Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![8 File:Картка "Херсон - це Україна".jpg](#File:Картка_"Херсон_-_це_Україна".jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![39 File:"Against the wind", Nida, Lithuania.jpg](#File:"Against_the_wind",_Nida,_Lithuania.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Brīvības_iela,_Rīga,_Latvia_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(222193185).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![66 File:"Future Tokyo" By Dan Kitchener London 2018. (39326187870).jpg](#File:"Future_Tokyo"_By_Dan_Kitchener_London_2018._(39326187870).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![167 File:Rūjiena, piemineklis "Tālavas taurētājs" 2000-08-05.jpg](#File:Rūjiena,_piemineklis_"Tālavas_taurētājs"_2000-08-05.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pardon | C'est mon premier essai. Supprimez la porte moi. (N.D.P.) Resnick Igwe (talk) 03:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
_Resnick_Igwe-20230724035400-File:Resnick_Igwe_(N.D.P.).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The copyright is with TRIPTYQUE jj@triptyque.be according to the metadata. Has the user this copyright? Wouter (talk) 11:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- public picture available on Franc Bogovic's linkedin, instagram and facebook profiles. 185.78.181.77 15:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- So what? You didn't read COM:L. --Achim55 (talk) 15:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete this. 186.175.98.214 00:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Broken redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 08:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
May not be an own work. 186.175.98.214 00:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete as it is found in Lawretta Ozoh's Facebook page. Definitively not the uploader's own work. Günther Frager (talk) 01:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deletd by Indeedous. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Did you crop this from a press photo? 186.175.98.214 00:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as it is found on the web here. It is an uncropped press photo :) Günther Frager (talk) 02:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Indeedous. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Martj9 (talk) 08:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
TAK Aleksander Oppenkowski (talk) 09:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
kept (non-admin closure), No rationale given. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Помилково завантажений Andy Nakamura (talk) 09:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
![09:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/07/24#c-Andy_Nakamura-20230724094900-File:Картка_"Херсон_-_це_Україна".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
![11:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/07/24#c-Rosenzweig-20230724110900-File:Картка_"Херсон_-_це_Україна".jpg){kind=link}
no permission to grant this image StephanieBlackPhotography (talk) 14:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Do you know him? 186.175.98.214 10:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Sourced only to "Cinema Treasures". Front page of website has clear copyright notice [1]; no evidence given of claimed free license. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Per the website, this specific image has been licensed under CC BY 3.0. Click here for the Cinema Treasures entry for this specific image: https://cinematreasures.org/theaters/6892/photos/145096 The license information is included there. Have now added this link to "Source" as well. Cielquiparle (talk) 03:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Thank you, nomination withdrawn. (I know the site contains some CC material, but wasn't able to verify this one). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Tak Aleksander Oppenkowski (talk) 09:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense request. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Aleksander Oppenkowski (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- ??? This is neither a logo, nor is it blurry, nor anything. And FOP applies as well. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- i can't see that the image is blurred
- this is not a logo, but one of thousands of images of stumbling stones on commons, see here: Category:Stolpersteine in Germany by state --Molgreen (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- i can't see that the image is blurred
Kept: nonsense request. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
I made a mistake in the process of uploading, so I have to reupload it again as it was Isabella of England and not Isabel of France. Flag Creator (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. @Flag Creator: In the future, just use {{Rename}}. --Rosenzweig τ 09:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Не відповідає вимогам проєкту Hryniuk (talk) 14:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
copyviolation, author is a professional photopgrapher, there is no permission for this licence Alabasterstein (talk) 07:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 06:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 2015 by Carlos Benavídez (1965–). There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for non-architectural works, permission from the artist is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional and out of scope. Hillary Clinton did not win Clinton County N Panama 84534 23:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The watermark on the bottom left is not the same as the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The watermark on the bottom left is not the same as the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Watermark indicates this is not the uploader’s photo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo * Pppery * it has begun... 02:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:24, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete more “extra thick” nonsense Dronebogus (talk) 14:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- How do you know your penis is extra thick? Do you look at other people's naked penises all the time? Most of us are not interested in other people's genitalia. Go find a positive hobby please. 186.175.192.229 23:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Wikimedia commons is not a sexting platform Dronebogus (talk) 14:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete: Extremely poor quality (the photograph). --Achim55 (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo * Pppery * it has begun... 02:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:24, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, erected in 1971 by H. A. Ruiz. Sculptor is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
The bust was completed in 1952 by Pedros Cresta (1912–1970). There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2041 A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
The bust was completed in 1952 by Pedros Cresta (1912–1970). There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2041 A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
The bust was completed in 1952 by Pedros Cresta (1912–1970). There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2041 A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The statue was completed in 1927 by Davide Calandra (1856–1915) and Edoardo Rubino (1871–1954). There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2025.
- File:2018-10-19 Recoleta, Buenos Aires, Argentina (Martin Rulsch) 15.jpg
- File:Buenos Aires - Monumento Bartolome Mitre.jpg
- File:Buenos Aires - Recoleta - Monumento a Mitre 1.JPG
- File:Buenos Aires - Recoleta - Monumento a Mitre 2.JPG
- File:Buenos Aires - Recoleta - Monumento a Mitre 3.JPG
- File:Buenos Aires - Recoleta - Monumento a Mitre 4.JPG
- File:Buenos Aires - Recoleta - Monumento a Mitre 5.JPG
- File:CABA - Recoleta - Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 02.jpg
- File:Estatua de Bartolomé Mitre, Buenos Aires, Argentina.jpg
- File:Homenaje a Bartolomé Mitre.JPG
- File:ID C675 Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 0875.jpg
- File:Monumento a Bartolome Mitre.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 01.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 02.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 03.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 04.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 05.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 06.jpg
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 07.jpg
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 08.jpg
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 09.jpg
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 10.jpg
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 1060202.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 1060203.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 1060204.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 1060206.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 1060208.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 1060210.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 1060211.JPG
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 11.jpg
- File:Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 12.jpg
- File:Monumento al Gral Bartolome Mitre C675.jpg
- File:WLM 2013 - Monumento a Bartolomé Mitre 2.jpg
_15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Romualdas Kvintas died in 2018 A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Klaudius Pudymas is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
![03:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/07/24#c-A1Cafel-20230724030900-File:"Against_the_wind",_Nida,_Lithuania.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
![04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/07/24#c-Krd-20230731043200-File:"Against_the_wind",_Nida,_Lithuania.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
_Br%C4%ABv%C4%ABbas_iela,_R%C4%ABga,_Latvia_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Br%C4%ABv%C4%ABbas_iela,_R%C4%ABga,_Latvia_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Latvia, artist Andris Vārpa is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
_Brīvības_iela,_Rīga,_Latvia_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
_Brīvības_iela,_Rīga,_Latvia_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.
- File:Lauzach Memorial 5.jpg
- File:Lauzach Memorial Panneau exemple.jpg
- File:Monument aux morts d'indochine-corée a lauzach - panoramio.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Estonia. The road sign is based on an artist's drawing, and therefore a COM:DW, also likely to be exceed COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Mozambique, architect João José Tinoco died in 1983 A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ethiopia A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chapel Cangiani (Naples)
[edit]There is no acceptable freedom of panorama in Italy. The building was authored by w:it:Alberto Izzo who died in 2019.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Casa del Portuale
[edit]Very distinctive architecture by w:it:Aldo Loris Rossi as per this site, but there is no freedom of panorama in Italy.
- File:Napoli -mix- 2019 by-RaBoe 103.jpg
- File:Napoli -mix- 2019 by-RaBoe 104.jpg
- File:Napoli -mix- 2019 by-RaBoe 106.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
_(222193185).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222193185).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
_(222193185).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
_(222193185).jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Italy, artist Charles Ray is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 05:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, no hope of undeletion even if Italy introduces FOP. See my added reason here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bayzid Hossin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
— Haseeb (talk) 06:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charles Ray (sculptor)
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama for public fine arts in Italy. The work was incepted in 2009 and authored by w:en:Charles Ray (artist). Also, even if Italy introduces FOP, the work may not be eligible as it was removed in 2013; the BBC article did not mention the fate of the artwork.
