Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/02/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 27th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nbt014 (talk) 05:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nbt014 (talk) 05:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this file exist as original poster GreaterSociety (talk) 06:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty, unused Kareyac (talk) 09:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Ayush Anand3310 (talk) 12:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of Nokia 2023.svg Hotpizza11 (talk) 09:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to remove a picture of unidentified person uploaded without a consent Shishtn (talk) 13:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Thisistanjilofficial (talk) 13:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete again. F10 181.43.5.243 14:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Fitindia. (non-admin closure) Marbletan (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte nicht eindeutig IoVala (talk) 13:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

part of chechoslovak review book, no permission given!!! jan.kamenicek never asks for permission!!! 43.224.170.52 09:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i agree:

jan.kamenicek (Redacted) proven wrong on uploading copyighted material, as usual:

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Oli2000s1.jpg 138.185.136.48 09:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i agree: as entire wmf already has tons of mistates and incorrect material as succinctly proven: arch've.md/Y0BB, jan.kamenicek just takes photos from copyrrighted material and posts them all over commons and wmf, colonel leroy hodges estate specifically demands: do not use leroy's image withot our permission.105.155.206.131 10:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Cropped from File:Colonel LeRoy Hodges in The Czechoslovak Review, vol. 3.jpg which was extracted from a 1919 book File:The Czechoslovak Review, vol3, 1919.djvu. --Achim55 (talk) 12:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Published in the U.S. before 1928. --Achim55 (talk) 12:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, quick closing since this was started by an LTA. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non mi serve più JKey128 (talk) 14:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Puede servir a otros. Keep. 181.43.5.243 14:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation. --Jaqen (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation uploaded under false "own work" tag, please see: https://tathagat.live/products/guru-ravidas-ji-poster ThethPunjabi (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Túrelio. (non-admin closure) Marbletan (talk) 21:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF data, unlikely from uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 04:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Polarlys. (non-admin closure) Marbletan (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image can be found from various sources. I didn't find it anywhere with a CC-BY-SA license so I think strongly that this is a copyright violation. Pullaharakka (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See, for example, Google search results when searching with this image. Pullaharakka (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: https://www.fullsteam.fi/images/pressikuvat/rony-rex/ronyrex%202.jpg. --King of ♥ 00:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

have created this category incorrectly Rigorius (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, I have mistakenly put the name of another author and need to reupload this file so i can then properly link it wherever appropriate. Tsonov (talk) 20:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upoad. --Rosenzweig τ 07:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redundancy, is already uploaded Greetings Kent Madsen. (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upoad. --Rosenzweig τ 07:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redundancy, is already uploaded Greetings Kent Madsen. (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upoad. --Rosenzweig τ 07:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 10:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 10:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 11:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barseghyan1234321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional photos with no exif. Google found one here but the link is dead https://www.aca-mma.com/en/news/aca-129-rezultaty-ceremonii-vzvesivaniya-aexCJLM3_1111 - likely all taken from there

Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barseghyan1234321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sock NETCOPYVIO/ADVERT issues - same as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marialili2001 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gayane140991

Эlcobbola talk 19:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amarjeetkr97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All photos are from https://www.facebook.com/ginnimahi.singer (confirmed by metadata), no evidence of permission

Utcursch (talk) 23:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per norm. Obvious copyright violations. ThethPunjabi (talk) 10:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no free "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under 'show more.' Leoboudv (talk) 02:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freee license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under show more at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under show more at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under show more at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission from author Hoyanova (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it´s a print screen from a youtube video, so the permission is CC BY 3.0, by youtube Giozinha (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has NO FREE "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under show more at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No free license Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Creative Commons license. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 18:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is an official logo of the Atlantic Cup (Major League Soccer), then it is a copyright violation and needs to be deleted. If it is not an official logo, then it is out of scope and needs to be deleted. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Updated 27 Feb but on IMDB for ages - https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2923880/bio - needs OTRS, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:MTR vs NIKE Commentary.jpg. Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 14:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent (2022) magazine cover featuring a recent photo of a band. I very much doubt that this is the uploader's own work as claimed; it's most likely a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 16:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal variant of Canadian flag, only uploaded for promotional purpose that is out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW without essential into, and basically at its core a text image that should just be in wiki-markup, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crazy wolf gaming ff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images that seems to be outside the scope of our project. Commons is not a web hosting platform for personal content

Herby talk thyme 12:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Tulsi 24x7 13:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: http://www2.educ.osaki.miyagi.jp/furukawa-c/web/getfile.php?photono=2 Christmas Wreath (talk) 02:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete penis or vagina images with bad lighting should qualify for speedy deletion Dronebogus (talk) 07:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted book cover A1Cafel (talk) 07:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obtained from iStock, not from Pixabay A1Cafel (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I got this picture from www.pixabay.com, and I think this picture is free, because as I knew all content is released under the Pixabay License so it is safe to use without having to ask permission or give credit to the creator, even for commercial purposes. 114.124.244.119 19:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide a link to the pixabay page. --Achim55 (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio: Unfree Flickr license; (All Rights Reserved) - missing other informations. --Wdwd (talk) 15:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image (see exif data), no permission by photographer/ copyright holder. 2003:C0:8F15:6E00:A867:DD61:C7CC:9B45 09:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission; earlier version in history unlikely to be own work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio: television poster Wiki Farazi (talk) 09:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio: television poster Wiki Farazi (talk) 09:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio: television poster Wiki Farazi (talk) 09:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 11:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 11:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Slovenia A1Cafel (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, photographs in image are copyrighted. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. --Karim talk to me :)..! 11:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the file created as advertisement. --Karim talk to me :)..! 19:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 16:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixabay images published after January 2019 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No notability of the person detected, advertisement suspected Ignatus (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of scope for Commons. Whpq (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 彭楷恩 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Subject does not appear to be notable.

Ixfd64 (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheAfishyall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has no other contributions.

