Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/09/23
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
File:Ambox warning orange.svg 2001:4451:8638:4000:7D7A:8672:3A3:73C5 03:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given, in use. --Achim55 (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Okay! please 2001:4451:866E:4700:4459:5E71:FE12:C12C 03:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per above. (Non-admin closure.) Omphalographer (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete please 112.204.115.115 04:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept again. (Non-admin closure.) Omphalographer (talk) 05:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete Page Cjhpaz (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rabin, W.98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]" Foley catheters help autistic children hold in their urine to prevent urinary tract infections and overfilling the bladder." - dangerous medical advices and finally this is nothing more than a perverted adult who lives his fantasies. Completely out of scope. If this really would be images of a minor, the uploader would need to meet with the police. Because even withe the "medical" advise this is nothing more than living a perverted fantasy and with a minior in it, it would be a crime. The user should also get blocked!
- File:Foley catheter.jpg
- File:Foley catheter (23).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (22).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (20).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (21).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (19).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (18).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (17).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (15).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (16).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (14).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (13).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (11).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (12).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (9).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (10).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (8).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (7).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (6).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (5).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (2).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (3).jpg
- File:Foley catheter (4).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (8).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (7).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (6).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (5).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (4).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (3).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (2).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema.jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (29).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (27).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (28).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (26).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (25).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (24).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (23).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (22).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (21).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (20).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (19).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (18).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (17).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (16).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (15).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (12).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (13).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (14).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (10).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (11).jpg
- File:Pediatric Enema (9).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (5).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (6).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation (2).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (7).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation.jpg
- File:Anal dilation (10).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (8).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (11).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (9).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation (5).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation (4).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation (3).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation (9).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation (8).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (20).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (18).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (17).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (12).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (16).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (13).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (14).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (15).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (19).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation (6).jpg
- File:Digital stimulation (7).jpg
- File:Anal dilation.jpg
- File:Anal dilation (2).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (3).jpg
- File:Anal dilation (4).jpg
- File:Poopdiaper.jpg
- File:Poop diaper.jpg
- File:Suppository for child.jpg
- File:Children defecation after suppository2.jpg
- File:Children defecation after suppository1.jpg
- File:Children defecation after suppository3.jpg
- File:Rectal temperature 1.jpg
- File:Rectal temperature 2.jpg
- File:Rectal temperature 3.jpg
- File:Diaper wet.jpg
- File:Poop diaper3.jpg
- File:Poop diaper2.jpg
- File:Suppository3.jpg
- File:Suppository.jpg
- File:Poop in dipaer.jpg
- File:Suppository2.jpg
- File:Suppository1.jpg
- File:Diaper rash.jpg
- File:Diaper rash (5).jpg
- File:Diaper rash (6).jpg
- File:Diaper rash (7).jpg
- File:Diaper rash (3).jpg
- File:Diaper rash (2).jpg
- File:Diaper rash (4).jpg
- File:Diaper Change 1.jpg
- File:Digital disimpaction 2.jpg
- File:Digital disimpaction 1.jpg
- File:Digital disimpaction 3.jpg
- File:Catheter Cleaning 1.jpg
- File:Catheter Cleaning 2.jpg
- File:Catheter 04.jpg
- File:Catheter 02.jpg
- File:Ctaheter01.jpg
- File:Catheter 03.jpg
- File:FtHGuHaaIAArbrC.jpg
- File:FtHG4ZYaMAAAzw1.jpg
- File:FtHHF7PacAA3-xZ.jpg
- File:FtHHF4RaEAAty8s.jpg
- File:FtHHF7PaMAMECor.jpg
Marcus Cyron (talk) 05:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
........ Rabin, W.98 (talk) 05:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
.......... Rabin, W.98 (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
......... Rabin, W.98 (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
......... Rabin, W.98 (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
.......... Rabin, W.98 (talk) 05:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
........... Rabin, W.98 (talk) 05:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
.......... Rabin, W.98 (talk) 05:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
...................... Rabin, W.98 (talk) 05:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded a personal photo of myself and would like to remove it. Twiqh (talk) 09:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, err G7. --Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Per subject's email: "Hi [me], I need to give you a different photo to use because I don't have a contract with the photographer who took my headshot." ToQ100gou (talk) 00:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023092210005822 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 02:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Redundant, same edition of File:The Rámáyana of Tulsi Dás.djvu (see s:Wikisource:Scriptorium/Archives/2023-02#Duplicate_book) Mpaa (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- FYI @Yann, @Jusjih, @TryKid, @Billinghurst Mpaa (talk) 16:30, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; duplicate of same edition of work. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Ré-upload en meilleure qualité sous peu - problème technique. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Media published on Unsplash after 4 June 2017 are not available under CC-Zero and do not comply with Commons policy.
- File:Plastikozko dardoa.jpg
- File:Altzairuko dardoa.jpg
- File:Altzairuzko punta.jpg
- File:Altzairuzko dardoak.jpg
- File:Diana elektronikoa.jpg
Larryasou (talk) 11:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
errore di caricamento Teodorarte (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Betere versie geplaatst Nico Middenwillens (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
The copyright holder should be Helen Sloan or HBO, as per metadata. Larryasou (talk) 20:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Sacheen Littlefeather
[edit]The source is a Flickr account that claims to be from UCLA Library. The images are indeed from the UCLA Library Special Collections, and it is part of the Los Angeles Times Photographic Archives [1]. I'm opening this DR because (1) the Flickr account had little activity and only a dozen followers, and UCLA Library doesn't mention it on their website, while it mentions a Tumblr account [2] (now discountinued) (2) Their duplication policy [3] mentions most of the Special Collection materials are copyrighted and the copyright holders are not the UCLA Library, this is the archive of a major newspaper (3) The source at UCLA Library [4] doesn't state the copyright status, it only mentions Rick Browne as the photographer. As the Flickr account is suspicious and the copyright holder is likely Los Angeles Times, we cannot kept this unless this photo was published without a copyright symbol (likely in 1973).
- File:Sacheen Littlefeather Oscar 45 (cropped).jpg
- File:Sacheen Littlefeather Oscar 45.jpg
- File:Sacheen Littlefeather Oscar 45 (cropped) (cropped).jpg
- File:Sacheen Littlefeather Oscar 45 (cropped1).jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 21:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- The images are part of the Los Angeles Times Photographic Collection at the UCLA Digital Library, specifically from this image. The rights holder is The Regents of the University of California after it was deeded to them by the LA Times, and they license it CC BY-4.0 as stated in {{LATimes UCLA}}. Its most likely that the Flickr account is also the UCLA Library as they have most of the same images, though lower resolution like the previous UCLA Digital Library before its revamping. reppoptalk 21:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination as the link provided by @Reppop is more informative that the one I based my DR. I will proceed to add the {{LATimes UCLA}} template to the affected files. Günther Frager (talk) 21:30, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
실수로 한 업로드 Gksyy (talk) 04:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
실수로 한 업로드 Gksyy (talk) 04:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
실수로 한 업로드 Gksyy (talk) 04:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Uploading a photo without permission from the owner Apipattana (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bellminsterboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader should provide the link to the web page on which the image is displayed to verify the licensing.