- File:Charles-Ray-Boy-with-frog (1).jpg
- File:Charles-Ray-Boy-with-frog.jpg
- File:Punta della dogana 05.JPG
- File:The Boy and the Frog (7226492478).jpg
- File:The Boy and the Frog 2 (7226501086).jpg
- File:The boy and the sea (28759615756).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think your second argument is relevant. Just because an artwork is no longer in public does not mean that it disqualifies for FOP. When it was originally intended to be placed in public forever, that would be sufficient. Is just a border note here, though. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- @PaterMcFly no, it was meant to be temporary only. Read the BBC article I gave here. Any way, Italy has no FOP for any copyrighted artistic works. Assume Italy introduces FOP, I doubt Italy would follow Mexican FOP model that even allows temporary works. This artwork was never meant to be permanent, Venetian authorities said. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Artwork from 2007 as per w:en:Charles Ray (artist). But there is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted visual art in public in the United States. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- oppose - de minimus, unavoidable. Mtaylor848 (talk) 20:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Mural is the only thing depicted in this photo. --Krd 05:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in UK, artist Dan Kitchener is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
![06:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/07/24#c-A1Cafel-20230724064700-File:"Future_Tokyo"_By_Dan_Kitchener_London_2018._(39326187870).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
![04:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/07/24#c-Krd-20230731043400-File:"Future_Tokyo"_By_Dan_Kitchener_London_2018._(39326187870).jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio, missing permission for original work. Different web-sources of this or very similar drawing; Eg here hcp-sense.com or here linkedin. Maybe could be kept as PD-Shape. Wdwd (talk) 09:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 10:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Argentina. The template FoP-Argentina is only valid for buildings. Günther Frager (talk) 10:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
no FoP in Russia for monuments, should be kept only in local Wikipedias as fair-use where needed rubin16 (talk) 12:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Cannot find on the internet, but every other upload by this user was a copyvio + metadata indicates "Screenshot", so I think this was a copyvio too. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
محتوای استفاده نشده RobonamarI (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete out of courtesy. Uploader's request, uploaded one month ago, not in use. --Achim55 (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO UK, where the awards are based Yeeno (talk) 17:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Watermark implies not own work. Copyvio. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Headquartered in the UK one can assume the logo was created on British soil. It is hence COM:TOO UK we should judge by and it's clear that this logo surpasses it. Jonteemil (talk) 19:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Fair use (fair use)
1940s German photograph. Possibly public domain in Germany, but we'd need publication information and the photographer info to determine that. Otherwise, we may have to wait until 2066 (120 years from 1945). Abzeronow (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 05:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted File:Witch Elm Book Cover.pdf showing the same cover. --Rosenzweig τ 05:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
unnotable rapper, own work unlikely QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 03:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of Star Wars artwork Di (they-them) (talk) 04:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
-20230724041800-File:No_acta_(6971045707).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no author no permission, copied from https://www.weeldetuinen.nl and the summary is explicit promo for this gardening company as well. Used for contentspam on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 06:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
no author no permission, copied from https://www.weeldetuinen.nl and the description is explicit promo for this gardening company as well. Used for contentspam on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
no author no permission, copied from https://www.weeldetuinen.nl and the description is explicit promo for this gardening company as well. Used for contentspam on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 06:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by সৌরাষ্ট্র দাশ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of COM:SCOPE.
— Haseeb (talk) 06:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
no permission from given author, copied from https://www.facebook.com/groups/vwritter, given photographer is Stéphan Lugens Hoyanova (talk) 08:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- general picture of a classic Ritter Bull Solemé1977 (talk) 14:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Uploader thinks an image becomes public domain if it is published on the web. --Achim55 (talk) 15:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- /methinks that would be a great rule! ;-) PaterMcFly (talk) 11:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
no permission from given author, copied from https://www.facebook.com/groups/vwritter, given photographer is Stéphan Lugens Hoyanova (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
no permission from given author, copied from https://www.facebook.com/groups/vwritter, given photographer is Stéphan Lugens Hoyanova (talk) 08:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- an owners Dackel that was freely published Solemé1977 (talk) 14:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide a web link that confirmes a free license. --Achim55 (talk) 15:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
no permission from given author, copied from https://www.facebook.com/groups/vwritter, given photographer is Stéphan Lugens Hoyanova (talk) 08:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- vintage '70s picture from an old brochure, no copyright Solemé1977 (talk) 14:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Why did you add a CC BY-SA 4.0 license if there is no copyright? Delete --Achim55 (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Why did you add a CC BY-SA 4.0 license if there is no copyright?
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot from the film Avatar (2009). StarTrekker (talk) 11:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Image obtained from the internet [2] HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Selfie, only used in drafts with nothing in them since August 2018 (were uploader's only edits) Nutshinou Talk! 12:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
website stated this SCM Link Copyright © 2019 *angys* (talk) 12:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright picture https://www.utusan.com.my/berita/2021/02/kedah-tawar-pinjaman-mudah-tanpa-faedah/ *angys* (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Selfie of someone who is not here to build an encyclopedia (only contributions are from 2015 on their userpage) Nutshinou Talk! 13:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright? Is this all own work? Wouter (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:18, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Persianmusics (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very highly likely to be copyvios, considering lack of metadata, low quality and the uploader's bad record
- File:Mohammad-Reza Shajarian and Mohammad Motamedi.jpg
- File:Hossein Alizadeh and Mohammad Motamedi.jpg
- File:Mohammad Motamedi and Houshang Zarif.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indiaartist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely that all of these photos (including a family photo of the subject aged 6) are the own work of the uploader. Past uploads from this user have been deleted as copyright violations.
- File:Chevaliermedal.jpg
- File:Shashankblue.jpg
- File:Shashankdarbar202020.jpg
- File:Shashank2022.jpg
- File:Shashank at Delhi 2019.jpg
- File:An young Shashank at his Six - 1984.jpg
- File:Ms. J. Jayalalithaa presenting an award to Shashank - World Tamil Conference, Tanjore, 1993.jpg
- File:ShashankwithBhimsenJoshi.jpg
- File:Shashank Subramanyam performing the Sadas concert at The Music Academy. Jan 01, 1991.jpg
- File:Pandit Ravishankar, Balamuralikrishna, Shashank.jpeg
- File:Shashankzakir.jpg
- File:Shashankkgs.jpg
Belbury (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- These are my original works and the copywright belongs to the artist Shashank Subramanyam. I request you to not block or delete these files. These are authentic content and no one can challenge the authenticity of the content Indiaartist (talk) 14:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- We need a formal written permission from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure.
- See also [3] for information. Yann (talk) 16:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surachet s (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: logos and architectural planning documents for something called "BKC MarkWhite"? All unused, and no context in file descriptions to suggest what they are.
- File:LayOut F1.png
- File:LayOut F2.png
- File:Ideas 1 F2 New line supply (1).jpg
- File:D04826700dcd.png
- File:D04826700.png
- File:Layout F2.jpg
- File:Office 123.jpg
- File:Gemba 1.jpg
- File:Rm222-mind-16.jpg
- File:Rm222-mind-16 1.png
- File:MarkWhite8-Blue.png
- File:MarkWhite8-White.png
- File:MarkWhite5-removebg-preview.png
- File:MarkWhite7-removebg-preview.png
- File:MarkWhite3-removebg-preview.png
- File:MarkWhite4-removebg-preview.png
- File:MarkWhite6-removebg-preview.png
- File:MarkWhite2-removebg-preview.png
- File:Map 4 at BKC.png
- File:Map 3 at BKC.png
- File:Map 2 of BKC.png
- File:Map BKC.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 03:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surachet s (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: more of the same unexplained architectural diagrams.
Omphalographer (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surachet s (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two more files, same issue as previous DRs above.
Yann (talk) 08:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Serban Junior (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE content only used for self-promo at ro:Serban Junior.
