Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_-JS_MUSIC_CREW_-_HINDI_RAP.jpg){kind=link}
_แบบ_Colour_0001.jpg){kind=link}
_แบบ_Colour_0002.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ethanhoudefag (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality amateur porn
- File:Ethan houde artistic nude.jpg
- File:2022-08-1222ethanhoudenaked 0020.jpg
- File:Ethanhoudenekkid 09.png
- File:Ethanhoudenekkid 08.png
- File:Ethanhoudenekkid 07.png
- File:Ethanhoudenekkid 06.png
- File:Ethanhoudenekkid 05.jpg
- File:Ethanhoudenekkid 04.jpg
- File:Ethanhoudenekkid 02.jpg
- File:Ethanhoudenekkid 03.jpg
- File:Stanleypark1.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 01:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation Mehwish Moviemis (talk) 08:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deepmind28081996 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clearly Copyright violations, see links on descrptions.
- File:Nón lá gò găng(1).jpg
- File:Nón lá gò găng.jpg
- File:Nón lá gò găng(2).jpg
- File:Người dân coi làm hàng mã là một nghề phụ lúc nông nhàn.webp
- File:Hang ma xe may.webp
- File:...giày.webp
- File:Làng nghề đúc đồng Ngũ Xã.jpg
- File:Đut lò.jpg
- File:Unnamed-1-4.jpg
- File:Công đoạn chôn hoạ tiết, hoa văn lên bề mặt sản phẩm đòi hỏi sự khéo léo và tính chính xác cao của người thợ.jpg
- File:Các sản phẩm đúc đồng của làng Đại Bái.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lemonaka (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 20:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - migrated from it.wiki with defined source. Blackcat 
21:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Archivo de Facebook, F1. 186.175.13.130 00:51, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Blackcat 07:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
self-promotion Trade (talk) 23:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Ggfffshgffff 98.254.249.41 23:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep This deletion nomination is vandalism. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Vandalism by sock of locked LTA User:Bmmederos. --Achim55 (talk) 07:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
File images not seen in Wikisource Index, there seems some error. Meghdhanu (talk) 06:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
_-JS_MUSIC_CREW_-_HINDI_RAP.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-JS_MUSIC_CREW_-_HINDI_RAP.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
self-promotion Trade (talk) 00:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
_-JS_MUSIC_CREW_-_HINDI_RAP.jpg){kind=link}
Delete per nom, regardless of whether the file that's purely a photo of him should be deleted or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)- Delete missing permission, promotional, and COM:OOS. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
_-JS_MUSIC_CREW_-_HINDI_RAP.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope? Trade (talk) 00:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Question Is that w:Jassie Gill or someone else? Either way, this photo is in a category with an actress named Jassie. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Different person and an obvious self promo. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:14, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Second US Civil War (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Fictional flags, unused except on the draft page of the former user.
Enyavar (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not a fanfiction flag repository. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete crappy generic penis pic. Dronebogus (talk) 11:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete terrible flash photo Dronebogus (talk) 11:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Terrible quality COM:PENIS photo Dronebogus (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, not being used outside user namespace A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality penis photo, only being used on a talkpage by an IP A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - just another lo-res run-of-the-mill penis like there are already so many on Commons. --Wutsje 09:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful, unused outside usertalk namespace A1Cafel (talk) 05:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Even if it were "special" enough, a penis is never educationally useful, you can't use it as a pen or pencil... Delete. 186.173.202.52 23:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:23, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ternmedical (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality COM:PENIS photo, no educational value
- File:Flaccid uncut Penis with pubic hair 01.jpg
- File:Erection uncut Penis with pubic hair 02.jpg
- File:Scrotum & testicles 02.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:23, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of vagina photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as nonsense. The description also seems balderdash. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tommieboy1111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality COM:VULVA photo, no educational value
A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all per COM:VULVA. SHB2000 (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused screenshot. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unclear what this image's meaning is supposed to be and COM:OOS. SHB2000 (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Delfina Moreno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Shoe designs are probably copyrightable, furthermore, source is needed for background
- File:Las Patrentes Wikipe.jpg
- File:Las Caramelos Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Cristales Wiki.png
- File:Las Tiburón Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Cavernicolas Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Lunitas Wiki.jpg
- File:Las 7 Puntos Wiki.jpg
- File:Las 4 Dientes Wiki.png
- File:Las 3 Dientes Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Zebras Wiki.jpg
- File:Las 3 Letras Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Diamantes Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Punto Negro Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Mason Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Tridimencionales Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Patentes Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Boxeadoras Wiki.jpg
- File:Las cruzadas Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Payasos Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Ventanitas Wiki.jpg
- File:Lengua Plateada Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Carritos Wiki.jpg
- File:Las Cocodrilos Wiki.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo materials of company of questionable notability.