Larryasou (talk) 07:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination The sources have been given and the photos were found under cc-by-sa license. Larryasou (talk) 04:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 12:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bellminsterboy (talk · contribs)
[edit]According to the website agreement, a royalty-free permission is only granted to Historic England website and its users. The author don't grant permission to publish these photos on commons under a free license.
- File:Bridgwater church roof.jpg
- File:Parish Church of St Mary Bargate Ward.jpg
- File:Worcester Cathedral from Fort Royal.jpg
- File:St Mary Redcliffe aerial.jpg
- File:South Petherton organ.jpg
- File:South Petherton east window.jpg
- File:South Petherton crossing vault.jpg
- File:South Petherton crossing.jpg
- File:South Petherton pulpit.jpg
- File:Writtle Church October 2015-1.jpg
- File:Writtle Church October 2015-2.jpg
0x0a (talk) 16:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I thought I replied to this much sooner, but apparently I didn't. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 03:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Kei2000 (talk) 10:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
실수로 한 업로드 Gksyy (talk) 10:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Gksyy (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
La personne représentée n'a pas donné son accord pour être prise en photo. Le Commissaire (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Effectivement ! Je ne voyais pas de tour de cou sur la photo mais je viens de la recroiser. Toutes mes excuses. Exilexi (talk) 12:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
No motiv *Nord68 (talk) 12:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep the file, bann the troll. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The file is just a white page. Why should it be kept? *Nord68 (talk) 14ː55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's a PDF file. The first two pages are blank, then the out-of-copyright magazine starts. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have never uploaded a PDF document and thought this file was just a white sheet. Thanks for the clarification, Tcr25. Tuválkin: I think you should stop calling other users trolls.*Nord68 (talk) 09:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think users should stop trolling. Not sure what is worse: Either that you actually saw a «blank page» and assumed it was all of it when the filetype is clearly PDF, or that this was one more pathetic attempt at grave dancing against Fæ. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have never uploaded a PDF document and thought this file was just a white sheet. Thanks for the clarification, Tcr25. Tuválkin: I think you should stop calling other users trolls.*Nord68 (talk) 09:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's a PDF file. The first two pages are blank, then the out-of-copyright magazine starts. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The file is just a white page. Why should it be kept? *Nord68 (talk) 14ː55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep not under copyright, valid file PseudoSkull (talk) 22:30, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination *Nord68 (talk) 09:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- What you should do, since you now want to keep this file after all, is to add {{Withdraw}} to this vote, not {{Keep}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 12:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Gksyy (talk) 13:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bust of Ivan Mazepa, Chernihiv
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine, artist Giennadij Jerszow is still alive
- File:Chernihiv - Ivan Mazepa.jpg
- File:Гетман. Фото Виктора Белоусова. - panoramio.jpg
- File:Мазепа.JPG
- File:Монумент на честь Івана Мазепи.jpg
- File:Пaм'ятник Івану Мазепі (Чернігів).jpg
- File:Пам'ятник І. Мазепі.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі (Чернігів) 11.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі (Чернігів)).JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі (Чернігів).JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі 2009.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі в Чернігові.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі м.Чернігів.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі на Валу.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі у м.Чернігів.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі, Чернігів, вул. Преображенська, 1, територія Валу.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Мазепі (Чернігів).jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Мазепі в Чернігові, серпень 2015.jpg
- File:Памятник И.Мазепе в Чернигове.jpg
- File:Пам’ятник князю Ігорю, Чернігів 01.jpg
- File:Пам’ятник князю Ігорю, Чернігів 02.JPG
- File:Чернігів Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі 06-2016.jpg
- File:Чернігів Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі 1.jpg
- File:Чернігів Пам'ятник Івану Мазепі.jpg
- File:Чернігів Памятник Івану Мазепі 1.jpg
- File:Чернігів Памятник Івану Мазепі 2.jpg
- File:Чернігів Памятник Івану Мазепі 3.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine, artist Giennadij Jerszow is still alive
- File:Chernobyl disaster memorial in Chernihiv 1996 by Giennadij Jerszow.jpg
- File:Жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, Чернігів.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи (Чернігів).jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи 1.JPG
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи 2.JPG
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи в м. Чернігів, 2019 р.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи в м. Чернігів.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи Чернігів Алея Героїв.JPG
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи Чернігів.JPG
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, м. Чернігів, Алея Героїв, 2019 р.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, м. Чернігів, вересень 2019 р.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, м. Чернігів, осінь 2019 р.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, м. Чернігів.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, Чернігів 11.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, Чернігів, проспект Миру, Алея Героїв.jpg
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, Чернігів.JPG
- File:Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи,.JPG
- File:Чернігів Пам’ятний знак жертвам Чорнобильської катастрофи, 2016.jpg
- File:Чернігів чорнобильцям.jpg
- File:Чернигов - Памятник ЧАЭС.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:31, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr Data Angola (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, extracted from pdf.
- File:Mapa do Parque Nacional do Bicuar.jpg
- File:Parque Nacional da Maiombe - República de Angola.svg
- File:Parque Nacional do Bicuar - República de Angola.svg
- File:Parque Nacional da Quiçama - República de Angola.svg
- File:Parque Nacional do Iona - República de Angola.svg
- File:Parque Nacional da Cangandala - República de Angola.svg
Larryasou (talk) 08:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
out of scope, violating personal rights 4028mdk09 (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Neither sexy, nor useful. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sexy teen girl.jpg. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Out of scope; not educationally useful 197.184.178.82 09:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Random AI-generated nude photo, nothing special, little educational value A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- After deleting this thrash please redirect the title to a real sexy girl like Jennifer Aniston. Thank you. 186.172.203.106 14:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 22:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment After deletion please lock this title forever "brew: only administrators". Taylor 49 (talk) 22:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted but not yet locked. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Locked too. Taylor 49 (talk) 23:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Images by user: nguthi joseph k
[edit]Out of scope selfies. Commons isn't a personal file host.
- File:A portrait of nguthi joseph kagechu.jpg
- File:Nguthi Joseph k.jpg
- File:Nguthi joseph kagechu at home in Thigio Mboroti area.jpg
- File:Nguthijosepk at home.jpg
- File:Nguthijosepk at workplace.jpg
- File:Nguthijosepk in kinoo Kikuyu.jpg
- File:Nguthijosepk.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 09:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nairobi Kenya
[edit]Out of scope selfies. Commons isn't a personal file host.