- File:Rebexman3000 (Serban 64300).png
- File:Mqdefault.png
- File:Thethumbnail.png
- File:Serban Junior Current PFP.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gikü (talk) 17:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
No Exif data or other data to prove own work, resolution is quite low, probably copied from the Internet -- DaxServer (talk) 18:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo for advertisement, no educational value Zafer (talk) 18:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no metadata, out of project Zafer (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value Zafer (talk) 18:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:1,2-dimethoxyethane 200.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover from 2022 https://www.museothyssen.org/en/exhibitions/eye-storm-modernism-ukraine-1900-1930s CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover from 2018 https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/60429520-kurinji CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Book cover, no sure of the TOO CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover from before the upload according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unfree img (advertisement) Mateus2019 (talk) 20:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Cover of my book, I shared it on Wikimedia. GravityIsForSuckers (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The actual image is tiny and low-resolution and has a lot of unnecessary white space Doomhope (talk) 22:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
copyviol: photo by Italian website gazzettadellosport.it, no indication about a free relase — danyele 23:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo by non-contributor that is also a hoax as both individuals have been Photoshopped into it. I initially thought it may have value due to having the Bangladeshi PM in it, but upon a closer look, it is fake. Uhai (talk) 23:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Speedy ? 181.43.0.108 13:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- The owner of the picture (Grit Lomba) has given me permission to use this picture! Leumas44 (talk) 13:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, really? Please show it. 181.43.0.108 16:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I can send you a picture of our chat! https://file.io/EKOc1irDP9BG Leumas44 (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry... Link will not work. Hopefully this one: https://unsee.cc/album#YEcodUSPCB77 Leumas44 (talk) 14:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Link expired. The new one: https://unsee.cc/album#sEf4fVl83XB7 Leumas44 (talk) 20:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, really? Please show it. 181.43.0.108 16:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete unless we know which free license the photographer choose for publication. --Achim55 (talk) 20:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I want to change the licence of the picture now. Grit Lomba gave me the permission for Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. Where to change it? Leumas44 (talk) 11:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- I found! I added the license... I think it's fine now. No deletion required. Leumas44 (talk) 12:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Satellie images from National Institute of Informatics (NII) were All Rights Reserved A1Cafel (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Satellite images from National Institute of Informatics (NII) were All Rights Reserved A1Cafel (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted image by FIFA BugWarp (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- lamento soy novato en esto Plazafrank (talk) 08:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source was Twitter. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
FIFA created logo with copyright, not own work. BugWarp (talk) 14:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- subi las tre primeras fotos aqui por este medio pero no sabia de como colocar el codigo en las fotos perdon soy novato en esto si me puedes ayudar gracias Plazafrank (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Not a proper work, seems to be copyrighted logo ("author missing" seems to be a fake reason). Taichi (talk) 00:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We had long and tedious discussion about URAA which ended her: URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Other than URAA issue there is no other issues her. The file comes from the The National Photo Collection. An official site of the Israeli government press office. I have added "Not-PD-US-URAA" template. -- Geagea (talk) 10:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We had long and tedious discussion about URAA which ended her: URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Other than URAA issue there is no other issues her. The file comes from the The National Photo Collection. An official site of the Israeli government press office. I have added "Not-PD-US-URAA" template. -- Geagea (talk) 10:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: We had long and tedious discussion about URAA which ended her: URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Other than URAA issue there is no other issues her. The file comes from the The National Photo Collection. An official site of the Israeli government press office. I have added "Not-PD-US-URAA" template. -- Geagea (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Carregamento irregular Cosmo Skerry (talk) 00:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation: author Caio Viegas, no permission. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This unused file is of a hypothetical situation that has not occurred. Susmuffin (talk) 07:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Strong oppose But, it's my creation and plus is a hypothetical situation that could happen on the future. Though, I don't think Ukraine would approve of this idea tbh. Angelgreat (talk) 16:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Strong oppose: This file reflects a hypothetical situation, but that's not a reason to propose deletion. FrozedCourgette (talk) 19:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not in use and not obviously useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No educational value, out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
used for vandalism on enwiki Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 10:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD#F10. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
It`s wrong 42.3.27.22 13:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete watermarked, and check out that summary! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: own artwork, out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
6 KB music composer 186.173.250.71 17:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: not an own work, copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of PD, random rationale. 188.123.231.59 18:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Seems to be a derivative work of a film poster Di (they-them) (talk) 04:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
-20230724040900-File:The_Jumbotron_featured_the_Blue_Jays_at_the_movies._(7981524115).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Some parts of the collage deleted as copyvio. 188.123.231.59 17:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:CSD#F3 applies. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
This monument was erected in 1984, and is still copyrighted. Photos of it are not allowed on Commons per COM:FOP Lithuania.
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius 01(js).jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz monument in Vilnius.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius1.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius2.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius3.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius4.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 01.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Keep This image should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features Bernadine Monastery building behind the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz sculpture itself (monument does not appear in this image), and any work associated with it, should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 10:56, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features the towers and mural of the facade of the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features the tower of St. Anne's Church of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features towers of St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features towers of St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features the Orthodox Cathedral of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Architectural Detail - Vilnius - Lithuania - 04 (27562871070).jpg
- File:Berdhardiner church, Vilnius.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep This pictures is not about Statue of Adam Mickevicius. It is about the Berdhardiner church. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. See File:BernardMonastery.jpg too! This pictures should be acceptable as de minimis Texaner (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Mickeviciaus-paminklas.jpg
- File:Pomnik Adama Mickiewicza - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Pomnik Adama Mickiewicza w Wilnie 2.jpg
- File:Senamiestis, Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (181).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This photo is about the St. Anna Cathedral and the Berdhardiner church. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. This picture should be acceptable as de minimis --Regasterios (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This pictures is not about Statue of Adam Mickevicius. It is about the St. Anna Cathedral. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. See File:BernardMonastery.jpg too! This pictures should be acceptable as de minimis Texaner (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Statue of Adomas Mickevicius (7932205176).jpg
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 044.JPG
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 045.JPG
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 047.JPG
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 048.JPG
- File:Vilnius. Šv.Onos bažnyčia - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep This photo is about the St. Anna Cathedral and the Berdhardiner church. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. This picture should be acceptable as de minimis --Regasterios (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This photo is about the St. Anna Cathedral and other buildings. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. This picture should be acceptable as de minimis --Regasterios (talk) 16:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Wilno - pomnik Mickiewicza.JPG
File:Odsłonięcie pomnika Adama Mickiewicza w Wilnie (22-326).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Last image is related to a different monument. Yarl 💭 13:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jeff G “Commercial use of reproductions of works of architecture or sculpture in public places is not allowed when ….” but to my knowledge there is no commercial use, or intended commercial use, associated with the images posted by Scotch Mist under CCA-4 and referenced above. Of course should any of the creators of the original works photographed in public spaces indicate (or have indicated) that they wish to have associated images removed from Wikimedia then their wishes should naturally be complied with, but in the meantime it would seem appropriate to leave decisions in these matters to ‘local adminstrators’ who may have direct contact with the creators as well as a more intimate understanding of whether such ‘public works’ should be accessible through Wikimedia and thereby extend appreciation of the talents of local artists and the diversity of ‘public art’ presented throughout Lithuania. Please consider removing the delete tags on these images – thank you …--SM1 (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist: Authorization for commercial use is required for the works underlying dws such as these photos, please see COM:L for details. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist: Where is "allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place'" which permits commercial use in Lithuanian law? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: This link COM:FOP Lithuania should take you to the following statement: "It shall be permitted to carry out the following acts without the authorisation of an author or any other owner of copyright and without a remuneration, as long as the source, including the author's name, is indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible: to reproduce and make available to the public works of architecture and sculptures, made to be located permanently in public places, except for the cases where they are displayed in exhibitions and museums". --SM1 (talk)
- @Scotch Mist: You missed the main point there: "
