Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/09/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Out-of-context personal image (spam) Pierre cb (talk) 04:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Out-of -scope selfie. Pierre cb (talk) 04:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
different file Phbsfndt (talk) 09:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suurecadde (talk · contribs)
[edit]User is just uploading copyrighted stock photos of animals, eg. https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/zebra-grasslands-serengeti-dawn-tanzania-east-66542878
- File:Leopard-tree 4x3.webp
- File:HjFE8NKWuCmgfHCcndJ3rK-1200-80.jpg
- File:Cheetah-running 4x3.webp
- File:What-is-the-Difference-Between-Oryx-and-Gemsbok Figure-1.jpg
- File:Homson-Gazelle.jpg
- File:Logisi.jpg
- File:Xayawan.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted image from television show, as noted in the description. – Rhain ☔ 12:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by error Perrygogas (talk) 13:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
uploaded by mistake Perrygogas (talk) 13:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
This logo is above the threshold of originality in both India and the United States and appears to be copyrighted by Disney. I see no evidence of a free license, so I am bringing this here for deletion as a copyright violation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete and personally speedy Herby talk thyme 16:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Some doubt about claimed third-party permission, as image is available in far higher resolution here and was prepublished in 2010 here. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no permission, no author Hoyanova (talk) 07:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no permission, no author Hoyanova (talk) 07:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, not for WMF purposes Taichi (talk) 06:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE Mateus2019 (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope, cross wiki promo, no source, no author, no permission Hoyanova (talk) 07:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational value Drakosh (talk) 08:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Offickevin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host for sharing your photo album.
- File:20200804 140953family.jpg
- File:20200804 140950family.jpg
- File:20200804 40952family.jpg
- File:20200804 140946fjdkikf.jpg
- File:20200804 140944gkglkl.jpg
- File:20200804 140949family.jpg
- File:IMG hfua6e.jpg
- File:IMG fdqgah.jpg
- File:IMG l1gdht.jpg
- File:IMG -ujmv30family.jpg
- File:IMG -tc57ezfamily.jpg
- File:Fhghjfhfjd.jpg
- File:Familyggkjgjg.jpg
- File:5748875family.jpg
- File:Family678r8.jpg
- File:Family677878.jpg
- File:Family86757.jpg
- File:Family67564.jpg
- File:Family675.jpg
- File:20210203 011256family.png
- File:20210109 100847family.jpg
- File:20210109 143527family.png
- File:20210103 193342family.png
- File:20210103 191825family.png
- File:20210102 233653family.jpg
- File:20201226 112350family.png
- File:20201225 211202family.jpg
- File:20201222 160839family.jpg
- File:20201222 145456family.jpg
- File:20201222 125250family.png
- File:Family687.jpg
- File:Family67458.jpg
- File:20210503 155517family.jpg
- File:20210503 155230family.jpg
- File:20201225 201623family.jpg
- File:Family403.png
- File:IMG -ql8zyt.jpg
- File:20200929 familt142247.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 10:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Personal images, out of COM:Scope.
- File:QuillBot Logo.jpg
- File:House in Cina.jpg
- File:Maths Homework 19.05.20.jpg
- File:Howling wolf.png
MKFI (talk) 11:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope editing of pages presumably for some personal purpose/prejudice. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eiheducation (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising: these documents are full of multiple embedded links to a single website, eiheducation.in, which matches the uploader's username. It's clear that their purpose is solely an attempt to drive traffic to that website. Uploader has no other contributions. Content is outside COM:SCOPE.
- File:A guide to port security in Cisco switches.pdf
- File:A Guide To Manage Files From Command Line.pdf
- File:A Guide to Frame Tagging.pdf
- File:A Brief Intro to SSL and How It Works.pdf
- File:The different types of routing and routing protocol.pdf
- File:A Beginner's Guide to Accessing the Command Line.pdf
Marbletan (talk) 12:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Meaningless lesson plan, out of scope of Wikimedia Commons Kareyac (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal/fantasy COA, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Vandalism Aitorembe (talk) 18:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 22:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 22:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Nicholaz Little Trade (talk) 22:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of projects scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Bitte erste Version der Datei löschen, da Person erkenntlich Musikus.Aaron (talk) 09:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the file as such; deleted the first version as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Because is not him. Just not him. Why is on wikipedia? Is popular or famous? JustMusicLoft (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Comment Right now, the file is in use. Let's reconsider when the article it's used in is deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment No longer in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Crosswiki vandalism and sabotage. Involved users: MusicandFun494 (talk · contributions · Statistics), MusicEDMLive (talk · contributions · Statistics), JustMusicLoft (talk · contributions · Statistics), MusicLovers007 (talk · contributions · Statistics). MexTDT (talk) 01:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- All users have made contributions related to Darius Dominte and were created within less than 36 hours.
- MusicEDMLive created the article on the Japanese and French Wikipedia.
- MusicandFun494 created the article on the Spanish Wikipedia and a draft on the Polish Wikipedia.
- MusicLovers007 edited the Spanish article and uploaded this image file.
- JustMusicLoft started to vandalize several pages in Commons, Japanese Wikipedia and Spanish Wikipedia translating the same tagline: "Delete Because is not him. Just not him. Why is on wikipedia? Is popular or famous?"
- MexTDT (talk) 01:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Photo taken by the corresponding photographer from PA Media Assignments, as credited in the description and the EXIF data, not from the FCDO, permission from the agency is required.
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52362782212).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52362826312).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52362826537).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363077377).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363117152).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363391572).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363392067).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363392542).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363572261).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363719016).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363719256).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363762886).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363802768).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363884164).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363949658).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363949853).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363950503).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363993353).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52363993423).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364000768).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364029324).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364029774).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364053596).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364074089).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364081759).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364096344).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364142805).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364209265).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364241733).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364241898).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364325686).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364326246).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364326331).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364327241).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364327256).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364327351).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364328091).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364328651).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364434555).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364553618).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364553713).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364553968).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364555443).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364555528).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364555728).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364555833).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364556153).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364635144).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364635629).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364637554).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364637619).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364748170).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364749125).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364750420).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364750870).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364853772).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364883717).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364883887).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364949457).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52364999762).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365003087).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365022832).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365106067).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365106322).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365167042).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365347172).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365347492).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365347612).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365348647).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365357952).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365468462).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365468922).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365468987).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365469077).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365551957).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365552102).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365726621).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365778112).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365779207).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365791101).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365791201).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365791251).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365791431).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365821026).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365821161).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365832892).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365833162).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365886796).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365937586).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52365937811).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366018948).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366019158).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366045556).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366046076).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366046126).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366048068).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366069898).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366069958).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366070023).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366103064).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366125081).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366132029).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366151545).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366153594).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366164678).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366187903).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366199054).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366216905).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366217330).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366246710).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366247235).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366249279).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366249484).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366272509).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366272748).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366272793).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366273008).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366273073).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366285541).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366286326).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366286576).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366286671).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366298216).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366312530).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366312700).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366333478).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366333578).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366363000).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366363430).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366405011).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366405191).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366405511).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366435984).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366470440).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366470770).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366470880).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366514538).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366514928).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366515478).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366515688).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366530680).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366550400).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366598964).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366599079).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366599549).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366633558).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366633858).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366634168).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366710770).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366711270).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366711420).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366712245).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366717683).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366718131).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366718789).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366719024).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366719186).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366719466).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366719551).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366723560).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366723670).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366767471).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366803004).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366803104).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366831630).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366831815).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366918870).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366944193).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366944838).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52366993538).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367030449).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367031104).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367083779).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367141755).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367142015).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367854142).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367972287).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367972367).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367972387).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367972542).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367998812).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52367998832).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52368358707).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52368795336).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52368795366).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52368795461).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52368795471).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52368912536).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52368912651).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369028568).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369107679).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369107784).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369147263).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369147353).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369172214).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369172239).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369173283).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369209298).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369214575).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369214760).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369226029).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369226209).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369226309).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369226384).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369226429).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369252099).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369288399).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369298656).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369333445).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369394955).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369395005).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369395080).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369395130).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369395175).jpg
- File:BOOK OF CONDOLENCE (52369611499).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete // sikander { talk } 🦖 14:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]Post file re-uploads, another deletion discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Temporary cat boc // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Klemens.rangger (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:EN MAR Penergetic logo CMYK no-Slogan 191023.jpg
- File:UN MAR Penergetic Kreis Impulse 170917.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Detlef Glinski
[edit]German stamps were found not to be official works by courts, so they are not automatically in the public domain. These stamps are the work of Detlef Glinski (born in 1933), who is apparently still alive. So they are still protected by copyright and should be deleted. The files can be restored 70 years after his death.
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Bauernhaus Spreewald.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Bauernhaus Thüringen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Bauernhaus Schwarzwald.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Bauernhaus Westfalen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Bauernhaus Schleswig-Holstein.jpg
- File:750 Jahre Berlin Stamp.jpg
- File:DBP 1991 1537-1538a-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1537-1538b-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1537-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1991 1538-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1993 1677 Galopprennbahn Hoppegarten.jpg
- File:DBP 1994 1722 Fulda.jpg
- File:Frdli.jpg
- File:GDR 1983 SouvBfAntarktForsch MiNr2772 pm B002.jpg
- File:GDR 1984 SouvBfIonospObserv MiNr2772 pm B002.jpg
- File:GDR 1984 SouvBrWetSatAntarct MiNr2772 pm B002a.jpg
- File:GDR 1985 MiNr2965-96 SD B002.jpg
- File:GDR 1985 SouvBAntarctForsch MiNr2832 pm B002.jpg
- File:GDR 1986 SouvBr75JAntarktExp pm B002.jpg
- File:Kurt Tucholsky (timbre RDA).jpg
- File:PSC 1985 GDR SozPhilex85 pm B002b.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1978 GDR Jähn pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1981 GDR MiNr25952598 pm B003.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1984 GDR Prettin pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1985 GDR RatkeKöthen pm B002b.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1973 GDR RAWStendal pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1983 GDR LZ17 pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1986 GDR Forst 01 pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1986 GDR Forst04 MiNr2993 pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1986 GDR ForstRosengarten 02 pm B002.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1986 GDR MiNr2993 pmForst B002.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1987 GDR 75JahreB´FernflugBerlinWien pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2893 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2894 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2895 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2896(Bl78) pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1985 GDR MiNr2957 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1985 GDR MiNr2958 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1986 GDR MiNr2993 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1986 GDR MiNr2994 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1986 GDR MiNr2995 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1986 GDR MiNr2996 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1986 GDR MiNr3023 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3149 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3151 pm B002b.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr3152 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1988 GDR MiNr32ß8 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1989 GDR MiNr3238 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1989 GDR MiNr3239 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1989 GDR MiNr3240 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1990 GDR MiNr3320 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1990 GDR MiNr3321 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp GDR 1983 10pf Funkrugen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Heidelberg.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2285 Weihnachten I.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2286 Weihnachten II.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1973, MiNr 1844.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1973, MiNr 1845.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1973, MiNr 1846.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1973, MiNr 1847.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1973, MiNr 1848.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1973, MiNr 1849.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1976, MiNr 2118.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2236.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2237.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2238.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2239.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1977, MiNr 2240.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2326.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2327.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2328.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2329.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2361.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2414.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2415.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2416.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1979, MiNr 2417.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2502.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2562.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2563.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2564.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2565.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr Block 058.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr Zusammendruck 2562, 2564.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr Zusammendruck 2563, 2565.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2599.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2629.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2630.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2631.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2632.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr Block 063.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr Zusammendruck 2629, 2631.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr Zusammendruck 2630, 2632.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2699.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2700.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2751.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2752.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2753.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2770.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2780.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2831.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2832.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2868.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2893.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2894.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2895.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2896.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr Block 078.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2965.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2966.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2967.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr Zusammendruck 2965, 2966.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 2993.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 2994.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 2995.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 2996.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3005.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3006.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3007.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3008.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3023.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3024.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3025.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr Block 084.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr Bogen 3005-3008.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr Zusammendruck 3005-3008.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3072.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3076.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Kleinbogen 3075.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3149.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3150.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3151.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3152.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3208.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3238.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3239.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3240.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3320.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3321.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3360.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3361.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3362.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1990, MiNr 3363.jpg
- File:Triebzug mxa.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Detlef Glinski
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted per the normal term of 70+ years after the stamp designer's death. In this case the designer, Detlef Glinski, seems to still be alive or at least hasn't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Bbalancesteaamenginee.jpg
- File:Briefmarke Sigmund Jänh vo 1978.jpg
- File:DDR. 85. Einigster schienenfahrzeugbau.jpg
- File:Europa 2002 Deutschland.jpg
- File:Flugpostdienst Leipzig - Frankfurt.jpg
- File:Gerstamp-ddr-interkosmos.jpg
- File:Stamp DDR 1979 diesel locomotive.jpg
- File:Stamp GDR Sammlerausweis Typ II 1.JPG
- File:Stamps DDR - 25 years manned space-flight.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2779.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2792.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2793.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2794.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2795.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr Zusammendruck 2792, 2793.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr Zusammendruck 2794, 2795.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2864.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2865.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2866.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2867.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr Zusammendruck 2864, 2867.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr Zusammendruck 2865, 2866.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2951.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2957.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2958.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3026.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3027.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3071.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3073.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3074.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3075.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3077.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3078.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3123.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3128.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr 3129.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Block 089.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Kleinbogen 3076.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Kleinbogen 3077.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1987, MiNr Kleinbogen 3078.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 16:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination. Uploaded a new version (with the stamps blurred) of File:Stamp GDR Sammlerausweis Typ II 1.JPG, kept that version, hid the first version. --Rosenzweig τ 09:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Photo credit should read: Jonathan Hordle/PA Media Assignments, not works from the FCDO A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:12, 3 October 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:People signing condolence books for Elizabeth II --Krdbot 07:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Collection of selfies and other low quality images from speedily deleted articles on English Wikipedia. Unlikely to be own work. Out of project scope.