Adamant1 (talk) 09:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:30, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The artist Ainabek Ospanov is still living. This is his 2015 painting Соғыс ардагері Дүйсенбай ақсақал. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator and the first commenter. No commercial freedom of panorama, copyvio and no commercial license clearance from the artist via COM:VRTS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Портрет Сабита Муканова (1970s) by Konstantin Baranov who died in 1988. Can consider undeleting in 2064. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:34, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, no commercial FOP. @KazyKazyKazakhstan and Tcr25: since this is not a work of architecture, it may be eligible for U.S. copyright through COM:URAA copyright restoration (as a work published or first displayed in public before 1989). The U.S. copyright term is 95+1 years after the year of publication or public display, so even if it falls public domain in Kazakhstan, the photo won't be restored until U.S. copyright expires. U.S. copyright can be ignored, if Kazakhstan removes commercial restriction in FOP clause (see {{Not-free-US-FOP}}). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, derivative work of the uncredited original painter. No freedom of panorama for 2D paintings here. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work and not simple geometry KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 13:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
False license MRTFR55 (talk) 17:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete 30 November 1979, past PD date. --RAN (talk) 19:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Believe that we need to more clearly demonstrate that this image is out of copyright. A quick search of authorities shows no year of death, and being born in 1887, if lived to 100 then we are talking 1987 for a death year, and that is not PD-60 per the claim. We need to have something definitive that the author is dead prior to 1963 — billinghurst sDrewth 23:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The painter seems to have died on 17 May 1968. Undelete on 17 May 2028. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Sajnos a jelen képet is feltöltő nem nagyon figyel oda a szerzői jogokra, illetőleg a feltöltései nagyon hanyagok. Ezt a képet is úgy töltötte fel, hogy szerinte ismeretlen a szerzője1. Természetesen előbb a flickr-jére is feltette, majd -- kihasználva a flickrbotot -- ide is, amivel igyekezett kimosni a licencet. Nekem nagyjából 5 percbe került kideríteni, hogy ki a szerző. Sajnos azonban én nem találtam meg a festő halálozási idejét. Mint az most kiderült, 1963-ban hunyt el, így természetesen a festménye nem PD-old. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused out-of-focus photo, unidentified species, no meaningful description, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Eritrea A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I don't know if this has stolen somewhere, or just out of scope. But I think that does not belong to Commons in any way. Marcus Cyron (talk) 05:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no hint for a free publishing of these images.
- File:MD Illustration.jpg
- File:Uzi Doorman.png
- File:Serial Designation N.png
- File:Serial Designation J.png
- File:J Murder Drones.png
Marcus Cyron (talk) 05:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 10:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Denmark, artist Johannes Bjerg died in 1955 A1Cafel (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Roy Lichtenstein died in 1997 A1Cafel (talk) 10:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Jordan A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mmramosborges (talk · contribs)
[edit]The artist / creator, Suzi Ferrer, died in 2006 so her artwork is still under copyright.
- File:Suzi Ferrer, The Nudelman Altarpiece.jpg
- File:Suzi Ferrer, Portrait in Six Dimensions.jpg
- File:Suzi Ferrer, Conflicto.jpg
- File:Suzi Ferrer, Amenaza.jpg
- File:Yiyo Tirado poster design for Suzi Ferrer's retrospective at MADMi.jpg
- File:Ephemera room Suzi Ferrer retrospective at MADMi.jpg
- File:Suzi Ferrer, Ream Clean; Oh, Sensuous Woman, Oh.jpg
- File:Suzi Ferrer, Amerika.jpg
- File:Suzi Ferrer, The Artist & His Conscience, Private Collection.jpg
- File:Suzi Ferrer, Untitled, Private Collection.jpg
The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 10:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
1953 painting by Walter Waentig who died in 1962. Won't be public domain in the EU until 2033, and not in the US until 2049. Abzeronow (talk) 16:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
most of informations from this page Gouvernement works is copyrighted in Turkey. So this file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 16:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
TinEye https://tineye.com/search/a6c2e0a751c5b11b969777db577422837370ccb1?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 turns up a result from https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mechanismsrobotics/article-abstract/8/2/021009/473218/Kinematics-for-an-Actuated-Flexible-n-Manifold?redirectedFrom=fulltext before upload to Commons Abzeronow (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- The uploader's name does a match an author from the article so VRT would probably be best here. Abzeronow (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The original upload description says: "Wikipedia image use courtesy McGill Environmental Systems of N.", which does nto imply any free license but DOES imply only Wikipedia use. One way or the other, it's not free licensed. Masur (talk) 19:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
A picture of an Israeli mayor that seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web (this one, for example, where there's a credit for a photographer, not sharing the same name as the uploader). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- That would be a COM:VRT note. Let's try to use current links. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not in use file, seems to be copied from somewhere else. The Commons cannot be a repository for just anything and it is not an online photo album. Ldorfman (talk) 01:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
probably copyvio Patrik L. (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
probably copyvio Patrik L. (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
probably copyvio Patrik L. (talk) 13:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Metadata credits MahdI Azadbakht, unclear if it’s the same person as the uploader Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
uploaded for vandalism purposes discospinster (talk) 16:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Jan Kameníček (talk) 18:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Applies also to File:KAGOZ MOVIE POSTER.png. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 18:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The photo was previously published on Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/photos/aQvtAipM270) under a unacceptable unsplash license. So, the VRT permission is needed to verify authorship. Larryasou (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Groot character will be copyright protected for sure. Possible Freedom of Panorama but depends on where the photograph was taken. Headlock0225 (talk) 18:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, Google Lens shows countless examples of the image being used somewhere else (eg [5] [6]). It was also uploaded by a notoriouss sock in the English Wikipedia, which makes it even more unlikely that it's own work. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Image marked with {{Low quality chem}} that is only used on 2 user pages that are translations of a previous version of the German Wikipedia article w:de:Terpen. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The tag is for missing stereochemical detail. We have multiple alternatives that resolve this problem in Category:Labdane. DMacks (talk) 20:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Fantasy map showing a historical Tunisian dynasty controlling Morocco, Libya, Egypt, Hedjaz and Palestine. Enyavar (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Fantasy flag and fantasy maps (exaggerating territory extension) - unused
- File:First Bulgarian Empire at its peak at 925 AD over modern European Borders.png
- File:Khanate Of Kazan flag.png
- File:Volga Bulgaria territory.png
Enyavar (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Clarinetguy097 (talk) 19:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The photo is also available on Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/photos/2tMxpUPZ95Q). So, the VRT process is needed to confirm the ownership. Larryasou (talk) 20:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
File:TRABAJO FINAL CURSO PSICOTRAUMA , Desgaste emocional del los abogados que trabajan con Víctimas, Licda. Monique Cruz, Guatemala, colegiada 242..pdf
[edit]Monograph written apparently by the uploader. Unlikely to be an historical relevant document to keep it in Commons. Günther Frager (talk) 21:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
According to the talk page of the uploader, it was "given" to the uploader. It is unclear whether that also involved the transfer of copyright status, or a mere physical image. Bremps... 21:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unknown license status. Derivative work of an image of unknown origin, see 800+ TinEye matches GeorgHH • talk 23:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Stock photo watermarked with spammy text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Roland Müller M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:27, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Per the template warning, post-1975 Italian images are copyrighted in the United States. QuestFour (talk) 18:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
adult nudity 58.153.10.171 05:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason, and I don't plan to look at this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation (watermark). --Polarlys (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio: professional promo photo. Changing the background doesn't make it any less so. 2003:C0:8F47:6E00:2DEB:788E:946A:A21F 06:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
no educational value, out of scope. Zafer (talk) 06:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Nudity and dangerous medical treatment 58.153.10.171 06:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 20:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Ложная лицензия: по указанному адресу фото отсутствует. сайт под копирайтом; в других местах публикации нет совместимой лицензии https://vk.com/@arhkoncert-bel-suono -- Tomasina (talk) 07:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete (c) Ivan Gushchin wighout permission --Drakosh (talk) 09:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alihack051 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely copyvios, low res and no EXIF, other soccer player photos from this user have been taken from Getty Images.