- File:Untitledhdd.jpg
- File:พนักงาน.jpg
- File:ผู้จัดการ.jpg
- File:ผู้จัดการใหญ่.jpg
- File:บรอด.jpg
- File:ผู้ถือหุ้นอื่นๆ.jpg
- File:ผู้ถือหุ้น.jpg
- File:Untitledceo.jpg
- File:พื้นฐาน.jpg
- File:เงิน.jpg
- File:ทอง.jpg
- File:บัตรแพลทินัม.jpg
- File:Broad group.jpg
- File:Cmpany struture.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused screenshot of a personal webpage. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. — Haseeb (talk) 10:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Awful-quality photo of an unidentified and presumably non-notable person. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Watermark. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Quite clearly cribbed from somewhere. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person, img not used @ WM Mateus2019 (talk) 10:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
fictional map, out of scope Hinnerk11 (talk) 11:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Alternate fictional history maps are COM:OOS. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 11:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Copyvio. [1] —Yahya (talk) 23:41, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope and copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unidentified subject Ske (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SirAbbas10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:Abbas f0rest 14010425 015225413.jpg
- File:Sir abbas photo in the park.jpg
- File:Abbas f0rest 14010425 015230701.jpg
- File:Abbas f0rest 14010425 015227520.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 12:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 12:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mayur savdas modhwadia (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
- File:Mayur savdas-20221013-0002.jpg
- File:Mayur savdas-20221013-0003.jpg
- File:Mayur savdas-20221013-0001.jpg
Didym (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, vanity. --Achim55 (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Comment 19.7K followers on Instagram. That's not super-huge but it's impressive to me. What do you all make of that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope and wiki-spammer. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AhmedSayedBakr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
- File:Ahmed Sayed.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed.jpg
- File:Ahmed Sayed10.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed11.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed3.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed9.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed5.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed7.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed20.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed6.jpg
- File:AhmedSayed15.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.' EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikiquote screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
unused screenshot of text Ske (talk) 14:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope Stang★ 16:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, not for WMF purposes, possibly autopromo. Taichi (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused profile pic of user with 3 global contributions, all in 2017. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:54, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:54, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 23:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 23:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete 7 subscribers on YouTube, 228 followers on Instagram. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
กลยุทธ์ลึกล้ำลึกลับใจสั่งยา (R.1191 End) Serttbj (talk) 04:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by George Chernilevsky at 15:20, 22 October 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Serttbj --Krdbot 19:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
_%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%9A_Colour_0001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%9A_Colour_0001.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
กลยุทธ์ลึกล้ำลึกลับใจสั่งยา (R.1191) แบบ Colour 0001.jpg Serttbj (talk) 04:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by George Chernilevsky at 15:20, 22 October 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Serttbj --Krdbot 19:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
_%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%9A_Colour_0002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%9A_Colour_0002.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
กลยุทธ์ลึกล้ำลึกลับใจสั่งยา (R.1191) แบบ Colour 0002.jpg Serttbj (talk) 04:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by George Chernilevsky at 15:20, 22 October 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Serttbj --Krdbot 19:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
กลยุทธ์ลึกล้ำลึกลับใจสั่งยา (R.1191 End Complete).pdf Serttbj (talk) 04:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
กลยุทธ์ลึกล้ำลึกลับใจสั่งยา (R.1191 End Complete).pdf Serttbj (talk) 08:52, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Permission from AhmedBahhodh needed via OTRS. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 16:19, 23 October 2022 UTC: No permission since 15 October 2022 --Krdbot 19:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Permission from AhmedBahhodh needed via OTRS. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 16:19, 23 October 2022 UTC: No permission since 15 October 2022 --Krdbot 19:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Permission from "SoSo1cut" needed --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Methyl-glycolate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyvio + is that literally a photo of a screen? Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 15:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope garbage Dronebogus (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope junk
Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope
Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS junk files Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS junk
Dronebogus (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Out of scope junk Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS crap junk Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info + OOS Dronebogus (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Load of OOS crap This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert me if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Oos garbage Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
That was fast. More junk as usual Dronebogus (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted The images were deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nom, some apparent copyviols from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Garbagé de OOS Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
_2.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_posted_on_Instagram_CPvlHbYFa7t(JPG).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:1
[edit]Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual collection of Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Oos garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual oos crap
Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Derivative work of logo. Source country is unknown, so we cannot be sure in freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Personal spam and potential copyright violations
- File:Azmy Ehab21.jpg
- File:BALSA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:JARDIM BALNEARIO EUCLIDES.webp
- File:MAPA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:Moatazelmasry1632004.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