IronGargoyle (talk) 18:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 18:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal images. File:Mustafa.lutfullah.mp.jpg is from Facebook. VRT-permission is needed
Estopedist1 (talk) 11:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 18:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Request from the op. This is a duplicate Dirk0001 (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Dupe of what? --Achim55 (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Request from the op. This is a duplicate Dirk0001 (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope - The face image was taken from ny times (as per this discussion) so imho that would more or less be a copyright violation (whilst only the outline exists it would still be Derivative Work, That aside the uploader has tried to get this plastered on EN and is using this as a political statement[1] which in some respects goes against what this project is about,
Either way I don't see where or how this could ever be used internally or externally, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- hello, if the copyright (that not originaly from nytimes), i used iranwire image as nytimes did. but the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protest_art have sample of this kind of digital works. also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Mahsa_Amini has 31 languegs and reached more than 100K views each day. so it's useful for this event. we are talking about copyright problem, all news agencies (bbc, daily mail, nytimes, guardian, cnn and ... used this photo) the source is iranwire.com that mahsa amini family gave photos to them. i'm in email contact with them. please extend the duration of this nomination. Roxjor (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- also, please keep an eye on this page:
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#does_my_upload_violate_any_rule?Roxjor (talk) 22:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think it is out of scope, other than possible copyright issues. The uploaded said the underlying image came originally from Mahsa Amini's family. If -- and this is a big if -- they license their contribution to this derivative work from a photo to which they presumably hold copyright, then I think we should keep it. But that underlying copyright issue needs to be addressed. - Jmabel ! talk 23:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- hello, i don't know why people think when someone right after upload an image want to use it is unsecure. at the time image was uploaded can be used, :::what's the problem with it? here is the addressee of newyork time quote that said image provided by family to news agencies:
- https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/21/world/middleeast/iran-protests-mahsa-amini.html
- and the quote (right side of picture in nytimes article):
- "A picture of Mahsa Amini provided to Iran Wire by her family. The authorities have said she died of heart failure; her family say she had been in good health."Roxjor (talk) 23:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Because Commons doesn't accept an image on a vague, "Yeah, you can use it." We need an explicit license (e.g. {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}), or an explicit release into the public domain (e.g. {{Cc-0}}). - Jmabel ! talk 01:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think it is out of scope, other than possible copyright issues. The uploaded said the underlying image came originally from Mahsa Amini's family. If -- and this is a big if -- they license their contribution to this derivative work from a photo to which they presumably hold copyright, then I think we should keep it. But that underlying copyright issue needs to be addressed. - Jmabel ! talk 23:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clear DW copyright issue. Linked discussion shows copyright of original photograph held by some unknown family member. Without a free license from that unknown member, the artwork does not belong on Commons. That news organizations have published the photo does not imply the license is free. The claim that it is just an "outline" minimizes the importance of the photo, but it is much more than just an outline. Even if it were just an outline, it would be a derivative work. Glrx (talk) 04:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete For copyright reasons and as a derivative work of file without a free license. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 07:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The copyright issue may be resolved or not. But I strongly oppose the outofscope rationale. WMF has started the picsome site, that takes its media from commons and is supposed to become the leading free stockphoto service. The image in question however is in scope for any MW wiki with Instant commons that support the Iranian human rights issue (while may be not WMF wikis). --C.Suthorn (talk) 09:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
some modification
[edit]User:C.Suthorn User:Mateusz_Konieczny User:Glrx User:Jmabel User:Davey2010 .We have two problem to discuss, first is out of scope and second is copyright. i uploaded another version of it with less elements (no but shape and form of original work (face texture in texts), dose it fix the copyright problem? and i'm still waiting for iranwire.com email reply. just look at texts of this picture, they are totally white without any pattern, this is new (current) version of it i uploaded. and compare it with old version that i used face texture inside fonts.Roxjor (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- The source of image is iranwire.com.as i mentiond form newyork times, the family members shared the image with that site. in the PRIVACY AND TERMS AND CONDITIONS of that site (this link), they wrote: "You may not copy, reproduce, publish, transmit, distribute, perform, display, post, modify, create derivative works from, sell, license or otherwise exploit this Website or any of its Materials without our prior written permission, which may be requested as specified in Section 2 below.", i email them again and inform them newer version has less elements of original source. and want them to email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org for permission. can you please wait until they reply the email?Roxjor (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Roxjor even if a file is deleted, it can be undeleted later (and will be if VRT-permission is received). Importent however: The permission sent by the copyright-owner to VRT has to make it explicitly clear, that the media is available under a free license (cc-zero oder cc-by-sa-4.0 are fine, others will do, but the license has to be named or included, and it has to be free: NC will not do.) C.Suthorn (talk) 08:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Roxjor: If I understand C.Suthorn correctly, I'm in complete agreement: you need permission for the underlying photo (as laid out in COM:VRT), but once that is resolved I see no scope problem. - Jmabel ! talk 01:14, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the discussion above, it is a derivative work and a copyright violation. --4nn1l2 (talk) 00:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 17:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- See also: File:GREGORY N. HILL - 2021.png. The user wants to upload a picture of Gregory Hill but is unable or not willing to understand that he can't use a picture from the internet. Can probably be speedy deleted due to copyvio. Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 08:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Photo de mauvaise qualité que j'ai publiée il y a des années, et qui donne des indications de certains accès (sécurité). PYRDLT (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Photo de mauvaise qualité, reflets PYRDLT (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tourmirandol1.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:TourMirandol2.JPG Andy Dingley (talk) 20:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Mon propre travail (Pikendorf, py.redon@gmail.com, je n'arrive plus à me connecter malgré plusieurs demandes de réinitialisation). Très mauvaise qualité avec reflet (photo de photo dans un cadre).A l'époque je n'avais pas su revenir en arrière lors de la publication. Photo utilisée nulle part. PYRDLT (talk) 08:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Photo de mauvaise qualité, reflets PYRDLT (talk) 19:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete If this is a photograph of a photograph, it would appear to be an infringement of the copyright on the original photo.
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tourmirandol1.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Tourmirandol1.JPG as well. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité - Photo de photo flash. PYRDLT (talk) 15:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: photo of existing photo, DW missing all essential info for the original. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PaulGorduiz106 (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]COM:Derivative work violation. Photos show copyrighted content (programs, audio-visual works like videos et cetera) being broadcasted on TV screens. In effect equal to COM:SCREENSHOT.
- File:Samsung Neo QLED 98QN90A (09-09-2022).jpg
- File:Dévant tv with Parkmall advent (05-30-2021).jpg
- File:Samsung Crystal UHD TU7000 (04-25-2021).jpg
- File:Dévant tv with Parkmall advent (04-24-2021).jpg
- File:Dévant Quantum & Ultra HD (03-14-2021).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PaulGorduiz106 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Nominated photos substantially show copyrighted COM:PACKAGING of food products et cetera. Needs commercial license authorization from packaging designers. I'm not sure if other photos of the same uploader that I didn't nominate, like File:Lucky Me Pancit Canton (05-28-2021).jpg, File:Juices (09-09-2022).jpg, and File:Nissin Cup Noodles and Shomen (03-07-2021).jpg, can be considered as acceptable too as these are borderline OK and not (probable COM:De minimis for other non-nominated photos).
- File:Nissin Souper Meal (09-10-2022).jpg
- File:Del Monte Potato Crisp - Original (05-28-2021).jpg
- File:Del Monte Potato Crisp - Spicy (05-28-2021).jpg
- File:Veega Meat-Free Foods (05-28-2021).jpg
- File:Instant noodles (and also Pasta) (05-09-2021).jpg
- File:Ngatanien Fried Rice Mix Salmon (05-22-2021).jpg
- File:Henyo's Pizza Box (03-08-2021).jpg
- File:Veega meat-free Nuggets (03-07-2021).jpg
- File:Aviko Fries (03-07-2021).jpg
- File:Korean Noodles (03-07-2021).jpg
- File:Jordan Farms Brown Rice (03-07-2021).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PaulGorduiz106 (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Derivative works (photos) of copyrighted screen displays: of a smartphone and of a display screen. Equivalent to COM:SCREENSHOT.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:08, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
It appears that the file was taken directly from here: http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=1808371 Davidng913 (talk) 20:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Image license stated in source is CC BY-NC-ND (i.e. not freely available). -SlvrHwk (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused private photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Obviously stolen image BlinxTheKitty (talk) 22:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Source unknown as there is no META data, likely copyrighted. Pierre cb (talk) 23:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Photo without META, unlikely the uploader owned. Pierre cb (talk) 16:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:25, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
probably copyviol: a too "posed" photo — danyele 00:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo from ACM Lock, clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks.") — danyele 00:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks.") — danyele 00:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
photo credited to ACM Lock, so clearly a copyviol; the website notes state: (it) "Le foto utilizzate per gli sfondi non sono di nostra proprietà, ma sono tutte trovate su motori di ricerca e social network." = (en) "The photos used for the wallpapers are not our property, but are all found on Internet browsers and social networks." — danyele 00:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:CUR Euro due to COM:CUR Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:CUR Euro due to COM:CUR Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Although the flag is PD (due to it composing of only stripes), the photo is taken without the permission of the photographer, Orange East (https://t.me/orange_east/28742) SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 03:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. This flag has never been used in protests. The photo was taken long before the protests. Askhab Dargo (talk) 19:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:CUR Euro due to COM:CUR Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:CUR Euro due to COM:CUR Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Finland A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Finland A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Finland A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Finland A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Austria A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Austria A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Finland A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Finland A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Austria A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Finland A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:EURO due to COM:CUR Finland A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Still under copyright per COM:CUR China
- File:2012 600 g silver lunar dragon 9 sons of the dragon father dragon - Obverse.jpg
- File:2012 600 g silver lunar dragon 9 sons of the dragon father dragon - Reverse.jpg
- File:Five Jiao Obverse.jpg
- File:Five Jiao Reverse.jpg
- File:Foreign Country Coin 15.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 16.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 2.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 23.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 8.JPG
- File:Foreign Country Coin 9.JPG
- File:One Jiao Obverse.jpg
- File:One Jiao Reverse.jpg
- File:SZ 人民幣 RMB Fifty 50 cents Lotus lily flower in art Oct 2017 IX1.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR China
- File:China-1-fen-2010 (1).jpg
- File:China-1-fen-2010.jpg
- File:China-2-fen-1982 (1).jpg
- File:China-2-fen-1982.jpg
- File:China-5-fen-1987 (1).jpg
- File:China-5-fen-1987.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
The original file name contained the wrong locomotive number (as a typographical error) and the file therefore has no conceivable usefulness as a redirect. SCHolar44 (talk) 04:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused and implausible redirect/G2. --Wdwd (talk) 09:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Screenshots of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
There are multiple photos of this exact same meeting that were published before 2020 and appear to be credited to Shutterstock, including a photo available here. As such, this appears to be a photo that Shutterstock would own, and I see no evidence of a free license being provided; this photograph should be deleted as a presumptive copyright violation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Regardless of if Shutterstock owns it or not, the claim of it being "Own work" from 2020 is clearly false. SnowFire (talk) 05:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
The source website credits the photograph to a Horacio Seguí, indicating that this was a work taken by a person. This photo was taken c. 1973-1976 and appears to have been taken in Spain, so this work likely is copyrighted in Spain (70 years post-death) and the United States (URAA). As such, this should be deleted as a copyrighted photograph without evidence of a valid license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake. Not own work. See https://www.ramat-hanadiv.org.il/%d7%9c%d7%92%d7%9c%d7%95%d7%aa-%d7%90%d7%aa-%d7%94%d7%9e%d7%a7%d7%95%d7%9d/%d7%a4%d7%90%d7%a8%d7%a7-%d7%94%d7%98%d7%91%d7%a2/%d7%a9%d7%91%d7%99%d7%9c%d7%99-%d7%90%d7%95%d7%a4%d7%a0%d7%99%d7%99%d7%9d/%d7%9e%d7%a1%d7%9c%d7%95%d7%9c%d7%99-%d7%a8%d7%9b%d7%99%d7%91%d7%aa-%d7%90%d7%95%d7%a4%d7%a0%d7%99%d7%99%d7%9d/%d7%a9%d7%91%d7%99%d7%9c-%d7%90%d7%95%d7%a4%d7%a0%d7%99%d7%99%d7%9d-%d7%94%d7%97%d7%95%d7%a8%d7%a9-%d7%91%d7%a8%d7%9e%d7%aa-%d7%94%d7%a0%d7%93%d7%99%d7%91-%d7%94%d7%a9%d7%91%d7%99%d7%9c-%d7%94/ IsraelHikingMap (talk) 07:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Publikacja okolicznościowa z okazji ekspozycji Jeźdźca polskiego w Łazienkach królewskich.jpg
[edit]At least the text content of the depicted exhibition catalogue is likely copyrighted and thereby requires permission from the original author. Alternatively, the right half of the image could be cut away. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
no indication of cc-by-sa 4.0 219.79.71.135 08:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
no indication of cc-by-sa-4.0 219.79.71.135 08:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
It look like fair image of a poster A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 08:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW without permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, copyrighted [2] Kareyac (talk) 10:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, but the large poster on the backside of the depicted bus is rather above COM:TOO and thereby assumed to be copyrighted. Regrettably, Denmark has no FoP-exception for such works. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have reuploaded the image, where the poster has been removed is that enough ? Greetings Kent Madsen. (talk) 10:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. I can hide the original image-version. However, you should amend the description about the removal. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already processed, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 12:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Denmark has FoP-exception only for buildings, not for other works of art. So, if this sculpture is still in copyrighted (for 70 years pma), a permission by the sculptor is needed or the image needs to be deleted. Uploader will likely know about the sculptor.-- Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Same problem:
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Not own work [3] Kareyac (talk) 10:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Didier Lamouche (talk · contribs)
[edit]unsourced Map about a fictional event (Jesus walking to/from Afghanistan). Also apparently a GoogleMaps CopyVio.