Not OK Commercial use of reproductions of works of architecture or sculpture in public places is not allowed when the work is the main subject and it is used commercially." We require works uploaded here to be allowed to be used commercially, so no (modern, in copyright) architectural works in Lithuania may be featured in works we host unless we have permission from the architects, sculptors, or both (in certain cases you mentioned above). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you for taking the time to provide more detailed explanation here and I apologize if I am now simply totally confused or my logical faculties are failing me but perhaps something has been ‘lost in translation’. While understanding the requirement that images uploaded to Wikimedia should be free to use commercially, even if authors\uploaders themselves have no intent to use those images commercially, if the interpretation of Lithuanian FOP that you have provided is correct, then the qualifying clause I referenced does not seem to make sense in this context – why state the permission exception “made to be located permanently in public places” if the interpretation applies to all reproductions of works of architecture and sculpture whether they were only created to remain in specific public places (apart from exhibitions and museums) or not? Appreciate your patience on this but as I plan to head back to Lithuania shortly I wish to be certain that I have a clear understanding of what is permissible with regard to taking photographs and uploading the images. Thanks again ... --SM1 (talk) 09:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist: That language was added by @Aymatth2 in this edit, and came from Law No. VIII-1185 of 1999, as amended up to Law No. XII-1183 of 2014, Article 28.1.1. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you again for your informative response. It appears that the apparent ‘contradiction’ has arisen with the introduction of the current wording that replaced the clause “Limited freedom of panorama in Lithuania is granted by article 28 ("Limitations to Copyright in Works of Architecture and Sculptures") of the Law Amending the Law on Copyright and Related Rights. This allows a photographer to make and publish pictures of sculptures and works of architecture that are permanently located in public places (excluding works presented in museums and exhibitions), "but they cannot be used commercially in any form”. Therefore as Wikimedia Commons Licensing general conditions (including the commercial stipulation) apply here, along with permissible restrictions, only photographs\images of sculptures permanently located in public spaces in Lithuania where authorization for commercial use has been obtained explicitly from the sculptor may be published (unless seventy years have elapsed since the sculptor’s death). This however does not apply “if the artwork is not the primary content of the image” [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you for taking the time to provide more detailed explanation here and I apologize if I am now simply totally confused or my logical faculties are failing me but perhaps something has been ‘lost in translation’. While understanding the requirement that images uploaded to Wikimedia should be free to use commercially, even if authors\uploaders themselves have no intent to use those images commercially, if the interpretation of Lithuanian FOP that you have provided is correct, then the qualifying clause I referenced does not seem to make sense in this context – why state the permission exception “made to be located permanently in public places” if the interpretation applies to all reproductions of works of architecture and sculpture whether they were only created to remain in specific public places (apart from exhibitions and museums) or not? Appreciate your patience on this but as I plan to head back to Lithuania shortly I wish to be certain that I have a clear understanding of what is permissible with regard to taking photographs and uploading the images. Thanks again ... --SM1 (talk) 09:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist: You missed the main point there: "
- @Jeff G.: This link COM:FOP Lithuania should take you to the following statement: "It shall be permitted to carry out the following acts without the authorisation of an author or any other owner of copyright and without a remuneration, as long as the source, including the author's name, is indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible: to reproduce and make available to the public works of architecture and sculptures, made to be located permanently in public places, except for the cases where they are displayed in exhibitions and museums". --SM1 (talk)
- Delete all picture of the statue. Pictures of the reliefs may remain. WIPO gives both English and Lithuanian versions of the current law here. Section 28.1 says you can take and publish pictures of works of architecture and sculptures "made to be located permanently in public places", which would be true of the church and the monument, but Section 28.2 qualifies that by saying reproductions are not allowed without the copyright holder's permission when the work is the main subject and the copy is for direct or indirect commercial advantage. That rules out these pictures: the monument is the main subject, and pictures uploaded to Commons must be usable for commercial purposes. There is no way that inclusion of the monument in the pictures could be considered "de minimis". A simple test is to ask whether the photograph would be as good or as useful if the monument were to be masked out. If not, inclusion of the monument is not "de minimis". Aymatth2 (talk) 12:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
@Aymatth2: Am disappointed that a decision appears to have been made to delete all of the above photographs, even where clearly “the artwork is not the primary content of the image” [COM:L]. The term ‘primary content’ is generally used in a photograph to reference the main content as defined by relative area covered or by significant focus, or by a combination of both. The test suggested of the quality or usefulness of the photograph is not analogous to this clause although it is conceded that it could be considered analogous to assessing “De minimis”. That said would removal of the name ‘Adam Mickiewicz’ (simply used for a group of files uploaded together) from the filenames of Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 11, 12 and 13, not support removal of the deletion tags associated with those respective images, which action might also be reasonably applied to files: Berdhardiner church, Vilnius; Senamiestis, Vilnius; Lithuania - panoramio (181); St. Anna Cathedral; A. Mickevich monument – panoramio (title also to be edited); VILNIUS, AB. 047; VILNIUS, AB. 048; Vilnius. Šv.Onos bažnyčia - panoramio and Wileńskie kościoły oraz pomnik Adama Mickiewicza przy Maironio gatve - panoramio (title also to be edited)? Retaining half of these images would seem consistent with the reasonable application of Commons Licensing unless the intent is now to apply much stricter publishing conditions to all images containing Lithuanian public artwork, no matter how incidental that artwork may be to the primary content, including images that have existed on Wikimedia for more than a decade. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal --SM1 (talk) 15:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- The image to the right would be acceptable, since the monument has been cropped out. The law is annoying, but is unambiguous and we have to comply with it. We cannot publish photos of copyrighted buildings or works or art permanently located in public places where these buildings or works are the main subject of the photo and the photo may be used for commercial purposes. All images on Commons must be free for commercial use. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- To be clear, the restriction only applies to reproductions of work that are protected by copyright. In this case, the statue was made by Gediminas Jokūbonis (1927–2006) and will be covered by copyright until 2076 under current laws. The reliefs by Henryk Kuna (1885–1945) have been out of copyright since 2016. In File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius2.JPG the buildings in the background are presumably out of copyright or could be considered de minimis (could be cropped out without seriously affecting the value of the image). Aymatth2 (talk) 16:11, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
@Aymatth2: Thank you for your clarification – does this mean that you will now remove the deletion tags from File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius2.JPG, File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 03.jpg, and other works where the relief is the only ‘work’ subject to license debate, or is there further action that the authors of these images need to take to avoid inappropriate deletion? Thank you also for taking the time to provide the ‘cropped example’ you have instructively provided although in this instance the work/monument is clearly the ‘primary content’ of the photograph - not only does it take up about a third of the area and is at the centre of the image, it is also the largest object in the photo\image. These conditions do not apply to the images I have proposed be re-assessed (Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 11, 12 and 13, plus images from other contributors), where for example in ‘12’ the monument is barely visible in the foreground of the main subjects of the image being the churches of Sts Anne and Francis (which could not be photographed together in elevation without the monument). Also, you have referred to the sculptor’s ‘category’ (Gediminas Jokūbonis) on Wikimedia but only the work by Adam Mickiewicz is tagged for deletion where clearly in all four of these images (uploads dating back to 2006) his work is the primary content of the image. It would seem regrettable in the laudable cause of generally promoting public Lithuanian art that if now a more rigorous licensing policy (which will discourage future contributions) is now to be applied and that all evidence of the work of this artist on Wikimedia, and presumably the works of other Lithuanian artists, are now to be removed, including those where the work appearing in the image published is clearly not the ‘primary content’. --SM1 (talk) 10:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Break1
[edit]It is up to the closing admin to decide which files to delete, and that is not me. I did not realize all the files in the Category:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius had been tagged for deletion, when some of them do not even include the copyrighted statue. I just looked at the seven files from this category that were listed. My vote would be to delete all pictures in the category where the copyrighted statue is featured prominently, but keep the others. Technically, the public domain reliefs could be considered part of the overall monument, a derived work assembled by Gediminas Jokūbonis and still in copyright until 2076. I think we can get away with pictures of the reliefs alone, and with panoramas where the statue could be blacked out without causing any real problem. My list of "must go" would be:
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius 01(js).jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz monument in Vilnius.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius1.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 01.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 02.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 04.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 05.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 06.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 07.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 08.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 09.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 10.jpg
- File:Architectural Detail - Vilnius - Lithuania - 04 (27562871070).jpg
- File:Berdhardiner church, Vilnius.jpg
- File:Lithuania Vilnius Maironio gatve2.JPG
- File:Mickeviciaus-paminklas.jpg
- File:Pomnik Adama Mickiewicza - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Pomnik Adama Mickiewicza w Wilnie 2.jpg
- File:Statue of Adomas Mickevicius (7932205176).jpg
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 044.JPG
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 047.JPG
- File:Wilno - pomnik Mickiewicza.JPG}}
This is going to be an ongoing problem though. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
The statue is not featured prominently and not added to the photo significantly in File:Berdhardiner church, Vilnius.jpg. It depicts the church. --Regasterios (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- De minimis does not mean "not the main subject of the picture". It means "trivial and inconsequential use". File:Berdhardiner church, Vilnius.jpg could easily be cropped to reveal a high-resolution image of the statue. Again, a basic test is "would the picture be o.k. if the copyrighted work was blacked out?" If not, the use is not inconsequential. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Why is problem that the photo has high resolution (anyway 1 206 × 790 is not too high)? You can crop a small copyrighted details from a photo with very high resolution. See File:Louvre at night centered.jpg. This picture is in the table as "OK Very likely" on the page of de minimis: "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X. X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable." Same resolution, same scale. Although the statue is not part of the church but you can't take any photo about the churh from this view without the statue. --Regasterios (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- We tend to err on the side of caution. The copyright protected statue makes it hard to make commercial use of views of the church from this exact angle. The statue could of course be blurred out... Aymatth2 (talk) 16:59, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept several as DM. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
The monument was completed in 1984 by Gediminas Jokūbonis (1927–2006) and Vytautas Čekanauskas (1930–2010). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2081.
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Denkmal, Vilnius, 1983.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Statue, Vilnius, Lithuania.jpg
- File:Paminklas Adomui Mickevičiui.jpg
- File:Wilno, pomnika Adama Mickiewicza - 2014.09.06.jpg
- File:Wilno, pomnika Adama Mickiewicza - DSCF5976.jpg
- File:Wilno, pomnika Adama Mickiewicza - DSCF5977.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Done per the first section above. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1992 by Vytautas Čekanauskas (1930–2010). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2081.
- File:Contemporary Art Centre in Vilnius1.JPG
- File:Contemporary Art Centre in Vilnius2.JPG
- File:The Contemporary Arts Centre in Vilnius, Lithuania.jpg
- File:Šiuolaikinio meno centras naktį.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This cover is obviously PD in the US. However, this cover is a work that originates from the UK. The UK has a much lower threshold for copyright protection. The current file can be found here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wham_final.jpg and clearly states do not transfer as it could be copyrighted in home country. Needs to be PD in UK & US to be hosted on Commons.