กลยุทธ์ลึกล้ำลึกลับใจสั่งยา (R.1191) แบบ Colour.pdf Serttbj (talk) 04:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by George Chernilevsky. --Rosenzweig τ 12:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
กลยุทธ์ลึกล้ำลึกลับใจสั่งยา (R.1191) แบบ Colour.pdf Serttbj (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by George Chernilevsky. --Rosenzweig τ 12:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
fictional election map,out of scope Hinnerk11 (talk) 09:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by George Chernilevsky at 07:22, 28 October 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kingtiwa99 --Krdbot 13:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Wohl URV, da als eigenes Werk ausgegebenes Foto eines Fotografen ohne Freigabe durch den Copyrightholder Jbergner (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, and the rest of this user's contributions were all deleted, including this one, previously. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Presumably copyrighted cover of a magazine or book (the Russian description Google-translates as "cover"). Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Is from https://www.familienhotels.de/de/familienhotels/hotel-4813-ahorn-berghotel-friedrichroda.html. No exif data. If it is indeed "own work" we need a VRT ticket and the name of the photographer. JopkeB (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation? This image is also on https://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/2453772 and many more websites. I found it hard to believe this is "own work". To me it looks like a commercial image. There is no VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 13:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation? There are a lot of images on the internet similar to this one, for instance on https://www.reddit.com/r/TheGenerators/comments/sbv7io/tower_of_illusions_by_thomas_kinkade_in_unreal/. The credits are for Thomas Kinkade, not for Yismail. So I doubt whether the uploader has indeed made this one himself. JopkeB (talk) 13:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photo is on many websites, for instance on https://www.renegadehorseboot.com/information-about-the-upcoming-tevis-cup-ride/, stating that was in 2009, not in 2022. So I doubt whether it is "own work". No Exif data, no VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ogomez12392 (talk · contribs)
[edit]2 files clearly aren't own work. Others are of varying sizes, dubious own work claim
- File:Runwaysghersi.jpg
- File:ALEGHERSICOMERCAIL.jpg
- File:ALEGHERSImodelo.jpg
- File:Ghersiamarillo.jpg
- File:GhersiVideomusical.png
- File:GhersiVideo.png
- File:GHERSIRUNWAY.jpg
- File:Aleghersiportada.jpg
- File:Foto OSH Perfil Wiki.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation? This photo is also on https://www.facebook.com/ukp3100/, I do not see Exif data, nor a VRT ticket. A VRT ticket gives Commons the assurance that Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten is the copyright holder of this photo and agrees on placing it on Commons. For more information about a VRT ticket see Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/de. JopkeB (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Permission needed from "GOLCHA STUDIO" --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jjbeckles01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]"interviewed by Forbes Magazine", photos probably came from them as well. Permission needed.
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Вікторія Зиско has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in uk.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Too complex for PD-textlogo? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
no category, no encyclopedic value, useless, unused, out of scope, just a test, etc F (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Per the uploader, this file is licensed as CC 4.0. However, there's nothing on the linked source indicating the licensing. Denniscabrams (talk) 16:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Per the uploader, this file is licensed as CC 4.0. However, there's nothing on the linked source indicating the licensing. Denniscabrams (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. The uploader claims that this is his own work and that he's publishing it under a CC 4.0 license. However, the metadata shows that Karl von Moller is the author and copyright holder. Denniscabrams (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio from site darkwarez.pl (non existing ATM) and no proof that is has been on free licence. ptjackyll (leave a message) 17:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Per EXIF-data, VRT-permission is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
I'm having trouble understanding how a purely red image could be useful unless it were a reproduction of a painting (which this is not). Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
False own work declaration, file stolen from the site [2] 5.142.46.105 20:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
![[2]](https://mpr.nso.ru/sites/mpr.nso.ru/wodby_files/files/page_2623/Chulymskiy%20rayon.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Haseeb55 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 20:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- May be notable or not, but this is not a selfie, so permission from the photographer is needed. Yann (talk) 20:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
most likely a copyrighted design Lukas Beck (talk) 20:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Unclear who this person is. Image is used only on a user sandbox page on English Wikipedia, and it's not obvious that the image is of the user who made the sandbox page (even so, would probably meet F10). Dylnuge (talk) 20:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, unlikely that the uploader is the photographer. Appears to be a still from a video, from which several similar stills are available online. In a news report published before the upload to Commons.[3] The uploader has uploaded several other problematic files. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, unlikely to be 'own work'. Widely published online including in news reports dated before the upload to Commons.[4][5] This uploader has uploaded several other problematic files. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
this is a photo of me being used without my permission. Delete it immediately. Thank you. 2600:1702:3650:9050:809F:AC54:83CB:1639 01:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, only because it fails COM:SELFIE. To the IP, you don't need permission to upload a photo onto Commons; it fails the CSD. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete PierreSelim (talk) 17:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
File:View of the Meiji Jingu Baseball Stadium scoreboard commemorating Munetaka Murakami's 56th home run of the season, October 3, 2022.jpg
[edit]
