Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 31st, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

09503096065 103.169.69.90 03:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Test or vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 08:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly Copyrighted material Red Natters (talk) 02:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See also this discussion on en.wiki. Felix QW (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong upload Cedarjp (talk) 07:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request & not own work. --Achim55 (talk) 08:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dendermonde vroeger & nu (talk · contribs)

[edit]
   Wat hier wordt gepost heeft 7 jaar werk gekost .
   Indien je in de site kijkt staat er reeds : personen die toelating gaven hun foto te gebruiken .
   Dit zal ingevuld worden wanneer mijn kleindochter tijd vind , ik kan niet vlug genoeg typen om dit epistel neer te pennen .
   Dat dit succes heeft bij de plaatselijke bevolking kan je zien op mijn Facebook site met dezelfde naam .
   De namen zijn gelijkend , maar ze geven steeds een ander zicht .
   Vele steden zouden ook beter iets dergelijks doen , anders verdwijnt de geschiedenis .
   MVG
   Rudy Dendermonde vroeger & nu (Overleg) 07:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

This is the first fifty of 1,000 images, many of which have the same problems. First, I don't think it is appropriate to upload historical images in pairs or triplets as was done here. That make it harder for our users to reuse them. Second, and more important, while some of these may be PD because of age, that must be proven, and I doubt that any of them are actually "own work" as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Copyright law actually has it so that when you scan or even crop an existing public domain/creative-commons image, that derivative copy is your own work, even though it doesn't transfer the original copyright to you. That is why we don't allow people to upload under a "no derivative license". The problem is that our form only allows you to add in one name, the original author or the derivative copy maker. All these images are properly dated and are public domain in the EU except File:Kerkstraat H. Maagdcollege 1958.png which can be deleted, the cutoff date is 1951. --RAN (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my bad English .
You asked for the permissions to use the foto .
I already ment dat they were comming in Dutch
I ditn't start de list because I'm not verry quicly in that thing en my dauchter dus .
I will start to give the list of permissions , even in Facebook You need to have de autorisations .
If there are more problems , please tell me
Dendermonde vroeger & nu
Rudy Dendermonde vroeger & nu (talk) 07:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward By now there are 4500 uploads, it seems all of them are tagged "own work", "cc-by-sa-4.0", and none of them is "own work" or "cc-by-sa-4.0". The actual authors are mentioned on the user page. C.Suthorn (talk) 07:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward By now there are 5169 uploads. C.Suthorn (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It is sad to delete all these images. I considered many of them, they are all combinations of unsourced photos or drawings. As an arbitrary example, the schoolclass photo (File:Kerkstraat H Maagd-College 1914 Klasfoto uit WO I. & 1965 3° Wet B.png), a combination of a photo from 1914 and 1965. Both are still copyrighted and we would need permissions of the photographers (not of the owner of the prints). These items cannot be maintained on Commons, because the copyright status is unclear, and the large majority is still copyrighted. My advise would be to store this work on a dedicated website, where you can include a disclaimer about the copyright. Perhaps with involvement of a lawyer to avoid problems. Several are old postcards, there have been severe problems with these in my home country, the Netherlands. For instance read https://www.prentbriefkaarten.info/blog/richtlijnen-auteurswet. --Ellywa (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dendermonde vroeger & nu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

same rationale as first DR. 7195 files. some uploaded before first DR, others while the first DR was runnning. It would be good to keep all this files, but it does need VRT permission.

C.Suthorn (talk) 10:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - more of the same -- speedy delete. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter died in 1965


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:penis Dronebogus (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image shows design studies how the museum should look like after the renovation. most probably not own work unless the uploader represents the design/architectural studio involved in this project. Albinfo (talk) 15:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 20:47, 31 October 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 03:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio. Maurice Flesier (talk) 13:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silme isteğindeki gerekçeniz nedir Pdrtunc (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Credit at source is "Foto: Anadolu Bilder". No evidence for a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 15:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Copyvio + is that literally a photo of a screen?

Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 15:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Out of scope garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Out of scope junk

Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Out of scope

Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS junk files

Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

More OOS junk

Dronebogus (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope junk

Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS crap junk

Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:1

No copyright info + OOS

Dronebogus (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:1

Load of OOS crap

Dronebogus (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

More OOS crap

Dronebogus (talk) 05:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert me if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Oos garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per the nominator. BTW, I'm interested to know what the plan is for the category once it's empty. One could argue it should be deleted, but empty or not it seems like an important category...Although realistically there probably aren't going to be many (if any) files about the year 1. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

That was fast. More junk as usual

Dronebogus (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted The images were deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, some apparent copyviols from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Out of scope crap

Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Garbagé de OOS

Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Personal photos of non-contributors. Kadı Message 19:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Considering that the photos starting with Kareem were uploaded today, isn't it premature to make the conclusion that that used is a non-contributor? So far, they are, but surely, we have to give them more than one day to show whether they will contribute. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    There’s a long-standing pattern that people who upload random selfies in nonsense categories are not productive contributors. Most productive editors edit, THEN add purely decorative material like this. Dronebogus (talk) 00:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm aware of that policy. My point, since I guess it's not obvious, is that one day (or, for example, one week) is not long enough to know whether a user will be productive or not. If we want to prohibit users from uploading photos of themselves before uploading any other photo or making any other edits to articles that are not about them, a policy stating that needs to be made explicit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek, These images which are linked above do not contain encyclopedic value, that's why they are being deleted. This policy is about that. If we accept these kind of photos, Commons would turn into Instagram. Your arguments are about assuming good faith and being tolerable which are valuable, but we need to look at this point of view also. Regards, Kadı Message 14:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No we wouldn't. Users are allowed to upload a photo of themselves. We have to decide whether if a user uploads a photo of themselves, it should be the subject of a deletion request on the same day it is uploaded, which seems very rude to me, or whether we will be polite and give them a grace period. If not, we need to establish a new rule explicitly prohibiting such uploads with much more stringent specified exceptions than I believe are spelled out now, as I stated above. I suppose we need to have a discussion about this on Commons talk:Deletion requests. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure it's a formal policy that users are allowed to upload a photo of themselves. That may just be an informal courtesy. Do you know whether such an exception is clarified anywhere? I know that such photos are supposed to have a template on them, stating that they are not educationally useful and are subject to deletion when no longer in use on a user page, but that's a different though related matter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek, please open a discussion, so everyone can have a chance to see it and then make comments. Kadı Message 14:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Instagram crap

Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Usual collection of Instagram crap

Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Oos garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Usual oos crap

Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Derivative work of logo. Source country is unknown, so we cannot be sure in freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Personal spam and potential copyright violations

Dronebogus (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Marchelo99 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: uso indebido y no vigilado por parte de wikimedia
Converted to DR by me, for procedural reasons as image is on Commons since 2013. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept, improper use is sad but beyond our responsibility and control Denniss (talk) 19:35, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Marchelo99 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: uso indebido y no seguimiento por parte de wikimedia
Converted to DR by me, for procedural reasons as image is on Commons since 2013. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept, improper use is sad but beyond our responsibility and control Denniss (talk) 19:35, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong picture was uploaded 2022 Hlab (talk) 12:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong picture was uploaded 2022 Hlab (talk) 12:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong picture was uploaded 2022 Hlab (talk) 12:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong picture was uploaded 2022 Hlab (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong picture was uploaded 2022 Hlab (talk) 12:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong picture was uploaded 2022 Hlab (talk) 12:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong picture was uploaded 2022 Hlab (talk) 12:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong picture was uploaded 2022 Hlab (talk) 12:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate post(Mistake by the author) 虫塚虫蔵 (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Wappen ist nicht originalgetreu; die Verwendung des Wappens ist nur auf Kategorien und auf der Bildwebseite selber; das Originalwappen wird dann umbenannt/verschoben Markus04122 (talk) 11:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Das Wappen ist eine Vektorisierung des gescannten Originals unter Beibehaltung der heraldischen Farben: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProjekt_Wappen/Neuzeichnen
Es entspricht genau der offiziell gültigen Blassionierung, verliehen durch Beschluss vom 5. Juni 1989 durch die Steiermärkische Lan­desregierung zur Führung eines Gemeindewappens ab dem 1. Juli 1989: „In schwarzen mit goldenen Weinblättern bestreuten Schild ein goldener Wolf.“
Das von dir zur Löschung vorgeschlagene Bild ist meine eigene Kreation, auf Basis des offiziell Verwendeten Wappens der Gemeinde (siehe [1]https://hartberg-umgebung.gv.at/). Nur weil es dir nicht gefällt und du ständig dieses Bild auf allen eingebundenen Seiten wieder entfernst, brauchst du es nicht zur Löschung vorschlagen. Eine Umbenennung auf meinen Dateinamen ist ebenfalls nicht möglich, da es sich um einen anderen Dateityp handelt (du hast ein pixeliges .png hochgeladen, meine Version ist eine frei skalierbare Vektorgrafik, ohne Qualitätsverlust). Maxwxyz (talk) 11:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Markus04122 Why did you remove the category Hartberg Umgebung? You could have removed the category Bezirk Hartberg-Fürstenfeld instead, as I just did. Brianjd (talk) 08:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As noted below, the nominator overwrote this file with a significantly different version while this request was open. I leave it to other users to decide whether to revert the file or take any other action. Brianjd (talk) 08:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting this post! If you do it once more, I will start an ANU case on you! Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I appreciate your help. It's not really my job to monitor this user's nominations, beyond noting that the file is in use and objecting to their having reverted my keep vote and comment twice. I'm way behind in grading for my teaching job and have been spending more time here than usual while I've been sick. We're all volunteers here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek You should focus on getting better. Over committing to the project is bad for you and, ultimately, bad for the project.
    I directed my comment at you because you seemed so heavily involved, but my comment was really directed at all readers of this DR; I will also try to monitor it. Brianjd (talk) 10:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F4. Failed license review Trauenbaum (talk) 13:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Wappen ist nicht mehr originalgetreu Markus04122 (talk) 20:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a photo of me and I no longer wish to have it posted on Wikimedia commons Andrzej Szurman (talk) 19:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. {{subst:delete2|image=File:Andrzej Szurman.jpg|reason=It's a photo of me and I no longer wish to have it posted on Wikimedia commons}} ~~~~
Andrzej Szurman (talk) 20:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is an existing consensus to delete chemistry-related gallery pages as evidenced by the outcome of Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages and later nominations that refer to it. (See also Commons:Deletion requests/Aromatics) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 13:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this file deleted as a courtesy for personal reasons. Thank you. Sjgdzn (talk) 03:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion. Sjgdzn (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, free licensed since 2017, far too long ago for courtesy deletion without reason; kept earlier this year, no new reason for deletion offered. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have privacy concerns regarding photo metadata. Please delete. Sjgdzn (talk) 02:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep per previous deletion requests. If some metadata turns out to be problematic, it can be revdel’d. Brianjd (talk) 10:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Please contact with an oversighter. --Kadı Message 15:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhgtek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on arwp