Marbletan (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map seems to voilate Wikipedia's "No Original Research" policy. It's listed as "own work", and does not cite reliable, published sources 193.75.58.187 22:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In use. This is not Wikipedia. --Achim55 (talk) 09:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:3-Oxocyclobutanecarboxylic-acid-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV channel logo, listed with a wrong license. Taichi (talk) 06:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:BOCAS TV LOGO 3D.png and File:BocastvTV-Logo-18.png. Taichi (talk) 07:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image: https://kanserdestektedavisi.com/ Yabancım 21:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless blank page, single page scan from a book PDF file AmsaTalla (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, part of a source document. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Carl Lindberg, no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Brayan Francisco Miranda Meraz (talk) 02:40, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: inferior duplicate of File:Escudo de Armas Hermosillo Sonora Mexico.GIF; deleted and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 18:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The logo will be used on the page I'm currently working on. WikiDiaspora (talk) 20:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The logo is now part of the page about Serbian-Canadian magazine SAN. WikiDiaspora (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   01:58, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is hardly possible that Ola.Rajchel is the author of this picture from 1943. In pl:wiki she described Karol Kostecki as her uncle. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted this photograph. At the time, I believed that I would be able to correct any false and misleading information about Karol Kazimierz Kostecki. This turned out to be impossible and an attempt to correct it ended with me being called a vandal and threatened with the deletion of my account. This led to my decision to take my picture off this badly created page with a lot of false information that cannot be corrected. Ola.Rajchel (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 09:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is porn 194.233.96.65 06:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, yes, it is, but this is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality amateur porn, shaky and frequently out of focus Dronebogus (talk) 15:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality file, commons is not an amateur porn site Dronebogus (talk) 15:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think in fact it looks more like a professional porn site. Therefore better delete this kind of amateur stuff from this place. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.5.243 (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and lack of COM:EDUSE due to poor quality. --Achim55 (talk) 18:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It doesn't look professional, and it seems strange to argue that it's both poor-quality and professional. And the thing is, do we have better videos of missionary position sex, other than the full-length Debbie Does Dallas? Might it be good to keep this as educational? I admit to feeling a little strange making this argument, but still. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I tried to ignore your stupid question but then how will you understand that the question was stupid? Who told you that the file was both poor-quality AND professional? Por Dios! 181.43.5.243 15:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons nie jest amatorską stroną pornograficzną 188.147.12.36 21:53, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims this is their own work, but this is scanned from the TIA/EIA-422-B standard, which is copyright Telecommunications Industry Association Drt1245 (talk) 00:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I could not find the document online, but given othe other copyvios I don't assume the uploader tells the truth. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims this is their own work, but this is from Posital's SSI documentation, figure 1.3. Drt1245 (talk) 00:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I have checked the document, yes it is. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims this is their own work, but this is from Posital's SSI documentation, figure 1.2. Drt1245 (talk) 00:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I have checked the document, yes it is (derivative work, still a copyvio). --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims this is their own work, but this is from Posital's SSI documentation, figure 1.2. Drt1245 (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I have checked the document, yes it is. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims this is their own work, but this is from Posital's SSI documentation. Drt1245 (talk) 00:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I have checked the document, yes it is (Figure 1.1). --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims this is their own work, but I find that dubious given their other uploads. Drt1245 (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Given the other copyvios another copyvio is the most likely. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|A imagem possuí "copyright"}} Kongs (talk) 01:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently published in 1936 per [3], not 1922. And likely not {{PD-US-no-notice}} because the notice could be on other pages of the magazine. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please delete. sorry I must have been out of my mind. It's from here but she I click in it was definitely an 1936 not 1924 and def not 1922. I'll do better. https://lantern.mediahist.org/catalog/universal2438univ_1818 Jengod (talk) 03:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To guard against impersonation, the uploader will need to supply evidence that they are the owner of the website https://cloverbastcoon.fr/. This can be done by emailing COM:VRT/fr from the email address listed in the contact section on the website.