Scoreboard graphic is considered copyrighted Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person, img not used anywhere@WM Mateus2019 (talk) 05:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Designs not free I99pema (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, Sweddish Currency Not OK. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Per COM:CUR Sweden & COM:CUR Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as before (exactly the same file was deleted before and transferred again from Flickr). --Rosenzweig τ 22:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted still from CSPAN2 Book TV. Uses license that is only appropriate for CSPAN broadcast footage of the House and Senate chambers. William Graham (talk) 00:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete CSPAN licensing seems to be for NC according to [6], so it's not considered free. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted still from CSPAN2 Book TV. Uses license that is only appropriate for CSPAN broadcast footage of the House and Senate chambers. William Graham (talk) 00:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete CSPAN licensing seems to be for NC according to [7], so it's not considered free. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted still from CSPAN 3 recording of a public event at the University of Maryland. Uses license that is only appropriate for CSPAN broadcast footage of the House and Senate chambers. William Graham (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete CSPAN licensing seems to be for NC according to [8], so it's not considered free. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted still from CSPAN2 Book TV. Uses license that is only appropriate for CSPAN broadcast footage of the House and Senate chambers. William Graham (talk) 00:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete CSPAN licensing seems to be for NC according to [9], so it's not considered free. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Thailand A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. De minmis clearly does not apply here. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In the U.S. there is freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings. It might be discussed whether the depicted murals are copyrighted or there is any special exception-rule. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
empty file --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 43.jpg
[edit]
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- I find this photograph very important from a historical point of view, it is ridiculous to think that in a country under a dictatorship without basic human rights someone is going to be claiming copyright, especially when these posters help to create awareness of what was lived there during the protests. Personally I see a negative decision for the neutral point of view in case these photos are deleted. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 44.jpg
[edit]
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- I find this photograph very important from a historical point of view, it is ridiculous to think that in a country under a dictatorship without basic human rights someone is going to be claiming copyright, especially when these posters help to create awareness of what was lived there during the protests. Personally I see a negative decision for the neutral point of view in case these photos are deleted. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 45.jpg
[edit]
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- I find this photograph very important from a historical point of view, it is ridiculous to think that in a country under a dictatorship without basic human rights someone is going to be claiming copyright, especially when these posters help to create awareness of what was lived there during the protests. Personally I see a negative decision for the neutral point of view in case these photos are deleted. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Banner at demonstrations and protests against Chavismo and Nicolas Maduro government 46.jpg
[edit]
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- I find this photograph very important from a historical point of view, it is ridiculous to think that in a country under a dictatorship without basic human rights someone is going to be claiming copyright, especially when these posters help to create awareness of what was lived there during the protests. Personally I see a negative decision for the neutral point of view in case these photos are deleted. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coins of Uganda
[edit]Per COM:CUR Uganda, published less than 50 years
- File:1000sh.png
- File:100ugandanshillings(non-magnetic).png
- File:100ugandanshillings.png
- File:10ugandanshillings.png
- File:1ugandanshilling.png
- File:200ugandanshillings(non-magnetic).png
- File:200ugandanshillings.png
- File:2ugandanshillings.png
- File:500ugandanshillings.png
- File:50ugandanshillings.png
- File:5ugandanshillings.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
This work does not appear to be under the CC-BY-SA-4.0. If I am mistaken, please correct me. Mbrickn (talk) 00:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As stated in the EXIF data, the copyright holder of this image belongs to Apple, Inc., no way that the CC license from the President of Ukraine is still valid A1Cafel (talk) 00:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The site said that all content on this site is licensed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0. [10] No matter who took the photo, it's logical to assume that it was provided to the press service of Ukraine. I specifically wrote the following at the bottom under the license: Despite the fact that the copyright holder indicates "Apple, Inc." in the metadata, all materials are published on the website of the President of Ukraine under a Creative Commons license, regardless of whether otherwise specified or not. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 15:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As stated in the EXIF data, the copyright holder of this image belongs to Apple, Inc., no way that the CC license from the President of Ukraine is still valid A1Cafel (talk) 00:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The site says that all content on this site is licensed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0. [11] No matter who took the photo, it's logical to assume that it was provided to the press service of Ukraine. I specifically wrote the following at the bottom under the license: Despite the fact that the copyright holder indicates "Apple, Inc." in the metadata, all materials are published on the website of the President of Ukraine under a Creative Commons license, regardless of whether otherwise specified or not. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 15:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As stated in the EXIF data, the copyright holder of this image belongs to Apple, Inc., no way that the CC license from the President of Ukraine is still valid A1Cafel (talk) 00:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The site says that all content on this site is licensed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0. [12] No matter who took the photo, it's logical to assume that it was provided to the press service of Ukraine. I specifically wrote the following at the bottom under the license: Despite the fact that the copyright holder indicates "Apple, Inc." in the metadata, all materials are published on the website of the President of Ukraine under a Creative Commons license, regardless of whether otherwise specified or not. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 15:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture was upload to promote UnIRam Israeli company זור987 (talk) 08:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep Useful and in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Pictures that intended to promote business have no place in the encyclopedia. This picture was uploaded to promote the Israeli corporation "UniRam". זור987 (talk) 13:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Argue on the talk pages of the articles that are using it, but the intent of the uploader doesn't matter, only whether the photos are educationally useful or not. See Commons talk:Project scope#Advertising or self-promotion and feel free to argue that no upload with promotional intent could possibly be educational, but don't think that just stating that as if it were a fact makes it true or will convince anyone. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Probably this guy? If so, Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