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is probably copyrighted but dubiously listed under a Creative Commons license Goji1895 (talk) 09:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:34, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo, needs OTRS from original photographer Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not usable due to low resolution. Achim55 (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not usable due to low resolution. Achim55 (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 17:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Leyo 17:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, personal photos of non-contributors. --Kadı Message 15:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: The photos are an important part of the picture and are not subject to FOP. I suspect the "Snow White" lettering may also be above TOO in the UK as well. --bjh21 (talk) 10:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: This is closer to the border than most, but I think the three-dimensional text "LAUNCHING 31 MARCH" is probably above TOO in the UK, and it's the main subject of the picture. --bjh21 (talk) 10:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: The main subject of the picture is the photo of a Big Mac, and that's not covered by FOP. --bjh21 (talk) 10:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in UK. Poster created in 1986 is still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: The picture is the entire useful content of the photo, so COM:DM has no hope of applying. --bjh21 (talk) 12:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio. I am not sure. Seems like copyvio, but comes from somehow trusted source. I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structures; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Chromium(III) hydroxide.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antoniks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. All files taken from various websites without source and permission.

Smooth O (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antonio cruz wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work ViperSnake151 (talk) 05:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely flickrwashing, see for instance [2] Lymantria (talk) 06:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:Scope: text-only PDF, apparently an attempt to create a Wikipedia article by uploading a PDF. MKFI (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:RCA ASTRO.pdf which appears to be a duplicate. MKFI (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant, crop of File:NGC7293_(2004).jpg with a misleading title and description. Ilzolende (talk) 10:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work (webp, 59 Kio) LeFnake (talk) 11:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the United States unfortunately Gbawden (talk) 15:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with copyright mark 95.31.175.134 15:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: (c) notice was deliberately cut out of original Enyavar (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, Not educationally useful Xexito (talk) 16:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 16:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadragta5w (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Instagram crap from non contributor

Dronebogus (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requires a permission ticket. MarioGom (talk) 23:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a valid Logo 204.186.45.140 12:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This logo is below the threshold of originality and thus in public domain. However,  Delete on the grounds that it was uploaded solely for promotional purposes as the uploader is blocked indefinitely on the English Wikipedia for being a spammer. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Spam, out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 23:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by SPA, no EXIF, unlikely Own work. Also ticket:2022103110010549. Ankry (talk) 11:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist Otto Ernst died in 1967, so this is not in the PD yet. The file can be restored in 2038. Rosenzweig τ 15:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist da:Sven Brasch died in 1970, so this is not in the PD yet. The file can be restored in 2041. Rosenzweig τ 16:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Moldova A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist de:Fritz Koch-Gotha died in 1956, so this is still copyrighted. The file can be restored in 2027. Rosenzweig τ 16:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist de:Curt Wild-Wall died in 1990, so this is still copyrighted. The file can be restored in 2061. Rosenzweig τ 16:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist Rudolf Bayerl died in 1953, so this is still protected by copyright. The file can be restored in 2024. Rosenzweig τ 17:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist Reinhard Hoffmüller died in 1975, so this is still protected by copyright. The file can be restored in 2046. Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist Cajetan Dreißer died in 1975, so this is not in the public domain yet. The file can be restored in 2046. Rosenzweig τ 19:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist de:Willi Sitte died in 2013, so this is still protected by copyright. The file can be restored in 2084. Rosenzweig τ 20:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

+ File:Erwürgt nicht die junge Freiheit durch Unordnung und Brudermord; sonst verhungern Eure Kinder LCCN2004666180.tif