- File:Itinéraire pédestre.jpg
- File:Itinéraire pédestre le plus court empreinté par Jésus & sa mère.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 11:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Apparently taken from Facebook, where the image is dated to August: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=151908260792231&set=a.112956488020742 MKFI (talk) 11:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Screencap of a Youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drnxZlS9gyw MKFI (talk) 11:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Apparently a scanned image: COM:Derivative work. MKFI (talk) 11:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Photograph by Liel Marín; VRT permission from Liel Marín is needed to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 11:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Copy of File:Zêdka Kareyac (talk) 11:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a reproduction of a 1967 painting by Cuneo who died in 1996. I believe that this is still under copyright. The Science Museum website allows download under BY-NC-SA/4.0, which is not enough for Wikipedia Commons. (See https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co27959/waterloo-station-oil-painting) -- Verbarson talkedits 11:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
admits to being a magazine shoot. No metadata. Claims of being own work from a user with a long history of uploading stuff like logos as own work Geni (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Reupload of image previously deleted; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:American University of Beirut.jpg ElKevbo (talk) 12:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- ElKevbo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) ElKevbo has been deleting the new logo of the American University of Beirut for several times now. The logo is owned by the university and has been released on August 31, 2022 as per this message from the President: https://www.aub.edu.lb/President/Documents/Messages/2022/global-identity-new-brand.pdf and was added on the official website here: https://www.aub.edu.lb/communications/logo/Pages/default.aspx. Please lock the page and deny further deletions of the logo. 2A00:6920:E11C:B7:6873:8A5F:93AE:8682 08:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. @1994 at page 14 Kareyac (talk) 13:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Lacks of essential source information. Probably not an own work Goji1895 (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Watermark name isn’t uploader’s name, lacks of essential source information Goji1895 (talk) 14:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Very unlikely own work. Another image of the uploader was deleted as copyvio. This image looks like an official image of the administration of Israel. Raymond 13:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
the image created in 1981 by Stanley Bell who is still alive, so, not PD-Old. And no evidence of other free license, too rubin16 (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- If useful, we can load the SVG file of the logo Ikanlive (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation: resolution and lack of EXIF metadata indicate that these pictures are not original image files. This blog post (posted on 1 April 2022 according to this index) seems to be the source. Their terms and conditions do not provide a license compatible with Commons.
- File:Sheikh Saad bin Mansour Faqih.jpg
- File:Sheikh Ahmed Farouk Hadhrawi.jpg
- File:Sheikh Atef bin Ali Ahmed Mullah.jpg
HyperGaruda (talk) 09:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size disparate images without EXIF data, historical images and DW montage.
- File:Kamil Yusuf al Bahtimi.png
- File:Qari Siddique Mahmood al Minshawy.png
- File:Rare photo of a young Ali Mullah.jpg
- File:Rare pictures of the 'Mullah Family'.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 19:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Not a work of the European Union Delegation: https://www.bahamas.gov.bs/wps/portal/public/gov/government/news/the%20hon.%20cornelius%20a.%20smith%20sworn%20in%20as%20the%2011th%20governor%20general/!ut/p/b1/vZTJjqMwFEW_pT4ghc3M0gFCwpiAGTcohEAgAxAIEL6-iVRSqVrq6k1X2ytL1-88H8smIiIgotu-L_J9V1S3_eW1jtiYAoqBEM0b_IpFYONSK4rREKXs4BwI5wD4w0Dg636LxALYQBGymssAXmIJnwjWIdTlyhgk2erpHOqi5vGXCSiJdF9eRSelpeXoN1zWiZ2aTI7jd454M5gz9CbXFopMkXK7ZlXSd0ycdjUX6pU8nfNCNq54VdybCF1aGlUDo6lUMqzS3B4efoTuBoUM_yEFDwE8TUvBKjDkHRjtIxNkmITVhlKUeLil9SOC7F3MTg3X1k3Yk_HKqt196zB30tvxHd3lJHs6ZeWTv9zTVPpw8s2h_-LUJ6LvtdEfgW-0m-vqeiTCOcZ91lGwB-Y6ANkO3AGe4whMBICOnfJZb6bzZJfg-TRlQLbTjoLYh6akYzORB9x5JpZpEsgkxHKnmVKq4ns4GKm-TT3bXSLJKOOH_Tvwa-OOQv00UGEsfpbJ4S1iyFkE-7-BzE8BFcvYiS-lePlSSq3XiNUpS4b_G_jv71AloiK5vg-H6zt4Z2jIMAIkBZbkSA5yhFeH9JicjfH1P1StV_YMgH4cHmkp1atsUY4oap-J6Fo6FC77zVozRXVE5tJouHHD9DAE-WnC16C9e5fLmDgtDPzzttk5IA9M3elxse6Gc9Ty2VjeTklwVuvDlhIYx_Cgod8kv1rVWm8vm1Ks5KYOfDHZDHnf0u1qz-UNnetRoQQ7Nuc1JDbxgT5Kg5ov-guSqfA0dy8IFhYaEI3VgvTd0Osyzmv748GX8NFiqsWeGryjPj_nGPIBxy5PMmy0_I2or26vszZvZp_TQG9vvwDkfinT/dl4/d5/L2dBISEvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/ 219.79.71.135 15:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Valderi da Silva — a random person — is not the owner of this video recorded by Kelmon. The original video in question was commonly shared by other channels and users and got repercussion, which explains the number of reuploads by different YouTube channels. Proof that the video existed before Valderi da Silva uploaded it: [4] [5] [6] Skyshifter (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with Skyshifter. It's sad that the lack of criteria for licensing content in YouTube videos is reflected here on Commons. Sturm (talk) 00:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This image is super low resolution, and while I have no doubt it is public domain, the uploader has falsely claimed it as their own work and marked it as CC-BY-SA-4.0. Mycranthebigman (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing correct source/license information. --Wdwd (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope. the usage of the image seems to be as spam Trade (talk) 22:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep In use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)- Delete--Trade (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: file is in use (=in scope). --Wdwd (talk) 19:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 18:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
file in copyviol: a trademark, non an "own" work — danyele 23:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 19:31, 16 October 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 01:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
First published in France, not PD yet — Racconish 💬 14:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2047. --Rosenzweig τ 16:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The mascot was created by Yoshiyuki Hayakawa in 2008. No permission from the creator, and falls under COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: non-free character. --Yasu (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The architect died in 1925: https://www.archi-wiki.org/Adresse:12_rue_du_Hohwald_(Strasbourg). Edelseider (talk) 05:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Architectural work in public domain. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork, artist is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This photo is not in the public domain because it has not been 70 years since the author died, the author died in the year 2000 Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in South Korea. A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:October Asia Stargate get open Wings Panmunyong - Master Asia Photography 2012 38 Degrees North Roter Mond - panoramio.jpg
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in South Korea. A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright belongs to the creator of this mascot per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright belongs to the creator of this mascot per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
They are temporarily artworks, so does not covered by FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Fails COM:CUR Euro due to COM:CUR Greece A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
obviously not self-made, not sure if it is trivial enough rubin16 (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This photo is not in the public domain because it has not been 70 years since the author died, the author died in the year 2000 Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Uruguay law assigns the copyright to the sitter, not the creator for portraits. --RAN (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This photo is not in the public domain because it has not been 70 years since the author died, the author died in the year 2000 Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Uruguay Law 9739 which says that Gardel owned the rights to the portrait. Uruguayan photographer José María Silva snapped the shutter on the camera, but Gardel held the rights to the image according to Uruguayan law. Gardel died in 1935. Binksternet (talk) 13:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cybularny as no permission (No permission since) Niegodzisie (talk) 06:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- At the very bottom of the page: "All content published on this website is covered by a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 PL license, unless stated otherwise". (Polish: "Wszystkie treści publikowane w serwisie są udostępniane na licencji Creative Commons: uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne - bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 PL), o ile nie jest to stwierdzone inaczej.") Niegodzisie (talk) 06:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Niegodzisie: Non commercial and no derviative restrictions make that licence incompatible with Commons:Licensing rules. Not all Creative Commons licences are acceptable on Wikimedia Commons. Note that gov.pl website has changed their licensing policy recently and media publish there since 19 August 2022 cannot be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons unless an individual free licence is provided via e-mail permission on VRT. See {{Gov.pl}}. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Cybularny, ok, didn't know about this change. Pity. Niegodzisie (talk) 20:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Cybularny, how about this link? There it is stated: "Licence Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Polsko". Niegodzisie (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- New source appears to be properly licensed. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Niegodzisie: Non commercial and no derviative restrictions make that licence incompatible with Commons:Licensing rules. Not all Creative Commons licences are acceptable on Wikimedia Commons. Note that gov.pl website has changed their licensing policy recently and media publish there since 19 August 2022 cannot be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons unless an individual free licence is provided via e-mail permission on VRT. See {{Gov.pl}}. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. —hueman1 (talk • uploads) 02:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete in view of this user's history on this site and en.wikipedia. Anyone who wants to understand why should just look through her global contributions, noting that she blanked her user talk page on Commons and tried to derail a unanimous vote to delete an article on Wikipedia by blanking the thread. Etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed.[7] Kareyac (talk) 03:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright 2022 [8] Kareyac (talk) 09:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Map not sourced Waran18 (talk) 15:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. No need for source; crude base map is likely hand-drawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RamaGaspar (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]COM:Derivative work of long texts. The Filipino-language texts are not simple listing or information, but some sort of blessing to the church. All texts are from 2020. Commercial licenses from the author/s are required.