King of ♥ 04:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is taken from this, with a license "licenza CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT", which disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cannot release this with a cc license since they are not the copyright holder. David10244 (talk) 04:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I value your suggestion and have an humble submission that I have uploaded this .jpg image in discussion and I have created the Wikipedia page- Deshbhakti ke Pavan Teerth. I am sorry as I am not well versed with the rules and formatting and trying my best to learn from my mistake. I admit that I don't own the copyright of the image. Please help me in updating the the details on the book cover page. Please don't delete this page, as we could update the correct information. Thank You. Raksha57 (talk) 09:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE and COM:Redundant. This files are self-made low quality illustration. --61.120.241.1 05:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work most likely by Charles Collet, who died in 1983, so his works are still under copyright until 2064. Kritzolina (talk) 07:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That this is indeed the work by Charles Collet (Q19800732) (1902–1983) is confirmed by Jordi Moias i Rifà, Guía oficial de Montserrat, p. 35, see [4]. Quote: Al otro lado de la sala se encuentra la Fuente de la Virgen, cuyos relieves son obra de Charles Collet, así como los capiteles que ornamentan sus arcos. A picture of the fountain is to be found on the page. Unfortunately, we have no freedom of panorama for church interiors in Spain. The relevant discussion can be found here. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is it truly copyrighted until 2064? Isn’t it supposed to be 1983+70+1, which gives 2054? I’ve been adding the Category:Undelete in 2054 to some DRs. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work most likely by Charles Collet, who died in 1983, so his works are still under copyright until 2064. Kritzolina (talk) 07:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That this is indeed the work by Charles Collet (Q19800732) (1902–1983) is confirmed by Jordi Moias i Rifà, Guía oficial de Montserrat, p. 35, see [5]. Quote: Al otro lado de la sala se encuentra la Fuente de la Virgen, cuyos relieves son obra de Charles Collet, así como los capiteles que ornamentan sus arcos. A picture of the fountain is to be found on the page. Unfortunately, we have no freedom of panorama for church interiors in Spain. The relevant discussion can be found here. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work most likely by Charles Collet, who died in 1983, so his works are still under copyright until 2064. Kritzolina (talk) 07:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That this is indeed the work by Charles Collet (Q19800732) (1902–1983) is confirmed by Jordi Moias i Rifà, Guía oficial de Montserrat, p. 35, see [6]. Quote: Al otro lado de la sala se encuentra la Fuente de la Virgen, cuyos relieves son obra de Charles Collet, así como los capiteles que ornamentan sus arcos. A picture of the fountain is to be found on the page. Unfortunately, we have no freedom of panorama for church interiors in Spain. The relevant discussion can be found here. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work most likely by Charles Collet, who died in 1983, so his works are still under copyright until 2064. Kritzolina (talk) 07:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a picture taken in an art exhibition inside a museum but it's part of the architecture of the Basilica of Santa Maria de Montserrat. If this must be deleted, all the pictures in the Category:Capella_del_Santíssim_(Cathedral_of_Mallorca), by Miquel Barceló, for instance, must be also deleted? --Enric (talk) 10:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete That this is indeed the work by Charles Collet (Q19800732) (1902–1983) is confirmed by Jordi Moias i Rifà, Guía oficial de Montserrat, p. 35, see [7]. Quote: Al otro lado de la sala se encuentra la Fuente de la Virgen, cuyos relieves son obra de Charles Collet, así como los capiteles que ornamentan sus arcos. A picture of the fountain is to be found on the page. Unfortunately, we have no freedom of panorama for church interiors in Spain. The relevant discussion can be found here. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work most likely by Charles Collet, who died in 1983, so his works are still under copyright until 2064. Kritzolina (talk) 07:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a picture taken in an art exhibition inside a museum but it's part of the architecture of the Basilica of Santa Maria de Montserrat. If this must be deleted, all the pictures in the Category:Capella_del_Santíssim_(Cathedral_of_Mallorca), by Miquel Barceló, for instance, must be also deleted? --Enric (talk) 10:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete That this is indeed the work by Charles Collet (Q19800732) (1902–1983) is confirmed by Jordi Moias i Rifà, Guía oficial de Montserrat, p. 35, see [8]. Quote: Al otro lado de la sala se encuentra la Fuente de la Virgen, cuyos relieves son obra de Charles Collet, así como los capiteles que ornamentan sus arcos. A picture of the fountain is to be found on the page. Unfortunately, we have no freedom of panorama for church interiors in Spain. The relevant discussion can be found here. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern artwork that most likely is not in the public domain yet, artist unkonwn Kritzolina (talk) 07:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern artwork that most likely is not in the public domain yet, artist unkonwn Kritzolina (talk) 07:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stained glass window forms major part of this image. COM:FOP Spain mentions Works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares may be freely reproduced but public interiors are not okay under COM:CRT/Spain. Evidence is needed for the work of which this happens to be derivative is free. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a picture taken in an art exhibition inside a museum but it's part of the architecture of the Basilica of Santa Maria de Montserrat. If this must be deleted, all the pictures in the Category:Capella_del_Santíssim_(Cathedral_of_Mallorca), by Miquel Barceló, for instance, must be also deleted? --Enric (talk) 10:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Enric: Do you know which artist created this window? In Austria, photographing such a window would be covered by freedom of panorama because the Austrian version explicitely also extends to parts of buildings. Not so in Spain though. And yes, the pictures of works of art by a living artist inside a Spanish church you mentioned are not ok as well. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty much as Rosenzweig has elaborated above, there is no FoP in Spain for such stuff which could cover the images included in the category and yeah, all of that must go. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtlich geschütztes Foto Jbergner (talk) 08:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jbergner, Apologies for speaking English. Could you please explain why this photo would be protected by copyright? The source (Flickr) mentions CC-BY-SA; photographer Jan Zappner has well over 1,500 photographs in Commons. In what way would this photo be under copyright? Vysotsky (talk) 09:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Die Re:publica conference publiziert alles auf eine freie CC lizens. Vera (talk) 09:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Yes, it is protected by copyright. But it is also under a free CC license, so it is ok for Wikimedia Commons. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Apologies. I expressed myself utterly wrong. Rosenzweig is right. What I should have said: the license of this image is, according to the source, CC-BY-SA. That license permits inclusion in Wikimedia Commons and usage in Wikipedia. Vysotsky (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photo, found on https://nohostudiorentals.com/about-photo-studio (use the scroll to move right at the bottom) - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The actress owns the photo, it is on that site only as a marketing example of photos taken at that studio. I don't believe posting it here violates copyright. 38.43.31.255 05:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from https://www.facebook.com/neushoornleeuwarden/ also no permission no author no metadata Hoyanova (talk) 10:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata - "Copyright holder Edwin Westra" and also mention of the photographer in the left corner of this image Hoyanova (talk) 10:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is uploaded with CC BY-SA 2.0 on Commons. But original photo with uploaded with copyright on Flickr. Also there is a web archive that it is captured in upload date on Commons. It is copyrighted seem in this capture. According to this situation, this file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if it is possible to use PD-USGov here. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete My understanding is that PD-USGov doesn't apply when a work isn't created as part of one's duties as a government employee. It's Barack Obama's work as a candidate, so it is protected by copyright. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Иной автор Ил Т (talk) 13:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Иной автор Ил Т (talk) 19:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has No Free "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)" under 'show more" at the web source. Leoboudv (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9   13:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The videos on this youtube channel are all collected information found on the Internet. It can be said to be a second-hand source of information. All the pictures used can be found in Google. Although the YouTube video is marked CC, it’s re-using footage from a third party, so the license does not apply here. Tychou12 (talk) 02:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:LL. --P 1 9 9   13:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was taken from this, with a license "licenza CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT", which disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 05:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was taken from this, with a license "licenza CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT", which disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture violate the Copyright of the photographer Ovedc (talk) 06:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (source: "אייל ליאני" = Eyal Liani). --P 1 9 9   13:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the article at en:Tustin_High_School#Campus, there was a plan for a science center in 2008 and this looks like plans. I highly doubt the uploader created this diagram of the plans so I think we need evidence of permission for the plans. I wouldn't even think this would qualify as a non-free use as it may have actually been built years ago. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