Not against keeping this file, if it can be proven it is below the UK threshold. PascalHD (talk) 01:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; TOO in the UK is ridiculously low. —holly {chat} 20:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Photo taken in 1976, and published in 1983 in a magazine in Argentina. It is in the public domain in Argentina. However, it was not in the public domain there in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is protected by copyright in the US. We should not keep this image following COM:PCP. Günther Frager (talk) 01:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Photo taken in 1976, and published in 1983 in a magazine in Argentina. It is in the public domain in Argentina. However, it was not in the public domain there in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is protected by copyright in the US. We should not keep this image following COM:PCP. Günther Frager (talk) 01:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope - privacy violation minor Hoyanova (talk) 16:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use (and not a minor according to vi.wp). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Clear copyright infringement. See this, this article was published on February 11, 2022, this photo was published September 28 of the same year. Another article also contains this image [4] MagicalNight97 (talk) 02:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. The linked site indeed published the photo on February 11, 2022. However, the photo was uploaded to Commons on September 28, 2021. No matches on TinEye, and the only match on Google Images is to Wikimedia Commons itself. Sure, this might be copyright violation, but you need a better argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, and the other article you link is from 2023, so also irrelevant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 20:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
No proof it's under Creative Commons or author's own work. See exhibit A and exhibit B. Furthermore, this picture was uploaded as part of a video that claims to exploit Wikipedia for SEO. (exhibit C) QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 02:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork, installed in 2014 as per w:en:Horse and Rider (Ray) and authored by w:en:Charles Ray (artist). There is no freedom of panorama for outdoor works like this in the United States. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork, first publicly installed in Chicago in 2014 as per w:en:Horse and Rider (Ray) and authored by w:en:Charles Ray (artist). There is no freedom of panorama for outdoor works like this in the United States. The statue isn't trivial here; courts will certainly rule this as infringing Ray's copyright (see COM:DM United States). Removing the sculpture only leaves an out of scope photo similar to Google Street View-snapshot. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I intended the photo to capture the context of the sculpture in addition to the work itself, but if the standard is "trvial", I don't think it could meet that. I would not have uploaded were I aware of the sculpture copyright rules at the time. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 14:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but I disagree that cropping out the statue would make the photo unusable. Photos of paths are in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek I think the photographer meant to intentionally include the sculpture here. The file description speaks of it. There are already better photos found at Category:Paths in the United States, and its attached subcategories. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- It would still be usable, though. If there are better photos of this particular path, it wouldn't be important to salvage this photo, but I don't think the current filename or intention of the photographer are important reasons not to crop the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speaking as the photographer, I intended to capture both the path and sculpture. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- I realize that, but the image of the statue can't be hosted by Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- It would still be usable, though. If there are better photos of this particular path, it wouldn't be important to salvage this photo, but I don't think the current filename or intention of the photographer are important reasons not to crop the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but I disagree that cropping out the statue would make the photo unusable. Photos of paths are in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no COM:FOP for modern sculptures in Latvia. Leoboudv (talk) 08:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
![08:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/07/24#c-Leoboudv-2014-03-26T08:31:00.000Z-File:Rūjiena,_piemineklis_"Tālavas_taurētājs"_2000-08-05.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Monument was erected in 1937 and author was died in 1963, so the monument in the public domain from 1989. --Voll (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Okey Natuur12 (talk) 21:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
![21:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/07/24#c-Natuur12-2014-04-02T21:04:00.000Z-File:Rūjiena,_piemineklis_"Tālavas_taurētājs"_2000-08-05.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Latvia, artist Kārlis Zemdega died in 1963 A1Cafel (talk) 07:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment The image was previously kept as there appears to be a reason to believe the monument is already in PD. I can't figure out why though (the relevant commons document on Latvia seems to lack information about the copyright law from before 2000) PaterMcFly (talk) 10:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Ooligan (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Both name of the author and year of the creation can be found here, for example: https://www.zudusilatvija.lv/objects/object/44298/ It seems we have to delete it to restore on January 1, 2034. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Undelete in 2034. —holly {chat} 21:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no COM:FOP modern sculptures in Latvia. Leoboudv (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Monument was installed in 1935. Author Kārlis Zemdega was died at 1963.11.09. Copyright term in 1935 was 50 years after author's death and copyright term in 1963 was 25 years after author's death. Have I missed something? --Voll (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 11:31, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, artist Kārlis Zemdega died in 1963 A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment see previous DR. Apparently, this is PD according to the old Latvian laws. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- The p.m.a. of Latvia is 50 years until 2000, but as of that the sculpture is still copyrighted. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- A1Cafel,please explain further. 1963 is over 50 years ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Voll and @A1Cafel,
- What independent source states that Kārlis Zemdega is the artist?
- What independent source states that this artwork was installed in 1935? -- Thanks, Ooligan (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- A1Cafel,please explain further. 1963 is over 50 years ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- The p.m.a. of Latvia is 50 years until 2000, but as of that the sculpture is still copyrighted. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- 50 years term of protection existed till 2000, since 2000 it's 70. As far as this monument was still protected in 2000 (2000–1963=37), its protection was prolongated in 2000 (from 2013 to 2033). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Undelete in 2034. —holly {chat} 21:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
no permission from given author, copied from https://www.facebook.com/groups/vwritter, given photographer is Stéphan Lugens Hoyanova (talk) 08:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- This picture was taken at the classic car meeting, and the car was used as promotional purpose for Ritter Solemé1977 (talk) 09:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- You didn't address the photographer's copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Argentina. The template FoP-Argentina is only valid for buildings. Günther Frager (talk) 09:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Perhaps de minimis--A1Cafel (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see the reasoning behind de minis here. The main focus of the image is the sculpture, and the file name that the uploader (also the photographer) used reinforces it. Günther Frager (talk) 10:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
No evidence for the claimed free license at source https://www.warheroes.ru/hero/hero.asp?id=14920. In addition, the portrait on the gravestone is likely still in copyright and Russia has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such artworks. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete warheroes.ru released some text under free licenses but the photos are copyrighted and the image on this grave is subject to FoP restrictions.--71.25.17.57 20:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Dr. Nnamdi? 186.175.98.214 10:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. —holly {chat} 21:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COMːSS screenshot, needs permission to keep Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- And what should the permission look like? That Claas gets in touch? How is it then verified that it is Claas? lg A.M.A. (talk) 21:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Instructions on how to send permission are at COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! It's too inconvenient for me, you can be deleted. I will upload a private photo when I meet him. lg A.M.A. (talk) 21:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Instructions on how to send permission are at COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Questionable own work claim. File without metadata, only 98 kb of size. Seems to be a screenshot. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan درود، عکاسیِ این تصویر از خودم است و به هیچ عنوان اسکرینشات نیست تاکنون صدها تصویر بارگذاری کردهام و به خوبی با قوانین کپیرایت در ویکی انبار آشنا هستم. M.Bozorgmehr (talk) 08:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @MBozorgmehr سلام. لطفاً نسخه اصلی و باکیفیت عکس را بارگذاری کنید. متادیتای این فایل نشان میدهد با نرمافزار ACDSee 17 روتوش شده و هیچ نشانی از عکاسی ندارد. HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistanنسخۀ اصلی همین است که ادیت و ذخیره شده است. چون این تصویر با موبایل هواوی نه چندان خوبی گرفته شده کیفیت بهتری از نسخه فعلی نداشت M.Bozorgmehr (talk) 08:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @MBozorgmehr با توجه به این که چندین عکس مشابه با دوربین WAS-LX1A آپلود کردهاید فرمایش شما پذیرفتنی است اما لطفاً متادیتای عکسها را پاک نکنید و عکسها را با کیفیت اصلی آپلود کنید. پیکسلهای نیمه پائینی عکس تقریباً محو هستند و شائبه اسکرینشات را متبادر میکند.