- File:San Isidro Labrador Parish Church (Muzon, San Jose del Monte City) 05.jpg
- File:San Isidro Labrador Parish Church (Muzon, San Jose del Monte City) 04.jpg
- File:San Isidro Labrador Parish Church (Muzon, San Jose del Monte City) 02.jpg
- File:San Isidro Labrador Parish Church (Muzon, San Jose del Monte City) 03.jpg
- File:San Isidro Labrador Parish Church (Muzon, San Jose del Monte City) 01.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: I did text 2 members of the Pastoral Council of the Dioceses of Iba and Malolos on this matter; I will quote the reply: "the wooden frame is bought at nearby sash factories with benders while the metal is purchased at a Metal Craft shop; we send the wordings; here in Muzon Church, there is a concise recital of the history of the church based on verbal traditions; there is no prayer or invocation for in Canon Law and Church protocols, Prayers that are not lifted in the Bible etc. (like the monthly Missal printed by Guiguinto Press of Judge Hermin and Bokal Arceo undergoes long process of review, verification and finally the Vicar General, and Bishop's signing of Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur; Church historical markers and commemorative plaques underwent long evolution of change: from the 1939 NHC markers to Bishops Bartolome Gaspar Santos, Almario, Oliveros and Dennis Villarojo's appointing craftsmen not artists or artisans to make uniform Decretum, Markers, etc. - source from the Commissions of Liturgy and Temporaties et Vicar General"; nonetheless, I am just submitting their recital of facts and discussion reply to my text; I say the Commons is not bound by their opinions, thus I remain sincerely RamaGaspar (talk) 04:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC).
- @RamaGaspar: who is/are the authors of the texts? Will they be able to permit your use of commercial licensing in your photos of their works? Possibly they must send an email allowing people to freely exploit their works via COM:VRTS correspondence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RamaGaspar (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]There is no COM:FOP Philippines. Apparently the uploader has been warned before but continues to upload recent works by living architects and authors like photographers.
- Interior and exterior architecture
- File:Bulacan TravelMart Expo - Singkaban Festival 2022 06.jpg
- File:Vista Mall Malolos Interior 09.jpg
- File:Vista Mall Malolos 08.jpg
- File:Vista Mall Malolos 02.jpg
- File:Vista Mall Malolos 01.jpg
- Exhibit of photographs. Apparently temporal purpose.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Mr. Artemio C. Veneracion Jr., President of the Association of Rabbit Meat Producers, Inc. (ARaMP. Inc.) as well as Learning Site for Agriculture (LSA) per his wife exhibited this Category: Food menus in the Philippines; we confronted and discussed with him why the menu is not presentable or cheap, though; he politely replied, "my wife is so superstitious ... this menu was made by her by simple photo and xerox of her culinary rabbit cuisine ... it is 1 year old from home and we bought it here for Pung Soy Good Luck, since we raked moneys based on this Suerte menu"; he said that the menu is not temporary but is permanent due to Suerte of Pure Luck sincerely RamaGaspar (talk) 05:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC).
- Comment: I asked the administration of Vista Mall and I was informed that like Camella and all other buildings of Mannuel and Cynthia Villar, are pre-fabricated copy cat so to speak; as genius, they said, it is ridiculous for the spouses to hire and pay architects, when their son Sen Mark is expert on civil and archetectural aspects; Vista Mall, like Divimart and Walter Mart is composed of a) stone masonry and civil engineering of the body and then b) read made pre fab parts are assembled, like most of fast food chains like Jolibbe McDo Mang Inasal; thus Edward J. Aguilar personally drew and pre fact the P 160 million Baliuag Padre Pio church; tersely, it is sad to say that all Vista Malls have no artistic but only copy cats, sincerely RamaGaspar (talk) 09:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC).
- I don't see how this is prefabricated. @RamaGaspar: , the interior looks well-designed. The ceilings, the floor levels, circular atrium. See File:Bulacan TravelMart Expo - Singkaban Festival 2022 06.jpg. How can this well-designed interior be fabricated? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Re: photos. The way the photos were distributed is irrelevant. The question is, who is the photographer? Did he/she authorized you to license your photo of his/her photos under commercial licensing? Such permit must be forwarded by email to Wikimedia Foundation through COM:VRTS correspondence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: I asked the administration of Vista Mall and I was informed that like Camella and all other buildings of Mannuel and Cynthia Villar, are pre-fabricated copy cat so to speak; as genius, they said, it is ridiculous for the spouses to hire and pay architects, when their son Sen Mark is expert on civil and archetectural aspects; Vista Mall, like Divimart and Walter Mart is composed of a) stone masonry and civil engineering of the body and then b) read made pre fab parts are assembled, like most of fast food chains like Jolibbe McDo Mang Inasal; thus Edward J. Aguilar personally drew and pre fact the P 160 million Baliuag Padre Pio church; tersely, it is sad to say that all Vista Malls have no artistic but only copy cats, sincerely RamaGaspar (talk) 09:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RamaGaspar (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]COM:SPAM and COM:WEBHOSTING. These three images are already redundant to the existing identical images of the same type of transmission towers at Category:High-voltage overhead power lines in the Philippines. There is no need to make Commons an Instagram-like social media platform of every transmission tower in Bulacan, which has been over-covered here on Commons. Uploader RamaGaspar seems to be treating Commons as his social media platform.
- File:Electricity pylons in the Philippines Barangay Longos 08.jpg
- File:Electricity pylons in the Philippines Barangay Longos 07.jpg
- File:Electricity pylons in the Philippines Barangay Longos 06.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Category:High-voltage overhead power lines in the Philippines shows only 79 images. Is that all there are? If so, I see no compelling reason to hide any of them and would vote to Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: that's already too many, considering most of the images come from w:en:Bulacan province, which is already over-covered here. Too many Bulacan transmission towers already, these three only reduce the overall quality of the category (ref. to Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - Ritanila - IMG 2466 De profeet Jesaja, d'Eijck.jpg). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Question All 79 images in the broad category are from Bulacan? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: 38 are from Bulacan, which is already a subsantial number. Inclusive of many images in two of its subcategories: all from Category:Hermosa-San Jose Transmission Line and more than half from Category:Hermosa–Duhat–Balintawak Transmission Line (North Luzon Expressway segment), this counts to more than a hundred images of such transmission towers from Bulacan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: there are only 3 images in the area of Longos, Malolos City; we discovered at the site that these pylons are at the status of maintenance or upgrading due to power outages we have not yet uploaded photos taken Pylon maintenance and construction in the Philippines Category:Pylon maintenance and construction in the Philippines : the NGCP is in the process of Pylon maintenance and construction or Tower Erection like in Sulipan, Apalit and Tarcan, Baliuag to improve its service; and in Pylon maintenance and construction there are only 4 and Philippines is one of them; sincerely RamaGaspar (talk) 05:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC).
- @RamaGaspar: sorry but the towers are all virtually same in appearance. Because of that the towers are potentially out of scope. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. There are 592 photos in its category! But honestly JWilz12345, this DR was a bit silly. I'm surprised why you singled-out these 3 files when the category is full of near-duplicate images, many portraying electricity pylons much poorer way. Kept one as OK. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:33, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RamaGaspar (talk · contribs) 4
[edit]Violation of sculptors' copyrights. Derivative works of statues of Blessed w:en:Carlo Acutis, who died in 2006 and was beatified only in 2020. Hence the sculptors are unlikely to be dead for more than 50 years. The statues may be of temporal exhibition during the occasion, and it is unsire if some are to be placed permanently inside the church (which may benefit from future freedom of panorama) or not (not: those that were only brought by parishioners to bless or consecrate them, then afterwards will be brought back home after the occasion).
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta 05.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta 04.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta 06.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta 03.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta 02.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta 01.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 50.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 49.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 46.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 15.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 14.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 13.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 12.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 11.jpg
- File:Carlo Acutis Baliwag Fiesta Patronales 2022 10.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment and opposition: In my humble view, I am submitting the grounds to Keep: a) the Pilgrim Carlo Acutis Reliquary (Baliuag Church) and Statue are parts of The Tour, “Byahe ni Kuya Carlo”; b) on April 19, 2021, Bishop Dennis Cabanada Villarojo, D.D., Ph.D., granted the petition of the Biyahe ni Kuya Carlo Movement of the Friends of Blessed Carlo Acutis Philippines to be the movement’s Bishop Promoter; c) On July 27, 2022 Bishop Villarojo officiated the Solemn Liturgical Reception of the new pilgrim relic] ex corpore et ex capilis (from the body and hair), a d) Gift from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Assisi-Nocera Umbra-Gualdo Tadino and the Associazione Amici di Carlo Acutis;” e) led by Hermano Mayor Mackee Tengco Burgos (2nd child of Victoria Rodriguez Tengco-Burgos, with siblings Vicsi and Vimmy Tengco-Burgos), f) clearly the Carlo Acutis statue's and reliquary's ownership including all other remaining rights to these, are absolutely transfered via Donation Inter Vivos by Diocese to Diocese to the Tengcos-Biyahe ni Kuya Carlo Movement of the Friends of Blessed Carlo Acutis Philippines to be the movement’s Bishop Promoter; g) ad cautelam and asssuming for the sake of argument that the Bureau of Copyright and its legal division vis-à-vis the Phil Copyright law are consulted, the Transferors foreigners are not protected and they cannot enforce any right under the Philippine law; g) for instance, the transferor would file a copyright violation in the Bureau of Copyright, forthwith that would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or legal personality; h) the sculpture and reliquary were and are meant to promote Carlo Acutis for Canonization by the owner Tengcos as Promoter in all the areas under the jurisdiction of the Diocese of Malolos; i) Blessed Carlo Acutis wooden sculpture by Felman Limlengco Bagalso of Paete, Laguna is another story, unlike the foreign Gift to the Tengcos; since there is no copyright violation which can be invoked by any foreign architect etc.; regrettably I humbly oppose the deletion for lack of utter merit, sincerely RamaGaspar (talk) 07:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC).
- Relevant response to RamaGaspar: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statues and Reliquaries of Blessed Carlo Acutis in the Philippines, which is applicable for this case. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment and opposition: In my humble view, I am submitting the grounds to Keep: a) the Pilgrim Carlo Acutis Reliquary (Baliuag Church) and Statue are parts of The Tour, “Byahe ni Kuya Carlo”; b) on April 19, 2021, Bishop Dennis Cabanada Villarojo, D.D., Ph.D., granted the petition of the Biyahe ni Kuya Carlo Movement of the Friends of Blessed Carlo Acutis Philippines to be the movement’s Bishop Promoter; c) On July 27, 2022 Bishop Villarojo officiated the Solemn Liturgical Reception of the new pilgrim relic] ex corpore et ex capilis (from the body and hair), a d) Gift from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Assisi-Nocera Umbra-Gualdo Tadino and the Associazione Amici di Carlo Acutis;” e) led by Hermano Mayor Mackee Tengco Burgos (2nd child of Victoria Rodriguez Tengco-Burgos, with siblings Vicsi and Vimmy Tengco-Burgos), f) clearly the Carlo Acutis statue's and reliquary's ownership including all other remaining rights to these, are absolutely transfered via Donation Inter Vivos by Diocese to Diocese to the Tengcos-Biyahe ni Kuya Carlo Movement of the Friends of Blessed Carlo Acutis Philippines to be the movement’s Bishop Promoter; g) ad cautelam and asssuming for the sake of argument that the Bureau of Copyright and its legal division vis-à-vis the Phil Copyright law are consulted, the Transferors foreigners are not protected and they cannot enforce any right under the Philippine law; g) for instance, the transferor would file a copyright violation in the Bureau of Copyright, forthwith that would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or legal personality; h) the sculpture and reliquary were and are meant to promote Carlo Acutis for Canonization by the owner Tengcos as Promoter in all the areas under the jurisdiction of the Diocese of Malolos; i) Blessed Carlo Acutis wooden sculpture by Felman Limlengco Bagalso of Paete, Laguna is another story, unlike the foreign Gift to the Tengcos; since there is no copyright violation which can be invoked by any foreign architect etc.; regrettably I humbly oppose the deletion for lack of utter merit, sincerely RamaGaspar (talk) 07:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:33, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Logo of unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Logo of unknown copyright status Pierre cb (talk) 16:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gouwenaar as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see this website, uploader does not have the rights to provide a license. Previously speedily deleted, restored per COM:UNDEL to allow discussion to continue on whether this qualifies for {{PD-USGov-Military-Army}}. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Info Previous discussion: Special:Permalink/692125742#File:Charles Vanden Bulck (1904-1962) portrait.jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note, another, possibly applicable template might be {{PD-USGov-DOE}}. This template is used on other photos of the Manhattan project, like this one. Ellywa (talk) 00:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as per the discussion on UDR. Yann (talk) 15:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Republishing a 1940s image does not restart the copyright clock or transfer the copyright. An image from the 1940s, to be eligible for a copyright, would have to be registered with the copyright office up until 1964, and have the copyright renewed. A description of this image does not appear in the copyright database, or the renewal database. United States case law declares that when the image leaves the custody of the photographer, it is "made public". --RAN (talk) 00:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion here and at UDR. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
UK threshold of originality is very low and can apply even to simple typographical elements (e.g. the "CR III") and the Crown retains copyright on original works (in fact, they are particularly litigious, evidently, with footage of Elizabeth II's funeral). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The rendition of the monogram is not the same as the official version, and there are differences in the characters and their positioning. This is heraldically valid, see Template:Coa blazon. This is clearly the royal monogram, but it is not the same emblazonment that is protected by copyright. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It would have been just as easy to copy the official image from Buckingham Palace and upload it onto the commons, but I believe the cypher's current state (as it was re-created) is not any different than Elizabeth II's or other cyphers previously uploaded onto the commons. This is not an original work that falls under Crown copyright.