totally blurry image, no value for the project — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source in pikiwiki Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 10:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, "No file by this name exists". --P 1 9 9   13:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/91362_desert_stork%27s-bill_PikiWiki_Israel.jpg Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 10:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: link above is the same file - no duplicate found. If there reallly is a duplicate, just use the {{Duplicate}} template. --P 1 9 9   13:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo with photographer's watermark ... sure doesn't look like Creative Commons licensing to me. 2003:C0:8F15:6E00:A867:DD61:C7CC:9B45 11:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Provided this photo meets threshold of originality in the first place. If not, we'd need permission by the artist of the painting, which I don't see anywhere either. --2003:C0:8F15:6E00:A867:DD61:C7CC:9B45 11:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This picture is made by an photographer called Peter Walter and it is shot in the Erotic Art Museum for free use for the artist. It shows the Mona Lisa of Reeperbahn "DOMENICA" by DonnaSanisue. 2A02:8108:483F:B39B:E0A2:1709:9EFB:BB29 12:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"For free use for the artist" is not the same thing as Creative Commons. Which is basically "for free use for everyone". --2003:C0:8F15:6E00:A867:DD61:C7CC:9B45 13:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:50, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit is from the Office of the President of Cuba, not a work from the IAEA A1Cafel (talk) 11:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit is from the Office of the President of Cuba, not a work from the IAEA A1Cafel (talk) 11:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit is from the Office of the President of Cuba, not a work from the IAEA A1Cafel (talk) 11:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit is from the Office of the President of Cuba, not a work from the IAEA A1Cafel (talk) 11:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit is from the Office of the President of Armenia, not a work from the IAEA A1Cafel (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit is from the Office of the President of Armenia, not a work from the IAEA A1Cafel (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit is from the Office of the President of Armenia, not a work from the IAEA A1Cafel (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit is from the Office of the President of Armenia, not a work from the IAEA A1Cafel (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. This is a calendar of the year 1386 in solar Hijro (2007-2008). HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW, no source, authors, or permission. --P 1 9 9   13:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation (Nicolas Nova) Antimuonium (talk) 12:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as no source (No source since) Rasbak (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The original source is indicated in the file information. There is no way anybody can guarantee that something posted on the internet will stay there forever. The deletion of the original source cannot be a reason to delete the file from Wikicommons. Afil (talk) 20:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unfortunately fails COM:LR; even the archived version from Feb. 2020 shows a different image. --P 1 9 9   14:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Mint eggy93 (talk) 13:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   13:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense, possible copyvio of the Vice city game logo, does not appear to be made by jacknjellify and instead appears made by uploader who claims to be jacknjellify yet only has this “contribution” Aaron Liu (talk) 13:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonsene, spam Docosong (talk) 13:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Kyrle Daly (talk) 23:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another admin? G4 181.43.5.243 13:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely not own work: small crop from an unknown source and subject is same as uploader. --P 1 9 9   14:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicity photo 181.43.5.243 13:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9   14:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. This is a part (print screen) of electronic nautical chart, which is copyrighted. Aotearoa (talk) 13:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False CC licenses on Lofter. Weibo is the true source: https://weibo.com/5846287130/Fj4E7BlOO And the author on Lofter had indicated that all the photos with "BOWL" watermarks did not belong to him in this post. Same problem with: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karry Wang in 2019 - 4.jpg EditFake (talk) 14:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

  •  Delete CSD F6 (license laundering)

--EditFake (talk) 03:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from "Shivalal_Shrestha" needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a good quality image of the musician at File:Georgmalmsten.jpg. {{PD-Finland}} does not seem to apply to the record displayed in this collage. Gikü (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. The Finnish Copyright Act (404/1961, amended 607/2015) specifies that photographs not considered to be "works of art" become public domain 50 years after they were created. A picture of an old record label can hardly be considered a work of art”””” Afil (talk) 19:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   14:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a good quality image of the musician at File:Eugenmalmsten2.jpg. {{PD-Finland}} does not seem to be a fitting license for the record displayed in this collage. Gikü (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. The Finnish Copyright Act (404/1961, amended 607/2015) specifies that photographs not considered to be "works of art" become public domain 50 years after they were created.A picture of an old record label can hardly be considered a work of art. ”””” Afil (talk) 19:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, photographs, but not graphic art of the kind we can see on this record.
Anyway, I have found that images of pre-1977 Columbia records and Odeon records older than 70 years can be licensed with Template:PD-US-no notice and Template:Anonymous-EU respectively. As such, I went ahead and uploaded File:Eugen Malmsten - Sä Muistatko Metsätien.jpg and File:Georg Malmstén - Tango-unelma (Enfernuta Mia).jpg as better-quality images of the records themselves.
Consequently, I  I withdraw my nomination on this particular file as it became a collage of File:Eugenmalmsten2.jpg and File:Eugen Malmsten - Sä Muistatko Metsätien.jpg. Gikü (talk) 20:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   14:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, unknown source, unknown author, false license 2003:E1:3722:248:FCC9:499A:A611:E601 15:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, unknown source, unknown author, false license 2003:E1:3722:248:FCC9:499A:A611:E601 15:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, unknown source, unknown author, false license 2003:E1:3722:248:FCC9:499A:A611:E601 15:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, unknown source, unknown author, false license 2003:E1:3722:248:FCC9:499A:A611:E601 15:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, unknown source, unknown author, false license 2003:E1:3722:248:FCC9:499A:A611:E601 15:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, unknown source, unknown author, false license 2003:E1:3722:248:FCC9:499A:A611:E601 15:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, unknown source, unknown author, false license (see other files) 2003:E1:3722:248:FCC9:499A:A611:E601 15:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. There’s also no Exif. RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I’ve just found out it’s an AFP/Getty Images picture, simply cropped to avoid being detected. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/14/jair-bolsonaro-bitten-by-bird-during-coronavirus-quarantine RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly taken from a print source, so not "own work" Yes, it appears to be taken from a period publication. This is a photograph taken in 1960 in Switzerland. If it is considered an artistic photograph, it's still under copyright. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 16:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow. The two photos of Anna Maurizio were taken by my father in 1960 and then published in a journal. He uploaded the photos personally. If needed I can send a confirmation that I am the copyright owner, because my father died in 2015. Please tell me what is needed to keep the two photos. Hadi (talk) 16:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hadi: , If you are the copyright owner, contact COM:VRT. Abzeronow (talk) 16:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Reinhard Kraasch. --P 1 9 9   14:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly taken from a print source, so not "own work" Swiss photograph created in 1970 and was published prior to upload. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Reinhard Kraasch. --P 1 9 9   14:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JeffersonJohnny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader's personal theories about physics. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has no other contributions.

Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are these formally published papers (i.e Can you find a "reliable" journal citation for them?) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe these have been published formally (or informally) elsewhere. As far as I can tell, they are nothing more than text that someone wrote in order to upload to Commons. Marbletan (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, only text. --P 1 9 9   14:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author & source nonsense; uploaded for self-promotion only, most recently at w:de:Ali zafar igo Schniggendiller (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Croatia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://zoolubin.pl/atrakcje/szlak-zwierzat-wymarlych/ Nux (talk··dyskusja) 17:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://zoolubin.pl/ Nux (talk··dyskusja) 17:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://zoolubin.pl/ Nux (talk··dyskusja) 17:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://zoolubin.pl/atrakcje/szlak-zwierzat-wymarlych/ Nux (talk··dyskusja) 17:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://zoolubin.pl/ Nux (talk··dyskusja) 17:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uproad wrong picture Yuka.y0 (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   14:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orge Poogen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality, no convincing EXIF-data. One file name is really suspicious. I suspect that not own work

Estopedist1 (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (painting by Alexandra Galinova) M2k~dewiki (talk) 19:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Galinova has passed away. Her heirs agree to the publication of the image on Wikipedia. Museum Sammlung Prinzhorn (talk) 10:50, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, insufficient permission. --P 1 9 9   14:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not relevant for 2023 year, will be created and added a new version of it OlesiaLukaniuk (WMUA) (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. Just overwrite it with the new version. --P 1 9 9   14:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marialili2001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent netcopyvios - low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Mkrtich Sarkisyan.jpg is here, etc.), clearly different photographers, etc. Also likely COM:ADVERT issue; uploaded by sock promoting non-notable persons (e.g., File:Murad Al.jpg was for deleted ru:Мурад Алискеров) See also DRs of sock uploads: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gayane140991‎ and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Barseghyan1234321.

Эlcobbola talk 19:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gayane140991 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sock NETCOPYVIO/ADVERT issues - same as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Marialili2001 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Barseghyan1234321

Эlcobbola talk 19:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eien20 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/Its-not-Karate-its-Life-658203300996963/photos/658229080994385 Yann (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dignitywiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files (certificates, letters) outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 20:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cpandian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files (essays or stories) outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons.

Marbletan (talk) 20:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masuod26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal photos not in use.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright belongs to Barack Obama, the presidential candidate, not office of the president of the United States. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. --P 1 9 9   14:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work"; haven't see such a logo Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo by an unknown phtographer from the 1930s would have been PD in Germany in the 2000s, well after the URAA date. Therefore these images will have a USA copyright until at least 2025. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Munke travels to Spain in 1936. He will never return to the Soviet Union. It is also known that Munke started to write between 1933 and 1936 and no longer worked in the printing shop. A book with his journalistic and literary contributions was published in 2015. This also suggests that the picture was taken before 1935/1936. Ulricus Angelus (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The picture appears to have been taken in 1933. That says the book "Walter Munke, Zweimal um die Ecke", Berlin 2015, p. 76. The picture was taken in Moscow, except for Munke, nobody is known. So there is no copyright infringement. Ulricus Angelus (talk) 13:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An example is the following photo: File:Ernest Hemingway with Soviet and German intellectuals Ilya Ehrenburg and Gustav Regulator, possibly working on the propaganda film The Spanish Earth, Spain, 1937. (25888498228).jpg
The image has been reviewed and the file has been licensed under the terms of cc-by-2.0. Ulricus Angelus (talk) 13:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Respectfully, this template is based on a misunderstanding and needs to be deleted, just like other, similar templates: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/NoFacebook_templates Gnom (talk) 17:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos rather than data display in Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India (group of several images, out of 12 863)

[edit]

how do we know that "b. Data that the data provider(s) is not authorized to license, that is data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive;" exclusion is not applying? That is why GODL requires license to be clearly marked - because without that omnipotence is required to know whether this (or some other exclusion) is applying

Also, it is an invalid license use, claimed license is for data (including graphic representation of data) - not for photos. See "“Data” means a representation of information4, numerical compilations and observations, documents, facts, maps, images, charts, tables and figures, concepts in digital and/or analog form, and includes metadata,5 that is all information about data, and/or clarificatory notes provided by data provider(s), without which the data concerned cannot be interpreted or used.6" in license text

see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Media_in_Category:Unreviewed_photos_of_GODL-India for failed attempt to mass delete everything in category in one go

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 05:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these images are from the official twitter account of the Indian Army. The copyright policy of the Indian Army website is here [9] The twitter account, using logic, is an extension of the website. Akk7a (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The other images are from the Indian Navy website [10] and should probably be using the template {{Indian navy}}. Akk7a (talk) 13:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright policy of the Indian Army website start from "Material featured on this site" so it does not apply to Twitter. Also, not sure about "This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." restriction anyway Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Akk7a: Are you aware of any policy applying to their Twitter postings? What you linked starts from "Material featured on this site" - is there anything covering Twitter there? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{Indian navy}} is quite confusing - is it applying to all materials produced by Indian Navy? Some subset? Publications on some websites like indiannavy.nic.in? Is it overriding "© Since 1999. All Rights Reserved." in footer of for example https://indiannavy.nic.in/node/27254 ? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Akk7a: Do you have any idea to what {{Indian navy}} can be applied? I would help with it but I have no idea at all to which content it is applicable. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mateusz Konieczny and Akk7a, it applies to "work[s] created by the Indian Navy and [] present at https://indiannavy.nic.in/, so the works needs to be made by the Indian Navy and present at https://indiannavy.nic.in/ to qualify. And this overrules any "All rights reserved" footnote. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the licensing with a "data" license is incorrect. The images from website indian navy can be kept according to the discussion and the VRT ticket. The other images are deleted as the source is a twitter account or other indian government websites. --Ellywa (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logos/insignia apparently excluded by claimed license

[edit]

Claimed license does not apply AT ALL. Note that "c. Names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s); (...) e. Military insignia;" are explicitly excluded and not covered by this license.

