir, modificar o suprimir la información, contenido o advertencias de esta web sin la previa autorización por escrito de EUSKAL HERRIA BILDU." (translates as: "Only for personal and private use it is permitted to download the contents, copy or print any page of this website. It is prohibited to reproduce, transmit, modify or delete the information, content or warnings on this website without the prior written authorization of EUSKAL HERRIA BILDU."). It is not clear what does the footer mean, but it is in clear contradiction with the website's specific legal advice and should be interpreted restrictively. Where can we find than this image in particular has a cc-by-sa license? Because that's not made clear from the link you provide nor from the website itself. Impru20 (talk) 08:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It should be noted that a derivative work from this file, File:Pello Otxandiano (cropped).jpg, was deleted a couple days ago due to it indeed not having permission. Impru20 (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Theklan: Why don't you try contacting the party to figure out if CC-BY-SA is valid or if the language on the Terms & Conditions page takes precedence? holly {chat} 17:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because it is self evident that it is free, as they have a cc-by-sa tag below. You can't do anything without their authorization, which you have because it is written below. Theklan (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this is an interesting interpretation: "You can't do anything unless we authorize it. Oh by the way, we authorize it." Still, it certainly won't hurt to ask, so I would like you to email them to clarify. We can wait a little longer to close this DR. holly {chat} 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Theklan: Any luck? holly {chat} 19:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't have an answer, but the same image can be found here, where they publish things with cc-by-sa license: https://www.argia.eus/albistea/eh-bilduk-pello-otxandiano-proposatu-du-eaeko-lehendakarigai-izateko. As this is the image given by them to all the media (including those which publish under a free license), and the web states that their content is cc-by-sa, I think is pretty fair to assume that, indeed, this image is free. Anyway, I will ask again. Theklan (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Google Translate, Argia's license declaration says "This license is valid only for texts and, in the case of photographs and illustrations, those bearing the signature of ARGIA." So this photo would not be included. holly {chat} 22:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Holly, permission excludes photographs. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [6]. Ccontent can be used, copied, distributed, shown, publicly displayed, modified, developed, combined with other materials, used for commercial purposes. Also File:Pello Otxandiano (cropped).jpg. Yann (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) Theklan (talk) 07:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We already discusse this: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Pello_Otxandiano.jpg Theklan (talk) 07:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo; actual age of the components of the image need to be confirmed; not clearly eligible for speedy deletion  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per COM:TOO Mexico, "Reproductions or imitations, without authorization, of shields, flags or emblems of any country, state, municipality or equivalent political division" are not subject to copyright. holly {chat} 17:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Appears to be a photograph (the uploader's?) of another photograph which was taken decades ago (the subject died in the 90s). Likely a photograph of some archived photograph owned by someone other than the uploader. Dan Leonard (talk) 04:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo (the original, hard copy photo, not the jpg) is in possession of one of the descendants of Herb Kramer. This photo was from his personal effects. It is now in the possession of his daughter Katherine. Berwin (talk) 18:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Berwin: Do you or Katherine know who took the photo, and is that person still alive (or if not, are either one of you their heir)? If yes to both questions, then you should contact the volunteer response team to declare this and confirm the usage of the free license. holly {chat} 17:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This photo was likely taken by a white house staff photographer (and thus in the public domain by default). I'll try and find out definitive evidence for this. Berwin (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also can I ask how you came to comment on this today? Because by coincidence (or not) I know someone who downloaded the photo from the Wiki at the same time. I'm wondering if the two are related. Berwin (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I closed a bunch of deletion requests today and this one was in the queue, that's all. holly {chat} 22:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Berwin: Any progress? holly {chat} 22:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Yann (talk) 13:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to vote keep as its typical of Government official photos but I cannot find a source to confirm Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same. I was unable to find this particular photo on any *.gov website, but https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/bureau/254661.htm has an alternative we can use. holly {chat} 17:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like that file already exists at File:Juan Gonzalez, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State.jpg. I ordered a universal replace and we can delete this guy when CommonsDelinker does its job. holly {chat} 19:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 23:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]