- That Coptic Guy (talk) 00:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @That Coptic Guy: I did just that. Do you think the deletion should be contested? File:Cypher of Charles III.webp. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Koavf I'm not sure how else you expect me to answer. No, the deletion shouldn't be contested. @Di (they-them)'s work is recreation of the cypher whereas your image is the official cypher itself. That Coptic Guy (talk) 01:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @That Coptic Guy: I thought you just wrote, "It would have been just as easy to copy the official image from Buckingham Palace and upload it onto the commons", implying that it would have been acceptable to do that. I still don't understand what you mean by that. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- What I meant to say was that that would have been the simplest thing to do (and have the image subsequently rejected), but the artist decided to take the time to re-create it. That's all I meant lol That Coptic Guy (talk) 01:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- But if I personally recreate a copyrighted work, that doesn't make it no longer copyrighted. That's literally what copyright means. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- What I meant to say was that that would have been the simplest thing to do (and have the image subsequently rejected), but the artist decided to take the time to re-create it. That's all I meant lol That Coptic Guy (talk) 01:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @That Coptic Guy: I thought you just wrote, "It would have been just as easy to copy the official image from Buckingham Palace and upload it onto the commons", implying that it would have been acceptable to do that. I still don't understand what you mean by that. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Koavf I'm not sure how else you expect me to answer. No, the deletion shouldn't be contested. @Di (they-them)'s work is recreation of the cypher whereas your image is the official cypher itself. That Coptic Guy (talk) 01:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Elizabeth II's cypher was out of copyright at the time it was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. It was designed during, or prior to, 1953, and so was out of copyright in 2004 at the latest, and was only uploaded in 2014.
- The cypher of Charles III will be out of copyright in late 2072 (assuming the law does not change, and is not given to the public domain before then). Timtjtim (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- That's my understanding, too. Do you think this means that this file is not acceptable here? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @That Coptic Guy: I did just that. Do you think the deletion should be contested? File:Cypher of Charles III.webp. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, the drawings themselves are not derived from a (non-free) copyrighted source and were created from the blazon, per Di — Berrely • T∕C 06:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It's a British government work, the work of a government official working for a government agency, so should be available under the same rules as, say, photographs from the Ministry of Defence, which we frequently host here without issue. As with coats of arms, simply illustrating the state emblems is not a problem, the issue of rights only arises when one attempts to use the image to confer the impression that the relevant armiger is connected with something he is not. Putting the royal arms on a Wiki page is fine, putting them on the packaging of something you're selling to give off the idea you hold a royal warrant is obviously something quite different. A disembodied royal cypher is the same: a generic state symbol as freely available for educational uses as any government or military symbol; putting it on a cast iron red box in the hope of diverting the Royal Mail is something else entirely. GPinkerton (talk) 00:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not saying there's a trademark infringement, but a copyright one. Did you read this? Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Crown_copyright —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: This recreation is different from the original version and so does not inherit its copyright status. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation. The source is taken from Twitter and shows no claims of the file being released in public domain Rejoy2003 21:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete also eligible under COM:CSD F1 as unlicensed -- DaxServer (talk) 19:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE. The Burj Khalifa is too prominent that fails de minimis, details of the tower can be retouched to make it clear, so it is also not allowed A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Question We really have to concern ourselves with people retouching photos? Hell, someone could draw an outline of a copyrighted building on top of a photo. I think we have to judge the photo as it is. Whether the Burj Khalifa is de minimis or not would be a matter of UAE copyright law; I hope the admin who closes this nomination knows what it states in these kinds of cases, because I (and perhaps you) don't know what is or is not de minimis there in non-obvious cases. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Casablanca Twin Center
[edit]The tower was completed in 1999 by Ricardo Bofill (1939–2022). There is no freedom of panorama in Morocco. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2093.
- File:IMG 3932-TC-.JPG
- File:Maârif, Morocco - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:P1020209 (7348591196).jpg
- File:P1020282 (7348586868).jpg
- File:P1020285 (7162398085).jpg
- File:Twin Center, Casablanca, Morocco (5422908111) (6).jpg
- File:Twin Center, Casablanca.jpg
- File:Twin centre.jpg
- File:Twins - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:توين سانتر.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Can File:Twins - panoramio (5).jpg be applied de minimis? Ox1997cow (talk) 13:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- May not be, because the tower occupied almost entire left side of the photo. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Well, has the two towers really reached the level of creativity here? Lukas Beck (talk) 04:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, architectural work is still an architecture, especially if it was designed by a noteworthy architect, here Bofill. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
First published in France, not PD yet. — Racconish 💬 14:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and copy to en.wp. Image is in use on en.wp (and is a featured picture there), and is PD in the U.S. as PD-US-expired. Toohool (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Toohool: If you (or anyone else) wants to move this file to en.wp, do it now. There is no automatic process for this, and it is not part of the closure of this DR to move the file to other wikis. --Rosenzweig τ 10:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Uploaded to en.wp and updated the pages that include it. The DR closure process should absolutely include allowances for copying the file to other wikis that are using it and might accept it under local policy. Not doing so undermines the trust that other WMF projects are supposed to be able to have in Commons as a file hosting platform. Toohool (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Toohool: Commons has its own licensing regulations and this file does not comply with them. It's good that you've uploaded to en.wp, but it is absolutely not the job of Commons to retain files that are non-compliant just because another project deems them valuable. You can always go back to the original source anyway. Amakuru (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: You're entitled to that opinion, but in my view it's bureaucratic thinking that is not constructive. Commons was created as a platform to serve other WMF projects. People upload to Commons mainly because other projects like en.wp strongly encourage people to come here. There's a trust relationship that needs to be kept in mind. As for the original source, it is not always available or easily accessible. Toohool (talk) 15:46, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Toohool: alright then, and sorry if I seemed rude. Amakuru (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: You're entitled to that opinion, but in my view it's bureaucratic thinking that is not constructive. Commons was created as a platform to serve other WMF projects. People upload to Commons mainly because other projects like en.wp strongly encourage people to come here. There's a trust relationship that needs to be kept in mind. As for the original source, it is not always available or easily accessible. Toohool (talk) 15:46, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Toohool: Commons has its own licensing regulations and this file does not comply with them. It's good that you've uploaded to en.wp, but it is absolutely not the job of Commons to retain files that are non-compliant just because another project deems them valuable. You can always go back to the original source anyway. Amakuru (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Uploaded to en.wp and updated the pages that include it. The DR closure process should absolutely include allowances for copying the file to other wikis that are using it and might accept it under local policy. Not doing so undermines the trust that other WMF projects are supposed to be able to have in Commons as a file hosting platform. Toohool (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Mettle30
[edit]Mettle30 has uploaded many, many copyright violations. Currently, they have over 100 uploaded images on Commons. The large majority of them do not have exif data, are wildly different resolutions, in png format, and reverse image searches finds many of these images elsewhere online. However, they do seem to have uploaded some of their own work, judging by exif data and file format. I am requesting that all images uploaded by them be removed, except for images that have exif data showing a camera model of "Nokia 7 plus" (e.g., File:Khurmi, Chhattisgarhi Cuisine.jpg, File:Angakar roti , Chhattisgarhi Cuisine.jpg). PD-logo images should remain as well, but all others should be deleted as they are likely copyright violations. – Pbrks (t • c) 14:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Info Please supply a list of all files which should be deleted in your opinion.--Wdwd (talk) 19:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No list of files was provided. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio
TOO? Achim55 (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a US company, so I think it likely falls below the threshold of originality per COM:TOO US. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: and license changed to PD-textlogo. --Achim55 (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit should read: David Parry/PA Media Assignments, not works from FCDO A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. If the FCDO doesn't hold the rights to this photo, then a lot of Category:People signing condolence books for Elizabeth II will likely have to be deleted as well. Yeeno (talk) 08:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 12:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit should read: Jonathan Hordle/PA Media Assignments, not works from the FCDO A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel You could've changed it yourself. Why nominate for deletion? Prodrummer619 (talk) 05:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- There is no proof that Jonathan Hordle allows FCDO to publish their image under a free license. Please submit the permission to VRT--A1Cafel (talk) 10:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Original from which this was extracted was deleted as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:People signing condolence books for Elizabeth II. --Xover (talk) 12:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Downloaded from radiozamaneh.com (Persian-language radio based on the Netherlands): check watermark Carnby (talk) 05:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The source of download is not relevant as the image is almost certainly {{PD-Iran}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per IronGargoyle. Photo is dated in File:BankMelli1946.jpg to 1946, so an Iranian pub. +30 copyright for photographs had most likely expired well before the URAA. If significant evidence indicates it was unpublished, or was simultaneously published in the US with a copyright notice and renewal, the issue can be reassessed. Given the low resolution etc. I think this is too trivial to worry too much about the theoretical paths that could lead to this photo still being under copyright. If Iran revises their copyright law and makes it retroactive we may need to reassess. --Xover (talk) 12:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Worldlydev as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Hans Majestet Kongens Garde.svg|2= Coat of arms uses an incorrect crown, the other version is of a higher quality.|3= Worldlydev
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as these images are not really duplicate as they differ in color/hue. An expert-opinion is needed to tell us which color/hue is correct. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't speak to the specific hue, but as with all heraldry the precise hue is a matter for interpretation for each person rendering it (cf. eg. the many renderings of w:Shakespeare coat of arms). However, File:HM Kongens Garde.svg is clearly incorrect as it contains that little blue thingy inside the circle right below the cross on the crown. That part appears to possibly be a bit of the Flag of Sweden. There's an image showing the actual patch in this Facebook post for reference. --Xover (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Xover, image clearly shows a mistake and has no educational use and is therefore out of COM:SCOPE. I replaced the only use at the projects at by the correct version. --Ellywa (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Apparent car plates Fresseng (talk) 08:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I propose to suppress the 2016 version which has apparent car plates. They are blurred on the 2022 version Fresseng (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Fresseng: If the intent was to make the license plates illegible you need to apply more aggressive blurring, or even more effective (blur filters can be reversed) to replace the license plates with either a solid colour or a dummy pattern that looks like a blurred license plate. I'm not really sure hiding license plates in a public place is really necessary though. Xover (talk) 11:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete or rather COM:REVDEL per nom; and applicable to all older versions if uploader uploads further redacted versions. --Xover (talk) 11:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. While I think the impulse to blur plates is well-intentioned, does it really have a policy backing to it? Car plates are fundamentally public information. Only the names that are registered with them are (sometimes) private. Also, I think the fear that encourages blurring is considerably overblown. If someone wanted to clone a car plate, it would be far easier to snap a photo of some random car they walked by. Why would someone go to Wikimedia Commons? Having photos of car plates on Wikimedia Commons does not increase the cumulative risk to society or the people whose cars are photographed. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Just to add: I guess I ultimately support the request to revdel because it was made by the uploader within 7 days, but I just wanted to get that off my chest. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for this and for your comment ! You are indeed perfectly right. However, the owner of this Castle has asked me to remove the car plates of its employees. I guess this can be called a policy.--Fresseng (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: kept the last version, deleted the first upload per COM:COURTESY and remark of IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
This photo is not in the public domain because it has not been 70 years since the author died, the author died in the year 2000 Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep – The "Permission" field claims that Gardel is the author because of Law 9739. Is that not true? GA-RT-22 (talk) 12:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Uruguay Law 9739 which says that Gardel owned the rights to the portrait. Uruguayan photographer José María Silva snapped the shutter on the camera, but Gardel held the rights to the image according to Uruguayan law. Gardel died in 1935. Binksternet (talk) 13:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: I have checked the law and I can confirm it says what the file description says. The link is a deadlink, but I found the text of the law here (I hope this other link works, if not just go to https://parlamento.gub.uy/ and manually search for law 9739). Cambalachero (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. An English translation of the law is available on WIPOLex and, although the translation isn't great, Art. 20 does indeed seem to say that when a photograph of a person was taken by request of that person, then the copyright vests in the subject not the photographer.However, since the subject died in 1935 the copyright didn't expire in Uruguay until the end of 2005. That means it was not in the public domain in the country of origin on the URAA date and consequently had its US copyright restored to a pub. +95 term. According to enWP the photo was taken in 1933—and given it seems like a promo photo I think it's reasonable to assume it was published more or less immediately—so the US copyright will expire at the end of 2028 (so undel in 2029).The only open (theoretical) paths to the public domain I can see for this photo are 1) that it was simultaneously (within 30 days) published in the US without notice or renewal, or 2) that the date is wrong and the photo was really taken before 1928. I don't hold either as likely, but those are the paths to pursue evidence for in order to keep this image. --Xover (talk) 08:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Remark, if it is decided to delete this image, File:Gardel color.jpg should be deleted as well, as a derivative work. Ellywa (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: As I see it, while the copyright in commissioned portraits in Uruguay is owned by the portrayed person (article 20), the actual copyright term is still tied to the person of the author (article 14). Other countries had a provision like this in older versions of their copyright laws too, I can think of Sweden and the UK. So while Gardel's heirs still own the copyright to that photograph, the term (70 years pma in Uruguay since 2019) is still tied to the photographer José María Silva, who died in 2000. So I've decided to delete this file and its colorized version. They can be restored in 2071. The US copyrights will have expired by then as well. --Rosenzweig τ 13:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:G. L. Manuel frères
[edit]These are photographs from a Paris (France) based photo studio, G. L. Manuel frères, active from 1913 to 1939. G. L. are the two owners, two photographer brothers, Gaston Manuel and Lucien Manuel. There's a third brother, fr:Henri Manuel, who had a photo studio with his brother Gaston starting in 1900, until he went solo in 1913, and Gaston founded G. L. Manuel frères with his other brother Lucien. That probably explains why various web sites (including Wikidata) have 1900 as the year in which G. L. Manuel frères was founded.