This is probably also a selfie of said person. Permission is needed. @Ikan Kekek: . --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- I have nothing to say about that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- I also have nothing to say about that, but I note that it is low resolution (900 × 900) and has no meaningful metadata. Someone should check their other upload too. Brianjd (talk) 02:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Recently uploaded, superseded by File:Dask Logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Artwork by living artist (Oddmund Raudberget, b. 1932). No freedom of panorama in Norway (except for buildings). 4ing (talk) 11:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Syria (2009~2020)
[edit]Per COM:CUR Syria
- File:50 Syrian Pounds 2009 1.png
- File:50 Syrian Pounds 2009 2.png
- File:50-Syrian-Pounds(2009-2020).jpg
- File:Syrian 50,100,200 pound banknotes. Arabic letters. (51930732897).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- In this case my files (50 Syrian Pounds 2009 1.png, 50 Syrian Pounds 2009 2.png) are my own copyrighted ones, they are not taken from the Internet or any other source. I don't think they can be subject to deletion, given that compared to the other two Syrian Pound files, my photos are not as high quality. TagMorgan (talk) 09:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ehh, I'm not seeing any propaganda comments?! You say these are your currency designs? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- No, of course the banknotes design is not mine. I just mean the format of the images, the links from where the files were taken. TagMorgan (talk) 11:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- The problem is that there is no clear freedom of panorama in Syria, so even a photograph of a Syrian banknote is problematic. --Minoa (talk) 04:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ehh, I'm not seeing any propaganda comments?! You say these are your currency designs? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Syria (2009~2020)
[edit]Per COM:CUR Syria
- File:Syrian pound 100 pound back.jpg
- File:Syrian Pound 50 Pound back.jpg
- File:Syrian pound 50 Pound note front.jpg
Ox1997cow (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
does this go beyond the treshold of originality? Trade (talk) 23:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the Flickr user's own work: the image, presumably taken in the 1980s, appears on Flickr with a 2012 date, in an album called "Found Objects" along with a TV show screenshot that the Flickr user has also CC-licenced. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there! Really appreciate the work you all put into this stuff -- that picture is a shot I took from my backyard (the upland pasture on our farm); hope I can provide enough info to make everyone comfortable with keeping it! Vtfarmgirl (talk) 19:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Absence of camera Exif data is grounds for some suspicion and for questioning (so this is a reasonable DR), but doesn't necessarily mean that a picture was taken from somewhere else. I did some research and didn't find this image anywhere else on the web using TinEye and Google's reverse image search, so, in this case, I'll accept the uploader's plausible assertion unless an external source for the image can be found. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
This is not an anonymous work but there is a clear signature inside the cartoon (below the right pot). en:Donald McGill died in 1962, so this work is copyrighted through 2032. De728631 (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Rightly so. Vysotsky (talk) 22:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Indeed. Unfortunately at least four other illustrations from the same series (1), (2), (3), (4) seem to bear the same signature and, I guess, could be restored in ten years. -- Mdd (talk) 18:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all of them, per nomination. The files can be restored in 2033. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Sculpture not a US government work but made by J. Seward Johnson, Jr. The second statue of Naked Warrior unveiled to the public in Bellows AFS, Oahu, Hawaii, in 2014. The first one unveiled in Florida in 1988. Per COM:FOP US, sculptures lack freedom of panorama in the US, so photos of them should be considered copyrighted and ineligible for Commons. This is no exception. George Ho (talk) 02:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Je me suis trompé de mot. Le terme "appartement" doit être remplacé par le terme "bâtiment". Pouvez-vous supprimé ce fichier s'il vous plaît? Cela me permettra de recréer le fichier avec cette fois-ci le mot correct. OutriggrLife (talk) 21:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Je peux changer le mot. C'est seulement le terme "appartement" que vous voulez replacer? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oui, c'est exact. Il faudrait bien évidemment que le terme "bâtiment" soit au pluriel. Je voudrais modifier cette erreur dans le nom du fichier et dans la description. Merci d'avance! OutriggrLife (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Fait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: was renamed as requested. --Rosenzweig τ 20:14, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Under, Valenzuela City's Ordinance No. 739 | Series of 2020, The use of the Valenzuela City seal is prohibited in any kind of commercial, product, document or any similar kind without the consent from the City Government. CoastalShell182 (talk) 05:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this would be a non-copyright restriction of use, akin to File:Seal of the President of the United States.svg. {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} seems clear in this case. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Under, Valenzuela City's Ordinance No. 739 | Series of 2020, The use of the Valenzuela City seal is prohibited in any kind of commercial, product, document or any similar kind without the consent from the City Government. CoastalShell182 (talk) 05:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this would be a non-copyright restriction of use, akin to File:Seal of the President of the United States.svg. {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} seems clear in this case. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Under, Valenzuela City's Ordinance No. 739 | Series of 2020, The use of the Valenzuela City seal is prohibited in any kind of commercial, product, document or any similar kind without the consent from the City Government. CoastalShell182 (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this would be a non-copyright restriction of use, akin to File:Seal of the President of the United States.svg. {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} seems clear in this case. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Yurihonjo Akita.JPG SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 00:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 20:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