Also, it is an invalid license use, claimed license is for data (including graphic representation of data) - not for photos. See "“Data” means a representation of information4, numerical compilations and observations, documents, facts, maps, images, charts, tables and figures, concepts in digital and/or analog form, and includes metadata,5 that is all information about data, and/or clarificatory notes provided by data provider(s), without which the data concerned cannot be interpreted or used.6" in license text

And how do we know that "b. Data that the data provider(s) is not authorized to license, that is data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive;" exclusion is not applying? That is why GODL requires license to be clearly marked - because without that omnipotence is required to know whether this (or some other exclusion) is applying

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Help:VisualFileChange.js updated this page instead of creating new one. Let me know if that was a misuse of that tool (still, likely better than a new separate entry for every single image with the same reason) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for File:BRICS India 2021 logo.svg - The logo is a simple geometrical shapes and text and thus is below COM:TOO / COM:TOO India threshold. As such it should be updated to PD-logo license and a better quality version from [11] be uploaded. I haven't checked other files, but will do so in a couple of days -- DaxServer (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar with: File:+Jakarta Logo.svg Whatsup236 (talk) 12:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not the same picture, this one has text in English and the other one in Indonesian. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 22:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this file might be a derivative work of en:Natsuiro Matsuri, I am not seeing an obvious affiliation between the YouTuber and the channel or uploader. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think they have obvious affiliation. Because Natsuiro Matsuri and Sakura Miko are belongs to same company called Cover corporation that manage Hololive. Please see here. So this video is not illegally uploaded. 赤座 (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 10:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 2

Per COM:TOYS

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete the Harry Potter images. From their description they appear to be taken from a Youtube Video (which is not freely licensed) and also link to other Flickr Albums containing similar images (which are also not freely licensed). As the linked Flickr album and the source Flickr Album are not the same I am concerned these are not freely licensed and could be COM:FLICKRWASHING.

Deleted: per nomination - (File:Easter Egg Nest (26930997217).jpg is also unambiguous - it is a bird's nest; copyright is explicitly granted without consideration of "quality" or "merit"). --Эlcobbola talk 15:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 3

Commons:Derivative works from botanical illustrations. Painters information need to be supplied to find out if illustrations are in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 4

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F3. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 5

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F3. --1989 (talk) 17:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 6

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

clpo13(talk) 15:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Clpo13: There’s a same image on enwiki saying the opposite. Any reason why it’s below TOO? -- 1989 (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was going off what the Commons version said, but after a closer look at it and the examples at COM:TOO#United States, I'd say there's probably enough originality there to be copyrightable. clpo13(talk) 15:57, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: F3, two files kept per above. --1989 (talk) 20:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 7

Newer duplicates of files that already exists on commons.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 07:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F8. --1989 (talk) 09:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 8

[edit]

Statues and component of the Independence Monument in Asghabat. The monument dates to 2001 as per w:en:Independence Monument, Ashgabat. Since there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Turkmenistan, commercial license clearances from the monument designer as well as statues' sculptors is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 9

[edit]

Violation of architects' copyrights, and Kazakhstan has no commercial freedom of panorama.

Palace of Peace and Reconciliation, ©️2006 Foster + Partners (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Palace of Peace and Reconciliation)
KazMunayGas Headquarters, ©️2002 Basis-A construction company (source)
Other modern architecture

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Courtesy of Spirit of Virginia", which is https://www.firstlady.virginia.gov/spirit-of-virginia-award/ ?

500+ more https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22Spirit+of+Virginia .

RZuo (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Spirit of Virginia is an award from the State of Virginia executive branch. This is clearly the official Flickr account of the governor and it would follow that in the absence of contradictory statute, the governor would be able to control the type of copyright produced by his executive offices. While there is a personal-use-only restriction, that is overridden by the fact that there is a clear Creative Commons license from a source competent to release its images as such. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see anything that indicates that Leonard Nadel was an employee of the United States Department of Justice, sources say that he was a freelance photographer. From this website: "Between 1953 and 1980 Nadel worked as a freelance photographer for such publications as the Los Angeles Times, Harvester News, Life, Business Week, and other major publications." reppoptalk 03:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per RAN. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep eh, the angle is something different Dronebogus (talk) 07:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Low quality photograph of an erect penis. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Highly unlikely this private photo of the former Vietnamese emperor's daughter is the work of the government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Bookish Worm (talk) 12:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: the permission template has been changed to PD-Italy. 源義信 (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No proof that Italy was country of origin of the photograph, could have been Vietnam and restored by URAA. Undelete in 2076 (120 years after photo's creation). --Abzeronow (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Highly unlikely this photo of the former Vietnamese emperor's daughter is the work of the government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Bookish Worm (talk) 12:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:PD-Italy applies to it. 源義信 (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Metadata in file says "MONDADORI PORTFOLIO/Angelo Cozzi". This may have been unpublished until after 2003. Undelete in 2076. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ucelovp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The same uploader as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election maps of the Czech Republic, the same problems. The uploader is trying use these maps on cs.wiki, but there is an consensus among more editors to not use these badly done maps in the articles.

Harold (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ucelovp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The same uploader as above and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election maps of the Czech Republic, the same problems. Very strange and unreadeable graphic presentation with many languages errors and typos, JPG format, watermarks, non-existent administrative units.

Harold (talk) 13:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

nechapu které kazisvět zase chce něco mazat! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ucelovp (talk • contribs) 09:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC) u voleb prezidenta my nepřijdou dulezité administrativní celky . je zájem ukázat rozdíly v preferencich voličů . Na tech "admin-krajich" se přece nevoli samostatně ( vitěz (ne)bere vše ) , ale do celkového součtu se posílají hlasy pro všechny tam volené kandidáty !!!! ja naopak považuju za manipulaci vybarvit barvou jen jednoho kandidáta část mapy kde získal jen část hlasu, často méně než 1/4 s oprávněných voličů nebo meně jak 1/2 s odevzdaných hlasů. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ucelovp (talk • contribs) 10:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Připomínky různých editorů k vámi vytvářeným "mapám" jsou dostupné na cs:Diskuse s wikipedistou:Ucelovp, žádná však nebyla v minulosti reflektována. Pokud vám "nepřijdou důležité administrativní celky" a místo nich do map vkládáte neexistující územní jednotky, tak mi přijde, že jakékoliv pokusy o diskusi s vámi jsou zbytečné. Wikimedia Commons není skládka nepoužitelného (graficky, jazykově, typograficky) a nesmyslného (neexistující územní jednotky) balastu. --Harold (talk) 11:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Not useful for Commons, and only used in user pages. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ucelovp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The same uploader as above and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election maps of the Czech Republic, the same problems. Very strange and unreadeable graphic presentation with many languages errors and typos, JPG format.