Anyway, according to fr:Henri Manuel, Gaston Manuel lived from 1881 to 1967, and Lucien Manuel lived from 1882 to 1971. Archival records of the French Legion of Honor I could access with [9] confirm a December 28, 1967 death date for Gaston Manuel and a December 27, 1971 death date for Lucien Manuel. Which means their works are still copyrighted in France (and some of their works are most likely also still protected in the US because of the URAA if published, like postcards and such).
It is reasonable to assume that if two photographer brothers have a common studio, they are also the authors of the photographs by this studio. So all these photographs are still protected by copyright, and the files should be deleted. The files can be restored in 2042, 70 years after the death of Lucien Manuel. Any US copyrights for works published no later than 1939 should have expired as well by then.
- File:Académie goncourt Rosny l'ainé in toute l'édition.jpg
- File:Alexandra Balachova et Victor Smolzoff.jpg
- File:Alexandra Balachova.jpg
- File:Amiral François Darlan.jpg
- File:André Malraux - 1933.jpg
- File:Anna de Noailles Dornac (cropped).jpg
- File:Anna de Noailles Dornac.jpg
- File:Augusta Moll-Weiss.jpg
- File:Bernard Zimmer by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Camille Bos.jpg
- File:Camille Mauclair 1921.jpg
- File:Claire-Clémence de Polignac, née de Maillé de la Tour-Landry (1918-1970) (phbd05 0025).jpg
- File:Francis Jammes 1927.jpg
- File:Félix Goudard, administrateur général du carburateur Solex durant les années 1930, officier de la Légion d'Honneur 1935 au titre du ministère de l'air.jpg
- File:Gabrielle Dorziat (par Manuel frères).jpg
- File:Georges Claretie.png
- File:Georges Dolley by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Guilbert-Chiffon.jpg
- File:Gustave Libeau by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:JB-410-1925-Lieutenant-Colonel-1.jpg
- File:JB-410-1920-pilot-1.jpg
- File:Jean Desbons.jpg
- File:Les enfants Borelli.jpg
- File:Louis Aragon - prix Renaudot.jpg
- File:Louis Barthou vers 1925.jpg
- File:Louis Verneuil by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Ludmilla Pitoëff by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Manuel de Falla by Studio G. L. Manuel frères (cropped).jpg
- File:Manuel de Falla by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Marcel Dupont.jpg
- File:Marguerite-dEscola-1931.jpg
- File:Maurice Ravel & Lily Laskine 1935 tornada cadrar.jpg
- File:Maurice Ravel & Lily Laskine 1935.jpg
- File:Maurice Renard (1875-1939).jpg
- File:Max d'Ollone BNF.jpg
- File:Mlle Bizoulette.jpg
- File:Partition mistinguett Mario Cazes.jpg
- File:Paul Chack, 1934.jpg
- File:Paul Faure.jpg
- File:Photographie de Claude Jonquière en 1933.png
- File:Photographie de Saint-Ange.png
- File:Pierre Drieu la Rochelle 1934.jpg
- File:Pol Rab by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Portrett av den norsk-amerikanske sopranen Grace Holst (1892-1975) (34598798554).jpg
- File:Raquel Meller by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:René jouglet.jpg
- File:Rhené-Baton 01.jpg
- File:Rigaud Air embaumé 1931.jpg
- File:Robert Pierre-Léon Lespieau. Photograph by G.L. Manuel Frère Wellcome V0026699.jpg
- File:Robert Rey (1888-1964).jpg
- File:Roger Vincent, Max Doria, De Nevry et Anne Mariel.jpg
- File:Régine Flory by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:S. E. M. Arciniegas - 1924.jpg
- File:S. E. M. de Peralta - 1924.jpg
- File:S. E. M. Gonzalo Zaldumbide - 1924.jpg
- File:Un jardin sur l'Oronte (opéra) 1.jpg
- File:Un jardin sur l'Oronte (opéra) 2.jpg
- File:Unė Babickaitė performing in 1929.jpeg
Rosenzweig τ 15:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If the photographs are credited to "Studio G.L. Manuel Frères" and not "G.L. Manuel Frères", then it is a company and not individuals.They are protected 70 years from publication not 70 years pma if they are considered as collective works (cf Studio d'Harcourt jurisprudence). — Racconish 💬 16:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I saw, they are rarely credited to a studio (even though some editors here often wrote that in the file description template; an exception where it is right on the postcard is File:Paul Faure.jpg) or atelier. They are usually credited to G.-L. Manuel frères, G. L. Manuel frères, Manuel frères, G. & L. Manuel or Gaston Lucien Manuel. --Rosenzweig τ 17:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- See here the rejected forms. — Racconish 💬 20:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I saw, they are rarely credited to a studio (even though some editors here often wrote that in the file description template; an exception where it is right on the postcard is File:Paul Faure.jpg) or atelier. They are usually credited to G.-L. Manuel frères, G. L. Manuel frères, Manuel frères, G. & L. Manuel or Gaston Lucien Manuel. --Rosenzweig τ 17:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- We have {{PD-France}} for collective works, which says right in the template The collective work status is quite restrictive, please make sure that it is actually established. Is it? en.wp has an article on these collective works, en:Collective work (France), which says The concept of a collective work (œuvre collective) in French law is complicated and unclear, [...] The article goes on to say that all authorities agree that the concept of an oeuvre collective in France covers dictionaries, encyclopaedias and periodical works such as newspapers or magazines. I can't find photographs here. Later paragraphs of that article focus on contributions of employees who transfer their authorship rights in a collective work to a maître: The maître takes all the ownership rights in a collective work, and these rights are directly vested in the maître rather than transferred from the contributors, as long as the maître directed the creative process enough for it to be considered a collective work. Here we have a photo studio jointly owned by two brothers, so not employees, but owners. Probably not the same as Studio d'Harcourt. Can you provide links to more discussion, case law etc. about this? --Rosenzweig τ 16:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- You can forget these irrelevant examples
. There is now a jurisprudence in France for the application of the concept of collective works to studio photos. If the corporate look is predominant, if it looks like a photo by Studio X and not by photographer Y, then it is a collective work. You will find easily a lot of discussion on the Studio d'Harcourt case. Here is one. Here is a more recent case. — Racconish 💬 16:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- You can forget these irrelevant examples
- Arguments are admissible and should be taken into account in order to comprehensively prevent any legal issue. Trauenbaum (talk) 05:51, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_St._Martinus,_Frontansicht.jpg){kind=link}
![89 File:Album "Blues zapomnianych serc".jpg](#File:Album_"Blues_zapomnianych_serc".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg_+_File:Padre_Kelmon_no_YouTube.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5143995251).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
,_1924,_Man_Ray.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_St._Martinus,_Frontansicht.jpg){kind=link}
,_St._Martinus,_Frontansicht.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_St._Martinus,_Frontansicht.jpg){kind=link}
,_St._Martinus,_Frontansicht.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pm_B002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_1844.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_1845.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_1846.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_1847.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_1848.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1973,_MiNr_1849.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1976,_MiNr_2118.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_2236.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_2237.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_2238.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_2239.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1977,_MiNr_2240.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2326.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2327.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2328.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2329.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2361.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_2414.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_2415.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_2416.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1979,_MiNr_2417.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1980,_MiNr_2502.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1980,_MiNr_2562.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1980,_MiNr_2563.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1980,_MiNr_2564.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1980,_MiNr_2565.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1980,_MiNr_Block_058.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1980,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2562,_2564.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1980,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2563,_2565.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_2599.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_2629.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_2630.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_2631.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_2632.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_Block_063.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2629,_2631.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2630,_2632.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2699.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2700.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2751.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2752.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2753.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2770.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2780.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2831.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2832.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2868.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2893.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2894.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2895.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2896.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_Block_078.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2965.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2966.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2967.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2965,_2966.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_2993.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_2994.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_2995.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_2996.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3005.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3006.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3007.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3008.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3023.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3024.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3025.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_Block_084.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_Bogen_3005-3008.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_3005-3008.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3072.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3076.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3075.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3149.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3150.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3151.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3152.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1988,_MiNr_3208.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_3238.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_3239.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_3240.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_3320.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_3321.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_3360.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_3361.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_3362.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_3363.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2779.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2792.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2793.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2794.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2795.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2792,_2793.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2794,_2795.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2864.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2865.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2866.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2867.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2864,_2867.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_2865,_2866.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2951.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2957.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2958.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3026.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3027.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3071.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3073.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3074.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3075.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3077.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3078.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3123.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3128.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_3129.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Block_089.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3076.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3077.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_3078.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(05-09-2021).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![21:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/26#c-CoffeeEngineer-20220926211400-File:Album_"Blues_zapomnianych_serc".jpg){kind=link}
![14:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/26#c-Wdwd-20221004143600-File:Album_"Blues_zapomnianych_serc".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Agir%C3%AE.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg_+_File:Padre_Kelmon_no_YouTube.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg_+_File:Padre_Kelmon_no_YouTube.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5143995251).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5143995251).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(5143995251).jpg){kind=link}
_(5143995251).jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RichardTrentonChase.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1924,_Man_Ray.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1924,_Man_Ray.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_1924,_Man_Ray.png){kind=link}
,_1924,_Man_Ray.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(phbd05_0025).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(34598798554).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep as per Racconish above. Yann (talk) 12:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
The BNF has determined that these file are in the public domain in France
[edit]- File:Alexandra Balachova et Victor Smolzoff.jpg
- File:Alexandra Balachova.jpg
- File:Camille Bos.jpg
- File:Mlle Bizoulette.jpg
Ces fichiers proviennent du site Internet de la Bibliothèque nationale de France (BNF). La BNF a établi que ce fichier est dans le domaine public en France; These files come from the website of the National Library of France (BNF). The BNF has determined that these files are in the public domain in France. Keep it --L'Ange au Sourire (talk) 16:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Did they also tell why they think these are in the public domain in France? --Rosenzweig τ 16:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I've looked them all up on the BNF web site. The German language version does not say anything about the rights status, French says «Droits : Consultable en ligne», and the English version says “Rights : Public domain”. That is not exactly a clear statement, you could even say it is downright confusing. --Rosenzweig τ 16:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I would agree the argument of the authority of BNF to assess copyright is not very strong. BNF considers all periodical publications that have stopped their publication more than 70 years ago to be collective works, regardless of the question whether the copyright ot a certain work incorporated in that publication can be assigned to a person because it is signed. The question here is rather : should it be assigned to a person or to a collective entity with no way of knwowing precisely who did what? — Racconish 💬 17:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep all the deletion reason sounds like an exercise in original legal research and a case of copyright paranoia. There is an argument for collective work. BNF has identified at least a few files as PD. Another file (File:Unė Babickaitė performing in 1929.jpeg) has been also identified as PD by a Lithuanian museum. I don't see a compelling reason to argue otherwise. Renata3 (talk) 01:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
File from Norwegian National Library
[edit]The source of File:Portrett av den norsk-amerikanske sopranen Grace Holst (1892-1975) (34598798554).jpg can be found at The Website of Norwegian National Library. I see no reason to preemptively override their determination of this image being Public Domain. So I at least vote keep for this image. The others, I haven't looked into. TommyG (talk) 07:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Response
[edit] Comment I'll respond here to several arguments brought in this discussion (above). I'll list them below in bullet point form and sign each section separately to allow for easy and transparent discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – original legal research: That is not an argument here at Wikimedia Commons. Unlike Wikipedia, where "original research" is frowned upon as a source for writing articles, Commons is a repository that hosts many millions of media files, but only if they are freely licensed or in the public domain. Establishing the copyright status of these files is what we need to do here, and we can't do that by just regurgitating what others have claimed. I'm an admin here, and trying to get the copyright facts is part of the job description. --Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – copyright paranoia: Finding out that some files that are hosted here may actually not be freely licensed or in the public domain, and subsequently nominating them for deletion giving the detailed reasons why, is in no way "paranoia". It's part of the necessary process to keep Wikimedia Commons running and to minimize negative legal repercussions both for the project and its users. If you haven't done so yet, please read Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, where it says:
- "Also, arguments that amount to "we can get away with it", such as the following, are against Commons' aims:"
- "The copyright owner will not bother to sue or cannot afford to."