Belbury (talk) 08:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 09:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted book cover. Solomon203 (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal image 20 upper 09:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No, a photo shoot of a model. Pretty good and with a proper license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal image 20 upper 09:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No, a photo of a porn actress, properly licensed, and might be useful to someone. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal image 20 upper 09:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No, a photo of a porn actress, properly licensed, and might be useful to someone. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope 20 upper 09:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This one doesn't seem useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing author information. --Polarlys (talk) 20:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No evidence to show that the photo is under cc-by-sa license. Archive available on [7]. Larryasou (talk) 09:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atom labels; not drawn according to MoS guidelines. Replaced by better alternatives in Category:TBSCl like File:TBSCl.svg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete, does not conform to MoS and is of low quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use. Uploaded for promotion. Possible copyvio. Drakosh (talk) 10:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use. Uploaded for promotion. Possible copyvio. Drakosh (talk) 10:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No global usage and superseded by a superior/higher resolution .svg file Worldlydev (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, two people walking a garden on a pictures that adds no information. Dosseman (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Commons:Project scope. --Polarlys (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, two people walking a garden on a picture that adds no information. Dosseman (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Commons:Project scope. --Polarlys (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
copy vio from this link; screenshot of tv drama; not own work Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Trash file *Jonnie Nord (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Very low quality. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 20:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not used anywhere WhiteRoomBlues (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: On the internet since 2017 according to TineEye, Dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
ファイル名にした建築物の名称を間違えました 松乃翠 (talk) 02:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Google translation: "I made a mistake in the name of the building I used as the file name." Solution: Commons:File renaming. Though in this case, 松乃翠, if you state in a reply what you'd like the filename to be, I can rename it for you. But since you just uploaded it, it will be deleted if that's what you want. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- ありがとうございます。間違えた部分は「旧美浜郵便局」で、正しい名称は「野間郵便局旧局舎」です。正しいファイル名は 野間郵便局旧局舎 登録有形文化財(建造物) 04 街道沿い遠景.jpgとなります。他に01から03まで同様のファイルがあります。 松乃翠 (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- The filename is now File:野間郵便局旧局舎 登録有形文化財(建造物) 04 街道沿い遠景.jpg. Is that correct? I'm sorry; I don't read Japanese and I'm relying on Google Translate. If it's not right, please give me just the filename you want. If it is right, I can rename the others, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Since you thanked me, I assume I got the filename right, so I changed the filenames of the other files in the same way. Please let me know if I made any mistakes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- 4つのファイルの改名ありがとうございました。返信が遅くてごめんなさい。これらで大丈夫です。本当にありがとう。 松乃翠 (talk) 20:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Since you thanked me, I assume I got the filename right, so I changed the filenames of the other files in the same way. Please let me know if I made any mistakes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept and renamed. (non-admin closure) ClydeFranklin (talk) 21:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Images uploaded by Welcome back bro
[edit]- File:Yellow_devil.jpg
- File:The_yellow_devil.jpg
- File:Yellow_devil_coin.jpg
- File:Steklyannaya_Garmonika.jpg
- File:"Yellow devil" coin.jpg
- File:Glass Harmonica.jpg
Screenshots from a 1968 Russian film; unlikely claim of Creative Commons license. --Muzilon (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am only trying to use two photos, I uploaded multiple versions of the same images trying to get the best resolution. This is my first time creating a draft, and I’m new to a lot of these copyright rules, so I could be wrong about them. I saw that a screenshot of a movie isn’t fair use, but I don’t understand how other articles about movies have them uploaded correctly. I’d like to know how I can make it the right way, I just think those two photos make understanding the article better. Welcome back bro (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please see COM:Licensing - Commons does not allow images to be uploaded under "Fair Use"; it only accepts screenshots that are so old that the copyright has expired, or alternatively if the filmmaker has explicitly granted a Commons-friendly license. Certain copyrighted screenshots may be uploaded to Wikipedia (but not Commons) under WP:FAIRUSE, but there are special conditions for that which you'd need to familiarize yourself with. Muzilon (talk) 01:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, fair-use is not allowed on Commons. Welcome back bro seems to understand the correct way forward – uploading as fair use to enwiki – but it still needs to be deleted at Commons. HouseBlaster (talk) 01:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 15:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
داده اشتباه 5.113.145.123 08:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- کدام داده؟ Hanooz 15:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seniorjackfr
[edit]- File:CCR Algeria Logo.png
- File:ETRAG.png
- File:ENMTP.jpg
File:Saint Possidius.jpgFile:Ecoair.jpgFile:27391e 3a4259b4a5204071b1e379f45e6a52b1~mv2.pngFile:Tiaret in 2021.pngFile:Djeddars of Frenda.pngFile:Coffee bombed in Algiers.jpg
All files explicitly or most likely drawn from online sources without any evidence of permission, often low-res, many of them company logos. In the file description for File:Tiaret in 2021.png they wrote "Twitter" as the source (see here), in File:Djeddars of Frenda.png they wrote "idk who tbh" for the author. Clearly, they don't understand the rules yet. I've already nominated two other files from the same user for speedy deletion for similar problems (File:Pyramids of Djeddars.jpg, a non-free image from Flickr via pinterest, and File:Christian-martyrs.jpg, a duplicate of an existing image which the uploader misattributed to themself). R Prazeres (talk) 19:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Update: Some of the files have since been deleted through other discussions/nominations. File:Coffee bombed in Algiers.jpg has also been re-nominated here after I found its precise source. To avoid any potential confusion or conflict, I've taken the liberty of striking these files from the list above (feel free to change that if there's a more appropriate option). The remaining 3 files are all company logos. R Prazeres (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: most already deleted as part of other DR's. Kept 2 logos that are below TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:City Hall lion, Luxembourg City
[edit]No FoP in Luxembourg, artist Auguste Trémont died in 1980
- File:City Hall with lion by Auguste Trémont - Luxembourg City - DSC06073.JPG
- File:Hotel de ville Luxembourg.jpg
- File:León en la plaza Guillaume II en Luxemburgo.jpg
- File:Luxembourg - panoramio (19).jpg
- File:Luxembourg hotel de ville.jpg
- File:Luxmairie1.jpg
- File:Tremont-lion-02.jpg
- File:Urbodomo de Luksemburgo.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
ファイル名にした建造物の名称を間違えました 松乃翠 (talk) 02:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I believe File:野間郵便局旧局舎 登録有形文化財(建造物) 01 街道沿い遠景.jpg was the name you wanted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file has been renamed. --Yasu (talk) 15:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
ファイル名にした建造物の名称を間違えました 松乃翠 (talk) 02:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I believe File:野間郵便局旧局舎 登録有形文化財(建造物) 02 街道沿い遠景.jpg is the name. you wanted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file has been renamed. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
ファイル名にした建造物の名称を間違えました 松乃翠 (talk) 03:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment 松乃翠, I believe File:野間郵便局旧局舎 登録有形文化財(建造物) 03 街道沿い遠景.jpg was the requested rename. If it was, you can use the {{withdraw}} template to withdraw this deletion request. If I got the name wrong, please tell me what name you'd like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file has been renamed. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
film poster; copyvio Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by krd as no permission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
copyvio from Kosmo Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by krd as no permission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
copy vio Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by krd as no permission. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 18:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 18:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Applies to all of the following
Created in error, correctly at {{Mncat by}}. Josh (talk) 19:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MRTFR55 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: He died in 1987, not 70 years ago. RAN (talk) 19:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Turkey is the correct license, the death date of one of the people pictured does not affect the copyright. --RAN (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Screenshots of Vivaldi
[edit]Vivaldi is non-free software per Wikipedia. This is not allowed on Commons (excl screenshots freely licenced by Vivaldi themselves).