The artist de:Max Pechstein died in 1955, so this is not in the PD yet. The file can be restored in 2026. Rosenzweig τ 20:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist fr:Maurice Leroy (peintre) died in 1973, so this is not in the PD yet. The file can be restored in 2044. Rosenzweig τ 20:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist de:Adolf Münzer died in 1953, so this is not in the PD yet. The file can be restored in 2024. Rosenzweig τ 20:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Now public domain in Germany. Abzeronow (talk) 23:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist fr:Auguste Leroux died in 1954, so this is not in the PD yet. The file can be restored in 2025. Rosenzweig τ 20:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is credited to photographer de:Franz Schensky, who died in 1957, so it is not in the PD yet. The file can be restored in 2028. Rosenzweig τ 21:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hesambeik requested deletion of this 8-year-old file they created (see diff); unclear why. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DaxServer as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request
Converted to regular DR, as there are a lot of external uses of this photography[3]. Nominator should check whether any are linking to our file, as deletion would break that. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio Uploaded in 2021. Obviously not eligible for speedy deletion.
When I followed your search link, all the page 1 results were from npm or GitHub. Presumably because at least one GitHub user uses this photo as their profile picture. How is this relevant to this deletion request? Brianjd (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This question is (somewhat) relevant for DRs as this one, which are based on courtesy instead of necessity. Of course, a copyvio will be deleted even if it's massively used on- and off-wiki. But this DR would be performed merely out of courtesy towards the requester. The requester himself has uploaded this image some time ago under a free license, which so far has not been questioned. External re-users may have relied on Commons' claim to provide freely licensed media. If this image is deleted, the formerly given (and called unrevokable) license is seemingly "retracted", at least the image is no longer available on Commons. Re-users who didn't download the file to their website, but used hot-linking to our file, will have no longer access to it. So, in order not to damage Commons' reputation, in DRs with a weak rationale, it should be checked for external re-uses and re-users eventually be notified. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio But the GitHub/npm results are not relevant for this purpose. Are there other results that are relevant?
Also, the GitHub/npm results do not demonstrate that the image is in scope. Are there other results that demonstrate this? (The file is tagged {{User page image}}, implying that it is out of scope.) Brianjd (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the note @Túrelio I've updated the GitHub and npmjs pictures, they're not taken from Commons license anyways. The other search results were reflecting npmjs, so they would be updated [hopefully] soon. Other than these, I don't see any more usages. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 10:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, courtesy-deletion (no dependent external uses found). --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still under copyright in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still under copyright in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted portraits A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 17:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owner not given permission to publish 82.115.12.156 08:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the image. 58.174.25.161 11:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Owner not given permission to publish 58.174.139.168 23:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Owner permits and requests deletion, 14:00, 18 November 2022 (CST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tristan Sterk (talk • contribs) 20:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no evidence. --Krd 17:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owner not given permission for image publication 82.115.12.156 08:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the image. 58.174.25.161 11:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Owner not given permission for image publication 58.174.139.168 23:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Owner permits and requests deletion, 14:00, 18 November 2022 (CST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tristan Sterk (talk • contribs) 20:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no evidence. --Krd 17:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image shows design studies how the museum should look like after the renovation. most probably not own work unless the uploader represents the design/architectural studio involved in this project. Albinfo (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

painter died in 1965 Fransvannes (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and undelete in 1965+70+1=2036.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this is in the public domain. Archer1234 (talk) 20:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. Archer1234 (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, bogus license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://mobile.twitter.com/dannymalinuk WWGB (talk) 21:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work Trade (talk) 23:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Higher res of same poster seen at IMDB, which has readable copyright notice. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyvol / photo credits by DFP, cf. metadata — danyele 00:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:57, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:Qian Du - Autumn Forest Under the Moonlight.jpg due to watermarks and small size. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What about the copyright? See w:en:File:Furby_picture.jpg and w:en:File:Furby,_a_McDonaldsToy_circa_2001,_with_bright_blue_coat.jpg Wouter (talk) 20:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although I made the picture myself, I agree to delete the file. Unfortunately I cannot delete my uploads myself. I would like to delete most of my entries to avoid future questions about copyrights. Pat boen (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The game screen captured directly by the user who uploaded this file appears to be copyright violation. --용인 학생 (talk) 11:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 5ysksos6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Fictional symbols

Enyavar (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unacessary file, copy of an already existing one TheHistoryOFEUROPE (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Arleady deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of British artist George F. Morrell, who died in 1962. It's from a 1919 German publication, so unless someone has evidence that it was published in the US before or at the same time than it was first published in the UK (which presumably happened before the German publication), it is still copyrighted and should be deleted. The file can be restored in 2033. Rosenzweig τ 23:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding
to this deletion request - same artist, same source/publication, same uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 14:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Qatar

Elisfkc (talk) 20:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Qatar Elisfkc