- "The copyright owner will never find out."
- "The copyright owner will not mind/should be pleased that we have disseminated their work."
- "Nobody knows who the copyright owner is, so it really doesn’t matter."
- "The file is obviously common property. It can be found all over the internet and nobody has complained." --Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – the BNF or some other library/museum determined this or that file to be in the public domain: Did the BNF really do that? As I remember, years ago they claimed many of their online contents to be in the public domain, but more or less quietly changed that to "Consultable en ligne" (viewable online). Like in this case: I checked all four files that were mentioned, and in every case the BNF now has them as "Consultable en ligne" (while the English language version of the web site still has them as "Public domain"). As I wrote above: That is not exactly a clear statement, you could even say it is downright confusing, and I don't think you can say that the BNF "has determined that these files are in the public domain in France".
- This is not the only library, archive or museum to be (apparently) confused about copyright. Heidelberg University Library here in Germany posted the complete Jugend magazine online, 1896 to 1940. At first, they also claimed that these volumes were in the public domain, despite lots of illustrations in that magazine by (credited) artists who died less than 70 years ago. Then, after questions from Wikipedia/Commons users, they changed it to "Rechte vorbehalten - freier Zugang" (rights reserved - free access). I've seen more cases like these, but for now that example should suffice.
- Given that even France's national library retracted its earlier "public domain" statement, why exactly should I trust the Norwegian or Lithuanian libraries to get the copyright statement right for French photos or postcards they have in their collections because they show a Norwegian or Lithuanian performer? The Norwegian library simply uses this "public domain" image without any reason why the photo would be in the PD (while also uploading it to Flickr with "no known usage restrictions"), while the Lithuanian library uses the words "public domain", linking them to the Creative Commons PD mark. Neither of them does in any way explain why the photo should be in the PD. Or even where the photo is supposed to be in the PD. In Norway or Lithuania perhaps? But to keep the files, we need them to be in the PD in France and in the US.
- tl;dr: We shouldn't blindly believe anything that is claimed by a library, museum or similar, but think with our own heads and apply plausibility criteria if necessary. Like in this case: French photographers died less than 70 years ago, yet libraries from other countries claim their photos to be in the PD or say that there are "no known usage restrictions" without explaining why -> that is very implausible and should not be taken as true. --Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – the photos by this studio could be collective works (which would protect them for 70 years from publication): I've read the two articles about court cases from 2014 and 2017 above. The second one immediately starts by saying that such court decisions declaring photographs to be collective works are rare ("Rares sont les décisions de justice admettant qu’une œuvre photographique est une œuvre collective"). The French Ministry of Culture, in this guideline for photographs in cultural institutions, calls collective works "rare exceptions". So it's not like such decisions are common for studio photos. On the contrary, the norm in French intellectual property law, as confirmed in the first article linked above, is not collective works, but works by individual authors, persons, not corporations. Collective works were introduced in 1957 mainly for the cases I mentioned above (dictionaries, encyclopaedias and periodical works such as newspapers or magazines), and while at least one court has now applied them to specific photographs, the summary given by Racconish – "If the corporate look is predominant, if it looks like a photo by Studio X and not by photographer Y, then it is a collective work." – seems to be quite abridged.
- Both of the court cases, decided by the same court, same pôle (the one for intellectual property law), same chamber, in Paris, revolve around photographers employed by companies, in 2014 the Studio Harcourt, in 2017 some online merchant of clothes, shoes and fashion accessoires, hence the 2014 "studio" case and the 2017 "fashion photos" case. The first was brought by the photographer, the second by the company, but essentially in both cases the photographers wanted to retain control of their photographs and also additional payment for additional uses, while the companies wanted complete control over how the photographs were used, without any additional payments beyond what they had payed the photographer initially. So the companies argued that these photos were collective works because all the prerequisites demanded for this by article L.113-2 alinéa 3 of the French Code de la propriété intellectuelle (intellectual property law) were fulfilled, namely that (my summary) the work was created upon the initiative of a (natural or legal) person which edited this work, published and distributed it under his/her/its direction, and that the individual contributions of the various people involved cannot be distinguished anymore ("sur l’initiative d’une personne physique ou morale qui l’édite, la publie et la divulgue sous sa direction et son nom et dans laquelle la contribution personnelle des divers auteurs participant à son élaboration se fond dans l’ensemble en vue duquel elle est conçue, sans qu’il soit possible d’attribuer à chacun d’eux un droit distinct sur l’ensemble réalisé"), and the court agreed.
- The court then decided, after hearing the case, reviewing evidence that was brought etc. that the photographers and other people involved (stylists, lighting, make-up) were basically working under such tight guidelines regulating every detail of the photographs that they did not have any room to express any creativity of their own, so that the resulting photographs basically reflected the studio's or company's style and one cannot identify any individual contributions anymore; therefore these photos are collective works by the reasoning of this court.
- That court was able to decide these two cases after reviewing the facts brought in each case, which apparently included detailed insights into how photographs are created in these companies. For the Manuel frères photos, we have nothing of the sort, we don't know how it worked back then at Manuel frères. Unlike the 2014 and 2017 cases, it's also not a case of employed photographer against his employing company, these are two photographers who had their own studio. Finally, they certainly weren't expecting their photographs to be "collective works" when that whole category was only introduced into French IP law in 1957, 18 years after they had ceased operation.
- tl;dr: For the reasons given above, we should definitively not jump to the conclusion that all photos by French photo studios (or all such photos with a certain distinctive "look") are collective works, regardless if they are credited to a "studio" or not (in this case, they were usually not credited to one). Unlike a court, we don't have the necessary insights and resources to make that determination, and we should therefore only label French photos as "collective works" if, like in the Harcourt case, there is a specific court decision declaring such. --Rosenzweig τ 21:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ecrire entièrement en anglais un énorme argumentaire alors que cela concerne un studio français et donc des images principalement utilisées par des francophones, c'est assez malhonnête car tous les francophones ne maîtrisent pas assez bien l'anglais pour le traduire, le comprendre et pouvoir y répondre.Guil2027 (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, while I can understand written French, I'm not good enough at writing French, and English is the de facto working language of Commons. You can use one of the web translation services (like Google), try [10]. / (traduction automatique DeepL:) Désolé, bien que je puisse comprendre le français écrit, je ne suis pas assez bon pour écrire le français, et l'anglais est la langue de travail de facto des Commons. Vous pouvez utiliser l'un des services de traduction en ligne (comme Google), essayez [11]. --Rosenzweig τ 15:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is very persuasive but I still have a question. We know these are not collective works, you have persuaded me. However, we don't know exactly whose works these are: we don't know which brother created this or that picture. Moreover, we don't know for sure that the given picture is indeed created by any of them and not by a certain employee of their studio. It's not that we just currently don't have this information for this case; rather it seems that this is very typical for this kind of studio photographs: nobody at that epoch bothered to keep personal authorship fo any picture. Under these circumstances shouldn't we see these works as anonymous? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ecrire entièrement en anglais un énorme argumentaire alors que cela concerne un studio français et donc des images principalement utilisées par des francophones, c'est assez malhonnête car tous les francophones ne maîtrisent pas assez bien l'anglais pour le traduire, le comprendre et pouvoir y répondre.Guil2027 (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think that the legal category of anonymous works was made for cases like this. The French IP code (copyright law) apparently does not define what an anonymous work is, probably because it's assumed that no explanation is needed. Looking back on the history of the copyright laws we currently have, you'll find that they basically go back to British laws, specifically the 1710 en:Statute of Anne, which was about printed books. And in the context of printed books, an anonymous author makes sense, you have a title page where the author is named, and if no author is named, that is deliberate. The French IP code seems to assume that scenario too, because in article L113-6 it says «Les auteurs des oeuvres pseudonymes et anonymes jouissent sur celles-ci des droits reconnus par l'article L. 111-1. Ils sont représentés dans l'exercice de ces droits par l'éditeur ou le publicateur originaire, [...]» (The authors of pseudonymous and anonymous works enjoy the rights recognized by article L. 111-1. They are represented in the exercise of these rights by the publisher or the original publicator, [...])
- So anonymous, in this legal sense, means that the author does not want to be known. Here at Wikimedia Commons, it is often convenient to say that a certain work is anonymous. You'll find users who basically declare every photo (or other work) that was uploaded here without naming an author to be anonymous and in the PD after 70 years, with PD-EU-anonymous if it's an EU country or some other tag if it is not. Current copyright laws have to be applied to much more than printed books of course, so I think most people would agree that if a work (photograph or other work) is first (rightfully) published without naming an author, the author can be considered anonymous, unless the name of the author becomes known later (a provision you will usually find in copyright laws). But that we do not know the author does not mean that the author is also anonymous in a legal sense, and specifically, if an author (or two, like in this case) is (are) named, I don't think such a case fits the legal category of an anonymous author.