- File:Vivaldi 1.13.png
- File:Vivaldi Browser on Kindle Fire tablet - 2.jpg
- File:Vivaldi Browser on Kindle Fire tablet - 3.jpg
- File:Wikipedia Requests-for-comment Deployment-of-Vector-2022--zoom-80.png
Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 19:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Rationale makes sense but could you link to why you think "This is not allowed on Commons" [or why it would not be CCBY]? The nondeletion of this File:Photoshop-screenshot.JPG suggests proprietary software – and all its icons if they can be cut out of the screenshots – are considered CCBY if they aren't overly complex.
- Prototyperspective (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Newcandys as Speedy (db-author) and the most recent rationale was: author No valid reason provided. Yann (talk) 18:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- The photo is old and misleading because band members have changed. Newcandys (talk) 18:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a valid reason for deletion. We kept old images as well as new ones. You can edit the description explaining who left and joined the band. Yann (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- The photo includes a touring member together with four official members, it is misleading unfortunately as the band never performed as a five piece live. Newcandys (talk) 09:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a valid reason for deletion. We kept old images as well as new ones. You can edit the description explaining who left and joined the band. Yann (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Bands change lineups all the time. The argument that we shouldn't document their lineup at a particular point in time because it is not the same now makes no sense at all. Marbletan (talk) 14:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
the old photo is misleading and present the band as a 5 piece because it includes a touring member, but they never performed ad a 5 piece. The new version is a copycat of another one already in use and it's not necessary. Newcandys (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Derivative version in use in en:W. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
New Candys don't have permission to publish this particular photo. Newcandys (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please explain. How did you have permission to release under a free license a year ago, but not now? Wondering, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Uncertain whether the band holds the copyright to the file. Permission from photographer needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncertain copyright + OOS. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
As clear from the logos on the top line and the link in the file's details, it is certainly not a free file, hence it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 00:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; CV, bogus license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This image, a logo of an Israeli municipality (but not the Municipal seal), cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted, plus it is copied, as clearly mentioned in the details, from the city's site. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
A picture of an Israeli acting-mayor that seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web (this one, for example, where there's a credit for a photographer, not sharing the same name as the uploader). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Wrong licence. Denver is not the copyright holder for this work, that would be James Gurney. Doesn't seem like Denver asked for permission to release this image under Creative Commons & there's nothing on Gurney's website to suggest he released under CC either. Monsieur X (talk) 01:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unofficial flag, per description "Islamic flag created by orhangazi, the author of this page". Omphalographer (talk) 02:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: joke image. Omphalographer (talk) 02:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible above the threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 03:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Threshold of originality is extremely low, possibly even nonexistent, in the Philippines (cf. COM:TOO#Philippines); the line art of a teacup in this logo is certainly above that threshold. Omphalographer (talk) 04:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This does not look like a simple logo Trade (talk) 03:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. This should be uploaded locally on en.wikipedia for fair use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not a text logo. Unrelated, but I thought this was a file I uploaded with a similar name. Dronebogus (talk) 03:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Iceland, artist Ólöf Pálsdóttir died in 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's a pity. I took a photo of the sculpture myself where it is less prominent, with some people and vehicles in the background. Would that be acceptable? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, unfortunately. It would have to be de minimis, and certainly not the subject of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Author is Richard Lewis per Metadata, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The file was posted by The Commonwealth to Flickr with a cc-by-nc 2.0 license. Given it's from an official event and it's an official Flickr account, The Commonwealth is the most likely rights holder and they've assigned a CC license that doesn't meet Commons's requirements. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal image 20 upper 09:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Cosplay image, might be useful and properly licensed. Watermark is regrettable, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek (cosplay at convention; identifable from Flickr original as Dragon Con; appropriate category added to image). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
copy vio of book cover Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
copy vio from this link Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
copy vio from this link Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK Kln City 九龍城 Kowloon City 獅子石道 44A Lion Rock Road shop Mama Mia! Pizzeria September 2021 SS2 07.jpg
[edit]copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
File:What is the importance of non-locomotor movement skills in our daily life?What are the things that we need to consider when performing non-locomotor movements?How can non-locomotor movements be improved?.png
[edit]Out of scope: Unused diagram with limited value outside of its original context; low resolution makes most of the text illegible. Omphalographer (talk) 02:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Radisson Blu Hotel Lietuva
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Lithuania.
- File:Radisson Blu naktis.JPG
- File:Radisson Blu Vilnius.JPG
- File:Vcup.jpg
- File:Vilnius, White Bridge, Vilnius, Baltasis tiltas - panoramio.jpg
- File:Šnipiškės, Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio - Иван Бай.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-free content, derivative work, no FoP. Image contains copyrighted sculptures by a living artist (Thaddeus Mosley), photographed in the United States (no freedom of panorama) 19h00s (talk) 03:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OmegaFallon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works of Pokémon figures. Many of these could be kept after cropping or otherwise removing the copyrighted element.
TilmannR (talk) 20:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think a case can be made (for most of them at least) that these could be seen as de minimis. They represent the travels of an identifiable character, represented by the figure. But that figure just needs to be present, or identifiable at most, it doesn't need to be an illustrative image of the figure, such that it details the creative aspects that are protected under COM:TOYS.