watermark, probably not in public domain F (talk) 06:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 20:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Is the text protected with copyright? How old is it? Taivo (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- It dates back to only 1996 and is still protected in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep According to the Iranian CR law – an unofficial translation can be found here– which also determines COM:TOO in Iran, the works to be covered should have one of the three elements; "knowledge, art or innovation" regardless of the creation method. This handwriting from Navab Safavi fails to have any of the mentioned elements and hence falls below TOO according to the law. --Mhhossein talk 06:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Are you sure, that no knowledge is needed for writing that text? What kind of text is it actually? The text is not very long, can you provide translation? Taivo (talk) 16:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, the author is asking his friends to write a poem on his grave stone. But wait, does this 1 line of poem make the text an artistic one? If yes, then I take back the 'keep'. --Mhhossein talk 04:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo: --Mhhossein talk 11:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Are you sure, that no knowledge is needed for writing that text? What kind of text is it actually? The text is not very long, can you provide translation? Taivo (talk) 16:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; since it's not use anywhere anyway. —howcheng {chat} 20:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Dunno, 90.6K followers on Instagram. I don't think Commons admins care about stuff like that, but that seems like a large enough following to be worth keeping a photo of him. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails per COM:EV. Number of followers in Insta doesn't make them notable all of a sudden, and it's still COM:OOS. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Question Why would we not take online followings into account? This is not Wikipedia, so we don't have to debate their policies on notability, but why should Commons totally ignore people who have an online presence? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- I know an influencer IRL who was over 2 million TikTok followers; a photo of them would still have no COM:EV, though. Tbh, 90k followers isn't that many to have educational value, IMO. SHB2000 (talk) 03:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- A discussion of what number of followers a person needs for their photo not to merit hiding on Commons is a useful discussion, but claiming that a photo of a genuine influencer has no educational value is absurd to me. How does it make any sense to ignore the online notability of people on Commons, when we would consider photos of every type of nail, nut, bolt, plate, or cup in scope? Do we need to take up this discussion elsewhere, such as Commons talk:Project scope? It's time for Commons to accept the times we're in, particularly as it's a website, not a physical photo library! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-promotional file of a non-contributor, outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; if the person is notable to have an article created about them, then we can undelete. —howcheng {chat} 20:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused photo of two YouTubers, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- I mean, they are YouTubers with almost 9M subscribers. On COM:PS, as per the conditions provided, it, just passes. Weak Support. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 09:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Weak keep for now. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Haseeb55 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: YouTube video is private. . No indication of free license on YouTube. Renominating for deletion instead of speedying it in light of the prior discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: license is fine, but file is unused; if an article is created about them, then we can undelete. —howcheng {chat} 20:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Wrong colour
2 Reasons:
1. The file uses wrong colour code of the flag of India and it does not matches the colour scheme used in the official website of PM of India [[13]]. There is already a file with "Government of India" as its Author as given below (which is the uppermost agency whose colour scheme decision is final and binding). Also the colour scheme used by ISRO, the Government of India space agency and Government established flag posts is also different from that used in this file.
- 360px|thumb|Image up for deletion here
- 360px|thumb|Image as per Government of India sources
- Third_largest_Indian_flag_in_Tankbund,_Hyderabad|360px|thumb|Third largest Flag post within India
- Payload_Fairing_for_GSLV_Mk_III_D2_being_transported|360px|thumb|Flag used by space agency of Government of India
- GSLV_Mk_III_M1,_Chandrayaan-2_-_GSLV_Mk_III_M1_vehicle_being_transferred_to_the_Second_Launch_Pad|360px|thumb|Flag on rocket of space agency of Government of India
- 360px|thumb|Indian flag and the State Emblem atop Vidhana Soudha in Bengaluru
- 360px|thumb|Air Force flag
2. Retaining this file is blocking the flag introduced by the Government source being used across Wikipedia pages since this file with wrong colour scheme is encroaching that position.Editor8220 (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep (at present)
- We would need a reliable source for the definition of the colours. Colour picking from a website, even a government website, isn't good enough. Governments might be seen as authorities here, but their web designers and websites aren't implicitly so. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- See also https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.1.1968/page/n7/mode/2up for a 1968 standard (although unit conversion is often tricky) Andy Dingley (talk) 09:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, because it's in use, which is enough of a reason by itself. Argue about the accuracy of the flag on the file's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per COM:INUSE. There's no way we're deleting a file that's used in thousands of pages. If there's a minor issue with the colour, discuss this on the talk page, but deletion is not the way to go. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
But that does not explain the colour difference this file has with all these sample images I provided (Including flag posts and rocket fairing), But all of it matches with the referance file I introduced in the top. Also the issue of colour and size of the wheel in the middle has been raised by several users in the talk page, but none has been addressed by the administrators nor they reduce protection to necessiate updating the file. COM:INUSE. does not apply since this is no ordinary image, its national flag of a nation. A change in colour cannot be superceded as not an issue just because too many pages uses it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor8220 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- What is preventing you from editing or uploading a new version of the file? You should have started a discussion on the file's talk page. It's not too late for you to do so, but the main point is that someone should change the colors suitably. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- There already is another version of the, as desired (2nd image link). Andy Dingley (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- OK, so substitute that image everywhere where this image is used, and then let us know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- There already is another version of the, as desired (2nd image link). Andy Dingley (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Editor8220: "COM:INUSE does not apply since this is no ordinary image, its [sic] national flag of a nation." Does COM:INUSE say that a flag of a nation or any non-ordinary images are somehow exempt from the policy. No it does not – the policy says "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like." This image is used across thousands of pages. I can guarantee that a vast majority of users and projects don't give a shit about such a minor trivial colour issue. Please read the policy first before making such spurious claims. SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @SHB2000: First of all its not used in thousands of pages, its only used in less than a 200 pages. All national flag files follow a common name format called "Flag of xxxx.svg". So for using India's flag, this file is the default file as it follows that format. Thats why all pages and projects are restricted to using this file. A change in colour of national flag is still a form of vandalism. If I change Red colour on chinese flag to pink, do you agree that It is still chinese flag? Editor8220 (talk) 12:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's used in many thousands of pages.