- I withdraw my nomination. HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan سپاس از راهنمایی، در عکاسیهای بعدی حتما این نکات را رعایت خواهم کرد M.Bozorgmehr (talk) 08:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistanنسخۀ اصلی همین است که ادیت و ذخیره شده است. چون این تصویر با موبایل هواوی نه چندان خوبی گرفته شده کیفیت بهتری از نسخه فعلی نداشت M.Bozorgmehr (talk) 08:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- @MBozorgmehr سلام. لطفاً نسخه اصلی و باکیفیت عکس را بارگذاری کنید. متادیتای این فایل نشان میدهد با نرمافزار ACDSee 17 روتوش شده و هیچ نشانی از عکاسی ندارد. HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. —holly {chat} 21:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Image that was uploaded in 2003 that hasn't had an apparent license. Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This is a messy file to figure out because User:Sreejithk2000 split up the file. But I checked the original file and original uploader did not add a license template or edit the file later. It seems jawiki used ja:Template:Oldimage to indicate that the file may be GFDL because of the old image use policy. I can't figure out if the file were kept because the uploader confirmed the license somewhere or if the file were kept because the later version had a valid license. I think we need a Japanese speaking user to find out. Anyway the original file is low res so its not a big loss. --MGA73 (talk) 21:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah it's definitely a mess, hopefully we do get a Japanese speaker that will help sort this out. Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: It wasn't worth the effort of figuring this out. I replaced it with File:Iidabashi-Sta-E.JPG. —holly {chat} 21:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Historical photos, paintings, documents and non-trivial logo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Manifesto.pdf
- File:Portrait of Roman painter Umberto Coromaldi by Jerry Ross.jpg
- File:PortraitOfTheArtist2.png
- File:Fiorella2.JPG
- File:Martin Sostre.jpg
- File:Martin Sostre Portrait.jpg
- File:Angela a go-go.jpg
- File:Buffalo's "Finest" Invading UB Campus.png
- File:From left to right Gross Malek Kroneberg Beyer.png
- File:Jerry Gross confronted by Buffalo Cops.png
- File:Gross Berry Beyer Kroneberg.png
- File:Buffalo Nine Defendants.jpg
- File:Buffalo Nine Pin 1960s.jpg
- File:The Arrest Of Bruce Beyer.jpg
- File:PortraitOfMArtinSostreNumberTwo.JPG
- File:B9 20 Year Reunion Statement.pdf
- File:THE POLITICAL DECLARATION OF THE BUFFALO NINE.pdf
- File:BuffaloNinePamphet 04.jpg
- File:BuffaloNinePamphet 01.jpg
- File:BuffaloNinePamphet 02.jpg
- File:Jerry Gross and Buffalo cops.jpg
- File:MartinGonzalesSostre.JPG
- File:PierCesraeBori.jpg
- File:ArrestOfBruceBeyerTwo.jpg
- File:ArrestOfBruceBeyer.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Several work by Jerry Ross; the painter is still alive. If the uploader is related to the painter, he can send us an OTRS authorization. --Ruthven (msg) 09:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Actually Jerry Ross (painter) is pittore44 and is one and the same person who has uploaded and indeed given his permission for the free use of these images. Firstly, as author of the Buffalo Nine article for Wikipedia, I am the owner and source for the uploaded photo, pamphlet, and other photos that were deleted. I have requested that all those files be restored. There may be an element of confusion because my original name ws "Gross" which I had to change to "Ross" in the Tombstone, Arizona Courthouse. But I have used Wikipedia Commons to share and freely allow use off the images on the Martin Sostre, the Buffalo Nine, the Jerry Ross (painter), the Pier Cesare Bori, and the Umberto Coromaldi articles. Recently all these articles have seen images removed that are mine, freely uploaded to Wikipedia commons with the intent too share these freely. If you are able, please restore these images as they are vital to the contents. Pittore44 (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Pittore44 (talk) 23:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Regarding File:From left to right Gross Malek Kroneberg Beyer.png that has been deleted. This is a photo inside the non-copyrighted pamphlet "The Buffalo Nine" which I took with my own camera since I am in possession of an actual original pamphlet of the first printing (1968) and am the owner of said pamphlet. Moreover I was a member of the Committee called Buffalo Nine Defense Committee which was created to publicize our case, especially on UB campus. I was the person who uploaded the photo in the first place to Wiki Commons and gave copyright permission. I am the original author of the Buffalo Nine article and would like all of the deleted images restored since they are my own and I have given full copyright permission for their use.
Pittore44 (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Actually Jerry Ross (painter) is pittore44 and is one and the same person who has uploaded and indeed given his permission for the free use of these images. Firstly, as author of the Buffalo Nine article for Wikipedia, I am the owner and source for the uploaded photo, pamphlet, and other photos that were deleted. I have requested that all those files be restored. There may be an element of confusion because my original name ws "Gross" which I had to change to "Ross" in the Tombstone, Arizona Courthouse. But I have used Wikipedia Commons to share and freely allow use off the images on the Martin Sostre, the Buffalo Nine, the Jerry Ross (painter), the Pier Cesare Bori, and the Umberto Coromaldi articles. Recently all these articles have seen images removed that are mine, freely uploaded to Wikipedia commons with the intent too share these freely. If you are able, please restore these images.
These are very similar to the images deleted in the previous DR covering this uploader's work. There is no reason to believe that the uploader is actually the photographer as claimed.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Actually Jerry Ross (painter) is pittore44 and is one and the same person who has uploaded and indeed given his permission for the free use of these images. Firstly, as author of the Buffalo Nine article for Wikipedia, I am the owner and source for the uploaded photo, pamphlet, and other photos that were deleted. I have requested that all those files be restored. There may be an element of confusion because my original name ws "Gross" which I had to change to "Ross" in the Tombstone, Arizona Courthouse. But I have used Wikipedia Commons to share and freely allow use off the images on the Martin Sostre, the Buffalo Nine, the Jerry Ross (painter), the Pier Cesare Bori, and the Umberto Coromaldi articles. Recently all these articles have seen images removed that are mine, freely uploaded to Wikipedia commons with the intent too share these freely. If you are able, please restore these images.
Pittore44 (talk) 23:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The uploader claims that these are "own work" and that they are the work of Jerry Ross (Painter). Obviously both cannot be true. There is no evidence that Jerry Ross (who is living) has given a free license to these works.
- File:Jerry J. Ross.jpg
- File:Portrait of Angela Ross.jpg
- File:Umberto Coromaldi.jpg
- File:UmbertoCoramaldi.jpg
- File:PierCesraeBori 2.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Actually Jerry Ross (painter) is pittore44 and is one and the same person who has uploaded and indeed given his permission for the free use of these images. Firstly, as author of the Buffalo Nine article for Wikipedia, I am the owner and source for the uploaded photo, pamphlet, and other photos that were deleted. I have requested that all those files be restored. There may be an element of confusion because my original name ws "Gross" which I had to change to "Ross" in the Tombstone, Arizona Courthouse. But I have used Wikipedia Commons to share and freely allow use off the images on the Martin Sostre, the Buffalo Nine, the Jerry Ross (painter), the Pier Cesare Bori, and the Umberto Coromaldi articles. Recently all these articles have seen images removed that are mine, freely uploaded to Wikipedia commons with the intent too share these freely. If you are able, please restore these images.
Pittore44 (talk) 23:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The file: File:Martin Sostre Portrait.jpg has been deleted from the Martin Sostre article. I am the author of this article and am the same Jerry Ross who painted the portrait. I took a photo of my oil portrait of Martin Sostre (inspired by the mug shot in the Buffalo News) and am the only and full copyright holder of that image. I have given free and unconditional permission for its use when I uploaded it to the Commons. I wish that this file be restored so that my original design and composition of said article, its very integrity as originally written, can be maintained. Please undelete this and all the other image files speak across multiple Wikipedia articles I have authored because there is no copyright volation in these instances.
Pittore44 (talk) 04:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- OTRS received: ticket:2017090310007912. There are a lot of files here, so I think it's best to simply leave this DR open until I can work everything out. Guanaco (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
COM:DW - images of contemporary paintings/writing by still-living artist. Evidence of permission needed.
- File:Jerry Ross Artist.jpg
- File:Portrait of Diane Bush.jpg
- File:American Verismo and the Documentary.pdf
- File:Portrait of Martin Sostre Hi Res.tif
Эlcobbola talk 20:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep User:Pittore44 is the artist, see previous DR and OTRS ticket 2017090310007912. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 21:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
If I'm not mistaken, the butterfly in the centre would push this logo beyond the threshold of originality. I don't think a butterfly is considered to be a simple geometric shape. PascalHD (talk) 16:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. An abstract butterfly like File:Butterfly icon (Noun Project).svg might fall under TOO in some jurisdictions, but this detailed drawing is clearly over the line. Omphalographer (talk) 19:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Random Creative Commons license, no evidence of PD as well. 188.123.231.59 18:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]
Literally in the source where I got the image ([5]), it explicitly says "Public Domain".— Preceding unsigned comment added by Almeja Mística (talk • contribs)
- Almeja Mística, this website is not the proper copyright holder for this image and is not authorized to licence images of Russian origin, see Commons:License laundering. As for requirements for public domain images of Russian origin see COM:Russia#PD_tags: you must search for the author's name and give evidence of publication 70 or more years ago. --188.123.231.59 09:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- The photo was published in 1949 (74 years ago) Almeja Mística (talk) 19:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-free content, derivative work, no FoP. Image contains copyrighted art by a recently deceased artist (Louise Bourgeois, Cell (Eyes and Mirrors), 1989-1993), photographed at a temporary exhibition in the United Kingdom (out of bounds of Freedom of Panorama) 19h00s (talk) 14:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free content, derivative work, out of bounds of FoP. Image contains copyrighted art by a recently deceased artist (Louise Bourgeois, d. 2010, Cell XIV (Portrait), 2000), photographed at a temporary exhibition in the United Kingdom (out of bounds of FoP) 19h00s (talk) 14:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Screenshot from a FWWC graph, not own work. BugWarp (talk) 14:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- subi las tre primeras fotos aqui por este medio pero no sabia de como colocar el codigo en las fotos perdon soy novato en esto Plazafrank (talk) 08:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
unknown source HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
No proof of PD-Iran. Author unknown, fake date HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
TSC logo has never been red, not used TSCtvc (talk) 15:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/mississauga-on-canada-june-12-2021-1990985825?id=1990985825&irclickid=3XuVFL2M%3AxyPWXkwNHy-P0sqUkFwmLQ1SVlDQ40&irgwc=1&utm_campaign=SeekLogo&utm_content=42119&utm_medium=Affiliate&utm_source=89242 --Achim55 (talk) 15:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Has never been used on website, it was only a colorful version for the holidays.--2605:B100:529:8440:5DB0:ED88:7890:1C92 16:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- And the logo on building is pink, never been red.