- What I don't think we can justify is to crop the figure out of the images. That makes them useless for the "travelling character" aspect. Nor are they then particularly useful to illustrate the location (they're notable locations, we have better photos of them)
- Overall, we might well need to delete these (the "conversion overhead" problem). Without prejudice to re-uploads by the original uploader, should they wish to do whatever edits we agree as necessary. But that shouldn't be an overhead on the project otherwise – there are just too many. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Just hopping in to say I support the deletion because it's really just needless clutter. OmegaFallon (talk) 15:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- @TilmannR @Andy Dingley How to we get someone to get up on this? There's no discussion to be had; even I agree here. OmegaFallon (talk) 17:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- @OmegaFallon: We currently have more than 2000 open deletion requests from before March. It'll take a while for the admins to work through the backlog. I don't think we need to expedite this particular deletion. It'll be done eventually. TilmannR (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Fair enough. OmegaFallon (talk) 19:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- @OmegaFallon: We currently have more than 2000 open deletion requests from before March. It'll take a while for the admins to work through the backlog. I don't think we need to expedite this particular deletion. It'll be done eventually. TilmannR (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- @TilmannR @Andy Dingley How to we get someone to get up on this? There's no discussion to be had; even I agree here. OmegaFallon (talk) 17:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Just hopping in to say I support the deletion because it's really just needless clutter. OmegaFallon (talk) 15:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Kept two, which have been cropped. If somebody wants to do more cropping, please ask for undeletion of some (please not all...) images. --Ellywa (talk) 22:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OmegaFallon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possibly above threshold of originality?
- File:Slay the Princess logo black.svg
- File:Slay the Princess logo white.svg
- File:SH Logo Black.svg
- File:SH Logo Color Dark.svg
Trade (talk) 03:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OmegaFallon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Lego minifigures fall under COM:TOYS, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego minifigures.
- File:2023-07-13 10-00-39 ILCE-7C DSC11619 Kiri (53055679271).jpg
- File:2023-07-13 10-00-33 ILCE-7C DSC11618 Kiri (53055088077).jpg
- File:2023-07-13 10-00-28 ILCE-7C DSC11617 Kiri (53056154163).jpg
- File:2023-07-13 10-00-11 ILCE-7C DSC11615 Kiri (53055859969).jpg
- File:2023-07-13 10-00-16 ILCE-7C DSC11616 Kiri (53056154093).jpg
- File:2023-07-13 10-00-02 ILCE-7C DSC11614 Kiri (53056052260).jpg
- File:2023-07-13 09-59-56 ILCE-7C DSC11613 Kiri DxO (53148961290).jpg
- File:2023-07-13 09-59-56 ILCE-7C DSC11613 Kiri (53055678771).jpg
Belbury (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Works by Todd Gray
[edit]- File:Photograph of Gray's work on display at the Whitney Museum of Art 's Biennial Collection 2019.jpg
- File:Todd Gray's work on display at the Whitney Museum in New York City.jpg
- File:Gray's work on display.jpg
Non-free content, derivative works, no FoP. All images contain copyrighted artworks by a living artist (Todd Gray), photographed in the United States (no freedom of panorama). --19h00s (talk) 03:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 04:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Orange poppy flowers.jpg. Larryasou (talk) 10:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK TST Tsim Sha Tsui Minden Row Star Mansion Star Seafood Restaurant September 2021 SS2 17.jpg
[edit]copyrighted screenshot in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK SPK 新蒲崗 San Po Kong 爵祿街 86 Tseuk Luk Street 康景樓 Hong King Building 明星商場 Star Plaza 明星海鮮酒家 Star Seafood Restaurant September 2021 SS2 06.jpg
[edit]copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK MK 旺角 Mongkok 窩打老道 Waterloo Road 染布房街 Yim Po Fong Street September 2021 SS2 09 shop property agent window display.jpg
[edit]copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK Kln City 九龍城 Kowloon City 獅子石道 44A Lion Rock Road shop Mama Mia! Pizzeria September 2021 SS2 08.jpg
[edit]copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK 中環 Central 德輔道中 Des Voeux Road Central shop 7-Eleven Store magazines February 2023 Px3.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted book covers in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK 中環 Central 蘇豪區 SOHO 些利街 Shelley Street Mosque Street shop Feather & Bone Restaurant menu February 2023 Px3.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Metadata credits smmebgmlm4vni7at192d, unclear if it’s the same person as the uploader Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 14:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Enyavar: The file name says “Landsat Map”, the description “Landsat imagery”. When I watch this imagery using Google Earth, it says “Image U.S. Geological Survey”, and it's dated 2020-11-26. So this might be a Landsat 7 or 8 image and a case of {{PD-USGov-USGS}}. I'm not sure about the lettering and the icons, are those from Google or the uploader's work? --Rosenzweig τ 12:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- I checked the sources stated in GoogleMaps, they say (c)2023 NASA, which means that Google is using PD-US data for the satellite view, yes. The two labels of "Ross Archipelago" and "McMurdoch Station" are Google's placements and not coming from NASA. I don't know where the colorful icons and their labels come from, but this looks like the uploader lifted the image from a webmapping service that lifted the map from Google which lifted the satellite photos from NASA. I can't see how the claim "Own work" would be true. --Enyavar (talk) 13:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Photo credited to Edu Garcia/Diario SP, not the Flickr uploader Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessary colourless duplicate of File:Albert Edelfelt - Portrait of the Artist Werner von Hausen.jpg. 2001:14BA:A300:7C93:0:0:0:1 18:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Reason : The metadata doesn't allow you to tell whether it's a personal photo or a cropped copy of an original, non-rights-free image.-- Adri08 (talk) 12:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, it’s clearly a derivative work. 2804:388:4107:BB81:1:0:8FAC:5F44 12:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
And:
- File:Green mechanical switch Razer keyboard - Levi Loot.jpg -> (https://unsplash.com/photos/rHvHUto9gZA)
- File:Afbeelding van een Europees korthaar calico.jpg -> (https://unsplash.com/photos/JbJRCCunDJQ)
The photo was previously published on unsplash (https://unsplash.com/photos/uywcuDU0ecM). So, the uploader is required to send VRT letter to verify the authorship. Larryasou (talk) 15:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Assume good faith. Larryasou (talk) 17:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
False license MRTFR55 (talk) 17:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Turkey is the correct license. --RAN (talk) 19:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Should be merged with Creator:Jean-Nicolas Truchelut William C. Minor (talk) 20:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: nothing to merge. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation. "own work" and "date unknown"??? Xocolatl (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm new to wikipedia, so I don't really know how to describe a photo taken in an unknown year by an unknown person. Could you provide your solution to this? Spykoz (talk) 10:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Недостоверные сведения об авторстве, дате и лицензии https://www.facebook.com/mkatska/?locale=hr_HR -- Tomasina (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as no permission (No permission since). Declared own work by the uploader, uploaded in reasonably high resolution, so I think we should check whether this image was found somewhere on the web before the upload date; if not, I think the "own work" declaration is plausible enough. The uploader's name sounds French, the image was taken in France, it's perfectly possible that the uploader took it in March 1973, and we usually accept own work declarations if there is nothing pointing to the contrary. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- PS: The image has also evidence of being a self-scanned photograph (specks of dust clearly visible in full resolution) which IMHO strengthens the assumption that this was an analog photo indeed taken by the uploader and recently scanned. Without evidence to the contrary, I would keep it. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Michel Langrognet is a profesional photographer known to document the Larzac protests in the 1970s, you can see him credited on a documentary [8], and on this newspaper [9]. I asked for a VRT as it is not clear that the user is the real Langrognet. Günther Frager (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn't know that. Well I think that it still looks likely that the uploader User:Langrognet Michel is actually Michel Langrognet himself, but if he's a well-known photographer, a VRT statement could be in order. I hope he sees this deletion request and is able to respond in a timely manner, as he came only here in 2021 to upload that image, but we will see... Gestumblindi (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Michel Langrognet is a profesional photographer known to document the Larzac protests in the 1970s, you can see him credited on a documentary [8], and on this newspaper [9]. I asked for a VRT as it is not clear that the user is the real Langrognet. Günther Frager (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Michel Langrognet died last year at 82 year. 1/ we will not have a permission 2/it seems unlikely that he created the account in 2021 just to upload this image, as this was its only contribution on the wikimedia projects. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Identique à Chanteloube-11, mais moins bonne qualité, et mal nommée Fr.Latreille (talk) 21:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: file redirected. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Agency photo, marked "Strictly Editorial Use Only." Polarlys (talk) 21:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Possibly uploaded by photographer, compare user name and EXIF info. --Polarlys (talk) 21:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the photo is for sale on shutterstock, and the photographer seems to be a pro, if he is the uploader it will be easy for him to send a confirmation via com:VRT. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Agency photo, marked "Strictly Editorial Use Only." Polarlys (talk) 21:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Possibly uploaded by photographer, compare user name and EXIF info --Polarlys (talk) 21:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the photo is for sale on shutterstock, and the photographer seems to be a pro, if he is the uploader it will be easy for him to send a confirmation via com:VRT. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Bare tree during sunset.jpg. Larryasou (talk) 12:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete Agreed. Don't see a reason to keep the lower-resolution webp version when the jpg exists.Switch to Keep now that the quality of the webp version has been improved. Keeping multiple file format versions is fine. Tcr25 (talk) 15:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Delete per nomination.However Larryasou it seems that the file was uploaded today by you itself. It would have been better if you had uploaded the better quality version overwriting the existing file name. This would have saved the community's time processing the DR and also made it easy for administrators. Just a thought, please keep in mind doing so afterwards! Contributers2020Talk to me here! 14:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)- Please note that overwriting could't be perform if file extension are different. Larryasou (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Larryasou I do agree on the same, however not much pains is taken to convert a high-quality jpg file to a webp file, it actually does not make a difference! (Updated picture that I uploaded to a higher quality one, and if selected the highest quality of both, these are the results - this one and this one. If it weren't for the link that you can compare the names and extensions of the file, you wouldn't understand which ones which!) Contributers2020Talk to me here! 16:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advice. I'll try. Larryasou (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Larryasou I do agree on the same, however not much pains is taken to convert a high-quality jpg file to a webp file, it actually does not make a difference! (Updated picture that I uploaded to a higher quality one, and if selected the highest quality of both, these are the results - this one and this one. If it weren't for the link that you can compare the names and extensions of the file, you wouldn't understand which ones which!) Contributers2020Talk to me here! 16:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please note that overwriting could't be perform if file extension are different. Larryasou (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Also, since as per a quite seeming-to-be credible website suggests that a webp works better with the quality (The WebP format intends to provide higher-quality images in comparable file size to JPEG) and is made for the internet itself, and now since we have the same quality, I will suggest a Keep to this image and let the jpg image be deleted for duplication reasons, however it quite doesn't matter much, so I conclude here. Thanks, Contributers2020Talk to me here! 15:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per COM:File_types#JPEG. it generally makes no sense to convert JPEG to other format: converting JPG into other format (PNG or WebP) doesn't buy you anything. Actually, your JPEG-WebP conversion is lossy, even if WebP provides acceptable visual quality. 0x0a (talk) 03:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- I would like @0x0a to refer to the previous responses, suggesting that if selected on the same resolution size, we cannot by any means distinguish if this is WebP or jpeg. Plus, resorting to these deletion requests further increases the backlog in the deletion requests, and most probably it would be lying, forgotten by the nominator himself, for atleast 1 month+. Instead, if we can simply change the file extension without the loss of picture resolution, without the involvement of anyone, let alone an administrator. (Pardon me for any grammatical mistakes) Contributers2020Talk to me here! 18:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, please use libwebp to check whether it's a lossy or a lossless conversion before you say so. In addition, the human eye may not able to tell the difference between the two images, it doesn't mean the printer can't either. A research has pointed out that the JPG - WebP conversion can cause changes in colours and the drawing sharpness of the image and affect the technical, semantic and syntactic features of the photographs. I am not against the use of webp, just against meaningless format conversions. 0x0a (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- 0x0a I am simply trying to prioritize the backlog of the admin to the "meaningless" format conversions. A citation that was provided by me in previous replies tells us that for a website, a "webp" format is better than the "JPG" format, if they are available in the same resolutions. (Pardon me for any grammatical mistakes) Contributers2020Talk to me here! 14:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, please use libwebp to check whether it's a lossy or a lossless conversion before you say so. In addition, the human eye may not able to tell the difference between the two images, it doesn't mean the printer can't either. A research has pointed out that the JPG - WebP conversion can cause changes in colours and the drawing sharpness of the image and affect the technical, semantic and syntactic features of the photographs. I am not against the use of webp, just against meaningless format conversions. 0x0a (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- I would like @0x0a to refer to the previous responses, suggesting that if selected on the same resolution size, we cannot by any means distinguish if this is WebP or jpeg. Plus, resorting to these deletion requests further increases the backlog in the deletion requests, and most probably it would be lying, forgotten by the nominator himself, for atleast 1 month+. Instead, if we can simply change the file extension without the loss of picture resolution, without the involvement of anyone, let alone an administrator. (Pardon me for any grammatical mistakes) Contributers2020Talk to me here! 18:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per COM:File_types#JPEG. it generally makes no sense to convert JPEG to other format: converting JPG into other format (PNG or WebP) doesn't buy you anything. Actually, your JPEG-WebP conversion is lossy, even if WebP provides acceptable visual quality. 0x0a (talk) 03:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete both. Leave formats aside. Both the images were uploaded after 2017, when Unsplash had stopped distributing images under the cc0 license. Therefore, neither has valid cc0 license. 0x0a (talk) 05:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The photo was posted to Unsplash on May 17, 2017
and uploaded to Commons a day later. The license change at Unsplash went into effect on June 5, 2017, so it would have been originally distributedand uploadedunder the CC0 license. (My mistake in reading the file info. 0x0a is correct and the file was uploaded after the license change, but the {{Unsplash}} template and discussion around the license change back in 2017 indicate that if a photo was uploaded to Unsplash prior to June 5, 2017, then the original CC0 license remains the relevant one. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC))
- The photo was posted to Unsplash on May 17, 2017
Deleted: uploaded after 2017 = never copied from a validly-licensed source. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC) → the jpg file undeleted as per discussion on my talk page [10]. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
no license available at source, same for File:Alastair Bruce of Crionaich 2019 (cropped).jpg Polarlys (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
I see a mention of copyrights ownership in the Metadata section, with the name mentioned there not really matching that of the original uploader. Unless some form of clarification is provided we could consider the copyrights status of the photo as not clear enough. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: the user uploaded a lot of photos taken with the same camera and with the same name within the EXIFs, this seems that this is very likely their name. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Images from blog.naver.com/choisttt1
[edit]The first image was found copyrighted by GettyImage accroding to the article. The second one is in very low quality and unlikely the blogger's own work. --Larryasou (talk) 04:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please delete the first photo. But the second photo is a bit ambiguous Gksyy (talk) 05:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
The files was previously published on unsplash. The uploader should send VRT letter to confirm ownership.