- Also, please sign your posts Andy Dingley (talk) 11:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Editor8220: Yabbut a minor colour issue is still not a reason for deletion. And no, a slight change in colour is clearly not vandalism – I suggest you read COM:Vandalism and m:Vandalism to get an insight of what truly is vandalism, but making spurious vandalism claims isn't supporting your argument. SHB2000 (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Agreed, I wish to close the deletion tag and keep the file. I moved to deletion because, the issue has been raised several times in talk page by multiple users, But no response or reduction in protection.Still the colour issue is not ignorable or considered as negligable, if you look at very older versions of the same file, colours had deviated very much from the default combination. Editor8220 (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: request was withdrawn. —howcheng {chat} 20:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
The user who uploaded this is Argentine, and didn’t pay the fee for “Paying public domain”. Alejitao123 (talk) 16:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This is nonsense. Did you see that the file clarifies that is in PD because 25 years passed from the creation and 20 of the publication? There is neither mention nor necessity of a Paying public domain. And what's the issue with I'm being Argentine? That's ridiculous. —Frodar (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Well, you see… Argentina have something called “Paying public domain”, which oblies all Argentine citizens to pay a fee using something that have fallen in public domain.
- As I understand, the regulation on Paying public domain in Argentina stipulates a fee for the commercial exploitation of works in public domain. Which does not implies the need to request authorization for the use of the work. Commons:Paying public domain says "the existence of a paying public domain regime (...) does not prevent the work from being uploaded to Commons". And not to mention that there are tens of thousands of photographs in Commons uploaded under the criteria that they are in the public domain in Argentina. —Frodar (talk) 19:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "non-copyright restriction", should be respected by users of the work; nonetheless, it is not grounds for the removal of works from Commons. Thooompson (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This image is still under copyright in the United States due to COM:URAA--A1Cafel (talk) 12:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- This image wasn't copyrighted in Argentina on the URAA date because this image didn't even exist at the URAA copyright restoration date of 1 January 1996. There cannot be restoration applied to something that does not exist. Plus, per closing in Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. —Frodar (talk) 15:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 20:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
This image was published in Argentina in 1997. It is in the public domain there, but it is not in the public domain in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 00:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Question How do you answer Frodar's 16 November 2022 comment in the last deletion request, which was closed as kept? "This image wasn't copyrighted in Argentina on the URAA date because this image didn't even exist at the URAA copyright restoration date of 1 January 1996. There cannot be restoration applied to something that does not exist. Plus, per closing in Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- This DR is not about URAA, it is about normal copyright protection in the US. The US gives 70 pma and does not follow the rule of the shorter term. That is, once the US grants copyright protection to a work it does under the terms of the US law and not under the terms of the foreign law. The URAA arguments are about deciding whether the US granted copyright protection or not to works published before the US joined the Berne Convention. As pointed before, this image was published in 1997, i.e., after the US joined the convention, and therefore protected automatically by US copyright. Günther Frager (talk) 12:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- I see. Thanks for the clear explanation. What do you think of this, User:Howcheng? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyright in the United States is still present, even though the Argentine copyright has expiered. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aash Gates (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, Out of scope
- File:Aash Gates at EPCET.jpg
- File:Aash With Teacher.jpg
- File:Aash Gates.png
- File:Classroom of SJES Polytechnic Bangalore Classroom.png
- File:Aashik having Tea.png
–Davey2010Talk 18:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment He's an active user at en.wikipedia, so we should let him keep one profile photo, but his Wikipedia profile in its current form should be deleted for touting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey @Ikan Kekek, Looking at his contribs he appears to have gone to EN and pasted his spammy userpage there which too ended up deleted[14], Although I believe his tenure here wont last long I too believe in fairness/2nd chances so I've told him to pick one image out of the 4, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- It was right to delete his userpage in that form. If he gets banned, we should delete the remaining photo at that time. Thanks, Davey. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek I agree deletion was the only best option, You're more than welcome to DR/speedy his remaining image as I give it a week or 2 tops before he's blocked :), Enjoy the rest of your evening/day Ikan, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 20:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Belated greetings to you, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
|
Deleted: User has not edited in three months; if he returns to become an active user, we can undelete. —howcheng {chat} 20:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Why PD-AR on a file without any source, depicting a man from Spain? Didym (talk) 19:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure --RAN (talk) 21:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Question What makes you believe it has been published anonymously before 1952? I only see an approximate creation date but nothing that suggests a publication without naming an author. Felix QW (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Besides, it would be protected in the US nonetheless as still having been copyrighted in Spain in 1996.