- Has never been used on website, it was only a colorful version for the holidays.--2605:B100:529:8440:5DB0:ED88:7890:1C92 16:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
https://www.instantstreetview.com/@43.639679,-79.697424,74.78h,13.7p,4z,x0lJJX-lmWAMxfUJOYqhJg --2605:B100:529:8440:45D:6E25:2891:39C 16:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; uploader obviously got it from somewhere, and while I can't rule out the possibility of a hoax, I don't see why anyone would care enough to put out fake logos of a TV shopping channel. —holly {chat} 23:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an association CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:01.01.2023 - Solenidade de Posse Presidencial 39º presidente do Brasil (52622109373).jpg, or vice versa. RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and redirected to the other file. —holly {chat} 22:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Not used, no longer essential 2605:B100:529:8440:5DB0:ED88:7890:1C92 15:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Below COM:TOO Canada, and there is a w:TSC (TV channel) article. Why should it be deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; old versions of logos are often kept for historical purposes. —holly {chat} 23:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Same image is used by the subject's social media presence at https://www.facebook.com/fluteshashank/photos/pb.100063595665499.-2207520000./1254016354738179/?type=3, as part of a 2018 photoshoot (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1178332892306526&set=pb.100063595665499.-2207520000.) - unlikely they would have distributed this to be credited to "Flutemusicofindia". Belbury (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
No consent and infringement of portrait rights 최광모 (talk) 16:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. —holly {chat} 23:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Medium resolution image which is also used on the subject's social media (https://www.youtube.com/@ShashankSubramanyam), no evidence of permission for upload here. Belbury (talk) 16:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Darkness logos
[edit]I'd say File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is more complax than this one and and it surpasses COM:TOO UK.
.svg){kind=link}
- File:ChristmasTimefont.jpg
- File:GetYourHandsOffMyWomanfont.jpg
- File:IBelieveinaThingCalledLovefont.png
- File:Permission to Land promo.jpg
- File:Thedarkness-logo.svg
- File:TheDarknessHotCakesfont.png
Jonteemil (talk) 21:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Exact duplicate of Relativesweetness-ca.png. Alhadis (talk) 21:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Confederate States of America (1861–1863).svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- The .svg file has also been deleted. Why? 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 01:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- The .svg file has also been deleted. Why? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- I've informed the deleting admin; hopefully the cleanup after the file is restored isn't too hard. Hog Farm (talk) 03:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging @Holly Cheng just in case. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- I've undeleted, looks like it mostly didn't get delinked but if someone could look through https://commons-delinquent.toolforge.org/index.php?image=Flag_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America_(1861–1863).svg that would be appreciated. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, y'all. I must have been a little too trigger happy with the mouse button. —holly {chat} 17:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- I've undeleted, looks like it mostly didn't get delinked but if someone could look through https://commons-delinquent.toolforge.org/index.php?image=Flag_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America_(1861–1863).svg that would be appreciated. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging @Holly Cheng just in case. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
THIS IS NOT OWN WORK - SCREENSHOOT OF https://www.aparat.com/v/NoIfz [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 23:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Screenshot accusation is baseless, because metadata shows this photograph was taken with a Sony Ericsson K530i phone, and this still image was not seen in the video URL above. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 23:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
He is an entrepreneur. 186.175.98.214 11:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. —holly {chat} 17:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Suspicious copyrighted picture as no EXIF data provided, only Google as EXIF *angys* (talk) 17:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Unable to find this via TinEye, so I need better evidence of copyvio than strange EXIF. —holly {chat} 17:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Pac-12 school logos
[edit]- File:Pac-12 logo in Utah colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in Washington colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in Oregon colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in California colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in UCLA colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in Arizona colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in USC colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in Colorado colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in Stanford colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in Oregon State colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in Arizona State colors.svg
- File:Pac-12 logo in Washington State colors.svg
Derivative works of the Pac-12 logo, which despite being arguably simple is copyrighted (registration V3617D047). See English Wikipedia file description page w:File:Pac-12 logo.svg --funplussmart (talk) 19:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep — All entries at the copyright registration are for the Pac-10 logo, not Pac-12 version. Corky 01:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- RE: the logo on the English Wikipedia (uploaded by me), that is ineligible for Commons because of the gradients in the logo. The logos listed above are the "simple" version. Corky 01:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Derivative work. A copyright does not need to be registered by the or another government agency in order to be a valid copyright (see also en:Copyright law of the United States#Registration procedure). And under what seems to be the uploader's flawed logic, I or any other person would then be able to use Photoshop or some other image editor to remove the gradients or similar from any other copyrighted image and then attempt to claim it as a PD simple logo. Zzyzx11 (talk) 00:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The argument that the registration is for PAC 10 doesn't hold water either. If the PAC 10 logo was sufficiently not simple to attract copyright, then so is the PAC 12 logo. The only difference is the "0" on the PAC 10 logo is a "2" on the PAC 12. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: the Pac-12 logo is specifically noted on COM:TOO United States as being protected. —holly {chat} 18:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
No consent and infringement of portrait rights 최광모 (talk) 16:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
No consent and infringement of portrait rights 최광모 (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Argentinean images from the 1990s uploaded by User:Bleff
[edit]- File:La Raulito en Boca versus Gimnasia, 1996.png
- File:La Raulito en Boca versus Gimnasia, 1996 b.png
- File:La Raulito en Boca versus Gimnasia, 1996 c.png
- File:Susana Giménez y Jazmín.png
- File:Alejandra Pradón.jpg
- File:Alejandra Pradón en Playboy Argentina 4.jpg
- File:Alejandra Pradón en Playboy Argentina 3.jpg
- File:Alejandra Pradón en Playboy Argentina 2.jpg
- File:Alejandra Pradón en Playboy Argentina.jpg
- File:Valeria Mazza en Para Ti, 1990.jpg
- File:Valeria Mazza por Claudio Divella.jpg
- File:Valeria Mazza Caras 1995.jpg
- File:Valeria Mazza y Alejandro Gravier.jpg
- File:Valeria Mazza 1995.jpg
- File:Valeria Mazza revista Caras 1995.jpg
- File:Valeria Mazza 94.jpg
- File:Divina Gloria en Caliente.jpg
- File:Epumer 1995 crop.png
- File:Epumer 1995.png
- File:Carballo y Mihanovich.jpg
- File:Carballo & Mihanovich.jpg
- File:Sandra y Celeste en Mujer contra mujer.jpg
- File:Afiches de Sandra y Celeste.jpg
- File:Fito, Sandra y Celeste.jpg
- File:Pablo César en Fuego Gris.jpeg
- File:Spinetta y Pablo César.jpg
- File:Isabel Sarli 1995.jpg
- File:Toscano 1991.jpg
- File:Kosiuko 96.jpg
- File:Moda argentina noventas.jpg
- File:Publicidad Vitamina invierno 1995.jpg
- File:Sol Acuña.jpg
- File:Juana Molina y Federico Mayol.jpg
- File:La minimanía.jpg
These photos uploaded by User:Bleff were published in the 1990s in Argentina. All of them are in the public domain in Argentina and are tagged correctly with PD-AR-Photo. However, they are not in the public domain in the United States. Notice that the US entered in the Berne convention in 1 March 1989, so no work after that date required the inclusion of copyright symbol or to be registered. That is, they never were in the public domain in the United States. Notice that some files were incorrectly tagged with Not-PD-US-URAA: the template can only be used in files uploaded before 2012, and these were all uploaded after 2020. Günther Frager (talk) 00:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of publication 70 or more years ago, random PD tag. 188.123.231.59 18:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]
Image obtained from [6] with copyright status clearly stated.
![[6]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%91%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BE_%D0%9B%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B7%D0%B5.jpg){kind=link}
- The author=unknown, so they could not have died 70 years ago. The question is does the image meet PD-Russia. --RAN (talk) 02:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Almeja Mística, Wikipedia is not a reliable source for anything, see w:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. As for requirements for public domain images of Russian origin see COM:Russia#PD_tags: you must search for the author's name and give evidence of publication 70 or more years ago. --188.123.231.59 09:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Fake Creative Commons license, no evidence of publication 70 or more years ago, random PD tag. 188.123.231.59 18:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Image obtained from [7] with copyright status clearly stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almeja Mística (talk • contribs)
- Almeja Mística, Wikipedia is not a reliable source for anything, see w:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. As for requirements for public domain images of Russian origin see COM:Russia#PD_tags: you must give evidence of publication 70 or more years ago. --188.123.231.59 08:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
![[7]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Kviring_ei.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of PD, random PD tag. 188.123.231.59 18:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]
Image obtained from [8] with copyright status clearly stated.