- File:Stefano-bucciarelli-3GU9twSszaY-unsplash.jpg --> (https://unsplash.com/photos/3GU9twSszaY)
- File:Verona-notte.jpg --> (https://unsplash.com/photos/gDBL6uJ9ask)
- File:Villa-balbianello.jpg --> (https://unsplash.com/photos/Oo_GSNAtF20)
Larryasou (talk) 21:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the images can be restored if a permission is sent to VRT. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as no source (No source since). It looks like a album cover in view of google searching results. I don't believe the channel own this work. Larryasou (talk) 03:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Although it is not the person's album, I could not find any evidence that it was created by that channel. Please delete it. Gksyy (talk) 05:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 00:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal "artwork", unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The uploader presumably chose to upload this work licensed by its artist, a distinct person. So not "personal" in the usual sense. - Jmabel ! talk 02:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This appears to be a photographic effect, so might it not be potentially useful? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of a Commons compatible license at source. — Racconish 💬 14:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-US-1978-89" To be eligible for a copyright, the image had to register within 5 years and no image of "Jule Gregory Charney" or "Jule Charney" or "Jule G. Charney" appear in the registration database. --RAN (talk) 19:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Battle for Dream Island
[edit]Out of scope.
* Pppery * it has begun... 03:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, why?! RblxFunkyGamer (talk) 04:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Because Battle For Dream Island isn't notable. The logos are in actual use and thus allowed on Commons, but I'm really not seeing how its fan art and flags are realistically useful for an educational purpose. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. Wikimedia doesn't welcome it as well as other object shows and doesn't care about low-quality files here, unfortunately. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 23:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC); edited: 01:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator; this is outside the scope of WC and these kinds of things should be on a Fandom Wiki, not here. 118.149.94.25 04:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- I say delete everything other than Volleyball.png
- That file can just be a generic illustration of a volleyball, and can have non-fancruft uses. Ca (talk) 06:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- We have plenty of actual pictures and drawings of volleyballs in Category:Volleyball balls and its subcategories. There's no imaginable educational situation where this cartoon would be used in place of one of those images. Omphalographer (talk) 00:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
I also suggest merging Category:Object shows (a BFDI coatrack) to Category:Battle for Dream Island; there are currently four files in the former that should be deleted as well–they are used on simple:Pentagon but they're (in my opinion) improper/unsuitable to use on that page and are also outside the scope of WC. 118.149.93.70 07:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- These images of pentagons in Category:Object shows are likely copyright violations (contrary to the "free use" claim); can someone do a quick reverse image search on them? AlphaBeta135talk 11:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- I did a quick search and couldn't find anything obvious, but possibly someone with more experience that me could. I removed them from simple:Pentagon, but don't consider it appropriate to unilaterally remove an image from use and then nominate it for deletion as out of scope, so won't take any further action. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, on second thought, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Object shows * Pppery * it has begun... 23:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- I did a quick search and couldn't find anything obvious, but possibly someone with more experience that me could. I removed them from simple:Pentagon, but don't consider it appropriate to unilaterally remove an image from use and then nominate it for deletion as out of scope, so won't take any further action. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 14:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Battle for Dream Island
[edit]Out of scope - the two series-wide logos suffice for legitimate uses and we don't need a logo for every season.
- File:Battle for Dream Island- The Power of Two logo.png
- File:Battle for Dream Island- The Power of Two logo.svg
- File:BFDI Mini logo.png
- File:BFDI Mini logo.svg
- File:BFDIA LogoHQ.png
* Pppery * it has begun... 16:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Eh, don't really care if they get deleted. I'm not an ultra who overreacts. Davest3r08 (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete 118.149.77.248 20:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
insufficient and dubious source licensing information – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I've uploaded a replacement and put in a CommonsDelinker command. Once it's executed, I'll deleted this, as there is no evidence of who performed the work. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no evidence that the performer was the US government. Replaced with File:South Vietnamese national anthem on AFVN radio.mp3 everywhere it appeared. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Most of the photo is take up by the engine of the plane (not a helicopter as claimed). I don't see this having any useful value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:34, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment It could be if the location could be described more specifically. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
No Meta data proving the ownership of the uploader. Seems to be a photo of a painting from unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 11:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- 1. Sería bueno saber la razón por la cual quieren darlo de baja,
- 2. Es común que no den detalles de sus argumentos para darlo de baja.
- 3. Hasta donde sé no hay razón válida conocida por mí, para darla de baja, o que se haya que se haya infringido.
- 4. Aunque he cubierto para otras imágenes, todos los requisitos exigidos por wikipedia para ser incluidos en sus artículos, de todas lo dan de baja.
- 5. El diálogo que he solicitado ha sido ignorado e imposible, algo que lamento mucho, porque de no ser así, Wikipedia se enriquecería mucho más rápido, y de la misma manera el aprendizaje multilateral de los participantes. Tacicuri (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" is the correct license. --RAN (talk) 19:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
1954 portrait by the Elliott & Fry company. If that's considered an anonymous photographer and the portrait was definitely published as soon as it was taken, Commons:Anonymous works#UK won't kick in until 2024. Belbury (talk) 20:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Well, it's 2024 now, so PD-UK-unknown applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
This image is likely still copyrighted in its country of origin. Mexico has an unusual long protection of 100 years pma. The image was taken by "I. Rodríguez Avalos" (inscribed in the photo) around 1921 (according to description). This would be in the Mexican PD only if the photographer died at most year after taking this photography. Without a clear information regarding the author we cannot keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 23:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: If it's from 1921, PD-Mexico applies. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
I, the person who originally uploaded this file to Commons, believe the license I uploaded it with may not be valid. According to another user, this image has been uploaded to Commons and deleted many times by other users due to invalid licensing. This may not be public domain, and as such, until a proper license can be obtained, I believe it is best not to risk it. Additionally, it is of low quality in terms of resolution, and is thus not an ideal image anyways.ThaddeusOrlando55 (talk) 23:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:PCP - replaced with file:Miguel de la Madrid.jpg where it appeared. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Jordan A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- No copyrights for all pre-1975 works in Jordan. --Tarawneh (talk) 21:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Tarawneh: The language on {{PD-Jordan}} is specific to photographs and applied art, and COM:Jordan says The meaning of the term "applied arts" is not spelled out, but is distinct from painting, photography, sculpting, architecture and lithographical works, so are we sure that this building qualifies? —holly {chat} 17:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, no indication that architecture is treated as an applied art and architecture is as a creative work as sculpture. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)