- Keep. This should be {{PD-Spain-photo}}. Given that this is a simple photograph, it is easily in the public domain by the 1996 URAA restoration date. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, that makes sense. As a side note, one probably should update COM:CRT/Spain to reflect this important special case rather than hide it in the tag list. Felix QW (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 20:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Verkleind versie van 外観画像 2017 09 19 IMG 3296.jpg. Niet meer in gebruik. トトト (talk) 01:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 20:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Thailand A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. SHB2000 (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep COM:CUR Thailand states, "Reproduction of banknote images requires a permission from the Bank of Thailand." This image is not a "banknote" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ooligan (talk • contribs)
- Ooligan, so how do you see currency coins? Are you sure that the design of the coin here is not copyrighted and how are you so much sure? ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, @TheAafi - I read the COM:CUR Thailand. It says, "Not OK: Reproduction of banknote images requires a permission from the Bank of Thailand." The key work here is "banknote." This does not say "coin." Also, I clicked on the citation footnote "[6]." Here is the archived webpage of the Bank of Thailand: [[15]]. This webpage has NO coins, only various denominations of banknotes. -- Ooligan (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ooligan, I agree that this is a coin and that is why I'm asking about what is do you say about Commons:Currency#Important points#1, which mentions, A photograph of a coin has two requirements before it can be included. The first is that the design of the coin itself is not copyrighted, or permission has been obtained. The second is that the photographer agrees to license it under a free licence. Do we have any proof that says the design of this coin is not copyrighted? ─ The Aafī (talk) 03:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 18:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Thailand A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep COM:CUR Thailand states, "Reproduction of banknote images requires a permission from the Bank of Thailand." This image is not a "banknote" Ooligan (talk) 09:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ooligan, Keeping the banknote vs coin aside, It'd be very good if you tell why the design on the coin is not copyrighted? I'd gladly support keeping this file if my concern is answered. Commons:Currency#Important points#1 mentions, A photograph of a coin has two requirements before it can be included. The first is that the design of the coin itself is not copyrighted, or permission has been obtained. The second is that the photographer agrees to license it under a free licence. This needs to be clarified. ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @TheAafi -- Thank you for the "Important points" link. As the quoted text states, there are "two requirements..." First, to help people with less experience in this subject area, I suggest changing the section heading to "Requirements and important points."
- I was directed by the DR link to the Thai currency section. That section only refers to "banknotes," so I commented based on that information. I was unaware that at the top of the were these "two requirements" mentioned under "Important points" section.
- I suggest that some note here should mention "coins" relevant information.
- The Bank of Thailand appears to be controlled by the Government of Thailand, so the coin design may be owned by the Thai government. Are Thai government works public domain works? I read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Thailand/en. This does not mention Government works, except for postage stamps. Do you read the Thai language? I don't. It would be nice to know if there is some mention about government works (other than postage stamps). Otherwise, I have no information on any copyright.
- -- Ooligan (talk) 06:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ooligan, a good number of volunteers that know this language are listed at Category:User_th, and I see @Kudpung as one, whom I know from English Wikipedia. They might help in any way. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 09:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ooligan, Keeping the banknote vs coin aside, It'd be very good if you tell why the design on the coin is not copyrighted? I'd gladly support keeping this file if my concern is answered. Commons:Currency#Important points#1 mentions, A photograph of a coin has two requirements before it can be included. The first is that the design of the coin itself is not copyrighted, or permission has been obtained. The second is that the photographer agrees to license it under a free licence. This needs to be clarified. ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep COM:CUR Thailand states, "Reproduction of banknote images requires a permission from the Bank of Thailand." This image is not a "banknote" Ooligan (talk) 09:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 18:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
COM:TOO Switzerland and terms-and-conditions (Copyright & Trademark): The Site and its Materials, save for any User Generated Content, is provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License (CCPL)...Non-Commercial ... All trademarks...They are protected by national and international law through Intellectual Property Protection Treaties and must not be used or reproduced without express permission 『白猫』Обг. 08:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- As stated in your comment which directly cites the World Scout Bureau's website also linked in your comment, the Scout Logo is "provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License", its use on Wikipedia which is a non-commercial platform is therefore legal. 158.169.150.14 19:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- please see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ and see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ . First it's license Wikipedia. And see Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses, because "Non-Commercial" license = not allowed on Commons. 『白猫』Обг. 20:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as remarked by Shiro Neko, the license on the scouting webste leeds to CC BY-NC-SA 2.5, wich is not compatible with the licensing on Commons. Therefore this logo must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced flag AAAAA143222 (talk) 23:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
This should be deleted. The only source for this file is a twitter post AAAAA143222 (talk) 17:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use across multiple wikis. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This flag is allegedly from a movement, so the Wikimedia user is unlikely its original author. Cantonese Union (talk) 00:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I did not find an older version on the web. Flag is in scope, because in use, per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
No reliable source for this. (the only source is from blogspot) 69.157.185.224 23:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Kept: This file is in use in many projects, therefore it is in project scope and "useful for an educational purpose". In fact it is used on one page which is a real article and it is in the context of explaining what this mistake was. It is also not a complete fiction, it does not meet the significance criterion, but you can come across it on the Internet [It is also not a complete fiction, it does not meet the significance criterion, but you can come across it on the Internet [16] [17] [18] [19].I see no reason to remove this, especially because it is not copyright infringement, but I am supportive of adding the word "fictional" to the filename. Swiãtopôłk (talk) 18:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- The file was uploaded by me from the Blogspot source by Leonardo Piccioni de Almeida. I agree to rename the file, as proposed by Swiãtopôłk. Hosmich (talk) 17:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion, please rename the file as suggested. --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