Harold (talk) 10:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

přesně nevím o co jde , zas řádí nějaké cenzor ?
nevím jakému kazisvětovi muže vadit nějaká presentace dat , kterou jsem ani nedal k "oficielnimu" zdroji?!
jaké ma být měřítko hodnocení přízpěvků na wikipedii ? jenom líbí/nelíbí to je podle mě hodně subjektivní. myslím že by se mělo argumentovat s hlediska , jak je to blízko pravdě .myslím že komunální volební systém v česku je hodně nepřehledný , taky počet municipalit atd.
učel proč jsem to kdysi dělal byl nějaký přehled s hlediska "volebních stran " , především pro menší obecní uřady  .  
překlad přes google angličtina
I don't know exactly what it's about, is there a censor on the loose?
I don't know what kind of scumbag could be bothered by a presentation of data that I didn't even add to the "official" source?!
what should be the rating scale for wikipedia posts? just like/dislike is very subjective in my opinion.
I think that one should argue from the point of view of proximity to the truth.
taught why I used to do it was some overview for voters here in places where there are a lot of municipal offices Ucelovp (talk) 16:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ucelovp: Doporučuji si pročíst COM:SCOPE, abyste zjistil, k čemu Wikimedia Commons slouží. Určitě to není skládka souborů, které jsou graficky, obsahově, typograficky, pravopisně a gramaticky na zcela tragické úrovni. --Harold (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
řekl bych nemějte přehnané iluze o své kompetenci. Ucelovp (talk) 12:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- many upload errors. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - es handelt sich aber um ein Werk des lebenden Künstlers Michael Lampe Lutheraner (talk) 16:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Needs VRT confirmation from the artist Michael Lampe. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Iran.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It isn’t the same, your creation has red lines slightly going into the white, (look above the text) while mine doesn’t I understand how this looks almost identical, but it’s not. ARandomGuy23 (talk) 20:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: They are subtly different files. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images imported from a flickr account [12] which seems to belong to the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. Flickr license says CC-BY-SA 2.0, metadata says Copyright holder is ©UK Ministry of Defence CROWN COPYRIGHT, 2022. COM:CROWN indicates that Crown Copyright is not an acceptable free license. I don't think the Embassy has the Authority to relicense Crown Copyright images from the MoD and the MoD does not release images under the OGL if "one individual is recognisable within an image" [13].

XxakixX (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I found File:Jenkins performs with the Royal Marine Band during the Sunset Ceremony 09.jpg on the website of the Royal Navy: [14] Direct link: [15] Lower resolution, same metadata. XxakixX (talk) 17:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Flickr description on the photographs says "The Forum will be led by the Department for International Trade (DIT), working alongside the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) to strengthen the trade and economic pillars of the Euro-Atlantic alliance and reinforce our security and defence partnerships with like-minded, democratic allies". MoD and FCDO were working together on the event, permissions for FCDO to relicense MoD photographs seem like a thing they'd do. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed license does not apply AT ALL. Note that "c. Names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s); (...) e. Military insignia;" are explicitly excluded and not covered by this license.

Also, it is an invalid license use, claimed license is for data (including graphic representation of data) - not for photos. See "“Data” means a representation of information4, numerical compilations and observations, documents, facts, maps, images, charts, tables and figures, concepts in digital and/or analog form, and includes metadata,5 that is all information about data, and/or clarificatory notes provided by data provider(s), without which the data concerned cannot be interpreted or used.6" in license text

And how do we know that "b. Data that the data provider(s) is not authorized to license, that is data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive;" exclusion is not applying? That is why GODL requires license to be clearly marked - because without that omnipotence is required to know whether this (or some other exclusion) is applying

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Names, crest and logos not covered by license. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed license does not apply AT ALL. Note that "c. Names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s); (...) e. Military insignia;" are explicitly excluded and not covered by this license.

Also, it is an invalid license use, claimed license is for data (including graphic representation of data) - not for photos. See "“Data” means a representation of information4, numerical compilations and observations, documents, facts, maps, images, charts, tables and figures, concepts in digital and/or analog form, and includes metadata,5 that is all information about data, and/or clarificatory notes provided by data provider(s), without which the data concerned cannot be interpreted or used.6" in license text

And how do we know that "b. Data that the data provider(s) is not authorized to license, that is data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive;" exclusion is not applying? That is why GODL requires license to be clearly marked - because without that omnipotence is required to know whether this (or some other exclusion) is applying

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Logos and symbols not covered by license. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is a screenshot of a report made by Sparbanken Skåne (see https://www.sparbankenskane.se/om-oss/skansk-konjunktur/skansk-konjunktur-maj-2019.html), so the image is likely not CC-BY-2.0. Most of the individual images seem to be already be on Commons, like File:20190413 C4 shoppingcenter Kristianstad 003 (33730315828).jpg. EdTre (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in twitter posts cannot be assumed to be GODL, also when posted from official accounts. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply:@Mateusz Konieczny but this photo from twitter US President account is public domain and belongs to White House but File:"Chief Minister of Maharashtra Shri Uddhav Thackeray, Deputy Chief Minister Shri AjitPawar and Cabinet Minister Shri AshokChavan.jpg which was from Prime Minister of India's Office from offical twitter handle , how can it not be classified in GODL-India , Kindly please review it , and close the deletation nomination page. Thank You, Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

a work of the U.S. federal government is automatically in the public domain. Not all work of Indian government is automatically GODL-licensed, as far as I know (GODL has numerous exceptions and is badly designed) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 07:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PubleyPetit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The sources for these files are Twitter, FB, or other but no actual evidence that these are works of government employees in official duty (PD-Gov is merely assumed by uploader). Needs official sources to provide proof.