- Instead, I think we should go with another category of work we have in the French IP code (and in many other copyright laws): The cooperative or collaborative work (oeuvre de collaboration), or co-authorship, in which the duration of copyright is determined by the date of the death of the last surving co-author. In our case, the Manuel brothers probably did not actually take their photographs together; most likely the majority or even all of the photographs were taken by either one or the other. But they chose to be credited together, as G. L. Manuel frères or similar (kind of like en:Lennon–McCartney :-)), so we can go with that. And yes, if they had employed photographers working for them, some of the photos could be the work of these employees, who could have lived longer than Lucien Manuel (or not). But unless it became (or becomes) known that a specific photo was actually made by a known employed photographer (because of, for example, a court case, by reviewing archival records or based on research someone does), we have the credit to the Manuel brothers as the legal basis for our assessment of authorship and therefore the duration of copyright. -- Rosenzweig τ 17:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all per Rosenzweig. A super-special French "collective work" theory is yet another angle of purely wishful thinking: if we're to apply anything but straightforward pma. 70 it would be cooperative or collaborative work (common enough in copyright acts, and fairly well understood and straightforwardly applicable for cases like this). That the BNF or Nasjonalbiblioteket (Norwegian National Library) has any special authority here is very much mistaken: the Nasjonalbiblioteket determines a work's copyright status in Norway, and they do so based on limited time and whatever information is available. They are often wrong (and are very appreciative of feedback to that effect). This has been the case for pretty much every library or archive I've been in contact with over the years. But in any case, their copyright determination is never going to be an assessment against Commons' policies, just their own internal criteria. It's useful information for us, but we can never just blindly accept it as self-evident and the final word on much of anything. --Xover (talk) 11:49, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree on general principle with the arguments of {{PD-France}}, but I think there is a simpler way to think of these images besides getting into a ticky-tacky argument over French case law, which revolves around whether an individual creator or heirs can exercise a personal PMA copyright duration over a fundamentally collective work. Instead, {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} seems the relevant license here. While there are a limited number of possible creators for these images (the brothers and their employees), we still don't know who took particular photos. Troubles caused by unknowable creators is why laws like {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} exist. While we need to be cautious about tags claiming that the authors are not known, I think the sourcing in this case for the images is very authoritative. If the libraries these are drawn from do not have information on individual authorship, no one will. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- By that logic, several songs by en:Lennon–McCartney would also fit PD-EU-no author disclosure (or a UK counterpart) 70 years after publication, because given the conflicting information we don't exactly know which of the two wrote them. I don't buy this "no author disclosure" theory for images with two named authors. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think the Lennon-McCartney comparison really works for several reasons. First of all, songwriting has the potential to be a more collaborative work than photography in most cases. Lennon and McCartney had joint creative input into many songs. Second, if either author was a sole contributor for a particular song, it is much easier to determine who wrote what. McCartney is still alive (so you can ask him) and I'm certain there is just better historical documentation about The Beatles' works. It's all hypothetical because all these Beatles works are still copyrighted under any regime and will remain so in the US for considerably longer due to URAA. If, hypothetically, we find out that there is a "no author disclosed" Beatles song in the future, with strong evidence that we can never determine the author, and if for some reason we were no longer bound by US copyright, then yeah, I would support keeping this "no author disclosed Beatles song". Just as we don't keep files because we think no one will sue us, we don't delete files because someone might file a spurious suit (DMCA takedowns aside). You can't have your deletion cake and eat it too. This is either a collective work (in which case it should be kept due to {{PD-France}}) or a no author disclosed work (in which case it should be kept due to {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I've explained that I reject both of these categories (and why I reject them) and why I think that these are collaborative works with 70 years pma after the death of the last collaborator. --Rosenzweig τ 19:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think the Lennon-McCartney comparison really works for several reasons. First of all, songwriting has the potential to be a more collaborative work than photography in most cases. Lennon and McCartney had joint creative input into many songs. Second, if either author was a sole contributor for a particular song, it is much easier to determine who wrote what. McCartney is still alive (so you can ask him) and I'm certain there is just better historical documentation about The Beatles' works. It's all hypothetical because all these Beatles works are still copyrighted under any regime and will remain so in the US for considerably longer due to URAA. If, hypothetically, we find out that there is a "no author disclosed" Beatles song in the future, with strong evidence that we can never determine the author, and if for some reason we were no longer bound by US copyright, then yeah, I would support keeping this "no author disclosed Beatles song". Just as we don't keep files because we think no one will sue us, we don't delete files because someone might file a spurious suit (DMCA takedowns aside). You can't have your deletion cake and eat it too. This is either a collective work (in which case it should be kept due to {{PD-France}}) or a no author disclosed work (in which case it should be kept due to {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- By that logic, several songs by en:Lennon–McCartney would also fit PD-EU-no author disclosure (or a UK counterpart) 70 years after publication, because given the conflicting information we don't exactly know which of the two wrote them. I don't buy this "no author disclosure" theory for images with two named authors. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Additional discussion about TOO
[edit]- @Rosenzweig, have you considered threshold of originality? According to Template:TOO-France, France has a high TOO for photographic works, so works published before 1928 may be PD in both US and France. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 17:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Matr1x-101: These portrait photographs are NOT below the threshold of originality in either France or the US. See COM:TOO France. --Rosenzweig τ 18:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: COM:TOO France says that French law asserts that a work is copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author". I would argue that some of these photos (like this and this) don't fulfill this criterion. This will probably have to be decided on a file-by-file/case-by-case basis. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Matr1x-101: I think this is a ridiculous notion. But believe what you want if it pleases you. --Rosenzweig τ 18:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig, if you think my motion is "ridiculous", please refute it. If the pictures are below TOO, then they could be PD on the URAA date anyway. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 19:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Notion, not motion. That whole idea goes back to one outlier court decision about a photo of fish on a dining plate, which COM:TOO France tells clearly enough. That someone would come and think this is a reason to declare portrait photographs (of people, not food) to be below the threshold of originality is just another example of the usual antics here at Wikimedia Commons. And no, even if a photo had been in the PD in France on the URAA date because of this, that would not stop the URAA because it would not be “in the public domain in its source country through expiration of term of protection” (s:Uruguay Round Agreements Act/Title V). If there was no term of protection in the source country, that term did not expire, which means the work was protected by the URAA. --Rosenzweig τ 19:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: , I'm not saying that all photos are lower than French TOO; I'm saying that photos that don't involve much creativity (think of a generic background, no lighting, no facial expression, etc.) are maybe PD. So photos published before 1928 with minimal creativity could be PD, that's my theory. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 19:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: I have (painstakingly) reviewed all of these images. Here's what I think is PD in France and the US.
Is public domain (Use {{TOO-France}} and {{PD-US-expired}}.
- File:Anna de Noailles Dornac.jpg
- File:Anna de Noailles Dornac (cropped).jpg
- File:Bernard Zimmer by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Camille Bos.jpg
- File:Camille Mauclair 1921.jpg
- File:Eugène Vigo.jpg
- File:Francis Jammes 1927.jpg
- File:Georges Dolley by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:JB-410-1925-Lieutenant-Colonel-1.jpg
- File:Louis Barthou vers 1925.jpg
- File:Ludmilla Pitoëff by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Manuel de Falla by Studio G. L. Manuel frères (cropped).jpg
- File:Manuel de Falla by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Raquel Meller by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:Régine Flory by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg
- File:S. E. M. Arciniegas - 1924.jpg
- File:S. E. M. de Peralta - 1924.jpg
- File:S. E. M. Gonzalo Zaldumbide - 1924.jpg
Will be public domain when US copyright expires (the date on the right is the undeletion date):
- File:Académie goncourt Rosny l'ainé in toute l'édition.jpg 2026
- File:Robert Rey (1888-1964).jpg 2026
- File:Augusta Moll-Weiss.jpg 2026
- File:René jouglet.jpg 2027
- File:Marcel Dupont.jpg 2027
- File:Marguerite-dEscola-1931.jpg 2027
- File:Pol Rab by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg 2027
- File:André Malraux - 1933.jpg 2029
- File:Photographie de Claude Jonquière en 1933.png 2029
- File:Paul Chack, 1934.jpg 2030
- File:Pierre Drieu la Rochelle 1934.jpg
- File:Félix Goudard, administrateur général du carburateur Solex durant les années 1930, officier de la Légion d'Honneur 1935 au titre du ministère de l'air.jpg 2031
- File:Gustave Libeau by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg 2031
- File:Georges Claretie.png 2032
- File:Louis Aragon - prix Renaudot.jpg 2032
- File:Photographie de Saint-Ange.png
- File:Louis Verneuil by Studio G. L. Manuel frères.jpg 2034
- File:Amiral François Darlan.jpg 2036
- File:Max d'Ollone BNF.jpg 2036
- Probably above TOO:
Unsure about TOO:
- Unsure (no date/big range of dates):
- File:Claire-Clémence de Polignac, née de Maillé de la Tour-Landry (1918-1970) (phbd05 0025).jpg
- File:Jean Desbons.jpg
- File:Maurice Renard (1875-1939).jpg
- File:Paul Faure.jpg
- File:Portrett av den norsk-amerikanske sopranen Grace Holst (1892-1975) (34598798554).jpg
- File:Rhené-Baton 01.jpg
- File:Robert Pierre-Léon Lespieau. Photograph by G.L. Manuel Frère Wellcome V0026699.jpg
- I have been fairly conservative on this. If a photo had some lighting/originality, I put it in unsure. Also, some of my undeletion dates may be slightly wrong. Most of the photos are just unoriginal generic portraits, so most are below TOO. Remember France has "a slightly higher threshold of originality in general, and particularly so in the context of photographic works" (quoting from COM:TOO France). See this blog for more info. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: on a completely unrelated note, you said "If there was no term of protection in the source country, that term did not expire, which means the work was protected by the URAA". Doesn't that invalidate {{PD-Brazil-Photo}}? --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Probably, but please let us not continue that here, take it to COM:VPC instead. --Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: , I'm not saying that all photos are lower than French TOO; I'm saying that photos that don't involve much creativity (think of a generic background, no lighting, no facial expression, etc.) are maybe PD. So photos published before 1928 with minimal creativity could be PD, that's my theory. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 19:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Notion, not motion. That whole idea goes back to one outlier court decision about a photo of fish on a dining plate, which COM:TOO France tells clearly enough. That someone would come and think this is a reason to declare portrait photographs (of people, not food) to be below the threshold of originality is just another example of the usual antics here at Wikimedia Commons. And no, even if a photo had been in the PD in France on the URAA date because of this, that would not stop the URAA because it would not be “in the public domain in its source country through expiration of term of protection” (s:Uruguay Round Agreements Act/Title V). If there was no term of protection in the source country, that term did not expire, which means the work was protected by the URAA. --Rosenzweig τ 19:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig, if you think my motion is "ridiculous", please refute it. If the pictures are below TOO, then they could be PD on the URAA date anyway. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 19:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Matr1x-101: I think this is a ridiculous notion. But believe what you want if it pleases you. --Rosenzweig τ 18:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: COM:TOO France says that French law asserts that a work is copyrightable when it bears the "imprint of the personality of the author". I would argue that some of these photos (like this and this) don't fulfill this criterion. This will probably have to be decided on a file-by-file/case-by-case basis. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Matr1x-101: These portrait photographs are NOT below the threshold of originality in either France or the US. See COM:TOO France. --Rosenzweig τ 18:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Conclusion
[edit]Je ne comprends vraiment pas cette demande de suppression qui s'éternise et qui manifestement est loin de faire l'unanimité. Comme il s'agit de photographies françaises, on peut se référer au droit français. Et celui-ci est clair :
- Article L123-3 du code de la propriété intellectuelle : "Pour les oeuvres pseudonymes, anonymes ou collectives, la durée du droit exclusif est de soixante-dix années à compter du 1er janvier de l'année civile suivant celle où l'oeuvre a été publiée. La date de publication est déterminée par tout mode de preuve de droit commun, et notamment par le dépôt légal."
Lorsqu'il est écrit sous une photographie G. L. Manuel frères, il s'agit bien d'une oeuvre collective. On ne sait pas quel frère a réalisé ces photographies et peut-être même qu'il s'agit d'un de leurs employés. Guil2027 (talk) 11:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- The "collective work" claim has been debated extensively above. I have rejected it giving the detailed reasons why. I say this is a collaborative work:
- Article L123-2 du code de la propriété intellectuelle : "Pour les oeuvres de collaboration, l'année civile prise en considération est celle de la mort du dernier vivant des collaborateurs." --Rosenzweig τ 17:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sauf qu'il est impossible d'attribuer à chacun des membres du studio G. L. Manuel frères un droit distinct sur chaque photographie, comment peut-on savoir qui a décidé de l'angle, de la pose du modèle, de la lumière, qui a pris la photographie, qui l'a développée etc ? Guil2027 (talk) 22:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- En plus, la justice a déjà tranché dans ce sens pour un autre studio de photographes : https://www.village-justice.com/articles/Affaire-Pierre-Anthony-HARCOURT,16496.html. Guil2027 (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- I've discussed the Harcourt case (and another one) in detail above and come to the conclusion that these cases are so specific that we cannot just transfer them to other cases. Specifically, collective works are considered rare exceptions in French IP law and not the norm for photographs from studios. See details above. --Rosenzweig τ 08:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete the onus for evidence is on whoever claims PD and I see reasonable doubt demonstrated with detailed research and back-and-forth (which I all read, and damn it's a lot). Also: gathering evidence to be in compliance with policy is a core function here, so claiming analysis to be copyright paranoia is quite bizarre. Hekerui (talk) 11:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This is the oldest active DR by a whole month, so it's time to close. There are good arguments in both directions, but ultimately it comes down to PCP. There exists some reasonable doubt whether these are truly in the public domain. This close is without prejudice against an undeletion request should new evidence come to light. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)