Elisfkc (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Qatar Elisfkc

Elisfkc (talk) 01:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as Qatar Andy Dingley (talk) 10:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I guess we should apply the same rules to Visita ao estádio de futebol Al Janoub.jpg, so it also needs to be cropped or deleted. Brianjd (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the image of the stands, as it shows more than an incidental amount of the stadium, therefore would have to fall under FOP. Without FOP in Qatar, Commons cannot host this image. The image focusing on the dignitaries is fine to keep. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 22:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept #1, Deleted #2. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bfposner2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no further proof; please delete these photos. Bfposner2 (talk) 14:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non serve Adam capoletti (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non serve Adam capoletti (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:Emblem of Somaliland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajt0714 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All taken with different cameras, 2 of which credits "Cherry_fafa" as copyright holder.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:30, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like this file delete as a courtesy for personal reasons. Thank you. Sjgdzn (talk) 03:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 14:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion. Sjgdzn (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Uploaded under irrevocable free license in 2017; far too long ago for courtesy deletion without particular reason. In scope photo with no evident problem. Kept earlier this year. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have privacy concerns regarding photo metadata. Please delete. Sjgdzn (talk) 02:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep per previous deletion requests. If some metadata turns out to be problematic, it can be revdel’d.
For the sake of completeness, the similar deletion requests Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trees at Dawn.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sageleaves.jpg (involving the same uploader) suggest that the file should be deleted because its subject is unidentified. But that makes no sense. Categories like Unidentified Agaricomycetes, which this file is in, exist for a reason. Brianjd (talk) 11:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thanks for giving a bit more info as to reason, however the concern is still not evident to me. Metadata includes a rather common name. Would you like it stripped? If there are concerns you do not wish to state, perhaps send more detailed request via COM:VRT. Thanks. Meanwhile I do not see any reason why a photo of a mushroom would require deletion for privacy reasons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 13:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising / self-promotion Evs (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer the question. What is the problem with the photo itself? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just COM:NOTHOST Evs (talk) 07:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Then the question is whether the photo is good enough to host simply as a portrait, without considering who is being depicted. I'm guessing whichever admin closes this DR will answer that question with a "no," but since it's a pretty good portrait, it's not so obvious to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek Does ‘self-promotion’ imply that the uploader is the subject? Since the subject is usually not the copyright holder, this might be a copyright violation. It is claimed to be the uploader’s own work. Brianjd (talk) 12:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The name of the subject is Alisa Kalinicheva; the name of the uploader is Angels Pery. Is that the same person? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek I don’t know; Angels Pery might not be a real name. Brianjd (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:28, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:28, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crishna nandyala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 10:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not author's own work, as pretended ; taken from a FB page and flag related to the "World Organisation of Andalusian People" rather than what the author pretends (link) Omar-toons (talk) 10:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, author? license? Xocolatl (talk) 10:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as her amazon photo - same crop everything - https://www.amazon.com/Madalyn-Aslan/e/B001HMPPKA%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share - we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The game screen captured directly by the user who uploaded this file appears to be copyright violation. --용인 학생 (talk) 11:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why? -- Firestar0817 (talk) 04:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The game screen captured directly by the user who uploaded this file appears to be copyright violation. --용인 학생 (talk) 12:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The game screen captured directly by the user who uploaded this file appears to be copyright violation. --용인 학생 (talk) 12:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most of this file is just empty white space, but at the upper left we see an aerial image of unclear origin. The file name translates to "Saint Paul's Church in Orgeval, Reims seen from the sky source Open Street Map", and it is indeed an image showing that church. But OpenStreetMap is a map, not satellite imagery. The image is not a Bing or GoogleMaps/Earth satellite image as I found out by comparing it to those, but it also almost certainly is not an "own work" of the uploader under a CC license as claimed. So I think it should be deleted, for one because of the unclear copyright situation, but also because it can be hardly used if it is just a tiny photo surrounded by lots of empty white space. Rosenzweig τ 14:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oui vous pouvez la supprimer sans problème
Cordialement Ours51+ (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extrait photo fond de carte n'est pas un fichier d'OSM proprement dit Ours51+ (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image shows design studies how the museum should look like after the renovation. most probably not own work unless the uploader represents the design/architectural studio involved in this project. The image can also be seen on the first picture in this article https://ata.gov.al/2022/10/14/durres-nisin-punimet-per-restaurimin-e-muzeut-arkeologjik/ Albinfo (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image shows design studies how the museum should look like after the renovation. most probably not own work unless the uploader represents the design/architectural studio involved in this project. Albinfo (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image shows design studies how the museum should look like after the renovation. most probably not own work unless the uploader represents the design/architectural studio involved in this project. Albinfo (talk) 15:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image shows design studies how the museum should look like after the renovation. most probably not own work unless the uploader represents the design/architectural studio involved in this project. Albinfo (talk) 15:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YandexMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 15:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SandwichDoge (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictional country. and yes I'm aware all other uploads by the user is also fictional stuff, but SCP is (somehow??) relevant.