![[8]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%B4_%D0%93%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2.png){kind=link}
- Almeja Mística, Wikipedia is not a reliable source for anything, see w:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. As for requirements for public domain images, you must search for the author's name and give evidence of publication 70 or more years ago. --188.123.231.59 09:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of PD, random PD tag. 188.123.231.59 18:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]
Image obtained from [9] with copyright status clearly stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almeja Mística (talk • contribs)
![[9]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%9C._%D0%90%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2.jpg){kind=link}
- Almeja Mística, Wikipedia is not a reliable source for anything, see w:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. As for requirements for public domain images of Russian origin see COM:Russia#PD_tags: you must search for the author's name and give evidence of publication 70 or more years ago. --188.123.231.59 09:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Fake Creative Commons license, no evidence of PD as well. 188.123.231.59 18:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]
Image obtained from [10] with copyright status clearly stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almeja Mística (talk • contribs) 21:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
![[10]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Avanesov.JPG){kind=link}
- How can you say both that it is PD in countries "where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer" and that the author is unknown? How do you know when the anonymous author died? - Jmabel ! talk 21:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Random PD tag, no evidence of publication 70 or more years ago to be PD. 188.123.231.59 18:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]
Image obtained from [11] with copyright status clearly stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almeja Mística (talk • contribs)
![[11]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Zelensky.jpg){kind=link}
- Almeja Mística, Wikipedia is not a reliable source for anything, see w:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. As for requirements for public domain images of Russian origin see COM:Russia#PD_tags: you must search for the author's name and give evidence of publication 70 or more years ago. --188.123.231.59 09:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Random PD tag, no evidence of publication 70 or more years ago to be PD. Re-uploaded twice after deletions. 188.123.231.59 18:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]
Image obtained from [12] with copyright status clearly stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almeja Mística (talk • contribs)
![[12]](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ikramov_AI.jpg){kind=link}
- Almeja Mística, Wikipedia is not a reliable source for anything, see w:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. As for requirements for public domain images of Russian origin see COM:Russia#PD_tags: you must give evidence of publication 70 or more years ago. --188.123.231.59 09:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Philroc as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Since it’s COM:INUSE, speedy deletion is not valid. Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 18:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
license invalid 71.25.17.57 20:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Doggoohcool (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope images:
- Unsourced, unused, potentially fictitious flags of various historical Middle Eastern cultures, at least one of which is generally believed to be mythical (w:Macrobia).
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- "Country ball" cartoon characters based on these and other flags, which would be out of scope even if the flags were legitimate.
Omphalographer (talk) 22:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
This pic is a duplicate of File:Adirondack Canoe Classic, Shore Parking.jpg and they are NOT made of Kevlar BUT fiber glass and polyesther: https://wenonah.com/Canoes.aspx?id=32 JSoos (talk) 14:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Actually it's a crop, not a duplicate, and there's no reason why we can't have both, even if I also don't see the point in such a minimal crop. As for the factual error, that's easily fixed by renaming the file and changing the description. —holly {chat} 22:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, possible copyvio. There also exists no Kushano-Sasanian coin of Bahram III as far as I am aware, so wrong name too. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Coin photograph appears to be a netcopyvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of PD, random PD tag. 188.123.231.59 18:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, no evidence that this was anonymous and published before 1946. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
No source and author's permission. 188.123.231.59 18:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo is too young to be public domain (from 1980), and we have no evidence of permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source and author's permission. 188.123.231.59 18:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence of PD, random PD tag. 188.123.231.59 18:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence that this was published anonymously and before 1946. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Funplussmart as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Found elsewhere on the internet, user has only ever uploaded blatant copyright violations with fake "own work" claims and has been previously blocked. Admin please consider indeffing user as they clearly have no intention of respecting copyright.
Yes, but this is a circa 1940 postcard and per COM:Jordan, photographs created before 1975 are public domain in Jordan and the US. Converting to DR to discuss. Abzeronow (talk) 20:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Jordan. —holly {chat} 18:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I had uploaded the image under the understanding that the Threshold of originality had not been met for this book cover to be eligible for copyright. The image consists of very simple shapes ineligible for copyright protection. I believe the assessment was correct and if not please elaborate. Thank you. Al83tito (talk) 21:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I concur with {{PD-ineligible}}. —holly {chat} 21:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I agree with Holly, PD-ineligible. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I guess this can be kept if we assume that the flag of the Dominican Republic is PD. And/or because it's obviously an official document. I don't know the relevant rules for the Dominican Republic, though. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure it is an official document, and if these documents are under TOO in Dominicqn Republic, but I would not contest if it is kept. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know what could be more "offical" than a country's constitution. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure it is the official constitution, as it seems to be the book of an publisher https://gacetajudicial.com.do/, but I am not fluent in spanish. I suspected it and that is why I opened this deletion request. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I'm sure it's the real constitution, but Gaceta Judicial is a private enterprise, so while the words of the constitution would be public domain, the cover Gaceta Judicial uses could in theory be copyrighted. That said, although there is no COM:TOO Dominican Republic on this site, the elements of the cover other than the Dominican flag (obviously not copyrightable by a private enterprise, and I don't see how imitating it flapping a little in the wind would change that) are simple text plus two very simple geometric shapes. So I'd have to think this is PD-textlogo on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure it is the official constitution, as it seems to be the book of an publisher https://gacetajudicial.com.do/, but I am not fluent in spanish. I suspected it and that is why I opened this deletion request. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know what could be more "offical" than a country's constitution. PaterMcFly (talk) 13:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure it is an official document, and if these documents are under TOO in Dominicqn Republic, but I would not contest if it is kept. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is a photo of the flag and you can clearly see it's got a fold in it, so that makes it a photo of a 3D object, which means the photo itself has its own copyright. If this had been a 2D representation of the flag, then we would totally be in the clear. —holly {chat} 21:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Cover is a DW of a photo of the flag per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Cure logos
[edit]I'd say File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is more complax than these ones and and it surpasses COM:TOO UK.
- File:4-13-dream-logo.png
- File:Greatest Hits-logo.png
- File:Kiss Me-logo.png
- File:Mixed-Up-logo.png
- File:Paris-logo.png
- File:Show-logo2.png
- File:The Cure-logo-2008.jpg
- File:Thecure-logo.svg
- File:THOD-logo.png
- File:Top-logo3.png
- File:Wish-logo.png
Jonteemil (talk) 21:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bullet for My Valentine logos
[edit]I'd say File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is more complax than this one and and it surpasses COM:TOO UK.
Jonteemil (talk) 21:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. LeafGreen (talk) 21:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Florence and the Machine logos
[edit]I'd say File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is more complax than these ones and and it surpasses COM:TOO UK.
- File:F+tM.jpg
- File:Florence + the Machine.png
- File:Florence and the Machine - Dog Days Are Over (2010) - Logo.jpg
- File:Florence and the Machine - High as Hope logo.png
- File:Florence and the Machine - live at the wiltern logo.png
- File:Florence and the Machine - Lungs logo.png
- File:Florence and the Machine - MTV Unplugged logo.png
- File:Florence and the Machine 2018 logo.png
_-_Logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jonteemil (talk) 21:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Little Mix logos
[edit]I'd say File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is more complax than these ones and and it surpasses COM:TOO UK.
- File:Get Weird.png
- File:Little Mix Logo 2013.png
- File:Little Mix logo.png
- File:Little Mix Word up single.png
- File:Little-Mix-Salute-single.svg
- File:Woman Like Me cover.jpg
Jonteemil (talk) 21:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, but i use them on french wikipedia, what's the problem? Datsofelija (talk) 06:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- They're copyright violations. Unless you can prove otherwise. Jonteemil (talk) 10:45, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pink Floyd logos
[edit]I'd say File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is more complax han these ones and and it surpasses COM:TOO UK. If this logo wasn't created somewhere else I'd say that they are not suitable for Commons.
Jonteemil (talk) 21:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- The logo was by Gerald Scarfe for the Wall album, so copyrighted. --RAN (talk) 02:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, Delete then. Jonteemil (talk) 10:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Okay,
- Keep No. Deciding whether or not to delete a file, or indeed making an entirely new law on Commons based on a single obscure case seems a little silly. GreatLakesShips (talk) 11:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- We haven't made a law on Commons. The UK government has made the law, and the UK courts have judged by it. We must follow the decisions by the UK courts which show that COM:TOO UK is very low. Jonteemil (talk) 19:41, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'd say File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is more complax than this one and and it surpasses COM:TOO UK. Jonteemil (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Per [13] and [14], this appears to be hand-lettered and not created with a simple font, and thus is above TOO in the UK. —holly {chat} 16:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
copyright violation; this file is from the book "Principles of Development" 4th edition p. 181 Thomas03876 (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