P 1 9 9   19:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harrisarroyocrop.jpg states that it is extracted from File:President Arroyo and Honolulu Mayor Jeremy Harris.jpg, which states that it comes from:
It certainly seems like that was an official source. Peaceray (talk) 22:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated File:Harrisarroyocrop.jpg with the original source & wikilinked to the Commons file from which it was extracted. Peaceray (talk) 23:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do the corresponding house/senate.gov containers serve as an official source for these files?
Wesleyhunt.jpg: https://hunt.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/hunt.house.gov/files/styles/evo_image_portrait_480/public/evo-media-image/official-wesley-hunt-tx38.jpg?itok=Uj7gYuEj
Tuberville-portrait-with-football.jpg: https://www.tuberville.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Coach-Tossing-the-Ball.jpg
Tony-Gonzales-Congress.jpg: https://gonzales.house.gov/about PubleyPetit (talk) 23:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep For Hunt, it is the image from the congress website and his website, and the metadata says official portrait, and matches the others for the year he entered Congress. The others appear on official .gov pages. The only one I am not sure of is File:Johnduarte-kevinkiley.jpg --RAN (talk) 03:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Four of the photographs were kept because they were shown to be public domain. Two deleted because Kevin Kiley was not a member of Congress when that photograph was taken so he'd have copyright as a private citizen. I will adjust file information to include the public domain sources. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CongBongSuntay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. Or official portraits without essential source and permission.

P 1 9 9   19:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I also doubt these are own works. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sikander as a speedy delete and the most recent rationale was: 1=Replaced with File:Claudio Fabián Tapia - 2020 (cropped).jpg from same flickr source and with verified license. Despite the fact that it is labeled as a speedy delete, there is no reason to label it as such. Both files are also different file types, with one being jpg and the other being png, and different sizes, with one being 2558×3840 and the other being 2704×3728, there is no rationale to deletion, only to replace a "duplicate". It would be ideal if Sikander could elaborate on his actions, thanks. nicolas talkpage★★★ 22:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thooompson, my thought process was that File:Chiqui Tapia 2020.png is sourced from https://www.flickr.com/photos/culturaargentina/50514276581 but the Flickr bot was not able to verify the license because the uploaded image is a different size and different format. So, I uploaded the original Flickr size+format at File:Encuentro entre Tristán Bauer con AFA.jpg and then cropped it at File:Claudio Fabián Tapia - 2020 (cropped).jpg which makes File:Chiqui Tapia 2020.png redundant. But, you're right that it is a different format so I have no objection leaving it as is. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 🦖 22:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I just license reviewed the file. It is available at the Flickr source with the stated license and the Ministry appears to be the copyright holder of the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Yann (talk) 20:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: essential information unknown, COM:PCP. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This painting became public domain in Hungary in 2021, but since it is a circa 1930 painting, it would still be subject to URAA since it was not public domain in 1996 and the date is later than 1927. Undelete in 2026. Abzeronow (talk) 15:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please give me the details: why is Uruguay Round Agricultural Agreement important (URAA) in this case ? --Elekes Andor (talk) 17:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. It is an American law that restored U.S. copyright to many works in 1996. COM:URAA Since Wikimedia Commons servers are in the U.S., American copyright has to be clear for a file to be hosted here. Abzeronow (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And ? So ? Try to explain what you mean. Elekes Andor (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the 1930 painting is still under copyright in the United States. US copyright would expire in 2026. Commons requires that a file be free to use in both its source country(Hungary in this case) and the United States.
Through Google Translate: Rendben, az 1930-as festmény még mindig szerzői jogvédelem alatt áll az Egyesült Államokban. Az Egyesült Államok szerzői joga 2026-ban járna le. A Commons megköveteli, hogy egy fájl szabadon használható legyen mind a forrásországban (jelen esetben Magyarországon), mind az Egyesült Államokban. Abzeronow (talk) 01:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+File:A Tisza Tokajnál.jpg. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That one is OK. 1920 painting would be public domain in the US unless there's evidence it was hidden away from the public for many years. Abzeronow (talk) 01:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sajnos ez nem annyira egyértelmű. A feltöltő nagyon szeret hamis adatokat megadni a feltöltéseinél (lásd itt: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Róna Viktor.png), ráadásul még ezeknél is először azt tüntette fel, hogy ő a szerzőjük: [16], [17] (utóbbinál még a licencnél is). Az A Tisza Tokajnál képnél nincs bizonyítva, hogy 1920-ban készült, mivel erre egyelőre csak a feltöltő -- nem túl megbízható -- állítása van, ugyanakkor szeret manipulálni a dátumokkal (ezt sajnos nem tudom hivatkozni, mert azóta törölve lett a lap, ahol elhangzott az állítás, melyben leírja, hogy nem kell tudni a dátumot, elég ha tippelget rá).
Amíg nincs független forrásból alátámasztva, hogy az A Tisza Tokajnál című festmény 1920-ban készült, addig erősen kétséggel kezelni ezt az állítást. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ráadásul a "A Tisza Tokajnál" "Kárpáthy Jenő" keresés csak a Commonsra feltöltött képet találja (illetve a magyar wikipédia oldalt Kárpáthy Jenőről), így az sem biztos, hogy valóban a megadott festő festette, sőt az sem biztos, hogy 1920 körül. A feltöltő azóta rátette a képre a Category:1921 in Hungary-t. Fura, hogy a kép elkészültére csak 1920 körül van megadva, de a kép belekerül az 1921 Magyarországon kategóriába. Utóbbi milyen alapon, ha erre nincs információ? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Családi hagyomány szerint a festmény részt vett a Nemzeti Szalon 1921 évi kiállításán. Elekes Andor (talk) 07:15, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
És erre ugye van valamilyen megbízható forrásod is, a szavadon kívül... Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to check this via my resources that I can access through Wikipedia Library. For now, that would establish A Tisza Tokajnál as not falling under URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 15:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A Tisza Tokajnál is part of Elekes Collection. Elekes Andor (talk) 16:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: one, kept one. holly {chat} 21:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]