Enyavar (talk) 15:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SandwichDoge (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unknown undentified logos, possibly out of the project scope

Nutshinou Talk! 15:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is credited to de:Heinrich Hoffmann (Fotograf), who died in 1957, so it is still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2027. The file can be restored in 2028. Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lasermanat101 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claims. Files have a wide range of EXIF and some are professional-quality. File:2714 Provo Wallis - House 6,7,8. Historic Dockyard Residences.jpg was posted to twitter a few years before being uploaded here, though at lower resolution than here. File:HMCS Ville de Quebec alongside the Nanisivik Naval Facility ((NNF).jpg was posted to twitter after being uploaded here, but in higher resolution and with a wider crop.
@-Lasermanat101-: if you are the photographer of these photos, please send permission to COM:VRT.

-M.nelson (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/giulianorassuofficial/photos/2275577049239230 Bradipo Lento (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyVio - copyright mark in lower right corner, among others by ESRI, HERE and Garmin Enyavar (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine ordentliche Lizenzierung, die der angebliche Urheber "Drunken Masters" sind zwei Personen und können nicht gleichzeitig Urheber sein Lutheraner (talk) 20:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map would be in the public domain, but a modern photograph of it is probably not in the public domain. Archer1234 (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So I have read that a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art that is in the public domain might be okay. Is that true and does that apply to this case? Note, too, that this image was taken from a website that is selling copies of this map. While Etsy has the right to use it, it is not clear that others have the same right absent permission from the seller. – Archer1234 (talk) 21:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Archer1234: this is not even PD-art; this is PD-scan. A scan of a public domain document is in the public domain. This file can 100% be hosted. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 23:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@D. Benjamin Miller, Ok, so how does this deletion request get closed? Will someone come along and close it and remove the notice at [4] or is there something I need to do? – Archer1234 (talk) 00:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 13:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant with File:Cartersvirginiapine.jpg Ilzolende (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete Cartersvirginiapine, it seems that file was to large to be displayed.
Thank you Tamparitus (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that's true? Wikipedia:en:Southern Appalachian low-elevation pine forest uses Cartersvirginiapine and it seems fine to me. Are you aware that Wikimedia Commons automatically generates previews of images at various smaller sizes, so when a Wikipedia page calls for a thumbnail image, it can use a pregenerated small image even if the original image is large? —Ilzolende (talk) 20:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamparitus and Ilzolende: The uploader tried to add the image to the article, but omitted the file extesnion. Of course, this did not work, and the uploader probably concluded that the image was too large. Notice also that the file extension is omitted in their comment above.
@Tamparitus: Do you want to withdraw your request to delete Cartersvirginiapine.jpg?
 Delete Carterspine.jpg per nomination. Brianjd (talk) 12:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamparitus It’s not up to us to make editorial decisions for Wikipedia, but I would suggest using Commons:CropTool to crop out some of the lake and use the cropped image in that article. Brianjd (talk) 12:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not seem to be any use for this, nominate for deletion Lobsterthermidor (talk) 20:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I don't know wheather it is OK to upload or not. Bcxfu75k (talk) 04:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Read Usage of images, videos, music and web texts: "Unless specifically noted, the images, videos, and music distributed on the public ESO website, along with the texts of press releases, announcements, pictures of the week, blog posts and captions, are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, and may on a non-exclusive basis be reproduced without fee provided the credit is clear and visible." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ikan. --Ezarateesteban 22:49, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We already have several consensus on deprecation of Nofacebook tags: Commons:Deletion requests/NoFacebook templates, Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Nofacebook, m:Legal/CC BY-SA licenses and social media and several dozens of VP(C)/AN(U/B)... discussions, they show solidarity of Ukraine :P untouchable panoramas where FB users may reverse-blocklist those who tag em. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226 At the risk of stating the obvious, the nominated page is in user space. Deleting anything in user space, except at the user’s request, is an exceptional action.
Who’s user space, though? There seems to be no record of a user called Denis Ape. The edits to the nominated page were made by Denis Apel; there’s no record of that user being renamed. Brianjd (talk) 12:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Probably the author has dropped such useless restriction tags? Better to be answered by Denis, though. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the user blanks his userpage and not in use. --Ezarateesteban 22:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pic has been taken inside the evangelical church Igreja Fonte Missionária in Brazil. The persons haven't given consent to their picture being published, as it's necessary in Brazil Nemracc (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Brazil.
@Nemracc It’s just a picture of a crowd; it doesn’t focus on any specific person. Is consent still required? Brianjd (talk) 12:50, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And perhaps you should say ‘may not have given consent’, unless you know something we don’t. Brianjd (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the people are identifiable, consensus is required. --Ezarateesteban 22:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since)

It appears to be a derivative of this Pixabay image that is freely licensed. A reverse image search shows results like this, but they all appear to be on free image depositories. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Own work claim is incorrect for derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not an own work, not authorship provided. --Ezarateesteban 22:57, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:00, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source said photos taken from a museum, original author's permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --Ezarateesteban 23:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 17:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! You are probably right, that these posters are copyrighted and that framing them in this way may not be enough for de minimis. On the other hand, I cannot imagine the Cuban government prosecuting anyone for spreading their propaganda. Even if they wanted to sell the posters in the West, these low-quality photographs would not discourage any buyer. Showing e.g. a Disney cartoon this way would of course be a very different issue. But I admit that this reasoning is more about the financial value of a copyvio rather than a binary answer "copyvio yes/no". And that the same answer will likely apply to all pictures in the same nomination category. I would of course prefer to keep it online as a part of a travel story. --Sapfan (talk) 09:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. And we must apply the rules, if Cuban government doesn't prosecute anyone doing his propaganda isn't relevant--Ezarateesteban 23:02, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Qatar Elisfkc Elisfkc (talk) 01:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Qatar Elisfkc Elisfkc (talk) 01:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the original MeatballWiki article, the image was originally from a site called “Barnstar Subterfuge”, which seems to not have any notice indicating a free license. http://web.archive.org/web/20030621123717/http://www.designculture.nu/barn/barnstar.html 2001:569:BF37:5300:4C73:F76:1923:B039 21:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --plicit 03:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an inferior duplicate of File:Fasching Dienstag Redoute 1922.jpg. Rosenzweig τ 17:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an inferior duplicate of File:Stephan Krotowski - PKZ - Burger-Kehl-Co.jpg. Rosenzweig τ 18:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was nominated for speedy deletion as "Watermarked (c) www.qamaal.com". I'm not sure that's not the Panoramio uploader's own website. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That account has uploaded many images of en:Morbi (link) and hence I don't doubt they are taken from somewhere else. Watermark does not really mean copyrights. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Info every photo at Category:Julto Pul Hanging Bridge also bears this watermark. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! Thats because they are from the same Panoramio user. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: watermark consistent with many uploads of this Panoramio user. --P 1 9 9   14:48, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost identical file exists; this one is outdated Languaeditor (talk) 19:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There was a not categorized same version of the logo (File:Logo of the The Beer Party (Austria).svg). Welkend (talk) 19:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate. --P 1 9 9   14:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an inferior duplicate of File:You and me, performance (1929) (25077928327).jpg. Rosenzweig τ 20:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is another, exact same version of this logo (File:Logo of ODS inverse version.svg) Welkend (talk) 20:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is credited to photographer Erich Benninghoven, who lived 1873–1965, so it is not in the PD yet. The file can be restored in 2036. Rosenzweig τ 21:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding
to this deletion request - same photographer, same original source, same uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is another exact same file (File:Logo Piratenpartei Österreich.svg). Welkend (talk) 21:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of British artist en:Norman Wilkinson (artist), who died in 1971. It's from a 1919 German publication, so unless someone has evidence that it was published in the US before or at the same time than it was first published in the UK (which presumably happened before the German publication), it is still copyrighted and should be deleted. The file can be restored in 2042. Rosenzweig τ 23:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding
to this deletion request - same artist, same source/publication, same uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 18:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be fair use at enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax I guess you mean en:File:Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation logo.png.
Something is really messed up here. enwp non-free files are supposed to have minimum resolution, but the file nominated here has an even lower resolution, despite having an extra element (Where did that extra element come from, anyway?). Brianjd (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Probably we need a professor of unstable (by level) COM:TOO India. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. plicit 00:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:Flagge Reichskolonialbund2.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unacessary file, copy of an already existing one TheHistoryOFEUROPE (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We already have several consensus on deprecation of Nofacebook tags: Commons:Deletion requests/NoFacebook templates, Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Nofacebook, m:Legal/CC BY-SA licenses and social media and several dozens of VP(C)/AN(U/B)... discussions, they show solidarity of Ukraine :P untouchable panoramas where FB users may reverse-blocklist those who tag em. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226  Speedy keep This is ridiculous. Deletion of user space pages, except at the user’s request, requires an exceptional reason. And here there isn’t even a good reason.
This is a long list of legitimate credits, with a perhaps problematic ‘no Facebook’ section buried in the middle, and you simply want to delete the whole thing. Did you make any attempt to discuss this with Shakibul Alam Risvy first? Brianjd (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd Don't you think that, per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:No Facebook, any re-creation of nofacebook tags are facing-to-facing COM:CSD#G4? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226 There are three problems with applying COM:CSD#G4 to this page:
  1. G4 applies only to recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus (emphasis added). The offending content on this page was added at 14 September 2016, 05:10:49, long before any such consensus.
  2. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed Arrhioui.jpg, G4 applies only to identical (not merely similar) content. Is the offending content on this page identical to content previously deleted per community consensus? It’s not identical to {{No Facebook}}, which you refer to (it is in Spanish and English, not German and English; it uses all-bold text with no underlining and it lacks a link to Facebook's licensing terms).
  3. G4’s description says Page or file matches content … (emphasis added). It does not say contains. As noted above, this page, taken as a whole, doesn’t even come close to matching a ‘no Facebook’ template.
Also, the previous discussions all seem to involve templates actually transcluded in file descriptions; this page is not used in this way. Brianjd (talk) 12:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So under your logical those Nofacebook tags should be restored? If so then why not just ask via COM:DRV or elsewhere? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226 Suppose I wrote: For the record, the ‘no Facebook’ templates nominated for deletion consist of the image No Facebook.svg and the text ‘[insert text here]’ (but with the actual text inserted). Would you then ask for this page to be deleted, because I had used it to recreate content deleted per consensus? Or would you realise that context matters here?
I said above that there is a huge difference between an actual template, used on file descriptions, and a page showing examples of such templates (without endorsing them, I might add). Again, context matters! Brianjd (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Not sure whether I could meet (Edit conflict)s when discussing your matters responsed, are you really having interests on editing same times of when I'm editing?)
Actually for that file (and don't surprise the black-white png one), I'm indeed, and always yes conscientious, considering a 3rd nomination. On context matters, let's just ask Shakibul themselves. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 19:40, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While was kept for once, there are several new concerns populated by VPC that such requirements listed under this credits subpage contain rules violate CC 4.0 Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unacessary file, copy of an already existing one TheHistoryOFEUROPE (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The other version was at en:File:Volcano Entertainment Logo.jpg, but I deleted it. howcheng {chat} 19:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hjart as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from https://com.uw.edu/post/something-is-rotten-in-the-united-states-of-denmark/ Yann (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HR with EXIF data, and Commons version is much bigger than this. Yann (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This appears to be a photo of the uploader; however, it appears da:Frederik Appel Olsen was deleted, so potentially this is out of scope, but I put it in Category:User page images if the user wants to have it for his user page at some point in the future. howcheng {chat} 19:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет лицензии Creative Commons MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Source says Copyright © 2022, USIONLINE.com. All Rights Reserved. --Rosenzweig τ 14:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inferior (less wd,hjg) version of File:Peçorin Kərimov.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Rosenzweig τ 14:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wyffio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of sport team that wasn't made by the user D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This file should not be deleted, because it is too simple to qualify for a copyright (PD-shape), though it should be replaced by a SVG. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 23:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Questionable whether it is simple enough for PD-shape given the shading, and no indication this is a notable club. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unacessary file, copy of an already existing one TheHistoryOFEUROPE (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong source, authorship, license. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:37, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in the United States since it's a Cuban government work made after 1927, and on the Coat of arms it clearly states "1976", the M-26-7 flags where made after 1956, and more. CubanoBoi (talk) 21:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. Cuban government works are perpetually copyrighted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in the United States since it's a Cuban government work made after 1927, the M-26-7 flag in the bottom left was made after 1958, the province was made in 2011, and more. CubanoBoi (talk) 21:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. Cuban government works are perpetually copyrighted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in the United States since it's a Cuban government work made after 1927. The province was formed in 2011, and most likely the coat of arms wasn't planned before 1927. CubanoBoi (talk) 21:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. Cuban government works are perpetually copyrighted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in the United States since it's a Cuban government work made after 1927. The province was formed in 2011, and most likely the coat of arms wasn't planned before 1927. CubanoBoi (talk) 21:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. Cuban government works are perpetually copyrighted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in the United States since it's a Cuban government work made after 1927. The province was formed in 2011, and most likely the coat of arms wasn't planned before 1927. CubanoBoi (talk) 21:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. Cuban government works are perpetually copyrighted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in the United States since it's a Cuban government work made after 1927, the M-26-7 flag in the bottom left was made after 1958, the province was made in 2011, and more. CubanoBoi (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. Cuban government works are perpetually copyrighted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Province was made in 1976 and its Copyrighted in the United States since it's a Cuban government work made after 1927 CubanoBoi (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. Cuban government works are perpetually copyrighted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on the data provided, we can assume that there is no evidence that the author published the file under a free license Артём 13327 (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • В связи с тем, что автор бланка (Artur Jan Fijałkowski, никнейм WarX) на котором основана эта картинка, опубликовал с условием указания авторства, то ссылка на его авторство и необходимость указания его в производных произведениях оставлена. Про соавтора (того кто разукрасил авторский бланк) — это сделал это аноним, который хочет скрыть не только имя, а даже и ничего не значащий никнейм (соавтор - никто и звать соавтора никак). Соавтор хотел бы поставить ССО или другую лицензию с атрибутом "Без указания авторства", но это ущемит права автора бланка. Поэтому, при необходимости, - можете заменить лицензию на правильную, но не ущемляющую права автора бланка и необходимость указания его в производных произведениях от этого раскрашенного рисунка. So categorical (talk) 22:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 06:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still under copyright in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag represents the Commonwealth of nations, and is very similar to Commonwealth Flag 2013.svg already deleted because of authorisation missing. I suppose that this is a DW of a coyprighted flag.

Also affected File:Commonwealth.png. Ruthven (msg) 07:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how the logo of an international governative organization could be copyrighted, but anyway... I didn't create this image, I only made it bigger and more definite, but if we can't keep it this way we could still revert the file to the 23bit version, which the copyright doesn't apply to. Est. 2021 (talk) 07:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand. They want to control the use of it, so that it is not used in a misleading or derogatory way. Whether their copyright is unnecessarily restrictive for those purposes, though, is a different question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]